RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts)
Louis, stop trying to pull on the exchange mailing list and get back to those backups. JJ Ahh! knowing smile Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 01:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) life, love and the pursuit of sensible threads on this list *wink*... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) What's so funny young lady? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) Ha ha ha..rofl -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Fonts e. Well the email you have just sent doesn't contain any of those little quirks at the bottom anymore. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Roberto Glavich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Fonts I applied the patch in the http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q273/6/15.ASP article. But it seems not to have worked. /Roberto _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ta na - How to automate mailbox creation in Exch2k
Yes but I need to be in charge of the mailboxes created and be able to use my own developed testing tool to fire mails @ the accounts and I need to have control over the user names of the accounts created. I had a quick look @ loadsim and as far as I could tell, all it did was create Mailboxes which lived on the Exch Svr but which were not actual 'live' AD user accounts. I needed to be in control of the user mailboxes to ensure that the differently configured mailboxes could each receive mail-fire off to 3rd party product-receive back again and deliver safely to user. I would use the loadsim tool as a stress tester before I put an Exch. system live but without in-depth programming knowledge, in my testing environ, it would not be much use to me. Thanks for the thought thou'. Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Ta na - How to automate mailbox creation in Exch2k So this is probably too late to ask... But if you're doing this for testing purposes, doesn't loadsim automagically create accounts and DLs? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Ta na - How to automate mailbox creation in Exch2k Exported the existing users in there into a text file using ldifde. (NOTE: It is NB. @ this point to keep these elements the same: cn: **Mary Wood** objectClass: *user* samAccountName: **Mary** givenName: **Mary** sn: **Wood* userPrincipalName: **Mary** mail: **[EMAIL PROTECTED]** mailNickname: **Mary**) Copied and pasted (keeping the 1 letter of the user name the same for every user) so my list went: cn=Aa Wood (and all the other details) cn=Ab Wood (and all the other details) Ac Wood (you get the picture) Made 1 text file with 2000 users.used 'edit, replace' to edit the case-sensitive first letter of each name and saved as file 2 eg. Ba Wood Bb Wood Bc Wood (snore) So I had 26 x 2000 users in this format after about an hours work Now I will go back into those 26 files and use replace to change Aa to AAa after this I will have over 100,000 users.and so on. Like everything else with Exch2KSrv...it is s damm simple once you know how to do it .. finding out how to do it is the only hard part Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Ta na - How to automate mailbox creation in Exch2k So how did you create 50k users in this format? dn: CN=**Mary Wood*,CN=*Users*,DC=**Rome**,DC=**com** changetype: add cn: **Mary Wood** objectClass: *user* samAccountName: **Mary** givenName: **Mary** sn: **Wood* userPrincipalName: **Mary** mail: **[EMAIL PROTECTED]** mailNickname: **Mary** Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: Ta na - How to automate mailbox creation in Exch2k Idiots (my) guide to automating account creation (and therefore mailbox creation) in an AD/Exchange 2k environ Tools used: ldifde.exe (launches from the command prompt on a W2K AD DC) Notepad (or any other text editor) Note: This method presumes that you have a valid AD and Exch2K setup. You must be in front of W2K Svr. to access the Admin tools needed. You must be logged in as a Domain Controller on the server you complete this function from. 1. Create a template text file which is going to give AD. all the config. info it needs to create the account. It should look something like this: dn: CN=**Mary Wood*,CN=*Users*,DC=**Rome**,DC=**com** changetype: add cn: **Mary Wood** objectClass: *user* samAccountName: **Mary** givenName: **Mary** sn: **Wood* userPrincipalName: **Mary** mail: **[EMAIL PROTECTED]** mailNickname: **Mary** *= AD environment variables **=User-dependant variables I recommend a max. number of users to add @ any one time to be 276 (280+ by this method has made the Exchange server freezes for up to 30 seconds) 2. Save this file as an 'All files' *.ldif file under windows. 3. The syntax to use in the command window is: ldifde -i -f *Exportuser.ldif* -s *AD-DC* What this means: Idifde = The .exe to run the process -i. The Idifde runs in export mode by default, the -i switch changes this to import mode *Exportuser.ldif*. The full name and path of the .Idif file you created earlier *AD-DC* The IP address/Domain name of the Active Directory Domain Controller Recommended: Run the tool on one user in the .ldif file to check that you have the syntax correct. Once the command has run (this is betrayed by the 'X entries modified successfully' instruction on the command prompt window), all you have to do is go to your Exchange server, refresh the 'Users'
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
Groan, that herts...truly dreadful. The really sad thing is that I am probably the only one on the list (besides you) who gets it. E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? I think I preferred the Puns, people round here are Welwyn to that. SB -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Ahem. Err... I'm kinda new to this flirting thing. Umm So Are you a umm... thief? Why? Err Wellbecause... ummm... you stole... the sunshine from my eyes -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Flirting? Ok, I'll start it off To all the women out there.What's your sign? Come here often? Didn't I see you the last time I saw you? Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? What the hell is this all about ...? From: Elizabeth Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 17:46:01 -0800 Pah. [1]Your pun was worse than mine. [2]Who's flirting??? I'm serious :) [3] If you can't stand the heat.get outta Hitchin', or so they say What the hell does that mean??? E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? It herts me to say this, but I'm in Hereford. No more talk of Hitchin, please[1]. Phil [1] That's taking flirtation a little too far :-) - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? well it is an 'Exchange' list after all. /me ducks in anticipation of rotten tomatoes.. OOoh as you work for the Herts county council, can you make sure all the services in Hitchin work properly as I have just bought a house there?? Nothing like putting people to work :) Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) Are flirtatious exchanges [1] within the remit of this list? ;-) Phil [1] Does Microsoft sell those? - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) life, love and the pursuit of sensible threads on this list *wink*... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) What's so funny young lady? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) Ha ha ha..rofl -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Fonts e. Well the email you have just sent doesn't contain any of those little quirks at the bottom anymore. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Roberto Glavich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Fonts I applied the patch in the http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q273/6/15.ASP article. But it seems not to have worked. /Roberto _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
Glad to hear someone's getting it! - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 19:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Groan, that herts...truly dreadful. The really sad thing is that I am probably the only one on the list (besides you) who gets it. E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? I think I preferred the Puns, people round here are Welwyn to that. SB -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Ahem. Err... I'm kinda new to this flirting thing. Umm So Are you a umm... thief? Why? Err Wellbecause... ummm... you stole... the sunshine from my eyes -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Flirting? Ok, I'll start it off To all the women out there.What's your sign? Come here often? Didn't I see you the last time I saw you? Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? What the hell is this all about ...? From: Elizabeth Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 17:46:01 -0800 Pah. [1]Your pun was worse than mine. [2]Who's flirting??? I'm serious :) [3] If you can't stand the heat.get outta Hitchin', or so they say What the hell does that mean??? E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? It herts me to say this, but I'm in Hereford. No more talk of Hitchin, please[1]. Phil [1] That's taking flirtation a little too far :-) - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? well it is an 'Exchange' list after all. /me ducks in anticipation of rotten tomatoes.. OOoh as you work for the Herts county council, can you make sure all the services in Hitchin work properly as I have just bought a house there?? Nothing like putting people to work :) Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) Are flirtatious exchanges [1] within the remit of this list? ;-) Phil [1] Does Microsoft sell those? - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) life, love and the pursuit of sensible threads on this list *wink*... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) What's so funny young lady? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) Ha ha ha..rofl -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Fonts e. Well the email you have just sent doesn't contain any of those little quirks at the bottom anymore. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Roberto Glavich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Fonts I applied the patch in the http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q273/6/15.ASP article. But it seems not to have worked. /Roberto _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
If you're gonna be bad, be TRULY BAD! GRIN SB -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Groan, that herts...truly dreadful. The really sad thing is that I am probably the only one on the list (besides you) who gets it. E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? I think I preferred the Puns, people round here are Welwyn to that. SB -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Ahem. Err... I'm kinda new to this flirting thing. Umm So Are you a umm... thief? Why? Err Wellbecause... ummm... you stole... the sunshine from my eyes -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Flirting? Ok, I'll start it off To all the women out there.What's your sign? Come here often? Didn't I see you the last time I saw you? Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? What the hell is this all about ...? From: Elizabeth Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 17:46:01 -0800 Pah. [1]Your pun was worse than mine. [2]Who's flirting??? I'm serious :) [3] If you can't stand the heat.get outta Hitchin', or so they say What the hell does that mean??? E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? It herts me to say this, but I'm in Hereford. No more talk of Hitchin, please[1]. Phil [1] That's taking flirtation a little too far :-) - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? well it is an 'Exchange' list after all. /me ducks in anticipation of rotten tomatoes.. OOoh as you work for the Herts county council, can you make sure all the services in Hitchin work properly as I have just bought a house there?? Nothing like putting people to work :) Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) Are flirtatious exchanges [1] within the remit of this list? ;-) Phil [1] Does Microsoft sell those? - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) life, love and the pursuit of sensible threads on this list *wink*... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) What's so funny young lady? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) Ha ha ha..rofl -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Fonts e. Well the email you have just sent doesn't contain any of those little quirks at the bottom anymore. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Roberto Glavich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Fonts I applied the patch in the http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q273/6/15.ASP article. But it seems not to have worked. /Roberto _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
= conspicuous lack on comment on that outrageous innuendo! E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Glad to hear someone's getting it! - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Groan, that herts...truly dreadful. The really sad thing is that I am probably the only one on the list (besides you) who gets it. E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? I think I preferred the Puns, people round here are Welwyn to that. SB -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Ahem. Err... I'm kinda new to this flirting thing. Umm So Are you a umm... thief? Why? Err Wellbecause... ummm... you stole... the sunshine from my eyes -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Flirting? Ok, I'll start it off To all the women out there.What's your sign? Come here often? Didn't I see you the last time I saw you? Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? What the hell is this all about ...? From: Elizabeth Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 17:46:01 -0800 Pah. [1]Your pun was worse than mine. [2]Who's flirting??? I'm serious :) [3] If you can't stand the heat.get outta Hitchin', or so they say What the hell does that mean??? E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? It herts me to say this, but I'm in Hereford. No more talk of Hitchin, please[1]. Phil [1] That's taking flirtation a little too far :-) - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? well it is an 'Exchange' list after all. /me ducks in anticipation of rotten tomatoes.. OOoh as you work for the Herts county council, can you make sure all the services in Hitchin work properly as I have just bought a house there?? Nothing like putting people to work :) Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) Are flirtatious exchanges [1] within the remit of this list? ;-) Phil [1] Does Microsoft sell those? - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) life, love and the pursuit of sensible threads on this list *wink*... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) What's so funny young lady? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) Ha ha ha..rofl -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Fonts e. Well the email you have just sent doesn't contain any of those little quirks at the bottom anymore. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Roberto Glavich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Fonts I applied the patch in the http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q273/6/15.ASP article. But it seems not to have worked. /Roberto _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ta na - How to automate mailbox creation in Exch2k
To have a 'live' mailbox they must be users in the AD, as that is the only directory !! Yours, Julian Stone Exchange 2000 Consultant Netstore - Europe's Leading Application Service Provider -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 18:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ta na - How to automate mailbox creation in Exch2k Yes but I need to be in charge of the mailboxes created and be able to use my own developed testing tool to fire mails @ the accounts and I need to have control over the user names of the accounts created. I had a quick look @ loadsim and as far as I could tell, all it did was create Mailboxes which lived on the Exch Svr but which were not actual 'live' AD user accounts. I needed to be in control of the user mailboxes to ensure that the differently configured mailboxes could each receive mail-fire off to 3rd party product-receive back again and deliver safely to user. I would use the loadsim tool as a stress tester before I put an Exch. system live but without in-depth programming knowledge, in my testing environ, it would not be much use to me. Thanks for the thought thou'. Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Ta na - How to automate mailbox creation in Exch2k So this is probably too late to ask... But if you're doing this for testing purposes, doesn't loadsim automagically create accounts and DLs? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Ta na - How to automate mailbox creation in Exch2k Exported the existing users in there into a text file using ldifde. (NOTE: It is NB. @ this point to keep these elements the same: cn: **Mary Wood** objectClass: *user* samAccountName: **Mary** givenName: **Mary** sn: **Wood* userPrincipalName: **Mary** mail: **[EMAIL PROTECTED]** mailNickname: **Mary**) Copied and pasted (keeping the 1 letter of the user name the same for every user) so my list went: cn=Aa Wood (and all the other details) cn=Ab Wood (and all the other details) Ac Wood (you get the picture) Made 1 text file with 2000 users.used 'edit, replace' to edit the case-sensitive first letter of each name and saved as file 2 eg. Ba Wood Bb Wood Bc Wood (snore) So I had 26 x 2000 users in this format after about an hours work Now I will go back into those 26 files and use replace to change Aa to AAa after this I will have over 100,000 users.and so on. Like everything else with Exch2KSrv...it is s damm simple once you know how to do it .. finding out how to do it is the only hard part Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Ta na - How to automate mailbox creation in Exch2k So how did you create 50k users in this format? dn: CN=**Mary Wood*,CN=*Users*,DC=**Rome**,DC=**com** changetype: add cn: **Mary Wood** objectClass: *user* samAccountName: **Mary** givenName: **Mary** sn: **Wood* userPrincipalName: **Mary** mail: **[EMAIL PROTECTED]** mailNickname: **Mary** Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: Ta na - How to automate mailbox creation in Exch2k Idiots (my) guide to automating account creation (and therefore mailbox creation) in an AD/Exchange 2k environ Tools used: ldifde.exe (launches from the command prompt on a W2K AD DC) Notepad (or any other text editor) Note: This method presumes that you have a valid AD and Exch2K setup. You must be in front of W2K Svr. to access the Admin tools needed. You must be logged in as a Domain Controller on the server you complete this function from. 1. Create a template text file which is going to give AD. all the config. info it needs to create the account. It should look something like this: dn: CN=**Mary Wood*,CN=*Users*,DC=**Rome**,DC=**com** changetype: add cn: **Mary Wood** objectClass: *user* samAccountName: **Mary** givenName: **Mary** sn: **Wood* userPrincipalName: **Mary** mail: **[EMAIL PROTECTED]** mailNickname: **Mary** *= AD environment variables **=User-dependant variables I recommend a max. number of users to add @ any one time to be 276 (280+ by this method has made the Exchange server freezes for up to 30 seconds) 2. Save this file as an 'All files' *.ldif file under windows. 3. The syntax to use in the command window is: ldifde -i -f *Exportuser.ldif* -s *AD-DC* What this means: Idifde = The .exe to run the process -i. The Idifde runs in export mode by default, the -i switch changes this to import mode *Exportuser.ldif*. The full name and path of the .Idif file you
RE: Ta na - How to automate mailbox creation in Exch2k
errryes, and as I said, that is why I used the Ldifde tool to create the accounts and not loadsim. Was there some part of my reply to Chris you misinterpreted? Easily excited chap aren't you? Don't wear out the exclamation marks button on your KB. :) E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Ta na - How to automate mailbox creation in Exch2k To have a 'live' mailbox they must be users in the AD, as that is the only directory !! Yours, Julian Stone Exchange 2000 Consultant Netstore - Europe's Leading Application Service Provider -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Ta na - How to automate mailbox creation in Exch2k Yes but I need to be in charge of the mailboxes created and be able to use my own developed testing tool to fire mails @ the accounts and I need to have control over the user names of the accounts created. I had a quick look @ loadsim and as far as I could tell, all it did was create Mailboxes which lived on the Exch Svr but which were not actual 'live' AD user accounts. I needed to be in control of the user mailboxes to ensure that the differently configured mailboxes could each receive mail-fire off to 3rd party product-receive back again and deliver safely to user. I would use the loadsim tool as a stress tester before I put an Exch. system live but without in-depth programming knowledge, in my testing environ, it would not be much use to me. Thanks for the thought thou'. Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Ta na - How to automate mailbox creation in Exch2k So this is probably too late to ask... But if you're doing this for testing purposes, doesn't loadsim automagically create accounts and DLs? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Ta na - How to automate mailbox creation in Exch2k Exported the existing users in there into a text file using ldifde. (NOTE: It is NB. @ this point to keep these elements the same: cn: **Mary Wood** objectClass: *user* samAccountName: **Mary** givenName: **Mary** sn: **Wood* userPrincipalName: **Mary** mail: **[EMAIL PROTECTED]** mailNickname: **Mary**) Copied and pasted (keeping the 1 letter of the user name the same for every user) so my list went: cn=Aa Wood (and all the other details) cn=Ab Wood (and all the other details) Ac Wood (you get the picture) Made 1 text file with 2000 users.used 'edit, replace' to edit the case-sensitive first letter of each name and saved as file 2 eg. Ba Wood Bb Wood Bc Wood (snore) So I had 26 x 2000 users in this format after about an hours work Now I will go back into those 26 files and use replace to change Aa to AAa after this I will have over 100,000 users.and so on. Like everything else with Exch2KSrv...it is s damm simple once you know how to do it .. finding out how to do it is the only hard part Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Ta na - How to automate mailbox creation in Exch2k So how did you create 50k users in this format? dn: CN=**Mary Wood*,CN=*Users*,DC=**Rome**,DC=**com** changetype: add cn: **Mary Wood** objectClass: *user* samAccountName: **Mary** givenName: **Mary** sn: **Wood* userPrincipalName: **Mary** mail: **[EMAIL PROTECTED]** mailNickname: **Mary** Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: Ta na - How to automate mailbox creation in Exch2k Idiots (my) guide to automating account creation (and therefore mailbox creation) in an AD/Exchange 2k environ Tools used: ldifde.exe (launches from the command prompt on a W2K AD DC) Notepad (or any other text editor) Note: This method presumes that you have a valid AD and Exch2K setup. You must be in front of W2K Svr. to access the Admin tools needed. You must be logged in as a Domain Controller on the server you complete this function from. 1. Create a template text file which is going to give AD. all the config. info it needs to create the account. It should look something like this: dn: CN=**Mary Wood*,CN=*Users*,DC=**Rome**,DC=**com** changetype: add cn: **Mary Wood** objectClass: *user* samAccountName: **Mary** givenName: **Mary** sn: **Wood* userPrincipalName: **Mary** mail: **[EMAIL PROTECTED]** mailNickname: **Mary** *= AD environment variables **=User-dependant variables I recommend a max. number of users to add @ any one time to be 276 (280+ by this method has made the Exchange server freezes for up to 30 seconds) 2. Save this file as an 'All files' *.ldif file under windows. 3. The syntax to
RE: limiting smtp (or other) mail...
Mimesweeper has been getting a bit of unfavourable press here in the UK lately: http://computing.vnunet.com/News/1126721 This is just a report and not an endorsement much :) But it is nice to work with and on a product I admire. Regards E. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: limiting smtp (or other) mail... You can implement a 3rd party product such as mimesweeper. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: limiting smtp (or other) mail... I know there have been some threads in the past regarding how to limit the kind of email some users can send/receive, most usually smtp mail directed/received from the internet. I haven't been able to find those threads again in my or swynk's archives :(, however IIRC the most suggested method has been: - limit sending on the IMC, in order to simplify management (if you have multiple IMC or something) restrict a DL containing the users, or a DL containing a CR with it's primary NT account set to a NT group if you prefer). - limit receiving by removing the smtp address from those accounts. I'm wondering if a better solution for the receiving part has been found (for nt4 btw) - the smtp address could be usefull internally (some of my users still always do write name.surname@ourdomain, never surname ctrl-k or choose from the address book), and anyway this does mean touching directly the mailbox and the IMC or the DL or the Nt group. I'd prefer either something changeable with one action (exchange admin if necessary, or Nt Usermanager changeable from nt user manager (one action, can be changed by a user admin without exchange permissions) or at least with a single action (by a exchange admin). I suppose I could always write some kind of script but I fear it would become somewhat ugly (for example, change a nt group and then the user by automatic user export/change/import, or are there some objects for this ?) Thanks Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I have no other place to go
It worked I had to only add another VPN port. It was set to allow only one caller to come in at a time. Thanks for all your help guys. Rich -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go I just added another VPN port and connected two users to the server. I did that with phone lines through the internet though . I cant test the two laptops that are connected to the router because they are at home connected through a cable modem. I will test it out when I get home and crossing my finger I hope it works. I have to have this done tomorrow (deadline). They only gave me three days notice to set this up. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Would'nt you know it, one of my few posts to this list and its not about exchange Anyway I was going to setup a client with MS PPTP/RRAS Vpn behind a linksys (same model), but discovered this Netopia R910 router (about $100 more) supports PPTP VPN connections at the router. Along with some nifty Router to Router tunneling. Just FYI (no connection to the company) http://www.netopia.com/support/technotes/hardware/NQG_022.html For what it's worth I think your 2nd VPN connection was failing because you had only the 1 defined VPN port configured. Allan -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Say I heard on the radio there were going to be solar flares today. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Don't blame it on a fluke... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Reboot it, run out of the server room as soon as you hit restart and go to your desk. Then when someone complains say let me check on it. Then come back and act like it was just a fluke. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go I hate office time I want to restart the server cause I added another vpn Port but I cant test it until everyone leave which around 8 oclock R -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go There is a FW in the router. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go I connected the linksys router to my cable modem at home then I connected the two laptops to the router. I got internet connection with them. Then when I connected one laptop to the VPN it worked. And when I tried the second one it gave me error 781: Im not sure if there is a firewall in the linksys router. Otherwise Im not behind a firewall. 2598 Windows 2000 VPN connection generates error 781 - Encryption failed because no valid certificate was found? When you attempt to establish a VPN connection to a VPN server, you receive: Error 781 Encryption failed because no valid certificate was found. This can occur on a new connection or on one that previously worked. The error is produced because the connection is incomplete. You should: 1. Verify basic network connectivity between the client and the server. 2. Make sure that you have name resolution between the client and the server. 3. Use the Networking and TCP/IP troubleshooter in the Windows 2000 Help. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Oh, and you're running NAT on the Linux Firewall Router right? What kind of firewall is the VPN server sitting behind? Some VPN connections don't work over NAT. That could be your biggest problem right there. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go One VPN port for 10 users Shouldn't you have 10 VPN ports? One for each connecting user... What is the exact error message? I don't tend to remember things like 781 equals -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
RE: ADC
And in English? CAs are between (containers in) 55 Sites and (OUs in) AD Domains whereas you appear to be referring to Sites when you may mean Domains and vice-versa. Rephrase it logically and we'll see what we can do! Mark -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 November 2001 21:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC All, Ok I have currently an ADC setup in my 5.5 org between one of my 5.5 servers and my e2k box that's inside this site. Ok, I have to setup another ADC on another site to my site. Now can I setup mulitple CA's on on containers? For instance I have a CA between my Exchange users(5.5) and users on my E2K server. Now I want to setup a CA from my other site to my Exchange users on my (5.5) server. Is this acceptable? Will I encounter any problems by doing this? Please advise. Thank you, John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seriously been tasked with this
Happy Friday to all. I should have saved this for a Monday morning as I'm sure it's going to bring many laughs and many people saying that this is absolutely crazy. I've been tasked with this though and I thus have to come up with a solution and pricing for the solution. I doubt it is anything that will seriously be implemented but here is the job at hand. I'm running Exchange 2000 with all incoming mail coming in through a Mail Marshal mail gateway. We had a situation a few months ago in which we had major AD replication issues that cause DCs/GCs to respond very slowly and in some cases not respond as DCs/GCs at all. This caused Exchange to be unusable and for all practical purposes we were in a network down situation for 3 days with Microsoft in house working the issue with us. As we all know if AD is down then Exchange is down also. The task is to make sending, receiving and access to recent emails available in the event of another network down situation. Obviously if the physical network is down this is impossible but if Exchange goes down then they want email to be available in some way. Since E2K relies on AD I figure this secondary access can not include E2K. My thought, and I don't think the money could be justified, is that I have some type of a POP server that no one ever logs into. I would have a mailbox for each user on that POP server and every message coming in from the internet would be forward from the gateway to Exchange like it currently is and a copy also sent to the POP server. The POP server would then need the functionality to automatically delete any emails over a certain age. In the event of Exchange being down we could notify everyone to open Outlook Express which we would have preconfigured through policy to point to the POP server and the users would be functional with respect to email. I'm prepared for some interesting responses to this crazy idea. Dave Cook Exchange Administrator Kutak Rock, LLP 402-231-8352 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## The information contained in this electronic mail transmission (including any accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its authorized recipient(s), and may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, or responsible for delivering some or all of this transmission to an intended recipient, you have received this transmission in error and are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from reading, copying, printing, distributing or disclosing any of the information contained in it. In that event, please contact us immediately by telephone (402)346-6000 or by electronic mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete the original and all copies of this transmission (including any attachments) without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. ## _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu
On a Server its one more thing that could go wrong. I stand by my first comment. Rachel (Note to self... Where did I leave lace blouse that shows off cleavage?) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu You must be using it wrong then. Uncheck View as Web Page. Works Fine. Respectfully leering Andy -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu I hope you are kidding. Active Desktop has never been, and is not now stable. I would never recommend you turn that feature on. Ever. respectfully lurking rachel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu Or Maybe install IE with active Desktop and split the Logoff and Shutdown menus... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Seriously been tasked with this
Actually I have heard of something like this before. I don't think this is all that unusual. I know the Mdaemon (http://www.mdaemon.com) has the ability to delete messages after so many days. Mdaemon is a ver full featured mail server, but it just doesn't have all the collaboration that exchange does. I used Mdaemon for years before moving to Exchange. Mike -Original Message- From: Cook, David A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Seriously been tasked with this Happy Friday to all. I should have saved this for a Monday morning as I'm sure it's going to bring many laughs and many people saying that this is absolutely crazy. I've been tasked with this though and I thus have to come up with a solution and pricing for the solution. I doubt it is anything that will seriously be implemented but here is the job at hand. I'm running Exchange 2000 with all incoming mail coming in through a Mail Marshal mail gateway. We had a situation a few months ago in which we had major AD replication issues that cause DCs/GCs to respond very slowly and in some cases not respond as DCs/GCs at all. This caused Exchange to be unusable and for all practical purposes we were in a network down situation for 3 days with Microsoft in house working the issue with us. As we all know if AD is down then Exchange is down also. The task is to make sending, receiving and access to recent emails available in the event of another network down situation. Obviously if the physical network is down this is impossible but if Exchange goes down then they want email to be available in some way. Since E2K relies on AD I figure this secondary access can not include E2K. My thought, and I don't think the money could be justified, is that I have some type of a POP server that no one ever logs into. I would have a mailbox for each user on that POP server and every message coming in from the internet would be forward from the gateway to Exchange like it currently is and a copy also sent to the POP server. The POP server would then need the functionality to automatically delete any emails over a certain age. In the event of Exchange being down we could notify everyone to open Outlook Express which we would have preconfigured through policy to point to the POP server and the users would be functional with respect to email. I'm prepared for some interesting responses to this crazy idea. Dave Cook Exchange Administrator Kutak Rock, LLP 402-231-8352 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## The information contained in this electronic mail transmission (including any accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its authorized recipient(s), and may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, or responsible for delivering some or all of this transmission to an intended recipient, you have received this transmission in error and are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from reading, copying, printing, distributing or disclosing any of the information contained in it. In that event, please contact us immediately by telephone (402)346-6000 or by electronic mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete the original and all copies of this transmission (including any attachments) without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. ## _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox Creation in 5.5 via Perl or Other (not vbs)
Is anyone on this list familiar with the creation of mailboxes via perl (substitute your favorite scripting language here). I'd prefer not to use VBS if I can manage. Basically I have a payroll system I want to pull my list of new accounts from and create them automatically, any help would be appreciated. J _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe
We are all over-worked. Just because you are the only one isnt any excuse for failing to test and plan a roll out. You need to make the case to your boss about help. Like they say here in the US Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Personally, I like a former coworker's comment: If we don't have the time to do it right the first time, when are we going to have time to do it again? Personally, the original poster brought the entire issue upon himself. Had this been an obscure, undocumented issue, we'd be right there trying it out with him. But this is about the most well documented patch in the history of Microsoft. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe The MS01-052 patch is a case in point of making sure you TEST patches BEFORE you roll them out. The day that patch was released, NTBugTraq lit up like a christmas tree with all the problems people had with that patch. As an administrator you absolutely need to test everything before you roll it out and read ALL the documentation regarding the patches. If you do not and you cause downtime because the patch breaks something, the powers that be may have some words for you. We are all over-worked. Just because you are the only one isnt any excuse for failing to test and plan a roll out. You need to make the case to your boss about help. Like they say here in the US Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Where I work we have a few dozen servers ranging from ancient VAX systems to OS/2 boxes to Novel 4.11 to Win2k to SQL 7 to Lotus Notes to CC:Mail to ArcServe to IIS all managed by 4 of us. We have a few hundred users in the US and a few dozen scattered over the rest of the planet. Our supported applications are everything from Acces 2.0 applications to all kinds of weird freakish applications to Office XP. OSs are everything from Linux to WinXP to MacOS X. Again, 4 of us. We still manage to test everything before we roll it out. That is not to say we dont get bit in the butt once in a while, but we are sure to take all the steps we can. Outlook is working exactly as designed. It is meant to do what it is doing. If you do not like they way Outlook works now, uninstall it and start from stratch. Mike -Original Message- From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Shawn: (and all others that seem to enjoy raging against Microsoft) If you truly believe what you say about Microsoft's incompetence, why are you using their products? There are other products out there, as you proclaim in your message. If you are really opposed to that product why do you support it? Aren't there plenty of companies out there that are so sick and tired of Microsoft's faulty software that they run other packages? If your response to the above is well, I HAVE to use them because... -- then since you realize the weakness in these products shouldn't you KNOW the potential for problems in their fixes? You DON'T have to support those products. Find another company with better software. Sure, that job market is smaller, but isn't it better than working with this miserable Microsoft software? But in case you don't realize it: Microsoft products (like all other ones) have problems. Patches and Upgrades have consequences. README files are there for a reason. Competent administrators make plans and perform tests because they KNOW that every case is not covered by the manufacture in testing. If you truly hate Microsoft, stop supporting it and find another job with a company that doesn't use their products (good luck) where all you do is watch the systems run smoothly all day long and get paid handsomely. Otherwise, quit whining about it and get used to the fact that being an administrator in a microsoft network takes lots of WORK! Tom Gray, Network Engineer University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ATT Net: (919)960- -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe You know, it astounds me that so many IT people are blind to Microsoft's incompetence! BTW Mike, your 'car head light' analogy is not even relevant. A more apt analogy would refer to the Ford Pinto's with the exploding gas tanks. Sure the user could be mindful of
RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe
Actually, I was smart enough to test the patch first and didn't roll that one out. I was just voicing my opinion on Microsoft's business practices. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe How come you didn't discover this when you read the readme, or when you were testing it? Or is it always easier to just blame someone else for your mistakes? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wynkoop, John Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe I should have the option to block attachments or not! Explanation: Some of us (those who work for universities with stupid staff members and arrogant professors) don't have the option of blocking attachments (Gosh forbid we infringe on anyone's academic freedom). That is unless we wish to endure a never ending reign of sh*t from above. Instead we have to work around the vunerabilities found in things such as VBS, EXE, and COM files (which we have successfully done I might add). We managed to succesfully ward off NIMDA, Code Red, and a rash of other recent viruses without changing what users can and can't do (see, it can be done). Now outlook just gives my users one more reason to jump down my throat when something doesn't work. Thanks MicroShaft. John -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Even allowing your mail system to pass .EXE and .COM files is a mistake. You should thank MS for making OL block those types of files since you don't. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe For such a typically minor patch? Where did you get that idea? The Patch didnt break Outlook, your lack of preparation did. Over and Out. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe You know, it astounds me that so many IT people are blind to Microsoft's incompetence! BTW Mike, your 'car head light' analogy is not even relevant. A more apt analogy would refer to the Ford Pinto's with the exploding gas tanks. Sure the user could be mindful of driving only on roads with no other vehicles, thereby preventing a back-end collision. The 'solution' in service patch 2 could be likened to Microsoft removing the gas tank altogether. First, I read about 70% of the material related to this service patch. There are about 20 pages of material relating to this patch and since I run a dept. with over 50 systems and 6 servers ON MY OWN (no help, not even support contracts), I really don't have the time (nor is it humanly possible) to read every patch/update/security document produced by Microsoft alone (to say nothing about the 50+ other products I look after). No, I'm not whining!! Simply put, this patch broke Outlook!! An email program that cannot accept .com and .exe's is damaged! Yes, yes, I know there are other methods of receiving files (such as zip'ed) but the point is that no other email program such as Eudora, Groupwise, Netscape block these attachments. All Microsoft had to do was to either disable the dangerous capabilities of .asp,.vbs, (et al) code OR entirely block access to this code. IT WAS AS SIMPLE AS THAT!! Geezz, what's with some of you in this (supposed to be?) friendly discussions group? I sent a message asking about this (yes, I admit it was confrontational) and I read return responses basically calling me an idiot based on inane assumptions! Of course, I had to risk installing this patch because the risk of an Outlook-based virus outbreak out weighted the potential annoyance of breaking Outlook. BTW, I have never experienced a virus outbreak in the 6 years I've been with this company because of my pro-active stance on these issues. Message to Lori: Project Plan and Test Plan Results??? For such a typically minor patch? How many IT people do you have in your organization? The last time I had the time to do anything like that was in 98/99 for Y2K. I'm beginning to feel very small; am I the only IT person in this discussion group with an IT budget less than my wage? Message to Andy David: See note about inane assumptions. Over and out, Shawn -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions digest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: November 6, 2001 1:00 AM To:
RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu
Well. I have absolutely no retort to this! Andy -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu On a Server its one more thing that could go wrong. I stand by my first comment. Rachel (Note to self... Where did I leave lace blouse that shows off cleavage?) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu You must be using it wrong then. Uncheck View as Web Page. Works Fine. Respectfully leering Andy -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu I hope you are kidding. Active Desktop has never been, and is not now stable. I would never recommend you turn that feature on. Ever. respectfully lurking rachel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu Or Maybe install IE with active Desktop and split the Logoff and Shutdown menus... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe
You have complete control, in a fully documented way, to control whether the Outlook Security Patch (also included in Office 2000 SP2, IIRC) 'blocks' attachments or not. Again, this is hardly Microsoft's fault, unless you want to blame them for developing functionality that a lot of their customers demanded. They are guilty of that. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe I should have the option to block attachments or not! Explanation: Some of us (those who work for universities with stupid staff members and arrogant professors) don't have the option of blocking attachments (Gosh forbid we infringe on anyone's academic freedom). That is unless we wish to endure a never ending reign of sh*t from above. Instead we have to work around the vunerabilities found in things such as VBS, EXE, and COM files (which we have successfully done I might add). We managed to succesfully ward off NIMDA, Code Red, and a rash of other recent viruses without changing what users can and can't do (see, it can be done). Now outlook just gives my users one more reason to jump down my throat when something doesn't work. Thanks MicroShaft. John -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Even allowing your mail system to pass .EXE and .COM files is a mistake. You should thank MS for making OL block those types of files since you don't. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe For such a typically minor patch? Where did you get that idea? The Patch didnt break Outlook, your lack of preparation did. Over and Out. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe You know, it astounds me that so many IT people are blind to Microsoft's incompetence! BTW Mike, your 'car head light' analogy is not even relevant. A more apt analogy would refer to the Ford Pinto's with the exploding gas tanks. Sure the user could be mindful of driving only on roads with no other vehicles, thereby preventing a back-end collision. The 'solution' in service patch 2 could be likened to Microsoft removing the gas tank altogether. First, I read about 70% of the material related to this service patch. There are about 20 pages of material relating to this patch and since I run a dept. with over 50 systems and 6 servers ON MY OWN (no help, not even support contracts), I really don't have the time (nor is it humanly possible) to read every patch/update/security document produced by Microsoft alone (to say nothing about the 50+ other products I look after). No, I'm not whining!! Simply put, this patch broke Outlook!! An email program that cannot accept .com and .exe's is damaged! Yes, yes, I know there are other methods of receiving files (such as zip'ed) but the point is that no other email program such as Eudora, Groupwise, Netscape block these attachments. All Microsoft had to do was to either disable the dangerous capabilities of .asp,.vbs, (et al) code OR entirely block access to this code. IT WAS AS SIMPLE AS THAT!! Geezz, what's with some of you in this (supposed to be?) friendly discussions group? I sent a message asking about this (yes, I admit it was confrontational) and I read return responses basically calling me an idiot based on inane assumptions! Of course, I had to risk installing this patch because the risk of an Outlook-based virus outbreak out weighted the potential annoyance of breaking Outlook. BTW, I have never experienced a virus outbreak in the 6 years I've been with this company because of my pro-active stance on these issues. Message to Lori: Project Plan and Test Plan Results??? For such a typically minor patch? How many IT people do you have in your organization? The last time I had the time to do anything like that was in 98/99 for Y2K. I'm beginning to feel very small; am I the only IT person in this discussion group with an IT budget less than my wage? Message to Andy David: See note about inane assumptions. Over and out, Shawn -Original Message- From:
RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu
But I'm sure that you have a smart-aleck comment somewhere out there that you are waiting to use...(snicker) Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu Well. I have absolutely no retort to this! Andy -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu On a Server its one more thing that could go wrong. I stand by my first comment. Rachel (Note to self... Where did I leave lace blouse that shows off cleavage?) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu You must be using it wrong then. Uncheck View as Web Page. Works Fine. Respectfully leering Andy -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu I hope you are kidding. Active Desktop has never been, and is not now stable. I would never recommend you turn that feature on. Ever. respectfully lurking rachel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu Or Maybe install IE with active Desktop and split the Logoff and Shutdown menus... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe
Someone else on this list used to post the peoples names on the main Intranet page. It only took one major outbreak to fix that behavior. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Eric Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 7:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe At my last job we proposed a security policy whereby any user who executed a virus and infected the system would have to wear a dunce cap and a T-Shirt that says I'm the idiot who opened the virus for a week. It was almost made policy. Damn hippies shot it down... - Original Message - From: Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:00 PM Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Exactly why MS has to create patches like this particular one. Morons. What would be cool is if you could put a lock on their mail box so that when they open up Outlook there is an administrative message staring them in the face. Before they could open any email they would have to click OK and then retype what the administrative message was in a box exactly as it was. If they don't get it right, they are prompted again. If a new virus goes around the admin could put a lock on all mailboxes until they perform those steps. Kind like yelling at your kids. You tell them something and then you make them repeat it back to you so that you realize they heard what you said. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Users will open anything regardless of what you say. I remember ILOVEYOU, and a user. I had sent out emails all day long warning about this virus that had penetrated to a few machines before we had the DAT file for it. Anyhow, after an email an hour all day, I was talking to this guy about it at his desk. As I am talking, he is looking at mail and opens it right then! He had a laptop, and I ripped the PCCard NIC out, but too late. He just stood there and stared at me, as I turned and ran for my servers. Too late. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Carlson Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Yes you should and you do. Edit the registry. No reason to blame MS for stupid people that open every clickmetof*ckupyourcomputer.exe they get in an email. When are people going to take responsibility for stupid stuff they do and their own incompetence. If you don't know how to drive are you going to blame the person that runs into you? If you don't know how to use a shotgun are going to blame the person who sold you the gun when you blow your arm off? I am amazed all the time when we get new hires, that cant barely survive without a sign on their desk reminding them to inhale and exhale otherwise they will die, and throw them in front of a computer and they have no clue. We had to send a tech down to help a person log into their computer. They didn't know how to press CTRL+ALT+DEL. The keyboard had CTL instead of CTRL on the key. Or the other fabulous ones that reboot their computer and call us saying their hard drive crashed when all they did was leave a non-bootable floppy disk in the drive. People need to take responsibility and face up to the fact that they are computer illiterate or just plain dense when it comes to some of this stuff. Because people think they are computer geniuses even though they couldn't tell the difference between \ and / companies like Microsoft have to put in their application things like this patch. My wife is a prime example. She will be the first to admint she doesn't know anything about computers ecept for the applications that she uses all the time. If I am logged into my computer and she needs it, she logs into her own account because I have setup her account so that she cant do any damage to the computer. Don't blame MS. They are just responding to all the crap they got about not being secure. If people wouldn't click on every stupid theng they get via email, MS would ahev NEVER released that patch. There is no one to blame but morons. Mike -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe I should have
RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe
Conformity by humiliation. Works like a champ. Mike -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Someone else on this list used to post the peoples names on the main Intranet page. It only took one major outbreak to fix that behavior. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Eric Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 7:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe At my last job we proposed a security policy whereby any user who executed a virus and infected the system would have to wear a dunce cap and a T-Shirt that says I'm the idiot who opened the virus for a week. It was almost made policy. Damn hippies shot it down... - Original Message - From: Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:00 PM Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Exactly why MS has to create patches like this particular one. Morons. What would be cool is if you could put a lock on their mail box so that when they open up Outlook there is an administrative message staring them in the face. Before they could open any email they would have to click OK and then retype what the administrative message was in a box exactly as it was. If they don't get it right, they are prompted again. If a new virus goes around the admin could put a lock on all mailboxes until they perform those steps. Kind like yelling at your kids. You tell them something and then you make them repeat it back to you so that you realize they heard what you said. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Users will open anything regardless of what you say. I remember ILOVEYOU, and a user. I had sent out emails all day long warning about this virus that had penetrated to a few machines before we had the DAT file for it. Anyhow, after an email an hour all day, I was talking to this guy about it at his desk. As I am talking, he is looking at mail and opens it right then! He had a laptop, and I ripped the PCCard NIC out, but too late. He just stood there and stared at me, as I turned and ran for my servers. Too late. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Carlson Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Yes you should and you do. Edit the registry. No reason to blame MS for stupid people that open every clickmetof*ckupyourcomputer.exe they get in an email. When are people going to take responsibility for stupid stuff they do and their own incompetence. If you don't know how to drive are you going to blame the person that runs into you? If you don't know how to use a shotgun are going to blame the person who sold you the gun when you blow your arm off? I am amazed all the time when we get new hires, that cant barely survive without a sign on their desk reminding them to inhale and exhale otherwise they will die, and throw them in front of a computer and they have no clue. We had to send a tech down to help a person log into their computer. They didn't know how to press CTRL+ALT+DEL. The keyboard had CTL instead of CTRL on the key. Or the other fabulous ones that reboot their computer and call us saying their hard drive crashed when all they did was leave a non-bootable floppy disk in the drive. People need to take responsibility and face up to the fact that they are computer illiterate or just plain dense when it comes to some of this stuff. Because people think they are computer geniuses even though they couldn't tell the difference between \ and / companies like Microsoft have to put in their application things like this patch. My wife is a prime example. She will be the first to admint she doesn't know anything about computers ecept for the applications that she uses all the time. If I am logged into my computer and she needs it, she logs into her own account because I have setup her account so that she cant do any damage to the computer. Don't blame MS. They are just responding to all the crap they got about not being secure. If people wouldn't click on every stupid theng they get via email, MS would ahev NEVER released that patch. There is no one to blame
RE: Tumbleweed or Mimesweeper
Well, neither of those products is cheap, so depending on how one defines cost effective it might be worth looking at other products (www.mail-resources.com has a list). I've found mimesweeper to be a bit more reliable in my testing, but that was quite a while ago. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed or Mimesweeper Hi Thanks for the response. There are about 100 useres, and we mainly want it to: 1: Scan all email and quantine for; i. Virus ii. Specific words incoming and outgoing iii. Stop specific attachments i.e. .vbs files 2: Add a disclaimer 3: Cost effective 4: Archive all emails sent and received Thanks Vas -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: 07 November 2001 22:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed or Mimesweeper How large of an organization and what are the operational parameters they must meet (in order of importance preferably)? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tumbleweed or Mimesweeper Hi all I have been to both websites and have read up on tumbleweed and mimesweeper for SMTP. They both do the job, and they both sound really good... Which one has the edge on the other tho... Any advice? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu
Hell has officially frozen over, please disperse quietly. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 09, 2001 08:00 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu Well. I have absolutely no retort to this! Andy -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu On a Server its one more thing that could go wrong. I stand by my first comment. Rachel (Note to self... Where did I leave lace blouse that shows off cleavage?) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu You must be using it wrong then. Uncheck View as Web Page. Works Fine. Respectfully leering Andy -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu I hope you are kidding. Active Desktop has never been, and is not now stable. I would never recommend you turn that feature on. Ever. respectfully lurking rachel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu Or Maybe install IE with active Desktop and split the Logoff and Shutdown menus... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR and Relaying Problems
Call your ISP and tell them they are non-compliant with the relevant RFCs. Or configure your server to deliver mail using DNS. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 12:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR and Relaying Problems Hello Ever since I installed Exchange 5.5 sp4, my server can longer send NDRs. Whenever a message reaches the server with a bad address, and the server tries to send back an NDR, I get the following error message: The following recipients did not receive the attached mail. Reasons are listed with each recipient: originator originator MSEXCH:IMS:ANZIMA S.A.L.:ANZIMA:YASMINA 3550 (000B09AA) 550 relaying mail to [originator domain] is not allowed. My server is Yasmina, and my organization/site is Anzima. For outbound mail, I set Exchange to forward all messages to my ISP SMTP server, because if I use DNS, a lot of messages fail to be delivered (I have a dial-up connection). Thank you for your help. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Creation in 5.5 via Perl or Other (not vbs)
Check the script archives at swinc for an e2k perl sample. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Creation in 5.5 via Perl or Other (not vbs) Is anyone on this list familiar with the creation of mailboxes via perl (substitute your favorite scripting language here). I'd prefer not to use VBS if I can manage. Basically I have a payroll system I want to pull my list of new accounts from and create them automatically, any help would be appreciated. J _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Seriously been tasked with this
Sounds like a good idea Dave. Shouldn't be that expensive to make a reality. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Cook, David A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 13:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Seriously been tasked with this Happy Friday to all. I should have saved this for a Monday morning as I'm sure it's going to bring many laughs and many people saying that this is absolutely crazy. I've been tasked with this though and I thus have to come up with a solution and pricing for the solution. I doubt it is anything that will seriously be implemented but here is the job at hand. I'm running Exchange 2000 with all incoming mail coming in through a Mail Marshal mail gateway. We had a situation a few months ago in which we had major AD replication issues that cause DCs/GCs to respond very slowly and in some cases not respond as DCs/GCs at all. This caused Exchange to be unusable and for all practical purposes we were in a network down situation for 3 days with Microsoft in house working the issue with us. As we all know if AD is down then Exchange is down also. The task is to make sending, receiving and access to recent emails available in the event of another network down situation. Obviously if the physical network is down this is impossible but if Exchange goes down then they want email to be available in some way. Since E2K relies on AD I figure this secondary access can not include E2K. My thought, and I don't think the money could be justified, is that I have some type of a POP server that no one ever logs into. I would have a mailbox for each user on that POP server and every message coming in from the internet would be forward from the gateway to Exchange like it currently is and a copy also sent to the POP server. The POP server would then need the functionality to automatically delete any emails over a certain age. In the event of Exchange being down we could notify everyone to open Outlook Express which we would have preconfigured through policy to point to the POP server and the users would be functional with respect to email. I'm prepared for some interesting responses to this crazy idea. Dave Cook Exchange Administrator Kutak Rock, LLP 402-231-8352 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## The information contained in this electronic mail transmission (including any accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its authorized recipient(s), and may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, or responsible for delivering some or all of this transmission to an intended recipient, you have received this transmission in error and are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from reading, copying, printing, distributing or disclosing any of the information contained in it. In that event, please contact us immediately by telephone (402)346-6000 or by electronic mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete the original and all copies of this transmission (including any attachments) without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. ## _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Haiku Friday
People are stupid At least the ones around me I am really doomed. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I have no other place to go
So where's my Scooby snacks?!?!?!?!?! That was one of the first things that was mentioned... I want my Scooby snacks!!! ;o) -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go It worked I had to only add another VPN port. It was set to allow only one caller to come in at a time. Thanks for all your help guys. Rich -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go I just added another VPN port and connected two users to the server. I did that with phone lines through the internet though . I cant test the two laptops that are connected to the router because they are at home connected through a cable modem. I will test it out when I get home and crossing my finger I hope it works. I have to have this done tomorrow (deadline). They only gave me three days notice to set this up. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Would'nt you know it, one of my few posts to this list and its not about exchange Anyway I was going to setup a client with MS PPTP/RRAS Vpn behind a linksys (same model), but discovered this Netopia R910 router (about $100 more) supports PPTP VPN connections at the router. Along with some nifty Router to Router tunneling. Just FYI (no connection to the company) http://www.netopia.com/support/technotes/hardware/NQG_022.html For what it's worth I think your 2nd VPN connection was failing because you had only the 1 defined VPN port configured. Allan -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Say I heard on the radio there were going to be solar flares today. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Don't blame it on a fluke... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Reboot it, run out of the server room as soon as you hit restart and go to your desk. Then when someone complains say let me check on it. Then come back and act like it was just a fluke. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go I hate office time I want to restart the server cause I added another vpn Port but I cant test it until everyone leave which around 8 oclock R -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go There is a FW in the router. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go I connected the linksys router to my cable modem at home then I connected the two laptops to the router. I got internet connection with them. Then when I connected one laptop to the VPN it worked. And when I tried the second one it gave me error 781: Im not sure if there is a firewall in the linksys router. Otherwise Im not behind a firewall. 2598 Windows 2000 VPN connection generates error 781 - Encryption failed because no valid certificate was found? When you attempt to establish a VPN connection to a VPN server, you receive: Error 781 Encryption failed because no valid certificate was found. This can occur on a new connection or on one that previously worked. The error is produced because the connection is incomplete. You should: 1. Verify basic network connectivity between the client and the server. 2. Make sure that you have name resolution between the client and the server. 3. Use the Networking and TCP/IP troubleshooter in the Windows 2000 Help. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Oh, and you're running NAT on the Linux Firewall Router right? What kind of firewall is the VPN server sitting behind? Some VPN connections don't work over NAT. That could be your biggest problem right there. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange
RE: I have no other place to go
quickly Rich, i can here Don's toys falling from the pram!. ;) Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 15:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go So where's my Scooby snacks?!?!?!?!?! That was one of the first things that was mentioned... I want my Scooby snacks!!! ;o) -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go It worked I had to only add another VPN port. It was set to allow only one caller to come in at a time. Thanks for all your help guys. Rich -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go I just added another VPN port and connected two users to the server. I did that with phone lines through the internet though . I cant test the two laptops that are connected to the router because they are at home connected through a cable modem. I will test it out when I get home and crossing my finger I hope it works. I have to have this done tomorrow (deadline). They only gave me three days notice to set this up. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Would'nt you know it, one of my few posts to this list and its not about exchange Anyway I was going to setup a client with MS PPTP/RRAS Vpn behind a linksys (same model), but discovered this Netopia R910 router (about $100 more) supports PPTP VPN connections at the router. Along with some nifty Router to Router tunneling. Just FYI (no connection to the company) http://www.netopia.com/support/technotes/hardware/NQG_022.html For what it's worth I think your 2nd VPN connection was failing because you had only the 1 defined VPN port configured. Allan -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Say I heard on the radio there were going to be solar flares today. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Don't blame it on a fluke... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Reboot it, run out of the server room as soon as you hit restart and go to your desk. Then when someone complains say let me check on it. Then come back and act like it was just a fluke. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go I hate office time I want to restart the server cause I added another vpn Port but I cant test it until everyone leave which around 8 oclock R -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go There is a FW in the router. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go I connected the linksys router to my cable modem at home then I connected the two laptops to the router. I got internet connection with them. Then when I connected one laptop to the VPN it worked. And when I tried the second one it gave me error 781: Im not sure if there is a firewall in the linksys router. Otherwise Im not behind a firewall. 2598 Windows 2000 VPN connection generates error 781 - Encryption failed because no valid certificate was found? When you attempt to establish a VPN connection to a VPN server, you receive: Error 781 Encryption failed because no valid certificate was found. This can occur on a new connection or on one that previously worked. The error is produced because the connection is incomplete. You should: 1. Verify basic network connectivity between the client and the server. 2. Make sure that you have name resolution between the client and the server. 3. Use the Networking and TCP/IP troubleshooter in the Windows 2000 Help. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Oh, and you're
RE: I have no other place to go
VBG -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go quickly Rich, i can here Don's toys falling from the pram!. ;) Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 15:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go So where's my Scooby snacks?!?!?!?!?! That was one of the first things that was mentioned... I want my Scooby snacks!!! ;o) -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go It worked I had to only add another VPN port. It was set to allow only one caller to come in at a time. Thanks for all your help guys. Rich -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go I just added another VPN port and connected two users to the server. I did that with phone lines through the internet though . I cant test the two laptops that are connected to the router because they are at home connected through a cable modem. I will test it out when I get home and crossing my finger I hope it works. I have to have this done tomorrow (deadline). They only gave me three days notice to set this up. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Would'nt you know it, one of my few posts to this list and its not about exchange Anyway I was going to setup a client with MS PPTP/RRAS Vpn behind a linksys (same model), but discovered this Netopia R910 router (about $100 more) supports PPTP VPN connections at the router. Along with some nifty Router to Router tunneling. Just FYI (no connection to the company) http://www.netopia.com/support/technotes/hardware/NQG_022.html For what it's worth I think your 2nd VPN connection was failing because you had only the 1 defined VPN port configured. Allan -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Say I heard on the radio there were going to be solar flares today. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Don't blame it on a fluke... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Reboot it, run out of the server room as soon as you hit restart and go to your desk. Then when someone complains say let me check on it. Then come back and act like it was just a fluke. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go I hate office time I want to restart the server cause I added another vpn Port but I cant test it until everyone leave which around 8 oclock R -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go There is a FW in the router. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go I connected the linksys router to my cable modem at home then I connected the two laptops to the router. I got internet connection with them. Then when I connected one laptop to the VPN it worked. And when I tried the second one it gave me error 781: Im not sure if there is a firewall in the linksys router. Otherwise Im not behind a firewall. 2598 Windows 2000 VPN connection generates error 781 - Encryption failed because no valid certificate was found? When you attempt to establish a VPN connection to a VPN server, you receive: Error 781 Encryption failed because no valid certificate was found. This can occur on a new connection or on one that previously worked. The error is produced because the connection is incomplete. You should: 1. Verify basic network connectivity between the client and the server. 2. Make sure that you have name resolution between the client and the server. 3. Use the Networking and TCP/IP troubleshooter in the Windows 2000 Help.
Re: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
I am wearing my stilletto thigh high boots today... they can do some damage, I think. But, they are only 4 1/2 inches. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Martin Tuip| || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 11/09/2001 02:18 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? | --| From one lady on this list you could get the following response: Those are 9 inch high heels buddy ... those could do some serious damage Martin - Original Message - From: Denis Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 9:57 PM Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? How about this.. Nice shoes, wanna install a service pack? Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? That's not flirting, those are bad pick up lines. At least use a good one like, can I buy you a drink so I start looking better? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Flirting? Ok, I'll start it off To all the women out there.What's your sign? Come here often? Didn't I see you the last time I saw you? Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? What the hell is this all about ...? From: Elizabeth Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 17:46:01 -0800 Pah. [1]Your pun was worse than mine. [2]Who's flirting??? I'm serious :) [3] If you can't stand the heat.get outta Hitchin', or so they say What the hell does that mean??? E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? It herts me to say this, but I'm in Hereford. No more talk of Hitchin, please[1]. Phil [1] That's taking flirtation a little too far :-) - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? well it is an 'Exchange' list after all. /me ducks in anticipation of rotten tomatoes.. OOoh as you work for the Herts county council, can you make sure all the services in Hitchin work properly as I have just bought a house there?? Nothing like putting people to work :) Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) Are flirtatious exchanges [1] within the remit of this list? ;-) Phil [1] Does Microsoft sell those? - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
This one will rattle a few cages!! It has been suggested that most men would be pleased with 4 1/2 inches.UCH ! SB -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? I am wearing my stilletto thigh high boots today... they can do some damage, I think. But, they are only 4 1/2 inches. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Martin Tuip| || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 11/09/2001 02:18 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- ---| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? | --- ---| From one lady on this list you could get the following response: Those are 9 inch high heels buddy ... those could do some serious damage Martin - Original Message - From: Denis Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 9:57 PM Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? How about this.. Nice shoes, wanna install a service pack? Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? That's not flirting, those are bad pick up lines. At least use a good one like, can I buy you a drink so I start looking better? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Flirting? Ok, I'll start it off To all the women out there.What's your sign? Come here often? Didn't I see you the last time I saw you? Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? What the hell is this all about ...? From: Elizabeth Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 17:46:01 -0800 Pah. [1]Your pun was worse than mine. [2]Who's flirting??? I'm serious :) [3] If you can't stand the heat.get outta Hitchin', or so they say What the hell does that mean??? E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? It herts me to say this, but I'm in Hereford. No more talk of Hitchin, please[1]. Phil [1] That's taking flirtation a little too far :-) - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? well it is an 'Exchange' list after all. /me ducks in anticipation of rotten tomatoes.. OOoh as you work for the Herts county council, can you make sure all the services in Hitchin work properly as I have just bought a house there?? Nothing like putting people to work :) Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) Are flirtatious exchanges [1] within the remit of this list? ;-) Phil [1] Does Microsoft sell those? - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) life, love and the pursuit of
RE: I have no other place to go
Don here is your Scooby snack www.scoobysnacks.com -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go So where's my Scooby snacks?!?!?!?!?! That was one of the first things that was mentioned... I want my Scooby snacks!!! ;o) -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go It worked I had to only add another VPN port. It was set to allow only one caller to come in at a time. Thanks for all your help guys. Rich -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go I just added another VPN port and connected two users to the server. I did that with phone lines through the internet though . I cant test the two laptops that are connected to the router because they are at home connected through a cable modem. I will test it out when I get home and crossing my finger I hope it works. I have to have this done tomorrow (deadline). They only gave me three days notice to set this up. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Would'nt you know it, one of my few posts to this list and its not about exchange Anyway I was going to setup a client with MS PPTP/RRAS Vpn behind a linksys (same model), but discovered this Netopia R910 router (about $100 more) supports PPTP VPN connections at the router. Along with some nifty Router to Router tunneling. Just FYI (no connection to the company) http://www.netopia.com/support/technotes/hardware/NQG_022.html For what it's worth I think your 2nd VPN connection was failing because you had only the 1 defined VPN port configured. Allan -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Say I heard on the radio there were going to be solar flares today. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Don't blame it on a fluke... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Reboot it, run out of the server room as soon as you hit restart and go to your desk. Then when someone complains say let me check on it. Then come back and act like it was just a fluke. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go I hate office time I want to restart the server cause I added another vpn Port but I cant test it until everyone leave which around 8 oclock R -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go There is a FW in the router. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go I connected the linksys router to my cable modem at home then I connected the two laptops to the router. I got internet connection with them. Then when I connected one laptop to the VPN it worked. And when I tried the second one it gave me error 781: Im not sure if there is a firewall in the linksys router. Otherwise Im not behind a firewall. 2598 Windows 2000 VPN connection generates error 781 - Encryption failed because no valid certificate was found? When you attempt to establish a VPN connection to a VPN server, you receive: Error 781 Encryption failed because no valid certificate was found. This can occur on a new connection or on one that previously worked. The error is produced because the connection is incomplete. You should: 1. Verify basic network connectivity between the client and the server. 2. Make sure that you have name resolution between the client and the server. 3. Use the Networking and TCP/IP troubleshooter in the Windows 2000 Help. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I have no other place to go Oh, and you're running NAT on the Linux Firewall Router right? What kind of firewall is the VPN server sitting
RE: Haiku Friday
LOL -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Richard Tener owes Scooby Snacks To those who helped him We want them now. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 6:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday People are stupid At least the ones around me I am really doomed. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
...it has also been suggested that most women wouldn't evil grin E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? This one will rattle a few cages!! It has been suggested that most men would be pleased with 4 1/2 inches.UCH ! SB -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? I am wearing my stilletto thigh high boots today... they can do some damage, I think. But, they are only 4 1/2 inches. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list? From one lady on this list you could get the following response: Those are 9 inch high heels buddy ... those could do some serious damage Martin - Original Message - From: Denis Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? How about this.. Nice shoes, wanna install a service pack? Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? That's not flirting, those are bad pick up lines. At least use a good one like, can I buy you a drink so I start looking better? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Flirting? Ok, I'll start it off To all the women out there.What's your sign? Come here often? Didn't I see you the last time I saw you? Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? What the hell is this all about ...? From: Elizabeth Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 17:46:01 -0800 Pah. [1]Your pun was worse than mine. [2]Who's flirting??? I'm serious :) [3] If you can't stand the heat.get outta Hitchin', or so they say What the hell does that mean??? E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? It herts me to say this, but I'm in Hereford. No more talk of Hitchin, please[1]. Phil [1] That's taking flirtation a little too far :-) - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? well it is an 'Exchange' list after all. /me ducks in anticipation of rotten tomatoes.. OOoh as you work for the Herts county council, can you make sure all the services in Hitchin work properly as I have just bought a house there?? Nothing like putting people to work :) Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) Are flirtatious exchanges [1] within the remit of this list? ;-) Phil [1] Does Microsoft sell those? - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) life, love and the pursuit of sensible threads on this list *wink*... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) What's so funny young lady? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) Ha ha ha..rofl -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Fonts e. Well the email you have just sent doesn't contain any of those little quirks at the bottom anymore. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Roberto Glavich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Fonts I applied the patch in the http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q273/6/15.ASP article. But it seems not to have worked. /Roberto _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
OWA Redirect
Hay Guys and Gals (Ms. Kelly, Ms.Elizabeth), What was the end result to redirecting http://severname/exchange to http://severname ? or even spoofing the real servername by adding a phony name and redirecting to the correct name. David S. Pomerantz, MCT, MCSE Network Systems Engineer City of Hallandale Beach _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
fine. now, do you suppose you could take this charming conversation elsewhere? i don't think there was ever a consensus that you could commandeer this list to any topic simply by putting OT: in in the subject line. i promise to take it on faith that all of you are quite capable of being thoroughly bawdy and repugnant, though in your fumbling, geeky way. so will you hush? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Elizabeth Farrell Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? ...it has also been suggested that most women wouldn't evil grin E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Redirect
We all talked about it, then went out for fish tacos and beer. Ms Kelly danced on the table. A good time was had by all. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David S. Pomerantz Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Redirect Sensitivity: Confidential Hay Guys and Gals (Ms. Kelly, Ms.Elizabeth), What was the end result to redirecting http://severname/exchange to http://severname ? or even spoofing the real servername by adding a phony name and redirecting to the correct name. David S. Pomerantz, MCT, MCSE Network Systems Engineer City of Hallandale Beach _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
#OOooohhhwho popped their cogs and made you the list owner? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kim Cameron Sent: 09 November 2001 07:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? fine. now, do you suppose you could take this charming conversation elsewhere? i don't think there was ever a consensus that you could commandeer this list to any topic simply by putting OT: in in the subject line. i promise to take it on faith that all of you are quite capable of being thoroughly bawdy and repugnant, though in your fumbling, geeky way. so will you hush? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Elizabeth Farrell Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? ...it has also been suggested that most women wouldn't evil grin E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
Is that a 20GB IMS or are you just happy to see me? Happy POETS Day! Mike -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? #OOooohhhwho popped their cogs and made you the list owner? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kim Cameron Sent: 09 November 2001 07:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? fine. now, do you suppose you could take this charming conversation elsewhere? i don't think there was ever a consensus that you could commandeer this list to any topic simply by putting OT: in in the subject line. i promise to take it on faith that all of you are quite capable of being thoroughly bawdy and repugnant, though in your fumbling, geeky way. so will you hush? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Elizabeth Farrell Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? ...it has also been suggested that most women wouldn't evil grin E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
i know you're new here, but you should really read the archives - there are several years worth of this particular conversation, repeated at two month intervals, practically verbatim. please don't bore everyone by making us repeat it again - go read the archives. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Elizabeth Farrell Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? #OOooohhhwho popped their cogs and made you the list owner? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kim Cameron Sent: 09 November 2001 07:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? fine. now, do you suppose you could take this charming conversation elsewhere? i don't think there was ever a consensus that you could commandeer this list to any topic simply by putting OT: in in the subject line. i promise to take it on faith that all of you are quite capable of being thoroughly bawdy and repugnant, though in your fumbling, geeky way. so will you hush? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Elizabeth Farrell Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? ...it has also been suggested that most women wouldn't evil grin E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
Autumn has arrived Leaves float from the trees above Falling like tech stocks. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday People are stupid At least the ones around me I am really doomed. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flirtatious Haiku Friday
To flirt on this list Is really out of order I am a culprit Phil :-) - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
Off topic banter Like a Late Afternoon breeze Stirs, then fades away -Original Message- From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? i know you're new here, but you should really read the archives - there are several years worth of this particular conversation, repeated at two month intervals, practically verbatim. please don't bore everyone by making us repeat it again - go read the archives. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Elizabeth Farrell Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? #OOooohhhwho popped their cogs and made you the list owner? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kim Cameron Sent: 09 November 2001 07:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? fine. now, do you suppose you could take this charming conversation elsewhere? i don't think there was ever a consensus that you could commandeer this list to any topic simply by putting OT: in in the subject line. i promise to take it on faith that all of you are quite capable of being thoroughly bawdy and repugnant, though in your fumbling, geeky way. so will you hush? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Elizabeth Farrell Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? ...it has also been suggested that most women wouldn't evil grin E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
4 1/2 is enough to kill someone if used to puncture the right organ :) Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? I am wearing my stilletto thigh high boots today... they can do some damage, I think. But, they are only 4 1/2 inches. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Martin Tuip| || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 11/09/2001 02:18 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- ---| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? | --- ---| From one lady on this list you could get the following response: Those are 9 inch high heels buddy ... those could do some serious damage Martin - Original Message - From: Denis Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 9:57 PM Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? How about this.. Nice shoes, wanna install a service pack? Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? That's not flirting, those are bad pick up lines. At least use a good one like, can I buy you a drink so I start looking better? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Flirting? Ok, I'll start it off To all the women out there.What's your sign? Come here often? Didn't I see you the last time I saw you? Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? What the hell is this all about ...? From: Elizabeth Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 17:46:01 -0800 Pah. [1]Your pun was worse than mine. [2]Who's flirting??? I'm serious :) [3] If you can't stand the heat.get outta Hitchin', or so they say What the hell does that mean??? E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? It herts me to say this, but I'm in Hereford. No more talk of Hitchin, please[1]. Phil [1] That's taking flirtation a little too far :-) - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? well it is an 'Exchange' list after all. /me ducks in anticipation of rotten tomatoes.. OOoh as you work for the Herts county council, can you make sure all the services in Hitchin work properly as I have just bought a house there?? Nothing like putting people to work :) Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) Are flirtatious exchanges [1] within the remit of this list? ;-) Phil [1] Does Microsoft sell those? - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts)
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
oh, pul-leeze. you don't know anything about me, and you've only been on the list a couple of weeks. i'm not uptight, quite possibly scads more *fun* than you might imagine. you really don't need to worry about embarrassing me on the exchange list. i'm not exactly quaking in my boots at the prospect that some of the people here think i'm a bitch - it's a reputation i've cultivated in earnest. you can't possibly have read the archives, or you'd know that boring drivel like this thread is what has driven away most of the helpful technical people over the years. ultimately, that decreases the likelihood that interesting exchange discussions will take place. besides, it's friday, and the minimum daily requirement of fish taco haiku has not been met. of course, mention of Kelly's boots should always be worked in if possible. -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? I read the technical archives long ago thanks for the rec. Don't really care to read others whingey opinions about what should be posted on an open list. You might care to notice that I help a lot of people, as you do as well as being the perpetrator of a lot of fun on the list. If you're too uptight to appreciate a bit of fun, I am sure that someone would be only too glad to give you detailed instruction about how to guide all OT mails or mails from me if you prefer into your wastebin. I'm posting to you off-list because a lot of people have written to me privately to warn me what an ass you are and I feel you are only embarrassing yourself continuing this conversation on in an open forum. E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
A reputation I've cultivated in earnest That's a great line. Jim -Original Message- From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? oh, pul-leeze. you don't know anything about me, and you've only been on the list a couple of weeks. i'm not uptight, quite possibly scads more *fun* than you might imagine. you really don't need to worry about embarrassing me on the exchange list. i'm not exactly quaking in my boots at the prospect that some of the people here think i'm a bitch - it's a reputation i've cultivated in earnest. you can't possibly have read the archives, or you'd know that boring drivel like this thread is what has driven away most of the helpful technical people over the years. ultimately, that decreases the likelihood that interesting exchange discussions will take place. besides, it's friday, and the minimum daily requirement of fish taco haiku has not been met. of course, mention of Kelly's boots should always be worked in if possible. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail not flowing in mixed site
I added the first Exchange 2000 server to our Org... The ADC is working properly... I see new mailboxes that are added to 5.5 as well as 2000. The problem I'm having is that when I try to send a message from a mailbox on the Exch 5.5 server to a mailbox on the Exch 2000 server I get the following error. + Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 11/7/01 3:53 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Andrew Fletcher on 11/7/01 3:53 PM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=ORG;l=SERVER-011107205237Z-69415 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:CORPEXCH:ISNT1 + I see the Exch 2000 mailbox in my Exch 5.5 GAL... It's almost like the link between the two Exchange server is not running... Again, this is a Mixed site 2000 and 5.5 and the connection should be seamless. Right? Help! grin Thanks, Kevin Fletcher The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Redirect
We could tell you but we've been asked to keep it confidential. -Original Message- From: David S. Pomerantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Redirect Sensitivity: Confidential Hay Guys and Gals (Ms. Kelly, Ms.Elizabeth), What was the end result to redirecting http://severname/exchange to http://severname ? or even spoofing the real servername by adding a phony name and redirecting to the correct name. David S. Pomerantz, MCT, MCSE Network Systems Engineer City of Hallandale Beach _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
Two stroppy ladies clashing on the list today Oh how amusing - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 16:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? A reputation I've cultivated in earnest That's a great line. Jim -Original Message- From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? oh, pul-leeze. you don't know anything about me, and you've only been on the list a couple of weeks. i'm not uptight, quite possibly scads more *fun* than you might imagine. you really don't need to worry about embarrassing me on the exchange list. i'm not exactly quaking in my boots at the prospect that some of the people here think i'm a bitch - it's a reputation i've cultivated in earnest. you can't possibly have read the archives, or you'd know that boring drivel like this thread is what has driven away most of the helpful technical people over the years. ultimately, that decreases the likelihood that interesting exchange discussions will take place. besides, it's friday, and the minimum daily requirement of fish taco haiku has not been met. of course, mention of Kelly's boots should always be worked in if possible. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mail not flowing in mixed site
Does mail flow the other way? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Forum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail not flowing in mixed site I added the first Exchange 2000 server to our Org... The ADC is working properly... I see new mailboxes that are added to 5.5 as well as 2000. The problem I'm having is that when I try to send a message from a mailbox on the Exch 5.5 server to a mailbox on the Exch 2000 server I get the following error. + Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 11/7/01 3:53 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Andrew Fletcher on 11/7/01 3:53 PM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=ORG;l=SERVER-011107205237Z-69415 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:CORPEXCH:ISNT1 + I see the Exch 2000 mailbox in my Exch 5.5 GAL... It's almost like the link between the two Exchange server is not running... Again, this is a Mixed site 2000 and 5.5 and the connection should be seamless. Right? Help! grin Thanks, Kevin Fletcher The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Losing Attachments?
Hello all, I have this very strange issue with my Exchange server and one of my clients. We have 40 clients all together. All of them can send attachments internally and externally without a problem, except one. All of them run Outlook 2000 on an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. This trouble user can get attachments from anywhere but can't send them out or forward them. When they do send them, the messages comes through but strips the attachment. Any ideas? Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Server
The prevailing thought from previous postings is that this may be a version 1.0 product, needing some upgrades and help before it deserves serious consideration. That information is strictly hearsay, however; I would appreciate hearing from someone who actually ran the product and see if it might meet some needs for low-cost, same-campus video conferencing capabilities. We have a free copy of the software sitting on the shelf and wonder if it's worth the pain of install, config, etc.(I know, besides the ***sheer joy of learning***, which is what we're supposed to be about at a school) Rick Bauer The Hill School -Original Message- From: Vinny Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Conference Server I am embarking on a journey to install the Conference Server with Exchange 2000 and would like to know your thoughts. What are some things to look out for or some major benefits, other then the obvious one of have the flexibility of an in house conference server. Thanks. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
Possibly filled with Jell-O brand gelatin. I now type with one hand. -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? We need a nice ring Filled with mud or similar Let the fun begin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Randal, Phil Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Two stroppy ladies clashing on the list today Oh how amusing - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 16:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? A reputation I've cultivated in earnest That's a great line. Jim -Original Message- From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? oh, pul-leeze. you don't know anything about me, and you've only been on the list a couple of weeks. i'm not uptight, quite possibly scads more *fun* than you might imagine. you really don't need to worry about embarrassing me on the exchange list. i'm not exactly quaking in my boots at the prospect that some of the people here think i'm a bitch - it's a reputation i've cultivated in earnest. you can't possibly have read the archives, or you'd know that boring drivel like this thread is what has driven away most of the helpful technical people over the years. ultimately, that decreases the likelihood that interesting exchange discussions will take place. besides, it's friday, and the minimum daily requirement of fish taco haiku has not been met. of course, mention of Kelly's boots should always be worked in if possible. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
Kelly, I need some new pictures to put on your site. Today sounds like a good day for photos. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? I am wearing my stilletto thigh high boots today... they can do some damage, I think. But, they are only 4 1/2 inches. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Martin Tuip| || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 11/09/2001 02:18 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- ---| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? | --- ---| From one lady on this list you could get the following response: Those are 9 inch high heels buddy ... those could do some serious damage Martin - Original Message - From: Denis Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 9:57 PM Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? How about this.. Nice shoes, wanna install a service pack? Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? That's not flirting, those are bad pick up lines. At least use a good one like, can I buy you a drink so I start looking better? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Flirting? Ok, I'll start it off To all the women out there.What's your sign? Come here often? Didn't I see you the last time I saw you? Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? What the hell is this all about ...? From: Elizabeth Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 17:46:01 -0800 Pah. [1]Your pun was worse than mine. [2]Who's flirting??? I'm serious :) [3] If you can't stand the heat.get outta Hitchin', or so they say What the hell does that mean??? E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? It herts me to say this, but I'm in Hereford. No more talk of Hitchin, please[1]. Phil [1] That's taking flirtation a little too far :-) - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? well it is an 'Exchange' list after all. /me ducks in anticipation of rotten tomatoes.. OOoh as you work for the Herts county council, can you make sure all the services in Hitchin work properly as I have just bought a house there?? Nothing like putting people to work :) Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) Are flirtatious exchanges [1] within the remit of this list? ;-) Phil [1] Does Microsoft sell those? - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Giggle (was:RE: Fonts) life, love and the pursuit of sensible threads on this list
Re: Losing Attachments?
Did you try opening his account from another workstation? Maybe someone applied the SP2 patch for Office 2000 on his machine. - Original Message - From: Denis Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:37 AM Subject: Losing Attachments? Hello all, I have this very strange issue with my Exchange server and one of my clients. We have 40 clients all together. All of them can send attachments internally and externally without a problem, except one. All of them run Outlook 2000 on an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. This trouble user can get attachments from anywhere but can't send them out or forward them. When they do send them, the messages comes through but strips the attachment. Any ideas? Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Losing Attachments?
I haven't tried opening his account on another machine, but I will do that now. No one applied any SPs to his machine yet, it's a default Office2k install. Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Losing Attachments? Did you try opening his account from another workstation? Maybe someone applied the SP2 patch for Office 2000 on his machine. - Original Message - From: Denis Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:37 AM Subject: Losing Attachments? Hello all, I have this very strange issue with my Exchange server and one of my clients. We have 40 clients all together. All of them can send attachments internally and externally without a problem, except one. All of them run Outlook 2000 on an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. This trouble user can get attachments from anywhere but can't send them out or forward them. When they do send them, the messages comes through but strips the attachment. Any ideas? Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Losing Attachments?
Try sending different types of attachment through this persons account. Plain text TNEF, HTML formatting, *.vbs etc. Try http://www.exinternals.com/Ex2K-SP2.htm for more info. on SP2 if it turns out to be certain attachments that are consistently blocked. Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Losing Attachments? I haven't tried opening his account on another machine, but I will do that now. No one applied any SPs to his machine yet, it's a default Office2k install. Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Losing Attachments? Did you try opening his account from another workstation? Maybe someone applied the SP2 patch for Office 2000 on his machine. - Original Message - From: Denis Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Losing Attachments? Hello all, I have this very strange issue with my Exchange server and one of my clients. We have 40 clients all together. All of them can send attachments internally and externally without a problem, except one. All of them run Outlook 2000 on an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. This trouble user can get attachments from anywhere but can't send them out or forward them. When they do send them, the messages comes through but strips the attachment. Any ideas? Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Losing Attachments?
E, Didn't he say he was running Ex 5.5 with Outlook 2000? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 November 2001 00:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Losing Attachments? Try sending different types of attachment through this persons account. Plain text TNEF, HTML formatting, *.vbs etc. Try http://www.exinternals.com/Ex2K-SP2.htm for more info. on SP2 if it turns out to be certain attachments that are consistently blocked. Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Losing Attachments? I haven't tried opening his account on another machine, but I will do that now. No one applied any SPs to his machine yet, it's a default Office2k install. Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Losing Attachments? Did you try opening his account from another workstation? Maybe someone applied the SP2 patch for Office 2000 on his machine. - Original Message - From: Denis Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Losing Attachments? Hello all, I have this very strange issue with my Exchange server and one of my clients. We have 40 clients all together. All of them can send attachments internally and externally without a problem, except one. All of them run Outlook 2000 on an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. This trouble user can get attachments from anywhere but can't send them out or forward them. When they do send them, the messages comes through but strips the attachment. Any ideas? Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR and Relaying Problems
Thank you Chris for your reply, but it seems to me that the error message is originating from my server and not from the ISP's relay server, or is it not? As far as using DNS for outbound mail, unfortunately this configuration is not working properly when using internet mail over a dial-up connection, as a lot of times, messages cannot be delivered because the recipient domain name host cannot be resolved. I have noticed this behavior on all servers where Exchange IMS uses dial-up to deliver outbound mail. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR and Relaying Problems Call your ISP and tell them they are non-compliant with the relevant RFCs. Or configure your server to deliver mail using DNS. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 12:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR and Relaying Problems Hello Ever since I installed Exchange 5.5 sp4, my server can longer send NDRs. Whenever a message reaches the server with a bad address, and the server tries to send back an NDR, I get the following error message: The following recipients did not receive the attached mail. Reasons are listed with each recipient: originator originator MSEXCH:IMS:ANZIMA S.A.L.:ANZIMA:YASMINA 3550 (000B09AA) 550 relaying mail to [originator domain] is not allowed. My server is Yasmina, and my organization/site is Anzima. For outbound mail, I set Exchange to forward all messages to my ISP SMTP server, because if I use DNS, a lot of messages fail to be delivered (I have a dial-up connection). Thank you for your help. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Losing Attachments?
Ahh sorry Denis, one foot out the door to the pub and one mind not on the ball, nearly made it :) Meant O2K Sp2 http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/prodtechn ol/office/support/fixes/off2ksp2.asp The little beastie that stopped everyone in our office from receiving *.vbs files for 1/2 a day according to the sys admin. It has the receiving of *.vbs and one or two other file types turned off by default I think Hope this helps Regards E. Can I go for my pint now Louis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Losing Attachments? E, Didn't he say he was running Ex 5.5 with Outlook 2000? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions Aahhh, sorry -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Losing Attachments? Try sending different types of attachment through this persons account. Plain text TNEF, HTML formatting, *.vbs etc. Try http://www.exinternals.com/Ex2K-SP2.htm for more info. on SP2 if it turns out to be certain attachments that are consistently blocked. Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Losing Attachments? I haven't tried opening his account on another machine, but I will do that now. No one applied any SPs to his machine yet, it's a default Office2k install. Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Losing Attachments? Did you try opening his account from another workstation? Maybe someone applied the SP2 patch for Office 2000 on his machine. - Original Message - From: Denis Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Losing Attachments? Hello all, I have this very strange issue with my Exchange server and one of my clients. We have 40 clients all together. All of them can send attachments internally and externally without a problem, except one. All of them run Outlook 2000 on an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. This trouble user can get attachments from anywhere but can't send them out or forward them. When they do send them, the messages comes through but strips the attachment. Any ideas? Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Losing Attachments?
Yep Have one on me. Oh, i didnt mean it like...errm. Oh no. Here we go again! Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 November 2001 01:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Losing Attachments? Ahh sorry Denis, one foot out the door to the pub and one mind not on the ball, nearly made it :) Meant O2K Sp2 http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/prodtechn ol/office/support/fixes/off2ksp2.asp The little beastie that stopped everyone in our office from receiving *.vbs files for 1/2 a day according to the sys admin. It has the receiving of *.vbs and one or two other file types turned off by default I think Hope this helps Regards E. Can I go for my pint now Louis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Losing Attachments? E, Didn't he say he was running Ex 5.5 with Outlook 2000? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions Aahhh, sorry -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Losing Attachments? Try sending different types of attachment through this persons account. Plain text TNEF, HTML formatting, *.vbs etc. Try http://www.exinternals.com/Ex2K-SP2.htm for more info. on SP2 if it turns out to be certain attachments that are consistently blocked. Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Losing Attachments? I haven't tried opening his account on another machine, but I will do that now. No one applied any SPs to his machine yet, it's a default Office2k install. Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Losing Attachments? Did you try opening his account from another workstation? Maybe someone applied the SP2 patch for Office 2000 on his machine. - Original Message - From: Denis Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Losing Attachments? Hello all, I have this very strange issue with my Exchange server and one of my clients. We have 40 clients all together. All of them can send attachments internally and externally without a problem, except one. All of them run Outlook 2000 on an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. This trouble user can get attachments from anywhere but can't send them out or forward them. When they do send them, the messages comes through but strips the attachment. Any ideas? Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Seriously been tasked with this
Since you already have the MS licenses, could you have a totally separate standby forest configured with just a couple of DC/GCs and one E2K box with very strict mailbox limits? Presumably it's not a breach of licensing to have standby/recovery servers so you are just stretching that point a little. This would work nicely with your Outlook Express idea as well. Mark H x50668 -Original Message- From: Cook, David A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 13:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Seriously been tasked with this Happy Friday to all. I should have saved this for a Monday morning as I'm sure it's going to bring many laughs and many people saying that this is absolutely crazy. I've been tasked with this though and I thus have to come up with a solution and pricing for the solution. I doubt it is anything that will seriously be implemented but here is the job at hand. I'm running Exchange 2000 with all incoming mail coming in through a Mail Marshal mail gateway. We had a situation a few months ago in which we had major AD replication issues that cause DCs/GCs to respond very slowly and in some cases not respond as DCs/GCs at all. This caused Exchange to be unusable and for all practical purposes we were in a network down situation for 3 days with Microsoft in house working the issue with us. As we all know if AD is down then Exchange is down also. The task is to make sending, receiving and access to recent emails available in the event of another network down situation. Obviously if the physical network is down this is impossible but if Exchange goes down then they want email to be available in some way. Since E2K relies on AD I figure this secondary access can not include E2K. My thought, and I don't think the money could be justified, is that I have some type of a POP server that no one ever logs into. I would have a mailbox for each user on that POP server and every message coming in from the internet would be forward from the gateway to Exchange like it currently is and a copy also sent to the POP server. The POP server would then need the functionality to automatically delete any emails over a certain age. In the event of Exchange being down we could notify everyone to open Outlook Express which we would have preconfigured through policy to point to the POP server and the users would be functional with respect to email. I'm prepared for some interesting responses to this crazy idea. Dave Cook Exchange Administrator Kutak Rock, LLP 402-231-8352 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## The information contained in this electronic mail transmission (including any accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its authorized recipient(s), and may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, or responsible for delivering some or all of this transmission to an intended recipient, you have received this transmission in error and are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from reading, copying, printing, distributing or disclosing any of the information contained in it. In that event, please contact us immediately by telephone (402)346-6000 or by electronic mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete the original and all copies of this transmission (including any attachments) without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. ## _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Losing Attachments?
Careful there Louis, you'll have the wrath of the righteous down on you. :) I'm away. Enjoy your wk-end. Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: 09 November 2001 09:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Losing Attachments? Yep Have one on me. Oh, i didnt mean it like...errm. Oh no. Here we go again! Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 November 2001 01:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Losing Attachments? Ahh sorry Denis, one foot out the door to the pub and one mind not on the ball, nearly made it :) Meant O2K Sp2 http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/prodtechn ol/office/support/fixes/off2ksp2.asp The little beastie that stopped everyone in our office from receiving *.vbs files for 1/2 a day according to the sys admin. It has the receiving of *.vbs and one or two other file types turned off by default I think Hope this helps Regards E. Can I go for my pint now Louis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Losing Attachments? E, Didn't he say he was running Ex 5.5 with Outlook 2000? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions Aahhh, sorry -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Losing Attachments? Try sending different types of attachment through this persons account. Plain text TNEF, HTML formatting, *.vbs etc. Try http://www.exinternals.com/Ex2K-SP2.htm for more info. on SP2 if it turns out to be certain attachments that are consistently blocked. Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Losing Attachments? I haven't tried opening his account on another machine, but I will do that now. No one applied any SPs to his machine yet, it's a default Office2k install. Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Losing Attachments? Did you try opening his account from another workstation? Maybe someone applied the SP2 patch for Office 2000 on his machine. - Original Message - From: Denis Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Losing Attachments? Hello all, I have this very strange issue with my Exchange server and one of my clients. We have 40 clients all together. All of them can send attachments internally and externally without a problem, except one. All of them run Outlook 2000 on an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. This trouble user can get attachments from anywhere but can't send them out or forward them. When they do send them, the messages comes through but strips the attachment. Any ideas? Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MS Access
I just finished writing a program in access and Im trying to get the switchboard form that I created to be the first form that the user sees when he opens up the program. Im really not sure how to do this. Can anybody help??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Access
You need to upgrade to Exch2000. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blair LCpl Jeston C Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS Access I just finished writing a program in access and Im trying to get the switchboard form that I created to be the first form that the user sees when he opens up the program. Im really not sure how to do this. Can anybody help??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Access
It's under Tools Startup Display Form Page from the main database page. Real easy to select which form you want. Also, this isn't an MS Access list. -Original Message- From: Blair LCpl Jeston C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:16 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: MS Access Subject: MS Access I just finished writing a program in access and Im trying to get the switchboard form that I created to be the first form that the user sees when he opens up the program. Im really not sure how to do this. Can anybody help??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Access
I do have EX2K -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Access You need to upgrade to Exch2000. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blair LCpl Jeston C Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS Access I just finished writing a program in access and Im trying to get the switchboard form that I created to be the first form that the user sees when he opens up the program. Im really not sure how to do this. Can anybody help??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Access
Thanks, we got it. I know it isnt an MS Access list, but figured somebody might know. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Access It's under Tools Startup Display Form Page from the main database page. Real easy to select which form you want. Also, this isn't an MS Access list. -Original Message- From: Blair LCpl Jeston C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:16 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: MS Access Subject: MS Access I just finished writing a program in access and Im trying to get the switchboard form that I created to be the first form that the user sees when he opens up the program. Im really not sure how to do this. Can anybody help??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
new Exchange book
eff-why-aye: autumn: Jim McBee pens new e2k book called 24seven http://www1.fatbrain.com/asp/bookinfo/bookinfo.asp?theisbn=0782127975vm= http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0782127975/qid=1005091741/sr=8-1/ref= sr_8_3_1/002-2534583-1266469 (link may wrap). _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR and Relaying Problems
Your server is reporting the error, not generating it.. Turn up logging on your IMS to see exactly what is being sent or try sending a message to the ISP's mail server from the Exchange server using a null sender. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR and Relaying Problems Thank you Chris for your reply, but it seems to me that the error message is originating from my server and not from the ISP's relay server, or is it not? As far as using DNS for outbound mail, unfortunately this configuration is not working properly when using internet mail over a dial-up connection, as a lot of times, messages cannot be delivered because the recipient domain name host cannot be resolved. I have noticed this behavior on all servers where Exchange IMS uses dial-up to deliver outbound mail. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR and Relaying Problems Call your ISP and tell them they are non-compliant with the relevant RFCs. Or configure your server to deliver mail using DNS. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 12:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR and Relaying Problems Hello Ever since I installed Exchange 5.5 sp4, my server can longer send NDRs. Whenever a message reaches the server with a bad address, and the server tries to send back an NDR, I get the following error message: The following recipients did not receive the attached mail. Reasons are listed with each recipient: originator originator MSEXCH:IMS:ANZIMA S.A.L.:ANZIMA:YASMINA 3550 (000B09AA) 550 relaying mail to [originator domain] is not allowed. My server is Yasmina, and my organization/site is Anzima. For outbound mail, I set Exchange to forward all messages to my ISP SMTP server, because if I use DNS, a lot of messages fail to be delivered (I have a dial-up connection). Thank you for your help. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organizational Forms Permissions
Does anyone know how to give a standard user permissions to publish to the Organizational Forms? Thanks Saul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello All meet...the new guy
To all, Hey I just joined this list in the hopes that one of you guys will help in the coming months with some updates and upgrades. With that being said? How the hell is everybody? I received my first messages earlier this morning...and its not totally what I expected. Desmond Witherspoon Network and PC Support Technician Metropolitan New York Library Council 57 East 11th Street New York, NY 10003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe
Are you related to Stephen (Wynkoop)? -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Actually, I was smart enough to test the patch first and didn't roll that one out. I was just voicing my opinion on Microsoft's business practices. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe How come you didn't discover this when you read the readme, or when you were testing it? Or is it always easier to just blame someone else for your mistakes? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wynkoop, John Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe I should have the option to block attachments or not! Explanation: Some of us (those who work for universities with stupid staff members and arrogant professors) don't have the option of blocking attachments (Gosh forbid we infringe on anyone's academic freedom). That is unless we wish to endure a never ending reign of sh*t from above. Instead we have to work around the vunerabilities found in things such as VBS, EXE, and COM files (which we have successfully done I might add). We managed to succesfully ward off NIMDA, Code Red, and a rash of other recent viruses without changing what users can and can't do (see, it can be done). Now outlook just gives my users one more reason to jump down my throat when something doesn't work. Thanks MicroShaft. John -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Even allowing your mail system to pass .EXE and .COM files is a mistake. You should thank MS for making OL block those types of files since you don't. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe For such a typically minor patch? Where did you get that idea? The Patch didnt break Outlook, your lack of preparation did. Over and Out. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe You know, it astounds me that so many IT people are blind to Microsoft's incompetence! BTW Mike, your 'car head light' analogy is not even relevant. A more apt analogy would refer to the Ford Pinto's with the exploding gas tanks. Sure the user could be mindful of driving only on roads with no other vehicles, thereby preventing a back-end collision. The 'solution' in service patch 2 could be likened to Microsoft removing the gas tank altogether. First, I read about 70% of the material related to this service patch. There are about 20 pages of material relating to this patch and since I run a dept. with over 50 systems and 6 servers ON MY OWN (no help, not even support contracts), I really don't have the time (nor is it humanly possible) to read every patch/update/security document produced by Microsoft alone (to say nothing about the 50+ other products I look after). No, I'm not whining!! Simply put, this patch broke Outlook!! An email program that cannot accept .com and .exe's is damaged! Yes, yes, I know there are other methods of receiving files (such as zip'ed) but the point is that no other email program such as Eudora, Groupwise, Netscape block these attachments. All Microsoft had to do was to either disable the dangerous capabilities of .asp,.vbs, (et al) code OR entirely block access to this code. IT WAS AS SIMPLE AS THAT!! Geezz, what's with some of you in this (supposed to be?) friendly discussions group? I sent a message asking about this (yes, I admit it was confrontational) and I read return responses basically calling me an idiot based on inane assumptions! Of course, I had to risk installing this patch because the risk of an Outlook-based virus outbreak out weighted the potential annoyance of breaking Outlook. BTW, I have never experienced a virus outbreak in the 6 years I've been with this company because of my pro-active stance on these issues. Message to Lori: Project Plan and Test Plan Results??? For such a typically minor patch? How many IT people do you have in your organization? The last time I had the time to do anything like that was in 98/99 for Y2K. I'm beginning to feel very small; am I the only IT person in this discussion group with
Frontend / Backend servers
Hi there I'm currently trying to setup a server to act as frontend for OWA users, but I'm a bit lost about what to do. The backend is running EXCH2K std edition, the frontend is enterprise. I guess I'll need to setup some kind of connector between those 2, but unsure about what kind. Hope someone will be able to give a hint or post an url with some more info Best regards Sune Gellert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe
We have a vendor who's president executed that one at least three times himself. All in all I trapped it over 3000 times just from this one company. They used to be in here, probably still lurk, but after I posted that long tale of stupidity they got rather quiet. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Users will open anything regardless of what you say. I remember ILOVEYOU, and a user. I had sent out emails all day long warning about this virus that had penetrated to a few machines before we had the DAT file for it. Anyhow, after an email an hour all day, I was talking to this guy about it at his desk. As I am talking, he is looking at mail and opens it right then! He had a laptop, and I ripped the PCCard NIC out, but too late. He just stood there and stared at me, as I turned and ran for my servers. Too late. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Carlson Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Yes you should and you do. Edit the registry. No reason to blame MS for stupid people that open every clickmetof*ckupyourcomputer.exe they get in an email. When are people going to take responsibility for stupid stuff they do and their own incompetence. If you don't know how to drive are you going to blame the person that runs into you? If you don't know how to use a shotgun are going to blame the person who sold you the gun when you blow your arm off? I am amazed all the time when we get new hires, that cant barely survive without a sign on their desk reminding them to inhale and exhale otherwise they will die, and throw them in front of a computer and they have no clue. We had to send a tech down to help a person log into their computer. They didn't know how to press CTRL+ALT+DEL. The keyboard had CTL instead of CTRL on the key. Or the other fabulous ones that reboot their computer and call us saying their hard drive crashed when all they did was leave a non-bootable floppy disk in the drive. People need to take responsibility and face up to the fact that they are computer illiterate or just plain dense when it comes to some of this stuff. Because people think they are computer geniuses even though they couldn't tell the difference between \ and / companies like Microsoft have to put in their application things like this patch. My wife is a prime example. She will be the first to admint she doesn't know anything about computers ecept for the applications that she uses all the time. If I am logged into my computer and she needs it, she logs into her own account because I have setup her account so that she cant do any damage to the computer. Don't blame MS. They are just responding to all the crap they got about not being secure. If people wouldn't click on every stupid theng they get via email, MS would ahev NEVER released that patch. There is no one to blame but morons. Mike -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe I should have the option to block attachments or not! Explanation: Some of us (those who work for universities with stupid staff members and arrogant professors) don't have the option of blocking attachments (Gosh forbid we infringe on anyone's academic freedom). That is unless we wish to endure a never ending reign of sh*t from above. Instead we have to work around the vunerabilities found in things such as VBS, EXE, and COM files (which we have successfully done I might add). We managed to succesfully ward off NIMDA, Code Red, and a rash of other recent viruses without changing what users can and can't do (see, it can be done). Now outlook just gives my users one more reason to jump down my throat when something doesn't work. Thanks MicroShaft. John -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Even allowing your mail system to pass .EXE and .COM files is a mistake. You should thank MS for making OL block those types of files since you don't. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe For such a typically minor patch? Where did you get that idea? The Patch didnt break Outlook, your lack of preparation did. Over and Out. -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Haiku Friday
We changed reply-to Now my posts don't show up here This makes me worry :( -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday People are stupid At least the ones around me I am really doomed. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
mud fight,... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 16:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Cat Fight! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kim Cameron Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? oh, pul-leeze. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as their content could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, arrive late or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the context of this message which arise as a result of its internet transmission. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Any opinions contained in this message are those of the author and are not given or endorsed by any entity or office through which this message has been sent unless otherwise clearly indicated in this message and the authority of the author to so bind Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited or any other company within its group is duly verified. Any email may be monitored in accordance with Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited's communication policy. Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited Registered Office 24 Monument Street London EC3R 8AJ. Registered in England Number 3973777 Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited regulated by the SFA ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu
Er, does anyone see four horsemen lurking about? Especially in the Manhattan area? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu Well. I have absolutely no retort to this! Andy -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu On a Server its one more thing that could go wrong. I stand by my first comment. Rachel (Note to self... Where did I leave lace blouse that shows off cleavage?) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu You must be using it wrong then. Uncheck View as Web Page. Works Fine. Respectfully leering Andy -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu I hope you are kidding. Active Desktop has never been, and is not now stable. I would never recommend you turn that feature on. Ever. respectfully lurking rachel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu Or Maybe install IE with active Desktop and split the Logoff and Shutdown menus... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA 5.5
Dear All, I wanted to have OWA5.5 for Exchange 2000 BE server. Can anyone advice me how can I acheive this? George Vijay _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hello All meet...the new guy
Welcome to the biggest cat-fight-flirting-haiku-throwing-exchange-bash on the planet. Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Desmond Witherspoon Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hello All meet...the new guy To all, Hey I just joined this list in the hopes that one of you guys will help in the coming months with some updates and upgrades. With that being said? How the hell is everybody? I received my first messages earlier this morning...and its not totally what I expected. Desmond Witherspoon Network and PC Support Technician Metropolitan New York Library Council 57 East 11th Street New York, NY 10003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
One more great Friday Got db corruption here Sucks to be me, eh? -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday We changed reply-to Now my posts don't show up here This makes me worry :( -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday People are stupid At least the ones around me I am really doomed. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hello All meet...the new guy
Hi. Welcome. Hey, take the time and go through the FAQs. They'll help you a bundle. S. -Original Message- From: Desmond Witherspoon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hello All meet...the new guy To all, Hey I just joined this list in the hopes that one of you guys will help in the coming months with some updates and upgrades. With that being said? How the hell is everybody? I received my first messages earlier this morning...and its not totally what I expected. Desmond Witherspoon Network and PC Support Technician Metropolitan New York Library Council 57 East 11th Street New York, NY 10003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Organizational Forms Permissions
Organizational forms are just like public folders and they are under system folders, eforms registry in Exchange Admin. I hope by standard user you don't mean everybody in the company. s. -Original Message- From: Saul Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Organizational Forms Permissions Does anyone know how to give a standard user permissions to publish to the Organizational Forms? Thanks Saul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe
Hey, I resemble THAT remark! I'm a full-fledged, card carrying hippie witch here, Eric. I would have voted for that policy and as an added bonus put pictures of the offenders (wearing cap and shirt) on a bulletin board by the coffee machine. Probably posted on the intranet as well. Damn conservatives. -Original Message- From: Eric Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 6:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe At my last job we proposed a security policy whereby any user who executed a virus and infected the system would have to wear a dunce cap and a T-Shirt that says I'm the idiot who opened the virus for a week. It was almost made policy. Damn hippies shot it down... - Original Message - From: Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:00 PM Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Exactly why MS has to create patches like this particular one. Morons. What would be cool is if you could put a lock on their mail box so that when they open up Outlook there is an administrative message staring them in the face. Before they could open any email they would have to click OK and then retype what the administrative message was in a box exactly as it was. If they don't get it right, they are prompted again. If a new virus goes around the admin could put a lock on all mailboxes until they perform those steps. Kind like yelling at your kids. You tell them something and then you make them repeat it back to you so that you realize they heard what you said. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Users will open anything regardless of what you say. I remember ILOVEYOU, and a user. I had sent out emails all day long warning about this virus that had penetrated to a few machines before we had the DAT file for it. Anyhow, after an email an hour all day, I was talking to this guy about it at his desk. As I am talking, he is looking at mail and opens it right then! He had a laptop, and I ripped the PCCard NIC out, but too late. He just stood there and stared at me, as I turned and ran for my servers. Too late. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Carlson Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Yes you should and you do. Edit the registry. No reason to blame MS for stupid people that open every clickmetof*ckupyourcomputer.exe they get in an email. When are people going to take responsibility for stupid stuff they do and their own incompetence. If you don't know how to drive are you going to blame the person that runs into you? If you don't know how to use a shotgun are going to blame the person who sold you the gun when you blow your arm off? I am amazed all the time when we get new hires, that cant barely survive without a sign on their desk reminding them to inhale and exhale otherwise they will die, and throw them in front of a computer and they have no clue. We had to send a tech down to help a person log into their computer. They didn't know how to press CTRL+ALT+DEL. The keyboard had CTL instead of CTRL on the key. Or the other fabulous ones that reboot their computer and call us saying their hard drive crashed when all they did was leave a non-bootable floppy disk in the drive. People need to take responsibility and face up to the fact that they are computer illiterate or just plain dense when it comes to some of this stuff. Because people think they are computer geniuses even though they couldn't tell the difference between \ and / companies like Microsoft have to put in their application things like this patch. My wife is a prime example. She will be the first to admint she doesn't know anything about computers ecept for the applications that she uses all the time. If I am logged into my computer and she needs it, she logs into her own account because I have setup her account so that she cant do any damage to the computer. Don't blame MS. They are just responding to all the crap they got about not being secure. If people wouldn't click on every stupid theng they get via email, MS would ahev NEVER released that patch. There is no one to blame but morons. Mike -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe I should have the option to block attachments or not! Explanation: Some of us (those who work for universities with stupid staff members and arrogant professors) don't have the
RE: OWA 5.5
I guess you can just specify the name of the E2K server when you're installing OWA 5.5. The question is: why on earth do you want to do this? S. -Original Message- From: George Vijay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA 5.5 Dear All, I wanted to have OWA5.5 for Exchange 2000 BE server. Can anyone advice me how can I acheive this? George Vijay _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 5.5
Er...iirc, that can NOT be done. Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: George Vijay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:41 PM Posted To: NewsgroupDiscussion Conversation: OWA 5.5 Subject: OWA 5.5 Dear All, I wanted to have OWA5.5 for Exchange 2000 BE server. Can anyone advice me how can I acheive this? George Vijay _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe
I'm a closet hippie, too - but when it comes to E-mail I'm a militant fascist. I was referring to E-mail hippies. I hate em. Real hippies are groovy man. - Original Message - From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:05 AM Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Hey, I resemble THAT remark! I'm a full-fledged, card carrying hippie witch here, Eric. I would have voted for that policy and as an added bonus put pictures of the offenders (wearing cap and shirt) on a bulletin board by the coffee machine. Probably posted on the intranet as well. Damn conservatives. -Original Message- From: Eric Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 6:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe At my last job we proposed a security policy whereby any user who executed a virus and infected the system would have to wear a dunce cap and a T-Shirt that says I'm the idiot who opened the virus for a week. It was almost made policy. Damn hippies shot it down... - Original Message - From: Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:00 PM Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Exactly why MS has to create patches like this particular one. Morons. What would be cool is if you could put a lock on their mail box so that when they open up Outlook there is an administrative message staring them in the face. Before they could open any email they would have to click OK and then retype what the administrative message was in a box exactly as it was. If they don't get it right, they are prompted again. If a new virus goes around the admin could put a lock on all mailboxes until they perform those steps. Kind like yelling at your kids. You tell them something and then you make them repeat it back to you so that you realize they heard what you said. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Users will open anything regardless of what you say. I remember ILOVEYOU, and a user. I had sent out emails all day long warning about this virus that had penetrated to a few machines before we had the DAT file for it. Anyhow, after an email an hour all day, I was talking to this guy about it at his desk. As I am talking, he is looking at mail and opens it right then! He had a laptop, and I ripped the PCCard NIC out, but too late. He just stood there and stared at me, as I turned and ran for my servers. Too late. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Carlson Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe Yes you should and you do. Edit the registry. No reason to blame MS for stupid people that open every clickmetof*ckupyourcomputer.exe they get in an email. When are people going to take responsibility for stupid stuff they do and their own incompetence. If you don't know how to drive are you going to blame the person that runs into you? If you don't know how to use a shotgun are going to blame the person who sold you the gun when you blow your arm off? I am amazed all the time when we get new hires, that cant barely survive without a sign on their desk reminding them to inhale and exhale otherwise they will die, and throw them in front of a computer and they have no clue. We had to send a tech down to help a person log into their computer. They didn't know how to press CTRL+ALT+DEL. The keyboard had CTL instead of CTRL on the key. Or the other fabulous ones that reboot their computer and call us saying their hard drive crashed when all they did was leave a non-bootable floppy disk in the drive. People need to take responsibility and face up to the fact that they are computer illiterate or just plain dense when it comes to some of this stuff. Because people think they are computer geniuses even though they couldn't tell the difference between \ and / companies like Microsoft have to put in their application things like this patch. My wife is a prime example. She will be the first to admint she doesn't know anything about computers ecept for the applications that she uses all the time. If I am logged into my computer and she needs it, she logs into her own account because I have setup her account so that she cant do any damage to the computer. Don't blame MS. They are just responding to all the crap they got about not being secure. If people wouldn't click on every stupid theng they get via email, MS would ahev NEVER
RE: Hello All meet...the new guy
And wear a cup, preferably fireproof. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hello All meet...the new guy Hi. Welcome. Hey, take the time and go through the FAQs. They'll help you a bundle. S. -Original Message- From: Desmond Witherspoon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hello All meet...the new guy To all, Hey I just joined this list in the hopes that one of you guys will help in the coming months with some updates and upgrades. With that being said? How the hell is everybody? I received my first messages earlier this morning...and its not totally what I expected. Desmond Witherspoon Network and PC Support Technician Metropolitan New York Library Council 57 East 11th Street New York, NY 10003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hello All meet...the new guy
FAQs? HEHE
{Look at bottom of email}
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hello All meet...the new guy
Hi. Welcome. Hey, take the time and go through the FAQs. They'll help you
a bundle.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Desmond Witherspoon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hello All meet...the new guy
To all,
Hey I just joined this list in the hopes that one of you guys
will help in the coming months with some updates and upgrades.
With that being said? How the hell is everybody? I received my
first messages earlier this morning...and its not totally what
I expected.
Desmond Witherspoon
Network and PC Support Technician
Metropolitan New York Library Council
57 East 11th Street
New York, NY 10003
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hello All meet...the new guy
What did you expect, the Spanish Inquisition? Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition. -Original Message- From: Desmond Witherspoon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hello All meet...the new guy To all, Hey I just joined this list in the hopes that one of you guys will help in the coming months with some updates and upgrades. With that being said? How the hell is everybody? I received my first messages earlier this morning...and its not totally what I expected. Desmond Witherspoon Network and PC Support Technician Metropolitan New York Library Council 57 East 11th Street New York, NY 10003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu
Naw, even the horsemen have fled the city! -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu Er, does anyone see four horsemen lurking about? Especially in the Manhattan area? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu Well. I have absolutely no retort to this! Andy -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu On a Server its one more thing that could go wrong. I stand by my first comment. Rachel (Note to self... Where did I leave lace blouse that shows off cleavage?) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu You must be using it wrong then. Uncheck View as Web Page. Works Fine. Respectfully leering Andy -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu I hope you are kidding. Active Desktop has never been, and is not now stable. I would never recommend you turn that feature on. Ever. respectfully lurking rachel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu Or Maybe install IE with active Desktop and split the Logoff and Shutdown menus... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hello All meet...the new guy
The parrot's not deadhes...hessleeping!! Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hello All meet...the new guy What did you expect, the Spanish Inquisition? Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition. -Original Message- From: Desmond Witherspoon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hello All meet...the new guy To all, Hey I just joined this list in the hopes that one of you guys will help in the coming months with some updates and upgrades. With that being said? How the hell is everybody? I received my first messages earlier this morning...and its not totally what I expected. Desmond Witherspoon Network and PC Support Technician Metropolitan New York Library Council 57 East 11th Street New York, NY 10003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hello All meet...the new guy
Welcome to the biggest cat-fight-flirting-haiku-throwing-exchange-bash on the planet -Denis Baldwin Well, yeah that's what I meant -Original Message- From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hello All meet...the new guy Welcome to the biggest cat-fight-flirting-haiku-throwing-exchange-bash on the planet. Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Desmond Witherspoon Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hello All meet...the new guy To all, Hey I just joined this list in the hopes that one of you guys will help in the coming months with some updates and upgrades. With that being said? How the hell is everybody? I received my first messages earlier this morning...and its not totally what I expected. Desmond Witherspoon Network and PC Support Technician Metropolitan New York Library Council 57 East 11th Street New York, NY 10003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upgrading to W2K
I want to upgrade an NT4 SP6a server with E5.5 Sp4 to W2K Server. I want to do a direct upgrade and not have to touch Exchange. Has anyone done this and if so are there any pitfalls to be aware of? I plan to review TechNet prior to doing it but I thought someone who as had the experience could comment. Thanks. Bill Lambert, MCP,MCSE Network Consultant Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hello All meet...the new guy
~ndi Don't worry Desmond, Fridays are always like this. They all get serious from Monday onwards... Or so the King of the Potato People told me anyway PBB -Original Message- From: Desmond Witherspoon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 19:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hello All meet...the new guy Welcome to the biggest cat-fight-flirting-haiku-throwing-exchange-bash on the planet -Denis Baldwin Well, yeah that's what I meant -Original Message- From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hello All meet...the new guy Welcome to the biggest cat-fight-flirting-haiku-throwing-exchange-bash on the planet. Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Desmond Witherspoon Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hello All meet...the new guy To all, Hey I just joined this list in the hopes that one of you guys will help in the coming months with some updates and upgrades. With that being said? How the hell is everybody? I received my first messages earlier this morning...and its not totally what I expected. Desmond Witherspoon Network and PC Support Technician Metropolitan New York Library Council 57 East 11th Street New York, NY 10003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
HP and Compaq Executive Dilemma Carly's gotta go -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday One more great Friday Got db corruption here Sucks to be me, eh? -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday We changed reply-to Now my posts don't show up here This makes me worry :( -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday People are stupid At least the ones around me I am really doomed. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrading to W2K
Upgrades suck. Period. I wouldn't waste my time unless you have some specific business need. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrading to W2K I want to upgrade an NT4 SP6a server with E5.5 Sp4 to W2K Server. I want to do a direct upgrade and not have to touch Exchange. Has anyone done this and if so are there any pitfalls to be aware of? I plan to review TechNet prior to doing it but I thought someone who as had the experience could comment. Thanks. Bill Lambert, MCP,MCSE Network Consultant Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hello All meet...the new guy
Yeah, that's what I mean too :) Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Desmond Witherspoon Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hello All meet...the new guy Welcome to the biggest cat-fight-flirting-haiku-throwing-exchange-bash on the planet -Denis Baldwin Well, yeah that's what I meant -Original Message- From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hello All meet...the new guy Welcome to the biggest cat-fight-flirting-haiku-throwing-exchange-bash on the planet. Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Desmond Witherspoon Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hello All meet...the new guy To all, Hey I just joined this list in the hopes that one of you guys will help in the coming months with some updates and upgrades. With that being said? How the hell is everybody? I received my first messages earlier this morning...and its not totally what I expected. Desmond Witherspoon Network and PC Support Technician Metropolitan New York Library Council 57 East 11th Street New York, NY 10003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
