[Elecraft] K2 Remote DC Power Control

2012-01-15 Thread KG3VTomZ
I am assembling a remotely-operated K2 station. I need a timer that will  
kill a runaway transmitter. I am planning to install a kill-switch on the  
12 volt DC supply, as that is the only way I can be sure to disable the  
transmitter. If I have a K2 and the separate 100W power amp, is it  
sufficient/safe to just disable the power to the K2 base unit (leaving  
power to the amp connected)?

Anybody else experienced in auto-shutoff of a K2?

Thanks,

Tom, KG3V
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Remote DC Power Control

2012-01-15 Thread KG3VTomZ
Don,

Thanks for the reply, and for all your other help in configuring my K2  
station over the last 5 years.

Just out of curiosity - can this not be done if they are mounted in the  
same box? I think when mine were configured that way, there still were two  
separate 12V inputs - or do they get tied together? I would like to know if  
my timeout-switch approach would be useable by someone with the KPA-100 in  
the same chassis as the K2-base.

Interesting that it sound like it is not as safe to pull power from the  
K3 during operation. What about a natural power outage event? Would there  
be some complications in the recovery process?

73, Tom
KG3V


On , Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:
 Tom,



 Yes, it is sufficient to kill the power to the base K2 (when the KPA100  
 is mounted remotely). Unlike the K3, there is little to be lost (bits  
 mixed up) if you turn the power source off for the K2 during normal  
 operation.



 73,

 Don W3FPR



 On 1/15/2012 2:14 PM, kg3vt...@gmail.com wrote:


 I am assembling a remotely-operated K2 station. I need a timer that will

 kill a runaway transmitter. I am planning to install a kill-switch on  
 the

 12 volt DC supply, as that is the only way I can be sure to disable the

 transmitter. If I have a K2 and the separate 100W power amp, is it

 sufficient/safe to just disable the power to the K2 base unit (leaving

 power to the amp connected)?



 Anybody else experienced in auto-shutoff of a K2?







__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Remote DC Power Control

2012-01-15 Thread KG3VTomZ
Don,

I get it. Thanks for the details. Just one more reason I am glad I  
converted to the separate Amp/ATU box. This makes it very easy.

73, Tom
KG3V


On , Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:
 Tom,



 First the answer about the K3 - there is some cleanup work that must be  
 done when the K3 is powered off, so the power off button should be used  
 rather than just pulling the plug. With the K2, there is no difference  
 between pulling the plug and using the power switch. Yes, just like  
 your computer, the K3 is exposed to writing bad data if the plug is  
 pulled (or a power outage occurs). The chances of anything really  
 disastrous is small, but some strange happenings may reveal themselves  
 after such an event - the real answer is it all depends on what the K3  
 was doing at the time power went out - if it was writing something to  
 storage, that last used frequency, mode, etc. may not be preserved  
 properly.



 If the base K2 and the KPA100 are mounted in the same box, then the  
 situation is different - you would have to interrupt the higher current  
 connection (to the KPA100) if everything were connected normally.

 Now, there is a way -- if you do not connect the AUX 12V connector from  
 the KPA100 to the base K2, the base K2 will not be powered by the KPA100  
 power supply connection - you will have to power the base K2 from the  
 coaxial connector. That makes the power off conditions the same as with  
 the remotely mounted KPA100.



 73,

 Don W3FPR



 On 1/15/2012 8:26 PM, kg3vt...@gmail.com wrote:


 Don,



 Thanks for the reply, and for all your other help in configuring my K2  
 station over the last 5 years.



 Just out of curiosity - can this not be done if they are mounted in the  
 same box? I think when mine were configured that way, there still were  
 two separate 12V inputs - or do they get tied together? I would like to  
 know if my timeout-switch approach would be useable by someone with the  
 KPA-100 in the same chassis as the K2-base.



 Interesting that it sound like it is not as safe to pull power from the  
 K3 during operation. What about a natural power outage event? Would there  
 be some complications in the recovery process?



 73, Tom

 KG3V





 On , Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:

  Tom,

 

 

 

  Yes, it is sufficient to kill the power to the base K2 (when the KPA100  
 is mounted remotely). Unlike the K3, there is little to be lost (bits  
 mixed up) if you turn the power source off for the K2 during normal  
 operation.

 

 

 

  73,

 

  Don W3FPR

 

 

 

  On 1/15/2012 2:14 PM, kg3vt...@gmail.com wrote:

 

 

  I am assembling a remotely-operated K2 station. I need a timer that will

 

  kill a runaway transmitter. I am planning to install a kill-switch on  
 the

 

  12 volt DC supply, as that is the only way I can be sure to disable the

 

  transmitter. If I have a K2 and the separate 100W power amp, is it

 

  sufficient/safe to just disable the power to the K2 base unit (leaving

 

  power to the amp connected)?

 

 

 

  Anybody else experienced in auto-shutoff of a K2?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] [KX3] Re: How close ???

2011-12-11 Thread KG3VTomZ
I agree. I would prefer they don't take orders until they have radios ready  
to ship. Why is everybody in such a hurry to part with their money? We also  
don't want them to ship radios until they are ready. Once we get them, we  
want them to be good for many years of use.

I am as impatient as the next guy, but let's wait till it is ready. For all  
of you who really can't wait, I could take you money now and hold it...  
Just contact me off list

73,

Tom
KG3V


On , TJ Campie tom.cam...@gmail.com wrote:























 THOSE BLASTED FIELD TESTERSIn reality, the day to take orders is  
 fairly meaningless... none of us are going to get our new little toys  
 until February anyway. That is going to be the hardest part...




 TJ W0EA


 On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Wayne Burdick n...@elecraft.com wrote:


 kb3...@msn.com wrote:

  Seems like all questions on the KX3 get an answer pretty quick from

  the inventors except the when question. Maybe testing is a little

  behind, maybe parts are not available, maybe manufacturing is taking


  longer to gear up than expecpted

 



 Hi Curron,



 As usual with a complex product release it's a bit of all of the

 above. Last month, we gave early field-test units to several very

 picky operators who've been scrutinizing every detail on behalf of

 future customers. Several opportunities for improvement have come out

 of this, and it's critical that we get such changes in now, rather

 than impose field-upgrades later.



 I already mentioned the change to the internal battery; the battery

 holders will now be included, even if you don't purchase the charger

 module. Our testers also just convinced us to switch to a much nicer

 (but more expensive) optical shaft encoder for VFO A. These and other

 last-minute tweaks necessitated layout changes to both of the main PC

 boards. Since costs also went up, we've been working with vendors to

 get better pricing on other parts, where possible, so we can hold the

 line on the retail price.



 My seven year-old, Griffin, may be the most impatient future KX3 user

 of all. He's got his own corner at my workbench where he tests

 batteries, rigs up improbable assemblies of scrapped parts, and makes

 sure I'm working instead of playing my guitar. When? is his favorite

 question, and he'll be the first to know.



 We're still hoping to take orders in December.



 Wayne

 N6KR









 



 Yahoo! Groups Links



 To visit your group on the web, go to:

 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/KX3/



 Your email settings:

 Individual Email | Traditional



 To change settings online go to:

 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/KX3/join

 (Yahoo! ID required)



 To change settings via email:

 kx3-dig...@yahoogroups.com

 kx3-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com



 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

 kx3-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com



 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
















 __._,_.___








 Reply to sender |

 Reply to group |
 Reply via web post |
 Start a New Topic



 Messages in this topic
 (10)








 Recent Activity:



 New Members
 24


 New Photos
 6


 New Links
 1




 Visit Your Group






 MARKETPLACE




 Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on -  
 Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.








 Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
























 .







 __,_._,___









__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] [HAM] Hi Q versus Vertical

2010-01-03 Thread KG3VTomZ
I have the Hi-Q 4/80 screwdriver antenna and have only used it mobile so  
far. It is a great antenna as far as mobile operation goes. I may use it  
parked in the driveway as one of my fixed antennas for some upcoming  
contests.You could use the Hi-Q antenna with radials or just leave it on  
your vehicle, then you don't need the radials. I don't know if that is  
convenient for you (location of the vehicle relative to the operating  
position), but it is an option.

Good luck,

Tom, KG3V


On Jan 3, 2010 7:00pm, Maarten van Rossum pd2r.maar...@gmail.com wrote:
 The antenna by itself maybe small, but keep in mind that in order to make  
 it

 function properly, you need radials and lots of 'em.

 If you mount the vertical on the ground, radial length is less important.  
 If

 you mount is with elevated radials you need at least 2 tuned radials for

 each band to make it work.

 But you can find that info on the SteppIR Website as well so you probably  
 no

 this already ;-)



 73, Maarten

 PD2R



 2010/1/3 Mike K2MK k...@comcast.net



 

  Hi Frank:

 

  Lots of K3 users have the SteppIR BigIR vertical. I know this from  
 being a

  member of both Yahoo groups. You might want to pose the same question on

  the

  SteppIR Yahoo group.

