OL2002: Error Message Occurs When You Synchronize an OST That Is 1.82 GB in Size (PST = BAD)
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q306/0/76.ASP _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue
Ahhh... That was the tool I was trying to think of earlier. Good find Jennifer! D -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue if you cannot find the old exchange client to rename the inbox, use mdbvu32.exe which is in the SERVER\SUPPORT\UTILS\I386 on the 5.5 cd. logon to user's mailbox open mdbvu32.exe hit ok go to mdb open message store highlight the users mailbox hit open go to mdb open root folder double click top of information store double click renamed inbox hit call function click set properties highlight PR_Display_Name type Inbox in the Prop data box click add click call click close click close click close click close click close hit X click ok click ok -Original Message- From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue Well, the TechNet article said it was a problem in O2K, and I quote: OL2000: Inbox May Be Renamed When Deleting an Appointment The user remembers his secretary being active in his calendar when this happens, so I'm thinking that's probably it. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 14:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue I'd be very curious as to how that happened. There isn't an option in O2K to rename the inbox. -Original Message- From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue Hi Gang! We have a user whose Inbox got renamed. (Exchange 5.5, sp4. NT 4 sp 6a, user Outlook 2000). I found TechNet article Q249750 which seemed to be a very good fit for our situation. The article said to use exchng32.exe to rename the mailbox. I had to look around the shop, but i did find a copy of that old exchange client. Problem is, it won't run, at least not on my win2000 desktop. Get an error that reads: 'The NTVDM CPU has encountered an illegal instruction.' Same on an NT4 box. Do i have a bad copy of exchng32.exe? (mine is time stamped 8/9/96. Where can i get a good one? Or do i have to run this on a win98 box or something? It looks like it runs in a dos window Or does somebody know another way to rename an inbox back to INBOX? Thanks, Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Security
Someone has added a group to the permissions in the Exchange Admin program. And if that is hosed up, there's no telling what other fun permissions your predecessor has set up elsewhere on your network! :) Stephen -Original Message- From: DonFG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Security I cannot figure this one out. The Exchange server v5.5 was setup prior to my working at the current location. It was found out that anyone can access anyone elses email box by using OpenOther User's Folder I checked the settings on the folders themselves and found as the default, no one has access. You are still allowed access though. WHAT AM I MISSING%#@%*! Any help would be appriciated. DonFG _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: seperating atachments
KVS K-Vault (Enterprise Vault) http://www.k-vault.com Stephen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: seperating atachments I am looking for a program (or way) to automaticaly seperate all of the attachments from the emails in outlook 2000 mailboxes and public on exchange 5.5 to the file server while leaving a link in the message to the new location of the attachment. A great way to downsize the size of the info. store. thx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.
You can set some of the ports as static (IS, DS, MTA, etc.,) but you cannot assign a static port to UDP Push Notification. If ports1024 are blocked, your Outlook clients might be able to send and receive mail just fine, but the blocked Push will prevent the view from refreshing. This results in the APPEARANCE that mail is not coming in until you change folders, mail not leaving the outbox, etc., Stephen -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. Maybe I didn't understand the post. I believe you can especially if your behind a firewall. Refer to Q148732. XADM: Setting TCP/IP Port Numbers for Internet Firewalls [Q148732] -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. You cannot make that static. That range that you listed is for the UDP Push Notification from the Exchange server to the client. It is a randomly selected (by the client) UDP port above 1024. The Exchange server uses this to send the new mail notification (refresh command) to the client. Stephen -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. Went through TechNet and couldn't find any reference to the actual range. Found the articles on how to make it static, but no range. Also posted that question on the list asking about the range and I don't recall anyone stating what it was. The MS tech I talked to had to place me on hold 3 times to get the answer. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. You could have searched the MSKB and figured that out. There's plenty of documentation out there... -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. Just a note to everyone. We called Microsoft and inquired what the range for the two random ports were that Exchange allocates to the client once it connects to a socket. According to Microsoft the range is from 1,024 to 64,000. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. No security consultant I know is going to open holes in the network from the DMZ to the Internal network. Being proficient in both Exchange and Security, I feel sorry for your clients if you suggest the model you propose below to them. I think you ought to study up on security some more... If you open holes from the DMZ to the internal LAN, why in the hell do you have a DMZ. You've made the DMZ virtually pointless. Or did your teacher or book you read say something different. If it were a book that told you to configure things this way, please send me the ISBN number, I really wanna read that book. Apparently, I've been taking the wrong approach for years now. I happen to know of a company who has the same model you describe. After I showed them the security issues, they were desiring a change for the better immediately. -Original Message- From: Frank Knobbe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:55 PM Don't bother. Use a proxy server and publish OWA. Or require SSL and open port 443. Or implement a VPN. I still think putting an Exchange front-end server in a DMZ is kind of silly. Not as silly with Exchange 2000 as with Exchange 5.5, but silly nonetheless. Ed, I don't find this silly at all. Let me try to clarify: Scenario A: You have an Internet connection coming to a firewall. Behind the firewall in your internal network you have an Exchange server. You also have a web server (maybe on the same box, maybe different box). You allow HTTPS traffic through the firewall to the web server in the LAN. Scenario B: You have an Internet connection coming to a firewall. Behind the firewall in your internal network you have an Exchange server. In a DMZ segment (which can be a third network card in the firewall, or a segment between two firewalls) you have a web server. HTTPS traffic is allowed to the web server, and required ports (say, RPC, NetBIOS, InfoStore, Directory) are allowed from the web server through the firewall to the Exchange server. Scenario A has following
RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue
aol mode Me too! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue I'm trying to quit smoking -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue I would say me too, but then I would be breaking law number 3.4 of the swinc bible. I have run into this issue more than 5 times, obviously. Also, I love the tool. Manager is impressed when I use it and manage to *not* crash the server. Note to self and others: it is a dangerous tool. your craving of nicotine was brought on by the repetition of click close click close click close...you sicko. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue Jennifer, that was awesome. A lot of digging down there. I felt like I needed a cigarette after that. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue if you cannot find the old exchange client to rename the inbox, use mdbvu32.exe which is in the SERVER\SUPPORT\UTILS\I386 on the 5.5 cd. logon to user's mailbox open mdbvu32.exe hit ok go to mdb open message store highlight the users mailbox hit open go to mdb open root folder double click top of information store double click renamed inbox hit call function click set properties highlight PR_Display_Name type Inbox in the Prop data box click add click call click close click close click close click close click close hit X click ok click ok -Original Message- From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue Well, the TechNet article said it was a problem in O2K, and I quote: OL2000: Inbox May Be Renamed When Deleting an Appointment The user remembers his secretary being active in his calendar when this happens, so I'm thinking that's probably it. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 14:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue I'd be very curious as to how that happened. There isn't an option in O2K to rename the inbox. -Original Message- From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue Hi Gang! We have a user whose Inbox got renamed. (Exchange 5.5, sp4. NT 4 sp 6a, user Outlook 2000). I found TechNet article Q249750 which seemed to be a very good fit for our situation. The article said to use exchng32.exe to rename the mailbox. I had to look around the shop, but i did find a copy of that old exchange client. Problem is, it won't run, at least not on my win2000 desktop. Get an error that reads: 'The NTVDM CPU has encountered an illegal instruction.' Same on an NT4 box. Do i have a bad copy of exchng32.exe? (mine is time stamped 8/9/96. Where can i get a good one? Or do i have to run this on a win98 box or something? It looks like it runs in a dos window Or does somebody know another way to rename an inbox back to INBOX? Thanks, Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: After applying Service Pack4 on our exchange5.5 and post SP4 fix for MTA
1) You are not looking at the event on an Exchange server 2) Event 9322 is a network problem of some sort (RPC server unavailable if I remember correctly). I normally drop a HOSTS file on the Exchange servers so that they can see each other. Exchange 5.5 uses a HOSTS file, if present, as it's primary form of name resolution. See then if it disappears. If it does, then troubleshoot your WINS or DNS, otherwise, troubleshoot your network. Stephen -Original Message- From: Jain, Manoj - EMO Trans Freeport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: After applying Service Pack4 on our exchange5.5 and post SP4 fix for MTA We have two NT4.0 Servers with Exchange5.5 SP4 and post SP4 MTA fix. I see the following error on one of the server on LAN. Event ID 9322: The description for Event ID(9322) in source(MSExchangeMTA) could not be found. It contains the following strings, 28,1722,1722,0, HQSERVER-1, ncacn_ip_tcp[1058] BASE IL, INCOMING RPC, 36, 507. Mail flow is OK between the two MTAs. Microsoft is still wotking on the problem. Has anyone come across this problem ??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes
I don't remember THAT being said in the last meeting! -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes Minutes of last meeting and date of next meeting attached. -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- Version: PGP 7.1 qANQR1DBwU4D8XE+82mH6LkQB/9r/bjjOegcvDkeRvqeTDR9BcY4slhoT6JNVM4p t4Rp9EPQgQj6bcJm6+cZ6mkfq3ksuDMxhB5GU55ciVq/DVkuv9a8fpiRMAjlhIoW tzg4RtkIxm8mcW8iJinGpqwsbndps90jvYeDHt7RewY46c5nw1B9nWtY+84Z6D+3 VUrb2jzo+a8n4uLvQKUn83BRwpKSDKVYzP2dFAX9f/s2bzH/Ot3tnrCMwXflmTkf /eJfak+knkE6Z+ptFgtJQkxoXFKlLfkCFkFZEhhJj2maqFZwfBxnWwde3wW/uxL2 k7J3d6kCNXhbxgVCC1u+xScdp07KxnBq3fCuMPeyq8rUZg7oCADcDae0vJFASMe5 YQqWtDZnFxj+E++HnJqmOPxo9QRC7Q/QEBR6UAsK4V3tIASliX9rR3LTt3nM8gHh MnQEmqWkxkRks2SkHNNESEo4j/nHY0CjgRHQJ7lU/B6gR2nUP7nPEAEzdxOhlEAk aZ9rp/fATSJFOruAqCH7gWTywB6DJXWUhgb0eVfgrQFjERYfhSJsnzR+JpCY94Ei RSITCrjXFs5TQrxqv3jCKJ0J9jvp2CzcvLsgAs2Z5bAC4SS8MJ/Kn7jnblDxyQ1I +F3lDYn0kxyMDS/Lq6tepn8CEBdLTJkXpJ1DyqYwqt3TsriiAiNJqPLNOv8pRvuy +xxVNT2nyeziMggXq3NmFOjsNWNJ+hXBXoxA+/xqu+P4a97oik6HpMzGATTmLlaH WzFBH451A8JB+mfvr115HCcDx7Ui126lk4/h/BvJRnyzYK3ECA7nXVWYvhD+Umv6 xwXpgtwxUo1zxlSdt0ThhBYGlmE89Ihc0ltwTDQBOq4bAxiHXiQDiGGahzjsVGKl 2w9N1tKQJOwH1UBHVEq46tScAvegIUUbBuC21FsNi6y8jQLHDjCw7d9OvIGM0sJ5 iMAuOPcJIMEhBhwl+Zg6tQk3N5I7mHhyp9qBOKhxtsflIUF45ToFE5CHZAQh9psZ 6BxQClSqL/s3CqjQPt/whhe6Lb4lCll0bhmWL8dVoUbBen4zxbEQLItaIjxGXZSr fgR+9Lz5i3pti3axSPGSN4xdeR2yko0McoQkcVbzkZJ9lBqu37gUQkUeHjHyKVeQ hmKj5gIO9988NdWaVDJaNK+Z4KVgVrwilYe96DhXcaaQtjErRlATVmpQTJcA1iek bdF0wzj35pQbGMQnJMH0xF2h/NUCX9lxRhZ4RYcWSQphSJN+olqUOvikJQZHzJf1 7AAPCG8MHYFTmeXsXT7aq2A2aM5sATQTudop9mjocyu82Ct7F5MzjsAfIlT4RAQS TKzpTW+YgjfHTa9vzjyHkO5IH5tvMouSxfsBuKPVT5osK7Adygp4klI9B5tJliFc Apuy6Og4DBWWTS8xG0efrp/MFeDNqedgtXhYlHl2DfHFPazkFdhdlB84qWOpyfv3 ztTvi1c8xK1OB0RLwtB7KOj0DbbPBc0WFgeuHLtJ+hBmFhu3ZtDHEGFYsAAB68M2 rdYhW98wfc+IYcK7+FBRTbjr3ce7unJ2YC63mKbS/ONShxY09wSIbjCwjbL7Na5O RH0BMLBSAWhKuQaFNAIHe1fLLdEsbv8opX9ps2dmWAXJLcOZ6xfdt1acaD/6M28W ovLBvZdkI7SRMfAfsFCK3VS3yxQbF9bB9MEs/aplP1vMD4mOFLczMY9cN5eHHatZ djOIY9F1HFiSuDs3xKNj+64Yn1Y4uCTX3QFR9PT/PvDbbYaR51nszV+ZeumQvrFm 0zTJiWTVfDfpnu+dNJxnw25GV+xcQLTCi+EyRnexF82j2MUOw9zlD0vgf1YZ7C3d Bp6JaXkazKMAaOJ5Wi+n3P/tUJVPkFaSWaT6B/pEJpXeds6Ya3FEYP9R79VrbSHR f7x3xSzQfXhKRp+SBTA4DAwX7NZWjLw4B3iaqEZ0n8ikO6zwOj8/u0AWO9/uNGuP T96fHHlXIeJV2AgpWGUi+VaDbn3sYS/2NOaR1BXxC8XEVwBNSFQO5dUll/za8n5O fPO4V5ln0yzZ7Nbx0rKEG2GoDpX7jtBvMCSY9thm1aewnqnjMfxtZT5y6IleZ2mt jYkDBtOfi+ZglUKsNEh32LFzlq7DJUCokrHvKCAI3CuBtaQtfQhcWAyYuzIIM0LM G1Jc6BDwUrKaVktfM+c5WXfuKnT8KhoDnPLgpsp6VvuBLBz4FAA4JI3Q7fJEnFTK K1JZ3dMO9fQjqf6RnSwonoi6WTr0eS5fSfZL0xKn+MzLx206S8Vi44YTqRUDjoi/ pvAk6mNGRbyFIARLCDG4mb5zp6G9H3xwJ+k0Ma29OCCIHZvXb7fFKoOZvNnIUT04 Qwb49yY0nVbhNgHE7hRB4OMDb4tElP0xxbsO73bH0okVcDY/8t8AU6Nk8iz/Tr/h MLzEGF6Dc7Qh2Y5wYB2yJL1jN29t+LIDAh3dWq4gn+vb4ylGyzEc8c8fbyO4JVmI sY5376guFym13AYQAton58G4BchdYFaSrrGY7lGUaNeHoNXS6uBCrQU0n4jR9rot Di76pQhWKVwxMk1YbCZ/uLE5dh9FanL+j6vHAEu+eNgBnptJYh5Yw6NhCbZ+aq1p Y1E6hnERv3PSzaCEaw/qxufbkSQ12S3cQNpQ1lGZJejDk27KlKKIJVjFY8oA83it fm6sanbW+BgzCUtxwoimBtfcdPAB1izSGrDXuvUF6Hp5jN0cBOake0/66nZkAYEz NJl5hq2WDcyt52b39xz2ISBKXwbZNtpqUkhl97WWe082FSbZPTHx213SP5sP/6s1 94Y+uV+sieEVJcZlJ2CQ9X99vWfs+1lI98VpNhO1rnzWVVUdZ5/+J2Zg8g6wDnq4 EBRhin2nCPqH9/ws5FGgs3r3wgD3nL3gVpf5/1KO1//2jB7NMyCXIIMvlL6luWwA 95HENExo4qS4rdHVN/FMK0gnmOSJm9234W4rbLgzbnN2o9CDacatqblAQp4f+hd1 zxyK1/6BcvO9tY+Jwy6MCB8ARs9IRHjaDTo6fl+3+TipisD9/71LdJBzWBEOxFyJ tpvzI5XJirL2uDXuvwCg1jXgMmC9PCxW5nRdRykP9XqvgB9sorCwVQaBdPaNZCID czD/sRL1NOjW8dPLlXQigNZCp+zK9uu4pEXUE2AYsU5PQtqE7caV0fK1h8LarHNr 5d+RDy9dkzgh1arcyVPIvuMyyJ0Zgwb/DMEXENpBCLWMyzi86xg/T1WV2FeXQ69Q zodiET1pmlnYG34CDPkI3FrKMHE4DAOfXQLkYPmu45I+kHh/JXP2bChbFbGIw5sx p+7HvBsMQTB9MwwdAJU8YhtamIjF/Vi2+AUAgmLcbT0PZHO+wJtvms0LhE5RvDjv h73dNWWx1mzi+np73t5WGjli9+EPgPj7zGKvPx8EdwFlPI3OMVi3TUwh6+V7FLZ8 BIz1Gar5lb2aDDuRdmlUCBWBZ2nnwdolLhJAfKy/MpsVTphD4Oyne0QhLnv+rmbh GBC+gI95UvRrpJA2S4P25ZBJjKNZyl/g9fjA2I6bebynVSJ4h4fhaMwEh1E7oA7P pgw3MYyZhCTk4X47nhEtzFe1HsCG4uOQ/oovLfHaMZRoX0uWjJJt9Ol+GHxvk/56 KhmRWP3xgYgKLGSPcsGtWF6t8nEaPxtht6TaqmmaftmmGXCpsZxPt+DVX2z8XeF5 26rkb3ptOue7MXJXhsQQEN19fRHbE/NnDAedHWRV5fQerOJZVdloVqmWo7qHhrWT 3xtCj98hIclXzrMBtN00w006M1u9aYYSkLKRn6DKO2e95Psy5NV0AwoQvLYTvxp5 AAqQKiGj6khHaLnBFVma2Zq+UxXXb9az/2LegjOg4d3/vxw7T12INEvDTfZLvglr UjONLlhN6k9lglenJFzd7JwAXtbH0IOfc8nGUAKdwkpQnGi6cM6P5Yytm5L2iOTw bcHBOf5jcW23Wp3TWIbLE+81kb+kSWX6d90N3HOhIVmEh2PpXp9XWzJg09rhfcAd BQ8HJFpUdDOXMcVmUnemIGVv9eHXm7nsK4zhVrRySqPQzyt1rxdl7eYhIF44sMRg 1d9MDZr6TAt70aMkzBm/myZ15Rr1bZY73ptV+2sCkJTg+8a+DrPKirtYXbZwGDRO ov6xJDD97lGmESnKuESNpukGowokNJ8OQBpoQ8F8mc6Q4r5XrjhLFVsyhCphDokW DNzLCZ7NhX0ea94wPgXwLpPQKG7rIGIwW+7npNAeZS5NarNPyNfGKdUzxZ+vBGe/ ZaPGgensj4Jynr3dN8cEWTWn3HaK9j3bVTBfDA51SRnvJqe3eMH8x9cs8XVevRL2 ULD+MbxE1q9SkpVb7Ka14SHWqby8pSSrZZAFhFWr5bjdDp9wBtrU6oBZSyLq32Aw tDMt1h/yDfIq0w4fB5j7iQBN6fxuaOpFPP9O7bqvP5as9QMJjY7OP6JPIf+O1Djx 4kmgsl1pfgZmgpH8YCWs7zCq8pCGFUYhg/cke6cVFvDPLfF7elLqMvZ19pgvkT3r
RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
Mike Thankyou for your comments, but our requirement is to have the team leaders of each of the groups (about 800) modify the permissions of their folders as staff move between teams quite regularly, and other people need access temporarily to assist with operations. Regards Jason Tuffin -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions Don't give users Owner permissions on the top level folder. Reserve that permission to your Exchange admins. Users shouldn't need to be changing permissions at the upper levels, anyway, and those permission sets shouldn't change very frequently (if you are using DLs for granting permission). As long as they can create folders under the top level, they'll have owner permissions on the folders they create and can do the things you listed. You might also (if you haven't already) turn on deleted items retention for your public folders, and do the dumpsteralwayson registry hack on your machine so you can easily recover those items. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions I am having a little difficulty with owners of folders deleting the top level folder for their group. Our environment has 500 or so Org Units and each org unit has a public folder visible to the whole org unit. Within the Org unit we assign 1 or 2 users with owner rights, and the rest of the members of the org unit are listed with author rights. Our problem is that the owners are accidently deleting the top level folders. Is there a way that we can assign permissions to someone which will allow them to: change the client permissions for the folder; view, edit and delete messages; create and delete subfolders; but not delete the top level folder? If you have any ideas I am happy to test and investigate further. Thanks and best regards Jason Tuffin CSC Exchange Server Support for WA Police Service This email message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient be advised that you have received this message in error and that any use, copying, circulation, forwarding, printing or publication of this message or attached files is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information contained therein. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your Inbox. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient be advised that you have received this message in error and that any use, copying, circulation, forwarding, printing or publication of this message or attached files is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information contained therein. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your Inbox. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
If the folders were permissioned with dlists then these team leaders would only need to edit the dlists and not the PF permissions directly. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 October 2001 09:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions Mike Thankyou for your comments, but our requirement is to have the team leaders of each of the groups (about 800) modify the permissions of their folders as staff move between teams quite regularly, and other people need access temporarily to assist with operations. Regards Jason Tuffin -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions Don't give users Owner permissions on the top level folder. Reserve that permission to your Exchange admins. Users shouldn't need to be changing permissions at the upper levels, anyway, and those permission sets shouldn't change very frequently (if you are using DLs for granting permission). As long as they can create folders under the top level, they'll have owner permissions on the folders they create and can do the things you listed. You might also (if you haven't already) turn on deleted items retention for your public folders, and do the dumpsteralwayson registry hack on your machine so you can easily recover those items. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions I am having a little difficulty with owners of folders deleting the top level folder for their group. Our environment has 500 or so Org Units and each org unit has a public folder visible to the whole org unit. Within the Org unit we assign 1 or 2 users with owner rights, and the rest of the members of the org unit are listed with author rights. Our problem is that the owners are accidently deleting the top level folders. Is there a way that we can assign permissions to someone which will allow them to: change the client permissions for the folder; view, edit and delete messages; create and delete subfolders; but not delete the top level folder? If you have any ideas I am happy to test and investigate further. Thanks and best regards Jason Tuffin CSC Exchange Server Support for WA Police Service This email message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient be advised that you have received this message in error and that any use, copying, circulation, forwarding, printing or publication of this message or attached files is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information contained therein. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your Inbox. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient be advised that you have received this message in error and that any use, copying, circulation, forwarding, printing or publication of this message or attached files is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information contained therein. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your Inbox. _ List
RE: Exchange 2K Clustering
If you are running active/active, you should have 3 groups: In our case - 'Cluster' group, which should contain the quorum disk resource, cluster network name resource, and cluster ip address resource. 2 Exchange Virtual Server groups, (EVS1 and EVS2 in our case). Each contains a disk resource (or 2 - one for data, one for logs), ip address resource, network name resource, and exchange SA resource. The rest of the resources are created by the exchange install. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 6:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I have exactly that setup as you are explaining. I'm just trying to figure out when I'm in Cluster Admin that when I go to the servers listed in there at the bottom. It has listed under each server: Active Groups, Active Resources, and Network Interfaces. I'm sorry if this sounds elmentary but I don't know jack about cluster servers (but learning). But how come under these folders all the active groups and resources are only listed under one server while both servers are up and running? Is this the way it should be setup if you are running active/active cluster server? Thanks for the help. John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Winterton, Robert K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering At a minimum, I would think you would have disk resources for: 1: the Quorum drive 2: Data drive for node 1 3: Log drive for node 1 4: Data drive for node 2 5: Log drive for node 2 You might be able to combine the Data and Log drives for each node into a single disk resource since they would failover together. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2K Clustering All, I'm trying to install active/active clustering for Exchange 2k. When I'm setting up virtual servers you have to setup the IP address Resource, Net Name,and Disk resource. Now I'm curious, do I have to have 2 disks setup on W2K Disk Manager for each server? I would think that it uses just one disk resource since it's Active/Active cluster. I'm reading the white paper on this and it just says to repeat the step for the other node in the clusterif you are using Active/Active. Can someone please shed some light onto this? Thanks alot, John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes
Wow! I'm a member of the of circle? When do I get to laugh manically, twirl my moustache imperiously and tie young maidens to the railroad tracks. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes Minutes of last meeting and date of next meeting attached. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AntiVirus Change
And I am trying to convince my supervisor to not use InoculateIT and use Sybari's Antigen instead... but, as you already know, that isn't an easy task... So, I beg you: please give me some link to a website/document that compares antivirus for exchange server 5.5, so I can show my superiors the mistake they are doing!! I guess the new version of InoculateIT (eTrust InoculateIT 6.0, if i'm not mistaken) is better than version 4... but I still consider Antigen better than InoculateIT. Thanks! Ok, I am trying to convince my Supervisor to switch from InoculateIT to Antigen. Can someone point me to their website so that I can get some more information about the product and get my research started. Both my mail servers are Nt 4.0 w/SP6a, running Exchange 5.5 w/SP4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: After applying Service Pack4 on our exchange5.5 and post SP4 fix for MTA
We did the same thing and it worked like a champ. When DNS fails. . .thank God for the HOSTS file. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Stephen Mynhier Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 01:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: After applying Service Pack4 on our exchange5.5 and post SP4 fix for MTA 1) You are not looking at the event on an Exchange server 2) Event 9322 is a network problem of some sort (RPC server unavailable if I remember correctly). I normally drop a HOSTS file on the Exchange servers so that they can see each other. Exchange 5.5 uses a HOSTS file, if present, as it's primary form of name resolution. See then if it disappears. If it does, then troubleshoot your WINS or DNS, otherwise, troubleshoot your network. Stephen -Original Message- From: Jain, Manoj - EMO Trans Freeport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: After applying Service Pack4 on our exchange5.5 and post SP4 fix for MTA We have two NT4.0 Servers with Exchange5.5 SP4 and post SP4 MTA fix. I see the following error on one of the server on LAN. Event ID 9322: The description for Event ID(9322) in source(MSExchangeMTA) could not be found. It contains the following strings, 28,1722,1722,0, HQSERVER-1, ncacn_ip_tcp[1058] BASE IL, INCOMING RPC, 36, 507. Mail flow is OK between the two MTAs. Microsoft is still wotking on the problem. Has anyone come across this problem ??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes
I thought this was simply the creation of the latest script kiddie... Rick Bauer -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 6:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes Wow! I'm a member of the of circle? When do I get to laugh manically, twirl my moustache imperiously and tie young maidens to the railroad tracks. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes Minutes of last meeting and date of next meeting attached. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AntiVirus Change
The active answers section of Compaq's website does. It'd over a year old now though and thus not really relevant anymore. But it sounds like external validation is more important than internal testing. I can recommend some folks to write you a fairly unbiased report on the current technologies for Exchange 5.5. They'll certainly be less biased than say... a PC magazine roundup on the subject. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 5:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change And I am trying to convince my supervisor to not use InoculateIT and use Sybari's Antigen instead... but, as you already know, that isn't an easy task... So, I beg you: please give me some link to a website/document that compares antivirus for exchange server 5.5, so I can show my superiors the mistake they are doing!! I guess the new version of InoculateIT (eTrust InoculateIT 6.0, if i'm not mistaken) is better than version 4... but I still consider Antigen better than InoculateIT. Thanks! Ok, I am trying to convince my Supervisor to switch from InoculateIT to Antigen. Can someone point me to their website so that I can get some more information about the product and get my research started. Both my mail servers are Nt 4.0 w/SP6a, running Exchange 5.5 w/SP4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2K Clustering
All, I'm running clustering for Exchange 2k. I'm in Cluster Administrator trying to move a disk resource to a group. But I keep getting the error message: The cluster node is not the owner of the group. I checked the properties and the server (in the cluster) I'm trying to move it to is in the Possible Owners list. Does anyone have any ideas why I'm getting this error message? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering If you are running active/active, you should have 3 groups: In our case - 'Cluster' group, which should contain the quorum disk resource, cluster network name resource, and cluster ip address resource. 2 Exchange Virtual Server groups, (EVS1 and EVS2 in our case). Each contains a disk resource (or 2 - one for data, one for logs), ip address resource, network name resource, and exchange SA resource. The rest of the resources are created by the exchange install. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 6:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I have exactly that setup as you are explaining. I'm just trying to figure out when I'm in Cluster Admin that when I go to the servers listed in there at the bottom. It has listed under each server: Active Groups, Active Resources, and Network Interfaces. I'm sorry if this sounds elmentary but I don't know jack about cluster servers (but learning). But how come under these folders all the active groups and resources are only listed under one server while both servers are up and running? Is this the way it should be setup if you are running active/active cluster server? Thanks for the help. John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Winterton, Robert K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering At a minimum, I would think you would have disk resources for: 1: the Quorum drive 2: Data drive for node 1 3: Log drive for node 1 4: Data drive for node 2 5: Log drive for node 2 You might be able to combine the Data and Log drives for each node into a single disk resource since they would failover together. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2K Clustering All, I'm trying to install active/active clustering for Exchange 2k. When I'm setting up virtual servers you have to setup the IP address Resource, Net Name,and Disk resource. Now I'm curious, do I have to have 2 disks setup on W2K Disk Manager for each server? I would think that it uses just one disk resource since it's Active/Active cluster. I'm reading the white paper on this and it just says to repeat the step for the other node in the clusterif you are using Active/Active. Can someone please shed some light onto this? Thanks alot, John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting
RE: Massive read activity
s.. if you are verrry quite, rich, you can hear the sound of cliques in this discussion list.. ..capice? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Massive read activity Ok it made me laugh -Original Message- From: Dumb Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Massive read activity and since rich is back (nice going Andy) so i guess i'll be leaving. Oh.. and thanks for anyone who helped me out there it was fun for a couple of weeks but I am going to remove myself from the board because I know many of you would like that anyway. See Ya (p.s... i'll be back, just like rich..) GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OL2002: Error Message Occurs When You Synchronize an OST That Is 1.82 GB in Size (PST = BAD)
What does this have to do with PST=BAD? -Original Message- From: David N Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL2002: Error Message Occurs When You Synchronize an OST That Is 1.82 GB in Size (PST = BAD) http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q306/0/76.ASP _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Massive read activity
sure -Original Message- From: Dumb Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Massive read activity s.. if you are verrry quite, rich, you can hear the sound of cliques in this discussion list.. ..capice? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Massive read activity Ok it made me laugh -Original Message- From: Dumb Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Massive read activity and since rich is back (nice going Andy) so i guess i'll be leaving. Oh.. and thanks for anyone who helped me out there it was fun for a couple of weeks but I am going to remove myself from the board because I know many of you would like that anyway. See Ya (p.s... i'll be back, just like rich..) GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Haiku Friday
Another week ends with no stops in the EV. Doing something right. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Queue active but mail not moving
In Exchange 5.5, when you look at the outbound mail queue, you can double-click on the messages that aren't being sent and see what the reason was. Can you do something similar on the IIS 6 SMTP queues? Or is there a protocol log for SMTP separate from the regular event log that you could look at? Somewhere, there should be more of a clue as to why the mail isn't happening. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Cook, David A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP Queue active but mail not moving E2K sp1, w2k sp2 I am having an sporadic problem in which smtp mail is not being delivered. When this happens I look at the queue on the server that is not sending mail and the smtp connection in question shows active but has messages sitting in it. I can enumerate the messages and the largest message will 10-15KB. I have let the queue sit in the active state for up to 30 minutes with no activity. I can restart the SMTP virtual server and all mail is delivered immediately. The app event log is not showing any events. Anyone seen this or know what may be causing this? Dave Cook Desktop Administrator Kutak Rock, LLP 402-231-8352 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## The information contained in this electronic mail transmission (including any accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its authorized recipient(s), and may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, or responsible for delivering some or all of this transmission to an intended recipient, you have received this transmission in error and are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from reading, copying, printing, distributing or disclosing any of the information contained in it. In that event, please contact us immediately by telephone (402)346-6000 or by electronic mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete the original and all copies of this transmission (including any attachments) without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. ## _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
Installing SSS PPP and praying for no stops for not loose week end (glup) -Mensaje original- De: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: viernes, 19 de octubre de 2001 14:39 Para: Exchange Discussions Asunto: Haiku Friday Another week ends with no stops in the EV. Doing something right. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders
RE: Dumb thought No 3: Creating a new container for the CRs, while a good idea in my opinion, will not prevent the addresses from muddying the GAL. It will make it easier to separate the two entities out if the users, when addressing their messages, choose to use the drop down menu next to the Show Messages from in the address book to select one of the containers instead of the GAL, but the CRs will most definitely show in the GAL without ABVs. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Unfortunately, a client is required in order to access a PF; even if you do some CDO, you are still gonna need a client to gain access to the dir. Dumb thought No 1: If OL2k is choking on a massive import, have you considered breaking the job into bitty parts? ..say, 10k names instead? Dumb thought No 2: Configure OL2k as OST client. Add target PF into Favorites folder. Set Favorites/targetPF to sync offline. Sync OL2k. Take OL2k offline. Import contacts into Favorites/targetPF (hold breath #1). Sync OL2k (hold breath #2). Let list know if dumb idea really works.. Dumb thought No 3: ABV's will provide a nice way to segregate users. And you are correct that it'll take some planning to work out both the technical and political whatnots. But you can certainly import 60k CR's into your dir without being pressed into implementing ABV's before you are ready. I presume their is a desire not to muddy the GAL with all those CR's, so create a new container and import the CR's into there. Tim. -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Actually in the long run, I will import the records into the Exchange Directory as custom recipients. I don't do that today because once our GAL is increased by 60,000 entries, I will need to immediately create address book views to manage the whole thing. Creating these views will involve cooperation of administrators across Exchange sites and that process takes time. I was hoping to find a quick way to copy 60,000 contact records into a Public Folder without hanging up the client. -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Why not use Custom Recipients instead of a public folder contacts list? Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Huge contact folder in Public Folders I have a problem. I have a contact folder in the Public folders that is used for an address folder for Outlook clients. It contains 60,000 records. Once a month, I get a new list in csv format that I need to use to update the records in the folder. Outlook won't import a foreign file directly into the Public Folders. If I import into a local folder, then move the folder into the Public Folders, all the clients that are configured to use this folder as an Outlook Address folder have to be reconfigured. I can't import into a local folder, then copy the records into the Public Folder because Outlook hangs up with such a large list of records. ANY SUGGESTIONS? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Exchange 2K Clustering
To move a resource from one group to another in a cluster, both groups have to be active on the same node. My guess is that the group you are trying to move the disk resource to is not owned (not active on) the same node as your other group. Chris Lapworth Software Engineer Unisys Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering All, I'm running clustering for Exchange 2k. I'm in Cluster Administrator trying to move a disk resource to a group. But I keep getting the error message: The cluster node is not the owner of the group. I checked the properties and the server (in the cluster) I'm trying to move it to is in the Possible Owners list. Does anyone have any ideas why I'm getting this error message? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering If you are running active/active, you should have 3 groups: In our case - 'Cluster' group, which should contain the quorum disk resource, cluster network name resource, and cluster ip address resource. 2 Exchange Virtual Server groups, (EVS1 and EVS2 in our case). Each contains a disk resource (or 2 - one for data, one for logs), ip address resource, network name resource, and exchange SA resource. The rest of the resources are created by the exchange install. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 6:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I have exactly that setup as you are explaining. I'm just trying to figure out when I'm in Cluster Admin that when I go to the servers listed in there at the bottom. It has listed under each server: Active Groups, Active Resources, and Network Interfaces. I'm sorry if this sounds elmentary but I don't know jack about cluster servers (but learning). But how come under these folders all the active groups and resources are only listed under one server while both servers are up and running? Is this the way it should be setup if you are running active/active cluster server? Thanks for the help. John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Winterton, Robert K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering At a minimum, I would think you would have disk resources for: 1: the Quorum drive 2: Data drive for node 1 3: Log drive for node 1 4: Data drive for node 2 5: Log drive for node 2 You might be able to combine the Data and Log drives for each node into a single disk resource since they would failover together. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2K Clustering All, I'm trying to install active/active clustering for Exchange 2k. When I'm setting up virtual servers you have to setup the IP address Resource, Net Name,and Disk resource. Now I'm curious, do I have to have 2 disks setup on W2K Disk Manager for each server? I would think that it uses just one disk resource since it's Active/Active cluster. I'm reading the white paper on this and it just says to repeat the step for the other node in the clusterif you are using Active/Active. Can someone please shed some light onto this? Thanks alot, John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The
RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
Perzactly. Set the Team Leaders as owners of the distribution lists, and give the DLs appropriate permissions (but not owner) to the public folders. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 4:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions If the folders were permissioned with dlists then these team leaders would only need to edit the dlists and not the PF permissions directly. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 October 2001 09:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions Mike Thankyou for your comments, but our requirement is to have the team leaders of each of the groups (about 800) modify the permissions of their folders as staff move between teams quite regularly, and other people need access temporarily to assist with operations. Regards Jason Tuffin -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions Don't give users Owner permissions on the top level folder. Reserve that permission to your Exchange admins. Users shouldn't need to be changing permissions at the upper levels, anyway, and those permission sets shouldn't change very frequently (if you are using DLs for granting permission). As long as they can create folders under the top level, they'll have owner permissions on the folders they create and can do the things you listed. You might also (if you haven't already) turn on deleted items retention for your public folders, and do the dumpsteralwayson registry hack on your machine so you can easily recover those items. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions I am having a little difficulty with owners of folders deleting the top level folder for their group. Our environment has 500 or so Org Units and each org unit has a public folder visible to the whole org unit. Within the Org unit we assign 1 or 2 users with owner rights, and the rest of the members of the org unit are listed with author rights. Our problem is that the owners are accidently deleting the top level folders. Is there a way that we can assign permissions to someone which will allow them to: change the client permissions for the folder; view, edit and delete messages; create and delete subfolders; but not delete the top level folder? If you have any ideas I am happy to test and investigate further. Thanks and best regards Jason Tuffin CSC Exchange Server Support for WA Police Service This email message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient be advised that you have received this message in error and that any use, copying, circulation, forwarding, printing or publication of this message or attached files is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information contained therein. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your Inbox. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient be advised that you have received this message in error and that any use, copying, circulation, forwarding, printing or
RE: Exchange 2K Clustering
Can someone confirm that you cannot run ADC on an Exchange cluster server? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Lapworth, Christopher S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering To move a resource from one group to another in a cluster, both groups have to be active on the same node. My guess is that the group you are trying to move the disk resource to is not owned (not active on) the same node as your other group. Chris Lapworth Software Engineer Unisys Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering All, I'm running clustering for Exchange 2k. I'm in Cluster Administrator trying to move a disk resource to a group. But I keep getting the error message: The cluster node is not the owner of the group. I checked the properties and the server (in the cluster) I'm trying to move it to is in the Possible Owners list. Does anyone have any ideas why I'm getting this error message? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering If you are running active/active, you should have 3 groups: In our case - 'Cluster' group, which should contain the quorum disk resource, cluster network name resource, and cluster ip address resource. 2 Exchange Virtual Server groups, (EVS1 and EVS2 in our case). Each contains a disk resource (or 2 - one for data, one for logs), ip address resource, network name resource, and exchange SA resource. The rest of the resources are created by the exchange install. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 6:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I have exactly that setup as you are explaining. I'm just trying to figure out when I'm in Cluster Admin that when I go to the servers listed in there at the bottom. It has listed under each server: Active Groups, Active Resources, and Network Interfaces. I'm sorry if this sounds elmentary but I don't know jack about cluster servers (but learning). But how come under these folders all the active groups and resources are only listed under one server while both servers are up and running? Is this the way it should be setup if you are running active/active cluster server? Thanks for the help. John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Winterton, Robert K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering At a minimum, I would think you would have disk resources for: 1: the Quorum drive 2: Data drive for node 1 3: Log drive for node 1 4: Data drive for node 2 5: Log drive for node 2 You might be able to combine the Data and Log drives for each node into a single disk resource since they would failover together. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2K Clustering All, I'm trying to install active/active clustering for Exchange 2k. When I'm setting up virtual servers you have to setup the IP address Resource, Net Name,and Disk resource. Now I'm curious, do I have to have 2 disks setup on W2K Disk Manager for each server? I would think that it uses just one disk resource since it's Active/Active cluster. I'm reading the white paper on this and it just says to repeat the step for the other node in the clusterif you are using Active/Active. Can someone please shed some light onto this? Thanks alot, John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: OL2002: Error Message Occurs When You Synchronize an OST That Is 1.82 GB in Size (PST = BAD)
its even worse than PST 2k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 08:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL2002: Error Message Occurs When You Synchronize an OST That Is 1.82 GB in Size (PST = BAD) What does this have to do with PST=BAD? -Original Message- From: David N Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL2002: Error Message Occurs When You Synchronize an OST That Is 1.82 GB in Size (PST = BAD) http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q306/0/76.ASP _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders
hmm.. yeah.. i think you may be correct, Mike.. I got confused regarding ABV's and the GAL that results from using them. (More on that in a future thread on ABV's.) But the short of it is this: in an ABV-less environment (re: no Search perm. set), the GAL is the culmination of visible objects within all recipient containers of a Site. I, dullard, retract the "separate container" suggestion in 'Dumb thought #3". (doh.. there goes my coffee.. great..) Tim. -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders RE: Dumb thought No 3: Creating a new container for the CRs, while a good idea in my opinion, will not prevent the addresses from muddying the GAL. It will make it easier to separate the two entities out if the users, when addressing their messages, choose to use the drop down menu next to the Show Messages from in the address book to select one of the containers instead of the GAL, but the CRs will most definitely show in the GAL without ABVs. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Unfortunately, a client is required in order to access a PF; even if you do some CDO, you are still gonna need a client to gain access to the dir. Dumb thought No 1: If OL2k is choking on a massive import, have you considered breaking the job into bitty parts? ..say, 10k names instead? Dumb thought No 2: Configure OL2k as OST client. Add target PF into Favorites folder. Set Favorites/targetPF to sync offline. Sync OL2k. Take OL2k offline. Import contacts into Favorites/targetPF (hold breath #1). Sync OL2k (hold breath #2). Let list know if dumb idea really works.. Dumb thought No 3: ABV's will provide a nice way to segregate users. And you are correct that it'll take some planning to work out both the technical and political whatnots. But you can certainly import 60k CR's into your dir without being pressed into implementing ABV's before you are ready. I presume their is a desire not to muddy the GAL with all those CR's, so create a new container and import the CR's into there. Tim. -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Actually in the long run, I will import the records into the Exchange Directory as custom recipients. I don't do that today because once our GAL is increased by 60,000 entries, I will need to immediately create address book views to manage the whole thing. Creating these views will involve cooperation of administrators across Exchange sites and that process takes time. I was hoping to find a quick way to copy 60,000 contact records into a Public Folder without hanging up the client. -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Why not use Custom Recipients instead of a public folder contacts list? Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Huge contact folder in Public Folders I have a problem. I have a contact folder in the Public folders that is used for an address folder for Outlook clients. It contains 60,000 records. Once a month, I get a new list in csv format that I need to use to update the records in the folder. Outlook won't import a foreign file directly into the Public Folders. If I import into a local folder, then move the folder into the Public Folders, all the clients that are configured to use this folder as an Outlook Address folder have to be reconfigured. I can't import into a local folder, then copy the records into the Public Folder because Outlook hangs up with such a large list of records. ANY SUGGESTIONS? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders
Blame it on your cold medication, Tim [1]. Even if you aren't taking any! Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. [1] Check the archives-- I had to do this a couple of weeks back. I _really_ was taking medication at the time, but I reserve the right to use the excuse in the future! -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders hmm.. yeah.. i think you may be correct, Mike.. I got confused regarding ABV's and the GAL that results from using them. (More on that in a future thread on ABV's.) But the short of it is this: in an ABV-less environment (re: no Search perm. set), the GAL is the culmination of visible objects within all recipient containers of a Site. I, dullard, retract the "separate container" suggestion in 'Dumb thought #3". (doh.. there goes my coffee.. great..) Tim. -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders RE: Dumb thought No 3: Creating a new container for the CRs, while a good idea in my opinion, will not prevent the addresses from muddying the GAL. It will make it easier to separate the two entities out if the users, when addressing their messages, choose to use the drop down menu next to the Show Messages from in the address book to select one of the containers instead of the GAL, but the CRs will most definitely show in the GAL without ABVs. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Unfortunately, a client is required in order to access a PF; even if you do some CDO, you are still gonna need a client to gain access to the dir. Dumb thought No 1: If OL2k is choking on a massive import, have you considered breaking the job into bitty parts? ..say, 10k names instead? Dumb thought No 2: Configure OL2k as OST client. Add target PF into Favorites folder. Set Favorites/targetPF to sync offline. Sync OL2k. Take OL2k offline. Import contacts into Favorites/targetPF (hold breath #1). Sync OL2k (hold breath #2). Let list know if dumb idea really works.. Dumb thought No 3: ABV's will provide a nice way to segregate users. And you are correct that it'll take some planning to work out both the technical and political whatnots. But you can certainly import 60k CR's into your dir without being pressed into implementing ABV's before you are ready. I presume their is a desire not to muddy the GAL with all those CR's, so create a new container and import the CR's into there. Tim. -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Actually in the long run, I will import the records into the Exchange Directory as custom recipients. I don't do that today because once our GAL is increased by 60,000 entries, I will need to immediately create address book views to manage the whole thing. Creating these views will involve cooperation of administrators across Exchange sites and that process takes time. I was hoping to find a quick way to copy 60,000 contact records into a Public Folder without hanging up the client. -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Why not use Custom Recipients instead of a public folder contacts list? Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Huge contact folder in Public Folders I have a problem. I have a contact folder in the Public folders that is used for an address folder for Outlook clients. It contains 60,000 records. Once a month, I get a new list in csv format that I need to use to update the records in the folder. Outlook won't import a foreign file directly into the Public Folders. If I import into a local folder, then move the folder into the Public Folders, all the clients that are configured to use this folder as an Outlook Address folder have to be reconfigured. I can't import into a local folder, then copy the records into the Public Folder because Outlook hangs up with such a large list of records. ANY SUGGESTIONS? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders
I love skiing in Vermont. If I kiss up to you, can I sleep at your place so I have a cheap place to stay near Mad River Glen? -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders RE: Dumb thought No 3: Creating a new container for the CRs, while a good idea in my opinion, will not prevent the addresses from muddying the GAL. It will make it easier to separate the two entities out if the users, when addressing their messages, choose to use the drop down menu next to the Show Messages from in the address book to select one of the containers instead of the GAL, but the CRs will most definitely show in the GAL without ABVs. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Unfortunately, a client is required in order to access a PF; even if you do some CDO, you are still gonna need a client to gain access to the dir. Dumb thought No 1: If OL2k is choking on a massive import, have you considered breaking the job into bitty parts? ..say, 10k names instead? Dumb thought No 2: Configure OL2k as OST client. Add target PF into Favorites folder. Set Favorites/targetPF to sync offline. Sync OL2k. Take OL2k offline. Import contacts into Favorites/targetPF (hold breath #1). Sync OL2k (hold breath #2). Let list know if dumb idea really works.. Dumb thought No 3: ABV's will provide a nice way to segregate users. And you are correct that it'll take some planning to work out both the technical and political whatnots. But you can certainly import 60k CR's into your dir without being pressed into implementing ABV's before you are ready. I presume their is a desire not to muddy the GAL with all those CR's, so create a new container and import the CR's into there. Tim. -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Actually in the long run, I will import the records into the Exchange Directory as custom recipients. I don't do that today because once our GAL is increased by 60,000 entries, I will need to immediately create address book views to manage the whole thing. Creating these views will involve cooperation of administrators across Exchange sites and that process takes time. I was hoping to find a quick way to copy 60,000 contact records into a Public Folder without hanging up the client. -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Why not use Custom Recipients instead of a public folder contacts list? Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Huge contact folder in Public Folders I have a problem. I have a contact folder in the Public folders that is used for an address folder for Outlook clients. It contains 60,000 records. Once a month, I get a new list in csv format that I need to use to update the records in the folder. Outlook won't import a foreign file directly into the Public Folders. If I import into a local folder, then move the folder into the Public Folders, all the clients that are configured to use this folder as an Outlook Address folder have to be reconfigured. I can't import into a local folder, then copy the records into the Public Folder because Outlook hangs up with such a large list of records. ANY SUGGESTIONS? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Haiku Friday
All tests successful Outage Saturday next week New domain ahead -Original Message- From: Javier Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 5:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Installing SSS PPP and praying for no stops for not loose week end (glup) -Mensaje original- De: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: viernes, 19 de octubre de 2001 14:39 Para: Exchange Discussions Asunto: Haiku Friday Another week ends with no stops in the EV. Doing something right. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders
Best I can do for you (maybe) is a free tour of our Waterbury plant. I live almost 2 hours from Mad River Glen, so I wouldn't say you'd be very near to it. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders I love skiing in Vermont. If I kiss up to you, can I sleep at your place so I have a cheap place to stay near Mad River Glen? -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders RE: Dumb thought No 3: Creating a new container for the CRs, while a good idea in my opinion, will not prevent the addresses from muddying the GAL. It will make it easier to separate the two entities out if the users, when addressing their messages, choose to use the drop down menu next to the Show Messages from in the address book to select one of the containers instead of the GAL, but the CRs will most definitely show in the GAL without ABVs. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Unfortunately, a client is required in order to access a PF; even if you do some CDO, you are still gonna need a client to gain access to the dir. Dumb thought No 1: If OL2k is choking on a massive import, have you considered breaking the job into bitty parts? ..say, 10k names instead? Dumb thought No 2: Configure OL2k as OST client. Add target PF into Favorites folder. Set Favorites/targetPF to sync offline. Sync OL2k. Take OL2k offline. Import contacts into Favorites/targetPF (hold breath #1). Sync OL2k (hold breath #2). Let list know if dumb idea really works.. Dumb thought No 3: ABV's will provide a nice way to segregate users. And you are correct that it'll take some planning to work out both the technical and political whatnots. But you can certainly import 60k CR's into your dir without being pressed into implementing ABV's before you are ready. I presume their is a desire not to muddy the GAL with all those CR's, so create a new container and import the CR's into there. Tim. -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Actually in the long run, I will import the records into the Exchange Directory as custom recipients. I don't do that today because once our GAL is increased by 60,000 entries, I will need to immediately create address book views to manage the whole thing. Creating these views will involve cooperation of administrators across Exchange sites and that process takes time. I was hoping to find a quick way to copy 60,000 contact records into a Public Folder without hanging up the client. -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Why not use Custom Recipients instead of a public folder contacts list? Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Huge contact folder in Public Folders I have a problem. I have a contact folder in the Public folders that is used for an address folder for Outlook clients. It contains 60,000 records. Once a month, I get a new list in csv format that I need to use to update the records in the folder. Outlook won't import a foreign file directly into the Public Folders. If I import into a local folder, then move the folder into the Public Folders, all the clients that are configured to use this folder as an Outlook Address folder have to be reconfigured. I can't import into a local folder, then copy the records into the Public Folder because Outlook hangs up with such a large list of records. ANY SUGGESTIONS? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
RE: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes
Rats! I would've gotten away with it, if it wasn't for those pesky goddesses. -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 October 2001 14:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes You don't, at least not the last part - the goddesses of the inner circle don't allow it. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 3:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes Wow! I'm a member of the of circle? When do I get to laugh manically, twirl my moustache imperiously and tie young maidens to the railroad tracks. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes Minutes of last meeting and date of next meeting attached. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes
Is there such a thing as a young maiden anymore? I thought they were extinct. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 6:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes Wow! I'm a member of the of circle? When do I get to laugh manically, twirl my moustache imperiously and tie young maidens to the railroad tracks. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes Minutes of last meeting and date of next meeting attached. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinion on Backups
To end the debate, DMR is useless for be because I run Exchange 5.5. -cm -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups So can CommVault and a few others out there... That's still not to say it's a good idea and as William mentioned, E2K offers Deleted Mailbox Retention as well. So... What's the point? -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups NetBackup DataCenter can.. it's a Class thing. I'm working that out right now... Fred -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups Nope. Why would you want to? Deleted Items Retention works very nicely. D -Original Message- From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups Is there a way to make NTBACKUP restore a single mailbox? Not flaming, genuinely interested in knowing. TIA. Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups I like NT Backup, Backup Exec (Occasionally, the other night I didn't like it at all), CommVault Galaxy, Ultrabac, LiveVault, and there might be a few others. Off of the top of my head, those products are very good. ArcCrap is exactly that... Unreliable, no support, a pain in the arse, breaks more than it fixes... Shall I go on? -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups It seems like there's NO backup software anybody likes. Everytime someone mentions a brand, they get toasted. We use ArcServe (foisted on me by others). I'm not real wild about it, but I don't hate it either. But then I haven't had to do a major recovery with it yet. Their support is pretty poor, but so far the software has done the job for us (like I said, no disaster recoveries yet). I don't know that I'd go so far as to recommend it, but I wouldn't totally dis it either. Rob -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups Do you always bet on the losing horse? - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Govindaraj Rangan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 October 2001 13:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups I would bet on ArcServe. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Manske Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opinion on Backups I've been looking at Backup software for out NT/2000/Exchange servers. Right now we run Veritas Backup Exec but because of the poor support (Pay support sucks) and horriable Customer Service (They didn't have any information on file about my company or purchases). I've decided to choose another brand of tape software. What I'd like to know is what you're opinion is on the best software (Other then BE) to use with NT/2000 including Exchange support. Thanks -- Craig Manske [EMAIL PROTECTED] IS Manager Stanek Tool www.stanektool.com New Berlin, WI _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders
Um... I think Waterbury, VT, is about 10 miles outside of Barre/Montpelier. That's a haul from New Haven, even if I-91 is clear. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, October 19, 2001 08:28 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders I am out of New Haven so we can meet up in Waterbury -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Best I can do for you (maybe) is a free tour of our Waterbury plant. I live almost 2 hours from Mad River Glen, so I wouldn't say you'd be very near to it. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders
Unfortunately, a client is required in order to access a PF; even if you do some CDO, you are still gonna need a client to gain access to the dir. No client required if going the programmatic way. You can run this code on the Exchange Server machine or any other machine that has the Excahnge admin console install without any client software involved. Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 3:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Unfortunately, a client is required in order to access a PF; even if you do some CDO, you are still gonna need a client to gain access to the dir. Dumb thought No 1: If OL2k is choking on a massive import, have you considered breaking the job into bitty parts? ..say, 10k names instead? Dumb thought No 2: Configure OL2k as OST client. Add target PF into Favorites folder. Set Favorites/targetPF to sync offline. Sync OL2k. Take OL2k offline. Import contacts into Favorites/targetPF (hold breath #1). Sync OL2k (hold breath #2). Let list know if dumb idea really works.. Dumb thought No 3: ABV's will provide a nice way to segregate users. And you are correct that it'll take some planning to work out both the technical and political whatnots. But you can certainly import 60k CR's into your dir without being pressed into implementing ABV's before you are ready. I presume their is a desire not to muddy the GAL with all those CR's, so create a new container and import the CR's into there. Tim. -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Actually in the long run, I will import the records into the Exchange Directory as custom recipients. I don't do that today because once our GAL is increased by 60,000 entries, I will need to immediately create address book views to manage the whole thing. Creating these views will involve cooperation of administrators across Exchange sites and that process takes time. I was hoping to find a quick way to copy 60,000 contact records into a Public Folder without hanging up the client. -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Why not use Custom Recipients instead of a public folder contacts list? Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Huge contact folder in Public Folders I have a problem. I have a contact folder in the Public folders that is used for an address folder for Outlook clients. It contains 60,000 records. Once a month, I get a new list in csv format that I need to use to update the records in the folder. Outlook won't import a foreign file directly into the Public Folders. If I import into a local folder, then move the folder into the Public Folders, all the clients that are configured to use this folder as an Outlook Address folder have to be reconfigured. I can't import into a local folder, then copy the records into the Public Folder because Outlook hangs up with such a large list of records. ANY SUGGESTIONS? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders
isnt there a Waterbury CT ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 09:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Um... I think Waterbury, VT, is about 10 miles outside of Barre/Montpelier. That's a haul from New Haven, even if I-91 is clear. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, October 19, 2001 08:28 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders I am out of New Haven so we can meet up in Waterbury -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Best I can do for you (maybe) is a free tour of our Waterbury plant. I live almost 2 hours from Mad River Glen, so I wouldn't say you'd be very near to it. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OL2002: Error Message Occurs When You Synchronize an OST That Is 1.82 GB in Size (PST = BAD)
Well, an OST is really just a PST without most of the disadvantages... But I think he might have either been drawing attention to the suggestion in the article of moving some data into PST files or the 'new' limitation of OST file size. The latter will be irrelevant in short order if the latest information regarding 33TB limits in future releases is to be believed. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL2002: Error Message Occurs When You Synchronize an OST That Is 1.82 GB in Size (PST = BAD) What does this have to do with PST=BAD? -Original Message- From: David N Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL2002: Error Message Occurs When You Synchronize an OST That Is 1.82 GB in Size (PST = BAD) http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q306/0/76.ASP _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2K Clustering
I can't. But can I ask why you're considering doing so? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering Can someone confirm that you cannot run ADC on an Exchange cluster server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
Oh my, 1018. Helpdesk calls; the day is young. Time to prove my worth. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
Hardware problems son Call your vendor now and cry, Latest BIOS please! -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Oh my, 1018. Helpdesk calls; the day is young. Time to prove my worth. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders
One with a Ben Jerry's plant in it that Mike can give a tour of? Not that I know of. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, October 19, 2001 08:52 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders isnt there a Waterbury CT ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 09:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Um... I think Waterbury, VT, is about 10 miles outside of Barre/Montpelier. That's a haul from New Haven, even if I-91 is clear. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, October 19, 2001 08:28 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders I am out of New Haven so we can meet up in Waterbury -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Best I can do for you (maybe) is a free tour of our Waterbury plant. I live almost 2 hours from Mad River Glen, so I wouldn't say you'd be very near to it. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2K Clustering
Because I'm about to attempt to add this Exch2K server to an Exchan 5.5 org so I can move all my users to the Exch2k box and upgrade my entire organzation after that. Basically trying to pull off the mailbox swing method. And having the ADC will help populate the Exchange 5.5 server info into Exchange 2k. So I can see the servers in there respective adminstrative groups. John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I can't. But can I ask why you're considering doing so? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering Can someone confirm that you cannot run ADC on an Exchange cluster server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.
Well I believe I'm finally starting to understand. Even if we opened up the ports as described in FAQ 3.24 and assigned static ports on the Exchange server for the DS and IS, it would also be necessary to open the UDP ports 1024-65535 up for clients to get notified of new mail. Don't get me wrong. I'm still leaning toward requiring the VPN client, but I need to insure I have all the information for the networking/security group. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 2:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. You can set some of the ports as static (IS, DS, MTA, etc.,) but you cannot assign a static port to UDP Push Notification. If ports1024 are blocked, your Outlook clients might be able to send and receive mail just fine, but the blocked Push will prevent the view from refreshing. This results in the APPEARANCE that mail is not coming in until you change folders, mail not leaving the outbox, etc., Stephen -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. Maybe I didn't understand the post. I believe you can especially if your behind a firewall. Refer to Q148732. XADM: Setting TCP/IP Port Numbers for Internet Firewalls [Q148732] -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. You cannot make that static. That range that you listed is for the UDP Push Notification from the Exchange server to the client. It is a randomly selected (by the client) UDP port above 1024. The Exchange server uses this to send the new mail notification (refresh command) to the client. Stephen -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. Went through TechNet and couldn't find any reference to the actual range. Found the articles on how to make it static, but no range. Also posted that question on the list asking about the range and I don't recall anyone stating what it was. The MS tech I talked to had to place me on hold 3 times to get the answer. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. You could have searched the MSKB and figured that out. There's plenty of documentation out there... -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. Just a note to everyone. We called Microsoft and inquired what the range for the two random ports were that Exchange allocates to the client once it connects to a socket. According to Microsoft the range is from 1,024 to 64,000. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. No security consultant I know is going to open holes in the network from the DMZ to the Internal network. Being proficient in both Exchange and Security, I feel sorry for your clients if you suggest the model you propose below to them. I think you ought to study up on security some more... If you open holes from the DMZ to the internal LAN, why in the hell do you have a DMZ. You've made the DMZ virtually pointless. Or did your teacher or book you read say something different. If it were a book that told you to configure things this way, please send me the ISBN number, I really wanna read that book. Apparently, I've been taking the wrong approach for years now. I happen to know of a company who has the same model you describe. After I showed them the security issues, they were desiring a change for the better immediately. -Original Message- From: Frank Knobbe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:55 PM Don't bother. Use a proxy server and publish OWA. Or require SSL and open port 443. Or implement a VPN. I still think putting an Exchange front-end server in a DMZ is kind of silly. Not as silly with Exchange 2000 as with Exchange 5.5, but silly nonetheless. Ed, I don't find this silly at all. Let me try to clarify: Scenario A: You have an Internet connection coming to a firewall. Behind the firewall in your internal network you have an Exchange server. You also have a
RE: Exchange 2K Clustering
I understand what the ADC does. g But I was wondering why the desire to place that ADC on an Exchange 2000 cluster server, rather than say a desktop machine with some extra RAM. I thought there I read something about not being able to add a clustered E2K server as the first E2K server in an Exchange 5.5 site... Is the SRS a clusterable service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering Because I'm about to attempt to add this Exch2K server to an Exchan 5.5 org so I can move all my users to the Exch2k box and upgrade my entire organzation after that. Basically trying to pull off the mailbox swing method. And having the ADC will help populate the Exchange 5.5 server info into Exchange 2k. So I can see the servers in there respective adminstrative groups. John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I can't. But can I ask why you're considering doing so? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering Can someone confirm that you cannot run ADC on an Exchange cluster server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes
You were snoring too loud to hear it said... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stephen Mynhier Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes I don't remember THAT being said in the last meeting! -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes Minutes of last meeting and date of next meeting attached. -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- Version: PGP 7.1 qANQR1DBwU4D8XE+82mH6LkQB/9r/bjjOegcvDkeRvqeTDR9BcY4slhoT6JNVM4p t4Rp9EPQgQj6bcJm6+cZ6mkfq3ksuDMxhB5GU55ciVq/DVkuv9a8fpiRMAjlhIoW tzg4RtkIxm8mcW8iJinGpqwsbndps90jvYeDHt7RewY46c5nw1B9nWtY+84Z6D+3 VUrb2jzo+a8n4uLvQKUn83BRwpKSDKVYzP2dFAX9f/s2bzH/Ot3tnrCMwXflmTkf /eJfak+knkE6Z+ptFgtJQkxoXFKlLfkCFkFZEhhJj2maqFZwfBxnWwde3wW/uxL2 k7J3d6kCNXhbxgVCC1u+xScdp07KxnBq3fCuMPeyq8rUZg7oCADcDae0vJFASMe5 YQqWtDZnFxj+E++HnJqmOPxo9QRC7Q/QEBR6UAsK4V3tIASliX9rR3LTt3nM8gHh MnQEmqWkxkRks2SkHNNESEo4j/nHY0CjgRHQJ7lU/B6gR2nUP7nPEAEzdxOhlEAk aZ9rp/fATSJFOruAqCH7gWTywB6DJXWUhgb0eVfgrQFjERYfhSJsnzR+JpCY94Ei RSITCrjXFs5TQrxqv3jCKJ0J9jvp2CzcvLsgAs2Z5bAC4SS8MJ/Kn7jnblDxyQ1I +F3lDYn0kxyMDS/Lq6tepn8CEBdLTJkXpJ1DyqYwqt3TsriiAiNJqPLNOv8pRvuy +xxVNT2nyeziMggXq3NmFOjsNWNJ+hXBXoxA+/xqu+P4a97oik6HpMzGATTmLlaH WzFBH451A8JB+mfvr115HCcDx7Ui126lk4/h/BvJRnyzYK3ECA7nXVWYvhD+Umv6 xwXpgtwxUo1zxlSdt0ThhBYGlmE89Ihc0ltwTDQBOq4bAxiHXiQDiGGahzjsVGKl 2w9N1tKQJOwH1UBHVEq46tScAvegIUUbBuC21FsNi6y8jQLHDjCw7d9OvIGM0sJ5 iMAuOPcJIMEhBhwl+Zg6tQk3N5I7mHhyp9qBOKhxtsflIUF45ToFE5CHZAQh9psZ 6BxQClSqL/s3CqjQPt/whhe6Lb4lCll0bhmWL8dVoUbBen4zxbEQLItaIjxGXZSr fgR+9Lz5i3pti3axSPGSN4xdeR2yko0McoQkcVbzkZJ9lBqu37gUQkUeHjHyKVeQ hmKj5gIO9988NdWaVDJaNK+Z4KVgVrwilYe96DhXcaaQtjErRlATVmpQTJcA1iek bdF0wzj35pQbGMQnJMH0xF2h/NUCX9lxRhZ4RYcWSQphSJN+olqUOvikJQZHzJf1 7AAPCG8MHYFTmeXsXT7aq2A2aM5sATQTudop9mjocyu82Ct7F5MzjsAfIlT4RAQS TKzpTW+YgjfHTa9vzjyHkO5IH5tvMouSxfsBuKPVT5osK7Adygp4klI9B5tJliFc Apuy6Og4DBWWTS8xG0efrp/MFeDNqedgtXhYlHl2DfHFPazkFdhdlB84qWOpyfv3 ztTvi1c8xK1OB0RLwtB7KOj0DbbPBc0WFgeuHLtJ+hBmFhu3ZtDHEGFYsAAB68M2 rdYhW98wfc+IYcK7+FBRTbjr3ce7unJ2YC63mKbS/ONShxY09wSIbjCwjbL7Na5O RH0BMLBSAWhKuQaFNAIHe1fLLdEsbv8opX9ps2dmWAXJLcOZ6xfdt1acaD/6M28W ovLBvZdkI7SRMfAfsFCK3VS3yxQbF9bB9MEs/aplP1vMD4mOFLczMY9cN5eHHatZ djOIY9F1HFiSuDs3xKNj+64Yn1Y4uCTX3QFR9PT/PvDbbYaR51nszV+ZeumQvrFm 0zTJiWTVfDfpnu+dNJxnw25GV+xcQLTCi+EyRnexF82j2MUOw9zlD0vgf1YZ7C3d Bp6JaXkazKMAaOJ5Wi+n3P/tUJVPkFaSWaT6B/pEJpXeds6Ya3FEYP9R79VrbSHR f7x3xSzQfXhKRp+SBTA4DAwX7NZWjLw4B3iaqEZ0n8ikO6zwOj8/u0AWO9/uNGuP T96fHHlXIeJV2AgpWGUi+VaDbn3sYS/2NOaR1BXxC8XEVwBNSFQO5dUll/za8n5O fPO4V5ln0yzZ7Nbx0rKEG2GoDpX7jtBvMCSY9thm1aewnqnjMfxtZT5y6IleZ2mt jYkDBtOfi+ZglUKsNEh32LFzlq7DJUCokrHvKCAI3CuBtaQtfQhcWAyYuzIIM0LM G1Jc6BDwUrKaVktfM+c5WXfuKnT8KhoDnPLgpsp6VvuBLBz4FAA4JI3Q7fJEnFTK K1JZ3dMO9fQjqf6RnSwonoi6WTr0eS5fSfZL0xKn+MzLx206S8Vi44YTqRUDjoi/ pvAk6mNGRbyFIARLCDG4mb5zp6G9H3xwJ+k0Ma29OCCIHZvXb7fFKoOZvNnIUT04 Qwb49yY0nVbhNgHE7hRB4OMDb4tElP0xxbsO73bH0okVcDY/8t8AU6Nk8iz/Tr/h MLzEGF6Dc7Qh2Y5wYB2yJL1jN29t+LIDAh3dWq4gn+vb4ylGyzEc8c8fbyO4JVmI sY5376guFym13AYQAton58G4BchdYFaSrrGY7lGUaNeHoNXS6uBCrQU0n4jR9rot Di76pQhWKVwxMk1YbCZ/uLE5dh9FanL+j6vHAEu+eNgBnptJYh5Yw6NhCbZ+aq1p Y1E6hnERv3PSzaCEaw/qxufbkSQ12S3cQNpQ1lGZJejDk27KlKKIJVjFY8oA83it fm6sanbW+BgzCUtxwoimBtfcdPAB1izSGrDXuvUF6Hp5jN0cBOake0/66nZkAYEz NJl5hq2WDcyt52b39xz2ISBKXwbZNtpqUkhl97WWe082FSbZPTHx213SP5sP/6s1 94Y+uV+sieEVJcZlJ2CQ9X99vWfs+1lI98VpNhO1rnzWVVUdZ5/+J2Zg8g6wDnq4 EBRhin2nCPqH9/ws5FGgs3r3wgD3nL3gVpf5/1KO1//2jB7NMyCXIIMvlL6luWwA 95HENExo4qS4rdHVN/FMK0gnmOSJm9234W4rbLgzbnN2o9CDacatqblAQp4f+hd1 zxyK1/6BcvO9tY+Jwy6MCB8ARs9IRHjaDTo6fl+3+TipisD9/71LdJBzWBEOxFyJ tpvzI5XJirL2uDXuvwCg1jXgMmC9PCxW5nRdRykP9XqvgB9sorCwVQaBdPaNZCID czD/sRL1NOjW8dPLlXQigNZCp+zK9uu4pEXUE2AYsU5PQtqE7caV0fK1h8LarHNr 5d+RDy9dkzgh1arcyVPIvuMyyJ0Zgwb/DMEXENpBCLWMyzi86xg/T1WV2FeXQ69Q zodiET1pmlnYG34CDPkI3FrKMHE4DAOfXQLkYPmu45I+kHh/JXP2bChbFbGIw5sx p+7HvBsMQTB9MwwdAJU8YhtamIjF/Vi2+AUAgmLcbT0PZHO+wJtvms0LhE5RvDjv h73dNWWx1mzi+np73t5WGjli9+EPgPj7zGKvPx8EdwFlPI3OMVi3TUwh6+V7FLZ8 BIz1Gar5lb2aDDuRdmlUCBWBZ2nnwdolLhJAfKy/MpsVTphD4Oyne0QhLnv+rmbh GBC+gI95UvRrpJA2S4P25ZBJjKNZyl/g9fjA2I6bebynVSJ4h4fhaMwEh1E7oA7P pgw3MYyZhCTk4X47nhEtzFe1HsCG4uOQ/oovLfHaMZRoX0uWjJJt9Ol+GHxvk/56 KhmRWP3xgYgKLGSPcsGtWF6t8nEaPxtht6TaqmmaftmmGXCpsZxPt+DVX2z8XeF5 26rkb3ptOue7MXJXhsQQEN19fRHbE/NnDAedHWRV5fQerOJZVdloVqmWo7qHhrWT 3xtCj98hIclXzrMBtN00w006M1u9aYYSkLKRn6DKO2e95Psy5NV0AwoQvLYTvxp5 AAqQKiGj6khHaLnBFVma2Zq+UxXXb9az/2LegjOg4d3/vxw7T12INEvDTfZLvglr UjONLlhN6k9lglenJFzd7JwAXtbH0IOfc8nGUAKdwkpQnGi6cM6P5Yytm5L2iOTw bcHBOf5jcW23Wp3TWIbLE+81kb+kSWX6d90N3HOhIVmEh2PpXp9XWzJg09rhfcAd BQ8HJFpUdDOXMcVmUnemIGVv9eHXm7nsK4zhVrRySqPQzyt1rxdl7eYhIF44sMRg 1d9MDZr6TAt70aMkzBm/myZ15Rr1bZY73ptV+2sCkJTg+8a+DrPKirtYXbZwGDRO ov6xJDD97lGmESnKuESNpukGowokNJ8OQBpoQ8F8mc6Q4r5XrjhLFVsyhCphDokW DNzLCZ7NhX0ea94wPgXwLpPQKG7rIGIwW+7npNAeZS5NarNPyNfGKdUzxZ+vBGe/
RE: Opinion on Backups
To step back in time and end the debate before it even started, can I point out the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method [tm] in the FAQ? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Craig Manske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups To end the debate, DMR is useless for be because I run Exchange 5.5. -cm -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups So can CommVault and a few others out there... That's still not to say it's a good idea and as William mentioned, E2K offers Deleted Mailbox Retention as well. So... What's the point? -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups NetBackup DataCenter can.. it's a Class thing. I'm working that out right now... Fred -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups Nope. Why would you want to? Deleted Items Retention works very nicely. D -Original Message- From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups Is there a way to make NTBACKUP restore a single mailbox? Not flaming, genuinely interested in knowing. TIA. Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups I like NT Backup, Backup Exec (Occasionally, the other night I didn't like it at all), CommVault Galaxy, Ultrabac, LiveVault, and there might be a few others. Off of the top of my head, those products are very good. ArcCrap is exactly that... Unreliable, no support, a pain in the arse, breaks more than it fixes... Shall I go on? -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups It seems like there's NO backup software anybody likes. Everytime someone mentions a brand, they get toasted. We use ArcServe (foisted on me by others). I'm not real wild about it, but I don't hate it either. But then I haven't had to do a major recovery with it yet. Their support is pretty poor, but so far the software has done the job for us (like I said, no disaster recoveries yet). I don't know that I'd go so far as to recommend it, but I wouldn't totally dis it either. Rob -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups Do you always bet on the losing horse? - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Govindaraj Rangan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 October 2001 13:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups I would bet on ArcServe. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Manske Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opinion on Backups I've been looking at Backup software for out NT/2000/Exchange servers. Right now we run Veritas Backup Exec but because of the poor support (Pay support sucks) and horriable Customer Service (They didn't have any information on file about my company or purchases). I've decided to choose another brand of tape software. What I'd like to know is what you're opinion is on the best software (Other then BE) to use with NT/2000 including Exchange support. Thanks -- Craig Manske [EMAIL PROTECTED] IS Manager Stanek Tool www.stanektool.com New Berlin, WI _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.
And even after opening those ports it's entirely possible you'd experience a greater number of dropped UDP new mail notifications with that connection method than you would with VPN (at least that's been my experience). Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. Well I believe I'm finally starting to understand. Even if we opened up the ports as described in FAQ 3.24 and assigned static ports on the Exchange server for the DS and IS, it would also be necessary to open the UDP ports 1024-65535 up for clients to get notified of new mail. Don't get me wrong. I'm still leaning toward requiring the VPN client, but I need to insure I have all the information for the networking/security group. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 2:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. You can set some of the ports as static (IS, DS, MTA, etc.,) but you cannot assign a static port to UDP Push Notification. If ports1024 are blocked, your Outlook clients might be able to send and receive mail just fine, but the blocked Push will prevent the view from refreshing. This results in the APPEARANCE that mail is not coming in until you change folders, mail not leaving the outbox, etc., Stephen -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. Maybe I didn't understand the post. I believe you can especially if your behind a firewall. Refer to Q148732. XADM: Setting TCP/IP Port Numbers for Internet Firewalls [Q148732] -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. You cannot make that static. That range that you listed is for the UDP Push Notification from the Exchange server to the client. It is a randomly selected (by the client) UDP port above 1024. The Exchange server uses this to send the new mail notification (refresh command) to the client. Stephen -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. Went through TechNet and couldn't find any reference to the actual range. Found the articles on how to make it static, but no range. Also posted that question on the list asking about the range and I don't recall anyone stating what it was. The MS tech I talked to had to place me on hold 3 times to get the answer. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. You could have searched the MSKB and figured that out. There's plenty of documentation out there... -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. Just a note to everyone. We called Microsoft and inquired what the range for the two random ports were that Exchange allocates to the client once it connects to a socket. According to Microsoft the range is from 1,024 to 64,000. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. No security consultant I know is going to open holes in the network from the DMZ to the Internal network. Being proficient in both Exchange and Security, I feel sorry for your clients if you suggest the model you propose below to them. I think you ought to study up on security some more... If you open holes from the DMZ to the internal LAN, why in the hell do you have a DMZ. You've made the DMZ virtually pointless. Or did your teacher or book you read say something different. If it were a book that told you to configure things this way, please send me the ISBN number, I really wanna read that book. Apparently, I've been taking the wrong approach for years now. I happen to know of a company who has the same model you describe. After I showed them the security issues, they were desiring a change for the better immediately. -Original Message- From: Frank Knobbe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:
RE: Exchange 2K Clustering
I thought I read something about not being able to install a cluster server first in an Exchange 5.5 site. But I was in a discussion with a friend and they suggested that you could install it in the site first no problem. But when I look into my administrative group I don't see any servers from Exchange 5.5 in there. Am I screwed here? Or can this be resolved? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I understand what the ADC does. g But I was wondering why the desire to place that ADC on an Exchange 2000 cluster server, rather than say a desktop machine with some extra RAM. I thought there I read something about not being able to add a clustered E2K server as the first E2K server in an Exchange 5.5 site... Is the SRS a clusterable service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering Because I'm about to attempt to add this Exch2K server to an Exchan 5.5 org so I can move all my users to the Exch2k box and upgrade my entire organzation after that. Basically trying to pull off the mailbox swing method. And having the ADC will help populate the Exchange 5.5 server info into Exchange 2k. So I can see the servers in there respective adminstrative groups. John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I can't. But can I ask why you're considering doing so? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering Can someone confirm that you cannot run ADC on an Exchange cluster server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2K Clustering
Q281290 actually. I thought there I read something about not being able to add a clustered E2K server as the first E2K server in an Exchange 5.5 site... Is the SRS a clusterable service? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2K Clustering
Q292757 says no Dr. Nikolay Kumanov MIS Manager, Zeitungsgruppe Bulgarien GmbH 47, Tsarigradsko chaussee, Sofia 1504, Bulgaria phone: +(359-2)942-2205, fax: +(359-2)946-1286 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, October 19, 2001 5:00 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Conversation: Exchange 2K Clustering Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I understand what the ADC does. g But I was wondering why the desire to place that ADC on an Exchange 2000 cluster server, rather than say a desktop machine with some extra RAM. I thought there I read something about not being able to add a clustered E2K server as the first E2K server in an Exchange 5.5 site... Is the SRS a clusterable service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2K Clustering
Well, you're screwed. The question is how badly. And the answer is I'm not sure... Did you join an existing Exchange org on install? If so, I would have expected the install to fail if your ADC wasn't already running (which based on the original question it's not clear that it is/was). Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I thought I read something about not being able to install a cluster server first in an Exchange 5.5 site. But I was in a discussion with a friend and they suggested that you could install it in the site first no problem. But when I look into my administrative group I don't see any servers from Exchange 5.5 in there. Am I screwed here? Or can this be resolved? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I understand what the ADC does. g But I was wondering why the desire to place that ADC on an Exchange 2000 cluster server, rather than say a desktop machine with some extra RAM. I thought there I read something about not being able to add a clustered E2K server as the first E2K server in an Exchange 5.5 site... Is the SRS a clusterable service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering Because I'm about to attempt to add this Exch2K server to an Exchan 5.5 org so I can move all my users to the Exch2k box and upgrade my entire organzation after that. Basically trying to pull off the mailbox swing method. And having the ADC will help populate the Exchange 5.5 server info into Exchange 2k. So I can see the servers in there respective adminstrative groups. John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I can't. But can I ask why you're considering doing so? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering Can someone confirm that you cannot run ADC on an Exchange cluster server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.
Thanks! I think I now have the information I need to meet with the security and networking group. This should be a fun meeting! I appreciate all the information that was posted. Guess I need to review the FAQ's again to see if there is anything else I've missed. Once again thanks! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. And even after opening those ports it's entirely possible you'd experience a greater number of dropped UDP new mail notifications with that connection method than you would with VPN (at least that's been my experience). Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. Well I believe I'm finally starting to understand. Even if we opened up the ports as described in FAQ 3.24 and assigned static ports on the Exchange server for the DS and IS, it would also be necessary to open the UDP ports 1024-65535 up for clients to get notified of new mail. Don't get me wrong. I'm still leaning toward requiring the VPN client, but I need to insure I have all the information for the networking/security group. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 2:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. You can set some of the ports as static (IS, DS, MTA, etc.,) but you cannot assign a static port to UDP Push Notification. If ports1024 are blocked, your Outlook clients might be able to send and receive mail just fine, but the blocked Push will prevent the view from refreshing. This results in the APPEARANCE that mail is not coming in until you change folders, mail not leaving the outbox, etc., Stephen -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. Maybe I didn't understand the post. I believe you can especially if your behind a firewall. Refer to Q148732. XADM: Setting TCP/IP Port Numbers for Internet Firewalls [Q148732] -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. You cannot make that static. That range that you listed is for the UDP Push Notification from the Exchange server to the client. It is a randomly selected (by the client) UDP port above 1024. The Exchange server uses this to send the new mail notification (refresh command) to the client. Stephen -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. Went through TechNet and couldn't find any reference to the actual range. Found the articles on how to make it static, but no range. Also posted that question on the list asking about the range and I don't recall anyone stating what it was. The MS tech I talked to had to place me on hold 3 times to get the answer. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. You could have searched the MSKB and figured that out. There's plenty of documentation out there... -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. Just a note to everyone. We called Microsoft and inquired what the range for the two random ports were that Exchange allocates to the client once it connects to a socket. According to Microsoft the range is from 1,024 to 64,000. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. No security consultant I know is going to open holes in the network from the DMZ to the Internal network. Being proficient in both Exchange and Security, I feel sorry for your clients if you suggest the model you propose below to them. I think you ought to study up on security some more... If you open holes from the DMZ to the internal LAN, why in the hell do you have a DMZ. You've made the DMZ virtually pointless. Or did your teacher or book you read say something different. If it were a book that told you to configure things
RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue
was that aol7 mode ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 00:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue aol mode Me too! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue I'm trying to quit smoking -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue I would say me too, but then I would be breaking law number 3.4 of the swinc bible. I have run into this issue more than 5 times, obviously. Also, I love the tool. Manager is impressed when I use it and manage to *not* crash the server. Note to self and others: it is a dangerous tool. your craving of nicotine was brought on by the repetition of click close click close click close...you sicko. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue Jennifer, that was awesome. A lot of digging down there. I felt like I needed a cigarette after that. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue if you cannot find the old exchange client to rename the inbox, use mdbvu32.exe which is in the SERVER\SUPPORT\UTILS\I386 on the 5.5 cd. logon to user's mailbox open mdbvu32.exe hit ok go to mdb open message store highlight the users mailbox hit open go to mdb open root folder double click top of information store double click renamed inbox hit call function click set properties highlight PR_Display_Name type Inbox in the Prop data box click add click call click close click close click close click close click close hit X click ok click ok -Original Message- From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue Well, the TechNet article said it was a problem in O2K, and I quote: OL2000: Inbox May Be Renamed When Deleting an Appointment The user remembers his secretary being active in his calendar when this happens, so I'm thinking that's probably it. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 14:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue I'd be very curious as to how that happened. There isn't an option in O2K to rename the inbox. -Original Message- From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue Hi Gang! We have a user whose Inbox got renamed. (Exchange 5.5, sp4. NT 4 sp 6a, user Outlook 2000). I found TechNet article Q249750 which seemed to be a very good fit for our situation. The article said to use exchng32.exe to rename the mailbox. I had to look around the shop, but i did find a copy of that old exchange client. Problem is, it won't run, at least not on my win2000 desktop. Get an error that reads: 'The NTVDM CPU has encountered an illegal instruction.' Same on an NT4 box. Do i have a bad copy of exchng32.exe? (mine is time stamped 8/9/96. Where can i get a good one? Or do i have to run this on a win98 box or something? It looks like it runs in a dos window Or does somebody know another way to rename an inbox back to INBOX? Thanks, Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
RE: Exchange 2K Clustering
Well I'm not totally screwed because I'm doing this on a test lab. :) I joined it on intiail install but I already had ADC on it the server. I wanted to test to see if I needed to add another server first before adding the cluster server. Which turns I do. Now, when I install the first Exchange 2k box into Exchange 5.5 org. And then bring in the cluster, am I going to see my site servers in 5.5 in my Administrative group w/my new Exchange 2k servers? I left out that I'm going to run ADC on the first server installed into my 5.5 site until I complete the upgrade. It's basically going to server just the ADC purpose until I get all the mailboxes onto this cluster server. Then in turn I will remove it from the AG. John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering Well, you're screwed. The question is how badly. And the answer is I'm not sure... Did you join an existing Exchange org on install? If so, I would have expected the install to fail if your ADC wasn't already running (which based on the original question it's not clear that it is/was). Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I thought I read something about not being able to install a cluster server first in an Exchange 5.5 site. But I was in a discussion with a friend and they suggested that you could install it in the site first no problem. But when I look into my administrative group I don't see any servers from Exchange 5.5 in there. Am I screwed here? Or can this be resolved? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I understand what the ADC does. g But I was wondering why the desire to place that ADC on an Exchange 2000 cluster server, rather than say a desktop machine with some extra RAM. I thought there I read something about not being able to add a clustered E2K server as the first E2K server in an Exchange 5.5 site... Is the SRS a clusterable service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering Because I'm about to attempt to add this Exch2K server to an Exchan 5.5 org so I can move all my users to the Exch2k box and upgrade my entire organzation after that. Basically trying to pull off the mailbox swing method. And having the ADC will help populate the Exchange 5.5 server info into Exchange 2k. So I can see the servers in there respective adminstrative groups. John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I can't. But can I ask why you're considering doing so? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering Can someone confirm that you cannot run ADC on an Exchange cluster server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Opinion on Backups
Well you didn't mention that now did you. ;o) Doesn't matter anyway, BLB's are for wussies! -Original Message- From: Craig Manske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 6:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups To end the debate, DMR is useless for be because I run Exchange 5.5. -cm -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups So can CommVault and a few others out there... That's still not to say it's a good idea and as William mentioned, E2K offers Deleted Mailbox Retention as well. So... What's the point? -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups NetBackup DataCenter can.. it's a Class thing. I'm working that out right now... Fred -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups Nope. Why would you want to? Deleted Items Retention works very nicely. D -Original Message- From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups Is there a way to make NTBACKUP restore a single mailbox? Not flaming, genuinely interested in knowing. TIA. Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups I like NT Backup, Backup Exec (Occasionally, the other night I didn't like it at all), CommVault Galaxy, Ultrabac, LiveVault, and there might be a few others. Off of the top of my head, those products are very good. ArcCrap is exactly that... Unreliable, no support, a pain in the arse, breaks more than it fixes... Shall I go on? -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups It seems like there's NO backup software anybody likes. Everytime someone mentions a brand, they get toasted. We use ArcServe (foisted on me by others). I'm not real wild about it, but I don't hate it either. But then I haven't had to do a major recovery with it yet. Their support is pretty poor, but so far the software has done the job for us (like I said, no disaster recoveries yet). I don't know that I'd go so far as to recommend it, but I wouldn't totally dis it either. Rob -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups Do you always bet on the losing horse? - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Govindaraj Rangan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 October 2001 13:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups I would bet on ArcServe. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Manske Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opinion on Backups I've been looking at Backup software for out NT/2000/Exchange servers. Right now we run Veritas Backup Exec but because of the poor support (Pay support sucks) and horriable Customer Service (They didn't have any information on file about my company or purchases). I've decided to choose another brand of tape software. What I'd like to know is what you're opinion is on the best software (Other then BE) to use with NT/2000 including Exchange support. Thanks -- Craig Manske [EMAIL PROTECTED] IS Manager Stanek Tool www.stanektool.com New Berlin, WI _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue
No, actually it was lookIhaveanAOLfrisbeemode -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue was that aol7 mode ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 00:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue aol mode Me too! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue I'm trying to quit smoking -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue I would say me too, but then I would be breaking law number 3.4 of the swinc bible. I have run into this issue more than 5 times, obviously. Also, I love the tool. Manager is impressed when I use it and manage to *not* crash the server. Note to self and others: it is a dangerous tool. your craving of nicotine was brought on by the repetition of click close click close click close...you sicko. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue Jennifer, that was awesome. A lot of digging down there. I felt like I needed a cigarette after that. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue if you cannot find the old exchange client to rename the inbox, use mdbvu32.exe which is in the SERVER\SUPPORT\UTILS\I386 on the 5.5 cd. logon to user's mailbox open mdbvu32.exe hit ok go to mdb open message store highlight the users mailbox hit open go to mdb open root folder double click top of information store double click renamed inbox hit call function click set properties highlight PR_Display_Name type Inbox in the Prop data box click add click call click close click close click close click close click close hit X click ok click ok -Original Message- From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue Well, the TechNet article said it was a problem in O2K, and I quote: OL2000: Inbox May Be Renamed When Deleting an Appointment The user remembers his secretary being active in his calendar when this happens, so I'm thinking that's probably it. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 14:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue I'd be very curious as to how that happened. There isn't an option in O2K to rename the inbox. -Original Message- From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inbox renamed, exchng32.exe issue Hi Gang! We have a user whose Inbox got renamed. (Exchange 5.5, sp4. NT 4 sp 6a, user Outlook 2000). I found TechNet article Q249750 which seemed to be a very good fit for our situation. The article said to use exchng32.exe to rename the mailbox. I had to look around the shop, but i did find a copy of that old exchange client. Problem is, it won't run, at least not on my win2000 desktop. Get an error that reads: 'The NTVDM CPU has encountered an illegal instruction.' Same on an NT4 box. Do i have a bad copy of exchng32.exe? (mine is time stamped 8/9/96. Where can i get a good one? Or do i have to run this on a win98 box or something? It looks like it runs in a dos window Or does somebody know another way to rename an inbox back to INBOX? Thanks, Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Exchange 2K Clustering
