I haven't seen an e-mail closing the release vote, and neither the IPMC vote thread started. Are we still waiting for something specific here ? Anything one of the mentors can help ?
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > First you need to close the vote. Then the release needs to be approved in > general, check the archives there for an example of the vote thread, as you > need to add link to vote thread, cote result.... > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:03 PM Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> So, with three +1s, what do we need to do? Are there still things to >> address? Does this need to go to general Apache? This has been open for >> awhile. >> >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM Gino Bustelo <g...@bustelos.com> wrote: >> >> > +1 >> > >> > We need to get this thing moving. >> > >> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:17 PM Hitesh Shah <hit...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > > Sorry for the delay in reviewing the bits. >> > > >> > > Comments: >> > > >> > > KEYS file still missing. >> > > Did signature/checksum checks for binary, source and pip bundles. >> > > For the binary release, the assembly jar makes it a bit tough to >> validate >> > > all dependencies. Not completed this fully though. Would be good if >> other >> > > folks who are reviewing can help. >> > > For source release, there are a bunch of files without valid headers. >> > Also >> > > some files like .example-image, etc are part of the release tarball >> when >> > > they should not be. ( used `find . -type f | xargs grep -L "Licensed >> to >> > the >> > > Apache Software”` to find the ones in question). These should be fixed >> > > before the next release. >> > > The License/Notice file for the source bundle needs to be fixed. They >> > > contain entries for items that are not part of the source bundle. >> > > PKG-INFO for the pip package may need to be fixed. The license for it >> is >> > > not only ALv2 but a combination of all the other bits bundled into the >> > > assembly jar. >> > > >> > > License/Notice files: >> > > There are a bunch of copyright lines in the LICENSE file without any >> > > indication of why they are there. At the moment, it seems to indicate >> > they >> > > are for all of the toree codebase. >> > > >> > > +0 for this release. >> > > >> > > I think that there has been enough work done on this initial release >> that >> > > it will be useful to get some more eyes from the larger Incubator >> group >> > to >> > > provide more useful feedback. >> > > >> > > Please note that this vote does need atleast 3 PPMC +1s to pass. >> > > >> > > thanks >> > > — Hitesh >> > > >> > > >> > > > On Oct 27, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Gino Bustelo <g...@bustelos.com> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as >> > > > Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE and >> > > > NOTICE files since this is our first release. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc3 >> > > > (5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d) >> > > > >> > > > * >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/ >> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d >> > > > < >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/ >> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d >> > > >* >> > > > >> > > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can >> be >> > > found at: >> > > > >> > > > *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/ >> > > > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/ >> >* >> > > > >> > > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of >> at >> > > least >> > > > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. >> > > > >> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.1.0 >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >> > > >> > > >> > >> > -- > Sent from my Mobile device > -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
