Re: towards the first apache release of openwhisk-composer
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote on 11/20/2018 12:30:46 PM: > > We're all good to release this module now, and sorry that it took so > long - next time I think PPMC members can do almost all of this > without mentors help, we should try that! > > -Bertrand > Thanks Bertrand! I think I've learned how to do this now. --dave
Re: towards the first apache release of openwhisk-composer
I agree Bertrand, I personally have not dealt with IP clearance and acceptance so I was not aware one of the PPMC could do it. Please let us know and be explicit in the future if we can do this certain type of things, we will be glad to drive them as PPMC that’s our role and practice doesn’t hurt :-) — Carlos On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:31 PM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 4:42 PM Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > ...I started the vote now [1], made a note to tally it in 72 hours... > > The vote passed, I have updated > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/openwhisk-composer.html > accordingly, the IP clearance is really complete now. > > We're all good to release this module now, and sorry that it took so > long - next time I think PPMC members can do almost all of this > without mentors help, we should try that! > > -Bertrand > > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4694c0831e47c6c2b17e3d1f3db80a209588532b8d2f25698186aad4@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > -- Carlos Santana
Re: towards the first apache release of openwhisk-composer
Hi, On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 4:42 PM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > ...I started the vote now [1], made a note to tally it in 72 hours... The vote passed, I have updated http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/openwhisk-composer.html accordingly, the IP clearance is really complete now. We're all good to release this module now, and sorry that it took so long - next time I think PPMC members can do almost all of this without mentors help, we should try that! -Bertrand > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4694c0831e47c6c2b17e3d1f3db80a209588532b8d2f25698186aad4@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
Re: towards the first apache release of openwhisk-composer
Hi Dave, On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 7:38 PM David P Grove wrote: > ...Did you get a chance to initiate the vote email on the IPMC list?... Sorry, I had a crazy week and forgot that - I started the vote now [1], made a note to tally it in 72 hours. Any PPMC member could have started that vote, sorry if I failed to mention that. -Bertrand [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4694c0831e47c6c2b17e3d1f3db80a209588532b8d2f25698186aad4@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
Re: towards the first apache release of openwhisk-composer
Hi Bertrand, Did you get a chance to initiate the vote email on the IPMC list? If not, could you do it (or is it possible for me to do it)? On the technical/code side, we are ready to start the process of making the first Apache release of the composer module, but I think I have to wait for the IPMC vote to accept the code before I can start a release vote? thanks, -dave Bertrand Delacretaz wrote on 11/09/2018 09:17:41 AM: > > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:33 PM David P Grove wrote: > > ...Now that the formal donation process for the composer code base is > > completed... > > I checked and actually the IP clearance has not been completed, the > form at [1] needs to be approved by the Incubator PMC. > > I'm happy to start that vote but before I do that I have a question at > INVALID URI REMOVED > u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_INCUBATOR-2D222&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx- > siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV- > apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=LvtctSliuAH1oSmIn5OWjwkQ2mJdTsxWdQWqijWkiZI&s=- > DA1EBQooxSqKd9PbvM9yc9TmPn3GY-G_QDbapn0oDg&e=, Dave if you can > answer there I'll move that forward. > > In principle the vote that remains is just a formality but it is > required before that module can be released. > > -Bertrand > > [1] INVALID URI REMOVED > u=http-3A__incubator.apache.org_ip-2Dclearance_openwhisk-2Dcomposer.html&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx- > siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV- > apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=LvtctSliuAH1oSmIn5OWjwkQ2mJdTsxWdQWqijWkiZI&s=rvgUoNLJwXaLhKKCX9sKLW7QBcb2ijBJB3Pu7IvucGY&e= >
Re: towards the first apache release of openwhisk-composer
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote on 11/09/2018 09:17:41 AM: > From: Bertrand Delacretaz > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > Date: 11/09/2018 09:18 AM > Subject: Re: towards the first apache release of openwhisk-composer > > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:33 PM David P Grove wrote: > > ...Now that the formal donation process for the composer code base is > > completed... > > I checked and actually the IP clearance has not been completed, the > form at [1] needs to be approved by the Incubator PMC. > > I'm happy to start that vote but before I do that I have a question at > INVALID URI REMOVED > u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_INCUBATOR-2D222&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx- > siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV- > apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=LvtctSliuAH1oSmIn5OWjwkQ2mJdTsxWdQWqijWkiZI&s=- > DA1EBQooxSqKd9PbvM9yc9TmPn3GY-G_QDbapn0oDg&e=, Dave if you can > answer there I'll move that forward. > > In principle the vote that remains is just a formality but it is > required before that module can be released. > > -Bertrand Answered. Sorry, I could have been more explicit in my Oct 17th comment that we were fine to proceed with just the iCLAs. Please initiate a vote thread on the IPMC. thanks, --dave
Re: towards the first apache release of openwhisk-composer
Hi, On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:33 PM David P Grove wrote: > ...Now that the formal donation process for the composer code base is > completed... I checked and actually the IP clearance has not been completed, the form at [1] needs to be approved by the Incubator PMC. I'm happy to start that vote but before I do that I have a question at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-222, Dave if you can answer there I'll move that forward. In principle the vote that remains is just a formality but it is required before that module can be released. -Bertrand [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/openwhisk-composer.html
Re: towards the first apache release of openwhisk-composer
+1 Same comments as Matt on using the release repo to do the RC for the source tgz. - Carlos Santana @csantanapr > On Oct 23, 2018, at 1:32 PM, Matt Rutkowski wrote: > > That is great news Dave! > > Thanks for all your diligence in getting to this point. > > My only ask would be to update the table (README) in the release repo. > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release > and the automation JSON: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/tools/config.json > to include an entry (with hash of commit) for this new repo. > > In addition, I would appreciate it if you could follow the release > process/steps there and open any issues you find with the exiting > documentation (when following the manual process or auto. process), > i.e., "instructions for release managers ( > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/release_instructions.md > ). > > Of course, Vincent is the "go to" person for questions on docs/process > > Cheers to you! > > -Matt > > > > From: "David P Grove" > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > Date: 10/23/2018 10:40 AM > Subject:towards the first apache release of openwhisk-composer > > > > > > Now that the formal donation process for the composer code base is > completed, we can start working towards the first formal release of > composer from the Apache OpenWhisk. > > The motivation for a formal release is that we should have a formal Apache > release to enable us to publish an openwhisk-composer package to npm (to > replace the prior ibm-functions/composer npm package). > > I'm willing to act as release manager for the initial release of this > package. > > I believe the main technical work to be done before we can start preparing > a release candidate and then initiating the voting process is to agree on > the npm package name (suggestion: openwhisk-composer), and update the > documentation/code in the openwhisk-composer code base accordingly. Are > there any other items that I have overlooked? > > --dave > > > >
Re: towards the first apache release of openwhisk-composer
That is great news Dave! Thanks for all your diligence in getting to this point. My only ask would be to update the table (README) in the release repo. https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release and the automation JSON: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/tools/config.json to include an entry (with hash of commit) for this new repo. In addition, I would appreciate it if you could follow the release process/steps there and open any issues you find with the exiting documentation (when following the manual process or auto. process), i.e., "instructions for release managers ( https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/release_instructions.md ). Of course, Vincent is the "go to" person for questions on docs/process Cheers to you! -Matt From: "David P Grove" To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Date: 10/23/2018 10:40 AM Subject: towards the first apache release of openwhisk-composer Now that the formal donation process for the composer code base is completed, we can start working towards the first formal release of composer from the Apache OpenWhisk. The motivation for a formal release is that we should have a formal Apache release to enable us to publish an openwhisk-composer package to npm (to replace the prior ibm-functions/composer npm package). I'm willing to act as release manager for the initial release of this package. I believe the main technical work to be done before we can start preparing a release candidate and then initiating the voting process is to agree on the npm package name (suggestion: openwhisk-composer), and update the documentation/code in the openwhisk-composer code base accordingly. Are there any other items that I have overlooked? --dave
towards the first apache release of openwhisk-composer
Now that the formal donation process for the composer code base is completed, we can start working towards the first formal release of composer from the Apache OpenWhisk. The motivation for a formal release is that we should have a formal Apache release to enable us to publish an openwhisk-composer package to npm (to replace the prior ibm-functions/composer npm package). I'm willing to act as release manager for the initial release of this package. I believe the main technical work to be done before we can start preparing a release candidate and then initiating the voting process is to agree on the npm package name (suggestion: openwhisk-composer), and update the documentation/code in the openwhisk-composer code base accordingly. Are there any other items that I have overlooked? --dave