RE: EMail addresses not being created on new mailboxes
You are likely having some problem with the Recipient Update Service. Did you install any third-party connector, such as RightFax? Do you find an Application Event Log entry telling you of a missing DLL? Do you have a Recipient Update Service defined for the Active Directory domain in question? Do you have a recipient policy defined that applies to the recipients? If none of these apply, search TechNet for Recipient Update Service or RUS. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP One man's Spam is another man's UCE. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 9:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions I'm running into a situation at a client where email addresses never get generated on any new mail-enabled user or group. We've waited as long as overnight and still no email addresses. But if we restart the System Attendant, the addresses appear in a matter of minutes. The environment is as follows: 3 AD sites with Exchange servers in each site. 1 routing group. DC's in each site. A RUS has been created for a DC in each site. All servers are Windows 2000 SP3, Exchange 2000 SP3 plus the post-SP3 rollup. This is a clean environment, the entire dealio is less than a month old. Any idea's? Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailtraq question
Hi All In a proposal to a client I suggested an Exchange environment. The client, after considering cost primarily, asked about Mailtraq. I must admit I'm not familiar with the product. I have read up on the web about it. It seems to rely on a web based client a lot, but has anybody got any real life experience with this product? Any views? There doesn't appear to be much info on the actual inner workings of the product, nor any disaster recovery. Regards, Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE Sysadmin Manager Korbi.net _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Perrmission denied??
Tony, I assume when the PF is hidden and the user tries to send as he does not get the 'from' address to underline? normally you cannot send to an hidden GAL entry for example unless you specify something like the SMTP address and you cannot send as it will not resolve to the name and confirm that you have send rights. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2003 17:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Perrmission denied?? Forgot. E2K SP3 One single PF store , From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Perrmission denied?? Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:41:39 -0400 I have a user that is a owner of a public folder and he has send as and send on behalf permissions. The send as was added later but was decided to keep the send on behalf, as it wouldn't hurt anything. The PF mail address is hidden from the GAL. Receives mail fine. But when the user goes to send as he gets you do not have permissions. However if I unhide the PF mail address from the GAL he can send as just fine no errors. Is this a bug. Do I need to remove the send on behalf for it to function in the hidden mode. _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Activities tab of contact items in public folder
On our Exchange 2000 Server I've created a public folder which contains all our external contacts so that everyone can use this folder as a central address book. For each contact I want to make use of the Activities tab to track e-mail activity. This is working for my Contacts folder as part of my mailbox but is this also possible for contact items in a public folder? Kind regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Activities tab for contacts in public folder
Hello, On our Exchange 2000 Server I've created a public folder which contains all our external contacts so that everyone can use this folder as a central address book. For each contact I want to make use of the Activities tab to track e-mail activity. This is working for my Contacts folder as part of my mailbox but is this also possible for contact items in a public folder? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Restore Exchange 2000 IS?
OK, I have a priv.edb and priv.stm from an old backup (just these two files). I have built an offline exchange server with the same names and service packs as outlined by Microsoft. My question is, can I recover with just the files or do I need a full Exchange backup from a program such as Veritas or Windows Backup? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP
Bill, This will only stop the basic user (minesweeper for example will open multiple level zip file to scan or/and block certain attachments) because if you password protect the zipno can do and in it comes (assuming zips are allowed in). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 June 2003 16:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP I need something that can block specified file types contained in ZIP files.. i.e. if a say EXE...etc.. has been ZIP into a file attachment on an e-mail I need to block it.. Alas...my Trend suite does NOT! (disappointingvery!) rec's from anyone??? please FYI: presently exch55sp4. But I prefer a gateway type thingy..but on the box would do also. yes I requested Trend to add the feature..but no guarantees they will...sigh...bummer... thanks! bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP
Products such as Tumbleweed and Antigen however will allow the administrator to quarantine zip files that are password-protected. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hurst, Paul Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP Bill, This will only stop the basic user (minesweeper for example will open multiple level zip file to scan or/and block certain attachments) because if you password protect the zipno can do and in it comes (assuming zips are allowed in). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 June 2003 16:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP I need something that can block specified file types contained in ZIP files.. i.e. if a say EXE...etc.. has been ZIP into a file attachment on an e-mail I need to block it.. Alas...my Trend suite does NOT! (disappointingvery!) rec's from anyone??? please FYI: presently exch55sp4. But I prefer a gateway type thingy..but on the box would do also. yes I requested Trend to add the feature..but no guarantees they will...sigh...bummer... thanks! bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restore Exchange 2000 IS?
Depends on what you need :) The priv.edb and priv.stm should give you all mail that has been committed to the databases, but will not give you mail that has been received since that time. Also, having the same server name is not quite as important, but having the same org name and same Admin Group and Storage Group is what is important. Having the same server name should be absolutely fine though. Since you are not doing a typical restore though, you will probably have to stop the Exchange services, then replace the files. I also wouldn't be surprised if you may find that you have to run eseutil and/or isinteg to get the database mounted. Before running those though, try and re-start the services and then take note of any errors you receive. Also, before running eseutil or isinteg, make sure that you still have your backup copy of the databases in case something happens to them while running either of those utilities. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:40 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Restore Exchange 2000 IS? Subject: Restore Exchange 2000 IS? OK, I have a priv.edb and priv.stm from an old backup (just these two files). I have built an offline exchange server with the same names and service packs as outlined by Microsoft. My question is, can I recover with just the files or do I need a full Exchange backup from a program such as Veritas or Windows Backup? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Memory error
Brian, Recently someone had the same issues as you and the following was posted here - Here is something from Marc Stanton (Microsoft) Here is a useful checklist for VM problems that should be able to help solve your problems 1. Check whether this is Win2K Server or Advanced Server. If it's Server, then make sure that the /3GB switch is not in the boot.ini. If this is Advanced Server and there is more than 1Gb of physical RAM installed, ensure that /3GB does appear in the boot.ini 2. Look at the app log.are you seeing 9582 warnings (i.e. 32Mb block available) or 9582 errors (i.e. 16Mb block available). 3. Are the 9582's being accompanied by other out of memory errors such as 12800 events. If so, then you probably have users calling up the support desk asking why their mail isn't working. If user experience is good, then the 9582 may be relatively benign, but should still be investigated for possible action. 4. Look at the MSExchangeIS | VM Largest Block Size perfmon counter .I find this is the best counter to try figure out if something is wrong. You can look at this in realtime to get some data, but if you want to spot trends and figure out if memory is being released, then log this counter for 1 min intervals and collect about 18-24 hours worth. Look at the 'Minimum' value to see what the dip is. Don't worry if this value appears to be low, our own E2K servers at Microsoft were running at 55Mb as the largest block size. 5. Be aware that other store-related processes like virus scanning can tip the threshold. For example, at one customer, by enabling MDB scanning, the VM block would dip below 32Mb and thus the 9582's were generated. However, we only dipped slightly under 32Mb and user perf was absolutely fine. Additionally, during the night, the VM block would grow and the 9582's would stop. This is a classic example of a benign 9582 .as long as user perf is good and the VM block grows again during quiet times. 6. Unfortunately, some scenarios will dictate that you need to do something to get rid of the 9582's .pulling the MDB scanner off (if running) will probably do the trick, but this is a band-aid, not the solution. First of all, you really need to make sure that the server is running Exchange SP3. At various customers, we saw massive VM improvements once SP3 was applied. If you're running on a cluster, also make sure that Q315771 is installed. You'll also want to get the latest scsiport.sys driver install. The version which comes with Win2K SP2 is known to fragment VM (see Q311901 for more details) 7. If you're still seeing 9582's then you need to perform a reg tweak. This tweak is okay as long as there is a decent amount of RAM available in the server. Look at Memory | Available Bytes .if you have more than a couple hundred megs, then you're fine. This is the parameter that ITG runs with: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\HeapDeCommitFreeBlockThreshold=262144 8. At this stage, things should be on the up. For example, by doing all the above, a customer was able to re-enable MDB scanning and still only dip to 348Mb as the VM Largest Block. If you're still seeing issues, then you're either dealing with a heavily loaded system, or a leaky application. If you suspect a leaky app, take a look at Process | Private Bytes | Store to see if this is growing over a period of time. If you suspect the system is overloaded, then there should be other giveaways (such as high CPU utilization). 9. If the 9582's have still not disappeared, then take a look at your Physical Disk | Disk Queue Lengths for database and log drives (you'll need diskperf -y to get these stats). The disk queue length should never be consistently above the number of spindles in the array. You will of course see peaks, and these can range into the low hundreds, but this is fine. If disk queue lengths are up into 300+ and beyond pretty consistently then you have a disk bottleneck somewhere. If you determine that the disk is good, then you can lower the ESE buffer from 850 to 800Mb and get some more VM to play with This is the msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax value that is outlined in the Quick Tuning Guide. Note: Many customers with large systems actually up this value from 0.85Gb to 1.2Gb to get additional perf, however if you're VM bound, then it's much better to lower the value. 10. If after all this, things are still looking bad, you need to find other ways of reducing VM consumption. For example, what is the SG / MDB configuration? A customer having massive VM problems had 4 Storage Groups hosting a total of 8 databases. We got that down to 3 storage groups and they went away .sometimes the fourth will tip the server over the edge. This is certainly true for Exchange 2000 SP2 and under. SP3 this is not as big of deal 11. If all else fails, you will need to get a VADUMP (E2K reskit) on the store and contact PSS
RE: Message Headers
Check on the users Email account and see who has NT access and 'send as' permission set and it will be one of those. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 June 2003 15:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message Headers I have a few users that are using Outlook 2002. What they are doing is adding the From field in Outlook and sending mail as someone else instead of them. They click on new message and then they go to the view on the toolbar and then they select the From Field. I s there a way that i can tell what user is sending the message? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 11 Reply to All
Outlook will reply to you if you have your external address it has been sent to and it doesn't 'know' your the same person until exchange receive the request by which time it's to late and it sends it to you. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 13:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook 11 Reply to All although after some more observation it only seems to happen when I do a REPLY TO ALL from an external email address . . . - Original Message - From: Diane Poremsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:32 PM Subject: RE: Outlook 11 Reply to All Do you have more than one account in your profile? If so, it's because outlook has a problem knowing who you are - it's a problem in older versions too. -Original Message- I have notice lately that when I do a reply to all I am now included in the reply to all . . . . Anyone noticed this? I know it is beta, but thought perhaps someone else had seen this? Reviewing GFI Mail Essentials v8 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drafts Arriving in Inbox
Bill, Thanks for the reply. No rules are set for this user either on client or server side. My money's still on the PDA's as one of the Desktop guys suggested that when they use Bluetooth if it can't connect it hunts for another device. I'm also checking if we have an old version of Outlook as Inbox was the default location for Drafts with OL97. regards Phil -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 July 2003 18:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drafts Arriving in Inbox Could it be as simple as having set a rule incorrectly in Outlook on the client side? Wild Guess, Bill Kuhl -Original Message- From: Phil Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Drafts Arriving in Inbox Hi All, We are running Exchange 5.5 SP4 with post sp4 Hotfixes, clients are a mix of Outlook 2000 and 98, and I wondered if anyone has seen or can explain the following. One of our users received 8 messages into his Inbox all as draft messages from 8 different people. The originators have been identified by their signatures and I have looked in the various logs but other than their sudden appearance in the Inbox nothing has been logged. As a result my suspicion is that it is client related, and at one time we wondered if the cause may be related to the fact that these users have PDA's and are using Bluetooth, however, not all the originator's have this. At the moment its only happened to one user, but its strange enough that I sought the advice and experience of the list. Any information on this would be great. regards Phil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drafts Arriving in Inbox
I didn't really think it was that simple, but sometimes in our frustration we overlook the obvious. Bill -Original Message- From: Young, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drafts Arriving in Inbox Bill, Thanks for the reply. No rules are set for this user either on client or server side. My money's still on the PDA's as one of the Desktop guys suggested that when they use Bluetooth if it can't connect it hunts for another device. I'm also checking if we have an old version of Outlook as Inbox was the default location for Drafts with OL97. regards Phil -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 July 2003 18:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drafts Arriving in Inbox Could it be as simple as having set a rule incorrectly in Outlook on the client side? Wild Guess, Bill Kuhl -Original Message- From: Phil Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Drafts Arriving in Inbox Hi All, We are running Exchange 5.5 SP4 with post sp4 Hotfixes, clients are a mix of Outlook 2000 and 98, and I wondered if anyone has seen or can explain the following. One of our users received 8 messages into his Inbox all as draft messages from 8 different people. The originators have been identified by their signatures and I have looked in the various logs but other than their sudden appearance in the Inbox nothing has been logged. As a result my suspicion is that it is client related, and at one time we wondered if the cause may be related to the fact that these users have PDA's and are using Bluetooth, however, not all the originator's have this. At the moment its only happened to one user, but its strange enough that I sought the advice and experience of the list. Any information on this would be great. regards Phil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The spam that gets through
Quick question following a vigourous debate here: How do people out in list-land handle spam which gets past the spam filters? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The spam that gets through
I usually shake my head then kind of sigh. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The spam that gets through Quick question following a vigourous debate here: How do people out in list-land handle spam which gets past the spam filters? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP
As does mimesweeper. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 July 2003 14:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP Products such as Tumbleweed and Antigen however will allow the administrator to quarantine zip files that are password-protected. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hurst, Paul Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP Bill, This will only stop the basic user (minesweeper for example will open multiple level zip file to scan or/and block certain attachments) because if you password protect the zipno can do and in it comes (assuming zips are allowed in). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 June 2003 16:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP I need something that can block specified file types contained in ZIP files.. i.e. if a say EXE...etc.. has been ZIP into a file attachment on an e-mail I need to block it.. Alas...my Trend suite does NOT! (disappointingvery!) rec's from anyone??? please FYI: presently exch55sp4. But I prefer a gateway type thingy..but on the box would do also. yes I requested Trend to add the feature..but no guarantees they will...sigh...bummer... thanks! bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The spam that gets through
ROFL! Is that what's required to hit the delete key just right? Geez...and all this time I've been doing it wrong. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The spam that gets through I usually shake my head then kind of sigh. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The spam that gets through Quick question following a vigourous debate here: How do people out in list-land handle spam which gets past the spam filters? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The spam that gets through
If it gets past the database of known spam (we use SurfControl), then it also undergoes a keyword scan. Sometimes this blocks legitimate mail, which is a PITA. I've removed myself from the keyword scanning, as I was spending more time getting messgaes released than I was dealing with spam. It doesn't bother me to delete a few messages. If it gets past the keyword scan, then sometimes we evaluate the text, and we add in specific rules to combat that particular message. For example, we can't see much communication involving septic tanks within our normal day-to-daty activities. :0) The manual adding is not very scalable I admit. But SurfControl's spam datbase is catching 3x the amount of our previous product. Neil -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 08 July 2003 16:45 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: The spam that gets through Subject: The spam that gets through Quick question following a vigourous debate here: How do people out in list-land handle spam which gets past the spam filters? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The spam that gets through
I've just shaken my head and sighed at today's OOF messages I've got. :-) Including Liam Murphy at HP who I used to work with. Hi Liam! Neil -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 08 July 2003 16:47 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: The spam that gets through Subject: RE: The spam that gets through I usually shake my head then kind of sigh. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The spam that gets through Quick question following a vigourous debate here: How do people out in list-land handle spam which gets past the spam filters? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The spam that gets through
Del -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The spam that gets through Quick question following a vigourous debate here: How do people out in list-land handle spam which gets past the spam filters? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailtraq question
Lots of systems do mail, maybe it's a question of whether they would benefit from calendaring, the import/export/archive utilities, integrated contact lists, etc. And of course, you're right to question DR ability. -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 12:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailtraq question Hi All In a proposal to a client I suggested an Exchange environment. The client, after considering cost primarily, asked about Mailtraq. I must admit I'm not familiar with the product. I have read up on the web about it. It seems to rely on a web based client a lot, but has anybody got any real life experience with this product? Any views? There doesn't appear to be much info on the actual inner workings of the product, nor any disaster recovery. Regards, Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE Sysadmin Manager Korbi.net _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The spam that gets through
And know they love you. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The spam that gets through I usually shake my head then kind of sigh. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The spam that gets through Quick question following a vigourous debate here: How do people out in list-land handle spam which gets past the spam filters? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang= english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The spam that gets through
Neil, Where did you work with Liam? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 July 2003 16:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The spam that gets through I've just shaken my head and sighed at today's OOF messages I've got. :-) Including Liam Murphy at HP who I used to work with. Hi Liam! Neil -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 08 July 2003 16:47 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: The spam that gets through Subject: RE: The spam that gets through I usually shake my head then kind of sigh. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The spam that gets through Quick question following a vigourous debate here: How do people out in list-land handle spam which gets past the spam filters? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hidden accounts/recipients
Is there a way to search for accounts/recipients that are hidden from the exchange address list in AD? Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A bit off topic - Multiple apps on 1 server
All, Excuse me for the slightly off-topic inquiry. We are currently rolling out Exchange 2000 - we have about 10,000 users in several locations - 150-300 users per office on average. We run the Exchange 2000 servers also as Domain Controllers, with the addition of DNS and DHCP. Everything works just fine, but now the CTO wants to start doing an Office in a Box concept - where we load tons of additional apps on this server. Sort of like Small Business Server - but with additional licenses (more than 50), and not all the apps are Microsoft. I thought we were being a bit risky having Exchange on the same server as a DC, DNS, and DHCP. Does anyone have any advice on this? Bad idea? Terrible idea? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus Software for Exchange
Hello All. Current Configuration: Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000 Advanced Server (One server) OWA CA AntiVirus CA ArcServe (w/blb) 19GB IS 900 Users Currently I run all services for Exchange on one server. I know, I know, and I have paid the price more than one late night coming in to reboot because services are failing. Most problems came when ArcServe started the brick-level backups (again I knowcannot convince Mgmt. to stop brick level backupseven with 30 day retention settings). When the BLB started it would knock out OWA or worse, slowing backups to a crawl taking 36 hours to do a brick level backup. Also, when doing virus updates, brick level backups would again fail. When it comes down to it, probably too many services running on one server. I have recently convinced my management to purchase another server for Exchange so that I may move some services from the primary server to a second server. The services that I will be moving to the additional server (additional server will be outside the firewallprimary server inside firewall) are OWA, IIS/HTTP, SSL, SMTP Gateway and the IMC. My question: I am not sure what kind of Antivirus and Antispam software to purchase and where to put it. As I understand it, Computer Assoc. does not sell a product that will scan just the IMC. Trend has a product called Interscan Messaging Security Suite that will scan the IMC box as mail comes and goes through it. Trend's ScanMail for Exchange scans the IS which is good but do I really need it if I am scanning on the second Exchange server IMC? I would appreciate your comments positive or negative. Thanks in advance! Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Perrmission denied??
Unhide the folder address, have the user add the address from the GAL to his/her contacts or PAB and then rehide the folder address. Then all they have to do is select the address from their contacts or PAB when sending as. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Perrmission denied?? I have a user that is a owner of a public folder and he has send as and send on behalf permissions. The send as was added later but was decided to keep the send on behalf, as it wouldn't hurt anything. The PF mail address is hidden from the GAL. Receives mail fine. But when the user goes to send as he gets you do not have permissions. However if I unhide the PF mail address from the GAL he can send as just fine no errors. Is this a bug. Do I need to remove the send on behalf for it to function in the hidden mode. _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The spam that gets through
And then fall asleep. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The spam that gets through I usually shake my head then kind of sigh. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The spam that gets through Quick question following a vigourous debate here: How do people out in list-land handle spam which gets past the spam filters? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NNTPSVC Event ID 100
I have begun recieving these errors in the Event log Event ID 100 Source NNTPSVC The server was unable to logon the Windows NT account 'IUSR_ExchangeSrv' due to the following error: Logon failure: the specified account password has expired. The data is the error code. When at look at the status of this account, it says change password at next logon. I know this is an IIS acount. My question is, do I need this account active, and if so will it be a security risk. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A bit off topic - Multiple apps on 1 server
Bad, bad, bad idea. To paraphrase Clint Eastwood, do you feel lucky, well do you. There can be some serious repercussions with this one. You have 10,000 users on an Exchange servers in multiple sites and now he's suggesting that your mail server function as an application server, hosting multiple apps. What about performance, what about backups? You will need to run an Exchange backup and a standard file backup. You might need two versions of a virus software, one for your files and one for Exchange specifically. Oh this is the domain controller. Don't forget the application that needs to be rebooted once its installed and knocks off 10,000 users or even an application that overwrites certain dlls and Exchange no longer loads. These apps gonna' share the same drive with the priv and pub? I could go on, but you recall Renfields laugh when he was on the brink of madness, he, he, he he. Sorry, I got carried way. Dot -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A bit off topic - Multiple apps on 1 server All, Excuse me for the slightly off-topic inquiry. We are currently rolling out Exchange 2000 - we have about 10,000 users in several locations - 150-300 users per office on average. We run the Exchange 2000 servers also as Domain Controllers, with the addition of DNS and DHCP. Everything works just fine, but now the CTO wants to start doing an Office in a Box concept - where we load tons of additional apps on this server. Sort of like Small Business Server - but with additional licenses (more than 50), and not all the apps are Microsoft. I thought we were being a bit risky having Exchange on the same server as a DC, DNS, and DHCP. Does anyone have any advice on this? Bad idea? Terrible idea? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus Software for Exchange
I am not sure what kind of Antivirus and Antispam software to purchase and where to put it. As I understand it, Computer Assoc. does not sell a product that will scan just the IMC. Trend has a product called Interscan Messaging Security Suite that will scan the IMC box as mail comes and goes through it. Trend's ScanMail for Exchange scans the IS which is good but do I really need it if I am scanning on the second Exchange server IMC? Personally I like Trend stuff, it tends to just work, and work very well IMHO. I'd look at Scanmail as it will scan everything, inbound/outbound, internal, external and can be used on as many Exchange servers as you like so long as your licence covers the relevent number of users. Anti spam is a little trickier as it depends on your budget and a few other things. If you have an old machine spare I'd really suggest spending a short while investigating Spamassassin - downside is it's a *nix product so you need to get your head around more things, but for the price (totally free except for the time and a box to run it on) you will not do better. I'd also suggest a look at Xwall from www.dataenter.at, cheap and works well IME - I don't have any experience of the really expensive products, but I'd suggest spamassassin is as good as any of them if you have the time to spare. regards, Paul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus Software for Exchange
I dont have that many users myself...but I did a while ago and change to Trend's Suite of products Desktop-Servers-Exchange-IMSS(gateway) after having run Mcafee for 3 years here and looked at Symantec and Antigen, and a couple others.. IF I had the budget... Hands down I would have used Antigen for my Exchange and SMTP gateway. And Trend for everything else. As I sit I have trend for everything..and Must say I like it VERY much... features are really nice, product is good to excellent. I have only found one problem/feature with IMSS which is potentially a significant problem for me. I like it, Id use it again...I recommend itit's a very complete suite, and good preformance..etc. 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus Software for Exchange Hello All. Current Configuration: Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000 Advanced Server (One server) OWA CA AntiVirus CA ArcServe (w/blb) 19GB IS 900 Users Currently I run all services for Exchange on one server. I know, I know, and I have paid the price more than one late night coming in to reboot because services are failing. Most problems came when ArcServe started the brick-level backups (again I knowcannot convince Mgmt. to stop brick level backupseven with 30 day retention settings). When the BLB started it would knock out OWA or worse, slowing backups to a crawl taking 36 hours to do a brick level backup. Also, when doing virus updates, brick level backups would again fail. When it comes down to it, probably too many services running on one server. I have recently convinced my management to purchase another server for Exchange so that I may move some services from the primary server to a second server. The services that I will be moving to the additional server (additional server will be outside the firewallprimary server inside firewall) are OWA, IIS/HTTP, SSL, SMTP Gateway and the IMC. My question: I am not sure what kind of Antivirus and Antispam software to purchase and where to put it. As I understand it, Computer Assoc. does not sell a product that will scan just the IMC. Trend has a product called Interscan Messaging Security Suite that will scan the IMC box as mail comes and goes through it. Trend's ScanMail for Exchange scans the IS which is good but do I really need it if I am scanning on the second Exchange server IMC? I would appreciate your comments positive or negative. Thanks in advance! Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus Software for Exchange
I like Sybari Antigen. Now Antigen is available for IIS SMTP too. And they have content scanning option. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus Software for Exchange Hello All. Current Configuration: Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000 Advanced Server (One server) OWA CA AntiVirus CA ArcServe (w/blb) 19GB IS 900 Users Currently I run all services for Exchange on one server. I know, I know, and I have paid the price more than one late night coming in to reboot because services are failing. Most problems came when ArcServe started the brick-level backups (again I knowcannot convince Mgmt. to stop brick level backupseven with 30 day retention settings). When the BLB started it would knock out OWA or worse, slowing backups to a crawl taking 36 hours to do a brick level backup. Also, when doing virus updates, brick level backups would again fail. When it comes down to it, probably too many services running on one server. I have recently convinced my management to purchase another server for Exchange so that I may move some services from the primary server to a second server. The services that I will be moving to the additional server (additional server will be outside the firewallprimary server inside firewall) are OWA, IIS/HTTP, SSL, SMTP Gateway and the IMC. My question: I am not sure what kind of Antivirus and Antispam software to purchase and where to put it. As I understand it, Computer Assoc. does not sell a product that will scan just the IMC. Trend has a product called Interscan Messaging Security Suite that will scan the IMC box as mail comes and goes through it. Trend's ScanMail for Exchange scans the IS which is good but do I really need it if I am scanning on the second Exchange server IMC? I would appreciate your comments positive or negative. Thanks in advance! Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook Message Indents
I have a user who is having a problem with the indents on forwarded mail. Have you ever received a forwarded email that is hard to read because of the corruption from indents? The text is scattered and hard to follow. Is this happening because a user on the other end is sending from Outlook Express? Is this something that only happens in OE or can it happen in Outlook 2000? How do I fix it? Thanks Samantha Windows 2000 Professional Outlook 2000 Exchange 5.5 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Way out in left field (Sorry)
I know this is way off topic but it's hard to find uninterested people to give an opinion. I'm about to purchase a VOIP phone system for the company and am curious if anyone is either using Cisco or Avaya's solution and if so what is the effect on the Exchange server? Cisco closely integrates and Avaya just has a program that sits in Outlook and integrates like that. Also does anyone have an opinion on which is better? (we've ruled out everyone else, I'm a one man IT shop for a company of 98 employee's) Thank you, and sorry for this being s off topic. Todd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restore Exchange 2000 IS?
While running ESEUTIL /P I am seeing this in the log... (see below) Hopefully the repair will work and the darn thing will mount. Dbtime is larger than database dbtime -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Depends on what you need :) The priv.edb and priv.stm should give you all mail that has been committed to the databases, but will not give you mail that has been received since that time. Also, having the same server name is not quite as important, but having the same org name and same Admin Group and Storage Group is what is important. Having the same server name should be absolutely fine though. Since you are not doing a typical restore though, you will probably have to stop the Exchange services, then replace the files. I also wouldn't be surprised if you may find that you have to run eseutil and/or isinteg to get the database mounted. Before running those though, try and re-start the services and then take note of any errors you receive. Also, before running eseutil or isinteg, make sure that you still have your backup copy of the databases in case something happens to them while running either of those utilities. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:40 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Restore Exchange 2000 IS? Subject: Restore Exchange 2000 IS? OK, I have a priv.edb and priv.stm from an old backup (just these two files). I have built an offline exchange server with the same names and service packs as outlined by Microsoft. My question is, can I recover with just the files or do I need a full Exchange backup from a program such as Veritas or Windows Backup? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way out in left field (Sorry)
We have unity from cisco for our unified messaging and as far as the exchange server is concerned, no biggie. I however am not the admin for our VOIP stuff, someone else is. But it hasn't hurt me. -Original Message- From: Todd Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions I know this is way off topic but it's hard to find uninterested people to give an opinion. I'm about to purchase a VOIP phone system for the company and am curious if anyone is either using Cisco or Avaya's solution and if so what is the effect on the Exchange server? Cisco closely integrates and Avaya just has a program that sits in Outlook and integrates like that. Also does anyone have an opinion on which is better? (we've ruled out everyone else, I'm a one man IT shop for a company of 98 employee's) Thank you, and sorry for this being s off topic. Todd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way out in left field (Sorry)
I ran Avvid and Unity - it is solid and no problem with Exchange. The 'Unified Messaging' concept is difficult for most end users however. Remember, the attachments take up storage space in the email mailbox. People could not grasp that for some reason... Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way out in left field (Sorry) We have unity from cisco for our unified messaging and as far as the exchange server is concerned, no biggie. I however am not the admin for our VOIP stuff, someone else is. But it hasn't hurt me. -Original Message- From: Todd Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions I know this is way off topic but it's hard to find uninterested people to give an opinion. I'm about to purchase a VOIP phone system for the company and am curious if anyone is either using Cisco or Avaya's solution and if so what is the effect on the Exchange server? Cisco closely integrates and Avaya just has a program that sits in Outlook and integrates like that. Also does anyone have an opinion on which is better? (we've ruled out everyone else, I'm a one man IT shop for a company of 98 employee's) Thank you, and sorry for this being s off topic. Todd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way out in left field (Sorry)
I think Avaya has a solution that gets installed on the Exchange server -Original Message- From: Todd Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way out in left field (Sorry) I know this is way off topic but it's hard to find uninterested people to give an opinion. I'm about to purchase a VOIP phone system for the company and am curious if anyone is either using Cisco or Avaya's solution and if so what is the effect on the Exchange server? Cisco closely integrates and Avaya just has a program that sits in Outlook and integrates like that. Also does anyone have an opinion on which is better? (we've ruled out everyone else, I'm a one man IT shop for a company of 98 employee's) Thank you, and sorry for this being s off topic. Todd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Message Indents
You can do it quite easily in Outlook as well. Tools, Options, Email options button. Look towards the bottom at the On Replies and Forwards. Odds are it is set to Include and indent original message text Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 1:47 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Outlook Message Indents Subject: Outlook Message Indents I have a user who is having a problem with the indents on forwarded mail. Have you ever received a forwarded email that is hard to read because of the corruption from indents? The text is scattered and hard to follow. Is this happening because a user on the other end is sending from Outlook Express? Is this something that only happens in OE or can it happen in Outlook 2000? How do I fix it? Thanks Samantha Windows 2000 Professional Outlook 2000 Exchange 5.5 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Message Indents
What should it be set to? Thanks -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Message Indents You can do it quite easily in Outlook as well. Tools, Options, Email options button. Look towards the bottom at the On Replies and Forwards. Odds are it is set to Include and indent original message text Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 1:47 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Outlook Message Indents Subject: Outlook Message Indents I have a user who is having a problem with the indents on forwarded mail. Have you ever received a forwarded email that is hard to read because of the corruption from indents? The text is scattered and hard to follow. Is this happening because a user on the other end is sending from Outlook Express? Is this something that only happens in OE or can it happen in Outlook 2000? How do I fix it? Thanks Samantha Windows 2000 Professional Outlook 2000 Exchange 5.5 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way out in left field (Sorry)
Avaya owns what used to be Octel Unified Messenger, which is a really slick product. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way out in left field (Sorry) I think Avaya has a solution that gets installed on the Exchange server -Original Message- From: Todd Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way out in left field (Sorry) I know this is way off topic but it's hard to find uninterested people to give an opinion. I'm about to purchase a VOIP phone system for the company and am curious if anyone is either using Cisco or Avaya's solution and if so what is the effect on the Exchange server? Cisco closely integrates and Avaya just has a program that sits in Outlook and integrates like that. Also does anyone have an opinion on which is better? (we've ruled out everyone else, I'm a one man IT shop for a company of 98 employee's) Thank you, and sorry for this being s off topic. Todd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The spam that gets through
What were you using previously, and how many messages enter it from the Internet in a day? John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 11:55 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: The spam that gets through Subject: RE: The spam that gets through If it gets past the database of known spam (we use SurfControl), then it also undergoes a keyword scan. Sometimes this blocks legitimate mail, which is a PITA. I've removed myself from the keyword scanning, as I was spending more time getting messgaes released than I was dealing with spam. It doesn't bother me to delete a few messages. If it gets past the keyword scan, then sometimes we evaluate the text, and we add in specific rules to combat that particular message. For example, we can't see much communication involving septic tanks within our normal day-to-daty activities. :0) The manual adding is not very scalable I admit. But SurfControl's spam datbase is catching 3x the amount of our previous product. Neil -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 08 July 2003 16:45 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: The spam that gets through Subject: The spam that gets through Quick question following a vigourous debate here: How do people out in list-land handle spam which gets past the spam filters? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way out in left field (Sorry)
We are running the Cisco 7960 series phone, with Cisco Call Manager and Unity, but we are not using the Exchange functionality. We tested it, and it seems to work well, just don't need the feature set. -Original Message- From: Todd Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions I know this is way off topic but it's hard to find uninterested people to give an opinion. I'm about to purchase a VOIP phone system for the company and am curious if anyone is either using Cisco or Avaya's solution and if so what is the effect on the Exchange server? Cisco closely integrates and Avaya just has a program that sits in Outlook and integrates like that. Also does anyone have an opinion on which is better? (we've ruled out everyone else, I'm a one man IT shop for a company of 98 employee's) Thank you, and sorry for this being s off topic. Todd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restore Exchange 2000 IS?
You're using eseutil from what service pack version of exchange? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Posted At: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:00 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Restore Exchange 2000 IS? Subject: RE: Restore Exchange 2000 IS? While running ESEUTIL /P I am seeing this in the log... (see below) Hopefully the repair will work and the darn thing will mount. Dbtime is larger than database dbtime -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Depends on what you need :) The priv.edb and priv.stm should give you all mail that has been committed to the databases, but will not give you mail that has been received since that time. Also, having the same server name is not quite as important, but having the same org name and same Admin Group and Storage Group is what is important. Having the same server name should be absolutely fine though. Since you are not doing a typical restore though, you will probably have to stop the Exchange services, then replace the files. I also wouldn't be surprised if you may find that you have to run eseutil and/or isinteg to get the database mounted. Before running those though, try and re-start the services and then take note of any errors you receive. Also, before running eseutil or isinteg, make sure that you still have your backup copy of the databases in case something happens to them while running either of those utilities. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:40 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Restore Exchange 2000 IS? Subject: Restore Exchange 2000 IS? OK, I have a priv.edb and priv.stm from an old backup (just these two files). I have built an offline exchange server with the same names and service packs as outlined by Microsoft. My question is, can I recover with just the files or do I need a full Exchange backup from a program such as Veritas or Windows Backup? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Message Indents
You can do it quite easily in Outlook as well. Tools, Options, Email options button. Look towards the bottom at the On Replies and Forwards. Odds are it is set to Include and indent original message text Better yet: Forward as an attachment. This way you can easily response to the person whom originally sent it. -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: A bit off topic - Multiple apps on 1 server
Robert, Well, anything is possible, but this sort of configuration is certainly not recommended. An Exchange Server is an Exchange Server, a DC is a DC etc. Its generally thought of as a bad idea, however there are always costs associated with deploying larger numbers of servers for (comparatively) smaller regional offices. That being said, I have done similar things (although with smaller offices), and provided you have all the backup / AV and DR strategies in place, its not a huge issue. Performance and scaling of the server will be paramount to the configuration. For a 150-300 user office it could potentially be a bit of a squeeze to get all the apps on a single box and still provide the required levels of service, however the following is a configuration I've used that has worked in the past. Dual 2.4/2.8 GHz processors 1-2gb RAM RAID Controller, with up to 6 x36gb drives Software installed was Windows 2000, running AD, DNS, DHCP, WINS Exchange 2000 Oracle File and Print Server This was for an office of up to about 50 staff, and the performance levels were quite acceptable. Obviously the recommended Exchange configuration (mirror set, mirror set, RAID 5) wasn't possible in the hardware being used, however Exchange hasn't seemed to be affected (there is obviously a performance hit, but its been negligible). There are risks associated with doing this sort of config, but as long as you are aware of them, and have contingency plans in place, you should be ok. For example Exchange and SQL aren't very good bedfellows, and need optimisation on both sides to make sure the performance is appropiate for both applications. G. - Original Message - From: Miller, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 3:39 AM Subject: A bit off topic - Multiple apps on 1 server All, Excuse me for the slightly off-topic inquiry. We are currently rolling out Exchange 2000 - we have about 10,000 users in several locations - 150-300 users per office on average. We run the Exchange 2000 servers also as Domain Controllers, with the addition of DNS and DHCP. Everything works just fine, but now the CTO wants to start doing an Office in a Box concept - where we load tons of additional apps on this server. Sort of like Small Business Server - but with additional licenses (more than 50), and not all the apps are Microsoft. I thought we were being a bit risky having Exchange on the same server as a DC, DNS, and DHCP. Does anyone have any advice on this? Bad idea? Terrible idea? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers
Well I am not a legal speagle by any means, but the disclaimer issue it bad joke. The true responsibility of who the message went to is in the hands of the sender. If the message was addressed correctly then the need for disclaimers would be a non-issue. Sorry I watched this thread long enough that I had to put my two cents in there. I find it hard that anyone should accept the burden of responsibility for receiving an electronic message that was sent to them by mistake. And those disclaimers that try to shift the burden of responiblity from the shoulders of the sender to the reciever are a sad attempt at just that. -Original Message- From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers What about Klingon and Elvish? Google is available in both, so people must speak it. Should we not then make disclaimers available in these languages too? themolk. -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 19 June 2003 12:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers About a billion people on this planet speak Chinese ... going to included that as well ? I like the fact you are going to add Dutch to the disclaimer, but around 99% of the Dutch population speaks and understands English very well. ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:10 PM Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers Yup, Greek and Double-Dutch are in the list of languages that need to be covered. Web links are unacceptable since there is no way of checking whether the recipient clicked the link, or they might not be online when they read the message. We thought of using Latin since most of the legal team know that. Esperanto is a bit too leading edge. -Original Message- From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 June 2003 13:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers *Has* anyone tested email disclaimers in the courts in the UK, EU or US? I'm not aware of any cases. I do find it ironic that lawyers, who knowingly write in a way that most people do not find clear, should be concerned that the disclaimer should be written so as to be understood by any recipient. It's all Greek to me. Or double-Dutch. Perhaps your disclaimer could consist of Legal disclaimer - you must read this in every relevant language, each linked to a web page which contains the text in that language. Or write it in Esperanto. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 June 2003 14:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups That's not funny !! I'm currently involved in discussions with our legal team regarding the validity of English language disclaimers on messages written in various different European languages (we route all our Internet mail through a single SMTP gateway in the UK). The legal team are pushing to add disclaimers in each language. Just because no-one ever reads disclaimers doesn't mean that they are not legally applicable - when was the last time you read the MS license agreement when installing software? And just because I select the other radio button and click OK doesn't mean that I have read the labels attached to those actions either. I would be interested in Williams disclaimer list if he would be happy to publish. Also, does anyone know of a disclaimer adder that is language aware? Otherwise I'm going to have to do some funny tricks with SMTP connectors and routing inside the company. The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Error on Outlook 2000
Have a user that is using Outlook 2000 accessing an Exchange 2000 environment. While just sitting there will pop up with a memory error. Load that same user on a different machine creat a new profile same thing. I was thinking of exporting his mail to a pst killing his mailbox then create a new one. Only one seeing this and no events in the event logs indicating a problem with the exchange databse. Has anyone run into this before? Is the action I want to take the correct one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A bit off topic - Multiple apps on 1 server
I don't personally like the idea but it's what Small Business Server is all about, albeit for a smaller office population. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions All, Excuse me for the slightly off-topic inquiry. We are currently rolling out Exchange 2000 - we have about 10,000 users in several locations - 150-300 users per office on average. We run the Exchange 2000 servers also as Domain Controllers, with the addition of DNS and DHCP. Everything works just fine, but now the CTO wants to start doing an Office in a Box concept - where we load tons of additional apps on this server. Sort of like Small Business Server - but with additional licenses (more than 50), and not all the apps are Microsoft. I thought we were being a bit risky having Exchange on the same server as a DC, DNS, and DHCP. Does anyone have any advice on this? Bad idea? Terrible idea? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Message Indents
I hate those. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PF: Exchange Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions You can do it quite easily in Outlook as well. Tools, Options, Email options button. Look towards the bottom at the On Replies and Forwards. Odds are it is set to Include and indent original message text Better yet: Forward as an attachment. This way you can easily response to the person whom originally sent it. -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NNTPSVC Event ID 100
If you are not using newsgroups, just stop and disable the NNTPSVC service. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions I have begun recieving these errors in the Event log Event ID 100 Source NNTPSVC The server was unable to logon the Windows NT account 'IUSR_ExchangeSrv' due to the following error: Logon failure: the specified account password has expired. The data is the error code. When at look at the status of this account, it says change password at next logon. I know this is an IIS acount. My question is, do I need this account active, and if so will it be a security risk. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailtraq question
There are many mail systems for sale and Mailtraq is certainly among them. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP One man's Spam is another man's UCE. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 12:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi All In a proposal to a client I suggested an Exchange environment. The client, after considering cost primarily, asked about Mailtraq. I must admit I'm not familiar with the product. I have read up on the web about it. It seems to rely on a web based client a lot, but has anybody got any real life experience with this product? Any views? There doesn't appear to be much info on the actual inner workings of the product, nor any disaster recovery. Regards, Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE Sysadmin Manager Korbi.net _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Activities tab for contacts in public folder
Anything is possible if you want to write the code. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 4:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, On our Exchange 2000 Server I've created a public folder which contains all our external contacts so that everyone can use this folder as a central address book. For each contact I want to make use of the Activities tab to track e-mail activity. This is working for my Contacts folder as part of my mailbox but is this also possible for contact items in a public folder? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public folder
Hello All, In my organization we have 3 public folder servers where each represents its own home servers. Is there a way to collect information from one dedicated public folder server. I don't want it to be distributed. Thank you for your help Prakash Disclaimer Note : This e-mail is intended only for the person addressed. It may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the information from your computer. Please do not copy or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person. Check out Star Cruises' website at http://www.starcruises.com for more information. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folder
I do not understand; please explain your question in better detail. Are there three public folder trees, or just three servers with different content? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Prakash Sundaramoorthy - IT (XCHG-PKG) Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 9:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hello All, In my organization we have 3 public folder servers where each represents its own home servers. Is there a way to collect information from one dedicated public folder server. I don't want it to be distributed. Thank you for your help Prakash Disclaimer Note : This e-mail is intended only for the person addressed. It may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the information from your computer. Please do not copy or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person. Check out Star Cruises' website at http://www.starcruises.com for more information. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error on Outlook 2000
There can be a corrupt message that looks just fine to Exchange. Try running Outlook with some of the /clean* switches--maybe you're seeing a problem with a reminder. Try using OWA to delete the corrupt message if there is one and you can identify it. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP One man's Spam is another man's UCE. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 7:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Have a user that is using Outlook 2000 accessing an Exchange 2000 environment. While just sitting there will pop up with a memory error. Load that same user on a different machine creat a new profile same thing. I was thinking of exporting his mail to a pst killing his mailbox then create a new one. Only one seeing this and no events in the event logs indicating a problem with the exchange databse. Has anyone run into this before? Is the action I want to take the correct one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folder
Hi Ed, I have three exchange servers (exchg01 , exchg02, exchg03) They are all part of the same organization and within the same site. There are public folders created on each of them. Public folder 1 and 2 = home server exchg01 Public folder 3 to 5= home server exchg02 Public folder 6 = home server exchg03 I have now installed a new exchange server, (exchg04) and would like to re-home all the public folders (public folder 1 to 6) to exchg04. In doing this, I hope to free up processing power resources on exchg01, exchg02 exchg03. Does the re-homing actually help, and what implications are involved? Thanks, Prakash -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder I do not understand; please explain your question in better detail. Are there three public folder trees, or just three servers with different content? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Prakash Sundaramoorthy - IT (XCHG-PKG) Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 9:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hello All, In my organization we have 3 public folder servers where each represents its own home servers. Is there a way to collect information from one dedicated public folder server. I don't want it to be distributed. Thank you for your help Prakash Disclaimer Note : This e-mail is intended only for the person addressed. It may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the information from your computer. Please do not copy or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person. Check out Star Cruises' website at http://www.starcruises.com for more information. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Disclaimer Note : This e-mail is intended only for the person addressed. It may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the information from your computer. Please do not copy or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person. Check out Star Cruises' website at http://www.starcruises.com for more information. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folder
Replicate all folders to your new exchange server, rehome and then remove from all old servers. no implications, assuming you have ade3qute bandwidth for replication to occur and sufficient space on exhcange 4 other than redundancy of course. -Original Message- From: Prakash Sundaramoorthy - IT (XCHG-PKG) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 9 July 2003 4:36 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder Hi Ed, I have three exchange servers (exchg01 , exchg02, exchg03) They are all part of the same organization and within the same site. There are public folders created on each of them. Public folder 1 and 2 = home server exchg01 Public folder 3 to 5= home server exchg02 Public folder 6 = home server exchg03 I have now installed a new exchange server, (exchg04) and would like to re-home all the public folders (public folder 1 to 6) to exchg04. In doing this, I hope to free up processing power resources on exchg01, exchg02 exchg03. Does the re-homing actually help, and what implications are involved? Thanks, Prakash -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder I do not understand; please explain your question in better detail. Are there three public folder trees, or just three servers with different content? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Prakash Sundaramoorthy - IT (XCHG-PKG) Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 9:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hello All, In my organization we have 3 public folder servers where each represents its own home servers. Is there a way to collect information from one dedicated public folder server. I don't want it to be distributed. Thank you for your help Prakash Disclaimer Note : This e-mail is intended only for the person addressed. It may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the information from your computer. Please do not copy or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person. Check out Star Cruises' website at http://www.starcruises.com for more information. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Disclaimer Note : This e-mail is intended only for the person addressed. It may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the information from your computer. Please do not copy or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person. Check out Star Cruises' website at http://www.starcruises.com for more information. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] # Notice: This e-mail message is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz # _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folder
Leeann answered the how to question correctly. Unless the public folders are heavily used, you probably won't notice significant improvement on the servers. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Prakash Sundaramoorthy - IT (XCHG-PKG) Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 9:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hi Ed, I have three exchange servers (exchg01 , exchg02, exchg03) They are all part of the same organization and within the same site. There are public folders created on each of them. Public folder 1 and 2 = home server exchg01 Public folder 3 to 5= home server exchg02 Public folder 6 = home server exchg03 I have now installed a new exchange server, (exchg04) and would like to re-home all the public folders (public folder 1 to 6) to exchg04. In doing this, I hope to free up processing power resources on exchg01, exchg02 exchg03. Does the re-homing actually help, and what implications are involved? Thanks, Prakash -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder I do not understand; please explain your question in better detail. Are there three public folder trees, or just three servers with different content? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Prakash Sundaramoorthy - IT (XCHG-PKG) Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 9:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hello All, In my organization we have 3 public folder servers where each represents its own home servers. Is there a way to collect information from one dedicated public folder server. I don't want it to be distributed. Thank you for your help Prakash Disclaimer Note : This e-mail is intended only for the person addressed. It may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the information from your computer. Please do not copy or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person. Check out Star Cruises' website at http://www.starcruises.com for more information. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Disclaimer Note : This e-mail is intended only for the person addressed. It may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the information from your computer. Please do not copy or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person. Check out Star Cruises' website at http://www.starcruises.com for more information. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
