Closing this vote. Going to start a vote for an RC4 once I get all of the artifacts in place on staging and dist.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:59 AM Gino Bustelo <g...@bustelos.com> wrote: > Go for it Chip. > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:21 PM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I would check with Gino if he is ok with somebody else continuing this, > but > > if you know he is way or something, then it should be ok for you to > > continue, > > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Does Gino need to be the one to do this? Or can I get it started by > > closing > > > the vote thread and opening an approval request in general for the > > release? > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 5:30 PM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I haven't seen an e-mail closing the release vote, and neither the > IPMC > > > > vote thread started. Are we still waiting for something specific > here ? > > > > Anything one of the mentors can help ? > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Luciano Resende < > luckbr1...@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > First you need to close the vote. Then the release needs to be > > approved > > > > in > > > > > general, check the archives there for an example of the vote > thread, > > as > > > > you > > > > > need to add link to vote thread, cote result.... > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:03 PM Chip Senkbeil < > > chip.senkb...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> So, with three +1s, what do we need to do? Are there still things > to > > > > >> address? Does this need to go to general Apache? This has been > open > > > for > > > > >> awhile. > > > > >> > > > > >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM Gino Bustelo <g...@bustelos.com> > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > +1 > > > > >> > > > > > >> > We need to get this thing moving. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:17 PM Hitesh Shah <hit...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Sorry for the delay in reviewing the bits. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Comments: > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > KEYS file still missing. > > > > >> > > Did signature/checksum checks for binary, source and pip > > bundles. > > > > >> > > For the binary release, the assembly jar makes it a bit tough > to > > > > >> validate > > > > >> > > all dependencies. Not completed this fully though. Would be > good > > > if > > > > >> other > > > > >> > > folks who are reviewing can help. > > > > >> > > For source release, there are a bunch of files without valid > > > > headers. > > > > >> > Also > > > > >> > > some files like .example-image, etc are part of the release > > > tarball > > > > >> when > > > > >> > > they should not be. ( used `find . -type f | xargs grep -L > > > "Licensed > > > > >> to > > > > >> > the > > > > >> > > Apache Software”` to find the ones in question). These should > be > > > > fixed > > > > >> > > before the next release. > > > > >> > > The License/Notice file for the source bundle needs to be > fixed. > > > > They > > > > >> > > contain entries for items that are not part of the source > > bundle. > > > > >> > > PKG-INFO for the pip package may need to be fixed. The license > > for > > > > it > > > > >> is > > > > >> > > not only ALv2 but a combination of all the other bits bundled > > into > > > > the > > > > >> > > assembly jar. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > License/Notice files: > > > > >> > > There are a bunch of copyright lines in the LICENSE file > without > > > any > > > > >> > > indication of why they are there. At the moment, it seems to > > > > indicate > > > > >> > they > > > > >> > > are for all of the toree codebase. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > +0 for this release. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > I think that there has been enough work done on this initial > > > release > > > > >> that > > > > >> > > it will be useful to get some more eyes from the larger > > Incubator > > > > >> group > > > > >> > to > > > > >> > > provide more useful feedback. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Please note that this vote does need atleast 3 PPMC +1s to > pass. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > thanks > > > > >> > > — Hitesh > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Oct 27, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Gino Bustelo < > g...@bustelos.com> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > Please vote to approve the release of the following > candidate > > as > > > > >> > > > Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the > > LICENSE > > > > and > > > > >> > > > NOTICE files since this is our first release. > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc3 > > > > >> > > > (5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d) > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > * > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/ > > > > >> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d > > > > >> > > > < > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/ > > > > >> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d > > > > >> > > >* > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, > etc. > > > can > > > > >> be > > > > >> > > found at: > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > * > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/ > > > > >> > > > < > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/ > > > > >> >* > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a > > majority > > > of > > > > >> at > > > > >> > > least > > > > >> > > > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.1.0 > > > > >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -- > > > > > Sent from my Mobile device > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Luciano Resende > > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > >
