RE: US Modem Safety

2003-12-01 Thread Dan Pierce
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
I am not sure about your agency review, but I have always used the Telcom
rated fuses from Raychem (TR600-150)and there has never been a problem.
This is based on UL 60950 anex B testing via the flow chart on page 200 and
201.  I believe that refers to compliant PSTN fuse protection devices.
Please keep in mind that the EU and UL versions of 60950 are slightly
different.


Daniel J. Pierce
Sr. Hardware Engineer

Escient Division
Digital Networks of North America, Inc.
Suite 200
6325 Digital Way
Indianapolis, IN  46278

Direct Phone and Fax: (317) 616-6587
Email: dpie...@escient.com 
 


From: Alex McNeil [mailto:alex.mcn...@ingenicofortronic.com]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 6:00 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: US Modem Safety




Hi Colleagues,

I intend to use an overcurrent protection device, the Raychem polyswitch
TS250-130, on an analogue modem interface for Europe and the US. I know this
should be OK for Europe but is the 250V rating (ITU lightning protection to
1.5KV) OK for the US? 

Kind Regards
Alex McNeil
Principal Engineer


This email has been scanned for all known viruses and appropriate content by
the Messagelabs mail service.


This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   emc_p...@symbol.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc


Title: RE: US Modem Safety






I am not sure about your agency review, but I have always used the Telcom

rated fuses from Raychem (TR600-150)and there has never been a problem.

This is based on UL 60950 anex B testing via the flow chart on page 200 and

201.  I believe that refers to compliant PSTN fuse protection devices.

Please keep in mind that the EU and UL versions of 60950 are slightly

different.



Daniel J. Pierce

Sr. Hardware Engineer


Escient Division

Digital Networks of North America, Inc.

Suite 200

6325 Digital Way

Indianapolis, IN  46278


Direct Phone and Fax: (317) 616-6587

Email: dpie...@escient.com 

 


-Original Message-

From: Alex McNeil [mailto:alex.mcn...@ingenicofortronic.com]

Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 6:00 AM

To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org

Subject: US Modem Safety





Hi Colleagues,


I intend to use an overcurrent protection device, the Raychem polyswitch

TS250-130, on an analogue modem interface for Europe and the US. I know this

should be OK for Europe but is the 250V rating (ITU lightning protection to

1.5KV) OK for the US? 


Kind Regards

Alex McNeil

Principal Engineer




This email has been scanned for all known viruses and appropriate content by

the Messagelabs mail service.


---

This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety

Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.


Visit our web site at:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/


To cancel your subscription, send mail to:

 majord...@ieee.org

with the single line:

 unsubscribe emc-pstc


For help, send mail to the list administrators:

 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com

 Dave Heald:   emc_p...@symbol.com


For policy questions, send mail to:

 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org

 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc




<>


When is FCC DOC required?

2003-03-28 Thread Dan Pierce


Dear Group

I have a DVD player that has a hard disk drive, and Ethernet connection.
When is a declaration of conformance required?  Only if I apply the FCC
logo?  Would I need to be -3db from the limit or below the margin of error
of the test equipment?

What are the options I have besides self verification and the requirements /
logos.

Thank you in advance for all information.

-Dan Pierce


This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc



AV terminations

2002-12-11 Thread Dan Pierce

Dear Group, 

I was wondering what the typical load termination to use for audio and video
RCA connections on a typical receiver, both in and out. 

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"


ITE / AV Equipment with Ethernet

2002-12-11 Thread Dan Pierce

Dear Group,

I currently have a device that is a cross between ITE and AV (a typical set
top box) which has Ethernet.  I am wondering how to terminate the line for
testing both emissions and immunity.  In addition, should I have this
Ethernet setting so that I transmit data in a 1 meter loop back cable?
Would a connection to a hub with no other lines to/from be legal?

Any responses are greatly appreciated.

Sincerely, 

-Dan Pierce

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"


Conducted Line Emissions

2002-11-07 Thread Dan Pierce
Greetings:

I am looking for proof that I can use the averaged value for emissions
rather than the peak value.  Attached is a chart that I was given by an Asia
test site that told me I failed.  According to my past experience, I believe
that the average power is what I should be concerned about.  Similar to
radiated emissions right?


Thank you.

Daniel J. Pierce
Sr. Design Engineer
OpenGlobe, Inc.
> (An Escient Technologies Affiliate)
6325 Digital Way
Indianapolis, IN  46278

mailto:dpie...@openglobe.net
 
P:  (317) 616.6587
F:  (317) 616.6587


<>


Pages from Line conduction.pdf
Description: Binary data


EMI on ATAPI interface (HDD + DVD)

2002-10-30 Thread Dan Pierce
Dear Colleagues, 

I would like to know if anyone has experience in quieting an IDE interface
and if there are any good design guides.

Here is the scenario:

I have a system that has a HDD and DVD on the IDE interface.  My system
clock runs at 54MHz and I am having problems in the 120-125MHz range (+3dB
over).  I can suppress these frequencies by using a ferrite on the ribbon
cable by this is not an acceptable design.  I need to go into another layout
spin with a solution to get at least 6dB attenuation.  Radiation seems to be
coming from the point at which it leaves the motherboard.

I am going to go into the dirt to fix this, but I would like to know if
anyone has seen this before.  Does anyone  know of good termination schemes
for IDE or best place to put beads.

Anything is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely, 

Daniel J. Pierce
Sr. Design Engineer
OpenGlobe, Inc.
> (An Escient Technologies Affiliate)
6325 Digital Way
Indianapolis, IN  46278

mailto:dpie...@openglobe.net
 
P:  (317) 616.6587
F:  (317) 616.6587

<>


RE: Ferrites for GND

2002-10-15 Thread Dan Pierce

Should I be using 10 Ohm here?

-Original Message-
From: Wan Juang Foo [mailto:f...@np.edu.sg]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 8:29 PM
To: Dan Pierce; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Ferrites for GND




Dan,
It is a lossy material and most commercially available ferrite beads are
'tuned' to peak around the 100 MHz (VHF band II ?).   I suppose there must
be lots of exception but I have not use any outside this region.  Most of
them have different Q to describe their individual characteristics.
Obviously, there are lots of RFI from many FM radio stations making it a
necessity for many design.  The material's 'lossy' property are subjected
to saturation etc...

Here is how I suppose it works :-) or fail to work often..., the presence
of a ferrite bead in the ground path increases the inductance of the return
path at some frequencies, it also introduces a  form of RF losses that can
be modelled as an ac resistance.  Hence, it is a differential mode filter
of sorts, it will not work against CM interference if the bead is only in
the path of the return lead (signal ground).  There is always other grounds
that RF breakthrough can come around.

However, so much being said, pay careful attention to the layout
(installation and placement) because in general reference designs often do
not provide reference 'photographs' for best layout practices.  Some do
provide PCB layout but very often in the interest to avoid verbosity, the
all important 'notes' are absent.   Inter-conductor capacitance can ruin
the performance of the ferrite bead.

Just my 2 ¢

cheerio...

Tim Foo


 

  Dan Pierce

cc:  (bcc: Wan
Juang Foo/ece/staff/npnet)   
  Sent by:   Subject: Ferrites for
GND   
  owner-emc-pstc@majordo

  mo.ieee.org

 

 

  10/12/02 03:01 AM

  Please respond to Dan

  Pierce

 

 





I have always been reluctant to place ferrite beads in the ground path, but
I see them frequently in reference designs for USB and Analog Audio.

What kind material should this be and what characteristics  would this type
of ferrite have.  I am assuming this ferrite would not have 600 Ohm
impedance @ 100MHz

Thanks in advance,

Daniel J. Pierce
Sr. Design Engineer
OpenGlobe, Inc.
> (An Escient Technologies Affiliate)
6325 Digital Way
Indianapolis, IN  46278

mailto:dpie...@openglobe.net

P:  (317) 616.6587
F:  (317) 616.6587

(See attached file: Dan Pierce.vcf)





---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"


Ferrites for GND

2002-10-11 Thread Dan Pierce
I have always been reluctant to place ferrite beads in the ground path, but
I see them frequently in reference designs for USB and Analog Audio.

What kind material should this be and what characteristics  would this type
of ferrite have.  I am assuming this ferrite would not have 600 Ohm
impedance @ 100MHz

Thanks in advance, 

Daniel J. Pierce
Sr. Design Engineer
OpenGlobe, Inc.
> (An Escient Technologies Affiliate)
6325 Digital Way
Indianapolis, IN  46278

mailto:dpie...@openglobe.net
 
P:  (317) 616.6587
F:  (317) 616.6587

<>


Looking for good USB EMI suppression techniques

2002-09-18 Thread Dan Pierce
Greetings:

I am looking for a good design practice regarding USB transmission lines.  I
commonly have problems with 120.00MHz and 252.00MHz. 

Thanks in advance.

Daniel J. Pierce
Sr. Design Engineer
OpenGlobe, Inc.
> (An Escient Technologies Affiliate)
6325 Digital Way
Indianapolis, IN  46278

mailto:dpie...@openglobe.net
 
P:  (317) 616.6587
F:  (317) 616.6587

<>


RE: Requirements for Device Connected to Phone Line

2002-07-22 Thread Dan Pierce
A bunch of FCC Part68 tests, and registration of product.  If you integrate
a module that is already approved you can avoid all the testing but I think
you still have to register.

Canada is just paperwork submission of FCC results and more fees.

For fee information see the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachment
(ACTA)http://www.part68.org  this site provides useful information regarding
what is required.

Daniel J. Pierce
Sr. Design Engineer
OpenGlobe, Inc.
> (An Escient Technologies Affiliate)
6325 Digital Way
Indianapolis, IN  46278

mailto:dpie...@openglobe.net
 
P:  (317) 616.6587
F:  (317) 616.6587


-Original Message-
From: don_macart...@selinc.com [mailto:don_macart...@selinc.com]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 9:07 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Requirements for Device Connected to Phone Line





Hello Group,

What are the requirements for devices which connect to the public phone line
of
the U.S. and Canada?

Regards,
Don
--
This e-mail may contain SEL confidential information.  The opinions
expressed
are not necessarily those of SEL.  Any unauthorized disclosure, distribution
or
other use is prohibited.  If you received this e-mail in error, please
notify
the sender, permanently delete it, and destroy any printout.  Thank you.



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

<>


Hot Chassis?

2001-08-14 Thread Dan Pierce

I currently have a 110/220 power supply that has several 2200UF capacitors
tied to FGND two of which are tied to the AC lines in.  This supply comes
with a three prong NA cord set.  I have found that if I bypass the earth
ground plug I can measure a 80 VAC potential from my chassis to earth
ground.  I found this out in the lab when someone touched the chassis and a
grounded bench and got zapped.  Is there guidelines regarding this?   I see
the UL mark on this power supply.   I want to use a two prong NA cord set
not a three prong NA cord set and I have been told OK by the manufacturer.
I have been told that the FGND current is approx. 100uA, but I have not
verified yet.  How can this be safe?

Dan Pierce
Indianapolis, IN  46112

317.616.6587  Direct phone and fax

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.rcic.com/  click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"




CE or CB ?

2001-06-07 Thread Dan Pierce

 I am in the process of introducing product into the EU and possibly
world wide.  I was shown that the CB mark testing covers all the countries
in the EU that we plan to sell to and other countries as well.  Is this a
new mark? Would I be better off getting the CE mark and then test to
other countries applicable standards or the CB mark?  The test facility that
provided me with the information was Intertek Testing Services, in
California USA.

I planned to test to:

EN55013
EN55020
TBR21
61000-3-2
61000-3-3



Daniel J. Pierce
Sr. Design Engineer
OpenGlobe, Inc.
> (An Escient Technologies Affiliate)
6325 Digital Way
Indianapolis, IN  46278

mailto:dpie...@openglobe.net
 
P:  (317) 616.6587
F:  (317) 616.6587


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.rcic.com/  click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"