Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Carlos Rovira]

Thanks Piotr! I introduced the new texts.

@Dave, I think we are ready for review. Remember that is in preproduction
WP site.

If all is ok we can publish it in production, and announce in facebook and
twitter.

Thanks!

Carlos


2018-01-30 21:15 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :

> Carlos,
>
> Apache Mirrors to source code.
>
> TAR:
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> apache-royale-0.9.0-src.tar.gz
> ZIP:  http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> apache-royale-0.9.0-src.z
> ip
>
> Thanks, Piotr
>
>
> 2018-01-30 20:51 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :
>
> > Hi Piotr, I can make this in 1 or 2 hours, but please could you provide
> > exact links and texts for that links?
> > thanks!
> >
> > 2018-01-30 19:01 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> >
> > > Carlos,
> > >
> > > Sorry for the late response. I'm occupy by several tasks, also Royale
> > one.
> > > :) I just look into the website and I think if you add similar section
> as
> > > releases called "Source code" and put there:
> > >
> > > " Download the source code of Royale from one of the Apache mirror
> > sites: "
> > > - Put here in the same way apache mirrors as you did it with binary.
> > >
> > > I think it's enough. Let's push it. Dave and Andrew can review it.
> > >
> > > Thanks, Piotr
> > >
> > >
> > > 2018-01-30 18:53 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :
> > >
> > > > Hi Dave,
> > > >
> > > > 2018-01-30 18:37 GMT+01:00 Dave Fisher :
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Well then as a member of the trademarks committee I'll review it
> now,
> > > but
> > > > > where can I do that? (Too many emails and someone’s corporate mail
> > > server
> > > > > is rewriting URLs into oblivion.)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > maybe is better to wait for changes in download and source code
> page. I
> > > > need revision to download page new texts and put something new in
> > source
> > > > code and download page before put that on production site.
> > > >
> > > > I'll let you know as we have that published in order to review
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > *
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>



-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Carlos,

Apache Mirrors to source code.

TAR:
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/apache-royale-0.9.0-src.tar.gz
ZIP:  http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
apache-royale-0.9.0-src.z
ip

Thanks, Piotr


2018-01-30 20:51 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :

> Hi Piotr, I can make this in 1 or 2 hours, but please could you provide
> exact links and texts for that links?
> thanks!
>
> 2018-01-30 19:01 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
>
> > Carlos,
> >
> > Sorry for the late response. I'm occupy by several tasks, also Royale
> one.
> > :) I just look into the website and I think if you add similar section as
> > releases called "Source code" and put there:
> >
> > " Download the source code of Royale from one of the Apache mirror
> sites: "
> > - Put here in the same way apache mirrors as you did it with binary.
> >
> > I think it's enough. Let's push it. Dave and Andrew can review it.
> >
> > Thanks, Piotr
> >
> >
> > 2018-01-30 18:53 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :
> >
> > > Hi Dave,
> > >
> > > 2018-01-30 18:37 GMT+01:00 Dave Fisher :
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Well then as a member of the trademarks committee I'll review it now,
> > but
> > > > where can I do that? (Too many emails and someone’s corporate mail
> > server
> > > > is rewriting URLs into oblivion.)
> > > >
> > >
> > > maybe is better to wait for changes in download and source code page. I
> > > need revision to download page new texts and put something new in
> source
> > > code and download page before put that on production site.
> > >
> > > I'll let you know as we have that published in order to review
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > *
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>



-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Dave Fisher]

> On Jan 30, 2018, at 9:58 AM, Alex Harui  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 1/30/18, 9:37 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:
> 
>> Hi -
> 
>> (Too many emails and someone’s corporate mail server is rewriting URLs
>> into oblivion.)
> 
> It is the Adobe mail server.  I wish I knew how to turn it off...
>> 
>>> 
>>> Apache Open Office has a user-facing domain and site.  We weren't
>>> allowed
>>> to have one because the Branding folks only wanted to allow pre-existing
>>> domains, but IMO, they did not come up with a reason why allowing other
>>> projects to have user-facing domains would harm the ASF.
>> 
>> For OpenOffice.org, it was the user facing site for the project already
>> for 10 years when donated. It is also the registered trademark for
>> OpenOffice.
>> 
>> I know I am on that PMC. I did the migration of 9GB site in nearly 100
>> languages …
>> 
>> Let’s not revisit this as we’ve already hundreds of emails about this.
> 
> Are you saying there are 100's of email already on our list or our last
> attempt took 100 emails or to get oo.o approved it took hundreds of
> emails?  I'm not sure I want to give up on marketing Royale just because
> we can get shouted down.  IMO, there needs to be a good reason.

I’m saying (1) comparing a project that had millions of downloads and a 10 year 
history on a domain separate from and prior to acceptance in the Apache 
Incubator did not need to argue for a separate user facing site. That it was 
9GB meant that Infra wanted it separate. How spent a lot of effort 
parallelizing and using ZFS on the CMS so that I would stop sledgehammering 
overtime I changed the template.

By 100s of emails I mean that we already discussed in numerous emails on 
multiple lists royalesdk.org. I really don’t want to do it again.


> 
> Thanks, and apologies that my email server…

No trouble. Corporations need to protect from phishing attacks and conduct 
violations.

Regards,
Dave

> 
> -Alex
> 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[OmPrakash Muppirala]

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:00 PM, Alex Harui 
wrote:

> Hi Om,
>
> I ran the install.  I don't think the package.json is the one from the
> released source artifact, so I think we might need to call this a nightly.
>  But it does seem to work!
>

Cool, thanks for testing.  Yes, as I mentioned in this thread [1], I had a
modify the package.json and a couple of .js files that deal with
downloading the dependencies.
But the Royale SDK part is exactly the same.  Since the NPM release is not
an official Apache release, it is okay for us to claim that this is Apache
Royale v0.9.0.


[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a610c585f6d3d35f1be742d8cf66b160c27e7a3f5db6dbdab59c59ab@%3Cdev.royale.apache.org%3E


>
> Thanks for figuring something out so folks don't have to use URLs.  One
> question though:  Is having folks use @apache-royale/royale-js better than
> some day having folks use just apache-royale-js or might we switch to
> apache-royale-js some day?  I've never seen the @org/package before, but I
> don't use NPM much, so I don't know what folks expect.
>

It will be better for us as an organization if we maintain scoped releases
instead of one offs.  I see this trend in other projects as well.  For
example, the latest Angular code is available under the @angular org:
https://www.npmjs.com/~angular.  Vue is available under @vue:
https://www.npmjs.com/org/vue

This approach would also protect us from outsiders taking up package names
that might cause confusion with our packages.  Only we can deploy packages
under the @apache-royale namespace going forward.

Thanks,
Om


>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 1/29/18, 1:14 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
>  wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Om,
> >>
> >> Does that install our release or Nightly ?
> >>
> >
> >The release version, i.e. 0.9.0.
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> 2018-01-29 22:09 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala :
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Andrew Wetmore 
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > What about text like this for the download page on the website?
> >> > > ===
> >> > >
> >> > > The current version of Apache Royale is 0.9.0, released in January,
> >> 2018.
> >> > > It is beta-quality. This means that Royale may not work entirely as
> >>you
> >> > or
> >> > > we want it to, and that certain “standard” components or functions
> >>are
> >> > not
> >> > > yet available. However, you can create applications in Royale and
> >> compile
> >> > > them to run either in a browser window or on the Flash/AIR
> >>platforms.
> >> > >
> >> > > *Download *the compiled (binary) version of Royale from one of the
> >> Apache
> >> > > mirror sites:
> >> > >
> >> > > To create JavaScript applications only:
> >> > >
> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
> >>e.org%2Fdyn%2Fcloser.lua%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2F=02%
> 7C01%7Caharui%40adob
> >>e.com%7Cafc6683ae225455b441f08d5675d51cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> ce
> >>e1%7C0%7C0%7C636528572861041185=W6vjxZJ2Iy3XuHc5Z8VjaeDAtxVRxX
> 6GWha
> >>eoI2BeFc%3D=0
> >> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
> >> > >
> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
> >>e.org%2Fdyn%2Fcloser.lua%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2F=02%
> 7C01%7Caharui%40adob
> >>e.com%7Cafc6683ae225455b441f08d5675d51cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> ce
> >>e1%7C0%7C0%7C636528572861041185=W6vjxZJ2Iy3XuHc5Z8VjaeDAtxVRxX
> 6GWha
> >>eoI2BeFc%3D=0
> >> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.zip
> >> > >
> >> > > To create JavaScript or Flash applications:
> >> > >
> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
> >>e.org%2Fdyn%2Fcloser.lua%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2F=02%
> 7C01%7Caharui%40adob
> >>e.com%7Cafc6683ae225455b441f08d5675d51cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> ce
> >>e1%7C0%7C0%7C636528572861041185=W6vjxZJ2Iy3XuHc5Z8VjaeDAtxVRxX
> 6GWha
> >>eoI2BeFc%3D=0
> >> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
> >> > >
> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
> >>e.org%2Fdyn%2Fcloser.lua%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2F=02%
> 7C01%7Caharui%40adob
> >>e.com%7Cafc6683ae225455b441f08d5675d51cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> ce
> >>e1%7C0%7C0%7C636528572861041185=W6vjxZJ2Iy3XuHc5Z8VjaeDAtxVRxX
> 6GWha
> >>eoI2BeFc%3D=0
> >> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.zip
> >> > >
> >> > > Copy the contents of the download into a directory on your computer,
> >> then
> >> > > connect it to the IDE you are using.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > *NPM*:
> >> > >
> >> > > If you use npm, [WHAT GOES HERE?]
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > npm install @apache-royale/royale-js -g
> >> > npm install @apache-royale/royale-js-swf -g
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Om
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > ===
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Piotr, I can make this in 1 or 2 hours, but please could you provide
exact links and texts for that links?
thanks!

2018-01-30 19:01 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :

> Carlos,
>
> Sorry for the late response. I'm occupy by several tasks, also Royale one.
> :) I just look into the website and I think if you add similar section as
> releases called "Source code" and put there:
>
> " Download the source code of Royale from one of the Apache mirror sites: "
> - Put here in the same way apache mirrors as you did it with binary.
>
> I think it's enough. Let's push it. Dave and Andrew can review it.
>
> Thanks, Piotr
>
>
> 2018-01-30 18:53 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :
>
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > 2018-01-30 18:37 GMT+01:00 Dave Fisher :
> > >
> > >
> > > Well then as a member of the trademarks committee I'll review it now,
> but
> > > where can I do that? (Too many emails and someone’s corporate mail
> server
> > > is rewriting URLs into oblivion.)
> > >
> >
> > maybe is better to wait for changes in download and source code page. I
> > need revision to download page new texts and put something new in source
> > code and download page before put that on production site.
> >
> > I'll let you know as we have that published in order to review
> >
> > thanks
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>



-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Carlos,

Sorry for the late response. I'm occupy by several tasks, also Royale one.
:) I just look into the website and I think if you add similar section as
releases called "Source code" and put there:

" Download the source code of Royale from one of the Apache mirror sites: "
- Put here in the same way apache mirrors as you did it with binary.

I think it's enough. Let's push it. Dave and Andrew can review it.

Thanks, Piotr


2018-01-30 18:53 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :

> Hi Dave,
>
> 2018-01-30 18:37 GMT+01:00 Dave Fisher :
> >
> >
> > Well then as a member of the trademarks committee I'll review it now, but
> > where can I do that? (Too many emails and someone’s corporate mail server
> > is rewriting URLs into oblivion.)
> >
>
> maybe is better to wait for changes in download and source code page. I
> need revision to download page new texts and put something new in source
> code and download page before put that on production site.
>
> I'll let you know as we have that published in order to review
>
> thanks
>



-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Alex Harui]

On 1/30/18, 9:37 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:

>Hi -

> (Too many emails and someone’s corporate mail server is rewriting URLs
>into oblivion.)

It is the Adobe mail server.  I wish I knew how to turn it off...
>
>> 
>> Apache Open Office has a user-facing domain and site.  We weren't
>>allowed
>> to have one because the Branding folks only wanted to allow pre-existing
>> domains, but IMO, they did not come up with a reason why allowing other
>> projects to have user-facing domains would harm the ASF.
>
>For OpenOffice.org, it was the user facing site for the project already
>for 10 years when donated. It is also the registered trademark for
>OpenOffice.
>
>I know I am on that PMC. I did the migration of 9GB site in nearly 100
>languages …
>
>Let’s not revisit this as we’ve already hundreds of emails about this.

Are you saying there are 100's of email already on our list or our last
attempt took 100 emails or to get oo.o approved it took hundreds of
emails?  I'm not sure I want to give up on marketing Royale just because
we can get shouted down.  IMO, there needs to be a good reason.

Thanks, and apologies that my email server...

-Alex

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Dave,

2018-01-30 18:37 GMT+01:00 Dave Fisher :
>
>
> Well then as a member of the trademarks committee I'll review it now, but
> where can I do that? (Too many emails and someone’s corporate mail server
> is rewriting URLs into oblivion.)
>

maybe is better to wait for changes in download and source code page. I
need revision to download page new texts and put something new in source
code and download page before put that on production site.

I'll let you know as we have that published in order to review

thanks

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Alex,

I think we provide all what they ask us to provide. We just only need the
text for source code bundles to put in source code page, and we can add a
link for source code and GitHub pages in download page. So we have in place
all the things they ask. And we use our own presentation since we pursue
and objective to compete with project like React or Angular. So I don't see
any reason of weight to make us start wasting time making changes that, IMO
will end having a worst site that the current one.

the focus in on source code? ok, we'll soon have more info on how to get
source code.
the focus is to get commiters? ok, we have in all pages a call to arms
banner that ask people to join and link to mailing list. Moreover we have a
safe button (top - right corner) with a icon of user+ that again as people
to join us with a big button to join mailing list.





2018-01-30 18:10 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :

> Hi Carlos,
>
> We are under the rulings of the Apache Brand committee.  I've seen them
> request changes to other project sites in order to conform to certain
> branding standards for consistency.  It appears that whatever is on
> project.a.o needs to attract new committers and emphasize source code.
> So, whatever is on royale.a.o is not fully our decision.  If someone from
> Branding notices something a couple of months from now and doesn't like
> it, we'll have to change it.
>
> Apache Open Office has a user-facing domain and site.  We weren't allowed
> to have one because the Branding folks only wanted to allow pre-existing
> domains, but IMO, they did not come up with a reason why allowing other
> projects to have user-facing domains would harm the ASF.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 1/30/18, 9:02 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
>  wrote:
>
> >Hi Alex,
> >
> >I have to say that I'd not like that direction at all. I think that after
> >many efforts for our part, we are getting a good organization and we have
> >the opportunity to compete with other technologies if we get some other
> >things we really need. Instead, if we go down that route we'll be
> >providing
> >something that people coming could see it as something from the old
> >school.
> >We must honor what people coming to us expect from us while compiling with
> >what Apache want for s to do. I think now we are proving both in a good
> >mix
> >that is our brand.
> >
> >IMHO, we need work in the Royale docs and we'll be with almost all the
> >public pieces for our users set. Then as I always say we need a good
> >working royale UI set.
> >
> >I think although we are an Apache project we have our own personality and
> >while is great to copy others, we only need to copy things that really fit
> >us. But I think body and old organization only because many apache project
> >make in that way without thinking in what our project really demands will
> >be not good for our project.
> >
> >But that's only my opinion
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >2018-01-30 17:46 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> >
> >> We could appeal to have royalesdk.org allowed as our user-facing site.
> >> IMO, VP Branding never gave us a really good reason why it would be bad
> >> for Apache to allow it.  Every Apache project site I looked at is geared
> >> towards committers as well as users.  I don't think we can avoid
> >>appealing
> >> to committers on royale.a.o.
> >>
> >> My 2 cents,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 1/30/18, 8:40 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> >>Rovira"
> >>  wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi Alex,
> >> >
> >> >We are providing all of this. We can discuss the best organization, I
> >> >think
> >> >is right to add a links in the Downloads page to Source Code and
> >>Github so
> >> >people interested could go directly to that point. I think that while
> >>we
> >> >are providing all what Apache require from us we as well are organizing
> >> >and
> >> >presenting in a more modern way and more near to what people expect and
> >> >what others are doing.
> >> >
> >> >For two sites, I think we already have it and are ok with apache rules.
> >> >Remember that royalesdk.org was not allowed by apache brand and legal.
> >>So
> >> >for me  royale.a.o is the marketing site and Github (where code
> >>resides)
> >> >is
> >> >the "code" site and something directly prepared for people that wants
> >>the
> >> >code.
> >> >
> >> >Just my 2 ctnms
> >> >
> >> >2018-01-30 17:16 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Carlos,
> >> >>
> >> >> It may not be required by policy, but the first 5 Apache project
> >> >>websites
> >> >> I went to all had download links for the source package on their
> >> >>download
> >> >> page, and any "Source" page pointed to the project's repos.
> >> >>
> >> >> Apache's only official products are source code releases, not 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Alex Harui]

Hi Carlos,

We are under the rulings of the Apache Brand committee.  I've seen them
request changes to other project sites in order to conform to certain
branding standards for consistency.  It appears that whatever is on
project.a.o needs to attract new committers and emphasize source code.
So, whatever is on royale.a.o is not fully our decision.  If someone from
Branding notices something a couple of months from now and doesn't like
it, we'll have to change it.

Apache Open Office has a user-facing domain and site.  We weren't allowed
to have one because the Branding folks only wanted to allow pre-existing
domains, but IMO, they did not come up with a reason why allowing other
projects to have user-facing domains would harm the ASF.

-Alex

On 1/30/18, 9:02 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
 wrote:

>Hi Alex,
>
>I have to say that I'd not like that direction at all. I think that after
>many efforts for our part, we are getting a good organization and we have
>the opportunity to compete with other technologies if we get some other
>things we really need. Instead, if we go down that route we'll be
>providing
>something that people coming could see it as something from the old
>school.
>We must honor what people coming to us expect from us while compiling with
>what Apache want for s to do. I think now we are proving both in a good
>mix
>that is our brand.
>
>IMHO, we need work in the Royale docs and we'll be with almost all the
>public pieces for our users set. Then as I always say we need a good
>working royale UI set.
>
>I think although we are an Apache project we have our own personality and
>while is great to copy others, we only need to copy things that really fit
>us. But I think body and old organization only because many apache project
>make in that way without thinking in what our project really demands will
>be not good for our project.
>
>But that's only my opinion
>
>Thanks
>
>Carlos
>
>
>
>
>
>
>2018-01-30 17:46 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>
>> We could appeal to have royalesdk.org allowed as our user-facing site.
>> IMO, VP Branding never gave us a really good reason why it would be bad
>> for Apache to allow it.  Every Apache project site I looked at is geared
>> towards committers as well as users.  I don't think we can avoid
>>appealing
>> to committers on royale.a.o.
>>
>> My 2 cents,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 1/30/18, 8:40 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
>>Rovira"
>>  wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Alex,
>> >
>> >We are providing all of this. We can discuss the best organization, I
>> >think
>> >is right to add a links in the Downloads page to Source Code and
>>Github so
>> >people interested could go directly to that point. I think that while
>>we
>> >are providing all what Apache require from us we as well are organizing
>> >and
>> >presenting in a more modern way and more near to what people expect and
>> >what others are doing.
>> >
>> >For two sites, I think we already have it and are ok with apache rules.
>> >Remember that royalesdk.org was not allowed by apache brand and legal.
>>So
>> >for me  royale.a.o is the marketing site and Github (where code
>>resides)
>> >is
>> >the "code" site and something directly prepared for people that wants
>>the
>> >code.
>> >
>> >Just my 2 ctnms
>> >
>> >2018-01-30 17:16 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>> >
>> >> Hi Carlos,
>> >>
>> >> It may not be required by policy, but the first 5 Apache project
>> >>websites
>> >> I went to all had download links for the source package on their
>> >>download
>> >> page, and any "Source" page pointed to the project's repos.
>> >>
>> >> Apache's only official products are source code releases, not binary
>> >> artifacts.  I think we have to list the source package on the
>>downloads
>> >> page.  I did see that one project listed the binaries before the
>>source
>> >>so
>> >> maybe we can do that.  We want to direct people to our repos as well,
>> >>but
>> >> they are not releases.
>> >>
>> >> I think we have the option of having our download link redirect to
>>the
>> >> GitHub releases page if that makes sense.
>> >>
>> >> And as Piotr pointed out, there are 3 repos bundled into each release
>> >> artifact so the "Source" page should reference all 3 repos and the
>> >> "Downloads" reference the package that contains all 3 repos.
>> >>
>> >> Again, this is why I keep thinking we need a separate
>> >> user-facing/marketing site and domain that is distinct from
>>royale.a.o
>> >> which is more tuned to attracting new committers.
>> >>
>> >> My 2 cents,
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 1/30/18, 2:49 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
>> >>Rovira"
>> >>  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >No, I'm talking about this page:
>> >> 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Alex,

I have to say that I'd not like that direction at all. I think that after
many efforts for our part, we are getting a good organization and we have
the opportunity to compete with other technologies if we get some other
things we really need. Instead, if we go down that route we'll be providing
something that people coming could see it as something from the old school.
We must honor what people coming to us expect from us while compiling with
what Apache want for s to do. I think now we are proving both in a good mix
that is our brand.

IMHO, we need work in the Royale docs and we'll be with almost all the
public pieces for our users set. Then as I always say we need a good
working royale UI set.

I think although we are an Apache project we have our own personality and
while is great to copy others, we only need to copy things that really fit
us. But I think body and old organization only because many apache project
make in that way without thinking in what our project really demands will
be not good for our project.

But that's only my opinion

Thanks

Carlos






2018-01-30 17:46 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :

> We could appeal to have royalesdk.org allowed as our user-facing site.
> IMO, VP Branding never gave us a really good reason why it would be bad
> for Apache to allow it.  Every Apache project site I looked at is geared
> towards committers as well as users.  I don't think we can avoid appealing
> to committers on royale.a.o.
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
> On 1/30/18, 8:40 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
>  wrote:
>
> >Hi Alex,
> >
> >We are providing all of this. We can discuss the best organization, I
> >think
> >is right to add a links in the Downloads page to Source Code and Github so
> >people interested could go directly to that point. I think that while we
> >are providing all what Apache require from us we as well are organizing
> >and
> >presenting in a more modern way and more near to what people expect and
> >what others are doing.
> >
> >For two sites, I think we already have it and are ok with apache rules.
> >Remember that royalesdk.org was not allowed by apache brand and legal. So
> >for me  royale.a.o is the marketing site and Github (where code resides)
> >is
> >the "code" site and something directly prepared for people that wants the
> >code.
> >
> >Just my 2 ctnms
> >
> >2018-01-30 17:16 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> >
> >> Hi Carlos,
> >>
> >> It may not be required by policy, but the first 5 Apache project
> >>websites
> >> I went to all had download links for the source package on their
> >>download
> >> page, and any "Source" page pointed to the project's repos.
> >>
> >> Apache's only official products are source code releases, not binary
> >> artifacts.  I think we have to list the source package on the downloads
> >> page.  I did see that one project listed the binaries before the source
> >>so
> >> maybe we can do that.  We want to direct people to our repos as well,
> >>but
> >> they are not releases.
> >>
> >> I think we have the option of having our download link redirect to the
> >> GitHub releases page if that makes sense.
> >>
> >> And as Piotr pointed out, there are 3 repos bundled into each release
> >> artifact so the "Source" page should reference all 3 repos and the
> >> "Downloads" reference the package that contains all 3 repos.
> >>
> >> Again, this is why I keep thinking we need a separate
> >> user-facing/marketing site and domain that is distinct from royale.a.o
> >> which is more tuned to attracting new committers.
> >>
> >> My 2 cents,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/30/18, 2:49 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> >>Rovira"
> >>  wrote:
> >>
> >> >No, I'm talking about this page:
> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> http%3A%2F%2Froyale.apa
> >> >che.org%2Fsource-code%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> >> %7Cafe5673656ea4
> >> >92d967c08d567d00eff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636529065
> >> >657298785=v3PxmC3CwRXMLbJgHZVj8HjpqyG%
> >> 2BX%2Bno%2B7OrTixvYLs%3D
> >> >ved=0
> >> >(link is the footer since its priority is low)
> >> >
> >> >For all: I updated as well the Home in the pre-production with the NPM
> >> >info
> >> >so you can check. I added the "NPM" link to footer menu as well, as it
> >>was
> >> >some time ago before first website release.
> >> >
> >> >2018-01-30 11:34 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> >> >
> >> >> Carlos,
> >> >>
> >> >> Are you refering by source code - specific TAG in the repository ? If
> >> >>you
> >> >> wanted to point to the sources you need to point sources for the all
> >> >>three
> >> >> repository. Point to the 0.9.0 released tag.
> >> >>
> >> >> But what is for on the Download page link to the sources ? Just to
> >> >>address
> >> >> 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Alex Harui]

We could appeal to have royalesdk.org allowed as our user-facing site.
IMO, VP Branding never gave us a really good reason why it would be bad
for Apache to allow it.  Every Apache project site I looked at is geared
towards committers as well as users.  I don't think we can avoid appealing
to committers on royale.a.o.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

On 1/30/18, 8:40 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
 wrote:

>Hi Alex,
>
>We are providing all of this. We can discuss the best organization, I
>think
>is right to add a links in the Downloads page to Source Code and Github so
>people interested could go directly to that point. I think that while we
>are providing all what Apache require from us we as well are organizing
>and
>presenting in a more modern way and more near to what people expect and
>what others are doing.
>
>For two sites, I think we already have it and are ok with apache rules.
>Remember that royalesdk.org was not allowed by apache brand and legal. So
>for me  royale.a.o is the marketing site and Github (where code resides)
>is
>the "code" site and something directly prepared for people that wants the
>code.
>
>Just my 2 ctnms
>
>2018-01-30 17:16 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> It may not be required by policy, but the first 5 Apache project
>>websites
>> I went to all had download links for the source package on their
>>download
>> page, and any "Source" page pointed to the project's repos.
>>
>> Apache's only official products are source code releases, not binary
>> artifacts.  I think we have to list the source package on the downloads
>> page.  I did see that one project listed the binaries before the source
>>so
>> maybe we can do that.  We want to direct people to our repos as well,
>>but
>> they are not releases.
>>
>> I think we have the option of having our download link redirect to the
>> GitHub releases page if that makes sense.
>>
>> And as Piotr pointed out, there are 3 repos bundled into each release
>> artifact so the "Source" page should reference all 3 repos and the
>> "Downloads" reference the package that contains all 3 repos.
>>
>> Again, this is why I keep thinking we need a separate
>> user-facing/marketing site and domain that is distinct from royale.a.o
>> which is more tuned to attracting new committers.
>>
>> My 2 cents,
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>> On 1/30/18, 2:49 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
>>Rovira"
>>  wrote:
>>
>> >No, I'm talking about this page:
>> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2Froyale.apa
>> >che.org%2Fsource-code%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>> %7Cafe5673656ea4
>> >92d967c08d567d00eff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636529065
>> >657298785=v3PxmC3CwRXMLbJgHZVj8HjpqyG%
>> 2BX%2Bno%2B7OrTixvYLs%3D
>> >ved=0
>> >(link is the footer since its priority is low)
>> >
>> >For all: I updated as well the Home in the pre-production with the NPM
>> >info
>> >so you can check. I added the "NPM" link to footer menu as well, as it
>>was
>> >some time ago before first website release.
>> >
>> >2018-01-30 11:34 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
>> >
>> >> Carlos,
>> >>
>> >> Are you refering by source code - specific TAG in the repository ? If
>> >>you
>> >> wanted to point to the sources you need to point sources for the all
>> >>three
>> >> repository. Point to the 0.9.0 released tag.
>> >>
>> >> But what is for on the Download page link to the sources ? Just to
>> >>address
>> >> other type of users ? If they want to come and help us we have GitHub
>> >>link
>> >> on our page.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks, Piotr
>> >>
>> >> 2018-01-30 11:20 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :
>> >>
>> >> > Hi Alex,
>> >> >
>> >> > Thinking about this and I think is not right. We define Downloads
>>page
>> >> with
>> >> > the following phrase:
>> >> >
>> >> > "Here you can find the binary distributions of Apache Royale SDK
>>for
>> >>you
>> >> to
>> >> > download."
>> >> >
>> >> > the source is in the "source code" page and in the Github link.
>> >> >
>> >> > I think that's the right way, since we provide the separated spaces
>> >>to do
>> >> > that, and make it more clear for users coming
>> >> > (as I mentioned before, we should have two basic types of users,
>> >>people
>> >> > wanting to get the binaries to go fast without worry about more,
>>and
>> >> > people more advanced, first will go to downloads, and second will
>>go
>> >>to
>> >> > source code page or directly to gihub link.
>> >> >
>> >> > But, We should change the source code page with the links to the
>> >>source
>> >> > code bundles.
>> >> > @Andrew can you provide a text and right links to source code so I
>>can
>> >> make
>> >> > the same and put in Source code page?
>> >> >
>> >> > thanks
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > 2018-01-30 7:23 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Alex,

We are providing all of this. We can discuss the best organization, I think
is right to add a links in the Downloads page to Source Code and Github so
people interested could go directly to that point. I think that while we
are providing all what Apache require from us we as well are organizing and
presenting in a more modern way and more near to what people expect and
what others are doing.

For two sites, I think we already have it and are ok with apache rules.
Remember that royalesdk.org was not allowed by apache brand and legal. So
for me  royale.a.o is the marketing site and Github (where code resides) is
the "code" site and something directly prepared for people that wants the
code.

Just my 2 ctnms

2018-01-30 17:16 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :

> Hi Carlos,
>
> It may not be required by policy, but the first 5 Apache project websites
> I went to all had download links for the source package on their download
> page, and any "Source" page pointed to the project's repos.
>
> Apache's only official products are source code releases, not binary
> artifacts.  I think we have to list the source package on the downloads
> page.  I did see that one project listed the binaries before the source so
> maybe we can do that.  We want to direct people to our repos as well, but
> they are not releases.
>
> I think we have the option of having our download link redirect to the
> GitHub releases page if that makes sense.
>
> And as Piotr pointed out, there are 3 repos bundled into each release
> artifact so the "Source" page should reference all 3 repos and the
> "Downloads" reference the package that contains all 3 repos.
>
> Again, this is why I keep thinking we need a separate
> user-facing/marketing site and domain that is distinct from royale.a.o
> which is more tuned to attracting new committers.
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
>
> On 1/30/18, 2:49 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
>  wrote:
>
> >No, I'm talking about this page:
> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Froyale.apa
> >che.org%2Fsource-code%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %7Cafe5673656ea4
> >92d967c08d567d00eff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636529065
> >657298785=v3PxmC3CwRXMLbJgHZVj8HjpqyG%
> 2BX%2Bno%2B7OrTixvYLs%3D
> >ved=0
> >(link is the footer since its priority is low)
> >
> >For all: I updated as well the Home in the pre-production with the NPM
> >info
> >so you can check. I added the "NPM" link to footer menu as well, as it was
> >some time ago before first website release.
> >
> >2018-01-30 11:34 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> >
> >> Carlos,
> >>
> >> Are you refering by source code - specific TAG in the repository ? If
> >>you
> >> wanted to point to the sources you need to point sources for the all
> >>three
> >> repository. Point to the 0.9.0 released tag.
> >>
> >> But what is for on the Download page link to the sources ? Just to
> >>address
> >> other type of users ? If they want to come and help us we have GitHub
> >>link
> >> on our page.
> >>
> >> Thanks, Piotr
> >>
> >> 2018-01-30 11:20 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :
> >>
> >> > Hi Alex,
> >> >
> >> > Thinking about this and I think is not right. We define Downloads page
> >> with
> >> > the following phrase:
> >> >
> >> > "Here you can find the binary distributions of Apache Royale SDK for
> >>you
> >> to
> >> > download."
> >> >
> >> > the source is in the "source code" page and in the Github link.
> >> >
> >> > I think that's the right way, since we provide the separated spaces
> >>to do
> >> > that, and make it more clear for users coming
> >> > (as I mentioned before, we should have two basic types of users,
> >>people
> >> > wanting to get the binaries to go fast without worry about more, and
> >> > people more advanced, first will go to downloads, and second will go
> >>to
> >> > source code page or directly to gihub link.
> >> >
> >> > But, We should change the source code page with the links to the
> >>source
> >> > code bundles.
> >> > @Andrew can you provide a text and right links to source code so I can
> >> make
> >> > the same and put in Source code page?
> >> >
> >> > thanks
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2018-01-30 7:23 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> >> >
> >> > > IMO, we need to list the source package first.  Apache is about
> >>source.
> >> > >
> >> > > This is why I still think about a marketing site and domain that is
> >> more
> >> > > like the other JS frameworks out there.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Carlos Rovira
> >> >
> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%
> >>2Fcarlosrovira=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7Cafe5673656ea492d967c08
> >>d567d00eff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C63652906565729878
> >>5=GQobmSWy%2BnwN9rCu0Bu%2BGi77vSqDAikjTOkF11%2Byc%2FA%
> 3D=0
> >> >
> 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Carlos Rovira]

No, I'm talking about this page: http://royale.apache.org/source-code/
(link is the footer since its priority is low)

For all: I updated as well the Home in the pre-production with the NPM info
so you can check. I added the "NPM" link to footer menu as well, as it was
some time ago before first website release.

2018-01-30 11:34 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :

> Carlos,
>
> Are you refering by source code - specific TAG in the repository ? If you
> wanted to point to the sources you need to point sources for the all three
> repository. Point to the 0.9.0 released tag.
>
> But what is for on the Download page link to the sources ? Just to address
> other type of users ? If they want to come and help us we have GitHub link
> on our page.
>
> Thanks, Piotr
>
> 2018-01-30 11:20 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > Thinking about this and I think is not right. We define Downloads page
> with
> > the following phrase:
> >
> > "Here you can find the binary distributions of Apache Royale SDK for you
> to
> > download."
> >
> > the source is in the "source code" page and in the Github link.
> >
> > I think that's the right way, since we provide the separated spaces to do
> > that, and make it more clear for users coming
> > (as I mentioned before, we should have two basic types of users, people
> > wanting to get the binaries to go fast without worry about more, and
> > people more advanced, first will go to downloads, and second will go to
> > source code page or directly to gihub link.
> >
> > But, We should change the source code page with the links to the source
> > code bundles.
> > @Andrew can you provide a text and right links to source code so I can
> make
> > the same and put in Source code page?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> > 2018-01-30 7:23 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> >
> > > IMO, we need to list the source package first.  Apache is about source.
> > >
> > > This is why I still think about a marketing site and domain that is
> more
> > > like the other JS frameworks out there.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>



-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi, please check downloads page in preproduction site (WP site) and let me
know is ready for publication.

I'll wait for Andrew text for Source code page to introduce buttons to
download source code bundles

thanks

2018-01-30 11:20 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :

> Hi Alex,
>
> Thinking about this and I think is not right. We define Downloads page
> with the following phrase:
>
> "Here you can find the binary distributions of Apache Royale SDK for you
> to download."
>
> the source is in the "source code" page and in the Github link.
>
> I think that's the right way, since we provide the separated spaces to do
> that, and make it more clear for users coming
> (as I mentioned before, we should have two basic types of users, people
> wanting to get the binaries to go fast without worry about more, and
> people more advanced, first will go to downloads, and second will go to
> source code page or directly to gihub link.
>
> But, We should change the source code page with the links to the source
> code bundles.
> @Andrew can you provide a text and right links to source code so I can
> make the same and put in Source code page?
>
> thanks
>
>
> 2018-01-30 7:23 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>
>> IMO, we need to list the source package first.  Apache is about source.
>>
>> This is why I still think about a marketing site and domain that is more
>> like the other JS frameworks out there.
>>
>>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Carlos,

Are you refering by source code - specific TAG in the repository ? If you
wanted to point to the sources you need to point sources for the all three
repository. Point to the 0.9.0 released tag.

But what is for on the Download page link to the sources ? Just to address
other type of users ? If they want to come and help us we have GitHub link
on our page.

Thanks, Piotr

2018-01-30 11:20 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :

> Hi Alex,
>
> Thinking about this and I think is not right. We define Downloads page with
> the following phrase:
>
> "Here you can find the binary distributions of Apache Royale SDK for you to
> download."
>
> the source is in the "source code" page and in the Github link.
>
> I think that's the right way, since we provide the separated spaces to do
> that, and make it more clear for users coming
> (as I mentioned before, we should have two basic types of users, people
> wanting to get the binaries to go fast without worry about more, and
> people more advanced, first will go to downloads, and second will go to
> source code page or directly to gihub link.
>
> But, We should change the source code page with the links to the source
> code bundles.
> @Andrew can you provide a text and right links to source code so I can make
> the same and put in Source code page?
>
> thanks
>
>
> 2018-01-30 7:23 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>
> > IMO, we need to list the source package first.  Apache is about source.
> >
> > This is why I still think about a marketing site and domain that is more
> > like the other JS frameworks out there.
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>



-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Alex,

Thinking about this and I think is not right. We define Downloads page with
the following phrase:

"Here you can find the binary distributions of Apache Royale SDK for you to
download."

the source is in the "source code" page and in the Github link.

I think that's the right way, since we provide the separated spaces to do
that, and make it more clear for users coming
(as I mentioned before, we should have two basic types of users, people
wanting to get the binaries to go fast without worry about more, and
people more advanced, first will go to downloads, and second will go to
source code page or directly to gihub link.

But, We should change the source code page with the links to the source
code bundles.
@Andrew can you provide a text and right links to source code so I can make
the same and put in Source code page?

thanks


2018-01-30 7:23 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :

> IMO, we need to list the source package first.  Apache is about source.
>
> This is why I still think about a marketing site and domain that is more
> like the other JS frameworks out there.
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Andrew,
thanks! like it, I'm using it to modify download page :)

2018-01-29 22:06 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :

> What about text like this for the download page on the website?
> ===
>
> The current version of Apache Royale is 0.9.0, released in January, 2018.
> It is beta-quality. This means that Royale may not work entirely as you or
> we want it to, and that certain “standard” components or functions are not
> yet available. However, you can create applications in Royale and compile
> them to run either in a browser window or on the Flash/AIR platforms.
>
> *Download *the compiled (binary) version of Royale from one of the Apache
> mirror sites:
>
> To create JavaScript applications only:
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.zip
>
> To create JavaScript or Flash applications:
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.zip
>
> Copy the contents of the download into a directory on your computer, then
> connect it to the IDE you are using.
>
>
> *NPM*:
>
> If you use npm, [WHAT GOES HERE?]
>
>
> ===
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Alex Harui 
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 1/29/18, 10:43 AM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:
> >
> > >I as a reader would want to see a summary of what is in the release,
> where
> > >and how to get it, and what to do with it once I have it. The same
> > >information would go into the appropriate pages in the help docs. I can
> do
> > >a rough cut based on what I see in the README files, unless somebody
> with
> > >more knowledge wants to do the first draft.
> >
> > Go for it.  I don't have time for that today.
> > >
> > >On that front, here is a naive reader's question: I see lots of
> > >instructions in the README about compiling Royale, as if that were
> > >something I would always have to do. Then, almost as a throw-away, I see
> > >notes about the already-compiled binaries. Does EVERYBODY download and
> > >build Royale for themselves? I would have thought your average
> app-builder
> > >would start with the compiled binaries and just want to know how to
> > >reference them from the IDE of choice.
> >
> > Apache is very source-code oriented since it is about Open Source.  In
> > fact, to Apache, the binaries are not official releases, just convenience
> > artifacts.  So websites, readme's and lots of other things are supposed
> to
> > be about working from the source code.
> >
> > We could put a different README in the binary artifacts.  I just don't
> > know how many people will read it instead of the "Get Started" we put on
> > the docs page soon.
> >
> > HTH,
> > -Alex
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>



-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Andrew

2018-01-29 19:43 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :

> I as a reader would want to see a summary of what is in the release, where
> and how to get it, and what to do with it once I have it. The same
> information would go into the appropriate pages in the help docs. I can do
> a rough cut based on what I see in the README files, unless somebody with
> more knowledge wants to do the first draft.
>

+1

>
> On that front, here is a naive reader's question: I see lots of
> instructions in the README about compiling Royale, as if that were
> something I would always have to do.


mmm...it seems to me that README is the main file in GitHub. People that
goes to gihub would want to use royale building it.
In the other hand folks coming to the website use to be more like "users"
that wants the binaries and only have the more easy use



-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Alex Harui]

Hi Om,

I ran the install.  I don't think the package.json is the one from the
released source artifact, so I think we might need to call this a nightly.
 But it does seem to work!

