RE: SpamBelt
Hi Guys, We admit that this looked like spam a lot. I actually called the people who sent it for us and complained. The company who own this database and emailed it for us are MSD2D, they have worked for years for Microsoft building their trade show list and catalogs. That's why you are on their list. Here is included the answer from their Pres, who explained why it looks like this. - In response to your email today I admit that it has the appearance of Spam. We apologize for that. We usually send these type of announcements with our reply address but it was a last minute mailer and we had already use our regular mail box for our weekly Security newsletter. It was important that we get that notice out to people who we thought might be attending Tech-Ed as Sunbelt was accidentally left out of a proper position in the Microsoft Exchange Directory. David Cragg President - Understandably you assumed it was spam, with a juno address as the sender. Turns out this -is- what they use for their returns. An unfortunate choice to say the least. Hope this clarifies the situation. Warm regards, Stu *** Stu Sjouwerman - Founder, Chief Operating Off. Sunbelt Software, # 409 in the Inc. 500 List ~ Editor W2Knews: 500,000 readers every week. Publisher WinXPnews, 2Million subscribers email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: 1-727-562-0101 x218 or (888) NT UTILS Fax: 1-727-562-5199 or (877) 736-3444 Web: http://www.sunbelt-software.com and: http://www.w2knews.com Snail Mail: 101 N Garden Ave, Suite 120 Clearwater, FL, 33755 *** -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SpamBelt Not quite. I'm merely pointing out the difference here ;) If Tom's talking about the same message I got today, it was targeted to TechEd attendees, and not to any and every @$$hole who has ever browsed Sunbelt's website (i.e. their normal targeted audience). Of course, Sunbelt's messages in this case can still be construed as being vaguely requested (I get a boatload of junk from MEC/TechEd vendors) - it is assumed that all MEC/TechEd vendors get the list of attendees. The question remains why Sunbelt chose this particular message to look extremely spammy (See Tom's note re: roving.com and juno). -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 29-May-03 6:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: RE: SpamBelt Not only that, but since lots of us asked to be on the mailing list of Sunbelt.com it's not spam because we opted to have them send us that kind of stuff. Scott _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
That was my line! ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:16 AM Subject: RE: TechEd What's this Exchange 5.5 thing that I keep hearing people talk about? stemy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd What's a HOSTS file? ;o) - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:44 PM Subject: RE: TechEd But IF the HOSTS file has been modified, then ping could work and 5.5 routing could fail. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:37 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd These are in the same site. They can ping each other (was that by FQDN?) and have RPC communication confirmed. - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:40 PM Subject: RE: TechEd I just left that room... Slam packed and my feet were falling asleep. Had to get up and move around I'll be coming back down in a min for the next session... I'll be the one wearing the grey PSS Superior Kung Fu shirt... Yeah, DNS is first suspect. If its 5.5 then I'd put a HOSTS file in place on each one (to be certain to eliminate DNS, which is not 5.5's first method of name resolution). What are the exact error codes within the events? stemy -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed? all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no changes on either box. One here and one in the UK. both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail. both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue articles I can find dont apply. All are in DNS Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone. any ideas? VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :( TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Archiving Solutions
KVS has a very mature product ... ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Carmila Fresco [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:02 PM Subject: Archiving Solutions Does anyone have any experience with archiving solutions like veritas storage migrator for exchange? We currently do not impose hard limits on our users due to a lot of regulations that we need to comply with. We have users who have mailboxes close to 3GB. On one exchange server that has 180 users, the total size of the store is already at a 110GB. I'm interested to know what solutions you have in place to keep down the size of user's mailboxes. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending-Receiving Limit
You're using a Pix with the SMTP fixup protocol (blech) so not able to test it... But if you've set a limit on the connector of 2MB, user specified limits will not override. 2MB seems a tad bit onerous. -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Saturday, May 31, 2003 12:39 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Sending-Receiving Limit Subject: Sending-Receiving Limit Dear list, I have applied a global limit of 2 MB on sending and receiving message size. One of the user wants to receive 5 MB of mail from Internet, I have increase the receive limit of that particular user by taking user property, but it is not working. What can be the problem. Help in this regard is requested. Thanks Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: routing mail accross vpn link
On the IMS you can specify routing by domain... For the domain(s) in question you would specify an IP address which the VPN link would know how to route to the appropriate endpoint. We did this several times with customers when I worked for $vbc. -Original Message- From: MSX dude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:55 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: routing mail accross vpn link Subject: routing mail accross vpn link Instead of doing certificates to secure mail one of our partners would like to simply route mail accross our shared VPN link. We run Exchange 5.5 sp3. Do any of you have any experience with this? How would I set up the mail for domain to avoid going out to the internet and route to the vpn link? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opening a PDF in OWA 2000
Actually, there is a kick ass product from MessageWare (www.messageware.com) that I'm seriously considering implementing in my environment which does that and more. Unfortunately I don't see it on their site yet (brand new, saw a demo of it at TechEd) or the name of it... AttachMate for OWA? Maybe? Here's the name of someone there who can tell you all about it. Mention my name for my standard 0% discount. Matthew Seon Messageware Incorporated Tel. (905) 812-0638 Ext. 115 Fax. (905) 812-0602 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.messageware.com Hope that helps.. Chris MessageOne -Original Message- From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 02, 2003 12:12 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Opening a PDF in OWA 2000 Subject: Opening a PDF in OWA 2000 Is it possible to configure OWA to open a .pdf attachment without having to save it to the local hard drive? - Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Messages supposedly not being deleted
I've seen similar behavior with a corrupt OST file.. Perhaps that is what is happening here? -Original Message- From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:17 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Messages supposedly not being deleted Subject: Messages supposedly not being deleted Outlook 2000 Exchange 5.5 SP4 VPN access over broadband. We have a user with a computer at home they use to access their coporate email. They are saying that messages that they have deleted in that Outlook profile are not showing as deleted when they get back into the office. We don't have the ability to get in front of this box to see how it is (mis)configured. They are not using pop3 or IMAP. This is not happening to anyone else on the same server. What I am wondering is if anyone has seen this behavoir when accessing the mailbox from 2 different profiles. TIA Ken _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
I hear MVPs are overrated. -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:37 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Try the MS Newsgroup usually an MVP or MS will response to your questions within in 24 hours period. As for reading try the MS web site. -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Hello All: I am familiar with Exchange but now that I have been given all responsibilities pertaining to Exchange I am looking for good reading material. Any suggested material? Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: additional display name? - same question, proper thread topic
You could create 2 mailboxes, each with the name needed and on one use the other mailbox as alternate recipient. ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Morrison, Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:29 PM Subject: additional display name? - same question, proper thread topic Sorry for the repost. It's Friday afternoon and I forgot about the thread topic field being a header field. For those of you who sort by thread topic. Does anyone know of a way to have both a maiden name and married name appear as distinct display names in the OAB, yet have them both point to the same account? E2ksp3 Thanks, Gordon . ___NOTICE_ This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract. ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need a product to move attachements for the web
This product doesn't exactly meet your design goals out of the box (AFAIK), but it's still quite interesting for both the scenario you describe as well as internal consolidation of attachment storage. http://www.attachstore.com/ http://www.attachstore.com/products/exchange.shtml -Original Message- From: P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:33 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Need a product to move attachements for the web Subject: Need a product to move attachements for the web This is what I have in mind: 1) User composes email in email client with attachment 2) Sends to outside organization 3) Email (Exchange) looks at message and compares size of attachments with an administrator defined setting 4) If it is less than the size, just sends on the message normaly 5) If it is greater than or equal to the size it moves the attachment to an IIS location and inserts a link and a passcode into the message (inplace of the attachment) 6) recipient recieves the message and clicks on the link 7) types in the passcode 8) downloads the file Get my drift? Anybody know a product that does this . . . I am sure I am not an original genius who just designed a product . . . . Paul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Global Catalog and EX2K
Do you take down GCs routinely then? -Original Message- From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:11 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Global Catalog and EX2K Subject: Global Catalog and EX2K Is it true that OL2K can't redirect to the new GC once the current one assigned by DSAccess is unavailable? I heard that you have to restart OL in order to map the available one. If that the case then it's a big dis-advantage to the clients, because what if I took down the one of the GC then all clients have to restart their OL. Can someone confirm this for me please? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reply to bringing up wrong domain name.
Check the SMTP protocol logs at the exit point to your domain... Verify the data is correct when it leaves your environment. If you can do this, then start looking to them for issues... -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:16 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Reply to bringing up wrong domain name. Subject: Reply to bringing up wrong domain name. We have one of our companies complaining that one of their clients are having trouble replying to their email. The client is saying when they hit reply to an email they received from us, it changes the domain name of their email address to one that is not one of their SMTP addresses. Lets say their email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] When the client replies it automatically brings up [EMAIL PROTECTED] Now, works.com would be our main domain name, but our users who are sending does not have this domain as an SMTP address. The client says they don't have any contacts to pull this address from? We are running E2k SP3. Any ideas other than the contacts? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Global Catalog and EX2K
That solves a problem, but potentially introduces additional interesting ones such as clients talking to DS Access across a WAN instead of a GC sitting in the same building with them. -Original Message- From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:21 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Global Catalog and EX2K Subject: RE: Global Catalog and EX2K I wonder if there is a way to force OL2K to use DSAccess at all time. That might solve the problem. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Catalog and EX2K My experience seems to indicate that this is indeed true for OL2002 - I assume OL2K is the same. BTW, OL98 seems to not be able to switch GCs even after being restarted. We recently un-GC'd a DC because we were having problems with it. All of the OL2K clients that were using it had to be restarted. We eventually had to re-GC it because our few remaining OL98 clients wouldn't work. -Original Message- From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Global Catalog and EX2K Is it true that OL2K can't redirect to the new GC once the current one assigned by DSAccess is unavailable? I heard that you have to restart OL in order to map the available one. If that the case then it's a big dis-advantage to the clients, because what if I took down the one of the GC then all clients have to restart their OL. Can someone confirm this for me please? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Real world experience
Not sure I know enough about your environment to speak definitively to your scenario, though I've seen similar things done with great success. I will however offer this bit of advice, more GCs = Good. With 2 GCs for Exchange, failure of 1 puts entirely too much stress on the remaining server for 5k users. Although performance is supposed to be improved for GC queries in W2K3, I have no hard numbers to draw from and like to reduce SPOFs (Single Points of Failure) so I'd still suggest more than 2. Sounds like a fun project though! -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:47 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Real world experience Subject: Real world experience I will spare the gory 'political' details as we are in the midst of trying to consolidate 35 '5.5' Exchange servers in 35 domains to as little servers as possible. We're looking at an Exchange 2K3 rollout and probably a hybrid AD using MS's meta directory (maybe). The real question is I am looking for real world experience with something similar to what we are going to from a Exchange 2K shop. Essentially we'll be looking at 5,000 users (.5 GB per mailbox) to start with another 5,000 in phase 2 and 5,000 more in phase 3. With a new 2K3 AD, we'll probably consider at least 2 DC's and one dedicated server for OWA. The main mail servers and storage is really the number cruncher. It's looking like a 3 server cluster and external storage (AV also has to be factored). All client stations will be on at least 10 if not 100 switched lines, GB speed on the WAN backbone. I have gone to Dell and other places to run the traditional load 'configuration wizard' and I have always preferred to error on the side of you can never have too much power. I would like to hear from people using SAN's or the like to account for TB size storage and backup. How close was the configuration load wizards to what you really required. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Group
For a group mailbox, use a mailbox and assign the group permissions to it. -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, June 05, 2003 3:00 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Mailbox Group Subject: Mailbox Group I'm needing to setup a support type mailbox that when email is sent to it, it will be delivered to a group of users here. I know I can setup a Group and have the address sent to those members. They would also like an auto-response sent to the sender stating that we have received their request and someone will get back to them within 48 hours. Is this possible? Exchange 2000 SP3 Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP PC Systems Administrator MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company www.mpdinc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Friday Haiku
I'm never going to wash my MessageOne shirt ( not that I wash any of them). Thanks to MessageOne and Chris for a great party and a memorable night. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday Haiku Actually, there are 2 shirts The one that Chris is talking about is from the MessageOne party at SpeedZone on Sunday night. It has the TechEd 2003 logo with a nice red X over TechEd and a handwritten MEC above it. Very nice. The one I was referring to was from the Aelita booth. It just has Exchange Guru written on it in nice big letters. Also very nice, but unfortunately, handed out willy-nilly, and therefore, not as cool. I think that some of the people that I saw wearing them could barely spell IT -Original Message- From: Mark Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:03 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Friday Haiku Subject: RE: Friday Haiku Got a pix of that shirt you can share with us? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Friday Haiku I have to tell you all I have never had a shirt generate so much interaction for me!! I am curious if anyone else had similar experiences . . . 1. exactly 6 people offered to buy the shirt off of me. 2. exactly 9 different people at the party last night had pictures taken with my shirt. And I mean my shirt. I had to turn around so they could be photographed standing next to the back of it. 3. At the expo yesterday someone from MS approached me and asked me why I found it necessary to cross out Tech Ed on my shirt. He seemed to think I made this shirt up just for myself and not that it was a group shirt and was quite dismayed. As if this was my personal political statement. I told him it was given to me at a party for a group of Exchange admins; not a personal vendetta, etc. Of course, I said, as long as you are here I am disappointed you canceled MEC and don't disagree with the back of the shirt. And went on with my grievances . . . :) In the end he thanked me! :) Chris - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:02 AM Subject: Friday Haiku What have I learned here? I need a wireless toy No, not one like that I want to check mail While sitting in a session I want better toys Drunk geeks aren't pretty Not enough girls for them all They need cold showers Walking around here All these Exchange Guru shirts Most cannot spell it Some sessions were good Other sessions were long naps I still hate clusters. stemy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Message Transfer Agent
Yes. It's used to communicate with 5.5 servers in the site among other things. -Original Message- From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:47 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Message Transfer Agent Subject: Message Transfer Agent Hi, Is MTA is use at all in any way in Exchange 2000 even if we still have 5.5 on the NT domain with a trust in between them for the migration? Thnx! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Archiving Solutions
KVS and AttachStor are technologies worth looking at. www.mail-resources.com has a number of other 3rd party tools listed in the web links | server | archival section I believe. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 06, 2003 3:02 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Archiving Solutions Subject: Archiving Solutions Does anyone have any experience with archiving solutions like veritas storage migrator for exchange? We currently do not impose hard limits on our users due to a lot of regulations that we need to comply with. We have users who have mailboxes close to 3GB. On one exchange server that has 180 users, the total size of the store is already at a 110GB. I'm interested to know what solutions you have in place to keep down the size of user's mailboxes. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting Global address book
Frigging Lyris... Delete the users and the views will go away automatically. Views only exist for the criteria for which they were created. When valid objects fit the criteria there is no way to remove the object other than deleting the objects which meet the criteria or changing the criteria. -Original Message- From: suriya suriya suriya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:12 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: RE: Deleting Global address book Subject: Re: RE: Deleting Global address book All receipents of those unused servers. On Fri, 23 May 2003 Chris Scharff wrote : What shows up under these 'unused' views? -Original Message- From: suriya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, May 23, 2003 2:51 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Deleting Global address book Subject: Deleting Global address book hi we have 12 branches for our office. We are using Exchange Server 5.5 in all locations and these are=20 interconnected with VSAT communication. Now we have closed 5 locations office/ In our location, it shows all the 12 location address=20 book views. with all the receipents. Now how to delete these 5=20 location address book views in my locaiton server/. or generally explanation on deleting global address book views in exchange server 5.5 suriya _ List posting FAQ: =20 http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:=20 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=3Dexchangetext_mod e= =3D lang=3Denglish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: =20 http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=3Dexchangetext_mod e= =3D lang=3Denglish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Get email that means BUSINESS! me @ mycompany.com. Just Rs.1499/year. To start, click http://www.rediffmailpro.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=3Dexchangetext_mode =3D= lang=3Denglish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
