Re: [Elecraft] Antenna tuner range

2019-03-06 Thread Don Wilhelm

Steve,

The range of the T1 and the internal KX3 are about the same.

PS - why do folks insist on putting hyphens in the Elecraft model 
numbers - they do not belong, it is KX3 and not KX-3.

Look at the sales brochure or the webpage.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 3/6/2019 8:17 PM, Steve via Elecraft wrote:
I have an KX-3 with the built in tuner. How much wider range is the 
stand alone 20 QRP watt tuner? Thanks Steve kb1chu


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Antenna tuner range

2019-03-06 Thread Steve via Elecraft
I have an KX-3 with the built in tuner. How much wider range is the 
stand alone 20 QRP watt tuner? Thanks Steve kb1chu


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] ANTENNA TUNER on KX3-PROBLEM

2013-11-23 Thread mistymaggie
Hi,

I received my KX3 yesterday and I love it--I downloaded the utility and
updated the firmware (see below)

07:52:13 Elecraft KX3 Utility Revision 1.13.4.29
07:52:13 OS Version 6.2 Build 9200 
07:52:14 Attempting to contact KX3 on port COM4 at 19200 bit/s
07:52:14 Attempting to contact KX3 on port COM4 at 9600 bit/s
07:52:14 Attempting to contact KX3 on port COM4 at 4800 bit/s
07:52:14 KX3 MCU revision 01.61. RS-232 speed 4800 bit/s

Right now the only thing I am having trouble with is the ATU. I have gone to
the config and made sure it is set to auto--It read at first not inst--I
double checked-(eye ball) to see if the unit was installed and it was.--When
I press auto tune it comes up as N/A---

I set the vfo to 40m hit the transmit and the swr is very high
I used an external ANT Tuner MFJ after I went in and by passed the
tuner--and tuned 40 m to a 1.2 then I tried transmit again on the EX3 and it
read 1.2

I know I am new to the unit so I believe I am doing something or have not
done something correctly--I failed to mention before I did anything I
checked all the config settings and they were all default according to the
manual--Any help out there ??



--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ANTENNA-TUNER-on-KX3-PROBLEM-tp7581087.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] ANTENNA TUNER on KX3-PROBLEM

2013-11-23 Thread Mark Petiford
Did you exit the menus, turn the radio off and back on again after setting the 
ATU to AUTO?  See page 29 of the owner's manual (C2 revision):    
Set ATU MDto AUTO. Exit the menu and turn the KX3 off,then back on.

Mark
KE6BB

From: mistymaggiewa...@m-comm.com
Sent: ‎Sat, ‎Nov‎ ‎23‎, ‎2013 at ‎6‎:‎43‎ ‎AM
To:  elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] ANTENNA TUNER on KX3-PROBLEM

Hi,

I received my KX3 yesterday and I love it--I downloaded the utility and
updated the firmware (see below)

07:52:13 Elecraft KX3 Utility Revision 1.13.4.29
07:52:13 OS Version 6.2 Build 9200 
07:52:14 Attempting to contact KX3 on port COM4 at 19200 bit/s
07:52:14 Attempting to contact KX3 on port COM4 at 9600 bit/s
07:52:14 Attempting to contact KX3 on port COM4 at 4800 bit/s
07:52:14 KX3 MCU revision 01.61. RS-232 speed 4800 bit/s

Right now the only thing I am having trouble with is the ATU. I have gone to
the config and made sure it is set to auto--It read at first not inst--I
double checked-(eye ball) to see if the unit was installed and it was.--When
I press auto tune it comes up as N/A---

I set the vfo to 40m hit the transmit and the swr is very high
I used an external ANT Tuner MFJ after I went in and by passed the
tuner--and tuned 40 m to a 1.2 then I tried transmit again on the EX3 and it
read 1.2

I know I am new to the unit so I believe I am doing something or have not
done something correctly--I failed to mention before I did anything I
checked all the config settings and they were all default according to the
manual--Any help out there ??



--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ANTENNA-TUNER-on-KX3-PROBLEM-tp7581087.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] ANTENNA TUNER on KX3-PROBLEM

2013-11-23 Thread Don Wilhelm
Review all the KXAT3 installation instructions and make certain that 
everything is plugged in correctly.
The N/A display indicates that there is no communication between the KX3 
processor and the processor in the KXAT3.  A misplaced connector pin or 
something of that order is the usual suspect.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 11/23/2013 9:43 AM, mistymaggie wrote:

Hi,

I received my KX3 yesterday and I love it--I downloaded the utility and
updated the firmware (see below)

07:52:13 Elecraft KX3 Utility Revision 1.13.4.29
07:52:13 OS Version 6.2 Build 9200
07:52:14 Attempting to contact KX3 on port COM4 at 19200 bit/s
07:52:14 Attempting to contact KX3 on port COM4 at 9600 bit/s
07:52:14 Attempting to contact KX3 on port COM4 at 4800 bit/s
07:52:14 KX3 MCU revision 01.61. RS-232 speed 4800 bit/s

Right now the only thing I am having trouble with is the ATU. I have gone to
the config and made sure it is set to auto--It read at first not inst--I
double checked-(eye ball) to see if the unit was installed and it was.--When
I press auto tune it comes up as N/A---

I set the vfo to 40m hit the transmit and the swr is very high
I used an external ANT Tuner MFJ after I went in and by passed the
tuner--and tuned 40 m to a 1.2 then I tried transmit again on the EX3 and it
read 1.2

I know I am new to the unit so I believe I am doing something or have not
done something correctly--I failed to mention before I did anything I
checked all the config settings and they were all default according to the
manual--Any help out there ??




__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Antenna Tuner Or Not

2012-09-14 Thread Fred Smith
My best QRP tuner is my Palstar AT4K as shown on the Alpha 4510
Wattmeter/SWR meter .02-3000w + or - 10% and my W2 wattmeter. My QRP tuner
was quite lossy so I sold it granted this tuner will be used portable for
sure. 

73,
Fred/N0AZZ

-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bruce Beford
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 6:06 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Antenna Tuner Or Not

For those that don't know Robert Heinlein:
TANSTAAFL= There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.

There is wisdom here.

What Mike is saying is that, even though your auto-tuner may find a match to
make the transmitter happy, there may be more efficient ways of coupling
your signal to the ether.

IR losses (Ohms law) within the tuner can eat up a fair amount of your QRP
signal. This loss is higher when the inductor is wound with teeny-tiny wire.
This is the case in some of these small internal ATUs. 

So, bottom line- 

1. The internal ATU can make it possible to operate using an antenna that
presents a wild reactance that must be cancelled out to make the transmitter
happy.

2. When an antenna system (i.e. feedline plus antenna) requires a fairly
large inductance to cancel out capacitive reactance in the system, this
inductance can be provided by the nifty little ATU.

3. If the ATU has small diameter conductors creating this inductive
reactance, the Ohmic losses in the wire adds up quickly.

4. The smaller the wire used for the inductors, the higher the losses.

5. To maximize your actual radiated signal, optimize your antenna system to
require the least inductance to resonate it. 

6 alternative to 5 (above), you could build an external ATU with a large
roller inductor made from heavy gauge conductor.

7. For most situations, ignore 1-6 above, and just get on the air.

8. No matter what, Have fun!

8-) 73,
Bruce, N1RX


 It *always* surprises me though, that in Elecraft-world all manner of 
 antenna deformity is to be handled by an ATU magic bullet.  Small- 
 conductor ATUs are never your friend, if an antenna/feedline could be 
 used that doesn't require tuner reactance.  TANSTAAFL!

 73,
 Mike / KK5F



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Antenna Tuner Or Not

2012-09-13 Thread Mike Morrow
 So, are there advantages to the internal KX3 ATU over the T1.


 I believe the tuning range on the internal ATU is very wide.  Someone
 on the reflector compared the tuning ranges of all the Elecraft ATUs
 and it is wider than the T1.

I posted such information last month, summarized now as follows:

ELECRAFT ATU L AND C CONFIGURATIONS

The reactance configuration for all Elecraft ATUs is an L-network of series
inductance, with a capacitance connected to common before (radio side) or
after (antenna side) the inductance (but not both) by a relay.  It is a
classic low pass filter.

KAT1, Configs=1020, L=0 to 4.9 uH (16 steps), C=0 to 300 pF (32 steps)

KAT2, Configs=131068, L=0 to 20.7 uH (256 steps), C=0 to 2420 pF (256 steps)

KAT3, Configs=131068, L=0 to 17.4 uH (256 steps), C=0 to 2600 pF (256 steps)

KXAT1, Configs=124, L=0 to 4.5 uH (8 steps), C=0 to 140 pF (8 steps)

KXAT3, Configs=131068, L=0 to 15.9 uH (256 steps), C=0 to 2680 pF (256 steps) 

T1, Configs=32764, L=0 to 7.5 uH (128 steps), C=0 to 1300 pF (128 steps)

The last two entries show a significantly greater range of reactance that
the KXAT3 can insert...double the inductance and the capacitance of the T1.

It *always* surprises me though, that in Elecraft-world all manner of antenna
deformity is to be handled by an ATU magic bullet.  Small-conductor ATUs are
never your friend, if an antenna/feedline could be used that doesn't require
tuner reactance.  TANSTAAFL!

73,
Mike / KK5F
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Antenna Tuner Or Not

2012-09-13 Thread Bruce Beford
For those that don't know Robert Heinlein:
TANSTAAFL= There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.

There is wisdom here.

What Mike is saying is that, even though your auto-tuner may find a match to
make the transmitter happy, there may be more efficient ways of coupling
your signal to the ether.

IR losses (Ohms law) within the tuner can eat up a fair amount of your QRP
signal. This loss is higher when the inductor is wound with teeny-tiny wire.
This is the case in some of these small internal ATUs. 

So, bottom line- 

1. The internal ATU can make it possible to operate using an antenna that
presents a wild reactance that must be cancelled out to make the transmitter
happy.

2. When an antenna system (i.e. feedline plus antenna) requires a fairly
large inductance to cancel out capacitive reactance in the system, this
inductance can be provided by the nifty little ATU.

3. If the ATU has small diameter conductors creating this inductive
reactance, the Ohmic losses in the wire adds up quickly.

4. The smaller the wire used for the inductors, the higher the losses.

5. To maximize your actual radiated signal, optimize your antenna system to
require the least inductance to resonate it. 

6 alternative to 5 (above), you could build an external ATU with a large
roller inductor made from heavy gauge conductor.

7. For most situations, ignore 1-6 above, and just get on the air.

8. No matter what, Have fun!

8-) 73,
Bruce, N1RX


 It *always* surprises me though, that in Elecraft-world all manner of 
 antenna deformity is to be handled by an ATU magic bullet.  Small-
 conductor ATUs are never your friend, if an antenna/feedline could be
 used that doesn't require tuner reactance.  TANSTAAFL!

 73,
 Mike / KK5F



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] antenna tuner f/ s

2009-07-17 Thread Scott McDowell

The antenna tuner has been sold.

n5sm


  

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Antenna Tuner Stored Settings Clear

2009-06-20 Thread Brett Howard
Is there a way to make the K3 forget all of the prior antenna tuner
settings for when one switches antennas?  I've searched and not been
able to find anything...  I'm hoping that its a really nice intuitive
thing such as renaming the antenna automatically clears any remembered
tuning settings for that antenna on all bands...  But I'd be willing to
settle for pressing CLR while in some tuner only mode or something too.
Like maybe the tuner menu entries or something like that.


~Brett KC7OTG

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Antenna Tuner Stored Settings Clear

2009-06-20 Thread Ken Wagner K3IU
G'morning Brett:
Check the release notes for what you are asking. I think it was about 
v3.0.4 that added this feature.
73, Ken K3IU

Brett Howard wrote:
 Is there a way to make the K3 forget all of the prior antenna tuner
 settings for when one switches antennas?  I've searched and not been
 able to find anything...  I'm hoping that its a really nice intuitive
 thing such as renaming the antenna automatically clears any remembered
 tuning settings for that antenna on all bands...  But I'd be willing to
 settle for pressing CLR while in some tuner only mode or something too.
 Like maybe the tuner menu entries or something like that.


 ~Brett KC7OTG

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

   
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Antenna Tuner Stored Settings Clear

2009-06-20 Thread Brett Howard
Looks like it was there... I didn't think I'd remembered it being
there...  If anyone else is interested it appears in the 3.03 release
from 3-17-2009.  The link to the release notes is currently here:
http://www.elecraft.com/K3/hfwnotes.rtf


Thanks


On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 05:55 -0400, Ken Wagner K3IU wrote:
 G'morning Brett:
 Check the release notes for what you are asking. I think it was about
 v3.0.4 that added this feature.
 73, Ken K3IU
 
 Brett Howard wrote: 
  Is there a way to make the K3 forget all of the prior antenna tuner
  settings for when one switches antennas?  I've searched and not been
  able to find anything...  I'm hoping that its a really nice intuitive
  thing such as renaming the antenna automatically clears any remembered
  tuning settings for that antenna on all bands...  But I'd be willing to
  settle for pressing CLR while in some tuner only mode or something too.
  Like maybe the tuner menu entries or something like that.
  
  
  ~Brett KC7OTG
  
  __
  Elecraft mailing list
  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
  Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
  
  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
  Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
  


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3 - Elecraft Antenna Tuner KAT3

2008-09-30 Thread Lee Buller

I am curious as to the experience of others on the list concerning the KAT3.  
Mine works find, but never finds that 1.0 to 1 match.  It will find 1.2 or so 
(which is OK I know) but does not seem to find anything better.  Yes, I do the 
tune procedure twice within 5 seconds.  Latest firmware.  It also seems to 
increase over time a tadand I am not moving around on frequency that much 
either.  I am kinda addicted to running stations.

Antenna is a Force-12 which is about .14 to 1.6.  I really don't need to use 
the tuner but I do.  The 40 meter vee and the 80 mter vee do the same thing 
when I run the antenna tuner.  I do not on 40 CW and the 80 meter dipole is 
tuned to mid band since I try to work both SSB and CW.  All this has bee 
checked by an antenna analyzer.

Just asking another one of my brilliant questions...

Lee - K0WA :)




In our day and age it seems that Common Sense is in short supply.  If you don't 
have any Common Sense - get some Common Sense and use it.  If you can't find 
any Common Sense, ask for help from somebody who has some Common Sense.  Is 
Common Sense divine?___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

RE: [Elecraft] K3 - Elecraft Antenna Tuner KAT3

2008-09-30 Thread Jack Regan
Lee,

I had the same problem.  I redoing the Wattmeter 5 and 50 watt Calibrations
and the Transmitter Gain Calibrations (for all bands) fixed the problem.

 

Background: KAT3 worked after initial install. 1.0 SWR into a 40M dipole
resonant in the CW end but tunable thru the SSB end and 1.0 into a 20 M
vertical (1.2 SWR w/o tuner) at the CW end and 1.0 at the SSB end. After a
power output problem with SSB on 40 and 80 was solved by a firmware upgrade
the KAT3 degraded to the symptoms you described.  It has been working FB
since then, as has everything else.

 

Renne at Elecraft recognized the symptoms immediately and walked me thru a
few diagnostic steps to confirm the diagnoses.  Have a dummy load ready and
give him a call!

 

Jack AE6GC 

 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Buller
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 10:00 AM
To: Elecraft Reflector
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 - Elecraft Antenna Tuner KAT3

 



I am curious as to the experience of others on the list concerning the KAT3.
Mine works find, but never finds that 1.0 to 1 match.  It will find 1.2 or
so (which is OK I know) but does not seem to find anything better.  Yes, I
do the tune procedure twice within 5 seconds.  Latest firmware.  It also
seems to increase over time a tadand I am not moving around on frequency
that much either.  I am kinda addicted to running stations.

Antenna is a Force-12 which is about .14 to 1.6.  I really don't need to use
the tuner but I do.  The 40 meter vee and the 80 mter vee do the same thing
when I run the antenna tuner.  I do not on 40 CW and the 80 meter dipole is
tuned to mid band since I try to work both SSB and CW.  All this has bee
checked by an antenna analyzer.

Just asking another one of my brilliant questions...

Lee - K0WA :)




In our day and age it seems that Common Sense is in short supply. If you
don't have any Common Sense - get some Common Sense and use it. If you can't
find any Common Sense, ask for help from somebody who has some Common Sense.
Is Common Sense divine?

 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Re: [Elecraft] K3 - Elecraft Antenna Tuner KAT3

2008-09-30 Thread NZ0T

I usually get 1.0 to 1 on a variety of antennas including my 160 sloper cut
for 1.947 down on the CW portion of the band.  Sometimes it's not quite as
good but that's when I'm trying to make a really bad match work.

Bill NZ0T

Lee Buller wrote:
 
 
 I am curious as to the experience of others on the list concerning the
 KAT3.  Mine works find, but never finds that 1.0 to 1 match.  It will find
 1.2 or so (which is OK I know) but does not seem to find anything better. 
 Yes, I do the tune procedure twice within 5 seconds.  Latest firmware.  It
 also seems to increase over time a tadand I am not moving around on
 frequency that much either.  I am kinda addicted to running stations.
 
 Antenna is a Force-12 which is about .14 to 1.6.  I really don't need to
 use the tuner but I do.  The 40 meter vee and the 80 mter vee do the same
 thing when I run the antenna tuner.  I do not on 40 CW and the 80 meter
 dipole is tuned to mid band since I try to work both SSB and CW.  All this
 has bee checked by an antenna analyzer.
 
 Just asking another one of my brilliant questions...
 
 Lee - K0WA :)
 
 
 
 
 In our day and age it seems that Common Sense is in short supply.  If you
 don't have any Common Sense - get some Common Sense and use it.  If you
 can't find any Common Sense, ask for help from somebody who has some
 Common Sense.  Is Common Sense divine?
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/K3---Elecraft-Antenna-Tuner-KAT3-tp1129458p1129913.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Antenna Tuner versus Antenna Analizer

2008-09-16 Thread Paul Maruna
Thanks to everyone that replied to my subject email.

All the info helped cleared up some of my confusion.

Paul
(73)
KD8 HWP
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Antenna Tuner versus Antenna Analizer ?

2008-09-14 Thread Paul Maruna

Thanks to everyone that replied to my subject email.

All the info helped cleared up some of my confusion.

Paul
(73)
KD8 HWP


- Original Message - 
From: Paul Maruna [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 5:46 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] Antenna Tuner versus Antenna Analizer ?


I bought a buddipole antenna system and I want to get one of the subject 
units but I don't know the difference between them, and what each one does, 
and which one will help me with the setup with my K3 and my antenna system ?


When I bought my K3 I also bought a KAT3 which I believe is an antenna tuner 
for the K3 -- Will this do the same thing to match the antenna to the K3, or 
am I better off getting another unit like a LDG Z-100 or an LDG AT-200 Pro 
or something else like one of the MFJ units ?


Where does the baluns come into this play with either unit ?

I am just a Technician class and am studying for the General class and I 
have not built the K3 that I have yet, and all this antenna stuff is pretty 
confusing.


Can anyone help please ?

Thank you,
Paul
(73)
KD8HWP
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Antenna Tuner versus Antenna Analizer ?

2008-09-11 Thread Tom Hammond

Hi Paul:


I bought a buddipole antenna system and I want to get one of the subject
units but I don't know the difference between them, and what each one
does, and which one will help me with the setup with my K3 and my antenna
system ?


Actually, BOTH devices may help you. But, at this point, possibly the Antenna
Analyzer might help most... IF you understand what it does.

Using an Antenna Analyzer will allow you to adjust your antenna(s) such that
they will present (to your transmitter) the best and most efficient LOAD for
a given band. The closer the LOAD IMPEDANCE of the antenna (and feedline)
are to matching the output impedance of your transmitter, the more efficient
will be the transfer of RF power from the TX to the antenna.  The Antenna
Analyzer is NOT a 'tuning device', in that it MAKES these adjustments!  It
only allows you to SEE the effect of adjustments you make to the antenna
as you attempt to optimize the antenna's performance.

On the other hand, an Antenna Tuner (ATU) is a device which you DO 
adjust in an

effort to compensate for mismatched presented by the antenna/coax combination
to the transmitter. This device will NOT change the SWR on the coax between
itself and the antenna, BUT it can (often) create an offsetting set of
conditions which will make the mismatch APPEAR TO THE TRANSMITTER is if the
transmitter is seeing a near-perfect load impedance, even though the real
loaf from the antenna/feedline may be much different from 'perfect'.


When I bought my K3 I also bought a KAT3 which I believe is an antenna tuner
for the K3 -- Will this do the same thing to match the antenna to the K3,
or am I better off getting another unit like a LDG Z-100 or an LDG AT-200
Pro or something else like one of the MFJ units ?


The KAT3 is the 'antenna tuner' of which I wrote above. It is NOT 'the
perfect answer' to all antenna mismatch (SWR) problems. But it CAN compensate
for some of the smaller ones and allow your K3 to operate rather efficiently
into a non-perfect load (from the antenna/coax combination).

You FIRST would want to try to optimize your antenna/coax combination such
that it presents to the TX a LOAD which is as close as possible to the
desired 50 Ohms (which is what most modern ham transmitters wish to see).

Once you have gotten the load from the antenna/coax as close to 50 Ohms as
you can reasonably expect to achieve, THEN, you can use the antenna tuner
(KAT3 or other similar device) to provide the final compensation between
the antenna/coax and the TX so the TX 'sees' its desired 50 Ohm load on the
desired band and frequency.

If your antenna/coax combination cannot present a decent load to the TX, the
antenna tuner will ATTEMPT to compensate so the TX still thinks it's seeing
a workable load impedance. But most ATUs have their limits to he range of
load mismatch for which they can compensate... often they cannot make a silk
purse from a sow's ear!!!

This having been said... and assuming the ATU is either installed INSIDE the
radio, or immediately outside the radio in the coax line, you must understand
that the ONLY compensation which the ATU can provide is to the TRANSMITTER
and any short length of coax between the ATU and the TX.  IT DOES NOT CHANGE
THE LOAD (SWR) WHICH IS STILL PRESENT ON THE COAX GOING TO THE ANTENNA!  As a
result, if your antenna is badly non-resonant, and presents a horrid load to
the TX, using an ATU may(!) be able to compensate to the point that the TX
'thinks' is sees a resonant antenna, BUT the truth of the matter is that the
TX is the only one being 'fooled'... the antenna/coax still has the same poor
load impedance it originally presented, and it will be just as INefficient as
it was before the ATU was introduced into the equation. The ATU does NOTHING
to change the real matching at the antenna.  YOU must make those changes
yourself BEFORE you try to use the antenna.


Where does the baluns come into this play with either unit?


A balun (BALanced-to-UNbalanced) impedance transformer will NOT come into play
in the scenario you write about, above. The Buddipole does NOT require an
impedance matching transformer, and neither does the coax between it and
your K3.

Sometimes a 1:1 impedance ratio balun is used in an effort to keep RF which
can appear on the OUTSIDE of the feedline coax from being radiated. In this
case, the 1:1 balun (or a similar in-line coaxial RF choke) will be installed
AT the feedpoint of the antenna. In this manner, RF is 'choked' off of the
outside of the coax and prevented from being radiated, thus keeping the feed-
line from acting as a 'radiating' part of the antenna system.


I am just a Technician class and am studying for the General class and I
have not built the K3 that I have yet, and all this antenna stuff is pretty
confusing.


Hope this helps.

73,

Tom HammondN0SS

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the 

[Elecraft] Antenna Tuner versus Antenna Analizer ?

2008-09-10 Thread Paul Maruna
I bought a buddipole antenna system and I want to get one of the subject units 
but I don't know the difference between them, and what each one does, and which 
one will help me with the setup with my K3 and my antenna system ?

When I bought my K3 I also bought a KAT3 which I believe is an antenna tuner 
for the K3 -- Will this do the same thing to match the antenna to the K3, or am 
I better off getting another unit like a LDG Z-100 or an LDG AT-200 Pro or 
something else like one of the MFJ units ?

Where does the baluns come into this play with either unit ?

I am just a Technician class and am studying for the General class and I have 
not built the K3 that I have yet, and all this antenna stuff is pretty 
confusing.

Can anyone help please ?

Thank you,
Paul
(73)
KD8HWP
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Antenna Tuner versus Antenna Analizer ?

