[board-discuss] Membership Committee candidacy
Full Name: Jesús Corrius Llavina Email: jcorr...@gmail.com Affiliation: Summary: I have been a member of the LibreOffice project (and from its ancestor) from day one, starting to work in the legacy project in 2001. I have been a member of the Board of Directors, developer, translator, community manager and also helped organizing events and bring students to the project. I think my knowledge of how many things work can be useful in the membership commitee. Kind regards, -- Jesús Corrius http://www.corrius.org
Re: [tdf-discuss] confcall issues gone?
Hello, I just wanted to ask all those who participated in today's confcall: Do I assume correctly that the issues are gone? No echoes, no noise, dial-in works? Worked well for me using skype. -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] LibOCon proposals
Hi Florian, Neither can we, nor do we intend do. The point, as stated, is that in the last years, we had many joke votings, and we would like to find a system where eligible people, i.e. those contributing and most likely attending the conference, can vote. I don't think the joking votes are that important in this particular case. We have two very serious proposals and I am sure we'll have a great LibOCon 2012 wherever we hold it. The two places are not that distant so I don't think it makes a lot of difference one place or the other one from a practical point of view (I am sure the travel costs are similar if you don't live in any of the countries). So even if people who don't plan to attend start voting massively for one of the places, where's the problem? Cheers, -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [board-discuss] Electing a BoD chairperson and it's deputy
+1 for Florian and Thorsten (also abstaining from vote on myself) -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Deputy of the Board of Directors of the Document Foundation Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to board-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Will win64 native build exist on 3.5.0 or at least 3.5.x releases?
I must admit I considered the option of answering you in catalá slang. It is a shame that this is the answer from a Deputy of the Board of Directors... Sorry for my last message. It wasn't my intention to be offensive. -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Deputy of the Board of Directors of the Document Foundation Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [steering-discuss] Vote for MC elections
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org wrote: Florian Effenberger wrote: == We postpone the MC elections and will have elections next year, so the next MC will be in place by July 1st, 2012. This also helps us to not having elections of BoD and MC in parallel. (NB: This is a gentlemen's agreement, since we cannot legally enforce the MC stepping down effective that date.) == +1 -- Jesús Corrius Deputy of the Board of Directors The Document Foundation Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [steering-discuss] freezing membership applications
Hi all, Not really - it's 3 weeks from candidate introduction to end of election, compared to 2 weeks for the usual MC meeting cadence. I agree that there are no strong, hard arguments for or against either procedure, I just have the impression it appears much cleaner to suspend MC work during election. I agree with Thorsten. Waiting 3 weeks, in the worst case, for your membership to be approved because there are elections, is not that much. Many other organizations take longer under normal circumstances. And then you get one year membership as everybody else so, in fact, if you don't collaborate anymore, you win 3 weeks for free ;) I don't consider the membership freezing a big deal. -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [steering-discuss] appointing Thorsten as election officer for MC
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote: Hello, just to have it official: I'd hereby like to nominate Thorsten Behrens as election officer for the upcoming membership committee elections. As Thorsten is elected BoD member, he is not running for an MC seat, and thus should have no conflict of interest in acting as election officer. +1 for Thorsten from my side +1 from my side. -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [steering-discuss] size of to be elected MC
Based on the statutes, the BoD is in charge of defining the size of the MC, with the limitations of having at least three people, and not more than 10% of the total members (i.e. 13-15 people right now, IIRC). I'd ask all BoD members to vote on the above proposal. My vote: +1 +1 -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Deputy of the Board of Directors of the Document Foundation Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [steering-discuss] Candidacy for Board: Michael Meeks
Hi David, On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:38 PM, David Nelson li...@traduction.biz wrote: Hi Jesus, 2011/10/8 Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org: In my opinion, I don't think it's best for the project to put some of the most skilled developers to work in documentation, when other developers can also do this task perfectly well. It is precisely these guys who could put the most effective work into this initiative, and probably the fastest. I'm asking the potential future members of the BoD to lead the way on this. Documentation is always considered to be some kind of unnecessary-to-optional accompaniment to software -- unless you're some poor blighter trying to understand how the thing works. I think your proposal is interesting and I really see your point here, but, at the same time, I'd create a group of people with different skill levels to work on it. I don't deny that it will not be as effective, but I could also be a chance for wannabe developers to learn a lot about the project while they work in benefit of the community. Just my two cents :) -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[steering-discuss] Candidacy for a BoD seat - Jesús Corrius
Dear friends, I would like to announce my candidacy for a Board of Directors seat at The Document Foundation. I am Jesús Corrius, 32 years old. I live in Barcelona, Spain. I have a degree in Audiovisual Communication (Cinema major) for the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and another one in Software Engineering for the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. I also studied at the Universities of Valencia and Vilnius. I am currently teaching Software Development in a Free / Open Source environment in an International Master for students in Spain and South America. I am also currently working as a freelance software developer for the largest telecommunications company in Asia, and the second-largest in the world. I am a member of the association Softcatalà, that promotes the use of the Catalan language in computers and Internet and I have been involved in the translation of many projects to Catalan like GNOME, Mozilla and, of course, OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice. I am also a proud owner of a plastic rooster named Papuga, which has become an unofficial mascot of the LibreOffice Project. I was involved in the OpenOffice.org project for 10 years, as Catalan was the first non Sun translation included in OpenOffice. At the time Softcatalà was hired by Sun Microsystems Spain to work in the translations and provide full localized builds for Linux, Windows and Solaris. My work started many months before OOo 1.0 was officially released. During all those years I did many different works, including: translations, customized builds, representing the project in conferences, marketing, working in the cross-compilation, fixing the Windows build, teaching Catalan to Fridrich, and organizing the OpenOffice.org Conference in Barcelona in 2007. I also was on the founders of TDF and the LibreOffice project. I can wear many hats and I think I can help The Document Foundations in many areas, from engineering to community development. I strongly believe in the project and its community. But, please, vote for the others, they are all a lot better than me! :) -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] Candidacy for a BoD seat - Jesús Corrius
Dear friends, I would like to announce my candidacy for a Board of Directors seat at The Document Foundation. I am Jesús Corrius, 32 years old. I live in Barcelona, Spain. I have a degree in Audiovisual Communication (Cinema major) for the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and another one in Software Engineering for the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. I also studied at the Universities of Valencia and Vilnius. I am currently teaching Software Development in a Free / Open Source environment in an International Master for students in Spain and South America. I am also currently working as a freelance software developer for the largest telecommunications company in Asia, and the second-largest in the world. I am a member of the association Softcatalà, that promotes the use of the Catalan language in computers and Internet and I have been involved in the translation of many projects to Catalan like GNOME, Mozilla and, of course, OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice. I am also a proud owner of a plastic rooster named Papuga, which has become an unofficial mascot of the LibreOffice Project. I was involved in the OpenOffice.org project for 10 years, as Catalan was the first non Sun translation included in OpenOffice. At the time Softcatalà was hired by Sun Microsystems Spain to work in the translations and provide full localized builds for Linux, Windows and Solaris. My work started many months before OOo 1.0 was officially released. During all those years I did many different works, including: translations, customized builds, representing the project in conferences, marketing, working in the cross-compilation, fixing the Windows build, teaching Catalan to Fridrich, and organizing the OpenOffice.org Conference in Barcelona in 2007. I also was on the founders of TDF and the LibreOffice project. I can wear many hats and I think I can help The Document Foundations in many areas, from engineering to community development. I strongly believe in the project and its community. But, please, vote for the others, they are all a lot better than me! :) -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibO 3.4.2 RC1 under Windows
Hi all, On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:15 AM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote: On 07/18/2011 06:07 PM, plino wrote: NoOp wrote: I'd recommend a followup to the dev list. plino, when you do that you might also add links to the security notices for the earlier version of VC++ 2008. The Dev list is for devs only. I have unsubscribed from it. I got crap for posting there a few times (Jesús Corrius will certainly remember Change executable/sh names - which went nowhere and are still not changed btw), so I can't blame you. Well, this is not the developers list and I don't want a discussion that goes to nowhere :) so here is my last message to this thread with my points: 1. LibreOffice and all the other applications (ok, unless they are using private assemblies[1]) will always use the lastest updated versions of the libraries installed in the system. Any user has many old libraries installed in the WinSxS directory and it's not a security threat because they are not in use. 2. The versions of the C++ libraries we are distributing are the last ones available from Microsoft as a full package. According to the security bulletin: These updates are not the versions on the download center. Microsoft does not recommend customers redistribute any version other than the full versions that can be downloaded from the Microsoft Download Center (KB973544, KB973551, and KB973552). [2] And this is what we are doing. If you check the KBxx's mentioned, these are the versions we are currently distributing. 3. When Microsoft provides new full versions of the Visual Studio 2008 runtimes, we will be happy to distribute them. So if you find new full versions in the Microsoft Download Center, let us know and we will update them immediately. [1] http://helgeklein.com/blog/2010/03/deploying-visual-c-runtime-files-as-private-assemblies/ [2] http://support.microsoft.com/kb/973924 -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibO 3.4.2 RC1 under Windows
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com wrote: On 7/19/11 2:53 PM, plino wrote: I understand that it is the version you are supposed to distribute. BUT it still needs a CHECK because there are NEWER security fixes. Although I don't use Windows, I've seen a recent update of the C++ Redistributable Package under Windows 7 on a friend's PC. Online, I could just find this link, which I don't think is the right one, but mentions a Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 Redistributable Package: http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=. Maybe, the new package is what gets installed on updated PCs, and might be included in LibreOffice (but I'm not a developer, and I don't know if there are differences between C++ 2008 and C++ 2010). Hi Italo, Yes, there are diferences. We should distribute the C++ 2008 as we are using the Visual C++ 2008 compiler to build it. -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibO 3.4.2 RC1 under Windows
I ALREADY HAVE A NEWER VERSION INSTALLED!!! LibreOffice IGNORES my NEWER VC++ and STILL installs the OLDER version included. It's a waste of time and resources. I understand that it is the version you are supposed to distribute. BUT it still needs a CHECK because there are NEWER security fixes. If you prefer to ignore this, it's fine with me. I understand it can be annoying. But without those libraries properly installed, LibreOffice will not work. Some modifications on the Windows files or registry (or a corrupted status) is something that we can't properly detect. And in those cases, LibreOffice will not execute. We launch the installer all the time to try make sure LibreOffice will work under any circumstance. Think of that as an insurance (yes, it's annoying, but it has a good purpose). We can detect if there a new version installed, and then do nothing, but the trade-off will be to make LibreOffice less reliable. -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] LibO 3.4.2 RC1 under Windows
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:46 PM, plino pedl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all First of all I find it odd that this release is named RC1. Shouldn't there be a Beta first? I found the following bugs in the Windows installer: 1) Forces installation of MS VC++ 2008 x86 9.0.30729.4148 although MS VC++ 2008 x86 9.0.30729.6161 was already installed This is working fine. Visual C++ 2008 uses shared side-by-side assemblies that are installed into the native assembly cache (WinSxS folder on the Windows root). The manifests of the applications describe their dependencies on Visual C++ libraries, including version info. If you don't have the matching version already installed, then the installer should install the version referenced in the manifests. If the version is already installed, the VC runtime installer does nothing. But in this case, it's polite to detect that the version is already installed and don't launch it, although many application launch it anyway just in case. 2) New dictionaries are selected to install (this time Kurdish, Nepali, Occitan and Romanian). Isn't there a way for it to remember just the ones previously selected and ignore all new? We could put the values in the registry and then read them every new installation. 3) Portuguese dictionary isn't included (but the Language Pack is). The dictionary for Brazilian Portuguese should be renamed to Portuguese (Brasil) just like e.g. German (Germany) 4) The Create a start link on desktop option is always selected although I unselect it every time. This is the only installer option that isn't saved from one install to the next. Same as option 2. -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibO 3.4.2 RC1 under Windows
No it's not, Jesus. It is installing a previous version with security issues when a newer fixed version is already installed. It should never install if a newer is already installed. The versions are not overridden, they are installed in parallel. If you go to your C:\windows\winsxs folder, you'll find many different versions of the Visual C++ libraries. -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: Availability of source code (Was: Re: OFF TOPIC about GPL enforcement (Was: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice))
I checked those files as well. They are all 'noarch' (do not contain compiled programs; No Architecture), and contain the same .png branding images. The license not only covers the code, also the images. So if those images are in the program, the source code must include them. That's why the link to the source code has to point to them too, that is, it must point to the modified source code of your distribution. And not the original at LibreOffice's. Or point to both ;) -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: Availability of source code (Was: Re: OFF TOPIC about GPL enforcement (Was: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice))
1. We want to add a paragraph somewhere in the About dialog box which says that if we are interested in the source code, we should read a specific Wiki page, for example http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/AvailabilityOfSourceCode I see a problem here. Usually GNU/Linux distributions make modifications to the original source code. That means that the *real* source code will be the one from your distro and not the one you can download from the LibO website, hence the information will be misleading. We provide all the required source tarballs for each version and every piece of code is in our git repository. So we fulfill all the requirements but we have the problem that it's not easy to find. I guess writing a good text about how to get the source code for every version and place it in our download page (or a link to the wiki page) is good enough. -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice
And finally, whether it would make any sense from the technical point of view for LibreOffice contributors to even try to participate in OOo at ASF depends very much on what actually ends up there, and in what direction it is taken by the presumed main driving force, IBM. For all we know, it might be that the code that is eventually dumped in ASF's SVN (!) is a subset that doesn't even build, and then IBM starts adding its own hitherto proprietary stuff including build mechanisms that makes it into a completely different beast than what we are used to. I suspect lots of Java is involved, and that is not necessarily that popular around here. As if understanding and using the old OOo build mechanisms which have been somewhat adapted at LO wasn't hard enough. Good point, Tor. Is the source code available somewhere already? I wouldn't join any Open Source project if I can't see the source code first :) -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Disclaimer
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote: Hello, Daniel Gonzalez wrote on 2011-03-09 02.52: Took several days working and working hard on marketing lists, users, support, and others in Spanish. Recently I talked with some people who told me that everything related to LibreOffice in Spanish is being led by http://oooes.org/, the idea seems good but not when I think people there are as much help Partial use OOo well, OOoES and TDF are two independent entities. The one does *not* speak on behalf of the other. LibreOffice perhaps should not have mailing lists that came driving and on which we were making our contributions. Far apart for a few hours ago we only have a single point to lists http://oooes.org/ and they appear to be handled with great discretion. There are official mailing lists for Spain: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Local_Mailing_Lists#Spanis It's indeed interesting that they are not referenced on http://es.libreoffice.org/asistencia/listas-de-correo/ ... Yes, I think the pages should point to the official lists inside the project. Or at least don't hide that they exist! If there are no objections in 24 hours, I'll edit the pages to point to the official lists. -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Disclaimer
We, the sudacas, really need a great european (intelligent and good) that help us. In this point, you interrupt the dialog... Duce. This answer is totally unacceptable. Part of my family was killed because of the fascist violence in Spain and I think this is not a matter of laughs or jokes. -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Trouble installing on Windows XP
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 5:48 PM, abenglen abeng...@bellsouth.net wrote: I have to admit to being totally frustrated now. I cleared any reference to OpenOffice and LibreOffice from the registry, AND, even though neither OpenOffice, LibreOffice nor StarOffice were listed as installed programs at Control Panel/Add or Remove Programs, I found and removed some directories (and files) of OpenOffice, LibreOffice and StarOffice just in case that is the reason for the conflict. I even changed the anti-virus program on my computer thinking that may be where the problem is, all to no avail. When the installation stops (hangs) at about 4/5th the way on the progress bar, both the NEXT and BACK buttons are ghosted, but I can click on CANCEL which prompts a warning window asking if I am sure I want to cancel the installation. When I click on YES, nothing happens, and the only why to clear the installation window(s) is by using End Task of the Windows Task Manager. Using Alt + Tab did not show any other warning screen. I am reluctant to do anything else in the Registry without specific guidance. I don't know what to do, but I need to be able to use the Calc part of either OpenOffice of LibreOffice. As far as I can tell I am not having any other problems on my computer. Thanks for any other help Can you run the file libreoffice33.msi through this utility: http://www.installsite.org/files/iswi/MsiTools.zip and then enable the logging [*] - All Options after choosing a log file. That log file will help us to find the problem. Cheers, -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] ODF viewer Extension for Chromium/Firefox
2010/12/13 Javier Obregón oseargent...@gmail.com: On 13/12/10 12:40, Jaime R. Garza wrote: Hello all, I would like to start the development of a ODF viewer Extension for Chromium/Firefox. I know there is an ODF Viewer already, I want to probably port it to an extension that could be installed to Firefox Chromium. Would anybody like to help me? Cheers, Jaime R. Garza Hola amigos, ante todo disculpen la intromisión del idioma :) hay alguna lista para hispano parlantes...? no la encontré en la pagina oficial del proyecto... mi consulta si puedo hacerla por aquí es... Aquí tienes las listas oficiales del proyecto en español: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Local_Mailing_Lists#Spanish Si escribes un mensaje a us...@es.libreoffice.org te voy a contestar yo mismo. Saludos, -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Libreoffice 3.3 Beta 3
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote: OOo is currently at 3.3rc5 - anyone know what LibO 3.3b3 is based on? Will there be any kind of consistency between them? According to the internal version numbers, LibO 3.3b3 is based on OOo 3.3rc2. I don't think there will be any consistency because LibO is still in Beta and OOo is already in Release Candidate. -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Libreoffice 3.3 Beta 3
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote: On 2010-11-18 3:03 PM, Jesús Corrius wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote: OOo is currently at 3.3rc5 - anyone know what LibO 3.3b3 is based on? Will there be any kind of consistency between them? According to the internal version numbers, LibO 3.3b3 is based on OOo 3.3rc2. Bummer - so lots of bug-fixes in OOo 3.3rc5 that aren't in LibO 3.3b3... I wouldn't say lots but a few. In any case, the final version of LibO 3.3 will contain all of them. Anyone using it yet? Is it stable enough for daily use? I do. For me it's stable enough for daily use. -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Clear separation between frontend and backend?
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:58 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote: I was thinking on something similar. If it were possible to completely separate core from UI it would be great. For example, someone who knows Qt but nothing about GTK will be able to create a gui for MeeGo without messing with core elements. Or someone else will be able to build a gui for small monitors. Or another person will be able to build something for power users in which you can only see style stuff while just another person will contribute a kids format painter lovers interface. To go on with this idea, I think it will be interesting to make the core toolkit independent (i.e., pure C or C++, without GTK or any stuff like that), so it will be possible to integrate LibO on any platform just (yes, I know it is not easy, that's why I used quotes... ;) ) by writing a proper UI. LibO already has different frontends for GTK+, QT, native Win32 and native Mac in the vcl module and they are independent as any change in the code of one of those toolkits doesn't affect the others. It could be done better for sure, but what you are mentioning is already possible. -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Re: RE : Re: [steering-discuss] Version numbering of LibO
Hi all, On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Stefan Weigel stefan.wei...@bildungskreis.org wrote: Hi, Am 03.11.2010 14:54, schrieb Charles-H. Schulz: Hi, Top posting from my phone... This is not an easy answer to give. Both strategies have pros and cons. My advice would be to start where we are but alter the numbering scheme wildly: 3.3, 3.5 and then 4.0 instead of 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 like OOo. Ever considered a ubuntu-like numbering? (My personal favorite) 10.10 (October 2010) 11.04 (April 2011) I also like the ubuntu-like numbering. What about a mix of both? Using your examples: 3.3.10.10 3.5.11.04 Or maybe that is just too much for an average user? :) -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/steering-discuss/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Compiling in Windows
Which is free (as in beer) for as long as Microsoft wishes. Plus it is no longer updated and creating a script for VC 2010 requires changes. Finally, the free VC version does not create x64 builds which I hope LO starts producing since most (all?) modern CPUs are 64bit... Last week I made the necessary changes to compile LO with VC2010. It still requires some tweaks, but I have a full working build available. You can get the 64 bits compilers in the Windows SDK. In fact the VC Express Editions are not necessary to compile the product, as the Windows SDK also ships them. All the developers agree that we should use open source compilers, and this will happen. But it's not ready for production yet, so probably the next few versions for Windows will still be using the Microsoft compilers. It depends on how many people volunteer to work on that. Cheers, -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Oracle's OpenOffice in Libre Software World Conference
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:39 AM, timofonic timofonic timofo...@gmail.com wrote: Hello. I'm not sure what one of the two mailing lists suits best, so I reply in both because it may have different topis on each thread. Oracle's OpenOffice (oOO) is going to participate in the Libre Software World Conference (LSWC). LSWC is the spiritual sucessor of the Open Source World Conference (OSWC), that got canceled 20 days before celebration due to supossed economical issues. LSWC replaces this event and will be celebated at 27 October in Malaga (Andalucia, Spain, Europe). I would like to inform you about this and if there are any plans in respect to it. Maybe a group of volunteers can come in with some The Document Foundation's LibreOffice T-shirts (you can send me the logo in vectorized version, PDF and such is preferred), for example ;) http://www.libresoftwareworldconference.org Sorry for saying it too late, but I checked the program today (http://www.libresoftwareworldconference.org/index.php/en/about-the-conference/agenda). I was invited to the OSWC to give an official presentation about The Document Foundation. Unfortunately, I had to change my plans and now it's impossible for me to attend the LSWC. I will be happy to attend the conference next year if we can know the dates a few months in advance. Thanks Microsoft and friends for ruining my trip :( -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Oracle's OpenOffice in Libre Software World Conference
However if the speaker can manage himself to get to it, he will be welcomed. They also told me that Oracle's speaker is paying his own expenses as well, mainly because he got invited to the Valencian educational lliurex event. Louis used to be listed in the lliurex schedule, but I see he's not there anymore. -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius -- E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] New name
Hi all, Also a very difficult thing is to find a good name that is not already registered or trademarked as, unfortunately, most of the names are. I don't like LibreOffice either, but we went public with that name and I think the users will get confused if we change the name again. Just my five cents. On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Claus Agerskov c...@agercon.dk wrote: Hi all I don't like the name LibreOffice. But I don't think the time is right for a new name yet. The community behind the office suite have to be established both concern ing the existing office suites based on OpenOffice.org - do they become a par t of this or will the be on the sideline. And concerning which kind of organisation it will become. Oracle has not stated if they will give the rights to the name OpenOffice.org to us so the name could be kept - or we really have to continue with LibreOffice or find a new name. If the work on a new name should be started then we have to set up a list of guidelines for such name - and keep the work on the new name on a closed mailing list so others wont registrate the name and domain names before w e had the time to do it ourselves. And open competition to get more name suggestions from everyone could sti ll be in the open - but not the work on selecting the name. I would be interested to be in such a workgroup. The most enjoyable greetings -- .: Claus Agerskov :: c...@agercon.dk :: +45 27 59 69 96 :. .: Robinievej 129 :: DK-2620 Albertslund :. .: AgerCon :: www.agercon.dk :. .: FOSS consulting, speeches and teaching :. -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot b e deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ -- Jesús Corrius http://www.corrius.org -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Re: [tdf-discuss] Error compiling slideshow
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Nguyen Vu Hung vuhung16p...@gmail.com wro te: Hello, I've raised my problem to the people on IRC today but I didn't get the answer. Can anyone please take a look at the following errors? I did: ./download ./configure -with-gcc-speedupÌache \ --with-qt-dir/usr/lib/qt-3.3 \ --with-qt-includes/usr/lib/qt-3.3/include \ --with-qt-libraries/usr/lib/qt-3.3/lib make Error: [snip] /engine/OGLTrans/OGLTrans_TransitionerImpl.cxx:1234: error: 'myglXReleaseTexImageEXT' was not declared in this scope dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../../ unxlngi6.pro/slo/OGLTrans_TransitionerImpl.obj' make: *** [stamp/build] Error 1 1 module(s): slideshow need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s): Attention: if you fix the errors in above module(s) you may continue the build issuing the following command: build --all:slideshow source ./build/libreoffice-3.2.99.1/LinuxX86Env.Set.sh cd build/libreoffice-3.2.99.1/slideshow/ build Error: Compiling: slideshow/source/engine/OGLTrans/OGLTrans_TransitionerImpl.cxx /home/vuhung/work/002.Libre/tmp/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.1/slidesho w/ source/engine/OGLTrans/OGLTrans_TransitionerImpl.cxx: In member function 'voidunnamed::OGLTransitionerImpl::createTexture(unsigned int*, unx::GLXPixmap, bool, bool, com::sun::star::uno::Sequencesigned char, constunnamed::unnamed::OGLFormat*)': /home/vuhung/work/002.Libre/tmp/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.1/slidesho w/ source/engine/OGLTrans/OGLTrans_TransitionerImpl.cxx:869: error: 'PFNGLXBINDTEXIMAGEEXTPROC' is not a member of 'unx' /home/vuhung/work/002.Libre/tmp/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.1/slidesho w/ source/engine/OGLTrans/OGLTrans_TransitionerImpl.cxx:869: error: expected `;' before 'myglXBindTexImageEXT' /home/vuhung/work/002.Libre/tmp/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.1/slidesho w/ source/engine/OGLTrans/OGLTrans_TransitionerImpl.cxx:874: error: 'myglXBindTexImageEXT' was not declared in this scope /home/vuhung/work/002.Libre/tmp/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.1/slidesho w/ source/engine/OGLTrans/OGLTrans_TransitionerImpl.cxx: In member function 'voidunnamed::OGLTransitionerImpl::disposeTextures() ': /home/vuhung/work/002.Libre/tmp/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.1/slidesho w/ source/engine/OGLTrans/OGLTrans_TransitionerImpl.cxx:1221: error: 'PFNGLXRELEASETEXIMAGEEXTPROC' is not a member of 'unx' /home/vuhung/work/002.Libre/tmp/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.1/slidesho w/ source/engine/OGLTrans/OGLTrans_TransitionerImpl.cxx:1221: error: expected `;' before 'myglXReleaseTexImageEXT' /home/vuhung/work/002.Libre/tmp/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.1/slidesho w/ source/engine/OGLTrans/OGLTrans_TransitionerImpl.cxx:1224: error: 'myglXReleaseTexImageEXT' was not declared in this scope /home/vuhung/work/002.Libre/tmp/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.1/slidesho w/ source/engine/OGLTrans/OGLTrans_TransitionerImpl.cxx:1234: error: 'myglXReleaseTexImageEXT' was not declared in this scope dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../../ unxlngi6.pro/slo/OGLTrans_TransitionerImpl.obj' Are you using the nvidia-glx header files? Look what package is the owner of glxext.h. If so, try to install the mesa development package for your distribution. -- Jesús Corrius http://www.corrius.org -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Re: [tdf-discuss] Error compiling slideshow
I am not sure: [vuh...@www2 slideshow]$ rpm -qf /usr/include/GL/glxext.h mesa-libGL-devel-6.5.1-7.8.el5 This is the standard rpm on CentOS 5.5 that I has installed with yum inst al This mesa version is more than 4 years old and the problem may be related to that. Looks like the following ifdef: #if defined( GLX_VERSION_1_3 ) defined( GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap ) doesn't work well with your version of the mesa package. The program will probably compile if you undefine one of the constants above, but I am unsure about the side effects. Regards, -- Jesús Corrius http://www.corrius.org -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Re: [tdf-discuss] [OT] Interview on LibreOffice
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org wr ote: Just want to point to an interview I recently gave on a Mexican podcast regarding the libreoffice project and the Document Foundation. The interv iew is in spanish and starts on the minute 21. http://www.alexandrocolorado.com/wordpress/?p6 Thanks for the interview and congratulations. But I think you should have stressed a bit more the importance of the Document Foundation and LibreOffice. It's not just a fork, we are brining the community and the product to the 21st century! This is one small step for a seagull but one giant leap for mankind(*) (*) Copyright 2010 by Jesús Corrius. -- Jesús Corrius http://www.corrius.org -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Re: [tdf-discuss] how to unsubscribe
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Andre Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net wrote: Hi, Von: Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es I have already sent an email to unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org But the messages keep coming. Any idea what is wrong? You used the wrong mailaddress to unsubscribe. Correct is: To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Maybe we should put this unsubscribe information in the website too, for people who are not familiar with mailing-lists? -- Jesús Corrius http://www.corrius.org -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Re: [tdf-discuss] Old welcome message after installing LibreOffice
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Erich Christian erich_...@irq.at wrote: Hi Jesus, * Am 28.09.2010 20:21, schrieb Jesús Corrius: On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Christopher Avila avila.christop...@gmail.com wrote: Why the welcome message (that is shown after installing LibreOffice) is the same as the one that comes in OpenOffice (with the Oracle logo)? Do you have an old language pack installed? No, in my case there was a localized 3.2.1_de installed, which was overwritten which I do not appreciate for a beta behaviour. Has this been in your sense or is it a bug? LibreOffice can use old installed language packs of OpenOffice.org previously installed in your system. It happened to me in my testing machine, but I don't know if we can call this a bug :) -- Jesús Corrius http://www.corrius.org -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
