Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net discontinued
Hi, Le jeudi 06 décembre 2018 à 22:55 +0100, Gerhard Pircher a écrit : > Am 2018-12-01 um 18:35 schrieb Damien Sandras: > > Due to the lack of time, and to the last outages, I have taken > > thedecision to discontinue EKIGA.NET before the end of the year. > > Thank you for your support during all those years. > > It has been a pleasure! > I just wanted to say thank you for keeping the ekiga.net service > upand running all those years! Thank you for the nice words! Best regards, -- Damien Sandras ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net discontinued
On Sat, 1 Dec 2018, A Human via ekiga-list wrote: how can i unsubscribe from this list pls Use the link at the bottom. I'm copying it here: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list -- Stuart D. Gathman "Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net discontinued
Hi Bret, Thank you for your email and support. You are absolutely right... Actually, Ekiga, the software, is not discontinued. Ekiga.net, the SIP platform that goes with it, will be shutting down by the end of the year. However, actually, the state of the software is not better. I have actively maintained ekiga during more or less 12 to 13 years. A new version is nearly ready (without instant messaging support anymore, and without STUN/NAT support). A few years ago, I asked for help to finish it. It was a call to developers, but nobody answered. Having to maintain the software, the SIP platform, the websites, the manuals, the documentation for that new release alone is simply not possible. It would be if I was unemployed. But in that case, the "free" as "free beer" aspect of Open Source would be annoying for me :-) So well, if developers want to keep working on the Ekiga software, they are welcome. The code is in GNOME's git, available for everyone! Le dimanche 02 décembre 2018 à 06:15 +0800, Bret Busby via ekiga-list a écrit : > On 02/12/2018, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Hi all, > > Due to the lack of time, and to the last outages, I have taken > > thedecision to discontinue EKIGA.NET before the end of the year. > > Thank you for your support during all those years. > > It has been a pleasure!-- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Damien SANDRAS > > > > > > Ekiga Project > > http://www.ekiga.org > > > > > > > > > > Hello. > I am wondering whether, given that Ekiga is said to be open > source,rather than, as its owner, simply shutting it down, it would > not bemore appropriate and consistent with the (perceived) nature of > opensource,, to seek a new group of people, to take it on, for the > sake ofits continuance. > More and more good Linux software, has been > abandoned/discontinued,and, with MS apparently determined to > progressively eliminate skype(MS has been p[rogressively hobbling > skype, since MS bought it out), adeveloping technology in IT - the > means od making video calls, amongstother uses, is being eliminated. > It is a bit like, if Alexander Bellhad decided that he had had enough > of trying to develop telephony, andsaid "Stuff it - I've had enough - > I am going to put it all into boxesand bury it.", rather than passing > it on to others to continue thedevelopment. > Imagine what the world would be like, if we had not had > telephony.Imagine what the wotld could be like, if we would have > video calls andvideoconferencing, as commonplace, as telephony has > been. > Here in Australia, members of the federal parliament, fly thousands > ofkilometres, to sit in the parliament (when they can be > botheredturning up for "work" - the federal parliament is apparently > scheduledto meet, for only ten days, in the next eight months, while > itsmembers hibernate (and, hide from each other) ), and, whilst > theAustralian federal partliament does not want to progress from > thestone age, if its members used virtual attendance, > throughvideoconferencing, it could save the country a fortune, and, > show thatAustralia is not really such a stupid and backward country, > that itappears to be (we have a federal government, that is obsessed > withburning as much cpoall as possible, as it is worried about > theincreasing chill in the air). > So, while MS is doing as much as it can, to obstruct > communications,with its progressive hobbling of skype, if Ekiga could > be turned intoa community project, and, thence, continue to be > developed andmaintained, instead of being abandoned, like so much > other Linuxsoftware, we could have hope, that communications > technology willcontinue to advance, instead of being abandoned and > left in unusablepieces on the side of the road.. > So, rather than simply abandoning Ekiga, I ask whether it could > beoffered as a community project, so as to provide for its > continueddevelopment, maintenance, and, support, rather than simply > abandoningit. -- Damien SANDRAS Ekiga Project http://www.ekiga.org ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net discontinued
how can i unsubscribe from this list pls Le sam. 1 déc. 2018 à 20:45, Stuart D. Gathman a écrit : > On Sun, 2 Dec 2018, Bret Busby via ekiga-list wrote: > > > On 02/12/2018, Damien Sandras wrote: > >> Due to the lack of time, and to the last outages, I have taken the > >> decision to discontinue EKIGA.NET before the end of the year. > > > I am wondering whether, given that Ekiga is said to be open source, > > rather than, as its owner, simply shutting it down, it would not be > > more appropriate and consistent with the (perceived) nature of open > > source,, to seek a new group of people, to take it on, for the sake of > > its continuance. > > Ekiga.net is not needed for peer to peer calls. It is only to help > out unfortunate souls still in IP4 NAT jail because they haven't learned > how to join the IP6 world. ISPs will never offer IP6. You have to > peer with friends and/or sign up with a general tunnel broker like > he.net. > > There are other sites offering free IP4 SIP call brokering (generally > charging for POTS connections to make their money). > > I moved to Linphone (another open source SIP client) because it > supported IPv6. Peer to peer SIP really requires IPv6. > > The Cjdns IPv6 mesh VPN allows authenticated, encrypted peer to peer calls > anywhere in the world without any exchange of certs, etc, and a device > keeps its IP as it moves around. The IPv6 is a hash of the public key > of the node. > > Even without a VPN, IPv6 allows direct peer to peer without needing > a public IP4 or a centralized site to help with all the NAT workarounds. > > Ekiga does a number of things better than linphone (e.g. addressbook). > But the lack of IPv6 was a deal killer. There were efforts to > add IPv6 support to ekiga, but never finished that I was aware of. > Actually, IPv6 support in Linphone is a pain - it can't listen on > IP4 (for commercial SIP to POTS services) and IP6 simultaneously. > You have to switch back and forth in preferences. Ekiga could do it so > much better. > > -- > Stuart D. Gathman > "Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for > a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial. > ___ > ekiga-list mailing list > ekiga-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list > ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net discontinued
Thanks for all the work you put in over the years Damien - sometimes it is best to allow the world to move on without us. There is a tide in the affairs of man - and all that Shakespeare stuff. Sad to see it go - but you can only do so much. Thanks again David Bedtime Stories (4 - 8 years) http://www.everopenstorybook.com Nature https://www.ja2da.com Random Thoughts https://medium.com/@ford.davidj/latest On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 at 17:36, Damien Sandras wrote: > Hi all, > > Due to the lack of time, and to the last outages, I have taken the > decision to discontinue EKIGA.NET before the end of the year. > > Thank you for your support during all those years. > > It has been a pleasure! > > -- > > Damien SANDRAS > > *Ekiga Project* > http://www.ekiga.org > ___ > ekiga-list mailing list > ekiga-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net discontinued
Hi all, Due to the lack of time, and to the last outages, I have taken the decision to discontinue EKIGA.NET before the end of the year. Thank you for your support during all those years. It has been a pleasure! -- Damien SANDRAS Ekiga Project http://www.ekiga.org ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net directory is blank
Damien, Many thanks. Your restart co-incided with my firewall changes, so I incorrectly thought I'd solved the problem by opening the outgoing STUN ports. Ha Ha. Bob On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:06:55 +0100 Damien Sandraswrote: > Hi, > The service was down. I restarted it. > Le jeudi 16 mars 2017 à 10:19 +, Bob Williams a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I've just installed Ekiga on openSUSE Leap 42.2 with KDE Frameworks > > 5. > > I've done a successful echo test so it looks like I've opened the > > correct ports in my router and firewall. > > > > When I open the Address Book, the Ekiga.net directory is empty. > > Clicking on the Find button with no search string does nothing, but > > there is a status bar message saying -1 users found. > > > > Could I have missed some configuration option? Do I need to run an > > openldap server? > > > > Many thanks > > > > Bob > > ___ > > ekiga-list mailing list > > ekiga-list@gnome.org > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list > -- > > > > > > > > Damien SANDRAS > > > > Ekiga Project > > http://www.ekiga.org > > -- Bob Williams System: Linux 4.4.49-16-default Distro: openSUSE 42.2 (x86_64) Desktop: KDE Frameworks: 5.26.0, Qt: 5.6.1 and Plasma: 5.8.2 pgppRCGn94xby.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net directory is blank
Hi, The service was down. I restarted it. Le jeudi 16 mars 2017 à 10:19 +, Bob Williams a écrit : > Hi, > > I've just installed Ekiga on openSUSE Leap 42.2 with KDE Frameworks > 5. > I've done a successful echo test so it looks like I've opened the > correct ports in my router and firewall. > > When I open the Address Book, the Ekiga.net directory is empty. > Clicking on the Find button with no search string does nothing, but > there is a status bar message saying -1 users found. > > Could I have missed some configuration option? Do I need to run an > openldap server? > > Many thanks > > Bob > ___ > ekiga-list mailing list > ekiga-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list -- Damien SANDRAS Ekiga Project http://www.ekiga.org ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net directory is blank [SOLVED]
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:19:58 + Bob Williamswrote: > Hi, > > I've just installed Ekiga on openSUSE Leap 42.2 with KDE Frameworks 5. > I've done a successful echo test so it looks like I've opened the > correct ports in my router and firewall. > > When I open the Address Book, the Ekiga.net directory is empty. > Clicking on the Find button with no search string does nothing, but > there is a status bar message saying -1 users found. > > Could I have missed some configuration option? Do I need to run an > openldap server? > > Many thanks > > Bob OK, I've found the problem. I had to open the STUN ports 3478, 3479 for outgoing udp traffic. Sorry for the noise. Bob -- Bob Williams System: Linux 4.4.49-16-default Distro: openSUSE 42.2 (x86_64) Desktop: KDE Frameworks: 5.26.0, Qt: 5.6.1 and Plasma: 5.8.2 pgpVYutkB_DzY.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net directory is blank
Hi, I've just installed Ekiga on openSUSE Leap 42.2 with KDE Frameworks 5. I've done a successful echo test so it looks like I've opened the correct ports in my router and firewall. When I open the Address Book, the Ekiga.net directory is empty. Clicking on the Find button with no search string does nothing, but there is a status bar message saying -1 users found. Could I have missed some configuration option? Do I need to run an openldap server? Many thanks Bob -- Bob Williams System: Linux 4.4.49-16-default Distro: openSUSE 42.2 (x86_64) Desktop: KDE Frameworks: 5.26.0, Qt: 5.6.1 and Plasma: 5.8.2 pgpER7Yeh8PQf.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net Could not register (Globally not acceptable)
On 14/06/14 20:56, Mark Smith wrote: It has been several years since I was able to use my ekiga.net account. On the account status I get ekiga.net Could not register (Globally not acceptable) There is also an error message telling me that I need to manually configure port forwarding. However, I also have an account on iptel and ideasip. I have not had problems with them. Also, I have tried changing the port forwarding parameters with no success. It used to work, but something changed. A debug output is attached. You are now behind a symmetric NAT (i.e. the error message about port forwarding), which is not well taken into account by ekiga. Your output contains: 2014/06/14 13:42:58.722 0:02.866 StunDetect...f2da08d700 OPAL STUN server stun.ekiga.net replies Symmetric NAT ... Something has recently changed in your network configuration, either you or your Internet provider. Do you know anything about that? -- Eugen Eugen, Thanks for the note. I am running Fedora and it is possible that the firewall configuration has changed when I have updated versions. But I have internet access complicated by use of an ooma VOIP device. I have the ooma device connected to the cable modem and then a wireless router connected to the ooma. I am running ddwrt on the router. Do you have any suggestions of how to find where the symmetric NAT is occurring? Thanks, Mark ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] ekiga.net Could not register (Globally not acceptable)
Resend: Christian sent me a message saying that when I originally sent this it ended up in his spam folder. Did this happen on other accounts also? I have not gotten any feedback on my question. Thanks It has been several years since I was able to use my ekiga.net account. On the account status I get ekiga.net Could not register (Globally not acceptable) There is also an error message telling me that I need to manually configure port forwarding. However, I also have an account on iptel and ideasip. I have not had problems with them. Also, I have tried changing the port forwarding parameters with no success. It used to work, but something changed. A debug output is attached. Thanks output.txt.gz Description: application/gzip ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net Could not register (Globally not acceptable)
On 21/06/14 17:39, Mark Smith wrote: Resend: Christian sent me a message saying that when I originally sent this it ended up in his spam folder. Did this happen on other accounts also? I have not gotten any feedback on my question. Thanks It has been several years since I was able to use my ekiga.net account. On the account status I get ekiga.net Could not register (Globally not acceptable) There is also an error message telling me that I need to manually configure port forwarding. However, I also have an account on iptel and ideasip. I have not had problems with them. Also, I have tried changing the port forwarding parameters with no success. It used to work, but something changed. A debug output is attached. I answered you, see https://mail.gnome.org/archives/ekiga-list/2014-June/msg3.html. -- Eugen ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net Could not register (Globally not acceptable)
On 14/06/14 20:56, Mark Smith wrote: It has been several years since I was able to use my ekiga.net account. On the account status I get ekiga.net Could not register (Globally not acceptable) There is also an error message telling me that I need to manually configure port forwarding. However, I also have an account on iptel and ideasip. I have not had problems with them. Also, I have tried changing the port forwarding parameters with no success. It used to work, but something changed. A debug output is attached. You are now behind a symmetric NAT (i.e. the error message about port forwarding), which is not well taken into account by ekiga. Your output contains: 2014/06/14 13:42:58.722 0:02.866 StunDetect...f2da08d700 OPAL STUN server stun.ekiga.net replies Symmetric NAT ... Something has recently changed in your network configuration, either you or your Internet provider. Do you know anything about that? -- Eugen ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] ekiga.net Could not register (Globally not acceptable)
It has been several years since I was able to use my ekiga.net account. On the account status I get ekiga.net Could not register (Globally not acceptable) There is also an error message telling me that I need to manually configure port forwarding. However, I also have an account on iptel and ideasip. I have not had problems with them. Also, I have tried changing the port forwarding parameters with no success. It used to work, but something changed. A debug output is attached. Thanks output.txt.gz Description: application/gzip ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] ekiga.net available again
... sorry for the inconvenience. We will upgrade the server soon, hope such interruptions will disappear. -- Eugen ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net available again
Ok, looking forward to the upgrades. When I was using the 3.2 version I never experienced any problems. It was really working every day and was always registering. Gesendet:Freitag, 21. Dezember 2012 um 11:06 Uhr Von:Eugen Dedu eugen.d...@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr An:Ekiga mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org Betreff:[Ekiga-list] ekiga.net available again ... sorry for the inconvenience. We will upgrade the server soon, hope such interruptions will disappear. -- Eugen ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net does not appear to use password hashes
On 16/07/12 21:10, ek...@phillipsjk.ca wrote: Hello, When I tried to sign up for Ekiga.net, my high information password: RojrpKw@8jU=RhT' Got mangled to: RojrpKw@8jU=RhT\#039; When I tried to change my password to another high-information password, the password update e-mail contained a password with only about 20 bits of information (rather than 96 bits). So this is a problem with ekiga.net, right? If yes, I personnally have no access to this server. When I try to connect, I get an error message of: Registration failed: Forbidden I am using a Cone NAT and have STUN (using stun.ekiga.nt) enabled, even though I don't think it will work. I am faily certain I can only recieve Cone NAT is supported, no need to configure anything. But as shown below you use an old version, I do not know how it works for it... incomming connections on ports I explicitly forward; or in response to an outgoing request. I have not tried forwarding ports yet. I hope to eventually set up an Asterix gateway, then point Ekiga to that. Regards, James Phillips PS: I hope to eventually use IPv6 and encryption as well. Not sure how suitable Ekiga would be for that. I would say that IPv6 could be available in a few months, if everything goes well, but sometimes I am very bad at guessing dates. Encryption is more tricky, I have really no estimation. PPS: I may be testing an old version of Ekiga: 2.0.12 Indeed. Personnally, I have never worked in 2.x version. -- Eugen ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net does not appear to use password hashes
Hello, When I tried to sign up for Ekiga.net, my high information password: RojrpKw@8jU=RhT' Got mangled to: RojrpKw@8jU=RhT\#039; When I tried to change my password to another high-information password, the password update e-mail contained a password with only about 20 bits of information (rather than 96 bits). When I try to connect, I get an error message of: Registration failed: Forbidden I am using a Cone NAT and have STUN (using stun.ekiga.nt) enabled, even though I don't think it will work. I am faily certain I can only recieve incomming connections on ports I explicitly forward; or in response to an outgoing request. I have not tried forwarding ports yet. I hope to eventually set up an Asterix gateway, then point Ekiga to that. Regards, James Phillips PS: I hope to eventually use IPv6 and encryption as well. Not sure how suitable Ekiga would be for that. PPS: I may be testing an old version of Ekiga: 2.0.12 -- OpenPGP Public Key: http://phillipsjk.ca/OpenPGP0712.asc signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net Echo Test down?
5...@ekiga.net is not working for me, anybody else as well? -- Dave Koelmeyer http://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net Echo Test down?
In data martedì 04 ottobre 2011 12:33:22, Dave Koelmeyer ha scritto: 5...@ekiga.net is not working for me, anybody else as well? Yes, I'm tryng but ecotestis not run. Ciao Pietro ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net Echo Test down?
On 04/10/11 12:33, Dave Koelmeyer wrote: 5...@ekiga.net is not working for me, anybody else as well? It's down again :o( -- Eugen ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net Echo Test down?
On 04/10/11 13:13, Eugen Dedu wrote: On 04/10/11 12:33, Dave Koelmeyer wrote: 5...@ekiga.net is not working for me, anybody else as well? It's down again :o( It works now. -- Eugen ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net Echo Test down?
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:13:42 +0200 Eugen Dedu eugen.d...@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr wrote: On 04/10/11 12:33, Dave Koelmeyer wrote: 5...@ekiga.net is not working for me, anybody else as well? It's down again :o( Why don't you try one of these? sip:*850...@ekiga.net Idea SIP's echo test sip:*031...@ekiga.net Echo test from Voxalot (Europe) sip:*061...@ekiga.net Echo test from Voxalot (Australia) sip:*010...@ekiga.net Echo test from Voxalot (USA) Via: http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Fun_Numbers ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net uses alphanumeric usernames .....
... but each has a numerical alias to enable dialing from a standard telephone key pad. http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/FAQ#SIP_Numbers Hi, I am trying the find the numerical alias of a specific user I wish to call. Because I am using a hardware VOIP-phone I need numbers, not letters. Can someone tell me how to do that please? (or maybe a workaround way) Thank! Walter -- Wikizine.org - community newsletter - It keeps coming back! gopher://gopher.wikizine.org - http://www.wikizine.org You have news? - walter AT wikizine DOT org ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net subscribe spam
On 28/06/11 14:07, Tiberiu Breana wrote: Hello. Is there any way to stop Ekiga from spamming SUBSCRIBE requests to 5...@ekiga.net? I'm not using the Ekiga account service and these messages are disturbing my SIP server. Please look at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618607 for a workaround. Also, remove 500 account. -- Eugen ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] ekiga.net subscribe spam
Hello. Is there any way to stop Ekiga from spamming SUBSCRIBE requests to 5...@ekiga.net? I'm not using the Ekiga account service and these messages are disturbing my SIP server. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On 05/25/2011 01:52 PM, Jānis Rukšāns wrote: If the phone supports either STUN or ICE, it is usually indicated by a public IP in the Contact address. I'm pretty sure diamondcard.us have a relay server, thus they don't care whether the IP is public or private. Ekiga.net doesn't have a relay server, therefore it's reasonable that it rejects registrations with private IPs. But only if the private IP is in the Contact address. In the cases we are complaining about, the Contact is a public IP, but ekiga.net rejects it anyway. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 02:04:10AM +0300, J??nis Rukš??ns wrote: [...] From the traces it looks like it doesn't support any way to traverse NAT. It is not really a bug, but rather important missing feature, something they should do. Wait a second... then why do the registrations at sip.poivy.com and sip.diamondcard.us work? Doesn't this mean that my SIP-client *is* somehow able to traverse NAT? (I'm afraid i'm missing technical background about NAT-traversal here to be able to answer this question myself :-( Technically ekiga.net is wrong about the Via (but not Contact), but with no NAT support in phone (either classic STUN or ICE, or whatever), it doesn't make any difference to you. As Damien told in another post, you will experience audio problems (almost certainly). But the cool thing about SIP is you're not tied to a single provider. You can call anyone with a SIP address no matter what your provider is. If the phone has no NAT support, there are multiple providers with media relay, select the one(s) you like, and configure to use their outbound proxy. At least audio should work fine. OK. So let me try to summarize the conclusions of this discussion: 1) The ekiga.net server is wrong in returning a 606 Not Acceptable because of a private IP in the Contact header of the REGISTER message. We have to wait for the ekiga.net admins to fix this. It is not at all clear how trivial this fix is. 2) If I want my Android 2.3.4 native SIP client to work with ekiga.net, I will have to wait until it supports STUN, ICE or another NAT traversal technology. 3) I can register with another SIP account (e.g. my poivy or diamondcard account), but then this means I won't be reachable at my ekiga.net SIP-address... and to be honest, because i support the Open Source philosophy, i would really like it if people could call me at my ekiga.net address and not some other address from a commercial provider... 4) I can try another SIP-client on android, like CSipSimple or Sipdroid. It will need some more testing to see if these work with ekiga.net... More on this later :-) Regards, Bart -- Share what you know. Learn what you don't. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 nativeSIP-client
Wed May 25 2011 12:06:04 AM MST from Bart Vandewoestyne bart.vandewoest...@telenet.be Subject: Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 nativeSIP-client On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 02:04:10AM +0300, J??nis Rukscaron;??ns wrote: [...] From the traces it looks like it doesn't support any way to traverse NAT. It is not really a bug, but rather important missing feature, something they should do. There is a good description of the Ekiga problems on the Jitsi web site: http://www.jitsi.org/index.php/Documentation/FAQ#ekiga.net ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On 25/05/11 07:06 PM, Bart Vandewoestyne wrote: 4) I can try another SIP-client on android, like CSipSimple or Sipdroid. It will need some more testing to see if these work with ekiga.net... More on this later :-) Hi Bart, FWIW Sipdroid is what I use on a Motorola Milestone, and it works fine with Ekiga.net If you observe anything of note while trying out different SIP clients, would be useful to know so we can update the Android compatibility list at: http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Ekiga_Interoperability#Android Cheers, -- Dave Koelmeyer http://davekoelmeyer.wordpress.com/ ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 07:35:45PM +1200, Dave Koelmeyer wrote: Hi Bart, FWIW Sipdroid is what I use on a Motorola Milestone, and it works fine with Ekiga.net If you observe anything of note while trying out different SIP clients, would be useful to know so we can update the Android compatibility list at: http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Ekiga_Interoperability#Android Hmm... I just tried creating an account so that I could update the information, but apparently creating accounts does not work (or I am not allowed to do it...) If somehow I can get an account to edit that info, I would be happy to try and keep it up-to-date and add all possible info concerning Android (2.3.4) compatibility. Regards, Bart -- Share what you know. Learn what you don't. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On 25/05/11 09:59, Bart Vandewoestyne wrote: On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 07:35:45PM +1200, Dave Koelmeyer wrote: Hi Bart, FWIW Sipdroid is what I use on a Motorola Milestone, and it works fine with Ekiga.net If you observe anything of note while trying out different SIP clients, would be useful to know so we can update the Android compatibility list at: http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Ekiga_Interoperability#Android Hmm... I just tried creating an account so that I could update the information, but apparently creating accounts does not work (or I am not allowed to do it...) If somehow I can get an account to edit that info, I would be happy to try and keep it up-to-date and add all possible info concerning Android (2.3.4) compatibility. Created. -- Eugen ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:05:08AM +0200, Eugen Dedu wrote: If somehow I can get an account to edit that info, I would be happy to try and keep it up-to-date and add all possible info concerning Android (2.3.4) compatibility. Created. Thanks Eugen! I've updated the information at http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Ekiga_Interoperability#Android with all that I know. Please check and if certain things are not well done or well written, please correct. I'll keep on experimenting with Android and update the info when necessary. Kind regards, Bart -- Share what you know. Learn what you don't. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Bart Vandewoestyne bart.vandewoest...@telenet.be wrote: On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 02:04:10AM +0300, J??nis Rukš??ns wrote: [...] From the traces it looks like it doesn't support any way to traverse NAT. It is not really a bug, but rather important missing feature, something they should do. Wait a second... then why do the registrations at sip.poivy.com and sip.diamondcard.us work? Doesn't this mean that my SIP-client *is* somehow able to traverse NAT? (I'm afraid i'm missing technical background about NAT-traversal here to be able to answer this question myself :-( No, it doesn't mean that the client is able to traverse NAT. It means that either the *server* is able to traverse NAT by relaying the audio, or you will have no audio in an actual call (either incoming or both ways). The technical background is that when you make a call, the phone sends an INVITE message, telling the other end your IP and the port where to send audio. However, if you're behind NAT, that IP and port is generally not reachable from the outside world. Which means that with no NAT support, the audio sent by the other end will not reach you. The same applies to the called phone, if it is behind NAT as well, you will have no audio at all. There are several ways to counter this: 1) classic STUN - the phone can discover the corresponding public IP and port by contacting a STUN server, and then uses it in the INVITE. However this doesn't work for more complex types of NAT, and the whole thing is a bit sketchy. Therefore classic STUN has been deprecated for some time. 2) ICE - instead of contacting a dedicated STUN server, the endpoints communicate between themselves to find out each others public IPs and ports used for audio. This works in most cases, except when both parties are behind a very restrictive NAT. 3) Dedicated media relay server - instead of sending audio directly to the other party, the audio is sent through a dedicated server with a public IP. This works even with no NAT support in the client, but is very costly to the provider (in terms of bandwidth, hardware and money). If the phone supports either STUN or ICE, it is usually indicated by a public IP in the Contact address. I'm pretty sure diamondcard.us have a relay server, thus they don't care whether the IP is public or private. Ekiga.net doesn't have a relay server, therefore it's reasonable that it rejects registrations with private IPs. Cheers -- Ian ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
I was reading the results of your test with ekiga.net on android 2.3.4 built in sip, which i use for my daily life only on tmobile-usa 3g network. I think you can get ekiga.net to work with android but it would have to be through a middle man. That middle man would have to be pbxes.org which is what i use as my sip provider on android 2.3.4 built in sip client. It registers and connects fine, but for people to call you on ekiga.net you would have to go to pbxes.org and forward the incoming call going to your sip address at pbxes.org to ekiga.net and vice versa. So if someone calls your ekiga.net sip address it would be forwarded to your pbxes.org sip address then you would be able to pick up phone call on your android 2.3.4 device's sip client which would be registered to your pbxes.org sip address. In terms of calling other people on sip you could simply just return the call and use pbxes.org web browser system settings to tell people that the incoming call-id would show your ekiga.net sip address instead of your pbxes.org sip address. Basically what i think could solve your problem would be to use another sip provider to forward and direct your calling through your ekiga.net sip address. Hope this helps. Also if you are still certain about using a third party app over the built in sip client which i use to do on my android phone before android got built in sip, both sipdroid and csipsimple are fantastic. I think I will have to give csipsimple more thumbs up and praise because i feel that app is a little more polished than sipdroid and also they have in there settings an actual pre-made settings for users who use ekiga, so getting ekiga registered with that sip client is easier in my opinion, they also have actually a whole bunch of sip providers settings already pre-made for users. On 05/25/2011 04:05 AM, Eugen Dedu wrote: On 25/05/11 09:59, Bart Vandewoestyne wrote: On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 07:35:45PM +1200, Dave Koelmeyer wrote: Hi Bart, FWIW Sipdroid is what I use on a Motorola Milestone, and it works fine with Ekiga.net If you observe anything of note while trying out different SIP clients, would be useful to know so we can update the Android compatibility list at: http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Ekiga_Interoperability#Android Hmm... I just tried creating an account so that I could update the information, but apparently creating accounts does not work (or I am not allowed to do it...) If somehow I can get an account to edit that info, I would be happy to try and keep it up-to-date and add all possible info concerning Android (2.3.4) compatibility. Created. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
