RE: MS Instant Messaging
It has reappeared in Live Communications Server 2003. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging Why bother with it? It's gone from Exchange 2003, supposedly to reappear in another product. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Greer Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 5:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS Instant Messaging Does anyone here have much experience with IM server implementation? Could anyone at least refer me to some good documentation or reference material. There seems to be precious little out there, from Microsoft or otherwise. Thanks! -A _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ## The information contained in this electronic mail transmission (including any accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its authorized recipient(s), and may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, or responsible for delivering some or all of this transmission to an intended recipient, you have received this transmission in error and are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from reading, copying, printing, distributing or disclosing any of the information contained in it. In that event, please contact us immediately by telephone (402)346-6000 or by electronic mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete the original and all copies of this transmission (including any attachments) without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. ## _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move PST between Outlook 03 and Outlook 2k
These are users that will have mailboxes on your Exchange server, no? If so, why not use OL2003 to convert from Eudora and then merge the contents into their Exchange mailbox. Then it doesn't matter which client they use. If you insist on doing the additional PST step, you need to be careful when exporting the PST file from OL2003. The default format for new PST files created in OL2003 is the Unicode format, which is NOT supported on other versions of Outlook. You have to make sure that you create the PST file in the old format. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, October 27, 2003 5:46 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Move PST between Outlook 03 and Outlook 2k Subject: Move PST between Outlook 03 and Outlook 2k I need to convert a bunch of users from Eudora 5 to Outlook 2000. Outlook 2003 has support for importing Eudora 5 messages/mailboxes, so I was considering using a copy of Outlook 2003 to convert, then exporting a PST file to Outlook 2000. Is that possible? Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move PST between Outlook 03 and Outlook 2k
Actually, IIRC, you can choose the format. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:36 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Move PST between Outlook 03 and Outlook 2k Subject: RE: Move PST between Outlook 03 and Outlook 2k IIRC OL2003 has a different PST format to OL2002 or lower. All that means is that you will probably have to use and exchange server to import the eudora emails into a mailbox using OL2003 and use OL2000 to drag and drop the emails from the exchange mailbox to a Local PST folder. google search resulted in this from http://www.outlook-tips.net/archives/20030807.htm If you try Outlook 2003, don't forget that it uses a new Unicode PST format that is not compatible with previous versions of Outlook. You'll need to move or copy the Outlook items to an OL97/2002 PST format if you test Outlook 2003 using a Unicode PST. Outlook will not convert your existing PST to Unicode. If you create a new profile and let Outlook create a new PST, Outlook will use Unicode. Hotmail and IMAP account use OL97/2002 PST format for the local copy. http://www.google.com/search?hl=enlr=ie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8q=outlook+2003+ pst+formatspell=1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 28/10/2003 12:16:46 p.m. I've tried that, but OE doesn't import everything, and often crashes partway through. These are Eudora mailboxes that have been upgraded from 3.x - 4.x - 5.x, so there is are probably some invalid messages in the mailboxes that cause the problems. Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arlo Clizer Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move PST between Outlook 03 and Outlook 2k Sure. I think outlook express might be able to do it as well (import from Eudora into OE, then Outlook) That might save a little time. -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Move PST between Outlook 03 and Outlook 2k I need to convert a bunch of users from Eudora 5 to Outlook 2000. Outlook 2003 has support for importing Eudora 5 messages/mailboxes, so I was considering using a copy of Outlook 2003 to convert, then exporting a PST file to Outlook 2000. Is that possible? Thanks, Erick ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000/3 InterForest Synchronization
I will look into these options and see what the client wishes to do. Thanks for all your help. Damian Scoles Senior Technical Analyst MCSE, CCNP, CNA, A+ -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000/3 InterForest Synchronization Avaliable options I'm aware of: 1. HP LDAP Directory Synchronization Utility (LDSU) 2. Microsoft Identity Integration Server (MIIS) 3. SimpleSync 4. MS Mail Dirsync (unsupported by Microsoft, but is supposed to work) 5. Active Directory Connector (in interorganizational mode) 6. Your own code Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scoles, Damian Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000/3 InterForest Synchronization I have a client that wants to synch their mailboxes, distribution lists and custom recipients to other Exchange 2000/3 organizations. They want to do this because their company has partnerships with 2 other companies and are tied together in a loose group. I know with Exchange 5.5 there was an InterOrg Synch tool. For Exchange 2000, I think I will have to use the Microsoft Metadirectory Services product (which is now called Microsoft Identity Integration Server 2003). Can any confirm this or point me to another solution? I want something that will be fairly easy to setup and maintain if possible. Thanks in advance. Damian Scoles Senior Technical Analyst MCSE, CCNP, CNA, A+ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NetMeeting
Exchange 5.5 does not have such component. But Ecxhange 2000 Conferencing Server does. :) Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 9:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NetMeeting NetMeeting is a peer-to-peer tool. Exchange has no component to centralize this onto a server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McCready, Robert Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NetMeeting Anybody out there using NetMeeting with Exchange 5.5? We've never used it before, and were looking for a way for several people to communicate without having to type in the computer name. Perhaps a user name or E-mail address? Anybody know if that's possible? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
Last time I used Tumbleweed, it did not care whether it was used with Exchange or any other mail system. It was installed on a separate machine and talked SMTP on port 25 with the Exchange server. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed We use it here at Hilton. Exchange 2000, with about 10k users. -A -Original Message- From: internet.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tumbleweed Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? Thanks Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5
Outlook XP seems to be very picky. Even on the LAN. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 9:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5 Upgrade to Outlook 2003 and use cache mode. I am advised that it works with back versions of Exchange, though I haven't personally verified it. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NetNinja Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5 all maybe somebody out there is in a similar predicament. I have a user who is using Outlook XP/2002 and they are connecting to my Exchange server via a VPN connection. There is no way in He** that I am going to setup a pop3 or Imap connection point for them. Every so often this user starts getting slow response times. A dialog box pops up and tries to establish a connection with the exchange server. I have users who have a similar setup. But they are using Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 and they don't experience the same delays. This user lives out in California but when they came to Atlanta they were experiencing the same thing. Exchange 5.5 has the latest service pack4. Please don't say upgrade to Exchange 2003. That's not in our budget and also we have about 200 email accounts and in Exchange 2003 you have to pay for every email account you create. I think we are going Lotus and drop Microsoft all together. Anybody have any ideas? Exchange 5.5 has the lastest serivce pack4. Please don't say upgrade to Exhchange 2003. That's not in our budget and also we have about 200 email accounts and in Exchange 2003 you have to pay for evey email acount you create. I think we are going Lotus and drop microsoft all together. Anybody have any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NetMeeting
You just need an LDAP server to keep track of each Netmeeting user. MS used to have a one called Internet Locator Service (or some such). Not sure if it's still available. Aaron -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NetMeeting Anybody out there using NetMeeting with Exchange 5.5? We've never used it before, and were looking for a way for several people to communicate without having to type in the computer name. Perhaps a user name or E-mail address? Anybody know if that's possible? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Upgrade to Outlook 2003 and use cache mode. Something that I haven't figured out about cached mode yet, does it bring _all_ folders over? I have 31K items in deleted and 12K items in sent and I don't need them duplicated to the client. (Exchange Admin shows 1.6Gig in my mailbox) G -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address
Users have a little checkbox that makes them listen to the recipient policies. Turn it off - and the user will never be updated. Or you could create a number of different recipient policies that would only match certain users. Then only those users will be affected by the specific recipient policies. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 11:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Bulk set of primary smtp address OK, I got the recipient update service to run, but that didn't turn out to be a good idea at all. Our email addresses are mostly custom addresses they don't have any fixed format. I ended up with additonal SMTP addresses [EMAIL PROTECTED] The same are also set in the mail field (E-mail field on the General Tab). I scripted to add the [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and set it as the primary addresses. I scripted also to reset the mail field to to the same (E-mail field on the General Tab) however the default policy keeps setting it back. What can I do so the default policy doesn't mess up my email names? thanks Uso - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 7:55 PM Subject: RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address It seems as if your Recipient Update Service isn't running. Search TechNet for that phrase and start checking out the potential causes. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Uso Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 10:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Bulk set of primary smtp address I have set the desired smtp address as primary in my default policy. And applied it (Recipient Update Service) but that hasn't changed anything for me. I still have smtp address with the old name set as primary. What am I doin wrong? I tried LDIFDE. My only problem is that I don't have to write a multivalued field and the ProxyAddresses is multivalued. regards Uso - Original Message - From: mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 7:27 AM Subject: Re: Bulk set of primary smtp address use the recipient policy in system manager ... Uso wrote: Exchange 2000. regards Uso - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 6:30 PM Subject: Re: Bulk set of primary smtp address Which version of Exchange? From: Uso [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bulk set of primary smtp address Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 10:24:37 +0400 Hi, we have been using two SMTP addresses for each user with two different domain names. I would like to set the primary address of all users to one of these domain names. Is there an easy way to do that? regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get McAfee virus scanning and cleaning of incoming attachments. Get Hotmail Extra Storage! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: MS Instant Messaging
It worked 50% of the time for me on Exchange 2000. It actually worked 100% IF I had Windows 2000 for a client. For some reason Windows 98, ME, and XP clients act differently. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS Instant Messaging Does anyone here have much experience with IM server implementation? Could anyone at least refer me to some good documentation or reference material. There seems to be precious little out there, from Microsoft or otherwise. Thanks! -A _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NetMeeting
Site Server ILS Service: it's an optional component you can install on W2K server. http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/en/server/help/default.asp?url=/windows2000/en/server/help/TAPI_ILS_install.htm -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:56 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussions Conversation: NetMeeting Subject: RE: NetMeeting You just need an LDAP server to keep track of each Netmeeting user. MS used to have a one called Internet Locator Service (or some such). Not sure if it's still available. Aaron -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NetMeeting Anybody out there using NetMeeting with Exchange 5.5? We've never used it before, and were looking for a way for several people to communicate without having to type in the computer name. Perhaps a user name or E-mail address? Anybody know if that's possible? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weird Exchange 2003 OWA problem
I setup an Exchange 2003 server at home to play around with in anticipation that we will upgrade at work. I am having a weird problem that I can't seem to figure out. From my computer at work (XPSP1 and IE6SP1), I am unable to reply or forward an email. The body of the e-mail appears as a broken image (red x). From another computer here (W2kSP4 and IE6SP1) it works fine. From my workstation and the server at home, it works fine. Any clues? Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SPAM filtering on a budget
Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
If you could accept a *n?x solution, I'd recommend taking a look at Mailscanner, which integrates Spamassassin, Razor, Pyzor, DCC and virus scanning in a relatively easy to configure setup. Support is excellent via the Mailscanner mailing list. You can find it at http://www.mailscanner.info I'm about to build a box using it, so I might feel differently about it in a few weeks. Cheers, Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: 28 October 2003 16:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rules and filtering on un-deliverable messages, help please.
Sorry if this is posted posted twice I got a error back the first time because of subject. Ok I've not figured out a way to filter on the exception/undeliverable report or informaion contained in it. This is how we have it configured and working so I do get the messages: We Collect e-mails that are bounced for several web servers we have that send e-mail notices from web page visits requesting additional info or when items become available or is ordered (so the addresses are stored in a DB). Of course there are those people that can not type, provide invalid addresses or older ones that are no longer available. So when we send e-mail and it gets bounced at the server all of these get forwarded to a special account on our exchange server then sorted into folders (Sort by from address in originally message) for each server and DB. This is all no problem Now I want to extract the information on the reason for the failure.. you know the: -- Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: We've received your order! Sent: 10/28/2003 11:02 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/28/2003 11:02 AM The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. someserver.com #5.0.0 smtp;550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] unknown user account -- this is what I'm looking for: I can't seem to get access to the information in a undeliverable report portion or have it exported. 1. Anybody have any ideas? What I'm trying to do is grab all the of the 550 errors so I can create a list of e-mail accounts that are dead. 2. I also can't seem to create a rule that will filter on this specific information. If I could then I could create a subfolder then export just the e-mail addresses from that folder and I've have the list also. so any help is appricated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
We've been using Spamassassin for several months now. For being free it really does help out. We haven't updated to the latest version and I'm sure that has limited its effectiveness. It really isn't hard to configure and there is some excellent documentation available on the web. -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
Recently done exactly that with same previous exposure to Linux as you Matt. Works well, but still tweaking... All config information gathered from web - Linux downloaded from RedHat. Stu -Original Message- From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget We've been using Spamassassin for several months now. For being free it really does help out. We haven't updated to the latest version and I'm sure that has limited its effectiveness. It really isn't hard to configure and there is some excellent documentation available on the web. -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
http://www.gfi.com/news/en/msec8freeware.htm GFI has a free virusscanner with some content scanning ability. I haven't really looked at it (cuz we've been using Trend), but it might be useful for you. -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
While I use a custom SpamAssassin/Linux setup here, we looked at GFI MailEssentials. For our setup (~400 mailboxes), it was only $950. My advice would be to find someone who does know Linux (a student, maybe?) and have them assist you in setting up a Linux/SpamAssassin box. There are many, many guides available on the Internet to do this sort of thing. Here's two... http://www.geocities.com/scottlhenderson/spamfilter.html http://lawmonkey.org/anti-spam.html Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IronMail
Has anyone reviewed, tested, or used the IronMail appliance from Cipher Trust (http://www.ciphertrust.com/index.html)? We are interested in its spam filtering and security capabilities. TIA, Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SPAM filtering on a budget
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, at 11:21am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Running Linux - $32 Linux Administration Handbook - $45 Getting an anti-spam solution that works, for free - Priceless Some things in life are priceless. For everything else, there's Amazon. ;-) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html Here is how well they work in production. Not sure about pricing though, call em. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
::pats MailFrontier box:: -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html Here is how well they work in production. Not sure about pricing though, call em. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Instant Messaging
We are using Live Comm. Server here in a pilot environment and it is working great. We plan to roll it out right along side our Exchange 2003 migration. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging It worked 50% of the time for me on Exchange 2000. It actually worked 100% IF I had Windows 2000 for a client. For some reason Windows 98, ME, and XP clients act differently. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS Instant Messaging Does anyone here have much experience with IM server implementation? Could anyone at least refer me to some good documentation or reference material. There seems to be precious little out there, from Microsoft or otherwise. Thanks! -A _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
Those tests were not all that great.. The results are off due to bad imput.. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html Here is how well they work in production. Not sure about pricing though, call em. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
Well, we have had 3 of the products listed and its pretty accurate for those. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm[MVP] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget Those tests were not all that great.. The results are off due to bad imput.. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html Here is how well they work in production. Not sure about pricing though, call em. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
The ones at the top right = ] -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget Well, we have had 3 of the products listed and its pretty accurate for those. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm[MVP] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget Those tests were not all that great.. The results are off due to bad imput.. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html Here is how well they work in production. Not sure about pricing though, call em. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders not replicating to Exchange 2003 from Exchange 2000
Anyone, anyone... Bueller, Bueller? Eric -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HOLLIDAY, Eric Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders not replicating to Exchange 2003 from Exchange 2000 To all, My company uses Public Folders regularly, with no problems until now. We recently upgraded two of our Exchange servers (the FE 1 BE) to Win 2003/Exch 2003 moved all of the techs' accounts over to the upgraded server test the setup. All is well, EXCEPT: some, but not all of the Public Folder contents have replicated to the Exchange 2003 BE server. This server should have had enough time (?) to replicate all of the contents of the public folders - it was upgraded on 13 Nov. When I go into ESM 2003 to manually send the contents from Exch2k to the PF's on the 2003 server, the only server in the 'source server' column is the one I want to send the content _to_, not from. Am I missing something somewhere? Should I wait a bit longer for replication? My environment: 7 Exchange Ent. Ed. servers in a FE/BE setup: 5 BE servers are Win 2000 SP4 / Exch 2000 SP3 1 FE and 1 BE server are Win 2003 / Exch 2003 Any ideas or suggestions are welcome. Thank you, Eric Holliday Exchange Administrator Corporate Information Systems Logistics Management Institute (703) 917-7117 2000 Corporate Ridge McLean, Virginia 22102 www.lmi.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RPC over HTTP - help needed
I am pretty much in the same boat you are in, Lets watch this support web cast and see if it is helpful. Starts in about 30 minutes.. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=829134 -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troels Majlandt Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 10:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RPC over HTTP - help needed Hope any one can help. When I try to connect from Outook to Exchange with RPC over HTTP, my username/password are rejected. (My domianname are corp.test.dk) Con DC Computername : TESTEXCH Windows Server 2003 - Exchange Server 2003 (the only Exchange server I have) Cerificated is installed on this is also working at OWA where I use formbased logon and HTTPS 1) RPC over HTTP networking services are installed in the Windows Components Wizard 2) At the IIS the Basic authentication are selected in Authenticated access, at the Default website at the RPC directory. (Enable anonymous access same place are still checked) 3) The following are put as value here HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\software\Microsoft\Rpc\RpcProxy in ValidPorts TESTEXCH:593;testexch.corp.test.dk:593;TESTEXCH:6001-6002;testexch.corp .test.dk:6001-6002;TESTEXCH:6004;testexch.corp.test.dk:6004; TESTPRINT:593;testprint.corp.test.dk:593;TESTPRINT:6004;filprint.corp.te st.dk:6004 DC Computername : TESTPRINT (GC - Global Catalog) Windows Server 2003 1) The following are put as made as a Multi-String Value named NSPI interface protocol her HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\NTDS\Parameters Client (my home PC) Windows XP SR1 - updated on WIndowsUpdate with latest security fixes and so on and the Hotfix regarding RPC over HTTP to WindowsXP and Outlook 2003 Configuration Made a new profile - named it OutlookRPC. Add a new e-mail account - in server type choose Microsoft Exchange Server. As Microsoft Excange Server : https://webmail.test.dk (this is the same URL i use when I connect to the OWA from home and this is working fine, with formbased logon) In username - my username In more settings - Exchange Proxy settings Use this URL to connect to my proxy server for exchange : webmail.test.dk Selected Connect using SSL only Selected Mutually authenticated the session when connecting with SSL and in the Principle name for proxy server : msstd:testexch.corp.test.dk In Proxy authentication selected Basic authentication I do belive that I have made everything right - but when I try to connect my username and password are rejected no matter what I write. I use the samme username/password to connect to OWA and to logon at my work PC. Any1 have any ideas where to look for a way to find a fix for the error I have that the password/username are rejected. Tx Troels Majlandt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
I'll also chime in and suggest spamassassin, I've used both this and Xwall and they are both excellent products. I should stress that I haven't used its bayes functionallity, but Xwall is a very nice product for the money, in fact I still use it as a gateway between our LAN and our DMZ, but I stopped using it for spam filtering as I found keywords and RBLs to be a little too black and white (though to stress again, I've not really tried its bayes filtering). I currently use spamassassin, and I don't think I can over-emphasize just how good it is considering the cost. Granted it takes a little time to setup, but I'd suggest that once you've downloaded some ISOs (I used Redhat, mostly because it's one of the best supported/documented linuxes) it shouldn't take more than a few hours to setup a simply postfix install, then take a look at http://advosys.ca/papers/printable/postfix-filtering.html for a way of plugging spamassassin into things. Just give it a try, I also fall into the don't know much about linux category, but I found it simple enough to pick up the info I needed, and because it's linux there's a ton of free useful info on the web... Paul -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 October 2003 16:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Instant Messaging
Were you using IM on EX2000? Is there a migration tool? - Matt -Original Message- From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging We are using Live Comm. Server here in a pilot environment and it is working great. We plan to roll it out right along side our Exchange 2003 migration. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging It worked 50% of the time for me on Exchange 2000. It actually worked 100% IF I had Windows 2000 for a client. For some reason Windows 98, ME, and XP clients act differently. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS Instant Messaging Does anyone here have much experience with IM server implementation? Could anyone at least refer me to some good documentation or reference material. There seems to be precious little out there, from Microsoft or otherwise. Thanks! -A _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Password Changing
My company is about to implement a security policy that forces users to change their passwords every 60 Days. Problem some of our user accounts do not have self listed under security permissions within the ADUC. This user gets access denied when trying to change his/her password. This is an upgraded Windows 2000 Domain upgraded from NT 4.0 to Windows 2000 All Dc's Are Currently Windows 2000 SP4 and we are in Native Mode. Note we have tried to add Self under security but once replication occurs it removes Self. Has anyone ever heard of this ? TIA, Joshua _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Password Changing
You need to check the check box to inherit permissions on the sec tab. That should make you happier. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Password Changing My company is about to implement a security policy that forces users to change their passwords every 60 Days. Problem some of our user accounts do not have self listed under security permissions within the ADUC. This user gets access denied when trying to change his/her password. This is an upgraded Windows 2000 Domain upgraded from NT 4.0 to Windows 2000 All Dc's Are Currently Windows 2000 SP4 and we are in Native Mode. Note we have tried to add Self under security but once replication occurs it removes Self. Has anyone ever heard of this ? TIA, Joshua _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
I hear IMGate is really good. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Instant Messaging
No we sure weren't, we never went to Exchange 2000, still on 5.5 Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging Were you using IM on EX2000? Is there a migration tool? - Matt -Original Message- From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging We are using Live Comm. Server here in a pilot environment and it is working great. We plan to roll it out right along side our Exchange 2003 migration. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging It worked 50% of the time for me on Exchange 2000. It actually worked 100% IF I had Windows 2000 for a client. For some reason Windows 98, ME, and XP clients act differently. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS Instant Messaging Does anyone here have much experience with IM server implementation? Could anyone at least refer me to some good documentation or reference material. There seems to be precious little out there, from Microsoft or otherwise. Thanks! -A _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
Yep exactly Andrey, we use it here very successfully for about 16K users. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Last time I used Tumbleweed, it did not care whether it was used with Exchange or any other mail system. It was installed on a separate machine and talked SMTP on port 25 with the Exchange server. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed We use it here at Hilton. Exchange 2000, with about 10k users. -A -Original Message- From: internet.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tumbleweed Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? Thanks Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
I had a budget to work with, did all kinds of research until I found out we had the Enterprise License for SAV products... This meant that I was already licensed for SAV for SMTP Gateways, which does SPAM, Attachaments, virus scanning, subject blocking and DNSBL's too. My point being that maybe you're already licensed for a product and don't know it... Just a thought Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
Try Logsat's Spamfilter at www.logsat.com You can try it for as long as you want and if you want to register, it is USD 400.- per server Freddie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Dienstag, 28. Oktober 2003 17:22 To: Exchange Discussions Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
www.antespam.com $25/month for an entire site. Works great and it is hosted somewhere else so you don't have to worry about maintaining the hardware. It's based on SpamAssassin. -Marc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move PST between Outlook 03 and Outlook 2k
That's a really good point, I hadn't thought of that. I'm still used to the non Exchange world. Good to arrive in Exchange world. :-) To do this best, would I just reconfigure the Exchange Server service for each mailbox? I assume that would connect to the specified mailbox, and nothing else would be needed. Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ben Winzenz Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 5:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move PST between Outlook 03 and Outlook 2k These are users that will have mailboxes on your Exchange server, no? If so, why not use OL2003 to convert from Eudora and then merge the contents into their Exchange mailbox. Then it doesn't matter which client they use. If you insist on doing the additional PST step, you need to be careful when exporting the PST file from OL2003. The default format for new PST files created in OL2003 is the Unicode format, which is NOT supported on other versions of Outlook. You have to make sure that you create the PST file in the old format. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, October 27, 2003 5:46 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Move PST between Outlook 03 and Outlook 2k Subject: Move PST between Outlook 03 and Outlook 2k I need to convert a bunch of users from Eudora 5 to Outlook 2000. Outlook 2003 has support for importing Eudora 5 messages/mailboxes, so I was considering using a copy of Outlook 2003 to convert, then exporting a PST file to Outlook 2000. Is that possible? Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
My advice would be to find someone who does know Linux (a student, maybe?) and have them assist you in setting up a Linux/SpamAssassin box. There are many, many guides available on the Internet to do this sort of thing. ___ If you are a pure Microsoft shop I would consider the costs of moving from a standardized environment for just one product. It is not just an issue of today's installation, of course you will need to learn linux/unix spamassassin and sendmail, which is fun, and then learn how to support it. You should also consider how the company will support non standard NOS in the future i.e. when you leave, especially if spamassasin becomes the gateway, therefore becoming a critical system. I learnt UNIX at UC Berkeley, so don't take me as a Microsoft centric person, but I have seen the implications of this move. Network Environments that are mainly Microsoft standard and start adding a couple of free Linux boxes for a saving of a couple of grand tend to end up spending a lot more in the long run. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
There are win32 versions of spam assassin as well. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boyd, Nathan Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget My advice would be to find someone who does know Linux (a student, maybe?) and have them assist you in setting up a Linux/SpamAssassin box. There are many, many guides available on the Internet to do this sort of thing. ___ If you are a pure Microsoft shop I would consider the costs of moving from a standardized environment for just one product. It is not just an issue of today's installation, of course you will need to learn linux/unix spamassassin and sendmail, which is fun, and then learn how to support it. You should also consider how the company will support non standard NOS in the future i.e. when you leave, especially if spamassasin becomes the gateway, therefore becoming a critical system. I learnt UNIX at UC Berkeley, so don't take me as a Microsoft centric person, but I have seen the implications of this move. Network Environments that are mainly Microsoft standard and start adding a couple of free Linux boxes for a saving of a couple of grand tend to end up spending a lot more in the long run. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Secure E-Mail
All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exch 5.5 Routing Question
Hello, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP4 boxes. 1 ORG, 3 Sites (A, B, C) in three different cities across N.A. I have 2 x400 connectors setup in each location. Each site is setup the same in that they all have two x400 connectors, each going to one of the other sites. If the VPN link between Site A and Site C goes down and site C is trying to send mail to Site A, will Site C route it's mail through Site B to get to Site A? If not, how can I make this so? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
What kind of security are you looking for? Encryption? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
Yes, Encryption... I don't think we have a need for signatures Thanks -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail What kind of security are you looking for? Encryption? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exch 5.5 Routing Question
I believe the Qwart file takes care of that in 5.5 which was elliminated in 2000. From: Woods, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exch 5.5 Routing Question Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:08:19 -0800 Hello, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP4 boxes. 1 ORG, 3 Sites (A, B, C) in three different cities across N.A. I have 2 x400 connectors setup in each location. Each site is setup the same in that they all have two x400 connectors, each going to one of the other sites. If the VPN link between Site A and Site C goes down and site C is trying to send mail to Site A, will Site C route it's mail through Site B to get to Site A? If not, how can I make this so? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Want to check if your PC is virus-infected? Get a FREE computer virus scan online from McAfee. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
I am thinking that SSL and using a group policy applied to the users in question would be possible From: Miller, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 14:35:16 -0600 Yes, Encryption... I don't think we have a need for signatures Thanks -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail What kind of security are you looking for? Encryption? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Enjoy MSN 8 patented spam control and more with MSN 8 Dial-up Internet Service. Try it FREE for one month! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
Have you looked into Exchange 2003 and Rights Management Server? We are going forward with this most likely. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Secure E-Mail
http://www.e-government.govt.nz/docs/see-mail-bus-req-2-2/chapter1.html http://www.e-government.govt.nz/see/index.asp The NZ government has been down this path and the first link gives some practical requirements in regard to RFCs etc. May be of some help Mimesweeper has secrectsweeper and mail marshal has mail marshal secure. (I remember these two met NZ govt requirements inconjunction with vendor implementation) 1. There will be some 2. What do you mean? once it has left your gateway your stuffed. 3. Well tumbleweed does not meet that requirement (from reading its specs) 4. You need to either get something to plug into your SMTP gateways (what are they?) or replace them with something else. There is no whay an existing gateway is likey to be able to decrypt a secure message to scan it to chech for virii, attachments etc.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 8:48:36 a.m. All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
How does that enable distant clients to see encrypted mail, where the destination email client is not known? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 9:44:35 a.m. Have you looked into Exchange 2003 and Rights Management Server? We are going forward with this most likely. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
This is what I'm wondering. There has to be a mechanism on the receiving end to unencrypt this stuff. -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail How does that enable distant clients to see encrypted mail, where the destination email client is not known? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 9:44:35 a.m. Have you looked into Exchange 2003 and Rights Management Server? We are going forward with this most likely. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
Thats where tumbleweed and mimesweeper seem to have that bit covered from mimsweeper's publicity blurb When using the Send-Anywhere functionality the recipient does not need any special software installed for them to receive and read the message. The recipient opens the encrypted email using their standard email client and Web browser. tumbleweed has a a similar ability apparently [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 10:02:39 a.m. This is what I'm wondering. There has to be a mechanism on the receiving end to unencrypt this stuff. -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail How does that enable distant clients to see encrypted mail, where the destination email client is not known? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 9:44:35 a.m. Have you looked into Exchange 2003 and Rights Management Server? We are going forward with this most likely. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
Very interesting. So what's the point? I mean sure, you cant read it over the wire, but I doubt that's what attorneys are worried about. More likely they are worried about email falling into the wrong hands. So if I fat finger an email address, the wrong recipient will still be able to read it, correct? -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Thats where tumbleweed and mimesweeper seem to have that bit covered from mimsweeper's publicity blurb When using the Send-Anywhere functionality the recipient does not need any special software installed for them to receive and read the message. The recipient opens the encrypted email using their standard email client and Web browser. tumbleweed has a a similar ability apparently [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 10:02:39 a.m. This is what I'm wondering. There has to be a mechanism on the receiving end to unencrypt this stuff. -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail How does that enable distant clients to see encrypted mail, where the destination email client is not known? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 9:44:35 a.m. Have you looked into Exchange 2003 and Rights Management Server? We are going forward with this most likely. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] **
Re: Secure E-Mail
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, at 1:48pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training That is a contradiction. Security is about trust. In order to trust another party, you have to trust them to do the right thing. You need to trust them to have a secure system. You need to trust them to have the latest patches. To use a firewall. To not use the same password everywhere. To not have viruses, worms, spyware, and peer-to-peer programs on their computers. And so on. You cannot have trust if you have no interaction. All the technology in the world won't help you if the problem is the operator and not the computer. Anyone who says otherwise is trying to sell you something. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
I think you are missing the point of my statement - when I stated no user interaction I am referring to not having the requirement of the attorney having to do anything special prior to sending the message (as with client side certs - where the attorney has to hit the encrypt button on his toolbar before sending). I want everything done server/gateway side - with no interaction from the attorney. I hope this makes sense -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Secure E-Mail On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, at 1:48pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training That is a contradiction. Security is about trust. In order to trust another party, you have to trust them to do the right thing. You need to trust them to have a secure system. You need to trust them to have the latest patches. To use a firewall. To not use the same password everywhere. To not have viruses, worms, spyware, and peer-to-peer programs on their computers. And so on. You cannot have trust if you have no interaction. All the technology in the world won't help you if the problem is the operator and not the computer. Anyone who says otherwise is trying to sell you something. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
Without having used either product :-) yeah, correct. It looks like more of a pull delivery mechanism as in one way , to client. Be interesting to see how they would do a secure send to the attorney using any mail package. I would suspect it would have to be browser based to meet Rob's 3) which is not really email http://www.tumbleweed.com/en/products/secure_email.html for tumbleweed sales speak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 10:25:14 a.m. Very interesting. So what's the point? I mean sure, you cant read it over the wire, but I doubt that's what attorneys are worried about. More likely they are worried about email falling into the wrong hands. So if I fat finger an email address, the wrong recipient will still be able to read it, correct? -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Thats where tumbleweed and mimesweeper seem to have that bit covered from mimsweeper's publicity blurb When using the Send-Anywhere functionality the recipient does not need any special software installed for them to receive and read the message. The recipient opens the encrypted email using their standard email client and Web browser. tumbleweed has a a similar ability apparently [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 10:02:39 a.m. This is what I'm wondering. There has to be a mechanism on the receiving end to unencrypt this stuff. -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail How does that enable distant clients to see encrypted mail, where the destination email client is not known? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 9:44:35 a.m. Have you looked into Exchange 2003 and Rights Management Server? We are going forward with this most likely. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auto delete
I am sure this has been asked before, but I can't find it in my archives of the group. The powers that be have decided to impliment an e-mail retension policy. The policy states that all e-mail older then a certain amount of time will be automatically deleted off the server. This would include all folders, sent mail, deleted, etc. Is it possible to do this within Exchange 2000 Enterprise? Or is an additional piece of software required. At least they also have in the policy that no pst's are allowed, thank goodness. Thanks all! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
my requirement for number 3) the attorneys need to be able to send secure/encrypted email to a client using either his Outlook client on his office laptop - his Outlook client on his home computer - or OWA (from any machine). -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Without having used either product :-) yeah, correct. It looks like more of a pull delivery mechanism as in one way , to client. Be interesting to see how they would do a secure send to the attorney using any mail package. I would suspect it would have to be browser based to meet Rob's 3) which is not really email http://www.tumbleweed.com/en/products/secure_email.html for tumbleweed sales speak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 10:25:14 a.m. Very interesting. So what's the point? I mean sure, you cant read it over the wire, but I doubt that's what attorneys are worried about. More likely they are worried about email falling into the wrong hands. So if I fat finger an email address, the wrong recipient will still be able to read it, correct? -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Thats where tumbleweed and mimesweeper seem to have that bit covered from mimsweeper's publicity blurb When using the Send-Anywhere functionality the recipient does not need any special software installed for them to receive and read the message. The recipient opens the encrypted email using their standard email client and Web browser. tumbleweed has a a similar ability apparently [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 10:02:39 a.m. This is what I'm wondering. There has to be a mechanism on the receiving end to unencrypt this stuff. -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail How does that enable distant clients to see encrypted mail, where the destination email client is not known? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 9:44:35 a.m. Have you looked into Exchange 2003 and Rights Management Server? We are going forward with this most likely. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
Why do they want encryption? Is truly so it cant be sniffed over the wire or is it more that they don't want email to fall into the wrong hands? -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail my requirement for number 3) the attorneys need to be able to send secure/encrypted email to a client using either his Outlook client on his office laptop - his Outlook client on his home computer - or OWA (from any machine). -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Without having used either product :-) yeah, correct. It looks like more of a pull delivery mechanism as in one way , to client. Be interesting to see how they would do a secure send to the attorney using any mail package. I would suspect it would have to be browser based to meet Rob's 3) which is not really email http://www.tumbleweed.com/en/products/secure_email.html for tumbleweed sales speak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 10:25:14 a.m. Very interesting. So what's the point? I mean sure, you cant read it over the wire, but I doubt that's what attorneys are worried about. More likely they are worried about email falling into the wrong hands. So if I fat finger an email address, the wrong recipient will still be able to read it, correct? -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Thats where tumbleweed and mimesweeper seem to have that bit covered from mimsweeper's publicity blurb When using the Send-Anywhere functionality the recipient does not need any special software installed for them to receive and read the message. The recipient opens the encrypted email using their standard email client and Web browser. tumbleweed has a a similar ability apparently [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 10:02:39 a.m. This is what I'm wondering. There has to be a mechanism on the receiving end to unencrypt this stuff. -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail How does that enable distant clients to see encrypted mail, where the destination email client is not known? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 9:44:35 a.m. Have you looked into Exchange 2003 and Rights Management Server? We are going forward with this most likely. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english
RE: Secure E-Mail
they want it because their clients and legal peers have it... :) but that's another story... Actually both - from the CTO (and he was an attorney for years and used Tumbleweed at his prior firm)... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Why do they want encryption? Is truly so it cant be sniffed over the wire or is it more that they don't want email to fall into the wrong hands? -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail my requirement for number 3) the attorneys need to be able to send secure/encrypted email to a client using either his Outlook client on his office laptop - his Outlook client on his home computer - or OWA (from any machine). -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Without having used either product :-) yeah, correct. It looks like more of a pull delivery mechanism as in one way , to client. Be interesting to see how they would do a secure send to the attorney using any mail package. I would suspect it would have to be browser based to meet Rob's 3) which is not really email http://www.tumbleweed.com/en/products/secure_email.html for tumbleweed sales speak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 10:25:14 a.m. Very interesting. So what's the point? I mean sure, you cant read it over the wire, but I doubt that's what attorneys are worried about. More likely they are worried about email falling into the wrong hands. So if I fat finger an email address, the wrong recipient will still be able to read it, correct? -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Thats where tumbleweed and mimesweeper seem to have that bit covered from mimsweeper's publicity blurb When using the Send-Anywhere functionality the recipient does not need any special software installed for them to receive and read the message. The recipient opens the encrypted email using their standard email client and Web browser. tumbleweed has a a similar ability apparently [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 10:02:39 a.m. This is what I'm wondering. There has to be a mechanism on the receiving end to unencrypt this stuff. -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail How does that enable distant clients to see encrypted mail, where the destination email client is not known? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 9:44:35 a.m. Have you looked into Exchange 2003 and Rights Management Server? We are going forward with this most likely. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] **
RE: Secure E-Mail
Tumbleweed has two products. One was actually developed by Worldtalk, it was called WorldSecure Server. Then Tumbleweed bought Worldtalk. This product is just like MimeSweeper, although I like its admin interface better than Mimesweeper. Rules are built in a similar manner to Outlook Rules Wizard. It does content scanning. It also can encrypt and decrypt mail. So if you have Tumbleweed on one side and Tumbleweed on the other side, you can encrypt all mail flying between them. The other Tumbleweed product was designed by Tumbleweed. What it does is that User A sends message to User B, but Use B does not receive it right away. Instead the message goes to a secure server at Tumbleweed site. User B receives a notification message from Tumbleweed with a link to where the message from User A is stored. User B clicks on the link, authenticates and retrieves the message. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail This is what I'm wondering. There has to be a mechanism on the receiving end to unencrypt this stuff. -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail How does that enable distant clients to see encrypted mail, where the destination email client is not known? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 9:44:35 a.m. Have you looked into Exchange 2003 and Rights Management Server? We are going forward with this most likely. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
Well, in order to use PKI encryption, one has to have the recipient's public key. I think Worldtalk (now Tumbleweed) was considering to implement the repository of remote recipients' public keys. Then one could write a rule on Tumbleweed server that would detect that message is going from User A to User B and automatically encrypt it with User B's public key. I don't know if they ever implemented this feature. Depending on the number of people communicating, this could be a very tedious task to maintain such repository (unless it is designed to automatically snatch public keys from every digitally signed message it sees) Back when I used Worldtalk a few years ago there was only a way to encrypt mail between servers - the rule would detect that mail is going from Server A to Server B, therefore it should be encrypted with Server B's public key. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 4:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail I think you are missing the point of my statement - when I stated no user interaction I am referring to not having the requirement of the attorney having to do anything special prior to sending the message (as with client side certs - where the attorney has to hit the encrypt button on his toolbar before sending). I want everything done server/gateway side - with no interaction from the attorney. I hope this makes sense -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Secure E-Mail On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, at 1:48pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training That is a contradiction. Security is about trust. In order to trust another party, you have to trust them to do the right thing. You need to trust them to have a secure system. You need to trust them to have the latest patches. To use a firewall. To not use the same password everywhere. To not have viruses, worms, spyware, and peer-to-peer programs on their computers. And so on. You cannot have trust if you have no interaction. All the technology in the world won't help you if the problem is the operator and not the computer. Anyone who says otherwise is trying to sell you something. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
Time to pick their peers' admins' brains to see how they did it :) Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 5:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail they want it because their clients and legal peers have it... :) but that's another story... Actually both - from the CTO (and he was an attorney for years and used Tumbleweed at his prior firm)... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Why do they want encryption? Is truly so it cant be sniffed over the wire or is it more that they don't want email to fall into the wrong hands? -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail my requirement for number 3) the attorneys need to be able to send secure/encrypted email to a client using either his Outlook client on his office laptop - his Outlook client on his home computer - or OWA (from any machine). -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Without having used either product :-) yeah, correct. It looks like more of a pull delivery mechanism as in one way , to client. Be interesting to see how they would do a secure send to the attorney using any mail package. I would suspect it would have to be browser based to meet Rob's 3) which is not really email http://www.tumbleweed.com/en/products/secure_email.html for tumbleweed sales speak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 10:25:14 a.m. Very interesting. So what's the point? I mean sure, you cant read it over the wire, but I doubt that's what attorneys are worried about. More likely they are worried about email falling into the wrong hands. So if I fat finger an email address, the wrong recipient will still be able to read it, correct? -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Thats where tumbleweed and mimesweeper seem to have that bit covered from mimsweeper's publicity blurb When using the Send-Anywhere functionality the recipient does not need any special software installed for them to receive and read the message. The recipient opens the encrypted email using their standard email client and Web browser. tumbleweed has a a similar ability apparently [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 10:02:39 a.m. This is what I'm wondering. There has to be a mechanism on the receiving end to unencrypt this stuff. -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail How does that enable distant clients to see encrypted mail, where the destination email client is not known? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 9:44:35 a.m. Have you looked into Exchange 2003 and Rights Management Server? We are going forward with this most likely. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files
RE: Auto delete
Mailbox Manager Recipient Policy in Exchange 2000 Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 4:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Auto delete I am sure this has been asked before, but I can't find it in my archives of the group. The powers that be have decided to impliment an e-mail retension policy. The policy states that all e-mail older then a certain amount of time will be automatically deleted off the server. This would include all folders, sent mail, deleted, etc. Is it possible to do this within Exchange 2000 Enterprise? Or is an additional piece of software required. At least they also have in the policy that no pst's are allowed, thank goodness. Thanks all! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, at 3:55pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you are missing the point of my statement I think you missed the point of *mine*. :-) There is no silver bullet for security. You cannot buy a product or service and thereby achieve any level of security. You cannot apply diligence to just one small part of the puzzle and achieve any level of security. You said you need to exchange email with clients. I presume those clients are independent operators, over which you have no control. In that situation, you cannot guarantee *ANY* level of security, because the problems lie not with the technology, but how it is being used. If you really want secure email, I suspect you'll need to radically change how you use email. And I'm pretty sure that is not going to happen. Which means you're not going to have secure email. Period. If the goal is to just spend some money and buy a product, they go ahead and buy whatever looks good. :-) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
Ah right then, Any of the vendors I mentioned should be able to give you that functionality. In the case of the NZ Govt the button was a bit of VBA that prepended the subject with a keyword and their target was between gateways in organisations. Typically you would set the gateway up not allow any message out unless it had a keyword like [SENSITIVE] or [NORMAL] or [commercial] and the gateway would run it through its rules. Those rules could also ensure that only the [EMAIL PROTECTED] could send email (signed or not) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The test plan at http://www.e-government.govt.nz/docs/see-mail-tests-2-3/see-mail-tests-2-3.pdf Whilst only for gateway-gateway secure mail sould give you an idea of the tests needed to cover your requirements The thing I was interpreting in 3) was how the client got to read the message. You got 3 choices as I see it 3a Client has a gateway that decrypts the message (based on public/private keys per gateway) 3b Install some software on clients mail client (based on public/private keys per user - see Andrey's comments) 3c Use clientless (browser) option as described by Andrey cheers Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 11:00:12 a.m. my requirement for number 3) the attorneys need to be able to send secure/encrypted email to a client using either his Outlook client on his office laptop - his Outlook client on his home computer - or OWA (from any machine). ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RPC over HTTP - help needed
I did see the webcast and checked my configuration 2 more times - and still same result. I asked a question and the answer was that i should check that basic auth. was on - and it is - so I am still in the same boat, no luck to connect to the exchange server - the username/password are stil rejected. If there was a solution in the webcast I missed it :-) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
8859-1 caracter converter
Anybody with a link to a site or program to do 8859-1 caracter convertion? A lot of spam msg have the subject field in this format so you cannot just filter on some common keyword... -Message d'origine- De : Bourque Daniel Envoyé : 24 octobre, 2003 21:37 À : 'Exchange Discussions' Objet : 8859-1 caracter converter I am trying to locate a web site to do online caracter translation to and from iso-8859-1. I need that to be able to block spam using keywords in the e-mail subject using the 8859-1 format but display by Outlook as normal caracter. Exemple: Here the subjet field of a real message. What you see: Receive your Sild... Citr... order in 24 to 48 hours What's really in the smtp header: ?iso-8859-1?B?UmVjZWl2ZSB5b3VyIFNpbGRlbmFmaWwgQ2l0cmF0ZSAgb3JkZXIgaW4gMjQgdG 8gNDggaG91cnM=?= I would like to be able to feed words in the page or program and get the caracter translation so I can adjust anti-spam filter. Thank you. Daniel Bourque [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RPC over HTTP - help needed
Are you using SSL?? With a store bought Cert. I got about the same from the cast and went back to hunting on mine. Bought a cert and it seems to be working now.. My home grown cert would not install on the client side. You could try installing the cert with IE by connecting to https:// OWA ?? might help you. Have you watched it connect by holding down CTRL and right clicking the outlook icon in the task bar by the time?? -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troels Majlandt Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RPC over HTTP - help needed I did see the webcast and checked my configuration 2 more times - and still same result. I asked a question and the answer was that i should check that basic auth. was on - and it is - so I am still in the same boat, no luck to connect to the exchange server - the username/password are stil rejected. If there was a solution in the webcast I missed it :-) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Appointment reminders in a public folder
I have a need to have a public folder with calendar items, and have email notifications sent for reminders. There are a number of Outlook addins listed on slipstick to do this, but there don't seem to be any server side solutions. It seems like doing it with the addins relies on Outlook too heavily, in that if you reinstall Outlook without the addin, things stop working. I like the idea of server side email generation system more, but I can't find any. Is using Outlook for this purpose fairly standard? Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bulk set of primary smtp address
i disabled the update for all users. regards Uso - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:08 PM Subject: RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address Users have a little checkbox that makes them listen to the recipient policies. Turn it off - and the user will never be updated. Or you could create a number of different recipient policies that would only match certain users. Then only those users will be affected by the specific recipient policies. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 11:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Bulk set of primary smtp address OK, I got the recipient update service to run, but that didn't turn out to be a good idea at all. Our email addresses are mostly custom addresses they don't have any fixed format. I ended up with additonal SMTP addresses [EMAIL PROTECTED] The same are also set in the mail field (E-mail field on the General Tab). I scripted to add the [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and set it as the primary addresses. I scripted also to reset the mail field to to the same (E-mail field on the General Tab) however the default policy keeps setting it back. What can I do so the default policy doesn't mess up my email names? thanks Uso - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 7:55 PM Subject: RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address It seems as if your Recipient Update Service isn't running. Search TechNet for that phrase and start checking out the potential causes. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Uso Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 10:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Bulk set of primary smtp address I have set the desired smtp address as primary in my default policy. And applied it (Recipient Update Service) but that hasn't changed anything for me. I still have smtp address with the old name set as primary. What am I doin wrong? I tried LDIFDE. My only problem is that I don't have to write a multivalued field and the ProxyAddresses is multivalued. regards Uso - Original Message - From: mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 7:27 AM Subject: Re: Bulk set of primary smtp address use the recipient policy in system manager ... Uso wrote: Exchange 2000. regards Uso - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 6:30 PM Subject: Re: Bulk set of primary smtp address Which version of Exchange? From: Uso [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bulk set of primary smtp address Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 10:24:37 +0400 Hi, we have been using two SMTP addresses for each user with two different domain names. I would like to set the primary address of all users to one of these domain names. Is there an easy way to do that? regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get McAfee virus scanning and cleaning of incoming attachments. Get Hotmail Extra Storage! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
