Release Step 011 Succeeded

[Apache Royale CI Server]

1. Run ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_011 -Drelease.version=0.9.6
This will download the artifacts then unzip and compile the source artifact.
2. Validate that the compiled artifacts match the downloaded artifacts.
3. If they do, then run ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_011_Sign 
-Drelease.version=0.9.6
This will PGP sign the source ZIP and compiled JARs
4. Then run ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_011_Upload 
-Drelease.version=0.9.6
This will upload the signed artifacts to Maven Release Staging.  Verify that 
the compiler and typedefs artifacts are there along with the asjs artifacts, 
then hit the close to close the staging repo.

Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow

[Olaf Krueger]

+1 for apacheroyale



--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/

Release Step 010 Succeeded

[Apache Royale CI Server]

Log in to the server, open a command prompt, change directory to 
C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_010 and run the following commands:
git push
git push origin org.apache.royale.framework-0.9.6-rc1

You will need your Apache/Github username and 2FA token.

Royale_Release_Step_010 - Build # 3 - Still Failing!

[Apache Royale CI Server]

Royale_Release_Step_010 - Build # 3 - Still Failing:

Check console output at 
http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/Royale_Release_Step_010/3/
 to view the results.

Re: Failing build on Windows

[Alex Harui]

Need to see the console output...

On 3/4/19, 1:50 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:

I’m trying to build Royale on a Windows machine and I’m getting some odd 
errors.

The error happens in ASDateTests and I’m getting “unexpected compilation 
problems” as well as day and dayUTF being read-only.

I’ve tried cleaning things out including deleting the complete contents of 
the repos. I’ve tried ignoring the ASDateTests which just causes an error 
somewhere else.

I’m kind of stumped. Anyone have ideas?

Harbs

Royale_Release_Step_010 - Build # 2 - Still Failing!

[Apache Royale CI Server]

Royale_Release_Step_010 - Build # 2 - Still Failing:

Check console output at 
http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/Royale_Release_Step_010/2/
 to view the results.

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-typedefs #1149

[Apache Royale CI Server]

See 


--
Started by timer
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building on master in workspace 

 > git.exe rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree # timeout=10
Fetching changes from the remote Git repository
 > git.exe config remote.origin.url 
 > https://github.com/apache/royale-typedefs.git # timeout=10
Fetching upstream changes from https://github.com/apache/royale-typedefs.git
 > git.exe --version # timeout=10
 > git.exe fetch --tags --progress 
 > https://github.com/apache/royale-typedefs.git 
 > +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
 > git.exe rev-parse "refs/remotes/origin/develop^{commit}" # timeout=10
 > git.exe rev-parse "refs/remotes/origin/origin/develop^{commit}" # timeout=10
Checking out Revision 1b53df8a7c49cad79ba23a2c84ae211391d32062 
(refs/remotes/origin/develop)
 > git.exe config core.sparsecheckout # timeout=10
 > git.exe checkout -f 1b53df8a7c49cad79ba23a2c84ae211391d32062
Commit message: "Need these typedefs from royale-extras"
 > git.exe rev-list --no-walk 1b53df8a7c49cad79ba23a2c84ae211391d32062 # 
 > timeout=10
[royale-typedefs] $ cmd.exe /C "C:\apache\apache-ant-1.9.9\bin\ant.bat main && 
exit %%ERRORLEVEL%%"
Buildfile: 


main:

download:
 [echo] 

[mkdir] Created dir: 


BUILD FAILED
:58:
 The following error occurred while executing this line:
:86:
 src 
'
 doesn't exist.

Total time: 0 seconds
Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xmx1g -Xms1g
Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #2543

[Apache Royale CI Server]

See 


--
[...truncated 308.29 KB...]

check-sum:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

put-in-cache:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

copy-if-cached:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

download-dependency-zip:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

check-dependency:

download-dependency:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

echo-project-jar:
  [get] Getting: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
  [get] To: C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\lib\guava-LICENSE.txt
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

double-check-file:
 [echo] Need file: ${still_no_file}

get-from-cache-if-needed:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

fail-if-not-found:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

download-dependency-jar:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

check-cache:

download-jar:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

get-if-not-cached:
  [get] Getting: 
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/google/guava/guava/25.1-jre/guava-25.1-jre.jar
  [get] To: C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\lib\guava.jar
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

double-check-file:
 [echo] Need file: ${still_no_file}

get-from-cache-if-needed:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

fail-if-not-found:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] 

Royale_Release_Step_010 - Build # 1 - Failure!

[Apache Royale CI Server]

Royale_Release_Step_010 - Build # 1 - Failure:

Check console output at 
http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/Royale_Release_Step_010/1/
 to view the results.

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #2542

[Apache Royale CI Server]

See 


Changes:

[carlosrovira] jewel-button: icon position styles improved

--
[...truncated 308.30 KB...]

check-sum:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

put-in-cache:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

copy-if-cached:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

download-dependency-zip:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

check-dependency:

download-dependency:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

echo-project-jar:
  [get] Getting: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
  [get] To: C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\lib\guava-LICENSE.txt
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

double-check-file:
 [echo] Need file: ${still_no_file}

get-from-cache-if-needed:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

fail-if-not-found:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

download-dependency-jar:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

check-cache:

download-jar:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

get-if-not-cached:
  [get] Getting: 
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/google/guava/guava/25.1-jre/guava-25.1-jre.jar
  [get] To: C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\lib\guava.jar
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

double-check-file:
 [echo] Need file: ${still_no_file}

get-from-cache-if-needed:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

fail-if-not-found:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 

Release Step 009 Succeeded

[Apache Royale CI Server]

Log in to the server, open a command prompt, change directory to 
C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_009 and run the following commands:
git push

You will need your Apache/Github username and 2FA token.

Release Step 008 Succeeded

[Apache Royale CI Server]

Log in to the server, open a command prompt, change directory to 
C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_008 and run the following commands:
git push
git checkout release/0.9.6
git push -u origin release/0.9.6

You will need your Apache/Github username and 2FA token.

Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow

[Carlos Rovira]

More about good vs bad questions here [1]

[1] https://stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask

El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 19:50, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Hi Josh,
>
> thanks for pointing about how to do answers. As I signed in SO site, I saw
> some indications about be very explicit and avoid questions that could be
> "interpreted", So questions like you proposed seems perfect.
>
> About availability for all people here: IMHO we should all try to setup
> and account there and help as we can. That doesn't mean necessarily to move
> from this list to SO. Just to be aware and in the same way we help here,
> try to help there. And if any of you here spend 20' here spend only that
> time (and only that) here or there. I think we all here want Royale to
> succeed. I think this is a key point since people is in SO, and I'm sure
> this is an opportunity to make Apache Royale better known to people that in
> other circumstances could never know about it.
>
> As all vote for "apacheroyale", it's ok for me too.
>
> Thanks! :)
>
>
> El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 18:54, Alex Harui ()
> escribió:
>
>> Those who want to help create a presence for Royale on SO are certainly
>> welcome and have my thanks for doing so.
>>
>> I think an "apacheroyale" tag is best.
>>
>> I would not recommend making SO our main user support channel at this
>> time.  Some ASF projects do, but we already have users@ and also I think
>> myself and others are unable to help on SO.  I've had trouble getting
>> established on SO in the past.  In fact, I just tried logging in there
>> again and I think they erased my account so I had to sign up again.
>>
>> I'll keep trying if I have a few moments here and there, but for now I'll
>> mainly help on the mailing lists.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 3/4/19, 8:42 AM, "Josh Tynjala"  wrote:
>>
>> Another one:
>>
>> Question: Why isn't JSON working in my Royale app?
>> Answer: Either use variable["property"] syntax or enable the
>> -js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true compiler option.
>>
>> - Josh
>>
>> On 2019/03/04 16:41:03, Josh Tynjala  wrote:
>> > Recently, I edited an answer to an old question about AS3 IDEs
>> recently (to add VSCode and Moonshine), and the original question (which
>> had been up for years) was almost instantly closed by moderators.
>> StackOverflow has become very strict about open-ended questions that are
>> more appropriate to discussion forums. Choose your questions wisely.
>> >
>> > More specific questions that can be solved with a small code
>> example are probably the best choice.
>> >
>> > Look for issues that come up frequently. For instance, there are
>> often problems if someone forgets to add a data binding bead to a
>> component. In the question, you'll want a component that is broken because
>> it's missing the bead. In the answer, show them which bead to add and where
>> it should be added.
>> >
>> > In fact, more questions involving beads are probably great
>> candidates!
>> >
>> > Question: How do I use some feature in component X.
>> > Answer: This feature isn't enabled by default, but you can add Y
>> bead to the component.
>> >
>> > - Josh
>> >
>> > On 2019/03/04 13:14:09, Andrew Wetmore 
>> wrote:
>> > > "apacheroyale" is fine with me.
>> > >
>> > > SO's tutorial suggests that open-ended discussion-type questions
>> fare worse
>> > > on the site than specific, solution-focused questions. I wonder
>> if it would
>> > > be considered spam to "recreate" some of the conversations on
>> tricky
>> > > Flex-to-Royale issues that we have already talked through in this
>> channel.
>> > > Feels a bit like reality-show tv to me... An alternative would be
>> to post
>> > > some of the current, not-yet-resolved questions. We might even
>> attract
>> > > interesting response from outside the existing Royale community.
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:57 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I'm opt for "apacheroyale" - I'm using it for almost all posts
>> on
>> > > > Moonshine's IDE twitter and fb, so it could be somehow
>> consistent. ;)
>> > > >
>> > > > pon., 4 mar 2019 o 13:23 Andrew Wetmore 
>> napisał(a):
>> > > >
>> > > > > Carlos and I were pondering possible tags for such an
>> adventure. Options
>> > > > > seem to include "apacheroyale", "apache-royale", or just
>> plain "royale".
>> > > > It
>> > > > > is telling that none of these tags currently exist.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I am happy to lob softball questions to get conversations
>> started, maybe:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > - What's the best migration path away from Flash for an
>> enterprise-level
>> > > > > Flex app?
>> > > > > - What are the options for IDEs for developing in JS? [I note
>> that
>> > > > > "moonshine" is not a recognized tag on SO at the moment]
>> > > > > - How 

Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Josh,

thanks for pointing about how to do answers. As I signed in SO site, I saw
some indications about be very explicit and avoid questions that could be
"interpreted", So questions like you proposed seems perfect.

About availability for all people here: IMHO we should all try to setup and
account there and help as we can. That doesn't mean necessarily to move
from this list to SO. Just to be aware and in the same way we help here,
try to help there. And if any of you here spend 20' here spend only that
time (and only that) here or there. I think we all here want Royale to
succeed. I think this is a key point since people is in SO, and I'm sure
this is an opportunity to make Apache Royale better known to people that in
other circumstances could never know about it.

As all vote for "apacheroyale", it's ok for me too.

Thanks! :)


El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 18:54, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> Those who want to help create a presence for Royale on SO are certainly
> welcome and have my thanks for doing so.
>
> I think an "apacheroyale" tag is best.
>
> I would not recommend making SO our main user support channel at this
> time.  Some ASF projects do, but we already have users@ and also I think
> myself and others are unable to help on SO.  I've had trouble getting
> established on SO in the past.  In fact, I just tried logging in there
> again and I think they erased my account so I had to sign up again.
>
> I'll keep trying if I have a few moments here and there, but for now I'll
> mainly help on the mailing lists.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 3/4/19, 8:42 AM, "Josh Tynjala"  wrote:
>
> Another one:
>
> Question: Why isn't JSON working in my Royale app?
> Answer: Either use variable["property"] syntax or enable the
> -js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true compiler option.
>
> - Josh
>
> On 2019/03/04 16:41:03, Josh Tynjala  wrote:
> > Recently, I edited an answer to an old question about AS3 IDEs
> recently (to add VSCode and Moonshine), and the original question (which
> had been up for years) was almost instantly closed by moderators.
> StackOverflow has become very strict about open-ended questions that are
> more appropriate to discussion forums. Choose your questions wisely.
> >
> > More specific questions that can be solved with a small code example
> are probably the best choice.
> >
> > Look for issues that come up frequently. For instance, there are
> often problems if someone forgets to add a data binding bead to a
> component. In the question, you'll want a component that is broken because
> it's missing the bead. In the answer, show them which bead to add and where
> it should be added.
> >
> > In fact, more questions involving beads are probably great
> candidates!
> >
> > Question: How do I use some feature in component X.
> > Answer: This feature isn't enabled by default, but you can add Y
> bead to the component.
> >
> > - Josh
> >
> > On 2019/03/04 13:14:09, Andrew Wetmore  wrote:
> > > "apacheroyale" is fine with me.
> > >
> > > SO's tutorial suggests that open-ended discussion-type questions
> fare worse
> > > on the site than specific, solution-focused questions. I wonder if
> it would
> > > be considered spam to "recreate" some of the conversations on
> tricky
> > > Flex-to-Royale issues that we have already talked through in this
> channel.
> > > Feels a bit like reality-show tv to me... An alternative would be
> to post
> > > some of the current, not-yet-resolved questions. We might even
> attract
> > > interesting response from outside the existing Royale community.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:57 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm opt for "apacheroyale" - I'm using it for almost all posts on
> > > > Moonshine's IDE twitter and fb, so it could be somehow
> consistent. ;)
> > > >
> > > > pon., 4 mar 2019 o 13:23 Andrew Wetmore 
> napisał(a):
> > > >
> > > > > Carlos and I were pondering possible tags for such an
> adventure. Options
> > > > > seem to include "apacheroyale", "apache-royale", or just plain
> "royale".
> > > > It
> > > > > is telling that none of these tags currently exist.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am happy to lob softball questions to get conversations
> started, maybe:
> > > > >
> > > > > - What's the best migration path away from Flash for an
> enterprise-level
> > > > > Flex app?
> > > > > - What are the options for IDEs for developing in JS? [I note
> that
> > > > > "moonshine" is not a recognized tag on SO at the moment]
> > > > > - How can I reuse my AS3 and MXML code if Flash is not an
> option?
> > > > > Other leading questions?
> > > > >
> > > > > I am happy to be the naive question-asker, but of course
> getting juice
> > > > into
> > > > > these conversations (and maybe drawing conversation-browsers
> 

Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow

[Alex Harui]

Those who want to help create a presence for Royale on SO are certainly welcome 
and have my thanks for doing so.

I think an "apacheroyale" tag is best.

I would not recommend making SO our main user support channel at this time.  
Some ASF projects do, but we already have users@ and also I think myself and 
others are unable to help on SO.  I've had trouble getting established on SO in 
the past.  In fact, I just tried logging in there again and I think they erased 
my account so I had to sign up again.

I'll keep trying if I have a few moments here and there, but for now I'll 
mainly help on the mailing lists.

-Alex

On 3/4/19, 8:42 AM, "Josh Tynjala"  wrote:

Another one:

Question: Why isn't JSON working in my Royale app?
Answer: Either use variable["property"] syntax or enable the 
-js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true compiler option.

- Josh

On 2019/03/04 16:41:03, Josh Tynjala  wrote: 
> Recently, I edited an answer to an old question about AS3 IDEs recently 
(to add VSCode and Moonshine), and the original question (which had been up for 
years) was almost instantly closed by moderators. StackOverflow has become very 
strict about open-ended questions that are more appropriate to discussion 
forums. Choose your questions wisely.
> 
> More specific questions that can be solved with a small code example are 
probably the best choice.
> 
> Look for issues that come up frequently. For instance, there are often 
problems if someone forgets to add a data binding bead to a component. In the 
question, you'll want a component that is broken because it's missing the bead. 
In the answer, show them which bead to add and where it should be added.
> 
> In fact, more questions involving beads are probably great candidates!
> 
> Question: How do I use some feature in component X.
> Answer: This feature isn't enabled by default, but you can add Y bead to 
the component.
> 
> - Josh
> 
> On 2019/03/04 13:14:09, Andrew Wetmore  wrote: 
> > "apacheroyale" is fine with me.
> > 
> > SO's tutorial suggests that open-ended discussion-type questions fare 
worse
> > on the site than specific, solution-focused questions. I wonder if it 
would
> > be considered spam to "recreate" some of the conversations on tricky
> > Flex-to-Royale issues that we have already talked through in this 
channel.
> > Feels a bit like reality-show tv to me... An alternative would be to 
post
> > some of the current, not-yet-resolved questions. We might even attract
> > interesting response from outside the existing Royale community.
> > 
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:57 AM Piotr Zarzycki 

> > wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm opt for "apacheroyale" - I'm using it for almost all posts on
> > > Moonshine's IDE twitter and fb, so it could be somehow consistent. ;)
> > >
> > > pon., 4 mar 2019 o 13:23 Andrew Wetmore  
napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Carlos and I were pondering possible tags for such an adventure. 
Options
> > > > seem to include "apacheroyale", "apache-royale", or just plain 
"royale".
> > > It
> > > > is telling that none of these tags currently exist.
> > > >
> > > > I am happy to lob softball questions to get conversations started, 
maybe:
> > > >
> > > > - What's the best migration path away from Flash for an 
enterprise-level
> > > > Flex app?
> > > > - What are the options for IDEs for developing in JS? [I note that
> > > > "moonshine" is not a recognized tag on SO at the moment]
> > > > - How can I reuse my AS3 and MXML code if Flash is not an option?
> > > > Other leading questions?
> > > >
> > > > I am happy to be the naive question-asker, but of course getting 
juice
> > > into
> > > > these conversations (and maybe drawing conversation-browsers toward
> > > Royale)
> > > > depends on those who have already found Royale providing answers.
> > > >
> > > > a
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Carlos Rovira 

> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I as you used Stackoverflow just for consulting. Just create my 
account
> > > > > now, so I'm learning too.
> > > > >
> > > > > What does mean for Apache Royale? Nowadays, a way to measure tech
> > > impact
> > > > > and how others could choose to go with Royale is see how easy is 
to
> > > find
> > > > > answers to questions. So you know, we want to know how something 
is
> > > done
> > > > > and people instead to go to normal docs, he google it, and 
normally for
> > > > > development problems stack overflow use to have responses.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, how we could "start"? I think we'll need to enter some common
> > > > > questions and maybe respond ourselves ? I really don't know, but 
there
> > > > > should be 

Re: WebComponents and WebAssembly, a game changer!?

[Alex Harui]

On 3/4/19, 1:01 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:


Royale seems to me more like an option for the future, as a technology and
a foundation that you could use for years and years, so you can target JS
now, but WEBASM in the future.
But all of this remains in the success of Royale. Since if we don't attract
talent to make lots of this happen, maybe will not be better than other
options, and even more risky.

Making Royale moving forward and evolving with all the things we all now is
very difficult. We need people interested in make this happen and investing
time in tasks that are not easy to get.

Yep, getting more folks to contribute code is key.  One thing I wish we could 
get more folks to realize is that the Apache model has a very low bar for 
contribution.  If you want to write a bead that tweaks one small thing, we'll 
accept it.  Some of the other more corporate-driven projects may not.  That's 
one of the reasons for beads.  It allows small contributions that should have 
little impact on the rest of the framework.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow

[Josh Tynjala]

Another one:

Question: Why isn't JSON working in my Royale app?
Answer: Either use variable["property"] syntax or enable the 
-js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true compiler option.

