Re: [Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
I too would like to be able to send low power RF to my SGC to tune it.

I'm NOT asking for a f/w change right now, my suggestion below requires it
be incorporated with the capability of controlling the KAT3 on individual
antennas.

A menu option that sets the power you wish to use. The function is invoked
via the 'ATU TUNE' button and sends a carrier out the current ANT socket for
as long as the button is pressed (is it possible to press a button in this
way?). 

This would save using one of the PF buttons and since with the KAT3 'off'
for that antenna, the button is 'free' it's a logical, labelled choice
(external 'ATU TUNE').

I think there was discussion of being able to key this via the ACC connector
and that would work well for me too - using a push button on a lead.


It's possible to put the Yaesu FT-897 into 20W carrier transmit by grounding
a 'little brown wire', indicating the rig is on battery power (limits power
to 20W) AND grounding the ring of the ACC connector, intended to 'key' the
rig.

I'd like to be able to use a lot less power than that, the SG-237 will tune
up on 3W.


On 25/9/07 06:32, Dave G4AON [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
 A useful feature that was mentioned a long time ago (and put on the back
 burner I think), was adding a programmable transmit feature to one the
 PF buttons to give a carrier for linear/ATU tuning. I have this
 feature on my Kenwood TS-480 and find it invaluable. Pressing thw 480's
 PF button toggles a carrier on and off (regardless of mode), the carrier
 level can be adjusted while it's transmitting via the normal power
 setting route and can be set anywhere from 5 to 100 Watts in one Watt
 steps (the power setting limits of the 480). The power level is stored
 and occurs regardless of the main power level setting, so for example if
 I'm set for 5 Watts of QRP CW, pressing the button gives me 10 Watts for
 the external MFJ auto ATU. If I'm using my valve linear and have the 480
 set at 25 Watts on SSB, pressing the PF button gives me 10 Watts to tune
 the linear with. This is similar, if not the same functionality, as
 those external 3rd party button boxes do for the Yaesu FT817/857/897 rigs
-- 
The high minded man must care more for the truth than for what people
think. -Aristotle, philosopher (384-322 BCE)


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread Alexandr Kobranov



Dave G4AON napsal(a):
I seem to be missing the point of this PTT CW keying thing... Is it for 
transverter/linear/mast head pre-amp use on VHF/UHF?



BINGO!

Great job made by Elecraft!

Thanks!

73!
Lexa, ok1dst


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread Julian G4ILO
This capability is exactly what I'd like to see, too. I'm actually
using a manual external tuner on ANT B. I can tune using as little as
1W. Ideally, I'd like the option (which David didn't request) to see
the SWR when tuning. In K2 terminology, I'd like to have CAL S mode
automatically selected on one antenna socket and AUTO on the other.
The ability to set the power level for tuning independently of the
main power control would be a real bonus.

-- 
Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392  K3 s/n: ???
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Ham-Directory: www.ham-directory.com


On 9/25/07, David Ferrington, M0XDF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I too would like to be able to send low power RF to my SGC to tune it.

 I'm NOT asking for a f/w change right now, my suggestion below requires it
 be incorporated with the capability of controlling the KAT3 on individual
 antennas.

 A menu option that sets the power you wish to use. The function is invoked
 via the 'ATU TUNE' button and sends a carrier out the current ANT socket for
 as long as the button is pressed (is it possible to press a button in this
 way?).

 This would save using one of the PF buttons and since with the KAT3 'off'
 for that antenna, the button is 'free' it's a logical, labelled choice
 (external 'ATU TUNE').

 I think there was discussion of being able to key this via the ACC connector
 and that would work well for me too - using a push button on a lead.


 It's possible to put the Yaesu FT-897 into 20W carrier transmit by grounding
 a 'little brown wire', indicating the rig is on battery power (limits power
 to 20W) AND grounding the ring of the ACC connector, intended to 'key' the
 rig.

 I'd like to be able to use a lot less power than that, the SG-237 will tune
 up on 3W.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
Yes, watching the SWR would be good (I'd assumed that would be there).
I use an ext. SWR meter, but watching the SWR as the SGC tunes via the K3
display would be much nicer.

On 25/9/07 09:00, Julian G4ILO [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:

 This capability is exactly what I'd like to see, too. I'm actually
 using a manual external tuner on ANT B. I can tune using as little as
 1W. Ideally, I'd like the option (which David didn't request) to see
 the SWR when tuning. In K2 terminology, I'd like to have CAL S mode
 automatically selected on one antenna socket and AUTO on the other.
 The ability to set the power level for tuning independently of the
 main power control would be a real bonus.

-- 
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we
created them. -Albert Einstein, physicist, Nobel laureate (1879-1955)


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done! (PF Tuning button)

2007-09-25 Thread Dave G4AON
SWR is displayed on the TS-480 when using the PF button to generate a 
carrier.


The function works perfectly on the Kenwood rig, no need to re-invent 
things - just a little copying/cheating would be fine by me.


73 Dave, G4AON
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread Ed K1EP
At 9/24/2007 11:27 PM, Vic K2VCO wrote:
Joe, aa4nn wrote:
Do you mean
...closing PTT has no effect because QSK already
has you in transmit mode?
Or while in QSK mode must you closs PTT in order to transmit?
de Joe, aa4nn

There are three modes available.

1) PTT

2) Semi-QSK

3) QSK

In QSK mode, you just hit the key to transmit. That's all. In PTT mode, you 
must close PTT, which switches to TX mode, and then hitting the key transmits.

If you are in QSK mode, closing the PTT switch will put you in transmit mode. 
But the key is NOT disabled when PTT is open.

That is great!  I am amazed at how quickly the idea was accepted, implemented 
and tested considering the fact that Elecraft is concentrating on getting the 
FCS out the door.  Probably another example of feature creep, but one that is 
much appreciated.  

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread Julian G4ILO
So do I, but when using such a low power level for tuning, the minimum
is much easier to observe using the digital meter than the analog one.

-- 
Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392  K3 s/n: ???
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Ham-Directory: www.ham-directory.com


On 9/25/07, David Ferrington, M0XDF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yes, watching the SWR would be good (I'd assumed that would be there).
 I use an ext. SWR meter, but watching the SWR as the SGC tunes via the K3
 display would be much nicer.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread Ed Muns
 I seem to be missing the point of this PTT CW keying thing... 
 Is it for transverter/linear/mast head pre-amp use on VHF/UHF?

I don't know, but that certainly hasn't been the focus of our discussion of
this feature.  It is simply providing PTT-only control of transmission for
the CW mode, just like PTT works in SSB.  The transmit mode is 100%
controlled by the PTT line rather than transmission being turned on and off
in the QSK or SEMI break-in modes by PADDLE or KEY closures.  Some CW
operators prefer PTT-only over QSK or SEMI break-in.  Some SO2R controllers
and other station control units depend on this feature.  I understand that
it is required for some VHF/UHF transverter operations.  CW PTT-only (i.e.,
QSK and SEMI break-in are disabled) is on every transceiver except the K2,
as several postings have reiterated recently on this reflector.

 A useful feature that was mentioned a long time ago (and put 
 on the back burner I think), was adding a programmable 
 transmit feature to one the PF buttons to give a carrier 
 for linear/ATU tuning. I have this feature on my Kenwood 
 TS-480 and find it invaluable. Pressing thw 480's PF button 
 toggles a carrier on and off (regardless of mode), the 
 carrier level can be adjusted while it's transmitting via the 
 normal power setting route and can be set anywhere from 5 to 
 100 Watts in one Watt steps (the power setting limits of the 
 480). The power level is stored and occurs regardless of the 
 main power level setting, so for example if I'm set for 5 
 Watts of QRP CW, pressing the button gives me 10 Watts for 
 the external MFJ auto ATU. If I'm using my valve linear and 
 have the 480 set at 25 Watts on SSB, pressing the PF button 
 gives me 10 Watts to tune the linear with. This is similar, 
 if not the same functionality, as those external 3rd party 
 button boxes do for the Yaesu FT817/857/897 rigs
 
 Has this use of one of the three PF buttons been included yet?

The TUNE button on the K3, as on the K2, transmits a carrier at the power
level set on the POWER control.  There is not yet a dedicated button or even
a Function that could be assigned to a PF button, that transmits a carrier
at a reduced power level.  With the KAT3 installed, though, you can tap ATU
and get a five-watt carrier transmitted to tune the KAT3.  I find myself
using that button for just the purpose you describe.  It transmits 5 watts
and auto-tunes the KAT3 to match the input circuit of my linear amplifiers.
While I certainly don't need those inputs (since they are nominally 50
ohms), I do it anyway just to make use of the five watts, as you desire, for
preliminary tuning of the linear.  I then follow that with the TUNE button
and the POWER set at, say, 50 watts for final tweaking of the linear for
1500 watts output.

BTW, there are 10 PF buttons now on the K3, not three as on the earlier
front panel renderings.  PF1 and PF2 are hold operations on the RIT and XIT
buttons, while both tap and hold operations on the M1-M4 buttons can be used
for PF functions instead of message buffers (on a one by one basis).

73,
Ed - W0YK

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread Ed Muns
 That is great!  I am amazed at how quickly the idea was 
 accepted, implemented and tested considering the fact that 
 Elecraft is concentrating on getting the FCS out the door.  
 Probably another example of feature creep, but one that is 
 much appreciated.

Well, I've been campaigning for this during field test for two months now.
Many of our field testers prefer to use QSK and/or SEMI break-in all the
time on CW and don't see a need for PTT-only CW transmission control.
Thanks to you and others speaking up, it is clear that this standard feature
on all radios is really being used by a number of operators.  I wouldn't
call it feature creep, but rather a basic feature that should be in every
radio.

73,
Ed - W0YK

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread gw0etf
Don wrote the  following:

Joe  and all,

I have the same questions.

Since no one has explained the  difference between 'Transmit mode' and 
the K3 is now transmitting since QSK  has been started with a keypress 
- I would believe that the PTT input is  redundant when in QSK or 
Semi-break-in modes.

Yes, a little  clarification (or language lessons) seem to be appropriate 
here.
How is  'Transmit mode' different from 'transmitting already because the 
key was  tapped'?
Does closing PTT when in QSK mode inhibit a return to receive until  the 
PTT is released? - that is the only thing I can think of.

It  certainly seems that the generation of RF is controlled by the 
paddles in  any case (except for the new TX inhibit condition).  A few 
things were  clarified, but confusion still reigns high in my mind.

73,
Don  W3FPR


 Am I missing something or is this PTT stuff simply the same as MOX (in a  
Yaesu)?
 Pressing MOX is the same as pressing the PTT and holding it there  until 
switched off. TX light is on, RX is muted (ie Transmit Mode) and hitting  the 
key will transmit RF - it overrides both QSK and VOX. MOX will only actually  
put out RF of it's own accord in AM or FM modes that involve a carrier.
  
 In QSK, both MOX and VOX are disengaged and Break-In is switched in. Now  
hitting the key simultaneously kicks in the PTT and transmits RF but only for  
the duration of the key press.
  
 I thought this is pretty standard stuff and would assume the K3 would more  or 
less follow this protocol. But as I say maybe I've missed something subtle in  
the discussion in which case I'll apologise and go back to sleep.
  
 73,
 Stewart Rolfe, GW0ETF
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread Joe, aa4nn
Thanks for good explanatiion of PTT in K3.

I would also hope that the K3 carrys
forward the 8R feature built into the K2.
This keys some amps perfectly well.

de Joe, aa4nn

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread Ed Muns
  Am I missing something or is this PTT stuff simply the same 
 as MOX (in a  Yaesu)?

PTT is a jack on the K3 rear panel that performs as you describe MOX below
when it is shorted to ground.  Typically a footswitch is connected to the
PTT jack.  QSK and SEMI break-in are disabled in this mode.

However, the opposite is not true.  That is, PTT is still enabled when QSK
and SEMI break-in are active.  However, in this case, QSK or SEMI break-in
will over-ride PTT and put the K3 into transmit whether or not PTT is
closed.  And, if PTT is released (open), transmission can still continue, or
commence, whenever there is a key closure.

  Pressing MOX is the same as pressing the PTT and holding it 
 there  until switched off. TX light is on, RX is muted (ie 
 Transmit Mode) and hitting  the key will transmit RF - it 
 overrides both QSK and VOX. MOX will only actually  put out 
 RF of it's own accord in AM or FM modes that involve a carrier.
   
  In QSK, both MOX and VOX are disengaged and Break-In is 
 switched in. Now  hitting the key simultaneously kicks in the 
 PTT and transmits RF but only for  the duration of the key press.
   
  I thought this is pretty standard stuff and would assume the 
 K3 would more  or less follow this protocol. But as I say 
 maybe I've missed something subtle in  the discussion in 
 which case I'll apologise and go back to sleep.

Yes, PTT-only CW is very standard.  It is on every radio, perhaps named
differently, that I'm aware of except the K2.  All that's happening here is
making sure this standard capability is included in the K3.  It seems like
big deal because of all the discussion and length of the reflector threads.

73,
Ed - W0YK

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread Ed Muns
 I would also hope that the K3 carrys
 forward the 8R feature built into the K2.
 This keys some amps perfectly well.

Amplifier keying provided via the KEY OUT jack on the K3 rear panel.

73,
Ed - W0YK

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread Bill Tippett



W0YK:
Thanks to you and others speaking up, it is clear that this standard feature
on all radios is really being used by a number of operators.  I wouldn't
call it feature creep, but rather a basic feature that should be in every
radio.

Yes, it's been in such popular rigs as the TS-930S
and FT-1000MP since their beginning.  Full break-in (QSK),
Semi break-in (or VOX) and PTT (or MOX).  Indeed there's a
place for all three and thanks to Elecraft for listening.

I like the quote from Wayne I recall shortly
after the K3 was introduced.

##
(Paraphrased) Customer's inputs can be heard and ignored
...except around here.
##

If every company tattooed this on their employees'
foreheads, a lot more of them would still be in
business today.

73,  Bill  W4ZV
















___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3-Zerobeat and sidetone

2007-09-25 Thread Thom LaCosta
If the sidetone in the K3 is adjusted to a value other than default(which is ?), 
is the offset adjusted along with it?  Does one need to realign anything if the 
sidetone frequency is adjusted?


What indication(s) does the K3 provide for zerobeat?

thanks

73 - k3hrn
Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 cw PTT done...FB OM!

2007-09-25 Thread DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL
Gee whiz...go to bed early for one night and you miss all the good stuff.

Okay, cw PTT is done.  That's just great!

I guess this is one more difference between E and TT - and
clearly on the plus side for E.

Well done gents; kudos, and all that.

de Doug KR2Q
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 PTT - WHHTLOT

2007-09-25 Thread Fred (FL)
After the 28 posts on K3 PTT, I'm thinking we
haven't heard the last of this!

Wow - 45 versions and re-explanations of what the
K3 PTT function is.  In just CW?  As a non-contestor,
getting back into hamradio ham - I'm starting to 
think the K3 is getting perhaps too complex, for
normal operation.  I'm serious.  Its starting to
resemble a 747 dashboard.

Foot switches, PTT's, Key Down, Key Up, RF
Out, No RF, No Receive, Receive ..
and Knife Switches!  PTT CW?  PTT SSB,
PTT WFM?  Neon tuning tube?  Who's on first?

I hope Elecraft has a very good Technical Writer
on this one.  Lots of room, for misinterpretaton
and confusion remains IMHO.   When even Don,
got into this - I knew it was a confusing
topic.  Sounds like a long well-worded 
paragraph or 2, with some flow diagrams is in
order.  And especially include it in the 
preliminary startup description.

N3CSY
de Fred





  

Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings, 
and more!
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/3658 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PTT - WHHTLOT

2007-09-25 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
Not being rude, but you tried to drive an FT-2000 or worse an FT-857 where
nearly everything is on menus!

So far, this is looking like an easy ride, but with every comfort you could
imagine.


On 25/9/07 12:38, Fred (FL) [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:

 Its starting to
 resemble a 747 dashboard.

-- 
Children aren't happy without something to ignore, And that's what
parents were created for. -Ogden Nash (1902-1971)




___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] WHHTLOT ?

2007-09-25 Thread Darwin, Keith
Ah, um, what is WHHTLOT?

Reply directly if it is not something for public consumption ...

keith.darwin (dit-dah  dah) goodrich.com

- Keith N1AS - 
- K2 5411.ssb.100 - 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread Tom Hammond

Hi Vic:

You didn't mention it, but I'm assuming that this is with QSK and 
SEMI-QSK NOT invoked, right?


Haven't loaded the latest firmware release... busy yesterday... will 
do so though.


73,

Tom

At 22:15 09/24/2007, Vic K2VCO wrote:
I just loaded Wayne's latest K3 firmware, and (in addition to other 
neat stuff), there is a new PTT mode for CW which does this:


1) When PTT is open, hitting the key gives you sidetone but no RF.

2) When PTT is closed, you go into TX mode for as long as it's 
closed. Hitting the key then makes sidetone and RF.


This is in addition to the regular semi- and full-QSK modes. AND, if 
you are in semi- or full-QSK mode, closing PTT still puts you in transmit mode.


One day from clamor on reflector to beta testing!
--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread Tom Hammond

Hi Vic:

DISREGARD - Just re-read the bottom of your previous message... sorry.

Tom

_ I errantly wrote _

You didn't mention it, but I'm assuming that this is with QSK and 
SEMI-QSK NOT invoked, right?


Haven't loaded the latest firmware release... busy yesterday... will 
do so though.


73,

Tom

At 22:15 09/24/2007, Vic K2VCO wrote:
I just loaded Wayne's latest K3 firmware, and (in addition to other 
neat stuff), there is a new PTT mode for CW which does this:


1) When PTT is open, hitting the key gives you sidetone but no RF.

2) When PTT is closed, you go into TX mode for as long as it's 
closed. Hitting the key then makes sidetone and RF.


This is in addition to the regular semi- and full-QSK modes. AND, if 
you are in semi- or full-QSK mode, closing PTT still puts you in transmit mode.


One day from clamor on reflector to beta testing!
--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K-3 PTT

2007-09-25 Thread waltk8cv4612amos
So, if you have an old dog slow linear, you mash the foot switch and then 
hit the key line with the computer and when the computer is DONE you finally 
release the foot switch :-) Looks like  MISSION ACCOMPLISHED  to me 
.. :-)


Walt K8CV Royal Oak, MI. 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 cw PTT done...FB OM!

2007-09-25 Thread Tree
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 07:09:40AM -0400, DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL wrote:

 Gee whiz...go to bed early for one night and you miss all the good stuff.
 
 Okay, cw PTT is done.  That's just great!
 
 I guess this is one more difference between E and TT - and
 clearly on the plus side for E.
 
 Well done gents; kudos, and all that.

Us Beta Tester kids have been seeing this happen almost every day.

Tree
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 'puter Architecture Question

2007-09-25 Thread Goody K3NG
I'm curious what controller/microprocessor(s) is/are used in the K3 and 
what languages or development tools are used to program it at Elecraft?


TIA
73
Goody
K3NG

--
Blog: http://thek3ngreport.blogspot.com/

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PTT - WHHTLOT

2007-09-25 Thread Don Wilhelm

Fred,

I believe it has been clarified now - many thanks to Vic and Ed.  The 
problem that I saw was that different folks had a different view of what 
Transmit Mode meant when in CW mode.  I would prefer the use of 
Transmit State instead to describe a state of the hardware apart from 
the generation of RF by the paddles (or computer, etc.).


The prior discussion of what the action of a PTT closure while QSK or 
Semi-QSK were selected caused further drift of the terminology.


In other words, everyone knew what they were thinking, but I am not sure 
everyone knew what everyone else meant. So I had to ask.


73,
Don W3FPR

Fred (FL) wrote:

I hope Elecraft has a very good Technical Writer
on this one.  Lots of room, for misinterpretaton
and confusion remains IMHO.   When even Don,
got into this - I knew it was a confusing
topic.  Sounds like a long well-worded 
paragraph or 2, with some flow diagrams is in
order.  And especially include it in the 
preliminary startup description.


N3CSY
de Fred





  

Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings, 
and more!
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/3658 
___

Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


  

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread Tom Hammond

Hi Don, et al:

Since no one has explained the difference between 'Transmit mode' 
and the K3 is now transmitting since QSK has been started with a 
keypress - I would believe that the PTT input is redundant when in 
QSK or Semi-break-in modes.


Actually, it' might not all that redundant, since there ARE times 
when, even in QSK,
you might NOT want to allow the rig to return immediately to RX... 
WHILE SENDING...
for instance when you're in the middle of a transmission and someone 
(not the guy
you're sending to) REALLY LOAD comes on the same freq. You might not 
want to hear
the QRM from the other station (which your guy might well not be able 
to hear due to
prop.) until you complete whatever it is you're sending (since it'd 
just ass the the
confusion). Just hit the foot switch (connected to PTT) and you'll 
mute the RX until

you let up on the footswitch.


Yes, a little clarification (or language lessons) seem to be appropriate here.
How is 'Transmit mode' different from 'transmitting already because 
the key was tapped'?
Does closing PTT when in QSK mode inhibit a return to receive until 
the PTT is released? - that is the only thing I can think of.


My guess it that yes, it will inhibit auto-return to RX upon key release.

It certainly seems that the generation of RF is controlled by the 
paddles in any case (except for the new TX inhibit condition).  A 
few things were clarified, but confusion still reigns high in my mind.


73,

Tom   N0SS

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K-2 headphone jack

2007-09-25 Thread Jeremiah McCarthy
One way to eliminate the problem (I have never had it) with the front panel 
headphone jack in the K-2 is to use the rear panel mounted external speaker 
jack, which is less convenient, but more reliable...While this will energize 
only one side of the headset, the jack is a standard 1/8 mono phone jack, 
easily replaceable...One could use a monaural headset, or install a stereo jack 
and wire it so that both sides of the headphones work...This will not work if 
the front panel jack has already failed...

Jerry, wa2dkg
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Zerobeat and sidetone

2007-09-25 Thread Thom LaCosta

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Tree wrote:


On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 06:43:28AM -0400, Thom LaCosta wrote:


If the sidetone in the K3 is adjusted to a value other than default(which
is ?), is the offset adjusted along with it?  Does one need to realign
anything if the sidetone frequency is adjusted?


Nope - the filters come along for the ride - free of charge.


Great...and the tone itself can be adjusted?  I favor the lower tones.



What indication(s) does the K3 provide for zerobeat?


You can press the SPOT button and hear the offset tone while tuning in
the station.


And it changes pitch as one gets closer to zerobeat?


You can enable the CWT feature - which gives an indication of the beat
not with respect to zero beat.  In this mode - pressing the SPOT button
will enable the AUTO SPOT feature - and the radio will tune in the station
automatically.


That's really nice..

thanks for the info.

73 - k3hrn
Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread Bill W5WVO

Tom Hammond wrote:
Actually, it' might not all that redundant, since there ARE times when, even 
in QSK, you might NOT want to allow the rig to return immediately to RX... 
WHILE SENDING... for instance when you're in the middle of a transmission 
and someone
(not the guy you're sending to) REALLY LOUD comes on the same freq. You 
might not want to hear the QRM from the other station (which your guy might 
well not be able to hear due to prop.) until you complete whatever it is 
you're sending...
Just hit the foot switch (connected to PTT) and you'll mute the RX until you 
let up on the footswitch.


The scenario you articulate here is EXACTLY why many CW contesters prefer PTT 
on CW. Listening to all the QRM while you're transmitting, and having to focus 
on your own sending while doing so, gets exhausting after a while, and when 
you get mentally exhausted, errors ensue.


This is the way virtually all IKenSu transceivers work today. In other words, 
PTT has priority. It's as simple as that. Pressing PTT puts the rig into TX 
state, muting the RX, until it is released. Doesn't matter if you're doing QSK 
or semi-QSK. Hitting the foot switch overrides that functionality instantly 
for as long as it's held down (but no longer).


I don't think this is quite what the Elecraft implementation does, as it 
sounds like you have to actually be in PTT mode by manual operator setting 
in order for PTT to put the rig into the CW TX state. This is probably fine, 
as most ops will either prefer to use PTT CW or one of the other modes, and 
won't feel the need to be able to override in QSK or semi-QSK modes. But the 
override method is how most rigs work today, at least the ones I've used.


Bill W5WVO




Yes, a little clarification (or language lessons) seem to be
appropriate here. How is 'Transmit mode' different from
'transmitting already because the key was tapped'?
Does closing PTT when in QSK mode inhibit a return to receive until
the PTT is released? - that is the only thing I can think of.


My guess it that yes, it will inhibit auto-return to RX upon key
release.

It certainly seems that the generation of RF is controlled by the
paddles in any case (except for the new TX inhibit condition).  A
few things were clarified, but confusion still reigns high in my
mind.


73,

Tom   N0SS

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread Thom LaCosta

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Bill W5WVO wrote:


Tom Hammond wrote:
Just hit the foot switch (connected to PTT) and you'll mute the RX until 
you let up on the footswitch.



Would the same apply to SSB or AM operation for the monologists in the crowd?

73 - l3hrn

Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Zerobeat and sidetone

2007-09-25 Thread Vic K2VCO

Thom LaCosta wrote:
If the sidetone in the K3 is adjusted to a value other than 
default(which is ?), is the offset adjusted along with it?  Does one 
need to realign anything if the sidetone frequency is adjusted?


Unlike the K2, the sidetone pitch and filter center frequency are 
adjusted together, with one knob. There's nothing to realign.



What indication(s) does the K3 provide for zerobeat?


You can press SPOT and hear the sidetone as in the K2, you can use the 
manual CW tuning feature in which you center a little dot on the 
display, or you can use the automatic CW tuning feature in which you 
press SPOT and it tunes the signal in for you!


The CW tuning indicator also works for RTTY and PSK -- I don't know if 
the automatic tuning does, and I'm not near my radio to try it; but 
someone else will chime in.


--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PTT -- done!

2007-09-25 Thread hank k8dd
Bill W5WVO wrote:
 Tom Hammond wrote:
 Actually, it' might not all that redundant, since there ARE times
 when, even in QSK, you might NOT want to allow the rig to return
 immediately to RX... WHILE SENDING... for instance when you're in the
 middle of a transmission and someone
 (not the guy you're sending to) REALLY LOUD comes on the same freq.
 You might not want to hear the QRM from the other station (which your
 guy might well not be able to hear due to prop.) until you complete
 whatever it is you're sending...
 Just hit the foot switch (connected to PTT) and you'll mute the RX
 until you let up on the footswitch.

 The scenario you articulate here is EXACTLY why many CW contesters
 prefer PTT on CW.

That is one reason . The other is when a slower station responds to
a CQ or QRZ the considerate
op (even in a 100++ rate situation) will slow down to their speed (at
least I do) and PTT will keep the
amp relay from dropping between words or characters.

73HankK8DD

-- 
---
If God intended you to be on single sideband,
he would have given you only one nostril.
- Steve, K2PTS (SK)
---

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 PTT - WHHTLOT

2007-09-25 Thread Vic Rosenthal

Fred (FL) wrote:

After the 28 posts on K3 PTT, I'm thinking we
haven't heard the last of this!

Wow - 45 versions and re-explanations of what the
K3 PTT function is.  In just CW?  As a non-contestor,
getting back into hamradio ham - I'm starting to 
think the K3 is getting perhaps too complex, for

normal operation.  I'm serious.  Its starting to
resemble a 747 dashboard.


It's really very simple. Here's what I wrote to someone else:

It's my fault for saying Transmit mode when I should have said 
Transmit state. In transmit state the rx is muted (except for 
sidetone), the transmitter is 'armed', the antenna is switched to the 
transmitter, and an external amp or antenna relay is activated.


There is also a receive state, of course.

CW and SSB (etc.) are 'modes'. The following are 'submodes' for CW: PTT, 
QSK, and semi QSK.


Then it's simple: the PTT switch puts the rig into transmit state. QSK 
and semi-QSK are ways to *automatically* enter and exit transmit state 
when you send CW. But in  PTT submode, the automatic switching to 
transmit state with keying is disabled. In PTT submode, you switch 
states *manually*.


What seems to have confused everyone is that with the K3, if you are in 
the QSK or semi-QSK submode, the PTT switch is 'live' even though it is 
not needed. It will put you in transmit state if you close it. It is in 
a sense in parallel with the automatic switching that is initiated with 
the key.


This is not really important for the original issue, which is that some 
VHF (and other) operators wanted a PTT submode which did not originally 
exist, in which the *ONLY* way to enter transmit state is to use the PTT 
switch.


Now they have it.

I hope this is the final, definitive, solution to the confusion which I 
created.

--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: MorseGen

2007-09-25 Thread res04nyt

I agree!! This is a fantastic program for CW Practice!

Timothy KG6RII
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Zerobeat and sidetone

2007-09-25 Thread Tree
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:47:31AM -0400, Thom LaCosta wrote:
 On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Tree wrote:

 Great...and the tone itself can be adjusted?  I favor the lower tones.

Yes - I am running mine at 500.  Think it goes down to 350.

 What indication(s) does the K3 provide for zerobeat?
 
 You can press the SPOT button and hear the offset tone while tuning in
 the station.
 
 And it changes pitch as one gets closer to zerobeat?

No - you just hear the desired offset tone and you tune in the station to 
match it.

Tree
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] KPA100 smelling....

2007-09-25 Thread Karsten Eppert (DK4AS)

Hi,

I?ve been using my KPA100 for a while and suddenly had a strange smell 
in my nose - like something being very hot from too many amperes. I 
opened the unit, could not find anything burnt or molten but found 
resistors R38/R39 in the final stage hot. I still could touch them 
without burning my fingers but they were the hottest components I could 
identify.


Has anybody an idea, how hot these R?s may go or whether they may heat 
up at all?


73
Karsten
DK4AS
K2 #4764
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Zerobeat and sidetone

2007-09-25 Thread ab7r
But when you use the Auto-Spot function you do hear the tone as it tunes.

-
73,
Greg - AB7R
Whidbey Island WA
NA-065

On Tue Sep 25 12:56 , Tree  sent:

On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:47:31AM -0400, Thom LaCosta wrote:
 On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Tree wrote:

 Great...and the tone itself can be adjusted?  I favor the lower tones.

Yes - I am running mine at 500.  Think it goes down to 350.

 What indication(s) does the K3 provide for zerobeat?
 
 You can press the SPOT button and hear the offset tone while tuning in
 the station.
 
 And it changes pitch as one gets closer to zerobeat?

No - you just hear the desired offset tone and you tune in the station to 
match it.

Tree
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Query

2007-09-25 Thread Fred Jensen

Kevin Rock wrote:
Last night, during the 40 meter net, I heard a DG hail sign.  Then I 
copied K?DGW.  I asked, Is that you Fred? and got a reply in the 
affirmative.  Today I received an email from K6DGW disabusing me of the 
notion of his 40 meter QNI.  So, I have a conundrum: there is another 
person out there with a K?DGW call whose name is Fred.  If that is you 
could you please write me an email to tell me your information?  Such as 
what is the number in your call?  There were crashes of QRN during the 
contact but when I got a confirmation on the name of Fred I simply put 
K6DGW in the log.


Last time I checked, the only other of us is K4DGW.

73,

Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 2007 CQP Oct 6-7
- www.cqp.org
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Zerobeat and sidetone

2007-09-25 Thread Fred Jensen

Tree wrote:


In this mode - pressing the SPOT button
will enable the AUTO SPOT feature - and the radio will tune in the station
automatically.


Tell me you're kidding, Tree!  Does the tuning knob move while it's 
doing this? :-)


73,

Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 2007 CQP Oct 6-7
- www.cqp.org
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Variable-Bandwidth Crystal Filters

2007-09-25 Thread Edward Dickinson, III
When will we begin to see more information on these?


Regards,
Dick - KA5KKT/4

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Query

2007-09-25 Thread David Wilburn
I was not able to check in on Sunday evening.  The 3, 5, 8, and 0 do not 
appear to be in use.


David Wilburn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K4DGW
K2 #5982
FP#-1751


Fred Jensen wrote:

Kevin Rock wrote:
Last night, during the 40 meter net, I heard a DG hail sign.  Then I 
copied K?DGW.  I asked, Is that you Fred? and got a reply in the 
affirmative.  Today I received an email from K6DGW disabusing me of 
the notion of his 40 meter QNI.  So, I have a conundrum: there is 
another person out there with a K?DGW call whose name is Fred.  If 
that is you could you please write me an email to tell me your 
information?  Such as what is the number in your call?  There were 
crashes of QRN during the contact but when I got a confirmation on the 
name of Fred I simply put K6DGW in the log.


Last time I checked, the only other of us is K4DGW.

73,

Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 2007 CQP Oct 6-7
- www.cqp.org
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K2/100 or K3/10

2007-09-25 Thread DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL
Keith:

Not having a K3 in hand, I am just making a best guess, but I would
say, based on your self-description as a cw ragchewer, casual DXer,
and contester-light, I'd say go for the K2/100.  This recommendation
takes into account that you want 100 watts.  But if you're happy with
the K3/10 power level, then you'd be just as happy with the K2/10
power level and then for your style of operation, it should be a
no-brainer (get the K2, if cost is a factor).

I have a K2 (qrp only) and it is a GREAT cw rig.  It is not the BEST
rig, but waaay better than the vast majority.  For cw ragchewing, I
don't think you NEED the neat stuff on the K3, which appeals
especially (but not exclusively) to low band DXers and HF contesters.

At around $600 for the base K2, it is VERY hard to go wrong and
probably completely impossible to have better bang for the buck.
IMO + YMMV.

de Doug KR2Q
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Zerobeat and sidetone

2007-09-25 Thread Tree
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:25:31AM -0700, Fred Jensen wrote:
 Tree wrote:
 
 In this mode - pressing the SPOT button
 will enable the AUTO SPOT feature - and the radio will tune in the station
 automatically.
 
 Tell me you're kidding, Tree!  Does the tuning knob move while it's 
 doing this? :-)

Not for FCS.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3-Zerobeat and sidetone

2007-09-25 Thread Ed Muns
 Tree wrote:
  
  In this mode - pressing the SPOT button will enable the AUTO SPOT 
  feature - and the radio will tune in the station automatically.
 
 Tell me you're kidding, Tree!  Does the tuning knob move 
 while it's doing this? :-)

Welcome to the world of software-defined radios.

73,
Ed - W0YK

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] PTT

2007-09-25 Thread Fred Jensen
I had absolutely no idea that PTT was this complex and required all 
these words to adequately describe it :-)  The only complexity in PTT 
that I've ever known about is that it should stand for push, then talk 
since it's fairly common for new hams to start talking and then push the 
mic button.  I had a colleague at work [retired AF Col] who never really 
mastered the concept of point, then click either.


I am astounded at the speed with which The Big E implemented whatever it 
is that some folks wanted.  Gives whole new meaning to Responsive.


73,

Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 2007 CQP Oct 6-7
- www.cqp.org
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] PTT

2007-09-25 Thread Tree
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:43:33AM -0700, Fred Jensen wrote:

 I had absolutely no idea that PTT was this complex and required all 
 these words to adequately describe it :-)  The only complexity in PTT 
 that I've ever known about is that it should stand for push, then talk 
 since it's fairly common for new hams to start talking and then push the 
 mic button.  I had a colleague at work [retired AF Col] who never really 
 mastered the concept of point, then click either.

Most anything simple can be over complicated by really analyzing it.

This PTT issue is a case where the amount of detail we discuss everyday
on the secret beta test list showed up on the general reflector.  

This stuff gets much easier when it is done right and when you come up
with a new operating scenario you hadn't thought about before and think:
gee - maybe if I hook up my foot switch it will do what I need and 
voila - it does - then you realize it was all worth it.

It will do that if every possible scenario had been thought about when the
solution was developed.

So - I hope that everyone understands it really isn't that complicated.
The way you expect the radio to work is how it will work.  The problem comes
when you have many different people expecting slightly different things.

We just had to tell Wayne a white lie - that VOX really meant Vibroplex
Operated Xmitr.  

 I am astounded at the speed with which The Big E implemented whatever it 
 is that some folks wanted.  Gives whole new meaning to Responsive.

This is simply half the reason I am so excited about this radio.  The other
half is the wonderful hardware that the new features is being implemented
on.  Not only is Elecraft the most responsive radio vendor - it also has the
best platform to support.  

Tree N6TR
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2/100 or K3/10?

2007-09-25 Thread Dave G4AON

Keith

My favourite rig since 2001 is my ten Watt K2. There's plenty of DX to 
be worked on 10 Watts of CW, even with my simple wire antennas I've 
worked dozens of countries out as far as ZL. SSB would be another issue, 
ten Watts of SSB is hard work compared to ten Watts of CW.


Given the improved design of the K3, I would opt for a K3/10 and then 
upgrade it by adding the QRO PA when you can manage it. If you went the 
K2/100 route you would always wish you had a K3.


Dave, G4AON
K1 #1154, K2/10 #1892 and hopefully K3  #200 soon.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K2/100 or K3/10?

2007-09-25 Thread Dave Van Wallaghen
Hey Keith,

I'm a new ham, so take this for what its worth. I have K2/100 #5099 and it
is my first transceiver. I did the split of the KPA100 into the EC2 with the
KAT100. This summer I operated almost exclusively outside in my yard with my
basic K2 and a small wire doublet up in a tree. I ran 5 watts all summer
long and made some really nice contacts and several lengthy rag chews
(sometimes condx kept the QSO's short). Most of the time I received Wow as
a reply to my power report of 5 watts. My furthest contact was with W7DAX
out in Liberty, Utah (I'm near Detroit) with many in the 500 - 700 mile
range on mostly 40m during the afternoons.

Although I have my K3 in the second order group, my guess is that for casual
CW rag chewing and contesting the K2 would suffice (I only say this because
I have no experience with other radios). But I am really looking forward to
using some of the really nice features (not to mention the better Rx specs)
of the K3 I saw demonstrated in Dayton and thoroughly discussed here. If I
could only have the basic K3, based on this summer's activity, I would have
no problem running it QRP for more than a year. 

So if QRP might not be your bag, then the K2/100 seems like the best bang
for your buck. But if you can deal with QRP for a year, then the K3 looks
pretty nice. If solar condx improve starting this year... Obviously, if
price is an issue, the K2 fits the bill.

I'm sure, as you know, being a previous K2 owner you can't go wrong either
way.

73,
Dave W8FGU

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] PTT

2007-09-25 Thread w6jd
Fred, you said it all!

Doug
W6JD

-- Original message -- 
From: Fred Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 I had absolutely no idea that PTT was this complex and required all 
 these words to adequately describe it :-) The only complexity in PTT 
 that I've ever known about is that it should stand for push, then talk 
 since it's fairly common for new hams to start talking and then push the 
 mic button. I had a colleague at work [retired AF Col] who never really 
 mastered the concept of point, then click either. 
 
 I am astounded at the speed with which The Big E implemented whatever it 
 is that some folks wanted. Gives whole new meaning to Responsive. 
 
 73, 
 
 Fred K6DGW 
 - Northern California Contest Club 
 - CU in the 2007 CQP Oct 6-7 
 - www.cqp.org 
 ___ 
 Elecraft mailing list 
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list. 
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm 
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Zerobeat and sidetone

2007-09-25 Thread Thom LaCosta

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


But when you use the Auto-Spot function you do hear the tone as it tunes.


Ah...a throw-back sound to first having a vfo...probably spent more time 
zerobeating the guy than sending his call.


If autospot is on, does the K3 follow a drifting signal...or is it a one-shot 
kind of operation that would have to be initiated again?


thanks

73 - k3hrn
Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K2/100 or K3/10?

2007-09-25 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Another way to look at it is that 10 watts is 10 dB (about 1.5 S-units)
below 100 watts. 

That's enough to make a difference, but not a huge difference in who you can
work and when, especially on CW. SSB is perhaps a little more of a
challenge, but that might be because I'm a CW op too and only get on SSB on
rare occasions. 

Were I faced with that choice, I'd go for the 10 watt rig with more
potential for expansion and performance than the 100 watt rig. 

Ron AC7AC

-Original Message-
So, assuming it is one or the other, which do you think would be a better
choice for a CW operator who is mostly an east-coast rag chewer with
occasional DX chasing and light duty contesting?
 
I'm leaning toward the K3/10 since it can eventually be upgraded to 100
watts, but I wonder if 10 watts (3 dB more than QRP) is enough to keep me
happy for a year or so.
 
- Keith N1AS -

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] selling other radios in favor of a K2

2007-09-25 Thread John Shadle

Hi all,
I know that some of you have sold (or are planning to sell) your K2 in 
favor of the new K3, but I was wondering if you have sold other radios 
in favor of a K2 in the past.


I have an IC-735 (1980s 100w HF radio), a FT-817 (QRP HF radio), and a 
few VHF/UHF rigs. I want to pick up a K2, but I'm not sure if I will be 
really missing out on something if I get rid of my other rigs.


Do any of you have thoughts on the subject?

Thanks in advance for all your input!
-john W4PAH


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2/100 or K3/10

2007-09-25 Thread Gary D Krause
I would get the K3 for the same reason that Dave gave.  If you get the K2 it 
won't be long before you are wondering about the K3 and you'll probably end up 
with both.  If you get the K3 you can save some money.  When everyone starts 
getting their K3's, you'll be reading about them and that will make it worse. 
I'm sure we will see comparisons between the K2 and K3.  If it's a matter of 
money, I would get the best that you can afford.  If that means waiting a 
while, then do it.  I think that most of us have learned that with any hobby 
or interest, it pays buy the best you can.  This is just my experience and 
opinion.


Gary, N7HTS


On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:35:19 -0400
 DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Keith:

Not having a K3 in hand, I am just making a best guess, but I would
say, based on your self-description as a cw ragchewer, casual DXer,
and contester-light, I'd say go for the K2/100.  This recommendation
takes into account that you want 100 watts.  But if you're happy with
the K3/10 power level, then you'd be just as happy with the K2/10
power level and then for your style of operation, it should be a
no-brainer (get the K2, if cost is a factor).

I have a K2 (qrp only) and it is a GREAT cw rig.  It is not the BEST
rig, but waaay better than the vast majority.  For cw ragchewing, I
don't think you NEED the neat stuff on the K3, which appeals
especially (but not exclusively) to low band DXers and HF contesters.

At around $600 for the base K2, it is VERY hard to go wrong and
probably completely impossible to have better bang for the buck.
IMO + YMMV.

de Doug KR2Q
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Zerobeat and sidetone

2007-09-25 Thread Tree
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 04:11:13PM -0400, Thom LaCosta wrote:
 On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 But when you use the Auto-Spot function you do hear the tone as it tunes.
 
 Ah...a throw-back sound to first having a vfo...probably spent more time 
 zerobeating the guy than sending his call.
 
 If autospot is on, does the K3 follow a drifting signal...or is it a 
 one-shot kind of operation that would have to be initiated again?

one-shot
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3-Zerobeat and sidetone

2007-09-25 Thread Rowland

Hi All
Can I assume that the Auto Spot function will lock onto the received 
signal if ONLY  one signal is audible

in the receiver pass band.
Or will it lock on to the closest signal to the side tone you have 
previousy set

Thanks
Rowland
G4APO

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Zerobeat and sidetone

2007-09-25 Thread ab7r
When you have the CWT tuning indicator on you should be able to see the signal 
on 
the display and be somewhat close.  Then it will tune to that signal when you 
tap 
the SPOT button. 

-
73,
Greg - AB7R
Whidbey Island WA
NA-065

On Tue Sep 25 16:45 , Rowland  sent:

Hi All
Can I assume that the Auto Spot function will lock onto the received 
signal if ONLY  one signal is audible
in the receiver pass band.
Or will it lock on to the closest signal to the side tone you have 
previousy set
Thanks
Rowland
G4APO

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Sounds like you're asking about an AFC

2007-09-25 Thread DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL
OMG, please do NOT implement this autotracking feature.  It's bad
enough that one signal will drift across the band, now you want the K3
to intelligently drift also?

ARGH!

This is one idea that makes ZERO sense.

:-(

de Doug KR2Q

PS.  And please don't build in the option to add a chirp to the signal either.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sounds like you're asking about an AFC

2007-09-25 Thread Vic K2VCO

DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL wrote:

OMG, please do NOT implement this autotracking feature.  It's bad
enough that one signal will drift across the band, now you want the K3
to intelligently drift also?

ARGH!

This is one idea that makes ZERO sense.


Nobody having anything to do with Elecraft suggested this. Maybe it was 
a joke?


Adding chirp, on the other hand, sounds interesting. A little buzz, too, 
so you can sound like a Russian station of the 1950's.

--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sounds like you're asking about an AFC

2007-09-25 Thread John

At 04:08 PM 25/09/07, you wrote:


PS.  And please don't build in the option to add a chirp to the signal either.


Hey, you hit on a good idea there. Now days everybody sounds the 
same, clean pure signals, and electronic keyers. In the Good ole 
days, so they say, you could tell who people were by the sound of 
their signal and their fist, before they gave their call. Just think 
of it, if you could add varying degrees of chirp, hum, raspy tone, 
etc. with software on the K3, you could make amateur radio  just like 
the Good ole days.


John
k7up 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] selling other radios in favor of a K2

2007-09-25 Thread Fred Jensen

John Shadle wrote:

Hi all,
I know that some of you have sold (or are planning to sell) your K2 in 
favor of the new K3, but I was wondering if you have sold other radios 
in favor of a K2 in the past.


I have not.


I have an IC-735 (1980s 100w HF radio), a FT-817 (QRP HF radio), and a 
few VHF/UHF rigs. I want to pick up a K2, but I'm not sure if I will be 
really missing out on something if I get rid of my other rigs.


Do any of you have thoughts on the subject?


Hi John [and the rest of the list]

FWIW:  I have a TS-850 for HF and an FT-847 I use mainly on VHF/UHF and 
as a general coverage radio, and I used to use it in RTTY contests.  I 
started with Elecraft building a K2 [and a little later a KX1 to take 
with us on a Panama Canal cruise in 2005].  I later purchased a KAT100 
and KPA100 from another ham.  I use my K2 a lot, often in the field with 
the QRP top.  The K2 RX runs circles around the 850, especially when 
KF6T and WX6V are running HP in a contest ... they're less than 2 miles 
from me.  However, I didn't want my K2 tied closely into the station 
because I like to grab it and the Buddipole and head for a nearby 
campground or park during the good weather.  And, other than the IMD 
from my two contesting buddies, I like the 850, it has a countable 
number of knobs and buttons [and zero menu items], and I've learned to 
use maybe half of them pretty well.


I finally moved my RTTY contesting to the K2 because of the filters -- 
the 847 has no choices and you can't shut off the AGC, so a strong 
adjacent signal made the weak new mult I was trying to work just 
disappear.  I just ordered a K3.  When I get it, I will sell the TS-850. 
 For me, my K2 is more of a special radio than a shack radio.  The 
K3 will become my main shack radio [not that it won't be special too 
:-) ]  I didn't get the gen coverage option since I have the 847.


I would guess that a K2 would pretty much duplicate your FT-817 except I 
think the K2 RX would edge out the Yaesu.  With the KPA100, it *could* 
replace the IC-735 as a shack radio if you're not into grab and go 
field operations.  I've seen the K3 twice, and lifted it once.  It could 
be a field radio, however I think the power drain would make that 
difficult without a generator.  It would make a truly slick HF mobile. 
I get all the hamming in the field I can handle in a day on a 12 Ah SLA 
with my K2 @ 5W.


YMMV

73,

Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 2007 CQP Oct 6-7
- www.cqp.org
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sounds like you're asking about an AFC

2007-09-25 Thread Thom LaCosta

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL wrote:


OMG, please do NOT implement this autotracking feature.  It's bad
enough that one signal will drift across the band, now you want the K3
to intelligently drift also?

ARGH!

This is one idea that makes ZERO sense.


It was a question about the functionnot a suggestion.

73 - k3hrn
Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sounds like you're asking about an AFC

2007-09-25 Thread Thom LaCosta

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Vic K2VCO wrote:



Nobody having anything to do with Elecraft suggested this. Maybe it was a 
joke?


It was a question, not a suggestion.



Adding chirp, on the other hand, sounds interesting. A little buzz, too, so 
you can sound like a Russian station of the 1950's.


Is this a suggestion?

I'd love to see a swing optionand as far as other options, there's am 
interesting collection of retro-options at http://zerobeat.net/qrp/qrpretro.html


73 - k3hrn
Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sounds like you're asking about an AFC

2007-09-25 Thread Thom LaCosta

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, John wrote:


At 04:08 PM 25/09/07, you wrote:

PS.  And please don't build in the option to add a chirp to the signal 
either.


Hey, you hit on a good idea there. Now days everybody sounds the same, clean 
pure signals, and electronic keyers. In the Good ole days, so they say, you 
could tell who people were by the sound of their signal and their fist, 
before they gave their call. Just think of it, if you could add varying 
degrees of chirp, hum, raspy tone, etc. with software on the K3, you could 
make amateur radio  just like the Good ole days.


Just think of it..,some folks might actually send cw without keyers or 
computersbut that would be painful, it might require more hand-eye 
coordination and some sense of spacing, etc.


As far as chirp, hum, etc.wasn't there a series of posts about how the K3 
sounds, compared to the K2 and other rigs?  Geez, maybe Aptos best stamp out a 
distictive K3 sound(g).


73 - thom
Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] selling other radios in favor of a K2

2007-09-25 Thread Ken Kopp
I purchased my K2 (S/N 5665) solely on the word of a fellow 
DX'peditioner and contester KE7X.  Some of you will recognize 
the name of the group Fred belongs to ... Team Vertical.  They 
use only K2/00's.  Before retirement limited my spending, I was 
a member of this group.


My shack ... all at the same time ... housed an FT-1000D, an 
FT-990 and an IC-756 Pro II.  All are fine radios, but since building 
my K2 and using it for a year I'm prepared to say it's every bit as 
good as any of the three and they've all been sold.  

Yes, part of the reason for selling them is to finance my K3, but 
they've not been missed and I have no regrets. If I had wanted to 
keep one of them, it would have been the FT-1000D.  An FL-7000 
solid state PA went out the door too, along with three KW and two 
275 W Matchboxes.


I've been licensed and continously active on CW since 1951 and
it's been a very long time since I've had as much fun with the
hobby.  Look for me on 7036 most evenings.

73! Ken Kopp - K0PP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sounds like you're asking about an AFC

2007-09-25 Thread Ken Kopp

Oh boy, this thread brings back memories of the keying filter
many of us built to give our rigs a distinctive sound.  My T-4XB
sounded pretty good, too! (:-))

73! Ken Kopp - K0PP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Zerobeat and sidetone

2007-09-25 Thread Tom Hammond

At 15:11 09/25/2007, Thom LaCosta wrote:

If autospot is on, does the K3 follow a drifting signal...or is it a 
one-shot kind of operation that would have to be initiated again?


Nope... that's your job.  Once you push [SPOT], and the K3 has initially zeroed
the received signal, if HE moves, you must press [SPOT] again to 
readjust to his

new freq.

73,

Tom   N0SS 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sounds like you're asking about an AFC

2007-09-25 Thread w6jd
And let us not forget the banana boat swing.

Doug, W6JD

-- Original message -- 
From: Vic K2VCO [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL wrote: 
  OMG, please do NOT implement this autotracking feature. It's bad 
  enough that one signal will drift across the band, now you want the K3 
  to intelligently drift also? 
  
  ARGH! 
  
  This is one idea that makes ZERO sense. 
 
 Nobody having anything to do with Elecraft suggested this. Maybe it was 
 a joke? 
 
 Adding chirp, on the other hand, sounds interesting. A little buzz, too, 
 so you can sound like a Russian station of the 1950's. 
 -- 
 73, 
 Vic, K2VCO 
 Fresno CA 
 http://www.qsl.net/k2vco 
 ___ 
 Elecraft mailing list 
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list. 
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm 
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sounds like you're asking about an AFC

2007-09-25 Thread Thom LaCosta

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


And let us not forget the banana boat swing.


I've asked for a swing option several times..if one can get banana boat, there 
should also be a Lake Erie one.  I'll leave it to some other OT to mention more.


73 - k3hrn
Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Info 080 and KPA100

2007-09-25 Thread Joe Hetrick

Greetings folks,

If I may interrupt the K3 threads for just a moment...

My K2 SN 4912 developed a fault sometime between last evening and  
this evening!  Upon jumping to the shack to
have a few relaxing QSO's before bed I was greeted by an INFO 080.  I  
figured I'd start by checking pins of RFU1 as in the
manual and pulled the KPA.  I fired it up without the KPA, and,  
problem disappears.


Casual inspection of the KPA shows no fault, searching the list turns  
up no clues, and finally the KPA manual refers INFO 080 back to the  
K2 manual.


If I had to guess, I'd say auxbus short.

With only the KPA connected (nothing external to the AUX RS232) fault  
remains.  Where should I start digging in the KPA?


73,

Joe, KC0VKN
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] selling other radios in favor of a K2

2007-09-25 Thread Brett gazdzinski
I did not sell anything to get my K2, but sold the 756 pro after 
I got the K2, since the performance was so much better on the K2.
I did not sell the K2 to get the K3, but sold it because
I ran into a bunch of car bills, and the K3 will get here whenever.

I would not hesitate to sell almost any old rig to get a K2
if you are into CW.

The receiver of the K2 is better than all but a very few radios
like the Orion.

There is no comparison to old rigs like the IC735 or TS440, 
although I thought the 735 was a neat little rig.

Now some might like the big knobs, nice displays, multi mode
and more features then the K2 has, but those radios likely
don't work as well as the K2.

Brett
N2DTS

 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Shadle
 Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 4:24 PM
 To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: [Elecraft] selling other radios in favor of a K2
 
 Hi all,
 I know that some of you have sold (or are planning to sell) 
 your K2 in 
 favor of the new K3, but I was wondering if you have sold 
 other radios 
 in favor of a K2 in the past.
 
 I have an IC-735 (1980s 100w HF radio), a FT-817 (QRP HF 
 radio), and a 
 few VHF/UHF rigs. I want to pick up a K2, but I'm not sure if 
 I will be 
 really missing out on something if I get rid of my other rigs.
 
 Do any of you have thoughts on the subject?
 
 Thanks in advance for all your input!
 -john W4PAH
 
 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] selling other radios in favor of a K2

2007-09-25 Thread Werner Haschke

The only reason I keep my TS 850 SAT is because no one will give me all
that much for it. For the few bucks return I can leave it on the bench
and look at it.
What can you say, after the Elecraft gear came out it made all the
others less valuable.
Wish I could get half what I paid for it.

Werner   N8BB


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 list?

2007-09-25 Thread Mike Fatchett W0MU

Hello all,

I just put in an order for a K3.  I currently have two FT-2000's  
which I happen to like very much.  I am very anxious to see how the  
K3 stacks up.  I guess I will be in group 3.


Is there a separate reflector for the K3?

Thanks in advance.

Mike W0MU
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Wideband FM?

2007-09-25 Thread Fred (FL)
I don't understand fully the mode wideband FM?

At one point, there was a 2 meter repeater in
northern Baltimore County, which had a link
to 10 meters - back in the 90's.  I think the
10 meter portion (link), operated in Wideband FM
mode?  I may have this mixed up - but I've always
hoped someone would explain when/where WIDEBAND FM
is used in ham bands?

And, does the K3 support any of this in
its FM mode?

Fred
de N3CSY


   

Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for 
today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow  
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com