Re: [Test-Announce] 2022-09-12 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
Reading the log now On 9/12/22, Luna Jernberg wrote: > Have time but sick, so taking a rest day today, will read the logs > when its uploaded during tommorow > > On 9/10/22, Luna Jernberg wrote: >> Won't have time to attend this or the Blocker Review meeting as i have >> other plans on Monday >> >> On 9/10/22, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting >>> # Date: 2022-09-12 >>> # Time: 15:00 UTC >>> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) >>> # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat >>> >>> Greetings testers! >>> >>> We didn't meet for a couple of weeks, and the Beta release has been >>> signed off, so let's get together and check in. >>> >>> If anyone has any other items for the agenda, please reply to this >>> email and suggest them! Thanks. >>> >>> == Proposed Agenda Topics == >>> >>> 1. Previous meeting follow-up >>> 2. Fedora 37 Beta check-in and final steps >>> 3. Fedora CoreOS release criteria / test case revisions >>> 4. Test Day / community event status >>> 5. Open floor >>> -- >>> Adam Williamson >>> Fedora QA >>> IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha >>> https://www.happyassassin.net >>> >>> ___ >>> test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to >>> test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Fedora Code of Conduct: >>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >>> List Archives: >>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Do not reply to spam, report it: >>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue >>> ___ >>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Fedora Code of Conduct: >>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >>> List Archives: >>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Do not reply to spam, report it: >>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue >>> >> > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing contractor-0.3.5-9.el7 php-phpseclib-2.0.38-1.el7 rpki-client-8.0-1.el7 trafficserver-9.1.3-3.el7 Details about builds: contractor-0.3.5-9.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b819ba5f35) Desktop-wide extension service Update Information: Initial package for EPEL7 ChangeLog: * Mon Sep 12 2022 Benjamin A. Beasley 0.3.5-9 - Depend on dbus-common rather than dbus * Mon Sep 12 2022 Benjamin A. Beasley 0.3.5-8 - Add explicit gio-2.0/gio-unix-2.0 BuildRequires * Mon Sep 12 2022 Benjamin A. Beasley 0.3.5-7 - Drop BR on gettext * Mon Sep 12 2022 Benjamin A. Beasley 0.3.5-6 - Reduce macro indirection in the spec file * Sun Sep 11 2022 Benjamin A. Beasley 0.3.5-5 - Update License to SPDX * Wed Jul 20 2022 Fedora Release Engineering 0.3.5-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jan 19 2022 Fedora Release Engineering 0.3.5-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jul 21 2021 Fedora Release Engineering 0.3.5-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jul 14 2021 Fabio Valentini 0.3.5-1 - Update to version 0.3.5; Fixes RHBZ#1982149 * Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.3.4-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Jul 27 2020 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.3.4-5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild * Tue Jan 28 2020 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.3.4-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jul 24 2019 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.3.4-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Jan 31 2019 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.3.4-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Aug 2 2018 Fabio Valentini - 0.3.4-1 - Update to version 0.3.4. * Thu Jul 12 2018 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.3.3-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild * Fri May 18 2018 Fabio Valentini - 0.3.3-1 - Update to version 0.3.3. * Wed Feb 7 2018 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.3.2-11 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Feb 5 2018 Fabio Valentini - 0.3.2-10 - Clean up .spec file. * Wed Aug 2 2017 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.3.2-9 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jul 26 2017 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.3.2-8 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild * Fri Feb 10 2017 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.3.2-7 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Jan 23 2017 Fabio Valentini - 0.3.2-6 - Make BR on /usr/bin/pkg-config explicit. * Sun Jan 1 2017 Fabio Valentini - 0.3.2-5 - Own contract directory explicitly. * Sun Jan 1 2017 Fabio Valentini - 0.3.2-4 - Clean up spec file. * Thu Sep 29 2016 Fabio Valentini - 0.3.2-3 - Mass rebuild. * Mon Sep 19 2016 Fabio Valentini - 0.3.2-2 - Spec file cosmetics. * Thu Aug 11 2016 Fabio Valentini - 0.3.2-1 - Update to version 0.3.2. php-phpseclib-2.0.38-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fc4ece5868) PHP Secure Communications Library Update Information: **Version 2.0.38** - 2022-09-02 - RSA: add support for OpenSSH encrypted keys (#1737, #1733, #1531, #1490) - SSH2: fix possibly undefined variable error (#1802) - SFTP: try to delete dir even if it can't be opened (#1791) - SFTP: try without path canonicalization if initial realpath() fails (#1796) - SFTP: detect if stream metadata has wrapper_type set for put() method (#1792) - BigInteger: fix behavior on 32-bit PHP installs (#1820) - don't use dynamic properties, which are deprecated in PHP 8.2 (#1808, #1822) - fix deprecated implicit float to int on 32-bit PHP 8.1 ChangeLog: * Mon Sep 12 2022 Remi Collet - 2.0.38-1 - update to 2.0.38 rpki-client-8.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c2338496d8) OpenBSD RPKI validator to support BGP Origin Validation Update Information: # rpki-client 8.0* Add suport for validating Autonomous System Provider Authorization (ASPA) objects conforming to
[Bug 2125785] perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.29 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125785 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-9eddc98ea1 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-9eddc98ea1` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-9eddc98ea1 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125785 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2125785] perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.29 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125785 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-73865111a9 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-73865111a9` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-73865111a9 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125785 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Troubleshooting python import check on python-pyside2
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 5:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 12. 09. 22 22:34, Richard Shaw wrote: > > Adding LD_LIBRARY_PATH was the trick! That should really be documented > > somewhere if it's not :) > > Not many Python packages install .so libraries to libdir. But if we agree > this > would be a general problem, we can set LD_LIBRARY_PATH from within the > check > macros (%py*_check_import, %pytest, %tox). > Hmmm... Is it worth me seeing if I can make it install into %python3_sitearch instad? Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2123426] perl-Locale-Codes-3.72 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123426 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Locale-Codes-3.72-1.fc |perl-Locale-Codes-3.72-1.fc |37 |37 |perl-Locale-Codes-3.72-1.fc |perl-Locale-Codes-3.72-1.fc |36 |36 ||perl-Locale-Codes-3.72-1.fc ||35 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-66cf5d4e88 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123426 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2123426] perl-Locale-Codes-3.72 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123426 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Locale-Codes-3.72-1.fc |perl-Locale-Codes-3.72-1.fc |37 |37 ||perl-Locale-Codes-3.72-1.fc ||36 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-5213abf65a has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123426 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: CVE Tracking Bugs
I have started to ignore CVE bugs reports due to the low quality reporting. An outdated ffmpeg CVE was filed against nv-codec-headers, WTF!! It isn't the first time it's been totally bogus. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: CVE Tracking Bugs
On Mon Sep 12, 2022, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 09. 09. 22 v 17:09 Maxwell G via devel napsal(a): > > On Friday, September 9, 2022 Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> However, I think that the idea is that whatever should be said about the > >> CVE should be said in the main tracer. The fedora tracker should be used > >> just to not forget to fix this in Fedora. > > Why not both? We shouldn't have to reference two different bugs to figure > > out > > what's going on. > > > > > > First of all, what is the information you would like to put to either of > the trackers? Currently, the Fedora trackers contain > This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure > that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions > of fedora-all. > > For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed > against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. > > For more information see: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs > > When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next > comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as > the relevant top-level CVE bugs. > > Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the > fedpkg commit message. > > NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only > one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at > the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other, > you may clone this bug as appropriate. while the main bug has the actual description. I'm saying that the description should be copied to the Fedora tracker. -- Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Troubleshooting python import check on python-pyside2
On 12. 09. 22 22:34, Richard Shaw wrote: Adding LD_LIBRARY_PATH was the trick! That should really be documented somewhere if it's not :) Not many Python packages install .so libraries to libdir. But if we agree this would be a general problem, we can set LD_LIBRARY_PATH from within the check macros (%py*_check_import, %pytest, %tox). -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2126088] perl-Mojolicious-9.27 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126088 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version||perl-Mojolicious-9.27-1.fc3 ||8 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |CLOSED Last Closed||2022-09-12 21:34:41 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2061874 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126088 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2126011] Upgrade perl-HTML-Form to 6.10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126011 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-HTML-Form-6.10-1.fc38 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2022-09-12 21:34:06 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2061873 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126011 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
The only issues I've encountered were related to nautilus extensions. Bugs are open for all of them and I submitted a PR for an rpmfusion package. However, I think that for people on Workstation who encrypt/decrypt/sign files through nautilus (and who are not comfortable with a terminal), the loss of seahorse-nautilus is going to be a significant problem. Could anyone take a look to see if it can be patched to work on F37? I was able to get the compilation going up to a point, but the subsequent errors were beyond my knowledge. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F38 proposal: Node.js Repackaging (Self-Contained Change proposal)
On 12. 09. 22 20:56, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 3:30 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 07. 09. 22 19:30, Neal Gompa wrote: That said, I don't think alternatives makes sense for this case. Me neither. We used this for /usr/bin/python3 in RHEL 8 and it's very bad UX and requires custom hacks in scriptlets even in RHEL 9 to undo it. It's ugly and hard to get rid of. See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Alternatives/ """ Alternatives MAY be used to allow parallel installation of software when: the software can be used as a drop-in replacement and functions with sufficient similarity that users and other programs would, within reason, not need to know which variant is currently installed """ Not exactly the case here. """ AND the selection of the software is only performed system-wide by the system administrator and end users do not have a need to switch between the variants. """ Not exactly the case here either. Happy to talk to you about other options next week. Just noting this now here fast before I leave for a conference for the rest of this week. I was thinking about this some more and I have a modified proposal that I'd like to suggest. It will be much the same as the original, but with the following changes: * We will stop shipping an independent `npm` subpackage and ship /usr/bin/npm-$NODE_VERSION in the `nodejs-$NODE_VERSION` package. * Instead of the `update-alternatives` system, each `nodejs-$NODE_VERSION` still in support will ship a `nodejs-$NODE_VERSION-default` subpackage that will conflict with other packages that `Provides: nodejs-default`. It will provide the /usr/bin/node and /usr/bin/npm symlinks to the matching $NODE_VERSION * When a particular version of Node.js goes out of support before the EOL of that Fedora release, we will have the main `nodejs-$NODE_VERSION` subpackage add `Obsoletes: nodejs-$NODE_VERSION-default < `. We will still ship the `-default` subpackage, but it will have to be reinstalled intentionally once the EOL is reached.[1] The general idea here would be to allow end-users to pick whichever installed version they want to own /usr/bin/node and /usr/bin/npm, as well as binding those two executables tightly together[2]. In addition, it would offer us an opportunity to be noisy about the EOL date. The downside to this, of course, is that it could be annoying to our users that they need to take manual action to remain on an EOL Node.js version (as /usr/bin/node). WDYT? [1] If we want to be more picky, we could change the subpackage to `-eol-default` rather than just `-default` once the EOL is reached, in addition to adding the `Obsoletes:` to the main package. [2] The `npm update -g npm` command will still allow this to be overridden. I don't like the EOL-Obsolte within one Fedora release. Things like this should only change on release boundary. Other than that it sounds good, but consider that packages requiring /usr/bin/node might pick any of the versions we ship. Something might need to Suggest the one we prefer. In Python, we deliberately decided that RPM-packaged software only uses one version at one particular Fedora release. Do you wish to support RPMs to use arbitrary versions including "doesn't matter"? Depending on the answer of that questions, I might give more suggestions inspired by Python, or think about how to do it differently. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Troubleshooting python import check on python-pyside2
On Mon, 2022-09-12 at 10:08 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > For some reason the build is failing the import check on F35 only. > > + /usr/bin/python3 -s /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py > PySide2 > Check import: PySide2 > PySide2/__init__.py: Unable to import shiboken2 from > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyside2-5.15.2.1- > 1.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.10/site-packages, > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyside2-5.15.2.1- > 1.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages, > /usr/lib64/python310.zip, /usr/lib64/python3.10, > /usr/lib64/python3.10/lib-dynload, /usr/lib64/python3.10/site- > packages, /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages, > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyside2-5.15.2.1- > 1.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 171, in > > main() > File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 167, in main > import_modules(modules) > File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 100, in > import_modules > importlib.import_module(module) > File "/usr/lib64/python3.10/importlib/__init__.py", line 126, in > import_module > return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level) > File "", line 1050, in _gcd_import > File "", line 1027, in _find_and_load > File "", line 1006, in > _find_and_load_unlocked > File "", line 688, in _load_unlocked > File "", line 883, in > exec_module > File "", line 241, in > _call_with_frames_removed > File "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyside2-5.15.2.1- > 1.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.10/site- > packages/PySide2/__init__.py", line 107, in > _setupQtDirectories() > File "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyside2-5.15.2.1- > 1.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.10/site- > packages/PySide2/__init__.py", line 58, in _setupQtDirectories > import shiboken2 > File "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-pyside2-5.15.2.1- > 1.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib64/python3.10/site- > packages/shiboken2/__init__.py", line 27, in > from .shiboken2 import * > ImportError: libshiboken2.cpython-310-x86_64-linux-gnu.so.5.15: > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > > Long story short, the libshiboken2 python library is not in the > search path but I have no idea why this only happens on F35 or how to > fix it... works for me, with python3-pyside2-5.15.2-5.fc35.x86_64 , you are using 5.15.2.1-1.fc35.x86_64 ? rpm -q --requires python3-pyside2 | grep shiboken libshiboken2.cpython-310-x86_64-linux-gnu.so.5.15()(64bit) > Thanks, > Richard > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F38 proposal: Node.js Repackaging (Self-Contained Change proposal)
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 3:30 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 07. 09. 22 19:30, Neal Gompa wrote: > > That said, I don't think alternatives makes sense for this case. > > Me neither. We used this for /usr/bin/python3 in RHEL 8 and it's very bad UX > and requires custom hacks in scriptlets even in RHEL 9 to undo it. It's ugly > and hard to get rid of. > > See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Alternatives/ > > """ > Alternatives MAY be used to allow parallel installation of software when: > > the software can be used as a drop-in replacement and functions with > sufficient similarity that users and other programs would, within reason, not > need to know which variant is currently installed > """ > > Not exactly the case here. > > """ > AND > > the selection of the software is only performed system-wide by the system > administrator and end users do not have a need to switch between the variants. > """ > > Not exactly the case here either. > > Happy to talk to you about other options next week. Just noting this now here > fast before I leave for a conference for the rest of this week. I was thinking about this some more and I have a modified proposal that I'd like to suggest. It will be much the same as the original, but with the following changes: * We will stop shipping an independent `npm` subpackage and ship /usr/bin/npm-$NODE_VERSION in the `nodejs-$NODE_VERSION` package. * Instead of the `update-alternatives` system, each `nodejs-$NODE_VERSION` still in support will ship a `nodejs-$NODE_VERSION-default` subpackage that will conflict with other packages that `Provides: nodejs-default`. It will provide the /usr/bin/node and /usr/bin/npm symlinks to the matching $NODE_VERSION * When a particular version of Node.js goes out of support before the EOL of that Fedora release, we will have the main `nodejs-$NODE_VERSION` subpackage add `Obsoletes: nodejs-$NODE_VERSION-default < `. We will still ship the `-default` subpackage, but it will have to be reinstalled intentionally once the EOL is reached.[1] The general idea here would be to allow end-users to pick whichever installed version they want to own /usr/bin/node and /usr/bin/npm, as well as binding those two executables tightly together[2]. In addition, it would offer us an opportunity to be noisy about the EOL date. The downside to this, of course, is that it could be annoying to our users that they need to take manual action to remain on an EOL Node.js version (as /usr/bin/node). WDYT? [1] If we want to be more picky, we could change the subpackage to `-eol-default` rather than just `-default` once the EOL is reached, in addition to adding the `Obsoletes:` to the main package. [2] The `npm update -g npm` command will still allow this to be overridden. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2126024] Upgrade perl-Plack to 1.0050
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126024 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Last Closed||2022-09-12 18:51:57 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126024 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2126024] Upgrade perl-Plack to 1.0050
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126024 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|emman...@seyman.fr |rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius --- (In reply to Emmanuel Seyman from comment #1) > I can take care of it. No you can't - Builds already are on its way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126024 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2123969] perl-Sereal-Decoder-5.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123969 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-Decoder-5.001-1 |perl-Sereal-Decoder-5.001-1 |.fc38 |.fc38 ||perl-Sereal-Decoder-5.001-1 ||.fc37 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2022-09-12 17:46:45 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-820d29ea37 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123969 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2123967] perl-Sereal-5.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123967 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-5.001-1.fc38|perl-Sereal-5.001-1.fc38 ||perl-Sereal-5.001-1.fc37 Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2022-09-12 17:46:41 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-820d29ea37 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123967 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2123968] perl-Sereal-Encoder-5.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123968 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-Encoder-5.001-1 |perl-Sereal-Encoder-5.001-1 |.fc38 |.fc38 ||perl-Sereal-Encoder-5.001-1 ||.fc37 Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2022-09-12 17:46:43 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-820d29ea37 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123968 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2123426] perl-Locale-Codes-3.72 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123426 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Locale-Codes-3.72-1.fc ||37 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2022-09-12 17:44:54 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-fecdf174e5 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123426 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2123187] perl-Test-File-Contents-0.242 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123187 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-Test-File-Contents-0.2 |perl-Test-File-Contents-0.2 |42-1.fc38 |42-1.fc38 ||perl-Test-File-Contents-0.2 ||42-1.fc37 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2022-09-12 17:44:12 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-a05eb23dc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123187 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2091301] perl-Dist-Zilla-6.025 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091301 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-Dist-Zilla-6.025-1.fc3 |perl-Dist-Zilla-6.025-1.fc3 |8 |8 ||perl-Dist-Zilla-6.025-1.fc3 ||7 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2022-09-12 17:44:14 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-35663995b3 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091301 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2123150] perl-Net-Netmask-2.0002 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123150 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version|perl-Net-Netmask-2.0002-1.f |perl-Net-Netmask-2.0002-1.f |c38 |c38 ||perl-Net-Netmask-2.0002-1.f ||c37 Last Closed||2022-09-12 17:44:06 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-aae57fb905 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123150 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2122247] Upgrade perl-Exporter-Tiny to 1.004000
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122247 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2022-09-12 17:42:45 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-a0d6a604de has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122247 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2116188] perl-Text-CSV-2.02 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116188 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Text-CSV-2.02-1.fc38 |perl-Text-CSV-2.02-1.fc38 ||perl-Text-CSV-2.02-1.fc37 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2022-09-12 17:42:47 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-1e22155698 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116188 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2122028] perl-Data-Dmp-0.242 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122028 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Data-Dmp-0.242-1.fc38 |perl-Data-Dmp-0.242-1.fc38 ||perl-Data-Dmp-0.242-1.fc37 Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2022-09-12 17:42:17 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-8c3a9a8af4 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122028 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120413] perl-Locale-Maketext-1.32 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120413 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-a7f4abd7ee has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120413 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2120625] perl-Config-Perl-V-0.34 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120625 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-9d9488d6bf has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120625 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: libFLAC soname bump
On Mon Sep 12, 2022 at 11:29 AM CDT, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> >
> > Would a proven packager be willing to take care of it? The new flac is
> > now built in --target=f38-build-side-58420. libsndfile and audiofile
> > need to be rebuilt next as some of the other packages depend on them.
> >
>
> Sure, what do you need done? Just push an update from that sidetag, or
> actually do some rebuilds as well?
It sounds like they need all of those packages to be rebuilt:
```
$ koji list-tagged f38-build-side-58420
Build Tag Built by
flac-1.4.0-1.fc38 f38-build-side-58420 mlichvar
```
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2126024] Upgrade perl-Plack to 1.0050
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126024 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|rc040...@freenet.de |emman...@seyman.fr --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- I can take care of it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126024 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-09-13)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2022-09-13 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be discussed can be found at: https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = None this week = Followups = None this week = New business = #NNN Title of issue https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/NNN #2865 Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 2/2 https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2865 #2863 Change: libsoup 3: part two https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2863 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual issue. The report of the agenda items can be found at https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new issue at https://pagure.io/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Python packages using "maturin"
The orjson package itself is written in Rust, so it’s probably best just to do without orjson for the python-cattrs tests if you’re not inclined to go down that rabbit hole. That said, it would be great to have a python-orjson package in Fedora, and I’ve considered attempting it but never found the time. For a long time, it was not packageable because it required a nightly Rust toolchain, but it’s my understanding that it now builds on stable Rust. On Mon, Sep 12, 2022, at 12:09 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi folks, > > While trying to unretire python-cattrs[1], I ended up falling down a rabbit > hole of deps. > > One of its optional test deps, orjson[2], requires "maturin"[3] to > build. maturin looks like something that helps publish rust code as > python packages. I think I may have come across this before, but it's > the first time I've actually bothered to look into it. (I know nothing > about rust so I tend to steer clear of rust projects). > > So, has anyone else come across this before? Has anyone looked into > packaging it? > > Given my non-existent rust knowledge, I'd like to avoid > packaging/maintaining maturin if at all possible. Is there a way to not > use it perhaps (unlikely, I know)? > > [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-cattrs > [2] https://pypi.org/project/orjson/ > [3] https://pypi.org/project/maturin/ > > -- > Thanks, > Regards, > Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha > Time zone: Europe/London > > ___ > python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to > python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > > Attachments: > * signature.asc ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: libFLAC soname bump
Hi Miroslav, On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 04:36:47PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > flac-1.4.0 changes the libFLAC and libFLAC++ sonames. There are also > some incompatible changes in the API, but I didn't see any packages > failing to built due to these changes. > ... > > Would a proven packager be willing to take care of it? The new flac is > now built in --target=f38-build-side-58420. libsndfile and audiofile > need to be rebuilt next as some of the other packages depend on them. > Sure, what do you need done? Just push an update from that sidetag, or actually do some rebuilds as well? Best, -- Michel Alexandre Salim identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2125785] perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.29 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125785 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-413245ac71 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-413245ac71` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-413245ac71 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125785 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2126164] New: perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.85 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126164 Bug ID: 2126164 Summary: perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.85 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-YAML-LibYAML Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com, mspa...@redhat.com, p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 0.85 Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.85 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.84-1.fc38 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/YAML-LibYAML/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3548/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-YAML-LibYAML -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126164 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Python packages using "maturin"
Hi folks, While trying to unretire python-cattrs[1], I ended up falling down a rabbit hole of deps. One of its optional test deps, orjson[2], requires "maturin"[3] to build. maturin looks like something that helps publish rust code as python packages. I think I may have come across this before, but it's the first time I've actually bothered to look into it. (I know nothing about rust so I tend to steer clear of rust projects). So, has anyone else come across this before? Has anyone looked into packaging it? Given my non-existent rust knowledge, I'd like to avoid packaging/maintaining maturin if at all possible. Is there a way to not use it perhaps (unlikely, I know)? [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-cattrs [2] https://pypi.org/project/orjson/ [3] https://pypi.org/project/maturin/ -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F39 proposal: Replace DNF with DNF5 (System-Wide Change proposal)
+1 on this, I was wondering if there are any plans to include rpm-ostree in this effort? rpm-ostree today uses libdnf and since fedora silverblue & fedora coreos are managed by rpm-ostree it would be nice to have an unified plan/coordination for this change. Furthermore, it would also be nice if we could provide a more unified user experience in the Fedora distributions universe. -- Joseph Marrero ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
libFLAC soname bump
flac-1.4.0 changes the libFLAC and libFLAC++ sonames. There are also some incompatible changes in the API, but I didn't see any packages failing to built due to these changes. The following packages need to be rebuilt: libsndfile audiofile SDL_sound SFML allegro5 ardour6 audacious-plugins audacity audiocd-kio bigloo butt chromium easytag flac123 getdata gstreamer1-plugins-good gtkpod k3b kf5-audiocd-kio kid3 kwave libextractor libfishsound libopenmpt mame mednafen mkvtoolnix mp3fs ocp opus-tools qmmp retroarch scummvm scummvm-tools sox squeezelite timidity++ traverso vavoom vorbis-tools xmms2 I tried to rebuild them all except chromium which I suspect would take too much space and time. Only ardour6, audacity, and xmms2 failed, for unrelated reasons. Would a proven packager be willing to take care of it? The new flac is now built in --target=f38-build-side-58420. libsndfile and audiofile need to be rebuilt next as some of the other packages depend on them. Thanks, -- Miroslav Lichvar ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On Mon, 12 Sep 2022, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate package. Seemed fine. I saw two issues related to python azure packages but since I maintain some that might be self inflected. will double check though on a stock install. Paul ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2124543] perl-SOAP-WSDL-3.004-11.fc38 FTBFS: Can't locate CGI.pm in @INC at t/SOAP/WSDL/Server/Simple.t line 6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124543 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Bauer --- The author did indeed spin off Template::Plugin::CGI into its own package: https://metacpan.org/pod/Template::Plugin::CGI This will require a new package request. Unfortunately, this is not something I've got time for before I leave for vacation. September has been a busy month. Perhaps @dwrobel would be willing to get this started while I am out. If not, I can start on this after my return the last week in September. Alternatively, we could just cut out the server subpackage from perl-SOAP-WSDL. That component is not needed for my own purposes (ZoneMinder). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124543 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SSL CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED?
Thanks Kevin, much appreciated!
On 11 Sep 2022, at 14:45, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 12:31:34PM -0500, Ron Olson wrote:
>> Hey all-
>>
>> When trying to do a `fedpkg update`, I got this response:
>>
>> ```
>> Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: {"status":
>> "error", "errors": [{"location": "body", "name": "builds", "description":
>> "Unable to create update. [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate
>> verify failed: certificate has expired (_ssl.c:997)"}]}
>> A copy of the filled in template is saved as bodhi.template.last
>> ```
>> But the update shows up on bodhi as an active update.
>>
>> Is there something I can do to fix this; never seen this error before.
>
> It's nothing on your end. It's server node certs on the rabbitmq cluster
> that runs fedora-messaging. ;(
>
> I've renewd those certs now and I think I fixed your updates, so it should be
> fixed.
>
> kevin
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: WebKitGTK package naming
On Mon, Sep 12 2022 at 08:34:46 AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Debian hasn't packaged -5.0 yet Actually I was only looking in unstable, but in experimental they do have it: libwebkit2gtk-5.0-0 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: WebKitGTK package naming
Michael Catanzaro wrote: > And the Debian names are: > > libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37 > libwebkit2gtk-4.1-0 > > (Debian hasn't packaged -5.0 yet, and requires the soversion appended > to the package name.) Debian is also notorious for having shipped kdelibs 3 as kdelibs4 and kdelibs 4 as kdelibs5 due to the same soversion-based versioning policy. That confused the heck out of users. (Fedora, on the other hand, used human- readable versioning, so kdelibs 3 was and still is called kdelibs3, not kdelibs4.) So I do not think Debian is a good example to follow. Kevin Kofler ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On 9/12/22 08:59 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ --assumeno distro-sync Error: Problem: package nautilus-dropbox-1:2020.03.04-3.fc35.x86_64 requires libnautilus-extension.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - nautilus-extensions-42.2-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package nautilus-dropbox-1:2020.03.04-3.fc35.x86_64 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: WebKitGTK package naming
I fear there's no non-confusing way to name these packages. The theory behind the current naming was to stick as close as possible to the upstream pkg-config versions, which are: webkit2gtk-4.0 (GTK 3, libsoup 2) webkit2gtk-4.1 (GTK 3, libsoup 3) webkitgtk-5.0 (GTK 4, libsoup 3) (webkitgtk-5.0 is still unstable and I just renamed it from webkit2gtk-5.0 last week. That name change not yet reflected in Fedora packaging.) Our packaging guidelines don't allow the use of the hyphen in package names, so that character is removed, but otherwise the name names match the pkg-config API version. I'm open to feedback on this, but my opinion is that having a package name different from upstream and different from what other distributions are doing is not necessarily a good idea. For context, the Arch package names are: webkit2gtk webkit2gtk-4.1 webkit2gtk-5.0 And the Debian names are: libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37 libwebkit2gtk-4.1-0 (Debian hasn't packaged -5.0 yet, and requires the soversion appended to the package name.) I previously proposed changing the GTK 4 API version from -5.0 to -4.5 so that we could sync up with GTK at -5.0, but didn't see much support for the idea. Now would be a perfect time to do so, though, since this API name was just changed a couple days ago anyway. Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ --assumeno distro-sync This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual upgrade. In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 37. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F37FailsToInstall) reports: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2045109_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12486533 Thank you Miroslav___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora 37 compose report: 20220912.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-37-20220911.n.0 NEW: Fedora-37-20220912.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 0 B Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Container_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Base-37-20220912.n.0.s390x.tar.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Joining Fedora Chat from own Homeserver
On 9/12/22 06:44, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: That unfortunately seems typical -- I'm joining the space from a different server too (Element One, ironically*also* hosted by EMS). Joining from a different homeserver seems to be a bit unreliable no matter which two servers are involved, especially for larger rooms (getting this issue joining Debian, FOSDEM, and Linux Plumbers rooms too). This is an area of active development by the Matrix team; joining *large* rooms (either large numbers of participants, large numbers of messages, or both) is currently slow because it's a synchronous operation. Your client waits for your server, which waits for the complete backfill of the participant list and some amount of the message history. There are changes coming shortly to make this process asynchronous, which should help significantly. For now, what I've seen is that you attempt to join the room, after 60 seconds or so your client reports a failure, and then 5-10 minutes later you attempt to join again and it works; I believe this is happening because the backfill process continues on your server even though your client gave up. -- Kevin P. Fleming He/Him/His Principal Program Manager, RHEL Red Hat US/Eastern Time Zone ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2126088] New: perl-Mojolicious-9.27 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126088 Bug ID: 2126088 Summary: perl-Mojolicious-9.27 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Mojolicious Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, robinlee.s...@gmail.com, yan...@declera.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 9.27 Upstream release that is considered latest: 9.27 Current version/release in rawhide: 9.26-3.fc37 URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Mojolicious Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5966/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mojolicious -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126088 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Joining Fedora Chat from own Homeserver
Hi Simon, On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 12:24:39PM +0200, Simon de Vlieger wrote: > > However, I'd like to join the Fedora Project Chat not from my FAS account but > from > my own homeserver; this homeserver is hosted by EMS. As far as I know I can't > login > to multiple accounts with the Element application I use as my Matrix client. > > Doing so seems excessively hard, I had to look around for quite a while to > find and > invite link to the Fedora 'Space' which I eventually found on the forums: > https://matrix.to/#/#fedora-space:fedoraproject.org (can someone let me know > if this > is the correct link to use to join the Fedora 'Space'?) > That's the correct link, yes. It's a bit unfortunate that even though spaces are just special rooms, trying to find the room name for a space is rather hard in the Element client > After that the problems begin, I've been able to join two channels > (Announcements and > Introductions) but joining those channels took about 60 seconds each. Joining > other > channels such as Devel or Social time out. The Python room also gives me > issues but in > my local Element client it tells me that the room does not exists on the > server. > That unfortunately seems typical -- I'm joining the space from a different server too (Element One, ironically *also* hosted by EMS). Joining from a different homeserver seems to be a bit unreliable no matter which two servers are involved, especially for larger rooms (getting this issue joining Debian, FOSDEM, and Linux Plumbers rooms too). (my use case is: both Element One and Fedora Chat use SSO, and Element is the only app that does SSO properly right now, so I can't have both on my phone without futzing around with Island or some other app to be able to run Element in a normal and 'work' context) > Aside from that any joined room does not show up under the 'Fedora' space nor > can I > move them there. > That part is weird though, mine show up just fine. > I'd like to know any tips and/or tricks people have for succesfully joining > channels > on the Fedora Chat through their own homeserver or if I am relegated to > keeping an > extra browser open for the Fedora Chat web-Element, or if I should ignore all > of the > fancy Matrix-ness and revert back to IRC. This guide is also super handy: https://kparal.wordpress.com/2021/06/01/connecting-to-libera-chat-through-matrix/ Best, -- Michel Alexandre Salim identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2125785] perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.29 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125785 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-9eddc98ea1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-9eddc98ea1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125785 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2125785] perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.29 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125785 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-73865111a9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-73865111a9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125785 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2125785] perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.29 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125785 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-413245ac71 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-413245ac71 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125785 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Joining Fedora Chat from own Homeserver
Hello, Been looking for a place to hang out and chat to other Fedora people and through the docs I found: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/help/ I've previously used IRC to interact with the Fedora community and recently decided to switch to Matrix for those projects that support it so it's great to see that fedora.im exists and allows me to log in with my FAS credentials. While the initial experience is OK and channels join reasonably quickly, some channels give me errors (such as Fedora Python) as I get an error with a tarfile full of logs. However, I'd like to join the Fedora Project Chat not from my FAS account but from my own homeserver; this homeserver is hosted by EMS. As far as I know I can't login to multiple accounts with the Element application I use as my Matrix client. Doing so seems excessively hard, I had to look around for quite a while to find and invite link to the Fedora 'Space' which I eventually found on the forums: https://matrix.to/#/#fedora-space:fedoraproject.org (can someone let me know if this is the correct link to use to join the Fedora 'Space'?) After that the problems begin, I've been able to join two channels (Announcements and Introductions) but joining those channels took about 60 seconds each. Joining other channels such as Devel or Social time out. The Python room also gives me issues but in my local Element client it tells me that the room does not exists on the server. Aside from that any joined room does not show up under the 'Fedora' space nor can I move them there. I'd like to know any tips and/or tricks people have for succesfully joining channels on the Fedora Chat through their own homeserver or if I am relegated to keeping an extra browser open for the Fedora Chat web-Element, or if I should ignore all of the fancy Matrix-ness and revert back to IRC. Regards, Simon ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2125785] perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.29 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125785 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.29-1.fc ||38 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- A bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125785 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2125785] perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.29 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125785 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC|ppi...@redhat.com | Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125785 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: CVE Tracking Bugs
Dne 09. 09. 22 v 17:09 Maxwell G via devel napsal(a): On Friday, September 9, 2022 Vít Ondruch wrote: However, I think that the idea is that whatever should be said about the CVE should be said in the main tracer. The fedora tracker should be used just to not forget to fix this in Fedora. Why not both? We shouldn't have to reference two different bugs to figure out what's going on. First of all, what is the information you would like to put to either of the trackers? One information which comes to my mind is that one might have doubts about applicability of the CVE to Fedora, right? But if the CVE is not applicable to Fedora, then it is possibly not applicable to RHEL. Or if this is not convincing, the you can s/Fedora/Linux/ and applicability to Linux vs e.g. Windows. So should such information be put into Fedora tracker or into the main tracker? So what other information, which is really specific to Fedora should be put into Fedora tracker? Vít OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2126027] New: Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to 1.016010
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126027 Bug ID: 2126027 Summary: Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to 1.016010 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Type-Tiny Status: NEW Component: perl-Type-Tiny Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de Reporter: jples...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com, rc040...@freenet.de, xav...@bachelot.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest Fedora delivers 1.016008 version. Upstream released 1.016010. When you have free time, please upgrade it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126027 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2126024] New: Upgrade perl-Plack to 1.0050
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126024 Bug ID: 2126024 Summary: Upgrade perl-Plack to 1.0050 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Plack Status: NEW Component: perl-Plack Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de Reporter: jples...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, jose.p.oliveira@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com, rc040...@freenet.de, xav...@bachelot.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest Fedora delivers 1.0048 version. Upstream released 1.0050. When you have free time, please upgrade it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126024 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2126011] New: Upgrade perl-HTML-Form to 6.10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126011 Bug ID: 2126011 Summary: Upgrade perl-HTML-Form to 6.10 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/HTML-Form Status: NEW Component: perl-HTML-Form Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: jples...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, lkund...@v3.sk, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest Fedora delivers 6.09 version. Upstream released 6.10. When you have free time, please upgrade it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126011 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Orphaned firejail
Hi all, I have orphaned firejail as I do not have the time to maintain it and I do not use it for anything myself. Feel free to pick it up if you are interested. Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2126007] New: Upgrade perl-Email-MIME-ContentType to 1.027
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126007 Bug ID: 2126007 Summary: Upgrade perl-Email-MIME-ContentType to 1.027 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Email-MIME-ContentType Status: NEW Component: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType Assignee: spo...@gmail.com Reporter: jples...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jose.p.oliveira@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, rob.my...@gtri.gatech.edu, spo...@gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest Fedora delivers 1.026 version. Upstream released 1.027. When you have free time, please upgrade it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126007 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2125988] New: Upgrade perl-Class-Observable to 2.004
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125988 Bug ID: 2125988 Summary: Upgrade perl-Class-Observable to 2.004 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Class-Observable Status: NEW Component: perl-Class-Observable Assignee: andr...@bawue.net Reporter: jples...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: andr...@bawue.net, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest Fedora delivers 2.002 version. Upstream released 2.004. When you have free time, please upgrade it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125988 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
