Re: [ACFUG Discuss] DB Application Terms: (Was:) CF vs Velocity
On 1/21/07, Robert Reil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now it seems to me that that layers come into play here and it is all about layers. Yep. In the application architecture the phrase that pays is multiple tiers. See http://www.adobe.com/devnet/coldfusion/articles/ntier.html for a good article. -- Howard Fore, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -
Re: [ACFUG Discuss] MySpace growth
New Atlanta's stellar performance in the areas of product quality and support? Or the reason why I quit Team Macromedia and went with the BlueDragon Alliance? Or the consistent differences in reliability and performance we've seen between ColdFusion and BD.NET? Promise I am not trying to start a flame war, just the reason behind this move (I've probably read your posts, but don't remember them). From your comments are you implying screw Adobe because their product sucks; I hate them. And that you just like BD because you prefer their product (and the direction they are going), rather than Adobe/ Macromedia? People jump various ships all the time, but just wanting to know your 'why'. mcg Adam Churvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/19/2007 04:32 PM Please respond to discussion@acfug.org To discussion@acfug.org cc Subject Re: [ACFUG Discuss] MySpace growth Have you read any of my previous posts to various lists regarding New Atlanta's stellar performance in the areas of product quality and support? Or the reason why I quit Team Macromedia and went with the BlueDragon Alliance? Or the consistent differences in reliability and performance we've seen between ColdFusion and BD.NET? If not then take a look, or feel free to call me personally at 770-446-8866 and I'll be happy to share. Respectfully, Adam Phillip Churvis Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer BlueDragon Alliance Founding Committee Get advanced intensive Master-level training in C# ASP.NET 2.0 for ColdFusion Developers at ProductivityEnhancement.com - Original Message - From: Teddy Payne To: discussion@acfug.org Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 2:56 PM Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] MySpace growth Adam, Thank you for the colorful commentation. Can you offer a more thoughtful and objective point of view that would not slander one side or the other and would avoid a flame war? I am sure our readers would be interested in the ramifications of enterprise business to business partnerships versus product bias. Teddy On 1/19/07, Adam Churvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can only wish that one day that the two product will merge and support one another... Oh, God, no no no NO NO NO NO!! Lord, I know I've done You wrong before. I know I've had my differences with You in the past and not done as You'd wished from time to time. And I'm deeply sorry, Lord, *deeply* sorry, if I've offended You in any way, and I thank You for showing me the Light. I know now that I should have never invented the Puppy Trebuchet, had them manufactured by child slave labor in China, and sold them at an obscene profit to the idle rich. I know that now, because You've showed me The Way. I know now, Dear Lord, that it is not right to initiate dozens of simultaneous office pools around Atlanta on which employee can give the boss Herpes the fastest, take 10% For The House, and use that money to finance underground Free First Taste Of Crack Day for middle schoolers. You've shown me that it's wrong. But Lord, if You have any mercy left in You for the wretch that is me... If You can forgive me just one more time... If You can do one thing for me, then please please *PLEASE* don't ever let Adobe get their hands on BlueDragon.NET, Lord, please. Please keep them apart, Dear Lord, so that the pristine nature of BlueDragon.NET is not sullied. So that it remains a shining beacon of CFML performance when loads get heavy. So that we, it's disciples, can hear The Voice Of Reason when we need support, and not have to wait for generations in hopeless bondage. So that freedom of choice may reign. Thank you, and Amen. Respectfully, Adam Phillip Churvis Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer BlueDragon Alliance Founding Committee Get advanced intensive Master-level training in C# ASP.NET 2.0 for ColdFusion Developers at ProductivityEnhancement.com - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink - -- cf_payne / Adobe Certified ColdFusion MX 7 Developer Atlanta CFUG (ACFUG): http://www.acfug.org n?N??沸y??fj???�s|??? - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink - jpg1WsXmDDi2D.jpg Description: JPEG image
Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF vs Velocity
On 1/21/07, Robert Reil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not meaning to start some thing but here goes and somehow I smell one side of a flame war being sparked. AbleCommerce CFMX5.5 uses Jakarta Velocity to manage dynamic email generation. I have bought 2 books on Velocity and done much searching about Velocity on the net and the more I read I find that it may be an alternative application language to CF. In my application I have: Able Commerce (Java Based Cart) with a CF built Web Output and management application. I am running MySQL4, but will upgrade to 5 when I know it will be ok, and have the time to do it. I use Navicat (and LOVE IT) to manage MySQL. I have a need to develop an intranet to bring AbleCommerce to the level that it isn't, for my application. With all that my mind asks the question... Could Struts and Velocity do the same job? If yes what are the pros and cons? yes, they could. Struts and Velocity are a combo of framework and JSP tag lib, plus a few other classes. ColdFusion is not much different really, but it encapsulates more low level 'stuff' and will be quicker to pick up and run with. Struts and Velocity are going to require quite a bit more understanding of J2EE/Java. What motivated me to ask this question? I stumbled onto this blog comment at http://weblogs.macromedia.com/cantrell/archives/2003/04/controlling_whi.cfm And if you are on MX, and are using Java, why use CF at all? Just move over to a struts/Velocity/Servlet framework and do away with the crap called ColdFusion. Comments?? PS. Charlie I know its not my day but what the hey? Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com - -- Douglas Knudsen http://www.cubicleman.com this is my signature, like it? - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -
Re: [ACFUG Discuss] MySpace growth
Promise I am not trying to start a flame war, just the reason behind this move (I've probably read your posts, but don't remember them). From your comments are you implying screw Adobe because their product sucks; I hate them. And that you just like BD because you prefer their product (and the direction they are going), rather than Adobe/ Macromedia? People jump various ships all the time, but just wanting to know your 'why'. Ever since V6.0 we've had nothing but *expensive* problems with the product, and no one listening on the (then) Macromedia side of the publisher-developer relationship. Like a lot of ColdFusion developers, we had come to consider this as just par for the course, and like frogs slowly brought to the boil, we never realized just how bad it was until we started using BlueDragon.NET, and suddenly 95% of the problems disappeared. For the remaining 5%, it turns out they were there because NA was emulating MM's flawed design for certain functionality. But NA stepped up and solved this problem within hours. They listened, they worked with us, they got the job done -- and they did so with professionalism, a handshake, and a thank you for working with us attitude. Over the years I've also payed close attention to these two companies' political climates and the people that guide their technology focus, and I'm firmly convinced that NA is running just about everything correctly. My only pet peeve with NA -- and this totally stumps me to this day -- is why the hell they aren't screaming the truth from every rooftop: that BD.NET beats the pants off Adobe's product in reliability and performance, hands down. I've tried to imagine some clever evil genius hand-wringing strategy they might be playing out, but I'm stumped. Maybe they really are just very nice guys who don't want to step on any toes. Respectfully, Adam Phillip Churvis Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer BlueDragon Alliance Founding Committee Get advanced intensive Master-level training in C# ASP.NET 2.0 for ColdFusion Developers at ProductivityEnhancement.com - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com - attachment: BDAsmall.jpg
Re: [ACFUG Discuss] MySpace growth
Mary-Catherine, Even better -- here's a copy of a post I sent to the BlueDragon list a while ago: - If you think that's customer service, try this. Last year on the Friday before the Christmas holiday, when everone in the world was taking the day off to be with their families, David and I discovered an obscure CFLOGIN syndication issue with BD 6.1 when using hardware load balancing on a cluster with syndicated session objects using ScaleOut StateServer. We debugged for a couple of hours, then called New Atlanta and told them that we really needed to solve this issue immediately. So what would you expect to happen? Vince himself comes out to *our* office with his laptop and the BD.NET source code, and we work together for a few hours to uncover the problem. It turns out that because we're always diligent about putting OUTPUT=No in both the CFCOMPONENT and CFFUNCTION tags, this triggered an issue unique to our environment that he traced to a single line in the source code. So Vince corrects it, compiles us a special version, and everything works perfectly. Vince waited until everything worked before he went home to his family after 6:00 that night. And he was more than happy to do it. Some days later we came up against a second issue that also has affected clustered BD (and CF) apps: the fact that you can't have failover that honors authorization, because roles aren't syndicated between machines. So we were put in touch directly with the guy who was responsible for that part of the BD codebase, and we all worked out the design of the solution for how roles could be syndicated between machines in a cluster. 30 hours later, at about 2:15 AM, we got a fix emailed to us. And that is what made BD.NET the only CFML processor that handles the entire CFLOGIN framework across machines in a cluster with full failover. Well, you don't have to hit *me* in the head a third time... I resigned from Team Macromedia the following day, then David and I joined the BlueDragon Alliance. I can't tell you how good I feel about the level of service I get from New Atlanta. I am confident that the BD.NET solutions I deploy will just work, all the time. No server hangs from zero-byte mail spool files. No RegEx DoS attacks. No JVM Bind errors. No running out of database connections. It just works. And if it ever doesn't work -- even under the most exclusive and obscure conditions that might not affect others -- I get the best of the best handling it immediately. If the software industry had Marines, New Atlanta would be them. - Respectfully, Adam Phillip Churvis Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer BlueDragon Alliance Founding Committee Get advanced intensive Master-level training in C# ASP.NET 2.0 for ColdFusion Developers at ProductivityEnhancement.com - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: discussion@acfug.org Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 8:23 AM Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] MySpace growth New Atlanta's stellar performance in the areas of product quality and support? Or the reason why I quit Team Macromedia and went with the BlueDragon Alliance? Or the consistent differences in reliability and performance we've seen between ColdFusion and BD.NET? Promise I am not trying to start a flame war, just the reason behind this move (I've probably read your posts, but don't remember them). From your comments are you implying screw Adobe because their product sucks; I hate them. And that you just like BD because you prefer their product (and the direction they are going), rather than Adobe/ Macromedia? People jump various ships all the time, but just wanting to know your 'why'. mcg Adam Churvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/19/2007 04:32 PM Please respond to discussion@acfug.org To discussion@acfug.org cc Subject Re: [ACFUG Discuss] MySpace growth Have you read any of my previous posts to various lists regarding New Atlanta's stellar performance in the areas of product quality and support? Or the reason why I quit Team Macromedia and went with the BlueDragon Alliance? Or the consistent differences in reliability and performance we've seen between ColdFusion and BD.NET? If not then take a look, or feel free to call me personally at 770-446-8866 and I'll be happy to share. Respectfully, Adam Phillip Churvis Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer BlueDragon Alliance Founding Committee Get advanced intensive Master-level training in C# ASP.NET 2.0 for ColdFusion Developers at ProductivityEnhancement.com - Original Message - From: Teddy Payne To: discussion@acfug.org Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 2:56 PM Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] MySpace growth Adam, Thank you for the
Re: [ACFUG Discuss] MySpace growth
Thanks for the responses. Not like the government is going to jump ship any time soon. mcg Adam Churvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/22/2007 09:42 AM Please respond to discussion@acfug.org To discussion@acfug.org cc Subject Re: [ACFUG Discuss] MySpace growth Mary-Catherine, Even better -- here's a copy of a post I sent to the BlueDragon list a while ago: - If you think that's customer service, try this. Last year on the Friday before the Christmas holiday, when everone in the world was taking the day off to be with their families, David and I discovered an obscure CFLOGIN syndication issue with BD 6.1 when using hardware load balancing on a cluster with syndicated session objects using ScaleOut StateServer. We debugged for a couple of hours, then called New Atlanta and told them that we really needed to solve this issue immediately. So what would you expect to happen? Vince himself comes out to *our* office with his laptop and the BD.NET source code, and we work together for a few hours to uncover the problem. It turns out that because we're always diligent about putting OUTPUT=No in both the CFCOMPONENT and CFFUNCTION tags, this triggered an issue unique to our environment that he traced to a single line in the source code. So Vince corrects it, compiles us a special version, and everything works perfectly. Vince waited until everything worked before he went home to his family after 6:00 that night. And he was more than happy to do it. Some days later we came up against a second issue that also has affected clustered BD (and CF) apps: the fact that you can't have failover that honors authorization, because roles aren't syndicated between machines. So we were put in touch directly with the guy who was responsible for that part of the BD codebase, and we all worked out the design of the solution for how roles could be syndicated between machines in a cluster. 30 hours later, at about 2:15 AM, we got a fix emailed to us. And that is what made BD.NET the only CFML processor that handles the entire CFLOGIN framework across machines in a cluster with full failover. Well, you don't have to hit *me* in the head a third time... I resigned from Team Macromedia the following day, then David and I joined the BlueDragon Alliance. I can't tell you how good I feel about the level of service I get from New Atlanta. I am confident that the BD.NET solutions I deploy will just work, all the time. No server hangs from zero-byte mail spool files. No RegEx DoS attacks. No JVM Bind errors. No running out of database connections. It just works. And if it ever doesn't work -- even under the most exclusive and obscure conditions that might not affect others -- I get the best of the best handling it immediately. If the software industry had Marines, New Atlanta would be them. - Respectfully, Adam Phillip Churvis Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer BlueDragon Alliance Founding Committee Get advanced intensive Master-level training in C# ASP.NET 2.0 for ColdFusion Developers at ProductivityEnhancement.com - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: discussion@acfug.org Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 8:23 AM Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] MySpace growth New Atlanta's stellar performance in the areas of product quality and support? Or the reason why I quit Team Macromedia and went with the BlueDragon Alliance? Or the consistent differences in reliability and performance we've seen between ColdFusion and BD.NET? Promise I am not trying to start a flame war, just the reason behind this move (I've probably read your posts, but don't remember them). From your comments are you implying screw Adobe because their product sucks; I hate them. And that you just like BD because you prefer their product (and the direction they are going), rather than Adobe/ Macromedia? People jump various ships all the time, but just wanting to know your 'why'. mcg Adam Churvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/19/2007 04:32 PM Please respond to discussion@acfug.org To discussion@acfug.org cc Subject Re: [ACFUG Discuss] MySpace growth Have you read any of my previous posts to various lists regarding New Atlanta's stellar performance in the areas of product quality and support? Or the reason why I quit Team Macromedia and went with the BlueDragon Alliance? Or the consistent differences in reliability and performance we've seen between ColdFusion and BD.NET? If not then take a look, or feel free to call me personally at 770-446-8866 and I'll be happy to share. Respectfully, Adam Phillip Churvis Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer BlueDragon Alliance Founding Committee Get advanced intensive Master-level training in C# ASP.NET 2.0 for ColdFusion Developers at ProductivityEnhancement.com - Original Message -
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF vs Velocity
Thanks Doug. Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com http://www.motorcyclecarbs.com/ _ From: Douglas Knudsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 8:30 AM To: Carbs SalesService Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF vs Velocity On 1/21/07, Robert Reil [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not meaning to start some thing but here goes and somehow I smell one side of a flame war being sparked. AbleCommerce CFMX5.5 uses Jakarta Velocity to manage dynamic email generation. I have bought 2 books on Velocity and done much searching about Velocity on the net and the more I read I find that it may be an alternative application language to CF. In my application I have: Able Commerce (Java Based Cart) with a CF built Web Output and management application. I am running MySQL4, but will upgrade to 5 when I know it will be ok, and have the time to do it. I use Navicat (and LOVE IT) to manage MySQL. I have a need to develop an intranet to bring AbleCommerce to the level that it isn't, for my application. With all that my mind asks the question... Could Struts and Velocity do the same job? If yes what are the pros and cons? yes, they could. Struts and Velocity are a combo of framework and JSP tag lib, plus a few other classes. ColdFusion is not much different really, but it encapsulates more low level 'stuff' and will be quicker to pick up and run with. Struts and Velocity are going to require quite a bit more understanding of J2EE/Java. What motivated me to ask this question? I stumbled onto this blog comment at http://weblogs.macromedia.com/cantrell/archives/2003/04/controlling_whi.cfm http://weblogs.macromedia.com/cantrell/archives/2003/04/controlling_whi.cfm And if you are on MX, and are using Java, why use CF at all? Just move over to a struts/Velocity/Servlet framework and do away with the crap called ColdFusion. Comments?? PS. Charlie I know its not my day but what the hey? Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com http://Motorcyclecarbs.com , Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com http://www.motorcyclecarbs.com - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com http://www.fusionlink.com - -- Douglas Knudsen http://www.cubicleman.com http://www.cubicleman.com this is my signature, like it? - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink http://www.fusionlink.com -
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] DB Application Terms: (Was:) CF vs Velocity
Thanks Howard. Will read that shortly. Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com -Original Message- From: Howard Fore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 8:17 AM To: Carbs SalesService Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] DB Application Terms: (Was:) CF vs Velocity On 1/21/07, Robert Reil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now it seems to me that that layers come into play here and it is all about layers. Yep. In the application architecture the phrase that pays is multiple tiers. See http://www.adobe.com/devnet/coldfusion/articles/ntier.html for a good article. -- Howard Fore, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com - - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -
[ACFUG Discuss] cfxml
What version (MM/Adobe) was the CFXML tag added? Is it available in CFML 6.1? Robert - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] cfxml
Yes, it was available in 6.1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 12:02 PM To: acfug acfug Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] cfxml What version (MM/Adobe) was the CFXML tag added? Is it available in CFML 6.1? Robert - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com - - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -
Finding when a tag/function was added (was RE: [ACFUG Discuss] cfxml)
Robert (and others), if you ever have that sort of question (when was this tag, function, attribute, or argument added?), the CF docs have evolved in recent years to make it easier to answer. First, the CFML Reference docs themselves, as of CFMX, now tell you when each new tag or function (or attribute or argument) has been added since CFMX. You can see that at the livedocs.macromedia.com, of course, or at cfquickdocs.com (or in your own local copy of the docs). Second, perhaps of more interest, to some, is a document that breaks it down into detail when even older tags/attributes/functions/arguments were added. That's available as a download by way of http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=tn_18791. It's also available online via the ACT CFUG (Canberra Australia) at http://www.actcfug.com/files/cfmlhistory/. Sadly, it was not updated for CFMX 7, but again the refs themselves do document 7 changes. And in case it's important to anyone, that document would show that CFXML was in fact introduced in CFMX (6.0). Of course, Robert also asked if it was in 6.1, and Allen answered that accurately and affirmatively. :-) /Charlie http://www.carehart.org/blog/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 12:30 PM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] cfxml Yes, it was available in 6.1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 12:02 PM To: acfug acfug Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] cfxml What version (MM/Adobe) was the CFXML tag added? Is it available in CFML 6.1? Robert - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -
[ACFUG Discuss] SHA-1 cracked
These things are always going to happen (just give it enought time), but a research team in China finally cracked SHA-1. http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/20/1936257 http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/20/1936257from=rss from=rss John [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -
[ACFUG Discuss] Is this getting through?
- To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Is this getting through?
yep Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com -Original Message- From: Tom Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 6:02 PM To: Carbs SalesService Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] Is this getting through? - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com - - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] MySpace growth
It depends on which government you're referring to. The Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) is running BlueDragon on BEA WebLogic, the U.S. Senate is running BlueDragon.NET, the City of Los Angeles and Hillsborough County (Florida) are running BlueDragon Server JX. I'm sure there are more--those are just the first ones I can think of offhand. Let me know if you'd like more information, or want to arrange a meeting. Regards, Vince Bonfanti New Atlanta Communications, LLC http://www.newatlanta.com _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 9:55 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] MySpace growth Thanks for the responses. Not like the government is going to jump ship any time soon. mcg - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -
