Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo Labs

2007-10-06 Thread blammo

Frank,

Looks like it just needs some fleshing out in the details,  you  
didn't leave much out.  :c)


One question, should the templates be focused or somewhat generalized  
so a single template can work for all, or maybe some general  
questions with a business/technology focused group of questions added  
on, there may also be need to have a set of question related to the  
specific project itself, possibly originating with the author, I like  
the second method, because it allows some flexibility in how the  
interview can proceed, the general questions can be sort of the base  
stuff that everyone should answer, that sort of thing.


bobb


On Oct 6, 2007, at 1:10 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:


blammo wrote:

All,
This is the exact type of thing I was thinking about for project  
promotions that OSGEO could be instrumental in.  I also had a  
thought related to this, this afternoon, related to this, I was  
thinking about a project classification of OSGEO Registered for  
use by any project that applies in any way shape or form, then  
there is a list of project to keep track of, then you could put as  
many intermediate steps or tiers in place over time to progress  
projects against.
I would be interested in (trying) to help with something like  
this, but I wouldn't want to examine the same types of projects  
that I'm trying to promote, I would need to do other different  
types of projects.  You might start things out by setting up a few  
questionnaires that interviewers could start from for the  
different types of projects as templates, and then let the  
interviewers  go from there, should keep things similar in nature  
between projects but also allow for the interviewers to dig deeper  
if needed.


Bob,

I've written up a few of my thoughts on a revitalized Spotlights  
effort

at:

  http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/Spotlights

While clearly you can't interview yourself I don't see any big  
issues with
conflicts of interest on related projects as long as you can keep  
enough
distance to ensure the result is reasonably understandable to the  
general

OSGeo audience.

Best regards,
--
--- 
+--
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush| President OSGeo, http:// 
osgeo.org


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss



___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo Labs

2007-10-06 Thread Frank Warmerdam

blammo wrote:

Frank,

Looks like it just needs some fleshing out in the details,  you didn't 
leave much out.  :c)


One question, should the templates be focused or somewhat generalized so 
a single template can work for all, or maybe some general questions with 
a business/technology focused group of questions added on, there may 
also be need to have a set of question related to the specific project 
itself, possibly originating with the author, I like the second method, 
because it allows some flexibility in how the interview can proceed, the 
general questions can be sort of the base stuff that everyone should 
answer, that sort of thing.


Bob,

I see the template questions being quite different for people, sponsors
and projects, but I also think they should just be a starting point and
the interviewer and interviewee should have quite a bit of freedom to go
where they need.

I've added a list under editors for potential editors to indicate an
interest in helping.  (hint, hint!)

  http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/Spotlights#Editors

Best regards,
--
---+--
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush| President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo Labs

2007-10-06 Thread Micha Silver

Frank Warmerdam wrote:



Bob,

I see the template questions being quite different for people, sponsors
and projects, but I also think they should just be a starting point and
the interviewer and interviewee should have quite a bit of freedom to go
where they need.

I've added a list under editors for potential editors to indicate an
interest in helping.  (hint, hint!)

  http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/Spotlights#Editors

I've been following this thread with interest and I'm willing to conduct 
interviews with Spotlight candidates, so I've added my name to the wiki 
page.
To maintain a pace, as Frank suggested, of a few interviews a month, 
several editors will be needed. And furthermore some mechanism is needed 
to connect between each spotlight candidate and a certain editor.



Best regards,


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo Labs

2007-10-06 Thread blammo

All,

Frank  Micha,

Ok, I added myself to the list too.

So, what's first, trying to set up a template?  Who's going to be the  
first (new) guinea-pig for a subject?  should we try setting up the  
template based on a known subject or a made up one?


I'm mostly interested in new projects at this point.   But I'll try  
anything once.


bobb




On Oct 6, 2007, at 10:41 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:


blammo wrote:

Frank,
Looks like it just needs some fleshing out in the details,  you  
didn't leave much out.  :c)
One question, should the templates be focused or somewhat  
generalized so a single template can work for all, or maybe some  
general questions with a business/technology focused group of  
questions added on, there may also be need to have a set of  
question related to the specific project itself, possibly  
originating with the author, I like the second method, because it  
allows some flexibility in how the interview can proceed, the  
general questions can be sort of the base stuff that everyone  
should answer, that sort of thing.


Bob,

I see the template questions being quite different for people,  
sponsors
and projects, but I also think they should just be a starting point  
and
the interviewer and interviewee should have quite a bit of freedom  
to go

where they need.

I've added a list under editors for potential editors to indicate an
interest in helping.  (hint, hint!)

  http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/Spotlights#Editors

Best regards,
--
--- 
+--
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush| President OSGeo, http:// 
osgeo.org


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss



___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss