Re: Marketing - Apache logo
On 17/02/2014 Detlef Nannen wrote: this looks interesting. So far we finance a german Version of AOO-Flyers itself. What are the conditions for support, and how it can work? I'm answering both requests from you and Alexandro here. OpenOffice has a small fund donated for the OpenOffice participation in events. This translates to partial travel reimbursements in case it's a conference with an OpenOffice track (like FOSDEM), production of merchandising to give away at events (stickers, leaflets etc.), production of other materials like roll-ups for booths/stands. So far we used it only to produce a roll-up and leaflets in English for European events (Michael and Mechtilde have them) and to give partial support to speakers (but I think we never actually used it, besides a partial reimbursement we'll give to Jan for FOSDEM 2014, as discussed on this list; this has not been sent yet anyway). While there are a few technicalities related to Apache being a charity and needing to justify its expenses correctly, the process is: 1) Have clear what you want to do. If you are producing leaflets or stickers, have a design ready. Send it to the dev list for validation (there are a number of checks, mainly on trademarks). 2) Once we are all OK with the design, send a cost estimate and a reason (event, or better a series of events; why it is important and so on). 3) The dev list will discuss, and possibly approve; you will have to pay first and then ask for reimbursement later. If, instead, you want to have Apache-branded materials for events, these are much easier to obtain since they are already printed and available. Michael and Mechtilde for example have Apache stickers, and at FOSDEM I've also seen Apache-branded pens and pins. These simply need to be requested here, and if OK we can contact the Apache staff to have them delivered. The main issue is with delivery costs. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [CWiki] Account Whitelisting
shzh zhao wrote: I created an account in cwiki because I want to share some project information in wiki. My account name is 'aoo.zhaoshzh'. Seems I have to send out a mail to activate my account so that I can create a wiki. Account aoo.zhaoshzh whitelisted. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: switch trunk from Mac 32bit to 64bit
Hi, On 17.02.2014 20:43, Marcus (OOo) wrote: [snip] BTW: Cross the fingers that I'll get access to a 10.5.x machine after the weekend. I got the chance to test on a MacBook with 10.5.7 and it worked like I wanted to see it. So, we have confirmed that: - users with 10.5 *) and 10.6 are pointed to AOO 4.0.1 - users with 10.7 and newer are pointed to AOO 4.1.0 *) I think we can forget to test 10.4 and older as it's unlikely that we get the chance. However, I expect that these versions get identied the same way, so I think these will be covered, too. Feature done and verified. :-) Thx for this feature. Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Windows 8
Hi, On 18.02.2014 08:22, Amit Mittal wrote: I have successfully built open office on my Windows 8 machine without facing much issues except cygwin related setup problems :) cool. It would be great, if you could document your experience on the related wiki pages. Thx in advance. Best regards, Oliver. -amit On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Varun Bezzam varun.bez...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks for your help On 2/10/14, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 10.02.2014 09:09, Andre Fischer wrote: On 08.02.2014 14:06, Varun Bezzam wrote: Hi Everybody! I have noticed that the official Building on Windows page does not have any information on Building For Windows 8. My laptop runs Windows 8. Is this a problem? Should I install a different OS? No, don't install a different OS :-) But you may also want to look at [1] and [2]. and at [3] as this one should contain the complete prerequists for Building AOO on Windows. [3] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Building_on_Windows Best regards, Oliver. And it would be great if you note anything that does not work on Windows 8 as described and how you solved it, so that we can add a section for Windows 8 to the wiki pages. Thanks, Andre [1] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO [2] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Windows_7 Thanks for your help, Varun. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE]: New snapshot is ready
Hi, On 17.02.2014 20:37, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 02/17/2014 02:43 PM, schrieb Herbert Duerr: The development snapshot Wiki page is updated too, but due to server problems it is currently inaccessible. Just curious. How to update a Wiki page when the Wiki server is down? Magic ;-) Jürgen updated the wiki before the upload had been finished - as stated in his initial posting. Best regards, Oliver. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r1568331 - in /openoffice/trunk/main: default_images/introabout/intro.png ooo_custom_images/dev/introabout/intro.png ooo_custom_images/dev_nologo/introabout/intro.png ooo_custom_images
Hi, On 17.02.2014 12:42, Andre Fischer wrote: On 17.02.2014 12:05, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 17.02.2014 11:10, Andre Fischer wrote: On 17.02.2014 09:33, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, good catch. One minor remark: openoffice/trunk/main/default_images/introabout/intro.png and openoffice/trunk/main/ooo_custom_images/dev/introabout/intro.png does not carry the ASF logo anymore. I think these should carry the ASF logo while the other two do not. Because of the nologo part in their name? Please have a second look ;-) The two above mentioned images does _NOT_ have a nologo part in their path/name. These two images carried the ASF logo before Jürgen's accidental change on 2014-02-12. I know. I interpreted that as another oversight. Why would we want the ASF logo in one variant of intro.png but not the other? Is there anybody who actually *knows* a) whether the non default_images/ variants are still used (otherwise we don't have to bother anyway) b) whether the ASF logo should be in some intro.png variants As far as I know the images with the ASF logo are used for the builds which we as the ASF AOO community provide for convenience to our users. The images without the ASF logo are official ones also usable for others in derived works etc. Best regards, Oliver. -Andre Best regards, Oliver. These images exist for a long time and I don't think that nologo refers to the ASF logo. I don't know what they should display, I don't even know if they (all intro.png's outside default_images/) are still used. -Andre Best regards, Oliver. On 14.02.2014 16:02, a...@apache.org wrote: Author: af Date: Fri Feb 14 15:02:32 2014 New Revision: 1568331 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1568331 Log: 124224: Using the modern logo once again. Modified: openoffice/trunk/main/default_images/introabout/intro.png openoffice/trunk/main/ooo_custom_images/dev/introabout/intro.png openoffice/trunk/main/ooo_custom_images/dev_nologo/introabout/intro.png openoffice/trunk/main/ooo_custom_images/nologo/introabout/intro.png Modified: openoffice/trunk/main/default_images/introabout/intro.png URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/main/default_images/introabout/intro.png?rev=1568331r1=1568330r2=1568331view=diff == Binary files - no diff available. Modified: openoffice/trunk/main/ooo_custom_images/dev/introabout/intro.png URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/main/ooo_custom_images/dev/introabout/intro.png?rev=1568331r1=1568330r2=1568331view=diff == Binary files - no diff available. Modified: openoffice/trunk/main/ooo_custom_images/dev_nologo/introabout/intro.png URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/main/ooo_custom_images/dev_nologo/introabout/intro.png?rev=1568331r1=1568330r2=1568331view=diff == Binary files - no diff available. Modified: openoffice/trunk/main/ooo_custom_images/nologo/introabout/intro.png URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/main/ooo_custom_images/nologo/introabout/intro.png?rev=1568331r1=1568330r2=1568331view=diff == Binary files - no diff available. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [CWiki] Account Whitelisting
Thanks a lot. 2014-02-18 16:08 GMT+08:00 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org: shzh zhao wrote: I created an account in cwiki because I want to share some project information in wiki. My account name is 'aoo.zhaoshzh'. Seems I have to send out a mail to activate my account so that I can create a wiki. Account aoo.zhaoshzh whitelisted. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- *mailto: *aoo.zhaos...@gmail.com https://google.com/profiles https://google.com/profiles
Re: My self-build AOO starts and then closes immediately
Hi Regina, On 13.02.2014 13:01, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi Jürgen, Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: On 2/11/14 8:00 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi Oliver, without user profile it shows the same behavior: start with short flash of the image and creating user-folder, then close. I have also tested a user profile, which works in other versions. Same problem here. Only the debug build is affected. I have still got a debug version of r1537973, which works; but with r1554790 it fails already. Further tests show, that a pro-build is affected too. An administrative install from buildbot build has some similar: The first attempt to start closes immediately in the described way. Most times a second start works then, sometimes I need further starts. I suspect, that there is something in my Windows environment, but I have no idea where to search. I would make a complete rebuild and if the problem still exists start further debugging. New build is finished, but problem remains. It does not always fail to start. Sometimes it starts with first attempt, sometimes it needs several attempts. I have tried, whether any action between makes a difference, but I see no pattern. The integrated installed AOO4.0.1 does not have this problems. Perhaps something is missing, when an administrative install is done? Has something relevant changed from r1537973 (which still starts without problems) to now? I was not able to observe the same on my local builds on recent trunk revision in the last days. I have currently no idea what would cause such a behavior. Sorry that I am not able to help. Best regards, Oliver. Kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE]: New snapshot is ready
On 17.02.2014 20:37, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 02/17/2014 02:43 PM, schrieb Herbert Duerr: The development snapshot Wiki page is updated too, but due to server problems it is currently inaccessible. Just curious. How to update a Wiki page when the Wiki server is down? By updating it before it went down ;-) Herbert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
review denied: [Bug 124188] CRASH when pasting grouped contents from Draw over a selected image : [Attachment 82591] Avoid NULL pointer access
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann o...@apache.org has denied Andre awf@googlemail.com's request for review: Bug 124188: CRASH when pasting grouped contents from Draw over a selected image https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124188 Attachment 82591: Avoid NULL pointer access https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=82591action=edit --- Additional Comments from Oliver-Rainer Wittmann o...@apache.org The patch avoids the crash, but the document is afterwards in an inconsistent state as the anchor attribute for the as-character anchored object inside the corresponding text node is missing. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Paste screenshots in AOO writer 4.1 bêta
Hi all, I dont know if this issue is relevant or not, just for info. I generally use greenshot to make screenshots and copy them from greenshot to the clipboard before pasting them in Writer. http://getgreenshot.org/ I have noticed a little issue with writer in the latest bêta AOO 4.1 under Windows 7.0 (not tested in other OS). In Impress, Draw and Calc all is OK, but not in Writer, the command Paste or Ctr+V gives no results (in AOO 4.01 it was OK). If I make screenshots with the simple Windows Printscreen command, all is OK, also in Writer. So, only to indicate a change noticed between AOO 4.01 and AOO 4.1 bêta, not obligatory a bug. A+ -- gw
[IMPORTANT] Re: [RELEASE] review of solved issues incl. some minor Bugzilla clean up
Hi, On 10.02.2014 14:11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, with the support of Herbert - thanks to his script and the provided results - I reviewed the issues which we had solved for our next release based on the commit messages and the current Bugzilla data. My intention was to have the corresponding Bugzilla data cleaned up in order to be able to run a simple Bugzilla query to retrieve a list of the solved issues for AOO 4.1.0. After some minor adjustments to the Bugzilla data the simple query for issues whose field 'Target Milestone' equals '4.1.0' should give the corresponding list of issues - currently 254. Some are not in 'solved' state yet in the Bugzilla, but I assume they until the release. Please keep the Bugzilla data up-to-date for your future work on our next release in order to keep the simple query working. Thanks in advance. Please, please, please, keep the Bugzilla data up-to-date. E.g., when you fix a certain issue for the next release set field 'Target Milestone' to the value of the next release. Then simple Bugzilla queries will be possible to determine which issues are solved for a certain release and more important which issues needs to be verified by QA for the next release. Thx in advance. Best regards, Oliver. Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Paste screenshots in AOO writer 4.1 bêta
