Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias

2007-12-04 Thread Thomas Wright


Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Garey:
I think we're saying the same thing.  Using two new tubes and each one of 
the bad tubes to make the trio, I found that all three of the bad tubes 
produced the same effect when each was used in combination with the two good 
tubes.  I kept exchanging one of the bad tubes in the trio and each time got 
the same oscillating.  This occurred in both transceivers.  The only time it 
functioned properly was when I combined the two new tubes with an older tube 
which was weak.  Then both radios performed normally.  The strange thing is 
that after I peak the rf tune control for max s-level or noise, when tuning 
the transmitter I find that the current and output peaks at a completely 
different spot when I turn the rf tune control to peak current.  And current 
peaks when output peaks, of course, but it won't dip.  The xmtr gain control 
will not reduce output or current once the load and plate controls are 
maxed.  And rotating between sidebands makes no difference after the 
transmitter is tunes either.  Both USB and LSB produce high output.  I can't 
say what I'm looking for, but logic suggests that the PS must have something 
to do with this.  Last night I checked at the PS connector and found normal 
bias and high voltages (although I get the feeling that the high side is a 
bit high), and I found less than .6 volts of AC at any of the three sides. 
I've got three new finals on the way, but I have no expectation that those 
will act any differently.  I did check bias voltages with the transceiver on 
and found them normal at all three final sockets.  I'll keep looking.  And 
thanks for your continued comments.

Tom


- Original Message - 
From: Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 10:37 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
Thomas -

OK.  I'm not sure you did what I asked.  Let me try again...

I believe I understood you to say that the 20M thing happens in  _both_ 
transmitters when the good tubes are installed.   What I want to try is 
with two of the good tubes and one of the bad tubes, what happens.  If 
the problem is still there, then leave the two good tubes and put in a 
_different_  one of the bad tubes.  If the problem still exists, again 
leave the two good tubes and put in the third of the bad tubes.  What 
we're trying to determine is if just ONE of the bad tubes is really bad, 
or if the situation is that two good tubes with any one of the bad tubes 
results in the oscillation or whatever we're seeing.  You also need to 
check the neutralization with each tube change.  It doesn't have to be 
perfect, but you should be able to get close enough on 20M pretty easily.


The voltages you are seeing are certainly in the ballpark.  The HV will go 
to 700 VDC with no load, and should be around 650V at full load of ~350 
mA.


There's also the possibility that one of the good tubes is actually the 
problem, but I can't think what it might be!  :-)   Do you have one other 
good 6JB6 that you could rotate through the good trio?


I thought Gary might have a clue, but I agree that it's unlikely that both 
transceivers have a bad capacitor resulting in the same symptoms with one 
set of tubes and not the other.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B  C-Line Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Thomas Wright wrote:


Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
Garey:
The saga continues.  This is getting weird.  Back to the unable to 
control the transmit, and unable to dip the plate current on 20 meters 
thing. Using your advice I used two new tubes and one of the oscillating 
tubes on both radios (TR-4 and a TR-4C).  The same symptom is there using 
two new tubes and one of the oscillating tubes.  The only way I can get 
this thing to act normally is if I include one older tube that is only 
producing about 50% output.  Any combination of three strong tubes in 
either radio causes the problem.  Now, the only other thing in common is 
the power supply I just recapped and redioded.  No load bias voltage is 
approx -45-85, low volt is 257, and high volt is a little over 700.  At 
the PA feedthrough under the chassis when idling the voltage was also 
around 720.  Could too high a voltage on the high section cause these 
tubes to oscillate on higher frequencies?  I can't believe that I've got 
two transceivers that suddenly caught the same bug.  WAY too much of a 
coincidence.  Tonight I plan to open the PS and check everything I did, 
but if you have any thoughts I'd sure like to hear them.
And to Gary P...thanks for the comments.  I tried

Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias

2007-12-04 Thread Garey Barrell


Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Tom -

OK.  Just wanted to be sure we were on the same page!  :-)

It sure sounds like an oscillation in the PA stage.  The only thing that 
comes to mind is when you have one of the older tubes in there, the 
maximum plate current is lower.   The fact that the max current and 
output peak at a different point than the max receive certainly 
indicates that the final is at a different frequency than the receiver.  
This is also reinforced by the fact that the Pi-net won't resonate, 
indicating that the frequency is outside the range of the 20M band position.


Have you tried to find the oscillation frequency by listening on a 
general coverage receiver?  Knowing that frequency might give us a 
clue.  The fact that the RF TUNE control loses control of the output 
indicates that the PA is oscillating without drive, once it is kicked 
off by some initial drive.


This is a weird one.  Anyone else has an idea, speak up!!   I 
thought Gary was on to something until we found that the problem follows 
the tubes in two separate transceivers.   It's looking more and more 
like the problem is with the GOOD tube(s)!


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B  C-Line Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Thomas Wright wrote:


Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the 
drakelist gang

--
Garey:
I think we're saying the same thing.  Using two new tubes and each one 
of the bad tubes to make the trio, I found that all three of the bad 
tubes produced the same effect when each was used in combination with 
the two good tubes.  I kept exchanging one of the bad tubes in the 
trio and each time got the same oscillating.  This occurred in both 
transceivers.  The only time it functioned properly was when I 
combined the two new tubes with an older tube which was weak.  Then 
both radios performed normally.  The strange thing is that after I 
peak the rf tune control for max s-level or noise, when tuning the 
transmitter I find that the current and output peaks at a completely 
different spot when I turn the rf tune control to peak current.  And 
current peaks when output peaks, of course, but it won't dip.  The 
xmtr gain control will not reduce output or current once the load and 
plate controls are maxed.  And rotating between sidebands makes no 
difference after the transmitter is tunes either.  Both USB and LSB 
produce high output.  I can't say what I'm looking for, but logic 
suggests that the PS must have something to do with this.  Last night 
I checked at the PS connector and found normal bias and high voltages 
(although I get the feeling that the high side is a bit high), and I 
found less than .6 volts of AC at any of the three sides. I've got 
three new finals on the way, but I have no expectation that those will 
act any differently.  I did check bias voltages with the transceiver 
on and found them normal at all three final sockets.  I'll keep 
looking.  And thanks for your continued comments.

Tom


- Original Message - From: Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 10:37 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the 
drakelist gang

--
Thomas -

OK.  I'm not sure you did what I asked.  Let me try again...

I believe I understood you to say that the 20M thing happens in  
_both_ transmitters when the good tubes are installed.   What I 
want to try is with two of the good tubes and one of the bad 
tubes, what happens.  If the problem is still there, then leave the 
two good tubes and put in a _different_  one of the bad tubes.  If 
the problem still exists, again leave the two good tubes and put in 
the third of the bad tubes.  What we're trying to determine is if 
just ONE of the bad tubes is really bad, or if the situation is that 
two good tubes with any one of the bad tubes results in the 
oscillation or whatever we're seeing.  You also need to check the 
neutralization with each tube change.  It doesn't have to be perfect, 
but you should be able to get close enough on 20M pretty easily.


The voltages you are seeing are certainly in the ballpark.  The HV 
will go to 700 VDC with no load, and should be around 650V at full 
load of ~350 mA.


There's also the possibility that one of the good tubes is actually 
the problem, but I can't think what it might be!  :-)   Do you have 
one other good 6JB6 that you could rotate through the good trio?


I thought Gary might have a clue, but I agree that it's unlikely that 
both transceivers have a bad capacitor resulting in the same symptoms 
with one set of tubes and not the other.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B  C-Line Service Supplement

Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias

2007-12-03 Thread Thomas Wright


Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Garey:
The saga continues.  This is getting weird.  Back to the unable to control 
the transmit, and unable to dip the plate current on 20 meters thing. 
Using your advice I used two new tubes and one of the oscillating tubes on 
both radios (TR-4 and a TR-4C).  The same symptom is there using two new 
tubes and one of the oscillating tubes.  The only way I can get this thing 
to act normally is if I include one older tube that is only producing about 
50% output.  Any combination of three strong tubes in either radio causes 
the problem.  Now, the only other thing in common is the power supply I just 
recapped and redioded.  No load bias voltage is approx -45-85, low volt is 
257, and high volt is a little over 700.  At the PA feedthrough under the 
chassis when idling the voltage was also around 720.  Could too high a 
voltage on the high section cause these tubes to oscillate on higher 
frequencies?  I can't believe that I've got two transceivers that suddenly 
caught the same bug.  WAY too much of a coincidence.  Tonight I plan to open 
the PS and check everything I did, but if you have any thoughts I'd sure 
like to hear them.
And to Gary P...thanks for the comments.  I tried replacing the driver tube 
with a new one, and measured the capacitance of the capacitors you 
mentioned, and they were good.  The new tube had no change.

Thanks guys.

- Original Message - 
From: Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2007 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
Tom -

It sounds like you have an oscillation in the final caused by a defect in 
one of the tubes.  It's a little puzzling why it only shows on 20M, but 
probably has to do with the neutralization circuitry and the defective 
tube.  The fact that the plate current won't dip implies that the 
frequency of the oscillation is outside the range of the pi-net when set 
for 20M.  You might be able to find it with an external general coverage 
receiver, but it's really not that important.


I would expect one of the defective trio of tubes to show some color in 
the plate, since that one is probably drawing the excess plate current. 
If not, what I would do is take one of the tubes in the good trio, and 
swap it with one of the tubes in the bad trio.  If the oscillation is 
still evident, replace the tube removed from the bad trio and try 
another one until you find which one is the cause.
If the two tubes in the bad trio are otherwise in good shape, you can 
probably get a good new one and it will be a close enough match.  You can 
check for match by putting in one tube at a time and noting the plate 
current at idle.  It should be about 33 mA for one tube.  More accurate 
would be to measure the voltage across the 15 ohm cathode resistor of the 
socket that the one tube is plugged into.  Swap in each tube into the same 
socket and note the plate current of each  _without adjusting the bias 
voltage_  and  select the three that are closest in current.  Hopefully 
they will be within a couple - three mA of each other.  This is not a 
real matching, but will be close enough for all practical purposes.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B  C-Line Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Thomas Wright wrote:


Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
John:
Well, I tried swapping finals.  In fact I swapped with my TR-4 finals, 
which are weak.  The finals that were in the TR-4C that was acting up do 
the same thing in the TR-4, and vice versa.  When in the TR-4 the tubes 
produce very good outputs on all bands except 20, just like they do in 
the TR-4C. Obviously the problem is the Sylvania 6JB6's, or at least one 
of them.  20 meters simply won't dip on either radio when it has those 
tubes and output stays very high even when reducing xmit gain to full 
CCW.  Can someone explain that to me?  Do I sense that the only fix is 
new finals?  I hate to give up such a strong trio.

Tom

- Original Message - From: Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
I assume you mean finals.  I have a set but they're weak.


- Original Message - From: john [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




john [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang

Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias

2007-12-03 Thread Gary Poland


Gary Poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Tom,
 The bad .001 capacitor was only discovered with circuit cooler and re 
heating it with a soldering iron tip ... it failed with a specific 
temperature.


73, Gary 



--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias

2007-12-03 Thread Garey Barrell


Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Thomas -

OK.  I'm not sure you did what I asked.  Let me try again...

I believe I understood you to say that the 20M thing happens in  
_both_  transmitters when the good tubes are installed.   What I want 
to try is with two of the good tubes and one of the bad tubes, what 
happens.  If the problem is still there, then leave the two good tubes 
and put in a  _different_  one of the bad tubes.  If the problem still 
exists, again leave the two good tubes and put in the third of the bad 
tubes.  What we're trying to determine is if just ONE of the bad tubes 
is really bad, or if the situation is that two good tubes with any one 
of the bad tubes results in the oscillation or whatever we're seeing.  
You also need to check the neutralization with each tube change.  It 
doesn't have to be perfect, but you should be able to get close enough 
on 20M pretty easily.


The voltages you are seeing are certainly in the ballpark.  The HV will 
go to 700 VDC with no load, and should be around 650V at full load of 
~350 mA.


There's also the possibility that one of the good tubes is actually 
the problem, but I can't think what it might be!  :-)   Do you have one 
other good 6JB6 that you could rotate through the good trio?


I thought Gary might have a clue, but I agree that it's unlikely that 
both transceivers have a bad capacitor resulting in the same symptoms 
with one set of tubes and not the other.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B  C-Line Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Thomas Wright wrote:


Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the 
drakelist gang

--
Garey:
The saga continues.  This is getting weird.  Back to the unable to 
control the transmit, and unable to dip the plate current on 20 
meters thing. Using your advice I used two new tubes and one of the 
oscillating tubes on both radios (TR-4 and a TR-4C).  The same symptom 
is there using two new tubes and one of the oscillating tubes.  The 
only way I can get this thing to act normally is if I include one 
older tube that is only producing about 50% output.  Any combination 
of three strong tubes in either radio causes the problem.  Now, the 
only other thing in common is the power supply I just recapped and 
redioded.  No load bias voltage is approx -45-85, low volt is 257, and 
high volt is a little over 700.  At the PA feedthrough under the 
chassis when idling the voltage was also around 720.  Could too high a 
voltage on the high section cause these tubes to oscillate on higher 
frequencies?  I can't believe that I've got two transceivers that 
suddenly caught the same bug.  WAY too much of a coincidence.  Tonight 
I plan to open the PS and check everything I did, but if you have any 
thoughts I'd sure like to hear them.
And to Gary P...thanks for the comments.  I tried replacing the driver 
tube with a new one, and measured the capacitance of the capacitors 
you mentioned, and they were good.  The new tube had no change.

Thanks guys.

- Original Message - From: Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2007 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the 
drakelist gang

--
Tom -

It sounds like you have an oscillation in the final caused by a 
defect in one of the tubes.  It's a little puzzling why it only shows 
on 20M, but probably has to do with the neutralization circuitry and 
the defective tube.  The fact that the plate current won't dip 
implies that the frequency of the oscillation is outside the range of 
the pi-net when set for 20M.  You might be able to find it with an 
external general coverage receiver, but it's really not that important.


I would expect one of the defective trio of tubes to show some color 
in the plate, since that one is probably drawing the excess plate 
current. If not, what I would do is take one of the tubes in the 
good trio, and swap it with one of the tubes in the bad trio.  If 
the oscillation is still evident, replace the tube removed from the 
bad trio and try another one until you find which one is the cause.
If the two tubes in the bad trio are otherwise in good shape, you 
can probably get a good new one and it will be a close enough match.  
You can check for match by putting in one tube at a time and noting 
the plate current at idle.  It should be about 33 mA for one tube.  
More accurate would be to measure the voltage across the 15 ohm 
cathode resistor of the socket that the one tube is plugged into.  
Swap in each tube into the same socket and note the plate current of 
each  _without adjusting the bias voltage_  and  select the three 
that are closest in current.  Hopefully

Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias

2007-12-02 Thread Thomas Wright


Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
John:
Well, I tried swapping finals.  In fact I swapped with my TR-4 finals, which 
are weak.  The finals that were in the TR-4C that was acting up do the same 
thing in the TR-4, and vice versa.  When in the TR-4 the tubes produce very 
good outputs on all bands except 20, just like they do in the TR-4C. 
Obviously the problem is the Sylvania 6JB6's, or at least one of them.  20 
meters simply won't dip on either radio when it has those tubes and output 
stays very high even when reducing xmit gain to full CCW.  Can someone 
explain that to me?  Do I sense that the only fix is new finals?  I hate to 
give up such a strong trio.

Tom

- Original Message - 
From: Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
I assume you mean finals.  I have a set but they're weak.


- Original Message - 
From: john [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




john [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Sounds like the PA might be oscillating on 20M. Do you have another set 
of tubes to try, to see if behaves differently?

John


At 12:52 PM 12/1/2007, you wrote:

Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
Garey:
What I found taught me a lesson and has me confused.  After rechecking 
the PS, and reconnecting to the TR4C, I realized I hadn't tried bias 
adjustment on anywhere other than 20m.  The bias acts normally on all 
other bands, but on 14Mhz, the bias won't go below .25 amp, the rf tune 
control has no effect on output, the plate current won't dip, and when 
the mode switch is ccw, as on LSB, the PA output is still high.  This has 
me totally confused.  The rig acts correctly on all other bandseven 
gives me 140 watts on 28Mhz.  Any ideas?

Tom

- Original Message - From: Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
Tom -

OK.  The specified load for the Bias supply is ~ 30k, so a load of this 
value would emulate the load of the transceiver.


The bias goes to the PA via the  _middle_  feedthrough on the side of 
the PA shield under the chassis.  These feedthroughs are fragile and 
easily cracked if too much force is applied to the terminals.  The 
other points in the transceiver that are tied to the Bias supply are 
all very high impedance, so a short on one of those is unlikely to cause 
as big a difference as you are seeing.


Another unlikely fault would be a Grid-Cathode short in one of the 
final tubes.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B  C-Line Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Thomas Wright wrote:


Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the 
drakelist gang

--
Garey:
I measured the bias while disconnected from the transceiver, and when 
swinging the pot from stop to stop it seemed to vary the minus voltage 
linearly with no spikes, but of course the Fluke may dampen such a 
spike if it's a fast one.  I'm thinking it may be one of the two 
resistors opening up under heat or current (6.8K and 10K).  The pot 
measures correct resistance from one end to the other.  When connected 
to the rig the current was either very low or very high, but when 
disconnected, the voltage seems vernier as it should.  I thought 
that -52 volts or so may be too high a bias voltage, especially if 
that's as low as it will go. Thanks for you continued help.

Tom

- Original Message - From: Garey Barrell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the 
drakelist gang

--
Thomas -

I just re-read your message..

If the IDLE current is either Zero or 0.4A, with little adjustment, 
I'd suspect the potentiometer has a break or bad spot on the 
resistive element.


That behavior indicates that the Bias voltage is either some high 
value, such as 70-80 Negative volts, cutting the final tubes off 
completely, or somewhere around 30-40 Negative volts, allowing some 
400 ma of idle current, depending upon which side of the break the 
wiper

Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias

2007-12-02 Thread Garey Barrell


Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Tom -

It sounds like you have an oscillation in the final caused by a defect 
in one of the tubes.  It's a little puzzling why it only shows on 20M, 
but probably has to do with the neutralization circuitry and the 
defective tube.  The fact that the plate current won't dip implies that 
the frequency of the oscillation is outside the range of the pi-net when 
set for 20M.  You might be able to find it with an external general 
coverage receiver, but it's really not that important.


I would expect one of the defective trio of tubes to show some color in 
the plate, since that one is probably drawing the excess plate current.  
If not, what I would do is take one of the tubes in the good trio, and 
swap it with one of the tubes in the bad trio.  If the oscillation is 
still evident, replace the tube removed from the bad trio and try 
another one until you find which one is the cause. 

If the two tubes in the bad trio are otherwise in good shape, you can 
probably get a good new one and it will be a close enough match.  You 
can check for match by putting in one tube at a time and noting the 
plate current at idle.  It should be about 33 mA for one tube.  More 
accurate would be to measure the voltage across the 15 ohm cathode 
resistor of the socket that the one tube is plugged into.  Swap in each 
tube into the same socket and note the plate current of each  _without 
adjusting the bias voltage_  and  select the three that are closest in 
current.  Hopefully they will be within a couple - three mA of each 
other.  This is not a real matching, but will be close enough for all 
practical purposes.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B  C-Line Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Thomas Wright wrote:


Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the 
drakelist gang

--
John:
Well, I tried swapping finals.  In fact I swapped with my TR-4 finals, 
which are weak.  The finals that were in the TR-4C that was acting up 
do the same thing in the TR-4, and vice versa.  When in the TR-4 the 
tubes produce very good outputs on all bands except 20, just like they 
do in the TR-4C. Obviously the problem is the Sylvania 6JB6's, or at 
least one of them.  20 meters simply won't dip on either radio when it 
has those tubes and output stays very high even when reducing xmit 
gain to full CCW.  Can someone explain that to me?  Do I sense that 
the only fix is new finals?  I hate to give up such a strong trio.

Tom

- Original Message - From: Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the 
drakelist gang

--
I assume you mean finals.  I have a set but they're weak.


- Original Message - From: john [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




john [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Sounds like the PA might be oscillating on 20M. Do you have another 
set of tubes to try, to see if behaves differently?

John





--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias

2007-12-02 Thread Gary Poland


Gary Poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Tom,
 I have had the same problem in the past with two TR-4C's. All bands ok 
except 20 meters. One was fixed buy changing the 12BY7A driver and the other 
by replacing C51, a .001 disc capacitor at the tube socket for the 12BY7A. I 
also have a note written to check C59, a 865 pf silver mica capacitor. I 
don't remember if I have ever changed C59, it may be a suggestion I got from 
Drake at one time.




73, Gary W8PU
http://home.cinci.rr.com/w8pu





--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias

2007-12-01 Thread Thomas Wright


Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Garey:
What I found taught me a lesson and has me confused.  After rechecking the 
PS, and reconnecting to the TR4C, I realized I hadn't tried bias adjustment 
on anywhere other than 20m.  The bias acts normally on all other bands, but 
on 14Mhz, the bias won't go below .25 amp, the rf tune control has no effect 
on output, the plate current won't dip, and when the mode switch is ccw, as 
on LSB, the PA output is still high.  This has me totally confused.  The rig 
acts correctly on all other bandseven gives me 140 watts on 28Mhz.  Any 
ideas?

Tom

- Original Message - 
From: Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
Tom -

OK.  The specified load for the Bias supply is ~ 30k, so a load of this 
value would emulate the load of the transceiver.


The bias goes to the PA via the  _middle_  feedthrough on the side of the 
PA shield under the chassis.  These feedthroughs are fragile and easily 
cracked if too much force is applied to the terminals.  The other points 
in the transceiver that are tied to the Bias supply are all very high 
impedance, so a short on one of those is unlikely to cause as big a 
difference as you are seeing.


Another unlikely fault would be a Grid-Cathode short in one of the final 
tubes.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B  C-Line Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Thomas Wright wrote:


Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
Garey:
I measured the bias while disconnected from the transceiver, and when 
swinging the pot from stop to stop it seemed to vary the minus voltage 
linearly with no spikes, but of course the Fluke may dampen such a spike 
if it's a fast one.  I'm thinking it may be one of the two resistors 
opening up under heat or current (6.8K and 10K).  The pot measures 
correct resistance from one end to the other.  When connected to the rig 
the current was either very low or very high, but when disconnected, the 
voltage seems vernier as it should.  I thought that -52 volts or so may 
be too high a bias voltage, especially if that's as low as it will go. 
Thanks for you continued help.

Tom

- Original Message - From: Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
Thomas -

I just re-read your message..

If the IDLE current is either Zero or 0.4A, with little adjustment, I'd 
suspect the potentiometer has a break or bad spot on the resistive 
element.


That behavior indicates that the Bias voltage is either some high value, 
such as 70-80 Negative volts, cutting the final tubes off completely, or 
somewhere around 30-40 Negative volts, allowing some 400 ma of idle 
current, depending upon which side of the break the wiper is on.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B  C-Line Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Thomas Wright wrote:
Maybe you guys can direct me a little.  My AC3 has been showing signs 
of bad caps, especially in the bias section ( one of the bias caps 
measured at 700MFD).  I replaced all the caps in all sections, using 
33MFD 160 volt caps in the bias section, and while I was there did the 
diodes. After reassembly the bias was adjustable from 41 or so to 80 
volts. TR-4C was running well.  Today after operating for an hour or 
so, the transmitter started to show very high plate current, so I 
checked the bias and found that it was either zero or above .4 amps, 
without much adjustment between the two, and of course when higher the 
xmit relay was engaging.  Reducing xmit gain would not reduce the plate 
current.  I measured the voltage at the plug and the bias is now only 
adjustable from 52 to 94 volts, which I think is too high.  There's not 
much else to replace in the AC3 except the bias pot and two resistors, 
both of which measure within tolerance statically.  Any thoughts?




--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--




--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe

Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias

2007-12-01 Thread john


john [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Sounds like the PA might be oscillating on 20M. Do you have another set of 
tubes to try, to see if behaves differently?

John


At 12:52 PM 12/1/2007, you wrote:


Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Garey:
What I found taught me a lesson and has me confused.  After rechecking the 
PS, and reconnecting to the TR4C, I realized I hadn't tried bias 
adjustment on anywhere other than 20m.  The bias acts normally on all 
other bands, but on 14Mhz, the bias won't go below .25 amp, the rf tune 
control has no effect on output, the plate current won't dip, and when the 
mode switch is ccw, as on LSB, the PA output is still high.  This has me 
totally confused.  The rig acts correctly on all other bandseven gives 
me 140 watts on 28Mhz.  Any ideas?

Tom

- Original Message - From: Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Tom -

OK.  The specified load for the Bias supply is ~ 30k, so a load of this 
value would emulate the load of the transceiver.


The bias goes to the PA via the  _middle_  feedthrough on the side of the 
PA shield under the chassis.  These feedthroughs are fragile and easily 
cracked if too much force is applied to the terminals.  The other 
points in the transceiver that are tied to the Bias supply are all very 
high impedance, so a short on one of those is unlikely to cause as big a 
difference as you are seeing.


Another unlikely fault would be a Grid-Cathode short in one of the 
final tubes.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B  C-Line Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Thomas Wright wrote:


Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
Garey:
I measured the bias while disconnected from the transceiver, and when 
swinging the pot from stop to stop it seemed to vary the minus voltage 
linearly with no spikes, but of course the Fluke may dampen such a spike 
if it's a fast one.  I'm thinking it may be one of the two resistors 
opening up under heat or current (6.8K and 10K).  The pot measures 
correct resistance from one end to the other.  When connected to the rig 
the current was either very low or very high, but when disconnected, the 
voltage seems vernier as it should.  I thought that -52 volts or so may 
be too high a bias voltage, especially if that's as low as it will go. 
Thanks for you continued help.

Tom

- Original Message - From: Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
Thomas -

I just re-read your message..

If the IDLE current is either Zero or 0.4A, with little adjustment, I'd 
suspect the potentiometer has a break or bad spot on the resistive element.


That behavior indicates that the Bias voltage is either some high 
value, such as 70-80 Negative volts, cutting the final tubes off 
completely, or somewhere around 30-40 Negative volts, allowing some 400 
ma of idle current, depending upon which side of the break the wiper is on.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B  C-Line Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Thomas Wright wrote:
Maybe you guys can direct me a little.  My AC3 has been showing signs 
of bad caps, especially in the bias section ( one of the bias caps 
measured at 700MFD).  I replaced all the caps in all sections, using 
33MFD 160 volt caps in the bias section, and while I was there did the 
diodes. After reassembly the bias was adjustable from 41 or so to 80 
volts. TR-4C was running well.  Today after operating for an hour or 
so, the transmitter started to show very high plate current, so I 
checked the bias and found that it was either zero or above .4 amps, 
without much adjustment between the two, and of course when higher the 
xmit relay was engaging.  Reducing xmit gain would not reduce the 
plate current.  I measured the voltage at the plug and the bias is now 
only adjustable from 52 to 94 volts, which I think is too 
high.  There's not much else to replace in the AC3 except the bias pot 
and two resistors, both of which measure within tolerance 
statically.  Any thoughts?


--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias

2007-12-01 Thread Thomas Wright


Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
I assume you mean finals.  I have a set but they're weak.


- Original Message - 
From: john [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




john [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Sounds like the PA might be oscillating on 20M. Do you have another set of 
tubes to try, to see if behaves differently?

John


At 12:52 PM 12/1/2007, you wrote:

Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
Garey:
What I found taught me a lesson and has me confused.  After rechecking the 
PS, and reconnecting to the TR4C, I realized I hadn't tried bias 
adjustment on anywhere other than 20m.  The bias acts normally on all 
other bands, but on 14Mhz, the bias won't go below .25 amp, the rf tune 
control has no effect on output, the plate current won't dip, and when the 
mode switch is ccw, as on LSB, the PA output is still high.  This has me 
totally confused.  The rig acts correctly on all other bandseven gives 
me 140 watts on 28Mhz.  Any ideas?

Tom

- Original Message - From: Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
Tom -

OK.  The specified load for the Bias supply is ~ 30k, so a load of this 
value would emulate the load of the transceiver.


The bias goes to the PA via the  _middle_  feedthrough on the side of the 
PA shield under the chassis.  These feedthroughs are fragile and easily 
cracked if too much force is applied to the terminals.  The other 
points in the transceiver that are tied to the Bias supply are all very 
high impedance, so a short on one of those is unlikely to cause as big a 
difference as you are seeing.


Another unlikely fault would be a Grid-Cathode short in one of the 
final tubes.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B  C-Line Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Thomas Wright wrote:


Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
Garey:
I measured the bias while disconnected from the transceiver, and when 
swinging the pot from stop to stop it seemed to vary the minus voltage 
linearly with no spikes, but of course the Fluke may dampen such a spike 
if it's a fast one.  I'm thinking it may be one of the two resistors 
opening up under heat or current (6.8K and 10K).  The pot measures 
correct resistance from one end to the other.  When connected to the rig 
the current was either very low or very high, but when disconnected, the 
voltage seems vernier as it should.  I thought that -52 volts or so may 
be too high a bias voltage, especially if that's as low as it will go. 
Thanks for you continued help.

Tom

- Original Message - From: Garey Barrell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
Thomas -

I just re-read your message..

If the IDLE current is either Zero or 0.4A, with little adjustment, I'd 
suspect the potentiometer has a break or bad spot on the resistive 
element.


That behavior indicates that the Bias voltage is either some high 
value, such as 70-80 Negative volts, cutting the final tubes off 
completely, or somewhere around 30-40 Negative volts, allowing some 400 
ma of idle current, depending upon which side of the break the wiper is 
on.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B  C-Line Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Thomas Wright wrote:
Maybe you guys can direct me a little.  My AC3 has been showing signs 
of bad caps, especially in the bias section ( one of the bias caps 
measured at 700MFD).  I replaced all the caps in all sections, using 
33MFD 160 volt caps in the bias section, and while I was there did the 
diodes. After reassembly the bias was adjustable from 41 or so to 80 
volts. TR-4C was running well.  Today after operating for an hour or 
so, the transmitter started to show very high plate current, so I 
checked the bias and found that it was either zero or above .4 amps, 
without much adjustment between the two, and of course when higher the 
xmit relay was engaging.  Reducing xmit gain would not reduce the 
plate current.  I measured the voltage at the plug and the bias is now 
only adjustable from 52 to 94 volts, which I think is too high

Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias

2007-11-30 Thread Thomas Wright


Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Garey:
I measured the bias while disconnected from the transceiver, and when 
swinging the pot from stop to stop it seemed to vary the minus voltage 
linearly with no spikes, but of course the Fluke may dampen such a spike if 
it's a fast one.  I'm thinking it may be one of the two resistors opening up 
under heat or current (6.8K and 10K).  The pot measures correct resistance 
from one end to the other.  When connected to the rig the current was either 
very low or very high, but when disconnected, the voltage seems vernier as 
it should.  I thought that -52 volts or so may be too high a bias voltage, 
especially if that's as low as it will go.  Thanks for you continued help.

Tom

- Original Message - 
From: Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
Thomas -

I just re-read your message..

If the IDLE current is either Zero or 0.4A, with little adjustment, I'd 
suspect the potentiometer has a break or bad spot on the resistive 
element.


That behavior indicates that the Bias voltage is either some high value, 
such as 70-80 Negative volts, cutting the final tubes off completely, or 
somewhere around 30-40 Negative volts, allowing some 400 ma of idle 
current, depending upon which side of the break the wiper is on.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B  C-Line Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Thomas Wright wrote:
Maybe you guys can direct me a little.  My AC3 has been showing signs of 
bad caps, especially in the bias section ( one of the bias caps measured 
at 700MFD).  I replaced all the caps in all sections, using 33MFD 160 
volt caps in the bias section, and while I was there did the diodes. 
After reassembly the bias was adjustable from 41 or so to 80 volts. 
TR-4C was running well.  Today after operating for an hour or so, the 
transmitter started to show very high plate current, so I checked the 
bias and found that it was either zero or above .4 amps, without much 
adjustment between the two, and of course when higher the xmit relay was 
engaging.  Reducing xmit gain would not reduce the plate current.  I 
measured the voltage at the plug and the bias is now only adjustable from 
52 to 94 volts, which I think is too high.  There's not much else to 
replace in the AC3 except the bias pot and two resistors, both of which 
measure within tolerance statically.  Any thoughts?




--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--




--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


[drakelist] AC3 Bias

2007-11-30 Thread Thomas Wright
Maybe you guys can direct me a little.  My AC3 has been showing signs of bad 
caps, especially in the bias section ( one of the bias caps measured at 
700MFD).  I replaced all the caps in all sections, using 33MFD 160 volt caps in 
the bias section, and while I was there did the diodes.  After reassembly the 
bias was adjustable from 41 or so to 80 volts.  TR-4C was running well.  Today 
after operating for an hour or so, the transmitter started to show very high 
plate current, so I checked the bias and found that it was either zero or above 
.4 amps, without much adjustment between the two, and of course when higher the 
xmit relay was engaging.  Reducing xmit gain would not reduce the plate 
current.  I measured the voltage at the plug and the bias is now only 
adjustable from 52 to 94 volts, which I think is too high.  There's not much 
else to replace in the AC3 except the bias pot and two resistors, both of which 
measure within tolerance statically.  Any thoughts?

Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias

2007-11-30 Thread Garey Barrell


Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Thomas -

I just re-read your message..

If the IDLE current is either Zero or 0.4A, with little adjustment, I'd 
suspect the potentiometer has a break or bad spot on the resistive 
element.


That behavior indicates that the Bias voltage is either some high value, 
such as 70-80 Negative volts, cutting the final tubes off completely, or 
somewhere around 30-40 Negative volts, allowing some 400 ma of idle 
current, depending upon which side of the break the wiper is on.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B  C-Line Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Thomas Wright wrote:
Maybe you guys can direct me a little.  My AC3 has been showing signs 
of bad caps, especially in the bias section ( one of the bias caps 
measured at 700MFD).  I replaced all the caps in all sections, using 
33MFD 160 volt caps in the bias section, and while I was there did the 
diodes.  After reassembly the bias was adjustable from 41 or so to 80 
volts.  TR-4C was running well.  Today after operating for an hour or 
so, the transmitter started to show very high plate current, so I 
checked the bias and found that it was either zero or above .4 amps, 
without much adjustment between the two, and of course when higher the 
xmit relay was engaging.  Reducing xmit gain would not reduce the 
plate current.  I measured the voltage at the plug and the bias is now 
only adjustable from 52 to 94 volts, which I think is too high.  
There's not much else to replace in the AC3 except the bias pot and 
two resistors, both of which measure within tolerance statically.  Any 
thoughts?
  


--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias

2007-11-30 Thread Garey Barrell


Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Thomas -

Yeah, there are mighty few AC-3 power supplies still running with their 
original electrolytics!


First of all, the Final idle current is a DC circuit that requires 
nothing more than Plate, Screen and Filament voltage, and that the 
Cathode is at ground potential.  These conditions will result in the 
Final tubes drawing literally Amps of plate current for as long as the 
power supply, its fuse, the tube plates and/or the wiring will last!!  

To control the idle current we apply a Negative voltage to the Grids of 
the final tubes, and somewhere around -50 to -60 VDC at the Grids, the 
final plate current will be around 0.1A for a trio of good tubes.  If 
the Grid voltage is More negative, say -70 VDC, the idle current will  
_decrease_  and if the Grid voltage is Less negative, -40 VDC the idle 
current will  _increase_ .   So either range you are seeing on your Bias 
supply is sufficient to hold the idle current to 0.1A.


Your problem is that your Bias supply is dropping to zero volts, which 
results in maximum Final Plate current.   You don't say where you were 
checking the Bias voltage when it was at Zero, but I suspect you have 
either a bad solder joint or broken wire in the Bias supply.  You can 
work on the supply with it disconnected from the transceiver, by 
shorting Pins 1 and 2 of the connector together, which applies AC to the 
power supply.  Don't forget that there is still 300 and 700 VDC floating 
around on the other pins of that connector when it is ON, and for a 
brief period after it is turned off until the bleeder resistors can drop 
that voltage back near zero!!


It's also possible that an intermittent open of either R6 or R7 is 
occurring, or that the pot wiper is losing contact with the resistive 
element.  An open in either of these elements will take the Bias 
voltage to zero.  An open in R5 will take the Bias voltage to maximum.  
A pot cleaner/lube such as CAIG CaiLube can often clean a dirty pot, and 
sometimes just rotating the pot through it's range several times with 
the power off will clear it.  Occasionally a pot element will open up 
where the wiper has been sitting for a while, and the circuit will 
operate as long as the wiper is bridging the break. 


From what you wrote, I'd suspect a problem with R5 and/or its connections.

I'd suggest carefully examining the Bias supply wiring, and then with a 
meter across the output while disconnected from the TR-4 push and prod 
the connections and components will an insulated stick.  Again, be aware 
that there are serious, dangerous voltages floating around in there any 
time the power supply is on.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B  C-Line Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Thomas Wright wrote:
Maybe you guys can direct me a little.  My AC3 has been showing signs 
of bad caps, especially in the bias section ( one of the bias caps 
measured at 700MFD).  I replaced all the caps in all sections, using 
33MFD 160 volt caps in the bias section, and while I was there did the 
diodes.  After reassembly the bias was adjustable from 41 or so to 80 
volts.  TR-4C was running well.  Today after operating for an hour or 
so, the transmitter started to show very high plate current, so I 
checked the bias and found that it was either zero or above .4 amps, 
without much adjustment between the two, and of course when higher the 
xmit relay was engaging.  Reducing xmit gain would not reduce the 
plate current.  I measured the voltage at the plug and the bias is now 
only adjustable from 52 to 94 volts, which I think is too high.  
There's not much else to replace in the AC3 except the bias pot and 
two resistors, both of which measure within tolerance statically.  Any 
thoughts?



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.10/1160 - Release Date: 11/29/2007 8:32 PM
  


--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias

2007-11-30 Thread Garey Barrell


Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Tom -

OK.  The specified load for the Bias supply is ~ 30k, so a load of this 
value would emulate the load of the transceiver.


The bias goes to the PA via the  _middle_  feedthrough on the side of 
the PA shield under the chassis.  These feedthroughs are fragile and 
easily cracked if too much force is applied to the terminals.  The 
other points in the transceiver that are tied to the Bias supply are 
all very high impedance, so a short on one of those is unlikely to cause 
as big a difference as you are seeing.


Another unlikely fault would be a Grid-Cathode short in one of the 
final tubes.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B  C-Line Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Thomas Wright wrote:


Thomas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the 
drakelist gang

--
Garey:
I measured the bias while disconnected from the transceiver, and when 
swinging the pot from stop to stop it seemed to vary the minus voltage 
linearly with no spikes, but of course the Fluke may dampen such a 
spike if it's a fast one.  I'm thinking it may be one of the two 
resistors opening up under heat or current (6.8K and 10K).  The pot 
measures correct resistance from one end to the other.  When connected 
to the rig the current was either very low or very high, but when 
disconnected, the voltage seems vernier as it should.  I thought that 
-52 volts or so may be too high a bias voltage, especially if that's 
as low as it will go.  Thanks for you continued help.

Tom

- Original Message - From: Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] AC3 Bias




Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the 
drakelist gang

--
Thomas -

I just re-read your message..

If the IDLE current is either Zero or 0.4A, with little adjustment, 
I'd suspect the potentiometer has a break or bad spot on the 
resistive element.


That behavior indicates that the Bias voltage is either some high 
value, such as 70-80 Negative volts, cutting the final tubes off 
completely, or somewhere around 30-40 Negative volts, allowing some 
400 ma of idle current, depending upon which side of the break the 
wiper is on.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B  C-Line Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Thomas Wright wrote:
Maybe you guys can direct me a little.  My AC3 has been showing 
signs of bad caps, especially in the bias section ( one of the bias 
caps measured at 700MFD).  I replaced all the caps in all sections, 
using 33MFD 160 volt caps in the bias section, and while I was there 
did the diodes. After reassembly the bias was adjustable from 41 or 
so to 80 volts. TR-4C was running well.  Today after operating for 
an hour or so, the transmitter started to show very high plate 
current, so I checked the bias and found that it was either zero or 
above .4 amps, without much adjustment between the two, and of 
course when higher the xmit relay was engaging.  Reducing xmit gain 
would not reduce the plate current.  I measured the voltage at the 
plug and the bias is now only adjustable from 52 to 94 volts, which 
I think is too high.  There's not much else to replace in the AC3 
except the bias pot and two resistors, both of which measure within 
tolerance statically.  Any thoughts?




--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--