[Discuss] any experienGitUp

2015-06-15 Thread Pauline Barmby
Hi all --

Does anyone have experience using GitUp (http://gitup.co/ ) ?
As it's Mac-only, it's unlikely to be useful for Software Carpentry
teaching, but might be helpful elsewhere..

Thanks,
Pauline

Dr. Pauline Barmby, Associate Professor
Department of Physics  Astronomy,  Western University
1151 Richmond St., London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
Voice: (519) 661-2111 x81557 Fax: (519) 661-2033
pbar...@uwo.ca






___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.software-carpentry.org
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org


Re: [Discuss] any experienGitUp

2015-06-15 Thread Fonnesbeck, Christopher J
I've been using it pretty regularly for the pat couple of weeks. I find it very 
useful for getting a sense of where I am in a repository, particularly one with 
several collaborative branches. It also has nice creature comforts like simple 
keyboard shortcuts for mundane tasks such as editing commit messages. It would 
be useful for teaching because it stays out of the way until you need it, but 
is always available as a point of reference.

cf

---
Chris Fonnesbeck
Assistant Professor of Biostatistics
Department of Biostatistics
Vanderbilt Center for Quantitative Sciences
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine




On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 6:58 AM -0700, Pauline Barmby 
pbar...@uwo.camailto:pbar...@uwo.ca wrote:

Hi all --

Does anyone have experience using GitUp (http://gitup.co/ ) ?
As it's Mac-only, it's unlikely to be useful for Software Carpentry
teaching, but might be helpful elsewhere..

Thanks,
Pauline

Dr. Pauline Barmby, Associate Professor
Department of Physics  Astronomy,  Western University
1151 Richmond St., London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
Voice: (519) 661-2111 x81557 Fax: (519) 661-2033
pbar...@uwo.ca






___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.software-carpentry.org
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.software-carpentry.org
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org

Re: [Discuss] Food for thought for the Python 2 vs 3 debate

2015-06-15 Thread Matthias Bussonnier
For what its worth, a SWC bootcamp was tough at UC Berkeley 2 weeks ago. And 
was 100% python 3
(well the Python part, not the git and command line part of course). 
We didn’t had any issues. A couple of questions about python2, but nothing 
serious. 
As usual a couple of people came with no software installed, or where using 
Python2.

Some old habits of instructor are still sticking around (show python docs on 
Python2, and minor details). 
But the Python3 teaching was a success. 

— 
M

 On Jun 15, 2015, at 17:46, Greg Wilson gvwil...@software-carpentry.org 
 wrote:
 
 Python 3 it is.  What other changes would people like to our lessons in the 
 next couple of months?
 
 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.software-carpentry.org
 http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.software-carpentry.org
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org

Re: [Discuss] Food for thought for the Python 2 vs 3 debate

2015-06-15 Thread Greg Wilson
Python 3 it is.  What other changes would people like to our lessons in 
the next couple of months?


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.software-carpentry.org
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org


[Discuss] Food for thought for the Python 2 vs 3 debate

2015-06-15 Thread Maxime Boissonneault

Some interresting reading :

http://astrofrog.github.io/blog/2015/05/09/2015-survey-results/

Maxime

--
-
Maxime Boissonneault
Analyste de calcul - Calcul Québec, Université Laval
Ph. D. en physique


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.software-carpentry.org
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org

Re: [Discuss] Food for thought for the Python 2 vs 3 debate

2015-06-15 Thread Steven Haddock
This was a timely post by Maxime, because I was just thinking of surveying 
instructors about what they use for their own work and what were the thoughts 
about porting SWC lessons to Python 3. I can’t remember if there was a recent 
thread on this…
Worth creating an issue (or something even more formal) and having people state 
their cases? 

We are using Python 3 for the next edition of our book, but I feel a bit like 
the first guy over the wall at the Battle of Hastings, looking over my shoulder 
at the other 85% huddled in relative safety
.
-Steve


 On Jun 15, 2015, at 12:17 , Maxime Boissonneault 
 maxime.boissonnea...@calculquebec.ca wrote:
 
 Some interresting reading :
 
 http://astrofrog.github.io/blog/2015/05/09/2015-survey-results/
 
 Maxime


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.software-carpentry.org
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org

Re: [Discuss] Food for thought for the Python 2 vs 3 debate

2015-06-15 Thread Titus Brown
My grad student has dragged our project into 2011, kicking and screaming (Khmer 
is now Py3 compliant). I'll report back in a few months :)

--
Titus Brown, ctbr...@ucdavis.edu

 On Jun 15, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Steven Haddock hadd...@mbari.org wrote:
 
 This was a timely post by Maxime, because I was just thinking of surveying 
 instructors about what they use for their own work and what were the thoughts 
 about porting SWC lessons to Python 3. I can’t remember if there was a recent 
 thread on this…
 Worth creating an issue (or something even more formal) and having people 
 state their cases? 
 
 We are using Python 3 for the next edition of our book, but I feel a bit like 
 the first guy over the wall at the Battle of Hastings, looking over my 
 shoulder at the other 85% huddled in relative safety
 .
 -Steve
 
 
 On Jun 15, 2015, at 12:17 , Maxime Boissonneault 
 maxime.boissonnea...@calculquebec.ca wrote:
 
 Some interresting reading :
 
 http://astrofrog.github.io/blog/2015/05/09/2015-survey-results/
 
 Maxime
 
 
 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.software-carpentry.org
 http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.software-carpentry.org
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org

Re: [Discuss] Food for thought for the Python 2 vs 3 debate

2015-06-15 Thread Juan Nunez-Iglesias
Steve, the switch to Python 3 is happening for v5.4:
https://github.com/swcarpentry/python-novice-inflammation/issues/127
We're using Python 3 for our book also and devoting a few paragraphs to why and 
to how to make it run in Python 2.7 if absolutely necessary. So you are not 
alone in your charge. =)
Regardless of how we all feel about the transition, it's clear that it's not 
going away, and nobody wants to work in a forked language.
Juan. 





On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:42 PM -0700, Titus Brown ti...@idyll.org wrote:










My grad student has dragged our project into 2011, kicking and screaming (Khmer 
is now Py3 compliant). I'll report back in a few months :)

--
Titus Brown, ctbr...@ucdavis.edu

 On Jun 15, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Steven Haddock  wrote:
 
 This was a timely post by Maxime, because I was just thinking of surveying 
 instructors about what they use for their own work and what were the thoughts 
 about porting SWC lessons to Python 3. I can’t remember if there was a recent 
 thread on this…
 Worth creating an issue (or something even more formal) and having people 
 state their cases? 
 
 We are using Python 3 for the next edition of our book, but I feel a bit like 
 the first guy over the wall at the Battle of Hastings, looking over my 
 shoulder at the other 85% huddled in relative safety
 .
 -Steve
 
 
 On Jun 15, 2015, at 12:17 , Maxime Boissonneault  wrote:
 
 Some interresting reading :
 
 http://astrofrog.github.io/blog/2015/05/09/2015-survey-results/
 
 Maxime
 
 
 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.software-carpentry.org
 http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.software-carpentry.org
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.software-carpentry.org
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org

Re: [Discuss] Food for thought for the Python 2 vs 3 debate

2015-06-15 Thread R. David Murray
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:17:42 -, Juan Nunez-Iglesias jni.s...@gmail.com 
wrote:
 Steve, the switch to Python 3 is happening for v5.4:
 https://github.com/swcarpentry/python-novice-inflammation/issues/127
 We're using Python 3 for our book also and devoting a few paragraphs to why 
 and to how to make it run in Python 2.7 if absolutely necessary. So you are 
 not alone in your charge. =)
 Regardless of how we all feel about the transition, it's clear that it's not 
 going away, and nobody wants to work in a forked language.

At the UConn boot camp we started today, the attendees wanted to
know why we were teaching them python2.  For whatever that's worth :)

--David

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.software-carpentry.org
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org