On 18.02.2014 10:08, Guy Waterval wrote: Hi all, I dont know if this issue is relevant or not, just for info. I generally use greenshot to make screenshots and copy them from greenshot to the clipboard before pasting them in Writer. http://getgreenshot.org/ I have noticed a little issue with writer in the latest bêta AOO 4.1 under Windows 7.0 (not tested in other OS). In Impress, Draw and Calc all is OK, but not in Writer, the command Paste or Ctr+V gives no results (in AOO 4.01 it was OK). If I make screenshots with the simple Windows Printscreen command, all is OK, also in Writer. So, only to indicate a change noticed between AOO 4.01 and AOO 4.1 bêta, not obligatory a bug. What does Edit-Paste Special list as available data formats? -Andre A+ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Paste screenshots in AOO writer 4.1 bêta
Hi André, Thanks for your answer 2014-02-18 11:32 GMT+01:00 Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com: On 18.02.2014 10:08, Guy Waterval wrote: Hi all, I dont know if this issue is relevant or not, just for info. I generally use greenshot to make screenshots and copy them from greenshot to the clipboard before pasting them in Writer. http://getgreenshot.org/ I have noticed a little issue with writer in the latest bêta AOO 4.1 under Windows 7.0 (not tested in other OS). In Impress, Draw and Calc all is OK, but not in Writer, the command Paste or Ctr+V gives no results (in AOO 4.01 it was OK). If I make screenshots with the simple Windows Printscreen command, all is OK, also in Writer. So, only to indicate a change noticed between AOO 4.01 and AOO 4.1 bêta, not obligatory a bug. What does Edit-Paste Special list as available data formats? Only bitmap, and I just notice that the Paste special command is OK in Writer, only the normal Paste command doesn't give any results, For other modules, the two commands (normal and special) are OK. A+ -- gw
Re: US_inprogress folder went missing during the build
Hello guys, I just update my workspace and the build has now run successfully. This round I did the build without option -P. I wasn't sure whether the build is cause by the option -P or my workspace could be rather old. THanks @! On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:47 PM, LOH KOK HOE huahsi...@gmail.com wrote: @Regina I did build with -P option for the reason to speed up the building process. This is the command I use in the build: build --all -P2 -- -P2, and then I did also try build --all, result still the same. I didn't configure any thing including the --with-lang option. So I leave it default. FYI, my development PC consist of Ubuntu 13.04 64bit, i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz with 8GB RAM. :o) On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote: Hi, I build for Windows, but perhaps there are similar problems on Linux: Do you try to build with option -P ? I found, that -P4 does never work for me, but building without that option works. What is your value for --with-lang in configure? It seems to me that wrong values are not detected before packing. Kind regards Regina LOH KOK HOE schrieb: I have remove the unxingx6.pro and rebuild, error still persist. I'm having this error being shown during the build: ** ERROR: Saved logfile: /home/kokhoe/workspace/aoo-trunk/main/instsetoo_native/ unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/logging/en-US/log_AOO410_en-US.log ** Thu Feb 13 21:52:37 2014 (00:08 min.) dmake: Error code 255, while making 'openoffice_en-US.deb' 1 module(s): instsetoo_native need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s): ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /home/kokhoe/workspace/aoo-trunk/main/instsetoo_native/util When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build by running: build --all:instsetoo_native On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 12.02.2014 15:18, LOH KOK HOE wrote: As I following the guidelinehttps://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Building_ installation_packages on building the AOO, I got following error shown in the log file, the log file were locate at AOO-ROOT/main/instsetoo_native/ unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/logging/en-US directory, and the file name was log_AOO410_en-US.log. *** ERROR: More than one new package in directory /home/kokhoe/workspace/aoo-trunk/main/instsetoo_native/ unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/en-US_inprogress/DEBS ( /home/kokhoe/workspace/aoo-trunk/main/instsetoo_native/ unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/en-US_ inprogress/DEBS/openoffice-writer-4.0.0-1-linux-3.8-x86_ 64.deb/home/kokhoe/workspace/aoo-trunk/main/instsetoo_native/ unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/en-US_ inprogress/DEBS/openoffice-writer-4.0.0-1-linux-3.8-x86_64 ) in function: determine_new_packagename (packagepool) *** As I check in the install directory, I don't see US_inprogress folder, but I do see others. May I know how could I rectified this issue? Folder 'en-US_inprogress' is the folder name used during the creation of the installation packages. It is renamed to 'en-US' once the packaging has finished. Unfortunately, I can not help you with the error - I am not involved deep enough in the packaging. I recommendation is the remove folder 'unxlngx6.pro' (it is the build output folder) in module instsetoo_native and try a further 'build --all' Best regards, Oliver. The output of the console mention this: dmake: Error code 255, while making 'openoffice_en-US.deb' It seems to me that the build was failed due to the builder failed to make a deb package. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Trace Output
I configured the OpenOffice build without debug and disabled symbols, but I am still getting 'trace' output in the terminal when I run ./soffice. How do I disable this? Raymond
More annoying FUD
http://www.italovignoli.org/2014/02/language-support-of-office-suites/ Don't you love it when they come up with these false comparisons? If you look a little bit closer you see that they are releasing and counting languages where the UI is only 15% translated. So yes, if you are willing to release incomplete work then you can claim to support more languages. But what kind of support is this? A specific example: Tartar (15% UI translated) I thought OOo had a requirement for 80% completion before releasing a translation. With AOO we made the requirement be 100%. LO releases 15% complete UI translations ?! Of course, we shouldn't judge their release criteria. That is their business (and their users) not ours. But when they make false comparisons in a table, comparing apples-to-oranges, then we ought to note it. It is not fair to claim lower standards are the same as greater results. Another example: They've released Hebrew support at 90% complete. We have Hebrew support at 96% complete, but we have not released it yet. Another example: Our Icelandic translation (unreleased) is 95% complete. Theirs (released) is only 88%. Another example: We have 36 languages at 100% complete UI translation. LO has only 13. Look at the data and make your own comparisons: https://translate.apache.org/projects/aoo40/ https://translations.documentfoundation.org/projects/libo_ui/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: More annoying FUD
