Re: [dns-privacy] User Perspective

2018-09-24 Thread Brian Haberman
All,
 I would like the focus for this week (9/24-9/30) to be on
clarifying the requirements from the user's perspective. So far, I have
seen:

* DNS transaction privacy, if possible
* User willingness to send PII if transaction is encrypted

Do others have additional requirements?

If you agree with the above, could you describe a scenario to highlight
the requirements?

Regards,
Brian

On 7/19/18 2:23 PM, Brian Haberman wrote:
> This thread is for discussion of the user perspective of DNS privacy
> between the recursive resolver and authoritative servers.
> 
> - Focus on *what* is needed.
> - Avoid *how* to achieve it.
> - Consider both ends of DNS the exchange.
> - Scenarios will frame the discussion.
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> dns-privacy mailing list
> dns-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy


[dns-privacy] Moving discussions along

2018-09-24 Thread Brian Haberman
All,
 The threads for discussing the various perspectives on the
recursive-to-authoritative problem space have fizzled out. Rather than
having a series of parallel discussions going on, I am going to try and
get a focus on one area per week. Hopefully, this will get more people
involved in the discussion to help clarify the requirements for any
proposed solutions.

 Please contribute to the discussions so that we can prepare for
Bangkok.

Regards,
Brian



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy


Re: [dns-privacy] User Perspective

2018-09-24 Thread Melinda Shore
On 9/24/18 11:58 AM, Amelia Andersdotter wrote:
> I have difficulties seeing how a user (within the meaning of individual
> internet consumer) has any practical choice to other than to share PII
> with a DNS provider? It's not so much about "willingness" as it is about
> "feeling comfortable with".

I think it might be helpful to scope the data under discussion
and identify what counts as PII under the context of the DNS.

This may be outside the scope of the current discussion but I've
been somewhat concerned lately by some of the assertions being
made about who to trust (the "who" in this case being recursives)
in privacy-protected DNS transactions.  The assertions tend to be
fairly global but it seems to me that in at least some cases
(for example, secure messaging) the application will have some
fairly specific requirements around privacy that it's unwilling to
leave to the default OS configuration, the browser, the service
provider, etc.

Melinda

___
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy


Re: [dns-privacy] User Perspective

2018-09-24 Thread Amelia Andersdotter
On 2018-09-24 16:08, Brian Haberman wrote:
> All,
>  I would like the focus for this week (9/24-9/30) to be on
> clarifying the requirements from the user's perspective. So far, I have
> seen:
>
> * DNS transaction privacy, if possible
> * User willingness to send PII if transaction is encrypted
>
> Do others have additional requirements?

I propose to add:

* Data management practises (i.e. profiling, advertisement, re-selling, etc)

> If you agree with the above, could you describe a scenario to highlight
> the requirements?

I have difficulties seeing how a user (within the meaning of individual
internet consumer) has any practical choice to other than to share PII
with a DNS provider? It's not so much about "willingness" as it is about
"feeling comfortable with".

best regards,

Amelia

> Regards,
> Brian
>
> On 7/19/18 2:23 PM, Brian Haberman wrote:
>> This thread is for discussion of the user perspective of DNS privacy
>> between the recursive resolver and authoritative servers.
>>
>> - Focus on *what* is needed.
>> - Avoid *how* to achieve it.
>> - Consider both ends of DNS the exchange.
>> - Scenarios will frame the discussion.
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> dns-privacy mailing list
>> dns-privacy@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
>>
>
> ___
> dns-privacy mailing list
> dns-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy


-- 
Amelia Andersdotter
Technical Consultant, Digital Programme

ARTICLE19
www.article19.org

PGP: 3D5D B6CA B852 B988 055A 6A6F FEF1 C294 B4E8 0B55

___
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy