RE: Microsoft Metadirectory Services 2003
Last I heard it wasn't avilable to end of summer -Original Message- From: Evensen, Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 June 2003 15:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Microsoft Metadirectory Services 2003 I am trying to find MMS 2003, specifically the GAL sync tool. I understand MS has a standard version and an enterprise version. I am looking for the standard version. Have not been able to find information on where to acquire the tools. We are in the process of setting up a test environment with 2 forests, each with their own Exchange organization. We will need to replicate address lists between the organizations. Hoping the GAL sync tool will allow this replication. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Sam Evensen Systems Engineer, Systems Services Sunbeam _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need a product to move attachements for the web
Funny thing, it's a while I'm about to code something like that REALLY SOON NOW for internal use. A little bit more complicated since I'll need to traverse some firewalls and use unix based webservers, but basically the idea is exactly the same. Stupid instant poll: how many of you out there have something like that deployed internally ? Doesn't matter if it uses a commercial product or a internal development, I'm just curious how many organizations choose to... ahm... work around the insistence of users using email in order to send ??+MB files by email. Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +39-041-5907073 ph -- +39-041-5907472 fax -Original Message- From: P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Need a product to move attachements for the web This is what I have in mind: 1) User composes email in email client with attachment 2) Sends to outside organization 3) Email (Exchange) looks at message and compares size of attachments with an administrator defined setting 4) If it is less than the size, just sends on the message normaly 5) If it is greater than or equal to the size it moves the attachment to an IIS location and inserts a link and a passcode into the message (inplace of the attachment) 6) recipient recieves the message and clicks on the link 7) types in the passcode 8) downloads the file Get my drift? Anybody know a product that does this . . . I am sure I am not an original genius who just designed a product . . . . Paul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need a product to move attachements for the web
I spent a while looking for something similar, maybe without the initial exchange interaction as I think that may be tricky (I'm not a coder, it just sounds tricky, at least with 5.5). Most seem to be geared towards *nix, I didn't find a lot for IIS. I'd be most interested if anyone does find anything! regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 June 2003 20:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Need a product to move attachements for the web This is what I have in mind: 1) User composes email in email client with attachment 2) Sends to outside organization 3) Email (Exchange) looks at message and compares size of attachments with an administrator defined setting 4) If it is less than the size, just sends on the message normaly 5) If it is greater than or equal to the size it moves the attachment to an IIS location and inserts a link and a passcode into the message (inplace of the attachment) 6) recipient recieves the message and clicks on the link 7) types in the passcode 8) downloads the file Get my drift? Anybody know a product that does this . . . I am sure I am not an original genius who just designed a product . . . . Paul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need a product to move attachements for the web
Sounds like someworth deploying at some sites. most companies tell users if you need to send something larger that what is allowed they are told to use the FTP site and so on and so forth. I would like to see something like that. Count me as one. From: Herold Heiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Need a product to move attachements for the web Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:22:47 +0200 Funny thing, it's a while I'm about to code something like that REALLY SOON NOW for internal use. A little bit more complicated since I'll need to traverse some firewalls and use unix based webservers, but basically the idea is exactly the same. Stupid instant poll: how many of you out there have something like that deployed internally ? Doesn't matter if it uses a commercial product or a internal development, I'm just curious how many organizations choose to... ahm... work around the insistence of users using email in order to send ??+MB files by email. Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +39-041-5907073 ph -- +39-041-5907472 fax -Original Message- From: P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Need a product to move attachements for the web This is what I have in mind: 1) User composes email in email client with attachment 2) Sends to outside organization 3) Email (Exchange) looks at message and compares size of attachments with an administrator defined setting 4) If it is less than the size, just sends on the message normaly 5) If it is greater than or equal to the size it moves the attachment to an IIS location and inserts a link and a passcode into the message (inplace of the attachment) 6) recipient recieves the message and clicks on the link 7) types in the passcode 8) downloads the file Get my drift? Anybody know a product that does this . . . I am sure I am not an original genius who just designed a product . . . . Paul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook web access
Have recently set up outlook web access and set the config for a user and the http details, but having trouble loging in via a browser, not sure if I have missed a step. Does the users actual PC have to be set up to log on correctly?. What is the format for the url for the user?. Bit confused with it, we have just set up our own mail server with exchange 5.5. and have a user wanting to get their emails externally. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
Ya, it felt great. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:21 AM Subject: RE: TechEd Any news on the release yet? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [TX] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm asleep at the back of several of the Exchange specific presentations. Except for the one Andy Webb did. - Original Message - From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:10 PM Subject: TechEd Who else is here? stemy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TechEd
TMI my friend. TMI. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [TX] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: TechEd Ya, it felt great. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:21 AM Subject: RE: TechEd Any news on the release yet? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [TX] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm asleep at the back of several of the Exchange specific presentations. Except for the one Andy Webb did. - Original Message - From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:10 PM Subject: TechEd Who else is here? stemy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backing up the M Drive
Yep...that's the one I was talking about. Also there's a site called... http://www.microsoft.com that has some pretty good reads about Exchange. Granted, MS documentation is not as thorough as a Linux man page, but maybe they'll come around in time. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Just out of curiosity, which FAQ do you refer to, the one in the siggy? Are there any more good websites with good read's for exchange? There was a good website which I found this list on, but I forgotten what website that was :o -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 June 2003 18:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Neil, Have you even bothered to read the FAQ? All of the questions you are asking about restores/backups/retention are all in there. Jim -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Ahh right, so brick level backups albeit by Veritas or Arcserve is a bad idea anyway? Shame we have spent so much on Arcserve already, I wont recommend exchange agents and Veritas Backup then! So item retention is the way to go then. Let me think, this will allow me to restore files for a duration I set when setting up this retention (I assume?). That will have deleted files covered, the next scenario would be that the server crashes, I will only be wanting to do a full restore in this case. Okay, one last scenario, we have a leaver and we delete there mailbox from the server, then someone says oh can you get it back. I guess the best policy for this is to put leavers on a 5 day standby. I think that pretty much covers all events, and could be a better and cheaper alternative. Also a reason for them to give me more hard disk space in my servers ;) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 June 2003 18:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive The only way you can restore a single mailbox, as you described, is to have Brick Level Backups turned on. Before you say, Great, please consider this. When you run BLB's you do so by opening EVERY SINGLE EMAIL BOX to back them up. Not only is this time consuming, but is a great resource hog as well, and really quite un-necessary. Instead of using BLB's to correct user-errors such as deleting their whole inbox, you should implement Item Retention, and correct user permissions on public folders. Don't allow your users to delete ANY Public Folder, this way, you won't ever have to recreate it when they do this accidentally. To achieve Item Retention, go to www.microsoft.com and do a lookup in the Knowledge Base for ITEM RETENTION. There are more then enough Q Articles there to explain how to set this up. Hth, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive I was looking into the built in backup and noticed Exchange Options. Though I could not see anyway of selectively restoring only one mailbox via this method, or public folder using this backup? Is there a way of choosing which mailboxes you do and don't want to restore using the built in backup? When I try to expand the Microsoft Exchange tab it asks me which server do I want to query. I give it one, but the box never becomes un-greyed, the exchange server is local to where I am trying to run Microsoft Backup. The option for Microsoft Exchange Server is available and I can choose the server I want, but like I said previously this does not seem to allow for selective restore/backup on a per mailbox scale. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 June 2003 17:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Ouch. Don't. Everything I've read says that this will be the seventh sign that brings about Armageddon. Use NTBackup on your Exchange 2000 Server to backup to a file, then backup that file to tape using Arcserve. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backing up the M Drive I honestly have come to conclusion today that my arcserve backups would be a lot better off backing up the M drive, and not using the Exchange Agent at all. Does anyone else get this feeling ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Backing up the M Drive
Thanks, yeah I think I already knew about the Microsoft one, im fairly sure that I have even visited once or twice in the past, maybe im getting it mixed up with micr0soft.com? Anyway, are there any others that you know? I prefer the hobbyist sites, they seem to have better read ups than the creators site, because they speak from experience, not how it should work. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 June 2003 15:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Yep...that's the one I was talking about. Also there's a site called... http://www.microsoft.com that has some pretty good reads about Exchange. Granted, MS documentation is not as thorough as a Linux man page, but maybe they'll come around in time. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Just out of curiosity, which FAQ do you refer to, the one in the siggy? Are there any more good websites with good read's for exchange? There was a good website which I found this list on, but I forgotten what website that was :o -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 June 2003 18:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Neil, Have you even bothered to read the FAQ? All of the questions you are asking about restores/backups/retention are all in there. Jim -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Ahh right, so brick level backups albeit by Veritas or Arcserve is a bad idea anyway? Shame we have spent so much on Arcserve already, I wont recommend exchange agents and Veritas Backup then! So item retention is the way to go then. Let me think, this will allow me to restore files for a duration I set when setting up this retention (I assume?). That will have deleted files covered, the next scenario would be that the server crashes, I will only be wanting to do a full restore in this case. Okay, one last scenario, we have a leaver and we delete there mailbox from the server, then someone says oh can you get it back. I guess the best policy for this is to put leavers on a 5 day standby. I think that pretty much covers all events, and could be a better and cheaper alternative. Also a reason for them to give me more hard disk space in my servers ;) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 June 2003 18:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive The only way you can restore a single mailbox, as you described, is to have Brick Level Backups turned on. Before you say, Great, please consider this. When you run BLB's you do so by opening EVERY SINGLE EMAIL BOX to back them up. Not only is this time consuming, but is a great resource hog as well, and really quite un-necessary. Instead of using BLB's to correct user-errors such as deleting their whole inbox, you should implement Item Retention, and correct user permissions on public folders. Don't allow your users to delete ANY Public Folder, this way, you won't ever have to recreate it when they do this accidentally. To achieve Item Retention, go to www.microsoft.com and do a lookup in the Knowledge Base for ITEM RETENTION. There are more then enough Q Articles there to explain how to set this up. Hth, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive I was looking into the built in backup and noticed Exchange Options. Though I could not see anyway of selectively restoring only one mailbox via this method, or public folder using this backup? Is there a way of choosing which mailboxes you do and don't want to restore using the built in backup? When I try to expand the Microsoft Exchange tab it asks me which server do I want to query. I give it one, but the box never becomes un-greyed, the exchange server is local to where I am trying to run Microsoft Backup. The option for Microsoft Exchange Server is available and I can choose the server I want, but like I said previously this does not seem to allow for selective restore/backup on a per mailbox scale. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 June 2003 17:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Ouch. Don't. Everything I've read says that this will be the seventh sign that brings about Armageddon. Use NTBackup on your Exchange 2000 Server to backup to a file, then backup that file to tape using Arcserve. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
RE: IMS Corruption...
Any chance the NTFS permissions got changed on the \exchsrvr\imcdata\ directories? Or that it's corruption of the filesystem, which is reflecting as corruption of the IMC mailbox? Can you appropriate another machine (workstation even) to build as a second IMC and take some, or all, of the load off of your existing IMC? Maybe it's time to retire the very old hardware. The vast majority of virii we get come from the internet, so if you can upgrade your IMC box enough to run AV on it, you'll save a lot of work on your mailbox servers. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... Actually, now that I stop and think about it, this seems even stranger... Our IMS and Bridgehead machines run on very old hardware. Because of that, we are not running AV on either machine, only on the mailbox servers. So with no AV on the box trying to scan messages and attachments as the come thru the IMS, why would they have started seeing corruption all of a sudden? Would an increased amount of Spam being processed by the IMS cause this on old hardware? Our company has seen a ten-fold increase since January, in the number of NDR's being processed by the IMS and a five-fold increase in both the quantity of Spam blocked at the IMS and the amount of Spam still getting through and being reported. -Original Message- From: Greg S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMS Corruption... Thats kind of an old build of NAVMSE - see if you can get 2.18 from a recent Symantec AV distribution CD or from Symantec support. 2.18 bld 76 is the most recent i've seen. - Original Message - From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:13 PM Subject: IMS Corruption... Exchange 5.5, SP4 Win2k, SP2 NAVME Version: 2.12 (Build 59) I have 6,949 of the following errors in my IMS Application event log, since 4/9/03: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 3038 Date: 6/3/2003 Time: 8:43:03 AM User: N/A Computer: MAIL Description: An attempt to remove processed messages from the outbound store queue has failed. The removal will be retried later. If the messages are not removed before the service is shut down, the mail will be resent at service startup causing duplicate mail. This Q article is the exact message that I am getting and looks to be a valid fix for my problem: Q296879 - XFOR: Sent Messages Appear in the Internet Mail Service Queue and Event ID 3038 Occurs http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;296879 My question is this...The article says that this behavior has been observed when running CA's PantyShield, version 4.0.4. However, I am not, would not nor would I ever consider running this product on my Exchange box. So...can anyone tell me why this would happen? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backing up the M Drive
LOL... Yah...I'll go through some of my bookmarked pages today and see what I can put together for you. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Thanks, yeah I think I already knew about the Microsoft one, im fairly sure that I have even visited once or twice in the past, maybe im getting it mixed up with micr0soft.com? Anyway, are there any others that you know? I prefer the hobbyist sites, they seem to have better read ups than the creators site, because they speak from experience, not how it should work. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 June 2003 15:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Yep...that's the one I was talking about. Also there's a site called... http://www.microsoft.com that has some pretty good reads about Exchange. Granted, MS documentation is not as thorough as a Linux man page, but maybe they'll come around in time. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Just out of curiosity, which FAQ do you refer to, the one in the siggy? Are there any more good websites with good read's for exchange? There was a good website which I found this list on, but I forgotten what website that was :o -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 June 2003 18:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Neil, Have you even bothered to read the FAQ? All of the questions you are asking about restores/backups/retention are all in there. Jim -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Ahh right, so brick level backups albeit by Veritas or Arcserve is a bad idea anyway? Shame we have spent so much on Arcserve already, I wont recommend exchange agents and Veritas Backup then! So item retention is the way to go then. Let me think, this will allow me to restore files for a duration I set when setting up this retention (I assume?). That will have deleted files covered, the next scenario would be that the server crashes, I will only be wanting to do a full restore in this case. Okay, one last scenario, we have a leaver and we delete there mailbox from the server, then someone says oh can you get it back. I guess the best policy for this is to put leavers on a 5 day standby. I think that pretty much covers all events, and could be a better and cheaper alternative. Also a reason for them to give me more hard disk space in my servers ;) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 June 2003 18:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive The only way you can restore a single mailbox, as you described, is to have Brick Level Backups turned on. Before you say, Great, please consider this. When you run BLB's you do so by opening EVERY SINGLE EMAIL BOX to back them up. Not only is this time consuming, but is a great resource hog as well, and really quite un-necessary. Instead of using BLB's to correct user-errors such as deleting their whole inbox, you should implement Item Retention, and correct user permissions on public folders. Don't allow your users to delete ANY Public Folder, this way, you won't ever have to recreate it when they do this accidentally. To achieve Item Retention, go to www.microsoft.com and do a lookup in the Knowledge Base for ITEM RETENTION. There are more then enough Q Articles there to explain how to set this up. Hth, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive I was looking into the built in backup and noticed Exchange Options. Though I could not see anyway of selectively restoring only one mailbox via this method, or public folder using this backup? Is there a way of choosing which mailboxes you do and don't want to restore using the built in backup? When I try to expand the Microsoft Exchange tab it asks me which server do I want to query. I give it one, but the box never becomes un-greyed, the exchange server is local to where I am trying to run Microsoft Backup. The option for Microsoft Exchange Server is available and I can choose the server I want, but like I said previously this does not seem to allow for selective restore/backup on a per mailbox scale. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 June 2003 17:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Ouch. Don't. Everything I've read says that this
RE: IMS Corruption...
No...no NTFS permissions changes. I'm the only Exchange admin in the company and the only person allowed to make changes to the configuration of the machine. As far as the virii issue goes, I'd rather leave it the way it is. We are blocking almost everything in the MBLD (Martin Blackstone's List of Danger) and stop roughly 80-90% of our virii at the Linux mail gateway before they even reach the IMS. Besides, our mailbox servers are pretty beefy Compaq servers that are well up to the task of virus scanning...good suggestion though. I would LOVE to replace the IMS, but our contract here is in a state of flux and we won't be getting any new servers in and I'm not sure we have a workstation that could handle the load. -Original Message- From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 7:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... Any chance the NTFS permissions got changed on the \exchsrvr\imcdata\ directories? Or that it's corruption of the filesystem, which is reflecting as corruption of the IMC mailbox? Can you appropriate another machine (workstation even) to build as a second IMC and take some, or all, of the load off of your existing IMC? Maybe it's time to retire the very old hardware. The vast majority of virii we get come from the internet, so if you can upgrade your IMC box enough to run AV on it, you'll save a lot of work on your mailbox servers. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... Actually, now that I stop and think about it, this seems even stranger... Our IMS and Bridgehead machines run on very old hardware. Because of that, we are not running AV on either machine, only on the mailbox servers. So with no AV on the box trying to scan messages and attachments as the come thru the IMS, why would they have started seeing corruption all of a sudden? Would an increased amount of Spam being processed by the IMS cause this on old hardware? Our company has seen a ten-fold increase since January, in the number of NDR's being processed by the IMS and a five-fold increase in both the quantity of Spam blocked at the IMS and the amount of Spam still getting through and being reported. -Original Message- From: Greg S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMS Corruption... Thats kind of an old build of NAVMSE - see if you can get 2.18 from a recent Symantec AV distribution CD or from Symantec support. 2.18 bld 76 is the most recent i've seen. - Original Message - From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:13 PM Subject: IMS Corruption... Exchange 5.5, SP4 Win2k, SP2 NAVME Version: 2.12 (Build 59) I have 6,949 of the following errors in my IMS Application event log, since 4/9/03: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 3038 Date: 6/3/2003 Time: 8:43:03 AM User: N/A Computer: MAIL Description: An attempt to remove processed messages from the outbound store queue has failed. The removal will be retried later. If the messages are not removed before the service is shut down, the mail will be resent at service startup causing duplicate mail. This Q article is the exact message that I am getting and looks to be a valid fix for my problem: Q296879 - XFOR: Sent Messages Appear in the Internet Mail Service Queue and Event ID 3038 Occurs http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;296879 My question is this...The article says that this behavior has been observed when running CA's PantyShield, version 4.0.4. However, I am not, would not nor would I ever consider running this product on my Exchange box. So...can anyone tell me why this would happen? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backing up the M Drive
Actually, you are using E2k, so my 5.5 bookmarks are probably not going to do you a lot of good. But I can recommend Jim McBee's - Exchange 2000 24/7 book...very informative. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive LOL... Yah...I'll go through some of my bookmarked pages today and see what I can put together for you. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Thanks, yeah I think I already knew about the Microsoft one, im fairly sure that I have even visited once or twice in the past, maybe im getting it mixed up with micr0soft.com? Anyway, are there any others that you know? I prefer the hobbyist sites, they seem to have better read ups than the creators site, because they speak from experience, not how it should work. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 June 2003 15:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Yep...that's the one I was talking about. Also there's a site called... http://www.microsoft.com that has some pretty good reads about Exchange. Granted, MS documentation is not as thorough as a Linux man page, but maybe they'll come around in time. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Just out of curiosity, which FAQ do you refer to, the one in the siggy? Are there any more good websites with good read's for exchange? There was a good website which I found this list on, but I forgotten what website that was :o -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 June 2003 18:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Neil, Have you even bothered to read the FAQ? All of the questions you are asking about restores/backups/retention are all in there. Jim -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Ahh right, so brick level backups albeit by Veritas or Arcserve is a bad idea anyway? Shame we have spent so much on Arcserve already, I wont recommend exchange agents and Veritas Backup then! So item retention is the way to go then. Let me think, this will allow me to restore files for a duration I set when setting up this retention (I assume?). That will have deleted files covered, the next scenario would be that the server crashes, I will only be wanting to do a full restore in this case. Okay, one last scenario, we have a leaver and we delete there mailbox from the server, then someone says oh can you get it back. I guess the best policy for this is to put leavers on a 5 day standby. I think that pretty much covers all events, and could be a better and cheaper alternative. Also a reason for them to give me more hard disk space in my servers ;) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 June 2003 18:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive The only way you can restore a single mailbox, as you described, is to have Brick Level Backups turned on. Before you say, Great, please consider this. When you run BLB's you do so by opening EVERY SINGLE EMAIL BOX to back them up. Not only is this time consuming, but is a great resource hog as well, and really quite un-necessary. Instead of using BLB's to correct user-errors such as deleting their whole inbox, you should implement Item Retention, and correct user permissions on public folders. Don't allow your users to delete ANY Public Folder, this way, you won't ever have to recreate it when they do this accidentally. To achieve Item Retention, go to www.microsoft.com and do a lookup in the Knowledge Base for ITEM RETENTION. There are more then enough Q Articles there to explain how to set this up. Hth, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive I was looking into the built in backup and noticed Exchange Options. Though I could not see anyway of selectively restoring only one mailbox via this method, or public folder using this backup? Is there a way of choosing which mailboxes you do and don't want to restore using the built in backup? When I try to expand the Microsoft Exchange tab it asks me which server do I want to query. I give it one, but the box never becomes un-greyed, the exchange server is local to where I am trying to run Microsoft Backup. The option for Microsoft Exchange Server is available
Outlook XP Licensing
When you purchase sufficient Exchange 2000 licensing, you're entitled to install Outlook 2000 on each of the licensed clients, or so im lead to believe? :o Anyway, can you install Outlook XP on these clients without the need for any kind of Office XP license? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backing up the M Drive
Yah, ill get the boss to buy it me then :) Thanks for the pointers and the help anyway!! -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 June 2003 15:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Actually, you are using E2k, so my 5.5 bookmarks are probably not going to do you a lot of good. But I can recommend Jim McBee's - Exchange 2000 24/7 book...very informative. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive LOL... Yah...I'll go through some of my bookmarked pages today and see what I can put together for you. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Thanks, yeah I think I already knew about the Microsoft one, im fairly sure that I have even visited once or twice in the past, maybe im getting it mixed up with micr0soft.com? Anyway, are there any others that you know? I prefer the hobbyist sites, they seem to have better read ups than the creators site, because they speak from experience, not how it should work. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 June 2003 15:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Yep...that's the one I was talking about. Also there's a site called... http://www.microsoft.com that has some pretty good reads about Exchange. Granted, MS documentation is not as thorough as a Linux man page, but maybe they'll come around in time. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Just out of curiosity, which FAQ do you refer to, the one in the siggy? Are there any more good websites with good read's for exchange? There was a good website which I found this list on, but I forgotten what website that was :o -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 June 2003 18:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Neil, Have you even bothered to read the FAQ? All of the questions you are asking about restores/backups/retention are all in there. Jim -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Ahh right, so brick level backups albeit by Veritas or Arcserve is a bad idea anyway? Shame we have spent so much on Arcserve already, I wont recommend exchange agents and Veritas Backup then! So item retention is the way to go then. Let me think, this will allow me to restore files for a duration I set when setting up this retention (I assume?). That will have deleted files covered, the next scenario would be that the server crashes, I will only be wanting to do a full restore in this case. Okay, one last scenario, we have a leaver and we delete there mailbox from the server, then someone says oh can you get it back. I guess the best policy for this is to put leavers on a 5 day standby. I think that pretty much covers all events, and could be a better and cheaper alternative. Also a reason for them to give me more hard disk space in my servers ;) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 June 2003 18:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive The only way you can restore a single mailbox, as you described, is to have Brick Level Backups turned on. Before you say, Great, please consider this. When you run BLB's you do so by opening EVERY SINGLE EMAIL BOX to back them up. Not only is this time consuming, but is a great resource hog as well, and really quite un-necessary. Instead of using BLB's to correct user-errors such as deleting their whole inbox, you should implement Item Retention, and correct user permissions on public folders. Don't allow your users to delete ANY Public Folder, this way, you won't ever have to recreate it when they do this accidentally. To achieve Item Retention, go to www.microsoft.com and do a lookup in the Knowledge Base for ITEM RETENTION. There are more then enough Q Articles there to explain how to set this up. Hth, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive I was looking into the built in backup and noticed Exchange Options. Though I could not see anyway of selectively restoring only one mailbox via this method, or public folder using this backup? Is there a way of choosing which mailboxes you do and don't want to restore using the built in backup? When I try to
RE: Outlook XP Licensing
AFAIK, yes, since you're using E2k. If you were 5.5, then no. Neil -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 04 June 2003 15:50 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Outlook XP Licensing Subject: Outlook XP Licensing When you purchase sufficient Exchange 2000 licensing, you're entitled to install Outlook 2000 on each of the licensed clients, or so im lead to believe? :o Anyway, can you install Outlook XP on these clients without the need for any kind of Office XP license? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:11 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
â²Úh²PÛiÿü0ÂÌÇ(ú«qïÞÅÈ_j¨mg{^özm§ÿâÊZ®Ib²×(÷
¸§þ\«Êez{^ì\
©àz¶j zV§éà+!N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²)åËZvh§³
§Ê
RE: Outlook XP Licensing
In general, yes, that is how the Exchange CAL license reads. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP Licensing When you purchase sufficient Exchange 2000 licensing, you're entitled to install Outlook 2000 on each of the licensed clients, or so im lead to believe? :o Anyway, can you install Outlook XP on these clients without the need for any kind of Office XP license? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TechEd
I'm in the middle asleep in them Start snoring next time so I'll know where you are :) A couple, like Andy's, have been really good and very useful A few, like this WMI one, zonked me out quick... Stemy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [TX] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:43 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd I'm asleep at the back of several of the Exchange specific presentations. Except for the one Andy Webb did. - Original Message - From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:10 PM Subject: TechEd Who else is here? stemy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.
Be nice Stephen. You don't know how he got the job. I'm sure that your first day in dojo you didn't know Jujitsu from wu-shu pork. At least he's asking questions before something goes boom. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:01 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. You took a job as an Exchange Admin and don't know how to build a basic DR environment? stemy -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:28 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Hello All: Second day on the job as the new Exchange Admin and I need help! My employer has a two yr old backup tape of Exchange data. The Co. was using Arc-Serve 6.5. We are now using Veritas but found a version of Arc-Serve and believe we have recovered the data. Now, I need to place the data onto an Exchange Server so I can XMerge the necessary mailboxes into .pst files. Is there a way I can move the priv.edb and pub.edb files to my bridgehead or other mail servers and XMerge the needed data that is being requested for legal reasons nonetheless? Or, do I need to build a new Exchange Server? Any detailed information is much appreciated. Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Microsoft Metadirectory Services 2003
I am trying to find MMS 2003, specifically the GAL sync tool. I understand MS has a standard version and an enterprise version. I am looking for the standard version. Have not been able to find information on where to acquire the tools. We are in the process of setting up a test environment with 2 forests, each with their own Exchange organization. We will need to replicate address lists between the organizations. Hoping the GAL sync tool will allow this replication. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Sam Evensen Systems Engineer, Systems Services Sunbeam _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.
Nobody in their right minds would take an Exchange server or be a Exchange Admin.I too inherited the $#%^ thing and depend on help from people with more experience. So please, no crappy commentsjust help if you can. Thanks. Newbie too! -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. You took a job as an Exchange Admin and don't know how to build a basic DR environment? stemy -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:28 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Hello All: Second day on the job as the new Exchange Admin and I need help! My employer has a two yr old backup tape of Exchange data. The Co. was using Arc-Serve 6.5. We are now using Veritas but found a version of Arc-Serve and believe we have recovered the data. Now, I need to place the data onto an Exchange Server so I can XMerge the necessary mailboxes into .pst files. Is there a way I can move the priv.edb and pub.edb files to my bridgehead or other mail servers and XMerge the needed data that is being requested for legal reasons nonetheless? Or, do I need to build a new Exchange Server? Any detailed information is much appreciated. Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.
Uh oh -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Nobody in their right minds would take an Exchange server or be a Exchange Admin.I too inherited the $#%^ thing and depend on help from people with more experience. So please, no crappy commentsjust help if you can. Thanks. Newbie too! -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. You took a job as an Exchange Admin and don't know how to build a basic DR environment? stemy -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:28 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Hello All: Second day on the job as the new Exchange Admin and I need help! My employer has a two yr old backup tape of Exchange data. The Co. was using Arc-Serve 6.5. We are now using Veritas but found a version of Arc-Serve and believe we have recovered the data. Now, I need to place the data onto an Exchange Server so I can XMerge the necessary mailboxes into .pst files. Is there a way I can move the priv.edb and pub.edb files to my bridgehead or other mail servers and XMerge the needed data that is being requested for legal reasons nonetheless? Or, do I need to build a new Exchange Server? Any detailed information is much appreciated. Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS Corruption...
What kind of traffic do you get? We're handling 40,000+ messages per day through our primary IMC, running on a 333MHz box with 256MB RAM. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... No...no NTFS permissions changes. I'm the only Exchange admin in the company and the only person allowed to make changes to the configuration of the machine. As far as the virii issue goes, I'd rather leave it the way it is. We are blocking almost everything in the MBLD (Martin Blackstone's List of Danger) and stop roughly 80-90% of our virii at the Linux mail gateway before they even reach the IMS. Besides, our mailbox servers are pretty beefy Compaq servers that are well up to the task of virus scanning...good suggestion though. I would LOVE to replace the IMS, but our contract here is in a state of flux and we won't be getting any new servers in and I'm not sure we have a workstation that could handle the load. -Original Message- From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 7:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... Any chance the NTFS permissions got changed on the \exchsrvr\imcdata\ directories? Or that it's corruption of the filesystem, which is reflecting as corruption of the IMC mailbox? Can you appropriate another machine (workstation even) to build as a second IMC and take some, or all, of the load off of your existing IMC? Maybe it's time to retire the very old hardware. The vast majority of virii we get come from the internet, so if you can upgrade your IMC box enough to run AV on it, you'll save a lot of work on your mailbox servers. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... Actually, now that I stop and think about it, this seems even stranger... Our IMS and Bridgehead machines run on very old hardware. Because of that, we are not running AV on either machine, only on the mailbox servers. So with no AV on the box trying to scan messages and attachments as the come thru the IMS, why would they have started seeing corruption all of a sudden? Would an increased amount of Spam being processed by the IMS cause this on old hardware? Our company has seen a ten-fold increase since January, in the number of NDR's being processed by the IMS and a five-fold increase in both the quantity of Spam blocked at the IMS and the amount of Spam still getting through and being reported. -Original Message- From: Greg S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMS Corruption... Thats kind of an old build of NAVMSE - see if you can get 2.18 from a recent Symantec AV distribution CD or from Symantec support. 2.18 bld 76 is the most recent i've seen. - Original Message - From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:13 PM Subject: IMS Corruption... Exchange 5.5, SP4 Win2k, SP2 NAVME Version: 2.12 (Build 59) I have 6,949 of the following errors in my IMS Application event log, since 4/9/03: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 3038 Date: 6/3/2003 Time: 8:43:03 AM User: N/A Computer: MAIL Description: An attempt to remove processed messages from the outbound store queue has failed. The removal will be retried later. If the messages are not removed before the service is shut down, the mail will be resent at service startup causing duplicate mail. This Q article is the exact message that I am getting and looks to be a valid fix for my problem: Q296879 - XFOR: Sent Messages Appear in the Internet Mail Service Queue and Event ID 3038 Occurs http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;296879 My question is this...The article says that this behavior has been observed when running CA's PantyShield, version 4.0.4. However, I am not, would not nor would I ever consider running this product on my Exchange box. So...can anyone tell me why this would happen? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.
lol -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Uh oh -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Nobody in their right minds would take an Exchange server or be a Exchange Admin.I too inherited the $#%^ thing and depend on help from people with more experience. So please, no crappy commentsjust help if you can. Thanks. Newbie too! -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. You took a job as an Exchange Admin and don't know how to build a basic DR environment? stemy -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:28 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Hello All: Second day on the job as the new Exchange Admin and I need help! My employer has a two yr old backup tape of Exchange data. The Co. was using Arc-Serve 6.5. We are now using Veritas but found a version of Arc-Serve and believe we have recovered the data. Now, I need to place the data onto an Exchange Server so I can XMerge the necessary mailboxes into .pst files. Is there a way I can move the priv.edb and pub.edb files to my bridgehead or other mail servers and XMerge the needed data that is being requested for legal reasons nonetheless? Or, do I need to build a new Exchange Server? Any detailed information is much appreciated. Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Microsoft Metadirectory Services 2003
It's still in beta, You can download the enterprise version from the MMS website. Ken -Original Message- From: Evensen, Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions I am trying to find MMS 2003, specifically the GAL sync tool. I understand MS has a standard version and an enterprise version. I am looking for the standard version. Have not been able to find information on where to acquire the tools. We are in the process of setting up a test environment with 2 forests, each with their own Exchange organization. We will need to replicate address lists between the organizations. Hoping the GAL sync tool will allow this replication. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Sam Evensen Systems Engineer, Systems Services Sunbeam _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tracking and auditing Exchange administrators
I know that an admin can't read someone elses email by default. But they
*can* if they want to, and we simply want a way to audit this. Like I
said, this is a law firm and they are very particular about stuff like
this.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Jason,
By default the Exchange admin cannot read Emails (same as
GroupWise), only if he has implemented the Q article on how
to get round this security. I would say to set it back so
they cannot go into emails.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 June 2003 19:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Tracking and auditing Exchange administrators
I have a client that is in the middle of a Groupwise to
Exchange 2000 migration. They were a bit unsettled at the
discovery that an Exchange admin can grant himself permission
to read anyone's mail (something that is completely
impossible in Groupwise, short of changing the users'
password). They want to know how they can audit whether an
admin has modified the ACL on a mailbox store to grant
himself access to anyones mailbox. I know, I know, you should
be able to trust your administrators, but this is a law firm
and it's important that there's a paper trail.
I've done some testing and come up with the following
results. I wanted to run this by the group to see if anyone
can confirm or deny that I'm using the most appropriate
method to perform the auditing.
I've set the local policy on the Exchange server to audit
process tracking and privelege use. I then went into ESM and
gave an account full access to a mailbox store, including
send as and receive as rights.
I checked the security logs and found the following 3 events
(I actually found more than 3 events that appeared to be
generated when I modified the permissions, but these 3 seemed
most relevant):
Event Type: Success Audit
Event Source: Security
Event Category: Privilege Use
Event ID: 577
Date: 6/3/2003
Time: 11:08:06 AM
User: DOMAIN\User
Computer: SERVER
Description:
Privileged Service Called:
Server: Security
Service:-
Primary User Name: User
Primary Domain: DOMAIN
Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x29E68)
Client User Name: -
Client Domain: -
Client Logon ID:-
Privileges: SeIncreaseBasePriorityPrivilege
--
--
Event Type: Success Audit
Event Source: Security
Event Category: Privilege Use
Event ID: 577
Date: 6/3/2003
Time: 11:08:06 AM
User: DOMAIN\User
Computer: SERVER
Description:
Privileged Service Called:
Server: Security
Service:-
Primary User Name: User
Primary Domain: DOMAIN
Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x29E68)
Client User Name: -
Client Domain: -
Client Logon ID:-
Privileges: SeIncreaseBasePriorityPrivilege
-
Event Type: Success Audit
Event Source: Security
Event Category: Object Access
Event ID: 565
Date: 6/3/2003
Time: 11:08:25 AM
User: DOMAIN\User
Computer: SERVER
Description:
Object Open:
Object Server: Microsoft Exchange
Object Type:Microsoft Exchange Database
Object Name:/o=ORG/ou=First Administrative
Group/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=SERVER/cn=Microsoft Private MDB
New Handle ID: 0
Operation ID: {0,227067}
Process ID: 1636
Primary User Name: SERVER$
Primary Domain: DOMAIN
Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x3E7)
Client User Name: User
Client Domain: DOMAIN
Client Logon ID:(0x0,0x29E68)
AccessesUnknown specific access (bit 8)
Privileges -
Properties:
Unknown specific access (bit 8)
%{d0780592-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{d74a8762-22b9-11d3-aa62-00c04f8eedd8}
%{d74a8774-2289-11d3-aa62-00c04f8eedd8}
%{cf899a6a-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{cffe6da4-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{cfc7978e-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{d03a086e-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{d74a875e-22b9-11d3-aa62-00c04f8eedd8}
%{cf4b9d46-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{cf0b3dc8-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{d74a8766-22b9-11d3-aa62-00c04f8eedd8}
%{d74a8769-22b9-11d3-aa62-00c04f8eedd8}
RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.
We're here to help, but a lot of people on this list do tease people a little - don't take it personally. And most of us do expect people to make some kind of effort to figure things out themselves and read the help guides, etc, before expecting us to help. It's one thing to be stuck on a problem and need help and it's another to expect people on the list to do our job for us because I'm busy or Asking the list is quicker. Your time is a valuable resource; everyone else's is, too. Welcome to the list. Regards Rob Moir Microsoft MVP -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 June 2003 16:16 To: Exchange Discussions Nobody in their right minds would take an Exchange server or be a Exchange Admin.I too inherited the $#%^ thing and depend on help from people with more experience. So please, no crappy commentsjust help if you can. Thanks. Newbie too! -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. You took a job as an Exchange Admin and don't know how to build a basic DR environment? stemy -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:28 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Hello All: Second day on the job as the new Exchange Admin and I need help! My employer has a two yr old backup tape of Exchange data. The Co. was using Arc-Serve 6.5. We are now using Veritas but found a version of Arc-Serve and believe we have recovered the data. Now, I need to place the data onto an Exchange Server so I can XMerge the necessary mailboxes into .pst files. Is there a way I can move the priv.edb and pub.edb files to my bridgehead or other mail servers and XMerge the needed data that is being requested for legal reasons nonetheless? Or, do I need to build a new Exchange Server? Any detailed information is much appreciated. Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi- bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.
Color me crazy then. I picked this life a while ago and would never look back. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Nobody in their right minds would take an Exchange server or be a Exchange Admin.I too inherited the $#%^ thing and depend on help from people with more experience. So please, no crappy commentsjust help if you can. Thanks. Newbie too! -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. You took a job as an Exchange Admin and don't know how to build a basic DR environment? stemy -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:28 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Hello All: Second day on the job as the new Exchange Admin and I need help! My employer has a two yr old backup tape of Exchange data. The Co. was using Arc-Serve 6.5. We are now using Veritas but found a version of Arc-Serve and believe we have recovered the data. Now, I need to place the data onto an Exchange Server so I can XMerge the necessary mailboxes into .pst files. Is there a way I can move the priv.edb and pub.edb files to my bridgehead or other mail servers and XMerge the needed data that is being requested for legal reasons nonetheless? Or, do I need to build a new Exchange Server? Any detailed information is much appreciated. Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS Corruption...
It's a PII 450 with only 64 mb of RAM and a 2gb hard drive, handling an organization of 750 mailboxes. Last month alone, it sent out 180k+ NDR's, blocked 67k+ spam e-mails and delivered another 5,700+ spam e-mails...and that's just the spam people reported. That doesn't count all the legit traffic and the spam no one reports. -Original Message- From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... What kind of traffic do you get? We're handling 40,000+ messages per day through our primary IMC, running on a 333MHz box with 256MB RAM. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... No...no NTFS permissions changes. I'm the only Exchange admin in the company and the only person allowed to make changes to the configuration of the machine. As far as the virii issue goes, I'd rather leave it the way it is. We are blocking almost everything in the MBLD (Martin Blackstone's List of Danger) and stop roughly 80-90% of our virii at the Linux mail gateway before they even reach the IMS. Besides, our mailbox servers are pretty beefy Compaq servers that are well up to the task of virus scanning...good suggestion though. I would LOVE to replace the IMS, but our contract here is in a state of flux and we won't be getting any new servers in and I'm not sure we have a workstation that could handle the load. -Original Message- From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 7:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... Any chance the NTFS permissions got changed on the \exchsrvr\imcdata\ directories? Or that it's corruption of the filesystem, which is reflecting as corruption of the IMC mailbox? Can you appropriate another machine (workstation even) to build as a second IMC and take some, or all, of the load off of your existing IMC? Maybe it's time to retire the very old hardware. The vast majority of virii we get come from the internet, so if you can upgrade your IMC box enough to run AV on it, you'll save a lot of work on your mailbox servers. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... Actually, now that I stop and think about it, this seems even stranger... Our IMS and Bridgehead machines run on very old hardware. Because of that, we are not running AV on either machine, only on the mailbox servers. So with no AV on the box trying to scan messages and attachments as the come thru the IMS, why would they have started seeing corruption all of a sudden? Would an increased amount of Spam being processed by the IMS cause this on old hardware? Our company has seen a ten-fold increase since January, in the number of NDR's being processed by the IMS and a five-fold increase in both the quantity of Spam blocked at the IMS and the amount of Spam still getting through and being reported. -Original Message- From: Greg S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMS Corruption... Thats kind of an old build of NAVMSE - see if you can get 2.18 from a recent Symantec AV distribution CD or from Symantec support. 2.18 bld 76 is the most recent i've seen. - Original Message - From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:13 PM Subject: IMS Corruption... Exchange 5.5, SP4 Win2k, SP2 NAVME Version: 2.12 (Build 59) I have 6,949 of the following errors in my IMS Application event log, since 4/9/03: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 3038 Date: 6/3/2003 Time: 8:43:03 AM User: N/A Computer: MAIL Description: An attempt to remove processed messages from the outbound store queue has failed. The removal will be retried later. If the messages are not removed before the service is shut down, the mail will be resent at service startup causing duplicate mail. This Q article is the exact message that I am getting and looks to be a valid fix for my problem: Q296879 - XFOR: Sent Messages Appear in the Internet Mail Service Queue and Event ID 3038 Occurs http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;296879 My question is this...The article says that this behavior has been observed when running CA's PantyShield, version 4.0.4. However, I am not, would not nor would I ever consider running this product on my Exchange box. So...can anyone tell me why this would happen? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
Name could not be resolved Error
I am getting an error message when trying to configure Outlook 2k client for one of our users. After I entered Exchange server Mailbox information and click on Check Name tab, the following error message pops up: The name could not be resolved. The Microsoft Exchange Address Book was unable to log on the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if the problem persists. After I click OK another error message pops up as The name could not be resolved. The action could not be completed. I have already tried reinstalling Office 2k on this machine. I have also tried creating a different profile that did not work either. But the strange thing is I can create a profile for him on another machine without any problem. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks much for your help in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Name could not be resolved Error
We had workstation behave like this and re-installing the TCP/IP stack fixed the problem. - Matt -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Name could not be resolved Error I am getting an error message when trying to configure Outlook 2k client for one of our users. After I entered Exchange server Mailbox information and click on Check Name tab, the following error message pops up: The name could not be resolved. The Microsoft Exchange Address Book was unable to log on the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if the problem persists. After I click OK another error message pops up as The name could not be resolved. The action could not be completed. I have already tried reinstalling Office 2k on this machine. I have also tried creating a different profile that did not work either. But the strange thing is I can create a profile for him on another machine without any problem. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks much for your help in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Name could not be resolved Error
That machine isn't able to hit the Exchange server, it's a network problem rather than an Outlook problem. Can you ping/tracert to it? Double check your network DNS settings, including the gateway. David -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Name could not be resolved Error I am getting an error message when trying to configure Outlook 2k client for one of our users. After I entered Exchange server Mailbox information and click on Check Name tab, the following error message pops up: The name could not be resolved. The Microsoft Exchange Address Book was unable to log on the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if the problem persists. After I click OK another error message pops up as The name could not be resolved. The action could not be completed. I have already tried reinstalling Office 2k on this machine. I have also tried creating a different profile that did not work either. But the strange thing is I can create a profile for him on another machine without any problem. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks much for your help in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Name could not be resolved Error
If you would have typed that error message into the Microsoft Knowledge Base you would have got the solution. Check article 269665. Jeff -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Name could not be resolved Error I am getting an error message when trying to configure Outlook 2k client for one of our users. After I entered Exchange server Mailbox information and click on Check Name tab, the following error message pops up: The name could not be resolved. The Microsoft Exchange Address Book was unable to log on the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if the problem persists. After I click OK another error message pops up as The name could not be resolved. The action could not be completed. I have already tried reinstalling Office 2k on this machine. I have also tried creating a different profile that did not work either. But the strange thing is I can create a profile for him on another machine without any problem. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks much for your help in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
Hello All: I am familiar with Exchange but now that I have been given all responsibilities pertaining to Exchange I am looking for good reading material. Any suggested material? Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
Managing Exchange Server by Paul Robichaux would be my choice, bit of a bible IMHO. It's published by O'Reilly. regards Paul -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 June 2003 17:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Hello All: I am familiar with Exchange but now that I have been given all responsibilities pertaining to Exchange I am looking for good reading material. Any suggested material? Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
Try the MS Newsgroup usually an MVP or MS will response to your questions within in 24 hours period. As for reading try the MS web site. -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Hello All: I am familiar with Exchange but now that I have been given all responsibilities pertaining to Exchange I am looking for good reading material. Any suggested material? Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
Microsoft's Exchange 5.5 Administrator's Pocket Consultant. Will need more but this is worth looking at. I use it alot. -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Hello All: I am familiar with Exchange but now that I have been given all responsibilities pertaining to Exchange I am looking for good reading material. Any suggested material? Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.
I didn't say it...you did. :) -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Color me crazy then. I picked this life a while ago and would never look back. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Nobody in their right minds would take an Exchange server or be a Exchange Admin.I too inherited the $#%^ thing and depend on help from people with more experience. So please, no crappy commentsjust help if you can. Thanks. Newbie too! -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. You took a job as an Exchange Admin and don't know how to build a basic DR environment? stemy -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:28 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Hello All: Second day on the job as the new Exchange Admin and I need help! My employer has a two yr old backup tape of Exchange data. The Co. was using Arc-Serve 6.5. We are now using Veritas but found a version of Arc-Serve and believe we have recovered the data. Now, I need to place the data onto an Exchange Server so I can XMerge the necessary mailboxes into .pst files. Is there a way I can move the priv.edb and pub.edb files to my bridgehead or other mail servers and XMerge the needed data that is being requested for legal reasons nonetheless? Or, do I need to build a new Exchange Server? Any detailed information is much appreciated. Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
Indeed. I have dozens of Exchange books. Literally. If I compare, say, Barry Gerber's Mastering Exchange 5.5 (Sybex) with Paul Robichaux's book, I get more info in fewer pages in Paul's and the text is readable. Maybe it's an author-reader compatability thing. I find the style suitable. No offense intended to Mr Gerber, but Plus, when I go to the index with a search term in mind, it is THERE. In some other books, I struggle to locate that which I seek. William - Original Message - From: Paul Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:36 AM Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Managing Exchange Server by Paul Robichaux would be my choice, bit of a bible IMHO. It's published by O'Reilly. regards Paul -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 June 2003 17:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Hello All: I am familiar with Exchange but now that I have been given all responsibilities pertaining to Exchange I am looking for good reading material. Any suggested material? Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.
Approaching 110,000,000 exchange seats out there That's a lot of people not in their right minds. Me, I'm left-handed, so I'm an exception. William - Original Message - From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:15 AM Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Nobody in their right minds would take an Exchange server or be a Exchange Admin.I too inherited the $#%^ thing and depend on help from people with more experience. So please, no crappy commentsjust help if you can. Thanks. Newbie too! -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. You took a job as an Exchange Admin and don't know how to build a basic DR environment? stemy -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:28 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Hello All: Second day on the job as the new Exchange Admin and I need help! My employer has a two yr old backup tape of Exchange data. The Co. was using Arc-Serve 6.5. We are now using Veritas but found a version of Arc-Serve and believe we have recovered the data. Now, I need to place the data onto an Exchange Server so I can XMerge the necessary mailboxes into .pst files. Is there a way I can move the priv.edb and pub.edb files to my bridgehead or other mail servers and XMerge the needed data that is being requested for legal reasons nonetheless? Or, do I need to build a new Exchange Server? Any detailed information is much appreciated. Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June
02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+-¦-xm¶ÿÃ
,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\
öªy²'µêßi¶Úþ)íÙl¥ªä+-r¿r嬦W§µêÞÅÈZ{f¡jx
b²èº{.nÇ+·¦j)m¢W½ç±r§él³ §Ê!jx .+-iX¬µ§f{0Êy ¢
Message filtering
I´m runnning Exchange 5.5 How to prevent all uusers in specific domain from delivering message to my site BUT allow only 2 users from that domain. Thank _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
and of course http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:46 AM Subject: Re: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Indeed. I have dozens of Exchange books. Literally. If I compare, say, Barry Gerber's Mastering Exchange 5.5 (Sybex) with Paul Robichaux's book, I get more info in fewer pages in Paul's and the text is readable. Maybe it's an author-reader compatability thing. I find the style suitable. No offense intended to Mr Gerber, but Plus, when I go to the index with a search term in mind, it is THERE. In some other books, I struggle to locate that which I seek. William - Original Message - From: Paul Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:36 AM Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Managing Exchange Server by Paul Robichaux would be my choice, bit of a bible IMHO. It's published by O'Reilly. regards Paul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
I've got to plug Jim McBee's Exchange 5.5 24/7 book. It's been a tremendous help to me. I don't know if it's still in print, though. John Orban System Administrator The Country School www.countryschool.org -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Hello All: I am familiar with Exchange but now that I have been given all responsibilities pertaining to Exchange I am looking for good reading material. Any suggested material? Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS Corruption...
It just needs more RAM. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... It's a PII 450 with only 64 mb of RAM and a 2gb hard drive, handling an organization of 750 mailboxes. Last month alone, it sent out 180k+ NDR's, blocked 67k+ spam e-mails and delivered another 5,700+ spam e-mails...and that's just the spam people reported. That doesn't count all the legit traffic and the spam no one reports. -Original Message- From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... What kind of traffic do you get? We're handling 40,000+ messages per day through our primary IMC, running on a 333MHz box with 256MB RAM. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... No...no NTFS permissions changes. I'm the only Exchange admin in the company and the only person allowed to make changes to the configuration of the machine. As far as the virii issue goes, I'd rather leave it the way it is. We are blocking almost everything in the MBLD (Martin Blackstone's List of Danger) and stop roughly 80-90% of our virii at the Linux mail gateway before they even reach the IMS. Besides, our mailbox servers are pretty beefy Compaq servers that are well up to the task of virus scanning...good suggestion though. I would LOVE to replace the IMS, but our contract here is in a state of flux and we won't be getting any new servers in and I'm not sure we have a workstation that could handle the load. -Original Message- From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 7:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... Any chance the NTFS permissions got changed on the \exchsrvr\imcdata\ directories? Or that it's corruption of the filesystem, which is reflecting as corruption of the IMC mailbox? Can you appropriate another machine (workstation even) to build as a second IMC and take some, or all, of the load off of your existing IMC? Maybe it's time to retire the very old hardware. The vast majority of virii we get come from the internet, so if you can upgrade your IMC box enough to run AV on it, you'll save a lot of work on your mailbox servers. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... Actually, now that I stop and think about it, this seems even stranger... Our IMS and Bridgehead machines run on very old hardware. Because of that, we are not running AV on either machine, only on the mailbox servers. So with no AV on the box trying to scan messages and attachments as the come thru the IMS, why would they have started seeing corruption all of a sudden? Would an increased amount of Spam being processed by the IMS cause this on old hardware? Our company has seen a ten-fold increase since January, in the number of NDR's being processed by the IMS and a five-fold increase in both the quantity of Spam blocked at the IMS and the amount of Spam still getting through and being reported. -Original Message- From: Greg S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMS Corruption... Thats kind of an old build of NAVMSE - see if you can get 2.18 from a recent Symantec AV distribution CD or from Symantec support. 2.18 bld 76 is the most recent i've seen. - Original Message - From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:13 PM Subject: IMS Corruption... Exchange 5.5, SP4 Win2k, SP2 NAVME Version: 2.12 (Build 59) I have 6,949 of the following errors in my IMS Application event log, since 4/9/03: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 3038 Date: 6/3/2003 Time: 8:43:03 AM User: N/A Computer: MAIL Description: An attempt to remove processed messages from the outbound store queue has failed. The removal will be retried later. If the messages are not removed before the service is shut down, the mail will be resent at service startup causing duplicate mail. This Q article is the exact message that I am getting and looks to be a valid fix for my problem: Q296879 - XFOR: Sent Messages Appear in the Internet Mail Service Queue and Event ID 3038 Occurs
RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
Check the books section on: http://www.wiredeuclid.com Specifically the book by Paul Robichaux. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Hello All: I am familiar with Exchange but now that I have been given all responsibilities pertaining to Exchange I am looking for good reading material. Any suggested material? Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
Actually, with the exception of this week, in which most of us (myself excluded) are at Tech-MEC, this is the largest collection of MVP's helping Exchange users around. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Try the MS Newsgroup usually an MVP or MS will response to your questions within in 24 hours period. As for reading try the MS web site. -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Hello All: I am familiar with Exchange but now that I have been given all responsibilities pertaining to Exchange I am looking for good reading material. Any suggested material? Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.
I beg to differ. And worldwide deployment numbers would certainly back me up, but this isn't the Care Bear List. No Nick at Night here. We don't dance around in a purple dinosaur outfit singing I love you...you love me well... Most of us don't. But I can guarantee that How to build a DR environment has been answering dozens of times (if not hundreds) in the archives. I've seen many publicly available articles on how to do it. Try google. But if you're going to come with a question, then at least do your homework and say I've read this article on doing this action, but I don't understand this point. That way, the list is a resource and NOT an attempt to avoid work. Just my $0.02 stemy -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:16 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Nobody in their right minds would take an Exchange server or be a Exchange Admin.I too inherited the $#%^ thing and depend on help from people with more experience. So please, no crappy commentsjust help if you can. Thanks. Newbie too! -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. You took a job as an Exchange Admin and don't know how to build a basic DR environment? stemy -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:28 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Hello All: Second day on the job as the new Exchange Admin and I need help! My employer has a two yr old backup tape of Exchange data. The Co. was using Arc-Serve 6.5. We are now using Veritas but found a version of Arc-Serve and believe we have recovered the data. Now, I need to place the data onto an Exchange Server so I can XMerge the necessary mailboxes into .pst files. Is there a way I can move the priv.edb and pub.edb files to my bridgehead or other mail servers and XMerge the needed data that is being requested for legal reasons nonetheless? Or, do I need to build a new Exchange Server? Any detailed information is much appreciated. Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
Thank you, Mr Active Directory MVP. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:57 AM Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Actually, with the exception of this week, in which most of us (myself excluded) are at Tech-MEC, this is the largest collection of MVP's helping Exchange users around. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Try the MS Newsgroup usually an MVP or MS will response to your questions within in 24 hours period. As for reading try the MS web site. -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Hello All: I am familiar with Exchange but now that I have been given all responsibilities pertaining to Exchange I am looking for good reading material. Any suggested material? Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
It is...I just ordered it from Amazon.com on Monday for $13.95 + SH...under $18 US total. I ordered it because I really liked the process schematics that McBee includes in the E2K - 24/7 book, so I figured they would be as good in the 5.5 book. -Original Message- From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? I've got to plug Jim McBee's Exchange 5.5 24/7 book. It's been a tremendous help to me. I don't know if it's still in print, though. John Orban System Administrator The Country School www.countryschool.org -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Hello All: I am familiar with Exchange but now that I have been given all responsibilities pertaining to Exchange I am looking for good reading material. Any suggested material? Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.
And I quote: Exchange is a cruel master [1] Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. [1] Cthulhu Jones, 4 June 1999 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. I didn't say it...you did. :) -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Color me crazy then. I picked this life a while ago and would never look back. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Nobody in their right minds would take an Exchange server or be a Exchange Admin.I too inherited the $#%^ thing and depend on help from people with more experience. So please, no crappy commentsjust help if you can. Thanks. Newbie too! -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. You took a job as an Exchange Admin and don't know how to build a basic DR environment? stemy -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:28 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Hello All: Second day on the job as the new Exchange Admin and I need help! My employer has a two yr old backup tape of Exchange data. The Co. was using Arc-Serve 6.5. We are now using Veritas but found a version of Arc-Serve and believe we have recovered the data. Now, I need to place the data onto an Exchange Server so I can XMerge the necessary mailboxes into .pst files. Is there a way I can move the priv.edb and pub.edb files to my bridgehead or other mail servers and XMerge the needed data that is being requested for legal reasons nonetheless? Or, do I need to build a new Exchange Server? Any detailed information is much appreciated. Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tracking and auditing Exchange administrators
You can look at the security log and it will tell you. But if that person
is smart they will also remove entries in the log too
From: Clishe, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Tracking and auditing Exchange administrators
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:21:25 -0400
I know that an admin can't read someone elses email by default. But they
*can* if they want to, and we simply want a way to audit this. Like I
said, this is a law firm and they are very particular about stuff like
this.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Jason,
By default the Exchange admin cannot read Emails (same as
GroupWise), only if he has implemented the Q article on how
to get round this security. I would say to set it back so
they cannot go into emails.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 June 2003 19:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Tracking and auditing Exchange administrators
I have a client that is in the middle of a Groupwise to
Exchange 2000 migration. They were a bit unsettled at the
discovery that an Exchange admin can grant himself permission
to read anyone's mail (something that is completely
impossible in Groupwise, short of changing the users'
password). They want to know how they can audit whether an
admin has modified the ACL on a mailbox store to grant
himself access to anyones mailbox. I know, I know, you should
be able to trust your administrators, but this is a law firm
and it's important that there's a paper trail.
