Re: [DISCUSS] Make libpcap mandatory?
Let's not introduce yet another way to do such things ... these annotations seem to work fine and we/I've used them all over the place to make the testsuite runnable in all sorts of different scenarios. So-far we have: - RequireInternetConnection - RequireNonCaptureAllDns - RequirePcap - RequirePcapNg Chris Am 06.04.20, 12:08 schrieb "Googlemail OS" : Also one can use „assumeThat()“ in junit for such things. > Am 06.04.2020 um 10:25 schrieb Julian Feinauer : > > Nice, then thats the way to go! > > Am 06.04.20, 10:21 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : > >I've already got an annotation you can use: >@RequirePcap together with a Junit Condition, that skips the test if the condition is not met ... just noticed a bug in my condition however __ ... just fixing it. > >Chris > > >Am 06.04.20, 10:11 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : > >Hey, > >I would not choose 1, as you say. >Perhaps we can make this tests conditional (dont know how easy this is with junit5) an das you say, only allow releases with libpcap. > >Julian > >Am 06.04.20, 10:07 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : > >Hi, > >I’m currently working on the prerequisiteCheck for my new plc4c module and am testing on empty OSes (OSes without any installed additional software) >I noticed there are tests like the Raw-Socket test that naturally fail if you don’t have libpcap (or the windows counterpart installed) … > >We now have two options: > > 1. Make libpcap mandatory > 2. Disable any test that is libpcap related > >1) is the more secure version, but I think some people might have objections to installing libpcap on their systems. > >How about automatically disabling these tests and to have a check in the prerequisiteChecks to not allow doing an “apache-release” without libpcap? > >Got any other ideas? > >Chris > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Make libpcap mandatory?
Also one can use „assumeThat()“ in junit for such things. > Am 06.04.2020 um 10:25 schrieb Julian Feinauer : > > Nice, then thats the way to go! > > Am 06.04.20, 10:21 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : > >I've already got an annotation you can use: >@RequirePcap together with a Junit Condition, that skips the test if the > condition is not met ... just noticed a bug in my condition however __ ... > just fixing it. > >Chris > > >Am 06.04.20, 10:11 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" > : > >Hey, > >I would not choose 1, as you say. >Perhaps we can make this tests conditional (dont know how easy this is > with junit5) an das you say, only allow releases with libpcap. > >Julian > >Am 06.04.20, 10:07 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" > : > >Hi, > >I’m currently working on the prerequisiteCheck for my new plc4c > module and am testing on empty OSes (OSes without any installed additional > software) >I noticed there are tests like the Raw-Socket test that naturally > fail if you don’t have libpcap (or the windows counterpart installed) … > >We now have two options: > > 1. Make libpcap mandatory > 2. Disable any test that is libpcap related > >1) is the more secure version, but I think some people might have > objections to installing libpcap on their systems. > >How about automatically disabling these tests and to have a check > in the prerequisiteChecks to not allow doing an “apache-release” without > libpcap? > >Got any other ideas? > >Chris > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Make libpcap mandatory?
Nice, then thats the way to go! Am 06.04.20, 10:21 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : I've already got an annotation you can use: @RequirePcap together with a Junit Condition, that skips the test if the condition is not met ... just noticed a bug in my condition however __ ... just fixing it. Chris Am 06.04.20, 10:11 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hey, I would not choose 1, as you say. Perhaps we can make this tests conditional (dont know how easy this is with junit5) an das you say, only allow releases with libpcap. Julian Am 06.04.20, 10:07 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : Hi, I’m currently working on the prerequisiteCheck for my new plc4c module and am testing on empty OSes (OSes without any installed additional software) I noticed there are tests like the Raw-Socket test that naturally fail if you don’t have libpcap (or the windows counterpart installed) … We now have two options: 1. Make libpcap mandatory 2. Disable any test that is libpcap related 1) is the more secure version, but I think some people might have objections to installing libpcap on their systems. How about automatically disabling these tests and to have a check in the prerequisiteChecks to not allow doing an “apache-release” without libpcap? Got any other ideas? Chris
Re: [DISCUSS] Make libpcap mandatory?
I've already got an annotation you can use: @RequirePcap together with a Junit Condition, that skips the test if the condition is not met ... just noticed a bug in my condition however __ ... just fixing it. Chris Am 06.04.20, 10:11 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hey, I would not choose 1, as you say. Perhaps we can make this tests conditional (dont know how easy this is with junit5) an das you say, only allow releases with libpcap. Julian Am 06.04.20, 10:07 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : Hi, I’m currently working on the prerequisiteCheck for my new plc4c module and am testing on empty OSes (OSes without any installed additional software) I noticed there are tests like the Raw-Socket test that naturally fail if you don’t have libpcap (or the windows counterpart installed) … We now have two options: 1. Make libpcap mandatory 2. Disable any test that is libpcap related 1) is the more secure version, but I think some people might have objections to installing libpcap on their systems. How about automatically disabling these tests and to have a check in the prerequisiteChecks to not allow doing an “apache-release” without libpcap? Got any other ideas? Chris
Re: [DISCUSS] Make libpcap mandatory?
Hey, I would not choose 1, as you say. Perhaps we can make this tests conditional (dont know how easy this is with junit5) an das you say, only allow releases with libpcap. Julian Am 06.04.20, 10:07 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : Hi, I’m currently working on the prerequisiteCheck for my new plc4c module and am testing on empty OSes (OSes without any installed additional software) I noticed there are tests like the Raw-Socket test that naturally fail if you don’t have libpcap (or the windows counterpart installed) … We now have two options: 1. Make libpcap mandatory 2. Disable any test that is libpcap related 1) is the more secure version, but I think some people might have objections to installing libpcap on their systems. How about automatically disabling these tests and to have a check in the prerequisiteChecks to not allow doing an “apache-release” without libpcap? Got any other ideas? Chris
