RE: Insulated Electrolytic Capacitors

2001-10-25 Thread Colgan, Chris

It is my understanding the only X and Y type capacitors can be relied upon
to provide basic insulation (my experience with IEC60065)

>From bitter experience I have learned that you can't rely on other products
(or even your own previously approved products) for verification of
conformity.  The test engineer may have missed something - apparently
they're only human(?).

Regards

Chris Colgan
Compliance Engineer
TAG McLaren Audio Ltd
The Summit, Latham Road
Huntingdon, Cambs, PE29 6ZU
*Tel: +44 (0)1480 415 627
*Fax: +44 (0)1480 52159
* Mailto:chris.col...@tagmclaren.com
* http://www.tagmclaren.com


> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Merguerian [SMTP:pmerguer...@itl.co.il]
> Sent: 24 October 2001 14:38
> To:   "EMC-PSTC (E-mail)" <
> Subject:  Insulated Electrolytic Capacitors
> 
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> I have submitted an ac input to dc output switching power supply for NRTL
> approval. One deviation is that the primary ac insulated capacitor is too
> close to the earthed chassis and that the insulation cannot be relied to
> provide the required basic insulation. 
> 
> 1. What is the group's opinion regarding this point? I have personally
> seen
> many Listed/Recognized units with clearance distance less than 2.0 mm to
> the
> earthed chassis without any additional insulation to provide the required
> insulation. In fact, I am holding a switching power supply by a reputable
> manufacturer with only approx. 0.7 mm between the primary and earthed
> chassis. This power supply is  UL Recognized and TUV approved.
> 
> 2. There is a UL Pag 156002 regarding this issue, but it seems that some
> NRTL engineers are using their own judgement and approving units at their
> own discretion.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If
> you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use,
> disseminate,
> distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in any way. If
> you
> received this e-mail message in error, please return by forwarding the
> message and its attachments to the sender.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> PETER S. MERGUERIAN
> Technical Director
> I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd.
> 26 Hacharoshet St., POB 211
> Or Yehuda 60251, Israel
> Tel: + 972-(0)3-5339022  Fax: + 972-(0)3-5339019
> Mobile: + 972-(0)54-838175
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> 
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
> 
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>  majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line:
>  unsubscribe emc-pstc
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
>  Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
>  Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
> messages are imported into the new server.


**  
   Please visit us at www.tagmclaren.com
**

The contents of this E-mail are confidential and for the exclusive
use of the intended recipient. If you receive this E-mail in error,
please delete it from your system immediately and notify us either
by E-mail, telephone or fax. You  should not  copy, forward or 
otherwise disclose the content of the E-mail.

TAG McLaren Audio Ltd
The Summit, 11 Latham Road
Huntingdon, Cambs, PE29 6ZU
Telephone : 01480 415600 (+44 1480 415600)
Facsimile : 01480 52159 (+44 1480 52159)

**  
   Please visit us at www.tagmclaren.com
**

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.



Re: Insulated Electrolytic Capacitors

2001-10-24 Thread Douglas_Beckwith



From:  Douglas Beckwith@MITEL on 10/24/2001 02:05 PM
Hi Peter,
My understanding of 60950 is that distance through insulation applies here
(0.4mm). I have never had this issue with CSA.

Regards

Doug Beckwith
Mitel Networks




Peter Merguerian  on 10/24/2001 09:38:19 AM

Please respond to Peter Merguerian 

To:   "\"EMC-PSTC (E-mail)\" <" 
cc:(bcc: Douglas Beckwith/Kan/Mitel)

Subject:  Insulated Electrolytic Capacitors




Dear All,

I have submitted an ac input to dc output switching power supply for NRTL
approval. One deviation is that the primary ac insulated capacitor is too
close to the earthed chassis and that the insulation cannot be relied to
provide the required basic insulation.

1. What is the group's opinion regarding this point? I have personally seen
many Listed/Recognized units with clearance distance less than 2.0 mm to the
earthed chassis without any additional insulation to provide the required
insulation. In fact, I am holding a switching power supply by a reputable
manufacturer with only approx. 0.7 mm between the primary and earthed
chassis. This power supply is  UL Recognized and TUV approved.

2. There is a UL Pag 156002 regarding this issue, but it seems that some
NRTL engineers are using their own judgement and approving units at their
own discretion.





This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If
you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, disseminate,
distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in any way. If you
received this e-mail message in error, please return by forwarding the
message and its attachments to the sender.




PETER S. MERGUERIAN
Technical Director
I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd.
26 Hacharoshet St., POB 211
Or Yehuda 60251, Israel
Tel: + 972-(0)3-5339022  Fax: + 972-(0)3-5339019
Mobile: + 972-(0)54-838175






---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old messages
are imported into the new server.







---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.



Re: Insulated Electrolytic Capacitors

2001-10-24 Thread Rich Nute




Hi Peter:


As a general rule, the insulation on the outside of
an electrolytic capacitor is considered functional 
insulation.  (Indeed, the insulation between the 
elements of the capacitor and the aluminum can is
clearly functional insulation.)

As far as I know, only X- and Y-capacitor insulation
may be considered Basic insulation (in accordance 
with IEC 60384-14).

Consequently, the insulation on the capacitor must
be ignored.  The distance between the capacitor
case and grounded metal must meet the creepage and 
clearance distance requirements, or solid insulation 
must be interposed between the capacitor and the 
grounded metal.

The fact that some certified power supplies do not 
meet the spacing requirements is not an argument
that such spacings are not required.  This simply
means that neither the power supply safety engineer
nor the certification engineer caught the problem.
After all, the spacings within a power supply 
comprise a rather difficult and tedious job of 
identifying the various voltages and corresponding
creepage and clearances on the PWB two-dimensional
plane.  Often, we don't look at the clearances in 
the third, vertical dimension.


Best regards,
Rich




---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.



AW: Insulated Electrolytic Capacitors

2001-10-24 Thread Horst Haug

Peter,

my experience is, that you will not receive a statement from the
manufacturer of the capacitor about the foil around the cap. This would be
required to proof, that it is good for basic insulation.

Our company (we are a GS-mark certification body) does not accept the foil
around a capacitor as basic insulation without proof. My experience with UL
is, that UL is doing the same.

The only way to accept the insulation of the capacitor would be to get a
written statement from the capacitor manufacturer about the foil and
describe  this insulation in the list of safety critical components.

With best regards
Horst

-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]Im Auftrag von Peter Merguerian
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Oktober 2001 15:38
An: "EMC-PSTC (E-mail)" <
Betreff: Insulated Electrolytic Capacitors


Dear All,

I have submitted an ac input to dc output switching power supply for NRTL
approval. One deviation is that the primary ac insulated capacitor is too
close to the earthed chassis and that the insulation cannot be relied to
provide the required basic insulation.

1. What is the group's opinion regarding this point? I have personally seen
many Listed/Recognized units with clearance distance less than 2.0 mm to the
earthed chassis without any additional insulation to provide the required
insulation. In fact, I am holding a switching power supply by a reputable
manufacturer with only approx. 0.7 mm between the primary and earthed
chassis. This power supply is  UL Recognized and TUV approved.

2. There is a UL Pag 156002 regarding this issue, but it seems that some
NRTL engineers are using their own judgement and approving units at their
own discretion.





This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If
you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, disseminate,
distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in any way. If you
received this e-mail message in error, please return by forwarding the
message and its attachments to the sender.




PETER S. MERGUERIAN
Technical Director
I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd.
26 Hacharoshet St., POB 211
Or Yehuda 60251, Israel
Tel: + 972-(0)3-5339022  Fax: + 972-(0)3-5339019
Mobile: + 972-(0)54-838175






---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
messages are imported into the new server.


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.



RE: Insulated Electrolytic Capacitors

2001-10-24 Thread Jim Eichner

I asked a similar question a couple of years ago, and was told that the
bodies of plastic encapsulated Y1 capacitors are considered by CENELEC to be
reinforced insulation, except in the vicinity of the leads.  I don't know if
this extends to types of  X and Y caps other than Y1.

Hope this is some help,

Regards, 
Jim Eichner, P.Eng. 
Manager, Engineering Services 
Xantrex Technology Inc. 
Mobile Power
web: www.xantrex.com <http://www.xantrex.com> 

Any opinions expressed are those of my invisible friend, who really
exists.  I know because he talks to me.  Honest.



-Original Message-
From: Peter Merguerian [mailto:pmerguer...@itl.co.il]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 6:38 AM
To: "EMC-PSTC (E-mail)" <
Subject: Insulated Electrolytic Capacitors



Dear All,

I have submitted an ac input to dc output switching power supply for NRTL
approval. One deviation is that the primary ac insulated capacitor is too
close to the earthed chassis and that the insulation cannot be relied to
provide the required basic insulation. 

1. What is the group's opinion regarding this point? I have personally seen
many Listed/Recognized units with clearance distance less than 2.0 mm to the
earthed chassis without any additional insulation to provide the required
insulation. In fact, I am holding a switching power supply by a reputable
manufacturer with only approx. 0.7 mm between the primary and earthed
chassis. This power supply is  UL Recognized and TUV approved.

2. There is a UL Pag 156002 regarding this issue, but it seems that some
NRTL engineers are using their own judgement and approving units at their
own discretion.





This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If
you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, disseminate,
distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in any way. If you
received this e-mail message in error, please return by forwarding the
message and its attachments to the sender.




PETER S. MERGUERIAN
Technical Director
I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd.
26 Hacharoshet St., POB 211
Or Yehuda 60251, Israel
Tel: + 972-(0)3-5339022  Fax: + 972-(0)3-5339019
Mobile: + 972-(0)54-838175






---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
messages are imported into the new server.

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.



Re: Insulated Electrolytic Capacitors

2001-10-24 Thread Patrick Lawler

Our company manufactures switching power supplies to EN60950 and EN60601-1
standards, and our safety group looks for these issues.
In fact, I got 'bit' by that same problem last week.  Spacing was OK when the
PWB was mounted in the chassis, but when the cover was installed, it failed
primary-ground spacing.  I had to fix it.

As far as the sample power supplies you have:
- What safety standard does the manufacturer claim?
- What are the installation instructions, or 'conditions of acceptability'?
- Did they look as if they had been modified or installed in another chassis
assembly after it was manufactured?


On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 15:38:19 +0200, Peter Merguerian 
wrote:
>I have submitted an ac input to dc output switching power supply for NRTL
>approval. One deviation is that the primary ac insulated capacitor is too
>close to the earthed chassis and that the insulation cannot be relied to
>provide the required basic insulation. 
>
>1. What is the group's opinion regarding this point? I have personally seen
>many Listed/Recognized units with clearance distance less than 2.0 mm to the
>earthed chassis without any additional insulation to provide the required
>insulation. In fact, I am holding a switching power supply by a reputable
>manufacturer with only approx. 0.7 mm between the primary and earthed
>chassis. This power supply is  UL Recognized and TUV approved.
>
>2. There is a UL Pag 156002 regarding this issue, but it seems that some
>NRTL engineers are using their own judgement and approving units at their
>own discretion.

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.



Insulated Electrolytic Capacitors

2001-10-24 Thread Peter Merguerian

Dear All,

I have submitted an ac input to dc output switching power supply for NRTL
approval. One deviation is that the primary ac insulated capacitor is too
close to the earthed chassis and that the insulation cannot be relied to
provide the required basic insulation. 

1. What is the group's opinion regarding this point? I have personally seen
many Listed/Recognized units with clearance distance less than 2.0 mm to the
earthed chassis without any additional insulation to provide the required
insulation. In fact, I am holding a switching power supply by a reputable
manufacturer with only approx. 0.7 mm between the primary and earthed
chassis. This power supply is  UL Recognized and TUV approved.

2. There is a UL Pag 156002 regarding this issue, but it seems that some
NRTL engineers are using their own judgement and approving units at their
own discretion.





This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If
you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, disseminate,
distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in any way. If you
received this e-mail message in error, please return by forwarding the
message and its attachments to the sender.




PETER S. MERGUERIAN
Technical Director
I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd.
26 Hacharoshet St., POB 211
Or Yehuda 60251, Israel
Tel: + 972-(0)3-5339022  Fax: + 972-(0)3-5339019
Mobile: + 972-(0)54-838175






---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.