Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

[Chip Senkbeil]

Closing this vote. Going to start a vote for an RC4 once I get all of the
artifacts in place on staging and dist.

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:59 AM Gino Bustelo  wrote:

> Go for it Chip.
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:21 PM Luciano Resende 
> wrote:
>
> > I would check with Gino if he is ok with somebody else continuing this,
> but
> > if you know he is way or something, then it should be ok for you to
> > continue,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Chip Senkbeil 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Does Gino need to be the one to do this? Or can I get it started by
> > closing
> > > the vote thread and opening an approval request in general for the
> > release?
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 5:30 PM Luciano Resende 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I haven't seen an e-mail closing the release vote, and neither the
> IPMC
> > > > vote thread started. Are we still waiting for something specific
> here ?
> > > > Anything one of the mentors can help ?
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Luciano Resende <
> luckbr1...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > First you need to close the vote. Then the release needs to be
> > approved
> > > > in
> > > > > general, check the archives there for an example of the vote
> thread,
> > as
> > > > you
> > > > > need to add link to vote thread, cote result
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:03 PM Chip Senkbeil <
> > chip.senkb...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> So, with three +1s, what do we need to do? Are there still things
> to
> > > > >> address? Does this need to go to general Apache? This has been
> open
> > > for
> > > > >> awhile.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM Gino Bustelo 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > +1
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > We need to get this thing moving.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:17 PM Hitesh Shah 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Sorry for the delay in reviewing the bits.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Comments:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > KEYS file still missing.
> > > > >> > > Did signature/checksum checks for binary, source and pip
> > bundles.
> > > > >> > > For the binary release, the assembly jar makes it a bit tough
> to
> > > > >> validate
> > > > >> > > all dependencies. Not completed this fully though. Would be
> good
> > > if
> > > > >> other
> > > > >> > > folks who are reviewing can help.
> > > > >> > > For source release, there are a bunch of files without valid
> > > > headers.
> > > > >> > Also
> > > > >> > > some files like .example-image, etc are part of the release
> > > tarball
> > > > >> when
> > > > >> > > they should not be. ( used `find . -type f | xargs grep -L
> > > "Licensed
> > > > >> to
> > > > >> > the
> > > > >> > > Apache Software”` to find the ones in question). These should
> be
> > > > fixed
> > > > >> > > before the next release.
> > > > >> > > The License/Notice file for the source bundle needs to be
> fixed.
> > > > They
> > > > >> > > contain entries for items that are not part of the source
> > bundle.
> > > > >> > > PKG-INFO for the pip package may need to be fixed. The license
> > for
> > > > it
> > > > >> is
> > > > >> > > not only ALv2 but a combination of all the other bits bundled
> > into
> > > > the
> > > > >> > > assembly jar.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > License/Notice files:
> > > > >> > > There are a bunch of copyright lines in the LICENSE file
> without
> > > any
> > > > >> > > indication of why they are there. At the moment, it seems to
> > > > indicate
> > > > >> > they
> > > > >> > > are for all of the toree codebase.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > +0 for this release.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > I think that there has been enough work done on this initial
> > > release
> > > > >> that
> > > > >> > > it will be useful to get some more eyes from the larger
> > Incubator
> > > > >> group
> > > > >> > to
> > > > >> > > provide more useful feedback.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Please note that this vote does need atleast 3 PPMC +1s to
> pass.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > thanks
> > > > >> > > — Hitesh
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > On Oct 27, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Gino Bustelo <
> g...@bustelos.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Please vote to approve the release of the following
> candidate
> > as
> > > > >> > > > Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the
> > LICENSE
> > > > and
> > > > >> > > > NOTICE files since this is our first release.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc3
> > > > >> > > > (5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d)
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > *
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/
> > > > >> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> > > > >> > > > <
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > 

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

[Luciano Resende]

I would check with Gino if he is ok with somebody else continuing this, but
if you know he is way or something, then it should be ok for you to
continue,

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Chip Senkbeil 
wrote:

> Does Gino need to be the one to do this? Or can I get it started by closing
> the vote thread and opening an approval request in general for the release?
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 5:30 PM Luciano Resende 
> wrote:
>
> > I haven't seen an e-mail closing the release vote, and neither the IPMC
> > vote thread started. Are we still waiting for something specific here ?
> > Anything one of the mentors can help ?
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Luciano Resende 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > First you need to close the vote. Then the release needs to be approved
> > in
> > > general, check the archives there for an example of the vote thread, as
> > you
> > > need to add link to vote thread, cote result
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:03 PM Chip Senkbeil  >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> So, with three +1s, what do we need to do? Are there still things to
> > >> address? Does this need to go to general Apache? This has been open
> for
> > >> awhile.
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM Gino Bustelo 
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > +1
> > >> >
> > >> > We need to get this thing moving.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:17 PM Hitesh Shah 
> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Sorry for the delay in reviewing the bits.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Comments:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > KEYS file still missing.
> > >> > > Did signature/checksum checks for binary, source and pip bundles.
> > >> > > For the binary release, the assembly jar makes it a bit tough to
> > >> validate
> > >> > > all dependencies. Not completed this fully though. Would be good
> if
> > >> other
> > >> > > folks who are reviewing can help.
> > >> > > For source release, there are a bunch of files without valid
> > headers.
> > >> > Also
> > >> > > some files like .example-image, etc are part of the release
> tarball
> > >> when
> > >> > > they should not be. ( used `find . -type f | xargs grep -L
> "Licensed
> > >> to
> > >> > the
> > >> > > Apache Software”` to find the ones in question). These should be
> > fixed
> > >> > > before the next release.
> > >> > > The License/Notice file for the source bundle needs to be fixed.
> > They
> > >> > > contain entries for items that are not part of the source bundle.
> > >> > > PKG-INFO for the pip package may need to be fixed. The license for
> > it
> > >> is
> > >> > > not only ALv2 but a combination of all the other bits bundled into
> > the
> > >> > > assembly jar.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > License/Notice files:
> > >> > > There are a bunch of copyright lines in the LICENSE file without
> any
> > >> > > indication of why they are there. At the moment, it seems to
> > indicate
> > >> > they
> > >> > > are for all of the toree codebase.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > +0 for this release.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I think that there has been enough work done on this initial
> release
> > >> that
> > >> > > it will be useful to get some more eyes from the larger Incubator
> > >> group
> > >> > to
> > >> > > provide more useful feedback.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please note that this vote does need atleast 3 PPMC +1s to pass.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > thanks
> > >> > > — Hitesh
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > On Oct 27, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Gino Bustelo 
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as
> > >> > > > Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE
> > and
> > >> > > > NOTICE files since this is our first release.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc3
> > >> > > > (5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > *
> > >> > >
> > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/
> > >> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> > >> > > > <
> > >> > >
> > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/
> > >> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> > >> > > >*
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc.
> can
> > >> be
> > >> > > found at:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > *
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
> > >> > > > <
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
> > >> >*
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority
> of
> > >> at
> > >> > > least
> > >> > > > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.1.0
> > >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > > --
> > > Sent from my Mobile device
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > 

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

[Chip Senkbeil]

Does Gino need to be the one to do this? Or can I get it started by closing
the vote thread and opening an approval request in general for the release?

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 5:30 PM Luciano Resende 
wrote:

> I haven't seen an e-mail closing the release vote, and neither the IPMC
> vote thread started. Are we still waiting for something specific here ?
> Anything one of the mentors can help ?
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Luciano Resende 
> wrote:
>
> > First you need to close the vote. Then the release needs to be approved
> in
> > general, check the archives there for an example of the vote thread, as
> you
> > need to add link to vote thread, cote result
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:03 PM Chip Senkbeil 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> So, with three +1s, what do we need to do? Are there still things to
> >> address? Does this need to go to general Apache? This has been open for
> >> awhile.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM Gino Bustelo  wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > We need to get this thing moving.
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:17 PM Hitesh Shah  wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Sorry for the delay in reviewing the bits.
> >> > >
> >> > > Comments:
> >> > >
> >> > > KEYS file still missing.
> >> > > Did signature/checksum checks for binary, source and pip bundles.
> >> > > For the binary release, the assembly jar makes it a bit tough to
> >> validate
> >> > > all dependencies. Not completed this fully though. Would be good if
> >> other
> >> > > folks who are reviewing can help.
> >> > > For source release, there are a bunch of files without valid
> headers.
> >> > Also
> >> > > some files like .example-image, etc are part of the release tarball
> >> when
> >> > > they should not be. ( used `find . -type f | xargs grep -L "Licensed
> >> to
> >> > the
> >> > > Apache Software”` to find the ones in question). These should be
> fixed
> >> > > before the next release.
> >> > > The License/Notice file for the source bundle needs to be fixed.
> They
> >> > > contain entries for items that are not part of the source bundle.
> >> > > PKG-INFO for the pip package may need to be fixed. The license for
> it
> >> is
> >> > > not only ALv2 but a combination of all the other bits bundled into
> the
> >> > > assembly jar.
> >> > >
> >> > > License/Notice files:
> >> > > There are a bunch of copyright lines in the LICENSE file without any
> >> > > indication of why they are there. At the moment, it seems to
> indicate
> >> > they
> >> > > are for all of the toree codebase.
> >> > >
> >> > > +0 for this release.
> >> > >
> >> > > I think that there has been enough work done on this initial release
> >> that
> >> > > it will be useful to get some more eyes from the larger Incubator
> >> group
> >> > to
> >> > > provide more useful feedback.
> >> > >
> >> > > Please note that this vote does need atleast 3 PPMC +1s to pass.
> >> > >
> >> > > thanks
> >> > > — Hitesh
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > > On Oct 27, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Gino Bustelo 
> >> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as
> >> > > > Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE
> and
> >> > > > NOTICE files since this is our first release.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc3
> >> > > > (5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > *
> >> > >
> >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/
> >> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> >> > > > <
> >> > >
> >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/
> >> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> >> > > >*
> >> > > >
> >> > > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can
> >> be
> >> > > found at:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > *
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
> >> > > > <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
> >> >*
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of
> >> at
> >> > > least
> >> > > > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.1.0
> >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> > --
> > Sent from my Mobile device
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

[Luciano Resende]

I haven't seen an e-mail closing the release vote, and neither the IPMC
vote thread started. Are we still waiting for something specific here ?
Anything one of the mentors can help ?

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Luciano Resende 
wrote:

> First you need to close the vote. Then the release needs to be approved in
> general, check the archives there for an example of the vote thread, as you
> need to add link to vote thread, cote result
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:03 PM Chip Senkbeil 
> wrote:
>
>> So, with three +1s, what do we need to do? Are there still things to
>> address? Does this need to go to general Apache? This has been open for
>> awhile.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM Gino Bustelo  wrote:
>>
>> > +1
>> >
>> > We need to get this thing moving.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:17 PM Hitesh Shah  wrote:
>> >
>> > > Sorry for the delay in reviewing the bits.
>> > >
>> > > Comments:
>> > >
>> > > KEYS file still missing.
>> > > Did signature/checksum checks for binary, source and pip bundles.
>> > > For the binary release, the assembly jar makes it a bit tough to
>> validate
>> > > all dependencies. Not completed this fully though. Would be good if
>> other
>> > > folks who are reviewing can help.
>> > > For source release, there are a bunch of files without valid headers.
>> > Also
>> > > some files like .example-image, etc are part of the release tarball
>> when
>> > > they should not be. ( used `find . -type f | xargs grep -L "Licensed
>> to
>> > the
>> > > Apache Software”` to find the ones in question). These should be fixed
>> > > before the next release.
>> > > The License/Notice file for the source bundle needs to be fixed. They
>> > > contain entries for items that are not part of the source bundle.
>> > > PKG-INFO for the pip package may need to be fixed. The license for it
>> is
>> > > not only ALv2 but a combination of all the other bits bundled into the
>> > > assembly jar.
>> > >
>> > > License/Notice files:
>> > > There are a bunch of copyright lines in the LICENSE file without any
>> > > indication of why they are there. At the moment, it seems to indicate
>> > they
>> > > are for all of the toree codebase.
>> > >
>> > > +0 for this release.
>> > >
>> > > I think that there has been enough work done on this initial release
>> that
>> > > it will be useful to get some more eyes from the larger Incubator
>> group
>> > to
>> > > provide more useful feedback.
>> > >
>> > > Please note that this vote does need atleast 3 PPMC +1s to pass.
>> > >
>> > > thanks
>> > > — Hitesh
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > On Oct 27, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Gino Bustelo 
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as
>> > > > Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE and
>> > > > NOTICE files since this is our first release.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc3
>> > > > (5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d)
>> > > >
>> > > > *
>> > >
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/
>> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
>> > > > <
>> > >
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/
>> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
>> > > >*
>> > > >
>> > > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can
>> be
>> > > found at:
>> > > >
>> > > > *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
>> > > > > >*
>> > > >
>> > > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of
>> at
>> > > least
>> > > > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> > > >
>> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.1.0
>> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
> --
> Sent from my Mobile device
>



-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

[Hitesh Shah]

Wiki would be good. 

— Hitesh 

> On Nov 2, 2016, at 6:40 AM, Gino Bustelo  wrote:
> 
> @hitesh Where would be an good place to put release instructions?
> 
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 6:21 PM Marius van Niekerk 
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 2016-10-28 08:49 (-0400), Marius van Niekerk <
>> marius.v.niek...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> +1
>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:35 Gino Bustelo  wrote:
>>> 
 Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as
 Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE and
 NOTICE files since this is our first release.
 
 
 The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc3
 (5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d)
 
 *
 
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
 <
 
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> *
 
 All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
 found at:
 
 *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
 *
 
 The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>> least
 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
 
 [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.1.0
 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
 
>>> 
>> 
>> Tested with
>> 
>> make system-test
>> 
>> Deployed to my data science team internally.
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

[Chip Senkbeil]

+1.

- Manually installed using the pip package; verified that the install
worked and the Scala option was available in the notebook.
- Ran Scala code on the notebook.
- Ran some simple parallelization, reduces, etc. using a local Spark
cluster.
- Verified that PySpark interpreter worked correctly using same logic as
Scala.

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:40 AM Gino Bustelo  wrote:

@hitesh Where would be an good place to put release instructions?

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 6:21 PM Marius van Niekerk 
wrote:

>
>
> On 2016-10-28 08:49 (-0400), Marius van Niekerk <
> marius.v.niek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:35 Gino Bustelo  wrote:
> >
> > > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as
> > > Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE and
> > > NOTICE files since this is our first release.
> > >
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc3
> > > (5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d)
> > >
> > > *
> > >
>
https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> > > <
> > >
>
https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> > > >*
> > >
> > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> > > found at:
> > >
> > > *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
> > > *
> > >
> > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least
> > > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.1.0
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > >
> >
>
> Tested with
>
> make system-test
>
> Deployed to my data science team internally.
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

[Gino Bustelo]

@hitesh Where would be an good place to put release instructions?

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 6:21 PM Marius van Niekerk 
wrote:

>
>
> On 2016-10-28 08:49 (-0400), Marius van Niekerk <
> marius.v.niek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:35 Gino Bustelo  wrote:
> >
> > > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as
> > > Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE and
> > > NOTICE files since this is our first release.
> > >
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc3
> > > (5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d)
> > >
> > > *
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> > > <
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> > > >*
> > >
> > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> > > found at:
> > >
> > > *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
> > > *
> > >
> > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least
> > > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.1.0
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > >
> >
>
> Tested with
>
> make system-test
>
> Deployed to my data science team internally.
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

[Marius van Niekerk]

On 2016-10-28 08:49 (-0400), Marius van Niekerk  
wrote: 
> +1
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:35 Gino Bustelo  wrote:
> 
> > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as
> > Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE and
> > NOTICE files since this is our first release.
> >
> >
> > The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc3
> > (5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d)
> >
> > *
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> > <
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> > >*
> >
> > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> > found at:
> >
> > *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
> > *
> >
> > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
> > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.1.0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> 

Tested with 

make system-test

Deployed to my data science team internally.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

[Gino Bustelo]

I have written notes for now. My goal is to document all of it once we get
this recipe right. Fortunately, most of the steps are handled by make.

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:00 PM Hitesh Shah  wrote:

> Folks, when voting, please do mention all the various verification steps
> that you did for the release bits.
>
> Given that releasing is part of the learning curve of being in the ASF, it
> will be helpful for everyone to learn from these votes regarding all the
> checks that need to be done.
>
> Also, @Gino, is there a document/wiki page on how to create a Toree
> release?
>
> thanks
> — Hitesh
>
>
> > On Oct 28, 2016, at 5:49 AM, Marius van Niekerk <
> marius.v.niek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:35 Gino Bustelo  wrote:
> >
> >> Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as
> >> Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE and
> >> NOTICE files since this is our first release.
> >>
> >>
> >> The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc3
> >> (5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d)
> >>
> >> *
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> >> <
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> >>> *
> >>
> >> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> >> found at:
> >>
> >> *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
> >> *
> >>
> >> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least
> >> 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.1.0
> >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

[Marius van Niekerk]

+1
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:35 Gino Bustelo  wrote:

> Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as
> Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE and
> NOTICE files since this is our first release.
>
>
> The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc3
> (5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d)
>
> *
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> >*
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
> *
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
> 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.1.0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>