[IxDA Discuss] UX Field trips

2010-02-20 Thread Jason Richardson
Hi everyone,
I'm looking to take our UX team on a few "field trips" this year
in Northeast Ohio to visit other organization's UX teams and share
methods, deliverables and anything else related to UX in a half day
session.   I'm aware of UX Show and Tell which is a tremendous
resource and might also be another option for UX teams in NEO, but
for the time being I'm kicking around an idea of team-to-team
discussions.

So beyond the usual "don't take your most confidential
application's sketches" to something like this, does anyone have
any tips or ideas on what works for this type of meeting?  Have you
held this kind of session before and was it valuable.  At this point
anything is on the table and open for discussion.  

Finally, anyone in the NEO region up for talking or setting up
plans?

Jason

Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] Sketching before the Wireframes

2010-02-02 Thread Jason Richardson
Putting ideas on paper might seem like a waste to a stakeholder.  But
the one point to get across is that you're less likely to self edit
and clean up your ideas while sketching.  Pen and paper allows you
the ability to throw out ideas quickly and not necessarily worry
about the final deliverable to the stakeholder.  I prefer to sketch
ideas out and put into Omni, Visio or straight to HTML prototype
depending on the project.   But I have noticed that working in the
software as a first step, I'm definitely not as open to ideas and
thinking of the issue from another angle.

Also, check out these two resources.  
Thoughts from Will Evans on sketching -
http://blog.semanticfoundry.com/2010/01/31/shades-of-gray-thoughts-on-sketching/
  

Great book by Todd Zaki Warfel on prototyping -
http://rosenfeldmedia.com/books/prototyping/


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=48924



Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] Showcase/Portfolio examples

2010-01-29 Thread Jason Richardson
Looks like sortfolio is just lining clients up with vendors and taking
a hands free approach. From their about page: 
"Does Sortfolio make any guarantees?
Any web design firm is free to place their ad on Sortfolio, but
Sortfolio doesn't review the ads, censor the ads (unless they are
offensive), or make any warrantees or guarantees about the quality of
a firm's work."  http://sortfolio.com/about

I agree on the expertise factor.  I'm working with some internal
projects that deal with competencies and ratings on people and
knowledge.  You can pull credentials, knowledge sharing statistics
and a some other data to generate loose algorithims but that doesn't
guarantee expertise and trust.  


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=48814



Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] Research methods when you only have 2-3 hours or 2-3 days

2009-07-08 Thread Jason Richardson
I grab some time with the stakeholder at the beginning to get a sense
of the context of the goal.  Who the users might be, what they need
to accomplish, what they don%u2019t need to do, etc. are the main
points to get down.  They may not have all the answers but it%u2019s
a start.  

I also turn to resources already in hand.  I may have past
work/research lying around, personas, mental models that I can turn
to internally for reference.  Next step is to scour the web for other
data points (Safari, UX related sites and yes Twitter.)  If time
permits, I also quickly browse through my local city and university
libraries (very lucky to have two high quality libraries) and my own
collection of books.  I mine out the data and research that are
appropriate for the work at hand.  

After all that is done, slam it into a presentation, maybe do some
initial sketches and recap with the team and stakeholders.



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=43514



Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] Remote usability testing

2008-03-06 Thread Jason Richardson
Hi Kevin,
We do an extensive amount of remote usability testing at E&Y on our
applications.  From a technical point of view, we are a Notes shop so we use
Sametime Meeting to view the screens and capture the test with Camtasia.  In
your case, if you have a video feed as well you'll be able to capture some
physical reactions to questions or tasks which we can't do with our testing.

Not sure if you were also looking for some logistical aspects to remote
testing, but here are a few that we use.


   - We use conference calls that have a toll free option for observers
   and participants.  We typically have our observers dial in 10-15 minutes
   early so we don't hear beeping throughout the test.  We then stress to the
   observers to stay on mute until after the test is completed and questions
   are opened to everyone.  Nothing worse then hearing a sidebar conversation
   or coughing attack that leaks into the test.
   - We send out our observation worksheets prior to the test in order to
   maintain a consistent note-taking style.  Since all of our observers are
   remote, this also helps them stay on track with the questions.
   - Not sure if you're tests will be international or across time zones
   but we need to watch ours and make sure our invitations are correct.  It
   sounds obvious, but coordinating 10-15 tests across the US, UK and India can
   sometimes get a little messy.
   - Translation hasn't been a problem often, but in some instances we've
   either IM'd or emailed the question to a participant if they were proficient
   at reading English but had trouble understanding the question over the
   phone.


Jason

On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Kevin Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I've been recently tasked with testing users on a call center
> application...
> here's the kicker -- the client doesn't want to foot the bill for air
> travel. I will have access to video conferencing and I think that I will
> be
> able to use some kind of web conferencing software (like WebEx), but I've
> never had to do anything like this. Does anyone have experience with
> remote
> usability testing? Any recommendations on how to carry this out?
>
> Thanks in advance!
> k.
> 
> Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
> To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
> List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
> List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help
>

Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] Usability is more than...

2008-03-04 Thread Jason Richardson
I agree with Todd's criteria for evaluating usability.  We have the
same criteria plus we branch out learnability into memorability.  In
other words, can someone come into an application, start using it,
walk away for a week or two and then come back in and interact
without having to relearn everything.  We recently built a CMS for
internal sites and have been conducting training.  Users come back a
week or two later with similar questions from before.  In that case,
I think we need to work on memorability and need to adjust a few
things.  

I'll also cast my vote, two if I could, that satisfaction plays a
critical role in usability.  I've observed many sessions where users
aren't thrilled with certain aspects and become reluctant to use it.

Jason


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=26788



Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


[IxDA Discuss] Emotional Response Testing

2008-02-28 Thread Jason Richardson
Hi everyone,
Our User Experience team at work is looking to begin Emotive or Emotional
response testing on our internal web applications in the near future.  We're
starting to do some research on the topic to build out our methodology
around this type of testing. So, does anyone have pointers on the subject,
any presentations you've seen that are worth checking out, maybe some
methodology that people are familiar with that could provide some insight?
Is anyone out there now using a version of the Repertory Grid, Emotional
Heuristics or just a great way of capturing user satisfaction?  I'm also
interested in reporting these findings and how they're accepted by
management/clients.

Thanks for the input!
Jason

Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help