Re: [dns-privacy] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication-02.txt
Hi all, On 7/21/20 8:40 PM, Z.W. Yan wrote: > Thank you for your comments and suggestions, Vittorio. > I think it is also suitable in Dprive, because Dprive mainly aims to produce > the DNS privacy related solutions. > And this service discovery related scheme is tightly related with the > solution, but it also depends on the comments of the Chairs, :-) > There are a number of DNS-related drafts that are currently without an identified WG home. The chairs are working with our AD to initiate a discussion with chairs and ADs of DNSOP and ADD to discuss this situation. Once we get through that exercise, someone in leadership will communicate the proposed direction to the necessary mailing lists. Regards, Brian > > > Z.W. Yan > > From: Vittorio Bertola > Date: 2020-07-21 20:28 > To: Z.W. Yan > CC: gggeng; xincha.zhang; dns-privacy; liuyang7 > Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Fw: New Version Notification for > draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication-02.txt > > Il 21/07/2020 02:27 Z.W. Yan ha scritto: > > > Correct, Stephane, the notification from resolver is more direct. > However, based on DHCP/ICMP is also an approach because the end-user is > always bootstrapping based on DHCP/ICMP for the address configuration and so > on. > Besides, the configuration of resolver can be supported by DHCP/ICMP and only > an extension is needed based on RFC3646/4339... > I think it makes sense to standardize Do* service discovery via DHCP, then > people will decide whether they want to make use of it or not. > > I would however note that this draft (subject to assessment by the WG chairs) > might be more in topic for the ADD working group - you may want to post it > there. > > > > ___ > dns-privacy mailing list > dns-privacy@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
Re: [dns-privacy] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication-02.txt
Thank you for your comments and suggestions, Vittorio. I think it is also suitable in Dprive, because Dprive mainly aims to produce the DNS privacy related solutions. And this service discovery related scheme is tightly related with the solution, but it also depends on the comments of the Chairs, :-) Z.W. Yan From: Vittorio Bertola Date: 2020-07-21 20:28 To: Z.W. Yan CC: gggeng; xincha.zhang; dns-privacy; liuyang7 Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication-02.txt Il 21/07/2020 02:27 Z.W. Yan ha scritto: Correct, Stephane, the notification from resolver is more direct. However, based on DHCP/ICMP is also an approach because the end-user is always bootstrapping based on DHCP/ICMP for the address configuration and so on. Besides, the configuration of resolver can be supported by DHCP/ICMP and only an extension is needed based on RFC3646/4339... I think it makes sense to standardize Do* service discovery via DHCP, then people will decide whether they want to make use of it or not. I would however note that this draft (subject to assessment by the WG chairs) might be more in topic for the ADD working group - you may want to post it there. -- Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange vittorio.bert...@open-xchange.com Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy ___ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
Re: [dns-privacy] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication-02.txt
> Il 21/07/2020 02:27 Z.W. Yan ha scritto: > > > Correct, Stephane, the notification from resolver is more direct. > However, based on DHCP/ICMP is also an approach because the end-user is > always bootstrapping based on DHCP/ICMP for the address configuration and so > on. > Besides, the configuration of resolver can be supported by DHCP/ICMP and > only an extension is needed based on RFC3646/4339... > I think it makes sense to standardize Do* service discovery via DHCP, then people will decide whether they want to make use of it or not. I would however note that this draft (subject to assessment by the WG chairs) might be more in topic for the ADD working group - you may want to post it there. -- Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange vittorio.bert...@open-xchange.com mailto:vittorio.bert...@open-xchange.com Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy ___ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
Re: [dns-privacy] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication-02.txt
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:17:57AM +0800, Z.W. Yan wrote a message of 120 lines which said: > The motivation of this draft is to actively indicate the privacy > protection capability of the recursive server. The approach in draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-information seems better since: * it is more general, not limited to privacy, * the information is sent by the resolver itself, who probably knows better than the DHCP server. ___ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
[dns-privacy] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication-02.txt
Dear All, The motivation of this draft is to actively indicate the privacy protection capability of the recursive server. We can consider the extension of ND and DHCP protocols to support this configuration. BR, Zhiwei From: internet-drafts Date: 2020-07-13 08:41 To: Xinchang Zhang; Zhiwei Yan; Guanggang Geng; Yang Liu Subject: New Version Notification for draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication-02.txt A new version of I-D, draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication-02.txt has been successfully submitted by Zhiwei Yan and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication Revision: 02 Title: Indication of Local DNS Privacy Service During User Access Document date: 2020-07-12 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 4 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication-02.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication-02 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication-02 Abstract: This document aims to support the indication of privacy service of recursive resolver during the user access. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat ___ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