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SteppIR/

 

  And I just thought you would like to know that SteppIR has just  
 announced

  the addition of an optional coil to the SmallIR that will make that  
 antenna

  work on 80 through 6 meters as does the BigIR. The SmallIR is half the

  height of the BigIR. Just a bit more stealthy. Maybe it can be made to  
 look

  like a flagpole.

 

  73,

  Mike K2MK

 

 

  From Frank KD8FIP:

 

  I am looking for an antenna to work 6 thru 80 meters in a condo

  development. I presently own a k3/10.

 

  Stealth is a very strong consideration. It seems that a SteppIR

  Vertical or Hi Q antenna would make sense. Does anyone have experience

  with these two antennas for this type of application? Thanks you for

  your time and expertise.

 

  Frank KD8FIP

  --

  View this message in context:

  http://n2.nabble.com/Hi-Q-versus-Vertical-tp4246657p4247140.html

  Sent from the [HAM] mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

  __

  Elecraft mailing list

  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm

  Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 

  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net

  Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

 

 __

 Elecraft mailing list

 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm

 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net



 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net

 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Is the K2 old technology?

2009-12-13 Thread KG3VTomZ
Paul,

I see you got some good answers but just wanted to add some of my  
experience. If you are interested in building a kit you can not beat the  
K2. K3 is a great radio but is not really a kit. The K2 you build starting  
from a box of parts. One of the greatest things about the K2 kit is that  
there are almost no wires, so you are not building wiring harnesses (which  
I do not consider to be fun). You are building boards and building up the  
chassis. If there was a K3 kit that started with a bag of parts, there  
would be no decision to make, but that is not the case.

If you mainly want a CW rig, I don't see how you could need anything more.  
BUT if you want mainly a SSB rig, I would suggest you consider the K3  
instead. K2 works fine on SSB, but some of the creature comforts could be  
better.

As far as the reflector, some of us urged Elecraft to separate the K2 and  
K3 lists in some way, but they have opted not to do so. As a result, this  
is not the resource it used to be for a K2 owner. You can still get ALL  
your questions answered here, so don't get me wrong, but you will drown in  
K3 trivia if you just monitor the list, and there is no easy way to receive  
only K2-related threads that I know of.

Go for the K2 and enjoy it.

Tom KG3V

On Dec 10, 2009 7:20pm, Paul Huff ph...@mi.rr.com wrote:
 I think that I have finally saved up enough money to purchase my  
 long-desired

 K2. But there are two thoughts that cause me to hesitate:



 First, is the K2 long in the tooth? Am I spending a significant amount  
 of

 money on technology that is on it's way to being obsolete?



 Second, I will only be able to purchase a basic K2 and plan on adding the

 extras to it over the next couple of years. Will Elecraft still be  
 offering

 those products for that length of time?



 I guess that I will ask that 2nd question directly to Elecraft, but any  
 opinions

 on the first question would be appreciated.



 Thanks in advance and 73,

 Paul - N8XMS



 __

 Elecraft mailing list

 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm

 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net



 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net

 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K2 Clean or replace AF Gain control?

2009-11-09 Thread KG3VTomZ
I just noticed my K2 has a problem with the AF Gain control. It  
is scratchy in the area where I use it most. I see that the RIT control  
(rarely used) also has some linearity issues. The rig is about three years  
old. I do not use it on a daily basis, but I do use it in contests , where  
it gets stressed pretty well.

I must either clean or replace the AF Gain control ASAP, and I see it will  
be rather hard to get at. Can anyone tell me if these controls can be  
accessed to clean them, or should I just order replacement parts? It would  
help to know before I tear the rig apart.

Thanks and 73,

Tom, KG3V
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Need KAT2 Help

2009-09-13 Thread KG3VTomZ
Don,

Thanks again for the help. I think this is working and I will move ahead. I  
just need to install my new KNB2 and I should be ready to get the rig back  
in the operating position.

I do not have a major gripe with the KAT-2 directions, but it could use an  
update. I have a fair amount of building experience at this point, and I  
found myself in 2 or 3 uncertain situations. But the end result is fine, as  
with all my other Elecraft builds so far. I continue to be very impressed  
with the design of the K2 and accessories.

73,

Tom KG3V


On Sep 11, 2009 1:53pm, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:
 Tom,



 Yes, the balance point is very 'touchy' - such is the situation anytime  
 you are trying to get a null (on any kind of equipment - the null range  
 is very small, and ideally is a single point). On the KAT2, the normal  
 lowest reading on the display is in the 009 to 011 range as you have  
 found - from that I would say all is well.



 Yes, the Elecraft K2 option manuals do not have as much detailed  
 supplemental information as the K2 manual because the builder would  
 normally have already experienced the details in the K2 manual. That was  
 true initially, but now many K2 are being purchased used and the new  
 owner adds options without having that initial K2 building experience.

 As far as removing stuff that was not there, the manual must be written  
 to cover any possible K2 configuration - thus, it is important to observe  
 all the If statements - if you do not have a particular option  
 installed, you will have nothing to remove.



 73,

 Don W3FPR



 kg3vt...@gmail.com wrote:


 Thanks to both of you for the sugestions. I actually got this to work,  
 and I am not sure if it originally worked, or if my resoldering fixed a  
 problem. I was able to obtain a voltage reading but only over about 20  
 degrees of the rotation of C55. I had no idea it would be this touchy.  
 Also, the lowest I can get is about 009-011 on the reading. If this  
 sounds normal, I may be OK. If not, I may still want to do some more  
 checking/debugging. The ATU does now appear to be working.



 In general, I found the KAT2 instructions were not quite up to th elevel  
 of excellance of the other K2 components I have assembled. A couple small  
 things like telling you that R6 was nt yet installed at the end of board  
 assembly would have helped. Also, I was told to remove some stuff that  
 was not there, and told to add some stuff that was already there (of  
 course the later made me happy).



 As always, thanks for the help.



 Tom, KG3V




__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Need KAT2 Help

2009-09-11 Thread KG3VTomZ
Thanks to both of you for the sugestions. I actually got this to work, and  
I am not sure if it originally worked, or if my resoldering fixed a  
problem. I was able to obtain a voltage reading but only over about 20  
degrees of the rotation of C55. I had no idea it would be this touchy.  
Also, the lowest I can get is about 009-011 on the reading. If this sounds  
normal, I may be OK. If not, I may still want to do some more  
checking/debugging. The ATU does now appear to be working.

In general, I found the KAT2 instructions were not quite up to th elevel of  
excellance of the other K2 components I have assembled. A couple small  
things like telling you that R6 was nt yet installed at the end of board  
assembly would have helped. Also, I was told to remove some stuff that was  
not there, and told to add some stuff that was already there (of course the  
later made me happy).

As always, thanks for the help.

Tom, KG3V


On Sep 10, 2009 8:19pm, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:
 Tom,



 You must obtain a low balance reading before you can do any *valid* power  
 or SWR calibration.

 If you cannot null with the capacitor, there is something wrong -  
 normally that something is associated with T1 and the other wattmeter  
 components, but you say you have checked those.



 OK, the next logical step is to find out for certain whether you have a  
 problem with the wattmeter or the LC board. Separate the Control board  
 from the LC board and place a jumper from J4 pin 2 to J5 pin 15 (yes, it  
 is a long jumper - the second pin in from the far ends). Now, with only  
 the Control Board (you must use the ANT1 connector) - connect a dummy  
 load and again try to balance the wattmeter - if you find that the  
 capacitor now achieves a null, look for the problem (likely a relay) on  
 the LC Board -but if you still cannot null the wattmeter, take another  
 look at T1 and its associated components.



 73,

 Don W3FPR



 kg3vt...@gmail.com wrote:


 Just finished assembling a KAT2 for my K2. When I started testing I found  
 a problem. I only get HI on the display in the CALn step, where you are  
 supposed to adjust for a reading of 000. Reducing power as low as I can  
 go, I can get a 000 display, but as soon as I increase the power, I  
 get HI. I tried CALP and I did get readings that made some sense (a  
 high value for FWD and low value for REF power) but the FWD was something  
 like 22 watts, which seems too high.



 I disassembled and reveiwed the SWR bridge section, counted turns on T1,  
 removed the link on T1 and pulled up T1 to inspect the leads and  
 soldering. Also verified all the component values and soldering in that  
 area.



 So my streak is over. Thought you just finished assembl, turned on power,  
 and all this Elecraft stuff just worked! Guess it had to happen.



 Any ideas/



 Thanks/73,



 Tom, KG3V




__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Need KAT2 Help

2009-09-10 Thread KG3VTomZ
Just finished assembling a KAT2 for my K2. When I started testing I found a  
problem. I only get HI on the display in the CALn step, where you are  
supposed to adjust for a reading of 000. Reducing power as low as I can go,  
I can get a 000 display, but as soon as I increase the power, I get HI.  
I tried CALP and I did get readings that made some sense (a high value for  
FWD and low value for REF power) but the FWD was something like 22 watts,  
which seems too high.

I disassembled and reveiwed the SWR bridge section, counted turns on T1,  
removed the link on T1 and pulled up T1 to inspect the leads and soldering.  
Also verified all the component values and soldering in that area.

So my streak is over. Thought you just finished assembl, turned on power,  
and all this Elecraft stuff just worked! Guess it had to happen.

Any ideas/

Thanks/73,

Tom, KG3V
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Using K2 for both QRP 100 Watts

2009-06-29 Thread KG3VTomZ
I have been using my K2 exclusively in the 100W configuration. I now want  
to have the option of taking just the base radio and using it stand-alone  
for QRP, but without compromising my normal use with the KPA100. I have  
separated the KPA100 in the case with the antenna tuner.

I am consideinr adding the KAT2 tuner to the base radio. I see that you use  
the ANT 1/2 switch with the KAT2 for antenna selection on the QRP radio.  
Can I stil use this switch to select between my 2 antennas on the 100 Watt  
tuner (when I am bypassing the KAT2)?

Thanks,

Tom, KG3V
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K2: Audio stops until power is cycled

2009-04-10 Thread KG3VTomZ
I have an intermittent problem. It rarely occurs, but since I mainly use  
the K2 for Contesting, it is a real annoyance. Suddenly all audio will go  
dead. The only remedy is to recylce power to the unit. It is very possible  
that this happens just after I make some control changes (like changing  
bands and/or filters).

I have also had one other strange occurance, that may or may not be  
related. The LEDs on the KAT-2 will all go dark, and stay that way. I  
believe the unit still tunes, but no SWR indicators on the panel at all.  
Again, the only fix is to recycle power to the unit.

Any ideas? I am guessing a communication problem, maybe AUX Bus related?

73,

Tom, KG3V
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K2: Extending AUX cable length

2009-04-03 Thread KG3VTomZ
Has anyone tried REALLY extending the cable between the K2 and the KAT-2? I  
would like to separate mine by 20 or 30 feet. What I want to do is get the  
KAT-2 and all the antenna conectors off of my oprating table, and close to  
the exit point of the shack.

I have heard the main concerns are noise (pickup and radiation) and timing.  
It would seem that using optical converters and optical cable might take  
care of both.

Any thoughts??

73,

Tom, KG3V
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2: Extending AUX cable length

2009-04-03 Thread KG3VTomZ
Thanks Don

I guess this might have seemed like a good April fools joke, but actually,  
they do this with many other wire type interfaces. This includes Ethernet  
and RS-232. So if the drivers are fiber are affordable, I think it could be  
done.

If anyone has any data of the required rise times or prop delays between  
the devices, plese let me know. I may try something along this line.

Tom, KG3V


On Apr 3, 2009 10:37am, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:
 Tom,





 Pulse shaping as well as 'turnaround time' on the AUXBUS signal is  
 important. Extra cable length adds to the capacitance and will round over  
 the shape of the data pulses.


 Your proposed solution for using optical converters and cable may be a  
 potential solution, but as far as I know has not been tested.





 You are certainly welcome to try it, and if you do, I would encourage you  
 to share your results. I would be particularly interested in any data you  
 could find on data distortion and delay times through such a system.





 73,


 Don W3FPR





 kg3vt...@gmail.com wrote:




 Has anyone tried REALLY extending the cable between the K2 and the KAT-2?  
 I would like to separate mine by 20 or 30 feet. What I want to do is get  
 the KAT-2 and all the antenna conectors off of my oprating table, and  
 close to the exit point of the shack.





 I have heard the main concerns are noise (pickup and radiation) and  
 timing. It would seem that using optical converters and optical cable  
 might take care of both.





 Any thoughts??





 73,





 Tom, KG3V








__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] [K2} Headphone jack dead?

2009-01-31 Thread KG3VTomZ
A couple times over the past year my audio died and I had to cycle power to  
the rig to get it back. Now suddenly plugging something into the headphone  
jack does not stop audio going to the speaker (internal or external). This  
is handy for PSK-31, but not what I want for normal operation. Is this the  
famous headphone jack failure? Or do I need to do some troubleshooting?


I did just start using the headphone jack frequently, so I am guessing that  
is what has failed.


Thanks,

Tom KG3V
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html