RE: CE marking components... a breath of fresh air...

1997-04-15 Thread Grasso, Charles (Chaz)
Excellent review Peter!

I would add one thought for you to comment on.

My company routinely ships its products in pieces to be assembled at a 
customer site due to size and complexity. We toyed with the idea of  adding 
the phrase Part of a CE compliant system on the shipping containers.

Comments (good  bad!)?
Charles Grasso
EMC Engineer
StorageTek
Tel:(303)673-2908
Fax(303)661-7115

--
From:   Peter E. Perkins[SMTP:peperk...@compuserve.com]
Sent:   Monday, April 14, 1997 1:37 PM
To: PSNetwork
Subject:CE marking components... a breath of fresh air...


PSNet

Editorial, Educate Your Customers from Test  Measurement
World/April, 1997 by Martin Rowe, Technical Editor

A reader who works for a component manufacturer told me that his
customers want his company to place the CE marking on its components. (The
CE marking indicates compliance with European EMC and Low-Voltage
Directives.)  The reader says his customers think that designing products
with CE-marked components will ensure that the products will meet the
standards.  He also claims that should a product fail compliance testing,
the customer can blame failure on any non-CE marked components.
I'd like to inform that customer that components can't officially
carry the CE marking.  The CE marking applies to systems and subsystems
available for sale to end users.  Components are excluded.
Manufacturers shouldn't place all blame for testing failures on
component manufacturers.  Even if the components in a design have 
excellent
EMC and safety characteristics, a product can still fail compliance
testing.  Components can't compensate for a poor board layout, lack of
proper shielding, and improper grounding.
Another problem with putting a CE mark on components is that the
end user might assume that a board or system filled with CE-marked
components meets the requirements for the marking.  Therefore, installing
CE-marked components in your product can be deceptive.
So what should this company do?  Should the company place the CE
marking on its components, adhering to the belief in Rule number one: the
customer is always right.  Rule number two:see rule number one?  Should
the company lose sales because it insists in not lulling customers into a
false sense of security?
Perhaps the company should try to educate its customers.  The
component manufacturer can explain to its customers why components can't
carry the CE mark.  The company should encourage its customers to design
for EMC; its customers must understand that the burden for EMC and safety
compliance fall on them.  The trick is to make it clear that the company
isn't just trying to pass the buck to the customer.
If your company busy components to build into its products, you
shouldn't insist that those components have the CE marking, and none
should.  If your marketing department or upper management thinks that
having products loaded with the CE-marked components makes the products
better, tactfully inform them that they're wrong.  If you want your
products to pass compliance tests, you'll have to design them with
compliance in mind.

- - - - -

submitted by

Peter E Perkins
Principal Product Safety Consultant
Tigard, ORe  97281-3427

+1/503/452-1201 phone/fax

p.perk...@ieee.org  email

visit our website:

http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/peperkins

- - - - -



RE: VCCI labelling

1997-04-15 Thread BARRON_MANNY

Here is a brief summary of a public VCCI meeting that was held in Santa
Clara, California on March 17, 1997, which I attended.

Five VCCI officials from Japan made presentaions to the audience
relative to the changes in their VCCI standards that become effective
April 1, 1997.  They provided a draft copy of the revised standards and
then proceeded to highlight all of the changes made.  The VCCI informed
the audience that the final versions of the revised standards will be
distributed by VCCI sometime in late April (but they said the new
standards still become effective April 1).  The affected standards are
listed below:

1. V-2/97.04  Regulations for Voluntary Control Measures
2. V-3/97.04  Technical Requirements
3. V-4/97.04  Guidelines for Test Conditions for Equipment under Test
4. V-4/97.04  Appendix II:  Test Site Evaulation using Shortened Dipole
5. Misc Forms Application Procedures for Registration of Measurement
  Facilities

These draft revised standards were issued by:

VCCI
Shiba-koen Sanada Bldg 2nd Floor
5-12 Shiba-koen 3-chome, Minato-ku, Tokoyo 105
Tel:  03-3434-8809
Fax:  03-3434-8837
http://www.vcci.or.jp/vcci/

Hope this is helpful.



 Sincerely,


 Manny Barron
 Tandem Computers, Inc.


   ORIGINAL ATTACHMENT   
SENT 04-05-97 FROM SMTPGATE @MAILMN (gra...@louisville.stortek.com)

It s in their  AGREEMENT OF VCCI FOR ITE document V-2/96.03..Beware though
- I understand that they are revising this agreement AGAIN - I'll keep you
posted.
Charles Grasso
EMC Engineer
StorageTek


--
From:   Arthur Poolton (MEPCD)[SMTP:arth...@apricot.mee.com]
Sent:   Friday, April 04, 1997 6:54 AM
To: Grasso, Charles (Chaz); 'EMC Group'
Subject:RE: VCCI labelling

Does anyone have samples of the new label ?

--
From:  Grasso, Charles (Chaz)[SMTP:gra...@louisville.stortek.com]
Sent:  04 April 1997 01:06
To:'EMC Group'
Subject:   VCCI labelling

I noticed that the VCCI have changed their labelling requirements for
ITE.

How long before we have to use the new label? We still have a lot of the
old
label.




Re: Four Layer board optimum design guidelines.

1997-04-15 Thread Terry J. Meck
Matt or Anyone:

Do you know why I received four (4) copies of this 
interesting problem??!!

I seem to be getting duplicates from time to time but 
4?

On 14 Apr 97 at 18:17, Mat Mahmoudi wrote about, Four 
Layer board optimum design gui:

 
  We are developing a 1500W power factor corrected
  power supply. Using a Boost converter in the
  front end, switching at 100 KHZ to achieve power
  factor correction. We have about 4 working
  prototypes, however these units have to be
  modified to meet the requirements of EN61010 for
  creepage distances.
 
  As a result of this, we have decided to change
  the layout of the power board to ensure
  compliance to EN 61010 . In order to maintain
  proper distance between primary and secondary
  traces and also to have sufficient trace width
  for power carrying traces up to 12amp ,We are
  forced  to change the power board design from 2
  layers to four layers. However, we are not sure
  the order of these planes. For example, we can
  put the output of the Boost converter usually
  380-390V Dc bus,which carries 4 amp dc, at the
  component side( top external layer) and place
  its return at solder side (bottom external
  layer). We can then place  all other traces such
  input  AC lines,Power traces, +/-15 vac logic
  supplies and all other signals in the two
  remaining internal layers or  planes. I am not
  sure if this the best arrangement, because our
  PWB designer is indicating that these planes (
  +390v dc bus  its return) are usually placed as
  internal layers and not as external layers. In
  addition, we have two current sense signals
  which are very sensitive and we presently using
  Co-axial cables to carry these signal. I am not
  sure with 4-layer boards and  additional
  shielding ,if I can eliminate the CO-axial cable
  and find a proper plane to place these signals.
  I appreciate any comment regarding this matter.
  Best Regards Mat Mahmoudi 
 


Best regards,
Terry J. Meck
Senior QA/Test Engineer
215-721-5280
tjm...@accusort.com
Accu-Sort Systems Inc. Telford, Pa USA


NPSS, Inc. Dinner 4/23/97, Charles Ludolph to speak

1997-04-15 Thread Art Michael
Hello all,

If you are, or plan to be in the Boston area on April 23rd, you may be
interested in the following NPSS, Inc. Dinner/Meeting

ThanX and regards, Art Michael (For the Northeast Product Safety Society)
-- Forwarded message =

Who:   Northeast Product Safety Society, Inc.
   P.O. Box 651, Boylston MA 01505-0651

What:  3rd Annual NPSS, Inc., Membership Recruitment Dinner -
   which affords members the opportunity to meet socially
   and to introduce prospective members to the Society, 
   its members and its programs.

When:  April 23, 1997
   Registration   5:00 pm
   Dinner  Program   6:00 p.m.
   Speaker  QA  7:30 p.m. - 8:30 p.m.
   Dinner Closes  9:30 p.m

Where: Radisson Inn Marlboro, 75 Felton St., Marlborough MA

The Speaker:  Charles Ludolph, Director, Office of the European Union 
  and Regional Affairs, Int'l Trade Administration, 
  U.S. Department of Commerce

  Mr. Ludolph chairs the U.S. government committee on 
  Standards, Testing and Certification of the European 
  Union which is charged with developing policy towards 
  European standards initiatives and dealing with Mutual 
  Recognition agreements. He has been with the U.S.
  D.O.C., since 1971 and has been involved with European 
  Union concerns since 1983.

The topic:The Status of U.S.-EU Mutual Recognition Agreements 
   Their Impact on Conformity Assessment in the U.S.

Dinner:   A Pasta Festival Buffet will be served at 6:00 p.m.  
  The dinner is free to members of the Society, and $15.00 
  to all others.  Membership in the Society is $28.00 per 
  year (Membership includes the dinner).

Reservations: Dinner reservations are necessary; Please contact: 
  Dick Silvernail, Sequoia Systems
  Phone: 1-508-480-0800 Ext 1343
  Fax:   1-508-481-2418
  Email: r...@sequoia.sequoia.com

Background: The Northeast Product Safety Society, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) 
incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.  Founded
in 1988, its stated purpose is the Advancement of theory and practice of
product safety and allied arts  sciences and the maintenance of a high
professional standing among its members. 

Further information about the Society and its programs can be found on its
website at:  http://www.safetylink.com/npss.html















FAQ: Sources of EMC Safety Compliance Information

1997-04-15 Thread Bill Lyons

   FAQ: Sources of EMC  Safety Compliance Information

This is to let you know that I have just posted in two parts the 13th 
issue of the above FAQ to the newsgroup for regulatory/compliance matters 
and EMC and safety specifications and testing, 

  sci.engr.electrical.compliance


The FAQ will also be available at the following URL:

http://world.std.com/~techbook/compliance_faq.html


Hope you find it useful:  suggestions for additions or corrections are 
welcomed.  

-- 
Bill Lyons - b...@lyons.demon.co.uk / w.ly...@ieee.org
=
Claude Lyons Limited  Brook Road  Waltham Cross   Herts EN8 7LR   England
Leaders in Voltage and Power Control - Precise Electrical Instrumentation
Tel: +44 1992 768 888 Fax: +44 1992 788 000 Telex: 22724 CL LTD G
email: i...@lyons.demon.co.uk   URL: http://www.lyons.demon.co.uk
=