Re: [Dovecot] Install Configuring and run.
Hello Thorsten, now on moving mail into SPAM folder seems okay in dspam.debug log = 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] DSPAM Instance Startup 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] input args: /usr/bin/dspam --source=error --class=spam --signature==?iso-8859-1?Q?1,491d3cb5151261000521152=0D?= --user clamav 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] pass-thru args: 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] processing user clamav 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] uid = 207, euid = 207, gid = 207, egid = 1000 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] loading preferences for user clamav 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] Loading preferences for uid 1 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] Loading preferences for uid 0 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] Loading preferences for uid 0 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] default preferences empty. reverting to dspam.conf preferences. 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] Loading preferences from dspam.conf 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] using /var/spool/dspam/opt-in/local/clamav.dspam as path 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] using /var/spool/dspam/opt-out/local/clamav.nodspam as path 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] sedation level set to: 0 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] DSPAM Instance Shutdown. Exit Code: 0 BUT, in systemlog /var/log/messages i get this = Nov 14 10:20:25 kraftwerk1 imap: antispam: /usr/bin/dspam --source=error --class=spam --signature==?iso-8859-1?Q?1,491d40b9162159695846858=0D?= ... Nov 14 10:20:25 kraftwerk1 dspam[16295]: _ds_get_signature(): _mysql_drv_getpwuid(0) failed: aborting Nov 14 10:20:25 kraftwerk1 dspam[16295]: Signature retrieval for '=?iso-8859-1?Q?1,491d40b9162159695846858=0D?=' failed Nov 14 10:20:25 kraftwerk1 dspam[16295]: Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting. Nov 14 10:20:25 kraftwerk1 dspam[16295]: process_message returned error -5. dropping message. maybe its cause now all is done with user clamav, and before incoming mails was checked as user clamav and moving mails was done by user postfix... dunno but when incoming mails was scanned as user clamav and signatur was saved for clamav in db and now moving mails is also done by user clamav , why he cant finde the signatur ? i also added user clamav postfix as Trust user in dspam.conf marko Thorsten Vollmer schrieb: On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 23:44 +0100, Marko Weber wrote: Hello Thorsten, i got dovecot-antispam working now. also moving mails now fully work. but retraining dont seems to work fully. emails that are delivered to mailbox are scanned with user clamav 28799: [11/13/2008 23:26:25] DSPAM Instance Startup 28799: [11/13/2008 23:26:25] input args: /usr/bin/dspam --stdout --deliver=spam,innocent --mode=tum --tokenizer=chained,noise --enable-signature-headers --user clamav 28799: [11/13/2008 23:26:25] pass-thru args: --tokenizer=chained,noise --enable-signature-headers 28799: [11/13/2008 23:26:25] processing user clamav 28799: [11/13/2008 23:26:25] uid = 105, euid = 105, gid = 449, egid = 1000 28799: [11/13/2008 23:26:25] loading preferences for user clamav 28799: [11/13/2008 23:26:25] Loading preferences for uid 1 i dont have a maildrop filter ready yet that move spam tagged mails into SPAM folder. all is delivered to incoming. when i now move the mail to SPAM; this is done by user postfix 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] DSPAM Instance Startup 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] input args: /usr/bin/dspam --source=error --class=spam --signature==?iso-8859-1?Q?1,491930ac25229173225906=0D?= 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] pass-thru args: 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] processing user postfix 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] uid = 207, euid = 207, gid = 207, egid = 1000 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] loading preferences for user postfix 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] Loading preferences for uid 6 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] Loading preferences for uid 0 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] Loading preferences for uid 0 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] default preferences empty. reverting to dspam.conf preferences. 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] Loading preferences from dspam.conf 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] using /var/spool/dspam/opt-in/local/postfix.dspam as path 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] using /var/spool/dspam/opt-out/local/postfix.nodspam as path 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] sedation level set to: 0 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] DSPAM Instance Shutdown. Exit Code: 0 Now when i move the mail again into incoming (also done by user postfix), the mail dont get tagged with innocent , it is still tagged spam. How do i get it work all under clamav If you really have a single user for DSPAM, add antispam_dspam_args = --user;clamav to dovecot.conf. Also, the user running dovecot's mail process needs to be trusted by DSPAM. and why are the removed mails from spam to incoming not tagged with inncoent ? dovecot-antispam does not change any headers of the messages you move. (do you need any logs?) thank you marko -- -- *Marko Weber* | Administration *SALON DIGITAL* Media GmbH Rothenbaumchaussee 19a 20148 Hamburg T.
Re: [Dovecot] Mailbox Hashing
On 11/13/2008, Kyle Wheeler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: (ReiserFS is often viewed as a purely experimental filesystem, and not reliable for production systems) Please stop spreading FUD. -- Best regards, Charles
Re: [Dovecot] Install Configuring and run.
Hello Thorsten , Hello All in List, i got to write again, ok : dspam workinng , dovecot-antispam working moving mails to or out of spam seems to work and is listed in the logs; BUT the logs shows this on moving a mail to or from spam = Nov 14 11:31:57 kraftwerk1 imap: antispam: /usr/bin/dspam --source=error --class=innocent --signature==?iso-8859-1?Q?1,491d521770551288576733=0D?= ... Nov 14 11:31:57 kraftwerk1 dspam[7203]: _ds_get_signature(): _mysql_drv_getpwuid(0) failed: aborting Nov 14 11:31:57 kraftwerk1 dspam[7203]: Signature retrieval for '=?iso-8859-1?Q?1,491d521770551288576733=0D?=' failed Nov 14 11:31:57 kraftwerk1 dspam[7203]: Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting. Nov 14 11:31:57 kraftwerk1 dspam[7203]: process_message returned error -5. dropping message. incoming mails are scanned by user clamav and mails are moved now by user clamav after the the Tip of Thorsten adding this to dovecot.conf = antispam_dspam_args = --user;clamav the following point in the logs mysql_drv_getpwuid(0) , looks for me like dspam tries with User-ID 0 to work, but User clamav is in the mysql-db with User ID 1 do i have to set any special entires in dovecot.conf or dspam.conf ? marko Marko Weber schrieb: Hello Thorsten, now on moving mail into SPAM folder seems okay in dspam.debug log = 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] DSPAM Instance Startup 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] input args: /usr/bin/dspam --source=error --class=spam --signature==?iso-8859-1?Q?1,491d3cb5151261000521152=0D?= --user clamav 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] pass-thru args: 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] processing user clamav 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] uid = 207, euid = 207, gid = 207, egid = 1000 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] loading preferences for user clamav 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] Loading preferences for uid 1 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] Loading preferences for uid 0 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] Loading preferences for uid 0 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] default preferences empty. reverting to dspam.conf preferences. 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] Loading preferences from dspam.conf 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] using /var/spool/dspam/opt-in/local/clamav.dspam as path 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] using /var/spool/dspam/opt-out/local/clamav.nodspam as path 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] sedation level set to: 0 16277: [11/14/2008 10:18:33] DSPAM Instance Shutdown. Exit Code: 0 BUT, in systemlog /var/log/messages i get this = Nov 14 10:20:25 kraftwerk1 imap: antispam: /usr/bin/dspam --source=error --class=spam --signature==?iso-8859-1?Q?1,491d40b9162159695846858=0D?= ... Nov 14 10:20:25 kraftwerk1 dspam[16295]: _ds_get_signature(): _mysql_drv_getpwuid(0) failed: aborting Nov 14 10:20:25 kraftwerk1 dspam[16295]: Signature retrieval for '=?iso-8859-1?Q?1,491d40b9162159695846858=0D?=' failed Nov 14 10:20:25 kraftwerk1 dspam[16295]: Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting. Nov 14 10:20:25 kraftwerk1 dspam[16295]: process_message returned error -5. dropping message. maybe its cause now all is done with user clamav, and before incoming mails was checked as user clamav and moving mails was done by user postfix... dunno but when incoming mails was scanned as user clamav and signatur was saved for clamav in db and now moving mails is also done by user clamav , why he cant finde the signatur ? i also added user clamav postfix as Trust user in dspam.conf marko Thorsten Vollmer schrieb: On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 23:44 +0100, Marko Weber wrote: Hello Thorsten, i got dovecot-antispam working now. also moving mails now fully work. but retraining dont seems to work fully. emails that are delivered to mailbox are scanned with user clamav 28799: [11/13/2008 23:26:25] DSPAM Instance Startup 28799: [11/13/2008 23:26:25] input args: /usr/bin/dspam --stdout --deliver=spam,innocent --mode=tum --tokenizer=chained,noise --enable-signature-headers --user clamav 28799: [11/13/2008 23:26:25] pass-thru args: --tokenizer=chained,noise --enable-signature-headers 28799: [11/13/2008 23:26:25] processing user clamav 28799: [11/13/2008 23:26:25] uid = 105, euid = 105, gid = 449, egid = 1000 28799: [11/13/2008 23:26:25] loading preferences for user clamav 28799: [11/13/2008 23:26:25] Loading preferences for uid 1 i dont have a maildrop filter ready yet that move spam tagged mails into SPAM folder. all is delivered to incoming. when i now move the mail to SPAM; this is done by user postfix 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] DSPAM Instance Startup 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] input args: /usr/bin/dspam --source=error --class=spam --signature==?iso-8859-1?Q?1,491930ac25229173225906=0D?= 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] pass-thru args: 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] processing user postfix 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] uid = 207, euid = 207, gid = 207, egid = 1000 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] loading preferences for user postfix 28917: [11/13/2008 23:40:17] Loading preferences for uid 6 28917: [11/13/2008
Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot error with Symbian mail client
Thanks for the replies. I guess Timo is right, since I already upgraded from 1.0.9 to version 1.0.13. So I probably need to change my openssl version. What would be the easiest way to do that, since I'm on an debian etch server, which (I think) I cant upgrade? Regards, Jan Seeger
Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot error with Symbian mail client
Hi Jan, normally on debian server u do this : # aptitude update # aptitude upgrade look on aptitude upgrade if openssl is listed to be updated with a newer version nr marko Jan Seeger schrieb: Thanks for the replies. I guess Timo is right, since I already upgraded from 1.0.9 to version 1.0.13. So I probably need to change my openssl version. What would be the easiest way to do that, since I'm on an debian etch server, which (I think) I cant upgrade? Regards, Jan Seeger -- -- *Marko Weber* | Administration *SALON DIGITAL* Media GmbH Rothenbaumchaussee 19a 20148 Hamburg T. (040) 429 48 68 - 23 F. (040) 429 48 68 - 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.salondigital.de http://www.salondigital.de -- Geschäftsführung: Stephan Michalik, Ekkehart Opitz Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, NR: HRB 78111 NOTE: This communication is confidential and is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is directed. It may contain information that is privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately. You should not copy it or disclose its contents to any other person.
Re: [Dovecot] Install Configuring and run.
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 11:40 +0100, Marko Weber wrote: Hello Thorsten , Hello All in List, i got to write again, ok : dspam workinng , dovecot-antispam working moving mails to or out of spam seems to work and is listed in the logs; BUT the logs shows this on moving a mail to or from spam = Nov 14 11:31:57 kraftwerk1 imap: antispam: /usr/bin/dspam --source=error --class=innocent --signature==?iso-8859-1?Q?1,491d521770551288576733=0D?= ... Nov 14 11:31:57 kraftwerk1 dspam[7203]: _ds_get_signature(): _mysql_drv_getpwuid(0) failed: aborting Nov 14 11:31:57 kraftwerk1 dspam[7203]: Signature retrieval for '=?iso-8859-1?Q?1,491d521770551288576733=0D?=' failed Nov 14 11:31:57 kraftwerk1 dspam[7203]: Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting. Nov 14 11:31:57 kraftwerk1 dspam[7203]: process_message returned error -5. dropping message. incoming mails are scanned by user clamav and mails are moved now by user clamav after the the Tip of Thorsten adding this to dovecot.conf = antispam_dspam_args = --user;clamav I just realized that you enabled MySQLUIDInSignature. Thus specifying the user is not strictly necessary. You may also try to disable MySQLUIDInSignature. the following point in the logs mysql_drv_getpwuid(0) , looks for me like dspam tries with User-ID 0 to work, but User clamav is in the mysql-db with User ID 1 do i have to set any special entires in dovecot.conf or dspam.conf ? marko signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot error with Symbian mail client
At Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:57:17 +0100, Marko Weber wrote: Hi Jan, normally on debian server u do this : # aptitude update # aptitude upgrade Greetings! I do have the latest versions of all packages installed, so an upgrade won't do anything. A downgrade seems not to be possible, so I should probably look into doing a dist-upgrade... Regards, Jan Seeger
Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot error with Symbian mail client
On 11/14/2008, Jan Seeger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I guess Timo is right, since I already upgraded from 1.0.9 to version 1.0.13. 1.1.16 is the current stable version... -- Best regards, Charles
Re: [Dovecot] Install Configuring and run.
Hi Thorsten, now it looks different to old log before, I disabled MySQLUIDInSignature like you said , now when i move a mail to SPAM folder dspam.debug tells this = 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] DSPAM Instance Startup 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] input args: /usr/bin/dspam --source=error --class=spam --signature==?iso-8859-1?Q?491d76cb23581804284693=0D?= --user clamav 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] pass-thru args: 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] processing user clamav 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] uid = 207, euid = 207, gid = 207, egid = 1000 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] loading preferences for user clamav 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] Loading preferences for uid 1 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] Loading preferences for uid 0 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] Loading preferences for uid 0 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] default preferences empty. reverting to dspam.conf preferences. 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] Loading preferences from dspam.conf 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] using /var/spool/dspam/opt-in/local/clamav.dspam as path 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] using /var/spool/dspam/opt-out/local/clamav.nodspam as path 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] sedation level set to: 0 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] mysql_fetch_row() failed in _ds_get_signature 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] DSPAM Instance Shutdown. Exit Code: 0 failed on fetch_row the /var/log/messages tells this = Nov 14 14:02:51 kraftwerk1 imap: antispam: /usr/bin/dspam --source=error --class=spam --signature==?iso-8859-1?Q?491d76cb23581804284693=0D?= ... Nov 14 14:02:51 kraftwerk1 dspam[2376]: Signature retrieval for '=?iso-8859-1?Q?491d76cb23581804284693=0D?=' failed Nov 14 14:02:51 kraftwerk1 dspam[2376]: Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting. Nov 14 14:02:51 kraftwerk1 dspam[2376]: process_message returned error -5. dropping message. when i search with phpmyadmin in the database the signatur 491d76cb23581804284693 is there. i really dont get it what can be wrong. thanks marko Thorsten Vollmer schrieb: On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 11:40 +0100, Marko Weber wrote: Hello Thorsten , Hello All in List, i got to write again, ok : dspam workinng , dovecot-antispam working moving mails to or out of spam seems to work and is listed in the logs; BUT the logs shows this on moving a mail to or from spam = Nov 14 11:31:57 kraftwerk1 imap: antispam: /usr/bin/dspam --source=error --class=innocent --signature==?iso-8859-1?Q?1,491d521770551288576733=0D?= ... Nov 14 11:31:57 kraftwerk1 dspam[7203]: _ds_get_signature(): _mysql_drv_getpwuid(0) failed: aborting Nov 14 11:31:57 kraftwerk1 dspam[7203]: Signature retrieval for '=?iso-8859-1?Q?1,491d521770551288576733=0D?=' failed Nov 14 11:31:57 kraftwerk1 dspam[7203]: Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting. Nov 14 11:31:57 kraftwerk1 dspam[7203]: process_message returned error -5. dropping message. incoming mails are scanned by user clamav and mails are moved now by user clamav after the the Tip of Thorsten adding this to dovecot.conf = antispam_dspam_args = --user;clamav I just realized that you enabled MySQLUIDInSignature. Thus specifying the user is not strictly necessary. You may also try to disable MySQLUIDInSignature. the following point in the logs mysql_drv_getpwuid(0) , looks for me like dspam tries with User-ID 0 to work, but User clamav is in the mysql-db with User ID 1 do i have to set any special entires in dovecot.conf or dspam.conf ? marko -- -- *Marko Weber* | Administration *SALON DIGITAL* Media GmbH Rothenbaumchaussee 19a 20148 Hamburg T. (040) 429 48 68 - 23 F. (040) 429 48 68 - 20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.salondigital.de http://www.salondigital.de -- Geschäftsführung: Stephan Michalik, Ekkehart Opitz Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, NR: HRB 78111 NOTE: This communication is confidential and is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is directed. It may contain information that is privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately. You should not copy it or disclose its contents to any other person.
Re: [Dovecot] Install Configuring and run.
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 14:09 +0100, Marko Weber wrote: now it looks different to old log before, I disabled MySQLUIDInSignature like you said , now when i move a mail to SPAM folder dspam.debug tells this = 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] DSPAM Instance Startup 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] input args: /usr/bin/dspam --source=error --class=spam --signature==?iso-8859-1?Q?491d76cb23581804284693=0D?= --user clamav 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] pass-thru args: 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] processing user clamav 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] uid = 207, euid = 207, gid = 207, egid = 1000 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] loading preferences for user clamav 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] Loading preferences for uid 1 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] Loading preferences for uid 0 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] Loading preferences for uid 0 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] default preferences empty. reverting to dspam.conf preferences. 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] Loading preferences from dspam.conf 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] using /var/spool/dspam/opt-in/local/clamav.dspam as path 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] using /var/spool/dspam/opt-out/local/clamav.nodspam as path 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] sedation level set to: 0 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] mysql_fetch_row() failed in _ds_get_signature 2376: [11/14/2008 14:02:51] DSPAM Instance Shutdown. Exit Code: 0 failed on fetch_row the /var/log/messages tells this = Nov 14 14:02:51 kraftwerk1 imap: antispam: /usr/bin/dspam --source=error --class=spam --signature==?iso-8859-1?Q?491d76cb23581804284693=0D?= ... Nov 14 14:02:51 kraftwerk1 dspam[2376]: Signature retrieval for '=?iso-8859-1?Q?491d76cb23581804284693=0D?=' failed Nov 14 14:02:51 kraftwerk1 dspam[2376]: Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting. Nov 14 14:02:51 kraftwerk1 dspam[2376]: process_message returned error -5. dropping message. when i search with phpmyadmin in the database the signatur 491d76cb23581804284693 is there. i really dont get it what can be wrong. This is obviously no problem with dovecot-antispam. I am sure that you will get more help on DSPAM's mailing list. Regards, Thorsten signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] Mailbox Hashing
On Friday, November 14 at 05:30 AM, quoth Charles Marcus: On 11/13/2008, Kyle Wheeler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: (ReiserFS is often viewed as a purely experimental filesystem, and not reliable for production systems) Please stop spreading FUD. shrug I'm not saying that's *true*, I'm just saying I've heard that a lot... It's entirely possible that ReiserFS is just as reliable as any other filesystem *now* but someone pushed it into the mainline Linux kernel before it was ready, thereby biting the early adopters with bugs that hadn't been worked out yet and creating the impression that it isn't very stable. ~Kyle -- Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth. -- Albert Einstein pgpsppJdKgVt8.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Dovecot] antispam plugin claims antispam signature not found
Johannes Berg a écrit :
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 11:42 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
Not sure, I personally think that moving them silently makes errors
harder to diagnose. I'll add an option since then you can set this
option (antispam_missing_signature = [error|move]) to move after you've
tested and verified that it works just fine.