I've done some testing and come up with the following
results. I wanted to run this by the group to see if anyone
can confirm or deny that I'm using the most appropriate
method to perform the auditing.
I've set the local policy on the Exchange server to audit
process tracking and privelege use. I then went into ESM and
gave an account full access to a mailbox store, including
send as and receive as rights.
I checked the security logs and found the following 3 events
(I actually found more than 3 events that appeared to be
generated when I modified the permissions, but these 3 seemed
most relevant):
Event Type:Success Audit
Event Source: Security
Event Category:Privilege Use
Event ID: 577
Date: 6/3/2003
Time: 11:08:06 AM
User: DOMAIN\User
Computer: SERVER
Description:
Privileged Service Called:
Server: Security
Service:-
Primary User Name: User
Primary Domain: DOMAIN
Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x29E68)
Client User Name: -
Client Domain: -
Client Logon ID:-
Privileges: SeIncreaseBasePriorityPrivilege
--
--
Event Type:Success Audit
Event Source: Security
Event Category:Privilege Use
Event ID: 577
Date: 6/3/2003
Time: 11:08:06 AM
User: DOMAIN\User
Computer: SERVER
Description:
Privileged Service Called:
Server: Security
Service:-
Primary User Name: User
Primary Domain: DOMAIN
Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x29E68)
Client User Name: -
Client Domain: -
Client Logon ID:-
Privileges: SeIncreaseBasePriorityPrivilege
-
Event Type:Success Audit
Event Source: Security
Event Category:Object Access
Event ID: 565
Date: 6/3/2003
Time: 11:08:25 AM
User: DOMAIN\User
Computer: SERVER
Description:
Object Open:
Object Server: Microsoft Exchange
Object Type:Microsoft Exchange Database
Object Name:/o=ORG/ou=First Administrative
Group/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=SERVER/cn=Microsoft Private MDB
New Handle ID: 0
Operation ID: {0,227067}
Process ID: 1636
Primary User Name: SERVER$
Primary Domain: DOMAIN
Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x3E7)
Client User Name: User
Client Domain: DOMAIN
Client Logon ID:(0x0,0x29E68)
AccessesUnknown specific access (bit 8)
Privileges -
Properties:
Unknown specific access (bit 8)
%{d0780592-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{d74a8762-22b9-11d3-aa62-00c04f8eedd8}
%{d74a8774-2289-11d3-aa62-00c04f8eedd8}
%{cf899a6a-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{cffe6da4-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{cfc7978e-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{d03a086e-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{d74a875e-22b9-11d3-aa62-00c04f8eedd8}
RE: IMS Corruption...
Agreed. I suggest something in mauve. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... It just needs more RAM. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... It's a PII 450 with only 64 mb of RAM and a 2gb hard drive, handling an organization of 750 mailboxes. Last month alone, it sent out 180k+ NDR's, blocked 67k+ spam e-mails and delivered another 5,700+ spam e-mails...and that's just the spam people reported. That doesn't count all the legit traffic and the spam no one reports. -Original Message- From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... What kind of traffic do you get? We're handling 40,000+ messages per day through our primary IMC, running on a 333MHz box with 256MB RAM. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... No...no NTFS permissions changes. I'm the only Exchange admin in the company and the only person allowed to make changes to the configuration of the machine. As far as the virii issue goes, I'd rather leave it the way it is. We are blocking almost everything in the MBLD (Martin Blackstone's List of Danger) and stop roughly 80-90% of our virii at the Linux mail gateway before they even reach the IMS. Besides, our mailbox servers are pretty beefy Compaq servers that are well up to the task of virus scanning...good suggestion though. I would LOVE to replace the IMS, but our contract here is in a state of flux and we won't be getting any new servers in and I'm not sure we have a workstation that could handle the load. -Original Message- From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 7:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... Any chance the NTFS permissions got changed on the \exchsrvr\imcdata\ directories? Or that it's corruption of the filesystem, which is reflecting as corruption of the IMC mailbox? Can you appropriate another machine (workstation even) to build as a second IMC and take some, or all, of the load off of your existing IMC? Maybe it's time to retire the very old hardware. The vast majority of virii we get come from the internet, so if you can upgrade your IMC box enough to run AV on it, you'll save a lot of work on your mailbox servers. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... Actually, now that I stop and think about it, this seems even stranger... Our IMS and Bridgehead machines run on very old hardware. Because of that, we are not running AV on either machine, only on the mailbox servers. So with no AV on the box trying to scan messages and attachments as the come thru the IMS, why would they have started seeing corruption all of a sudden? Would an increased amount of Spam being processed by the IMS cause this on old hardware? Our company has seen a ten-fold increase since January, in the number of NDR's being processed by the IMS and a five-fold increase in both the quantity of Spam blocked at the IMS and the amount of Spam still getting through and being reported. -Original Message- From: Greg S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMS Corruption... Thats kind of an old build of NAVMSE - see if you can get 2.18 from a recent Symantec AV distribution CD or from Symantec support. 2.18 bld 76 is the most recent i've seen. - Original Message - From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:13 PM Subject: IMS Corruption... Exchange 5.5, SP4 Win2k, SP2 NAVME Version: 2.12 (Build 59) I have 6,949 of the following errors in my IMS Application event log, since 4/9/03: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 3038 Date: 6/3/2003 Time: 8:43:03 AM User: N/A Computer: MAIL Description: An attempt to remove processed messages from the outbound store queue has failed. The removal will be retried later. If the messages are not removed before the service is shut down, the mail will be resent at service startup causing duplicate mail.
RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.
Actually, in rereading Ms. Bridge's comment, I'd suggest she search the archives for the phrase Exchange is a Cruel Master circa June 1999.[1] I think it dovetails in nicely here. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. [1] If you need the extra help here: Subject: Re: Question of Ethics From: Cthulhu Jones Date: 4 June 1999 -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. I beg to differ. And worldwide deployment numbers would certainly back me up, but this isn't the Care Bear List. No Nick at Night here. We don't dance around in a purple dinosaur outfit singing I love you...you love me well... Most of us don't. But I can guarantee that How to build a DR environment has been answering dozens of times (if not hundreds) in the archives. I've seen many publicly available articles on how to do it. Try google. But if you're going to come with a question, then at least do your homework and say I've read this article on doing this action, but I don't understand this point. That way, the list is a resource and NOT an attempt to avoid work. Just my $0.02 stemy -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:16 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Nobody in their right minds would take an Exchange server or be a Exchange Admin.I too inherited the $#%^ thing and depend on help from people with more experience. So please, no crappy commentsjust help if you can. Thanks. Newbie too! -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. You took a job as an Exchange Admin and don't know how to build a basic DR environment? stemy -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:28 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Hello All: Second day on the job as the new Exchange Admin and I need help! My employer has a two yr old backup tape of Exchange data. The Co. was using Arc-Serve 6.5. We are now using Veritas but found a version of Arc-Serve and believe we have recovered the data. Now, I need to place the data onto an Exchange Server so I can XMerge the necessary mailboxes into .pst files. Is there a way I can move the priv.edb and pub.edb files to my bridgehead or other mail servers and XMerge the needed data that is being requested for legal reasons nonetheless? Or, do I need to build a new Exchange Server? Any detailed information is much appreciated. Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS Corruption...
Mauve always has more RAM. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... Agreed. I suggest something in mauve. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... It just needs more RAM. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... It's a PII 450 with only 64 mb of RAM and a 2gb hard drive, handling an organization of 750 mailboxes. Last month alone, it sent out 180k+ NDR's, blocked 67k+ spam e-mails and delivered another 5,700+ spam e-mails...and that's just the spam people reported. That doesn't count all the legit traffic and the spam no one reports. -Original Message- From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... What kind of traffic do you get? We're handling 40,000+ messages per day through our primary IMC, running on a 333MHz box with 256MB RAM. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... No...no NTFS permissions changes. I'm the only Exchange admin in the company and the only person allowed to make changes to the configuration of the machine. As far as the virii issue goes, I'd rather leave it the way it is. We are blocking almost everything in the MBLD (Martin Blackstone's List of Danger) and stop roughly 80-90% of our virii at the Linux mail gateway before they even reach the IMS. Besides, our mailbox servers are pretty beefy Compaq servers that are well up to the task of virus scanning...good suggestion though. I would LOVE to replace the IMS, but our contract here is in a state of flux and we won't be getting any new servers in and I'm not sure we have a workstation that could handle the load. -Original Message- From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 7:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... Any chance the NTFS permissions got changed on the \exchsrvr\imcdata\ directories? Or that it's corruption of the filesystem, which is reflecting as corruption of the IMC mailbox? Can you appropriate another machine (workstation even) to build as a second IMC and take some, or all, of the load off of your existing IMC? Maybe it's time to retire the very old hardware. The vast majority of virii we get come from the internet, so if you can upgrade your IMC box enough to run AV on it, you'll save a lot of work on your mailbox servers. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... Actually, now that I stop and think about it, this seems even stranger... Our IMS and Bridgehead machines run on very old hardware. Because of that, we are not running AV on either machine, only on the mailbox servers. So with no AV on the box trying to scan messages and attachments as the come thru the IMS, why would they have started seeing corruption all of a sudden? Would an increased amount of Spam being processed by the IMS cause this on old hardware? Our company has seen a ten-fold increase since January, in the number of NDR's being processed by the IMS and a five-fold increase in both the quantity of Spam blocked at the IMS and the amount of Spam still getting through and being reported. -Original Message- From: Greg S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMS Corruption... Thats kind of an old build of NAVMSE - see if you can get 2.18 from a recent Symantec AV distribution CD or from Symantec support. 2.18 bld 76 is the most recent i've seen. - Original Message - From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:13 PM Subject: IMS Corruption... Exchange 5.5, SP4 Win2k, SP2 NAVME Version: 2.12 (Build 59) I have 6,949 of the following errors in my IMS Application event log, since
RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.
It wasn't my question. Just helping out the poor new Exchange Admin who asked a question and was attacked. Thanks for your response. Let's try being more patient with new Exchange Admins is all I wanted to get across. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. I beg to differ. And worldwide deployment numbers would certainly back me up, but this isn't the Care Bear List. No Nick at Night here. We don't dance around in a purple dinosaur outfit singing I love you...you love me well... Most of us don't. But I can guarantee that How to build a DR environment has been answering dozens of times (if not hundreds) in the archives. I've seen many publicly available articles on how to do it. Try google. But if you're going to come with a question, then at least do your homework and say I've read this article on doing this action, but I don't understand this point. That way, the list is a resource and NOT an attempt to avoid work. Just my $0.02 stemy -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:16 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Nobody in their right minds would take an Exchange server or be a Exchange Admin.I too inherited the $#%^ thing and depend on help from people with more experience. So please, no crappy commentsjust help if you can. Thanks. Newbie too! -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. You took a job as an Exchange Admin and don't know how to build a basic DR environment? stemy -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:28 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Hello All: Second day on the job as the new Exchange Admin and I need help! My employer has a two yr old backup tape of Exchange data. The Co. was using Arc-Serve 6.5. We are now using Veritas but found a version of Arc-Serve and believe we have recovered the data. Now, I need to place the data onto an Exchange Server so I can XMerge the necessary mailboxes into .pst files. Is there a way I can move the priv.edb and pub.edb files to my bridgehead or other mail servers and XMerge the needed data that is being requested for legal reasons nonetheless? Or, do I need to build a new Exchange Server? Any detailed information is much appreciated. Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook XP Licensing
Contact MS Licensing. They are the true source. - Original Message - From: Neil Doody [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:50 Subject: Outlook XP Licensing When you purchase sufficient Exchange 2000 licensing, you're entitled to install Outlook 2000 on each of the licensed clients, or so im lead to believe? :o Anyway, can you install Outlook XP on these clients without the need for any kind of Office XP license? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
Hey I'm helpful. On tuesdays. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 04/06/2003 17:57 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Actually, with the exception of this week, in which most of us (myself excluded) are at Tech-MEC, this is the largest collection of MVP's helping Exchange users around. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Try the MS Newsgroup usually an MVP or MS will response to your questions within in 24 hours period. As for reading try the MS web site. -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Hello All: I am familiar with Exchange but now that I have been given all responsibilities pertaining to Exchange I am looking for good reading material. Any suggested material? Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED])j¹%Ë\¢oâùr®+)éíz·±r§ë^ÆuéZ§X¬ :.±Êâm[hæ¯yì\ ©àz[,Ã)ärÅÈZËZvh§+-iÌ2G(
Mailbox Rule - Send on Behalf
Hi, I receive multiple emails that are 'sent on behalf' of Data Center. The rule I have created never works. I specifically must state who the email is being sent from, in this case Brian Hale, for the rule to work. This is the from the email: From: Brian Hale On Behalf Of Data Center My question is: Can you create a rule that works even when the email is 'sent on behalf of'? Is there a better way to do this? Perhaps this is a design problem? Has anyone else run into this issue and if so how did you work around it? Thank you, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
Only because the AD Lead beat the Exchange lead to it... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Thank you, Mr Active Directory MVP. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:57 AM Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Actually, with the exception of this week, in which most of us (myself excluded) are at Tech-MEC, this is the largest collection of MVP's helping Exchange users around. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Try the MS Newsgroup usually an MVP or MS will response to your questions within in 24 hours period. As for reading try the MS web site. -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Hello All: I am familiar with Exchange but now that I have been given all responsibilities pertaining to Exchange I am looking for good reading material. Any suggested material? Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Global Exchange Filtering
Is there a way to have all messages with a certain line in the header be moved into a folder of the admins choosing? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Name could not be resolved Error
Hi David Matt, Thanks much guys! Yes, re-installing the TCP/IP stack fixed it. -Original Message- From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Name could not be resolved Error We had workstation behave like this and re-installing the TCP/IP stack fixed the problem. - Matt -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Name could not be resolved Error I am getting an error message when trying to configure Outlook 2k client for one of our users. After I entered Exchange server Mailbox information and click on Check Name tab, the following error message pops up: The name could not be resolved. The Microsoft Exchange Address Book was unable to log on the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if the problem persists. After I click OK another error message pops up as The name could not be resolved. The action could not be completed. I have already tried reinstalling Office 2k on this machine. I have also tried creating a different profile that did not work either. But the strange thing is I can create a profile for him on another machine without any problem. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks much for your help in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:59 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June
02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
[EMAIL
PROTECTED])j¹%Ë\¢oâùr®+)éíz·±r§ë^ÆuéZ§X¬
:.±Êâm[hæ¯yì\
©àz[,Ã)ärÅÈZËZvh§+-iÌ2G(
Re: Mailbox Rule - Send on Behalf
That becuase you have them setup as a deleagte. From: Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mailbox Rule - Send on Behalf Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:02:03 -0700 Hi, I receive multiple emails that are 'sent on behalf' of Data Center. The rule I have created never works. I specifically must state who the email is being sent from, in this case Brian Hale, for the rule to work. This is the from the email: From: Brian Hale On Behalf Of Data Center My question is: Can you create a rule that works even when the email is 'sent on behalf of'? Is there a better way to do this? Perhaps this is a design problem? Has anyone else run into this issue and if so how did you work around it? Thank you, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and AD Question
Set exchange up in a hosting environment. You can keep 100's of companies separate -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and AD Question This question may be a little off the list subject but you guys are some of the best authorities I know so I wanted your opinions. (Note the subtle butt-kissing) Situation: Single domain forest with single Exchange Server and total 4 DC. About 85 Employees. Class C IP block with fixed IP addresses for all. We are in the process of starting up a new venture company and want to keep them relatively separate from our main organization so as they grow, they can be easily separated if so chosen. We have our web presence under ourcompany.org and have reserved a domain theircompany.com for the new company's web presence. We have also set up recipient policies in Exchange to receive email sent to theircompany.com for the first couple users we have set up in our domain. Question. What would be the best way to set up this new company in our AD organization to meet the requirements of easy separation in the future, while allowing us to continue serving them with our single Exchange server and with minimal additional expense and complexity. We have been looking into the possibility of setting up a child domain for them so that they can have separate security and domain suffix but are unsure if we can do this without adding a subnet or some other complexity. I appreciate any opinions or recommendations from the wise ones of the list (more butt-kissing). Thanks... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains with
properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet caf.
Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can TS to my box at
home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever implemented the network here
to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003
12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June
02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
â²Úh²PÛiÿü0ÂÌÇ(ú«qïÞÅÈ_j¨mg{^özm§ÿâÊZ®Ib²×(÷
¸§þ\«Êez{^ì\
©àz¶j zV§éà+!N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²)åËZvh§³
§Ê
Re: TechEd
It works absolutely fine at 7:00am. - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:10 PM Subject: RE: TechEd No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains with properly implemented MS technologies... Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever implemented the network here to please CJ -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: RE: TechEd Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there? John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: RE: TechEd No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it -Original Message- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed?
all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no
changes on either box. One here and one in the UK.
both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail.
both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue
articles I can find dont apply.
All are in DNS
Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i
have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone.
any ideas?
VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :(
TIA
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains
with properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet
caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can
TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever
implemented the network here to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday,
June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
At: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
. ryi rrr ZZvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;257679 ?
Where are you by the way?
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: TechEd
Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed?
all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no
changes on either box. One here and one in the UK.
both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail.
both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue
articles I can find dont apply.
All are in DNS
Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i
have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone.
any ideas?
VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :(
TIA
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains
with properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet
caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can
TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever
implemented the network here to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday,
June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
At: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
. ryi rrr ZZvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
right now I am in the exchange transport lecture in the ultra-crowded
D171-175 which has been packed to the gills for every exchange session :(
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: TechEd
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;257679 ?
Where are you by the way?
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: TechEd
Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed?
all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no
changes on either box. One here and one in the UK.
both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail.
both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue
articles I can find dont apply.
All are in DNS
Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i
have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone.
any ideas?
VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :(
TIA
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance
gains
with properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet
caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can
TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever
implemented the network here to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
Wednesday,
June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
At: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
. ryi rrr ZZvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Message filtering
I would say with a third party application. - Original Message - From: Diop [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:27 AM Subject: Message filtering I´m runnning Exchange 5.5 How to prevent all uusers in specific domain from delivering message to my site BUT allow only 2 users from that domain. Thank _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
unfortunately this is an all 5.5 site . . . no Exchange 2000 yet . . .
I have found 3 or 4 Q articles with the exact event id messages, but the
resoution doesnt apply.
They either say Exchange 2000 or one said DNS is in error, which it is not,
etc.
Where are you?
Chris
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: TechEd
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;257679 ?
Where are you by the way?
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: TechEd
Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed?
all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no
changes on either box. One here and one in the UK.
both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail.
both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue
articles I can find dont apply.
All are in DNS
Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i
have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone.
any ideas?
VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :(
TIA
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance
gains
with properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet
caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can
TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever
implemented the network here to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
Wednesday,
June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
At: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
. ryi rrr ZZvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
Did you see this one?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q323733
It's really not an exchange error. It's way more likely a networking error
or Windows error.
An MtaBindBack over RPC has failed
The receiving MTA can not authenticate (bind) the sending MTA
Can you bump up diagnostics on it?
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: TechEd
unfortunately this is an all 5.5 site . . . no Exchange 2000 yet . . .
I have found 3 or 4 Q articles with the exact event id messages, but the
resoution doesnt apply.
They either say Exchange 2000 or one said DNS is in error, which it is not,
etc.
Where are you?
Chris
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: TechEd
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;257679 ?
Where are you by the way?
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: TechEd
Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed?
all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no
changes on either box. One here and one in the UK.
both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail.
both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue
articles I can find dont apply.
All are in DNS
Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i
have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone.
any ideas?
VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :(
TIA
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance
gains
with properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet
caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can
TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever
implemented the network here to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
Wednesday,
June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
At: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
. ryi rrr ZZvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
RE: TechEd
I just left that room... Slam packed and my feet were falling asleep. Had to get up
and move around
I'll be coming back down in a min for the next session... I'll be the one wearing the
grey PSS Superior Kung Fu shirt...
Yeah, DNS is first suspect. If its 5.5 then I'd put a HOSTS file in place on each one
(to be certain to eliminate DNS, which is not 5.5's first method of name resolution).
What are the exact error codes within the events?
stemy
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:42 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: Re: TechEd
Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed?
all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no changes on
either box. One here and one in the UK.
both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail.
both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue articles I can
find dont apply.
All are in DNS
Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i have
rebooted one in Uk since they are gone.
any ideas?
VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :(
TIA
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains
with properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet
caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can
TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever
implemented the network here to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday,
June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
At: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
. ryi rrr Z Zvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+-¦-xm¶ÿÃ
,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\
öªy²'µêßi¶Úþ)íÙl¥ªä+-r¿r嬦W§µêÞÅÈZ{f¡jx
b²èº{.nÇ+·¦j)m¢W½ç±r§él³ §Ê!jx .+-iX¬µ§f{0Êy ¢
Re: TechEd
These are in the same site. They can ping each other (was that by FQDN?) and have RPC communication confirmed. - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:40 PM Subject: RE: TechEd I just left that room... Slam packed and my feet were falling asleep. Had to get up and move around I'll be coming back down in a min for the next session... I'll be the one wearing the grey PSS Superior Kung Fu shirt... Yeah, DNS is first suspect. If its 5.5 then I'd put a HOSTS file in place on each one (to be certain to eliminate DNS, which is not 5.5's first method of name resolution). What are the exact error codes within the events? stemy -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed? all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no changes on either box. One here and one in the UK. both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail. both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue articles I can find dont apply. All are in DNS Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone. any ideas? VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :( TIA Chris - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM Subject: RE: TechEd No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains with properly implemented MS technologies... Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever implemented the network here to please CJ -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: RE: TechEd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TechEd
Anyone got a spare pass for the IT Pro party tonight...
Got the Developer party pass and forgot to pick up the IT pro party pass...
Those SQL people are a bit too weird for me :(
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
I just left that room... Slam packed and my feet were falling asleep. Had to get up
and move around
I'll be coming back down in a min for the next session... I'll be the one wearing the
grey PSS Superior Kung Fu shirt...
Yeah, DNS is first suspect. If its 5.5 then I'd put a HOSTS file in place on each one
(to be certain to eliminate DNS, which is not 5.5's first method of name resolution).
What are the exact error codes within the events?
stemy
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:42 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: Re: TechEd
Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed?
all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no changes on
either box. One here and one in the UK.
both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail.
both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue articles I can
find dont apply.
All are in DNS
Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i have
rebooted one in Uk since they are gone.
any ideas?
VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :(
TIA
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains
with properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet
caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can
TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever
implemented the network here to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday,
June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
At: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
. ryi rrr Z Zvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+--xm ,)r( \y'i)l+-rrW{jxVmyzrvi
â²Úh²PÛiÿü0ÂÌÇ(ú«qïÞÅÈ_j¨mg{^özm§ÿâÊZ®Ib²×(÷
¸§þ\«Êez{^ì\
©àz¶j zV§éà+!N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²)åËZvh§³
§Ê
RE: TechEd
But IF the HOSTS file has been modified, then ping could work and 5.5 routing could fail. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:37 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd These are in the same site. They can ping each other (was that by FQDN?) and have RPC communication confirmed. - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:40 PM Subject: RE: TechEd I just left that room... Slam packed and my feet were falling asleep. Had to get up and move around I'll be coming back down in a min for the next session... I'll be the one wearing the grey PSS Superior Kung Fu shirt... Yeah, DNS is first suspect. If its 5.5 then I'd put a HOSTS file in place on each one (to be certain to eliminate DNS, which is not 5.5's first method of name resolution). What are the exact error codes within the events? stemy -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed? all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no changes on either box. One here and one in the UK. both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail. both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue articles I can find dont apply. All are in DNS Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone. any ideas? VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :( TIA Chris - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM Subject: RE: TechEd No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains with properly implemented MS technologies... Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet café. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever implemented the network here to please CJ -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: RE: TechEd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
What's a HOSTS file? ;o) - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:44 PM Subject: RE: TechEd But IF the HOSTS file has been modified, then ping could work and 5.5 routing could fail. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:37 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd These are in the same site. They can ping each other (was that by FQDN?) and have RPC communication confirmed. - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:40 PM Subject: RE: TechEd I just left that room... Slam packed and my feet were falling asleep. Had to get up and move around I'll be coming back down in a min for the next session... I'll be the one wearing the grey PSS Superior Kung Fu shirt... Yeah, DNS is first suspect. If its 5.5 then I'd put a HOSTS file in place on each one (to be certain to eliminate DNS, which is not 5.5's first method of name resolution). What are the exact error codes within the events? stemy -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed? all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no changes on either box. One here and one in the UK. both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail. both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue articles I can find dont apply. All are in DNS Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone. any ideas? VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :( TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Two Unusual Outlook 2002 Problems
Recently I reconfigured my production workstation from scratch to include: - Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition; and - Office XP with sp2 This replaces a Windows 2000 Advanced Server with Office 2000 SR-1. Now I am getting two weird problems (so far) with Outlook 2002. 1. My ability to modify Outlook folder permissions now consists of modifying the Default permissions, and adding users to the list of those who have permissions. I cannot modify any permissions (except Default) and I cannot delete users from the list of those who have permissions. This is true of my individual mailbox folders, and also Public Folders. Essentially, almost everything is grayed out. 2. Every time I go to modify the current view of a folder (like add a field) using the View - Current View - Customize Current View etc. routine I get a Microsoft Outlook has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience. message, after which Outlook restarts. I can modify things by using the Field Chooser tool, or by dragging fields off the board. This is a pretty vanilla install; it has only been in production for two days. If I go back to an Outlook 2000 install I have on another Windows 2000 box everything works normally. Any ideas? Thanks . . . Jon Martin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TechEd
What's this Exchange 5.5 thing that I keep hearing people talk about? stemy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd What's a HOSTS file? ;o) - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:44 PM Subject: RE: TechEd But IF the HOSTS file has been modified, then ping could work and 5.5 routing could fail. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:37 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd These are in the same site. They can ping each other (was that by FQDN?) and have RPC communication confirmed. - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:40 PM Subject: RE: TechEd I just left that room... Slam packed and my feet were falling asleep. Had to get up and move around I'll be coming back down in a min for the next session... I'll be the one wearing the grey PSS Superior Kung Fu shirt... Yeah, DNS is first suspect. If its 5.5 then I'd put a HOSTS file in place on each one (to be certain to eliminate DNS, which is not 5.5's first method of name resolution). What are the exact error codes within the events? stemy -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed? all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no changes on either box. One here and one in the UK. both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail. both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue articles I can find dont apply. All are in DNS Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone. any ideas? VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :( TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TechEd
Q248488 talks to Exch 5.0, but may apply in your situation
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: TechEd
unfortunately this is an all 5.5 site . . . no Exchange 2000 yet . . .
I have found 3 or 4 Q articles with the exact event id messages, but the
resoution doesnt apply.
They either say Exchange 2000 or one said DNS is in error, which it is not,
etc.
Where are you?
Chris
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: TechEd
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;257679 ?
Where are you by the way?
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: TechEd
Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed?
all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no
changes on either box. One here and one in the UK.
both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail.
both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue
articles I can find dont apply.
All are in DNS
Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i
have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone.
any ideas?
VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :(
TIA
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance
gains
with properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet
caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can
TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever
implemented the network here to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
Wednesday,
June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
At: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
. ryi rrr ZZvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
If I can do a successful rpc ping and normal ping; which I can; I would think routing would be okay; but obviously something is amiss . . . - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:44 PM Subject: RE: TechEd But IF the HOSTS file has been modified, then ping could work and 5.5 routing could fail. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:37 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd These are in the same site. They can ping each other (was that by FQDN?) and have RPC communication confirmed. - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:40 PM Subject: RE: TechEd I just left that room... Slam packed and my feet were falling asleep. Had to get up and move around I'll be coming back down in a min for the next session... I'll be the one wearing the grey PSS Superior Kung Fu shirt... Yeah, DNS is first suspect. If its 5.5 then I'd put a HOSTS file in place on each one (to be certain to eliminate DNS, which is not 5.5's first method of name resolution). What are the exact error codes within the events? stemy -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed? all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no changes on either box. One here and one in the UK. both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail. both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue articles I can find dont apply. All are in DNS Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone. any ideas? VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :( TIA Chris - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM Subject: RE: TechEd No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains with properly implemented MS technologies... Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet café. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever implemented the network here to please CJ -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: RE: TechEd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
you can have mine but I am at my hotel now. If youre near the Wyndham Market
Center feel free to grab it.
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:42 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
Anyone got a spare pass for the IT Pro party tonight...
Got the Developer party pass and forgot to pick up the IT pro party
pass...
Those SQL people are a bit too weird for me :(
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
I just left that room... Slam packed and my feet were falling asleep. Had
to get up and move around
I'll be coming back down in a min for the next session... I'll be the one
wearing the grey PSS Superior Kung Fu shirt...
Yeah, DNS is first suspect. If its 5.5 then I'd put a HOSTS file in place
on each one (to be certain to eliminate DNS, which is not 5.5's first method
of name resolution). What are the exact error codes within the events?
stemy
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04,
2003 4:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: Re: TechEd
Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed?
all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no
changes on either box. One here and one in the UK.
both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail.
both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue
articles I can find dont apply.
All are in DNS
Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i
have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone.
any ideas?
VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :(
TIA
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance
gains
with properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet
caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can
TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever
implemented the network here to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
Wednesday,
June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
At: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
. ryi rrr Z Zvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+--xm ,)r( \y'i)l+-rrW{jxVmyzrvi
. ryi rrr ZZvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Two Unusual Outlook 2002 Problems
in server 2003 a lot of IE is disabled by default. Could that have something to do with it? I know IE and Outlook share a lot of components. - Original Message - From: Martin, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:59 PM Subject: Two Unusual Outlook 2002 Problems Recently I reconfigured my production workstation from scratch to include: - Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition; and - Office XP with sp2 This replaces a Windows 2000 Advanced Server with Office 2000 SR-1. Now I am getting two weird problems (so far) with Outlook 2002. 1. My ability to modify Outlook folder permissions now consists of modifying the Default permissions, and adding users to the list of those who have permissions. I cannot modify any permissions (except Default) and I cannot delete users from the list of those who have permissions. This is true of my individual mailbox folders, and also Public Folders. Essentially, almost everything is grayed out. 2. Every time I go to modify the current view of a folder (like add a field) using the View - Current View - Customize Current View etc. routine I get a Microsoft Outlook has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience. message, after which Outlook restarts. I can modify things by using the Field Chooser tool, or by dragging fields off the board. This is a pretty vanilla install; it has only been in production for two days. If I go back to an Outlook 2000 install I have on another Windows 2000 box everything works normally. Any ideas? Thanks . . . Jon Martin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.
Data this old I wouldn't even have around. We rotate our backup tapes frequently and destroy old tapes that we're not going to use anymore. I'll grant that some specific industries may require longer e-mail retention, but thankfully ours isn't one of them. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 7:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Data this old, I wouldn't put it anywhere NEAR my production environment. You can use a spare desktop machine for this type of work. Build a new server, and restore your data to that. If I were you, I'd keep it off the same LAN as your production servers, also. Through it on a test-lab VLAN, if you have one. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Hello All: Second day on the job as the new Exchange Admin and I need help! My employer has a two yr old backup tape of Exchange data. The Co. was using Arc-Serve 6.5. We are now using Veritas but found a version of Arc-Serve and believe we have recovered the data. Now, I need to place the data onto an Exchange Server so I can XMerge the necessary mailboxes into .pst files. Is there a way I can move the priv.edb and pub.edb files to my bridgehead or other mail servers and XMerge the needed data that is being requested for legal reasons nonetheless? Or, do I need to build a new Exchange Server? Any detailed information is much appreciated. Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5
What would be the best option if I had a person at work who works part time brings in her laptop and wants to access her email from home via outlook. We have our own domain and mail server now and she cant use a webmail type program gaining her email through our old ISP, is outlook web access through exchange an option or can I get access easier via the web somehow to her email. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending-Receiving Limit
No restriction applied on smtp virtual server. Only applied on Global Setting. -Original Message- From: Scott Pease [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Sending-Receiving Limit Check the size limit on your SMTP connector(s) for your routing group SMTP virtual server on their mailbox server? -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 12:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Dear list, I have applied a global limit of 2 MB on sending and receiving message size. One of the user wants to receive 5 MB of mail from Internet, I have increase the receive limit of that particular user by taking user property, but it is not working. What can be the problem. Help in this regard is requested. Thanks Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending-Receiving Limit
Thanks for the article. Here is my scenario. Example 2 In this example, the following size limits have been configured: * The global setting is set to 2 MB. * * * The user mailbox setting is set to 3 MB. But incoming mails greater than 2 MB never come to mailbox whose incoming limit is 3 MB. Why is this happening. Regards, irf. -Original Message- From: Scott Pease [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Sending-Receiving Limit You might also want to check Q322679, gives info on where to set the limits and what effect each has on your organization http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q322679gssnb=1 -Original Message- From: Scott Pease Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Check the size limit on your SMTP connector(s) for your routing group SMTP virtual server on their mailbox server? -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 12:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Dear list, I have applied a global limit of 2 MB on sending and receiving message size. One of the user wants to receive 5 MB of mail from Internet, I have increase the receive limit of that particular user by taking user property, but it is not working. What can be the problem. Help in this regard is requested. Thanks Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
