Re: epm 5 not compiling on FreeBSD 13

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi,

I would have expected that someone creates a pull request? ;-)

https://github.com/jimjag/epm

Regards,

   Matthias

Am 08.07.21 um 07:53 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> Aye, Jim has taken over from the original author as maintainer. Plus he has 
> the FreeBSD changes saved as an additional patch.
>
> However AOO 4.5.0 requests epm 5 I thin since last November, I think. At the 
> time I tried to get the update into arch Linux. Which is quite a while where 
> we did not build FreeBSD.
>
> All the best
> Peter
>
> Am 7. Juli 2021 22:44:29 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel 
> :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Am 07.07.21 um 20:11 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>> Hi Damjan,
>>>
>>> In my opinion the compiler is right and it should be vernumber not
>>> relnumber.
>> That's Jim's build, isn't it?
>>
>> https://github.com/jimjag/epm/blob/trunk/bsd.c
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>    Matthias
>>
>>> All the best
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> On 07.07.21 18:04, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
 Hi

 On FreeBSD 13.0 the epm module doesn't compile:

 =
 Building module epm
 =

 Entering
 /store0/Projects/Apache/Public/openoffice/openoffice-git/main/epm

 mkdir ./unxfbsdx/misc/build/epm-5.0.0/
 mkdir: ./unxfbsdx/misc/build/epm-5.0.0/: File exists
 cd ./unxfbsdx/misc/build/epm-5.0.0/ && make  && touch
 /path/to/openoffice-git/main/epm/./unxfbsdx/misc/build/so_built_epm
 Compiling bsd.c...
 bsd.c:203:27: error: no member named 'relnumber' in 'dist_t'; did
>> you
 mean
 'vernumber'?
  if (dist->relnumber) {
    ^
    vernumber
 ./epm.h:220:9: note: 'vernumber' declared here
  int vernumber,   /* Version number */
  ^
 bsd.c:205:35: error: no member named 'relnumber' in 'dist_t'; did
>> you
 mean
 'vernumber'?
  dist->relnumber, platname);
    ^
    vernumber
 ./epm.h:220:9: note: 'vernumber' declared here
  int vernumber,   /* Version number */
  ^
 2 errors generated.
 *** Error code 1

 Stop.





 There is no "relnumber" in epm.h:

 typedef struct / Distribution Structure /
 {
  char product[256],   /* Product name */
  version[256],    /* Product version string */
  release[256],    /* Product release string */
  copyright[256],  /* Product copyright */
  vendor[256], /* Vendor name */
  packager[256],   /* Packager name */
  license[256],    /* License file to copy */
  readme[256]; /* README file to copy */
  int num_subpackages; /* Number of subpackages */
  char **subpackages;  /* Subpackage names */
  int num_descriptions;    /* Number of description strings
>> */
  description_t *descriptions; /* Description strings */
  int vernumber,   /* Version number */
  epoch;   /* Epoch number */
  int num_commands;    /* Number of commands */
  command_t *commands; /* Commands */
  int num_depends; /* Number of dependencies */
  depend_t *depends;   /* Dependencies */
  int num_files;   /* Number of files */
  file_t *files;   /* Files */
 } dist_t;


 Any ideas?
 Damjan



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: catalina branch waiting for reviews

[Arrigo Marchiori]

Hello Jim,

On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:19:16AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> I thought that more recent systems were what the 4.2.x... branch was for.

Yes, but an attempt to build today's stable AOO (i.e. 4.1.10) on
today's hardware is probably the first thing a new developer would
try.

Or, at least, that's what I did in the first place when I wanted to
fix some bugs some time ago. And what I am trying to do now, being new
to macOS. I see a bug in the software I am using today and I want to
fix _that_, if I can.

As soon as we declare AOO41X old and deprecated I will be happy to
forget about it. :-)

Are you suggesting that _all_ our efforts shall rather be driven
towards stabilizing 4.2.0 instead?

> > On Jul 19, 2021, at 10:46 AM, Arrigo Marchiori  
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Hello Jim,
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:14:03AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > 
> >> What is wrong w/ using the build stuff that we have used for years?
> > 
> > The oldest system I have on my hands now is our shared Mini with
> > Catalina. I tried to install Xcode 7 there, but it did not seem to
> > work.
> > 
> > I thought that allowing more recent systems to build AOO41X could help
> > the overall development of AOO. Given the fact that no edits to the
> > code were necessary, I am proposing this set of changes.
> > 
> > The fact that Calc charts disappear from this build is IMHO
> > encouraging, because it gives more people (including myself) the
> > possibility to look into this problem.
> > 
> > The goal of these changes must be to allow newer systems to build
> > AOO41X, but without breaking things in any way for the _current_
> > accepted configuration. Unfortunately, I cannot test that, so I must
> > rely on someone else's tests.
> > 
> > _If_ we are interested, of course! If not... I just learned something
> > about macOS. :-) Same as my previous attempt at updating the Visual
> > Studio version, that ended up with just me learning some Windows
> > development.
> > 
> > I hope I could explain myself clearly. Any comments/criticism
> > are welcome!
> > 
> >>> On Jul 18, 2021, at 9:00 AM, Arrigo Marchiori  
> >>> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Dear All,
> >>> 
> >>> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 03:27:54PM +0200, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> >>> 
>  Dear All,
>  
>  I just committed the "catalina" branch:
>  https://github.com/apache/openoffice/tree/catalina
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > -- 
> > Arrigo
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

-- 
Arrigo

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Some observations about AOO 4.1.10 and Windows 10 Pro 21H1

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi all,

Am 20.07.21 um 14:45 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher (Apache):
> On 17.07.2021 10:42, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>> 2.
>> JRE 1.8.0_291 is not recognized by OO and cannot be activated - even if I 
>> first install JRE and then AOO it is like this.
>> (In the forum http://de.openoffice.info it is however reported by a user 
>> that he uses 1.8.0_291 in AOO 4.1.10, perhaps the problem occurs only with 
>> 21H1 of Windows 10).
>>
>> JRE 1.7.0_71 on the other hand is recognized without problems (even when 
>> installing after AOO) and can be activated.
> Could it be that JRE 1.8.0_291 is blocked? Cf. e.g.
> 
>  .

I can see absolutely no problem with AOO detecting Java:

https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/Windows10_AOO_JAVA.png

Oracle Java 7 and 8, alongside with AdoptOpenJDK 8 an 11. And yes, this
is Windows 10 21H1.

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> ---rony
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

RE: Some observations about AOO 4.1.10 and Windows 10 Pro 21H1

[Jörg Schmidt]

 

> -Original Message-
> From: Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) [mailto:r...@apache.org] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 2:46 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Some observations about AOO 4.1.10 and Windows 
> 10 Pro 21H1
> 
> On 17.07.2021 10:42, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> > 2.
> > JRE 1.8.0_291 is not recognized by OO and cannot be 
> activated - even if I first install JRE and then AOO it is like this.
> > (In the forum http://de.openoffice.info it is however 
> reported by a user that he uses 1.8.0_291 in AOO 4.1.10, 
> perhaps the problem occurs only with 21H1 of Windows 10).
> >
> > JRE 1.7.0_71 on the other hand is recognized without 
> problems (even when installing after AOO) and can be activated.
> 
> Could it be that JRE 1.8.0_291 is blocked? Cf. e.g.
>  rnet-in-windows-10/> .

I have read through this, but this does not apply to me, because there were no 
problems with the download and installation, also Java 1.8.0_291 is entered in 
the SYstemsteuerung as "activated".

On the command line (cmd.exe), returns:

Java -version

the display:

java version "1.8.0_291"



Jörg


Note:
that Java 1.8.0_291 is not recognized by AOO is annoying, but no problem, 
because the other Java version is recognized. Also, I do not use Win 10 
productively, but only for testing, so I am not dependent on it.
My thread here was _not_ intended to _ask for support_, but I wanted to report 
the problem with Java, since Win 10 21H1 is fairly new and I thought the 
problem could be general, especially since my system was installed very fresh.
However, it seems that the observed problem is not general, but occurs only 
with me (for whatever reason), so we can put the discussion to sleep.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

RE: Some observations about AOO 4.1.10 and Windows 10 Pro 21H1

[Jörg Schmidt]

Hello Mechtilde,

> -Original Message-
> From: Mechtilde [mailto:o...@mechtilde.de] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 3:02 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Some observations about AOO 4.1.10 and Windows 
> 10 Pro 21H1
> 
> Hello Jörg,
> 
> please look under C:\Programme (c86) or the corresponding 
> directory for
> a directory java.

Java.exe is in:

C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jre 1.8.0_291\bin\


greetings,
Jörg


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: catalina branch waiting for reviews [Was: [Mini] Setup of development environment]

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

Am 20.07.21 um 17:21 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>
>> On Jul 19, 2021, at 10:26 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> People need macOS builds more frequently to test.
>>
> Agreed. But every time I seem to encourage a test macOS build, it seems that 
> people want to hold off...

I do my Windows builds frequently.

Nobody holds me off... ;-)

> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: catalina branch waiting for reviews [Was: [Mini] Setup of development environment]

[Jim Jagielski]

> On Jul 19, 2021, at 10:26 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> People need macOS builds more frequently to test.
> 

Agreed. But every time I seem to encourage a test macOS build, it seems that 
people want to hold off...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: catalina branch waiting for reviews

[Jim Jagielski]

I thought that more recent systems were what the 4.2.x... branch was for.

> On Jul 19, 2021, at 10:46 AM, Arrigo Marchiori  
> wrote:
> 
> Hello Jim,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:14:03AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
>> What is wrong w/ using the build stuff that we have used for years?
> 
> The oldest system I have on my hands now is our shared Mini with
> Catalina. I tried to install Xcode 7 there, but it did not seem to
> work.
> 
> I thought that allowing more recent systems to build AOO41X could help
> the overall development of AOO. Given the fact that no edits to the
> code were necessary, I am proposing this set of changes.
> 
> The fact that Calc charts disappear from this build is IMHO
> encouraging, because it gives more people (including myself) the
> possibility to look into this problem.
> 
> The goal of these changes must be to allow newer systems to build
> AOO41X, but without breaking things in any way for the _current_
> accepted configuration. Unfortunately, I cannot test that, so I must
> rely on someone else's tests.
> 
> _If_ we are interested, of course! If not... I just learned something
> about macOS. :-) Same as my previous attempt at updating the Visual
> Studio version, that ended up with just me learning some Windows
> development.
> 
> I hope I could explain myself clearly. Any comments/criticism
> are welcome!
> 
>>> On Jul 18, 2021, at 9:00 AM, Arrigo Marchiori  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear All,
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 03:27:54PM +0200, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>>> 
 Dear All,
 
 I just committed the "catalina" branch:
 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/tree/catalina
> 
> [...]
> 
> -- 
> Arrigo
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Some observations about AOO 4.1.10 and Windows 10 Pro 21H1

[Mechtilde]

Hello Jörg,

please look under C:\Programme (c86) or the corresponding directory for
a directory java.

Maybe the JRE is in anther directory depending where you get the windows
binary from.

Kind regards

Mechtilde

Am 19.07.21 um 16:55 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
> Hello, 
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] 
>> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2021 4:26 PM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Some observations about AOO 4.1.10 and Windows 
>> 10 Pro 21H1
>>
>>
>> Reset the user profile and try again
> 
> That's the very first thing I have done.
> 
> 
> Jörg
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

-- 
Mechtilde Stehmann
## Apache OpenOffice
## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows und OS/2
## Debian Developer
## PGP encryption welcome
## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899  39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Some observations about AOO 4.1.10 and Windows 10 Pro 21H1

[Rony G. Flatscher (Apache)]

On 17.07.2021 10:42, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> 2.
> JRE 1.8.0_291 is not recognized by OO and cannot be activated - even if I 
> first install JRE and then AOO it is like this.
> (In the forum http://de.openoffice.info it is however reported by a user that 
> he uses 1.8.0_291 in AOO 4.1.10, perhaps the problem occurs only with 21H1 of 
> Windows 10).
>
> JRE 1.7.0_71 on the other hand is recognized without problems (even when 
> installing after AOO) and can be activated.

Could it be that JRE 1.8.0_291 is blocked? Cf. e.g.

 .

---rony


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Ubuntu 21.04 / dark mode

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi all,

It seems Windows 11 will also have dark mode as default:

https://www.windowscentral.com/windows-11-will-enable-dark-mode-default-more-pcs

So, starting to work on a new icon set would be great!

Regards,

   Matthias

Am 13.06.21 um 09:51 schrieb Dean.Webber:
> Yes, best to avoid Google content if possible..
> 
> From: Pedro Lino 
> Sent: Monday, 31 May 2021 5:42 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: Ubuntu 21.04 / dark mode
>
> Hi Andrea
>
> Thank you for the links. FontAwesome requires a paid license to have access 
> to the SVGs so I guess that excludes it.
> Personally I would avoid using something from Google so my choice would be 
> Remixicon. But I think we need to check which one has the most complete set. 
> Maybe we need a combination of both themes.
>
> Grazie mille!
> Pedro
>
>> On 05/30/2021 8:51 AM Andrea Pescetti  wrote:
>>
>>
>> Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> Pedro Lino wrote:
> On 05/29/2021 9:32 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fremixicon.com%2Fdata=04%7C01%7C2018001901%40student.sit.ac.nz%7Cb68b0bc77d8845d34ee908d92392597a%7Cc46ab213d1794a719ff7b9d9fe3f3b48%7C0%7C1%7C637579933764260143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000sdata=FjRuENi74%2BM9MH0INsZrvmyQpCy6fp1El7vccaDeuFk%3Dreserved=0
 This one is really interesting! Can you share the links to other
 projects that you have found?
>>> FontAwesome 
>>> https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffontawesome.com%2Flicense%2Ffreedata=04%7C01%7C2018001901%40student.sit.ac.nz%7Cb68b0bc77d8845d34ee908d92392597a%7Cc46ab213d1794a719ff7b9d9fe3f3b48%7C0%7C1%7C637579933764260143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000sdata=NHErL1d23pCGssQnh2CRbW%2FR%2BOn2zdQ%2BSzkXdjChchM%3Dreserved=0
>>>  is really popular and
>>> CC-BY (but recent versions include a "Pro" section that may have
>>> different terms).
>>>
>>> Google's Material Design Icons ... are
>>> AL2, come in different styles and, although the set is already quite
>>> comprehensive, are extended by community projects.
>> I copy-pasted the same link twice... the correct link to Google's
>> Material Design Icons is 
>> https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffonts.google.com%2Ficonsdata=04%7C01%7C2018001901%40student.sit.ac.nz%7Cb68b0bc77d8845d34ee908d92392597a%7Cc46ab213d1794a719ff7b9d9fe3f3b48%7C0%7C1%7C637579933764260143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000sdata=4DtmoviQ9uuZGh8vVkFD7N1Os1tKaja626e1cNBayqI%3Dreserved=0
>>
>> Regards,
>>Andrea.
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature