subject:"Issues"

Hi Peter,

Am 01.08.22 um 07:57 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I had this morning some wired effects, during my work with AOO.
>
> As soon as I have added a OLE Calc part through Copy (From
> LibreOffice :-D ), I get performance issues including crashes.
>
> Has anyone heard of performance issues in this constraint?
>
>
> Check out the document:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZScKadukzWfZGeJWsTEaGf1ORrLrmwGl/view?usp=sharing
>

I opened the document and could not reproduce a crash. I only get a slow
down when scrolling the OLE container.

I also use Ubuntu and my machine is definitely not powerful. ;-)

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>
> I am on Ubunutu 20.04. AOO is the 4.1.13 RC candidate.
>
> My machine is an Intel I5, with 32GB, and SSD hard disk. (So recent
> fast machine)
>
>
> All the best
>
> Peter
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [AOO4.1.13] Performance Issues in writer with OLE objects

Good luck!

Am 01.08.22 um 23:02 schrieb Dave:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Sorry, when I used the jovial expression "HOARDS" I didn't realise you
> had absolutely no sense of humour.
>
> Since 2001 I have trained more users of OOO.org, AOO and LO than you
> have ever had contact with. So please do NOT! (expletives deleted)
> talk down to me about users. I know users, YOU DO NOT, you only guess
> who they might be.
>
> YOU have just won your beloved project an Anti-AOO promoter. From here
> on the ASF and AOO can "Stick it where the sun don't shine".
>
> Don't waste time with any replies, because all messages from this list
> will now be directed to null/dev.
>
> BYE AOO!
>
>
> On 01/08/2022 21:28, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Am 01.08.22 um 22:17 schrieb Dave:
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>
>>> Sorry, but you loose that bet.
>>>
>>> I temporarily put aside my loathing and detestation of GNOME and
>>> installed the standard Ubuntu 22.04 GNOME desktop edition. My only
>>> readily available box was an AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core Processor with 16Gb
>>> RAM. Not an exact match for Peter's hardware, but possibly close enough.
>>>
>>> Pity these galactic hoards of GNOME users didn't step up and offer
>>> SOMETHING to assist Peter.
>> I never spoke of *hoards* but I don't think we should ignore our user.
>>
>> And users normally don't step up, that needs a developer.
>>
>>> @Peter:
>>> On this Ubuntu setup I removed LO and installed the released AOO 4.1.13
>>> edition. I opened your document and tried every trick I could think of
>>> to create a crash, but it remained rock solid.
>>>
>>> Is there any difference between the RC and released code?
>> No.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>    Matthias
>>
>>> Regards
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/08/2022 17:32, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>
>>>> Am 01.08.22 um 18:25 schrieb Dave:
>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>>
>>>>> Cinnamon, but I run PCLinuxOS KDE on my main production box.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have never been a fan of GNOME.
>>>> I bet you would get a crash when using GNOME. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Someone should have a look into it, these crashes are annoying and a lot
>>>> of people *are* using GNOME...
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>>    Matthias
>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Dave
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01/08/2022 16:59, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which desktop environment are you using on Linux Mint?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We do have some issues with Ubuntu (GNOME) and other distributions when
>>>>>> GNOME is used as DE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 01.08.22 um 17:53 schrieb Dave:
>>>>>>> On 01/08/2022 06:57, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I had this morning some wired effects, during my work with AOO.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As soon as I have added a OLE Calc part through Copy (From
>>>>>>>> LibreOffice :-D ), I get performance issues including crashes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Has anyone heard of performance issues in this constraint?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Check out the document:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZScKadukzWfZGeJWsTEaGf1ORrLrmwGl/view?usp=sharing
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am on Ubunutu 20.04. AOO is the 4.1.13 RC candidate.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My machine is an Intel I5, with 32GB, and SSD hard disk. (So recent 
>>>>>>>> fast
>>>>>>>> machine)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All the best
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not sure if this will be of any help to you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My hardware spec is very similar to yours and I am  on Linux Mint 20.3
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't get any (performance issues?) with your document in AOO 4.1.13
>>>>>>> (Released) and no crash when editing the OLE Calc object, with either
>>>>>>> AOO or LibreOffice on Linux.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, I do get a 100% reproducible crash when attempting to edit the
>>>>>>> OLE Calc object in your document with LibreOffice 7.3.5.2 x64 on Win 10,
>>>>>>> but it does not crash LibreOffice 7.4.0.2 x64 on Win 10.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [AOO4.1.13] Performance Issues in writer with OLE objects

Hi Matthias,

Sorry, when I used the jovial expression "HOARDS" I didn't realise you
had absolutely no sense of humour.

Since 2001 I have trained more users of OOO.org, AOO and LO than you
have ever had contact with. So please do NOT! (expletives deleted)
talk down to me about users. I know users, YOU DO NOT, you only guess
who they might be.

YOU have just won your beloved project an Anti-AOO promoter. From here
on the ASF and AOO can "Stick it where the sun don't shine".

Don't waste time with any replies, because all messages from this list
will now be directed to null/dev.

BYE AOO!


On 01/08/2022 21:28, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> Am 01.08.22 um 22:17 schrieb Dave:
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> Sorry, but you loose that bet.
>>
>> I temporarily put aside my loathing and detestation of GNOME and
>> installed the standard Ubuntu 22.04 GNOME desktop edition. My only
>> readily available box was an AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core Processor with 16Gb
>> RAM. Not an exact match for Peter's hardware, but possibly close enough.
>>
>> Pity these galactic hoards of GNOME users didn't step up and offer
>> SOMETHING to assist Peter.
> 
> I never spoke of *hoards* but I don't think we should ignore our user.
> 
> And users normally don't step up, that needs a developer.
> 
>>
>> @Peter:
>> On this Ubuntu setup I removed LO and installed the released AOO 4.1.13
>> edition. I opened your document and tried every trick I could think of
>> to create a crash, but it remained rock solid.
>>
>> Is there any difference between the RC and released code?
> 
> No.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
>>
>> Regards
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> On 01/08/2022 17:32, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> Am 01.08.22 um 18:25 schrieb Dave:
>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>
>>>> Cinnamon, but I run PCLinuxOS KDE on my main production box.
>>>>
>>>> I have never been a fan of GNOME.
>>> I bet you would get a crash when using GNOME. ;-)
>>>
>>> Someone should have a look into it, these crashes are annoying and a lot
>>> of people *are* using GNOME...
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>    Matthias
>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>> On 01/08/2022 16:59, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>
>>>>> Which desktop environment are you using on Linux Mint?
>>>>>
>>>>> We do have some issues with Ubuntu (GNOME) and other distributions when
>>>>> GNOME is used as DE.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>    Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 01.08.22 um 17:53 schrieb Dave:
>>>>>> On 01/08/2022 06:57, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I had this morning some wired effects, during my work with AOO.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As soon as I have added a OLE Calc part through Copy (From
>>>>>>> LibreOffice :-D ), I get performance issues including crashes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has anyone heard of performance issues in this constraint?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Check out the document:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZScKadukzWfZGeJWsTEaGf1ORrLrmwGl/view?usp=sharing
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am on Ubunutu 20.04. AOO is the 4.1.13 RC candidate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My machine is an Intel I5, with 32GB, and SSD hard disk. (So recent fast
>>>>>>> machine)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All the best
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not sure if this will be of any help to you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My hardware spec is very similar to yours and I am  on Linux Mint 20.3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't get any (performance issues?) with your document in AOO 4.1.13
>>>>>> (Released) and no crash when editing the OLE Calc object, with either
>>>>>> AOO or LibreOffice on Linux.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, I do get a 100% reproducible crash when attempting to edit the
>>>>>> OLE Calc object in your document with LibreOffice 7.3.5.2 x64 on Win 10,
>>>>>> but it does not crash LibreOffice 7.4.0.2 x64 on Win 10.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [AOO4.1.13] Performance Issues in writer with OLE objects

Hi Dave,

Am 01.08.22 um 22:17 schrieb Dave:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Sorry, but you loose that bet.
>
> I temporarily put aside my loathing and detestation of GNOME and
> installed the standard Ubuntu 22.04 GNOME desktop edition. My only
> readily available box was an AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core Processor with 16Gb
> RAM. Not an exact match for Peter's hardware, but possibly close enough.
>
> Pity these galactic hoards of GNOME users didn't step up and offer
> SOMETHING to assist Peter.

I never spoke of *hoards* but I don't think we should ignore our user.

And users normally don't step up, that needs a developer.

>
> @Peter:
> On this Ubuntu setup I removed LO and installed the released AOO 4.1.13
> edition. I opened your document and tried every trick I could think of
> to create a crash, but it remained rock solid.
>
> Is there any difference between the RC and released code?

No.

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> Regards
> Dave
>
>
> On 01/08/2022 17:32, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Am 01.08.22 um 18:25 schrieb Dave:
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>
>>> Cinnamon, but I run PCLinuxOS KDE on my main production box.
>>>
>>> I have never been a fan of GNOME.
>> I bet you would get a crash when using GNOME. ;-)
>>
>> Someone should have a look into it, these crashes are annoying and a lot
>> of people *are* using GNOME...
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>    Matthias
>>
>>> Regards
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> On 01/08/2022 16:59, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>
>>>> Which desktop environment are you using on Linux Mint?
>>>>
>>>> We do have some issues with Ubuntu (GNOME) and other distributions when
>>>> GNOME is used as DE.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>>    Matthias
>>>>
>>>> Am 01.08.22 um 17:53 schrieb Dave:
>>>>> On 01/08/2022 06:57, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I had this morning some wired effects, during my work with AOO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As soon as I have added a OLE Calc part through Copy (From
>>>>>> LibreOffice :-D ), I get performance issues including crashes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Has anyone heard of performance issues in this constraint?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Check out the document:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZScKadukzWfZGeJWsTEaGf1ORrLrmwGl/view?usp=sharing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am on Ubunutu 20.04. AOO is the 4.1.13 RC candidate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My machine is an Intel I5, with 32GB, and SSD hard disk. (So recent fast
>>>>>> machine)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All the best
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure if this will be of any help to you.
>>>>>
>>>>> My hardware spec is very similar to yours and I am  on Linux Mint 20.3
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't get any (performance issues?) with your document in AOO 4.1.13
>>>>> (Released) and no crash when editing the OLE Calc object, with either
>>>>> AOO or LibreOffice on Linux.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, I do get a 100% reproducible crash when attempting to edit the
>>>>> OLE Calc object in your document with LibreOffice 7.3.5.2 x64 on Win 10,
>>>>> but it does not crash LibreOffice 7.4.0.2 x64 on Win 10.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Dave
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [AOO4.1.13] Performance Issues in writer with OLE objects

Hi Matthias,

Sorry, but you loose that bet.

I temporarily put aside my loathing and detestation of GNOME and
installed the standard Ubuntu 22.04 GNOME desktop edition. My only
readily available box was an AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core Processor with 16Gb
RAM. Not an exact match for Peter's hardware, but possibly close enough.

Pity these galactic hoards of GNOME users didn't step up and offer
SOMETHING to assist Peter.

@Peter:
On this Ubuntu setup I removed LO and installed the released AOO 4.1.13
edition. I opened your document and tried every trick I could think of
to create a crash, but it remained rock solid.

Is there any difference between the RC and released code?

Regards
Dave


On 01/08/2022 17:32, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> Am 01.08.22 um 18:25 schrieb Dave:
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> Cinnamon, but I run PCLinuxOS KDE on my main production box.
>>
>> I have never been a fan of GNOME.
> 
> I bet you would get a crash when using GNOME. ;-)
> 
> Someone should have a look into it, these crashes are annoying and a lot
> of people *are* using GNOME...
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
>>
>> Regards
>> Dave
>>
>> On 01/08/2022 16:59, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> Which desktop environment are you using on Linux Mint?
>>>
>>> We do have some issues with Ubuntu (GNOME) and other distributions when
>>> GNOME is used as DE.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>    Matthias
>>>
>>> Am 01.08.22 um 17:53 schrieb Dave:
>>>> On 01/08/2022 06:57, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I had this morning some wired effects, during my work with AOO.
>>>>>
>>>>> As soon as I have added a OLE Calc part through Copy (From
>>>>> LibreOffice :-D ), I get performance issues including crashes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone heard of performance issues in this constraint?
>>>>>
>>>>> Check out the document:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZScKadukzWfZGeJWsTEaGf1ORrLrmwGl/view?usp=sharing
>>>>>
>>>>> I am on Ubunutu 20.04. AOO is the 4.1.13 RC candidate.
>>>>>
>>>>> My machine is an Intel I5, with 32GB, and SSD hard disk. (So recent fast
>>>>> machine)
>>>>>
>>>>> All the best
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter
>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>
>>>> Not sure if this will be of any help to you.
>>>>
>>>> My hardware spec is very similar to yours and I am  on Linux Mint 20.3
>>>>
>>>> I don't get any (performance issues?) with your document in AOO 4.1.13
>>>> (Released) and no crash when editing the OLE Calc object, with either
>>>> AOO or LibreOffice on Linux.
>>>>
>>>> However, I do get a 100% reproducible crash when attempting to edit the
>>>> OLE Calc object in your document with LibreOffice 7.3.5.2 x64 on Win 10,
>>>> but it does not crash LibreOffice 7.4.0.2 x64 on Win 10.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [AOO4.1.13] Performance Issues in writer with OLE objects

Hi Dave,

Am 01.08.22 um 18:25 schrieb Dave:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Cinnamon, but I run PCLinuxOS KDE on my main production box.
>
> I have never been a fan of GNOME.

I bet you would get a crash when using GNOME. ;-)

Someone should have a look into it, these crashes are annoying and a lot
of people *are* using GNOME...

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> Regards
> Dave
>
> On 01/08/2022 16:59, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Which desktop environment are you using on Linux Mint?
>>
>> We do have some issues with Ubuntu (GNOME) and other distributions when
>> GNOME is used as DE.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>    Matthias
>>
>> Am 01.08.22 um 17:53 schrieb Dave:
>>> On 01/08/2022 06:57, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I had this morning some wired effects, during my work with AOO.
>>>>
>>>> As soon as I have added a OLE Calc part through Copy (From
>>>> LibreOffice :-D ), I get performance issues including crashes.
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone heard of performance issues in this constraint?
>>>>
>>>> Check out the document:
>>>>
>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZScKadukzWfZGeJWsTEaGf1ORrLrmwGl/view?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>> I am on Ubunutu 20.04. AOO is the 4.1.13 RC candidate.
>>>>
>>>> My machine is an Intel I5, with 32GB, and SSD hard disk. (So recent fast
>>>> machine)
>>>>
>>>> All the best
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> Not sure if this will be of any help to you.
>>>
>>> My hardware spec is very similar to yours and I am  on Linux Mint 20.3
>>>
>>> I don't get any (performance issues?) with your document in AOO 4.1.13
>>> (Released) and no crash when editing the OLE Calc object, with either
>>> AOO or LibreOffice on Linux.
>>>
>>> However, I do get a 100% reproducible crash when attempting to edit the
>>> OLE Calc object in your document with LibreOffice 7.3.5.2 x64 on Win 10,
>>> but it does not crash LibreOffice 7.4.0.2 x64 on Win 10.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [AOO4.1.13] Performance Issues in writer with OLE objects

Hi Matthias,

Cinnamon, but I run PCLinuxOS KDE on my main production box.

I have never been a fan of GNOME.

Regards
Dave

On 01/08/2022 16:59, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> Which desktop environment are you using on Linux Mint?
> 
> We do have some issues with Ubuntu (GNOME) and other distributions when
> GNOME is used as DE.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
> Am 01.08.22 um 17:53 schrieb Dave:
>> On 01/08/2022 06:57, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I had this morning some wired effects, during my work with AOO.
>>>
>>> As soon as I have added a OLE Calc part through Copy (From
>>> LibreOffice :-D ), I get performance issues including crashes.
>>>
>>> Has anyone heard of performance issues in this constraint?
>>>
>>> Check out the document:
>>>
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZScKadukzWfZGeJWsTEaGf1ORrLrmwGl/view?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> I am on Ubunutu 20.04. AOO is the 4.1.13 RC candidate.
>>>
>>> My machine is an Intel I5, with 32GB, and SSD hard disk. (So recent fast
>>> machine)
>>>
>>> All the best
>>>
>>> Peter
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Not sure if this will be of any help to you.
>>
>> My hardware spec is very similar to yours and I am  on Linux Mint 20.3
>>
>> I don't get any (performance issues?) with your document in AOO 4.1.13
>> (Released) and no crash when editing the OLE Calc object, with either
>> AOO or LibreOffice on Linux.
>>
>> However, I do get a 100% reproducible crash when attempting to edit the
>> OLE Calc object in your document with LibreOffice 7.3.5.2 x64 on Win 10,
>> but it does not crash LibreOffice 7.4.0.2 x64 on Win 10.
>>
>> Regards
>> Dave
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [AOO4.1.13] Performance Issues in writer with OLE objects

Hi Dave,

Which desktop environment are you using on Linux Mint?

We do have some issues with Ubuntu (GNOME) and other distributions when
GNOME is used as DE.

Regards,

   Matthias

Am 01.08.22 um 17:53 schrieb Dave:
> On 01/08/2022 06:57, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I had this morning some wired effects, during my work with AOO.
>>
>> As soon as I have added a OLE Calc part through Copy (From
>> LibreOffice :-D ), I get performance issues including crashes.
>>
>> Has anyone heard of performance issues in this constraint?
>>
>> Check out the document:
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZScKadukzWfZGeJWsTEaGf1ORrLrmwGl/view?usp=sharing
>>
>> I am on Ubunutu 20.04. AOO is the 4.1.13 RC candidate.
>>
>> My machine is an Intel I5, with 32GB, and SSD hard disk. (So recent fast
>> machine)
>>
>> All the best
>>
>> Peter
> Hi Peter,
>
> Not sure if this will be of any help to you.
>
> My hardware spec is very similar to yours and I am  on Linux Mint 20.3
>
> I don't get any (performance issues?) with your document in AOO 4.1.13
> (Released) and no crash when editing the OLE Calc object, with either
> AOO or LibreOffice on Linux.
>
> However, I do get a 100% reproducible crash when attempting to edit the
> OLE Calc object in your document with LibreOffice 7.3.5.2 x64 on Win 10,
> but it does not crash LibreOffice 7.4.0.2 x64 on Win 10.
>
> Regards
> Dave
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [AOO4.1.13] Performance Issues in writer with OLE objects

On 01/08/2022 06:57, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I had this morning some wired effects, during my work with AOO.
> 
> As soon as I have added a OLE Calc part through Copy (From
> LibreOffice :-D ), I get performance issues including crashes.
> 
> Has anyone heard of performance issues in this constraint?
> 
> Check out the document:
> 
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZScKadukzWfZGeJWsTEaGf1ORrLrmwGl/view?usp=sharing
> 
> I am on Ubunutu 20.04. AOO is the 4.1.13 RC candidate.
> 
> My machine is an Intel I5, with 32GB, and SSD hard disk. (So recent fast
> machine)
> 
> All the best
> 
> Peter

Hi Peter,

Not sure if this will be of any help to you.

My hardware spec is very similar to yours and I am  on Linux Mint 20.3

I don't get any (performance issues?) with your document in AOO 4.1.13
(Released) and no crash when editing the OLE Calc object, with either
AOO or LibreOffice on Linux.

However, I do get a 100% reproducible crash when attempting to edit the
OLE Calc object in your document with LibreOffice 7.3.5.2 x64 on Win 10,
but it does not crash LibreOffice 7.4.0.2 x64 on Win 10.

Regards
Dave

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

[AOO4.1.13] Performance Issues in writer with OLE objects

2022-07-31 Thread Peter Kovacs


Hi all,


I had this morning some wired effects, during my work with AOO.

As soon as I have added a OLE Calc part through Copy (From 
LibreOffice :-D ), I get performance issues including crashes.


Has anyone heard of performance issues in this constraint?


Check out the document:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZScKadukzWfZGeJWsTEaGf1ORrLrmwGl/view?usp=sharing


I am on Ubunutu 20.04. AOO is the 4.1.13 RC candidate.

My machine is an Intel I5, with 32GB, and SSD hard disk. (So recent fast 
machine)



All the best

Peter


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Priority Issues: (was: How to cope with duplicate attributes in XML tags )

2021-02-23 Thread Peter

Sure pick one. No issues I have wrote more on purpose. 

Am 22. Februar 2021 18:53:02 MEZ schrieb Arrigo Marchiori 
:
>Hello Peter,
>
>thank you very much for replying.
>
>On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 01:40:15AM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
>> I would like to answer the priority list first.
>> 
>> Currently I have following Issues on my mind. The list may not be
>complete
>> or others may have other Opinions, which is fine.
>> 
>> 
>> On 07.02.21 21:51, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>> > If we approve it, I will surely need your indication (as per a
>> > previous thread on this ML) about the next "high priority issue" to
>> > address.
>> 
>> Next:
>> 
>> File corruption:
>> 
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126846 and
>> https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7=1532
>
>I'm starting with the related report
>https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126869
>There are too many and... I have to choose one ;-)
>
>Best regards,
>-- 
>Arrigo
>
>http://rigo.altervista.org
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.

Re: Priority Issues: (was: How to cope with duplicate attributes in XML tags )

2021-02-22 Thread Arrigo Marchiori

Hello Peter,

thank you very much for replying.

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 01:40:15AM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:

> I would like to answer the priority list first.
> 
> Currently I have following Issues on my mind. The list may not be complete
> or others may have other Opinions, which is fine.
> 
> 
> On 07.02.21 21:51, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> > If we approve it, I will surely need your indication (as per a
> > previous thread on this ML) about the next "high priority issue" to
> > address.
> 
> Next:
> 
> File corruption:
> 
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126846 and
> https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7=1532

I'm starting with the related report
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126869
There are too many and... I have to choose one ;-)

Best regards,
-- 
Arrigo

http://rigo.altervista.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Priority Issues: (was: How to cope with duplicate attributes in XML tags )

2021-02-21 Thread Keith N. McKenna

On 2/20/2021 7:40 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> I would like to answer the priority list first.
> 
> Currently I have following Issues on my mind. The list may not be
> complete or others may have other Opinions, which is fine.
> 
> 
> On 07.02.21 21:51, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>> If we approve it, I will surely need your indication (as per a
>> previous thread on this ML) about the next "high priority issue" to
>> address.
> 
> Next:
> 
> File corruption:
> 
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126846 and
> https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7=1532
> 
> 
> next 4.2.0 Issues:
> 
> My filter in bugzilla points to:
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed_id=247426=4.2.0%20OpenIssues
> 
> 
> Maybe someone else has a better list.
> 
> 
> next:
> 
> Patches we have received and we need to integrate:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENOFFICE-45
> 
> 
> 
> Next:
> 
> would be issues with corrupted profile files.
> 
> This seem to be still a thing. I found these Issues:
> 
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121930
> 
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121625
> 
> 
> Next:
> 
> Windows:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENOFFICE-35
> 
> 
> Next:
> 
> Handling of other crashes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENOFFICE-3
> 
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125006
> 
> 
> 
> Issues with the extension manager:
> 
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127520
> 
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122297
> 
> 
> Issues that deal with Memory leaks
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENOFFICE-28
> 
> (Currently only one)
> 
> 

Peter;

Your link comes back as does not exist from Bugzilla. The following 2
links are set as share with registered users and should work for anyone
with a Bugzilla account.

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem=run=4.2.0_ReleaseBlockers

https://bz.apache.org
/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem=run=4.2.0Milestone

Regards
Keith



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Priority Issues: (was: How to cope with duplicate attributes in XML tags )

2021-02-20 Thread Peter Kovacs


I would like to answer the priority list first.

Currently I have following Issues on my mind. The list may not be 
complete or others may have other Opinions, which is fine.



On 07.02.21 21:51, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:

If we approve it, I will surely need your indication (as per a
previous thread on this ML) about the next "high priority issue" to
address.


Next:

File corruption:

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126846 and 
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7=1532



next 4.2.0 Issues:

My filter in bugzilla points to: 
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed_id=247426=4.2.0%20OpenIssues


Maybe someone else has a better list.


next:

Patches we have received and we need to integrate:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENOFFICE-45



Next:

would be issues with corrupted profile files.

This seem to be still a thing. I found these Issues:

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121930

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121625


Next:

Windows:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENOFFICE-35


Next:

Handling of other crashes: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENOFFICE-3


https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125006



Issues with the extension manager:

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127520

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122297


Issues that deal with Memory leaks

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENOFFICE-28

(Currently only one)


--
This is the Way! http://www.apache.org/theapacheway/index.html

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [NOTICE] Issues building OpenOffice.org

2021-02-19 Thread Dave Fisher

Hi -

The builds are now restored and tested.

Regards,
Dave

> On Feb 18, 2021, at 11:35 AM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
> 
> Hi -
> 
> Starting Wednesday ci-builds.apache.org has experienced issues which are 
> being resolved.
> 
> In the meantime our Jenkins builds for openoffice.org are broken. I will keep 
> an eye on restoration and will rerun the staging build once it is available.
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

[NOTICE] Issues building OpenOffice.org

2021-02-18 Thread Dave Fisher

Hi -

Starting Wednesday ci-builds.apache.org has experienced issues which are being 
resolved.

In the meantime our Jenkins builds for openoffice.org are broken. I will keep 
an eye on restoration and will rerun the staging build once it is available.

Regards,
Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Keep issues@ in bug reports [Was: Request for Bugzilla karma]

2021-01-31 Thread Marcus


Am 30.01.21 um 12:17 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

Marcus wrote:

Am 26.01.21 um 22:57 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Maybe you can find something in the Bugzilla configuration that 
defines the default QA contact? ...
Sorry, not in BZ itself. I've looked into the admin settings but 
cannot find a suitable option.


I believe our old (and I don't know how old!) configuration was using 
these settings:

https://www.bugzilla.org/docs/2.18/html/components.html

"The Owner, QA Contact, and Reporter will get email when new bugs are 
created in this Component and when these bugs change. Default Owner and 
Default QA Contact fields dictate the default assignments".


Now, I've never administered Bugzilla so I have no idea where one can 
set those (or even if this is enabled in our current instance), but if 
that can help...


thanks for the hint. In the BZ version we are using it's still possible 
to set a default assignee.


However, also here everything is as it should. Every component has 
issues@ as default assignee.


Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Keep issues@ in bug reports [Was: Request for Bugzilla karma]

2021-01-30 Thread Andrea Pescetti


Marcus wrote:

Am 26.01.21 um 22:57 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Maybe you can find something in the Bugzilla configuration that 
defines the default QA contact? ...
Sorry, not in BZ itself. I've looked into the admin settings but cannot 
find a suitable option.


I believe our old (and I don't know how old!) configuration was using 
these settings:

https://www.bugzilla.org/docs/2.18/html/components.html

"The Owner, QA Contact, and Reporter will get email when new bugs are 
created in this Component and when these bugs change. Default Owner and 
Default QA Contact fields dictate the default assignments".


Now, I've never administered Bugzilla so I have no idea where one can 
set those (or even if this is enabled in our current instance), but if 
that can help...


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Keep issues@ in bug reports [Was: Request for Bugzilla karma]

2021-01-29 Thread Marcus


Am 26.01.21 um 22:57 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

Marcus wrote:
IMHO we just ned to make sure that isues@ is either the assignee - 
this works as long as nobody is taking over the issue for working on 
it - or it's in the CC list. Then every update on the issue will be 
posted to issues@.


Even though I can't really find it in older issues like
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125000
(so I might remember something wrong)


right, issues@ is not the assignee or in the CC list.
When looking into the history of the issue then 2014 the assignee was 
changed away from issues@.


> I believe we had some Bugzilla
configuration that would set the QA Contact to issues@ by default. This 
way we didn't have any strange tricks to do when taking/assigning an 
issue, as the QA Contact is a separate field.


Maybe you can find something in the Bugzilla configuration that defines 
the default QA contact? I believe this address receives notifications 
too, so setting it to issues@ would solve the problem.


Sorry, not in BZ itself. I've looked into the admin settings but cannot 
find a suitable option.


On "https://bz.apache.org/ooo/enter_bug.cgi; there is also no automated 
assignee.


Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Keep issues@ in bug reports [Was: Request for Bugzilla karma]

2021-01-27 Thread Arrigo Marchiori

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 07:56:24PM +0100, Marcus wrote:

> Am 25.01.21 um 09:15 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> > FWIW...
> > 
> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 09:10:51PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> > 
> > [...]
> > > If I recall correctly, we relied on a "trick" that would set the "QA
> > > contact" field for any new issues to the issues mailing list. Even if the
> > > assignee is changed, the "QA contact" is not reset and this meant the 
> > > issues
> > > list received all notifications.
> > > 
> > > But I don't see it set even for issues recently created such as
> > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128420
> > 
> > Confirmed. My last report:
> > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128424
> > has empty "QA contact" and I cannot change it.
> > 
> > issues@ is the default "Assignee" and I cannot change it as well.
> 
> IMHO we just ned to make sure that isues@ is either the assignee - this
> works as long as nobody is taking over the issue for working on it - or it's
> in the CC list. Then every update on the issue will be posted to issues@.

I understand.

> I'm quite sure I've done it already, but I've enabled you for the following
> BZ groups in BZ:
> 
> canconfirm: Can confirm a bug or mark it a duplicate
> editbugs: Can edit all bug fields
> qa-team: Members of the AOO QA team

Confirmed! Thank you!

Best regards,
-- 
Arrigo

http://rigo.altervista.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Keep issues@ in bug reports [Was: Request for Bugzilla karma]

2021-01-26 Thread Andrea Pescetti


Marcus wrote:
IMHO we just ned to make sure that isues@ is either the assignee - this 
works as long as nobody is taking over the issue for working on it - or 
it's in the CC list. Then every update on the issue will be posted to 
issues@.


Even though I can't really find it in older issues like
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125000
(so I might remember something wrong) I believe we had some Bugzilla 
configuration that would set the QA Contact to issues@ by default. This 
way we didn't have any strange tricks to do when taking/assigning an 
issue, as the QA Contact is a separate field.


Maybe you can find something in the Bugzilla configuration that defines 
the default QA contact? I believe this address receives notifications 
too, so setting it to issues@ would solve the problem.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Keep issues@ in bug reports [Was: Request for Bugzilla karma]

2021-01-26 Thread Marcus


Am 25.01.21 um 09:15 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:

FWIW...

On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 09:10:51PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

[...]

If I recall correctly, we relied on a "trick" that would set the "QA
contact" field for any new issues to the issues mailing list. Even if the
assignee is changed, the "QA contact" is not reset and this meant the issues
list received all notifications.

But I don't see it set even for issues recently created such as
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128420


Confirmed. My last report:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128424
has empty "QA contact" and I cannot change it.

issues@ is the default "Assignee" and I cannot change it as well.


IMHO we just ned to make sure that isues@ is either the assignee - this 
works as long as nobody is taking over the issue for working on it - or 
it's in the CC list. Then every update on the issue will be posted to 
issues@.


I'm quite sure I've done it already, but I've enabled you for the 
following BZ groups in BZ:


canconfirm: Can confirm a bug or mark it a duplicate
editbugs: Can edit all bug fields
qa-team: Members of the AOO QA team

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: High Priority Issues

2021-01-26 Thread Patricia Shanahan



> On Jan 26, 2021, at 07:23, Peter Kovacs  wrote:
> 
> Hello Arrigo,
> 
>> On 24.01.21 15:46, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 09:40:47AM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>> 
>>> There is feedback from Jon Ha ojn Issues that are important from the support
>>> Forum perspective.
>>> 
>>> Please look into the following Issues:
>>> 
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126846
>>> 
>>> (additional Info:
>>> https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7=1532 )
>> I understand that this meta-bug is about frequent bad and frustrating
>> behavior of OpenOffice, but from a developer point of view, I would
>> need some information to replicate such a data loss, so I could
>> inspect the software in the moment the problem is happening. I could
>> not find this kind of information in the above report and in the other
>> reports its first comments refer to.
>> 
>> Is there anyone more knowledgeable about this problem, who could help
>> track this bit down?
> 
> There has been multiple attempts to track this down. So far no success.
> 
> Patricia, Andrea looked into these issues.
> 
> There were 2 theories:
> 
> 1) the saving bar ends sooner then the task is done. So OpenOffice is still 
> saveing but it reports it is done so Windows Interrupts the processes and it 
> messes up.
> 
> 2) We have some sort of racing condition
> 
> We know from the reports the Issue may turn up when Battery level is low or 
> Laptops are closed during save and the system switches into hibernate mode, 
> if I remember this right.

It may be possible to solve this one without diagnosis. Some programs maintain 
two copies of the files during the save process, with a control file that says 
which is the live copy.

The old set of files remains live until the new set has been written and all 
writes flushed to disk. At that point there is a single write to the control 
file that makes the new files active. 
> 
> The other Issues I am not aware. Could be that they were mentioned, but I am 
> sure they did not stick in my mind. Maybe I listed them on Jira. I am sure 
> that least I never looked at those.
> 
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128356
>> Reproduced with 4.1.9 and trunk. I can look into this one.
>> 
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126927
>> I think that this issue can be generalized as a "lack of logging and
>> error reporting in AOO". This is one of my own pet peeves.
>> 
>>> plus Data loss on different occations see tutorials to:
>>> 
>>> https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=71=85038
>> This is really TL;DR -- can you help me understand if it is worth
>> reading all? It does not seem to be an error report, but rather a
>> ``trick'' to restore lost information from leftover temporary files.
>> 
>>> https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=71=87180
>> This seem to be a ``surgical'' (quoted) way to recover from certain
>> data corruption, again not an error report; am I right?
>> 
>>> Hopoe that sums it up. You can read the detailed statement with some
>>> critical feedback here:
>>> 
>>> https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=49=104234=505002#p505009
>>> 
>>> (hope the link works)
>> Yes, it does. But it is another very long form thread, with many links
>> to bug reports.
>> 
>> I believe you have got a better picture of the overall situation;
>> could you please help us split it into smaller problems?
>> 
>> From my humble point of view, bug 128356 shall be solved while working
>> on enhancing logging and error reporting at the same time; that would
>> be a great step towards solution of 126927.
>> 
>> I will start looking into the above, until someone with a better
>> overall picture will tell me otherwise.
>> 
>> Best regards,
> -- 
> This is the Way! http://www.apache.org/theapacheway/index.html
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: High Priority Issues

2021-01-26 Thread Peter Kovacs


Hello Arrigo,

On 24.01.21 15:46, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 09:40:47AM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:


There is feedback from Jon Ha ojn Issues that are important from the support
Forum perspective.

Please look into the following Issues:

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126846

(additional Info:
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7=1532 )

I understand that this meta-bug is about frequent bad and frustrating
behavior of OpenOffice, but from a developer point of view, I would
need some information to replicate such a data loss, so I could
inspect the software in the moment the problem is happening. I could
not find this kind of information in the above report and in the other
reports its first comments refer to.

Is there anyone more knowledgeable about this problem, who could help
track this bit down?


There has been multiple attempts to track this down. So far no success.

Patricia, Andrea looked into these issues.

There were 2 theories:

1) the saving bar ends sooner then the task is done. So OpenOffice is 
still saveing but it reports it is done so Windows Interrupts the 
processes and it messes up.


2) We have some sort of racing condition

We know from the reports the Issue may turn up when Battery level is low 
or Laptops are closed during save and the system switches into hibernate 
mode, if I remember this right.


The other Issues I am not aware. Could be that they were mentioned, but 
I am sure they did not stick in my mind. Maybe I listed them on Jira. I 
am sure that least I never looked at those.



https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128356

Reproduced with 4.1.9 and trunk. I can look into this one.


https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126927

I think that this issue can be generalized as a "lack of logging and
error reporting in AOO". This is one of my own pet peeves.


plus Data loss on different occations see tutorials to:

https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=71=85038

This is really TL;DR -- can you help me understand if it is worth
reading all? It does not seem to be an error report, but rather a
``trick'' to restore lost information from leftover temporary files.


https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=71=87180

This seem to be a ``surgical'' (quoted) way to recover from certain
data corruption, again not an error report; am I right?


Hopoe that sums it up. You can read the detailed statement with some
critical feedback here:

https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=49=104234=505002#p505009

(hope the link works)

Yes, it does. But it is another very long form thread, with many links
to bug reports.

I believe you have got a better picture of the overall situation;
could you please help us split it into smaller problems?

 From my humble point of view, bug 128356 shall be solved while working
on enhancing logging and error reporting at the same time; that would
be a great step towards solution of 126927.

I will start looking into the above, until someone with a better
overall picture will tell me otherwise.

Best regards,

--
This is the Way! http://www.apache.org/theapacheway/index.html

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Keep issues@ in bug reports [Was: Request for Bugzilla karma]

2021-01-25 Thread Arrigo Marchiori

Hello,

FWIW...

On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 09:10:51PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

[...]
> If I recall correctly, we relied on a "trick" that would set the "QA
> contact" field for any new issues to the issues mailing list. Even if the
> assignee is changed, the "QA contact" is not reset and this meant the issues
> list received all notifications.
> 
> But I don't see it set even for issues recently created such as
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128420

Confirmed. My last report:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128424
has empty "QA contact" and I cannot change it.

issues@ is the default "Assignee" and I cannot change it as well.

Best regards,
-- 
Arrigo

http://rigo.altervista.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: High Priority Issues

2021-01-24 Thread Arrigo Marchiori

Hello Peter, All,

I am trying to give my opinion, from the pure perspective of a
newcome developer.

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 09:40:47AM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:

> There is feedback from Jon Ha ojn Issues that are important from the support
> Forum perspective.
> 
> Please look into the following Issues:
> 
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126846
> 
> (additional Info:
> https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7=1532 )

I understand that this meta-bug is about frequent bad and frustrating
behavior of OpenOffice, but from a developer point of view, I would
need some information to replicate such a data loss, so I could
inspect the software in the moment the problem is happening. I could
not find this kind of information in the above report and in the other
reports its first comments refer to.

Is there anyone more knowledgeable about this problem, who could help
track this bit down?

> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128356

Reproduced with 4.1.9 and trunk. I can look into this one.

> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126927

I think that this issue can be generalized as a "lack of logging and
error reporting in AOO". This is one of my own pet peeves.

> plus Data loss on different occations see tutorials to:
> 
> https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=71=85038

This is really TL;DR -- can you help me understand if it is worth
reading all? It does not seem to be an error report, but rather a
``trick'' to restore lost information from leftover temporary files.

> https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=71=87180

This seem to be a ``surgical'' (quoted) way to recover from certain
data corruption, again not an error report; am I right?

> Hopoe that sums it up. You can read the detailed statement with some
> critical feedback here:
> 
> https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=49=104234=505002#p505009
> 
> (hope the link works)

Yes, it does. But it is another very long form thread, with many links
to bug reports.

I believe you have got a better picture of the overall situation;
could you please help us split it into smaller problems?

>From my humble point of view, bug 128356 shall be solved while working
on enhancing logging and error reporting at the same time; that would
be a great step towards solution of 126927.

I will start looking into the above, until someone with a better
overall picture will tell me otherwise.

Best regards,
-- 
Arrigo

http://rigo.altervista.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

High Priority Issues

2021-01-22 Thread Peter Kovacs

There is feedback from Jon Ha ojn Issues that are important from the 
support Forum perspective.


Please look into the following Issues:

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126846

(additional Info: 
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7=1532 )


https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128356

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126927

plus Data loss on different occations see tutorials to:

https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=71=85038

https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=71=87180


Hopoe that sums it up. You can read the detailed statement with some 
critical feedback here:


https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=49=104234=505002#p505009


(hope the link works)


All the best

Peter


--
This is the Way! http://www.apache.org/theapacheway/index.html

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO418 updated: Fix redland build issues when using CentOS5 as build and later platforms as user. Squash General Error.

2020-10-29 Thread Don Lewis

trunk and AOO42X should also get this fix.

On 29 Oct, j...@apache.org wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
> 
> jim pushed a commit to branch AOO418
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git
> 
> 
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/AOO418 by this push:
>  new 18848f5  Fix redland build issues when using CentOS5 as build and 
> later platforms as user. Squash General Error.
> 18848f5 is described below
> 
> commit 18848f57b67aa11f5b2c6c4b82e9d93676d1b57a
> Author: Jim Jagielski 
> AuthorDate: Thu Oct 29 07:39:50 2020 -0400
> 
> Fix redland build issues when using CentOS5 as build and later platforms 
> as user. Squash General Error.
> ---
>  main/redland/raptor/makefile.mk | 2 +-
>  main/redland/rasqal/makefile.mk | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/main/redland/raptor/makefile.mk b/main/redland/raptor/makefile.mk
> index 51b7876..0c8b6a4 100644
> --- a/main/redland/raptor/makefile.mk
> +++ b/main/redland/raptor/makefile.mk
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ XSLTLIB!:=$(XSLTLIB) # expand dmake variables for 
> xslt-config
>  CONFIGURE_DIR=
>  CONFIGURE_ACTION=.$/configure
>  # do not enable grddl parser (#i93768#)
> -CONFIGURE_FLAGS=--disable-static --disable-gtk-doc --enable-parsers="rdfxml 
> ntriples turtle trig guess rss-tag-soup" --with-www=xml 
> --prefix=$(PDW)/$(OUT) --includedir=$(PWD)/$(INCCOM) --libdir=$(PWD)/$(LB)
> +CONFIGURE_FLAGS=--with-threads --with-curl-config=no --with-icu-config=no 
> --disable-static --disable-gtk-doc --enable-parsers="rdfxml ntriples turtle 
> trig guess rss-tag-soup" --without-bdb --without-sqlite --without-mysql 
> --without-postgresql --without-threestore --with-regex-library=posix 
> --with-decimal=none --with-www=xml --prefix=$(PDW)/$(OUT) 
> --includedir=$(PWD)/$(INCCOM) --libdir=$(PWD)/$(LB)
>  .IF "$(SYSTEM_LIBXML)" == "NO"
>  
> CONFIGURE_FLAGS+=--with-xml2-config=${SOLARVERSION}/${INPATH}/bin/xml2-config 
> \
>   --with-xslt-config=${SOLARVERSION}/${INPATH}/bin/xslt-config
> diff --git a/main/redland/rasqal/makefile.mk b/main/redland/rasqal/makefile.mk
> index 72a4368..b95d8ca 100644
> --- a/main/redland/rasqal/makefile.mk
> +++ b/main/redland/rasqal/makefile.mk
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ XSLTLIB!:=$(XSLTLIB) # expand dmake variables for 
> xslt-config
>  
>  CONFIGURE_DIR=
>  CONFIGURE_ACTION=.$/configure PATH="..$/..$/..$/bin:$$PATH" 
> RASQAL_CFLAGS=-I${PWD}$/..$/${INPATH}/inc 
> RASQAL_LIBS="-L${PWD}/..$/${INPATH}/lib -lrasqual" 
> RAPTOR2_CFLAGS=-I${PWD}$/..$/${INPATH}/inc 
> RAPTOR2_LIBS="-L${PWD}/..$/${INPATH}/lib -lraptor2" 
> PKG_CONFIG_PATH="../raptor2-2.0.15:../rasqal-0.9.33"
> -CONFIGURE_FLAGS=--disable-static --disable-gtk-doc 
> --with-regex-library=posix --with-decimal=none
> +CONFIGURE_FLAGS=--disable-static --disable-gtk-doc 
> --with-regex-library=posix --with-decimal=none --with-libgcrypt-config=no
>  .IF "$(SYSTEM_LIBXML)" == "NO"
>  CONFIGURE_FLAGS+=--with-xml2-config=${SOLARVERSION}/${INPATH}/bin/xml2-config
>  .ENDIF
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Windows Application Issues | The Document Foundation | REF # 29112384 28643414

2020-10-21 Thread Thorsten Behrens

Hi Oscar,

please report your findings to The Document Foundation, who's
stewarding the LibreOffice project - I've copied our security list
already, where I believe this report belongs.

For general inquiries, or if you're not sure were to report:
i...@documentfoundation.org is a private list & always a good 2nd
pick. ;)

All the best, Thorsten

Oscar Ortiz Garcia (Axelerate LLC) wrote:
> Thank you Marcus for pointing this out. 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus  
> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 3:15 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Cc: Oscar Ortiz Garcia (Axelerate LLC) ; App Assure 
> ISV Outreach 
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Windows Application Issues | The Document Foundation 
> | REF # 29112384 28643414
> 
> Hi Oscar,
> 
> note that you have found the issues not in OpenOffice.
> 
> Please get in contact with the developers of the application you have tested. 
> And as you have stated yourself in the column for "Account" it's not the ASF. 
> ;-)
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Marcus
> 
> 
> 
> Am 20.10.20 um 20:15 schrieb Oscar Ortiz Garcia (Axelerate LLC):
> > I’m a program manager in the App Assure ISV Outreach Team at Microsoft. 
> > We work with Microsoft’s test organization to notify developers when 
> > issues have been identified in their applications. We’re reaching out 
> > to notify you of potential issues in one of your applications.
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > *Account*
> > 
> > The Document Foundation
> > 
> > *Product***
> > 
> > Libre Office
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > *Account*
> > 
> > The Document Foundation
> > 
> > *Product***
> > 
> > LibreOffice
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-- 
Thorsten Behrens, Director, Member of the Board
The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, Germany
Rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Windows Application Issues | The Document Foundation | REF # 29112384 28643414

2020-10-20 Thread Oscar Ortiz Garcia (Axelerate LLC)

Thank you Marcus for pointing this out. 

-Original Message-
From: Marcus  
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 3:15 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Oscar Ortiz Garcia (Axelerate LLC) ; App Assure ISV 
Outreach 
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Windows Application Issues | The Document Foundation | 
REF # 29112384 28643414

Hi Oscar,

note that you have found the issues not in OpenOffice.

Please get in contact with the developers of the application you have tested. 
And as you have stated yourself in the column for "Account" it's not the ASF. 
;-)

Thanks

Marcus



Am 20.10.20 um 20:15 schrieb Oscar Ortiz Garcia (Axelerate LLC):
> I’m a program manager in the App Assure ISV Outreach Team at Microsoft. 
> We work with Microsoft’s test organization to notify developers when 
> issues have been identified in their applications. We’re reaching out 
> to notify you of potential issues in one of your applications.
> 
> [...]
> 
> *Account*
> 
> The Document Foundation
> 
> *Product***
> 
> Libre Office
> 
> [...]
> 
> *Account*
> 
> The Document Foundation
> 
> *Product***
> 
> LibreOffice

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Windows Application Issues | The Document Foundation | REF # 29112384 28643414

2020-10-20 Thread Marcus


Hi Oscar,

note that you have found the issues not in OpenOffice.

Please get in contact with the developers of the application you have 
tested. And as you have stated yourself in the column for "Account" it's 
not the ASF. ;-)


Thanks

Marcus



Am 20.10.20 um 20:15 schrieb Oscar Ortiz Garcia (Axelerate LLC):
I’m a program manager in the App Assure ISV Outreach Team at Microsoft. 
We work with Microsoft’s test organization to notify developers when 
issues have been identified in their applications. We’re reaching out to 
notify you of potential issues in one of your applications.


[...]

*Account*

The Document Foundation

*Product***

Libre Office

[...]

*Account*

The Document Foundation

*Product***

LibreOffice


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Windows Application Issues | The Document Foundation | REF # 29112384 28643414

2020-10-20 Thread Oscar Ortiz Garcia (Axelerate LLC)

Dear Windows developer,

I'm a program manager in the App Assure ISV Outreach Team at Microsoft. We work 
with Microsoft's test organization to notify developers when issues have been 
identified in their applications. We're reaching out to notify you of potential 
issues in one of your applications.

The issue details are below. Our goal is to work with you to address these 
issues and to understand what your expected timeline to address these issues 
might be. If you have any questions about the details below or have already 
addressed these issues in a forthcoming update, please let me know.
Account
The Document Foundation
Product
Libre Office
Reference #
29112384
Issue
Windows defender reports the download setup file is corrupted or invalid

Environment: Desktop x86
OS Build:19041, 16299, 10240
OS: Windows 10 Insider Preview, Windows 10
App Version: 7.0.1.2

Repro Steps:
1. Install the application from Vendor site.
2. Observe.

Actual Results:
Windows defender reports the downloaded setup file is corrupted or invalid

Expected Results:
Setup file should be downloaded without any threats
Resource
For any questions on app development (or) submission on windows, contact 
Windows Dev Center. https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/support


Account
The Document Foundation
Product
LibreOffice
Reference #
28643414
Issue
Application menu items are not visible on high contrast

Environment: Desktop
OS Build:20198, 19645, 19041
OS: Windows 10 Insider Preview, Windows 10
App Version: 7.0.0.3

Repro Steps:
1. Install the Application.
2. Launch the Application.
3. Observe the App menu items.
4. Enable high contrast mode.
5. Observe the App menu items.

Actual Results:
Application menu items are not visible on high contrast

Expected Results:
Application menu items should be visible on high contrast
Resource
For any questions on app development (or) submission on windows, contact 
Windows Dev Center. https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/support



Thank you for your continued support of Windows!

Regards,
[cid:image001.jpg@01D6A6D2.62624A40]
App Assure ISV Outreach Team
Outreach and Engagement
EMAIL isvoutre...@microsoft.com

Re: Building 4.1.8-RC2 - packaging issues

2020-10-18 Thread Andrea Pescetti


On 13/10/20 Carl Marcum wrote:

Error: ERROR: More than one new package in directory
Using the 
--with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz 
rather than the installed newer version worked for me.


Thank you Jim and Carl, I've added a note to the wiki suggesting 3.7 as 
a fallback if the newer EPM gives errors.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Building 4.1.8-RC2 - packaging issues

2020-10-12 Thread Carl Marcum

On 10/12/20 6:37 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:

Hi All,

On 10/11/20 6:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I do know that there were some changes in the official EPM (the
project is now "dead") which may have caused this, but I'm not sure.

FTR: I have used the old, old 3.7 version for the Linux builds. I
consider it a build system variable that I did not want to modify... :)

On Oct 11, 2020, at 3:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:

I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/
on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM
and DEB builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems.

All good, for the most part. I'm still catching up with e-mails so I
didn't test anything specific to 4.1.8, just general usage. I have
news on the "General error" on Ubuntu too, but I'll expand on this
in the relevant thread.

But I'd like to highlight two issues occurring in the last stage of
the build, i.e., when we produce the RPM/DEB packages.

1) Jim's EPM installed as per
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#CentOS_7_for_AOO_4.2.x_and_later

didn't work for me. I got

Error: ERROR: More than one new package in directory

Configuring with

...
--with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz

did work instead, so I'd like to know if people who used the wiki
instructions

$ wget https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/epm-4.4.2.tar.gz
$ # (extract the archive)
$ cd epm-epm-4.4.2
$ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-aoo; make install

had better luck. Or maybe the new EPM is to be used for 4.2.x builds
only?

2) Something seems wrong here:

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/AOO418/main/solenv/bin/modules/RepoRevision.pm#L78

We populate the "Rev." section of the About dialog based on version
control, so for a tarball (no Git, no SVN) this should result in
"unknown-rev"; but it doesn't and Git is called instead, returning
an error message.

To my purpose I simply used a hardcoded string and completed the
build, but it should be checked better: the official tarball is not
a git clone and this will always result in a (non-blocking) error
message if someone builds from it.

Regards,
Andrea.

I just hit the epm problem also building 4.1.8 on the same VM I setup
for building trunk that had an installed epm-4.4.2

I'll try again and specify it by using the configure switch:
--with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz

I realized I usually package "installed" for testing so I never caught
it before on this VM.

Best regards,
Carl
Using the
--with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz

rather than the installed newer version worked for me.

Best regards,
Carl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Building 4.1.8-RC2 - packaging issues

2020-10-12 Thread Carl Marcum

Hi All,

On 10/11/20 6:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

I do know that there were some changes in the official EPM (the project is now
"dead") which may have caused this, but I'm not sure.

FTR: I have used the old, old 3.7 version for the Linux builds. I consider it a
build system variable that I did not want to modify... :)

On Oct 11, 2020, at 3:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/
on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM and DEB
builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems.

All good, for the most part. I'm still catching up with e-mails so I didn't test anything
specific to 4.1.8, just general usage. I have news on the "General error" on
Ubuntu too, but I'll expand on this in the relevant thread.

But I'd like to highlight two issues occurring in the last stage of the build,
i.e., when we produce the RPM/DEB packages.

1) Jim's EPM installed as per
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#CentOS_7_for_AOO_4.2.x_and_later
didn't work for me. I got

Error: ERROR: More than one new package in directory

Configuring with

...
--with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz

did work instead, so I'd like to know if people who used the wiki instructions

$ wget https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/epm-4.4.2.tar.gz
$ # (extract the archive)
$ cd epm-epm-4.4.2
$ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-aoo; make install

had better luck. Or maybe the new EPM is to be used for 4.2.x builds only?

2) Something seems wrong here:

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/AOO418/main/solenv/bin/modules/RepoRevision.pm#L78

We populate the "Rev." section of the About dialog based on version control, so for a
tarball (no Git, no SVN) this should result in "unknown-rev"; but it doesn't and Git is
called instead, returning an error message.

To my purpose I simply used a hardcoded string and completed the build, but it
should be checked better: the official tarball is not a git clone and this will
always result in a (non-blocking) error message if someone builds from it.

Regards,
Andrea.

I just hit the epm problem also building 4.1.8 on the same VM I setup
for building trunk that had an installed epm-4.4.2

I'll try again and specify it by using the configure switch:
--with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz

I realized I usually package "installed" for testing so I never caught
it before on this VM.

Best regards,
Carl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Building 4.1.8-RC2 - packaging issues

2020-10-11 Thread Jim Jagielski



> On Oct 11, 2020, at 5:48 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> Am 11.10.20 um 23:31 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> The code checks if it is a git repo and falls back to the assumption it is a 
>> svn repo. I am not sure if there is a default.
>> It is a script called svnrevision I think. 
> Andrea is talking about the source tarball here.
> 
> Formerly if you built from it there was no revision at all in the About 
> dialog.
> Jim changed the creation of the tarball to include a file "reporevision.lst" 
> that contains the Git hash now.
> 
> I don't know why Andreas build did not pick up the file...
> 

Yeah, that is weird... we do specifically tuck that value away.

> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
>> 
>> Am 11. Oktober 2020 23:25:44 MESZ schrieb Don Lewis  
>> <mailto:truck...@apache.org>:
>>> On 11 Oct, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>> I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/ 
>>>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/>
>>>> on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM
>>> and 
>>>> DEB builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems.
>>>> 
>>>> All good, for the most part. I'm still catching up with e-mails so I 
>>>> didn't test anything specific to 4.1.8, just general usage. I have
>>> news 
>>>> on the "General error" on Ubuntu too, but I'll expand on this in the 
>>>> relevant thread.
>>>> 
>>>> But I'd like to highlight two issues occurring in the last stage of
>>> the 
>>>> build, i.e., when we produce the RPM/DEB packages.
>>>> 
>>>> 1) Jim's EPM installed as per
>>>> 
>>> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#CentOS_7_for_AOO_4.2.x_and_later
>>>  
>>> <https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#CentOS_7_for_AOO_4.2.x_and_later>
>>>> didn't work for me. I got
>>>> 
>>>> Error: ERROR: More than one new package in directory
>>>> 
>>>> Configuring with
>>>> 
>>>> ... 
>>>> 
>>> --with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz
>>>  <http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz>
>>>> did work instead, so I'd like to know if people who used the wiki 
>>>> instructions
>>>> 
>>>> $ wget https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/epm-4.4.2.tar.gz 
>>>> <https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/epm-4.4.2.tar.gz>
>>>> $ # (extract the archive)
>>>> $ cd epm-epm-4.4.2
>>>> $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-aoo; make install
>>>> 
>>>> had better luck. Or maybe the new EPM is to be used for 4.2.x builds
>>> only?
>>>> 2) Something seems wrong here:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/AOO418/main/solenv/bin/modules/RepoRevision.pm#L78
>>>  
>>> <https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/AOO418/main/solenv/bin/modules/RepoRevision.pm#L78>
>>>> We populate the "Rev." section of the About dialog based on version 
>>>> control, so for a tarball (no Git, no SVN) this should result in 
>>>> "unknown-rev"; but it doesn't and Git is called instead, returning an
>>>> error message.
>>>> 
>>>> To my purpose I simply used a hardcoded string and completed the
>>> build, 
>>>> but it should be checked better: the official tarball is not a git
>>> clone 
>>>> and this will always result in a (non-blocking) error message if
>>> someone 
>>>> builds from it.
>>> I thought that the source tarball was supposed to include an artifact
>>> containing the git revision info.
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org>

Re: Building 4.1.8-RC2 - packaging issues

2020-10-11 Thread Jim Jagielski

I do know that there were some changes in the official EPM (the project is now 
"dead") which may have caused this, but I'm not sure.

FTR: I have used the old, old 3.7 version for the Linux builds. I consider it a 
build system variable that I did not want to modify... :)

> On Oct 11, 2020, at 3:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti  wrote:
> 
> I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/
> on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM and DEB 
> builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems.
> 
> All good, for the most part. I'm still catching up with e-mails so I didn't 
> test anything specific to 4.1.8, just general usage. I have news on the 
> "General error" on Ubuntu too, but I'll expand on this in the relevant thread.
> 
> But I'd like to highlight two issues occurring in the last stage of the 
> build, i.e., when we produce the RPM/DEB packages.
> 
> 1) Jim's EPM installed as per
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#CentOS_7_for_AOO_4.2.x_and_later
> didn't work for me. I got
> 
> Error: ERROR: More than one new package in directory
> 
> Configuring with
> 
> ... 
> --with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz
> 
> did work instead, so I'd like to know if people who used the wiki instructions
> 
> $ wget https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/epm-4.4.2.tar.gz
> $ # (extract the archive)
> $ cd epm-epm-4.4.2
> $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-aoo; make install
> 
> had better luck. Or maybe the new EPM is to be used for 4.2.x builds only?
> 
> 2) Something seems wrong here:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/AOO418/main/solenv/bin/modules/RepoRevision.pm#L78
> 
> We populate the "Rev." section of the About dialog based on version control, 
> so for a tarball (no Git, no SVN) this should result in "unknown-rev"; but it 
> doesn't and Git is called instead, returning an error message.
> 
> To my purpose I simply used a hardcoded string and completed the build, but 
> it should be checked better: the official tarball is not a git clone and this 
> will always result in a (non-blocking) error message if someone builds from 
> it.
> 
> Regards,
>  Andrea.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Building 4.1.8-RC2 - packaging issues

2020-10-11 Thread Matthias Seidel

Hi Peter,

Am 11.10.20 um 23:31 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> The code checks if it is a git repo and falls back to the assumption it is a 
> svn repo. I am not sure if there is a default.
> It is a script called svnrevision I think. 

Andrea is talking about the source tarball here.

Formerly if you built from it there was no revision at all in the About
dialog.
Jim changed the creation of the tarball to include a file
"reporevision.lst" that contains the Git hash now.

I don't know why Andreas build did not pick up the file...

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> Am 11. Oktober 2020 23:25:44 MESZ schrieb Don Lewis :
>> On 11 Oct, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/
>>> on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM
>> and 
>>> DEB builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems.
>>>
>>> All good, for the most part. I'm still catching up with e-mails so I 
>>> didn't test anything specific to 4.1.8, just general usage. I have
>> news 
>>> on the "General error" on Ubuntu too, but I'll expand on this in the 
>>> relevant thread.
>>>
>>> But I'd like to highlight two issues occurring in the last stage of
>> the 
>>> build, i.e., when we produce the RPM/DEB packages.
>>>
>>> 1) Jim's EPM installed as per
>>>
>> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#CentOS_7_for_AOO_4.2.x_and_later
>>> didn't work for me. I got
>>>
>>> Error: ERROR: More than one new package in directory
>>>
>>> Configuring with
>>>
>>> ... 
>>>
>> --with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz
>>> did work instead, so I'd like to know if people who used the wiki 
>>> instructions
>>>
>>> $ wget https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/epm-4.4.2.tar.gz
>>> $ # (extract the archive)
>>> $ cd epm-epm-4.4.2
>>> $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-aoo; make install
>>>
>>> had better luck. Or maybe the new EPM is to be used for 4.2.x builds
>> only?
>>> 2) Something seems wrong here:
>>>
>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/AOO418/main/solenv/bin/modules/RepoRevision.pm#L78
>>> We populate the "Rev." section of the About dialog based on version 
>>> control, so for a tarball (no Git, no SVN) this should result in 
>>> "unknown-rev"; but it doesn't and Git is called instead, returning an
>>> error message.
>>>
>>> To my purpose I simply used a hardcoded string and completed the
>> build, 
>>> but it should be checked better: the official tarball is not a git
>> clone 
>>> and this will always result in a (non-blocking) error message if
>> someone 
>>> builds from it.
>> I thought that the source tarball was supposed to include an artifact
>> containing the git revision info.
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Building 4.1.8-RC2 - packaging issues

2020-10-11 Thread Peter Kovacs

The code checks if it is a git repo and falls back to the assumption it is a 
svn repo. I am not sure if there is a default.
It is a script called svnrevision I think. 

Am 11. Oktober 2020 23:25:44 MESZ schrieb Don Lewis :
>On 11 Oct, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/
>> on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM
>and 
>> DEB builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems.
>> 
>> All good, for the most part. I'm still catching up with e-mails so I 
>> didn't test anything specific to 4.1.8, just general usage. I have
>news 
>> on the "General error" on Ubuntu too, but I'll expand on this in the 
>> relevant thread.
>> 
>> But I'd like to highlight two issues occurring in the last stage of
>the 
>> build, i.e., when we produce the RPM/DEB packages.
>> 
>> 1) Jim's EPM installed as per
>>
>https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#CentOS_7_for_AOO_4.2.x_and_later
>> didn't work for me. I got
>> 
>> Error: ERROR: More than one new package in directory
>> 
>> Configuring with
>> 
>> ... 
>>
>--with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz
>> 
>> did work instead, so I'd like to know if people who used the wiki 
>> instructions
>> 
>> $ wget https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/epm-4.4.2.tar.gz
>> $ # (extract the archive)
>> $ cd epm-epm-4.4.2
>> $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-aoo; make install
>> 
>> had better luck. Or maybe the new EPM is to be used for 4.2.x builds
>only?
>> 
>> 2) Something seems wrong here:
>> 
>>
>https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/AOO418/main/solenv/bin/modules/RepoRevision.pm#L78
>> 
>> We populate the "Rev." section of the About dialog based on version 
>> control, so for a tarball (no Git, no SVN) this should result in 
>> "unknown-rev"; but it doesn't and Git is called instead, returning an
>
>> error message.
>> 
>> To my purpose I simply used a hardcoded string and completed the
>build, 
>> but it should be checked better: the official tarball is not a git
>clone 
>> and this will always result in a (non-blocking) error message if
>someone 
>> builds from it.
>
>I thought that the source tarball was supposed to include an artifact
>containing the git revision info.
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Building 4.1.8-RC2 - packaging issues

2020-10-11 Thread Don Lewis

On 11 Oct, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/
> on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM and 
> DEB builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems.
> 
> All good, for the most part. I'm still catching up with e-mails so I 
> didn't test anything specific to 4.1.8, just general usage. I have news 
> on the "General error" on Ubuntu too, but I'll expand on this in the 
> relevant thread.
> 
> But I'd like to highlight two issues occurring in the last stage of the 
> build, i.e., when we produce the RPM/DEB packages.
> 
> 1) Jim's EPM installed as per
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#CentOS_7_for_AOO_4.2.x_and_later
> didn't work for me. I got
> 
> Error: ERROR: More than one new package in directory
> 
> Configuring with
> 
> ... 
> --with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz
> 
> did work instead, so I'd like to know if people who used the wiki 
> instructions
> 
> $ wget https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/epm-4.4.2.tar.gz
> $ # (extract the archive)
> $ cd epm-epm-4.4.2
> $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-aoo; make install
> 
> had better luck. Or maybe the new EPM is to be used for 4.2.x builds only?
> 
> 2) Something seems wrong here:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/AOO418/main/solenv/bin/modules/RepoRevision.pm#L78
> 
> We populate the "Rev." section of the About dialog based on version 
> control, so for a tarball (no Git, no SVN) this should result in 
> "unknown-rev"; but it doesn't and Git is called instead, returning an 
> error message.
> 
> To my purpose I simply used a hardcoded string and completed the build, 
> but it should be checked better: the official tarball is not a git clone 
> and this will always result in a (non-blocking) error message if someone 
> builds from it.

I thought that the source tarball was supposed to include an artifact
containing the git revision info.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Building 4.1.8-RC2 - packaging issues

2020-10-11 Thread Andrea Pescetti

I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/
on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM and
DEB builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems.

All good, for the most part. I'm still catching up with e-mails so I
didn't test anything specific to 4.1.8, just general usage. I have news
on the "General error" on Ubuntu too, but I'll expand on this in the
relevant thread.

But I'd like to highlight two issues occurring in the last stage of the
build, i.e., when we produce the RPM/DEB packages.

1) Jim's EPM installed as per
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#CentOS_7_for_AOO_4.2.x_and_later
didn't work for me. I got

Error: ERROR: More than one new package in directory

Configuring with

...
--with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz

did work instead, so I'd like to know if people who used the wiki
instructions

$ wget https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/epm-4.4.2.tar.gz
$ # (extract the archive)
$ cd epm-epm-4.4.2
$ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-aoo; make install

had better luck. Or maybe the new EPM is to be used for 4.2.x builds only?

2) Something seems wrong here:

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/AOO418/main/solenv/bin/modules/RepoRevision.pm#L78

To my purpose I simply used a hardcoded string and completed the build,
but it should be checked better: the official tarball is not a git clone
and this will always result in a (non-blocking) error message if someone
builds from it.

Regards,
Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Forum issues

2020-07-12 Thread Matthias Seidel

Hi all,

Am 07.07.20 um 16:58 schrieb Bidouille:
>> If I'm looking for "forum openoffice" in G**gle France
>> Among the results returned: https://forum-test.openoffice.org

I also get Google results for forum-test...

Looks ĺike a test subdomain from the forum migration that was forgotten
to be deactivated?

> I bump this issue
> This is anoying because lot of users use this wrong URL
> Is it possible to have a redirect rule to https://forum.openoffice.org 
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Forum issues

2020-07-07 Thread Bidouille

> If I'm looking for "forum openoffice" in G**gle France
> Among the results returned: https://forum-test.openoffice.org
I bump this issue
This is anoying because lot of users use this wrong URL
Is it possible to have a redirect rule to https://forum.openoffice.org 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Forum issues

2020-06-16 Thread Czesław Wolański

Hi,

G**gle, search: "forum OpenOffice"

result:

1st & 2nd ---> forum.openoffice.org
3rd & 4th ---> forum-test.openoffice.org

Regards,

Czesław Wolański


Am Di., 16. Juni 2020 um 12:47 Uhr schrieb Rory O'Farrell :

> On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:39:27 +0200 (CEST)
> Bidouille  wrote:
>
> > If I'm looking for "forum openoffice" in G**gle France
> > Among the results returned: https://forum-test.openoffice.org
> >
> > Did you have same thing?
> >
> > Other problem with Firefox 77.0.1 (x64)
> > Go to https://forum.openoffice.org returns an error
> > Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead
> > COMODO certificate seems to be a problem
>
> I didn't find the "test" site in the first three pages using default
> Google (probably Irish server);  Also not found using duckduckgo.  I did
> not look beyond the first three pages on either search engine.
>
> I think I got such an error using Firefox 76 or 77 - I told it to ignore,
> and never had the problem again with FireFoz; I usually use Opera,
>
> --
> Rory O'Farrell 
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: Forum issues

2020-06-16 Thread Rory O'Farrell

On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:39:27 +0200 (CEST)
Bidouille  wrote:

> If I'm looking for "forum openoffice" in G**gle France
> Among the results returned: https://forum-test.openoffice.org
> 
> Did you have same thing?
> 
> Other problem with Firefox 77.0.1 (x64)
> Go to https://forum.openoffice.org returns an error
> Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead
> COMODO certificate seems to be a problem

I didn't find the "test" site in the first three pages using default Google 
(probably Irish server);  Also not found using duckduckgo.  I did not look 
beyond the first three pages on either search engine.

I think I got such an error using Firefox 76 or 77 - I told it to ignore, and 
never had the problem again with FireFoz; I usually use Opera,

-- 
Rory O'Farrell 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Forum issues

2020-06-16 Thread Bidouille

If I'm looking for "forum openoffice" in G**gle France
Among the results returned: https://forum-test.openoffice.org

Did you have same thing?

Other problem with Firefox 77.0.1 (x64)
Go to https://forum.openoffice.org returns an error
Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead
COMODO certificate seems to be a problem

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Open office issues

2020-03-26 Thread F Campos Costero

I am sorry to hear you have been having stability problems. If you would
like some help debugging them, please register at the user forum (
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/) and start a topic there or ask for
help on the user mailing list.
Regards,
Francis

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:48 AM Rin Kagamine 
wrote:

> Dear Open Office team,
> Before reading this e-mail you should know that English is not my first
> language, but I still hope you understand what I'm writing.
> First of all, I'm genuinely angry at Open Office.
> I've worked with it a few times now and it's always the same: The program
> just suddenly crashes and absolutely EVERYTHING is gone! Hours of work for
> nothing!
> I made a PowerPoint presentation, it went horribly wrong. Other students
> made their PPP in about three hours, mine took more than twice the time
> since I had to deal with a constantly crashing program. It wasn't strong
> enough to keep the pictures I added and I always had to put each and every
> single picture back in place every time the program crashed.
> Yes, I did save the presentation every 5 minutes.
> Yes, the pictures were my very own and not just links.
> I saved the presentation with all its pictures - crash - they were gone.
> Recently, I had to write an essay. I wrote round about 12 pages when the
> program crashed. Luckily, I had saved it. The problem was the program
> wouldn't let me open my saved file. I wrote 12 pages about a scientific
> study. 12 pages of hard work, hours and hours of TORTURE. And for what? For
> nothing. FOR NOTHING, dear Open Office team. I'm so mad I could cry.
> I will uninstall OP and recommend all of my friends not to use it
> (especially as I've heard some of them say they had experienced the same
> problems with your program). Thanks for making my life harder. I think I'll
> be better off using an expensive program which actually works.
> Sincerely,
> Nina
>

Open office issues

2020-03-26 Thread Rin Kagamine

Dear Open Office team,
Before reading this e-mail you should know that English is not my first
language, but I still hope you understand what I'm writing.
First of all, I'm genuinely angry at Open Office.
I've worked with it a few times now and it's always the same: The program
just suddenly crashes and absolutely EVERYTHING is gone! Hours of work for
nothing!
I made a PowerPoint presentation, it went horribly wrong. Other students
made their PPP in about three hours, mine took more than twice the time
since I had to deal with a constantly crashing program. It wasn't strong
enough to keep the pictures I added and I always had to put each and every
single picture back in place every time the program crashed.
Yes, I did save the presentation every 5 minutes.
Yes, the pictures were my very own and not just links.
I saved the presentation with all its pictures - crash - they were gone.
Recently, I had to write an essay. I wrote round about 12 pages when the
program crashed. Luckily, I had saved it. The problem was the program
wouldn't let me open my saved file. I wrote 12 pages about a scientific
study. 12 pages of hard work, hours and hours of TORTURE. And for what? For
nothing. FOR NOTHING, dear Open Office team. I'm so mad I could cry.
I will uninstall OP and recommend all of my friends not to use it
(especially as I've heard some of them say they had experienced the same
problems with your program). Thanks for making my life harder. I think I'll
be better off using an expensive program which actually works.
Sincerely,
Nina

Re: Issues with SVG

2020-02-04 Thread Peter Kovacs

Nope my work is in writer.

Thanks the pointer.

On 04.02.20 20:14, Marcus wrote:
> Am 04.02.20 um 13:00 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> I am writing a document, and when I import a certain SVG file which
>> contains 3 letters it shows only 1 letter.
>>
>> Can I assume this is this Issue?
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122324
>
> it depends ... ;-)
>
> - Is it also a Draw document like in the issue?
> - Have you tried with the attached doument(s) if you get the same like
> it is described in the issue?
>
> If yes, then it loks (at least) very similar. But I'm no graphics
> expert. Maybe Regina can tell more as I remember she has don't some
> coding around SVG.
>
> HTH
>
> Marcus
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Issues with SVG

2020-02-04 Thread Marcus


Am 04.02.20 um 13:00 schrieb Peter Kovacs:

I am writing a document, and when I import a certain SVG file which
contains 3 letters it shows only 1 letter.

Can I assume this is this Issue?

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122324


it depends ... ;-)

- Is it also a Draw document like in the issue?
- Have you tried with the attached doument(s) if you get the same like 
it is described in the issue?


If yes, then it loks (at least) very similar. But I'm no graphics 
expert. Maybe Regina can tell more as I remember she has don't some 
coding around SVG.


HTH

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Issues with SVG

2020-02-04 Thread Peter Kovacs

Hi all,


I am writing a document, and when I import a certain SVG file which
contains 3 letters it shows only 1 letter.

Can I assume this is this Issue?

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122324


Thanks

All the Best

Peter


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Top 3 of urgent issues

2019-07-24 Thread Mechtilde

Hello,


Am 24.07.19 um 05:33 schrieb Larry Gusaas:
> On 2019-07-23 1:20 p.m., Bidouille wrote:
>> 1) AOO do not recognize JRE beyond v.8 and alternative
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128074

I had this problem under Debian too. There I have version 11 of JDK
which has long term support.
> 
> As I commented on this bug, jdk-12.0.1.jdk works on both AOO 4.1.6 and
> AOO Developer Build 4.2.0 on my Mac using macOS Mojave version 10.14.5
> 
>    Larry Gusaas 2019-05-08 01:31:42 UTC
>    jdk-12.0.1.jdk works on both versions of AOO

Version 11 doen't work with AOO independent of the version

Kind regards

-- 
Mechtilde Stehmann
## Apache OpenOffice
## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows
## Debian Developer
## PGP encryption welcome
## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899  39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Top 3 of urgent issues

2019-07-23 Thread Damjan Jovanovic

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 9:20 PM Bidouille  wrote:

> Maybe for AOO v5.0...
>
> 1) AOO do not recognize JRE beyond v.8 and alternative
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128074
>
>
The bug for AdoptOpenJDK is https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128157
and I think it should be << v5.0

Regards
Damjan

Re: Top 3 of urgent issues

2019-07-23 Thread Larry Gusaas


On 2019-07-23 1:20 p.m., Bidouille wrote:

1) AOO do not recognize JRE beyond v.8 and alternative
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128074


As I commented on this bug, jdk-12.0.1.jdk works on both AOO 4.1.6 and AOO Developer Build 
4.2.0 on my Mac using macOS Mojave version 10.14.5


   Larry Gusaas 2019-05-08 01:31:42 UTC
   jdk-12.0.1.jdk works on both versions of AOO


--
_

Larry I. Gusaas
Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada
Website: http://larry-gusaas.com

"An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs." - 
Edgard Varese

Re: Top 3 of urgent issues

2019-07-23 Thread Peter

I am with you that 1 and 2 become a pressing issue. 

However i see win 64 and getting rid of dmake bevor ooxml. 

About versions. I think it is a good idea to use the first version as indicator 
for incompatible Api change. The second and 3rd digit as we want. I am not sure 
we should use 3 digits and move to a 2 digit System.  I. E. API.VERSION
But I do not think this is really important. 

All the best
Peter

Am 23. Juli 2019 21:20:20 MESZ schrieb Bidouille :
>Maybe for AOO v5.0...
>
>1) AOO do not recognize JRE beyond v.8 and alternative 
>https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128074
>
>2) Python 2.7 is end of life for 2020
>https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123975
>
>3) OOXML Interoperability 
>Enhance existing import filter (lot of issues)
>and create export filter
>https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=88355
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.

Top 3 of urgent issues

2019-07-23 Thread Bidouille

Maybe for AOO v5.0...

1) AOO do not recognize JRE beyond v.8 and alternative 
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128074

2) Python 2.7 is end of life for 2020
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123975

3) OOXML Interoperability 
Enhance existing import filter (lot of issues)
and create export filter
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=88355

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Issues with EPS is this a printer related or more filter related?

2019-02-05 Thread Dave Fisher

Hi -

> On Feb 5, 2019, at 3:26 PM, Marcus  wrote:
> 
> Am 03.02.19 um 02:37 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> As you know I  sort and Order Issues we have in our databes in order to
>> get a better feeling where to plan changes in the code.
>> I do not know how to deal with Issues around the EPS Export. Is this
>> more a Filter issue or is this more in terms of Printing? What would you
>> say? Or some other connect?
> 
> it's a file format that describes data in a graphical way. A modern format 
> today is PDF.
> 
> In OpenOffice Impress and Draw you can export a file into the EPS file format.
> 
> Of course you can give an EPS file to a printer or printer shop. But you can 
> do this also with other file formats.

EPS files are Encapsulated Postscript files which have been supplanted by SVG 
(Scalable Vector Graphics) and PDF (Portable Document Format.) It is very much 
similar to a Postscript file for printing with the differences related to 
bounding box and preview images in EPS vs. Page flow control in Postscript 
files.

I did a lot of work producing EPS for pages (in Fortran) and then scripting the 
collation of these into Postscript print files which were either printed or 
“distilled” into a PDF. (PDF is a essentially a limited dialect of Postscript.)

What are the bugs that are happening with EPS?

Regards,
Dave

> 
> My 2ct.
> 
> Marcus
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Issues with EPS is this a printer related or more filter related?

2019-02-05 Thread Marcus


Am 03.02.19 um 02:37 schrieb Peter Kovacs:

As you know I  sort and Order Issues we have in our databes in order to
get a better feeling where to plan changes in the code.

I do not know how to deal with Issues around the EPS Export. Is this
more a Filter issue or is this more in terms of Printing? What would you
say? Or some other connect?


it's a file format that describes data in a graphical way. A modern 
format today is PDF.


In OpenOffice Impress and Draw you can export a file into the EPS file 
format.


Of course you can give an EPS file to a printer or printer shop. But you 
can do this also with other file formats.


My 2ct.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Issues with EPS is this a printer related or more filter related?

2019-02-02 Thread Peter Kovacs

Hello all,

As you know I  sort and Order Issues we have in our databes in order to
get a better feeling where to plan changes in the code.

I do not know how to deal with Issues around the EPS Export. Is this
more a Filter issue or is this more in terms of Printing? What would you
say? Or some other connect?

Thanks for any insights.


All the best

Peter


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Time issues

2018-12-02 Thread Peter Kovacs

FYI, I am currently unexpected busy with live. I hope I can make time
for OpenOffice soon again.

Looking into OpenGrok and Signing the Apple Binaries. These are the
current top things on my list.


all the best

Peter


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Issues w/ downloading ext sources from source forge on CentOS5 for 4.1.6

LOL :)

> On Aug 31, 2018, at 1:42 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Am 31.08.2018 um 19:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Not if they aren't using the exact same setup as the community builds :)
>> 
>> The buildbots are Ubuntu, iirc. The community build servers are CentOS5 (for 
>> 4.1.x)
> 
> I know. Ubuntu 14.04 and Windows 10 to be exact.
> 
> Should we delete the buildbots now? ;-)
> 
>> 
>>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 1:37 PM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Am 31.08.2018 um 19:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 But the buildbots are not the platforms used to create the community 
 builds...
>>> I know.
>>> But they are the first ones to discover a broken build.
>>> 
> On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:31 PM, Matthias Seidel 
>  wrote:
> 
> FWIW,
> 
> the buildbots already produce 4.1.6 builds:
> https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html
> 
> Unfortunately the page is not updated because our CMS is broken (again).
> 
> Regards,
> 
>  Matthias
> 
> 
> Am 31.08.2018 um 18:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Confirmed that with a somewhat newer Perl (I'm using 5.14.3) and openssl 
>> 1.0.2p, the downloads go off w/o a hitch.
>> 
>> Build progressing as we speak.
>> 
>>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 11:55 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
>>> CentOS5 has a VERY old perl. The problem is that sometime between the 
>>> release of AOO 4.1.5 and 4.1.6, Sourceforge has, from what I can see, 
>>> moved to using LetsEncrypt and the download perl script now fails 
>>> whenever it tries to download ext sources:
>>> 
>>> downloading to 
>>> /home/jim/src/asf/code/AOO416/ext_sources/ea570af93c284aa9e5621cd563f54f4d-bsh-2.0b1-src.tar.gz.part
>>> download from 
>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/ea570af93c284aa9e5621cd563f54f4d-bsh-2.0b1-src.tar.gz
>>>  failed (500 Can't connect to sourceforge.net:443)
>>> download failed
>>> 
>>> So currently, the 4.1.6 Linux builds, using our "official" community 
>>> build platform, is broken.
>>> 
>>> My plan is to see if upgrading to a newer openssl and Perl solves this.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
>>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>

Re: Issues w/ downloading ext sources from source forge on CentOS5 for 4.1.6

2018-08-31 Thread Matthias Seidel

Am 31.08.2018 um 19:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Not if they aren't using the exact same setup as the community builds :)
>
> The buildbots are Ubuntu, iirc. The community build servers are CentOS5 (for 
> 4.1.x)

I know. Ubuntu 14.04 and Windows 10 to be exact.

Should we delete the buildbots now? ;-)

>
>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 1:37 PM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Am 31.08.2018 um 19:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> But the buildbots are not the platforms used to create the community 
>>> builds...
>> I know.
>> But they are the first ones to discover a broken build.
>>
 On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:31 PM, Matthias Seidel  
 wrote:

 FWIW,

 the buildbots already produce 4.1.6 builds:
 https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html

 Unfortunately the page is not updated because our CMS is broken (again).

 Regards,

   Matthias


 Am 31.08.2018 um 18:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Confirmed that with a somewhat newer Perl (I'm using 5.14.3) and openssl 
> 1.0.2p, the downloads go off w/o a hitch.
>
> Build progressing as we speak.
>
>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 11:55 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>
>> CentOS5 has a VERY old perl. The problem is that sometime between the 
>> release of AOO 4.1.5 and 4.1.6, Sourceforge has, from what I can see, 
>> moved to using LetsEncrypt and the download perl script now fails 
>> whenever it tries to download ext sources:
>>
>> downloading to 
>> /home/jim/src/asf/code/AOO416/ext_sources/ea570af93c284aa9e5621cd563f54f4d-bsh-2.0b1-src.tar.gz.part
>> download from 
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/ea570af93c284aa9e5621cd563f54f4d-bsh-2.0b1-src.tar.gz
>>  failed (500 Can't connect to sourceforge.net:443)
>>  download failed
>>
>> So currently, the 4.1.6 Linux builds, using our "official" community 
>> build platform, is broken.
>>
>> My plan is to see if upgrading to a newer openssl and Perl solves this.
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Issues w/ downloading ext sources from source forge on CentOS5 for 4.1.6

Not if they aren't using the exact same setup as the community builds :)

The buildbots are Ubuntu, iirc. The community build servers are CentOS5 (for 
4.1.x)

> On Aug 31, 2018, at 1:37 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Am 31.08.2018 um 19:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> But the buildbots are not the platforms used to create the community 
>> builds...
> 
> I know.
> But they are the first ones to discover a broken build.
> 
>> 
>>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:31 PM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> FWIW,
>>> 
>>> the buildbots already produce 4.1.6 builds:
>>> https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html
>>> 
>>> Unfortunately the page is not updated because our CMS is broken (again).
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>>   Matthias
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Am 31.08.2018 um 18:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 Confirmed that with a somewhat newer Perl (I'm using 5.14.3) and openssl 
 1.0.2p, the downloads go off w/o a hitch.
 
 Build progressing as we speak.
 
> On Aug 31, 2018, at 11:55 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> CentOS5 has a VERY old perl. The problem is that sometime between the 
> release of AOO 4.1.5 and 4.1.6, Sourceforge has, from what I can see, 
> moved to using LetsEncrypt and the download perl script now fails 
> whenever it tries to download ext sources:
> 
> downloading to 
> /home/jim/src/asf/code/AOO416/ext_sources/ea570af93c284aa9e5621cd563f54f4d-bsh-2.0b1-src.tar.gz.part
> download from 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/ea570af93c284aa9e5621cd563f54f4d-bsh-2.0b1-src.tar.gz
>  failed (500 Can't connect to sourceforge.net:443)
>  download failed
> 
> So currently, the 4.1.6 Linux builds, using our "official" community 
> build platform, is broken.
> 
> My plan is to see if upgrading to a newer openssl and Perl solves this.
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
>>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Issues w/ downloading ext sources from source forge on CentOS5 for 4.1.6

2018-08-31 Thread Matthias Seidel

Am 31.08.2018 um 19:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> But the buildbots are not the platforms used to create the community builds...

I know.
But they are the first ones to discover a broken build.

>
>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:31 PM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> FWIW,
>>
>> the buildbots already produce 4.1.6 builds:
>> https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html
>>
>> Unfortunately the page is not updated because our CMS is broken (again).
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>Matthias
>>
>>
>> Am 31.08.2018 um 18:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Confirmed that with a somewhat newer Perl (I'm using 5.14.3) and openssl 
>>> 1.0.2p, the downloads go off w/o a hitch.
>>>
>>> Build progressing as we speak.
>>>
 On Aug 31, 2018, at 11:55 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:

 CentOS5 has a VERY old perl. The problem is that sometime between the 
 release of AOO 4.1.5 and 4.1.6, Sourceforge has, from what I can see, 
 moved to using LetsEncrypt and the download perl script now fails whenever 
 it tries to download ext sources:

  downloading to 
 /home/jim/src/asf/code/AOO416/ext_sources/ea570af93c284aa9e5621cd563f54f4d-bsh-2.0b1-src.tar.gz.part
  download from 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/ea570af93c284aa9e5621cd563f54f4d-bsh-2.0b1-src.tar.gz
  failed (500 Can't connect to sourceforge.net:443)
   download failed

 So currently, the 4.1.6 Linux builds, using our "official" community build 
 platform, is broken.

 My plan is to see if upgrading to a newer openssl and Perl solves this.



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Issues w/ downloading ext sources from source forge on CentOS5 for 4.1.6

But the buildbots are not the platforms used to create the community builds...

> On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:31 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> FWIW,
> 
> the buildbots already produce 4.1.6 builds:
> https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html
> 
> Unfortunately the page is not updated because our CMS is broken (again).
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
> 
> Am 31.08.2018 um 18:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Confirmed that with a somewhat newer Perl (I'm using 5.14.3) and openssl 
>> 1.0.2p, the downloads go off w/o a hitch.
>> 
>> Build progressing as we speak.
>> 
>>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 11:55 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
>>> CentOS5 has a VERY old perl. The problem is that sometime between the 
>>> release of AOO 4.1.5 and 4.1.6, Sourceforge has, from what I can see, moved 
>>> to using LetsEncrypt and the download perl script now fails whenever it 
>>> tries to download ext sources:
>>> 
>>>  downloading to 
>>> /home/jim/src/asf/code/AOO416/ext_sources/ea570af93c284aa9e5621cd563f54f4d-bsh-2.0b1-src.tar.gz.part
>>>  download from 
>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/ea570af93c284aa9e5621cd563f54f4d-bsh-2.0b1-src.tar.gz
>>>  failed (500 Can't connect to sourceforge.net:443)
>>>   download failed
>>> 
>>> So currently, the 4.1.6 Linux builds, using our "official" community build 
>>> platform, is broken.
>>> 
>>> My plan is to see if upgrading to a newer openssl and Perl solves this.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Issues w/ downloading ext sources from source forge on CentOS5 for 4.1.6

2018-08-31 Thread Matthias Seidel

FWIW,

the buildbots already produce 4.1.6 builds:
https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html

Unfortunately the page is not updated because our CMS is broken (again).

Regards,

   Matthias


Am 31.08.2018 um 18:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Confirmed that with a somewhat newer Perl (I'm using 5.14.3) and openssl 
> 1.0.2p, the downloads go off w/o a hitch.
>
> Build progressing as we speak.
>
>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 11:55 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>
>> CentOS5 has a VERY old perl. The problem is that sometime between the 
>> release of AOO 4.1.5 and 4.1.6, Sourceforge has, from what I can see, moved 
>> to using LetsEncrypt and the download perl script now fails whenever it 
>> tries to download ext sources:
>>
>>   downloading to 
>> /home/jim/src/asf/code/AOO416/ext_sources/ea570af93c284aa9e5621cd563f54f4d-bsh-2.0b1-src.tar.gz.part
>>   download from 
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/ea570af93c284aa9e5621cd563f54f4d-bsh-2.0b1-src.tar.gz
>>  failed (500 Can't connect to sourceforge.net:443)
>>download failed
>>
>> So currently, the 4.1.6 Linux builds, using our "official" community build 
>> platform, is broken.
>>
>> My plan is to see if upgrading to a newer openssl and Perl solves this.
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Issues w/ downloading ext sources from source forge on CentOS5 for 4.1.6

Confirmed that with a somewhat newer Perl (I'm using 5.14.3) and openssl 
1.0.2p, the downloads go off w/o a hitch.

Build progressing as we speak.

> On Aug 31, 2018, at 11:55 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> CentOS5 has a VERY old perl. The problem is that sometime between the release 
> of AOO 4.1.5 and 4.1.6, Sourceforge has, from what I can see, moved to using 
> LetsEncrypt and the download perl script now fails whenever it tries to 
> download ext sources:
> 
>   downloading to 
> /home/jim/src/asf/code/AOO416/ext_sources/ea570af93c284aa9e5621cd563f54f4d-bsh-2.0b1-src.tar.gz.part
>   download from 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/ea570af93c284aa9e5621cd563f54f4d-bsh-2.0b1-src.tar.gz
>  failed (500 Can't connect to sourceforge.net:443)
>download failed
> 
> So currently, the 4.1.6 Linux builds, using our "official" community build 
> platform, is broken.
> 
> My plan is to see if upgrading to a newer openssl and Perl solves this.
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Issues w/ downloading ext sources from source forge on CentOS5 for 4.1.6

CentOS5 has a VERY old perl. The problem is that sometime between the release 
of AOO 4.1.5 and 4.1.6, Sourceforge has, from what I can see, moved to using 
LetsEncrypt and the download perl script now fails whenever it tries to 
download ext sources:

   downloading to 
/home/jim/src/asf/code/AOO416/ext_sources/ea570af93c284aa9e5621cd563f54f4d-bsh-2.0b1-src.tar.gz.part
   download from 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/ea570af93c284aa9e5621cd563f54f4d-bsh-2.0b1-src.tar.gz
 failed (500 Can't connect to sourceforge.net:443)
download failed

So currently, the 4.1.6 Linux builds, using our "official" community build 
platform, is broken.

My plan is to see if upgrading to a newer openssl and Perl solves this.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: main/store exported symbol issues

I think this may have to do w/ the 'Implement the ability to build "UDK 
versioned" libraries in gbuild'
stuff from

 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1827456

This is breaking macOS horribly!

> On Jul 3, 2018, at 8:28 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Am 03.07.2018 um 13:59 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> 
>>> On Jul 3, 2018, at 7:47 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jim,
>>> 
>>> "Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:"
>>> 
>>> This might have something to do with Damjans changes for a Windows 64-bit 
>>> build.
>>> 
>>> The buildbots for Windows and Linux are doing fine, so it seems to be macOS 
>>> only.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>>   Matthias
>>> 
>> Thanks... anyone recall offhand what those changes were, svn rev #s, etc...?
> 
> Of course Damjan knows best! ;-)
> 
> But this might fit:
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1827620
> 
> Regards,
>Matthias
> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: main/store exported symbol issues

Looking over it again, it looks like the build is trying to do something wonky
with the store.map file...

> On Jul 3, 2018, at 8:28 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Am 03.07.2018 um 13:59 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> 
>>> On Jul 3, 2018, at 7:47 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jim,
>>> 
>>> "Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:"
>>> 
>>> This might have something to do with Damjans changes for a Windows 64-bit 
>>> build.
>>> 
>>> The buildbots for Windows and Linux are doing fine, so it seems to be macOS 
>>> only.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>>   Matthias
>>> 
>> Thanks... anyone recall offhand what those changes were, svn rev #s, etc...?
> 
> Of course Damjan knows best! ;-)
> 
> But this might fit:
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1827620
> 
> Regards,
>Matthias
> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: main/store exported symbol issues

2018-07-03 Thread Matthias Seidel

Am 03.07.2018 um 13:59 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>
>> On Jul 3, 2018, at 7:47 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> "Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:"
>>
>> This might have something to do with Damjans changes for a Windows 64-bit 
>> build.
>>
>> The buildbots for Windows and Linux are doing fine, so it seems to be macOS 
>> only.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>Matthias
>>
> Thanks... anyone recall offhand what those changes were, svn rev #s, etc...?

Of course Damjan knows best! ;-)

But this might fit:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1827620

Regards,
   Matthias

>
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: main/store exported symbol issues



> On Jul 3, 2018, at 7:47 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> "Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:"
> 
> This might have something to do with Damjans changes for a Windows 64-bit 
> build.
> 
> The buildbots for Windows and Linux are doing fine, so it seems to be macOS 
> only.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 

Thanks... anyone recall offhand what those changes were, svn rev #s, etc...?

main/store exported symbol issues

2018-07-03 Thread Matthias Seidel

Hi Jim,

"Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:"

This might have something to do with Damjans changes for a Windows
64-bit build.

The buildbots for Windows and Linux are doing fine, so it seems to be
macOS only.

Regards,

   Matthias


Am 03.07.2018 um 13:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> It looks like I'm having some weird build issues with
> this module due to exported symbols not working out
> (on macOS... haven't tried Linux yet). Any ideas??
>
> The error is:
>
> [ build CHK ] loaded modules: store
> [ build PKG ] store_xml
> mkdir -p 
> /Users/jim/src/asf/AOO420/main/solver/420/unxmaccx.pro/workdir/Package/ && 
> touch 
> /Users/jim/src/asf/AOO420/main/solver/420/unxmaccx.pro/workdir/Package/store_xml
> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
>   "UDK_3_0_0 {", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "global:", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "local:", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_acquireHandle;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_attrib;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_closeDirectory;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_closeFile;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_closeStream;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_createMemoryFile;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_findFirst;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_findNext;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_flushFile;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_flushStream;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_getFileRefererCount;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_getFileSize;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_getStreamSize;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_link;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_openDirectory;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_openFile;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_openStream;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_readStream;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_rebuildFile;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_releaseHandle;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_remove;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_rename;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_setStreamSize;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_symlink;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "store_writeStream;", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
>   "};", referenced from:
>  -exported_symbol[s_list] command line option
> ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
> clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see 
> invocation)
> make: *** [/Users/jim/src/asf/AOO420/main/solenv/gbuild/LinkTarget.mk:251: 
> /Users/jim/src/asf/AOO420/main/solver/420/unxmaccx.pro/workdir/LinkTarget/Library/libstore.dylib]
>  Error 1
> dmake:  Error code 2, while making 'all'
>
> 1 module(s): 
>   store
> need(s) to be rebuilt
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

main/store exported symbol issues