Outlook clients prompted for Username/Password/Domain
Hello all, For some unknown reason on Monday some of our clients are now being presented with the Enter password: dialogue box. These users computers are a member of the domain and when they enter there information once, Outlook opens normally. I have checked the profile and the logon network security is set to Password Authentication, it is not happening for all users and only happens when they start outlook. Server is Windows 2000 SP4 and Exchange 2000 Enterprise ED SP3 Clients are both Windows XP and Windows 2000 SP4 with Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2002. Any thoughts on why this would have just started would be greatly appreciated! Regards Winston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disable Display Name
We have a problem! We are running Exchange2000 and want to disable sending the display name to the Internet. We have not(!)checked the option under Global Settings-Internet Message Format-Default, the option to Preserve sender's display name on message. Still we send the display name out on the Internet! Since we work in Sweden, and use swedish characters in the display name, an external users trying to reply to a message get's a NDR, when a display name having swedish characters is used. The swedish characters are transformed into garbage. We don't want the display name sent. Any suggestions? Regards, Ola _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890
I've started getting a lot of emails back with the following message: -Original Message- From: System Administrator Sent: maandag 13 oktober 2003 17:15 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:Undeliverable: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 Sent: 13-10-03 17:12 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 13-10-03 17:15 You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. morpheus.intas.be #5.7.1 smtp;552 5.7.1 Mail from dialup refused. Use relay. Any idea? Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook clients prompted for Username/Password/Domain
I know Outlook XP goes crazy like this when someone's password is about to expire. Ctrl-Alt-Del, Change Password, Log out/Log in. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 3:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook clients prompted for Username/Password/Domain Hello all, For some unknown reason on Monday some of our clients are now being presented with the Enter password: dialogue box. These users computers are a member of the domain and when they enter there information once, Outlook opens normally. I have checked the profile and the logon network security is set to Password Authentication, it is not happening for all users and only happens when they start outlook. Server is Windows 2000 SP4 and Exchange 2000 Enterprise ED SP3 Clients are both Windows XP and Windows 2000 SP4 with Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2002. Any thoughts on why this would have just started would be greatly appreciated! Regards Winston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Error - Client seeing The Page cannot be displayed
Did you make sure to keep the necessary ports open so that the front-end in the DMZ could talk to the domain controllers (which I assume are behind your firewall?) Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 12:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Error - Client seeing The Page cannot be displayed Subject: RE: OWA Error - Client seeing The Page cannot be displayed From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 19:00:20 -0400 Start simple: Does this user have local logon rights to the OWA server?=20 No... BUT then I added some clients manually into the local users group...even granted admin. privs just for testing but even that didn't work. Everything was fine before the OWA was placed into a DMZ. Now the server cannot authenticate to the Domain so it cannot find the clients privs.. This server is also acting as a smart host/spam filter scanning both inbound/outbound mail and all of that is working fine. It turns out that most of the company cannot get their mail through OWA any longer. How the heck do I authenticate through the DMZ to the BDC? What now? Shawn _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how does everyone fight this spam?
Shawn, how are you fighting false positives with that product? we have it deployed and have since turned it off cause of that problem. We are working on a in house app that will email users with hyperlinks to their blocked email. e- -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how does everyone fight this spam? I am running a trial version of GFI's MailEssencials and MailSecurity on Exchange 5.5. Out of five different Corporate Email security programs I've tested, GFI's products have been the most successful. In addition, there prices are very reasonable. See: http://www.gfi.com/ I also appreciate that GFI gives you a 60 day trial period. I'm not sure why Microsoft has the absolute worst protection (filtering or whatnot) for worms and viruses of all the email server packages available. Isn't that a good example of irony? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how does everyone fight this spam?
If it helps, we use Postini. Not too expensive while fighting off viruses and spam. It's work a look. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how does everyone fight this spam? Shawn, how are you fighting false positives with that product? we have it deployed and have since turned it off cause of that problem. We are working on a in house app that will email users with hyperlinks to their blocked email. e- -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how does everyone fight this spam? I am running a trial version of GFI's MailEssencials and MailSecurity on Exchange 5.5. Out of five different Corporate Email security programs I've tested, GFI's products have been the most successful. In addition, there prices are very reasonable. See: http://www.gfi.com/ I also appreciate that GFI gives you a 60 day trial period. I'm not sure why Microsoft has the absolute worst protection (filtering or whatnot) for worms and viruses of all the email server packages available. Isn't that a good example of irony? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to change SMTP address for Public Folders
Import using the attribute Secondary-Proxy-Addresses. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of How, Say Chuan Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 7:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How to change SMTP address for Public Folders NT 4.0 and exchange 5.5 We are planning to change the SMTP address for our Exchange 5.5 environment to a new address but would like to maintain the existing ones for a while. We could used the Directory Export/Import to accomplish this for mailboxes and DLs but not for Public Folders. Does anyone know of any way to do this? //how _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable Display Name
Does this help: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;288635Product=exch2 k Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olle Gustafson Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 12:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disable Display Name We have a problem! We are running Exchange2000 and want to disable sending the display name to the Internet. We have not(!)checked the option under Global Settings-Internet Message Format-Default, the option to Preserve sender's display name on message. Still we send the display name out on the Internet! Since we work in Sweden, and use swedish characters in the display name, an external users trying to reply to a message get's a NDR, when a display name having swedish characters is used. The swedish characters are transformed into garbage. We don't want the display name sent. Any suggestions? Regards, Ola _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890
You should ask the postmaster for kapitza.ras.ru, no? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 3:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 I've started getting a lot of emails back with the following message: -Original Message- From: System Administrator Sent: maandag 13 oktober 2003 17:15 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:Undeliverable: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 Sent: 13-10-03 17:12 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 13-10-03 17:15 You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. morpheus.intas.be #5.7.1 smtp;552 5.7.1 Mail from dialup refused. Use relay. Any idea? Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Trend's change to how it reacts to eicar
With pattern 653 (from today) this change in how Scanmail reacts to the EICAR file has been returned to the way it was (it no longer passes the EICAR by default anymore). Cheers Greetings all, I recently had a problem with Scanmail 6.1 that required using the eicar file to troubleshoot (SM was not quarantining when I configured it to do so). To my surprise, no matter what I set the action to SM would pass the eicar file (it sees it and alerts on it...but passes it). So needless to say I got alarmed because who knows what else it was passing. So I opened a case. After a week and 12 engineers later I found this: http://kb.trendmicro.com/solutions/solutionDetail.asp?solutionId=16659submit2=Search Which was also confirmed by this email from Trends support: We have asked our Pattern PM regarding this issue and he told us that this was because of requests from marketing to change the active action of EICAR Test file to pass. This can be resolved by changing the Active Action on SMEX. We are in negotiations with SMEX team on their preferred Active Action. Please wait for further announcements. I wanted to share this with the list for those of us who are using SM (I suspect a number of us are since it tends to be the most recommended). For my current problem this leaves me with no way to trouble shoot it (sending a live virus through SM to see if it quarantines stuff is what I am left with which isnt gonna happen). I personally have big problems with this change (and the fact it was forced on all Trend customers without making it some sort of option) and I have told Trend my feelings about it .but I am but a single voice. Anyhow...now you know if you did not before. Enjoy, Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890
My mail to the postmaster comes right back (less then 1 second): Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: urgent - messages from intas.be Sent: 14-10-03 18:49 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 14-10-03 18:49 You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. morpheus.intas.be #5.7.1 smtp;552 5.7.1 Mail from dialup refused. Use relay. Kim -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 14 oktober 2003 17:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 You should ask the postmaster for kapitza.ras.ru, no? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 3:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 I've started getting a lot of emails back with the following message: -Original Message- From: System Administrator Sent: maandag 13 oktober 2003 17:15 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:Undeliverable: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 Sent: 13-10-03 17:12 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 13-10-03 17:15 You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. morpheus.intas.be #5.7.1 smtp;552 5.7.1 Mail from dialup refused. Use relay. Any idea? Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890
Sounds like they have some restrictive settings on who can send to them. They think you are a dial-up user who may be trying to relay spam through them. Possibly try sending from another address? That is pretty poor systems management IMHO. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 My mail to the postmaster comes right back (less then 1 second): Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: urgent - messages from intas.be Sent: 14-10-03 18:49 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 14-10-03 18:49 You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. morpheus.intas.be #5.7.1 smtp;552 5.7.1 Mail from dialup refused. Use relay. Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890
But how can it come back almost instantly? -Original Message- From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 14 oktober 2003 18:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 Sounds like they have some restrictive settings on who can send to them. They think you are a dial-up user who may be trying to relay spam through them. Possibly try sending from another address? That is pretty poor systems management IMHO. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 My mail to the postmaster comes right back (less then 1 second): Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: urgent - messages from intas.be Sent: 14-10-03 18:49 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 14-10-03 18:49 You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. morpheus.intas.be #5.7.1 smtp;552 5.7.1 Mail from dialup refused. Use relay. Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890
Because it's refusing the connection right away? If I use sam spade to test smtp connectivity to that address it accepts mail from work (proper static IP) whilst at home I get the same as you, presumably because although I'm on a static IP it's in an IP range that's publicly known to be home ADSL. regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 October 2003 18:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 But how can it come back almost instantly? -Original Message- From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 14 oktober 2003 18:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 Sounds like they have some restrictive settings on who can send to them. They think you are a dial-up user who may be trying to relay spam through them. Possibly try sending from another address? That is pretty poor systems management IMHO. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 My mail to the postmaster comes right back (less then 1 second): Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject:urgent - messages from intas.be Sent: 14-10-03 18:49 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 14-10-03 18:49 You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. morpheus.intas.be #5.7.1 smtp;552 5.7.1 Mail from dialup refused. Use relay. Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890
The 571 is part of the SMTP session your server has with the receiving server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 But how can it come back almost instantly? -Original Message- From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 14 oktober 2003 18:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 Sounds like they have some restrictive settings on who can send to them. They think you are a dial-up user who may be trying to relay spam through them. Possibly try sending from another address? That is pretty poor systems management IMHO. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 My mail to the postmaster comes right back (less then 1 second): Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: urgent - messages from intas.be Sent: 14-10-03 18:49 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 14-10-03 18:49 You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. morpheus.intas.be #5.7.1 smtp;552 5.7.1 Mail from dialup refused. Use relay. Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890
Our mail goes through ADSL, but a business line, not a home-line... What can I do? Kind regards, Kim Schotanus === Kim Schotanus Information Systems Manager INTAS Avenue des Arts 58 B-1000 Brussels Belgium T. +32 2 549 01 11 F. +32 2 549 01 56 === -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 14 oktober 2003 19:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 Because it's refusing the connection right away? If I use sam spade to test smtp connectivity to that address it accepts mail from work (proper static IP) whilst at home I get the same as you, presumably because although I'm on a static IP it's in an IP range that's publicly known to be home ADSL. regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 October 2003 18:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 But how can it come back almost instantly? -Original Message- From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 14 oktober 2003 18:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 Sounds like they have some restrictive settings on who can send to them. They think you are a dial-up user who may be trying to relay spam through them. Possibly try sending from another address? That is pretty poor systems management IMHO. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 My mail to the postmaster comes right back (less then 1 second): Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject:urgent - messages from intas.be Sent: 14-10-03 18:49 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 14-10-03 18:49 You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. morpheus.intas.be #5.7.1 smtp;552 5.7.1 Mail from dialup refused. Use relay. Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890
What I'd do is check your IP at http://www.moensted.dk/spam, if nothing shows there, you might simply be on their manual blocklist, in which case short of asking them there's not much you can - their server, their rules however flawed their thinking :-) Paul -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 October 2003 18:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 Our mail goes through ADSL, but a business line, not a home-line... What can I do? Kind regards, Kim Schotanus === Kim Schotanus Information Systems Manager INTAS Avenue des Arts 58 B-1000 Brussels Belgium T. +32 2 549 01 11 F. +32 2 549 01 56 === -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 14 oktober 2003 19:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 Because it's refusing the connection right away? If I use sam spade to test smtp connectivity to that address it accepts mail from work (proper static IP) whilst at home I get the same as you, presumably because although I'm on a static IP it's in an IP range that's publicly known to be home ADSL. regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 October 2003 18:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 But how can it come back almost instantly? -Original Message- From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 14 oktober 2003 18:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 Sounds like they have some restrictive settings on who can send to them. They think you are a dial-up user who may be trying to relay spam through them. Possibly try sending from another address? That is pretty poor systems management IMHO. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890 My mail to the postmaster comes right back (less then 1 second): Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: urgent - messages from intas.be Sent: 14-10-03 18:49 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 14-10-03 18:49 You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. morpheus.intas.be #5.7.1 smtp;552 5.7.1 Mail from dialup refused. Use relay. Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E2K3 and 5.5 smtp
we have a mixed envirnoment ... E2K3 and Exchange 5.5. The 5.5 has the in and outbound bridgeheads and the bulk of the users. We have only 5 or 6 test accounts on the new E2K3 server. one of the E2K3 accounts creates a message to one of the real users on the 5.5 system which has a deliver messages to both recipient and alternate recipient set to an external email system. The E2K3 account sends the message and the external account set by the deliver messages to both recipient and alternate recipient on the 5.5 account gets two (duplicate) messages. The logs on the E2K3 side show it 'reacted' to the fact that the 5.5 mailbox object that has be 'replicated' to the AD side, and sends an smtp message to our 5.5 bridgehead which processes the outbound immediately and the second message is sent to the 5.5 emailbox which has the deliver messages to both recipient and alternate recipient set and thus a second message to the external account is generated. Is there a way to tell E2K3 to ignore the alternate recipient on the AD side and sent everything to the 5.5 for handling? _ Add MSN 8 Internet Software to your current Internet access and enjoy patented spam control and more. Get two months FREE! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/byoa _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: DBs and daylight savings time
A mainframe db can get messed up when switching from daylight savings time. On the morning of Oct 26 an hour will be ran twice. A transaction could run at 1:15 AM, the hour be changed from 2 to 1 AM, and then another transaction ran after the first but be logged as 1:10 AM. That can mess up redo logs etc. How does Exchange's db keep it straight? Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DBs and daylight savings time
They are sequential: E001.log., E002.log. etc. E00.log is the current log file. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 6:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: DBs and daylight savings time A mainframe db can get messed up when switching from daylight savings time. On the morning of Oct 26 an hour will be ran twice. A transaction could run at 1:15 AM, the hour be changed from 2 to 1 AM, and then another transaction ran after the first but be logged as 1:10 AM. That can mess up redo logs etc. How does Exchange's db keep it straight? Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: DBs and daylight savings time
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, at 5:20pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A mainframe db can get messed up when switching from daylight savings time. Most systems designed in the past thirty years or so use an absolute counter (the number of seconds since Midnight, 1 Jan 1970 is a popular choice) for time keeping. They only care about time zones when presenting times to humans. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Message comes to inbox and disappears again
I am delivering to my mailbox and the mail is not delete by any rules. it keeps happening. Uso - Original Message - From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 5:16 PM Subject: RE: Message comes to inbox and disappears again Verify that you are delivering to your Exchange server mailbox and not a .pst. Samantha -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 6:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message comes to inbox and disappears again Hi, twice today I receive a mail in my inbox and then it disappears again. The messages is coming from my own email address and the subject says: My-Exchange-Server-Name - 10-13-2003 10-13-24-894ms any idea what that is? regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
