Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Martin, Just as a side note - I just verified that the license can be overridden by child projects - simply define a different license and maven ignores the parent license. I am trying to organize the projects in Wicket Stuff, and have created a common core-parent. Please look here and note the comments I have in the license section. This was verified with mvn site:site https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-core/pom.xml Thanks! -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Martin Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi Jeremy, just saw your commits on wicket-stuff. I allways like any attempt to get some more stucture into wicket-stuff. One thing I saw was the licences tag in the pom.xml http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket-stuff/trunk/pom.xml?revision=4329view=markuppathrev=4329 16 licenses 17 !-- default license (to override if needed) -- 18 license 19 nameThe Apache Software License, Version 2.0/name 20 urlhttp://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt /url 21 distributionrepo/distribution 22 /license 23 /licenses Not sure if maven allows 'overriding' here you can only extend the list elements of a parent.pom, so the Apache License will show up in all its children. I'm not sure what legal issus this imposes if multiple liceses appear. mf 2008/11/18 Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Okay, all of yours are added (includeing the persistence-template / iolite). wicket-contrib-openlayers-examples doesn't compile The rest are all building fine. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also: wicket-contrib-accordian is named Wicket Contrib Openlayers On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nino, I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you have wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the same group and artifact IDs. I'm going to wait to add them to the build server - can you tell me what the difference is? Maybe one should be renamed? On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be more cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of wicket... Jeremy Thomerson wrote: Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples. -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Ones the template for the other :) So wicket-persistence-template are a template for wicket-iolite , the latter are an archetype... Jeremy Thomerson wrote: Nino, I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you have wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the same group and artifact IDs. I'm going to wait to add them to the build server - can you tell me what the difference is? Maybe one should be renamed? On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be more cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of wicket... Jeremy Thomerson wrote: Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples. -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Argh! been too fast there... Jeremy Thomerson wrote: Also: wicket-contrib-accordian is named Wicket Contrib Openlayers On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nino, I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you have wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the same group and artifact IDs. I'm going to wait to add them to the build server - can you tell me what the difference is? Maybe one should be renamed? On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be more cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of wicket... Jeremy Thomerson wrote: Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples. -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Hi Jeremy, just saw your commits on wicket-stuff. I allways like any attempt to get some more stucture into wicket-stuff. One thing I saw was the licences tag in the pom.xml http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket-stuff/trunk/pom.xml?revision=4329view=markuppathrev=4329 16 licenses 17 !-- default license (to override if needed) -- 18 license 19 nameThe Apache Software License, Version 2.0/name 20 urlhttp://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt/url 21 distributionrepo/distribution 22 /license 23 /licenses Not sure if maven allows 'overriding' here you can only extend the list elements of a parent.pom, so the Apache License will show up in all its children. I'm not sure what legal issus this imposes if multiple liceses appear. mf 2008/11/18 Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Okay, all of yours are added (includeing the persistence-template / iolite). wicket-contrib-openlayers-examples doesn't compile The rest are all building fine. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also: wicket-contrib-accordian is named Wicket Contrib Openlayers On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nino, I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you have wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the same group and artifact IDs. I'm going to wait to add them to the build server - can you tell me what the difference is? Maybe one should be renamed? On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be more cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of wicket... Jeremy Thomerson wrote: Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples. -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
I copied that from wicketstuff-parent and used it as a test. Indeed, it wasn't going to work with the way WS is structured now, so I removed it. Thank you! Jeremy Thomerson On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Martin Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi Jeremy, just saw your commits on wicket-stuff. I allways like any attempt to get some more stucture into wicket-stuff. One thing I saw was the licences tag in the pom.xml http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket-stuff/trunk/pom.xml?revision=4329view=markuppathrev=4329 16 licenses 17 !-- default license (to override if needed) -- 18 license 19 nameThe Apache Software License, Version 2.0/name 20 urlhttp://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt /url 21 distributionrepo/distribution 22 /license 23 /licenses Not sure if maven allows 'overriding' here you can only extend the list elements of a parent.pom, so the Apache License will show up in all its children. I'm not sure what legal issus this imposes if multiple liceses appear. mf 2008/11/18 Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Okay, all of yours are added (includeing the persistence-template / iolite). wicket-contrib-openlayers-examples doesn't compile The rest are all building fine. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also: wicket-contrib-accordian is named Wicket Contrib Openlayers On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nino, I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you have wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the same group and artifact IDs. I'm going to wait to add them to the build server - can you tell me what the difference is? Maybe one should be renamed? On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be more cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of wicket... Jeremy Thomerson wrote: Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples. -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
So it seems to be running well. The only failure is on one project that has compile errors. What are the next steps? I don't mind running this on my server, but I assume we need to set it up to export snapshot builds to maven repos, etc. I am not familiar with what the TC setup was before. I don't know who owns the server that wicketstuff.org is on, but I guess the other option is to replace TC with Continuum on there. What does everyone think? -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devs, In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed a Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly configured. I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run it past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it run for a while as a test. http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
Continuum Build Server Set Up
Devs, In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed a Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly configured. I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run it past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it run for a while as a test. http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom for all projects. Martijn On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devs, In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed a Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly configured. I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run it past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it run for a while as a test. http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't inherit correctly, though. Right? On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom for all projects. Martijn On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devs, In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed a Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly configured. I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run it past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it run for a while as a test. http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Yes - and I think that's the best thing to do. To make this work, I would do this: - Create a pom.xml in wicketstuff trunk that sets up the SCM correctly and relies on wicket 1.4-SNAPSHOT - Delete the wicket-parent folder under trunk because it's not really needed if we do this - Each project then needs the pom changed to show that the parent of the project is wicketstuff-parent (the pom I created in trunk) - We can also remove the SCM config in each child pom because it will be set up correctly in the parent. Other things could also probably be deleted later - but that's not the goal of this, so we can wait on that. Please review and let me know if you approve. If several of the core committers are okay with this, I'll go ahead and do it. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom for all projects. Martijn On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devs, In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed a Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly configured. I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run it past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it run for a while as a test. http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
The problem is that the entire tree isn't copied over together, so the SCM links get messed up when you do that. On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tough to be sure - we could experiment. On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't inherit correctly, though. Right? On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom for all projects. Martijn On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devs, In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed a Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly configured. I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run it past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it run for a while as a test. http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Tough to be sure - we could experiment. On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't inherit correctly, though. Right? On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom for all projects. Martijn On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devs, In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed a Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly configured. I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run it past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it run for a while as a test. http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
I'm talking about the SCM url itself. It needs to change in the child when a branch/tag is created (because it now lives in a different place). Of course it would be able to find its parent (as long as it's in the local repository). On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think it would if you defined it like this in each child... right? parent * * groupId*org.apache.wicket*/groupId * * artifactId*wicket-parent*/artifactId * * version*1.4-SNAPSHOT*/version * * /parent Because it doesn't have a relative path, Maven just looks up the parent pom like it looks up any other dependency. If you had a relative path, like wicket does to its parent pom, then it would mess up. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: The problem is that the entire tree isn't copied over together, so the SCM links get messed up when you do that. On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tough to be sure - we could experiment. On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't inherit correctly, though. Right? On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom for all projects. Martijn On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devs, In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed a Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly configured. I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run it past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it run for a while as a test. http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Oh, gotcha! I'll try a test with one of my projects and see, but I think you're right. If so, I am still willing to add the SCM info to each pom if necessary - but I still want approval of the crowd since those aren't my projects to alter. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:07 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: I'm talking about the SCM url itself. It needs to change in the child when a branch/tag is created (because it now lives in a different place). Of course it would be able to find its parent (as long as it's in the local repository). On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think it would if you defined it like this in each child... right? parent * * groupId*org.apache.wicket*/groupId * * artifactId*wicket-parent*/artifactId * * version*1.4-SNAPSHOT*/version * * /parent Because it doesn't have a relative path, Maven just looks up the parent pom like it looks up any other dependency. If you had a relative path, like wicket does to its parent pom, then it would mess up. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: The problem is that the entire tree isn't copied over together, so the SCM links get messed up when you do that. On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tough to be sure - we could experiment. On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't inherit correctly, though. Right? On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom for all projects. Martijn On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devs, In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed a Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly configured. I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run it past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it run for a while as a test. http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
If all of wicketstuff was branched/tagged together, this would work and you could let the release plugin automagically change it for you. But, since they all have their own lifecycle (their own trunk/branches/tags), then you need to configure them individually. On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh, gotcha! I'll try a test with one of my projects and see, but I think you're right. If so, I am still willing to add the SCM info to each pom if necessary - but I still want approval of the crowd since those aren't my projects to alter. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:07 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: I'm talking about the SCM url itself. It needs to change in the child when a branch/tag is created (because it now lives in a different place). Of course it would be able to find its parent (as long as it's in the local repository). On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think it would if you defined it like this in each child... right? parent * * groupId*org.apache.wicket*/groupId * * artifactId*wicket-parent*/artifactId * * version*1.4-SNAPSHOT*/version * * /parent Because it doesn't have a relative path, Maven just looks up the parent pom like it looks up any other dependency. If you had a relative path, like wicket does to its parent pom, then it would mess up. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: The problem is that the entire tree isn't copied over together, so the SCM links get messed up when you do that. On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tough to be sure - we could experiment. On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't inherit correctly, though. Right? On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom for all projects. Martijn On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devs, In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed a Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly configured. I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run it past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it run for a while as a test. http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Yes - you're right. Overall, I think it will be much less intrusive to just add or fix the SCM tag in each project. Once I hear back whether anyone is in agreement with this or not, I can proceed (or not). At some point in the future we should probably discuss some way of creating at least a group of the core projects in wicket-stuff that all build and release together, on the same schedule as Wicket. But I don't want to muddy this build server discussion with that, and I don't have the mental or time bandwidth to work through that right now. So, what does everyone think? Can I update pom files to have correct SCM info and add them to Continuum on my server? -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:15 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: If all of wicketstuff was branched/tagged together, this would work and you could let the release plugin automagically change it for you. But, since they all have their own lifecycle (their own trunk/branches/tags), then you need to configure them individually. On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh, gotcha! I'll try a test with one of my projects and see, but I think you're right. If so, I am still willing to add the SCM info to each pom if necessary - but I still want approval of the crowd since those aren't my projects to alter. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:07 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: I'm talking about the SCM url itself. It needs to change in the child when a branch/tag is created (because it now lives in a different place). Of course it would be able to find its parent (as long as it's in the local repository). On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think it would if you defined it like this in each child... right? parent * * groupId*org.apache.wicket*/groupId * * artifactId*wicket-parent*/artifactId * * version*1.4-SNAPSHOT*/version * * /parent Because it doesn't have a relative path, Maven just looks up the parent pom like it looks up any other dependency. If you had a relative path, like wicket does to its parent pom, then it would mess up. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: The problem is that the entire tree isn't copied over together, so the SCM links get messed up when you do that. On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tough to be sure - we could experiment. On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't inherit correctly, though. Right? On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom for all projects. Martijn On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devs, In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed a Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly configured. I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run it past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let it run for a while as a test. http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Sure fine by me, and good initiative! I'll try to see if I can fix my own projects, can you provide a sniplet on how it should look? regards Nino Jeremy Thomerson wrote: Yes - you're right. Overall, I think it will be much less intrusive to just add or fix the SCM tag in each project. Once I hear back whether anyone is in agreement with this or not, I can proceed (or not). At some point in the future we should probably discuss some way of creating at least a group of the core projects in wicket-stuff that all build and release together, on the same schedule as Wicket. But I don't want to muddy this build server discussion with that, and I don't have the mental or time bandwidth to work through that right now. So, what does everyone think? Can I update pom files to have correct SCM info and add them to Continuum on my server? -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sure fine by me, and good initiative! I'll try to see if I can fix my own projects, can you provide a sniplet on how it should look? regards Nino Jeremy Thomerson wrote: Yes - you're right. Overall, I think it will be much less intrusive to just add or fix the SCM tag in each project. Once I hear back whether anyone is in agreement with this or not, I can proceed (or not). At some point in the future we should probably discuss some way of creating at least a group of the core projects in wicket-stuff that all build and release together, on the same schedule as Wicket. But I don't want to muddy this build server discussion with that, and I don't have the mental or time bandwidth to work through that right now. So, what does everyone think? Can I update pom files to have correct SCM info and add them to Continuum on my server? -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
And, as an example, look at this pom: https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-calendarviews/pom.xml The important part that is messed up or missing from most is that connection URL in the SCM tag. Take the one from that pom and modify accordingly (change your project folder). -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sure fine by me, and good initiative! I'll try to see if I can fix my own projects, can you provide a sniplet on how it should look? regards Nino Jeremy Thomerson wrote: Yes - you're right. Overall, I think it will be much less intrusive to just add or fix the SCM tag in each project. Once I hear back whether anyone is in agreement with this or not, I can proceed (or not). At some point in the future we should probably discuss some way of creating at least a group of the core projects in wicket-stuff that all build and release together, on the same schedule as Wicket. But I don't want to muddy this build server discussion with that, and I don't have the mental or time bandwidth to work through that right now. So, what does everyone think? Can I update pom files to have correct SCM info and add them to Continuum on my server? -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be more cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of wicket... Jeremy Thomerson wrote: Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples. -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Nino, I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you have wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the same group and artifact IDs. I'm going to wait to add them to the build server - can you tell me what the difference is? Maybe one should be renamed? On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be more cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of wicket... Jeremy Thomerson wrote: Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples. -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Also: wicket-contrib-accordian is named Wicket Contrib Openlayers On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nino, I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you have wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the same group and artifact IDs. I'm going to wait to add them to the build server - can you tell me what the difference is? Maybe one should be renamed? On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be more cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of wicket... Jeremy Thomerson wrote: Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples. -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up
Okay, all of yours are added (includeing the persistence-template / iolite). wicket-contrib-openlayers-examples doesn't compile The rest are all building fine. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also: wicket-contrib-accordian is named Wicket Contrib Openlayers On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nino, I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you have wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the same group and artifact IDs. I'm going to wait to add them to the build server - can you tell me what the difference is? Maybe one should be renamed? On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be more cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of wicket... Jeremy Thomerson wrote: Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples. -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