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: Of course, we shouldn't judge their release criteria. That is their business (and their users) not ours. But when they make false comparisons in a table, comparing apples-to-oranges, then we ought to note it. LIARS, that's the word. FC -- During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act Durante épocas de Engaño Universal, decir la verdad se convierte en un Acto Revolucionario - George Orwell - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: More annoying FUD
On 18 February 2014 18:34, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: http://www.italovignoli.org/2014/02/language-support-of-office-suites/ Don't you love it when they come up with these false comparisons? If you look a little bit closer you see that they are releasing and counting languages where the UI is only 15% translated. So yes, if you are willing to release incomplete work then you can claim to support more languages. But what kind of support is this? A specific example: Tartar (15% UI translated) I thought OOo had a requirement for 80% completion before releasing a translation. With AOO we made the requirement be 100%. LO releases 15% complete UI translations ?! Of course, we shouldn't judge their release criteria. That is their business (and their users) not ours. But when they make false comparisons in a table, comparing apples-to-oranges, then we ought to note it. It is not fair to claim lower standards are the same as greater results. Another example: They've released Hebrew support at 90% complete. We have Hebrew support at 96% complete, but we have not released it yet. Another example: Our Icelandic translation (unreleased) is 95% complete. Theirs (released) is only 88%. Another example: We have 36 languages at 100% complete UI translation. LO has only 13. Look at the data and make your own comparisons: https://translate.apache.org/projects/aoo40/ https://translations.documentfoundation.org/projects/libo_ui/ We could also turn around at start releasing less than 100%, I got frustratrated with some of the releases where danish have been around 96%, and the missing bit was the scripting language. If should be quite simple to group the release in 100% and less than 100% so users are warned. It should be noted when we say 100% it is the UI, it does not include the help system. But apart from that, I agree the blog is unfair and compare to give an advantage instead of being fair (I think that is called marketing). rgds jan I. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: More annoying FUD
Rob Weir wrote: Don't you love it when they come up with these false comparisons? The standard Help Translate Apache OpenOffice page https://openoffice.apache.org/translate.html is probably too fair to be sexy, but it explains well the situation in OpenOffice: --- A list of complete, released, translations available in the most recent release of Apache OpenOffice can be found at http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html A larger list of languages, including ones where translation work is still ongoing, can be found at https://translate.apache.org/projects/aoo40/ while the full list of available translations, including incomplete and dormant ones, is available at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/extras/l10n/source/ --- (the latter is between 110 and 120) I know people who say they can speak a bit German just because they can count to ten in German... Yes, knowing, or supporting, a language is a matter of definition in the end. Just to put something useful in this thread, I would support the idea to make incomplete translations available in some way. This is helpful to the community. It will eventually come with genLang, but building a snapshot with all the 110+ languages (which is annoying to do with the current process, I know) would help in getting volunteers involved, as validated (but it was still an easy guess) by talking to booth visitors at FOSDEM. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: More annoying FUD
On 2014-02-18, at 13:39, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Rob Weir wrote: Don't you love it when they come up with these false comparisons? The standard Help Translate Apache OpenOffice page https://openoffice.apache.org/translate.html is probably too fair to be sexy, but it explains well the situation in OpenOffice: --- A list of complete, released, translations available in the most recent release of Apache OpenOffice can be found at http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html A larger list of languages, including ones where translation work is still ongoing, can be found at https://translate.apache.org/projects/aoo40/ while the full list of available translations, including incomplete and dormant ones, is available at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/extras/l10n/source/ --- (the latter is between 110 and 120) I know people who say they can speak a bit German just because they can count to ten in German... Yes, knowing, or supporting, a language is a matter of definition in the end. Just to put something useful in this thread, I would support the idea to make incomplete translations available in some way. This is helpful to the community. It will eventually come with genLang, but building a snapshot with all the 110+ languages (which is annoying to do with the current process, I know) would help in getting volunteers involved, as validated (but it was still an easy guess) by talking to booth visitors at FOSDEM. Regards, Andrea. I presume or hope that the above and then more from Rob and others is to find its way into our blog? And I can point journalists to it. It's not that I'm tired of the endless FUD from Italo—he apparently has little else to do or give meaning to his retirement—but that I'm depressed that the crop of tech journalists have not wised up. But then, they are getting wizened: most that rereport this crap have been doing this sort of meta-stenography now for over a decade. The new journals don't bother with this sort of thing. louis - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE][DISCUSS] How to download AOO 4.1.0 Beta?
Am 02/18/2014 08:44 AM, schrieb Andre Fischer: On 17.02.2014 20:44, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 02/17/2014 09:37 AM, schrieb Andre Fischer: On 14.02.2014 22:32, Rob Weir wrote: On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: As this is our first beta release at Apache, I would like to clarify some things before it's maybe too late to change the facts and to prepare webpages: 1. Target group It is intended to be downloaded for the general public, right? 2. Hosting We are planning to host the files at Sourceforge, right? 3. File names: Of course the file names of the install files have to show a difference compared to the general release files. Suggestion: Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Beta_Win_x86_install.exe *If* there is a need to publish another round, it could be extended with a number like: Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Beta2_Win_x86_install.exe 4. Directory structure: Is it OK to expect to use the same dir structure like we have currently for 4.0.1? In general, yes, but please keep in mind that our Mac builds are now 64bit. I assume that the directories that contain the Mac downloads got renamed (Servers are currently down so I can not check). This is currently the complete path to the AOO 4.0.1 install files, example for English US: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.0.1/binaries/en-US/ There is no part included to reflect the OS and I don't know of an idea to do so. Or have I misunderstood you? Looks like I assumed wrong. I had the directory structure of the snapshot builds in mind, which obviously differ from that of the release. So we only keep in mind that the names of the Mac binaries change (not sure if that is relevant). That's true. Will keep in mind. Marcus The above makes sense to me. 5. Download webpage: Is it OK to expect to offer the download on our main download webpage? http://www.openoffice.org/download/ If yes, I can build up a download offer like we have for the green box. To ease the download as best as possible. I would not make this the default download option for users. We still want most users to download AOO 4.0.1. So keep the first box on /download.html as it is now. Maybe a yellow box (yellow == caution) with language that makes it clear that this is beta and gives the URL for reporting bugs. Were you thinking of a language/platform switch logic for the beta? Or just a link to a beta_other.html page with a table of links? If we do the table, then we would have room on the same page to give a prominent warning, a link to BZ, Release Notes, etc. Thanks! -Rob Thanks Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE][DISCUSS] How to download AOO 4.1.0 Beta?
Am 02/18/2014 02:05 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 02/15/2014 11:37 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 02/14/2014 10:47 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 02/14/2014 10:32 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: As this is our first beta release at Apache, I would like to clarify some things before it's maybe too late to change the facts and to prepare webpages: 1. Target group It is intended to be downloaded for the general public, right? 2. Hosting We are planning to host the files at Sourceforge, right? 3. File names: Of course the file names of the install files have to show a difference compared to the general release files. Suggestion: Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Beta_Win_x86_install.exe *If* there is a need to publish another round, it could be extended with a number like: Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Beta2_Win_x86_install.exe 4. Directory structure: Is it OK to expect to use the same dir structure like we have currently for 4.0.1? The above makes sense to me. 5. Download webpage: Is it OK to expect to offer the download on our main download webpage? http://www.openoffice.org/download/ If yes, I can build up a download offer like we have for the green box. To ease the download as best as possible. I would not make this the default download option for users. We still want most users to download AOO 4.0.1. So keep the first box on /download.html as it is now. Maybe a yellow box (yellow == caution) with language that makes it clear that this is beta and gives the URL for reporting bugs. I think I was not clear in my wording. :-) Of course the current 4.0.1 should not be effected in any way. With ease the download as best as possible I meant to do the same like we have for the green box but of course with a different color and text. Were you thinking of a language/platform switch logic for the beta? Or just a link to a beta_other.html page with a table of links? If we do the table, then we would have room on the same page to give a prominent warning, a link to BZ, Release Notes, etc. I thought about the one-click-download we have already. Then of course a beta-other.html is also needed and your suggestion makes absolutely sense. It could be a box somewhere below the green box. Or - as Kay mentioned - a separate webpage. I've added a quick version of how it could look like on the same download webpage: http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/index.html - The first yellow box is for the download when the Beta release is available. Of course the links are not yet working - but with link name and title you should get an first impression. This looks good, and, given the wording, shouldn't cause confusion. Thanks - The second one is a little teaser to show when is it coming. With a link to the AOO blog - in case of if we want to blog about the upcoming Beta release. not sure about needing this. Maybe we want to push the Beta release somehow. On the download webpage this could help to point the attention to something that is coming soon. Well, OK, I see your point, although the beta is supposed to be I just assumed we would use normal channels when we were ready with this -- I think the end of Feb is slated -- banner on website home page, announcements e-mail, social channels. Again, it will be a voted release. I think the only think that will remarkably distinguish it from a production release is it's a more formal way to get feedback from users before production. That's all good. However, to have a little hint like 4.1.0 coming soon on the download webpage is IMHO very valueable. When I remember right it's one of the most visited webpages on the entire AOO website. However, it's just a suggestion. Let's see what time will request. Marcus Juergen has proposed a new date for the beta to Feb. 28...I will change this on the wiki http://markmail.org/message/5kn5mk2qndjircqm PS: The green box is still for the Mac OS X test: - download AOO 4.1.0 if 10.7 or newer is recognized in browser - download AOO 4.0.1 if 10.6 or older is recognized in browser not for me! :) Still wants to give me Linux. You need to browse with MacOS to the webpage. With other OS's it's just the normal behavior. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: More annoying FUD
Am 02/18/2014 07:39 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Rob Weir wrote: Don't you love it when they come up with these false comparisons? The standard Help Translate Apache OpenOffice page https://openoffice.apache.org/translate.html is probably too fair to be sexy, but it explains well the situation in OpenOffice: --- A list of complete, released, translations available in the most recent release of Apache OpenOffice can be found at http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html A larger list of languages, including ones where translation work is still ongoing, can be found at https://translate.apache.org/projects/aoo40/ while the full list of available translations, including incomplete and dormant ones, is available at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/extras/l10n/source/ --- (the latter is between 110 and 120) I know people who say they can speak a bit German just because they can count to ten in German... Yes, knowing, or supporting, a language is a matter of definition in the end. Just to put something useful in this thread, I would support the idea to make incomplete translations available in some way. This is helpful to the community. It will eventually come with genLang, but building a snapshot with all the 110+ languages (which is annoying to do with the current process, I know) would help in getting volunteers involved, as validated (but it was still an easy guess) by talking to booth visitors at FOSDEM. yes, if the build system and effort could support the building of so many more languages I would support that wish, too. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: More annoying FUD
Thanks a lot for your investigations. It shows that both projects have a different view point of what an apple is and looks like. Marcus Am 02/18/2014 06:34 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: http://www.italovignoli.org/2014/02/language-support-of-office-suites/ Don't you love it when they come up with these false comparisons? If you look a little bit closer you see that they are releasing and counting languages where the UI is only 15% translated. So yes, if you are willing to release incomplete work then you can claim to support more languages. But what kind of support is this? A specific example: Tartar (15% UI translated) I thought OOo had a requirement for 80% completion before releasing a translation. With AOO we made the requirement be 100%. LO releases 15% complete UI translations ?! Of course, we shouldn't judge their release criteria. That is their business (and their users) not ours. But when they make false comparisons in a table, comparing apples-to-oranges, then we ought to note it. It is not fair to claim lower standards are the same as greater results. Another example: They've released Hebrew support at 90% complete. We have Hebrew support at 96% complete, but we have not released it yet. Another example: Our Icelandic translation (unreleased) is 95% complete. Theirs (released) is only 88%. Another example: We have 36 languages at 100% complete UI translation. LO has only 13. Look at the data and make your own comparisons: https://translate.apache.org/projects/aoo40/ https://translations.documentfoundation.org/projects/libo_ui/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
deleted files still showing in repository browse -- help!
In this repository -- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/documentation/online_help/helpauthoring/ I did an svn delete yesterday on all files named OOo2HelpAuthoring-number.html Just the ones followed by a number, not the others, and not the png files. Yet, they are still showing in the web browse of the repository. In my local repo, even deleting the whole directory, followed by an svn update yields the correct files. So, does anyone know why these files are still stuck like this in the web browse mode? and, oops! I didn't realize svn delete wouldn't prompt me for a log message so there was none. :/ -- - MzK Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect. -- James Mason
Re: More annoying FUD
Hi Rob and all, Heavy snow hit Japan. How about your places? http://www.italovignoli.org/2014/02/language-support-of-office-suites/ I don't understand numbers on the table. For example, Dzongkha. Where does the number, 171,300, come from? Thanks, khirano On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: http://www.italovignoli.org/2014/02/language-support-of-office-suites/ Don't you love it when they come up with these false comparisons? If you look a little bit closer you see that they are releasing and counting languages where the UI is only 15% translated. So yes, if you are willing to release incomplete work then you can claim to support more languages. But what kind of support is this? A specific example: Tartar (15% UI translated) I thought OOo had a requirement for 80% completion before releasing a translation. With AOO we made the requirement be 100%. LO releases 15% complete UI translations ?! Of course, we shouldn't judge their release criteria. That is their business (and their users) not ours. But when they make false comparisons in a table, comparing apples-to-oranges, then we ought to note it. It is not fair to claim lower standards are the same as greater results. Another example: They've released Hebrew support at 90% complete. We have Hebrew support at 96% complete, but we have not released it yet. Another example: Our Icelandic translation (unreleased) is 95% complete. Theirs (released) is only 88%. Another example: We have 36 languages at 100% complete UI translation. LO has only 13. Look at the data and make your own comparisons: https://translate.apache.org/projects/aoo40/ https://translations.documentfoundation.org/projects/libo_ui/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- khir...@apache.org Apache OpenOffice http://openoffice.apache.org
Re: More annoying FUD
On 18 February 2014 22:30, Kazunari Hirano khir...@gmail.com wrote: I don't understand numbers on the table. For example, Dzongkha. Where does the number, 171,300, come from? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dzongkha says 171,000 native speakers as of 2006, sourced from Ethnologue. - d. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
dmake clean
I am not sure why, but I just did a dmake clean in ../main and once if finished all the module directories including source was deleted. Thankfully, I had a backup. Can anyone explain this? Raymond
RE: dmake clean
I see in the Makefile: clean .PHONY -rm -rf */$(INPATH) -rm -rf solver/*/$(INPATH) I am going to make an assumption that I performed the dmake clean and $INPATH was not set, therefore rm -rf */ was performed From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 3:58 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: dmake clean I am not sure why, but I just did a dmake clean in ../main and once if finished all the module directories including source was deleted. Thankfully, I had a backup. Can anyone explain this? Raymond
Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
I have downloaded OpenOffice to my sister-in-law's HP mini (I think on 8th February 2014). She ended up with the *Start.MySearchDial.com http://Start.MySearchDial.com* redirects virus on her machine. Nothing else has been downloaded onto her machine in recent times so I do not think it can have come from any other source. With hindsight I now recall that the process seemed not to be as simple and straightforward as on previous occasions when I have downloaded OOO. I hope this info will help you be aware of the problem. Graeme Charters
Re: call for design of sticker etc.
On 17/02/2014 Rob Weir wrote: We have a few other requirements similar to this, for AOO-related graphics design work. Maybe we should make a list of such items on the wiki, or even in BZ? Then we can link to them from our Get Involved page and similar places where we direct new volunteers. Good idea. Or even a Get Involved in design page that is not much more than the list of needs (but this would be harder to update) and some links to the branding guidelines and trademark information... Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Question on building OpenOffice
Hi :) I had a problem while building open office it was written in the step by step building guide in Ubuntu https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step to write the command source LinuxX86-64Env.Set.sh but when I did that I got No such file or directory can anyone tell what went wrong ? Thanks in advance :)
Re: dmake clean
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Steele, Raymond raymond.ste...@lmco.comwrote: I see in the Makefile: clean .PHONY -rm -rf */$(INPATH) -rm -rf solver/*/$(INPATH) I am going to make an assumption that I performed the dmake clean and $INPATH was not set, therefore rm -rf */ was performed From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 3:58 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: dmake clean I am not sure why, but I just did a dmake clean in ../main and once if finished all the module directories including source was deleted. Thankfully, I had a backup. Can anyone explain this? Raymond Hello Raymond -- Yes, an incredibly annoying thing and one I have experienced as well. If you source your env script and THEN do dmake clean, only the bits generated toward the native build will disappear. The clean script does a MUCH bigger remove if you don't do that first. The first time this happened to me, I freaked a bit, but as I hadn't made any local mods, an svn update got everything back. It's good that you had a backup since I'm assuming you made local mods that you wanted to keep. The build doc needs a bit of updating to help others avoid this pitfall. Happy coding! -- - MzK Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect. -- James Mason
Re: More annoying FUD
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:09 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 18 February 2014 18:34, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: http://www.italovignoli.org/2014/02/language-support-of-office-suites/ Don't you love it when they come up with these false comparisons? If you look a little bit closer you see that they are releasing and counting languages where the UI is only 15% translated. So yes, if you are willing to release incomplete work then you can claim to support more languages. But what kind of support is this? A specific example: Tartar (15% UI translated) I thought OOo had a requirement for 80% completion before releasing a translation. With AOO we made the requirement be 100%. LO releases 15% complete UI translations ?! Of course, we shouldn't judge their release criteria. That is their business (and their users) not ours. But when they make false comparisons in a table, comparing apples-to-oranges, then we ought to note it. It is not fair to claim lower standards are the same as greater results. Another example: They've released Hebrew support at 90% complete. We have Hebrew support at 96% complete, but we have not released it yet. Another example: Our Icelandic translation (unreleased) is 95% complete. Theirs (released) is only 88%. Another example: We have 36 languages at 100% complete UI translation. LO has only 13. Look at the data and make your own comparisons: https://translate.apache.org/projects/aoo40/ https://translations.documentfoundation.org/projects/libo_ui/ We could also turn around at start releasing less than 100%, I got frustratrated with some of the releases where danish have been around 96%, and the missing bit was the scripting language. Maybe our criteria needs another round of discussion? If should be quite simple to group the release in 100% and less than 100% so users are warned. It should be noted when we say 100% it is the UI, it does not include the help system. I did not know this! I thought the translations included the help system. But apart from that, I agree the blog is unfair and compare to give an advantage instead of being fair (I think that is called marketing). rgds jan I. We could definitely use a rebuttal blog -- maybe something like The localization strategies of Apache OpenOffice -- maximizing user usability whether the FUD of this thread is referenced or not - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect. -- James Mason
Re: deleted files still showing in repository browse -- help!
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 02/18/2014 11:06 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: In this repository -- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/ content/documentation/online_help/helpauthoring/ I did an svn delete yesterday on all files named OOo2HelpAuthoring-number.html Just the ones followed by a number, not the others, and not the png files. Yet, they are still showing in the web browse of the repository. In my local repo, even deleting the whole directory, followed by an svn update yields the correct files. So, does anyone know why these files are still stuck like this in the web browse mode? and, oops! I didn't realize svn delete wouldn't prompt me for a log message so there was none. :/ Have you committed your delete actions? If not, that is very likely the cause. Marcus yes, and basically nothing changed... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect. -- James Mason
I have posted 3 wiki for OOXML export
1. shape export https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Shape+Export+in+OOXML+Export 2. DrawingML shape export https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/DrawingML+export+in+OOXML+export 3. UT method in OOXML export https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/UT+method+in+OOXML+Export VML shape export will be added later. -- *mailto: *aoo.zhaos...@gmail.com https://google.com/profiles https://google.com/profiles
Re: Paste screenshots in AOO writer 4.1 bêta
Hi, this may have to do with my changes to #123922#, see [1] I will check this... [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123922 On 18.02.2014 05:36, Guy Waterval wrote: Hi André, Thanks for your answer 2014-02-18 11:32 GMT+01:00 Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com: On 18.02.2014 10:08, Guy Waterval wrote: Hi all, I dont know if this issue is relevant or not, just for info. I generally use greenshot to make screenshots and copy them from greenshot to the clipboard before pasting them in Writer. http://getgreenshot.org/ I have noticed a little issue with writer in the latest bêta AOO 4.1 under Windows 7.0 (not tested in other OS). In Impress, Draw and Calc all is OK, but not in Writer, the command Paste or Ctr+V gives no results (in AOO 4.01 it was OK). If I make screenshots with the simple Windows Printscreen command, all is OK, also in Writer. So, only to indicate a change noticed between AOO 4.01 and AOO 4.1 bêta, not obligatory a bug. What does Edit-Paste Special list as available data formats? Only bitmap, and I just notice that the Paste special command is OK in Writer, only the normal Paste command doesn't give any results, For other modules, the two commands (normal and special) are OK. A+ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: willing to donate openoffice Base template
2014-02-17 14:27 GMT+01:00 John C. Pratt jpra...@gmail.com: Hello, I would like to donate http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project/family-address-book-birthday-remindersto Open Office, and I am willing to remove all branding. My problem is this: I can't continue to host the download of this any more; I need a new way to offer it. Can you host it? (The problem is that there is no category for Base for templates, and you require that non -oxc extensions be hosting offsite. What can I do? I am willing to donate it but I understand that there may not be enough interest to maintain it. Hi John, Actually for historical reason the Template website has been designed for managing only Write, Calc and Impress templates. The best way to handle this maybe to create a project page on SourceForge and we'll take care of creating the page on the Template site. It seems like many in the past went this way, and considering that now SourceForge is managing the Template site the end-user experience will be just like for every other template. If you do not want to create a SourceForge project for that just let me know, you might send me your template and I'll take care of handling the upload. Roberto --John
Re: Trace Output
On 18.02.2014 16:56, Steele, Raymond wrote: I configured the OpenOffice build without debug and disabled symbols, but I am still getting 'trace' output in the terminal when I run ./soffice. How do I disable this? Raymond Can you give us an example? With that we can find the place in the source and understand why it is still printed. -Andre - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: dmake clean
On 19.02.2014 00:48, Kay Schenk wrote: On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Steele, Raymond raymond.ste...@lmco.comwrote: I see in the Makefile: clean .PHONY -rm -rf */$(INPATH) -rm -rf solver/*/$(INPATH) I am going to make an assumption that I performed the dmake clean and $INPATH was not set, therefore rm -rf */ was performed From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 3:58 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: dmake clean I am not sure why, but I just did a dmake clean in ../main and once if finished all the module directories including source was deleted. Thankfully, I had a backup. Can anyone explain this? Raymond Hello Raymond -- Yes, an incredibly annoying thing and one I have experienced as well. If you source your env script and THEN do dmake clean, only the bits generated toward the native build will disappear. The clean script does a MUCH bigger remove if you don't do that first. The first time this happened to me, I freaked a bit, but as I hadn't made any local mods, an svn update got everything back. It's good that you had a backup since I'm assuming you made local mods that you wanted to keep. The build doc needs a bit of updating to help others avoid this pitfall. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Up to now I thought that the worst that 'dmake clean' would do would be to delete dmake as well. I will see what I can do. -Andre Happy coding! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
HOW-TO use Microsoft Access databases from within OpenOffice.org 1.1
HOW-TO use Microsoft Access databases from within OpenOffice.org 1.1 I need help using Access *.mdb files with OpenOffice 4.0.1 on Windows 8 (Stupid, I know. Win2K does not support touchscreen) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
