Re: IEC 61000-4-2 ESD 61000-4-5 Surge lower levels

2002-06-10 Thread Douglas C. Smith

Not to mention the vastly different current risetimes. Low voltage
discharges actually have higher di/dt values than high voltage ones (and
therefore higher interference potential).

Doug

don_borow...@selinc.com wrote:
 
 Let me add a bit on the air discharge side.
 
 You will want to do the lower voltage discharge tests because the path the
 discharge takes may change with voltage. I have seen several instances where
 connectors (sub-min D types, if I remember correctly) were mounted on metal
 panels. At higher voltages, the path between the ESD gun and the grounded 
 shell
 of the connector would break down first. At lower voltages, the connector pins
 could be approached without breakdown to the shell, and the discharge would
 occur to the connector pins.
 
 Don Borowski
 Schweitzer Engineering Labs
 Pullman, WA
 
 Pommerenke, David davi...@ece.umr.edu on 06/10/2002 06:36:46 AM
 
 Please respond to Pommerenke, David davi...@ece.umr.edu
 
 To:   Neil Helsby nei...@solid-state-logic.com, 
 emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
 cc:   kro...@yahoo.com (bcc: Don Borowski/SEL)
 Subject:  RE: IEC 61000-4-2 ESD  61000-4-5 Surge lower levels
 
 Dear Group,
 
 For most EUTs there is no need to do lower level testing in contact mode ESD.
 The time is better spend (meaning a better test results uncertainty is 
 achieved)
 if the number of discharges is increased at the highest test level (hundreds 
 is
 a good number). Although it is possible that a system fails at e.g., 2 kV
 contact mode (e.g., incomplete reset) and passes at 4 kV contact mode (full
 self-recovering quick reset) the likelyhood of that happening is not that 
 large
 to require it in a standard.
 
 For air discharge lower level testing is needed, as the risetime is often much
 lower at lower voltages. Of course, if no discharge occurs, no further testing
 at even lower levels makes sense.
 
 I do know that what I am saying violates the present IEC 61000-4-2 standard. 
 ut
 it reflects the coming version of IEC 61000-4-2. The standard does not intend 
 to
 protect agains every possible ESD failure.
 
 I would like to receive your input, as I am one of the US-representatives in 
 IEC
 TC77b WG-9 (ESD).
 
 David Pommerenke
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Neil Helsby [mailto:nei...@solid-state-logic.com]
 Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 4:56 AM
 To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
 Cc: kro...@yahoo.com
 Subject: Re: IEC 61000-4-2 ESD  61000-4-5 Surge lower levels
 
 I think there are two points here.
 
 1)   If you believe that in the environment in which it will be
 used, your product may be subject to levels in excess of that defined
 in the standard, you must test to that higher level.
 
 2)   Yes, failures can occur at mid range levels. We have just
 recently experienced this problem with ESD. Below about 3.5 kV and
 above about 4.5 kV the product worked fine. But at 4 kV we
 experienced a failure mode. If we had only tested at 8 kV we would
 have missed the problem.
 
  I also had a problem some years ago with mains voltage dips
 to 0V. Having a test set that enabled the period to be varied in ms
 increments, I discovered a problem affecting a voltage regulator.
 When the mains dip was between about 16 ms and 35 ms, the regulator
 went into a bistable mode switching on then off at each pulse.
 Outside these periods, it worked satisfactorily, eventually losing
 output when the period was extended.
 
 The problem with investigating these types of failure is determining
 the size of step between measurements. Too short a step and you will
 be testing forever, too long and you could miss a narrow band of
 problem.
 
 Regards,
 
 Neil Helsby
 
 **
 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
 are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
 the system manager.
 
 This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
 MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
 
 www.mimesweeper.com
 **
 
 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
 
 Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
 
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc
 
 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
  Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com
 
 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
  Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
 
 All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
 Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list
 
 

RE: IEC 61000-4-2 ESD 61000-4-5 Surge lower levels

2002-06-10 Thread Scott Douglas

David,

I disagree with you here. As others have said, I have seen numerous 
failures at less than the maximum required test voltage while the same 
system passes at the max required voltage. It seems to me the intent was / 
is / should be to verify product performance up to a maximum level, not 
just at that level. The logic here would be that the standards writing 
group would make the test cover reasonable ground up to some limit because 
it is quite common that anything up to that limit could happen. The reason 
for the limit is because it is uncommon for things larger / higher than the 
limit to happen. Contact discharge is the only way to make reliable and 
repeatable tests for ESD. No approach speed issues, etc. So testing at low 
levels and working up to a maximum limit is a reasonable test method.


On the other hand, I find air discharge to be a difficult and not very 
repeatable test to do which causes me to question its usefulness. Yes, I 
agree that people interacting with products will more often see air 
discharge rather than contact discharge. But I also find it impossible to 
reliably repeat air discharge test results. The old approach speed, 
distance and coordinates of contact point issue. Until someone can make an 
automated air discharge tester that keeps human interactions out of the 
process, I can't see it being corrected. That said, testing at lower levels 
is just as necessary here.


Regards,
Scott Douglas

Senior Compliance Engineer
Narad Networks
515 Groton Road
Westford, MA 01886
office:  978 589-1869
cell: 978-239-0693
dougl...@naradnetworks.com
www.naradnetworks.com

At 08:36 AM 6/10/02 -0500, Pommerenke, David wrote:


Dear Group,

For most EUTs there is no need to do lower level testing in contact mode 
ESD. The time is better spend (meaning a better test results uncertainty 
is achieved) if the number of discharges is increased at the highest test 
level (hundreds is a good number). Although it is possible that a system 
fails at e.g., 2 kV contact mode (e.g., incomplete reset) and passes at 4 
kV contact mode (full self-recovering quick reset) the likelyhood of that 
happening is not that large to require it in a standard.


For air discharge lower level testing is needed, as the risetime is often 
much lower at lower voltages. Of course, if no discharge occurs, no 
further testing at even lower levels makes sense.


I do know that what I am saying violates the present IEC 61000-4-2 
standard. ut it reflects the coming version of IEC 61000-4-2. The standard 
does not intend to protect agains every possible ESD failure.


I would like to receive your input, as I am one of the US-representatives 
in IEC TC77b WG-9 (ESD).


David Pommerenke






Mutual inductance as a troubleshooting tool

2002-06-10 Thread Douglas C. Smith

Hi All,

Mutual inductance can be a powerful debugging tool for problem circuits.
It can also be either a friend or foe in the designs themselves. This
month's Technical Tidbit at http://www.dsmith.org relates direct
measurement of Ldi/dt voltage drop with Mdi/dt of the same voltage.

Often direct measurement of a voltage drop is not possible. This article
shows that Ldi/dt and Mdi/dt measurements can be equivalent. Yet another
use for a probe made out of a paperclip!

Doug
-- 
---
___  _   Doug Smith
 \  / )  P.O. Box 1457
  =  Los Gatos, CA 95031-1457
   _ / \ / \ _   TEL/FAX: 408-356-4186/358-3799
 /  /\  \ ] /  /\  \ Mobile:  408-858-4528
|  q-( )  |  o  |Email:   d...@dsmith.org
 \ _ /]\ _ / Website: http://www.dsmith.org
---

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: DOC Assembled from tested components

2002-06-10 Thread Robert Wilson

Seems to me that the court could better use its time to nail some of the
el-cheapo products from the far east made by manufacturers that just
stick a CE mark on everything they make as part of the graphics
design. I have seen numerous such products that haven't a hope of
getting CE approval, proudly wearing a CE mark.

Bob Wilson
TIR Systems Ltd.
Vancouver.

-Original Message-
From: richwo...@tycoint.com [mailto:richwo...@tycoint.com] 
Sent: June 10, 2002 11:29 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: DOC Assembled from tested components


Ken, a UK court ruled that CE+CE does not equal CE. They fined at least
one
PC reseller because they integrated and sold PCs based upon the belief
that
CE+CE=CE. Obviously, the court thought otherwise.

Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Kenneth P (Rocky) [mailto:kpgon...@ingr.com]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:20 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: DOC Assembled from tested components



All,
Has anyone successfully issued a DOC using the assembled from
tested components method for a personal computer?  I have not been able
to
find a floppy disk drive manufacturer that has any DOC documentation for
their device; even the ones marketing directly to home users.  Have I
just
not found the right manufacturer?

Best regards,

Rocky
  -)-(-

Kenneth P. Gonzalez (Rocky)
Intergraph Solutions Group
Integrated Products Division
170 Graphics Drive
Madison, Alabama, USA 35758
phone (256) 730-2131
fax  (256)730-2424
kpgon...@ingr.com


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


(off topic) Stirling cycle

2002-06-10 Thread Ted Rook

Chris,
what is the Stirling cycle?
short tongue in cheek reply: a well kept secret!

in truth it is an external combustion engine which uses the thermal expansion 
and contraction of gas to produce motion.

typically the system is sealed,
there is a 'hot' end and a 'cold' end,
The energy input in the form of the temperature differential can be extracted 
as work from a piston and crank. 
Alternatively put work into the shaft and you can maintain a temperature 
differential..

try searching the web for Stirling cycle

the amount of information available has increased significantly in the past 
year or so

there is hope :-)

I believe people under estimate the incoming energy that penetrates the cloud 
cover. I don't have figures but I think long wave infrared reaches the ground 
through clouds. It can be focused by solar collectors.

The oil/gas/electricity utilities and their PR departments would like us to 
believe we are helpless and dependant on their massive infrastructure.

I believe they make sure we have the limitations of photovoltaic cells and 
rechargeable batteries rammed down our throats to discourage independent 
thinking.

Electrolysis, fuel cells, flywheels, solar collectors, stirling engines, wind 
and wave power, all are coming and will be usable on a small scale by 
individual households.
I plan to power/heat/cool my residence with solar energy and disconnect the 
utility lines in the foreseeable future.



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: 1kW per square meter.......free

2002-06-10 Thread George Stults

Just a related thought here.  I read last year in Science news weekly, that
the world wide availble power from offshore wave action is about 72
terawatts.  Its efficiently harvested in about 300 feet of water, before the
waves dissapate on sandbars etc.  The platform technology is based
(ironically perhaps) on oil drilling rigs.  The cost per kwhr is supposedly
competitive with wind power (6 to 7 cents/kwhr if memory serves.)  With that
kind of steady supply of energy, one could convert water to hydrogen and
oxygen, use the hydrogen to power cars and forget about oil, more or less.
There are a few details of course.

Regards

George Stults


-Original Message-
From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 11:52 AM
To: Scott Lacey; Ted Rook
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: 1kW per square meter...free



More accurately, it is not energy efficiency but energy storage volumetric
efficiency, or the ability to store large amounts of energy densely that is
important in a vehicle.  An electric motor is much more efficient than an
internal combustion engine, but that is more than offset by the poor energy
density (and mass) of batteries compared to gasoline or other chemical
fuels.

--
From: Scott Lacey sco...@world.std.com
To: Ted Rook t...@crestaudio.com
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: 1kW per square meter...free
Date: Sat, Jun 8, 2002, 12:15 PM



 Ted,

 While most alternative energy schemes sound very promising, energy
efficiency
 problems make most of them impractical for real world use. Small solar
charging
 systems are great for maintaining a charge on a seldom used battery in a
spare
 automobile, or similar application, but the ratio of charge time to usage
 has to be
 large. The problems with a solar powered automobile would be:

 1) Lots of expensive (and unsightly) solar panels plus the numerous serial
and
 parallel connections needed to make a usable system. Even then, the car
would
 have to be parked in the sunlight many more hours than it was driven.

 2) An expensive buck/boost charge controller to compensate for the
enormous
 voltage variations due to weather.

 3) A trunk full of heavy, expensive batteries, with their need to be
eventually
 replaced.

 4) And finally, how would the batteries be charged if it rained for four
or
 five days
 straight?

 The hybrid gas/electric vehicles seem to be the only practical electric
 vehicles made
 so far. And even these seem to be expensive enough that sales have to be
 subsidized.

 I know people who have tried to use solar dc electrical systems at remote
camps.
 You have to strictly ration electrical usage even if you only use the
place on
 weekends after it has charged all week. Most people eventually revert to
using
 combinations of propane, gasoline, and kerosene for light and cooking. A
gallon of
 Coleman fuel will last a week running a stove and some lights.

 As to the energy efficiency of gasoline, years ago I watched a
 demonstration where a
 homemade mortar lobbed a sand-filled beer can hundreds of yards using a
 SPOONFUL of gasoline! It graphically proved the point about why it is so
hard
to
 replace the internal combution engine.

