Location of Transaction Logs
Hello all, We are planning a global Exchange upgrade here to 2003 and are researching an issue that an email admin here is having with the location of the Transaction logs in our new Exchange Architecture. We are planning to Deploy Quad-proc servers that are boot-to-SAN on an EMC Clarion CX600. The OS, Logs and DATA will be stored on the SAN. The problem is we are not sure if the transaction log data will be secure in the case of server outage, since the SAN utilizes a very hefty cache before it writes the data to SAN disk. We have already begun queuing our SAN vendor and MS, but they do take awhile in complex questions such as these, I was wondering if anyone in the list has deployed Exchange 200x on a SAN and has come across this question? Thanks again, Anthony L. Sollars__ Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Location of Transaction Logs
Yes we do, our whole data center runs from a room full of batteries which are powered by 2 big diesel generators. SO losing power is the least of our worries. We just want to assure that if the server fails, that the latest transactions logs are still going to be intact on the SANS disk and/or cache so we can retrieve them. The EMC CX600 does have dual battery backup for the controller. -Anthony -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edgington, Jeff Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Location of Transaction Logs If the CX600 is like the FC4700, then you have two fairly large batteries that sit just below the controller for the SAN that powers the RAM used for the cache... if the SAN looses power, the batteries provide power to the cache to hold that information... of course you should have the SAN running on some form of UPS anyway. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Sollars Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Location of Transaction Logs Hello all, We are planning a global Exchange upgrade here to 2003 and are researching an issue that an email admin here is having with the location of the Transaction logs in our new Exchange Architecture. We are planning to Deploy Quad-proc servers that are boot-to-SAN on an EMC Clarion CX600. The OS, Logs and DATA will be stored on the SAN. The problem is we are not sure if the transaction log data will be secure in the case of server outage, since the SAN utilizes a very hefty cache before it writes the data to SAN disk. We have already begun queuing our SAN vendor and MS, but they do take awhile in complex questions such as these, I was wondering if anyone in the list has deployed Exchange 200x on a SAN and has come across this question? Thanks again, Anthony L. Sollars__ Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Location of Transaction Logs
WaaSp Roger, Good to hear from you. That is exactly what were considering 1 cold standby instead of clustering. All we would have to do is change the World Wide Name of our HBA fiber card in the SAN switch and were back up and running. Thanks for the info I will follow up with that, and will make sure I post my findings back here when I have them. -TOny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Location of Transaction Logs Yo, Tony! I see you survived the trip back from Orlando... If I remember correctly, you can bypass caching at the RAID group (not the LUN) level through Navisphere. I don't currently have access to mine to check, but I know I asked that question. Another option is to change the read/write cache percentage to be mostly read caching and reduce the potential exposure. I'd suggest skipping boot-from-SAN, but that's just me. The only reason I'd see boot-from-SAN helping is if you are going to have identical cold standby hardware available to replace in the case of system failure. I'm not sure you want to use non-identical hardware for cold spares in that kind of case. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Location of Transaction Logs Hello all, We are planning a global Exchange upgrade here to 2003 and are researching an issue that an email admin here is having with the location of the Transaction logs in our new Exchange Architecture. We are planning to Deploy Quad-proc servers that are boot-to-SAN on an EMC Clarion CX600. The OS, Logs and DATA will be stored on the SAN. The problem is we are not sure if the transaction log data will be secure in the case of server outage, since the SAN utilizes a very hefty cache before it writes the data to SAN disk. We have already begun queuing our SAN vendor and MS, but they do take awhile in complex questions such as these, I was wondering if anyone in the list has deployed Exchange 200x on a SAN and has come across this question? Thanks again, Anthony L. Sollars__ Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Location of Transaction Logs
We are doing Boot-to-SAN on about 30 production servers right now without a single problem or performance glitch. The idea spooked me also, but we extensively test and load simulated the setup in the lab and it proved to be very solid. We even have 2 production SQL servers running b00t-to-SAN and they are 2 of our best performing database servers. Technology moves forward and I guess we must move with it, sometimes :P. -tOny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Location of Transaction Logs Boot-from-SAN thingie kind of spooked me, but maybe because I have never been in an environment that used it. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Location of Transaction Logs Yo, Tony! I see you survived the trip back from Orlando... If I remember correctly, you can bypass caching at the RAID group (not the LUN) level through Navisphere. I don't currently have access to mine to check, but I know I asked that question. Another option is to change the read/write cache percentage to be mostly read caching and reduce the potential exposure. I'd suggest skipping boot-from-SAN, but that's just me. The only reason I'd see boot-from-SAN helping is if you are going to have identical cold standby hardware available to replace in the case of system failure. I'm not sure you want to use non-identical hardware for cold spares in that kind of case. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Location of Transaction Logs Hello all, We are planning a global Exchange upgrade here to 2003 and are researching an issue that an email admin here is having with the location of the Transaction logs in our new Exchange Architecture. We are planning to Deploy Quad-proc servers that are boot-to-SAN on an EMC Clarion CX600. The OS, Logs and DATA will be stored on the SAN. The problem is we are not sure if the transaction log data will be secure in the case of server outage, since the SAN utilizes a very hefty cache before it writes the data to SAN disk. We have already begun queuing our SAN vendor and MS, but they do take awhile in complex questions such as these, I was wondering if anyone in the list has deployed Exchange 200x on a SAN and has come across this question? Thanks again, Anthony L. Sollars__ Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue
RE: unhold
DePants -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unhold DeThong -Original Message- From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: unhold Unhold _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Diskeeper and Exchange
We run it just fine here on our exchange 5.5 2003 without incident. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lori Sagert Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Diskeeper and Exchange Hello All: I would like to know if anyone has had bad/good experiences with Diskeeper running on Exchange 5.5? I do not want to implement it on our Exchange servers but Mgmt is pushing the issue. I would like to go to the meeting with some ammunition why it shouldn't be implemented. Apparently my word isn't enough...;) It might help if I can give them some concrete proof from other Exchange Admins. Any stories out there? TIA Lori _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Diskeeper and Exchange
To clarify, we only run diskeeper on the OS drives not the drives that house the logs and/or exchange db's. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Sollars Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Diskeeper and Exchange We run it just fine here on our exchange 5.5 2003 without incident. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lori Sagert Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Diskeeper and Exchange Hello All: I would like to know if anyone has had bad/good experiences with Diskeeper running on Exchange 5.5? I do not want to implement it on our Exchange servers but Mgmt is pushing the issue. I would like to go to the meeting with some ammunition why it shouldn't be implemented. Apparently my word isn't enough...;) It might help if I can give them some concrete proof from other Exchange Admins. Any stories out there? TIA Lori _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a SAN
We have both IBM Sharks and EMC clarions and they both have tested very nicely, though I prefer the EMC solution due to hardware costs and more feature rich functionality. Anthony L. Sollars__ Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( office: 425.254.4845 7 fax: 425.793.6965 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wohlgemuth, Mike Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a SAN Hi all We are going to be purchasing a low/mid end SAN and plan on moving our Exchange Back End Server Storage to it ... Comments? Things to read? Experiences? Choices of SAN? Thanks in advance ... Mike Wohlgemuth To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; to steal from many is research - Steven Wright _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange IM
Correct, the IM client is dependant on your version of the IM server, in your case it's exchange 2000. In the case of exchange 2003, the IM server is called Live Communication server 2003. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6965 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange IM Is the chat/IM client that comes with Outlook 2003 the same one that comes with Outlook 2000? Or is it the version of Exchange that determines the version of the IM client? I'm thinking about rolling out an IM system, but we're going to be moving to Outlook 2003 before the year is up, so I don't want to invest in user training if it the versions are different. Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange IM
Yes they can Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6965 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange IM Do you know if 5.0 and 6.0 can work side by side? I know some users here use MSN for personal accounts. Erick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange IM I think 5.0 is the latest to work with Exchange. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange IM Is the chat/IM client that comes with Outlook 2003 the same one that comes with Outlook 2000? Or is it the version of Exchange that determines the version of the IM client? I'm thinking about rolling out an IM system, but we're going to be moving to Outlook 2003 before the year is up, so I don't want to invest in user training if it the versions are different. Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Florida Exchange Connections Conference Attendees
For those of you attending let's get together Tuesday night for dinner and drinks. Let's meet up at the Conference registration desk Tuesday after the last session. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2425.793.6905 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Instant Messaging
We are using Live Comm. Server here in a pilot environment and it is working great. We plan to roll it out right along side our Exchange 2003 migration. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging It worked 50% of the time for me on Exchange 2000. It actually worked 100% IF I had Windows 2000 for a client. For some reason Windows 98, ME, and XP clients act differently. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS Instant Messaging Does anyone here have much experience with IM server implementation? Could anyone at least refer me to some good documentation or reference material. There seems to be precious little out there, from Microsoft or otherwise. Thanks! -A _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Instant Messaging
No we sure weren't, we never went to Exchange 2000, still on 5.5 Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging Were you using IM on EX2000? Is there a migration tool? - Matt -Original Message- From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging We are using Live Comm. Server here in a pilot environment and it is working great. We plan to roll it out right along side our Exchange 2003 migration. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging It worked 50% of the time for me on Exchange 2000. It actually worked 100% IF I had Windows 2000 for a client. For some reason Windows 98, ME, and XP clients act differently. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS Instant Messaging Does anyone here have much experience with IM server implementation? Could anyone at least refer me to some good documentation or reference material. There seems to be precious little out there, from Microsoft or otherwise. Thanks! -A _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed
Yep exactly Andrey, we use it here very successfully for about 16K users. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Last time I used Tumbleweed, it did not care whether it was used with Exchange or any other mail system. It was installed on a separate machine and talked SMTP on port 25 with the Exchange server. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed We use it here at Hilton. Exchange 2000, with about 10k users. -A -Original Message- From: internet.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tumbleweed Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? Thanks Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
Have you looked into Exchange 2003 and Rights Management Server? We are going forward with this most likely. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pop3 to Exchange connector
I have the perfect solution, go to: http://www.dyndns.org/services/mailhop/relay.html They offer a service to allow you to redirect smtp traffic across a different port for exactly this reason. I don't use this specific service, I use there backupMX service for my home exchange server. Service has been great. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop3 to Exchange connector I would like to but it is the most reliable service in my area and I have had the e-mail address for so long it would be a pain to change. Call me lazy. I might try to contact them and see if I can get an exception made for me. The funny thing is their business connection is $40 more a month and is *slower* than my current connection but I would get some static IP's and no ports blocked. I am also finding that a lot of ISPs are going this direction to combat zombie Spam machines. I might have to bite the bullet and spend a little cash on this one: http://www.christensen-software.com/popcon.htm but I was hoping to find a free version somewhere. - Matt -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pop3 to Exchange connector If I were in your shoes, I'd find another ISP. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!(tm) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Pop3 to Exchange connector I am wrestling with a little problem that somebody on the list might know a solution for. I would like to setup an Exchange 2003 server at home to play around with but my ISP blocks port 25 inbound/outbound for everything but their mail server. I found a couple of products that will download mail from a POP3 account and relay them via SMTP to a Exchange server but they are a little cost prohibitive for a side project. Anybody know of a freeware program that provides the functionality? - Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2003.
Well I will be seeing you there then Ken, looking forward to what they're presenting on 99.99% uptime without clustering. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. So true Even then I have gotten conflicting answers. I have been told that we have purchased everything. I am just dragging my feet until there is service pack released for Exchange 2003. That is how I got buy-off for skipping 2000 and going straight to 2003. At TechEd they made it seem that the best path from Exchange 5.5 was to go straight to 2003. I am going to Orlando next month and will see what they say there. Thanks again. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:10 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. Check with your MS licensing rep for exact details. I was told that each Exchange 2003 CAL includes a license to use Outlook 2003, but not all of Office. I don't believe that you can use Exchange 2000 CAL's do to this, though. Again, to be sure, check with MS. They are the only ones authorized to quote official licensing. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Outlook 2003. Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. Does Outlook 2003 have the same licensing setup as the other versions? That is, I have an Exchange 2000 server, and licenses for Office 2000. Can I install Outlook 2003 on workstations using the Exchange CALs? Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arlo Clizer Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. Sure, do it. Outlook 2003 is really nice. We are upgrading from 2000 straight to 2003. What a difference! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2003. We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to Exchange 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 on our client systems. My question is... Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from the fact that features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be available to those clients that still have Outlook 2002? I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured out where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on others so that we can have a more gradual rollout. Thanks Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Outlook 2003.
There has been an issue raised with the store.exe service crashing with outlook 2003 clients being used in some cases. MS has released a store.exe patch that fixes it. One exch 5.5 server out 36 we have had this issue, and the patch fixed it. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2003. We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to Exchange 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 on our client systems. My question is... Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from the fact that features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be available to those clients that still have Outlook 2002? I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured out where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on others so that we can have a more gradual rollout. Thanks Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how does everyone fight this spam?
We use MMS and I have yet to get any of these spam. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 6:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how does everyone fight this spam? Pesky spam, is at its worst if you ask me. Not only do I get a hundred and one of them Microsoft please apply patches now. But a big domain of mine has been a recent victim of the old spam every possible combination jobbie. And when 1000's of tried addresses didn't exist at my domain and my server kicked it back and there server kicked it back again, the postmaster account forwards on endless supplies of junk mails. Also now, some spammers are sending out and using my email addresses as the return to address... . why me? :o -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 October 2003 14:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how does everyone fight this spam? I believe they're all the result of the swen virus. I'd like to see them go away, too. For me, I get three each: the failure message, the critical patch from MS notice, and the virus warning from our AV server (we use Trend's scanmail). A real PITA. Over the weekend I had 99 of them hit my mailbox. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: how does everyone fight this spam? Hi all. We are receiving a lot of these bogus messages every day - bug notice, failure message, report, error advice, bug announcement, etc. Some of them have a fake Microsoft address in the from line. They seem to be generated by a virus. Our antivirus programs (SurfControl and NAVEX) catch and kill the virus, but the messages still get through. They don't seem to have any consistent subject or From address... It seems that other organizations should be affected too, I am just wondering how others are dealing with these messages. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RPC over HTTP on a single DC/GC/Exchange server?
Yes this will work, while not reccomended, is perfectly doable in small offices. Truthfully I wouldn't do RPC over HTTP especially since this is your DC also. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RPC over HTTP on a single DC/GC/Exchange server? Yes I agree that best practices dictate seperating Exchange from the DC, but right now I'm just concerned with getting this to work for testing purposes. I have been told by Microsoft directly that it will work if everything is on the same box. JC -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bridges, Samantha Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RPC over HTTP on a single DC/GC/Exchange server? Hi. I think the recommendation is to keep DC/GC separate from the Exchange box. Do you see anything in the Event logs? Good luck always, Samantha -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 6:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RPC over HTTP on a single DC/GC/Exchange server? Has anyone been able to get RPC over HTTP to work when your DC/GC is on the same box as the Exchange server? My environment meets all of the prerequisites (Windows XP SP1 + RPC hotfix, Outlook 2003 RTM, Windows 2003 DC/GC, Exchange 2003). I have walked through the instructions to enable RPC over HTTP per the Exchange 2003 deployment guide, and also per the article in the Sep 2003 issue of Windows .NET Magazine. No joy. I do not want to use SSL initially (just for the purpose of testing; will enable SSL once I'm ready to roll this out). When I enable Basic Authentication in Outlook, it forces me to use SSL, so therefore I'm using NTLM. When I launch Outlook, it prompts me for credentials (even though I'm already logged in to the right account), and it continue's to prompt repeatedly, and I'm definitely entering the right password. I've seen mention of this same issue floating around on newsgroups, but no one has offered a solution. Oh, and I'm doing all of this internally for now, no firewall between me and Exchange. Any idea's? Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory Connector
Microsoft actually recommends it a best practice to run Exchange 2003 forestprep/domainprep before installing the Exch2003 ADC. SO your issue is something else. We have done this exact scenario several times in our lab. Actually the lab is one server running VMware GSX, all 6 servers used in the test are virtual, btw this really works well and saves tons of money. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory Connector Anyone know how (or if) you can fix a situation where the ADC was not installed first before ForestPrep and DomainPrep were run? Basically we cannot get the Public Folders to replicate because there's no ability to set up an intersite connection. Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange COnnections 2003
So who all is going to the Exchange Connections conference in Florida? www.winconnections.com -Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd
7. Is that a Blackberry in your pocket, or are you just happy to be here? Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions 8. Wanna see my new Pocket PC ? - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:42 PM Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd 9. What the hell died in there? -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions 10 Is an 8-node Active Exchange 2003 cluster supported under VMWare on Windows XP ? - one attendee joking ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