2008-09-10 Thread Bruce McLaughlin
I am not totally sure about your question but if you are wondering what the
difference is between an antenna analyzer and an antenna tuner, basically
the analyzer is an instrument to determine the characteristic impedance of
the antenna at the antenna terminals or the characteristic impedance of the
antenna system, including the feed line, at the end of the feed line.  It
can also measure a number of other electrical characteristics and is a very
useful instrument but I think it is probably in excess of your needs at this
stage of your hand career.  And antenna tuner on the other hand is a device
which will attempt to transform the impedance presented to it at the end of
the feed line from the antenna so that it matches the expected load
impedance of your radio which is 50 ohms.  The resulting transformation or
match performed by the antenna tuner should result in a 1:1 SWR as seen by
the final of your radio.  When there is a low SWR as seen by the final of
your radio there should be a maximum transfer of RF power from your radio to
the antenna so that it can be radiated as a signal.  However, if there is an
extreme impedance mismatch between the end of the feed line and the 50 ohms
expected by your radio there can be problems as noted below.

I think you will find that the K-3 antenna tuner is a very good one and will
tune a wide range of antennas.  Since you already have it, I suggest you try
it first with your antenna.  If for some reason it does not work you could
always try a different, external tuner.  But if the antenna cannot be tuned
with the built-in K-3 tuner I think you would be well advised to consider a
different antenna.  Just because you may be able to reduce the SWR presented
to the radio by using a tuner does not mean you have an efficient system or
that most of your RF will actually be radiated rather than simply dissipated
in the tuner.

If the terminal match between the antenna and feedline is very unfavorable,
while the tuner may be able to transform the resulting SWR presented to the
radio enough to allow the final to run at full power you may find that much
of the power is being dissipated in the antenna tuner as heat rather than
being radiated by the antenna.  If for example you are running 100 W from
the transmitter but 80 of those watts are being dissipated in the tuner
because of a very unfavorable antenna impedance, there won't be much RF
power left to actually reach and be radiated by the antenna.

So, I would try the K-3 antenna tuner first.  Chances are it will do the
job.  If not you may want to consider a better antenna before you start
looking for external antenna tuners.  Frankly, the only time I would
consider an external tuner is if I were using a balanced feed line and even
then I might choose a 4 to 1 current balin at the output of the radio
instead of a balanced antenna tuner.  Another situation calling for an
external tuner might be if you are using an amplifier following the K-3 and
the impedance presented by the antenna system cannot be handled by tuning
the amplifier.  Good luck with your license upgrade and your new K-3.

Bruce-W8FU

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Maruna
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 6:47 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] Antenna Tuner versus Antenna Analizer ?

I bought a buddipole antenna system and I want to get one of the subject
units but I don't know the difference between them, and what each one does,
and which one will help me with the setup with my K3 and my antenna system ?

When I bought my K3 I also bought a KAT3 which I believe is an antenna tuner
for the K3 -- Will this do the same thing to match the antenna to the K3, or
am I better off getting another unit like a LDG Z-100 or an LDG AT-200 Pro
or something else like one of the MFJ units ?

Where does the baluns come into this play with either unit ?

I am just a Technician class and am studying for the General class and I
have not built the K3 that I have yet, and all this antenna stuff is pretty
confusing.

Can anyone help please ?

Thank you,
Paul
(73)
KD8HWP
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Antenna Tuner versus Antenna Analizer ?

2008-09-10 Thread O. Johns

Paul,

As an addendum to the excellent summary by Bruce - W8FU, let me add  
that the Buddipole antennas are designed to match a 50 ohm coax feeder  
pretty well.  They are off-center fed to get near to the correct 50  
ohm impedance.  So if you use the K3 antenna tuner and the Buddipole  
you won't have too much loss in the coax line.  However, the Buddipole  
is a short dipole and as such not a particularly efficient radiator.   
You may find that with the 100 watts output of the K3 you will do very  
well with the Buddipole.  But at some later stage of your career you  
may want to have a longer piece of wire.  A non-resonant doublet of  
66ft or more fed at the center with 450 ohm ladder line is a good  
minimum.  BUT, don't get rid of your Buddipole.  It is great for Field  
Day.


Good luck and 73,

Oliver Johns - W6ODJ


On 10 Sep 2008, at 3:46 PM, Paul Maruna wrote:

I bought a buddipole antenna system and I want to get one of the  
subject units but I don't know the difference between them, and what  
each one does, and which one will help me with the setup with my K3  
and my antenna system ?


When I bought my K3 I also bought a KAT3 which I believe is an  
antenna tuner for the K3 -- Will this do the same thing to match the  
antenna to the K3, or am I better off getting another unit like a  
LDG Z-100 or an LDG AT-200 Pro or something else like one of the MFJ  
units ?


Where does the baluns come into this play with either unit ?

I am just a Technician class and am studying for the General class  
and I have not built the K3 that I have yet, and all this antenna  
stuff is pretty confusing.


Can anyone help please ?

Thank you,
Paul
(73)
KD8HWP
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Antenna Tuner versus Antenna Analizer ?

2008-09-10 Thread Don Wilhelm

Paul,

Since you find antennas confusing at this point, you may want to look at 
the Antenna article on my website http://w3fpr.qrpradio.com.  It tells 
about antenna concepts in layman's language as much as possible, and no 
math.


Second comment is that you may want a wire antenna instead of the 
Buddypole for your home station.  A half wave dipole at the lowest 
frequency of interest fed with ladder line will receive and radiate much 
better than the Buddypole in most situations.   One cannot defeat the 
laws of physics.  An antenna shorter than 1/2 wavelength (1/4 wavelength 
for verticals with a good ground system) will be inefficient by 
comparison - don't be fooled by the advertising hype - a full size G5RV 
antenna is just not as efficient on 80 meters as a 135 foot dipole.


The Buddypole *is* a very nice convenient antenna for portable work and 
likely more efficient than most portable antennas, but for the home 
station, you can likely do better with just wire.


The KAT3 with a 1:1 balun or 4:1 balun will provide all the tuning range 
normally needed to tune a wire antenna with ladder line, you should not 
need a separate tuner - and the KAT3 will remember its settings for each 
band for you - no knob twisting when changing bands.


73,
Don W3FPR

Paul Maruna wrote:

I bought a buddipole antenna system and I want to get one of the subject units 
but I don't know the difference between them, and what each one does, and which 
one will help me with the setup with my K3 and my antenna system ?

When I bought my K3 I also bought a KAT3 which I believe is an antenna tuner 
for the K3 -- Will this do the same thing to match the antenna to the K3, or am 
I better off getting another unit like a LDG Z-100 or an LDG AT-200 Pro or 
something else like one of the MFJ units ?

Where does the baluns come into this play with either unit ?

I am just a Technician class and am studying for the General class and I have 
not built the K3 that I have yet, and all this antenna stuff is pretty 
confusing.

Can anyone help please ?

Thank you,
Paul
(73)
KD8HWP
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1664 - Release Date: 9/10/2008 6:00 AM


  

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Antenna Tuner versus Antenna Analizer ?

2008-09-10 Thread Dave KQ3T

Hi Paul,

Just to expand slightly on this one aspect of your question.

The term balun is a contraction of balanced-unbalanced. It's a 
device for connecting a balanced feedline to an unbalanced one.


Most transceivers these days are designed to connect to a 50 ohm coaxial 
cable (such as RG-8, RG-58, etc.). Coaxial cable is an unbalanced 
feedline, since one side (the shield) is connected to ground. 
Unfortunately, coaxial cable will usually have a higher loss than a 
balanced feedline (ladder line). The purpose of a balun is to 
efficiently couple the balanced feedline to the unbalanced coax that 
connects to your rig.


Many hams do not use baluns. They will run coax from the rig all the way 
to the feedpoint of the antenna. This is especially true when the 
antenna is resonant (that is, a full half-wave on the band you're 
operating). Many commercial antennas are designed for connection 
directly to 50 ohm coax, without an intervening balun.


73,
Dave KQ3T



Paul Maruna wrote:

...Where does the baluns come into this play with either unit ?

...
Thank you,
Paul
(73)
KD8HWP
  


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Antenna Tuner upto 400w

2006-05-17 Thread SARA-VU3RSB
Hi Friends

Is there any one having good used automatic tuner for sale which can go upto
400w 

I would like to use along with my K2 for upcoming IOTA/Dxing / Dxpeditions
from India.

Awaiting for reply 

Regards
Sara, VU3RSB
Member in VU4 Dxpedition in 2004/2006.


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com