Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update
Hi! I prefer .odt and .pdf El dom, 26-02-2012 a las 03:22 +0800, David Nelson escribió: Hi, On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Nino Novak nn.l...@kflog.org wrote: Where is it / will it be kept? Wiki or ODT? Well, I had planned and prefer to do it in a .odt and generate a .pdf at the end but, if people would rather have it on the wiki, I could do it on the wiki instead. -- David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update
Hi Jean, guys, On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote: David, what are the chances of your getting time to do this within the next week? I have checked-out the Alfresco section of the contributor guide (on Alfresco...) and will be working on it for the next few days. But I probably won't get it finished for Wednesday as such, due to a client project. Let's say it'll be done by the end of the coming weekend. -- David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update
Hi I suggest we finish LO3.4 on ODF and move to Alfresco for LO3.5 John On 24/02/2012 16:49, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) My opinion doesn't really count as i don't do any of the editing. It would be good to hear from the people doing the work. However, i think it would be good to return to the Alfresco method. It is a bright, fresh interface that could help the translations teams. We do still have wiki-pages describing how to use it. Some of it has been commented-out temporarily but it's easy to reinstate. Moving back would mean that we have a fairly recent back-up on another site so even if we stay at ODFAuthors i think it is a good idea to get all the updated chapters back over to Alfresco just in case ODFAuthors goes down or becomes inacessible. Regards from Tom :) --- On Fri, 24/2/12, David Nelsonli...@traduction.biz wrote: From: David Nelsonli...@traduction.biz Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org Date: Friday, 24 February, 2012, 12:22 Hi Tom, On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Tom Daviestomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: So, this is a good time to upgrade Alfresco if you want and check the upgrades are working with no more wrinkles. I think you are saying that you have already done that but i'm not certain. I can dig out the email address of the other chap that was keen to learn to help with Alfresco so that we can see if he is still keen. All the upgrading is complete. There is no further work to do in that respect. Whether or not the team still wishes to use Alfresco is a debate that I'll leave you guys to decide about. I can only point out that, when left in peace and not bullied, Alfresco has been pretty stable and reliable. The only outages were entirely due to human error: the last upgrade was incorrectly executed. I certainly wouldn't see any need to upgrade the platform any further until long into the future: all past issues are now resolved (non-handling of accented characters in folder names: fixed; intermittent failures with multiple-file uploads: *vastly* improved). -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update
Hi :) That sounds pretty smart to me. Dan on Base can choose without really affecting other people i think. Regards from Tom :) --- On Sun, 26/2/12, John Smith clicks...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: From: John Smith clicks...@yahoo.co.uk Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org Date: Sunday, 26 February, 2012, 19:35 Hi I suggest we finish LO3.4 on ODF and move to Alfresco for LO3.5 John On 24/02/2012 16:49, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) My opinion doesn't really count as i don't do any of the editing. It would be good to hear from the people doing the work. However, i think it would be good to return to the Alfresco method. It is a bright, fresh interface that could help the translations teams. We do still have wiki-pages describing how to use it. Some of it has been commented-out temporarily but it's easy to reinstate. Moving back would mean that we have a fairly recent back-up on another site so even if we stay at ODFAuthors i think it is a good idea to get all the updated chapters back over to Alfresco just in case ODFAuthors goes down or becomes inacessible. Regards from Tom :) --- On Fri, 24/2/12, David Nelsonli...@traduction.biz wrote: From: David Nelsonli...@traduction.biz Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org Date: Friday, 24 February, 2012, 12:22 Hi Tom, On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Tom Daviestomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: So, this is a good time to upgrade Alfresco if you want and check the upgrades are working with no more wrinkles. I think you are saying that you have already done that but i'm not certain. I can dig out the email address of the other chap that was keen to learn to help with Alfresco so that we can see if he is still keen. All the upgrading is complete. There is no further work to do in that respect. Whether or not the team still wishes to use Alfresco is a debate that I'll leave you guys to decide about. I can only point out that, when left in peace and not bullied, Alfresco has been pretty stable and reliable. The only outages were entirely due to human error: the last upgrade was incorrectly executed. I certainly wouldn't see any need to upgrade the platform any further until long into the future: all past issues are now resolved (non-handling of accented characters in folder names: fixed; intermittent failures with multiple-file uploads: *vastly* improved). -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update
Hi, Am Samstag, 25. Februar 2012, 16:05:44 schrieb David Nelson: I'll start work on Monday on revising the Alfresco section of the contributor's guide, with screenshots and explanations. I'll be finished by Wednesday latest. Where is it / will it be kept? Wiki or ODT? Nino -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update
My strong preference is for ODT, because the Alfresco instructions are part of the Contributor's Guide, which is in ODT. (The chapters can be downloaded from from the wiki.) The instructions could, of course, also be wikified and put on the wiki in that form as well. I had always intended for all of the Contributor's Guide to be in wiki format as well as ODT, but obviously that hasn't happened yet. Or you could start with wiki and we can generate an ODT from that; it will need a bit of tweaking, but that's not a big drama. Jean On 26/02/2012, at 5:22, David Nelson li...@traduction.biz wrote: Hi, On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Nino Novak nn.l...@kflog.org wrote: Where is it / will it be kept? Wiki or ODT? Well, I had planned and prefer to do it in a .odt and generate a .pdf at the end but, if people would rather have it on the wiki, I could do it on the wiki instead. -- David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update
Hi, On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote: My strong preference is for ODT, because the Alfresco instructions are part of the Contributor's Guide, which is in ODT. .odt it will be then. -- David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update
Hi, Further update with good news: On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:30 PM, David Nelson li...@traduction.biz wrote: I still have not yet been able to properly log into the site, but I'll be working on this on Sunday. Once Alfresco is properly up and running again, the docs team can take decisions about where it wants to store its content in future. I have now succeeded in loging in to the site, and service is back to normal: the repo is back online with all the team's data seeming to be intact (my previous inability to log in was due to a proxy configuration problem). -- David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update
P.S. All previously-existing user accounts are intact, with the same passwords. If anyone requires a new password because they've lost the old one, please raise your hand and I'll send you a new one. -- David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update
Hi :) Good work chap :) Thanks. People are settled into using ODFAuthors right now and there has been a lot of work on quite a few chapters. So, this is a good time to upgrade Alfresco if you want and check the upgrades are working with no more wrinkles. I think you are saying that you have already done that but i'm not certain. I can dig out the email address of the other chap that was keen to learn to help with Alfresco so that we can see if he is still keen. I haven't tested my login yet so i will give that a try soon too. Congrats, thanks and regards from Tom :) --- On Fri, 24/2/12, David Nelson li...@traduction.biz wrote: From: David Nelson li...@traduction.biz Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org Cc: Christian Lohmaier lohma...@googlemail.com, floeff flo...@documentfoundation.org Date: Friday, 24 February, 2012, 11:41 Hi, Further update with good news: On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:30 PM, David Nelson li...@traduction.biz wrote: I still have not yet been able to properly log into the site, but I'll be working on this on Sunday. Once Alfresco is properly up and running again, the docs team can take decisions about where it wants to store its content in future. I have now succeeded in loging in to the site, and service is back to normal: the repo is back online with all the team's data seeming to be intact (my previous inability to log in was due to a proxy configuration problem). -- David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update
Hi Tom, On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: So, this is a good time to upgrade Alfresco if you want and check the upgrades are working with no more wrinkles. I think you are saying that you have already done that but i'm not certain. I can dig out the email address of the other chap that was keen to learn to help with Alfresco so that we can see if he is still keen. All the upgrading is complete. There is no further work to do in that respect. Whether or not the team still wishes to use Alfresco is a debate that I'll leave you guys to decide about. I can only point out that, when left in peace and not bullied, Alfresco has been pretty stable and reliable. The only outages were entirely due to human error: the last upgrade was incorrectly executed. I certainly wouldn't see any need to upgrade the platform any further until long into the future: all past issues are now resolved (non-handling of accented characters in folder names: fixed; intermittent failures with multiple-file uploads: *vastly* improved). -- David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update
Hi Tom, guys, The only other thing I can add is that I have tried hard to involve other people in the administration of the VPS that Alfresco is installed on, and of the Alfresco platform itself. That includes people from the LibreOffice project (notably the TDF sysadmin team), people from the Alfresco project, people from Apache OO.o and technical support that I've paid for privately. It is not a satisfactory situation to have an important team resource such as an ECM system dependent on one single person's management. If it is decided to use Alfresco in the future, I'm firmly hoping that TDF sysadmins and others will share the admin workload. This is essential for reliable, trouble-free operation. -- David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update
Hi :) My opinion doesn't really count as i don't do any of the editing. It would be good to hear from the people doing the work. However, i think it would be good to return to the Alfresco method. It is a bright, fresh interface that could help the translations teams. We do still have wiki-pages describing how to use it. Some of it has been commented-out temporarily but it's easy to reinstate. Moving back would mean that we have a fairly recent back-up on another site so even if we stay at ODFAuthors i think it is a good idea to get all the updated chapters back over to Alfresco just in case ODFAuthors goes down or becomes inacessible. Regards from Tom :) --- On Fri, 24/2/12, David Nelson li...@traduction.biz wrote: From: David Nelson li...@traduction.biz Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Alfresco site update To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org Date: Friday, 24 February, 2012, 12:22 Hi Tom, On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: So, this is a good time to upgrade Alfresco if you want and check the upgrades are working with no more wrinkles. I think you are saying that you have already done that but i'm not certain. I can dig out the email address of the other chap that was keen to learn to help with Alfresco so that we can see if he is still keen. All the upgrading is complete. There is no further work to do in that respect. Whether or not the team still wishes to use Alfresco is a debate that I'll leave you guys to decide about. I can only point out that, when left in peace and not bullied, Alfresco has been pretty stable and reliable. The only outages were entirely due to human error: the last upgrade was incorrectly executed. I certainly wouldn't see any need to upgrade the platform any further until long into the future: all past issues are now resolved (non-handling of accented characters in folder names: fixed; intermittent failures with multiple-file uploads: *vastly* improved). -- David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
