RE: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515
I don't know about the 515 but a PIX can do PAT. I have done this a few time and always put the FE Server inside with the BE Servers. FE/BE is only useful to load balance protocols. Has no security benefit. For that use the PIX and ISA(s). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515 Hello Everyone, Here is a scenario: Exchange 2000 FE and BE configuration behind a PIX 515 firewall. FE Server is just for OWA, so that External users can access their email offsite. It works perfectly with the necessary ports enabled( 80,443,143,993).However, it is not desirable to leave 80 accessible due to potential security risk. My long-term solution is an ISA Server in the DMZ. In the interim, is there a way to configure the PIX 515 for Port address translation? I am speculating that on the PIX we can assign a different port number( e.g. port 8800..any port)and let the PIX resolve/translate/forward all requests to Port 80. My Network Administrator does not think the PIX 515 is compliant. Is there anyone in this group who has a similar environment? Thanks and happy Friday! Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515
I think you may not be clear on what PAT does. You don't use it to make ports anything. It is dynamic, and PAT is simply a form of dynamic NAT that maps multiple unregistered IP addresses to a single registered IP address by using different ports. AKA single address NAT or port-level multiplexed NAT and NAT overloading. AFAIK it's a Cisco thing as NAT was also created by Cisco. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515 Umm I dont believe the Pix515 does port remapping at least I dont bother with mine. I guess whats the point..IF I could make port80 appear as 8080...whats the point? I quick port scan and somebody knows...this is not security even thru obsecurity they are going to find it and explote it...if it's not locked down correctly... make sure you just lock down your servers correctly ..etc. and have your other security stuff setup well... PS. if you dont have the Smartnet spend the money..it's worth ever penny...I wont leave home without it.. help-support, software updates ;-) 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515 Do you have a Smartnet Maintenance contract? If so call Cisco they would be happy to tell you Joshua Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515 Hello Everyone, Here is a scenario: Exchange 2000 FE and BE configuration behind a PIX 515 firewall. FE Server is just for OWA, so that External users can access their email offsite. It works perfectly with the necessary ports enabled( 80,443,143,993).However, it is not desirable to leave 80 accessible due to potential security risk. My long-term solution is an ISA Server in the DMZ. In the interim, is there a way to configure the PIX 515 for Port address translation? I am speculating that on the PIX we can assign a different port number( e.g. port 8800..any port)and let the PIX resolve/translate/forward all requests to Port 80. My Network Administrator does not think the PIX 515 is compliant. Is there anyone in this group who has a similar environment? Thanks and happy Friday! Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sloooooow roaming profile logins W2K/E2k/OL2003
Thanks Missy. Looks like you are correct. Dumping roaming profiles and using offline and redirected folders seems to be the better solution. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Missy Koslosky Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sloow roaming profile logins W2K/E2k/OL2003 The best workaround is to remove as much stuff as possible from the profile. But that also means that you won't have all the stuff your users want. Seriously, there's no good workaround. Missy Koslosky Exchange MVP - Original Message - From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:53 AM Subject: Sloow roaming profile logins W2K/E2k/OL2003 What are the best workarounds for slow logins with roaming profiles? How does OL figure into it, if at all? Some users have PSTs in addition to Exchange Mailboxes on the server. tia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forestprep Domain Prep
I always use the Exchange CD for the preps and then install the SP. No troubles. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 7:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forestprep Domain Prep It was mentioned on this list but I do not remember. When you use setup to use ForestPrep and DomainPrep option, it was mentioned that you use the version from the latest SP for Exchange 2000. Is this true? If so is more for the Forest Prep or Domain Prep? _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Flusing log files - almost out of space
If a full BU is not removing the logs you need to find out why. ? BU software ? Exchange aware? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pat Richard Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Flusing log files - almost out of space NT 4 SP6 (I think) Ex 5.5 SP4 - single org, site, server One problem led to many others. Drive with the log files (also the system drive) ran low on space, so the MTA stopped. I cleared some stuff off the drive to get up to 150MB. MTA started, and it's working. The disk space problem also caused BENT to not run correctly because it couldn't write the catalog to the disk (space was down to 7MB when I got there on Monday). I believe that this caused the Exchange logs to not get flushed. The logs now comprise 3GB of space (and growing). One successful backup has run since, but again, the logs aren't flushed. My question is (to refresh my memory)... Can I stop Exchange, copy the logs to another drive for archiving, then kill the originals, and restart Exchange? If I recall, it should recreate new log files, correct? (I'm making the assumption that the transactions in the logs are committed). It looks like the drive that the store is on has plenty of space (including enough to defrag the store, etc). All services are running fine. But obviously, I need to clear those logs, and want to make sure it's how I remember it. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Service Pack and Schema Permissions
no. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erik L. Vesneski Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 9:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Service Pack and Schema Permissions Hi, When applying SP3 for Exchange 2000 do you require schema admin permissions? Thanks, Erik Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO Intel Systems Phone: 925-658-6161 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] . r? zrmyzr ZZvh?+-i?2?G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sloooooow roaming profile logins W2K/E2k/OL2003
What are the best workarounds for slow logins with roaming profiles? How does OL figure into it, if at all? Some users have PSTs in addition to Exchange Mailboxes on the server. tia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Crashed exchange transaction log file partition
no place to write logsexchange quits. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bennett, Warren Mr 5 SIG CMD Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Crashed exchange transaction log file partition The question came up today what would happen to the exchange server if the log drives crashed. Assuming that the logs are sitting on a separate set of spindles. I hope to test this in the lab but wondered if anyone had had this happen to them. Warren _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K OWA timeouts
Timeout of what? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K OWA timeouts We are looking for a solution to E2K OWA's lack of a timeout feature. We are currently looking at several options, but I thought I'd ask the list what they are doing? Suggestions? Experiences (good or bad)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question
the users will pick ?? Then they will get what they deserve, with luck. Sounds like the patients running the asylum. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Norris Carden Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question We're undergoing the internal debate of whether to continue a suspended (for a year) implementation of Notes R5 or move to Exchange 2k. I'm not trying to start an Exchange vs Notes war, but one of our users asked a question I can't answer. Maybe someone else with experience in both environments can help. Notes has an mail option to prevent copying to clipboard, forwarding or replying with history (leave it to the head of HR to like this). To my knowledge there is nothing similar in Exchange. Is this something MS or some third party has done in Exchange 2k or 2003? Personally I prefer Exchange (esp in an AD environment). Feel free to send me any comments that might help the evaluation FROM A USER PERSPECTIVE. Unfortunately the users will pick and they don't care about how much effort it does or doesn't take to administer and maintain a system. Thanks, Norris Carden [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K OWA timeouts
That is an HTTP thing. Limit connection timeout in IIS. There are 3rd party products too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA timeouts Of logons so that when #$%@! idio^H^H^H^H users walk away from logged on sessions someone can't walk in behind them and have their session. -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA timeouts Timeout of what? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K OWA timeouts We are looking for a solution to E2K OWA's lack of a timeout feature. We are currently looking at several options, but I thought I'd ask the list what they are doing? Suggestions? Experiences (good or bad)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question: ES2k on a DC
There are good and bad reasons to do most anything. The # of mailboxes on a server, by itself, is not all that indicative of hardware requirements for many reasons. However, for what passes for normal requirements in my experience you have way more server than you need so it will probably perform well, all things being equal. You need at least 2 DCs in each domain and in small environments one being an Exchange Server is not unusual. DCs in small shops don't need to be high performance boxes but I would hardware mirror the OS on each. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Trevor Porter Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question: ES2k on a DC Hello All, Two questions in one ... I know that MS discourages the use of ES2k on a domain controller. Why is this? Load? Security? Other? Are there any good articles on this? Also, does anyone have any comments on the below config: I have (and will have) well under 100 mailboxes and am planning on using a Proliant DL380 G3 with 2x2.4 Xeons, 1 GB RAM and two RAID1 36 10k drives for the OS and the logs and three RAID5 36 10k drives for the information stores. Thanks, Trevor _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WARNING! OWA 5.5 E2K
I agree in spirit. But, don't you install it from the Exchange 5.5 CD? Could it be related to the mode of your AD Domain/s? If all this stuff worked perfectly it wouldn't pay nearly as well. :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WARNING! OWA 5.5 E2K OWA 5.5 isn't exchange, it's just a big vbscript asp program that uses some COM objects and MAPI to access mail. It worked just fine in our test lab. Unfortunately, our testing didn't include creating new users after the switch to native mode, since switching to native mode was the last thing on the test plan. -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WARNING! OWA 5.5 E2K Since Exchange 2k native means no 5.5 isn't this what one would expect? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: WARNING! OWA 5.5 E2K A word of warning! If you plan on using Exchange 5.5 OWA to access E2K mailboxes, DO NOT GO NATIVE E2K! Any new users created after going native will not be able to access their mailbox via OWA 5.5. We opened a PSS call on this and Microsoft confirmed that this will not work because legacy attributes are not created after switching to native mode. They could not tell us what these legacy attributes are (a quick perusal with LDP seems to indicate there is no obvious differences in AD attributes). _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook2000
I think you are not in mapi/workgroup mode? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook2000 I have just install Outlook 2000 and when I open Outlook to config for Exchange the Services is not there. I was looking under Tools menu. Right now it show account. When do I need to install? I have been installing Outlook 97 with the extension and then do the upgrade to 2000. How can I install outlook 2000 without doing the upgrade? Tony N. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Page cannot be displayed
If your Internet connection is solid what is causing them to loose the connection? It's using TCP. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gregory Householder Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Page cannot be displayed Okay, I have an issue with OWA that has just started to happen recently. I'm running Windows 2000 SP3 / Exchange 2000 SP3. I have users that once in a while they lose connection to their OWA. When they try to reconnect they get a page cannot be displayed. They are accessing the OWA through https and when they get that message if they change the web address to http they can get back in without any problems. It seems to me like the first connection gets froze up so by going the non-secure way they are going through a new connection. I have 24 restaurants accessing OWA and they all have had problems at one time or another and I have even experienced it at home a couple of times. IE is completed updated as well as everything on the server side. Our internet connection is always solid and doesn't go down. Has anyone seen this or have any suggestions I could try to keep this from happening? Thanks, Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Page cannot be displayed
So, how do you know it is solid. It's the Internet, right? You don't own the whole wire. Check the IIS settings for things like http keepalives and connection time out value. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gregory Householder Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Page cannot be displayed That's my question. I can't figure it out either. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Page cannot be displayed If your Internet connection is solid what is causing them to loose the connection? It's using TCP. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gregory Householder Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Page cannot be displayed Okay, I have an issue with OWA that has just started to happen recently. I'm running Windows 2000 SP3 / Exchange 2000 SP3. I have users that once in a while they lose connection to their OWA. When they try to reconnect they get a page cannot be displayed. They are accessing the OWA through https and when they get that message if they change the web address to http they can get back in without any problems. It seems to me like the first connection gets froze up so by going the non-secure way they are going through a new connection. I have 24 restaurants accessing OWA and they all have had problems at one time or another and I have even experienced it at home a couple of times. IE is completed updated as well as everything on the server side. Our internet connection is always solid and doesn't go down. Has anyone seen this or have any suggestions I could try to keep this from happening? Thanks, Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook2000
This list is for sharing? Whatever could it BE? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook2000 Thank everyone I found the answer -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook2000 Outlook? www.slipstick.com On 2/12/03 9:27, Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have just install Outlook 2000 and when I open Outlook to config for Exchange the Services is not there. I was looking under Tools menu. Right now it show account. When do I need to install? I have been installing Outlook 97 with the extension and then do the upgrade to 2000. How can I install outlook 2000 without doing the upgrade? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options
Have them do a local backup. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of HOLLIDAY, Eric Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Offline backup of Exch2k - options We have a remote office connected via T1. They have their own server (Exch2k Enterprise SP3 , Win2k Server SP3), and the database is close to 10Gb. Running an online backup (nightly) over the T1 is taking waaay too long. It's been suggested that we perform an offline backup, bring the stores back online, shoot the backed up files down the T1 later. I have the procedure to this using eseutil (Q296788), but I would like to know if anyone else has any other options. TIA, Eric Holliday Exchange Administrator Corporate Information Systems Logistics Management Institute McLean, VA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options
Using whatever works, just do it at the remote site. You can run/control it from the central office. What is the point of having a tape from a remote server? You gonna restore it over the T1? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of HOLLIDAY, Eric Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options Using Backup Exec, right? -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline backup of Exch2k - options Have them do a local backup. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of HOLLIDAY, Eric Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Offline backup of Exch2k - options We have a remote office connected via T1. They have their own server (Exch2k Enterprise SP3 , Win2k Server SP3), and the database is close to 10Gb. Running an online backup (nightly) over the T1 is taking waaay too long. It's been suggested that we perform an offline backup, bring the stores back online, shoot the backed up files down the T1 later. I have the procedure to this using eseutil (Q296788), but I would like to know if anyone else has any other options. TIA, Eric Holliday Exchange Administrator Corporate Information Systems Logistics Management Institute McLean, VA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange 550 error
Telnet to port 25 and run the SMTP commands is the simple way to send commands and read replies one at a time. The best way to ts SMTP issues imo. (I am not Chris and not speaking for him) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange 550 error Chris - Thanks for the info - looks like it could be an MX issue as the MX record for the customer points to oldcustomername.com not newcustomername.com (although both names are still valid). FYI - If you check out MSKB 284204, it does say that 550 maps to a Generic protocol error (SMTP error). Any suggestions on how to use the info in rfc821 to determine what the issue is and why it is sporadic? Thanks! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange 550 error It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic). Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using telnet and the basic SMTP commands in RFC821 will allow you to confirm this for yourself if you'd like.[1] [1] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any. On 2/12/03 7:42, Jeffrey Dubyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some recipients in a specific domain. I have logging turned up, and found a strange message: 550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error), but I can't make heads or tails out of the rest of the message. What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in nslookup and from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 25. The users have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this domain before or since, except for this most important email (or course). There was no NDR, no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole. Thanks for any assistance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange 550 error
The present moment is all we have control of, on a good day. :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange 550 error Charles - I fully agree and have successfully sent email through by telnetting from the Exchange server to that domain. What I'm trying to figure out is how to ensure this doesn't happen in the future as the issue is sporadic, but is quite perturbing to the customer. Regards, Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Marriott Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange 550 error Telnet to port 25 and run the SMTP commands is the simple way to send commands and read replies one at a time. The best way to ts SMTP issues imo. (I am not Chris and not speaking for him) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange 550 error Chris - Thanks for the info - looks like it could be an MX issue as the MX record for the customer points to oldcustomername.com not newcustomername.com (although both names are still valid). FYI - If you check out MSKB 284204, it does say that 550 maps to a Generic protocol error (SMTP error). Any suggestions on how to use the info in rfc821 to determine what the issue is and why it is sporadic? Thanks! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange 550 error It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic). Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using telnet and the basic SMTP commands in RFC821 will allow you to confirm this for yourself if you'd like.[1] [1] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any. On 2/12/03 7:42, Jeffrey Dubyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some recipients in a specific domain. I have logging turned up, and found a strange message: 550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error), but I can't make heads or tails out of the rest of the message. What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in nslookup and from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 25. The users have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this domain before or since, except for this most important email (or course). There was no NDR, no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole. Thanks for any assistance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders
use the ip address -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jerry J. Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k unable to open you default folders I have tried that and it tells me that it cannot resolve the name. The name could not be resolved. The Microsoft Exchange Address Book was unable to log on to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Issue with removing EX2000 Server
Was/is this the 1st server in the admin group? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Issue with removing EX2000 Server We are decommissioning an EX2000 server. I have setup all of the correct public folders according to this document: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;307917 Now as a test I shut all of the services down on the server that I want to remove. There have been a couple of instances though where clients are still trying to gain access to resources on that box that is not even there anymore. IE I had a user call saying she was no longer able to gain access to a person's calendar. So when I went to troubleshoot this I tried to open the other user's calendar I received the box that said that Outlook was requesting data from Exchange server and it was the box that I am decommissioning. The person she is trying to gain access to is on the new server. Why is this happening? I want to remove this server from the org but I am afraid to without knowing that this isn't going to become a huge problem. Will the clients stop trying to gain access to that box once removed from the org? Thanks in advance, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Issue with removing EX2000 Server
There is a KB article you need to read. I don't have the # handy but search on remove the 1st server in the admin group. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Issue with removing EX2000 Server Yes it was. Alex -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Was/is this the 1st server in the admin group? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Issue with removing EX2000 Server We are decommissioning an EX2000 server. I have setup all of the correct public folders according to this document: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;307917 Now as a test I shut all of the services down on the server that I want to remove. There have been a couple of instances though where clients are still trying to gain access to resources on that box that is not even there anymore. IE I had a user call saying she was no longer able to gain access to a person's calendar. So when I went to troubleshoot this I tried to open the other user's calendar I received the box that said that Outlook was requesting data from Exchange server and it was the box that I am decommissioning. The person she is trying to gain access to is on the new server. Why is this happening? I want to remove this server from the org but I am afraid to without knowing that this isn't going to become a huge problem. Will the clients stop trying to gain access to that box once removed from the org? Thanks in advance, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic: W2K Server List?
msnews.microsoft.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dirk du Plooy - CPX Mngd Services Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic: W2K Server List? Anybody know about a godd W2K Server List? Thanks Dirk du Plooy Analyst Centre Of Excellence (COE) Midrand For: Comparex Africa (Pty) Ltd Company Registration Number 1997/014212/07 Tel: +27 (0) 11 266 5445 Cell: +27 (0) 82 336 5263 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This message and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this message in error, please notify Dirk du Plooy at Comparex Africa (Pty) Ltd immediately, telephone number +27 (0) 11 266 5445. Any unauthorised use, alteration or dissemination is prohibited. Comparex Africa (Pty) Ltd Ltd accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss whether it be direct, indirect or consequential, arising from information made available and actions resulting there from. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SRS
Is SRS used and/or necessary with ADCs? tia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SRS
Brain fart I guess. I don't remember configuring it in any way for any migration. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: SRS Yes? On 2/11/03 17:23, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is SRS used and/or necessary with ADCs? tia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Book recommendation
The MS Documentation. It's free. This site a some free reading material too. http://microsoft.com/exchange/default.asp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Book recommendation Can anyone recommend a good book for an E2K newbie. Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: owa dns
where is the zone file for the delegated mail.phytoceutica.com subdomain? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Liddil Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: owa dns I get the following. I assume I need to create an A record but if I try to create one called mail.phytoceutica.com I can not. Perioeds don't appear. What am I doing wrong here? nslookup mail.phytoceutica.com Server: nhserver.newhaven.phytoceutica.com Address: 192.168.70.10 *** nhserver.newhaven.phytoceutica.com can't find mail.phytoceutica.com: Non-existent domain Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trans logs
Check the backup logs. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ashraph, Elizabeth A. Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trans logs All the backups being performed are full, and yet the logs are not getting deleted. Where would you start in troubleshooting that problem, the backup system or Exchange? Thanks. Liz Ashraph -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 9:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trans logs There is no such option in backup packages, including NTBACKUP, I've worked with. If you perform a full (normal) or incremental backup, the backup program purges the logs. If you perform a differential or copy backup, the logs are not purged. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of knighTslayer Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trans logs Your Exchange aware backup product does that. Or you do if you manually do so after a successful off-line backup. If the logs were not purged, then the option to do so wasn't set. knighTslayer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ashraph, Elizabeth A. Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 12:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trans logs Please forgive me in advance for asking this, but in Ex5.5 who deletes the transaction logs after a full backup, does Exchange or the Exchange aware Backup software (like Veritas). Has anyone seen cases where backups are successful but the logs don't get purged, what might cause this. Thanks. Liz Ashraph [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: owa dns
Well, it isn't a flat domain because you are not root. :-) com delegated phytoceutica.com and the admin of phytoceutica.com apparently delegated newhaven but not mail. Looks like newhaven delegated mail. I'm not sure what a secondary primary is. You can only have Fwd ADI, Primary, and/or Secondary and in-addr.arpa zones afaik. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Liddil Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa dns W2K/AD Environment. First off it is a flat domain one site. The VAR set up the server (NHSERVER)with Forward lookup AD zone as newhaven.phytoceutica.com. They also set up a forward lookup zone of phytoceutica.com and set it as a standard Primary. They then made the second server (COMPUTE) an AD DNS with the secondary primary lookup zone. Good or bad I have changed the phytoceutica.com FLZs to AD. And I have the RLZ with the 192.168.70. If I enter mail.newhaven.phytoceutica.com it works, but not mail.phytoceutica.com. Jim Liddil -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa dns where is the zone file for the delegated mail.phytoceutica.com subdomain? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Liddil Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: owa dns I get the following. I assume I need to create an A record but if I try to create one called mail.phytoceutica.com I can not. Perioeds don't appear. What am I doing wrong here? nslookup mail.phytoceutica.com Server: nhserver.newhaven.phytoceutica.com Address: 192.168.70.10 *** nhserver.newhaven.phytoceutica.com can't find mail.phytoceutica.com: Non-existent domain Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Gonna love this...
An alternate delivery location from the message store. :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gonna love this... what does Exchange have to to with PSTs? -Original Message- From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gonna love this... Are you using Exchange 2000 or 5.5? Just curious because since we went to 2000 we have had some strange problems with PST's on mapped drives. -Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (602) 631-7486 Fax: (602) 294-7486 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Gonna love this... We are testing Outlook 2002 in Windows 2000/Citrix terminal server and ran into issues with PST files on the users' mapped home drive. We opened a PSS call and were told that Microsoft does not support PST files on mapped drives. The support person then quoted a q article which basically says that performance of a PST file on a network drive will not match a local drive (duh...). Sheesh... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: owa dns
Yes, or move it from where it is. I don't know what your DNS Namespace requirements are. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Liddil Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa dns You are right. :-) I miss typed, it was a secondary, period. It is now AD. So I am a few watts short on fully understanding DNS. I have two AD FLZs under NHSERVER. newhaven.phytoceutica.com and phytoceutica.com. Are you suggesting I also make a zone called mail.phytoceutica.com? Jim -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa dns Well, it isn't a flat domain because you are not root. :-) com delegated phytoceutica.com and the admin of phytoceutica.com apparently delegated newhaven but not mail. Looks like newhaven delegated mail. I'm not sure what a secondary primary is. You can only have Fwd ADI, Primary, and/or Secondary and in-addr.arpa zones afaik. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Liddil Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa dns W2K/AD Environment. First off it is a flat domain one site. The VAR set up the server (NHSERVER)with Forward lookup AD zone as newhaven.phytoceutica.com. They also set up a forward lookup zone of phytoceutica.com and set it as a standard Primary. They then made the second server (COMPUTE) an AD DNS with the secondary primary lookup zone. Good or bad I have changed the phytoceutica.com FLZs to AD. And I have the RLZ with the 192.168.70. If I enter mail.newhaven.phytoceutica.com it works, but not mail.phytoceutica.com. Jim Liddil -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa dns where is the zone file for the delegated mail.phytoceutica.com subdomain? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Liddil Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: owa dns I get the following. I assume I need to create an A record but if I try to create one called mail.phytoceutica.com I can not. Perioeds don't appear. What am I doing wrong here? nslookup mail.phytoceutica.com Server: nhserver.newhaven.phytoceutica.com Address: 192.168.70.10 *** nhserver.newhaven.phytoceutica.com can't find mail.phytoceutica.com: Non-existent domain Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: servername limited same as in 55?
Yes, unless it's a DC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: servername limited same as in 55? MSX2000+sp3 1 Org Hi All We have two exchange servers in our organization A B, we are going to rehome everything from server A to B (mailboxes, public folder, systems folders, dls) once rehomed can we just rename the servername fom B to A and expect exchange2000 to work? we remember that In 5.5 the servername should not be rename it. rgds, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: servername limited same as in 55?
No, dcpromo makes a server a DC or makes a DC a server (non-DC). u can look it up. :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: servername limited same as in 55? Aha! no this is not a DC, hence if i run DCPROMO on that box I will avoid that problem? Please do you have a Q-article as a reference Rgds, ER -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: servername limited same as in 55? Yes, unless it's a DC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: servername limited same as in 55? MSX2000+sp3 1 Org Hi All We have two exchange servers in our organization A B, we are going to rehome everything from server A to B (mailboxes, public folder, systems folders, dls) once rehomed can we just rename the servername fom B to A and expect exchange2000 to work? we remember that In 5.5 the servername should not be rename it. rgds, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3 bad?
as in pst? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? They can do that just as well without POP. In fact, I would wager that many of your users are doing that today without POP3. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edwards, Aaron Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? At our site it's our policy that we purge all email 30 days and older. We don't want people downloading mail to their home computers at the risk of breaking that policy. That may not be applicable to your site, but that is one reason. Aaron -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? Well its always a bad idea in general security terms to run processes when you have no need to use them; why open yourself up to the potential of an exploit in something you don't have to use when you can just close it down and forget the risk? Why risk forgetting you need to apply a patch for it because We don't use that here so we don't need to worry about it (case in point would be those MSDE 2000 installs that got hit by slammer whose users didn't worry because they didn't use SQL Server 2000). Having it running when you don't use it is just more ways for things to go wrong -- for example a user connects to it while playing and downloads mail via pop, which deltes it from the server, and then complains they've lost their email. Why waste the server's resources on a process you don't expect to use. Robert Moir MSMVP IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College Ciderspace: An online 3D virtual reality environment for tramps. Ciderspace Cafe: A park Bench. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 February 2003 15:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POP3 bad? Are they any reasons to disable POP3 for use by users on a E2K setup? Security or any other? Customer would like to shut it off but needs reasons why POP3 should be shutdown. _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Front end Server
How many Exchange Servers, protocols and mailboxes will this FE Server be load balancing? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Front end Server Dear All, I am in the process of building a Front End server(Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, to be placed in the DMZ, just for OWA. An IBM workstation class machine with Pentium 4, 1.80GHz CPU with a 36GB HDD is being used for this purpose. I am not expecting more that 20-25 concurrent connections to this box at any given time. Will this box be able to handle this load or do I need a Server class machine? Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, windows 2000 server sp As always I appreciate all your input. Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Front end Server
Why do you think you need a FE server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server One Exchange Server, 200 mailboxes -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server How many Exchange Servers, protocols and mailboxes will this FE Server be load balancing? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Front end Server Dear All, I am in the process of building a Front End server(Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, to be placed in the DMZ, just for OWA. An IBM workstation class machine with Pentium 4, 1.80GHz CPU with a 36GB HDD is being used for this purpose. I am not expecting more that 20-25 concurrent connections to this box at any given time. Will this box be able to handle this load or do I need a Server class machine? Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, windows 2000 server sp As always I appreciate all your input. Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Front end Server
If security is your goal use an ISA Server. FE Exchange Servers are not security devices, contrary to what you may have been told. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server To keep the BE server secure ( do not want to open the OWA ports to users who are not using VPN and dialup). Also we have a document management software (imanage) which could be integrated to Outlook. Since the users access the Imanage web portal via the web, they could access their email also via owa (secured with SSL). Any other suggestions would be welcome. Thanks -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server Why do you think you need a FE server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server One Exchange Server, 200 mailboxes -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server How many Exchange Servers, protocols and mailboxes will this FE Server be load balancing? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Front end Server Dear All, I am in the process of building a Front End server(Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, to be placed in the DMZ, just for OWA. An IBM workstation class machine with Pentium 4, 1.80GHz CPU with a 36GB HDD is being used for this purpose. I am not expecting more that 20-25 concurrent connections to this box at any given time. Will this box be able to handle this load or do I need a Server class machine? Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, windows 2000 server sp As always I appreciate all your input. Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe
Browser addresses drop down arrow list
How do you control how many and how long URLs stay in the list? tia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Global Address List problem
What is the swing method? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem Now I am very confused. My environment is 3 Exchange 2000 SP3 servers, all my Exchange 5.5 servers have been upgraded. All the mailboxes have X.500 address because they were migrated from a 5.5 server (we used the swing method). -Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (602) 631-7486 Fax: (602) 294-7486 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem I believe you need a connection agreement so the recipients on the Exchange 5.5 side know about the recipients on the Exchange 2000 side and vice-versa. That X.500 address shows up because Outlook can't find the corresponding recipient in the directory. Remember that Exchange 5.5 routes internal mail, even to Exchange 2000, using this kind of addressing. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem I have the default config_CA agreement created when I installed my first 2000 sever into the site. The 5.5 ADC have been disabled. -Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (602) 631-7486 Fax: (602) 294-7486 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem Oh, from Outlook, now I understand. Tell me about your Active Directory Connector Connection Agreement(s). Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem When a user opens the GAL the Email address field is populated with /o=orgname/ou=sitename/cn=Recipients/cn=username. I don't have any 5.5 servers in the site but I haven't switched to Native mode until I am sure I won't need to do a restore from an 5.5 backup. -Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (602) 631-7486 Fax: (602) 294-7486 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem Where exactly do you mean that they are displaying users' email addresses as an x.400 address rather than the SMTP address? What does your Exchange 5.5 Site Addressing show? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem So if that is normal, how do I get the display of my GAL to show the SMTP address rather than the x.400 address? -Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (602) 631-7486 Fax: (602) 294-7486 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem Yes, that is normal for an upgraded Exchange 5.5 site and as far as I know, this policy is required while you are running in a mixed-mode site. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem Yes, the detail templates are set correctly. The one thing I found is the
RE: Browser addresses drop down arrow list
Someone wanted to limit the URLs to ONLY the OWA URL. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Browser addresses drop down arrow list Huh? On 2/5/03 13:36, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do you control how many and how long URLs stay in the list? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Gonna love this...
Exchange wouldn't know a drive, mapped or otherwise, from an oil filter. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gonna love this... Are you using Exchange 2000 or 5.5? Just curious because since we went to 2000 we have had some strange problems with PST's on mapped drives. -Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (602) 631-7486 Fax: (602) 294-7486 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Gonna love this... We are testing Outlook 2002 in Windows 2000/Citrix terminal server and ran into issues with PST files on the users' mapped home drive. We opened a PSS call and were told that Microsoft does not support PST files on mapped drives. The support person then quoted a q article which basically says that performance of a PST file on a network drive will not match a local drive (duh...). Sheesh... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Adding 2nd Exchange Server
If you only have 1 domain and 1 site just set up another exchange server in the remote site and test the performance. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joshua R. Morgan Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Adding 2nd Exchange Server Thanks for the reply , I just need to add another Exchange Server in a remote office where we already have a DC. Is it really just install Exchange in that office and it will know that an org is setup or is like Exchange 5.5 where I point it to an existing install for it to gather its info? If you want to point me to a book or something I understand. TIA Joshua Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Adding 2nd Exchange Server One thing to add about this. When you read the book pay close attention to what you need to do to decommission the first server. Setting up another Exchange server in the same organization is pretty easy but when you go to remove the first there are many things that you need to be aware prior to doing so. Alex Gonzalez Sr. Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 -Original Message- From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions I have to agree with Ed on this one. As one who has implemented backoffice type applications such as Exchange and helping with A.D installation and design, you need a book, a test environment, and or a class to get the knowledge you desire. After 3 years with AD and 5 with Exchange, I would never venture into just adding another server or throwing up AD without at least reading a good book. The task you are undertaking is more complex than it was in 5.5. Have you considered such details as routing, admin and storage groups when you add this new server? The short of it is that pointers, as Ed said, might help you really bollocks things up. Get a book and do some reading. There are some good ones out there that will help you with your situation while providing a foundation for competent support for later issues. Good luck. Damian Scoles Senior Technical Analyst MCSE+I, CCNP -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Adding 2nd Exchange Server I shall be blunt, and I know for sure that you will take this the wrong way and that others will likely leap to your defense and call me an ogre, but I perceived that what you need is much more than a few pointers. Had I thought I could give you a couple of pointers that would help you along your way, I would have cheerily done so. However, your questions are so fundamentally basic that it's obvious that you need much more than a few pointers. Actually, providing a few pointers might help you really bollocks things up. Exchange 2000 is especially unforgiving that way. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joshua R. Morgan Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Adding 2nd Exchange Server I appreciate that and I will be the first to admit that I need training the problem is right now I have to do this project before I can get training. I have installed Exchange 2000 in a Single Server and 5.5 in a Multi Server Environment but this is a little Different than 5.5 and I was just looking for some pointers. Joshua Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Adding 2nd Exchange Server http://www.microsoft.com/traincert/syllabi/1573BFinal.asp http://www.microsoft.com/traincert/syllabi/1572CFinal.asp Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joshua R. Morgan Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Adding 2nd Exchange Server I have an Active Dir in Native mode and 1 Exchange 2000 SP3 server I have been asked to add another exchange server to our environment to ease the pains of a remote office. Can someone point me to a Q that me detail how to do this or is it really just install in that office since everything is AD integrated. TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Method IQ Senior Network Engineer Main: (864) 272-1145 Mobile: (864) 449-9912 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Front end Server
You are getting into the deep end now but simply: Yes, put ISA in a DMZ. Use FE Servers for protocol load balancing and put them inside with the Exchange Servers. Use ISA to publish Exchange resources for controlled access from outside. This architecture involves much more than Exchange. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server OK, Any one using an ISA Server in the DMZ connecting to an Exchange Server through the firewall? I have been looking at some technet articles about a trihomed ISA Server in the Perimeter network. Is this a better option? Thanks for all the ideas. Raj -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server If security is your goal use an ISA Server. FE Exchange Servers are not security devices, contrary to what you may have been told. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server To keep the BE server secure ( do not want to open the OWA ports to users who are not using VPN and dialup). Also we have a document management software (imanage) which could be integrated to Outlook. Since the users access the Imanage web portal via the web, they could access their email also via owa (secured with SSL). Any other suggestions would be welcome. Thanks -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server Why do you think you need a FE server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server One Exchange Server, 200 mailboxes -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server How many Exchange Servers, protocols and mailboxes will this FE Server be load balancing? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Front end Server Dear All, I am in the process of building a Front End server(Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, to be placed in the DMZ, just for OWA. An IBM workstation class machine with Pentium 4, 1.80GHz CPU with a 36GB HDD is being used for this purpose. I am not expecting more that 20-25 concurrent connections to this box at any given time. Will this box be able to handle this load or do I need a Server class machine? Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, windows 2000 server sp As always I appreciate all your input. Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately
RE: Front end Server
Read Ken's post a few back on that. I agree with him and have taken that approach on several projects. It can be a little tricky. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server I was thinking of eliminating the FE Server if I implement the ISA, and point to the exchange server directly. -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server You are getting into the deep end now but simply: Yes, put ISA in a DMZ. Use FE Servers for protocol load balancing and put them inside with the Exchange Servers. Use ISA to publish Exchange resources for controlled access from outside. This architecture involves much more than Exchange. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server OK, Any one using an ISA Server in the DMZ connecting to an Exchange Server through the firewall? I have been looking at some technet articles about a trihomed ISA Server in the Perimeter network. Is this a better option? Thanks for all the ideas. Raj -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server If security is your goal use an ISA Server. FE Exchange Servers are not security devices, contrary to what you may have been told. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server To keep the BE server secure ( do not want to open the OWA ports to users who are not using VPN and dialup). Also we have a document management software (imanage) which could be integrated to Outlook. Since the users access the Imanage web portal via the web, they could access their email also via owa (secured with SSL). Any other suggestions would be welcome. Thanks -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server Why do you think you need a FE server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server One Exchange Server, 200 mailboxes -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front end Server How many Exchange Servers, protocols and mailboxes will this FE Server be load balancing? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Front end Server Dear All, I am in the process of building a Front End server(Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, to be placed in the DMZ, just for OWA. An IBM workstation class machine with Pentium 4, 1.80GHz CPU with a 36GB HDD is being used for this purpose. I am not expecting more that 20-25 concurrent connections to this box at any given time. Will this box be able to handle this load or do I need a Server class machine? Exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, windows 2000 server sp As always I appreciate all your input. Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
RE: New Blackberry Server
How, if at all, does MMIS figure into fulfilling the business requirement that BB fills/filled? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Blackberry Server Does anyone know how the newest Blackberry server works? I know with the older version you had to tie the server to an exchange server. Is that the case with the latest release? Does anybody care? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing from dual homed to single NIC
Just disable it or remove it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Strock Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Changing from dual homed to single NIC I am in the process of planning to move my Exchange 5.5 server from one location to another. At the old location, the machine was running with two NICs. One internal IP and one external IP. When we move to the new location, I will be putting the machine behind a firewall and would like to just have the single NIC activated. The machine will be exposed to the Internet via ports 25 and 110 only (no OWA on this domain). Can I do this, or do I need to re-install Exchange? Mike Strock [EMAIL PROTECTED] .+--xm ,) r(? \ b??! 0 zu?r?:.? m?[hy \z[, )r? ZZvh?+-i?2?G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 550 errors
iirc you must allow relay for domains accessible by POP on 5.5. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Strock Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 12:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 550 errors I'm administering a 5.5 box, SP3 installed. I've got a couple users who have switched to using POP3/SMTP through this machine (they are remote users now). They are getting a message when trying to send mail to users outside the default domain of '550, relaying prohibited'. I've had them set it such that they have checked 'Server requires authentication' and had them put in their username/password for the domain. One user is using Outlook Express, one is using Outlook 2000. How can I correct this? Thanks. Mike Strock [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E-mail Address Already Exists?
Update RUS. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tech Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E-mail Address Already Exists? Gurus, I am experiencing a weird problem with our Sysadmin Account. I was trying to send e-mail from an external address and it was giving an NDR that did not help. I have deleted this account and tried to recreate it but it will not give me the original SMTP address. When I try creating the [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP it claims it already exists. I have followed the KB280765 telling me to go through system manager, recipents, All Address Lists etc. but I do not find the address having tried every such criteria. Any ideas why I can not create the address seeing as Exchange doesn't agree with itself? Exchange 2000 SP2 2000 AD SP2 Cheers, Nathan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains
Try removing and re-establishing the trust. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains I've got an odd situation with an Exchange 5.5 server (Win2K, but in an NT4 domain) not seeing all of the trusted domains. I've checked the FAQ, the archives, and the Microsoft KB. Here's the situation: Exchange 5.5 organization in TestNTDomain with three sites/five servers (one or two servers per site) TestNTDomain trusts Test2KDomain (among others) I can see Test2KDomain in the logon options for all of the servers in TestNTDomain, even log on using a user from the Test2KDomain. On four of the five servers, I can log on with the Exchange service account (TestNTDomain\Exchange), open the Exchange admin tool, and grant permissions to any user in the trusted domains. On the fifth server, which is on the same subnet and has the same network configuration as three of the four that are working [1], I cannot. It doesn't show the trusted domains in the drop-down list on the permissions window, nor can I add them by entering test2Kdomain\user. Ideas? Thanks, Darcy [1] The one that's not working and three others are in Seattle, the last server is in New York and on a different subnet [2] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains
Bad atmospherics. They'll get you every time. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains Fixed the problem - by moving all recipients and connectors off the offending server (it wasn't the first in the site, thanks ghoddess!), uninstalling Exchange, replicating through the org, reinstalling Exchange 5.5 sp4 with the post sp4 MTA and RPC hotfixes (which is what was there before). I don't get it. Darcy -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains Did that, too. No static entries. This is really odd. You can assign access to *any* object on that misbehaving server to a user or group in the Test2Kdomain, but you can't assign permissions to any objects in Exchange if you're at that server. To *really* make it strange - if you go to another server in the testNTdomain, open up Exchange, and connect to Exchange on the troublesome server, you CAN assign permission to Exchange objects to users in the test2Kdomain. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains Look in WINS for incorrect static entries, especially for OD and OC entries, which signify domain controllers. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains Yes, on both the server and the WINS database. And yes, I can browse all domains from the 5th machine. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains Both on the server and in the WINS database? Can you browse from that machine? - Original Message - From: Darcy Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:12 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains That was my thought - my WINS/DNS guru has checked everything over, and hasn't found the problem. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains WINS. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains I've got an odd situation with an Exchange 5.5 server (Win2K, but in an NT4 domain) not seeing all of the trusted domains. I've checked the FAQ, the archives, and the Microsoft KB. Here's the situation: Exchange 5.5 organization in TestNTDomain with three sites/five servers (one or two servers per site) TestNTDomain trusts Test2KDomain (among others) I can see Test2KDomain in the logon options for all of the servers in TestNTDomain, even log on using a user from the Test2KDomain. On four of the five servers, I can log on with the Exchange service account (TestNTDomain\Exchange), open the Exchange admin tool, and grant permissions to any user in the trusted domains. On the fifth server, which is on the same subnet and has the same network configuration as three of the four that are working [1], I cannot. It doesn't show the trusted domains in the drop-down list on the permissions window, nor can I add them by entering test2Kdomain\user. Ideas? Thanks, Darcy [1] The one that's not working and three others are in Seattle, the last server is in New York and on a different subnet [2] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
NT Backup is BE Lite. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN Does NTBackup backup exchange faster than BE would I am just curious because I am looking for a way to improve our exchange backups (E2K, W2K, and BE 8.6) Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN BackupExec works really well, but let me suggest an alternative. Run NTBackup and backup Exchange to a disk file, then back that file up with a normal file backup from NetBackup. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN What backup/restore solutions are recommended for a large Exchange 2000 cluster running on an EMC SAN. We have been running netbackup for our Exchange 5.5 environment, and have been quite dissatisfied with its performance. Bryan Walbert agere systems Wintel Architecture, Engineering and Standards MS Exchange/Windows Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 610 712 5874 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Migration tools for GroupWise to E2K
I haven't done a GW migration for awhile and was wondering if anyone that has had a need for any 3rd party tools or did the MS tools work out ok? Which 3rd party tools are best based on your experience? 5000 users. tia, Charles _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No originator messages
Why are you accepting mail for nonexistent recipients? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karon Miller Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No originator mesages I know this has been talked about many times on here but is there any way to keep no orgininator messages from getting stuck in the outbound queue? I know that most of them are undeliverable messages usually all to Unknown Recipients but I see messages in the queue to people that haven't been here in 3 years. Is there anyway to block those or remove those before they can even get that far. I don't understand I guess why they're all going to no originator. I've tried to block them at the Trend server but no luck. Basically the Internet Mail Connector is just trying to notify the sender of these but can't. Any suggestions would be awesome. Thanks, Karon Miller E-Mail Administrator BSPMLAW [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No originator messages
What systems are in the path to your Exchange Server and what version of Exchange is it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karon Miller Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No originator messages Well, I don't know. I don't want to and that's why I was asking how not to. Why are you accepting mail for nonexistent recipients? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karon Miller Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No originator mesages I know this has been talked about many times on here but is there any way to keep no orgininator messages from getting stuck in the outbound queue? I know that most of them are undeliverable messages usually all to Unknown Recipients but I see messages in the queue to people that haven't been here in 3 years. Is there anyway to block those or remove those before they can even get that far. I don't understand I guess why they're all going to no originator. I've tried to block them at the Trend server but no luck. Basically the Internet Mail Connector is just trying to notify the sender of these but can't. Any suggestions would be awesome. Thanks, Karon Miller E-Mail Administrator BSPMLAW [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA E2k vs E55
how about http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/default.asp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of RBHATIA Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA E2k vs E55 Hi, Could someone tell me or point me to a resource on the web where I could compare the features of E2K's version of OWA to Exchange 5.5s version ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No originator messages
yes, am i missing something? I've been up all day. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: No originator messages Used Exchange much? On 1/22/03 13:13, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why are you accepting mail for nonexistent recipients? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karon Miller Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No originator mesages I know this has been talked about many times on here but is there any way to keep no orgininator messages from getting stuck in the outbound queue? I know that most of them are undeliverable messages usually all to Unknown Recipients but I see messages in the queue to people that haven't been here in 3 years. Is there anyway to block those or remove those before they can even get that far. I don't understand I guess why they're all going to no originator. I've tried to block them at the Trend server but no luck. Basically the Internet Mail Connector is just trying to notify the sender of these but can't. Any suggestions would be awesome. Thanks, Karon Miller E-Mail Administrator BSPMLAW [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No originator messages
and refuse [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is what I think she was accepting. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: No originator messages Exchange accepts mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 1/22/03 13:51, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes, am i missing something? I've been up all day. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: No originator messages Used Exchange much? On 1/22/03 13:13, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why are you accepting mail for nonexistent recipients? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karon Miller Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No originator mesages I know this has been talked about many times on here but is there any way to keep no orgininator messages from getting stuck in the outbound queue? I know that most of them are undeliverable messages usually all to Unknown Recipients but I see messages in the queue to people that haven't been here in 3 years. Is there anyway to block those or remove those before they can even get that far. I don't understand I guess why they're all going to no originator. I've tried to block them at the Trend server but no luck. Basically the Internet Mail Connector is just trying to notify the sender of these but can't. Any suggestions would be awesome. Thanks, Karon Miller E-Mail Administrator BSPMLAW [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No originator messages
I remember doing a 5.5 reg hack to stop NDRs for a customer way back when. I was looking for it on MS but can't find it. I know there was one but I can't remember the specifics. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No originator messages What we really need is a separate set of retry options for NDR's. Have it try an NDR once or twice and then give up without notifying your of its failure to deliver the NDR (instead of the normal retry sequence for real mail). TOm -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No originator messages Charles, I think what Chris is trying to say is, that's what an NDR is...REFUSING to accept mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED], because it doesn't exist, and trying to deliver notification of that fact to the original recipient. Exchange sends those notifications back to the originator with as the sender. What she's asking for is a way to eliminate sending NDRs to nonexistant return addresses, which is why she sees e-mail backed up in the outbound Q, addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], from . Many times, those SPAM e-mails are sent to what used to be legitimate SMTP addresses within the organization, but which have since been deleted, due to an employee leaving the company. Happens to me every day. So...Pete's initial suggestion to add the SMTP address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the Blackhole DL when the employee leaves the company, is a legitimate and very good suggestion. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No originator messages and refuse [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is what I think she was accepting. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: No originator messages Exchange accepts mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 1/22/03 13:51, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes, am i missing something? I've been up all day. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: No originator messages Used Exchange much? On 1/22/03 13:13, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why are you accepting mail for nonexistent recipients? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karon Miller Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No originator mesages I know this has been talked about many times on here but is there any way to keep no orgininator messages from getting stuck in the outbound queue? I know that most of them are undeliverable messages usually all to Unknown Recipients but I see messages in the queue to people that haven't been here in 3 years. Is there anyway to block those or remove those before they can even get that far. I don't understand I guess why they're all going to no originator. I've tried to block them at the Trend server but no luck. Basically the Internet Mail Connector is just trying to notify the sender of these but can't. Any suggestions would be awesome. Thanks, Karon Miller E-Mail Administrator BSPMLAW [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Users must login twice to OWA
The second prompt is probably for the public store. Did you specify it for the private and the public store? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Clishe, Jason Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Users must login twice to OWA Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. This is a brand new Exchange 2000 environment. When users access OWA, they are prompted for their credentials. Upon entering their credentials, they are immediately prompted again. After entering their credentials the second time, OWA works fine. Microsoft article Q324774 describes this problem and says the solution is to specify the default domain in the authentication tab of the Public virtual directory. I have done exactly as the article states, but users still must login twice. I have also done a Google search, but I haven't found any suggestions other than setting the default domain, as the MS article suggests. Any idea's? J a s o n C l i s h e Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help
That is the method. ~del removes the info from the header field. Check the header fields in the file. There must be data in each field identified in the header. A blank for a field is ,, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lloyd, D (Dave) Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 8:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help Hi all, With Exchange 5.5 SP4, what is the method of removing all SMTP addresses in bulk - ie using Directory Import? I've been given a csv by our HO with the entry ~DELSMTP: but all it gives me is errors on import. A google search seems to bring me stuff in foreign languages. The reason behing this request is that we are in the middle of migrating to E2K. The dist lists have been created and populated in 2K already. Now we are ready to hide the E55 ones and replicate the 2K ones back as custom recipients. I think we need to remove the SMTP address in order to have it in the custom recipient pointing to 2K. Since HO don't wake up for another few hours I hoped to get insight here. (And yes, this is in a lab first.) Thanks Dave == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction log reports
You are misinformed. All transacted databases have transaction logs. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Jeremy Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction log reports Hmmm, Transaction log is only related to MS-SQL and there no such thing as transaction logs for Exchange. Could you re-word your question please? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Transaction log reports eh? - Original Message - From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:22 PM Subject: Transaction log reports What is the best practice on extracting report info from E2k transaction logs or can it be done? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Access to Exchange Server
Unlikely the code update alone caused the current behavior. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cooke, Brian Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Access to Exchange Server Yeah that's what I figured. For some reason though this only happened when we migrated servers from NT to Win2k Advanced Server. I wasn't sure if any one had seen anything like this before. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Access to Exchange Server Then somehow your internal network is exposed. I would worry about other things besides people being able to access email using Outlook. - Original Message - From: Cooke, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:43 AM Subject: RE: Access to Exchange Server They are using the fat client. Outlook 2000 primarily. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Access to Exchange Server When you say they use Outlook, which version. The fat client, Outlook Express or OWA? - Original Message - From: Cooke, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:03 AM Subject: RE: Access to Exchange Server See that's what I thought as well. I even opened up a ticket with Cisco and went through our entire settings and they couldn't find any holes that would be allowing this type of access. Brian Cooke Systems Administrator U.S. Inspect -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Access to Exchange Server You mean they can get in from the Internet? Your firewall is misconfigured. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Cooke, Brian Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Access to Exchange Server I have a problem with access to our Exchange server. We are using Exchange 5.5 and have just migrated from NT 4.0 to Win2K Advanced server. The old server was also the PDC and it still is. Recently I realized that anyone with Outlook and internet access can access the server as long as they know the name or IP adress of the server, can authenticate to our PDC, and there is a mailbox for that user. This did not happen with our old server. We use a PIX 520 firewall so I contacted Cisco and they seem to think our firewall config is correct. Both the PDC and the Exchange server have external IP addresses and there is an mx record for the Exchange server. Anyone got any ideas? Thanks in advance, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting
RE: Opinions on the best message format.
It's common law. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darrin J. Carter Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I think that plain text is the way to go because of minimum hassle. But I'm dealing with 200 attorneys that like to ask why? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. Plain text. On 1/9/03 10:02, Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RTF. Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transaction log reports
What is the best practice on extracting report info from E2k transaction logs or can it be done? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction log reports
No, I am talking about the transaction logs. Can they be archived and used as a source of information for reporting purposes? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Transaction log reports Well, there are transaction logs, maybe you should have a look at all those .log files in your mdbdata directory. On second thoughtsyou'd better not :) However, charles may be referring to tracking logs, not transaction logs. G. - Original Message - From: Mark Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 9:38 AM Subject: RE: Transaction log reports Hmmm, Transaction log is only related to MS-SQL and there no such thing as transaction logs for Exchange. Could you re-word your question please? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Transaction log reports eh? - Original Message - From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:22 PM Subject: Transaction log reports What is the best practice on extracting report info from E2k transaction logs or can it be done? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction log reports
I haven't either Jim but I was included in a discussion with some Oracle folks and Oracle logs are a useful source of report info. Oracle has an email app and we were discussing it. You ever had any experience with it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of McBee, Jim Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction log reports Charles: I have never seen a tool for mining information from the transaction logs. The information in those logs would be information that only a mother could love. Specifically, mother-ESE. The transaction logs contain pages of data that will be written to the EDB or EDB/STM files; these pages correspond to the message information, but they may not be in any useful order, at least to mere humans. If you want to see a little more on the log files, you can use the ESEUTIL /M option to dump some info about the logs. AFAIK, Microsoft does not publicly publish any useful information on the contents of the log files or the ESE database. You are certainly not a newbie to Exchange or this list, so I know this is not one of those stupid questions. Did you have a specific goal in mind with this information. Any help? Jim -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:06 PM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Transaction log reports Subject: RE: Transaction log reports No, I am talking about the transaction logs. Can they be archived and used as a source of information for reporting purposes? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Transaction log reports Well, there are transaction logs, maybe you should have a look at all those .log files in your mdbdata directory. On second thoughtsyou'd better not :) However, charles may be referring to tracking logs, not transaction logs. G. - Original Message - From: Mark Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 9:38 AM Subject: RE: Transaction log reports Hmmm, Transaction log is only related to MS-SQL and there no such thing as transaction logs for Exchange. Could you re-word your question please? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Transaction log reports eh? - Original Message - From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:22 PM Subject: Transaction log reports What is the best practice on extracting report info from E2k transaction logs or can it be done? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction log reports
http://www.oracle.com/ip/deploy/cs/email/index.html?content.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Transaction log reports Tracking logs are generally the most useful source for Exchange reporting (not sure what one would glean that is useful from the transaction logs). Oracle has an e-mail application? On 1/9/03 18:38, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't either Jim but I was included in a discussion with some Oracle folks and Oracle logs are a useful source of report info. Oracle has an email app and we were discussing it. You ever had any experience with it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of McBee, Jim Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction log reports Charles: I have never seen a tool for mining information from the transaction logs. The information in those logs would be information that only a mother could love. Specifically, mother-ESE. The transaction logs contain pages of data that will be written to the EDB or EDB/STM files; these pages correspond to the message information, but they may not be in any useful order, at least to mere humans. If you want to see a little more on the log files, you can use the ESEUTIL /M option to dump some info about the logs. AFAIK, Microsoft does not publicly publish any useful information on the contents of the log files or the ESE database. You are certainly not a newbie to Exchange or this list, so I know this is not one of those stupid questions. Did you have a specific goal in mind with this information. Any help? Jim -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:06 PM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Transaction log reports Subject: RE: Transaction log reports No, I am talking about the transaction logs. Can they be archived and used as a source of information for reporting purposes? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Transaction log reports Well, there are transaction logs, maybe you should have a look at all those .log files in your mdbdata directory. On second thoughtsyou'd better not :) However, charles may be referring to tracking logs, not transaction logs. G. - Original Message - From: Mark Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 9:38 AM Subject: RE: Transaction log reports Hmmm, Transaction log is only related to MS-SQL and there no such thing as transaction logs for Exchange. Could you re-word your question please? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Transaction log reports eh? - Original Message - From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:22 PM Subject: Transaction log reports What is the best practice on extracting report info from E2k transaction logs or can it be done? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
DL it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available OK, this is a bug in the beta. If you burn it to CD it truncates some of the file names in the OMA folder. The solution is to DL the .EXE of Exchange, and extract to your HD, then install it from there. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 7:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available The only thing I find remotely like that are: Microsoft.Exchange.OMA.ExchangeDataProviderServerResources.Resources.dll And Microsoft.Exchange.OMA.ExchangeDataProviderServerResources.dll The top one EZ CD Creator tried to rename. I hade to change cd formats to UCF to make it stop. See if you have those 2 filenames the are located in Server\setup\i386\exchange\OMA\Browse\bin\en And Server\setup\i386\exchange\OMA\Browse\bin respectively -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available 9972 files and 407 folders... -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available How many files and folders from the server directory, including the server directory are there? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available I'm trying to install on Win2k SP3 server. It made it almost to the end. I am getting an error saying it needs a file called Microsoft.Exchange.OMA.Exchangedataproviderservice Any ideas on what it is looking for? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available The restrictions are with Ex5.5 and Ex2K not running on .NET 2003. Ex2003 will run on W2k with limited features or .NET with full feature support. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available I loaded using NET RC2. Worked just fine. Not sure about windows 2K - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 1:11 PM Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available Uh, no. I was trying to load it on .Net RC1. I'll give that a try. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available It says it runs on Windows 2000 with SP3. Is that what your trying to load it on. - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:52 PM Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available So I'm guessing you need .Net RC2 to install Titanium B2??? I cant get the install to believe that I have ASP.Net 1.1 for IIS installed. :( -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available Installing it now. Gee like waiting for Santa Claus to arrive. 495MB Geez - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 6:49 PM Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available MSDN subscription! -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available Does anyone know where I can download the 64 bit itanium version of .net. Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Mark Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 18:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available Care to give us a bit of a screenshot of OWA? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Failed to install SRS with error The distinguished name already exists...
Use ADSI edit. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Duane Purcell Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Failed to install SRS with error The distinguished name already exists... Yes there was a previous SRS on this server. I am also sure uninstalling exchange and demoting this domain controller (it's a backup server - no mailboxes), renaming the server and reinstalling exchange will allow me to create a new SRS - but I'd rather know the cause resolution. -Original Message- From: Mark H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 9 January 2003 12:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Failed to install SRS with error The distinguished name already exists... I have had this error when trying to create an additional SRS on a server that had had one previously. Is this what is happening in your case? It was during a call I had logged with Microsoft PSS. They looked up their version of the article (255703) and the engineers original notes but could offer no further information. I can't remember off-hand how we got round the issue but if you called PSS I would hope they do not charge you since it is their article that is at fault and not your interpretation. I'll ask my colleagues and if someone remembers what we did (other than installing an SRS on a different server) I'll let you know. rgrds Mark I am trying to install the SRS on a server and keep getting the error, The distinguished name already exists. Try the operation again. If the error reocurs, try stopping the directory service and the Administrator program and then restarting them. ID no: C1030B0C Exchange System Manager The only article I can find says I need to remove the distinguished name but does not provide any details on how to do this. Has anyone come across this before? Regards _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Skilled Engineering Ltd. The sender cannot guarantee that this email or any attachment to it is free of computer viruses or other conditions which may damage or interfere with data, hardware or software with which it might be used. It is sent on the strict condition that the user carries out and relies on its own procedures for ensuring that its use will not interfere with the recipients systems and the recipient assumes all risk of use and absolves the sender of all responsibility for any consequence of its use. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
The restrictions are with Ex5.5 and Ex2K not running on .NET 2003. Ex2003 will run on W2k with limited features or .NET with full feature support. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available I loaded using NET RC2. Worked just fine. Not sure about windows 2K - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 1:11 PM Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available Uh, no. I was trying to load it on .Net RC1. I'll give that a try. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available It says it runs on Windows 2000 with SP3. Is that what your trying to load it on. - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:52 PM Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available So I'm guessing you need .Net RC2 to install Titanium B2??? I cant get the install to believe that I have ASP.Net 1.1 for IIS installed. :( -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available Installing it now. Gee like waiting for Santa Claus to arrive. 495MB Geez - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 6:49 PM Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available MSDN subscription! -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available Does anyone know where I can download the 64 bit itanium version of .net. Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Mark Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 18:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available Care to give us a bit of a screenshot of OWA? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 5:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available OK. Who else got it installed? The OWA is just beautiful!! -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available I didn't set those policies. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 5:28 PM Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available I thought they wouldn't make it publicly available... -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 3:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/beta.asp -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event 9175 and 9200
Turn on auditing and see. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Marc Mearns Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 7:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Event 9175 and 9200 Roger Thanks I don't know what account is trying to sign in? Regards -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 January 2003 12:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Event 9175 and 9200 99% of the time, 80004005 is a permissions error. Make sure the account has all necessary rights. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event 9175 and 9200 Importance: High User Group 1. Exchange 2000 SP2 NT2000 SP2 2. The event error that we are getting are below: Event 9175 The MAPI call 'MAPILogonEx' failed with the following error: The MAPI call failed. MAPI or an unspecified service provider. ID no: 80004005-- followed by: Event 9200 Failed to perform MAPI logon. 3. I have looked on Technet and the first event seems to point to moving users. The problem seems to occur every night on our bridgehead or connector servers around 22:00. 4. I am wondering what process would could cause this to happen every night and has been happening for at least a month. Any positive input would be very much appreciated. Regards Marc Mearns Mobile - 07775-630508 Office - 020 7695 0286 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy confusion
And where does one locate that guy? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free/Busy confusion Use the Leagcy DN tool to make the changes if needed. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 6:05 PM Subject: RE: Free/Busy confusion Perhaps MS should have designed the move mailbox procedure in such a way that it would update the LegacyExchangeDN if mailbox is moved from one Admin Group to another. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 6:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy confusion It is probably not the intended design. Rather, it is probably a bit of deferred work that has been assigned a fairly low priority. There are a lot of ugly compromises in any complex product. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy confusion I have partially answered my own question - it has to do with the LegacyExchangeDN. I guess when a user gets moved from one server to another his/her LegacyExchangeDN does not change, even if the servers belong to different administrative groups. And it seems that LegacyExchangeDN determines which Free/Busy system folder that user is going to use. Is this a good design on Microsoft part? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy confusion I have Exchange 2000 with multiple administrative groups. A bunch of mailboxes have been moved from a server that belongs to one administrative group to a server in another administrative group. It seems that some of these mailboxes want to continue using the Free/Busy system folder on the old server. And if that old server is not available, they get the error that their free/busy info cannot be updated. So I have to make sure that they can reach the old server or replicate the free/busy folder from the old administratice group to the new server. Is this weird or what? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Email Blackhole
Was it the original and 1st server in the site? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brown, Mark Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 3 January 2003 22:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole My first guess is to look at the GWART and see what's showing as the actual options for SMTP message delivery (you can also look at the site addressing properties on the routing tab). That should tell you where the mail is going. Try forcing replication and then recalculating routing to see if the GWART changes. GWART is fine. It shows the workaround that I have put into place. Namely that Site2Exchange via a site connector to Site2 is the primary SMTP route and the secondary SMTP route is Internet Mail Connector on Exchange1. Pay particular attention to the address space assigned to the IMS, and also verify all IMS settings. Address space for the IMS is currently SMTP * 10 Organization. Prior to the workaround it was SMTP * 1 Organization. Internet email was working 100% with the first exchange server (Exchange)still in the site but with all services stopped. As soon as I deleted the server out of the site Internet email disappears into a black hole. It isn't getting delivered at all. Mark _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Email Blackhole
Did you move all the appropriate folders to the other server before you got rid of the 1st one? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brown, Mark Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole Yes -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 6 January 2003 10:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole Was it the original and 1st server in the site? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brown, Mark Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 3 January 2003 22:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole My first guess is to look at the GWART and see what's showing as the actual options for SMTP message delivery (you can also look at the site addressing properties on the routing tab). That should tell you where the mail is going. Try forcing replication and then recalculating routing to see if the GWART changes. GWART is fine. It shows the workaround that I have put into place. Namely that Site2Exchange via a site connector to Site2 is the primary SMTP route and the secondary SMTP route is Internet Mail Connector on Exchange1. Pay particular attention to the address space assigned to the IMS, and also verify all IMS settings. Address space for the IMS is currently SMTP * 10 Organization. Prior to the workaround it was SMTP * 1 Organization. Internet email was working 100% with the first exchange server (Exchange)still in the site but with all services stopped. As soon as I deleted the server out of the site Internet email disappears into a black hole. It isn't getting delivered at all. Mark _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Email Blackhole
Well, it goes somewhere! When users compose and send mail do messages stay in the users outboxes? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brown, Mark Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 4:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole I moved all folders including all hidden folders. I moved all connectors, I created a new IMS. I turned all the services off from the first server, ran like that for a week with no lost email. Site Connectors all work, Directory Replication all works, I can send internet email via another site. As soon as I deleted the first server in the site Internet Email stopped working. It doesn't go anywhere. Message Tracking shows the message being submitted by the user, but it doesn't go anywhere else. Mark -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 6 January 2003 10:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole Did you move all the appropriate folders to the other server before you got rid of the 1st one? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brown, Mark Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole Yes -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 6 January 2003 10:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole Was it the original and 1st server in the site? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brown, Mark Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 3 January 2003 22:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole My first guess is to look at the GWART and see what's showing as the actual options for SMTP message delivery (you can also look at the site addressing properties on the routing tab). That should tell you where the mail is going. Try forcing replication and then recalculating routing to see if the GWART changes. GWART is fine. It shows the workaround that I have put into place. Namely that Site2Exchange via a site connector to Site2 is the primary SMTP route and the secondary SMTP route is Internet Mail Connector on Exchange1. Pay particular attention to the address space assigned to the IMS, and also verify all IMS settings. Address space for the IMS is currently SMTP * 10 Organization. Prior to the workaround it was SMTP * 1 Organization. Internet email was working 100% with the first exchange server (Exchange)still in the site but with all services stopped. As soon as I deleted the server out of the site Internet email disappears into a black hole. It isn't getting delivered at all. Mark _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Email Blackhole
Likely a GWART issue. You probably need to cycle through and do recal/update in some orderly fashion in your org. How many physical ways do you have out to the Inet? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brown, Mark Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole No. From a users point of view the mail goes as normal. No bounced message. The external recipient never receives the email. I sent several messages to an external account of mine on Friday to test that haven't been received, I haven't received any bounced messages. If I track one of these messages I get Message Submitted by Mark Brown. That's it. It doesn't go anywhere else. If I track a message before the problem it gets submitted to the correct IMC and tracked properly. Mark -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 6 January 2003 10:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole Well, it goes somewhere! When users compose and send mail do messages stay in the users outboxes? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brown, Mark Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 4:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole I moved all folders including all hidden folders. I moved all connectors, I created a new IMS. I turned all the services off from the first server, ran like that for a week with no lost email. Site Connectors all work, Directory Replication all works, I can send internet email via another site. As soon as I deleted the first server in the site Internet Email stopped working. It doesn't go anywhere. Message Tracking shows the message being submitted by the user, but it doesn't go anywhere else. Mark -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 6 January 2003 10:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole Did you move all the appropriate folders to the other server before you got rid of the 1st one? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brown, Mark Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole Yes -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 6 January 2003 10:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole Was it the original and 1st server in the site? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brown, Mark Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 3 January 2003 22:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email Blackhole My first guess is to look at the GWART and see what's showing as the actual options for SMTP message delivery (you can also look at the site addressing properties on the routing tab). That should tell you where the mail is going. Try forcing replication and then recalculating routing to see if the GWART changes. GWART is fine. It shows the workaround that I have put into place. Namely that Site2Exchange via a site connector to Site2 is the primary SMTP route and the secondary SMTP route is Internet Mail Connector on Exchange1. Pay particular attention to the address space assigned to the IMS, and also verify all IMS settings. Address space for the IMS is currently SMTP * 10 Organization. Prior to the workaround it was SMTP * 1 Organization. Internet email was working 100% with the first exchange server (Exchange)still in the site but with all services stopped. As soon as I deleted the server out of the site Internet email disappears into a black hole. It isn't getting delivered at all. Mark _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection
Just curious, did this require a schema mod? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 5:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection I had all of that correct. It turns out I need the dn of an account that has read access to AD (which I thought was default for anyone). I originally put an account in, but not the accounts dn. Now that it is in, voila, it works. Thank for your replies. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 6:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection Correct - E2k no longer has an integrated directory, as it uses AD. Optimally, you'd point LDAP clients at a GC server, although I believe any DC would work. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 6:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection in an Exchange 5.5 no AD environment we just point ours at an Exchange server that has LDAP enabled on the default port. Have you tried that or does an Exchange 2000 server not keep its own copy of a directory since it is AD-enabled? I am not sure there . . . Chris - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:07 PM Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection If memory serves, you have to import a bunch of stuff into your Active Directory: new objects and things to support the HP unit. It may have even gone as far as modifying your schema (can't be sure on that). When we realized what was involved, we backed off in a hurry. That's mostly due to lack of confidence (our AD setup was quite new at the time), and a lack of any defined business need. All agreed that it would be nice to have, but then agreed that affecting the entire organization to benefit one department was a risk we didn't need to take. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:08 AM Subject: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection Has anyone used an HP 9100C Digital Sender connected to Active Directory before? I cannot get the darn thing to work. I have all all the parameters correct, but get No matching entries found when I do a search. I have the correct port (389), the correct IP of the GC server, and the search root is set to (DC=domain,DC=com). If anyone has any insight on this, I would gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E-mail in to China
Who hasn't? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Hanna Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail in to China RightFax has matured somewhat over the years. --steve -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail in to China Trials and Tribulation? Admittedly, this was several years ago, but I tested about four different fax-server products that integrated into exchange, the best (in my opinion) was Faxination... Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail in to China Bertha Venation? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drew Nicholson Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail in to China Faxination. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Aguet, Pierre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 4:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail in to China For all our business in China, after loosing hundreds of e-mails without any logical explanation other than Chinese Gvt filters, we made a policy to our sales persons to FAX ALL documents as well as they are sent to .CN recipients. Actually we are looking for a fax server to automate this process. HTH. Rgds Peter -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 8:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E-mail in to China I was wondering if anyone else is having issues sending and receiving emails with China (.cn) addresses. We have had several addresses over the last 4-6 months that we cannot send/receive email with. I watch it leave my server with no issues, we receive no errors, but the recipient never receives it. The same goes when they send to us, no errors, it leaves there server, but never arrives here, again no error on either end. The only way we have found to get around the issue for business to continue is to use a hotmail/yahoo account to correspond with them. Has anyone run into this? Does anyone have a suggestion of where to look next? Thanks, Ryan N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.XRite.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: MEC2003
It just says Microsoft Exchange Conference 97 and it is an ugly green color. I went to a couple of Washington conferences too but they were not quite the dog and pony shows at MECs. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 11:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 Depends on what you call the first MEC. The first conference called MEC was San Diego '98. The Austin '97 conference, which I call the first MEC, was actually called the Microsoft Exchange Deployment Conference. Isn't that what your shirt says?! But some might argue that there were earlier conferences in Bellevue, Washington. I didn't go to any of them, so I don't consider them to be the first MEC. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Marriott Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 Where/when was the 1st? Austin? I have a '97 shirt. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 MEC is history. Its going to be rolled into TechEd. http://msdn.microsoft.com/events/teched/ -Original Message- From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 6:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC2003 Does anyone know the dates and location for MEC2003? Bill Klosa Network Analyst PH: 773-338-1000 x2782 FAX: 773-381-4810 [EMAIL PROTECTED] SC Electric Company Chicago, IL USA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ex 5.5 / W2K
Can 5.5 be installed in a W2K native mode domain? tia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC2003
So, that was YOU! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Veld, Paul Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 I've got that T-shirt, too. That was in San Diego - my one and only MEC :-(. I remember it well because it was my first exposure to driving on the wrong side of the road :-). -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 18 December 2002 3:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 It just says Microsoft Exchange Conference 97 and it is an ugly green color. I went to a couple of Washington conferences too but they were not quite the dog and pony shows at MECs. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 11:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 Depends on what you call the first MEC. The first conference called MEC was San Diego '98. The Austin '97 conference, which I call the first MEC, was actually called the Microsoft Exchange Deployment Conference. Isn't that what your shirt says?! But some might argue that there were earlier conferences in Bellevue, Washington. I didn't go to any of them, so I don't consider them to be the first MEC. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Marriott Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 Where/when was the 1st? Austin? I have a '97 shirt. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 MEC is history. Its going to be rolled into TechEd. http://msdn.microsoft.com/events/teched/ -Original Message- From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 6:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC2003 Does anyone know the dates and location for MEC2003? Bill Klosa Network Analyst PH: 773-338-1000 x2782 FAX: 773-381-4810 [EMAIL PROTECTED] SC Electric Company Chicago, IL USA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC2003
Where/when was the 1st? Austin? I have a '97 shirt. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC2003 MEC is history. Its going to be rolled into TechEd. http://msdn.microsoft.com/events/teched/ -Original Message- From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 6:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC2003 Does anyone know the dates and location for MEC2003? Bill Klosa Network Analyst PH: 773-338-1000 x2782 FAX: 773-381-4810 [EMAIL PROTECTED] SC Electric Company Chicago, IL USA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tape Backup Questions
My favorite answer. It depends. Individual mailbox backup is a nice feature if you ever need to restore an individual mb FAST. It does make the backup take longer. I've used it in some smaller shops and it works fine. Check it out and see if it works in your situation. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Anderson Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 9:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tape Backup Questions Hello, In Exchange Aware tape backup programs, like the one bundled with Windows 2000 or Veritas Backup Exec, in the Tree of available drives and resources, it also shows Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes and the Microsoft Information Store. If the Mailbox store physically resides on the D Drive, what all do I need to check off to ensure that I properly backup the Exchange Message Store? Do I JUST want the Microsoft Information Store? Do I want that, AND D Drive? I am a bit confused here. I know that the Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes gives me the ability to backup individual users mailboxes - and that's something I would like to eventually do on a regular basis. But I have heard bad things about this too. Could an Exchange Guru please throw some good tips my way, as to what I should select (and not select) to ensure that all the proper datafiles are grabbed? Thank you all very much for any answers you can throw my way, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk
IMO FE/BE is simply a load balancing method by protocol. For an access point put ISA Server in the DMZ, OWA on a computer in the internal, and the Exchange store on another computer in the internal. Create web publishing rules on ISA Server for the OWA computer. Use a 3rd party to LB server publishing ISA Servers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 12:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Securing the OWA Kiosk One thing for sure that all users have to know is to make sure they close the browser window besides just logging off. Most do not even though a setting will tell the user to close the browser window. So maybe a product like Messageware would be OK. Also I would install some type of SSL security if OWA is going to be a major access point. Also if there are going to be many users using this type of access a Front-end/Backend solution is in order. - Original Message - From: Martin, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk On the common practice follow-up question, I should have been a bit more concise by indicating that my question relates to users who are connecting to our corporate email system via the Internet, not internal users. Jon -Original Message- From: Martin, Jon Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk Mark, Thanks - interesting audit. If we decide to go forward with allowing non-VPN clients access to Outlook we will take a closer look at the product. Is anyone aware of similar products? A question for the group on a related topic: is it common practice to allow non-VPN clients to access Outlook via OWA, or do most companies require at least a VPN connection? Jon -Original Message- From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk Jon, You could have a look at this OWA audit for some more details. Be aware that the document is useful, but the issues in it (as well as your #1) are handled by Messageware's SecureLogoff product. http://www.messageware.net/audits/owa.html -Original Message- From: Martin, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing the OWA Kiosk How are folks handling the following potential security risks using OWA from unsecured workstations, such as a kiosk or library environment? 1. Cached web pages, etc. on the workstation. User walks away without closing the browser, the next user has access to the previous users' email. 2. Stealth keyboard capture program grabs userids and passwords. It seems like there is a common train of thought about remote OWA that 'It is only email, what is the worst that could happen?' My take is someone who has unauthorized access to email can potentially: - Get people fired; - Get people arrested; - Get companies/people sued; - Cost companies/people money. Thanks . . . Jon Martin Systems Programmer East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Oakland, CA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: DMZ Options
A good thing to consider is ISA Server. FE/BE is really only designed for load distribution so having them both inside is fine with only ISA in DMZ. Then just publish Exchange on ISA. I think Exchange needs to be a Secure NAT Client. Just MHO. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darin Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 5:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DMZ Options We are on in the process of planning an exchange migration from GroupWise. We are looking at how the Front-End Design is going to be regarding OWA. I have read the Front-End Server Whitepaper and it appears that the best way is to have Users establish an SSL connection to a Front-End Server in a DMZ having only port 443 open on the Inter Fireall, then have IPSEC tunnel between the Front and Back-End Server having ports 51,50, 500/UDP and 88TCP/UDP open on the Intra Firewall. Another administrator had the idea of putting both Front and Back End Servers on the Internal Network and instead putting in an apache server in the DMZ and have the user create an SSL connection to the Apache Server, and then have that Server do a mod-proxy SSL connection to the Front-End Server. Therefore only having port 443 open on the Inter and Intra Firewall. Is this a better design in regards to security? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aelita products - Slightly OT
I have a BIG Exchange 2000 customer that is thinking Aelita EDR and Event Admin are going to be required to manage AD/EX2K and such. Anyone have experience with this stuff to share? tia Charles _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISA Server implementation for Exchange
Don't ever put ISA on a DC. (unless you create a separate forest) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Howard Griffith Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ISA Server implementation for Exchange Ok, here is the situation. I'm assigned to a project regarding Internet Security and I've been pushed into a corner and need some help. How are most people deploying ISA Server within their company? Are they adding it as a member of their AD domain or making it stand alone? Let me explain why I'm asking. Our company is looking at doing a more secure DMZ. For my part of the project I need to present a way to continue to allow access to our Exchange services to outside users, for this example, we'll say just SMTP and OWA. Ok, here is the catch. Even though we already have a checkpoint firewall in place on the outside border of the DMZ they feel that we should add another firewall on the inside border and put ISA between them as a stand alone box. While this will work, it's not exactly the best in my opinion. This is what I'm proposing but I need ammo to back it up. I'm telling them leave the Checkpoint where it is and use the ISA server as the inside border firewall and allow it to be a member of the AD domain. Put the web servers in the DMZ (their decision not mine) and allow me to publish my Exchange services with ISA to the outside world. Granted, even though this will all still be behind the checkpoint firewall, they don't like it. They want a completely disconnected DMZ. I've tried explaining the ins and outs about how ISA will do just fine and block everything the way it should and how we can do packet content level filtering but I'm still getting the you're wrong and stupid looks from them. Can somebody point me in the right direction for GOOD technical or political ammo to back up what I've recommended. Or am I whistling in the wind TIA, Howard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP banner
Is this from Exchange or IIS SMTP? (Or something else) Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 5.0.2195.5329 ready at Fri, 29 Nov 2002 05:09:04 -0700 tia Charles _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message path question
I have a new customer that has this setup. I don't know why, yet. :-) Senario: One Exchange 2000 Server which is NOT connected to the Internet. Users have Outlook 2002 and their profiles contain POP (from ISP) and Exchange with Exchange as default and Exchange mailbox as delivery location. Virus software is on clients with no virus software on Exchange Server. The customer was told their Internet email was being virus scanned before landing on Exchange. Question: When these users get their Internet mail using POP3 is it being scanned for viruses on their client machines before landing in their Exchange Server Mailbox?? tia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
offline defrag and 195 Gb store E2K
Having trouble removing whitespace from 195 Gb store. Is there an issue on DB size for this to work? tia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
eseutil issues with 195Gb DB?
I can't seem to remove about 30Gb of white space. You all know of any issues on this? tia, Charles _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connecting two forests
There are no trusts between forests, only between domains. Trusts between domains in different forests are explicit, created one way and nontransitive. Just like NT. :) User domain is trusted by resource domain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Putley Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Connecting two forests Can anyone outline the best practice for connecting two seperate forests with a trust Thanks Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AD/GC Clarification
You need at least one in a forest. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AD/GC Clarification Do Win2k AD controllers need to be GCs for Exchange to use them in a single domain environment? Tony Redmond's book says that all DCs in a single domain environment are effectively GCs - but do they need to be made GCs on the NTDS page for Exchange to use them? Thanks - I'm still getting up to speed with Ex2k. Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