 Scott Lacey
 On 7 Jun 2002 at 13:52, Ted Rook wrote:


 sorry, off topic, mostly for US residents:

 just imagine everyone's car being coated with 'solar cell generator'
 material with a storage device in the trunk..

 and how about air-conditioners that run on the Stirling cycle from a
 solar energy collector...

 lousy for the oil lobby but fantastic for the human race





 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

 Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc

 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
  Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
  Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

 All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
 Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list



 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

 Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc

 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
  Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
  Jim Bacher: 

RE: DOC Assembled from tested components

2002-06-10 Thread Gonzalez, Kenneth P (Rocky)

Richard,
This was just for an FCC DOC.  They (FCC) informed me that the floppy 
drive also had to have a DOC.  This is the last document I need so if I can't 
find one then the assembled from tested components will not work for any ITE 
that have floppy disk drives in them!

Rocky
-)-(-

-Original Message-
From: richwo...@tycoint.com [mailto:richwo...@tycoint.com]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:29 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: DOC Assembled from tested components



Ken, a UK court ruled that CE+CE does not equal CE. They fined at least one
PC reseller because they integrated and sold PCs based upon the belief that
CE+CE=CE. Obviously, the court thought otherwise.

Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Kenneth P (Rocky) [mailto:kpgon...@ingr.com]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:20 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: DOC Assembled from tested components



All,
Has anyone successfully issued a DOC using the assembled from
tested components method for a personal computer?  I have not been able to
find a floppy disk drive manufacturer that has any DOC documentation for
their device; even the ones marketing directly to home users.  Have I just
not found the right manufacturer?

Best regards,

Rocky
  -)-(-

Kenneth P. Gonzalez (Rocky)
Intergraph Solutions Group
Integrated Products Division
170 Graphics Drive
Madison, Alabama, USA 35758
phone (256) 730-2131
fax  (256)730-2424
kpgon...@ingr.com


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: DOC Assembled from tested components

2002-06-10 Thread richwoods

Ken, a UK court ruled that CE+CE does not equal CE. They fined at least one
PC reseller because they integrated and sold PCs based upon the belief that
CE+CE=CE. Obviously, the court thought otherwise.

Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Kenneth P (Rocky) [mailto:kpgon...@ingr.com]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:20 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: DOC Assembled from tested components



All,
Has anyone successfully issued a DOC using the assembled from
tested components method for a personal computer?  I have not been able to
find a floppy disk drive manufacturer that has any DOC documentation for
their device; even the ones marketing directly to home users.  Have I just
not found the right manufacturer?

Best regards,

Rocky
  -)-(-

Kenneth P. Gonzalez (Rocky)
Intergraph Solutions Group
Integrated Products Division
170 Graphics Drive
Madison, Alabama, USA 35758
phone (256) 730-2131
fax  (256)730-2424
kpgon...@ingr.com


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: DOC Assembled from tested components

2002-06-10 Thread Gonzalez, Kenneth P (Rocky)

Fred,
I have asked both Sony and Teac for DOC's and haven't received a 
positive response.  Where may one find the DOC information?  I have searched 
the web sites and sent them email too!  Did I not get the right people?

Best Regards,

Rocky
-)-(- 

-Original Message-
From: Fred Townsend [mailto:f...@poasana.com]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:29 PM
To: Gonzalez, Kenneth P (Rocky)
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: DOC Assembled from tested components


Rocky:

It is not clear what information you are looking for.  Are you looking for 
hook-up information or trying to write a driver? If you want to know how to 
hook it up, both Sony and Teac have such documents.  If you are writing a 
driver, the data sheet on the old NEC 765 controller chip may be of some help.  
No one uses the 765 any
more because they use multifunction chips but the data sheet is still the most 
comprehensive for the driver writer.

Fred Townsend

Gonzalez, Kenneth P (Rocky) wrote:

 All,
 Has anyone successfully issued a DOC using the assembled from tested 
 components method for a personal computer?  I have not been able to find a 
 floppy disk drive manufacturer that has any DOC documentation for their 
 device; even the ones marketing directly to home users.  Have I just not 
 found the right manufacturer?

 Best regards,

 Rocky
   -)-(-

 Kenneth P. Gonzalez (Rocky)
 Intergraph Solutions Group
 Integrated Products Division
 170 Graphics Drive
 Madison, Alabama, USA 35758
 phone (256) 730-2131
 fax  (256)730-2424
 kpgon...@ingr.com

 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

 Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc

 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
  Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
  Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

 All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
 Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


Re: PCB layout question for good EMC performance

2002-06-10 Thread Ken Javor

Thanks to all who replied on this question.

Ken Javor

--
From: emccom...@aol.com
To: dave.clem...@motorola.com, ken.ja...@emccompliance.com,
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: PCB layout question for good EMC performance
Date: Fri, Jun 7, 2002, 6:00 PM


 Hi Ken,

 Rent's Rule (spelled as in Howard and Graham's book) with a worked example
 is on pages 216-217.

 Good Luck with your problem,

 Thurman J. (Bill) Ritenour
 EMC Compliance LLC
 4575 Sioux Drive #303
 Boulder, CO 80303
 303-543-7404
 emccom...@aol.com
 

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


Re: DOC Assembled from tested components

2002-06-10 Thread Fred Townsend

Rocky:

It is not clear what information you are looking for.  Are you looking for 
hook-up information or trying to write a driver? If you want to know how to 
hook it up, both Sony and Teac have such documents.  If you are writing a 
driver, the data sheet on the old NEC 765 controller chip may be of some help.  
No one uses the 765 any
more because they use multifunction chips but the data sheet is still the most 
comprehensive for the driver writer.

Fred Townsend

Gonzalez, Kenneth P (Rocky) wrote:

 All,
 Has anyone successfully issued a DOC using the assembled from tested 
 components method for a personal computer?  I have not been able to find a 
 floppy disk drive manufacturer that has any DOC documentation for their 
 device; even the ones marketing directly to home users.  Have I just not 
 found the right manufacturer?

 Best regards,

 Rocky
   -)-(-

 Kenneth P. Gonzalez (Rocky)
 Intergraph Solutions Group
 Integrated Products Division
 170 Graphics Drive
 Madison, Alabama, USA 35758
 phone (256) 730-2131
 fax  (256)730-2424
 kpgon...@ingr.com

 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

 Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc

 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
  Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
  Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

 All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
 Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: IEC 61000-4-2 ESD 61000-4-5 Surge lower levels

2002-06-10 Thread Don_Borowski



Let me add a bit on the air discharge side.

You will want to do the lower voltage discharge tests because the path the
discharge takes may change with voltage. I have seen several instances where
connectors (sub-min D types, if I remember correctly) were mounted on metal
panels. At higher voltages, the path between the ESD gun and the grounded shell
of the connector would break down first. At lower voltages, the connector pins
could be approached without breakdown to the shell, and the discharge would
occur to the connector pins.

Don Borowski
Schweitzer Engineering Labs
Pullman, WA





Pommerenke, David davi...@ece.umr.edu on 06/10/2002 06:36:46 AM

Please respond to Pommerenke, David davi...@ece.umr.edu

To:   Neil Helsby nei...@solid-state-logic.com, emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
cc:   kro...@yahoo.com (bcc: Don Borowski/SEL)
Subject:  RE: IEC 61000-4-2 ESD  61000-4-5 Surge lower levels




Dear Group,

For most EUTs there is no need to do lower level testing in contact mode ESD.
The time is better spend (meaning a better test results uncertainty is achieved)
if the number of discharges is increased at the highest test level (hundreds is
a good number). Although it is possible that a system fails at e.g., 2 kV
contact mode (e.g., incomplete reset) and passes at 4 kV contact mode (full
self-recovering quick reset) the likelyhood of that happening is not that large
to require it in a standard.

For air discharge lower level testing is needed, as the risetime is often much
lower at lower voltages. Of course, if no discharge occurs, no further testing
at even lower levels makes sense.

I do know that what I am saying violates the present IEC 61000-4-2 standard. ut
it reflects the coming version of IEC 61000-4-2. The standard does not intend to
protect agains every possible ESD failure.

I would like to receive your input, as I am one of the US-representatives in IEC
TC77b WG-9 (ESD).

David Pommerenke





-Original Message-
From: Neil Helsby [mailto:nei...@solid-state-logic.com]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 4:56 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Cc: kro...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: IEC 61000-4-2 ESD  61000-4-5 Surge lower levels



I think there are two points here.

1)   If you believe that in the environment in which it will be
used, your product may be subject to levels in excess of that defined
in the standard, you must test to that higher level.

2)   Yes, failures can occur at mid range levels. We have just
recently experienced this problem with ESD. Below about 3.5 kV and
above about 4.5 kV the product worked fine. But at 4 kV we
experienced a failure mode. If we had only tested at 8 kV we would
have missed the problem.

 I also had a problem some years ago with mains voltage dips
to 0V. Having a test set that enabled the period to be varied in ms
increments, I discovered a problem affecting a voltage regulator.
When the mains dip was between about 16 ms and 35 ms, the regulator
went into a bistable mode switching on then off at each pulse.
Outside these periods, it worked satisfactorily, eventually losing
output when the period was extended.

The problem with investigating these types of failure is determining
the size of step between measurements. Too short a step and you will
be testing forever, too long and you could miss a narrow band of
problem.

Regards,

Neil Helsby


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list 

DOC Assembled from tested components

2002-06-10 Thread Gonzalez, Kenneth P (Rocky)

All,
Has anyone successfully issued a DOC using the assembled from tested 
components method for a personal computer?  I have not been able to find a 
floppy disk drive manufacturer that has any DOC documentation for their device; 
even the ones marketing directly to home users.  Have I just not found the 
right manufacturer?

Best regards,

Rocky
  -)-(-

Kenneth P. Gonzalez (Rocky)
Intergraph Solutions Group
Integrated Products Division
170 Graphics Drive
Madison, Alabama, USA 35758
phone (256) 730-2131
fax  (256)730-2424
kpgon...@ingr.com


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: IEC 61000-4-2 ESD 61000-4-5 Surge lower levels

2002-06-10 Thread Pommerenke, David

Dear Group,

For most EUTs there is no need to do lower level testing in contact mode ESD. 
The time is better spend (meaning a better test results uncertainty is 
achieved) if the number of discharges is increased at the highest test level 
(hundreds is a good number). Although it is possible that a system fails at 
e.g., 2 kV contact mode (e.g., incomplete reset) and passes at 4 kV contact 
mode (full self-recovering quick reset) the likelyhood of that happening is not 
that large to require it in a standard.

For air discharge lower level testing is needed, as the risetime is often much 
lower at lower voltages. Of course, if no discharge occurs, no further testing 
at even lower levels makes sense.

I do know that what I am saying violates the present IEC 61000-4-2 standard. ut 
it reflects the coming version of IEC 61000-4-2. The standard does not intend 
to protect agains every possible ESD failure. 

I would like to receive your input, as I am one of the US-representatives in 
IEC TC77b WG-9 (ESD).

David Pommerenke





-Original Message-
From: Neil Helsby [mailto:nei...@solid-state-logic.com]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 4:56 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Cc: kro...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: IEC 61000-4-2 ESD  61000-4-5 Surge lower levels



I think there are two points here.

1)  If you believe that in the environment in which it will be 
used, your product may be subject to levels in excess of that defined 
in the standard, you must test to that higher level.

2)  Yes, failures can occur at mid range levels. We have just 
recently experienced this problem with ESD. Below about 3.5 kV and 
above about 4.5 kV the product worked fine. But at 4 kV we 
experienced a failure mode. If we had only tested at 8 kV we would 
have missed the problem.

I also had a problem some years ago with mains voltage dips 
to 0V. Having a test set that enabled the period to be varied in ms 
increments, I discovered a problem affecting a voltage regulator. 
When the mains dip was between about 16 ms and 35 ms, the regulator 
went into a bistable mode switching on then off at each pulse. 
Outside these periods, it worked satisfactorily, eventually losing 
output when the period was extended.

The problem with investigating these types of failure is determining 
the size of step between measurements. Too short a step and you will 
be testing forever, too long and you could miss a narrow band of 
problem.

Regards,

Neil Helsby


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


Re: IEC 61000-4-2 ESD 61000-4-5 Surge lower levels

2002-06-10 Thread Neil Helsby


I think there are two points here.

1)	If you believe that in the environment in which it will be 
used, your product may be subject to levels in excess of that defined 
in the standard, you must test to that higher level.


2)	Yes, failures can occur at mid range levels. We have just 
recently experienced this problem with ESD. Below about 3.5 kV and 
above about 4.5 kV the product worked fine. But at 4 kV we 
experienced a failure mode. If we had only tested at 8 kV we would 
have missed the problem.


	I also had a problem some years ago with mains voltage dips 
to 0V. Having a test set that enabled the period to be varied in ms 
increments, I discovered a problem affecting a voltage regulator. 
When the mains dip was between about 16 ms and 35 ms, the regulator 
went into a bistable mode switching on then off at each pulse. 
Outside these periods, it worked satisfactorily, eventually losing 
output when the period was extended.


The problem with investigating these types of failure is determining 
the size of step between measurements. Too short a step and you will 
be testing forever, too long and you could miss a narrow band of 
problem.


Regards,

Neil Helsby


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
   http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
   Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list