Try this patch please, I have only compiled it so far. (there might be
rejects in the signature-log.c file unless you update to the current git
tree but you don't care about that)
diff --git a/antispam.7 b/antispam.7
index d07c1d0..e26db69 100644
--- a/antispam.7
+++ b/antispam.7
@@ -108,6 +108,13 @@ plugin {
# mail signature (used with any backend requiring a signature)
antispam_signature = X-DSPAM-Signature
+# action to take on mails without signature
+# (used with any backend requiring a signature)
+# (we recommend only setting this to 'move' after verifying that the
+# whole setup is working)
+# antispam_signature_missing = move # move silently without training
+antispam_signature_missing = error
+
# semicolon-separated list of Trash folders (default unset i.e. none)
# antispam_trash =
# antispam_trash = trash;Trash;Deleted Items
diff --git a/signature-log.c b/signature-log.c
index ab8cd6d..5b7b306 100644
--- a/signature-log.c
+++ b/signature-log.c
@@ -99,7 +99,12 @@ int backend_handle_mail(struct mailbox_transaction_context
*t,
return -1;
}
- signature = signature_extract(t, mail);
+ ret = signature_extract(t, mail, signature);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (!signature)
+ return 0;
switch (wanted) {
case CLASS_SPAM:
diff --git a/signature.c b/signature.c
index 7f9d83b..7ad29d6 100644
--- a/signature.c
+++ b/signature.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include mail-storage-private.h
const char *signature_hdr = X-DSPAM-Signature;
+static int signature_nosig_ignore = 0;
void signature_init(void)
{
@@ -12,6 +13,16 @@ void signature_init(void)
if (tmp)
signature_hdr = tmp;
debug(signature header line is \%s\\n, signature_hdr);
+
+ tmp = get_setting(SIGNATURE_MISSING);
+ if (!tmp)
+ tmp = error;
+ if (strcmp(tmp, move) == 0) {
+ signature_nosig_ignore = 1;
+ debug(will silently move mails with missing signature\n);
+ } else if (strcmp(tmp, error) != 0) {
+ debug(invalid signature_missing setting '%s', ignoring\n,
tmp);
+ }
}
int signature_extract_to_list(struct mailbox_transaction_context *t,
@@ -23,10 +34,14 @@ int signature_extract_to_list(struct
mailbox_transaction_context *t,
signatures = get_mail_headers(mail, signature_hdr);
if (!signatures || !signatures[0]) {
- mail_storage_set_error(t-box-storage,
- ME(NOTPOSSIBLE)
- antispam signature not found);
- return -1;
+ if (!signature_nosig_ignore) {
+ mail_storage_set_error(t-box-storage,
+ ME(NOTPOSSIBLE)
+ antispam signature not found);
+ return -1;
+ } else {
+ return 0;
+ }
}
while (signatures[1])
@@ -42,23 +57,30 @@ int signature_extract_to_list(struct
mailbox_transaction_context *t,
return 0;
}
-const char *signature_extract(struct mailbox_transaction_context *t,
- struct mail *mail)
+int signature_extract(struct mailbox_transaction_context *t,
+ struct mail *mail, const char **signature)
{
const char *const *signatures;
signatures = get_mail_headers(mail, signature_hdr);
if (!signatures || !signatures[0]) {
- mail_storage_set_error(t-box-storage,
- ME(NOTPOSSIBLE)
- antispam signature not found);
- return NULL;
+ if (!signature_nosig_ignore) {
+ mail_storage_set_error(t-box-storage,
+ ME(NOTPOSSIBLE)
+ antispam signature not found);
+ return -1;
+ } else {
+ *signature = NULL;
+ return 0;
+ }
}
while (signatures[1])
signatures++;
- return signatures[0];
+ *signature = signatures[0];
+
+ return 0;
}
void signature_list_free(struct siglist **list)
diff --git a/signature.h b/signature.h
index e25d1b5..1384924 100644
--- a/signature.h
+++ b/signature.h
@@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ void signature_init(void);
int signature_extract_to_list(struct mailbox_transaction_context *t,
Re: [Dovecot] antispam plugin claims antispam signature not found
I have the same problem and i'm wondering how should i use this patch ?
I'm not familiar with the patch command.
Thanks.
PS: Sorry for the empty mail
Johannes Berg a écrit
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 11:42 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
Not sure, I personally think that moving them silently makes errors
harder to diagnose. I'll add an option since then you can set this
option (antispam_missing_signature = [error|move]) to move after you've
tested and verified that it works just fine.
Try this patch please, I have only compiled it so far. (there might be
rejects in the signature-log.c file unless you update to the current git
tree but you don't care about that)
diff --git a/antispam.7 b/antispam.7
index d07c1d0..e26db69 100644
--- a/antispam.7
+++ b/antispam.7
@@ -108,6 +108,13 @@ plugin {
# mail signature (used with any backend requiring a signature)
antispam_signature = X-DSPAM-Signature
+# action to take on mails without signature
+# (used with any backend requiring a signature)
+# (we recommend only setting this to 'move' after verifying that the
+# whole setup is working)
+# antispam_signature_missing = move # move silently without training
+antispam_signature_missing = error
+
# semicolon-separated list of Trash folders (default unset i.e. none)
# antispam_trash =
# antispam_trash = trash;Trash;Deleted Items
diff --git a/signature-log.c b/signature-log.c
index ab8cd6d..5b7b306 100644
--- a/signature-log.c
+++ b/signature-log.c
@@ -99,7 +99,12 @@ int backend_handle_mail(struct mailbox_transaction_context
*t,
return -1;
}
- signature = signature_extract(t, mail);
+ ret = signature_extract(t, mail, signature);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (!signature)
+ return 0;
switch (wanted) {
case CLASS_SPAM:
diff --git a/signature.c b/signature.c
index 7f9d83b..7ad29d6 100644
--- a/signature.c
+++ b/signature.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include mail-storage-private.h
const char *signature_hdr = X-DSPAM-Signature;
+static int signature_nosig_ignore = 0;
void signature_init(void)
{
@@ -12,6 +13,16 @@ void signature_init(void)
if (tmp)
signature_hdr = tmp;
debug(signature header line is \%s\\n, signature_hdr);
+
+ tmp = get_setting(SIGNATURE_MISSING);
+ if (!tmp)
+ tmp = error;
+ if (strcmp(tmp, move) == 0) {
+ signature_nosig_ignore = 1;
+ debug(will silently move mails with missing signature\n);
+ } else if (strcmp(tmp, error) != 0) {
+ debug(invalid signature_missing setting '%s', ignoring\n,
tmp);
+ }
}
int signature_extract_to_list(struct mailbox_transaction_context *t,
@@ -23,10 +34,14 @@ int signature_extract_to_list(struct
mailbox_transaction_context *t,
signatures = get_mail_headers(mail, signature_hdr);
if (!signatures || !signatures[0]) {
- mail_storage_set_error(t-box-storage,
- ME(NOTPOSSIBLE)
- antispam signature not found);
- return -1;
+ if (!signature_nosig_ignore) {
+ mail_storage_set_error(t-box-storage,
+ ME(NOTPOSSIBLE)
+ antispam signature not found);
+ return -1;
+ } else {
+ return 0;
+ }
}
while (signatures[1])
@@ -42,23 +57,30 @@ int signature_extract_to_list(struct
mailbox_transaction_context *t,
return 0;
}
-const char *signature_extract(struct mailbox_transaction_context *t,
- struct mail *mail)
+int signature_extract(struct mailbox_transaction_context *t,
+ struct mail *mail, const char **signature)
{
const char *const *signatures;
signatures = get_mail_headers(mail, signature_hdr);
if (!signatures || !signatures[0]) {
- mail_storage_set_error(t-box-storage,
- ME(NOTPOSSIBLE)
- antispam signature not found);
- return NULL;
+ if (!signature_nosig_ignore) {
+ mail_storage_set_error(t-box-storage,
+ ME(NOTPOSSIBLE)
+ antispam signature not found);
+ return -1;
+ } else {
+ *signature = NULL;
+ return 0;
+ }
}
while (signatures[1])
signatures++;
- return signatures[0];
+ *signature = signatures[0];
+
+ return 0;
}
void signature_list_free(struct siglist **list)
diff --git a/signature.h b/signature.h
index e25d1b5..1384924 100644
--- a/signature.h
+++
Re: [Dovecot] antispam plugin claims antispam signature not found
Ok, i updated the files by hand, and it's working like a charm :)
Thanks for the patch Johannes.
Guillaume HILT a écrit :
I have the same problem and i'm wondering how should i use this patch ?
I'm not familiar with the patch command.
Thanks.
PS: Sorry for the empty mail
Johannes Berg a écrit
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 11:42 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
Not sure, I personally think that moving them silently makes errors
harder to diagnose. I'll add an option since then you can set this
option (antispam_missing_signature = [error|move]) to move after you've
tested and verified that it works just fine.
Try this patch please, I have only compiled it so far. (there might be
rejects in the signature-log.c file unless you update to the current git
tree but you don't care about that)
diff --git a/antispam.7 b/antispam.7
index d07c1d0..e26db69 100644
--- a/antispam.7
+++ b/antispam.7
@@ -108,6 +108,13 @@ plugin {
# mail signature (used with any backend requiring a signature)
antispam_signature = X-DSPAM-Signature
+# action to take on mails without signature
+# (used with any backend requiring a signature)
+# (we recommend only setting this to 'move' after verifying that
the
+# whole setup is working)
+# antispam_signature_missing = move # move silently without
training
+antispam_signature_missing = error
+
# semicolon-separated list of Trash folders (default unset i.e.
none)
# antispam_trash =
# antispam_trash = trash;Trash;Deleted Items
diff --git a/signature-log.c b/signature-log.c
index ab8cd6d..5b7b306 100644
--- a/signature-log.c
+++ b/signature-log.c
@@ -99,7 +99,12 @@ int backend_handle_mail(struct
mailbox_transaction_context *t,
return -1;
}
-signature = signature_extract(t, mail);
+ret = signature_extract(t, mail, signature);
+if (ret)
+return ret;
+
+if (!signature)
+return 0;
switch (wanted) {
case CLASS_SPAM:
diff --git a/signature.c b/signature.c
index 7f9d83b..7ad29d6 100644
--- a/signature.c
+++ b/signature.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include mail-storage-private.h
const char *signature_hdr = X-DSPAM-Signature;
+static int signature_nosig_ignore = 0;
void signature_init(void)
{
@@ -12,6 +13,16 @@ void signature_init(void)
if (tmp)
signature_hdr = tmp;
debug(signature header line is \%s\\n, signature_hdr);
+
+tmp = get_setting(SIGNATURE_MISSING);
+if (!tmp)
+tmp = error;
+if (strcmp(tmp, move) == 0) {
+signature_nosig_ignore = 1;
+debug(will silently move mails with missing signature\n);
+} else if (strcmp(tmp, error) != 0) {
+debug(invalid signature_missing setting '%s', ignoring\n,
tmp);
+}
}
int signature_extract_to_list(struct mailbox_transaction_context *t,
@@ -23,10 +34,14 @@ int signature_extract_to_list(struct
mailbox_transaction_context *t,
signatures = get_mail_headers(mail, signature_hdr);
if (!signatures || !signatures[0]) {
-mail_storage_set_error(t-box-storage,
- ME(NOTPOSSIBLE)
- antispam signature not found);
-return -1;
+if (!signature_nosig_ignore) {
+mail_storage_set_error(t-box-storage,
+ ME(NOTPOSSIBLE)
+ antispam signature not found);
+return -1;
+} else {
+return 0;
+}
}
while (signatures[1])
@@ -42,23 +57,30 @@ int signature_extract_to_list(struct
mailbox_transaction_context *t,
return 0;
}
-const char *signature_extract(struct mailbox_transaction_context *t,
- struct mail *mail)
+int signature_extract(struct mailbox_transaction_context *t,
+ struct mail *mail, const char **signature)
{
const char *const *signatures;
signatures = get_mail_headers(mail, signature_hdr);
if (!signatures || !signatures[0]) {
-mail_storage_set_error(t-box-storage,
- ME(NOTPOSSIBLE)
- antispam signature not found);
-return NULL;
+if (!signature_nosig_ignore) {
+mail_storage_set_error(t-box-storage,
+ ME(NOTPOSSIBLE)
+ antispam signature not found);
+return -1;
+} else {
+*signature = NULL;
+return 0;
+}
}
while (signatures[1])
signatures++;
-return signatures[0];
+*signature = signatures[0];
+
+return 0;
}
void signature_list_free(struct siglist **list)
diff --git a/signature.h b/signature.h
index e25d1b5..1384924 100644
--- a/signature.h
+++ b/signature.h
@@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ void signature_init(void);
int signature_extract_to_list(struct mailbox_transaction_context *t,
struct mail *mail, struct siglist **list,
enum classification wanted);
-const char *signature_extract(struct
[Dovecot] Error message in logs since 1.1.6 upgrade
Hi, I've got two imap boxes, one is running 1.1.5 and hasn't exhibited the error below, but the one that's been upgraded to 1.1.6 is showing them. Nov 14 16:06:31 mink dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected (no auth attempts): rip=x.x.x.x, lip=x.x.x.x, TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error:1408F119:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:decryption failed or bad record mac If this isn't already a known error, is there any extra data I can collect that would help diagnose what's causing it? I haven't a clue where to start with this sort of debugging I'm afraid. Thanks Guy -- Don't just do something...sit there!
Re: [Dovecot] Mailbox Hashing
On 11/14/2008 10:02 AM, Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Friday, November 14 at 05:30 AM, quoth Charles Marcus: On 11/13/2008, Kyle Wheeler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: (ReiserFS is often viewed as a purely experimental filesystem, and not reliable for production systems) Please stop spreading FUD. shrug I'm not saying that's *true*, I'm just saying I've heard that a lot... Thats called spreading FUD. If you don't know, you don't know, so why say it? I've heard plenty of horror stories about ext2/ext3, xfs, etc ALL losing data... The fact is, I've been using reiserfs on numerous boxes for many years with ZERO problems. The biggest issue is unclean shutdowns, but that problem is not unique to reiserfs, and can be minimized/eliminated by being smart - using battery backed up RAID controllers (if you're using hardware RAID), using good UPSs, using UPS s/w to cleanly shutdown a system before the UPS battery dies in the event of an extended power loss, etc... Anyway, this is completely OT... -- Best regards, Charles
Re: [Dovecot] Mailbox Hashing
On Friday, November 14 at 11:51 AM, quoth Charles Marcus: shrug I'm not saying that's *true*, I'm just saying I've heard that a lot... Thats called spreading FUD. No, it's not. FUD would be a strategic attempt to influence public opinion by disseminating negative (and vague) information. I am not trying to influence public opinion, I'm reporting existing public opinion. The consensus opinion of the sysadmins I trust most highly is that ReiserFS is still relatively experimental and has not yet earned their trust---several of them have been bitten by ReiserFS bugs on their development machines (read: data loss due to unrecoverable filesystem corruption). That said, their problems were several years ago. Unfortunately, in the world of filesystem reliability, trust comes slowly once lost (check out how recently ReiserFS has been fixing quota-related problems, including ACL deadlocks). In any case, I have no strategic purpose here. I have no interest or stake in any filesystem taking over the world. If ReiserFS is extremely stable and extremely reliable, then that's awesome, but it does have a bit of a reputation problem. Denying that it has a negative reputation, or claiming that anyone who describes its reputation is spreading FUD, is not only pointless but also counter productive. If you want to say well, that may be what you've heard, but I've used ReiserFS on several large, heavily-used, mission-critical systems for several years and have not had any problems, then that would be a useful and important statement. You'd even be helping ReiserFS's reputation. But by having such a knee-jerk reaction to the fact that it's got a negative reputation, you're making the filesystem seem like it's used largely by proselytizers and zealots---which is not a good way to build ReiserFS's reputation. I've heard plenty of horror stories about ext2/ext3, xfs, etc ALL losing data... Of course - any filesystem can loose data in bad situations (such as power loss, bad disks, etc.). Ext3 is certainly not perfect for all situations. For example, it's a bad idea on flash media because it keeps its journal file in a fixed spot on the drive, which can wear out that part of a flash drive quickly. The real question is: what are the reputations of those filesystems, and why? Ext2/3 have been around for a very long time, and are extremely well-tested by virtue of their popularity, and as such tend to be more trusted for mission-critical systems (unless there's a reason they shouldn't be used). The fact is, I've been using reiserfs on numerous boxes for many years with ZERO problems. Excellent! What kind of systems are we talking about? How heavily loaded? Did you use it with LVM? Did you ever have to use the recovery tools? How well did they work? ~Kyle -- The next best thing to solving a problem is finding some humor in it. -- Frank A. Clark pgpEn3WGrrFWb.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Dovecot] Mailbox Hashing
On 11/14/2008, Kyle Wheeler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: FUD would be a strategic attempt to influence public opinion by disseminating negative (and vague) information. Well, no need to be pedantic about it... ;) The fact is, I've been using reiserfs on numerous boxes for many years with ZERO problems. Excellent! What kind of systems are we talking about? Nothing fancy... single and dual opteron mostly, with 3ware RAID crds (don't use/recommend those any more - much prefer Areca now) How heavily loaded? Nothing special here either... so I'd say low to moderate loads... Did you use it with LVM? Yes, on most of them... Did you ever have to use the recovery tools? How well did they work? Never had to use them (knock on wood)... :) -- Best regards, Charles
Re: [Dovecot] PLAIN password scheme question
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 08:16:17PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
v1.1+ supports {plain.b64} or {plain.hex}.
As far as I can see (well - grep is used) You are implemented something
(I don't untderstand code jet - just from comments within
src/auth/password-scheme.c). It seems like to look for .hex,.b64 and .base64,
But I'm wrong to find anything about it from wiki or NEWS.
Where I'm wrong?
WBR
Dmitri Ivanov
Re: [Dovecot] antispam plugin claims antispam signature not found
Not really, I haven't tried it with some new mails. I had this problem with some old one I imported from my previous server (i used spamassassin and courier-imap). I'll try to test the training and if it's not working, I'll revert to the svn version. It's not a big deal anyway if I can't use some old mails to train the plugin. Johannes Berg a écrit : On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 16:53 +0100, Guillaume HILT wrote: Ok, i updated the files by hand, and it's working like a charm :) Thanks for the patch Johannes. Umm, you realise that now it's not training at all, right? That's why the docs there say don't use this patch unless you verified that it works first. Unless you really had this problem only with some large emails? johannes -- Guillaume Hilt