You'll see them in your administrative groups, but for the most part you'll manage each server using it's respective tools (5.5 servers managed with 5.5 admin and E2K managed with esm, aduc, adsiedit, iis snapins, etc.) In mixed mode an Exchange 5.5 site corresponds exactly to a single AG and RG in E2K and all servers which are a member will be visible. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering Well I'm not totally screwed because I'm doing this on a test lab. :) I joined it on intiail install but I already had ADC on it the server. I wanted to test to see if I needed to add another server first before adding the cluster server. Which turns I do. Now, when I install the first Exchange 2k box into Exchange 5.5 org. And then bring in the cluster, am I going to see my site servers in 5.5 in my Administrative group w/my new Exchange 2k servers? I left out that I'm going to run ADC on the first server installed into my 5.5 site until I complete the upgrade. It's basically going to server just the ADC purpose until I get all the mailboxes onto this cluster server. Then in turn I will remove it from the AG. John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering Well, you're screwed. The question is how badly. And the answer is I'm not sure... Did you join an existing Exchange org on install? If so, I would have expected the install to fail if your ADC wasn't already running (which based on the original question it's not clear that it is/was). Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I thought I read something about not being able to install a cluster server first in an Exchange 5.5 site. But I was in a discussion with a friend and they suggested that you could install it in the site first no problem. But when I look into my administrative group I don't see any servers from Exchange 5.5 in there. Am I screwed here? Or can this be resolved? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I understand what the ADC does. g But I was wondering why the desire to place that ADC on an Exchange 2000 cluster server, rather than say a desktop machine with some extra RAM. I thought there I read something about not being able to add a clustered E2K server as the first E2K server in an Exchange 5.5 site... Is the SRS a clusterable service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering Because I'm about to attempt to add this Exch2K server to an Exchan 5.5 org so I can move all my users to the Exch2k box and upgrade my entire organzation after that. Basically trying to pull off the mailbox swing method. And having the ADC will help populate the Exchange 5.5 server info into Exchange 2k. So I can see the servers in there respective adminstrative groups. John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I can't. But can I ask why you're considering doing so? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering Can someone confirm that you cannot run ADC on an Exchange cluster server?
RE: Re-applying SP4 to MSX 5.5 cluster server
Cluster-aware. Humph. Well, you asked. You must do the SP on the active side, so what benefit did having a cluster buy me, or you for that matter. A long Saturday away from home, that's what. Just do the standard things you do for an SP - stop all unnecessary services, stop perf mons, stop the cluster manager!! -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re-applying SP4 to MSX 5.5 cluster server I am going to be re-applying MSX Service Pack 4 on an NT 4 (SP 6a) cluster server with MSX 5.5 SP4. Why am I doing this? Because the server is being upgraded with some hardware and other software (not Exchange related) is being removed. I have found Q221393 which says that MS Exchange service packs are cluster aware. Seems pretty straight forward to me (a good thing). However, my question is in real life: Are there any gotchas I should be aware of before re-applying SP4 to the nodes of the cluster? Regards. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2K Clustering
So basically I will have all that functionality w/out setting up a CA w/Exchange 5.5 right off the bat? Also are there any known problems w/OWA running on a cluster server? Or any public folder issues? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering You'll see them in your administrative groups, but for the most part you'll manage each server using it's respective tools (5.5 servers managed with 5.5 admin and E2K managed with esm, aduc, adsiedit, iis snapins, etc.) In mixed mode an Exchange 5.5 site corresponds exactly to a single AG and RG in E2K and all servers which are a member will be visible. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering Well I'm not totally screwed because I'm doing this on a test lab. :) I joined it on intiail install but I already had ADC on it the server. I wanted to test to see if I needed to add another server first before adding the cluster server. Which turns I do. Now, when I install the first Exchange 2k box into Exchange 5.5 org. And then bring in the cluster, am I going to see my site servers in 5.5 in my Administrative group w/my new Exchange 2k servers? I left out that I'm going to run ADC on the first server installed into my 5.5 site until I complete the upgrade. It's basically going to server just the ADC purpose until I get all the mailboxes onto this cluster server. Then in turn I will remove it from the AG. John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering Well, you're screwed. The question is how badly. And the answer is I'm not sure... Did you join an existing Exchange org on install? If so, I would have expected the install to fail if your ADC wasn't already running (which based on the original question it's not clear that it is/was). Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I thought I read something about not being able to install a cluster server first in an Exchange 5.5 site. But I was in a discussion with a friend and they suggested that you could install it in the site first no problem. But when I look into my administrative group I don't see any servers from Exchange 5.5 in there. Am I screwed here? Or can this be resolved? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering I understand what the ADC does. g But I was wondering why the desire to place that ADC on an Exchange 2000 cluster server, rather than say a desktop machine with some extra RAM. I thought there I read something about not being able to add a clustered E2K server as the first E2K server in an Exchange 5.5 site... Is the SRS a clusterable service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Clustering Because I'm about to attempt to add this Exch2K server to an Exchan 5.5 org so I can move all my users to the Exch2k box and upgrade my entire organzation after that. Basically trying to pull off the mailbox swing method. And having the ADC will help populate the Exchange 5.5 server info into Exchange 2k. So I can see the servers in there respective adminstrative groups. John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions
One last question about Backups.
I've been sort of leaning toward Legato's backup solution because it offers a single server management console with multi server backups to their local storage devices. I was wondering if anyone has had any experience with it and NT/2000/Exchange? thanks -- Craig Manske _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Haiku Friday
Proxy Client gone Exchange now working so grand! Disney here I come! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
What is haiku Is it 5 then 7 or Am I old and dumb Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Another week ends with no stops in the EV. Doing something right. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
O2K transport stack order not reliable?
We have a couple of users with O2K installed in CW mode, set to use mailboxes on our EX5.5SP4 servers and also POP mailboxes on a Unix machine. They want mail to Internet addresses to go out via the SMTP smarthost set up in the POP configuration, so they have the Internet Mail transport at the top of the delivery stack above the Exchange service. The users *claim* that up to 6 weeks ago it worked as they wanted; but since then *all* messages go out via the Exchange server. We've tried on a test system using O2K SP2, and find that about 1 in 4 messages to Internet addresses don't go via the SMTP transport but use the Exchange server. The connection to the SMTP server is reliable on a LAN - there's not enough time for it to be timing out, and testing shows that if O2K gets a refused connection from the smarthost you get a popup message. So it looks like the client just doesn't always respect the defined transport stack order. Has anyone got any ideas what might be going on? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
It's Five-Seven-Five Your first line was only four Go Punish yourself -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Lambert Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday What is haiku Is it 5 then 7 or Am I old and dumb Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Another week ends with no stops in the EV. Doing something right. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes
There is no inner circle -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 3:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes Wow! I'm a member of the of circle? When do I get to laugh manically, twirl my moustache imperiously and tie young maidens to the railroad tracks. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes Minutes of last meeting and date of next meeting attached. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
One bad foul and hot Monday Our DNS went away It's time for IT to play Sometimes IT wants to pray But in the very end - yes It came back for all to see Email flows and I'm happy. -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 08:05 * To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday It's Five-Seven-Five Your first line was only four Go Punish yourself -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Lambert Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday What is haiku Is it 5 then 7 or Am I old and dumb Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Another week ends with no stops in the EV. Doing something right. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain confidential information of Integrated Biosystems, Inc., and is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by individuals or entities other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender and delete all copies. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
You have it right. Five, seven, five, seven, seven is Tanka Tuesday. -Original Message- From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday What is haiku Is it 5 then 7 or Am I old and dumb Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Another week ends with no stops in the EV. Doing something right. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AntiVirus Change
Well, first off, you can scan with more than one engine when using Antigen. Which means that if one virus pattern hasn't been updated, one of the others will. Good to fall back on. I can get docs comparing Antigen to Trend, feel free to contact me offline. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 10/19/2001 06:37 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change | | And I am trying to convince my supervisor to not use InoculateIT and use Sybari's Antigen instead... but, as you already know, that isn't an easy task... So, I beg you: please give me some link to a website/document that compares antivirus for exchange server 5.5, so I can show my superiors the mistake they are doing!! I guess the new version of InoculateIT (eTrust InoculateIT 6.0, if i'm not mistaken) is better than version 4... but I still consider Antigen better than InoculateIT. Thanks! Ok, I am trying to convince my Supervisor to switch from InoculateIT to Antigen. Can someone point me to their website so that I can get some more information about the product and get my research started. Both my mail servers are Nt 4.0 w/SP6a, running Exchange 5.5 w/SP4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mail from a secured exchange through ISA
We found the problem. Because we have people on two different segments we have two NIC cards in the server. (Multi-Homing) What was happening was the mail was connecting to the exchange server on one and trying to send the message on the other. That doesn't work. When we shut down the second NIC the mail worked fine. We figured the best way to fix the problem was a router using NAT to connect to the second segment. The current TEMPORARY fix was to put a manual entry into the bases exchange server that sends mail directly to us through the base segment. And since it costs nothing this TEMPORARY solution is likely to be the permanent solution. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders
Or search restrictions -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 5:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders RE: Dumb thought No 3: Creating a new container for the CRs, while a good idea in my opinion, will not prevent the addresses from muddying the GAL. It will make it easier to separate the two entities out if the users, when addressing their messages, choose to use the drop down menu next to the Show Messages from in the address book to select one of the containers instead of the GAL, but the CRs will most definitely show in the GAL without ABVs. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Unfortunately, a client is required in order to access a PF; even if you do some CDO, you are still gonna need a client to gain access to the dir. Dumb thought No 1: If OL2k is choking on a massive import, have you considered breaking the job into bitty parts? ..say, 10k names instead? Dumb thought No 2: Configure OL2k as OST client. Add target PF into Favorites folder. Set Favorites/targetPF to sync offline. Sync OL2k. Take OL2k offline. Import contacts into Favorites/targetPF (hold breath #1). Sync OL2k (hold breath #2). Let list know if dumb idea really works.. Dumb thought No 3: ABV's will provide a nice way to segregate users. And you are correct that it'll take some planning to work out both the technical and political whatnots. But you can certainly import 60k CR's into your dir without being pressed into implementing ABV's before you are ready. I presume their is a desire not to muddy the GAL with all those CR's, so create a new container and import the CR's into there. Tim. -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Actually in the long run, I will import the records into the Exchange Directory as custom recipients. I don't do that today because once our GAL is increased by 60,000 entries, I will need to immediately create address book views to manage the whole thing. Creating these views will involve cooperation of administrators across Exchange sites and that process takes time. I was hoping to find a quick way to copy 60,000 contact records into a Public Folder without hanging up the client. -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Why not use Custom Recipients instead of a public folder contacts list? Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Huge contact folder in Public Folders I have a problem. I have a contact folder in the Public folders that is used for an address folder for Outlook clients. It contains 60,000 records. Once a month, I get a new list in csv format that I need to use to update the records in the folder. Outlook won't import a foreign file directly into the Public Folders. If I import into a local folder, then move the folder into the Public Folders, all the clients that are configured to use this folder as an Outlook Address folder have to be reconfigured. I can't import into a local folder, then copy the records into the Public Folder because Outlook hangs up with such a large list of records. ANY SUGGESTIONS? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
I screwed up haiku So must now punish myself Installing arcserv Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday It's Five-Seven-Five Your first line was only four Go Punish yourself -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Lambert Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday What is haiku Is it 5 then 7 or Am I old and dumb Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Another week ends with no stops in the EV. Doing something right. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SENSLESS : RE: Haiku Friday
MS and Madonna are screaming me to buy XP The news people tell me Anthrax is evil I wish to see all indians deported to Cleveland for IT Time to create a budget that will get shelved Pray our DB provider will fix Memory leak bugs -Original Message- From: Dave Cabacongan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday One bad foul and hot Monday Our DNS went away It's time for IT to play Sometimes IT wants to pray But in the very end - yes It came back for all to see Email flows and I'm happy. -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 08:05 * To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday It's Five-Seven-Five Your first line was only four Go Punish yourself -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Lambert Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday What is haiku Is it 5 then 7 or Am I old and dumb Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Another week ends with no stops in the EV. Doing something right. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain confidential information of Integrated Biosystems, Inc., and is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by individuals or entities other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender and delete all copies. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders
I tried idea No 1, and it looks like when the folder has about 5K records, it will choke when copying in a few hundred more. It is not practical to use this technique to reach 60K records unless someone knows a cure for the choking. I like idea No 2. I haven't done much work with OST, but I think that I will be able to figure it out. I will post if I get it to work. If there only was a utility like Exmerge that worked on public folders, my problem would be solved. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Unfortunately, a client is required in order to access a PF; even if you do some CDO, you are still gonna need a client to gain access to the dir. Dumb thought No 1: If OL2k is choking on a massive import, have you considered breaking the job into bitty parts? ..say, 10k names instead? Dumb thought No 2: Configure OL2k as OST client. Add target PF into Favorites folder. Set Favorites/targetPF to sync offline. Sync OL2k. Take OL2k offline. Import contacts into Favorites/targetPF (hold breath #1). Sync OL2k (hold breath #2). Let list know if dumb idea really works.. Dumb thought No 3: ABV's will provide a nice way to segregate users. And you are correct that it'll take some planning to work out both the technical and political whatnots. But you can certainly import 60k CR's into your dir without being pressed into implementing ABV's before you are ready. I presume their is a desire not to muddy the GAL with all those CR's, so create a new container and import the CR's into there. Tim. -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Actually in the long run, I will import the records into the Exchange Directory as custom recipients. I don't do that today because once our GAL is increased by 60,000 entries, I will need to immediately create address book views to manage the whole thing. Creating these views will involve cooperation of administrators across Exchange sites and that process takes time. I was hoping to find a quick way to copy 60,000 contact records into a Public Folder without hanging up the client. -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders Why not use Custom Recipients instead of a public folder contacts list? Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Huge contact folder in Public Folders I have a problem. I have a contact folder in the Public folders that is used for an address folder for Outlook clients. It contains 60,000 records. Once a month, I get a new list in csv format that I need to use to update the records in the folder. Outlook won't import a foreign file directly into the Public Folders. If I import into a local folder, then move the folder into the Public Folders, all the clients that are configured to use this folder as an Outlook Address folder have to be reconfigured. I can't import into a local folder, then copy the records into the Public Folder because Outlook hangs up with such a large list of records. ANY SUGGESTIONS? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
Investigating a Forged Message
Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject: Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SENSLESS : RE: Haiku Friday
Whooops, My brain CPU is too hot. I went 7... 7 times poor five... -Original Message- From: Bauschek, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 08:17 * To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SENSLESS : RE: Haiku Friday MS and Madonna are screaming me to buy XP The news people tell me Anthrax is evil I wish to see all indians deported to Cleveland for IT Time to create a budget that will get shelved Pray our DB provider will fix Memory leak bugs -Original Message- From: Dave Cabacongan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday One bad foul and hot Monday Our DNS went away It's time for IT to play Sometimes IT wants to pray But in the very end - yes It came back for all to see Email flows and I'm happy. -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 08:05 * To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday It's Five-Seven-Five Your first line was only four Go Punish yourself -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Lambert Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday What is haiku Is it 5 then 7 or Am I old and dumb Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Another week ends with no stops in the EV. Doing something right. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain confidential information of Integrated Biosystems, Inc., and is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by individuals or entities other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender and delete all copies. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain confidential information of Integrated Biosystems, Inc., and is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by individuals or entities other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender and delete all copies. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
if they check the message header of the email they will see whether it came from within the organisation it will be blank if it was internal. If it is from a SMTP spoof site it will have details from out side the organisation. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 October 2001 16:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject: Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
However, the permissions on the DL's would of had to of been non existent. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 October 2001 16:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject: Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
Headers, Let us see the headers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject: Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
If they didn't use his username/password, there would be an event in the event log - get the IT people to have a look (or maybe they did it..) -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 October 2001 16:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject: Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
You have to be careful about using the Event log data as evidence. If someone just looks at the calendar, it shows that the user logged on but was not the owner of the mailbox. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message If they didn't use his username/password, there would be an event in the event log - get the IT people to have a look (or maybe they did it..) -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 October 2001 16:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject: Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automatic Deletion
It's been to long to remember details, but read some propaganda, ... ummm, sorry, sales brochures regarding a system that encrypts messages. On delivery it would provide secure delivery read receipts, while preventing cut paste type operations. After a predetermined time or # of reads it would destroy the document. If you need a secure (and uncopyable) email you'll need to look for some heavy-weight security packages. All this, of course, assume that the recipient is not a security risk himself... -Original Message- From: Anderson, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automatic Deletion How do you know when someone's read it? Why couldn't they just take a screen shot or cut and paste or, god forbid, just re-type the message and send it out to the Internet? -Original Message- From: Bury, Sue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Automatic Deletion Is there a way to either disable forwarding a particular email to the Internet or automatically and permanently delete an email upon reading? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
Thanks. The message appears to have been sent directly from McDonald's mailbox. Haven't heard yet if the font was courier (implies it was sent from OWA55). If the culprit sent it via O.E., then the source IP can be traced back to the internal host. Tim. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message if they check the message header of the email they will see whether it came from within the organisation it will be blank if it was internal. If it is from a SMTP spoof site it will have details from out side the organisation. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 October 2001 16:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject: Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
Yeah.. I'd like to see it too.. But I don't work there. I have to build up credibility with the dude before he'd turn over the message. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message Headers, Let us see the headers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject: Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Understanding Non Delivery Message
I'm getting messages periodically when mail is undelivered. I'm wondering why the From is showing only . I've looked at the IMS queues but there were no further details. I'm new to Exchange, obviously. Thanks for any help. Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
Thanks. Check the EV for 1016's.. good suggestion. Tim. -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message If they didn't use his username/password, there would be an event in the event log - get the IT people to have a look (or maybe they did it..) -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 October 2001 16:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject: Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
Thanks. I believe item #1 (of my post) is most probable.. hell, I must leave OL2k open and unattended on my PC a dozen times every day for minutes at a stretch. However, this takes balls. Considering the length and articulate phrasing of the message, it seems the person would have spent an inordinate amount of time at McDonald's desk. Certainly someone should have seen somebody there. I have recommended they check the EV on the server which McDonald's mailbox resides for EV 1016's.. just incase the Admin was in on it. Tim. -Original Message- From: Wright, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message It appears that it was send via Exchange since there are no internet addresses in the TO: FROM: fields. Also, if you check the headers and there is nothing there, then you have the culprit in-house and logging on legitimately via the user's account. The original suggestions below are probably what occurred. How accessible is the VP's computer? May be someone took a quick opportunity at an unattended computer. If they were very clever, they might have set the message to delay a day or so before delivery. Hope everyone at the company took it seriously and went home ;-) Steve -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message Headers, Let us see the headers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject: Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
Thanks. Coincidental time and date of a 1016 would be a good indicator of suspicious activity. Also, Reviewer access is not on by default in OL2k's Calendar; however, I do not know the delegate settings on McDonald's mailbox. (btw: Really? I never noticed that.. Are you certain?) Tim. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message You have to be careful about using the Event log data as evidence. If someone just looks at the calendar, it shows that the user logged on but was not the owner of the mailbox. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message If they didn't use his username/password, there would be an event in the event log - get the IT people to have a look (or maybe they did it..) -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 October 2001 16:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject: Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Understanding Non Delivery Message
Take a good look at RFC 2821 (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html). If there is a delivery failure after acceptance of a message, the receiver-SMTP MUST formulate and mail a notification message. This notification MUST be sent using a null () reverse path in the envelope. The recipient of this notification MUST be the address from the envelope return path (or the Return-Path: line). However, if this address is null (), the receiver-SMTP MUST NOT send a notification. It would appear that many mailers are misconfigured when it comes to handling From: . Cheers, Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 October 2001 17:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Understanding Non Delivery Message I'm getting messages periodically when mail is undelivered. I'm wondering why the From is showing only . I've looked at the IMS queues but there were no further details. I'm new to Exchange, obviously. Thanks for any help. Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: O2K transport stack order not reliable?
Covered in the archives ad infinitum. Have them set up .forward files on the unix boxxen or use separate profiles or upgrade to Outlook 2002, which is somewhat better. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Phillips, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Patterson, Norman Subject: O2K transport stack order not reliable? We have a couple of users with O2K installed in CW mode, set to use mailboxes on our EX5.5SP4 servers and also POP mailboxes on a Unix machine. They want mail to Internet addresses to go out via the SMTP smarthost set up in the POP configuration, so they have the Internet Mail transport at the top of the delivery stack above the Exchange service. The users *claim* that up to 6 weeks ago it worked as they wanted; but since then *all* messages go out via the Exchange server. We've tried on a test system using O2K SP2, and find that about 1 in 4 messages to Internet addresses don't go via the SMTP transport but use the Exchange server. The connection to the SMTP server is reliable on a LAN - there's not enough time for it to be timing out, and testing shows that if O2K gets a refused connection from the smarthost you get a popup message. So it looks like the client just doesn't always respect the defined transport stack order. Has anyone got any ideas what might be going on? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Understanding Non Delivery Message
Mail From can be blank. RFC822 describes this nicely -Original Message- From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Understanding Non Delivery Message I'm getting messages periodically when mail is undelivered. I'm wondering why the From is showing only . I've looked at the IMS queues but there were no further details. I'm new to Exchange, obviously. Thanks for any help. Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Understanding Non Delivery Message
Ok, this time I'll paste the message...duh...I've put X's in the to address for obvious reasons. I'm getting messages periodically when mail is undelivered. I'm wondering why the From is showing only . I've looked at the IMS queues but there were no further details. I'm new to Exchange, obviously. Thanks for any help. A mail message was not sent because the maximum time for delivery has expired. The message was not delivered to the following addresses: The message that caused this notification was: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Subject: Undeliverable: Endoxy Agreement Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
Yep. For example, if someone in the site schedules a meeting with another person through Calendar, and does a view of the times available for the scheduled person, an event log will show up saying the scheduling person logged into the scheduled person's) mailbox, but wasn't the owner. You don't need reviewer permissions to get the entry. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message Thanks. Coincidental time and date of a 1016 would be a good indicator of suspicious activity. Also, Reviewer access is not on by default in OL2k's Calendar; however, I do not know the delegate settings on McDonald's mailbox. (btw: Really? I never noticed that.. Are you certain?) Tim. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message You have to be careful about using the Event log data as evidence. If someone just looks at the calendar, it shows that the user logged on but was not the owner of the mailbox. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message If they didn't use his username/password, there would be an event in the event log - get the IT people to have a look (or maybe they did it..) -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 October 2001 16:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject: Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
I'll investigate it at my standard rate... Just have them give me a blank check and some beer nuts. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject:Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
Headers, Post your Headers -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message Thanks. The message appears to have been sent directly from McDonald's mailbox. Haven't heard yet if the font was courier (implies it was sent from OWA55). If the culprit sent it via O.E., then the source IP can be traced back to the internal host. Tim. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message if they check the message header of the email they will see whether it came from within the organisation it will be blank if it was internal. If it is from a SMTP spoof site it will have details from out side the organisation. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 October 2001 16:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject: Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
Very certain! -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message Thanks. Coincidental time and date of a 1016 would be a good indicator of suspicious activity. Also, Reviewer access is not on by default in OL2k's Calendar; however, I do not know the delegate settings on McDonald's mailbox. (btw: Really? I never noticed that.. Are you certain?) Tim. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message You have to be careful about using the Event log data as evidence. If someone just looks at the calendar, it shows that the user logged on but was not the owner of the mailbox. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message If they didn't use his username/password, there would be an event in the event log - get the IT people to have a look (or maybe they did it..) -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 October 2001 16:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject: Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
Well, that is not necessarily true. All he needs is to precompose the letter, put on floppy, and walk over with a simple copy-paste, done in 1 minute or less. Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:13 AM Posted To: NewsgroupDiscussion Conversation: Investigating a Forged Message Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message Thanks. I believe item #1 (of my post) is most probable.. hell, I must leave OL2k open and unattended on my PC a dozen times every day for minutes at a stretch. However, this takes balls. Considering the length and articulate phrasing of the message, it seems the person would have spent an inordinate amount of time at McDonald's desk. Certainly someone should have seen somebody there. I have recommended they check the EV on the server which McDonald's mailbox resides for EV 1016's.. just incase the Admin was in on it. Tim. -Original Message- From: Wright, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message It appears that it was send via Exchange since there are no internet addresses in the TO: FROM: fields. Also, if you check the headers and there is nothing there, then you have the culprit in-house and logging on legitimately via the user's account. The original suggestions below are probably what occurred. How accessible is the VP's computer? May be someone took a quick opportunity at an unattended computer. If they were very clever, they might have set the message to delay a day or so before delivery. Hope everyone at the company took it seriously and went home ;-) Steve -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message Headers, Let us see the headers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject: Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Investigating a Forged Message
Ask McDonald, Where exactly were you at 9:19AM this morning, and for how long before that, and who knew? i.e. was he in the washroom with his $250 Italian leathers poking out underneath the stall, making noises that indicated extreme abdominal discomfort... :) -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:13 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Investigating a Forged Message Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message Thanks. I believe item #1 (of my post) is most probable.. hell, I must leave OL2k open and unattended on my PC a dozen times every day for minutes at a stretch. However, this takes balls. Considering the length and articulate phrasing of the message, it seems the person would have spent an inordinate amount of time at McDonald's desk. Certainly someone should have seen somebody there. I have recommended they check the EV on the server which McDonald's mailbox resides for EV 1016's.. just incase the Admin was in on it. Tim. -Original Message- From: Wright, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message It appears that it was send via Exchange since there are no internet addresses in the TO: FROM: fields. Also, if you check the headers and there is nothing there, then you have the culprit in-house and logging on legitimately via the user's account. The original suggestions below are probably what occurred. How accessible is the VP's computer? May be someone took a quick opportunity at an unattended computer. If they were very clever, they might have set the message to delay a day or so before delivery. Hope everyone at the company took it seriously and went home ;-) Steve -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message Headers, Let us see the headers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Investigating a Forged Message Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine Friday.. put on your investigator hats.. My wife forwarded this message to me: From: McDonald, Arthur K. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems Subject:Much to be grateful for... All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and for that reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go home at noon today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more than I will ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your neighbors, love life and be grateful for all we have in this great nation of ours. Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to take on the world! ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, Arthur, VP (Very Pissed), wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the following likely prospects: 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop; 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username password; 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted User or Send as permission to culprit 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or used a similar serve from the web. Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a few details that have be provide me. Care to contribute? Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
