RE: EN55022 vrs. FCC Part 15

2000-10-20 Thread Colgan, Chris

Of course it does.  I had a bad case of pressing the send button without the
brain being engaged.  Sorry for the duff information.

Chris

 -Original Message-
 From: jmur...@quantumbridge.com [SMTP:jmur...@quantumbridge.com]
 Sent: 19 October 2000 20:13
 To:   emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
 Subject:  RE: EN55022 vrs. FCC Part 15
 
 
 FCC Pt15 states that you can use their limits or, alternatively, the
 limits
 found in CISPR 22:1995.  Your EN Class B data should be sufficient for
 having your lab generate an FCC B (or A) report.
 
 Jack
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Colgan, Chris [mailto:chris.col...@tagmclarenaudio.com]
 Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 4:51 AM
 To: 'Emc-Pstc' (E-mail)
 Subject: RE: EN55022 vrs. FCC Part 15
 
 
 
 No.
 The class B FCC limits for conducted disturbance at the mains ports are
 lower than EN55022 class B.
 QP limits:
 FCC - 0.45 to 30MHz = 48dBuV
 EN - 0.15 to 0.5MHz = 66 to 56dBuV (decreasing linearly with the log of
 frequency)
0.5 to 5MHz = 56dBuV
5 to 30MHz = 60dBuV
 Radiated disturbance is performed at 3m for FCC and 10m for EN55022.  The
 limits and are different.
 QP limits:
 FCC @ 3m - 30 to 88MHz = 34dBuV/m
88 to 216MHz = 37.5dBuV/m
216 to 960MHz = 40dBuV/m
960 to 1000MHz = 48dBuV/m
 EN @ 10m - 30 to 230MHz = 30dBuV/m
230 to 1000MHz = 37dBuV/m
 
 I'm afraid the only way to compare the two standards is to buy copies of
 them.
 
 Chris Colgan
 EMC  Safety
  TAG McLaren Audio Ltd
 The Summit, Latham Road
 Huntingdon, Cambs, PE29 6ZU
 United Kingdom
  * Phone: +44 (0)1480 415627
  * Fax: +44 (0)1480 415689
  * Mailto:chris.col...@tagmclarenaudio.com
  * http://www.tagmclarenaudio.com
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From:   Keith Zell [SMTP:zell...@pmifeg.com]
  Sent:   18 October 2000 14:53
  To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
  Subject:EN55022 vrs. FCC Part 15
  
  
  Will a product certified to EN55022 class B necessarily comply to FCC
 Part
  15 Class A limits?  Where might I find a valid comparison of these two
 EMC
  standards. 
  
  As always, thanks for your help. 
  
  B. Keith Zell
  Electrical Design Engineer
  PMI Food Equipment Group
  Troy, OH 45374
  (937) 332-3067 (ph)
  (937) 332-3007 (fax)
  zell...@pmifeg.com
 
 
 **  
Please visit us at www.tagmclarenaudio.com
 **
 
 The contents of this E-mail are confidential and for the exclusive
 use of the intended recipient. If you receive this E-mail in error,
 please delete it from your system immediately and notify us either
 by E-mail, telephone or fax. You  should not  copy, forward or 
 otherwise disclose the content of the E-mail.
 
 TAG McLaren Audio Ltd
 The Summit, 11 Latham Road
 Huntingdon, Cambs, PE29 6ZU
 Telephone : 01480 415600 (+44 1480 415600)
 Facsimile : 01480 52159 (+44 1480 52159)
 
 **  
Please visit us at www.tagmclarenaudio.com
 **
 
 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
 
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc
 
 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 
 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 
 
 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
 
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc
 
 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 
 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 


**  
   Please visit us at www.tagmclarenaudio.com
**

The contents of this E-mail are confidential and for the exclusive
use of the intended recipient. If you receive this E-mail in error,
please delete it from your system immediately and notify us either
by E-mail, telephone or fax. You  should not  copy, forward or 
otherwise disclose the content of the E-mail.

TAG McLaren Audio Ltd
The Summit, 11 Latham Road
Huntingdon, Cambs, PE29 6ZU
Telephone : 01480 415600 (+44 1480 415600)
Facsimile : 01480 52159 (+44 1480 52159)

**  
   Please

RE: EN55022 vrs. FCC Part 15

2000-10-20 Thread Benoit Nadeau


Bonjour de Montréal,

This is true, but don't forget that if your product uses or generate 
frequencies over 108 MHz you will have to test over 1 GHz using the ANSI 
C63.4 Standard and Part 15 limits. The FCC limit can go up to 40 GHz 
according to the following table:


9 KHz to  1,705 MHz /   30 MHz
1,705 to 108 MHz /  1 GHz
108 to 500 MHz /2 GHz
500 to 1000 MHz/5 GHz
 1 GHz /   5th harmonic up to 40 GHz

Best regards,



At 03:13 PM 10/19/2000 -0400, jmur...@quantumbridge.com wrote:


FCC Pt15 states that you can use their limits or, alternatively, the limits
found in CISPR 22:1995.  Your EN Class B data should be sufficient for
having your lab generate an FCC B (or A) report.

Jack

-Original Message-
From: Colgan, Chris [mailto:chris.col...@tagmclarenaudio.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 4:51 AM
To: 'Emc-Pstc' (E-mail)
Subject: RE: EN55022 vrs. FCC Part 15



No.
The class B FCC limits for conducted disturbance at the mains ports are
lower than EN55022 class B.
QP limits:
FCC - 0.45 to 30MHz = 48dBuV
EN - 0.15 to 0.5MHz = 66 to 56dBuV (decreasing linearly with the log of
frequency)
   0.5 to 5MHz = 56dBuV
   5 to 30MHz = 60dBuV
Radiated disturbance is performed at 3m for FCC and 10m for EN55022.  The
limits and are different.
QP limits:
FCC @ 3m - 30 to 88MHz = 34dBuV/m
   88 to 216MHz = 37.5dBuV/m
   216 to 960MHz = 40dBuV/m
   960 to 1000MHz = 48dBuV/m
EN @ 10m - 30 to 230MHz = 30dBuV/m
   230 to 1000MHz = 37dBuV/m

I'm afraid the only way to compare the two standards is to buy copies of
them.

Chris Colgan
EMC  Safety
 TAG McLaren Audio Ltd
The Summit, Latham Road
Huntingdon, Cambs, PE29 6ZU
United Kingdom
 * Phone: +44 (0)1480 415627
 * Fax: +44 (0)1480 415689
 * Mailto:chris.col...@tagmclarenaudio.com
 * http://www.tagmclarenaudio.com



 -Original Message-
 From: Keith Zell [SMTP:zell...@pmifeg.com]
 Sent: 18 October 2000 14:53
 To:   emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
 Subject:  EN55022 vrs. FCC Part 15


 Will a product certified to EN55022 class B necessarily comply to FCC Part
 15 Class A limits?  Where might I find a valid comparison of these two EMC
 standards.

 As always, thanks for your help.

 B. Keith Zell
 Electrical Design Engineer
 PMI Food Equipment Group
 Troy, OH 45374
 (937) 332-3067 (ph)
 (937) 332-3007 (fax)
 zell...@pmifeg.com


**
   Please visit us at www.tagmclarenaudio.com
**

The contents of this E-mail are confidential and for the exclusive
use of the intended recipient. If you receive this E-mail in error,
please delete it from your system immediately and notify us either
by E-mail, telephone or fax. You  should not  copy, forward or
otherwise disclose the content of the E-mail.

TAG McLaren Audio Ltd
The Summit, 11 Latham Road
Huntingdon, Cambs, PE29 6ZU
Telephone : 01480 415600 (+44 1480 415600)
Facsimile : 01480 52159 (+44 1480 52159)

**
   Please visit us at www.tagmclarenaudio.com
**

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org




--
Benoit Nadeau, ing. M.ing. (P.Eng., M.Eng)
Gerant du Groupe Conformite (Conformity Group Manager)
Matrox http://www.matrox.com/
--

1055, boul. St-Regis
Dorval (Quebec) Canada
H9P 2T4

Tel : (1)(514) 822-6000 (x2475)
FAX : (1)(514) 822-6275
Internet : bnad...@matrox.com, mailto:bnad...@matrox.com


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send

RE: EN55022 vrs. FCC Part 15

2000-10-19 Thread JMurphy

FCC Pt15 states that you can use their limits or, alternatively, the limits
found in CISPR 22:1995.  Your EN Class B data should be sufficient for
having your lab generate an FCC B (or A) report.

Jack

-Original Message-
From: Colgan, Chris [mailto:chris.col...@tagmclarenaudio.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 4:51 AM
To: 'Emc-Pstc' (E-mail)
Subject: RE: EN55022 vrs. FCC Part 15



No.
The class B FCC limits for conducted disturbance at the mains ports are
lower than EN55022 class B.
QP limits:
FCC - 0.45 to 30MHz = 48dBuV
EN - 0.15 to 0.5MHz = 66 to 56dBuV (decreasing linearly with the log of
frequency)
   0.5 to 5MHz = 56dBuV
   5 to 30MHz = 60dBuV
Radiated disturbance is performed at 3m for FCC and 10m for EN55022.  The
limits and are different.
QP limits:
FCC @ 3m - 30 to 88MHz = 34dBuV/m
   88 to 216MHz = 37.5dBuV/m
   216 to 960MHz = 40dBuV/m
   960 to 1000MHz = 48dBuV/m
EN @ 10m - 30 to 230MHz = 30dBuV/m
   230 to 1000MHz = 37dBuV/m

I'm afraid the only way to compare the two standards is to buy copies of
them.

Chris Colgan
EMC  Safety
 TAG McLaren Audio Ltd
The Summit, Latham Road
Huntingdon, Cambs, PE29 6ZU
United Kingdom
 * Phone: +44 (0)1480 415627
 * Fax: +44 (0)1480 415689
 * Mailto:chris.col...@tagmclarenaudio.com
 * http://www.tagmclarenaudio.com
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Keith Zell [SMTP:zell...@pmifeg.com]
 Sent: 18 October 2000 14:53
 To:   emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
 Subject:  EN55022 vrs. FCC Part 15
 
 
 Will a product certified to EN55022 class B necessarily comply to FCC Part
 15 Class A limits?  Where might I find a valid comparison of these two EMC
 standards. 
 
 As always, thanks for your help. 
 
 B. Keith Zell
 Electrical Design Engineer
 PMI Food Equipment Group
 Troy, OH 45374
 (937) 332-3067 (ph)
 (937) 332-3007 (fax)
 zell...@pmifeg.com


**  
   Please visit us at www.tagmclarenaudio.com
**

The contents of this E-mail are confidential and for the exclusive
use of the intended recipient. If you receive this E-mail in error,
please delete it from your system immediately and notify us either
by E-mail, telephone or fax. You  should not  copy, forward or 
otherwise disclose the content of the E-mail.

TAG McLaren Audio Ltd
The Summit, 11 Latham Road
Huntingdon, Cambs, PE29 6ZU
Telephone : 01480 415600 (+44 1480 415600)
Facsimile : 01480 52159 (+44 1480 52159)

**  
   Please visit us at www.tagmclarenaudio.com
**

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



RE: EN55022 vrs. FCC Part 15

2000-10-19 Thread Colgan, Chris

No.
The class B FCC limits for conducted disturbance at the mains ports are
lower than EN55022 class B.
QP limits:
FCC - 0.45 to 30MHz = 48dBuV
EN - 0.15 to 0.5MHz = 66 to 56dBuV (decreasing linearly with the log of
frequency)
   0.5 to 5MHz = 56dBuV
   5 to 30MHz = 60dBuV
Radiated disturbance is performed at 3m for FCC and 10m for EN55022.  The
limits and are different.
QP limits:
FCC @ 3m - 30 to 88MHz = 34dBuV/m
   88 to 216MHz = 37.5dBuV/m
   216 to 960MHz = 40dBuV/m
   960 to 1000MHz = 48dBuV/m
EN @ 10m - 30 to 230MHz = 30dBuV/m
   230 to 1000MHz = 37dBuV/m

I'm afraid the only way to compare the two standards is to buy copies of
them.

Chris Colgan
EMC  Safety
 TAG McLaren Audio Ltd
The Summit, Latham Road
Huntingdon, Cambs, PE29 6ZU
United Kingdom
 * Phone: +44 (0)1480 415627
 * Fax: +44 (0)1480 415689
 * Mailto:chris.col...@tagmclarenaudio.com
 * http://www.tagmclarenaudio.com
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Keith Zell [SMTP:zell...@pmifeg.com]
 Sent: 18 October 2000 14:53
 To:   emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
 Subject:  EN55022 vrs. FCC Part 15
 
 
 Will a product certified to EN55022 class B necessarily comply to FCC Part
 15 Class A limits?  Where might I find a valid comparison of these two EMC
 standards. 
 
 As always, thanks for your help. 
 
 B. Keith Zell
 Electrical Design Engineer
 PMI Food Equipment Group
 Troy, OH 45374
 (937) 332-3067 (ph)
 (937) 332-3007 (fax)
 zell...@pmifeg.com


**  
   Please visit us at www.tagmclarenaudio.com
**

The contents of this E-mail are confidential and for the exclusive
use of the intended recipient. If you receive this E-mail in error,
please delete it from your system immediately and notify us either
by E-mail, telephone or fax. You  should not  copy, forward or 
otherwise disclose the content of the E-mail.

TAG McLaren Audio Ltd
The Summit, 11 Latham Road
Huntingdon, Cambs, PE29 6ZU
Telephone : 01480 415600 (+44 1480 415600)
Facsimile : 01480 52159 (+44 1480 52159)

**  
   Please visit us at www.tagmclarenaudio.com
**

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org