RE: Defragging (important???)
Might be worth just checking your event log to confirm that the online maintenance is indeed running and not being interrupted by the backup. You should see 1221 events indicating the amount of white space for instance. Also I assume you are doing full online backups as well since the backup api does a certain amount of store error checking. Mark -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 December 2002 03:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Defragging (important???) Michael, there is an online process that performs this function by default on a nightly basis. It is beneficial (note: not even necessary, only beneficial) when: - you move a large amount of data from the store - you delete a large amount of data from the store In other words, don't worry about it. Go back to the Christmas party. Relax. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michael Anderson Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 7:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, I was just perusing some threads, and caught some particular threads regarding defragging the message store. The one that hit me hard, was the person that found out that doom was eminent - because of a specific error code, found in the Event Viewer regarding the Exchange Message Store. Is the Exchange Message Store supposed to be periodically defragged??? Are there ramifications, if the Message Store gets past a certain point of fragmentation? I am not trying to avoid any research, and be lazy on this topic - but all I need to know, is YES this is an important topic, and I better learn more about it FAST, or NO - it's just something good to do once in a while. Thanks in advance for any advice offered, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retenti on=0
Best thing I can see for everyone is to have the important emails resent. A bigger question - what were important emails doing in Deleted Items folder to begin with? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retention=0 I wouldn't call it impossible, but impractical. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jan Novák Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retention=0 Importance: High Hi, I have an urgent question. One of our customers incidentally deleted some important mails from deleted items folder. Deleted items retention is set to 0 for private information store, so it cannot be recovered using this feature. There is no current backup. I know, that mails still probably are somewhere in exchange database, but marked as white space. Is there any way to get it back, or is it completely lost ? If anyone is sure that it is possible or impossible, send me email as quickly as possible ... Thanks a lot Honza Novak _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments
Alex - By default, NAVCE creates a network scan of the M drive - turn this off in the Symantec System Center Console. This scan seemingly ignores any exclusion settings set locally on the server. Unfortunately, the only resort I found was to restore from backup. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments I have been away for awhile today but yes we do have NAV CE installed. How did you fix it if that was it. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 -Original Message- From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions I was some surprised when I pasted it. Sorry it was so long Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Those arent links, thats the whole pig. - Original Message - From: Boynton, Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Here's a couple links describing this issue. http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/9d94c8571a91ba4788 256b f3007f62b5/8b773850a36516fe88256c2f007e436d?OpenDocumentprev=http://sea rch. symantec.com/custom/us/techsupp/enterprise/kb/query.html?*col=kb%20us*st =1*n h=10*pcode=*qp=url:/ent-security.nsf/9d94c8571a91ba4788256bf3007f62b5,,, *qt= %2Bexchange%20%2B2000*miniver=sav_8_ce*sone=sav_8_ce_tasks.html*stg=*pro d=Sy mantec%20AntiVirus*ver=8.0%20Corporate%20Edition*base=http://www.symante c.co m/techsupp/enterprise/products/sav/sav_8_ce/*next=*boolean=andsone=sav_ 8_ce _tasks.htmlstg=prod=Symantec%20AntiVirusver=8.0%20Corporate%20Edition bas e=http://www.symantec.com/techsupp/enterprise/products/sav/sav_8_ce/nex t=s rc=entpcode=dtype=corpsvy= http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;301234 Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Indeed. I believe that things like things can be caused by scanning the M: drive (there's a tech article from MS somewhere). Neil -Original Message- From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 18 December 2002 15:30 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Do you have Norton Antivirus installed? I had this very same problem when I had NAV installed. Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disappearing Calendar Appointments This is going to sound crazy but I have a user that is claiming that a couple of her appointments are disappearing off her calendar. She swears she isn't doing anything. Has anyone ever heard of appointments legitimately disappearing from the system? We are running O2002 and EX2000 SP3. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
Re: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retenti on=0
And whats that beeping sound coming from the server room? - Original Message - From: Couch, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 5:57 AM Subject: RE: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retenti on=0 Best thing I can see for everyone is to have the important emails resent. A bigger question - what were important emails doing in Deleted Items folder to begin with? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retention=0 I wouldn't call it impossible, but impractical. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jan Novák Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retention=0 Importance: High Hi, I have an urgent question. One of our customers incidentally deleted some important mails from deleted items folder. Deleted items retention is set to 0 for private information store, so it cannot be recovered using this feature. There is no current backup. I know, that mails still probably are somewhere in exchange database, but marked as white space. Is there any way to get it back, or is it completely lost ? If anyone is sure that it is possible or impossible, send me email as quickly as possible ... Thanks a lot Honza Novak _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook 2000 on XP box
Don't find way to install Microsoft exchange server connector on Outlook 2000 installed on an XP box. Please advise. Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook 2000 on XP box
1. Recreate Outlook Profile? 2. Tools/ Options/Mail Services/Reconfigure Mail Support ..etc etc... - Original Message - From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 5:59 PM Subject: Outlook 2000 on XP box Don't find way to install Microsoft exchange server connector on Outlook 2000 installed on an XP box. Please advise. Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000 on XP box
Is he sure he has an Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook 2000 on XP box 1. Recreate Outlook Profile? 2. Tools/ Options/Mail Services/Reconfigure Mail Support ..etc etc... - Original Message - From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 5:59 PM Subject: Outlook 2000 on XP box Don't find way to install Microsoft exchange server connector on Outlook 2000 installed on an XP box. Please advise. Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook 2000 on XP box
Heck, Im not sure I have one. - Original Message - From: Candee Vaglica [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:20 AM Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 on XP box Is he sure he has an Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook 2000 on XP box 1. Recreate Outlook Profile? 2. Tools/ Options/Mail Services/Reconfigure Mail Support ..etc etc... - Original Message - From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 5:59 PM Subject: Outlook 2000 on XP box Don't find way to install Microsoft exchange server connector on Outlook 2000 installed on an XP box. Please advise. Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000 on XP box
Yabbut. You can use Martin's. ;) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook 2000 on XP box Heck, Im not sure I have one. - Original Message - From: Candee Vaglica [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:20 AM Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 on XP box Is he sure he has an Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook 2000 on XP box 1. Recreate Outlook Profile? 2. Tools/ Options/Mail Services/Reconfigure Mail Support ..etc etc... - Original Message - From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 5:59 PM Subject: Outlook 2000 on XP box Don't find way to install Microsoft exchange server connector on Outlook 2000 installed on an XP box. Please advise. Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LDAP Queries for Mac clients
Does anyone know of an easy way for mac clients to perform LDAP searches. I know it works if they use outlook, but, most use eudora and other apps. I'm running W2K SP2, E2K SP2 at my site. Also, pro's and con's of allowing LDAP Anonymous queries to the AD. Understand mac clients need this to allow them to access the AD for lookups. Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
I finally got my manager to allow me to turn this feature off. I've been telling her that this will leave us vulnerable for possible mail loops. And wouldn't you know it...we had one and she was like..you're right. Please turn that off. I don't think it's a good idea just for that fact. Cause it's a nightmare trying to fix a mail loop. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk My company allows them to go out. I don't use the feature at all. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk On a technical list I'm on that concerns Exchange (among other things) someone forwarded to the list someone's OOF from a major company. From his name and location the person found his address on the web. Since his OOF said he'd be gone for two weeks, out of town on vacation, he essentially is telling the whole world his house is unattended and ripe for picking. Bad idea. It's just a bad idea. - Original Message - From: Archie Call [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:01 PM Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very convincing. The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. ...Archie Call Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
OOFs generally do not cause mail loops unless you are unwisely using a rule. - Original Message - From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:08 AM Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk I finally got my manager to allow me to turn this feature off. I've been telling her that this will leave us vulnerable for possible mail loops. And wouldn't you know it...we had one and she was like..you're right. Please turn that off. I don't think it's a good idea just for that fact. Cause it's a nightmare trying to fix a mail loop. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk My company allows them to go out. I don't use the feature at all. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk On a technical list I'm on that concerns Exchange (among other things) someone forwarded to the list someone's OOF from a major company. From his name and location the person found his address on the web. Since his OOF said he'd be gone for two weeks, out of town on vacation, he essentially is telling the whole world his house is unattended and ripe for picking. Bad idea. It's just a bad idea. - Original Message - From: Archie Call [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:01 PM Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very convincing. The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. ...Archie Call Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
You're exactly right..that's what happened. I just didn't want to go into explaining all of that. But we cannot as mail administrators rely on our users to use this feature correctly. You're just setting yourself up for trouble. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk OOFs generally do not cause mail loops unless you are unwisely using a rule. - Original Message - From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:08 AM Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk I finally got my manager to allow me to turn this feature off. I've been telling her that this will leave us vulnerable for possible mail loops. And wouldn't you know it...we had one and she was like..you're right. Please turn that off. I don't think it's a good idea just for that fact. Cause it's a nightmare trying to fix a mail loop. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk My company allows them to go out. I don't use the feature at all. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk On a technical list I'm on that concerns Exchange (among other things) someone forwarded to the list someone's OOF from a major company. From his name and location the person found his address on the web. Since his OOF said he'd be gone for two weeks, out of town on vacation, he essentially is telling the whole world his house is unattended and ripe for picking. Bad idea. It's just a bad idea. - Original Message - From: Archie Call [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:01 PM Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very convincing. The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. ...Archie Call Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
Deny auto-replies to the Internet and you wont have to worry about users setting it up incorrectly. - Original Message - From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:13 AM Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk You're exactly right..that's what happened. I just didn't want to go into explaining all of that. But we cannot as mail administrators rely on our users to use this feature correctly. You're just setting yourself up for trouble. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk OOFs generally do not cause mail loops unless you are unwisely using a rule. - Original Message - From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:08 AM Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk I finally got my manager to allow me to turn this feature off. I've been telling her that this will leave us vulnerable for possible mail loops. And wouldn't you know it...we had one and she was like..you're right. Please turn that off. I don't think it's a good idea just for that fact. Cause it's a nightmare trying to fix a mail loop. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk My company allows them to go out. I don't use the feature at all. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk On a technical list I'm on that concerns Exchange (among other things) someone forwarded to the list someone's OOF from a major company. From his name and location the person found his address on the web. Since his OOF said he'd be gone for two weeks, out of town on vacation, he essentially is telling the whole world his house is unattended and ripe for picking. Bad idea. It's just a bad idea. - Original Message - From: Archie Call [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:01 PM Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very convincing. The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. ...Archie Call Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
Yea, I know. That's what I finally convinced my manager to turn that function off. Up until now, they wanted to keep that function. But once that happened she realized that we cannot leave ourselves open to a potential mail loop because of our users, using Outlook incorrectly. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Deny auto-replies to the Internet and you wont have to worry about users setting it up incorrectly. - Original Message - From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:13 AM Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk You're exactly right..that's what happened. I just didn't want to go into explaining all of that. But we cannot as mail administrators rely on our users to use this feature correctly. You're just setting yourself up for trouble. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk OOFs generally do not cause mail loops unless you are unwisely using a rule. - Original Message - From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:08 AM Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk I finally got my manager to allow me to turn this feature off. I've been telling her that this will leave us vulnerable for possible mail loops. And wouldn't you know it...we had one and she was like..you're right. Please turn that off. I don't think it's a good idea just for that fact. Cause it's a nightmare trying to fix a mail loop. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk My company allows them to go out. I don't use the feature at all. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk On a technical list I'm on that concerns Exchange (among other things) someone forwarded to the list someone's OOF from a major company. From his name and location the person found his address on the web. Since his OOF said he'd be gone for two weeks, out of town on vacation, he essentially is telling the whole world his house is unattended and ripe for picking. Bad idea. It's just a bad idea. - Original Message - From: Archie Call [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:01 PM Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very convincing. The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. ...Archie Call Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Defragging (important???)
Yes, fortunately we were allowed to purchase Backup Exec - which is the most wonderful tape backup solution I've ever found. So - we have solid backups of the Message Store. Thanks for everybody's input - I just won't worry about it then, but still look at the event logs from time to time. Have a great holiday everyone :-) Mike - Original Message - From: Mark Harford [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:30 AM Subject: RE: Defragging (important???) Might be worth just checking your event log to confirm that the online maintenance is indeed running and not being interrupted by the backup. You should see 1221 events indicating the amount of white space for instance. Also I assume you are doing full online backups as well since the backup api does a certain amount of store error checking. Mark -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 December 2002 03:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Defragging (important???) Michael, there is an online process that performs this function by default on a nightly basis. It is beneficial (note: not even necessary, only beneficial) when: - you move a large amount of data from the store - you delete a large amount of data from the store In other words, don't worry about it. Go back to the Christmas party. Relax. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michael Anderson Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 7:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, I was just perusing some threads, and caught some particular threads regarding defragging the message store. The one that hit me hard, was the person that found out that doom was eminent - because of a specific error code, found in the Event Viewer regarding the Exchange Message Store. Is the Exchange Message Store supposed to be periodically defragged??? Are there ramifications, if the Message Store gets past a certain point of fragmentation? I am not trying to avoid any research, and be lazy on this topic - but all I need to know, is YES this is an important topic, and I better learn more about it FAST, or NO - it's just something good to do once in a while. Thanks in advance for any advice offered, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message filter in Exchange 2000
I am quite familiar with Q258696 about modifying global settings in Exchange 2000 and have read the section on Creating a Message Filter List. In that section it gives the following examples on adding filters. [EMAIL PROTECTED] *@ domain.com user@*. domain.com *@*. domain.com I want to do a different filter and it hasn't work and I'm wondering if anyone can explain why or how I would set this type of filter up. *@bounce.*.* If anyone has any insight into this, I would greatly appreciate it. - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN
Thirded. The other benefit is the lower costs. A BCV volume for EMC is essentially a mirror of your existing set of spindles (which are probably mirrored). The DB is shut down and the mirror is broken and mounted elsewhere for backup to tape. In order to remount that mirror for the next day, you'll need to shut down the DB again. You can create a fourth mirror to mount as you are breaking the first one. That's 4 sets of spindles to handle the disk needs. That can get really expensive and you'll still need to verify the integrity of the DB before you back it up to tape. Backing it up to disk can take fewer disks as you are generally more concerned with volume size rather than spindle I/O's. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN Doing that also interrupts any users who are logged on. I agree about backing up to disk and snapping the backup file. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 5:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN script that shuts down the db does the snapshot and then restarts the db all done in less than a minute. Yo I don't know about you, but shutting down my Exchange databases takes significantly longer than a minute. Granted, they're still predominantly Ex5.5, but its not a one minute process. Might be if I did it daily, but I can't, since we run 24x7. Personally, I still think the best way to do it is to use a backup to disk option and rip that to tape, or use an agent based backup. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN It's only if you are taking snapshots of running db's that you have the problems. OK I know there are a number of sites out there who will not allow even a minute of the air but the majority of us can live with a script that shuts down the db does the snapshot and then restarts the db all done in less than a minute. You can then kick off your backup which backs the snapshot up to tape. I have seen this form of snapshotting on EMC and NetApps and it works very well. I have also seen Oracle databases recovered from snapshots successfully. Listening to MS they have added support for snapshots in Windows.NET and they are also saying that there will be snapshotting available on the next version of Exchange, but lets wait and see. The snapshots in .NET is more of a complete copy followed by delta's for each subsequent snapshot. EMC and NetApps use technology that provides instant snapshots as all it does it take a snapshot of the block allocation table and only if a block is about to change does it create a second block to keep a copy of the block as at the time of the snapshot. This obviously saves on space but if you have a mutliple disk failure does mean you could lose all of the data for that snapshot, though in one of these modern SAN's with multiple spare drives is very unlikely. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 18 December 2002 1:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN If you cant restore it, whats the point? Is it safe to assume the same with a SQL or Oracle db as well? What about a AD global directory? I'm getting the impression that its good for file systems and file servers and not much more. e- -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 11:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN You might be able to restore one if you're lucky. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 5:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN You can take snapshot backups of the database. You can't restore them, but you can take them. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 5:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: More OT: Hitachi SAN
cannot see all Win2k users from Exchange admin
greetings, Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT4 sp6a. We have users in multiple NT4 domains (same domains as the Exchange servers) and users in a Win2k domain with multiple two-way trusts. The problem is that when I want to add a Win2k user to the permissions tab of a mailbox, I cannot see all of the Win2k users. (I only see the users from one top level OU, and not from the other OU's) I can add users from the other OU's only after performing the search function. If anybody has any ideas I sure would love to hear them. Thanks, mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online Defragmentation
Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Online Defragmentation
IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
That's the feature of XP. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL XP - requesting data from server Hey all. I am really getting tired of hearing again and again from my users that their Outlook XP pops up a progress bar that slowly crawls across and says Outlook is requesting data from Exchange server. This is happening to our internal Outlook XP users. The users and the Exchange server are on the same LAN. What is wrong with this XP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LDAP Queries for Mac clients
Best paces to check would be: www.puremac.com Or better yet do what I did an dgo to Google and search on +LDAP +Macintosh You get quite a few entries with this search. Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Pennell, Ronald B. Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 08:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: LDAP Queries for Mac clients Does anyone know of an easy way for mac clients to perform LDAP searches. I know it works if they use outlook, but, most use eudora and other apps. I'm running W2K SP2, E2K SP2 at my site. Also, pro's and con's of allowing LDAP Anonymous queries to the AD. Understand mac clients need this to allow them to access the AD for lookups. Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
Yeah. It tells you when it's improperly configured so you can hire someone to fix it, and annotate it on your network/email administrator's performance review. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:42 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Online Defragmentation Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server That's the feature of XP. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL XP - requesting data from server Hey all. I am really getting tired of hearing again and again from my users that their Outlook XP pops up a progress bar that slowly crawls across and says Outlook is requesting data from Exchange server. This is happening to our internal Outlook XP users. The users and the Exchange server are on the same LAN. What is wrong with this XP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cannot see all Win2k users from Exchange admin
Sounds like an AD permissions issue. Has someone removed Authenticated Users from having Read rights from the top level of those OUs? This is sometimes done to prevent browsing through the OU structure despite there being Read rights further down the structure. It can cause problems with Address List creation as well so best avoided if possible. rgrds Mark -Original Message- From: Herb, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 December 2002 15:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: cannot see all Win2k users from Exchange admin greetings, Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT4 sp6a. We have users in multiple NT4 domains (same domains as the Exchange servers) and users in a Win2k domain with multiple two-way trusts. The problem is that when I want to add a Win2k user to the permissions tab of a mailbox, I cannot see all of the Win2k users. (I only see the users from one top level OU, and not from the other OU's) I can add users from the other OU's only after performing the search function. If anybody has any ideas I sure would love to hear them. Thanks, mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not seeing the IS Maintenance tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Online Defragmentation
On the server name itself, not Servers. - Original Message - From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:04 PM Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
In the Exchange Administrator? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not seeing the IS Maintenance tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
Do you only have one Exchange Server? Are you in 5.5 or E2k? We have seen this when I User requests information from one of our other Servers (or the bandwidth is saturated). Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server That's the feature of XP. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL XP - requesting data from server Hey all. I am really getting tired of hearing again and again from my users that their Outlook XP pops up a progress bar that slowly crawls across and says Outlook is requesting data from Exchange server. This is happening to our internal Outlook XP users. The users and the Exchange server are on the same LAN. What is wrong with this XP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
Dear Andy, Thank you. How much consecutive time should I give for this process? What are your settings (out of curiosity)? At the present (some of it will change), I have all 7 days looking the same, and each day has four hours total, given to this process. There are two two-hour blocks. The first taking place from 12:01 AM till 1:59 AM. The second taking place from 11:01 AM till 12:59 PM. If I only allocate one hour, and the process starts but does not finish, will it actually stop until the next selected block of time? I am led to think so. Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
Dude. You cant right click on anything in Ex55. You are using E2K, aren't you? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not seeing the IS Maintenance tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
Christ, I thought we were talking about E2K :[ My baad! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Dude. You cant right click on anything in Ex55. You are using E2K, aren't you? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not seeing the IS Maintenance tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
I've also seen this when the GC was being swamped (high CPU)... -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Do you only have one Exchange Server? Are you in 5.5 or E2k? We have seen this when I User requests information from one of our other Servers (or the bandwidth is saturated). Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server That's the feature of XP. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL XP - requesting data from server Hey all. I am really getting tired of hearing again and again from my users that their Outlook XP pops up a progress bar that slowly crawls across and says Outlook is requesting data from Exchange server. This is happening to our internal Outlook XP users. The users and the Exchange server are on the same LAN. What is wrong with this XP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
Do you use outlook? Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation In the Exchange Administrator? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cannot see all Win2k users from Exchange admin
this was the problem. Thank You! -mike -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: cannot see all Win2k users from Exchange admin Sounds like an AD permissions issue. Has someone removed Authenticated Users from having Read rights from the top level of those OUs? This is sometimes done to prevent browsing through the OU structure despite there being Read rights further down the structure. It can cause problems with Address List creation as well so best avoided if possible. rgrds Mark -Original Message- From: Herb, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 December 2002 15:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: cannot see all Win2k users from Exchange admin greetings, Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT4 sp6a. We have users in multiple NT4 domains (same domains as the Exchange servers) and users in a Win2k domain with multiple two-way trusts. The problem is that when I want to add a Win2k user to the permissions tab of a mailbox, I cannot see all of the Win2k users. (I only see the users from one top level OU, and not from the other OU's) I can add users from the other OU's only after performing the search function. If anybody has any ideas I sure would love to hear them. Thanks, mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
Set it to run in the middle of the night -- say 1:00 a.m. Block out the 1:00 a.m. for all days. That doesn't mean it will stop when 2:00 a.m. comes. It will complete the cycle. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Dear Andy, Thank you. How much consecutive time should I give for this process? What are your settings (out of curiosity)? At the present (some of it will change), I have all 7 days looking the same, and each day has four hours total, given to this process. There are two two-hour blocks. The first taking place from 12:01 AM till 1:59 AM. The second taking place from 11:01 AM till 12:59 PM. If I only allocate one hour, and the process starts but does not finish, will it actually stop until the next selected block of time? I am led to think so. Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
In that case look on the properties of the mailbox store. Database tab, maintenance interval. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:11 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Online Defragmentation Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Christ, I thought we were talking about E2K :[ My baad! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Dude. You cant right click on anything in Ex55. You are using E2K, aren't you? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not seeing the IS Maintenance tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
Re: Online Defragmentation
Every night off hours and outside the backup run schedule makes sense to me. Its a low priority task, and will run up to one hour after the scheduled time block. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:06 PM Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Dear Andy, Thank you. How much consecutive time should I give for this process? What are your settings (out of curiosity)? At the present (some of it will change), I have all 7 days looking the same, and each day has four hours total, given to this process. There are two two-hour blocks. The first taking place from 12:01 AM till 1:59 AM. The second taking place from 11:01 AM till 12:59 PM. If I only allocate one hour, and the process starts but does not finish, will it actually stop until the next selected block of time? I am led to think so. Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
Thank you very much. Sorry about that...got everone's panties in a knot there I see :) __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation In that case look on the properties of the mailbox store. Database tab, maintenance interval. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:11 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Online Defragmentation Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Christ, I thought we were talking about E2K :[ My baad! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Dude. You cant right click on anything in Ex55. You are using E2K, aren't you? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not seeing the IS Maintenance tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
I have found this to be related to attempts to find a Public Folder or Organizatuonal Form that might be homed on another server other than the users account. It could also be just heavy traffic or views. From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:42:01 -0500 That's the feature of XP. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL XP - requesting data from server Hey all. I am really getting tired of hearing again and again from my users that their Outlook XP pops up a progress bar that slowly crawls across and says Outlook is requesting data from Exchange server. This is happening to our internal Outlook XP users. The users and the Exchange server are on the same LAN. What is wrong with this XP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
That's ok I'm not wearing underwear today -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Thank you very much. Sorry about that...got everone's panties in a knot there I see :) __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation In that case look on the properties of the mailbox store. Database tab, maintenance interval. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:11 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Online Defragmentation Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Christ, I thought we were talking about E2K :[ My baad! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Dude. You cant right click on anything in Ex55. You are using E2K, aren't you? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not seeing the IS Maintenance tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Online Defragmentation
Too much information. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 19 December 2002 17:15 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Online Defragmentation Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation That's ok I'm not wearing underwear today -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Thank you very much. Sorry about that...got everone's panties in a knot there I see :) __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation In that case look on the properties of the mailbox store. Database tab, maintenance interval. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:11 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Online Defragmentation Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Christ, I thought we were talking about E2K :[ My baad! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Dude. You cant right click on anything in Ex55. You are using E2K, aren't you? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not seeing the IS Maintenance tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
But it seems that XP wants to hang more often. I am using Outlook 2000, most of my users are on XP. We are all on the same LAN, and the Exchange server is on the same LAN too. I admit, once in a while my Outlook hangs. But not as often as these people get their progress bars on XP. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server 1. Apply latest service pack 2. Lock down all your NICs' speed and duplex settings, as well as the hub. Server and workstations, please. 3. The thing that fixed it once and for all, for me, was the Office XP Accessibility Update thingy. This should be rolled into OfficeXP SP2. 4. Does this happen when the user accesses the root of a public folder tree, with 12 bazillion public folders at that level? Decrease that. 5. RPC binding order on the client. (I don't believe this should be necessary, but couldn't hoit.) 6. DNS, DNS, DNS. Your final question, What is wrong...? is interesting. Before, Outlook would just hang. Now it tells you it's hanging. The difference is somebody staring at you slack-jawed, and someone saying gimme a minute to think... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 15, 2002 1:40 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Online Defragmentation Subject: OL XP - requesting data from server Hey all. I am really getting tired of hearing again and again from my users that their Outlook XP pops up a progress bar that slowly crawls across and says Outlook is requesting data from Exchange server. This is happening to our internal Outlook XP users. The users and the Exchange server are on the same LAN. What is wrong with this XP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
I have seen this. But we have only one server. -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have found this to be related to attempts to find a Public Folder or Organizatuonal Form that might be homed on another server other than the users account. It could also be just heavy traffic or views. From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:42:01 -0500 That's the feature of XP. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL XP - requesting data from server Hey all. I am really getting tired of hearing again and again from my users that their Outlook XP pops up a progress bar that slowly crawls across and says Outlook is requesting data from Exchange server. This is happening to our internal Outlook XP users. The users and the Exchange server are on the same LAN. What is wrong with this XP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
But that's where the is BDSM chamber is, why would I want to move out..sorry got to go, I need to put the ball gag back in -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation Dont you think its time to move out of your parents basement? - Original Message - From: Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:15 PM Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation That's ok I'm not wearing underwear today -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Thank you very much. Sorry about that...got everone's panties in a knot there I see :) __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation In that case look on the properties of the mailbox store. Database tab, maintenance interval. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:11 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Online Defragmentation Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Christ, I thought we were talking about E2K :[ My baad! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Dude. You cant right click on anything in Ex55. You are using E2K, aren't you? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not seeing the IS Maintenance tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer
RE: Online Defragmentation
Now that comment is definitely categorized in the TMI department. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation But that's where the is BDSM chamber is, why would I want to move out..sorry got to go, I need to put the ball gag back in -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation Dont you think its time to move out of your parents basement? - Original Message - From: Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:15 PM Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation That's ok I'm not wearing underwear today -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Thank you very much. Sorry about that...got everone's panties in a knot there I see :) __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation In that case look on the properties of the mailbox store. Database tab, maintenance interval. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:11 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Online Defragmentation Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Christ, I thought we were talking about E2K :[ My baad! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Dude. You cant right click on anything in Ex55. You are using E2K, aren't you? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not seeing the IS Maintenance tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after
Re: explorer window grayed-out
Does anyone else on this list keep current with updates? Has anyone else experienced a problem where in W2K Adv server the explorer window, the folder view does not display? It remains grayed out. This is occurring on multiple systems, I applied the critical update last night. Just curious. - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exch 5.5 - E2K
All, I'm trying to decommission my last Exch 5.5 server in my site. What I've noticed is that this server has a direction replication connector setup to another site that has a 5.5 server. But their accounts are located on a W2K server. Now, what I'm trying to figure out since all our servers are on E2K. Do I still need to keep this directory replication at all? I've actually had this server turned off for 2 days and haven't seen any changes. I'm just trying to feel good about me removing this server. Does it sound like it's good to go ahead and remove the last Exch 5.5 server? __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: explorer window grayed-out
Are you using terminal services to view this server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: explorer window grayed-out Does anyone else on this list keep current with updates? Has anyone else experienced a problem where in W2K Adv server the explorer window, the folder view does not display? It remains grayed out. This is occurring on multiple systems, I applied the critical update last night. Just curious. - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
A little too much information there. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation That's ok I'm not wearing underwear today -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Thank you very much. Sorry about that...got everone's panties in a knot there I see :) __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation In that case look on the properties of the mailbox store. Database tab, maintenance interval. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:11 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Online Defragmentation Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Christ, I thought we were talking about E2K :[ My baad! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Dude. You cant right click on anything in Ex55. You are using E2K, aren't you? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Yes, right clicking on the server and going to properties. I'm not seeing the IS Maintenance tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
Fw: explorer window grayed-out
nope, at the console. - Original Message - From: Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:37 AM Subject: RE: explorer window grayed-out Are you using terminal services to view this server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: explorer window grayed-out Does anyone else on this list keep current with updates? Has anyone else experienced a problem where in W2K Adv server the explorer window, the folder view does not display? It remains grayed out. This is occurring on multiple systems, I applied the critical update last night. Just curious. - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Online Defragmentation
And don't turn it off. Set it to run in the offhours. And whoever set it to run during the day, remove his admin privileges. - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:33 AM Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation IS Maint Tab Properties of the Server. - Original Message - From: Garrish, Robert B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: Online Defragmentation Dear DL Members, Our environment looks like this. NT Server 4.0 with SP6a Exchange 5.5 with SP4 One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation during the business day. During this time, and shortly after, Outlook 2000 Clients hang (hour glass). In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical order). Event ID 179 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 180 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb Event ID 181 Source = ESE97 Category = Online Defragmentation Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb Event ID 1207 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation has terminated Event ID 1221 Source = MSExchangeIS Private Category = General Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete. Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes place during off hours? Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch 5.5 - E2K
Clark who? -- From: Bowles, John L. Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 5.5 - E2K I don't want to be like Clark Griswold when he opens his bonus checkjust trying to get that rosey feeling. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch 5.5 - E2K All, I'm trying to decommission my last Exch 5.5 server in my site. What I've noticed is that this server has a direction replication connector setup to another site that has a 5.5 server. But their accounts are located on a W2K server. Now, what I'm trying to figure out since all our servers are on E2K. Do I still need to keep this directory replication at all? I've actually had this server turned off for 2 days and haven't seen any changes. I'm just trying to feel good about me removing this server. Does it sound like it's good to go ahead and remove the last Exch 5.5 server? __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: OL XP - requesting data from server
There is a document from Microsoft which addresses this issue: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/OutlkImp.doc (Page 16) Excerpt: When a send and receive task takes a noticeable amount of time, Outlook displays an improved progress dialog box. This dialog box provides more detailed information about send and receive operations than was available in previous versions of Outlook. The following sections describe additional improvements to send and receive performance within Outlook 2002. Fewer Exchange 2000 Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) Results of load testing indicate that the use of Outlook 2002 produces 17 percent fewer Exchange remote procedure calls (RPCs) than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Outlook uses RPCs to retrieve data from or send data to Exchange. Less Data Transmitted to the Exchange 2000 Server Test results indicate that Outlook 2002 transmits and receives 20 percent fewer bytes to and from Exchange than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Fewer Delays If Outlook 2002 cannot immediately complete an RPC, it notifies you of the delay. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box displays the progress of the RPC, and provides you with the option of canceling the call. For example, if Outlook 2002 cannot contact Exchange, you can cancel the call and try again later. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box To wait for the call to complete, minimize the dialog box and continue to work in Outlook 2002. Continuing to work in Outlook was not possible in earlier versions of Outlook. If you do not want the Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box to interrupt your work, select the Always minimize this message when a delay occurs check box. Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2002 18:27 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have seen this. But we have only one server. -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have found this to be related to attempts to find a Public Folder or Organizatuonal Form that might be homed on another server other than the users account. It could also be just heavy traffic or views. From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:42:01 -0500 That's the feature of XP. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL XP - requesting data from server Hey all. I am really getting tired of hearing again and again from my users that their Outlook XP pops up a progress bar that slowly crawls across and says Outlook is requesting data from Exchange server. This is happening to our internal Outlook XP users. The users and the Exchange server are on the same LAN. What is wrong with this XP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OL XP - requesting data from server
Although in another message you mentioned something about the server being uninstalled and reinstalled or something like that leaving an orphan FB folder. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have seen this. But we have only one server. -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have found this to be related to attempts to find a Public Folder or Organizatuonal Form that might be homed on another server other than the users account. It could also be just heavy traffic or views. From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:42:01 -0500 That's the feature of XP. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL XP - requesting data from server Hey all. I am really getting tired of hearing again and again from my users that their Outlook XP pops up a progress bar that slowly crawls across and says Outlook is requesting data from Exchange server. This is happening to our internal Outlook XP users. The users and the Exchange server are on the same LAN. What is wrong with this XP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch 5.5 - E2K
Chevy Chase in Christmas Vacation. Clark Griswold. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 5.5 - E2K Clark who? -- From: Bowles, John L. Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 5.5 - E2K I don't want to be like Clark Griswold when he opens his bonus checkjust trying to get that rosey feeling. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch 5.5 - E2K All, I'm trying to decommission my last Exch 5.5 server in my site. What I've noticed is that this server has a direction replication connector setup to another site that has a 5.5 server. But their accounts are located on a W2K server. Now, what I'm trying to figure out since all our servers are on E2K. Do I still need to keep this directory replication at all? I've actually had this server turned off for 2 days and haven't seen any changes. I'm just trying to feel good about me removing this server. Does it sound like it's good to go ahead and remove the last Exch 5.5 server? __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments
Thank you very much for this information. I would have never looked passed the user. We have had some difficulties with the user when they are trying to update meetings and add and delete others so I basically chalked this one to user error but this is very good info. Thanks again! Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 6:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Alex - By default, NAVCE creates a network scan of the M drive - turn this off in the Symantec System Center Console. This scan seemingly ignores any exclusion settings set locally on the server. Unfortunately, the only resort I found was to restore from backup. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments I have been away for awhile today but yes we do have NAV CE installed. How did you fix it if that was it. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 -Original Message- From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions I was some surprised when I pasted it. Sorry it was so long Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Those arent links, thats the whole pig. - Original Message - From: Boynton, Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Here's a couple links describing this issue. http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/9d94c8571a91ba4788 256b f3007f62b5/8b773850a36516fe88256c2f007e436d?OpenDocumentprev=http://sea rch. symantec.com/custom/us/techsupp/enterprise/kb/query.html?*col=kb%20us*st =1*n h=10*pcode=*qp=url:/ent-security.nsf/9d94c8571a91ba4788256bf3007f62b5,,, *qt= %2Bexchange%20%2B2000*miniver=sav_8_ce*sone=sav_8_ce_tasks.html*stg=*pro d=Sy mantec%20AntiVirus*ver=8.0%20Corporate%20Edition*base=http://www.symante c.co m/techsupp/enterprise/products/sav/sav_8_ce/*next=*boolean=andsone=sav_ 8_ce _tasks.htmlstg=prod=Symantec%20AntiVirusver=8.0%20Corporate%20Edition bas e=http://www.symantec.com/techsupp/enterprise/products/sav/sav_8_ce/nex t=s rc=entpcode=dtype=corpsvy= http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;301234 Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Indeed. I believe that things like things can be caused by scanning the M: drive (there's a tech article from MS somewhere). Neil -Original Message- From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 18 December 2002 15:30 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments Do you have Norton Antivirus installed? I had this very same problem when I had NAV installed. Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disappearing Calendar Appointments This is going to sound crazy but I have a user that is claiming that a couple of her appointments are disappearing off her calendar. She swears she isn't doing anything. Has anyone ever heard of appointments legitimately disappearing from the system? We are running O2002 and EX2000 SP3. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248)
RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
why when the GC is busy ?? is the client waiting because it needs some data back from the GC like a directory lookup?? or is this an exchange server issue, is there a way that you can tell what the real cause is without putting a sniffer on the lan thanks Ray --- Edgington, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've also seen this when the GC was being swamped (high CPU)... -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Do you only have one Exchange Server? Are you in 5.5 or E2k? We have seen this when I User requests information from one of our other Servers (or the bandwidth is saturated). Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server That's the feature of XP. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL XP - requesting data from server Hey all. I am really getting tired of hearing again and again from my users that their Outlook XP pops up a progress bar that slowly crawls across and says Outlook is requesting data from Exchange server. This is happening to our internal Outlook XP users. The users and the Exchange server are on the same LAN. What is wrong with this XP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
That's on a different network, on our hosting side where we have many Exchange 2000 servers and a lot of users connecting over the Internet. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server Although in another message you mentioned something about the server being uninstalled and reinstalled or something like that leaving an orphan FB folder. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have seen this. But we have only one server. -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have found this to be related to attempts to find a Public Folder or Organizatuonal Form that might be homed on another server other than the users account. It could also be just heavy traffic or views. From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:42:01 -0500 That's the feature of XP. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL XP - requesting data from server Hey all. I am really getting tired of hearing again and again from my users that their Outlook XP pops up a progress bar that slowly crawls across and says Outlook is requesting data from Exchange server. This is happening to our internal Outlook XP users. The users and the Exchange server are on the same LAN. What is wrong with this XP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OL XP - requesting data from server
Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; Value name : TimeToShowCancelDialog ; Data type : DWORD ; Value data : 5 (the amount of time in milliseconds) WRITEVALUE (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ) - Original Message - From: Rickenbacher Beat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:51 AM Subject: AW: OL XP - requesting data from server There is a document from Microsoft which addresses this issue: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/OutlkImp.doc (Page 16) Excerpt: When a send and receive task takes a noticeable amount of time, Outlook displays an improved progress dialog box. This dialog box provides more detailed information about send and receive operations than was available in previous versions of Outlook. The following sections describe additional improvements to send and receive performance within Outlook 2002. Fewer Exchange 2000 Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) Results of load testing indicate that the use of Outlook 2002 produces 17 percent fewer Exchange remote procedure calls (RPCs) than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Outlook uses RPCs to retrieve data from or send data to Exchange. Less Data Transmitted to the Exchange 2000 Server Test results indicate that Outlook 2002 transmits and receives 20 percent fewer bytes to and from Exchange than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Fewer Delays If Outlook 2002 cannot immediately complete an RPC, it notifies you of the delay. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box displays the progress of the RPC, and provides you with the option of canceling the call. For example, if Outlook 2002 cannot contact Exchange, you can cancel the call and try again later. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box To wait for the call to complete, minimize the dialog box and continue to work in Outlook 2002. Continuing to work in Outlook was not possible in earlier versions of Outlook. If you do not want the Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box to interrupt your work, select the Always minimize this message when a delay occurs check box. Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2002 18:27 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have seen this. But we have only one server. -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have found this to be related to attempts to find a Public Folder or Organizatuonal Form that might be homed on another server other than the users account. It could also be just heavy traffic or views. From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:42:01 -0500 That's the feature of XP. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL XP - requesting data from server Hey all. I am really getting tired of hearing again and again from my users that their Outlook XP pops up a progress bar that slowly crawls across and says Outlook is requesting data from Exchange server. This is happening to our internal Outlook XP users. The users and the Exchange server are on the same LAN. What is wrong with this XP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
Does it actually speed up the process or just delay the inevitable? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; Value name : TimeToShowCancelDialog ; Data type : DWORD ; Value data : 5 (the amount of time in milliseconds) WRITEVALUE (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ) - Original Message - From: Rickenbacher Beat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:51 AM Subject: AW: OL XP - requesting data from server There is a document from Microsoft which addresses this issue: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/OutlkImp.doc (Page 16) Excerpt: When a send and receive task takes a noticeable amount of time, Outlook displays an improved progress dialog box. This dialog box provides more detailed information about send and receive operations than was available in previous versions of Outlook. The following sections describe additional improvements to send and receive performance within Outlook 2002. Fewer Exchange 2000 Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) Results of load testing indicate that the use of Outlook 2002 produces 17 percent fewer Exchange remote procedure calls (RPCs) than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Outlook uses RPCs to retrieve data from or send data to Exchange. Less Data Transmitted to the Exchange 2000 Server Test results indicate that Outlook 2002 transmits and receives 20 percent fewer bytes to and from Exchange than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Fewer Delays If Outlook 2002 cannot immediately complete an RPC, it notifies you of the delay. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box displays the progress of the RPC, and provides you with the option of canceling the call. For example, if Outlook 2002 cannot contact Exchange, you can cancel the call and try again later. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box To wait for the call to complete, minimize the dialog box and continue to work in Outlook 2002. Continuing to work in Outlook was not possible in earlier versions of Outlook. If you do not want the Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box to interrupt your work, select the Always minimize this message when a delay occurs check box. Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2002 18:27 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have seen this. But we have only one server. -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have found this to be related to attempts to find a Public Folder or Organizatuonal Form that might be homed on another server other than the users account. It could also be just heavy traffic or views. From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:42:01 -0500 That's the feature of XP. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL XP - requesting data from server Hey all. I am really getting tired of hearing again and again from my users that their Outlook XP pops up a progress bar that slowly crawls across and says Outlook is requesting data from Exchange server. This is happening to our internal Outlook XP users. The users and the Exchange server are on the same LAN. What is wrong with this XP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
Re: OL XP - requesting data from server
The (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ), change DOES improve the efficiency in the communication between the XP client and the E2K server. I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5. The most dramatic performance improvement is when communicating with large data size transactions, ie. E-mail with large attachments, large public folders, or public folders with forms. I just used the delay of the window to calm users nerves, because by the time I had things figured out, users were edgy, due to this new contacting Exchange windows for a few months. Remember user perception is 99% of the game - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Does it actually speed up the process or just delay the inevitable? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; Value name : TimeToShowCancelDialog ; Data type : DWORD ; Value data : 5 (the amount of time in milliseconds) WRITEVALUE (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ) - Original Message - From: Rickenbacher Beat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:51 AM Subject: AW: OL XP - requesting data from server There is a document from Microsoft which addresses this issue: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/OutlkImp.doc (Page 16) Excerpt: When a send and receive task takes a noticeable amount of time, Outlook displays an improved progress dialog box. This dialog box provides more detailed information about send and receive operations than was available in previous versions of Outlook. The following sections describe additional improvements to send and receive performance within Outlook 2002. Fewer Exchange 2000 Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) Results of load testing indicate that the use of Outlook 2002 produces 17 percent fewer Exchange remote procedure calls (RPCs) than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Outlook uses RPCs to retrieve data from or send data to Exchange. Less Data Transmitted to the Exchange 2000 Server Test results indicate that Outlook 2002 transmits and receives 20 percent fewer bytes to and from Exchange than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Fewer Delays If Outlook 2002 cannot immediately complete an RPC, it notifies you of the delay. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box displays the progress of the RPC, and provides you with the option of canceling the call. For example, if Outlook 2002 cannot contact Exchange, you can cancel the call and try again later. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box To wait for the call to complete, minimize the dialog box and continue to work in Outlook 2002. Continuing to work in Outlook was not possible in earlier versions of Outlook. If you do not want the Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box to interrupt your work, select the Always minimize this message when a delay occurs check box. Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2002 18:27 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have seen this. But we have only one server. -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have found this to be related to attempts to find a Public Folder or Organizatuonal Form that might be homed on another server other than the users account. It could also be just heavy traffic or views. From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:42:01 -0500 That's the feature of XP. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM
RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
Um, RPC binding order has benefitted every version of Exchange I've ever used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server The (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ), change DOES improve the efficiency in the communication between the XP client and the E2K server. I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5. The most dramatic performance improvement is when communicating with large data size transactions, ie. E-mail with large attachments, large public folders, or public folders with forms. I just used the delay of the window to calm users nerves, because by the time I had things figured out, users were edgy, due to this new contacting Exchange windows for a few months. Remember user perception is 99% of the game - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Does it actually speed up the process or just delay the inevitable? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outl ook\CancelRPC ; Value name : TimeToShowCancelDialog ; Data type : DWORD ; Value data : 5 (the amount of time in milliseconds) WRITEVALUE (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ) - Original Message - From: Rickenbacher Beat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:51 AM Subject: AW: OL XP - requesting data from server There is a document from Microsoft which addresses this issue: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/Out lkImp.doc (Page 16) Excerpt: When a send and receive task takes a noticeable amount of time, Outlook displays an improved progress dialog box. This dialog box provides more detailed information about send and receive operations than was available in previous versions of Outlook. The following sections describe additional improvements to send and receive performance within Outlook 2002. Fewer Exchange 2000 Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) Results of load testing indicate that the use of Outlook 2002 produces 17 percent fewer Exchange remote procedure calls (RPCs) than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Outlook uses RPCs to retrieve data from or send data to Exchange. Less Data Transmitted to the Exchange 2000 Server Test results indicate that Outlook 2002 transmits and receives 20 percent fewer bytes to and from Exchange than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Fewer Delays If Outlook 2002 cannot immediately complete an RPC, it notifies you of the delay. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box displays the progress of the RPC, and provides you with the option of canceling the call. For example, if Outlook 2002 cannot contact Exchange, you can cancel the call and try again later. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box To wait for the call to complete, minimize the dialog box and continue to work in Outlook 2002. Continuing to work in Outlook was not possible in earlier versions of Outlook. If you do not want the Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box to interrupt your work, select the Always minimize this message when a delay occurs check box. Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2002 18:27 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have seen this. But we have only one server. -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange
Re: OL XP - requesting data from server
Yes, but the key is wrong. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Um, RPC binding order has benefitted every version of Exchange I've ever used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server The (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ), change DOES improve the efficiency in the communication between the XP client and the E2K server. I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5. The most dramatic performance improvement is when communicating with large data size transactions, ie. E-mail with large attachments, large public folders, or public folders with forms. I just used the delay of the window to calm users nerves, because by the time I had things figured out, users were edgy, due to this new contacting Exchange windows for a few months. Remember user perception is 99% of the game - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Does it actually speed up the process or just delay the inevitable? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outl ook\CancelRPC ; Value name : TimeToShowCancelDialog ; Data type : DWORD ; Value data : 5 (the amount of time in milliseconds) WRITEVALUE (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ) - Original Message - From: Rickenbacher Beat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:51 AM Subject: AW: OL XP - requesting data from server There is a document from Microsoft which addresses this issue: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/Out lkImp.doc (Page 16) Excerpt: When a send and receive task takes a noticeable amount of time, Outlook displays an improved progress dialog box. This dialog box provides more detailed information about send and receive operations than was available in previous versions of Outlook. The following sections describe additional improvements to send and receive performance within Outlook 2002. Fewer Exchange 2000 Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) Results of load testing indicate that the use of Outlook 2002 produces 17 percent fewer Exchange remote procedure calls (RPCs) than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Outlook uses RPCs to retrieve data from or send data to Exchange. Less Data Transmitted to the Exchange 2000 Server Test results indicate that Outlook 2002 transmits and receives 20 percent fewer bytes to and from Exchange than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Fewer Delays If Outlook 2002 cannot immediately complete an RPC, it notifies you of the delay. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box displays the progress of the RPC, and provides you with the option of canceling the call. For example, if Outlook 2002 cannot contact Exchange, you can cancel the call and try again later. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box To wait for the call to complete, minimize the dialog box and continue to work in Outlook 2002. Continuing to work in Outlook was not possible in earlier versions of Outlook. If you do not want the Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box to interrupt your work, select the Always minimize this message when a delay occurs check box. Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL
RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
No its not. It hasn't changed, either. Seeing as it has nothing to do with the server version you're running, since this is set on the client, I have a hard time understanding why the key would change. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server Yes, but the key is wrong. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Um, RPC binding order has benefitted every version of Exchange I've ever used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server The (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ), change DOES improve the efficiency in the communication between the XP client and the E2K server. I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5. The most dramatic performance improvement is when communicating with large data size transactions, ie. E-mail with large attachments, large public folders, or public folders with forms. I just used the delay of the window to calm users nerves, because by the time I had things figured out, users were edgy, due to this new contacting Exchange windows for a few months. Remember user perception is 99% of the game - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Does it actually speed up the process or just delay the inevitable? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outl ook\CancelRPC ; Value name : TimeToShowCancelDialog ; Data type : DWORD ; Value data : 5 (the amount of time in milliseconds) WRITEVALUE (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ) - Original Message - From: Rickenbacher Beat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:51 AM Subject: AW: OL XP - requesting data from server There is a document from Microsoft which addresses this issue: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/Out lkImp.doc (Page 16) Excerpt: When a send and receive task takes a noticeable amount of time, Outlook displays an improved progress dialog box. This dialog box provides more detailed information about send and receive operations than was available in previous versions of Outlook. The following sections describe additional improvements to send and receive performance within Outlook 2002. Fewer Exchange 2000 Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) Results of load testing indicate that the use of Outlook 2002 produces 17 percent fewer Exchange remote procedure calls (RPCs) than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Outlook uses RPCs to retrieve data from or send data to Exchange. Less Data Transmitted to the Exchange 2000 Server Test results indicate that Outlook 2002 transmits and receives 20 percent fewer bytes to and from Exchange than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Fewer Delays If Outlook 2002 cannot immediately complete an RPC, it notifies you of the delay. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box displays
Re: OL XP - requesting data from server
I will have to pull my 5.5 server back up, I am sure it was a different key for 5.5!![1] I understand your point about this being a client side key, but I was under the slight remembrance that this added key was different under 5.5. I could be wrong it's been a while since I have looked at 5.5 - John Q Jr. [1] slight look of doubt. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:42 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server No its not. It hasn't changed, either. Seeing as it has nothing to do with the server version you're running, since this is set on the client, I have a hard time understanding why the key would change. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server Yes, but the key is wrong. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Um, RPC binding order has benefitted every version of Exchange I've ever used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server The (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ), change DOES improve the efficiency in the communication between the XP client and the E2K server. I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5. The most dramatic performance improvement is when communicating with large data size transactions, ie. E-mail with large attachments, large public folders, or public folders with forms. I just used the delay of the window to calm users nerves, because by the time I had things figured out, users were edgy, due to this new contacting Exchange windows for a few months. Remember user perception is 99% of the game - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Does it actually speed up the process or just delay the inevitable? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outl ook\CancelRPC ; Value name : TimeToShowCancelDialog ; Data type : DWORD ; Value data : 5 (the amount of time in milliseconds) WRITEVALUE (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ) - Original Message - From: Rickenbacher Beat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:51 AM Subject: AW: OL XP - requesting data from server There is a document from Microsoft which addresses this issue: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/Out lkImp.doc (Page 16) Excerpt: When a send and receive task takes a noticeable amount of time, Outlook displays an improved progress dialog box. This dialog box provides more detailed information about send and receive operations than was available in previous versions of Outlook. The following sections describe additional improvements to send and receive performance within Outlook 2002. Fewer Exchange 2000 Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) Results of load testing indicate that the use of
RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
I'm currently running it now - no need for you to look. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server I will have to pull my 5.5 server back up, I am sure it was a different key for 5.5!![1] I understand your point about this being a client side key, but I was under the slight remembrance that this added key was different under 5.5. I could be wrong it's been a while since I have looked at 5.5 - John Q Jr. [1] slight look of doubt. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:42 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server No its not. It hasn't changed, either. Seeing as it has nothing to do with the server version you're running, since this is set on the client, I have a hard time understanding why the key would change. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server Yes, but the key is wrong. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Um, RPC binding order has benefitted every version of Exchange I've ever used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server The (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ), change DOES improve the efficiency in the communication between the XP client and the E2K server. I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5. The most dramatic performance improvement is when communicating with large data size transactions, ie. E-mail with large attachments, large public folders, or public folders with forms. I just used the delay of the window to calm users nerves, because by the time I had things figured out, users were edgy, due to this new contacting Exchange windows for a few months. Remember user perception is 99% of the game - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Does it actually speed up the process or just delay the inevitable? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outl ook\CancelRPC ; Value name : TimeToShowCancelDialog ; Data type : DWORD ; Value data : 5 (the amount of time in milliseconds) WRITEVALUE (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ) - Original Message - From: Rickenbacher Beat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:51 AM Subject: AW: OL XP - requesting data from server There is a document from Microsoft which addresses this issue:
RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
I found changing the outlook binding order from doing WINS lookups to DNS lookups helped for a lot of users. There's a Q article on this somewhere. Also check out the reply to another thread I sent out on Public Folder ACL caching. Lastly what do the performance counters on your exchange servers show wrt disk queues, mta queues, etc? Mark -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 December 2002 17:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have found this to be related to attempts to find a Public Folder or Organizatuonal Form that might be homed on another server other than the users account. It could also be just heavy traffic or views. From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:42:01 -0500 That's the feature of XP. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL XP - requesting data from server Hey all. I am really getting tired of hearing again and again from my users that their Outlook XP pops up a progress bar that slowly crawls across and says Outlook is requesting data from Exchange server. This is happening to our internal Outlook XP users. The users and the Exchange server are on the same LAN. What is wrong with this XP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
Does this require a reboot? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions I'm currently running it now - no need for you to look. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server I will have to pull my 5.5 server back up, I am sure it was a different key for 5.5!![1] I understand your point about this being a client side key, but I was under the slight remembrance that this added key was different under 5.5. I could be wrong it's been a while since I have looked at 5.5 - John Q Jr. [1] slight look of doubt. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:42 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server No its not. It hasn't changed, either. Seeing as it has nothing to do with the server version you're running, since this is set on the client, I have a hard time understanding why the key would change. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server Yes, but the key is wrong. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Um, RPC binding order has benefitted every version of Exchange I've ever used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server The (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ), change DOES improve the efficiency in the communication between the XP client and the E2K server. I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5. The most dramatic performance improvement is when communicating with large data size transactions, ie. E-mail with large attachments, large public folders, or public folders with forms. I just used the delay of the window to calm users nerves, because by the time I had things figured out, users were edgy, due to this new contacting Exchange windows for a few months. Remember user perception is 99% of the game - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Does it actually speed up the process or just delay the inevitable? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outl ook\CancelRPC ; Value name : TimeToShowCancelDialog ; Data type : DWORD ; Value data : 5 (the amount of time in milliseconds) WRITEVALUE (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ) - Original Message - From: Rickenbacher Beat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:51 AM
Re: OL XP - requesting data from server
This is a client setting and only requires a restart of %exchange client%. On 12/19/02 14:26, Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does this require a reboot? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions I'm currently running it now - no need for you to look. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server I will have to pull my 5.5 server back up, I am sure it was a different key for 5.5!![1] I understand your point about this being a client side key, but I was under the slight remembrance that this added key was different under 5.5. I could be wrong it's been a while since I have looked at 5.5 - John Q Jr. [1] slight look of doubt. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:42 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server No its not. It hasn't changed, either. Seeing as it has nothing to do with the server version you're running, since this is set on the client, I have a hard time understanding why the key would change. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server Yes, but the key is wrong. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Um, RPC binding order has benefitted every version of Exchange I've ever used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server The (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ), change DOES improve the efficiency in the communication between the XP client and the E2K server. I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5. The most dramatic performance improvement is when communicating with large data size transactions, ie. E-mail with large attachments, large public folders, or public folders with forms. I just used the delay of the window to calm users nerves, because by the time I had things figured out, users were edgy, due to this new contacting Exchange windows for a few months. Remember user perception is 99% of the game - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Does it actually speed up the process or just delay the inevitable? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outl ook\CancelRPC ; Value name : TimeToShowCancelDialog ; Data type : DWORD ; Value data : 5 (the amount of time in milliseconds) WRITEVALUE (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange
Re: OL XP - requesting data from server
of the desktop? Yes. The Exchnage server, No! - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:26 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Does this require a reboot? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions I'm currently running it now - no need for you to look. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server I will have to pull my 5.5 server back up, I am sure it was a different key for 5.5!![1] I understand your point about this being a client side key, but I was under the slight remembrance that this added key was different under 5.5. I could be wrong it's been a while since I have looked at 5.5 - John Q Jr. [1] slight look of doubt. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:42 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server No its not. It hasn't changed, either. Seeing as it has nothing to do with the server version you're running, since this is set on the client, I have a hard time understanding why the key would change. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server Yes, but the key is wrong. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Um, RPC binding order has benefitted every version of Exchange I've ever used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server The (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ), change DOES improve the efficiency in the communication between the XP client and the E2K server. I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5. The most dramatic performance improvement is when communicating with large data size transactions, ie. E-mail with large attachments, large public folders, or public folders with forms. I just used the delay of the window to calm users nerves, because by the time I had things figured out, users were edgy, due to this new contacting Exchange windows for a few months. Remember user perception is 99% of the game - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Does it actually speed up the process or just delay the inevitable? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outl ook\CancelRPC ; Value name : TimeToShowCancelDialog ; Data type : DWORD ; Value data : 5 (the amount of time in milliseconds) WRITEVALUE (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider,
Re: OL XP - requesting data from server
---Correction --- -- I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5. should have read, blah. [1] Sorry for aby confusion. - John Q Jr. [1] Roger Seielstad (Swynk Exchange list communication, December 19, 2002) stated that Um, RPC binding order has benefitted every version of Exchange I've ever used. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:04 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I'm currently running it now - no need for you to look. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server I will have to pull my 5.5 server back up, I am sure it was a different key for 5.5!![1] I understand your point about this being a client side key, but I was under the slight remembrance that this added key was different under 5.5. I could be wrong it's been a while since I have looked at 5.5 - John Q Jr. [1] slight look of doubt. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:42 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server No its not. It hasn't changed, either. Seeing as it has nothing to do with the server version you're running, since this is set on the client, I have a hard time understanding why the key would change. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server Yes, but the key is wrong. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Um, RPC binding order has benefitted every version of Exchange I've ever used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server The (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ), change DOES improve the efficiency in the communication between the XP client and the E2K server. I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5. The most dramatic performance improvement is when communicating with large data size transactions, ie. E-mail with large attachments, large public folders, or public folders with forms. I just used the delay of the window to calm users nerves, because by the time I had things figured out, users were edgy, due to this new contacting Exchange windows for a few months. Remember user perception is 99% of the game - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Does it actually speed up the process or just delay the inevitable? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outl
RE: OL XP - requesting data from server
Sounds logical to me. I never had to reboot after making Outlook-related registry changes. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server This is a client setting and only requires a restart of %exchange client%. On 12/19/02 14:26, Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does this require a reboot? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions I'm currently running it now - no need for you to look. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server I will have to pull my 5.5 server back up, I am sure it was a different key for 5.5!![1] I understand your point about this being a client side key, but I was under the slight remembrance that this added key was different under 5.5. I could be wrong it's been a while since I have looked at 5.5 - John Q Jr. [1] slight look of doubt. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:42 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server No its not. It hasn't changed, either. Seeing as it has nothing to do with the server version you're running, since this is set on the client, I have a hard time understanding why the key would change. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server Yes, but the key is wrong. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Um, RPC binding order has benefitted every version of Exchange I've ever used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server The (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ), change DOES improve the efficiency in the communication between the XP client and the E2K server. I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5. The most dramatic performance improvement is when communicating with large data size transactions, ie. E-mail with large attachments, large public folders, or public folders with forms. I just used the delay of the window to calm users nerves, because by the time I had things figured out, users were edgy, due to this new contacting Exchange windows for a few months. Remember user perception is 99% of the game - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Does it actually speed up the process or just delay the inevitable? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ;
could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product and or support
Would anyone be will to give me their 2 cent on Trends Support? Why... I am considering moving to trends products or Symantec products (from another vendor to remain name less) It seems Trend gets good talk here...but Ive been testing it some (not all at this point yet) Ive had an occasion where the scan product missed a IRC Trojan... where Symantec detected it. Ive talked to trend two days ago and as of yet no response...another call to them a while ago did not leave me with the warm fuzzies... so opinions of either of the above products would be welcome. Exch55, NT4/ W2K, desktop the whole suite thingy' thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5
try Q259321 -Original Message- From: Stephen Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 5:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5 I had a similar problem with my home machine, even after disabling the pop-up stopper. My problem was with Zone Labs software firewall, I had the privacy settings too high. If you don't have anything like this running, then try going through your Internet Explorer options and resetting your security and privacy settings to default. Steve -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5 Presumably you are going through a firewall when you access OWA from home, and directly when you tried the laptop at work? What happens if you take the laptop home? Perhaps the firewall is using some sort of filter that isn't accepting your reply request? Mark -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 December 2002 21:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5 Hi there IE 6 - there's no anti popup software on this computer. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5 Forget the OWA part, my bad. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5 What version of OWA and IE? -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5 Hi all I have an unusual problem. When I access Outlook Web Access from my home machine, I can see all my emails. I can open my emails. However, if I try to reply to my emails, I hit the reply button and the window that normally allows me to reply never appears. I can type a new email, I just can't respond to an existing email. This doesn't happen on any other machine (I tried it at work with one of the laptops), just my home machine. I can't seem to find anything on Microsoft or Slipstick. Can anyone point me in the direction of a Q article that might be able to help me?? Thanks Russell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _
RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk
We had a virtual loop happen here from an OOF. Somebody went on vacation and set up OOF, then added an extra rule to auto-reply to all messages [1]. We have an app that uses a mailbox to send out daily updates, and has a rule on the mailbox to fire off a new message in response to anything sent directly to it. You guessed it - his OOF rule fired to it, and the secondary rule fired. He got an auto-reply back for both of them - the secondary rule continued to fire sending another note back to the unattended box, which sent another message, etc. . . The only thing that saved us was the Do not send limit on his mailbox. Darcy [1] I don't know what the guy was thinking - he said he wasn't sure which one was the OOF rule, so he set both. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 6:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk OOFs generally do not cause mail loops unless you are unwisely using a rule. - Original Message - From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:08 AM Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk I finally got my manager to allow me to turn this feature off. I've been telling her that this will leave us vulnerable for possible mail loops. And wouldn't you know it...we had one and she was like..you're right. Please turn that off. I don't think it's a good idea just for that fact. Cause it's a nightmare trying to fix a mail loop. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk My company allows them to go out. I don't use the feature at all. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk On a technical list I'm on that concerns Exchange (among other things) someone forwarded to the list someone's OOF from a major company. From his name and location the person found his address on the web. Since his OOF said he'd be gone for two weeks, out of town on vacation, he essentially is telling the whole world his house is unattended and ripe for picking. Bad idea. It's just a bad idea. - Original Message - From: Archie Call [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:01 PM Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Our company is proposing that we allow the Ouut Oof Offfice feature to be turned on for Internet Mail in Exchange 5.5. I have seen comments on this newsgroup discussing many security reasons for not doing this! I have looked in the PDF file but am have diffculty locating this discussion. I remember someone who wrote a little story that was very convincing. The downsides I see are: potential for mail looping (bugs in Exchange or Mailbox filled up); you tell the cyber crooks that you are gone and your house can be robbed; you tell the spammer they have a valid address; much increased mail traffic especially during a virus outbreat; you send numerous messages to everyone in a ListServer. If anyone has anything to add here, it would be greatly appreciated. ...Archie Call Note: I misspelled OOO so as not trigger your filter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My exchange server is acting like a POP3
I have a W2K EXCH2K Server (sp3 on each) with XP/outlook 2002 clients. We are all noticing lag in the delivery of messages. When sending a new message it will stay in the outbox until the sender clicks on another folder. Also there will be times that no new email will have come in but when you go to open an existing email there is a surge of deliveries. DNS seems fine, we have WINS and all IPs dynamically assigned on a single subnet. There are no other apparent issues with connectivity to the exchange server (a mapped drive for instance). Has anyone seen this before? Todd L. Bentley Rupert Technologies Group _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: My exchange server is acting like a POP3
open inbound UDP ports on your router. -Original Message- From: Bentley, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: My exchange server is acting like a POP3 I have a W2K EXCH2K Server (sp3 on each) with XP/outlook 2002 clients. We are all noticing lag in the delivery of messages. When sending a new message it will stay in the outbox until the sender clicks on another folder. Also there will be times that no new email will have come in but when you go to open an existing email there is a surge of deliveries. DNS seems fine, we have WINS and all IPs dynamically assigned on a single subnet. There are no other apparent issues with connectivity to the exchange server (a mapped drive for instance). Has anyone seen this before? Todd L. Bentley Rupert Technologies Group _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5
I had this scenario PC(DHCP)- D-Link router(DHCP) - BellSouth DSL modem/router I was able to click reply and get the reply window. But then when I clicked Send, the window would not close and the message would not get sent. The Send button turned grey for a few minutes. I think it is similar to your situation. Probably caused by routing and having to traverse multiple NATs. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5 Hi all I have an unusual problem. When I access Outlook Web Access from my home machine, I can see all my emails. I can open my emails. However, if I try to reply to my emails, I hit the reply button and the window that normally allows me to reply never appears. I can type a new email, I just can't respond to an existing email. This doesn't happen on any other machine (I tried it at work with one of the laptops), just my home machine. I can't seem to find anything on Microsoft or Slipstick. Can anyone point me in the direction of a Q article that might be able to help me?? Thanks Russell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product and or support
I've used Trend and I am very happy with their support. The only other company I would consider for my Exchange server is Sybari. They have some very interesting technology. Dennis Depp -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product and or support Would anyone be will to give me their 2 cent on Trends Support? Why... I am considering moving to trends products or Symantec products (from another vendor to remain name less) It seems Trend gets good talk here...but Ive been testing it some (not all at this point yet) Ive had an occasion where the scan product missed a IRC Trojan... where Symantec detected it. Ive talked to trend two days ago and as of yet no response...another call to them a while ago did not leave me with the warm fuzzies... so opinions of either of the above products would be welcome. Exch55, NT4/ W2K, desktop the whole suite thingy' thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product and or suppo rt
What scan engine and DAT versions are you using? Do you have it configured to scan all file types? -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product and or support Would anyone be will to give me their 2 cent on Trends Support? Why... I am considering moving to trends products or Symantec products (from another vendor to remain name less) It seems Trend gets good talk here...but Ive been testing it some (not all at this point yet) Ive had an occasion where the scan product missed a IRC Trojan... where Symantec detected it. Ive talked to trend two days ago and as of yet no response...another call to them a while ago did not leave me with the warm fuzzies... so opinions of either of the above products would be welcome. Exch55, NT4/ W2K, desktop the whole suite thingy' thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product and or support
Does Trend call their updates DATs? I always thought that was a McCrappy thing. FWIW, I havent used Trend's support, their corporate product rocks so I havent had the need I guess. I also use their retail AV version at home, but quite frankly, IMO, the new 2003 version of Peni$cillin bites and their support for it is even worse. -- Original Message -- From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:21:27 -0800 What scan engine and DAT versions are you using? Do you have it configured to scan all file types? -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product and or support Would anyone be will to give me their 2 cent on Trends Support? Why... I am considering moving to trends products or Symantec products (from another vendor to remain name less) It seems Trend gets good talk here...but Ive been testing it some (not all at this point yet) Ive had an occasion where the scan product missed a IRC Trojan... where Symantec detected it. Ive talked to trend two days ago and as of yet no response...another call to them a while ago did not leave me with the warm fuzzies... so opinions of either of the above products would be welcome. Exch55, NT4/ W2K, desktop the whole suite thingy' thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product and or suppo rt
They call them Patterns actually. Isn't it your dinner time? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product and or support Does Trend call their updates DATs? I always thought that was a McCrappy thing. FWIW, I havent used Trend's support, their corporate product rocks so I havent had the need I guess. I also use their retail AV version at home, but quite frankly, IMO, the new 2003 version of Peni$cillin bites and their support for it is even worse. -- Original Message -- From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:21:27 -0800 What scan engine and DAT versions are you using? Do you have it configured to scan all file types? -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product and or support Would anyone be will to give me their 2 cent on Trends Support? Why... I am considering moving to trends products or Symantec products (from another vendor to remain name less) It seems Trend gets good talk here...but Ive been testing it some (not all at this point yet) Ive had an occasion where the scan product missed a IRC Trojan... where Symantec detected it. Ive talked to trend two days ago and as of yet no response...another call to them a while ago did not leave me with the warm fuzzies... so opinions of either of the above products would be welcome. Exch55, NT4/ W2K, desktop the whole suite thingy' thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product and or suppo rt
One MAJOR gripe with the Corporate Product... It will not delete an ingected zip/rar file. It will detect it as infected, but cannot delete it because it is locking the file itself... A bit of bone-headed programming that they have been promising to fix for about a year now. Still love it... Far better than Norton... Just wish we did not have to manually delete those pesky Klez .rar files... Hth, David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unable to reply or forward to email in OWA, Exchange 2000
Exchange 2000 in a native mode child domain. OWA server setup as front end server in DMZ. 5 exchange 2000 servers scattered across the world, one in each remote office. For one office, they can't forward or reply to emails in OWA. All other remote offices are fine. I've tried logging in as one of the users from my machine and I can't respond or forward emails either. But I can from my own mailbox. looks like this is happening to everyone in that particular office. The users have the same rights and everyone else. Anyone have any ideas on what I should check? Thanks in advance, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product and or support
Will it quarantine or rename it? -- Original Message -- From: David Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:15:33 -0800 One MAJOR gripe with the Corporate Product... It will not delete an ingected zip/rar file. It will detect it as infected, but cannot delete it because it is locking the file itself... A bit of bone-headed programming that they have been promising to fix for about a year now. Still love it... Far better than Norton... Just wish we did not have to manually delete those pesky Klez .rar files... Hth, David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product and or support
Mongo eat BLT. -- Original Message -- From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:47:47 -0800 They call them Patterns actually. Isn't it your dinner time? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product and or support Does Trend call their updates DATs? I always thought that was a McCrappy thing. FWIW, I havent used Trend's support, their corporate product rocks so I havent had the need I guess. I also use their retail AV version at home, but quite frankly, IMO, the new 2003 version of Peni$cillin bites and their support for it is even worse. -- Original Message -- From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:21:27 -0800 What scan engine and DAT versions are you using? Do you have it configured to scan all file types? -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product and or support Would anyone be will to give me their 2 cent on Trends Support? Why... I am considering moving to trends products or Symantec products (from another vendor to remain name less) It seems Trend gets good talk here...but Ive been testing it some (not all at this point yet) Ive had an occasion where the scan product missed a IRC Trojan... where Symantec detected it. Ive talked to trend two days ago and as of yet no response...another call to them a while ago did not leave me with the warm fuzzies... so opinions of either of the above products would be welcome. Exch55, NT4/ W2K, desktop the whole suite thingy' thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help with creating a GAL
Hello, I admit, I am very new to modifying GALs - but it's an important skill to master, and I have to get this working. Since the Default Global Address List is grabbing everything from Active Directory that has an Exchange Address attached to it (which is not a desired thing), I want to create a more controlled version of the GAL - containing only entries that I dictate. What I *thought* would be the easiest thing - is to create a Group (lets call it ABC Group) containing only the recipients that I want. So I created ABC Group, and then I added all the Users and Contacts from Active Directory. So now we have a new Universal Distribution Group called ABC Group populated with 33 names that I selected from Active Directory. I then went to the Exchange Server, and using Exchange System Manager, I created another Global Address List under the All Global Address Lists Tree Item. I called it ABC Global. Then under Properties, I immediately went to the Advanced Tab since I know precisely the criteria I am interested in querying against. I created, Field: User - Group Membership Condition: Is (exactly) Value: ABC Group And after doing this, hitting the 'Find Now' button, brings back no results. I checked my typing for accuracy, among several other things. Is there something I am missing? Is there a better way to tackle this task, versus the way I am doing it? Thanks in advance for any information offered on this subject. Mike - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help with creating a GAL
First off, if you're going to insist on doing it this way (which I hope you don't) you're going to want to do use the distinguished name of the group: Group Membership Is Exactly cn=groupname,ou=OUname,dc=anderson,dc=net. Groups are calculated entities, and they don't work quite the way that you'd hope. Or that I'd hope. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q304516 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q304516 Better is to use a non-calculated attribute, like one of the ExtensionAttributes. Here's a quick dirty way using LDIFDE to populate the ExtensionAttribute1. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q237677 If you're running Enterprise, I like to throw people into different mailbox stores use that too. -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 19, 2002 6:49 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Help with creating a GAL Subject: Help with creating a GAL Hello, I admit, I am very new to modifying GALs - but it's an important skill to master, and I have to get this working. Since the Default Global Address List is grabbing everything from Active Directory that has an Exchange Address attached to it (which is not a desired thing), I want to create a more controlled version of the GAL - containing only entries that I dictate. What I *thought* would be the easiest thing - is to create a Group (lets call it ABC Group) containing only the recipients that I want. So I created ABC Group, and then I added all the Users and Contacts from Active Directory. So now we have a new Universal Distribution Group called ABC Group populated with 33 names that I selected from Active Directory. I then went to the Exchange Server, and using Exchange System Manager, I created another Global Address List under the All Global Address Lists Tree Item. I called it ABC Global. Then under Properties, I immediately went to the Advanced Tab since I know precisely the criteria I am interested in querying against. I created, Field: User - Group Membership Condition: Is (exactly) Value: ABC Group And after doing this, hitting the 'Find Now' button, brings back no results. I checked my typing for accuracy, among several other things. Is there something I am missing? Is there a better way to tackle this task, versus the way I am doing it? Thanks in advance for any information offered on this subject. Mike - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help with creating a GAL
Thank you SO much for taking the time to write such a great reply. I appreciate the information, and I will dive into this immediately. Mike :-) - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:41 PM Subject: RE: Help with creating a GAL First off, if you're going to insist on doing it this way (which I hope you don't) you're going to want to do use the distinguished name of the group: Group Membership Is Exactly cn=groupname,ou=OUname,dc=anderson,dc=net. Groups are calculated entities, and they don't work quite the way that you'd hope. Or that I'd hope. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q304516 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q304516 Better is to use a non-calculated attribute, like one of the ExtensionAttributes. Here's a quick dirty way using LDIFDE to populate the ExtensionAttribute1. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q237677 If you're running Enterprise, I like to throw people into different mailbox stores use that too. -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 19, 2002 6:49 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Help with creating a GAL Subject: Help with creating a GAL Hello, I admit, I am very new to modifying GALs - but it's an important skill to master, and I have to get this working. Since the Default Global Address List is grabbing everything from Active Directory that has an Exchange Address attached to it (which is not a desired thing), I want to create a more controlled version of the GAL - containing only entries that I dictate. What I *thought* would be the easiest thing - is to create a Group (lets call it ABC Group) containing only the recipients that I want. So I created ABC Group, and then I added all the Users and Contacts from Active Directory. So now we have a new Universal Distribution Group called ABC Group populated with 33 names that I selected from Active Directory. I then went to the Exchange Server, and using Exchange System Manager, I created another Global Address List under the All Global Address Lists Tree Item. I called it ABC Global. Then under Properties, I immediately went to the Advanced Tab since I know precisely the criteria I am interested in querying against. I created, Field: User - Group Membership Condition: Is (exactly) Value: ABC Group And after doing this, hitting the 'Find Now' button, brings back no results. I checked my typing for accuracy, among several other things. Is there something I am missing? Is there a better way to tackle this task, versus the way I am doing it? Thanks in advance for any information offered on this subject. Mike - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
