RE: Korean Requirements

2000-07-20 Thread PGodfrey

You are indeed correct in stating that KTL can perform such
testing/investigations. I have forwarded these messages to the Product
Safety Manager, Sim Jagpal. He can be contacted at +1 (613) 737-9680 or
email sjag...@ktlcanada.com.

Thankyou George and Bruce.

Regards,

Phil Godfrey
Manager, Product Safety

 -Original Message-
 From: Bruce Touzel [SMTP:btou...@acc.com]
 Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 12:36 PM
 To:   Jim Bacher
 Cc:   Seminsky; George; 'EMC - PSTC Forum'
 Subject:  Re: Korean Requirements
 
 
 KTL Ottawa is the only I know of which Korea will accept EMC/EMI results
 from.
 
 Jim Bacher wrote:
 
  Forwarding for George
 
  Reply Separator
  Subject:RE: Korean Requirements
  Author: Seminsky; George gsemin...@nuera.com
  Date:   7/20/00 7:28 AM
 
  The last time I checked, South Korean safety is IEC950 based, analog
  telephony is FCC part 68 based, and that EMC is CISPR22 based. However,
 the
  Korean authorities will not accept test reports, certifications for
 other
  countries. And a product must be tested, certified in either an
 in-country
  lab or in a certified lab in a country that has an MRA with South Korea.
  Check with KTL Ottawa for the latest information.
 
  George Seminsky
  Compliance Engineering
  Nuera Communications. Inc.
  10445 Pacific Center Court
  San Diego, CA 92121
  Ph 858 625 9220 X1248
  Fx 858 625 2422
  www.nuera.com
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Cameron O'phee [mailto:O'p...@ali.com.au]
  Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 4:54 PM
  To: 'EMC - PSTC Forum'
  Subject: Korean Requirements
 
  Hello All,
 
  I would like to get some advice on what is required to have products
  approved for sale in South Korea.  Our equipment has been tested for
 Safety
  and EMC to Australian and European requirements. The Australian test
 house
  that performs the safety testing can generate CB reports for safety.
  Contrary to the advice of the CB website, our agent in Korea has been
  informed that we would have to completely re-test our equipment for both
 EMC
  and safety.  Is this correct?
 
  The standards that we are currently certified to are as follows,
 
  Australia
  Safety - AS/NZS 3260
  EMC - AS/NZS 3548
 
  Europe
  Safety - EN60950
  EMC - EN55022 and EN50082-1
 
  This is my first e-mail to the group and I have to say that this forum
 has
  been most educational.
 
  Regards,
 
  Cameron O'Phee.
  Technical Officer.
  EMC  Safety Precompliance.
  Aristocrat Technologies Australia.
 
  Telephone : +61 2 9697 4420
  Facsimile  : +61 2 9663 1412
  Mobile  :   0418 464 016
 
  ---
  This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 
  ---
  This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
  Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
 
  To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
   majord...@ieee.org
  with the single line:
   unsubscribe emc-pstc
 
  For help, send mail to the list administrators:
   Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
   Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 
  For policy questions, send mail to:
   Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 
 
 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
 
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc
 
 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 
 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



Re: Korean Requirements

2000-07-20 Thread Ron Pickard


Bruce et al,

The APEC MRA, of which Korea is a member, has matured to the point where
test reports are being accepted from member countries given that certain
criteria are met. Those criteria are basically test lab quality system
oriented. We have been successful in gaining EMC approvals from other APEC
member countries with test reports from labs in the US (we have not pursued
Korea as yet). For those interested, go to APEC's web site for further
details, member countries, etc.:

http://www.apecsec.org.sg/

Please in mind that this MRA is still fairly new  and alignment procedures
are likely still being worked out by the member countries, although I
suspect after about a year now, a lot of the dust should've settled by now.
It is possible that some agencies affected by the APEC MRA may choose to
fully ignore the MRA,  may be unclear as to how to proceed, or my only
partially accept the MRA. That is, of course, their priviledge.

Anyone else benefitted by using the APEC MRA? Comments?

Best regards,

Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com






 
Bruce Touzel
 
btouzel@acc.To: Jim Bacher 
jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
com cc: Seminsky; George 
gsemin...@nuera.com, 'EMC - PSTC Forum'  
Sent by: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org  
 
owner-emc-pstSubject: Re: Korean Requirements   
 
c...@ieee.org   


 

 
07/20/00
 
09:36 AM
 
Please  
 
respond to  
 
Bruce Touzel
 

 

 




KTL Ottawa is the only I know of which Korea will accept EMC/EMI results
from.

Jim Bacher wrote:

 Forwarding for George

 Reply Separator
 Subject:RE: Korean Requirements
 Author: Seminsky; George gsemin...@nuera.com
 Date:   7/20/00 7:28 AM

 The last time I checked, South Korean safety is IEC950 based, analog
 telephony is FCC part 68 based, and that EMC is CISPR22 based. However,
the
 Korean authorities will not accept test reports, certifications for other
 countries. And a product must be tested, certified in either an
in-country
 lab or in a certified lab in a country that has an MRA with South Korea.
 Check with KTL Ottawa for the latest information.

 George Seminsky
 Compliance Engineering
 Nuera Communications. Inc.
 10445 Pacific Center Court
 San Diego, CA 92121
 Ph 858 625 9220 X1248
 Fx 858 625 2422
 www.nuera.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Cameron O'phee [mailto:O'p...@ali.com.au]
 Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 4:54 PM
 To: 'EMC - PSTC Forum'
 Subject: Korean Requirements

 Hello All,

 I would like to get some advice on what is required to have products
 approved for sale in South Korea.  Our equipment has been tested for
Safety
 and EMC to Australian and European requirements. The Australian test
house
 that performs the safety testing can generate CB reports for safety.
 Contrary to the advice of the CB website, our agent in Korea has been
 informed that we would have to completely re-test our equipment for both
EMC
 and safety.  Is this correct?

 The standards that we are currently certified to are as follows,

 Australia
 Safety - AS/NZS 3260
 EMC - AS/NZS 3548

 Europe
 Safety - EN60950
 EMC - EN55022 and EN50082-1

 This is my first e-mail to the group and I have to say that this forum
has
 been most educational.

 Regards,

 Cameron O'Phee.
 Technical Officer.
 EMC  Safety Precompliance.
 Aristocrat Technologies Australia.

 Telephone : +61 2 9697 4420
 Facsimile  : +61 2 9663 1412
 Mobile  :   0418 464 016

 ---
 This message is from the 

Re: Korean Requirements

2000-07-20 Thread Bruce Touzel

KTL Ottawa is the only I know of which Korea will accept EMC/EMI results from.

Jim Bacher wrote:

 Forwarding for George

 Reply Separator
 Subject:RE: Korean Requirements
 Author: Seminsky; George gsemin...@nuera.com
 Date:   7/20/00 7:28 AM

 The last time I checked, South Korean safety is IEC950 based, analog
 telephony is FCC part 68 based, and that EMC is CISPR22 based. However, the
 Korean authorities will not accept test reports, certifications for other
 countries. And a product must be tested, certified in either an in-country
 lab or in a certified lab in a country that has an MRA with South Korea.
 Check with KTL Ottawa for the latest information.

 George Seminsky
 Compliance Engineering
 Nuera Communications. Inc.
 10445 Pacific Center Court
 San Diego, CA 92121
 Ph 858 625 9220 X1248
 Fx 858 625 2422
 www.nuera.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Cameron O'phee [mailto:O'p...@ali.com.au]
 Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 4:54 PM
 To: 'EMC - PSTC Forum'
 Subject: Korean Requirements

 Hello All,

 I would like to get some advice on what is required to have products
 approved for sale in South Korea.  Our equipment has been tested for Safety
 and EMC to Australian and European requirements. The Australian test house
 that performs the safety testing can generate CB reports for safety.
 Contrary to the advice of the CB website, our agent in Korea has been
 informed that we would have to completely re-test our equipment for both EMC
 and safety.  Is this correct?

 The standards that we are currently certified to are as follows,

 Australia
 Safety - AS/NZS 3260
 EMC - AS/NZS 3548

 Europe
 Safety - EN60950
 EMC - EN55022 and EN50082-1

 This is my first e-mail to the group and I have to say that this forum has
 been most educational.

 Regards,

 Cameron O'Phee.
 Technical Officer.
 EMC  Safety Precompliance.
 Aristocrat Technologies Australia.

 Telephone : +61 2 9697 4420
 Facsimile  : +61 2 9663 1412
 Mobile  :   0418 464 016

 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety

 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc

 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



RE: Are NTCs Safe to Use in Electrical Equipment

2000-07-20 Thread Peter Tarver
Peter -

Thermistors are in common usage and my limited experience with them
indicates they are reliable for their intended function.

The thermal issues have been discussed, and the usual regimen for high
temperature components applies.  I'm not aware of any other particular
safety concerns.

There are some NTC is UL's RCD, under Thermistor Type Devices (XGPU2).  I
don't know about certifications with other agencies or for other countries.

Regards,

Peter L. Tarver, PE
Homologation Engineering
Nortel Networks
ptar...@nortelnetworks.com


-Original Message-
From: Peter Merguerian [mailto:pmerguer...@itl.co.il]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 7:58 AM
To: emc-pstc
Subject: Are NTCs Safe to Use in Electrical Equipment



Dear All,

I have seen some design where NTCs are used to limit inrush currents in
motion controllers. 

Q. Are NTCs safe and reliable as means to limit inrush currents?

Q. Are there safety considerations to consider for circuits employing NTCs?

Q. Are there any Approved (previously evaluated) NTC components out there?


I appreciate all of your comments and/or links regarding the use of NTCs in
electrical equipment.

Thanks 

Peter Merguerian
Managing Director
Product Testing Division
I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd.
Hacharoshet 26, POB 211
Or Yehuda 60251, Israel

Tel: 972-3-5339022 Fax: 972-3-5339019
e-mail: pmerguer...@itl.co.il
website: http://www.itl.co.il 






---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org




RE: Are NTCs Safe to Use in Electrical Equipment

2000-07-20 Thread Peter Tarver
I really don't have a clear idea of whether or not your solution will work.
Let us know.

NTCs, as with most thermistors, get very hot when in their switched state.
For the NTC, that's it's steady-state condition.  I wouldn't put this in a
junction box with other wiring, unless you're absolutely certain all the
wiring can take the temperatures they'll encounter (for normal household
wiring, likely not).

Rather, for the sake of your experiment, put the NTC in a separate (probably
should be metal) box that's in-line with the receptacle, with appropriate
goesintas and goesouttas.  Be certain to use your best safety engineer's hat
for this activity.

Regards,

Peter L. Tarver, PE
Homologation Engineering
Nortel Networks
ptar...@nortelnetworks.com


-Original Message-
From: Jim Eichner [mailto:jim.eich...@xantrex.com]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 11:35 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Are NTCs Safe to Use in Electrical Equipment



On the subject of NTC's, please allow me a slight detour from the compliance
world to the real world.

I have a circuit in my house that blows light bulbs far more often than any
other.  I can't determine any reason for this - the voltage seems normal and
there aren't any transient-producers on that same circuit (that I'm aware
of).  Long life and rural-duty bulbs make little or no difference.

Instead of figuring out the root cause, I'm considering resorting to trying
to deal with the symptom (blown bulbs) by putting an NTC in series with the
light fixture somewhere.  My thinking is that the mechanism that blows an
incandescent bulb filament is related to the high inrush current into the
cold (and therefore low R) filament, and the physical and thermal stresses
that that inrush causes.

Any comments on how likely this is to help, and whether or not I can safely
put an NTC in an junction box full of wires?  I'd check the NTC's
temperature under load (they get hot) and compare that the the temp. rating
of the wires in the box.  I'd also insulate the bare legs of the NTC and try
to make sure it isn't touching anything else.  Anyone familiar with the
failure modes of these things?

Thanks,

Jim 

-Original Message-
From: Peter Merguerian [mailto:pmerguer...@itl.co.il]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 7:58 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Are NTCs Safe to Use in Electrical Equipment



Dear All,

I have seen some design where NTCs are used to limit inrush currents in
motion controllers. 

Q. Are NTCs safe and reliable as means to limit inrush currents?

Q. Are there safety considerations to consider for circuits employing NTCs?

Q. Are there any Approved (previously evaluated) NTC components out there?


I appreciate all of your comments and/or links regarding the use of NTCs in
electrical equipment.

Thanks 

Peter Merguerian
Managing Director
Product Testing Division
I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd.
Hacharoshet 26, POB 211
Or Yehuda 60251, Israel

Tel: 972-3-5339022 Fax: 972-3-5339019
e-mail: pmerguer...@itl.co.il
website: http://www.itl.co.il 






---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org




RE: PDF file copy method

2000-07-20 Thread Scott Lacey

Barry,
If the protections are set so that you can neither select text nor print,
you are pretty much out of luck. If the problem is that the pdf file was
created from a scanned document you may be able to print to a fax file (if
you have a fax modem card and appropriate software. Many fax programs have
OCR (Optical Character Recognition)capability. You can print to a stored fax
file, and then open it as if it were a received fax, using the OCR input
option. Some OCR programs are better than others at recovering text
correctly. It's worth a try if you or a co-worker already have the software.

Just a thought.

Scott Lacey

At 01:59 PM 7/17/2000 -0700, Barry Ma wrote:

Hi,

When reading an EMC article in PDF file, I sometimes want to copy a couple
of sentences or paragraph to my MS WORD document. Most of times I failed.
But a few times I could do it. I don't know why. Do you have the same
experience?




---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



Re: Korean Requirements

2000-07-20 Thread Martin Garwood

Nothing has happened in terms of the APEC MRA with Korea.  Reports are not
being accepted under this MRA.  The Korean government have a bi-lateral
agreement with Canada, thus allowing accredited Canadian facilities to have
their reports accepted.

Hope this clarifies things.

B.Rgds,
Martin.
- Original Message -
From: Matejic, Mirko mmate...@foxboro.com
To: 'Martin Garwood' mgarw...@approvalspecialists.com
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 8:19 AM
Subject: RE: Korean Requirements


 Martin,

 Could you offer an update on MRA implementation schedule signed by KOLAS
 back in 1998?

 Thanks,
 Mirko Matejic

  aplacmra.pdf

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Garwood [SMTP:mgarw...@approvalspecialists.com]
 Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 20:48
 To: Cameron O'phee
 Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
 Subject: Re: Korean Requirements


 Cameron,

 As I assume the product is a poker/slot machine, no safety testing is
 required.  EMC needs to be redone, both emissions and immunity (in Korea),
 as no MRA currently exists for acceptance of foreign reports.  Emission
 testing is based on CISPR22  immunity is a mix of past and present
 EN50082-1.

 Please respond direct should you require further information or wish to
 utilize our South Korean test lab or office for testing or submissions.

 Best Regards,
 Martin Garwood
 BWS Tech inc
 The Approval Specialists
 http://www.approvalspecialists.com

 - Original Message -
 From: Cameron O'phee O'p...@ali.com.au
 To: 'EMC - PSTC Forum' emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
 Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 4:54 PM
 Subject: Korean Requirements


 
  Hello All,
 
  I would like to get some advice on what is required to have products
  approved for sale in South Korea.  Our equipment has been tested for
 Safety
  and EMC to Australian and European requirements. The Australian test
house
  that performs the safety testing can generate CB reports for safety.
  Contrary to the advice of the CB website, our agent in Korea has been
  informed that we would have to completely re-test our equipment for both
 EMC
  and safety.  Is this correct?
 
  The standards that we are currently certified to are as follows,
 
  Australia
  Safety - AS/NZS 3260
  EMC - AS/NZS 3548
 
  Europe
  Safety - EN60950
  EMC - EN55022 and EN50082-1
 
  This is my first e-mail to the group and I have to say that this forum
has
  been most educational.
 
  Regards,
 
  Cameron O'Phee.
  Technical Officer.
  EMC  Safety Precompliance.
  Aristocrat Technologies Australia.
 
  Telephone : +61 2 9697 4420
  Facsimile  : +61 2 9663 1412
  Mobile  :   0418 464 016
 
 
  ---
  This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
  Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
 
  To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
   majord...@ieee.org
  with the single line:
   unsubscribe emc-pstc
 
  For help, send mail to the list administrators:
   Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
   Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 
  For policy questions, send mail to:
   Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 
 


 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc

 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org





---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



Re: Korean Requirements

2000-07-20 Thread Martin Garwood

Cameron,

As I assume the product is a poker/slot machine, no safety testing is
required.  EMC needs to be redone, both emissions and immunity (in Korea),
as no MRA currently exists for acceptance of foreign reports.  Emission
testing is based on CISPR22  immunity is a mix of past and present
EN50082-1.

Please respond direct should you require further information or wish to
utilize our South Korean test lab or office for testing or submissions.

Best Regards,
Martin Garwood
BWS Tech inc
The Approval Specialists
http://www.approvalspecialists.com

- Original Message -
From: Cameron O'phee O'p...@ali.com.au
To: 'EMC - PSTC Forum' emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 4:54 PM
Subject: Korean Requirements



 Hello All,

 I would like to get some advice on what is required to have products
 approved for sale in South Korea.  Our equipment has been tested for
Safety
 and EMC to Australian and European requirements. The Australian test house
 that performs the safety testing can generate CB reports for safety.
 Contrary to the advice of the CB website, our agent in Korea has been
 informed that we would have to completely re-test our equipment for both
EMC
 and safety.  Is this correct?

 The standards that we are currently certified to are as follows,

 Australia
 Safety - AS/NZS 3260
 EMC - AS/NZS 3548

 Europe
 Safety - EN60950
 EMC - EN55022 and EN50082-1

 This is my first e-mail to the group and I have to say that this forum has
 been most educational.

 Regards,

 Cameron O'Phee.
 Technical Officer.
 EMC  Safety Precompliance.
 Aristocrat Technologies Australia.

 Telephone : +61 2 9697 4420
 Facsimile  : +61 2 9663 1412
 Mobile  :   0418 464 016


 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc

 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org




---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org