- Josh

On 2019/03/04 16:41:03, Josh Tynjala  wrote: 
> Recently, I edited an answer to an old question about AS3 IDEs recently (to 
> add VSCode and Moonshine), and the original question (which had been up for 
> years) was almost instantly closed by moderators. StackOverflow has become 
> very strict about open-ended questions that are more appropriate to 
> discussion forums. Choose your questions wisely.
> 
> More specific questions that can be solved with a small code example are 
> probably the best choice.
> 
> Look for issues that come up frequently. For instance, there are often 
> problems if someone forgets to add a data binding bead to a component. In the 
> question, you'll want a component that is broken because it's missing the 
> bead. In the answer, show them which bead to add and where it should be added.
> 
> In fact, more questions involving beads are probably great candidates!
> 
> Question: How do I use some feature in component X.
> Answer: This feature isn't enabled by default, but you can add Y bead to the 
> component.
> 
> - Josh
> 
> On 2019/03/04 13:14:09, Andrew Wetmore  wrote: 
> > "apacheroyale" is fine with me.
> > 
> > SO's tutorial suggests that open-ended discussion-type questions fare worse
> > on the site than specific, solution-focused questions. I wonder if it would
> > be considered spam to "recreate" some of the conversations on tricky
> > Flex-to-Royale issues that we have already talked through in this channel.
> > Feels a bit like reality-show tv to me... An alternative would be to post
> > some of the current, not-yet-resolved questions. We might even attract
> > interesting response from outside the existing Royale community.
> > 
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:57 AM Piotr Zarzycki 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm opt for "apacheroyale" - I'm using it for almost all posts on
> > > Moonshine's IDE twitter and fb, so it could be somehow consistent. ;)
> > >
> > > pon., 4 mar 2019 o 13:23 Andrew Wetmore  napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Carlos and I were pondering possible tags for such an adventure. Options
> > > > seem to include "apacheroyale", "apache-royale", or just plain "royale".
> > > It
> > > > is telling that none of these tags currently exist.
> > > >
> > > > I am happy to lob softball questions to get conversations started, 
> > > > maybe:
> > > >
> > > > - What's the best migration path away from Flash for an enterprise-level
> > > > Flex app?
> > > > - What are the options for IDEs for developing in JS? [I note that
> > > > "moonshine" is not a recognized tag on SO at the moment]
> > > > - How can I reuse my AS3 and MXML code if Flash is not an option?
> > > > Other leading questions?
> > > >
> > > > I am happy to be the naive question-asker, but of course getting juice
> > > into
> > > > these conversations (and maybe drawing conversation-browsers toward
> > > Royale)
> > > > depends on those who have already found Royale providing answers.
> > > >
> > > > a
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Carlos Rovira 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I as you used Stackoverflow just for consulting. Just create my 
> > > > > account
> > > > > now, so I'm learning too.
> > > > >
> > > > > What does mean for Apache Royale? Nowadays, a way to measure tech
> > > impact
> > > > > and how others could choose to go with Royale is see how easy is to
> > > find
> > > > > answers to questions. So you know, we want to know how something is
> > > done
> > > > > and people instead to go to normal docs, he google it, and normally 
> > > > > for
> > > > > development problems stack overflow use to have responses.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, how we could "start"? I think we'll need to enter some common
> > > > > questions and maybe respond ourselves ? I really don't know, but there
> > > > > should be some way to start and have a "apacheroyale" tag for all the
> > > > > question related to us.
> > > > >
> > > > > For example, I think Andrew could be a good active to starting this if
> > > he
> > > > > thing is interesting, both investigating the way to do it and starting
> > > > some
> > > > > questions so we can answer and easing the rest of us entering SO
> > > world..
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 10:42, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Same here with time for answering. By presence - what do you mean ?
> > > I'm
> > > > >> rather read-only user for Stackoverflow - How does presence of Royale
> > > > can
> > > > >> be printed there ?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> pon., 4 mar 2019 o 10:38 Harbs  napisał(a):
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have time to
> > > answer
> > > > >> SO
> > > > >> > questions.
> > > > >> >

Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow

[Josh Tynjala]

Recently, I edited an answer to an old question about AS3 IDEs recently (to add 
VSCode and Moonshine), and the original question (which had been up for years) 
was almost instantly closed by moderators. StackOverflow has become very strict 
about open-ended questions that are more appropriate to discussion forums. 
Choose your questions wisely.

More specific questions that can be solved with a small code example are 
probably the best choice.

Look for issues that come up frequently. For instance, there are often problems 
if someone forgets to add a data binding bead to a component. In the question, 
you'll want a component that is broken because it's missing the bead. In the 
answer, show them which bead to add and where it should be added.

In fact, more questions involving beads are probably great candidates!

Question: How do I use some feature in component X.
Answer: This feature isn't enabled by default, but you can add Y bead to the 
component.

- Josh

On 2019/03/04 13:14:09, Andrew Wetmore  wrote: 
> "apacheroyale" is fine with me.
> 
> SO's tutorial suggests that open-ended discussion-type questions fare worse
> on the site than specific, solution-focused questions. I wonder if it would
> be considered spam to "recreate" some of the conversations on tricky
> Flex-to-Royale issues that we have already talked through in this channel.
> Feels a bit like reality-show tv to me... An alternative would be to post
> some of the current, not-yet-resolved questions. We might even attract
> interesting response from outside the existing Royale community.
> 
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:57 AM Piotr Zarzycki 
> wrote:
> 
> > I'm opt for "apacheroyale" - I'm using it for almost all posts on
> > Moonshine's IDE twitter and fb, so it could be somehow consistent. ;)
> >
> > pon., 4 mar 2019 o 13:23 Andrew Wetmore  napisał(a):
> >
> > > Carlos and I were pondering possible tags for such an adventure. Options
> > > seem to include "apacheroyale", "apache-royale", or just plain "royale".
> > It
> > > is telling that none of these tags currently exist.
> > >
> > > I am happy to lob softball questions to get conversations started, maybe:
> > >
> > > - What's the best migration path away from Flash for an enterprise-level
> > > Flex app?
> > > - What are the options for IDEs for developing in JS? [I note that
> > > "moonshine" is not a recognized tag on SO at the moment]
> > > - How can I reuse my AS3 and MXML code if Flash is not an option?
> > > Other leading questions?
> > >
> > > I am happy to be the naive question-asker, but of course getting juice
> > into
> > > these conversations (and maybe drawing conversation-browsers toward
> > Royale)
> > > depends on those who have already found Royale providing answers.
> > >
> > > a
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Carlos Rovira 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I as you used Stackoverflow just for consulting. Just create my account
> > > > now, so I'm learning too.
> > > >
> > > > What does mean for Apache Royale? Nowadays, a way to measure tech
> > impact
> > > > and how others could choose to go with Royale is see how easy is to
> > find
> > > > answers to questions. So you know, we want to know how something is
> > done
> > > > and people instead to go to normal docs, he google it, and normally for
> > > > development problems stack overflow use to have responses.
> > > >
> > > > So, how we could "start"? I think we'll need to enter some common
> > > > questions and maybe respond ourselves ? I really don't know, but there
> > > > should be some way to start and have a "apacheroyale" tag for all the
> > > > question related to us.
> > > >
> > > > For example, I think Andrew could be a good active to starting this if
> > he
> > > > thing is interesting, both investigating the way to do it and starting
> > > some
> > > > questions so we can answer and easing the rest of us entering SO
> > world..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 10:42, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > >
> > > >> Same here with time for answering. By presence - what do you mean ?
> > I'm
> > > >> rather read-only user for Stackoverflow - How does presence of Royale
> > > can
> > > >> be printed there ?
> > > >>
> > > >> pon., 4 mar 2019 o 10:38 Harbs  napisał(a):
> > > >>
> > > >> > Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have time to
> > answer
> > > >> SO
> > > >> > questions.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Harbs
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrov...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Hi,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on
> > > Stackoverflow.
> > > >> > > Starting to have questions and answers there and increasing
> > presence
> > > >> over
> > > >> > > time should be a key goal for us.
> > > >> > > What do you think?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thanks
> > > >> > >

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #2002

[Apache Royale CI Server]

See 


Changes:

[yishayjobs] First implementation

[yishayjobs] Preparing to re-implement load indicator

[yishayjobs] Reimplemented LoadIndicator.

[carlosrovira] fix iconbutton and togglebutton icons removed when changed text 
at

[carlosrovira] jewel button add binding to text and html

[carlosrovira] jewel togglebutton: add selectedText property

[carlosrovira] jewel iconbutton: set icon to the left or right position

[carlosrovira] jewel button: add multiline text label bead

--
[...truncated 309.20 KB...]

check-sum:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

put-in-cache:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

copy-if-cached:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

download-dependency-zip:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

check-dependency:

download-dependency:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

echo-project-jar:
  [get] Getting: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
  [get] To: C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\lib\guava-LICENSE.txt
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

double-check-file:
 [echo] Need file: ${still_no_file}

get-from-cache-if-needed:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

fail-if-not-found:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

download-dependency-jar:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

check-cache:

download-jar:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

get-if-not-cached:
  [get] Getting: 
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/google/guava/guava/25.1-jre/guava-25.1-jre.jar
  [get] To: C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\lib\guava.jar
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

double-check-file:
 [echo] Need file: ${still_no_file}

Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow

[Andrew Wetmore]

"apacheroyale" is fine with me.

SO's tutorial suggests that open-ended discussion-type questions fare worse
on the site than specific, solution-focused questions. I wonder if it would
be considered spam to "recreate" some of the conversations on tricky
Flex-to-Royale issues that we have already talked through in this channel.
Feels a bit like reality-show tv to me... An alternative would be to post
some of the current, not-yet-resolved questions. We might even attract
interesting response from outside the existing Royale community.

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:57 AM Piotr Zarzycki 
wrote:

> I'm opt for "apacheroyale" - I'm using it for almost all posts on
> Moonshine's IDE twitter and fb, so it could be somehow consistent. ;)
>
> pon., 4 mar 2019 o 13:23 Andrew Wetmore  napisał(a):
>
> > Carlos and I were pondering possible tags for such an adventure. Options
> > seem to include "apacheroyale", "apache-royale", or just plain "royale".
> It
> > is telling that none of these tags currently exist.
> >
> > I am happy to lob softball questions to get conversations started, maybe:
> >
> > - What's the best migration path away from Flash for an enterprise-level
> > Flex app?
> > - What are the options for IDEs for developing in JS? [I note that
> > "moonshine" is not a recognized tag on SO at the moment]
> > - How can I reuse my AS3 and MXML code if Flash is not an option?
> > Other leading questions?
> >
> > I am happy to be the naive question-asker, but of course getting juice
> into
> > these conversations (and maybe drawing conversation-browsers toward
> Royale)
> > depends on those who have already found Royale providing answers.
> >
> > a
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Carlos Rovira 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I as you used Stackoverflow just for consulting. Just create my account
> > > now, so I'm learning too.
> > >
> > > What does mean for Apache Royale? Nowadays, a way to measure tech
> impact
> > > and how others could choose to go with Royale is see how easy is to
> find
> > > answers to questions. So you know, we want to know how something is
> done
> > > and people instead to go to normal docs, he google it, and normally for
> > > development problems stack overflow use to have responses.
> > >
> > > So, how we could "start"? I think we'll need to enter some common
> > > questions and maybe respond ourselves ? I really don't know, but there
> > > should be some way to start and have a "apacheroyale" tag for all the
> > > question related to us.
> > >
> > > For example, I think Andrew could be a good active to starting this if
> he
> > > thing is interesting, both investigating the way to do it and starting
> > some
> > > questions so we can answer and easing the rest of us entering SO
> world..
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 10:42, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >
> > >> Same here with time for answering. By presence - what do you mean ?
> I'm
> > >> rather read-only user for Stackoverflow - How does presence of Royale
> > can
> > >> be printed there ?
> > >>
> > >> pon., 4 mar 2019 o 10:38 Harbs  napisał(a):
> > >>
> > >> > Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have time to
> answer
> > >> SO
> > >> > questions.
> > >> >
> > >> > Harbs
> > >> >
> > >> > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org
> > >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Hi,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on
> > Stackoverflow.
> > >> > > Starting to have questions and answers there and increasing
> presence
> > >> over
> > >> > > time should be a key goal for us.
> > >> > > What do you think?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Carlos Rovira
> > >> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Piotr Zarzycki
> > >>
> > >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > >> *
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>


-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow

[Andrew Wetmore]

Carlos and I were pondering possible tags for such an adventure. Options
seem to include "apacheroyale", "apache-royale", or just plain "royale". It
is telling that none of these tags currently exist.

I am happy to lob softball questions to get conversations started, maybe:

- What's the best migration path away from Flash for an enterprise-level
Flex app?
- What are the options for IDEs for developing in JS? [I note that
"moonshine" is not a recognized tag on SO at the moment]
- How can I reuse my AS3 and MXML code if Flash is not an option?
Other leading questions?

I am happy to be the naive question-asker, but of course getting juice into
these conversations (and maybe drawing conversation-browsers toward Royale)
depends on those who have already found Royale providing answers.

a



On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Carlos Rovira 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I as you used Stackoverflow just for consulting. Just create my account
> now, so I'm learning too.
>
> What does mean for Apache Royale? Nowadays, a way to measure tech impact
> and how others could choose to go with Royale is see how easy is to find
> answers to questions. So you know, we want to know how something is done
> and people instead to go to normal docs, he google it, and normally for
> development problems stack overflow use to have responses.
>
> So, how we could "start"? I think we'll need to enter some common
> questions and maybe respond ourselves ? I really don't know, but there
> should be some way to start and have a "apacheroyale" tag for all the
> question related to us.
>
> For example, I think Andrew could be a good active to starting this if he
> thing is interesting, both investigating the way to do it and starting some
> questions so we can answer and easing the rest of us entering SO world..
>
>
>
>
>
> El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 10:42, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>> Same here with time for answering. By presence - what do you mean ? I'm
>> rather read-only user for Stackoverflow - How does presence of Royale can
>> be printed there ?
>>
>> pon., 4 mar 2019 o 10:38 Harbs  napisał(a):
>>
>> > Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have time to answer
>> SO
>> > questions.
>> >
>> > Harbs
>> >
>> > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira 
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on Stackoverflow.
>> > > Starting to have questions and answers there and increasing presence
>> over
>> > > time should be a key goal for us.
>> > > What do you think?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Carlos Rovira
>> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>> *
>>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>

-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Re: Failing build on Windows

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Harbs,

I just rebuild all repos and build SDK with ANT about 1 hour ago with no
problem. I'm on Mac and in Spain.
Latest time I had problems with dates and test was when changed the hour.
Yishay had the same problem at that time.
Maybe you're in some global zone that has some hour change this days?



El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 10:50, Harbs () escribió:

> I’m trying to build Royale on a Windows machine and I’m getting some odd
> errors.
>
> The error happens in ASDateTests and I’m getting “unexpected compilation
> problems” as well as day and dayUTF being read-only.
>
> I’ve tried cleaning things out including deleting the complete contents of
> the repos. I’ve tried ignoring the ASDateTests which just causes an error
> somewhere else.
>
> I’m kind of stumped. Anyone have ideas?
>
> Harbs



-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi,

I as you used Stackoverflow just for consulting. Just create my account
now, so I'm learning too.

What does mean for Apache Royale? Nowadays, a way to measure tech impact
and how others could choose to go with Royale is see how easy is to find
answers to questions. So you know, we want to know how something is done
and people instead to go to normal docs, he google it, and normally for
development problems stack overflow use to have responses.