Thanks for figuring something out so folks don't have to use URLs.  One
question though:  Is having folks use @apache-royale/royale-js better than
some day having folks use just apache-royale-js or might we switch to
apache-royale-js some day?  I've never seen the @org/package before, but I
don't use NPM much, so I don't know what folks expect.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 1/29/18, 1:14 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
 wrote:

>On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>
>wrote:
>
>> Om,
>>
>> Does that install our release or Nightly ?
>>
>
>The release version, i.e. 0.9.0.
>
>
>>
>>
>> 2018-01-29 22:09 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala :
>>
>> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Andrew Wetmore 
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > What about text like this for the download page on the website?
>> > > ===
>> > >
>> > > The current version of Apache Royale is 0.9.0, released in January,
>> 2018.
>> > > It is beta-quality. This means that Royale may not work entirely as
>>you
>> > or
>> > > we want it to, and that certain “standard” components or functions
>>are
>> > not
>> > > yet available. However, you can create applications in Royale and
>> compile
>> > > them to run either in a browser window or on the Flash/AIR
>>platforms.
>> > >
>> > > *Download *the compiled (binary) version of Royale from one of the
>> Apache
>> > > mirror sites:
>> > >
>> > > To create JavaScript applications only:
>> > > 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
>>e.org%2Fdyn%2Fcloser.lua%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adob
>>e.com%7Cafc6683ae225455b441f08d5675d51cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178dece
>>e1%7C0%7C0%7C636528572861041185=W6vjxZJ2Iy3XuHc5Z8VjaeDAtxVRxX6GWha
>>eoI2BeFc%3D=0
>> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
>> > > 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
>>e.org%2Fdyn%2Fcloser.lua%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adob
>>e.com%7Cafc6683ae225455b441f08d5675d51cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178dece
>>e1%7C0%7C0%7C636528572861041185=W6vjxZJ2Iy3XuHc5Z8VjaeDAtxVRxX6GWha
>>eoI2BeFc%3D=0
>> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.zip
>> > >
>> > > To create JavaScript or Flash applications:
>> > > 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
>>e.org%2Fdyn%2Fcloser.lua%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adob
>>e.com%7Cafc6683ae225455b441f08d5675d51cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178dece
>>e1%7C0%7C0%7C636528572861041185=W6vjxZJ2Iy3XuHc5Z8VjaeDAtxVRxX6GWha
>>eoI2BeFc%3D=0
>> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
>> > > 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
>>e.org%2Fdyn%2Fcloser.lua%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adob
>>e.com%7Cafc6683ae225455b441f08d5675d51cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178dece
>>e1%7C0%7C0%7C636528572861041185=W6vjxZJ2Iy3XuHc5Z8VjaeDAtxVRxX6GWha
>>eoI2BeFc%3D=0
>> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.zip
>> > >
>> > > Copy the contents of the download into a directory on your computer,
>> then
>> > > connect it to the IDE you are using.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > *NPM*:
>> > >
>> > > If you use npm, [WHAT GOES HERE?]
>> > >
>> > >
>> > npm install @apache-royale/royale-js -g
>> > npm install @apache-royale/royale-js-swf -g
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Om
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > ===
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Alex Harui
>>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On 1/29/18, 10:43 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" 
>>wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > >I as a reader would want to see a summary of what is in the
>>release,
>> > > where
>> > > > >and how to get it, and what to do with it once I have it. The
>>same
>> > > > >information would go into the appropriate pages in the help
>>docs. I
>> > can
>> > > do
>> > > > >a rough cut based on what I see in the README files, unless
>>somebody
>> > > with
>> > > > >more knowledge wants to do the first draft.
>> > > >
>> > > > Go for it.  I don't have time for that today.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >On that front, here is a naive reader's question: I see lots of
>> > > > >instructions in the README about compiling Royale, as if that
>>were
>> > > > >something I would always have to do. Then, almost as a
>>throw-away, I
>> > see
>> > > > >notes about the already-compiled binaries. Does EVERYBODY
>>download
>> and
>> > > > >build Royale for themselves? I would have thought your average
>> > > app-builder
>> > > > >would start with the compiled binaries and just want to know how
>>to
>> > > > >reference them from the IDE of choice.
>> > > >
>> > > > Apache is very source-code oriented since it is about Open Source.
>> In
>> > > > 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Alex Harui]

IMO, we need to list the source package first.  Apache is about source.

This is why I still think about a marketing site and domain that is more
like the other JS frameworks out there.

Here is the FlexJS 0.8.0 Download page in case it helps:
http://flex.apache.org/download-flexjs.html

My 2 cents,
-Alex

On 1/29/18, 1:13 PM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:

>If you post that text to the website, make sure the links are not broken
>by
>and that "_" characters have not been inserted.
>
>On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>
>wrote:
>
>> Om,
>>
>> Does that install our release or Nightly ?
>>
>>
>> 2018-01-29 22:09 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala :
>>
>> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Andrew Wetmore 
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > What about text like this for the download page on the website?
>> > > ===
>> > >
>> > > The current version of Apache Royale is 0.9.0, released in January,
>> 2018.
>> > > It is beta-quality. This means that Royale may not work entirely as
>>you
>> > or
>> > > we want it to, and that certain “standard” components or functions
>>are
>> > not
>> > > yet available. However, you can create applications in Royale and
>> compile
>> > > them to run either in a browser window or on the Flash/AIR
>>platforms.
>> > >
>> > > *Download *the compiled (binary) version of Royale from one of the
>> Apache
>> > > mirror sites:
>> > >
>> > > To create JavaScript applications only:
>> > > 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
>>e.org%2Fdyn%2Fcloser.lua%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adob
>>e.com%7C3aa0fa65f1a54076402808d5675d393e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178dece
>>e1%7C0%7C0%7C636528572460355078=qrvEPrliQLiH57E%2BKKdp04FHCOX7bHB7l
>>xSGMjxmg3g%3D=0
>> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
>> > > 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
>>e.org%2Fdyn%2Fcloser.lua%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adob
>>e.com%7C3aa0fa65f1a54076402808d5675d393e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178dece
>>e1%7C0%7C0%7C636528572460355078=qrvEPrliQLiH57E%2BKKdp04FHCOX7bHB7l
>>xSGMjxmg3g%3D=0
>> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.zip
>> > >
>> > > To create JavaScript or Flash applications:
>> > > 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
>>e.org%2Fdyn%2Fcloser.lua%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adob
>>e.com%7C3aa0fa65f1a54076402808d5675d393e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178dece
>>e1%7C0%7C0%7C636528572460355078=qrvEPrliQLiH57E%2BKKdp04FHCOX7bHB7l
>>xSGMjxmg3g%3D=0
>> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
>> > > 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
>>e.org%2Fdyn%2Fcloser.lua%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adob
>>e.com%7C3aa0fa65f1a54076402808d5675d393e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178dece
>>e1%7C0%7C0%7C636528572460355078=qrvEPrliQLiH57E%2BKKdp04FHCOX7bHB7l
>>xSGMjxmg3g%3D=0
>> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.zip
>> > >
>> > > Copy the contents of the download into a directory on your computer,
>> then
>> > > connect it to the IDE you are using.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > *NPM*:
>> > >
>> > > If you use npm, [WHAT GOES HERE?]
>> > >
>> > >
>> > npm install @apache-royale/royale-js -g
>> > npm install @apache-royale/royale-js-swf -g
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Om
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > ===
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Alex Harui
>>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On 1/29/18, 10:43 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" 
>>wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > >I as a reader would want to see a summary of what is in the
>>release,
>> > > where
>> > > > >and how to get it, and what to do with it once I have it. The
>>same
>> > > > >information would go into the appropriate pages in the help
>>docs. I
>> > can
>> > > do
>> > > > >a rough cut based on what I see in the README files, unless
>>somebody
>> > > with
>> > > > >more knowledge wants to do the first draft.
>> > > >
>> > > > Go for it.  I don't have time for that today.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >On that front, here is a naive reader's question: I see lots of
>> > > > >instructions in the README about compiling Royale, as if that
>>were
>> > > > >something I would always have to do. Then, almost as a
>>throw-away, I
>> > see
>> > > > >notes about the already-compiled binaries. Does EVERYBODY
>>download
>> and
>> > > > >build Royale for themselves? I would have thought your average
>> > > app-builder
>> > > > >would start with the compiled binaries and just want to know how
>>to
>> > > > >reference them from the IDE of choice.
>> > > >
>> > > > Apache is very source-code oriented since it is about Open Source.
>> In
>> > > > fact, to Apache, the binaries are not official releases, just
>> > convenience
>> > > > artifacts.  So websites, readme's and lots of other things are
>> supposed
>> > > to
>> > > > be about working from the 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[OmPrakash Muppirala]

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Piotr Zarzycki 
wrote:

> Om,
>
> Does that install our release or Nightly ?
>

The release version, i.e. 0.9.0.


>
>
> 2018-01-29 22:09 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala :
>
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Andrew Wetmore 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > What about text like this for the download page on the website?
> > > ===
> > >
> > > The current version of Apache Royale is 0.9.0, released in January,
> 2018.
> > > It is beta-quality. This means that Royale may not work entirely as you
> > or
> > > we want it to, and that certain “standard” components or functions are
> > not
> > > yet available. However, you can create applications in Royale and
> compile
> > > them to run either in a browser window or on the Flash/AIR platforms.
> > >
> > > *Download *the compiled (binary) version of Royale from one of the
> Apache
> > > mirror sites:
> > >
> > > To create JavaScript applications only:
> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.zip
> > >
> > > To create JavaScript or Flash applications:
> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.zip
> > >
> > > Copy the contents of the download into a directory on your computer,
> then
> > > connect it to the IDE you are using.
> > >
> > >
> > > *NPM*:
> > >
> > > If you use npm, [WHAT GOES HERE?]
> > >
> > >
> > npm install @apache-royale/royale-js -g
> > npm install @apache-royale/royale-js-swf -g
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> >
> > >
> > > ===
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Alex Harui 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 1/29/18, 10:43 AM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >I as a reader would want to see a summary of what is in the release,
> > > where
> > > > >and how to get it, and what to do with it once I have it. The same
> > > > >information would go into the appropriate pages in the help docs. I
> > can
> > > do
> > > > >a rough cut based on what I see in the README files, unless somebody
> > > with
> > > > >more knowledge wants to do the first draft.
> > > >
> > > > Go for it.  I don't have time for that today.
> > > > >
> > > > >On that front, here is a naive reader's question: I see lots of
> > > > >instructions in the README about compiling Royale, as if that were
> > > > >something I would always have to do. Then, almost as a throw-away, I
> > see
> > > > >notes about the already-compiled binaries. Does EVERYBODY download
> and
> > > > >build Royale for themselves? I would have thought your average
> > > app-builder
> > > > >would start with the compiled binaries and just want to know how to
> > > > >reference them from the IDE of choice.
> > > >
> > > > Apache is very source-code oriented since it is about Open Source.
> In
> > > > fact, to Apache, the binaries are not official releases, just
> > convenience
> > > > artifacts.  So websites, readme's and lots of other things are
> supposed
> > > to
> > > > be about working from the source code.
> > > >
> > > > We could put a different README in the binary artifacts.  I just
> don't
> > > > know how many people will read it instead of the "Get Started" we put
> > on
> > > > the docs page soon.
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Wetmore
> > >
> > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Andrew Wetmore]

If you post that text to the website, make sure the links are not broken by
and that "_" characters have not been inserted.

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Piotr Zarzycki 
wrote:

> Om,
>
> Does that install our release or Nightly ?
>
>
> 2018-01-29 22:09 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala :
>
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Andrew Wetmore 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > What about text like this for the download page on the website?
> > > ===
> > >
> > > The current version of Apache Royale is 0.9.0, released in January,
> 2018.
> > > It is beta-quality. This means that Royale may not work entirely as you
> > or
> > > we want it to, and that certain “standard” components or functions are
> > not
> > > yet available. However, you can create applications in Royale and
> compile
> > > them to run either in a browser window or on the Flash/AIR platforms.
> > >
> > > *Download *the compiled (binary) version of Royale from one of the
> Apache
> > > mirror sites:
> > >
> > > To create JavaScript applications only:
> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.zip
> > >
> > > To create JavaScript or Flash applications:
> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.zip
> > >
> > > Copy the contents of the download into a directory on your computer,
> then
> > > connect it to the IDE you are using.
> > >
> > >
> > > *NPM*:
> > >
> > > If you use npm, [WHAT GOES HERE?]
> > >
> > >
> > npm install @apache-royale/royale-js -g
> > npm install @apache-royale/royale-js-swf -g
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> >
> > >
> > > ===
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Alex Harui 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 1/29/18, 10:43 AM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >I as a reader would want to see a summary of what is in the release,
> > > where
> > > > >and how to get it, and what to do with it once I have it. The same
> > > > >information would go into the appropriate pages in the help docs. I
> > can
> > > do
> > > > >a rough cut based on what I see in the README files, unless somebody
> > > with
> > > > >more knowledge wants to do the first draft.
> > > >
> > > > Go for it.  I don't have time for that today.
> > > > >
> > > > >On that front, here is a naive reader's question: I see lots of
> > > > >instructions in the README about compiling Royale, as if that were
> > > > >something I would always have to do. Then, almost as a throw-away, I
> > see
> > > > >notes about the already-compiled binaries. Does EVERYBODY download
> and
> > > > >build Royale for themselves? I would have thought your average
> > > app-builder
> > > > >would start with the compiled binaries and just want to know how to
> > > > >reference them from the IDE of choice.
> > > >
> > > > Apache is very source-code oriented since it is about Open Source.
> In
> > > > fact, to Apache, the binaries are not official releases, just
> > convenience
> > > > artifacts.  So websites, readme's and lots of other things are
> supposed
> > > to
> > > > be about working from the source code.
> > > >
> > > > We could put a different README in the binary artifacts.  I just
> don't
> > > > know how many people will read it instead of the "Get Started" we put
> > on
> > > > the docs page soon.
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Wetmore
> > >
> > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>



-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Om,

Does that install our release or Nightly ?


2018-01-29 22:09 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala :

> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Andrew Wetmore 
> wrote:
>
> > What about text like this for the download page on the website?
> > ===
> >
> > The current version of Apache Royale is 0.9.0, released in January, 2018.
> > It is beta-quality. This means that Royale may not work entirely as you
> or
> > we want it to, and that certain “standard” components or functions are
> not
> > yet available. However, you can create applications in Royale and compile
> > them to run either in a browser window or on the Flash/AIR platforms.
> >
> > *Download *the compiled (binary) version of Royale from one of the Apache
> > mirror sites:
> >
> > To create JavaScript applications only:
> > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
> > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.zip
> >
> > To create JavaScript or Flash applications:
> > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
> > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.zip
> >
> > Copy the contents of the download into a directory on your computer, then
> > connect it to the IDE you are using.
> >
> >
> > *NPM*:
> >
> > If you use npm, [WHAT GOES HERE?]
> >
> >
> npm install @apache-royale/royale-js -g
> npm install @apache-royale/royale-js-swf -g
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
> >
> > ===
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Alex Harui 
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/29/18, 10:43 AM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:
> > >
> > > >I as a reader would want to see a summary of what is in the release,
> > where
> > > >and how to get it, and what to do with it once I have it. The same
> > > >information would go into the appropriate pages in the help docs. I
> can
> > do
> > > >a rough cut based on what I see in the README files, unless somebody
> > with
> > > >more knowledge wants to do the first draft.
> > >
> > > Go for it.  I don't have time for that today.
> > > >
> > > >On that front, here is a naive reader's question: I see lots of
> > > >instructions in the README about compiling Royale, as if that were
> > > >something I would always have to do. Then, almost as a throw-away, I
> see
> > > >notes about the already-compiled binaries. Does EVERYBODY download and
> > > >build Royale for themselves? I would have thought your average
> > app-builder
> > > >would start with the compiled binaries and just want to know how to
> > > >reference them from the IDE of choice.
> > >
> > > Apache is very source-code oriented since it is about Open Source.  In
> > > fact, to Apache, the binaries are not official releases, just
> convenience
> > > artifacts.  So websites, readme's and lots of other things are supposed
> > to
> > > be about working from the source code.
> > >
> > > We could put a different README in the binary artifacts.  I just don't
> > > know how many people will read it instead of the "Get Started" we put
> on
> > > the docs page soon.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >
>



-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[OmPrakash Muppirala]

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Andrew Wetmore  wrote:

> What about text like this for the download page on the website?
> ===
>
> The current version of Apache Royale is 0.9.0, released in January, 2018.
> It is beta-quality. This means that Royale may not work entirely as you or
> we want it to, and that certain “standard” components or functions are not
> yet available. However, you can create applications in Royale and compile
> them to run either in a browser window or on the Flash/AIR platforms.
>
> *Download *the compiled (binary) version of Royale from one of the Apache
> mirror sites:
>
> To create JavaScript applications only:
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.zip
>
> To create JavaScript or Flash applications:
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.zip
>
> Copy the contents of the download into a directory on your computer, then
> connect it to the IDE you are using.
>
>
> *NPM*:
>
> If you use npm, [WHAT GOES HERE?]
>
>
npm install @apache-royale/royale-js -g
npm install @apache-royale/royale-js-swf -g

Thanks,
Om


>
> ===
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Alex Harui 
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 1/29/18, 10:43 AM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:
> >
> > >I as a reader would want to see a summary of what is in the release,
> where
> > >and how to get it, and what to do with it once I have it. The same
> > >information would go into the appropriate pages in the help docs. I can
> do
> > >a rough cut based on what I see in the README files, unless somebody
> with
> > >more knowledge wants to do the first draft.
> >
> > Go for it.  I don't have time for that today.
> > >
> > >On that front, here is a naive reader's question: I see lots of
> > >instructions in the README about compiling Royale, as if that were
> > >something I would always have to do. Then, almost as a throw-away, I see
> > >notes about the already-compiled binaries. Does EVERYBODY download and
> > >build Royale for themselves? I would have thought your average
> app-builder
> > >would start with the compiled binaries and just want to know how to
> > >reference them from the IDE of choice.
> >
> > Apache is very source-code oriented since it is about Open Source.  In
> > fact, to Apache, the binaries are not official releases, just convenience
> > artifacts.  So websites, readme's and lots of other things are supposed
> to
> > be about working from the source code.
> >
> > We could put a different README in the binary artifacts.  I just don't
> > know how many people will read it instead of the "Get Started" we put on
> > the docs page soon.
> >
> > HTH,
> > -Alex
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Andrew Wetmore]

What about text like this for the download page on the website?
===

The current version of Apache Royale is 0.9.0, released in January, 2018.
It is beta-quality. This means that Royale may not work entirely as you or
we want it to, and that certain “standard” components or functions are not
yet available. However, you can create applications in Royale and compile
them to run either in a browser window or on the Flash/AIR platforms.

*Download *the compiled (binary) version of Royale from one of the Apache
mirror sites:

To create JavaScript applications only:
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.zip

To create JavaScript or Flash applications:
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.zip

Copy the contents of the download into a directory on your computer, then
connect it to the IDE you are using.


*NPM*:

If you use npm, [WHAT GOES HERE?]


===



On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Alex Harui 
wrote:

>
>
> On 1/29/18, 10:43 AM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:
>
> >I as a reader would want to see a summary of what is in the release, where
> >and how to get it, and what to do with it once I have it. The same
> >information would go into the appropriate pages in the help docs. I can do
> >a rough cut based on what I see in the README files, unless somebody with
> >more knowledge wants to do the first draft.
>
> Go for it.  I don't have time for that today.
> >
> >On that front, here is a naive reader's question: I see lots of
> >instructions in the README about compiling Royale, as if that were
> >something I would always have to do. Then, almost as a throw-away, I see
> >notes about the already-compiled binaries. Does EVERYBODY download and
> >build Royale for themselves? I would have thought your average app-builder
> >would start with the compiled binaries and just want to know how to
> >reference them from the IDE of choice.
>
> Apache is very source-code oriented since it is about Open Source.  In
> fact, to Apache, the binaries are not official releases, just convenience
> artifacts.  So websites, readme's and lots of other things are supposed to
> be about working from the source code.
>
> We could put a different README in the binary artifacts.  I just don't
> know how many people will read it instead of the "Get Started" we put on
> the docs page soon.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
>


-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Alex Harui]

On 1/29/18, 10:43 AM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:

>I as a reader would want to see a summary of what is in the release, where
>and how to get it, and what to do with it once I have it. The same
>information would go into the appropriate pages in the help docs. I can do
>a rough cut based on what I see in the README files, unless somebody with
>more knowledge wants to do the first draft.

Go for it.  I don't have time for that today.
>
>On that front, here is a naive reader's question: I see lots of
>instructions in the README about compiling Royale, as if that were
>something I would always have to do. Then, almost as a throw-away, I see
>notes about the already-compiled binaries. Does EVERYBODY download and
>build Royale for themselves? I would have thought your average app-builder
>would start with the compiled binaries and just want to know how to
>reference them from the IDE of choice.

Apache is very source-code oriented since it is about Open Source.  In
fact, to Apache, the binaries are not official releases, just convenience
artifacts.  So websites, readme's and lots of other things are supposed to
be about working from the source code.

We could put a different README in the binary artifacts.  I just don't
know how many people will read it instead of the "Get Started" we put on
the docs page soon.

HTH,
-Alex

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Piotr Zarzycki]

In the "release" section we are interested into the binary package only.
User have to download it and use in the choosen IDE. That is all.

2018-01-29 19:43 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :

> I as a reader would want to see a summary of what is in the release, where
> and how to get it, and what to do with it once I have it. The same
> information would go into the appropriate pages in the help docs. I can do
> a rough cut based on what I see in the README files, unless somebody with
> more knowledge wants to do the first draft.
>
> On that front, here is a naive reader's question: I see lots of
> instructions in the README about compiling Royale, as if that were
> something I would always have to do. Then, almost as a throw-away, I see
> notes about the already-compiled binaries. Does EVERYBODY download and
> build Royale for themselves? I would have thought your average app-builder
> would start with the compiled binaries and just want to know how to
> reference them from the IDE of choice.
>
> a
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Piotr Zarzycki  >
> wrote:
>
> > Carlos,
> >
> > I'm not sure what to write in the "Release" section here [1]. Maybe
> Andrew
> > could suggest something. I know only that in that section should landed
> > installation through npm. Take a look into above announce. Mac and
> Windows
> > version.
> >
> > [1] http://royale.apache.org/download/
> >
> > Thanks, Piotr
> >
> >
> > 2018-01-29 12:54 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> >
> > > I have noticed that many times in Alex's emails, but have never bother
> > > with that, cause I was just copy whole things. Yep we could use some
> > short
> > > versions.
> > >
> > > Thanks for pointing that.
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > 2018-01-29 12:51 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :
> > >
> > >> I see what the problem is: Because the URLs are long the announcement,
> > >> which has hard returns instead of line wrapping, inserts a "_"
> character
> > >> at
> > >> the line break:
> > >>
> > >> http://mirror.dsrg.utoronto.ca/apache/royale/0.9.0/binaries/
> > >> apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip
> > >>
> > >> With the "_" removed the download works properly.
> > >>
> > >> We should consider providing shorter alias URLs to avoid this issue,
> or
> > at
> > >> least naming it so people like me can catch and fix it instead of
> maybe
> > >> giving up.
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:55 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > What do you see when you go to that link [1] ? Can you post the
> > >> screenshot.
> > >> > - Make it through nabble [2] cause mailing list is stripping out
> > images.
> > >> >
> > >> > [1]
> > >> > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > >> > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.zip
> > >> >
> > >> > [2] http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/
> > >> >
> > >> > 2018-01-29 11:49 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :
> > >> >
> > >> > > *http://mirror.dsrg.utoronto.ca/apache/royale/0.9.0/
> > >> > > binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*
> > >> > >  > >> > > binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip>
> > >> > >
> > >> > > *http://apache.forsale.plus/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-
> > >> > > royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*
> > >> > >  > >> > > royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip>
> > >> > >
> > >> > > *http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/apache/royale/0.
> > >> > > 9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*
> > >> > >  > >> > > 9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip>
> > >> > >
> > >> > > and several others.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> > >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Hi Andrew,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > To me they are working. Which one you did try ?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Thanks, Piotr
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > 2018-01-29 11:36 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore  >:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Hi:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > None of the mirror sites seem to have the downloadable binary
> > zip.
> > >> > How
> > >> > > > long
> > >> > > > > does it take to propagate?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Carlos Rovira <
> > >> > > carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Hi Piotr, could you give in this thread all the info about
> the
> > >> > update
> > >> > > > and
> > >> > > > > > I'll do it as soon as I can?
> > >> > > > > > thanks
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > 2018-01-29 9:57 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > >> > > >:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > On the other hand I will wait for you, because we need to
> > >> update
> > >> > > > > website
> > >> > > > > > > first with information about 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Andrew Wetmore]

I as a reader would want to see a summary of what is in the release, where
and how to get it, and what to do with it once I have it. The same
information would go into the appropriate pages in the help docs. I can do
a rough cut based on what I see in the README files, unless somebody with
more knowledge wants to do the first draft.

On that front, here is a naive reader's question: I see lots of
instructions in the README about compiling Royale, as if that were
something I would always have to do. Then, almost as a throw-away, I see
notes about the already-compiled binaries. Does EVERYBODY download and
build Royale for themselves? I would have thought your average app-builder
would start with the compiled binaries and just want to know how to
reference them from the IDE of choice.

a

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Piotr Zarzycki 
wrote:

> Carlos,
>
> I'm not sure what to write in the "Release" section here [1]. Maybe Andrew
> could suggest something. I know only that in that section should landed
> installation through npm. Take a look into above announce. Mac and Windows
> version.
>
> [1] http://royale.apache.org/download/
>
> Thanks, Piotr
>
>
> 2018-01-29 12:54 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
>
> > I have noticed that many times in Alex's emails, but have never bother
> > with that, cause I was just copy whole things. Yep we could use some
> short
> > versions.
> >
> > Thanks for pointing that.
> > Piotr
> >
> > 2018-01-29 12:51 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :
> >
> >> I see what the problem is: Because the URLs are long the announcement,
> >> which has hard returns instead of line wrapping, inserts a "_" character
> >> at
> >> the line break:
> >>
> >> http://mirror.dsrg.utoronto.ca/apache/royale/0.9.0/binaries/
> >> apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip
> >>
> >> With the "_" removed the download works properly.
> >>
> >> We should consider providing shorter alias URLs to avoid this issue, or
> at
> >> least naming it so people like me can catch and fix it instead of maybe
> >> giving up.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:55 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > What do you see when you go to that link [1] ? Can you post the
> >> screenshot.
> >> > - Make it through nabble [2] cause mailing list is stripping out
> images.
> >> >
> >> > [1]
> >> > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> >> > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.zip
> >> >
> >> > [2] http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/
> >> >
> >> > 2018-01-29 11:49 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :
> >> >
> >> > > *http://mirror.dsrg.utoronto.ca/apache/royale/0.9.0/
> >> > > binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*
> >> > >  >> > > binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip>
> >> > >
> >> > > *http://apache.forsale.plus/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-
> >> > > royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*
> >> > >  >> > > royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip>
> >> > >
> >> > > *http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/apache/royale/0.
> >> > > 9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*
> >> > >  >> > > 9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip>
> >> > >
> >> > > and several others.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> >> > > >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi Andrew,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > To me they are working. Which one you did try ?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks, Piotr
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 2018-01-29 11:36 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Hi:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > None of the mirror sites seem to have the downloadable binary
> zip.
> >> > How
> >> > > > long
> >> > > > > does it take to propagate?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Carlos Rovira <
> >> > > carlosrov...@apache.org>
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Hi Piotr, could you give in this thread all the info about the
> >> > update
> >> > > > and
> >> > > > > > I'll do it as soon as I can?
> >> > > > > > thanks
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > 2018-01-29 9:57 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <
> >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> >> > > >:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On the other hand I will wait for you, because we need to
> >> update
> >> > > > > website
> >> > > > > > > first with information about download.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > 2018-01-29 9:52 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <
> >> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> >> > > > >:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > No problem! I will do it!
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Thanks for the info!
> >> > > > > > > > Piotr
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > 2018-01-29 9:42 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <
> >> > carlosrov...@apache.org
> >> > > >:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >> Hi Piotr,
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Carlos,

I'm not sure what to write in the "Release" section here [1]. Maybe Andrew
could suggest something. I know only that in that section should landed
installation through npm. Take a look into above announce. Mac and Windows
version.

[1] http://royale.apache.org/download/

Thanks, Piotr


2018-01-29 12:54 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :

> I have noticed that many times in Alex's emails, but have never bother
> with that, cause I was just copy whole things. Yep we could use some short
> versions.
>
> Thanks for pointing that.
> Piotr
>
> 2018-01-29 12:51 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :
>
>> I see what the problem is: Because the URLs are long the announcement,
>> which has hard returns instead of line wrapping, inserts a "_" character
>> at
>> the line break:
>>
>> http://mirror.dsrg.utoronto.ca/apache/royale/0.9.0/binaries/
>> apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip
>>
>> With the "_" removed the download works properly.
>>
>> We should consider providing shorter alias URLs to avoid this issue, or at
>> least naming it so people like me can catch and fix it instead of maybe
>> giving up.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:55 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <
>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > What do you see when you go to that link [1] ? Can you post the
>> screenshot.
>> > - Make it through nabble [2] cause mailing list is stripping out images.
>> >
>> > [1]
>> > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
>> > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.zip
>> >
>> > [2] http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/
>> >
>> > 2018-01-29 11:49 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :
>> >
>> > > *http://mirror.dsrg.utoronto.ca/apache/royale/0.9.0/
>> > > binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*
>> > > > > > binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip>
>> > >
>> > > *http://apache.forsale.plus/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-
>> > > royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*
>> > > > > > royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip>
>> > >
>> > > *http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/apache/royale/0.
>> > > 9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*
>> > > > > > 9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip>
>> > >
>> > > and several others.
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <
>> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Andrew,
>> > > >
>> > > > To me they are working. Which one you did try ?
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks, Piotr
>> > > >
>> > > > 2018-01-29 11:36 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > None of the mirror sites seem to have the downloadable binary zip.
>> > How
>> > > > long
>> > > > > does it take to propagate?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Carlos Rovira <
>> > > carlosrov...@apache.org>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi Piotr, could you give in this thread all the info about the
>> > update
>> > > > and
>> > > > > > I'll do it as soon as I can?
>> > > > > > thanks
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > 2018-01-29 9:57 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <
>> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>> > > >:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On the other hand I will wait for you, because we need to
>> update
>> > > > > website
>> > > > > > > first with information about download.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > 2018-01-29 9:52 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <
>> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>> > > > >:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > No problem! I will do it!
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks for the info!
>> > > > > > > > Piotr
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > 2018-01-29 9:42 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <
>> > carlosrov...@apache.org
>> > > >:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> Hi Piotr,
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> I'm off right now so could you do it for me?
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> If not I could make this night or tomorrow
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> thanks
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> 2018-01-29 8:59 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <
>> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>> > > > > >:
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> > Hi Alex,
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Thanks for the announce. I just respond because it's not
>> > seen
>> > > on
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > >> nabble
>> > > > > > > >> > Dev list. Due to send to multiple lists.
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Happy to finally have that release! :)
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Carlos will you announce on Twitter and Facebook ?
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Piotr
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > 2018-01-29 8:48 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > > The Apache Royale community is pleased to announce the
>> > > release
>> > > > > of
>> > > > > > > >> Apache
>> > > > > > > >> > > Royale 0.9.0.
>> > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > > >> > > The Apache Royale 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Piotr Zarzycki]

I have noticed that many times in Alex's emails, but have never bother with
that, cause I was just copy whole things. Yep we could use some short
versions.

Thanks for pointing that.
Piotr

2018-01-29 12:51 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :

> I see what the problem is: Because the URLs are long the announcement,
> which has hard returns instead of line wrapping, inserts a "_" character at
> the line break:
>
> http://mirror.dsrg.utoronto.ca/apache/royale/0.9.0/
> binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip
>
> With the "_" removed the download works properly.
>
> We should consider providing shorter alias URLs to avoid this issue, or at
> least naming it so people like me can catch and fix it instead of maybe
> giving up.
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:55 AM, Piotr Zarzycki  >
> wrote:
>
> > What do you see when you go to that link [1] ? Can you post the
> screenshot.
> > - Make it through nabble [2] cause mailing list is stripping out images.
> >
> > [1]
> > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.zip
> >
> > [2] http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/
> >
> > 2018-01-29 11:49 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :
> >
> > > *http://mirror.dsrg.utoronto.ca/apache/royale/0.9.0/
> > > binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*
> > >  > > binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip>
> > >
> > > *http://apache.forsale.plus/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-
> > > royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*
> > >  > > royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip>
> > >
> > > *http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/apache/royale/0.
> > > 9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*
> > >  > > 9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip>
> > >
> > > and several others.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Andrew,
> > > >
> > > > To me they are working. Which one you did try ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, Piotr
> > > >
> > > > 2018-01-29 11:36 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :
> > > >
> > > > > Hi:
> > > > >
> > > > > None of the mirror sites seem to have the downloadable binary zip.
> > How
> > > > long
> > > > > does it take to propagate?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Carlos Rovira <
> > > carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Piotr, could you give in this thread all the info about the
> > update
> > > > and
> > > > > > I'll do it as soon as I can?
> > > > > > thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2018-01-29 9:57 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On the other hand I will wait for you, because we need to
> update
> > > > > website
> > > > > > > first with information about download.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2018-01-29 9:52 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > > >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > No problem! I will do it!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks for the info!
> > > > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2018-01-29 9:42 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrov...@apache.org
> > > >:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Hi Piotr,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I'm off right now so could you do it for me?
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> If not I could make this night or tomorrow
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> thanks
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> 2018-01-29 8:59 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > > > >:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > Hi Alex,
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Thanks for the announce. I just respond because it's not
> > seen
> > > on
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > >> nabble
> > > > > > > >> > Dev list. Due to send to multiple lists.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Happy to finally have that release! :)
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Carlos will you announce on Twitter and Facebook ?
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Piotr
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > 2018-01-29 8:48 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > > The Apache Royale community is pleased to announce the
> > > release
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > >> Apache
> > > > > > > >> > > Royale 0.9.0.
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > The Apache Royale project is a continuation of the
> > previous
> > > > > effort
> > > > > > > >> called
> > > > > > > >> > > FlexJS to produce a next-generation of the Apache Flex
> SDK
> > > > that
> > > > > > > >> enables
> > > > > > > >> > > developers to use MXML and ActionScript to generated
> > > > HTML/JS/CSS
> > > > > > so
> > > > > > > >> > > applications can run natively in browsers.  The
> > > cross-compiled
> > > > > > code
> > > > > > > >> can
> > > > > > > >> > > also be used in Apache Cordova (Adobe PhoneGap) mobile

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Andrew Wetmore]

I see what the problem is: Because the URLs are long the announcement,
which has hard returns instead of line wrapping, inserts a "_" character at
the line break:

http://mirror.dsrg.utoronto.ca/apache/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip

With the "_" removed the download works properly.

We should consider providing shorter alias URLs to avoid this issue, or at
least naming it so people like me can catch and fix it instead of maybe
giving up.

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:55 AM, Piotr Zarzycki 
wrote:

> What do you see when you go to that link [1] ? Can you post the screenshot.
> - Make it through nabble [2] cause mailing list is stripping out images.
>
> [1]
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.zip
>
> [2] http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/
>
> 2018-01-29 11:49 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :
>
> > *http://mirror.dsrg.utoronto.ca/apache/royale/0.9.0/
> > binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*
> >  > binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip>
> >
> > *http://apache.forsale.plus/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-
> > royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*
> >  > royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip>
> >
> > *http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/apache/royale/0.
> > 9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*
> >  > 9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip>
> >
> > and several others.
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > >
> > > To me they are working. Which one you did try ?
> > >
> > > Thanks, Piotr
> > >
> > > 2018-01-29 11:36 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :
> > >
> > > > Hi:
> > > >
> > > > None of the mirror sites seem to have the downloadable binary zip.
> How
> > > long
> > > > does it take to propagate?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Piotr, could you give in this thread all the info about the
> update
> > > and
> > > > > I'll do it as soon as I can?
> > > > > thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > 2018-01-29 9:57 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On the other hand I will wait for you, because we need to update
> > > > website
> > > > > > first with information about download.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2018-01-29 9:52 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > No problem! I will do it!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for the info!
> > > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2018-01-29 9:42 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org
> > >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi Piotr,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I'm off right now so could you do it for me?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> If not I could make this night or tomorrow
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> thanks
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> 2018-01-29 8:59 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > > >:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Hi Alex,
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks for the announce. I just respond because it's not
> seen
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > > > >> nabble
> > > > > > >> > Dev list. Due to send to multiple lists.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Happy to finally have that release! :)
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Carlos will you announce on Twitter and Facebook ?
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Piotr
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > 2018-01-29 8:48 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > > The Apache Royale community is pleased to announce the
> > release
> > > > of
> > > > > > >> Apache
> > > > > > >> > > Royale 0.9.0.
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > The Apache Royale project is a continuation of the
> previous
> > > > effort
> > > > > > >> called
> > > > > > >> > > FlexJS to produce a next-generation of the Apache Flex SDK
> > > that
> > > > > > >> enables
> > > > > > >> > > developers to use MXML and ActionScript to generated
> > > HTML/JS/CSS
> > > > > so
> > > > > > >> > > applications can run natively in browsers.  The
> > cross-compiled
> > > > > code
> > > > > > >> can
> > > > > > >> > > also be used in Apache Cordova (Adobe PhoneGap) mobile
> > > > > applications.
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > (Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source
> application
> > > > > > framework
> > > > > > >> > for
> > > > > > >> > > building and maintaining expressive applications that
> deploy
> > > on
> > > > > > Adobe
> > > > > > >> > > Flash and Adobe AIR to provide a consistent experience on
> > all
> > > > > major
> > > > > > >> > > browsers, desktops and devices.)
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > This release should be considered ‘beta' quality. The
> > purpose
> > > of
> > > > 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Piotr Zarzycki]

What do you see when you go to that link [1] ? Can you post the screenshot.
- Make it through nabble [2] cause mailing list is stripping out images.

[1]
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.zip

[2] http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/

2018-01-29 11:49 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :

> *http://mirror.dsrg.utoronto.ca/apache/royale/0.9.0/
> binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*
>  binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip>
>
> *http://apache.forsale.plus/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-
> royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*
>  royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip>
>
> *http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/apache/royale/0.
> 9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*
>  9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip>
>
> and several others.
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Piotr Zarzycki  >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > To me they are working. Which one you did try ?
> >
> > Thanks, Piotr
> >
> > 2018-01-29 11:36 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :
> >
> > > Hi:
> > >
> > > None of the mirror sites seem to have the downloadable binary zip. How
> > long
> > > does it take to propagate?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Piotr, could you give in this thread all the info about the update
> > and
> > > > I'll do it as soon as I can?
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > > 2018-01-29 9:57 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki  >:
> > > >
> > > > > On the other hand I will wait for you, because we need to update
> > > website
> > > > > first with information about download.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2018-01-29 9:52 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > No problem! I will do it!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for the info!
> > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2018-01-29 9:42 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira  >:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi Piotr,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I'm off right now so could you do it for me?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> If not I could make this night or tomorrow
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> thanks
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> 2018-01-29 8:59 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Hi Alex,
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Thanks for the announce. I just respond because it's not seen
> on
> > > the
> > > > > >> nabble
> > > > > >> > Dev list. Due to send to multiple lists.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Happy to finally have that release! :)
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Carlos will you announce on Twitter and Facebook ?
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Piotr
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > 2018-01-29 8:48 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > The Apache Royale community is pleased to announce the
> release
> > > of
> > > > > >> Apache
> > > > > >> > > Royale 0.9.0.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > The Apache Royale project is a continuation of the previous
> > > effort
> > > > > >> called
> > > > > >> > > FlexJS to produce a next-generation of the Apache Flex SDK
> > that
> > > > > >> enables
> > > > > >> > > developers to use MXML and ActionScript to generated
> > HTML/JS/CSS
> > > > so
> > > > > >> > > applications can run natively in browsers.  The
> cross-compiled
> > > > code
> > > > > >> can
> > > > > >> > > also be used in Apache Cordova (Adobe PhoneGap) mobile
> > > > applications.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > (Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application
> > > > > framework
> > > > > >> > for
> > > > > >> > > building and maintaining expressive applications that deploy
> > on
> > > > > Adobe
> > > > > >> > > Flash and Adobe AIR to provide a consistent experience on
> all
> > > > major
> > > > > >> > > browsers, desktops and devices.)
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > This release should be considered ‘beta' quality. The
> purpose
> > of
> > > > > this
> > > > > >> > > release is to gather feedback about the features and
> > > > implementation
> > > > > >> > > strategies, and to recruit new contributors. We hope to grow
> > the
> > > > > code
> > > > > >> > base
> > > > > >> > > into an SDK and tool chain that delivers the highest
> > > productivity
> > > > > when
> > > > > >> > > developing applications that can run on many platforms. Beta
> > > > > releases
> > > > > >> may
> > > > > >> > > not handle production needs.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Please file bugs at:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >   https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > If you happen to know it is a compiler issue, please use:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >   https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/issues
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > For questions 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Andrew Wetmore]

*http://mirror.dsrg.utoronto.ca/apache/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*


*http://apache.forsale.plus/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*


*http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/apache/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*


and several others.

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Piotr Zarzycki 
wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> To me they are working. Which one you did try ?
>
> Thanks, Piotr
>
> 2018-01-29 11:36 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :
>
> > Hi:
> >
> > None of the mirror sites seem to have the downloadable binary zip. How
> long
> > does it take to propagate?
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Carlos Rovira 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Piotr, could you give in this thread all the info about the update
> and
> > > I'll do it as soon as I can?
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > 2018-01-29 9:57 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> > >
> > > > On the other hand I will wait for you, because we need to update
> > website
> > > > first with information about download.
> > > >
> > > > 2018-01-29 9:52 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki  >:
> > > >
> > > > > No problem! I will do it!
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the info!
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > > 2018-01-29 9:42 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi Piotr,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I'm off right now so could you do it for me?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> If not I could make this night or tomorrow
> > > > >>
> > > > >> thanks
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 2018-01-29 8:59 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Hi Alex,
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thanks for the announce. I just respond because it's not seen on
> > the
> > > > >> nabble
> > > > >> > Dev list. Due to send to multiple lists.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Happy to finally have that release! :)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Carlos will you announce on Twitter and Facebook ?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Piotr
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > 2018-01-29 8:48 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > The Apache Royale community is pleased to announce the release
> > of
> > > > >> Apache
> > > > >> > > Royale 0.9.0.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > The Apache Royale project is a continuation of the previous
> > effort
> > > > >> called
> > > > >> > > FlexJS to produce a next-generation of the Apache Flex SDK
> that
> > > > >> enables
> > > > >> > > developers to use MXML and ActionScript to generated
> HTML/JS/CSS
> > > so
> > > > >> > > applications can run natively in browsers.  The cross-compiled
> > > code
> > > > >> can
> > > > >> > > also be used in Apache Cordova (Adobe PhoneGap) mobile
> > > applications.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > (Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application
> > > > framework
> > > > >> > for
> > > > >> > > building and maintaining expressive applications that deploy
> on
> > > > Adobe
> > > > >> > > Flash and Adobe AIR to provide a consistent experience on all
> > > major
> > > > >> > > browsers, desktops and devices.)
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > This release should be considered ‘beta' quality. The purpose
> of
> > > > this
> > > > >> > > release is to gather feedback about the features and
> > > implementation
> > > > >> > > strategies, and to recruit new contributors. We hope to grow
> the
> > > > code
> > > > >> > base
> > > > >> > > into an SDK and tool chain that delivers the highest
> > productivity
> > > > when
> > > > >> > > developing applications that can run on many platforms. Beta
> > > > releases
> > > > >> may
> > > > >> > > not handle production needs.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Please file bugs at:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >   https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > If you happen to know it is a compiler issue, please use:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >   https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/issues
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > For questions about how to use Royale, send email to
> > > > >> > > us...@royale.apache.org.  For questions and feedback on the
> > > > >> development
> > > > >> > of
> > > > >> > > the source code in the release, send email to
> > > dev@royale.apache.org
> > > > .
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Apache Royale is available in source and binary form from the
> > > Apache
> > > > >> > > mirrors:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Source:
> > > > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > > >> > > apache-royale-0.9.0-src.t
> > > > >> > > ar.gz
> > > > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > > >> > > apache-royale-0.9.0-src.z
> > > > >> > > ip
> > > 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Hi Andrew,

To me they are working. Which one you did try ?

Thanks, Piotr

2018-01-29 11:36 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore :

> Hi:
>
> None of the mirror sites seem to have the downloadable binary zip. How long
> does it take to propagate?
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Piotr, could you give in this thread all the info about the update and
> > I'll do it as soon as I can?
> > thanks
> >
> > 2018-01-29 9:57 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> >
> > > On the other hand I will wait for you, because we need to update
> website
> > > first with information about download.
> > >
> > > 2018-01-29 9:52 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> > >
> > > > No problem! I will do it!
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the info!
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > 2018-01-29 9:42 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Piotr,
> > > >>
> > > >> I'm off right now so could you do it for me?
> > > >>
> > > >> If not I could make this night or tomorrow
> > > >>
> > > >> thanks
> > > >>
> > > >> 2018-01-29 8:59 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki  >:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi Alex,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks for the announce. I just respond because it's not seen on
> the
> > > >> nabble
> > > >> > Dev list. Due to send to multiple lists.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Happy to finally have that release! :)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Carlos will you announce on Twitter and Facebook ?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Piotr
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 2018-01-29 8:48 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > The Apache Royale community is pleased to announce the release
> of
> > > >> Apache
> > > >> > > Royale 0.9.0.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > The Apache Royale project is a continuation of the previous
> effort
> > > >> called
> > > >> > > FlexJS to produce a next-generation of the Apache Flex SDK that
> > > >> enables
> > > >> > > developers to use MXML and ActionScript to generated HTML/JS/CSS
> > so
> > > >> > > applications can run natively in browsers.  The cross-compiled
> > code
> > > >> can
> > > >> > > also be used in Apache Cordova (Adobe PhoneGap) mobile
> > applications.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > (Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application
> > > framework
> > > >> > for
> > > >> > > building and maintaining expressive applications that deploy on
> > > Adobe
> > > >> > > Flash and Adobe AIR to provide a consistent experience on all
> > major
> > > >> > > browsers, desktops and devices.)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > This release should be considered ‘beta' quality. The purpose of
> > > this
> > > >> > > release is to gather feedback about the features and
> > implementation
> > > >> > > strategies, and to recruit new contributors. We hope to grow the
> > > code
> > > >> > base
> > > >> > > into an SDK and tool chain that delivers the highest
> productivity
> > > when
> > > >> > > developing applications that can run on many platforms. Beta
> > > releases
> > > >> may
> > > >> > > not handle production needs.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Please file bugs at:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >   https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > If you happen to know it is a compiler issue, please use:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >   https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/issues
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > For questions about how to use Royale, send email to
> > > >> > > us...@royale.apache.org.  For questions and feedback on the
> > > >> development
> > > >> > of
> > > >> > > the source code in the release, send email to
> > dev@royale.apache.org
> > > .
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Apache Royale is available in source and binary form from the
> > Apache
> > > >> > > mirrors:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Source:
> > > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > >> > > apache-royale-0.9.0-src.t
> > > >> > > ar.gz
> > > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > >> > > apache-royale-0.9.0-src.z
> > > >> > > ip
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Binary:
> > > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > >> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.
> > > >> > > 9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
> > > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > >> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.
> > > >> > > 9.0-bin-js.zip
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Binary with SWF support:
> > > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > >> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.
> > > >> > > 9.0-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
> > > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > >> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.
> > > >> > > 9.0-bin-js-swf.zip
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > When downloading from a mirror site, please remember to verify
> the
> > > >> > > downloads using signatures or MD5 hashes.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > The -bin-js-swf package is not working when installed via NPM.
> > The
> > > >> > bin-js
> > > >> > > package can be installed via NPM by 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Andrew Wetmore]

Hi:

None of the mirror sites seem to have the downloadable binary zip. How long
does it take to propagate?

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Carlos Rovira 
wrote:

> Hi Piotr, could you give in this thread all the info about the update and
> I'll do it as soon as I can?
> thanks
>
> 2018-01-29 9:57 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
>
> > On the other hand I will wait for you, because we need to update website
> > first with information about download.
> >
> > 2018-01-29 9:52 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> >
> > > No problem! I will do it!
> > >
> > > Thanks for the info!
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > 2018-01-29 9:42 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :
> > >
> > >> Hi Piotr,
> > >>
> > >> I'm off right now so could you do it for me?
> > >>
> > >> If not I could make this night or tomorrow
> > >>
> > >> thanks
> > >>
> > >> 2018-01-29 8:59 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> > >>
> > >> > Hi Alex,
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks for the announce. I just respond because it's not seen on the
> > >> nabble
> > >> > Dev list. Due to send to multiple lists.
> > >> >
> > >> > Happy to finally have that release! :)
> > >> >
> > >> > Carlos will you announce on Twitter and Facebook ?
> > >> >
> > >> > Piotr
> > >> >
> > >> > 2018-01-29 8:48 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> > >> >
> > >> > > The Apache Royale community is pleased to announce the release of
> > >> Apache
> > >> > > Royale 0.9.0.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The Apache Royale project is a continuation of the previous effort
> > >> called
> > >> > > FlexJS to produce a next-generation of the Apache Flex SDK that
> > >> enables
> > >> > > developers to use MXML and ActionScript to generated HTML/JS/CSS
> so
> > >> > > applications can run natively in browsers.  The cross-compiled
> code
> > >> can
> > >> > > also be used in Apache Cordova (Adobe PhoneGap) mobile
> applications.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > (Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application
> > framework
> > >> > for
> > >> > > building and maintaining expressive applications that deploy on
> > Adobe
> > >> > > Flash and Adobe AIR to provide a consistent experience on all
> major
> > >> > > browsers, desktops and devices.)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > This release should be considered ‘beta' quality. The purpose of
> > this
> > >> > > release is to gather feedback about the features and
> implementation
> > >> > > strategies, and to recruit new contributors. We hope to grow the
> > code
> > >> > base
> > >> > > into an SDK and tool chain that delivers the highest productivity
> > when
> > >> > > developing applications that can run on many platforms. Beta
> > releases
> > >> may
> > >> > > not handle production needs.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please file bugs at:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >   https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues
> > >> > >
> > >> > > If you happen to know it is a compiler issue, please use:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >   https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/issues
> > >> > >
> > >> > > For questions about how to use Royale, send email to
> > >> > > us...@royale.apache.org.  For questions and feedback on the
> > >> development
> > >> > of
> > >> > > the source code in the release, send email to
> dev@royale.apache.org
> > .
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Apache Royale is available in source and binary form from the
> Apache
> > >> > > mirrors:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Source:
> > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > >> > > apache-royale-0.9.0-src.t
> > >> > > ar.gz
> > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > >> > > apache-royale-0.9.0-src.z
> > >> > > ip
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Binary:
> > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > >> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.
> > >> > > 9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
> > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > >> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.
> > >> > > 9.0-bin-js.zip
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Binary with SWF support:
> > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > >> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.
> > >> > > 9.0-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
> > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > >> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.
> > >> > > 9.0-bin-js-swf.zip
> > >> > >
> > >> > > When downloading from a mirror site, please remember to verify the
> > >> > > downloads using signatures or MD5 hashes.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The -bin-js-swf package is not working when installed via NPM.
> The
> > >> > bin-js
> > >> > > package can be installed via NPM by running:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Mac:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >   sudo npm install -g
> > >> > > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/releases/download/
> > >> > > apache-royale-0.9.0
> > >> > > /apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Windows:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >   npm install -g
> > >> > > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/releases/download/
> > >> > > apache-royale-0.9.0
> > >> > > 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Piotr Zarzycki]

On the other hand I will wait for you, because we need to update website
first with information about download.

2018-01-29 9:52 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :

> No problem! I will do it!
>
> Thanks for the info!
> Piotr
>
> 2018-01-29 9:42 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :
>
>> Hi Piotr,
>>
>> I'm off right now so could you do it for me?
>>
>> If not I could make this night or tomorrow
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> 2018-01-29 8:59 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
>>
>> > Hi Alex,
>> >
>> > Thanks for the announce. I just respond because it's not seen on the
>> nabble
>> > Dev list. Due to send to multiple lists.
>> >
>> > Happy to finally have that release! :)
>> >
>> > Carlos will you announce on Twitter and Facebook ?
>> >
>> > Piotr
>> >
>> > 2018-01-29 8:48 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>> >
>> > > The Apache Royale community is pleased to announce the release of
>> Apache
>> > > Royale 0.9.0.
>> > >
>> > > The Apache Royale project is a continuation of the previous effort
>> called
>> > > FlexJS to produce a next-generation of the Apache Flex SDK that
>> enables
>> > > developers to use MXML and ActionScript to generated HTML/JS/CSS so
>> > > applications can run natively in browsers.  The cross-compiled code
>> can
>> > > also be used in Apache Cordova (Adobe PhoneGap) mobile applications.
>> > >
>> > > (Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application framework
>> > for
>> > > building and maintaining expressive applications that deploy on Adobe
>> > > Flash and Adobe AIR to provide a consistent experience on all major
>> > > browsers, desktops and devices.)
>> > >
>> > > This release should be considered ‘beta' quality. The purpose of this
>> > > release is to gather feedback about the features and implementation
>> > > strategies, and to recruit new contributors. We hope to grow the code
>> > base
>> > > into an SDK and tool chain that delivers the highest productivity when
>> > > developing applications that can run on many platforms. Beta releases
>> may
>> > > not handle production needs.
>> > >
>> > > Please file bugs at:
>> > >
>> > >   https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues
>> > >
>> > > If you happen to know it is a compiler issue, please use:
>> > >
>> > >   https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/issues
>> > >
>> > > For questions about how to use Royale, send email to
>> > > us...@royale.apache.org.  For questions and feedback on the
>> development
>> > of
>> > > the source code in the release, send email to dev@royale.apache.org.
>> > >
>> > > Apache Royale is available in source and binary form from the Apache
>> > > mirrors:
>> > >
>> > > Source:
>> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
>> > > apache-royale-0.9.0-src.t
>> > > ar.gz
>> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
>> > > apache-royale-0.9.0-src.z
>> > > ip
>> > >
>> > > Binary:
>> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
>> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.
>> > > 9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
>> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
>> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.
>> > > 9.0-bin-js.zip
>> > >
>> > > Binary with SWF support:
>> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
>> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.
>> > > 9.0-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
>> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
>> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.
>> > > 9.0-bin-js-swf.zip
>> > >
>> > > When downloading from a mirror site, please remember to verify the
>> > > downloads using signatures or MD5 hashes.
>> > >
>> > > The -bin-js-swf package is not working when installed via NPM.  The
>> > bin-js
>> > > package can be installed via NPM by running:
>> > >
>> > > Mac:
>> > >
>> > >   sudo npm install -g
>> > > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/releases/download/
>> > > apache-royale-0.9.0
>> > > /apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
>> > >
>> > > Windows:
>> > >
>> > >   npm install -g
>> > > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/releases/download/
>> > > apache-royale-0.9.0
>> > > /apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
>> > >
>> > > We expect the packages to be available in the NPM registry in future
>> > > releases.
>> > >
>> > > See the README for more information. Visit http://royale.apache.org/
>> for
>> > > links to other resources.
>> > >
>> > > Please try Royale and become involved in shaping the future of
>> > application
>> > > development.
>> > >
>> > > The Apache Royale Community
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Piotr Zarzycki
>> >
>> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>> > *
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>



-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Piotr Zarzycki]

No problem! I will do it!

Thanks for the info!
Piotr

2018-01-29 9:42 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :

> Hi Piotr,
>
> I'm off right now so could you do it for me?
>
> If not I could make this night or tomorrow
>
> thanks
>
> 2018-01-29 8:59 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > Thanks for the announce. I just respond because it's not seen on the
> nabble
> > Dev list. Due to send to multiple lists.
> >
> > Happy to finally have that release! :)
> >
> > Carlos will you announce on Twitter and Facebook ?
> >
> > Piotr
> >
> > 2018-01-29 8:48 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> >
> > > The Apache Royale community is pleased to announce the release of
> Apache
> > > Royale 0.9.0.
> > >
> > > The Apache Royale project is a continuation of the previous effort
> called
> > > FlexJS to produce a next-generation of the Apache Flex SDK that enables
> > > developers to use MXML and ActionScript to generated HTML/JS/CSS so
> > > applications can run natively in browsers.  The cross-compiled code can
> > > also be used in Apache Cordova (Adobe PhoneGap) mobile applications.
> > >
> > > (Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application framework
> > for
> > > building and maintaining expressive applications that deploy on Adobe
> > > Flash and Adobe AIR to provide a consistent experience on all major
> > > browsers, desktops and devices.)
> > >
> > > This release should be considered ‘beta' quality. The purpose of this
> > > release is to gather feedback about the features and implementation
> > > strategies, and to recruit new contributors. We hope to grow the code
> > base
> > > into an SDK and tool chain that delivers the highest productivity when
> > > developing applications that can run on many platforms. Beta releases
> may
> > > not handle production needs.
> > >
> > > Please file bugs at:
> > >
> > >   https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues
> > >
> > > If you happen to know it is a compiler issue, please use:
> > >
> > >   https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/issues
> > >
> > > For questions about how to use Royale, send email to
> > > us...@royale.apache.org.  For questions and feedback on the
> development
> > of
> > > the source code in the release, send email to dev@royale.apache.org.
> > >
> > > Apache Royale is available in source and binary form from the Apache
> > > mirrors:
> > >
> > > Source:
> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > apache-royale-0.9.0-src.t
> > > ar.gz
> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > apache-royale-0.9.0-src.z
> > > ip
> > >
> > > Binary:
> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.
> > > 9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.
> > > 9.0-bin-js.zip
> > >
> > > Binary with SWF support:
> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.
> > > 9.0-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > > binaries/apache-royale-0.
> > > 9.0-bin-js-swf.zip
> > >
> > > When downloading from a mirror site, please remember to verify the
> > > downloads using signatures or MD5 hashes.
> > >
> > > The -bin-js-swf package is not working when installed via NPM.  The
> > bin-js
> > > package can be installed via NPM by running:
> > >
> > > Mac:
> > >
> > >   sudo npm install -g
> > > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/releases/download/
> > > apache-royale-0.9.0
> > > /apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
> > >
> > > Windows:
> > >
> > >   npm install -g
> > > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/releases/download/
> > > apache-royale-0.9.0
> > > /apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
> > >
> > > We expect the packages to be available in the NPM registry in future
> > > releases.
> > >
> > > See the README for more information. Visit http://royale.apache.org/
> for
> > > links to other resources.
> > >
> > > Please try Royale and become involved in shaping the future of
> > application
> > > development.
> > >
> > > The Apache Royale Community
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > *
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>



-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Piotr,

I'm off right now so could you do it for me?

If not I could make this night or tomorrow

thanks

2018-01-29 8:59 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :

> Hi Alex,
>
> Thanks for the announce. I just respond because it's not seen on the nabble
> Dev list. Due to send to multiple lists.
>
> Happy to finally have that release! :)
>
> Carlos will you announce on Twitter and Facebook ?
>
> Piotr
>
> 2018-01-29 8:48 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>
> > The Apache Royale community is pleased to announce the release of Apache
> > Royale 0.9.0.
> >
> > The Apache Royale project is a continuation of the previous effort called
> > FlexJS to produce a next-generation of the Apache Flex SDK that enables
> > developers to use MXML and ActionScript to generated HTML/JS/CSS so
> > applications can run natively in browsers.  The cross-compiled code can
> > also be used in Apache Cordova (Adobe PhoneGap) mobile applications.
> >
> > (Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application framework
> for
> > building and maintaining expressive applications that deploy on Adobe
> > Flash and Adobe AIR to provide a consistent experience on all major
> > browsers, desktops and devices.)
> >
> > This release should be considered ‘beta' quality. The purpose of this
> > release is to gather feedback about the features and implementation
> > strategies, and to recruit new contributors. We hope to grow the code
> base
> > into an SDK and tool chain that delivers the highest productivity when
> > developing applications that can run on many platforms. Beta releases may
> > not handle production needs.
> >
> > Please file bugs at:
> >
> >   https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues
> >
> > If you happen to know it is a compiler issue, please use:
> >
> >   https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/issues
> >
> > For questions about how to use Royale, send email to
> > us...@royale.apache.org.  For questions and feedback on the development
> of
> > the source code in the release, send email to dev@royale.apache.org.
> >
> > Apache Royale is available in source and binary form from the Apache
> > mirrors:
> >
> > Source:
> > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > apache-royale-0.9.0-src.t
> > ar.gz
> > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > apache-royale-0.9.0-src.z
> > ip
> >
> > Binary:
> > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > binaries/apache-royale-0.
> > 9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
> > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > binaries/apache-royale-0.
> > 9.0-bin-js.zip
> >
> > Binary with SWF support:
> > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > binaries/apache-royale-0.
> > 9.0-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
> > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> > binaries/apache-royale-0.
> > 9.0-bin-js-swf.zip
> >
> > When downloading from a mirror site, please remember to verify the
> > downloads using signatures or MD5 hashes.
> >
> > The -bin-js-swf package is not working when installed via NPM.  The
> bin-js
> > package can be installed via NPM by running:
> >
> > Mac:
> >
> >   sudo npm install -g
> > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/releases/download/
> > apache-royale-0.9.0
> > /apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
> >
> > Windows:
> >
> >   npm install -g
> > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/releases/download/
> > apache-royale-0.9.0
> > /apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
> >
> > We expect the packages to be available in the NPM registry in future
> > releases.
> >
> > See the README for more information. Visit http://royale.apache.org/ for
> > links to other resources.
> >
> > Please try Royale and become involved in shaping the future of
> application
> > development.
> >
> > The Apache Royale Community
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>



-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Hi Alex,

Thanks for the announce. I just respond because it's not seen on the nabble
Dev list. Due to send to multiple lists.

Happy to finally have that release! :)

Carlos will you announce on Twitter and Facebook ?

Piotr

2018-01-29 8:48 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :

> The Apache Royale community is pleased to announce the release of Apache
> Royale 0.9.0.
>
> The Apache Royale project is a continuation of the previous effort called
> FlexJS to produce a next-generation of the Apache Flex SDK that enables
> developers to use MXML and ActionScript to generated HTML/JS/CSS so
> applications can run natively in browsers.  The cross-compiled code can
> also be used in Apache Cordova (Adobe PhoneGap) mobile applications.
>
> (Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application framework for
> building and maintaining expressive applications that deploy on Adobe
> Flash and Adobe AIR to provide a consistent experience on all major
> browsers, desktops and devices.)
>
> This release should be considered ‘beta' quality. The purpose of this
> release is to gather feedback about the features and implementation
> strategies, and to recruit new contributors. We hope to grow the code base
> into an SDK and tool chain that delivers the highest productivity when
> developing applications that can run on many platforms. Beta releases may
> not handle production needs.
>
> Please file bugs at:
>
>   https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues
>
> If you happen to know it is a compiler issue, please use:
>
>   https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/issues
>
> For questions about how to use Royale, send email to
> us...@royale.apache.org.  For questions and feedback on the development of
> the source code in the release, send email to dev@royale.apache.org.
>
> Apache Royale is available in source and binary form from the Apache
> mirrors:
>
> Source:
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> apache-royale-0.9.0-src.t
> ar.gz
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> apache-royale-0.9.0-src.z
> ip
>
> Binary:
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> binaries/apache-royale-0.
> 9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> binaries/apache-royale-0.
> 9.0-bin-js.zip
>
> Binary with SWF support:
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> binaries/apache-royale-0.
> 9.0-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/
> binaries/apache-royale-0.
> 9.0-bin-js-swf.zip
>
> When downloading from a mirror site, please remember to verify the
> downloads using signatures or MD5 hashes.
>
> The -bin-js-swf package is not working when installed via NPM.  The bin-js
> package can be installed via NPM by running:
>
> Mac:
>
>   sudo npm install -g
> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/releases/download/
> apache-royale-0.9.0
> /apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
>
> Windows:
>
>   npm install -g
> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/releases/download/
> apache-royale-0.9.0
> /apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz
>
> We expect the packages to be available in the NPM registry in future
> releases.
>
> See the README for more information. Visit http://royale.apache.org/ for
> links to other resources.
>
> Please try Royale and become involved in shaping the future of application
> development.
>
> The Apache Royale Community
>
>
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*