(Bringing this back to the mailing list) On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Bart Vandewoestyne bart.vandewoest...@telenet.be wrote: OK. The tcpdump I did with my android phone is online at http://www.kuleuven-kortrijk.be/~bartv/android.pcap I've configured 4 SIP accounts and they all try to register. These are my findings: 1) For you server, I see a 400 Bad Contact address server response, and as I understand it, this is because of the private IP in the Contact header in the REGISTER message. 2) registration for sip.poivy.com and sip.diamondcard.us seem to work, even with the private IP in the Contact header. Right. 3) registration at ekiga.net fails, server returns a 606 Not Acceptable, probably because of the private IP in the Via header. First one (unregister others) because of the Via, the second because of the Contact. Your previous ekiga.net trace was missing the second REGISTER message, which led me to believe that Via was the main fault. My main questions are: * Do you see a bug in the Android 2.3.4 client? Can it send REGISTER messages with private IP's in the Via and Contact header or is this not allowed? From the traces it looks like it doesn't support any way to traverse NAT. It is not really a bug, but rather important missing feature, something they should do. IPv6 is not going to take over IPv4 any time soon, and there are other good reasons to use NAT (eg. my provider charges me for each public IP). * Is ekiga.net wrong by returning the 606 Not Acceptable? If ekiga.net is wrong, I still feel we should try to convince the ekiga.net admins to make it work... it will be a big step forward for Ekiga on the Android/mobile market. Technically ekiga.net is wrong about the Via (but not Contact), but with no NAT support in phone (either classic STUN or ICE, or whatever), it doesn't make any difference to you. As Damien told in another post, you will experience audio problems (almost certainly). But the cool thing about SIP is you're not tied to a single provider. You can call anyone with a SIP address no matter what your provider is. If the phone has no NAT support, there are multiple providers with media relay, select the one(s) you like, and configure to use their outbound proxy. At least audio should work fine. Cheers -- Ian ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On 20/05/11 08:02 PM, Bart Vandewoestyne wrote: Damien? What's your opinion on changing the ekiga.net config so that these issues get resolved? Kind regards, Bart My concern is that for the end-user this is undermining the usefulness of Ekiga.net, and therefore adoption of Ekiga as a SIP client. I have tested *four* different Mac OS SIP clients from behind a NAT router, and all four of them cannot and will not connect to Ekiga.net: - Jistsi (aka Sip Communicator) - Telephone - Blink - X-Lite 4 For the end-user, I can easily see this as a case of interoperability with Ekiga users potentially not being worth the effort, so move on to something else. It makes evangelising Ekiga for me (and SIP as an alternative to Skype for example) very challenging, when the promoted back-end service is broken with regards to cross-client interoperability. Some further discussion about this with a view to knowing if it can be resolved would be really useful at this point. -- Dave Koelmeyer http://davekoelmeyer.wordpress.com/ ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Dave Koelmeyer davekoelme...@me.com wrote: On 20/05/11 08:02 PM, Bart Vandewoestyne wrote: Damien? What's your opinion on changing the ekiga.net config so that these issues get resolved? Kind regards, Bart My concern is that for the end-user this is undermining the usefulness of Ekiga.net, and therefore adoption of Ekiga as a SIP client. I have tested *four* different Mac OS SIP clients from behind a NAT router, and all four of them cannot and will not connect to Ekiga.net: - Jistsi (aka Sip Communicator) - Telephone - Blink - X-Lite 4 You can add Empathy and Nokia N900 to that list. For the end-user, I can easily see this as a case of interoperability with Ekiga users potentially not being worth the effort, so move on to something else. It makes evangelising Ekiga for me (and SIP as an alternative to Skype for example) very challenging, when the promoted back-end service is broken with regards to cross-client interoperability. Some further discussion about this with a view to knowing if it can be resolved would be really useful at this point. Promoting SIP as an alternative to Skype will always be challenging, due to: 1) The large user base of Skype, and different protocols being used. Although there is an official Skype/SIP gateway, it is paid service, buggy and limited in functionality (you cannot simply call any Skype user). 2) NAT issues. In theory they are applying to Skype as well, but by installing Skype you're agreeing that your computer can be used for relaying other users' traffic, something that's not that easy with SIP. Setting up a dedicated server for media relay however can be expensive, and it doesn't scale well. Also I think that the average user's mindset plays a role here. For the non-computer savvy Jane Doe, VoIP and Skype are synonyms, just like PC and Windows, or, until recently, the Internet and IE. People will use whatever comes preinstalled, and one has to convince them that the alternative is significantly better. Of course sub-par services don't do any good here, but in the same time you cannot expect Damien to provide a media relay server, given that the service is gratis. Just my $.02 -- Ian ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 02:45:58AM +0300, J??nis Rukš??ns wrote: [...] I'm not so sure about this particular case anymore (because of the unregister), but in general, yes, it shouldn't. First, 6xx errors are considered global, and second, it definitely shouldn't give an error on Via. Like I said, the idea is to send the first message to discover one's public address (the server inlcludes it in the response), and then send a second one which should succeed. Keeping the private IP in Via allows some server side tricks to traverse the NAT. If you're willing to experiment, I can give you an access to my own server at work (I'm using it for testing - writing SIP software is what I'm getting paid for). You won't be able to call anyone but at least we'll see if the phone sends the second REGISTER. Let me know if you're up to that, I'll send you the details tomorrow. Nice to hear that people are getting payd for fun jobs like writing SIP software ;-) As for the testing: I also have a SIP account with diamondcard.us and poivy.com and for these accounts I have no problem registering with my Android 2.3.4 phone (not using STUN that is). I've played around with tcpdump and wireshark yesterday evening and iirc this was what was happening with both these accounts: 1) Android phone sends a REGISTER message 2) registrar sends back an error message (something with not authorized or credentials missing or so... if i recall correctly, it was a 401 Unauthorized message...) 3) Android phone sends second REGISTER message, now including some login info (and probably some kind of authentication stuff) 4) registrar sends back 200 OK. This was also from behind my Asus RT-N16 router running dd-wrt. I'm at work now and can't experiment, but I'll make a tcpdump of this flow this evening and put the .pcap file online somewhere. Please be patient for let's say 10 hours ;-) Knowing that these registrations work, confirms my suspision that the problem is really on the ekiga.net server side and not with my phone. From the above, i deduce that one should also be able to make it work *without* a STUN server. Having the STUN support possibility in the Android client would of course also be nice, as that would maybe be a trick to circumvent the ekiga.net server config problem. Damien? What's your opinion on changing the ekiga.net config so that these issues get resolved? Kind regards, Bart -- Share what you know. Learn what you don't. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:31:49AM +0300, J??nis Rukš??ns wrote: Judging from http://www.onsip.com/blog/leo/2011/01/05/our-evaluation-of-android-gingerbreads-native-sip-calling-with-the-nexus-s it seems that the Android SIP client is working fine from behind NAT - the SIP traces show a private IP in Via header, and a public one in Contact. Most likely your registration fails because ekiga.net is apparently configured to require a public IP in both Via and Contact headers. I cannot be 100% sure without seeing the actual SIP messages, but I guess a private IP in Via is why your registration fails. And sending 606 Not Acceptable Anywhere to REGISTER is a violation of the SIP standard on it's own. OK, so if I get things right, there are two possible reasons for me not being able to register with ekiga.net with the native Android 2.3.4 SIP client, namely: 1) it is because the native Android 2.3.4 SIP client does not support a STUN server yet. 2) it is a problem with the ekiga.net server configuration. I would be glad to help out here, but I'm not really sure how I can help. My educated guess is that I should somehow be able to grab the SIP messages from and to my Android phone, but I have no idea how I can do this. I have some basic familiarity with wireshark on Linux, but I have never done packet sniffing on an Android phone. If somebody knows, please let me know how I can get to the real SIP-traffic, so we can diagnose this problem more in depth. Kind regards, Bart -- Share what you know. Learn what you don't. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 09:50:08AM +0200, Bart Vandewoestyne wrote: OK, so if I get things right, there are two possible reasons for me not being able to register with ekiga.net with the native Android 2.3.4 SIP client, namely: 1) it is because the native Android 2.3.4 SIP client does not support a STUN server yet. 2) it is a problem with the ekiga.net server configuration. I would be glad to help out here, but I'm not really sure how I can help. My educated guess is that I should somehow be able to grab the SIP messages from and to my Android phone, but I have no idea how I can do this. I have some basic familiarity with wireshark on Linux, but I have never done packet sniffing on an Android phone. If somebody knows, please let me know how I can get to the real SIP-traffic, so we can diagnose this problem more in depth. OK. I've played a bit around with tcpdump on my dd-wrt Asus RT-N16 router and this is what I did: * turned off my Android phone * issued the following command: root@asus:~# tcpdump -i eth1 host 192.168.1.138 -w sip_capture.pcap * turned on my Android phone and played a bit around * turned off my android phone * CTRL+C the tcpdump command The output (to be visualised with e.g. wireshark) is here: http://www.kuleuven-kortrijk.be/~bartv/sip_capture.pcap All I can see is that the following is happening: 1) an UDP packet is being sent to ekiga.net 2) ekiga.net replies with a SIP message 606 Not Acceptable I cannot judge why sending of 1) results in a 606 Acceptable... I hope more experienced people can tell me what's going wrong here: is the problem on my side (not having STUN support) or is the problem on the ekiga.net server side? Kind regards, Bart -- Share what you know. Learn what you don't. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On 19/05/11 22:48, Bart Vandewoestyne wrote: On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 09:50:08AM +0200, Bart Vandewoestyne wrote: OK, so if I get things right, there are two possible reasons for me not being able to register with ekiga.net with the native Android 2.3.4 SIP client, namely: 1) it is because the native Android 2.3.4 SIP client does not support a STUN server yet. 2) it is a problem with the ekiga.net server configuration. I would be glad to help out here, but I'm not really sure how I can help. My educated guess is that I should somehow be able to grab the SIP messages from and to my Android phone, but I have no idea how I can do this. I have some basic familiarity with wireshark on Linux, but I have never done packet sniffing on an Android phone. If somebody knows, please let me know how I can get to the real SIP-traffic, so we can diagnose this problem more in depth. OK. I've played a bit around with tcpdump on my dd-wrt Asus RT-N16 router and this is what I did: * turned off my Android phone * issued the following command: root@asus:~# tcpdump -i eth1 host 192.168.1.138 -w sip_capture.pcap * turned on my Android phone and played a bit around * turned off my android phone * CTRL+C the tcpdump command The output (to be visualised with e.g. wireshark) is here: http://www.kuleuven-kortrijk.be/~bartv/sip_capture.pcap All I can see is that the following is happening: 1) an UDP packet is being sent to ekiga.net 2) ekiga.net replies with a SIP message 606 Not Acceptable There is a problem with your output. Captured packet is truncated to 62 bytes, so the full SIP packet is not shown. Could you retry tcpdump to have full packets in the file? -- Eugen ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:57:11PM +0200, Eugen Dedu wrote: There is a problem with your output. Captured packet is truncated to 62 bytes, so the full SIP packet is not shown. Could you retry tcpdump to have full packets in the file? I've updated the file, i think we now have the full information. The new version is at the same url, namely http://www.kuleuven-kortrijk.be/~bartv/sip_capture.pcap Please let me know if this is enough info to debug my problem. If not, then let me know what to do. I'm glad to be able to help here! Regards, Bart -- Share what you know. Learn what you don't. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:15:58PM +0200, Bart Vandewoestyne wrote: I've updated the file, i think we now have the full information. The new version is at the same url, namely http://www.kuleuven-kortrijk.be/~bartv/sip_capture.pcap Please let me know if this is enough info to debug my problem. If not, then let me know what to do. I'm glad to be able to help here! OK. I've done some more searching, and this is what I have so far. If I try with Ekiga on my laptop, then this is how a typical REGISTER message looks like: REGISTER sip:ekiga.net SIP/2.0 CSeq: 2 REGISTER Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 178.117.245.74:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1c2c966b-cb80-e011-82e5-00216b30c960;rport User-Agent: Ekiga/3.2.7 From: sip:bart.vandewoest...@ekiga.net;tag=282f826b-cb80-e011-82e5-00216b30c960 Call-ID: 7a1e826b-cb80-e011-82e5-00216b30c960@maverick To: sip:bart.vandewoest...@ekiga.net Contact: sip:Bart.Vandewoestyne@178.117.245.74;q=1, sip:Bart.Vandewoestyne@192.168.1.105;q=0.500 Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,SUBSCRIBE,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE,INFO,PING Expires: 3600 Content-Length: 0 Max-Forwards: 70 If I use my Android phone, then i have REGISTER sip:ekiga.net SIP/2.0 Call-ID: 261a54f294918a1eae37a14f2dc7dc89@192.168.1.138 CSeq: 8429 REGISTER From: Bart.Vandewoestyne sip:bart.vandewoest...@ekiga.net;tag=4156217873 To: Bart.Vandewoestyne sip:bart.vandewoest...@ekiga.net Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.138:45061;branch=z9hG4bK686f4bc2b5692c50ca09b29d1f26e6283531;rport Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: SIPAUA/0.1.001 Contact: * Expires: 0 Content-Length: 0 The most important differences that I notice are: * Ekiga uses the public WAN address of my router in the Via header, whereas my android phone has the local LAN address and port. * Ekiga uses both the public WAN address and the local LAN address in the Contact header, whereas my Android phone simply sets the '*'-symbol. My question to this list is still the same: Is this a bug or a missing feature (STUN) in the native Android client, or is the problem on the ekiga.net server side? Regards, Bart -- Share what you know. Learn what you don't. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Bart Vandewoestyne bart.vandewoest...@telenet.be wrote: On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:15:58PM +0200, Bart Vandewoestyne wrote: I've updated the file, i think we now have the full information. The new version is at the same url, namely http://www.kuleuven-kortrijk.be/~bartv/sip_capture.pcap Please let me know if this is enough info to debug my problem. If not, then let me know what to do. I'm glad to be able to help here! OK. I've done some more searching, and this is what I have so far. If I try with Ekiga on my laptop, then this is how a typical REGISTER message looks like: REGISTER sip:ekiga.net SIP/2.0 CSeq: 2 REGISTER Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 178.117.245.74:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1c2c966b-cb80-e011-82e5-00216b30c960;rport User-Agent: Ekiga/3.2.7 From: sip:bart.vandewoest...@ekiga.net;tag=282f826b-cb80-e011-82e5-00216b30c960 Call-ID: 7a1e826b-cb80-e011-82e5-00216b30c960@maverick To: sip:bart.vandewoest...@ekiga.net Contact: sip:Bart.Vandewoestyne@178.117.245.74;q=1, sip:Bart.Vandewoestyne@192.168.1.105;q=0.500 Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,SUBSCRIBE,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE,INFO,PING Expires: 3600 Content-Length: 0 Max-Forwards: 70 If I use my Android phone, then i have REGISTER sip:ekiga.net SIP/2.0 Call-ID: 261a54f294918a1eae37a14f2dc7dc89@192.168.1.138 CSeq: 8429 REGISTER From: Bart.Vandewoestyne sip:bart.vandewoest...@ekiga.net;tag=4156217873 To: Bart.Vandewoestyne sip:bart.vandewoest...@ekiga.net Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.138:45061;branch=z9hG4bK686f4bc2b5692c50ca09b29d1f26e6283531;rport Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: SIPAUA/0.1.001 Contact: * Expires: 0 Content-Length: 0 The most important differences that I notice are: * Ekiga uses the public WAN address of my router in the Via header, whereas my android phone has the local LAN address and port. * Ekiga uses both the public WAN address and the local LAN address in the Contact header, whereas my Android phone simply sets the '*'-symbol. My question to this list is still the same: Is this a bug or a missing feature (STUN) in the native Android client, or is the problem on the ekiga.net server side? This is something I didn't expect at all - the message your phone sends actually asks ekiga.net to unregister everyone from sip:bart.vandewoest...@ekiga.net. I can only guess why. It could be that the phone is trying to ensure it is only device registered. Whatever the reason, I expected at least two REGISTER messages - the first with the private IP in both Via and Contact (to discover it's public IP), followed by a second one with the public IP in Contact. The unregister could be a bug, but it is also possible that the phone is using it as a way to get the public IP, but doesn't send the second REGISTER because of the 606 error code. -- Ian ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 01:32:03AM +0300, J??nis Rukš??ns wrote: If I use my Android phone, then i have REGISTER sip:ekiga.net SIP/2.0 Call-ID: 261a54f294918a1eae37a14f2dc7dc89@192.168.1.138 CSeq: 8429 REGISTER From: Bart.Vandewoestyne sip:bart.vandewoest...@ekiga.net;tag=4156217873 To: Bart.Vandewoestyne sip:bart.vandewoest...@ekiga.net Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.138:45061;branch=z9hG4bK686f4bc2b5692c50ca09b29d1f26e6283531;rport Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: SIPAUA/0.1.001 Contact: * Expires: 0 Content-Length: 0 [...] This is something I didn't expect at all - the message your phone sends actually asks ekiga.net to unregister everyone from sip:bart.vandewoest...@ekiga.net. I can only guess why. I'm not a SIP-protocol expert. Can you explain me how you see this for the above message? Is it because of the asterisk in the Contact header? I have searched, but couldn't find the meaning of the * in the Contact header. It could be that the phone is trying to ensure it is only device registered. Whatever the reason, I expected at least two REGISTER messages - the first with the private IP in both Via and Contact (to discover it's public IP), followed by a second one with the public IP in Contact. OK. I'll play a bit more around, getting myself more comfortable with tcpdump and wireshark for my SIP-protocol debugging... The unregister could be a bug, but it is also possible that the phone is using it as a way to get the public IP, but doesn't send the second REGISTER because of the 606 error code. OK. And for as far as I understand it from http://www.jitsi.org/index.php/Documentation/FAQ#ekiga.net http://mail.gnome.org/archives/ekiga-list/2010-October/msg00040.html http://mail.gnome.org/archives/ekiga-list/2010-October/msg00041.html ekiga.net should not sent this 606 error, right? So the conclusion is that the problem is actually on the ekiga.net server side and I have to hope that it gets fixed? Regards, Bart -- Share what you know. Learn what you don't. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:34:22PM +, Dave Koelmeyer wrote: Most likely it is neither you nor the Android SIP client. The ekiga.net server has an overly restrictive configuration, which prevents any sufficiently up-to-date SIP client from registering from behind NAT. There have been numerous posts on the list regarding this. I imagine this isn't a trivial issue to fix, but all the same do we know who looks after Ekiga.net and w???ould this be something that could be addressed? Cheers, Dave Dave, According to the info on http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Ekiga.net_VoIP_service_subscription#FAQ it is Damien Sandras who looks after ekiga.net I've searched the mailing list archives for mails from Damien about this issue, but haven't found any the last few months. It would be nice to know what he thinks of the issue in this thread and how it can be fixed... I hope he has the time and is willing to fix it... In my opinion, it would really be a Big step forward for the Open Source VoIP community if the native Android 2.3.4 SIP client could register and work with ekiga.net accounts... Regards, Bart -- Share what you know. Learn what you don't. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Bart Vandewoestyne bart.vandewoest...@telenet.be wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:34:22PM +, Dave Koelmeyer wrote: Most likely it is neither you nor the Android SIP client. The ekiga.net server has an overly restrictive configuration, which prevents any sufficiently up-to-date SIP client from registering from behind NAT. There have been numerous posts on the list regarding this. I imagine this isn't a trivial issue to fix, but all the same do we know who looks after Ekiga.net and w???ould this be something that could be addressed? Cheers, Dave Dave, According to the info on http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Ekiga.net_VoIP_service_subscription#FAQ it is Damien Sandras who looks after ekiga.net I've searched the mailing list archives for mails from Damien about this issue, but haven't found any the last few months. It would be nice to know what he thinks of the issue in this thread and how it can be fixed... I hope he has the time and is willing to fix it... See http://mail.gnome.org/archives/ekiga-list/2011-May/msg00105.html In my opinion, it would really be a Big step forward for the Open Source VoIP community if the native Android 2.3.4 SIP client could register and work with ekiga.net accounts... Well, I'm not so sure about Android anymore, but removing the private Via restriction would allow sofia-sip based clients (Empathy, Maemo, probably some Nokia phones) to work with ekiga.net -- Ian ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Bart Vandewoestyne bart.vandewoest...@telenet.be wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 01:32:03AM +0300, J??nis Rukš??ns wrote: If I use my Android phone, then i have REGISTER sip:ekiga.net SIP/2.0 Call-ID: 261a54f294918a1eae37a14f2dc7dc89@192.168.1.138 CSeq: 8429 REGISTER From: Bart.Vandewoestyne sip:bart.vandewoest...@ekiga.net;tag=4156217873 To: Bart.Vandewoestyne sip:bart.vandewoest...@ekiga.net Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.138:45061;branch=z9hG4bK686f4bc2b5692c50ca09b29d1f26e6283531;rport Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: SIPAUA/0.1.001 Contact: * Expires: 0 Content-Length: 0 [...] This is something I didn't expect at all - the message your phone sends actually asks ekiga.net to unregister everyone from sip:bart.vandewoest...@ekiga.net. I can only guess why. I'm not a SIP-protocol expert. Can you explain me how you see this for the above message? Is it because of the asterisk in the Contact header? I have searched, but couldn't find the meaning of the * in the Contact header. The * in Contact header is allowed only when unregistering (Expires: 0) and means every IP that is currently registered at the particular address in To header. For example, if you have logged in from let's say laptop and work, the above will force both of those clients to log out (given that the server allows it). It could be that the phone is trying to ensure it is only device registered. Whatever the reason, I expected at least two REGISTER messages - the first with the private IP in both Via and Contact (to discover it's public IP), followed by a second one with the public IP in Contact. OK. I'll play a bit more around, getting myself more comfortable with tcpdump and wireshark for my SIP-protocol debugging... The unregister could be a bug, but it is also possible that the phone is using it as a way to get the public IP, but doesn't send the second REGISTER because of the 606 error code. OK. And for as far as I understand it from http://www.jitsi.org/index.php/Documentation/FAQ#ekiga.net http://mail.gnome.org/archives/ekiga-list/2010-October/msg00040.html http://mail.gnome.org/archives/ekiga-list/2010-October/msg00041.html ekiga.net should not sent this 606 error, right? So the conclusion is that the problem is actually on the ekiga.net server side and I have to hope that it gets fixed? I'm not so sure about this particular case anymore (because of the unregister), but in general, yes, it shouldn't. First, 6xx errors are considered global, and second, it definitely shouldn't give an error on Via. Like I said, the idea is to send the first message to discover one's public address (the server inlcludes it in the response), and then send a second one which should succeed. Keeping the private IP in Via allows some server side tricks to traverse the NAT. If you're willing to experiment, I can give you an access to my own server at work (I'm using it for testing - writing SIP software is what I'm getting paid for). You won't be able to call anyone but at least we'll see if the phone sends the second REGISTER. Let me know if you're up to that, I'll send you the details tomorrow. Cheers -- Ian ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On 18/05/11 13:46, Bart Vandewoestyne wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 03:35:07PM +0300, J??nis Rukš??ns wrote: Most likely it is neither you nor the Android SIP client. The ekiga.net server has an overly restrictive configuration, which prevents any sufficiently up-to-date SIP client from registering from behind NAT. There have been numerous posts on the list regarding this. Hmm... having googled around a bit, my guess would rather be that i cannot register because the native Android 2.3.4 SIP client seems not to support STUN. Couldn't this be the major problem for me not being able to register instead of an 'overly restrictive configuration' of the ekiga.net server? If others agree that this lack of STUN support is most likely the reason why my registration fails, then it seems like a good idea to vote for http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=15685 or maybe even add some comments there. This might speedup the STUN support in the native Android 2.3.4 SIP client, thereby making Ekiga much more accessible to the mobile world... Kind regards, Bart STUN is now depreciated - it has been recognised that it really doesn't work very well. David ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
Hello all, I'm trying to use the native Android 2.3.4 SIP client (on my Samsung Google Nexus S) with my Ekiga.net account. Apparently, nothing about it is listed on http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Ekiga_Interoperability#Android so I hope I can help here in testing. I tried adding my Ekiga.net account using (in Android) - Menu - Settings - Call settings - Internet call settings - Accounts - Add account There, I add the following info: Username: MyFirstName.MyLastName Password: my_ekiga_password Server: ekiga.net Set as primary account: selected Under the Optional settings I did not touch anything, so I have Authentication username: left empty Display name: left empty Outbound proxy address: left empty Port number: 5060 Transport type: UDP Send keep-alive: Automatic With these settings, I cannot seem to register myself, I get the error Primary account. Account registration failed: (Not Acceptable (606)); will try later Am I doing something wrong here or can the native Android 2.3.4 SIP client not work with Ekiga accounts yet? If not, then maybe somebody can tell me what features are missing in order to get Ekiga up and running, so we can submit a feature request at http://source.android.com/source/report-bugs.html ? Wouldn't that be a nice step forward? Kind regards, Bart -- Share what you know. Learn what you don't. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
Hi, On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Bart Vandewoestyne With these settings, I cannot seem to register myself, I get the error Primary account. Account registration failed: (Not Acceptable (606)); will try later Am I doing something wrong here or can the native Android 2.3.4 SIP client not work with Ekiga accounts yet? If not, then maybe somebody can tell me what features are missing in order to get Ekiga up and running, so we can submit a feature request at http://source.android.com/source/report-bugs.html ? Wouldn't that be a nice step forward? Most likely it is neither you nor the Android SIP client. The ekiga.net server has an overly restrictive configuration, which prevents any sufficiently up-to-date SIP client from registering from behind NAT. There have been numerous posts on the list regarding this. Best -- Ian ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 03:35:07PM +0300, J??nis Rukš??ns wrote: Most likely it is neither you nor the Android SIP client. The ekiga.net server has an overly restrictive configuration, which prevents any sufficiently up-to-date SIP client from registering from behind NAT. There have been numerous posts on the list regarding this. Hmm... having googled around a bit, my guess would rather be that i cannot register because the native Android 2.3.4 SIP client seems not to support STUN. Couldn't this be the major problem for me not being able to register instead of an 'overly restrictive configuration' of the ekiga.net server? If others agree that this lack of STUN support is most likely the reason why my registration fails, then it seems like a good idea to vote for http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=15685 or maybe even add some comments there. This might speedup the STUN support in the native Android 2.3.4 SIP client, thereby making Ekiga much more accessible to the mobile world... Kind regards, Bart -- Share what you know. Learn what you don't. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net account with Android 2.3.4 native SIP-client
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Bart Vandewoestyne bart.vandewoest...@telenet.be wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 03:35:07PM +0300, J??nis Rukš??ns wrote: Most likely it is neither you nor the Android SIP client. The ekiga.net server has an overly restrictive configuration, which prevents any sufficiently up-to-date SIP client from registering from behind NAT. There have been numerous posts on the list regarding this. Hmm... having googled around a bit, my guess would rather be that i cannot register because the native Android 2.3.4 SIP client seems not to support STUN. Couldn't this be the major problem for me not being able to register instead of an 'overly restrictive configuration' of the ekiga.net server? If others agree that this lack of STUN support is most likely the reason why my registration fails, then it seems like a good idea to vote for Judging from http://www.onsip.com/blog/leo/2011/01/05/our-evaluation-of-android-gingerbreads-native-sip-calling-with-the-nexus-s it seems that the Android SIP client is working fine from behind NAT - the SIP traces show a private IP in Via header, and a public one in Contact. Most likely your registration fails because ekiga.net is apparently configured to require a public IP in both Via and Contact headers. I cannot be 100% sure without seeing the actual SIP messages, but I guess a private IP in Via is why your registration fails. And sending 606 Not Acceptable Anywhere to REGISTER is a violation of the SIP standard on it's own. -- Ian ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] ekiga.net, registration failed: 401 Unauthorized
Using Twinkle, over the last few weeks I've frequently gotten the error ekiga.net, registration failed: 401 Unauthorized from the server. When this happens, the client no longer attempts to register, so I have to re-register manually. This almost never happened before. Nothing has changed at my end so the problem must be at the server. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net down again
On 08/12/10 02:57, Dave Koelmeyer wrote: On 08 Dec, 2010,at 11:32 AM, Allen T Parkertpar...@cpsco.net wrote: The ekiga.net server is down again. It's been down all of today and at least part of yesterday. http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list I am presently getting consistent could not register errors on two machines here (yesterday was okay). Well, here it works right now too. As always, the debug output is needed to track down the problem... -- Eugen ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] ekiga.net down again
The ekiga.net server is down again. It's been down all of today and at least part of yesterday. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net down again
On 07/12/10 23:32, Allen T Parker wrote: The ekiga.net server is down again. It's been down all of today and at least part of yesterday. 5...@ekiga.net is working right now... -- Eugen ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net down again
On 08 Dec, 2010,at 11:32 AM, Allen T Parker tpar...@cpsco.net wrote: The ekiga.net server is down again. It's been down all of today and at least part of yesterday.I am presently getting consistent "could not register" errors on two machines here (yesterday was okay). Cheers,Dave ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net server not properly configured?
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:10 AM, pal...@inwind.it wrote: On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:31:58 -0600 Anthony Base base.anth...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys! Empathy users like me would love to use your Ekiga server, but there's something whacked out about your server configuration that is preventing other clients from connecting to yours. Could you be more specific about the problems encountered by Empathy when trying to connect to ekiga.net? I think the links Anthony provided are very specific about the problems. To reiterate - ekiga.net responds to REGISTER w/ 606 Not Acceptable Anywhere when behind NAT, supposedly because of a private IP in the top Via. This breaks clients that use SIP Outbound for traversing NAT. -- Ian ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net server not properly configured?
Hi guys! Empathy users like me would love to use your Ekiga server, but there's something whacked out about your server configuration that is preventing other clients from connecting to yours. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624751 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=2412241group_id=143636atid=756076 These are some really big showstoppers for VoIP lovers who also want to chat. Is there any chance that these server configurations can be fixed in the near future? Thanks in advance! ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net server not properly configured?
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:31:58 -0600 Anthony Base base.anth...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys! Empathy users like me would love to use your Ekiga server, but there's something whacked out about your server configuration that is preventing other clients from connecting to yours. Besides ekiga, there are at least 4 other clients which are able to connect to an ekiga.net account: twinkle, linphone, asterisk and telephone so maybe the problem is not in the configuration of the ekiga.net server but somewhere else. Could you be more specific about the problems encountered by Empathy when trying to connect to ekiga.net? Best regards, Antonio Palamà -- pal...@inwind.it ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net refuses registering Twinkle
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:03:14 +0200 Eugen Dedu eugen.d...@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr wrote: Hello Antonio, glad to hear from you. I think this is a bug (I do not think there is a preference on Ekiga over other clients), but as I am not admnistrator I cannot be sure. Hello Eugen, it usually happens in late evening after Twinkle has been registered for many hours. I would like to help debbugging but, unfortunately it seems twinkle has no debug option so I will have to cut and paste from the log window or use the command line version with tee. Do you know whom should I mail this logs to find out what happens? Best regards, Antonio -- pal...@inwind.it ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net refuses registering Twinkle
On 28/09/10 09:41, pal...@inwind.it wrote: On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:03:14 +0200 Eugen Dedueugen.d...@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr wrote: Hello Antonio, glad to hear from you. I think this is a bug (I do not think there is a preference on Ekiga over other clients), but as I am not admnistrator I cannot be sure. Hello Eugen, it usually happens in late evening after Twinkle has been registered for many hours. I would like to help debbugging but, unfortunately it seems twinkle has no debug option so I will have to cut and paste from the log window or use the command line version with tee. Do you know whom should I mail this logs to find out what happens? Well, it should be Twinkle developers who need to be contacter. Cheers, -- Eugen ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net refuses registering Twinkle
At random occasions but at least once a day it happens that ekiga.net refuses my registration if I use twinkle 1.4.2 while it accepts registration if I use ekiga 2.0.12, same username and same password of course. Does anybody know if this the normal behaviuor of ekiga.net, maybe due to giving priority to people using ekiga, or if it is a bug? Best regards, Antonio Palamà -- pal...@inwind.it ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net refuses registering Twinkle
On 25/09/10 14:40, pal...@inwind.it wrote: At random occasions but at least once a day it happens that ekiga.net refuses my registration if I use twinkle 1.4.2 while it accepts registration if I use ekiga 2.0.12, same username and same password of course. Does anybody know if this the normal behaviuor of ekiga.net, maybe due to giving priority to people using ekiga, or if it is a bug? Best regards, Hello Antonio, glad to hear from you. I think this is a bug (I do not think there is a preference on Ekiga over other clients), but as I am not admnistrator I cannot be sure. -- Eugen ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net fails to interoperate with non-ekiga SIP clients behind NAT
Hi, was trying to get my ekiga.net account to work with imsdroid softphone for android and put in my information but kept getting failed so, searched on google on how to get ekiga to work with imsdroid and came across the bug 624751 at bugzila which basically says ekiga.net fails to interoperate with non-ekiga sip clients behind NAT. I wanted to know if the bug was fixed already? -- Nikolai Gauntlet Cassanova ncassanov...@gmail.com ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net 3cxphone (Android)
Hi, I have an Android phone and I have never tried 3cxphone as a softphone app but I know that the linphone app works flawlessly to register my ekiga account. The only thing is that I just started playing with the linphone app, so I can't give you an opinion on how well it functions when it comes to calls. Since reading your message, I will have to give 3cxphone a try as I am looking for a good softphone client/app that will work with my ekiga account and allow me to make 100 percent voip calls with out using cellular minutes. If I find out anything on getting 3cxphone registration to work with my ekiga account settings will let you know. On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 16:12 +0200, Kojiro Ame Kamex wrote: I'm trying to get Ekiga.net working with 3cxphone on Android. Sometimes the connection works but most of the time I can't authenticate. Is there anything I can try to fix this? ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list -- Nikolai Gauntlet Cassanova ncassanov...@gmail.com ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net 3cxphone (Android)
I'm trying to get Ekiga.net working with 3cxphone on Android. Sometimes the connection works but most of the time I can't authenticate. Is there anything I can try to fix this? ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net certificate
www.ekiga.net certificate expired on 12/16/2009 What should people do when connecting to the site? Best regards, Antonio -- pal...@inwind.it ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net certificate
Le samedi 19 décembre 2009 à 16:59 +0100, pal...@inwind.it a écrit : www.ekiga.net certificate expired on 12/16/2009 What should people do when connecting to the site? For now, just pass the warning. I'm trying to get my hand on a free certificate... Thank you for bringing it to our attention. Best regards, Yannick Best regards, Antonio ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net service interruption
Le dimanche 01 novembre 2009 à 15:53 +0100, Damien Sandras a écrit : Le dimanche 01 novembre 2009 à 15:06 +0100, Damien Sandras a écrit : Hello to all, Due to an upgrade, Ekiga.net will be unavailable in the following minutes for an undetermined period of time. I apologize for the inconvenience, (but well, it's a free service). The brand new kamailio 1.5.3 is up and running. I will update the configuration soon. It's up and running. You should even receive notifications when your peers are doing calls. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- //\Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/ v_/_ Be IP : http://www.beip.be/ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org/ SIP Phone : sip:dsand...@ekiga.net ___ Ekiga-devel-list mailing list Ekiga-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list
[Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net service interruption
Hello to all, Due to an upgrade, Ekiga.net will be unavailable in the following minutes for an undetermined period of time. I apologize for the inconvenience, (but well, it's a free service). -- _ Damien Sandras (o- //\Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/ v_/_ Be IP : http://www.beip.be/ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org/ SIP Phone : sip:dsand...@ekiga.net ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] ekiga.net STUN server down
The STUN server stun.ekiga.net (alias for stun01.sipphone.com which is Gizmo5's STUN server) has been down for a while. Should Ekiga have its own STUN server? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net
Le mardi 13 octobre 2009 à 12:43 -0700, peasth...@shaw.ca a écrit : Speaking of ekiga.net, can a donation be submitted _via_ Paypal? I have money in an account and prefer to use that rather than a credit card. Yes Paypal works (see the button). Also, I wonder whether https://www.ekiga.net might have a graphical indicator of donation progress vs. target. A thermometer is often used in fundraising, for example. We could use that, but we have no target (and very few donations, perhaps 50 € every 3 months). -- _ Damien Sandras (o- //\Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/ v_/_ Be IP : http://www.beip.be/ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org/ SIP Phone : sip:dsand...@ekiga.net ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net
Le mardi 13 octobre 2009 à 00:31 +0200, W.P. a écrit : Is ekiga.net DEAD? With 3 PROMILLE active users it seems to be. (because of lacking of possibility to edit account?, etc - some time in the past it WAS possible). What relationship do you see between the possibility to edit an account and the fact that it would be dead ? -- _ Damien Sandras (o- //\Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/ v_/_ Be IP : http://www.beip.be/ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org/ SIP Phone : sip:dsand...@ekiga.net ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net
Ok. So this is why I've never been able to register on Ubuntu... /JimmyVolatile On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:11 AM, yannick sev...@free.fr wrote: W.P. a écrit : Is ekiga.net DEAD? With 3 PROMILLE active users it seems to be. (because of lacking of possibility to edit account?, etc - some time in the past it WAS possible). I will start working on this in a few days (in 1 week or 2 most probably) Best regards, Yannick W.P. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net
JimmyVolatile a écrit : Ok. So this is why I've never been able to register on Ubuntu... It is not related. I'm using Ubuntu, and I can register. You issue is something else. /JimmyVolatile On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:11 AM, yannick sev...@free.fr wrote: W.P. a écrit : Is ekiga.net DEAD? With 3 PROMILLE active users it seems to be. (because of lacking of possibility to edit account?, etc - some time in the past it WAS possible). I will start working on this in a few days (in 1 week or 2 most probably) Best regards, Yannick W.P. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] ekiga.net
Speaking of ekiga.net, can a donation be submitted _via_ Paypal? I have money in an account and prefer to use that rather than a credit card. Also, I wonder whether https://www.ekiga.net might have a graphical indicator of donation progress vs. target. A thermometer is often used in fundraising, for example. Thanks, ... Peter E. -- Google pathology workshop ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] ekiga.net
Is ekiga.net DEAD? With 3 PROMILLE active users it seems to be. (because of lacking of possibility to edit account?, etc - some time in the past it WAS possible). W.P. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net
W.P. a écrit : Is ekiga.net DEAD? With 3 PROMILLE active users it seems to be. (because of lacking of possibility to edit account?, etc - some time in the past it WAS possible). I will start working on this in a few days (in 1 week or 2 most probably) Best regards, Yannick W.P. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net server down again
Le jeudi 09 juillet 2009 à 09:41 -0400, Andre Robatino a écrit : The server is down again. It's been down for at least a few hours. It should be back, thanks for warning us! -- _ Damien Sandras (o- //\Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/ v_/_ Be IP : http://www.beip.be/ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org/ SIP Phone : sip:dsand...@ekiga.net ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net server down again
I'm not sure what kind of process is dying on ekiga.net, but sometimes it can be very helpful to use an automatic restarter until the real problem is fixed: #!/bin/sh START_PROC=/usr/local/bin/dying_process -a -b -c NOTIFY_EMAIL=f...@bar.com while :; do $START_PROC EXITSTATUS=$? if [ $EXITSTATUS -gt 128 ]; then echo Process has crashed | /usr/bin/mail -s Crash$NOTIFY_EMAIL elif [ $EXITSTATUS == 0 ]; then echo Normally Stoped exit fi echo Restarting Process sleep 4 done Andre Robatino wrote: The server is down again. It's been down for at least a few hours. -- Jan Willamowius, j...@willamowius.de, http://www.gnugk.org/ ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] ekiga.net server down again
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The server is down again. It's been down for at least a few hours. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkpV84AACgkQ0pavuo9EGO//MgCfaatFlSmtcaiKx86m5QCz2tFu R1cAn2OkNsgR5YYNgm9LnAnkT/7fuOJO =Qs5Q -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] ekiga.net down again
The ekiga.net server is down again. It's been down for at least an hour or two but may have been for much longer. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net down again
Yes. I've been unable to connect for nearly 24 hours. On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 02:03 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: The ekiga.net server is down again. It's been down for at least an hour or two but may have been for much longer. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net down again
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 AFAICT, ekiga.net is down since yesterday, ~19H30 (UTC+0200) Allen T Parker a écrit : Yes. I've been unable to connect for nearly 24 hours. On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 02:03 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: The ekiga.net server is down again. It's been down for at least an hour or two but may have been for much longer. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkn5R1MACgkQaP9jcuuuScDbowCfZXA6L6xDgztLOrnKV+nmFF18 LVAAn0YmRGhiM3Im1R3pTT2HFaBYwlps =j7cN -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net down again
Le mercredi 29 avril 2009 à 23:25 -0700, Allen T Parker a écrit : Yes. I've been unable to connect for nearly 24 hours. I restarted it. However, I'll be offline for several days. If it crashes again, nobody will be able to restart it. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- //\Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/ v_/_ Be IP : http://www.beip.be/ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org/ SIP Phone : sip:dsand...@ekiga.net ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net down again
On 2009 April 29, Damien Sandras wrote: Le mercredi 29 avril 2009 à 23:25 -0700, Allen T Parker a écrit : Yes. I've been unable to connect for nearly 24 hours. I restarted it. However, I'll be offline for several days. If it crashes again, nobody will be able to restart it. But /why/ does it fall over so frequently? Dave NICE CTI Systems UK Limited (NICE) is registered in England under company number, 3403044. The registered office of NICE is at Tollbar Way, Hedge End, Southampton, Hampshire SO30 2ZP. Confidentiality: This communication and any attachments are intended for the above-named persons only and may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Any opinions expressed in this communication are not necessarily those of NICE. If this communication has come to you in error you must take no action based on it, nor must you copy or show it to anyone; please delete/destroy and inform the sender by e-mail immediately. Monitoring: NICE may monitor incoming and outgoing e-mails. Viruses: Although we have taken steps toward ensuring that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net down again
Le jeudi 30 avril 2009 à 07:49 +0100, Dave Higton a écrit : On 2009 April 29, Damien Sandras wrote: Le mercredi 29 avril 2009 à 23:25 -0700, Allen T Parker a écrit : Yes. I've been unable to connect for nearly 24 hours. I restarted it. However, I'll be offline for several days. If it crashes again, nobody will be able to restart it. But /why/ does it fall over so frequently? No idea. We should upgrade it. As long as I do not have an internet connection at home, I can't upgrade it. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- //\Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/ v_/_ Be IP : http://www.beip.be/ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org/ SIP Phone : sip:dsand...@ekiga.net ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net down again
No idea. We should upgrade it. Sounds like a great idea! How do we go about it? Regards, Evan Murphy ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] ekiga.net problems again?
I cannot register to ekiga.net from two computers in different countries for around 30 minutes now. Is there a problem with ekiga.net again? P. __ http://auto.sme.sk - Všetko o autách (novinky, testy, autosalón, autoškola, porovnaj si auto) ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net problems again?
I cannot register to ekiga.net from two computers in different countries for around 30 minutes now. Is there a problem with ekiga.net again? It went down sometime between 2030 and 2050 UTC. It's obvious when running Twinkle since the yellow star turns gray when it's not registered to any server. It would be nice if the Start Tray icon for Ekiga did the same, if there isn't some obvious way to tell (I haven't used Ekiga in a while). smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net problems again?
I cannot register to ekiga.net from two computers in different countries for around 30 minutes now. Is there a problem with ekiga.net again? I've been unable to register from Mexico today as well. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] ekiga.net problems again?
2009/4/26 Andre Robatino an...@bwh.harvard.edu: I cannot register to ekiga.net from two computers in different countries for around 30 minutes now. Is there a problem with ekiga.net again? It went down sometime between 2030 and 2050 UTC. Any updates on this? I still can't connect. ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net numeric aliases
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I'm the one who wrote the new web interface for ekiga.net. I know numeric aliases are important for our users, ufortunately I'm facing quite a lot of troubles in my life and the developement is very, very slow at the moment. The source code is available here: http://webxser.tuxfamily.org/ and a bug for this particular feature has been opened here: http://webxser.tuxfamily.org/flyspray/index.php?do=detailstask_id=5 but the plan is first to move the webinterface to drupal first. Still if anyone want to add this feature in the meantime to webxser, this help will be welcome. Sorry for not being able to help you now, Best regards, Yannick Simos a écrit : 2009/3/25 Catalin Francu c...@francu.com: Hi Simos, Well, I'm new to ekiga, but if I understand correctly, each account, say sip:j...@ekiga.net, can have a numeric alias, say 1234...@ekiga.net, so that I can call John from an ATA (i.e., my phone has a numeric keypad, but not a full keyboard). I understand this functionality used to exist, but was removed sometime in 2008, along with the web-based account maintenance. I just cast my vote to bring it back. :-) I will look up this issue in Bugzilla, thanks for the pointer. I see. It looks like this issue is not an Ekiga issue but a feature in the SIP server at ekiga.net. That is, the SIP server at ekiga.net could be configured to allow these 'numeric aliases', that correspond to some index number (for example, the first person which subscribed to ekiga.net is 1, the second is 10001 and so on). For this, you can ask the admin at ekiga.net. I am not sure if s/he reads this list. It could be possible for Ekiga to provide support with a smart way that assigns numbers to individual accounts that you may have in your addressbook, something similar to the feature you have on a mobile phone. For example, when you dial '1' and it takes you to an entry in your addressbook that you configured earlier. Such a feature would work well when you have many different SIP providers enabled in your Ekiga. If you feel this would be more reasonable, then you need to search at bugzilla.gnome.org as instructed before. Hope this helps, Simos On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Simos simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote: 2009/3/25 Catalin Francu c...@francu.com: Hi, First of all, thanks for Ekiga! Second, I'd like to add my vote to bring back the web interface, or at least the numeric alias feature. As a bit of background, I am looking for a new VoIP provider for a circle of about 20 family and friends. We have used FreeWorldDialup in the past, and even paid for membership in 2008, but their service has been appalling lately. We all use Handytone 286/386/486 ATAs, and we would like to keep using them. Most of these people are non-technical users and they would have a hard time using a soft phone; besides, they are not in the habit of keeping their computers on 24/7. Me and my brother took the time to set up and configure all these ATAs. Now we would love to switch to ekiga.net (we have been free software fans for many years), but to do so, we need numerical aliases in order to continue using ATAs and regular phones. There are several advantages to using an ATA over a soft phone: there is no need to keep the computer up 24/7, we can use any phone we like (e.g. a cordless one or an answering machine) etc. Please, bring back numeric aliases! I am not sure what you mean with numeric aliases. Can you give an example? The way to go forward with this request is to 1. Check at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=ekiga is the issue has been already reported. You normally go through the bug reports and try to find a similar request. 2. If [1] was fruitful, subscribe to the bug report. 3. If [2] was not fruitful, then you can add a bug report (of the type 'feature request') and put here the URL to this bug report. Other users that are interested can subscribe to the report and add their input. Hope this helps, Simos ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknLQJsACgkQaP9jcuuuScBCowCggsUwHfRPRv5RiCJU13bhyL+4 hHYAnirsS0yfMJzE1ImeuPTfqfv2QerK =GYWs -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
[Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net numeric aliases
Hi, First of all, thanks for Ekiga! Second, I'd like to add my vote to bring back the web interface, or at least the numeric alias feature. As a bit of background, I am looking for a new VoIP provider for a circle of about 20 family and friends. We have used FreeWorldDialup in the past, and even paid for membership in 2008, but their service has been appalling lately. We all use Handytone 286/386/486 ATAs, and we would like to keep using them. Most of these people are non-technical users and they would have a hard time using a soft phone; besides, they are not in the habit of keeping their computers on 24/7. Me and my brother took the time to set up and configure all these ATAs. Now we would love to switch to ekiga.net (we have been free software fans for many years), but to do so, we need numerical aliases in order to continue using ATAs and regular phones. There are several advantages to using an ATA over a soft phone: there is no need to keep the computer up 24/7, we can use any phone we like (e.g. a cordless one or an answering machine) etc. Please, bring back numeric aliases! Cheers, Catalin ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net numeric aliases
2009/3/25 Catalin Francu c...@francu.com: Hi, First of all, thanks for Ekiga! Second, I'd like to add my vote to bring back the web interface, or at least the numeric alias feature. As a bit of background, I am looking for a new VoIP provider for a circle of about 20 family and friends. We have used FreeWorldDialup in the past, and even paid for membership in 2008, but their service has been appalling lately. We all use Handytone 286/386/486 ATAs, and we would like to keep using them. Most of these people are non-technical users and they would have a hard time using a soft phone; besides, they are not in the habit of keeping their computers on 24/7. Me and my brother took the time to set up and configure all these ATAs. Now we would love to switch to ekiga.net (we have been free software fans for many years), but to do so, we need numerical aliases in order to continue using ATAs and regular phones. There are several advantages to using an ATA over a soft phone: there is no need to keep the computer up 24/7, we can use any phone we like (e.g. a cordless one or an answering machine) etc. Please, bring back numeric aliases! I am not sure what you mean with numeric aliases. Can you give an example? The way to go forward with this request is to 1. Check at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=ekiga is the issue has been already reported. You normally go through the bug reports and try to find a similar request. 2. If [1] was fruitful, subscribe to the bug report. 3. If [2] was not fruitful, then you can add a bug report (of the type 'feature request') and put here the URL to this bug report. Other users that are interested can subscribe to the report and add their input. Hope this helps, Simos ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga.net numeric aliases
Hi Simos, Well, I'm new to ekiga, but if I understand correctly, each account, say sip:j...@ekiga.net sip%3aj...@ekiga.net, can have a numeric alias, say 1234...@ekiga.net, so that I can call John from an ATA (i.e., my phone has a numeric keypad, but not a full keyboard). I understand this functionality used to exist, but was removed sometime in 2008, along with the web-based account maintenance. I just cast my vote to bring it back. :-) I will look up this issue in Bugzilla, thanks for the pointer. Catalin On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Simos simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote: 2009/3/25 Catalin Francu c...@francu.com: Hi, First of all, thanks for Ekiga! Second, I'd like to add my vote to bring back the web interface, or at least the numeric alias feature. As a bit of background, I am looking for a new VoIP provider for a circle of about 20 family and friends. We have used FreeWorldDialup in the past, and even paid for membership in 2008, but their service has been appalling lately. We all use Handytone 286/386/486 ATAs, and we would like to keep using them. Most of these people are non-technical users and they would have a hard time using a soft phone; besides, they are not in the habit of keeping their computers on 24/7. Me and my brother took the time to set up and configure all these ATAs. Now we would love to switch to ekiga.net (we have been free software fans for many years), but to do so, we need numerical aliases in order to continue using ATAs and regular phones. There are several advantages to using an ATA over a soft phone: there is no need to keep the computer up 24/7, we can use any phone we like (e.g. a cordless one or an answering machine) etc. Please, bring back numeric aliases! I am not sure what you mean with numeric aliases. Can you give an example? The way to go forward with this request is to 1. Check at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=ekiga is the issue has been already reported. You normally go through the bug reports and try to find a similar request. 2. If [1] was fruitful, subscribe to the bug report. 3. If [2] was not fruitful, then you can add a bug report (of the type 'feature request') and put here the URL to this bug report. Other users that are interested can subscribe to the report and add their input. Hope this helps, Simos ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list ___ ekiga-list mailing list ekiga-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list