So, how we could "start"? I think we'll need to enter some common questions
and maybe respond ourselves ? I really don't know, but there should be some
way to start and have a "apacheroyale" tag for all the question related to
us.

For example, I think Andrew could be a good active to starting this if he
thing is interesting, both investigating the way to do it and starting some
questions so we can answer and easing the rest of us entering SO world..





El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 10:42, Piotr Zarzycki ()
escribió:

> Same here with time for answering. By presence - what do you mean ? I'm
> rather read-only user for Stackoverflow - How does presence of Royale can
> be printed there ?
>
> pon., 4 mar 2019 o 10:38 Harbs  napisał(a):
>
> > Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have time to answer SO
> > questions.
> >
> > Harbs
> >
> > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on Stackoverflow.
> > > Starting to have questions and answers there and increasing presence
> over
> > > time should be a key goal for us.
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #750

[Apache Royale CI Server]

See 


Changes:

[harbs] jflex.de now requires https

--
[...truncated 16.65 KB...]
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is 

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is 


check-dependency:
 [echo] checking for 


download-dependency:
 [echo] basedir is 

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is 

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is 


check-dependency:
 [echo] checking for 


download-dependency:
 [echo] basedir is 

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is 

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is 


check-dependency:
 [echo] checking for 


download-dependency:
 [echo] basedir is 

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is 

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is 


check-dependency:
 [echo] checking for 


download-dependency:
 [echo] basedir is 

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is 

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is 


check-dependency:
 [echo] checking for 


download-dependency:
 [echo] basedir is 

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is 

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is 


check-dependency:
 [echo] checking for 


download-dependency:
 [echo] basedir is 

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is 

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is 


check-dependency:
 [echo] checking for 


download-dependency:
 [echo] basedir is 

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is 

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is 


check-dependency:
 [echo] checking for 


download-dependency:
 [echo] basedir is 

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is 

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is 

Failing build on Windows

[Harbs]

I’m trying to build Royale on a Windows machine and I’m getting some odd errors.

The error happens in ASDateTests and I’m getting “unexpected compilation 
problems” as well as day and dayUTF being read-only.

I’ve tried cleaning things out including deleting the complete contents of the 
repos. I’ve tried ignoring the ASDateTests which just causes an error somewhere 
else.

I’m kind of stumped. Anyone have ideas?

Harbs

Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Same here with time for answering. By presence - what do you mean ? I'm
rather read-only user for Stackoverflow - How does presence of Royale can
be printed there ?

pon., 4 mar 2019 o 10:38 Harbs  napisał(a):

> Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have time to answer SO
> questions.
>
> Harbs
>
> > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on Stackoverflow.
> > Starting to have questions and answers there and increasing presence over
> > time should be a key goal for us.
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>

-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: Apache Royale on Stackoverflow

[Harbs]

Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have time to answer SO 
questions.

Harbs

> On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on Stackoverflow.
> Starting to have questions and answers there and increasing presence over
> time should be a key goal for us.
> What do you think?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -- 
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira

Apache Royale on Stackoverflow

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi,

I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on Stackoverflow.
Starting to have questions and answers there and increasing presence over
time should be a key goal for us.
What do you think?

Thanks

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: WebComponents and WebAssembly, a game changer!?

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Olaf,

El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 8:23, Olaf Krueger ()
escribió:

>
> However, as Alex mentioned, I guess the perfect answer is that there is no
> perfect answer.
>

I think that's the great point. You can go with Royale, React, Angula,
Vue,... and all options has its pros and cons
so there's no perfect solution. React has many people behind, Facebook,
docs, you can find people that knows all libs that you need to work with
but has many other problems.

Royale seems to me more like an option for the future, as a technology and
a foundation that you could use for years and years, so you can target JS
now, but WEBASM in the future.
But all of this remains in the success of Royale. Since if we don't attract
talent to make lots of this happen, maybe will not be better than other
options, and even more risky.

Making Royale moving forward and evolving with all the things we all now is
very difficult. We need people interested in make this happen and investing
time in tasks that are not easy to get.
But when that happen is really amazing. If I think in how far we reach
since end of 2017 to these days, I think all is possible. Think all the
work done through this pass year... think how far we could go
in one more year I think possibilities are endless. We just need people
coming and joining, and Apache Royale could be an amazing tech to use.

One latest thought. For me React is a cool tech, but I think is just a
library and some other companion libs and is only in the JS realm. So for
me it seems the scope of React is almost done, and what about 5 years in
the future?
Will be React still be the king? And people that are investing now in
React? Should they migrate to the new trend (maybe Webasm?) when world says
that's the new tech to go?

I expect Royale would allow us to add other target, that we'll be difficult
and time consuming, but its all about Royale, and we must to see how to
adapt libs (Jewel,...) to output that new targets, and then adapt our apps
to target that new targets too. But other folks using JS libs...will need
to rewrite *all* from scratch...again...

In the other hand, going with those JS libs for a new app, is the most easy
and less risk solution today without no doubt.

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira