Re: [slim] Will I regret buying an SB1?

2007-04-13 Thread joatca

Kyle;194437 Wrote: 
 I want to hook up another Squeezebox to a boombox or powered speakers to
 use on my deck.  I've got an SB2 that currently works flawlessly on my
 network for streaming flac files.  I'd love another SB2, but there are
 none on ebay.  On either my front or back deck, I won't be much further
 from my router than the SB2 I'm using now.  The display is not a
 problem.  Will I be able to sync with an SB1, and will I be inviting
 network problems with its lower cache, non native support for flac and
 b rather than g capabilities?

FWIW I have an SB3 and SB1, both running wireless, both used with FLAC
(with SS set to transcode to WAV to the SB1). The SB1 runs fine alone
but when I try to synchronize the two they drift badly after a few
minutes. Sometimes both of them stop playing entirely. I have pretty
good signal quality to both boxes (80%) so I suspect an 802.1B-related
bandwidth problem. I haven't wanted to sync them often enough to bother
debugging it.


-- 
joatca

SB3, BW DM602 S3s, bi-amped from Cyrus III and Cyrus Power

joatca's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10387
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34401

___
discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Is there a lawyer in the house?

2007-04-11 Thread joatca

Harry G;194109 Wrote: 
 
 Does anyone know for sure what the legal status is for giving some of
 your music files to a friend?
 

Assuming you are in the US, I think other posts have it correct.
However here in Canada, if I understand the law correctly, it is legal
to make a copy of music (and only music, not movies, not books) for
personal use. The law does not specify that you must own the media you
are copying from.

Thus, for example, it would be legal for me to visit a friend's house,
and using his equipment (but my own blank media), make myself a copy of
one of his CDs, and take it home. However, it would be illegal for him
to copy his own CD then give me the copy. The essence is in who
performs the copying.

Thus I believe (but I'm not a lawyer) that it would be perfectly legal
for me to borrow a CD from the local library and make a copy for
myself. As soon as I give it away to someone else, it becomes illegal.

Any Canadian lawyers in the house? :-)


-- 
joatca

SB3, BW DM602 S3s, bi-amped from Cyrus III and Cyrus Power

joatca's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10387
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34366

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] SB3 Shows wrong time

2007-03-12 Thread joatca

Try restarting SlimServer. Maybe it's caching something to do with time
lookups.


-- 
joatca

SB3, NAD 3020, Mission 762i's

joatca's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10387
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33551

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Slim, Logitech, and the future of network music

2007-03-09 Thread joatca

Like many people here, my reaction to the purchase of Slim by Logitech
was... let's say mixed. Lots of concerns over whether it is a good or
bad thing, whether I'll lose Linux support, whether new devices will
have the same sound quality.

I personally doubt that Logitech will kill the quality of our favourite
device, and even if they do develop a low-fi version, there is still a
market for higher-fi, perhaps the model range will expand.

However I have come to the conclusion that when you look at the big
picture, even if Logitech were to do the absolute worst... close-source
new versions of SlimServer, de-support everything except Windows,
de-support older Slim boxes, drop hifi devices and other evils, it
doesn't really matter.

Consider:

1. Existing Squeezeboxes and Transporters will still be good.
SlimServer itself can be forked by the community and kept current for a
long while, even without firmware updates to the devices. Even as the
copyright holder, you can't close-source previous versions of something
under the GPL, only future versions. So, your current device will be
useable for years to come.

2. Other devices that perform the same core functionality already
exist. By that I mean stream music from hard-drives or network at
high-fidelity. That is the guts of it... the SB's nice display and RSS
plugins and such are just gravy. If a hole is left in the market by
changes in the Slim direction, someone else will fill it, and do it
better. Sonos, Hifidelio, and others already fill slightly difference
niches.

If you don't like the other alternatives available now, there will be
better ones around long before your SB becomes useless.

We all owe Slim Devices a debt of gratitude for showing that not only
can you make a network music player, you can make a very good one at
low cost with an open development model. They have changed hifi
forever. Anyone who has enjoyed a device like this can't go back to
putting dumb CDs into players again.

To Slim Devices: I've very happy with my Squeezeboxes and if the
quality and openness continues under Logitech I'll most likely buy more
in the future. If it doesn't, I'll be sorry to see you go, but it'll be
okay. Accept my thanks for opening up a new market, but I'll buy from
those that fill your shoes.


-- 
joatca

joatca's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10387
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33464

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss