RE: Suppressing the envelope
Why is it showing the envelope icon multiple times? That should only show up to the respective Terminal Services user. -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: 06 November 2002 11:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suppressing the envelope I've looked for this off and on an never had any luck finding it. Now we have an application server that is being shared, and folks are complaining that the envelop icon is appearing multiple times when they use Outlook via this server. Here's the question: Is there some way to suppress the envelope icon that shows up in the task bar when new mail comes in? Many thanks! Darcy Adams Sr. Exchange Administrator Getty Images 601 N. 34th Street Seattle, WA 98103 Tel 206-925-6617 Cell 206-255-0169 http://www.gettyimages.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
It clearly isn't a virus, but it might not be stretching things too much to call it a worm. It's really the delivery method that's different, along with the attempt to make it vaguely legal. But there's a big difference between legal and ethical. Personally I'd just block the users looking the the affected URLs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No more free/busy data?
Check their settings under Tools - Options - Calendar Options - Free/Busy Options. -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No more free/busy data? I noticed something odd today and I'm wondering why this is the case. When a user goes into their calendar and tries to set an appointment for anytime after Jan 1, 2003, the calendar displays No Information. Starting exactly on Jan 1, 2003. Mind you there are exceptions... SOME users have regular grey squares ad infinitum. What's going on here? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Information
They are in the same site but their mailboxes reside on different databases in the same cluster (Ex.user1 belongs to VS1 and user2 to VS2 both on respective nodes in first cluster). Chris -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free/Busy Information Are all users hitting servers in the same site? There are some limitations using Active/Active clustering as to which services work. - Original Message - From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:24 PM Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information When the users resolve the attendee they just see no information followed by // next to the attendee's name, even though the time is marked as busy. These calendars can be seen from some users just fine, but others see no info. I have made sure all fixes/service packs were applied on the client side and checked the number of months to publish/update but still nothing. Chris To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
How long do you reckon before one of these companies due an AV company from block their 'legal' (choke) SPAM, as the spy ware companies did! Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:jacob.busby;hants.gov.uk] Sent: 13 November 2002 12:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up It clearly isn't a virus, but it might not be stretching things too much to call it a worm. It's really the delivery method that's different, along with the attempt to make it vaguely legal. But there's a big difference between legal and ethical. Personally I'd just block the users looking the the affected URLs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
due (dodgy finder here) I meant SUE -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:Paul.Hurst;eu.sony.com] Sent: 13 November 2002 13:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up How long do you reckon before one of these companies due an AV company from block their 'legal' (choke) SPAM, as the spy ware companies did! Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:jacob.busby;hants.gov.uk] Sent: 13 November 2002 12:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up It clearly isn't a virus, but it might not be stretching things too much to call it a worm. It's really the delivery method that's different, along with the attempt to make it vaguely legal. But there's a big difference between legal and ethical. Personally I'd just block the users looking the the affected URLs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A question of NDR
By design I believe. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A question of NDR Scenario: mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2. mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with mailbox2 in From field. Any subsequent NDR's appear in Inbox of mailbox1 and not mailbox2. qué arriba con eso? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent Item
Amen! You'd be surprised how many times that important document isn't worth the $50.00 charge to their cost center. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 3. Ask the user for his cost center number to which to charge the costs of the restore. That'll usually scare 'em off! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of James Winzenz Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 1. restore from backup 2. have the user request that the person he/she sent the email to send it back to him/her. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent Item
And that works for all kinds of restores! -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:JSchwartz;BBandT.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Amen! You'd be surprised how many times that important document isn't worth the $50.00 charge to their cost center. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 3. Ask the user for his cost center number to which to charge the costs of the restore. That'll usually scare 'em off! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of James Winzenz Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 1. restore from backup 2. have the user request that the person he/she sent the email to send it back to him/her. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Sent Item
Woohooo! But why only $50? Seems like it should be $50/hr or something like that . . . With a minimum charge, of course! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:JSchwartz;BBandT.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Amen! You'd be surprised how many times that important document isn't worth the $50.00 charge to their cost center. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 3. Ask the user for his cost center number to which to charge the costs of the restore. That'll usually scare 'em off! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of James Winzenz Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 1. restore from backup 2. have the user request that the person he/she sent the email to send it back to him/her. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: No more free/busy data?
If you are asking if there is a way to globally set the Free/Busy publish date. I am not aware of any. the only place I know to change this is on the client. -- From: Yanek Korff Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 07:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Well that was the first place I looked. Mine is set to 2 months, surely. However, I am one of the few individuals who has free/busy data available until the end of time (sometime in 4051 apparently). Why am I an exception (and no, I'm not making the appointment to check this)? There are other exceptions too but their free/busy is set to two months also. Why the discrepancy? Is it always the 1st of the month? I would have guessed that if today were the 13th (and so it is!) that free/busy data would be available until Jan 13, 2003. Is there any way to effect a corporate policy on this enforce it? -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 07:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Check their settings under Tools - Options - Calendar Options - Free/Busy Options. -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No more free/busy data? I noticed something odd today and I'm wondering why this is the case. When a user goes into their calendar and tries to set an appointment for anytime after Jan 1, 2003, the calendar displays No Information. Starting exactly on Jan 1, 2003. Mind you there are exceptions... SOME users have regular grey squares ad infinitum. What's going on here? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Information
Are these people within the same site? How many servers do you have if they are in the same site? __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Martinez [mailto:ChrisMart;sanantonio.gov] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information When the users resolve the attendee they just see no information followed by // next to the attendee's name, even though the time is marked as busy. These calendars can be seen from some users just fine, but others see no info. I have made sure all fixes/service packs were applied on the client side and checked the number of months to publish/update but still nothing. Chris -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:John.Bowles;celera.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information You are not getting any information at all? Or just partial info? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Martinez [mailto:ChrisMart;sanantonio.gov] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Information Hello all- Current config is W2k/E2k Sp3 in Active/Active FE/BE configuration. I am currently experiencing issues where several users are unable to see other users free/busy data when scheduling appointments. These users are on different DB's on the same cluster, I have looked at several Q's and have come up empty. Any suggestions would be appreciated, thanks. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No more free/busy data?
Any value in excess of 12 is ignored. Only 12 months of F/B info is available (10 months past and one month prior to the current day, plus the current month). ref: Q262812 Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Well that was the first place I looked. Mine is set to 2 months, surely. However, I am one of the few individuals who has free/busy data available until the end of time (sometime in 4051 apparently). Why am I an exception (and no, I'm not making the appointment to check this)? There are other exceptions too but their free/busy is set to two months also. Why the discrepancy? Is it always the 1st of the month? I would have guessed that if today were the 13th (and so it is!) that free/busy data would be available until Jan 13, 2003. Is there any way to effect a corporate policy on this enforce it? -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 07:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Check their settings under Tools - Options - Calendar Options - Free/Busy Options. -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No more free/busy data? I noticed something odd today and I'm wondering why this is the case. When a user goes into their calendar and tries to set an appointment for anytime after Jan 1, 2003, the calendar displays No Information. Starting exactly on Jan 1, 2003. Mind you there are exceptions... SOME users have regular grey squares ad infinitum. What's going on here? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A question of NDR
If you know all the answers, why are you asking us? -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR oh come on, andy.. test the accuracy of your reply send a message from a mailbox that appears to be from another. monitor the inbox of the other mailbox. you'll find an NDR to a bogus address appears in the mailbox named in the From field Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR By design I believe. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A question of NDR Scenario: mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2. mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with mailbox2 in From field. Any subsequent NDR's appear in Inbox of mailbox1 and not mailbox2. qué arriba con eso? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No more free/busy data?
Korff, By design the free and busy only show complete months at a time it does not roll forward on each day (IE if you have three months it will only show to the end of the month). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: 13 November 2002 13:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Well that was the first place I looked. Mine is set to 2 months, surely. However, I am one of the few individuals who has free/busy data available until the end of time (sometime in 4051 apparently). Why am I an exception (and no, I'm not making the appointment to check this)? There are other exceptions too but their free/busy is set to two months also. Why the discrepancy? Is it always the 1st of the month? I would have guessed that if today were the 13th (and so it is!) that free/busy data would be available until Jan 13, 2003. Is there any way to effect a corporate policy on this enforce it? -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 07:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Check their settings under Tools - Options - Calendar Options - Free/Busy Options. -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No more free/busy data? I noticed something odd today and I'm wondering why this is the case. When a user goes into their calendar and tries to set an appointment for anytime after Jan 1, 2003, the calendar displays No Information. Starting exactly on Jan 1, 2003. Mind you there are exceptions... SOME users have regular grey squares ad infinitum. What's going on here? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sent Item
Are you guys the in-house mail admins? I would think that its part of the job description, to backup the data and be able to retrieve something. Or at least, that is what my users would say if I tried to charge them 50 Euro to retrive some data. I can understand if you are hosting company and the customers are paying for mailboxes and support, but if not, I'm really curious how you get away with that. Allison W. On Wednesday 13 November 2002 15:18, you wrote: The customer shouldn't be punished for something that should take 2 hours, but instead takes 4. A flat fee works best with a SLA that states 24 hours to restore it. Longer if you have to get tapes from offsite. $50.00 or $100.00 it doesn't matter really what you charge. No one wants to go to their boss and get the sign off on the charge to restore a picture of their sisters baby or that funny joke a friend sent. If it's important, really important, you could charge $1000.00 and they'd still pay. It just gets rid of the riff-raff. -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winzenz;inovis.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Woohooo! But why only $50? Seems like it should be $50/hr or something like that . . . With a minimum charge, of course! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:JSchwartz;BBandT.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Amen! You'd be surprised how many times that important document isn't worth the $50.00 charge to their cost center. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 3. Ask the user for his cost center number to which to charge the costs of the restore. That'll usually scare 'em off! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of James Winzenz Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 1. restore from backup 2. have the user request that the person he/she sent the email to send it back to him/her. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please
RE: Sent Item
-Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:aw;inubit.com] Sent: 13 November 2002 14:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sent Item Are you guys the in-house mail admins? I would think that its part of the job description, to backup the data and be able to retrieve something. Your company doesn't have the practice of cross charging internal departments for work that's outside the normal scope of the job? Robert Moir MSMVP IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College Ciderspace: An online 3D virtual reality environment for tramps. Ciderspace Cafe: A park Bench. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent Item
If.. 1) the deleted item retention time is set to some number of days, and 2) you are still within that number of days then, 1) close Outlook 2) open the affected user's registry 3) drill to HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Client\Options 4) add the DWORD: DumpsterAlwaysOn with a value of 1 5) open Outlook, click the sent items folder 6) Tools Deleted Items Recovery Good luck. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent Item
I think the whole point is to keep from having to do unnecessary restores. Would you want to restore, say, an email that contained a joke? It's a way of getting a user to examine their priorities - how important is the email. Is it important company data that needs to be recovered, or is it just convenience. I certainly wouldn't be willing to restore an exchange backup unless the customer/user can justify the worth of the email as being critical or necessary business data. I'm not saying that we would charge our users' cost centers for restores (we don't) - but then again, we also have deleted items retention set at 30 days so that we don't have to worry about this kind of thing. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:aw;inubit.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sent Item Are you guys the in-house mail admins? I would think that its part of the job description, to backup the data and be able to retrieve something. Or at least, that is what my users would say if I tried to charge them 50 Euro to retrive some data. I can understand if you are hosting company and the customers are paying for mailboxes and support, but if not, I'm really curious how you get away with that. Allison W. On Wednesday 13 November 2002 15:18, you wrote: The customer shouldn't be punished for something that should take 2 hours, but instead takes 4. A flat fee works best with a SLA that states 24 hours to restore it. Longer if you have to get tapes from offsite. $50.00 or $100.00 it doesn't matter really what you charge. No one wants to go to their boss and get the sign off on the charge to restore a picture of their sisters baby or that funny joke a friend sent. If it's important, really important, you could charge $1000.00 and they'd still pay. It just gets rid of the riff-raff. -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winzenz;inovis.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Woohooo! But why only $50? Seems like it should be $50/hr or something like that . . . With a minimum charge, of course! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:JSchwartz;BBandT.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Amen! You'd be surprised how many times that important document isn't worth the $50.00 charge to their cost center. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 3. Ask the user for his cost center number to which to charge the costs of the restore. That'll usually scare 'em off! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of James Winzenz Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 1. restore from backup 2. have the user request that the person he/she sent the email to send it back to him/her. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System
RE: A question of NDR
of course not. and what's with the non-sequitor..? in my first post on the issue I question what I believe is unusual behavior. you claim the behavior is by design. in my second post, I challenge your claim. geez.. if you don't know an answer, it's OK skip the thread, andy. we won't miss your reply. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR If you know all the answers, why are you asking us? -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR oh come on, andy.. test the accuracy of your reply send a message from a mailbox that appears to be from another. monitor the inbox of the other mailbox. you'll find an NDR to a bogus address appears in the mailbox named in the From field Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR By design I believe. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A question of NDR Scenario: mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2. mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with mailbox2 in From field. Any subsequent NDR's appear in Inbox of mailbox1 and not mailbox2. qué arriba con eso? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A question of NDR
Which Outlook version? I just did some testing with Outlook XP and it works correctly - NDRs return to mailbox2. Further explain what you're seeing, and also look at the headers to see what's going out. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A question of NDR Scenario: mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2. mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with mailbox2 in From field. Any subsequent NDR's appear in Inbox of mailbox1 and not mailbox2. qué arriba con eso? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A question of NDR
Your attitude is apparently by design as well. Like I said, if you send an email from within Outlook in the manner you described , I believe it works that way by design . If I am wrong, so be it. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR of course not. and what's with the non-sequitor..? in my first post on the issue I question what I believe is unusual behavior. you claim the behavior is by design. in my second post, I challenge your claim. geez.. if you don't know an answer, it's OK skip the thread, andy. we won't miss your reply. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR If you know all the answers, why are you asking us? -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR oh come on, andy.. test the accuracy of your reply send a message from a mailbox that appears to be from another. monitor the inbox of the other mailbox. you'll find an NDR to a bogus address appears in the mailbox named in the From field Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR By design I believe. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A question of NDR Scenario: mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2. mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with mailbox2 in From field. Any subsequent NDR's appear in Inbox of mailbox1 and not mailbox2. qué arriba con eso? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged
RE: A question of NDR
You mean like this, which worked as advertised, not as you're experiencing? Come on Tim - you know we need more details. ---SNIP Received: from atlrelay1.inovisinc.com (atlrelay1.itlogon.com [10.33.1.60]) by atlexcon1.itlogon.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id WL0Y7Z5W; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:13:09 -0500 Received: from inovisns2.inovisinc.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atlrelay1.inovisinc.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gADFC0r07389 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:12:00 GMT Received: from kepler.wiredeuclid.com (dsl092-212-061.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.212.61]) by inovisns2.inovisinc.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gADFBxLl017685 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:11:59 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost) by kepler.wiredeuclid.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id gADFBrh19887; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:11:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:11:53 -0500 (EST) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=gADFBrh19887.1037200313/kepler.wiredeuclid.com Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure) This is a MIME-encapsulated message --gADFBrh19887.1037200313/kepler.wiredeuclid.com --gADFBrh19887.1037200313/kepler.wiredeuclid.com Content-Type: message/delivery-status --gADFBrh19887.1037200313/kepler.wiredeuclid.com Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by kepler.wiredeuclid.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id gADFBrg19887 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:11:53 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: kepler.wiredeuclid.com: smtpd set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Received: from UNKNOWN(204.29.140.242), claiming to be atlrelay1.inovisinc.com via SMTP by kepler, id smtpde23048; Wed Nov 13 15:11:45 2002 Received: from atlexcon1.itlogon.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atlrelay1.inovisinc.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gADFBZr07362 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:11:44 GMT Received: by atlexcon1.itlogon.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id WL0Y7Z5J; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:12:41 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Testing NDR Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:12:40 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain ---SNIP -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR oh come on, andy.. test the accuracy of your reply send a message from a mailbox that appears to be from another. monitor the inbox of the other mailbox. you'll find an NDR to a bogus address appears in the mailbox named in the From field Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR By design I believe. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A question of NDR Scenario: mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2. mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with mailbox2 in From field. Any subsequent NDR's appear in Inbox of mailbox1 and not mailbox2. qué arriba con eso? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == == == _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Sent Item
I don't do much admin work any more. (quack) Deleted Items Retention solves 99.9% of the issues with someone deleting something unintentionally. Most of the time the user hits delete and immediately has knows that they needed that message. Our helpdesk (least cost) can walk them through how to restore the item themselves. A simple published document stating that mail is restorable for free up to x (whatever DIR is set to) and will cost x after that. Any item older than whatever your tape rotation is set to is not available for restore. The chargeback to the users is to cover the costs of the administrators time. Nobody really seems to mind this, as long as it spelled out in advance. -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:aw;inubit.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sent Item Are you guys the in-house mail admins? I would think that its part of the job description, to backup the data and be able to retrieve something. Or at least, that is what my users would say if I tried to charge them 50 Euro to retrive some data. I can understand if you are hosting company and the customers are paying for mailboxes and support, but if not, I'm really curious how you get away with that. Allison W. On Wednesday 13 November 2002 15:18, you wrote: The customer shouldn't be punished for something that should take 2 hours, but instead takes 4. A flat fee works best with a SLA that states 24 hours to restore it. Longer if you have to get tapes from offsite. $50.00 or $100.00 it doesn't matter really what you charge. No one wants to go to their boss and get the sign off on the charge to restore a picture of their sisters baby or that funny joke a friend sent. If it's important, really important, you could charge $1000.00 and they'd still pay. It just gets rid of the riff-raff. -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winzenz;inovis.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Woohooo! But why only $50? Seems like it should be $50/hr or something like that . . . With a minimum charge, of course! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:JSchwartz;BBandT.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Amen! You'd be surprised how many times that important document isn't worth the $50.00 charge to their cost center. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 3. Ask the user for his cost center number to which to charge the costs of the restore. That'll usually scare 'em off! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of James Winzenz Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 1. restore from backup 2. have the user request that the person he/she sent the email to send it back to him/her. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com
RE: Sent Item
Backups are done primarily for business continuance. They are not done because someone's too stupid to think twice before deleting a 50mb spreadsheet without making sure that its not needed anymore. If our job was to pick up after morons all day long, we'd never get anything done. Although, our company doesn't do chargebacks for IT at this point, though. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:aw;inubit.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sent Item Are you guys the in-house mail admins? I would think that its part of the job description, to backup the data and be able to retrieve something. Or at least, that is what my users would say if I tried to charge them 50 Euro to retrive some data. I can understand if you are hosting company and the customers are paying for mailboxes and support, but if not, I'm really curious how you get away with that. Allison W. On Wednesday 13 November 2002 15:18, you wrote: The customer shouldn't be punished for something that should take 2 hours, but instead takes 4. A flat fee works best with a SLA that states 24 hours to restore it. Longer if you have to get tapes from offsite. $50.00 or $100.00 it doesn't matter really what you charge. No one wants to go to their boss and get the sign off on the charge to restore a picture of their sisters baby or that funny joke a friend sent. If it's important, really important, you could charge $1000.00 and they'd still pay. It just gets rid of the riff-raff. -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winzenz;inovis.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Woohooo! But why only $50? Seems like it should be $50/hr or something like that . . . With a minimum charge, of course! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:JSchwartz;BBandT.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Amen! You'd be surprised how many times that important document isn't worth the $50.00 charge to their cost center. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 3. Ask the user for his cost center number to which to charge the costs of the restore. That'll usually scare 'em off! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of James Winzenz Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 1. restore from backup 2. have the user request that the person he/she sent the email to send it back to him/her. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com
RE: No more free/busy data?
Yeah, I saw and read that article. The real problem here is that ... well... why the hell do we want our users in control of when their calendars are available? Seomtimes meetings need to be scheduled more than 1 month in advance -- so we make all users go into their settings and change them? I think not. I walk around to everybody's desk and change it for them? Also unacceptable. I load their profile and change it there? Nope, I don't want to do that either. There's got to be a better way... ? -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 09:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Any value in excess of 12 is ignored. Only 12 months of F/B info is available (10 months past and one month prior to the current day, plus the current month). ref: Q262812 Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Well that was the first place I looked. Mine is set to 2 months, surely. However, I am one of the few individuals who has free/busy data available until the end of time (sometime in 4051 apparently). Why am I an exception (and no, I'm not making the appointment to check this)? There are other exceptions too but their free/busy is set to two months also. Why the discrepancy? Is it always the 1st of the month? I would have guessed that if today were the 13th (and so it is!) that free/busy data would be available until Jan 13, 2003. Is there any way to effect a corporate policy on this enforce it? -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 07:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Check their settings under Tools - Options - Calendar Options - Free/Busy Options. -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No more free/busy data? I noticed something odd today and I'm wondering why this is the case. When a user goes into their calendar and tries to set an appointment for anytime after Jan 1, 2003, the calendar displays No Information. Starting exactly on Jan 1, 2003. Mind you there are exceptions... SOME users have regular grey squares ad infinitum. What's going on here? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent Item
Yup! I've got high standards. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 6:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Darcy, you sure expect a lot. It isn't fair to expect me to actually comprehend everything I read herein! Disregard my suggestion until the user does a shift-Delete from the Sent Items folder. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Free/Busy Information
Sounds like a replication issue. Single server? - Original Message - From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:07 AM Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information They are in the same site but their mailboxes reside on different databases in the same cluster (Ex.user1 belongs to VS1 and user2 to VS2 both on respective nodes in first cluster). Chris -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free/Busy Information Are all users hitting servers in the same site? There are some limitations using Active/Active clustering as to which services work. - Original Message - From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:24 PM Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information When the users resolve the attendee they just see no information followed by // next to the attendee's name, even though the time is marked as busy. These calendars can be seen from some users just fine, but others see no info. I have made sure all fixes/service packs were applied on the client side and checked the number of months to publish/update but still nothing. Chris To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A question of NDR
That is correct; the message is sent on behalf of mailbox2 (as seen in the headers). The NDR goes the to _original_ sender. It makes sense: Secretary has user permissions on her boss' inbox. Secretary sends message on his behalf to other user(s). Message bounces. Who needs to know to resend the message, the secretary or the boss? -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 7:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A question of NDR Scenario: mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2. mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with mailbox2 in From field. Any subsequent NDR's appear in Inbox of mailbox1 and not mailbox2. qué arriba con eso? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A question of NDR
In Outlook2000 the reply to field defaults to the primary mailbox. You can set that to whatever you want on an individual message basis. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 5:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A question of NDR Scenario: mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2. mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with mailbox2 in From field. Any subsequent NDR's appear in Inbox of mailbox1 and not mailbox2. qué arriba con eso? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A question of NDR
perzaktly.. thanx roger. Your experienced is (I believe) the normal and expected behavior. However, a user working under the scenario I described reports intermittent issues with an OL2k client where some NDR's appear within the user's mailbox, rather than in the Inbox of the secondary mailbox. I checked the headers of some NDR's in the user's inbox and found no instances of the address of the primary mailbox--just the address of the secondary mailbox, again as one might expect. I am really confused as to how the NDR found its way into the user's Inbox. It's kinda like one would see with SPAM using a bogus To address with a valid BCC. Here's a WAG.. Could, somehow, the MTA route NDR's of external origin back to the actual mailbox of origin using internal directory info (x.400)? But then none of that exists within a message header. urggh.. I cannot replicate the user's experience on my mailbox, or any mailbox, I set up for testing. Things work as 'spected: NDR's go to the mailbox of the From address--every time. Gotta be something the user isn't telling me.. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR Which Outlook version? I just did some testing with Outlook XP and it works correctly - NDRs return to mailbox2. Further explain what you're seeing, and also look at the headers to see what's going out. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A question of NDR Scenario: mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2. mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with mailbox2 in From field. Any subsequent NDR's appear in Inbox of mailbox1 and not mailbox2. qué arriba con eso? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No more free/busy data?
You asked: why the hell do we want our users in control of when their calendars are available? The answer is because they know a lot more about their calendars than you do! Why would a user want some lowly e-mail admin controlling how much information they show?? -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: 13 November 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Yeah, I saw and read that article. The real problem here is that ... well... why the hell do we want our users in control of when their calendars are available? Seomtimes meetings need to be scheduled more than 1 month in advance -- so we make all users go into their settings and change them? I think not. I walk around to everybody's desk and change it for them? Also unacceptable. I load their profile and change it there? Nope, I don't want to do that either. There's got to be a better way... ? -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 09:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Any value in excess of 12 is ignored. Only 12 months of F/B info is available (10 months past and one month prior to the current day, plus the current month). ref: Q262812 Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Well that was the first place I looked. Mine is set to 2 months, surely. However, I am one of the few individuals who has free/busy data available until the end of time (sometime in 4051 apparently). Why am I an exception (and no, I'm not making the appointment to check this)? There are other exceptions too but their free/busy is set to two months also. Why the discrepancy? Is it always the 1st of the month? I would have guessed that if today were the 13th (and so it is!) that free/busy data would be available until Jan 13, 2003. Is there any way to effect a corporate policy on this enforce it? -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 07:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Check their settings under Tools - Options - Calendar Options - Free/Busy Options. -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No more free/busy data? I noticed something odd today and I'm wondering why this is the case. When a user goes into their calendar and tries to set an appointment for anytime after Jan 1, 2003, the calendar displays No Information. Starting exactly on Jan 1, 2003. Mind you there are exceptions... SOME users have regular grey squares ad infinitum. What's going on here? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Information
Not sure what you mean by single server? Exchange,DC,etc? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free/Busy Information Sounds like a replication issue. Single server? - Original Message - From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:07 AM Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information They are in the same site but their mailboxes reside on different databases in the same cluster (Ex.user1 belongs to VS1 and user2 to VS2 both on respective nodes in first cluster). Chris -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free/Busy Information Are all users hitting servers in the same site? There are some limitations using Active/Active clustering as to which services work. - Original Message - From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:24 PM Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information When the users resolve the attendee they just see no information followed by // next to the attendee's name, even though the time is marked as busy. These calendars can be seen from some users just fine, but others see no info. I have made sure all fixes/service packs were applied on the client side and checked the number of months to publish/update but still nothing. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: search all text, all mailboxes?
Sorry, my bad... thinking too much about my two week vacation coming up and not looking in the right place. I've got the right location now. thanks again. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 18:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: search all text, all mailboxes? The only tool listed where? In the client section? Yes, it doesn't really provide searching either. But there are a number of others listed in the server section as well as the Sherpa Software product, which also provides search capabilities. -Original Message- From: Horst Hinz [mailto:HHinz;bcmhs.bc.ca] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions I looked at the only tool listed there, the VM Mailkeeper program and it only allows searching of one mailbox at at time. I need to search all of them at once. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 09:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: search all text, all mailboxes? Several of the archival tools listed at www.mail-resources.com | web links will, as will tools such as those from Sherpa Software. -Original Message- From: Horst Hinz [mailto:HHinz;bcmhs.bc.ca] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions I've been asked to search all of our mailboxes on our Exchange server for a specific phrase to fullfill a Freedom of Information Act request. I know that Exmerge will search the entire Exchange server but only for subject or attachments. Is there a utility out there that will search the entire contents of the messages on the Exchange server as well? I've got 1800 mailboxes and I don't want someone to have to search through each one individually. Thanks, Horst _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent Item
Unfortunately . . . VBG James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Backups are done primarily for business continuance. They are not done because someone's too stupid to think twice before deleting a 50mb spreadsheet without making sure that its not needed anymore. If our job was to pick up after morons all day long, we'd never get anything done. Although, our company doesn't do chargebacks for IT at this point, though. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:aw;inubit.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sent Item Are you guys the in-house mail admins? I would think that its part of the job description, to backup the data and be able to retrieve something. Or at least, that is what my users would say if I tried to charge them 50 Euro to retrive some data. I can understand if you are hosting company and the customers are paying for mailboxes and support, but if not, I'm really curious how you get away with that. Allison W. On Wednesday 13 November 2002 15:18, you wrote: The customer shouldn't be punished for something that should take 2 hours, but instead takes 4. A flat fee works best with a SLA that states 24 hours to restore it. Longer if you have to get tapes from offsite. $50.00 or $100.00 it doesn't matter really what you charge. No one wants to go to their boss and get the sign off on the charge to restore a picture of their sisters baby or that funny joke a friend sent. If it's important, really important, you could charge $1000.00 and they'd still pay. It just gets rid of the riff-raff. -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winzenz;inovis.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Woohooo! But why only $50? Seems like it should be $50/hr or something like that . . . With a minimum charge, of course! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:JSchwartz;BBandT.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Amen! You'd be surprised how many times that important document isn't worth the $50.00 charge to their cost center. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 3. Ask the user for his cost center number to which to charge the costs of the restore. That'll usually scare 'em off! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of James Winzenz Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 1. restore from backup 2. have the user request that the person he/she sent the email to send it back to him/her. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then
RE: A question of NDR
Look at the headers for either a Reply-to: line or an X-Reply-To: line. It would seem that OL2k does it differently than OLXP. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR perzaktly.. thanx roger. Your experienced is (I believe) the normal and expected behavior. However, a user working under the scenario I described reports intermittent issues with an OL2k client where some NDR's appear within the user's mailbox, rather than in the Inbox of the secondary mailbox. I checked the headers of some NDR's in the user's inbox and found no instances of the address of the primary mailbox--just the address of the secondary mailbox, again as one might expect. I am really confused as to how the NDR found its way into the user's Inbox. It's kinda like one would see with SPAM using a bogus To address with a valid BCC. Here's a WAG.. Could, somehow, the MTA route NDR's of external origin back to the actual mailbox of origin using internal directory info (x.400)? But then none of that exists within a message header. urggh.. I cannot replicate the user's experience on my mailbox, or any mailbox, I set up for testing. Things work as 'spected: NDR's go to the mailbox of the From address--every time. Gotta be something the user isn't telling me.. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR Which Outlook version? I just did some testing with Outlook XP and it works correctly - NDRs return to mailbox2. Further explain what you're seeing, and also look at the headers to see what's going out. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A question of NDR Scenario: mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2. mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with mailbox2 in From field. Any subsequent NDR's appear in Inbox of mailbox1 and not mailbox2. qué arriba con eso? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A question of NDR
Thanks, Daniel. That's what I would expect (and what I experience in testing) as well. The NDR will appear in the Inbox of secondary (mailbox2 in my example). After a bit closer peek at the NDR header, it seems the headers of the NDR's (within mailbox1 Inbox) list the 'return-path' with the address of the mailbox of origin (mailbox1), and the From address of mailbox2. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR That is correct; the message is sent on behalf of mailbox2 (as seen in the headers). The NDR goes the to _original_ sender. It makes sense: Secretary has user permissions on her boss' inbox. Secretary sends message on his behalf to other user(s). Message bounces. Who needs to know to resend the message, the secretary or the boss? -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 7:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A question of NDR Scenario: mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2. mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with mailbox2 in From field. Any subsequent NDR's appear in Inbox of mailbox1 and not mailbox2. qué arriba con eso? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A question of NDR
thanks, Darcy. The user mentioned not setting that item in the original message. Maybe that should be an add'l step prior to sending their message? Still, in my tests, just changing the From field to list a different mailbox resulted in NDR's delivered to that secondary mailbox. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR In Outlook2000 the reply to field defaults to the primary mailbox. You can set that to whatever you want on an individual message basis. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 5:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A question of NDR Scenario: mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2. mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with mailbox2 in From field. Any subsequent NDR's appear in Inbox of mailbox1 and not mailbox2. qué arriba con eso? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A question of NDR
From the This Just in Dept.: The secondary mailbox is actually a PF against which the user has User permission. The PF is configured correctly to receive inbound email. return-path with the address of the origin mailbox appears in the header of NDR(s) in the origin mailbox. So maybe we have the culprit. Off to RFC822 to learn about this header item.. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR You mean like this, which worked as advertised, not as you're experiencing? Come on Tim - you know we need more details. ---SNIP Received: from atlrelay1.inovisinc.com (atlrelay1.itlogon.com [10.33.1.60]) by atlexcon1.itlogon.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id WL0Y7Z5W; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:13:09 -0500 Received: from inovisns2.inovisinc.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atlrelay1.inovisinc.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gADFC0r07389 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:12:00 GMT Received: from kepler.wiredeuclid.com (dsl092-212-061.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.212.61]) by inovisns2.inovisinc.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gADFBxLl017685 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:11:59 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost) by kepler.wiredeuclid.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id gADFBrh19887; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:11:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:11:53 -0500 (EST) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=gADFBrh19887.1037200313/kepler.wiredeuclid.com Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure) This is a MIME-encapsulated message --gADFBrh19887.1037200313/kepler.wiredeuclid.com --gADFBrh19887.1037200313/kepler.wiredeuclid.com Content-Type: message/delivery-status --gADFBrh19887.1037200313/kepler.wiredeuclid.com Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by kepler.wiredeuclid.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id gADFBrg19887 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:11:53 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: kepler.wiredeuclid.com: smtpd set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Received: from UNKNOWN(204.29.140.242), claiming to be atlrelay1.inovisinc.com via SMTP by kepler, id smtpde23048; Wed Nov 13 15:11:45 2002 Received: from atlexcon1.itlogon.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atlrelay1.inovisinc.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gADFBZr07362 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:11:44 GMT Received: by atlexcon1.itlogon.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id WL0Y7Z5J; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:12:41 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Testing NDR Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:12:40 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain ---SNIP -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR oh come on, andy.. test the accuracy of your reply send a message from a mailbox that appears to be from another. monitor the inbox of the other mailbox. you'll find an NDR to a bogus address appears in the mailbox named in the From field Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR By design I believe. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A question of NDR Scenario: mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2. mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with mailbox2 in From field. Any subsequent NDR's appear in Inbox of mailbox1 and not mailbox2. qué arriba con eso? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this
RE: No more free/busy data?
Perhaps you might push the changes to all the users thru your network. Create a .REG file containing the desired F/B settings (ref. 197712) Set that file to be executed within the logon script. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Yeah, I saw and read that article. The real problem here is that ... well... why the hell do we want our users in control of when their calendars are available? Seomtimes meetings need to be scheduled more than 1 month in advance -- so we make all users go into their settings and change them? I think not. I walk around to everybody's desk and change it for them? Also unacceptable. I load their profile and change it there? Nope, I don't want to do that either. There's got to be a better way... ? -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 09:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Any value in excess of 12 is ignored. Only 12 months of F/B info is available (10 months past and one month prior to the current day, plus the current month). ref: Q262812 Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Well that was the first place I looked. Mine is set to 2 months, surely. However, I am one of the few individuals who has free/busy data available until the end of time (sometime in 4051 apparently). Why am I an exception (and no, I'm not making the appointment to check this)? There are other exceptions too but their free/busy is set to two months also. Why the discrepancy? Is it always the 1st of the month? I would have guessed that if today were the 13th (and so it is!) that free/busy data would be available until Jan 13, 2003. Is there any way to effect a corporate policy on this enforce it? -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 07:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Check their settings under Tools - Options - Calendar Options - Free/Busy Options. -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No more free/busy data? I noticed something odd today and I'm wondering why this is the case. When a user goes into their calendar and tries to set an appointment for anytime after Jan 1, 2003, the calendar displays No Information. Starting exactly on Jan 1, 2003. Mind you there are exceptions... SOME users have regular grey squares ad infinitum. What's going on here? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent Item
Wait a year or two until a few new systems are in place and that might change. Then again, there's not enough deliniation between departmental budgets here, or in many other companies, in which chargebacks are a good thing. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: James Winzenz Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Unfortunately . . . VBG James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Backups are done primarily for business continuance. They are not done because someone's too stupid to think twice before deleting a 50mb spreadsheet without making sure that its not needed anymore. If our job was to pick up after morons all day long, we'd never get anything done. Although, our company doesn't do chargebacks for IT at this point, though. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:aw;inubit.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sent Item Are you guys the in-house mail admins? I would think that its part of the job description, to backup the data and be able to retrieve something. Or at least, that is what my users would say if I tried to charge them 50 Euro to retrive some data. I can understand if you are hosting company and the customers are paying for mailboxes and support, but if not, I'm really curious how you get away with that. Allison W. On Wednesday 13 November 2002 15:18, you wrote: The customer shouldn't be punished for something that should take 2 hours, but instead takes 4. A flat fee works best with a SLA that states 24 hours to restore it. Longer if you have to get tapes from offsite. $50.00 or $100.00 it doesn't matter really what you charge. No one wants to go to their boss and get the sign off on the charge to restore a picture of their sisters baby or that funny joke a friend sent. If it's important, really important, you could charge $1000.00 and they'd still pay. It just gets rid of the riff-raff. -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:james.winzenz;inovis.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Woohooo! But why only $50? Seems like it should be $50/hr or something like that . . . With a minimum charge, of course! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:JSchwartz;BBandT.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Amen! You'd be surprised how many times that important document isn't worth the $50.00 charge to their cost center. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 3. Ask the user for his cost center number to which to charge the costs of the restore. That'll usually scare 'em off! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of James Winzenz Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 1. restore from backup 2. have the user request that the person he/she sent the email to send it back to him/her. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson.
Re: Free/Busy Information
Do the users mail info reside on two different servers or just two different DB's on the same server. . - Original Message - From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 11:10 AM Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information Not sure what you mean by single server? Exchange,DC,etc? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free/Busy Information Sounds like a replication issue. Single server? - Original Message - From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:07 AM Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information They are in the same site but their mailboxes reside on different databases in the same cluster (Ex.user1 belongs to VS1 and user2 to VS2 both on respective nodes in first cluster). Chris -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free/Busy Information Are all users hitting servers in the same site? There are some limitations using Active/Active clustering as to which services work. - Original Message - From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:24 PM Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information When the users resolve the attendee they just see no information followed by // next to the attendee's name, even though the time is marked as busy. These calendars can be seen from some users just fine, but others see no info. I have made sure all fixes/service packs were applied on the client side and checked the number of months to publish/update but still nothing. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sent Item
No. But we are only 23 people here. 13 of us are IT/developers. AW On Wednesday 13 November 2002 15:54, you wrote: -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:aw;inubit.com] Sent: 13 November 2002 14:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sent Item Are you guys the in-house mail admins? I would think that its part of the job description, to backup the data and be able to retrieve something. Your company doesn't have the practice of cross charging internal departments for work that's outside the normal scope of the job? Robert Moir MSMVP IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College Ciderspace: An online 3D virtual reality environment for tramps. Ciderspace Cafe: A park Bench. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OAB version 2
MSX5.5 +SP4 1 Organization 12 sites We have noticed that onlye one site has contents in the systemfolders\exo:/ou\OAB version 2 it has two subfolders with numbers separated by hyphens. Do you knwo why this only site has those two subfolders is this ok or not? Rgds, ER _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stop NDR
I have a number of employees that are no longer with our company and I receive a large number of NDR's for mailing lists, SPAM, etc. that they signed up for. What is the best way to eliminate these? I am running Exch 2K. Any help would be greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AutoDL
Does anyone use the AutoDL utility that ships with Exchange2K? There have been very few responses to recent questions concerning the configuration of AutoDL, and I'm just curious if it's because no one uses it. The instructions aren't very clear, at least for those of us (like me) that don't have much experience with SQL or IIS. Thanks in advance! Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox Count
Anyone know a resource for programattically determining the number of mailboxes on an Exchange 5.5 server? Thanks Steve * The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Event ID 209 - Can I fix this?
Here's the message I'm getting: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: X.400 Service Event ID: 209 Date: 11/13/2002 Time: 14:16:46 User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE Description: Global domain identifier (Country, ADMD, PRMD) in first Trace Information of message C=us;A= ;P=rst;L=EXCHANGE0211131916WS5VB3DM does not match MTSID value. [MTA XFER-IN 11 40] (12) According to EventID.NET: This problem seems to be caused by a server being rebuilt in the exchange organization without it being removed first from the organization using Exchange Administrator in RAW mode. Now, I'm not entirely sure if this applies. I'm working on a 5.5 Migration to 2000, bringing in new hardware and changing NT4 to w2k domains. 5.5 server is NT4 in domain RST, E2k is in the new domain but has been added to the original ORG. Can anyone offer insight? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No more free/busy data?
The answer is because they know a lot more about their calendars than you do! Why would a user want some lowly e-mail admin controlling how much information they show?? Because users generally don't have a clue? Frankly I'm surprised this hasn't come up before. We often have users scheduling meetings months out. And we want to ensure that when users do this, free/busy data for that individual is available. I've found documentation elsewhere about how to change this value for everyone. Thanks to all who were actually helpful. -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Post Ex2k Migration Calendar Permissions Hosed
After migrating the mailboxes from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 (basically by bringing new Exchange 2000 servers into our Exchange 5.5 organization and then moving mailboxes from the 5.5 to 2000 servers) we have ended up with two outstanding problems that, to date, PSS has not been able to resolve. This is one of the two: In our organization the default calendar permission on all user calendars is Reviewer. (This was the default in our previous email system - PROFS/OV - and users wanted to keep this capability when we went to Exchange four years ago.) Post Exchange 5.5 to 2000 migration, a large number of user calendars (more than 25%, less than 50%) have permissions that include not only this default, but in addition the first 250 or so users in our address book now have specific permissions of Reviewer also. That is bad enough, but in addition, no one can actually review these user calendars. And, changes/deletions cannot be made though Outlook to these permission settings. Free/Busy info for the establishment of meetings still works. So far there is no fix. (Well, I can export the user's calendar entries to a PST file, then use the old pre-Outlook Exchange client to delete the calendar, then use Outlook with the /resetfolders option to re-create the calendar, and then import the PST file back in. This sounded viable when I thought the problem was five to ten users; now it looks more like upwards of 800-900 users.) MS PSS had me run through an ISINTEG -fix -test alltests run, which was exciting and all, but did not fix the problem. At this point, the 'why did this happen' aspect is much less important to me than the 'how do I fix it' question (we are not migrating back!). Any ideas?? Thanks . . . Jon Martin Systems Programmer East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Oakland, CA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shared Calendar Appointment Ownership
Fallout from Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade Part II: After migrating the mailboxes from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 (basically by bringing new Exchange 2000 servers into our Exchange 5.5 organization and then moving mailboxes from the 5.5 to 2000 servers) we have ended up with two outstanding problems that, to date, PSS has not been able to resolve. This is one of the two: In Exchange 5.5 we utilized the delegate account method (Q169872) to deal with meetings that included shared resources. As part of the upgrade to Exchange 2000 we used the NTDSNoMatch attribute on these calendars to force the ADC to create disabled accounts for them. So far, so good; it worked as advertised. Now that we have migrated, on an apparently random basis, users cannot modify meetings that they scheduled on conference room calendars prior to the migration. Not all meetings on any calendar have this problem; not all meetings scheduled by any one user have this problem. Of course in the migrated system the default access permissions to conference room calendars is Author. Creating new meetings that include resource calendars is working fine. Behind the scenes, what has happened on the problematic meeting entries is that the Owner of the meeting is no longer the same as the Meeting Organizer; the Owner is the disabled conference room account instead. The meeting organizer tries to update the meeting, and gets a Your changes could not be saved because you don't have permission to modify some or all of the items in this folder So far the only 'fix' that works is to make the default calendar access permission on the conference rooms 'Editor'. In an organization or our size (60 resource accounts, 1700 users) that would create a disaster all its own. At this point, the 'why did this happen' aspect is much less important to me than the 'how do I fix it' question (we are not migrating back!). Any ideas?? Thanks . . . Jon Martin Systems Programmer East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Oakland, CA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A question of NDR
I would miss your reply, Andy. You're like the little baby buffalo nibbling around the edges of the Exchange field. And I am the coyote who doesn't want to get sat on. -- be - MOS -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR Your attitude is apparently by design as well. Like I said, if you send an email from within Outlook in the manner you described , I believe it works that way by design . If I am wrong, so be it. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR of course not. and what's with the non-sequitor..? in my first post on the issue I question what I believe is unusual behavior. you claim the behavior is by design. in my second post, I challenge your claim. geez.. if you don't know an answer, it's OK skip the thread, andy. we won't miss your reply. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR If you know all the answers, why are you asking us? -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR oh come on, andy.. test the accuracy of your reply send a message from a mailbox that appears to be from another. monitor the inbox of the other mailbox. you'll find an NDR to a bogus address appears in the mailbox named in the From field Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR By design I believe. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A question of NDR Scenario: mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2. mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with mailbox2 in From field. Any subsequent NDR's appear in Inbox of mailbox1 and not mailbox2. qué arriba con eso? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == == == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == == == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Emails to clients that are restricted
Is somebody forging the headers? Trivially easy to do. Check to see if there are any SMTP headers in the messages, and if so, find the offender and put superglue on his or her keycaps. -- be - MOS You are confused; but this is your normal state. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez;handleman.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails to clients that are restricted We have a couple of system accounts that we send email to that no one has access to send back to via delivery restricts. Well someone actually sent back and it go through. Any idea's why? Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Information
Different servers, node1 holds virtual server1/user1 and node2 holds virtual server2/user2. Sorry about the confusion. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free/Busy Information Do the users mail info reside on two different servers or just two different DB's on the same server. . - Original Message - From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 11:10 AM Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information Not sure what you mean by single server? Exchange,DC,etc? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free/Busy Information Sounds like a replication issue. Single server? - Original Message - From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:07 AM Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information They are in the same site but their mailboxes reside on different databases in the same cluster (Ex.user1 belongs to VS1 and user2 to VS2 both on respective nodes in first cluster). Chris -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free/Busy Information Are all users hitting servers in the same site? There are some limitations using Active/Active clustering as to which services work. - Original Message - From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:24 PM Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information When the users resolve the attendee they just see no information followed by // next to the attendee's name, even though the time is marked as busy. These calendars can be seen from some users just fine, but others see no info. I have made sure all fixes/service packs were applied on the client side and checked the number of months to publish/update but still nothing. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook drops first address in TO: line
Have a user that when he types in more than 2 addresses in the TO: line it drops the first address. Did a test that had 4 seperate addresses that all come to me. The first address did disappear and the e-mail never arrived to that mailbox. This only happens with multiple addresses. If he sends an e-mail to that first mailbox alone it arrives fine. So not matter what the first address is, when 3 or more addresses are present the 1st one gets dropped every time. Anyone seen this before? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stop NDR
Create a list with no email address and put them on the list. All email sent to people belonging to the list will just disappear. It's called creating a blackhole. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:53 PM Subject: Stop NDR I have a number of employees that are no longer with our company and I receive a large number of NDR's for mailing lists, SPAM, etc. that they signed up for. What is the best way to eliminate these? I am running Exch 2K. Any help would be greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stop NDR
Most of us create either a dummy mailbox or Public Folder. Then assign the addresses in question to said mailbox or pf and set it to auto delete into never never land. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:kwenger;centershift.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stop NDR I have a number of employees that are no longer with our company and I receive a large number of NDR's for mailing lists, SPAM, etc. that they signed up for. What is the best way to eliminate these? I am running Exch 2K. Any help would be greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AutoDL
There was a big discussion within the last week. Check the archives. - Original Message - From: Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 1:00 PM Subject: AutoDL Does anyone use the AutoDL utility that ships with Exchange2K? There have been very few responses to recent questions concerning the configuration of AutoDL, and I'm just curious if it's because no one uses it. The instructions aren't very clear, at least for those of us (like me) that don't have much experience with SQL or IIS. Thanks in advance! Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stop NDR
Figure out a way to unsubscribe them, usually by putting their profile on your system, and reading the mail that comes in and unsubscribing. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:kwenger;centershift.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stop NDR I have a number of employees that are no longer with our company and I receive a large number of NDR's for mailing lists, SPAM, etc. that they signed up for. What is the best way to eliminate these? I am running Exch 2K. Any help would be greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stop NDR
If you aren't interested in resolving them, add their former SMTP address as a secondary to a distribution group with no members. They will disappear. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions I have a number of employees that are no longer with our company and I receive a large number of NDR's for mailing lists, SPAM, etc. that they signed up for. What is the best way to eliminate these? I am running Exch 2K. Any help would be greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AutoDL
I got a brief response about AutoDL, but haven't gotten any useful documentation or anything of that nature. Does anyone have a good document on how to install the product? I've followed the instructions given on this list in the past few weeks to try to make it work but haven't met with success yet. Any contributions will be met with eternal gratitude and a beer on me the next time you're in Houston. :) -Original Message- From: Mike [mailto:mike.koch;ebgames.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AutoDL Does anyone use the AutoDL utility that ships with Exchange2K? There have been very few responses to recent questions concerning the configuration of AutoDL, and I'm just curious if it's because no one uses it. The instructions aren't very clear, at least for those of us (like me) that don't have much experience with SQL or IIS. Thanks in advance! Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stop NDR
You need to deploy the old Black Hole DL trick. Make a Distribution List with no members, and assign it the smtp addresses of the departed employees. The messages will come in to the DL, be delivered to nobody, and then vanish. Be aware, however, that the senders will receive no indication that they sent to a bad address. For this reason I generally don't add departed people's addresses to the Black Hole list until they've been gone for awhile and the only people who are still sending to them are people like [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:kwenger;centershift.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stop NDR I have a number of employees that are no longer with our company and I receive a large number of NDR's for mailing lists, SPAM, etc. that they signed up for. What is the best way to eliminate these? I am running Exch 2K. Any help would be greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No more free/busy data?
Meow. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? The answer is because they know a lot more about their calendars than you do! Why would a user want some lowly e-mail admin controlling how much information they show?? Because users generally don't have a clue? Frankly I'm surprised this hasn't come up before. We often have users scheduling meetings months out. And we want to ensure that when users do this, free/busy data for that individual is available. I've found documentation elsewhere about how to change this value for everyone. Thanks to all who were actually helpful. -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Count
U... Open the Exchange Administrator, then expand the appropriate Site, Configuration and Server branches, expand the required server and then click on the Server Recipients entry? It'll tell you exactly how many people are on that server in the lower left-hand corner. -Original Message- From: Bevilacqua.Steve [mailto:Steve.Bevilacqua;suntrust.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Count Anyone know a resource for programattically determining the number of mailboxes on an Exchange 5.5 server? Thanks Steve * The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No more free/busy data?
The user may know more about their calendars than we do, but we have been directed by management to make as much calendar info available as possible to assist in creating a meeting. If you have to call a user who is blocking this info, it is a waste of time. We update their registry to make 12 months available at every log on. Jon -Original Message- From: Chris Jordan [mailto:Chris.Jordan;cmg.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? You asked: why the hell do we want our users in control of when their calendars are available? The answer is because they know a lot more about their calendars than you do! Why would a user want some lowly e-mail admin controlling how much information they show?? -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: 13 November 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Yeah, I saw and read that article. The real problem here is that ... well... why the hell do we want our users in control of when their calendars are available? Seomtimes meetings need to be scheduled more than 1 month in advance -- so we make all users go into their settings and change them? I think not. I walk around to everybody's desk and change it for them? Also unacceptable. I load their profile and change it there? Nope, I don't want to do that either. There's got to be a better way... ? -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 09:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Any value in excess of 12 is ignored. Only 12 months of F/B info is available (10 months past and one month prior to the current day, plus the current month). ref: Q262812 Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Well that was the first place I looked. Mine is set to 2 months, surely. However, I am one of the few individuals who has free/busy data available until the end of time (sometime in 4051 apparently). Why am I an exception (and no, I'm not making the appointment to check this)? There are other exceptions too but their free/busy is set to two months also. Why the discrepancy? Is it always the 1st of the month? I would have guessed that if today were the 13th (and so it is!) that free/busy data would be available until Jan 13, 2003. Is there any way to effect a corporate policy on this enforce it? -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 07:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Check their settings under Tools - Options - Calendar Options - Free/Busy Options. -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No more free/busy data? I noticed something odd today and I'm wondering why this is the case. When a user goes into their calendar and tries to set an appointment for anytime after Jan 1, 2003, the calendar displays No Information. Starting exactly on Jan 1, 2003. Mind you there are exceptions... SOME users have regular grey squares ad infinitum. What's going on here? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Stop NDR
Create A Distribution Group, add to it all the SMTP addresses of the users that are no longer there, hide the group. Emails disappear. No NDR. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:kwenger;centershift.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stop NDR I have a number of employees that are no longer with our company and I receive a large number of NDR's for mailing lists, SPAM, etc. that they signed up for. What is the best way to eliminate these? I am running Exch 2K. Any help would be greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stop NDR
resend Create A Distribution Group with no members, add to it all the SMTP addresses of the users that are no longer there, hide the group. Emails disappear. No NDR. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:kwenger;centershift.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stop NDR I have a number of employees that are no longer with our company and I receive a large number of NDR's for mailing lists, SPAM, etc. that they signed up for. What is the best way to eliminate these? I am running Exch 2K. Any help would be greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stop NDR
1. Create a dummy alias 2. Add the no-longer-valid addresses to that dummy as alternates 3. Identify the lists 4. Unsub those addresses from those lists - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 11:53 AM Subject: Stop NDR I have a number of employees that are no longer with our company and I receive a large number of NDR's for mailing lists, SPAM, etc. that they signed up for. What is the best way to eliminate these? I am running Exch 2K. Any help would be greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Free/Busy Information
Then I feel it's a replication issue. I would look in that area. - Original Message - From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 4:57 PM Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information Different servers, node1 holds virtual server1/user1 and node2 holds virtual server2/user2. Sorry about the confusion. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free/Busy Information Do the users mail info reside on two different servers or just two different DB's on the same server. . - Original Message - From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 11:10 AM Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information Not sure what you mean by single server? Exchange,DC,etc? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free/Busy Information Sounds like a replication issue. Single server? - Original Message - From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:07 AM Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information They are in the same site but their mailboxes reside on different databases in the same cluster (Ex.user1 belongs to VS1 and user2 to VS2 both on respective nodes in first cluster). Chris -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free/Busy Information Are all users hitting servers in the same site? There are some limitations using Active/Active clustering as to which services work. - Original Message - From: Chris Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:24 PM Subject: RE: Free/Busy Information When the users resolve the attendee they just see no information followed by // next to the attendee's name, even though the time is marked as busy. These calendars can be seen from some users just fine, but others see no info. I have made sure all fixes/service packs were applied on the client side and checked the number of months to publish/update but still nothing. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A question of NDR
PFs don't do NDRs. By design. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 11/13/2002 10:37 AM Subject: RE: A question of NDR From the This Just in Dept.: The secondary mailbox is actually a PF against which the user has User permission. The PF is configured correctly to receive inbound email. return-path with the address of the origin mailbox appears in the header of NDR(s) in the origin mailbox. So maybe we have the culprit. Off to RFC822 to learn about this header item.. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR You mean like this, which worked as advertised, not as you're experiencing? Come on Tim - you know we need more details. ---SNIP Received: from atlrelay1.inovisinc.com (atlrelay1.itlogon.com [10.33.1.60]) by atlexcon1.itlogon.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id WL0Y7Z5W; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:13:09 -0500 Received: from inovisns2.inovisinc.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atlrelay1.inovisinc.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gADFC0r07389 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:12:00 GMT Received: from kepler.wiredeuclid.com (dsl092-212-061.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.212.61]) by inovisns2.inovisinc.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gADFBxLl017685 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:11:59 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost) by kepler.wiredeuclid.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id gADFBrh19887; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:11:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:11:53 -0500 (EST) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=gADFBrh19887.1037200313/kepler.wiredeuclid.com Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure) This is a MIME-encapsulated message --gADFBrh19887.1037200313/kepler.wiredeuclid.com --gADFBrh19887.1037200313/kepler.wiredeuclid.com Content-Type: message/delivery-status --gADFBrh19887.1037200313/kepler.wiredeuclid.com Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by kepler.wiredeuclid.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id gADFBrg19887 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:11:53 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: kepler.wiredeuclid.com: smtpd set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Received: from UNKNOWN(204.29.140.242), claiming to be atlrelay1.inovisinc.com via SMTP by kepler, id smtpde23048; Wed Nov 13 15:11:45 2002 Received: from atlexcon1.itlogon.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atlrelay1.inovisinc.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gADFBZr07362 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:11:44 GMT Received: by atlexcon1.itlogon.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id WL0Y7Z5J; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:12:41 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Testing NDR Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:12:40 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain ---SNIP -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR oh come on, andy.. test the accuracy of your reply send a message from a mailbox that appears to be from another. monitor the inbox of the other mailbox. you'll find an NDR to a bogus address appears in the mailbox named in the From field Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR By design I believe. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A question of NDR Scenario: mailbox1 has user permission against mailbox2. mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with mailbox2 in From field. Any subsequent NDR's appear in Inbox of mailbox1 and not mailbox2. qué arriba con eso? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook drops first address in TO: line
User error and/or insufficient data. -Original Message- From: Jerry J. To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 11/13/2002 4:04 PM Subject: Outlook drops first address in TO: line Have a user that when he types in more than 2 addresses in the TO: line it drops the first address. Did a test that had 4 seperate addresses that all come to me. The first address did disappear and the e-mail never arrived to that mailbox. This only happens with multiple addresses. If he sends an e-mail to that first mailbox alone it arrives fine. So not matter what the first address is, when 3 or more addresses are present the 1st one gets dropped every time. Anyone seen this before? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AutoDL
I'll have to check when I get to work (and of course I'll forget) but something tells me I read a bit about it in Jim McBee's _Exchange_2000_24seven_. If not, there's something useful in the pile of papers that helps my desk remain firmly rooted to the floor. My second guess being that I saw it in Outlook Exchange Administrator newsletter within the last several months. It's hell getting old. -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:Michelle.M.Harmon;conoco.com] Posted At: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 5:33 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: AutoDL Subject: RE: AutoDL I got a brief response about AutoDL, but haven't gotten any useful documentation or anything of that nature. Does anyone have a good document on how to install the product? I've followed the instructions given on this list in the past few weeks to try to make it work but haven't met with success yet. Any contributions will be met with eternal gratitude and a beer on me the next time you're in Houston. :) -Original Message- From: Mike [mailto:mike.koch;ebgames.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AutoDL Does anyone use the AutoDL utility that ships with Exchange2K? There have been very few responses to recent questions concerning the configuration of AutoDL, and I'm just curious if it's because no one uses it. The instructions aren't very clear, at least for those of us (like me) that don't have much experience with SQL or IIS. Thanks in advance! Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent Item
Not to mention Peregrine! Edgar J. Crowley Jr. Technical Consultant Windows Messaging Platforms Practice hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of James Winzenz Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 6:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Woohooo! But why only $50? Seems like it should be $50/hr or something like that . . . With a minimum charge, of course! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:JSchwartz;BBandT.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Amen! You'd be surprised how many times that important document isn't worth the $50.00 charge to their cost center. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 3. Ask the user for his cost center number to which to charge the costs of the restore. That'll usually scare 'em off! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of James Winzenz Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item 1. restore from backup 2. have the user request that the person he/she sent the email to send it back to him/her. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item I did not implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method and the retention was not set. What other options do I have to restore the send item? Thank Everyone Tony -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent Item Search TechNet for DumpsterAlwaysOn. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent Item I have a user that deleted the sent item and then empty the deleted items. Is there a way to get this item back from the database? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
