RE: Arcserve and restoring public folder calander
Hi Neil, I think it's a permissions error. Check that you have sufficient privileges to write to the public folder from the user running the backup. HTH cheers Rachel. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 June 2003 15:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Arcserve and restoring public folder calander I know this is a long shot because arcserve is so crap, but I was wondering if someone may have an answer :o Basically ive been backing up with arcserve the public folders, today I have needed to restore something. I have the exchange agent which as far as I know is correctly installed, everything checks out fine anyway. I do a restore by session, because I have given a serial number to all the tapes in my pool by day, so I choose 104, which would be Thursdays backup. I go to the public folders in the exchange agent, I choose Sellafield calendar, it says that it is just over 2 meg in size, I choose to restore to original location and click run. The backup job runs but comes up with this message :- E8603 Failed to write to database. (DBNAME=Public Folders\Sellafield Calendar, EC=EXCH Exchange Agent - (402) Exchange system error.) However, the backup seems to restore one item from the calendar. Ive tried running it for alternate destinations, but it just crashes. It appears that there is 2 meg of data backed up, yet it only attempts to restore 33KB? Is there any other way of getting data off this tape? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move Mailbox problem
Hi, have you tried leaving it for a while? I have the same thing here where the admin program becomes not responding but it is still working and if I leave it, it finishes correctly. Happens every time. HTH Rachel -- From: Tony McCarthy[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Move Mailbox problem Hi Everyone, I have a new Exchange 5.5 server which I want to promote to the first site server. It's all ready to go, so this morning I thought I'd start moving mailboxes with the Move Mailbox tool. For some reason the tool freezes after it completes about 32% of the operation. I have tried this on two mailboxes with the same result. They're not big mailboxes and are both under 40 MB each. Any ideas re this? Also, is there another tool I could use to move mailboxes? The new server is running Win2K Server(SP2) and all the latest patches. Regards Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Replace Exchange 2k Server
I believe you need to leave the old server up in order for the clients to be redirected to the new server. cheers Rachel -- From: Raji Arulambalam[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 11 April 2002 07:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Replace Exchange 2k Server Hi Many thanks for that. Did all those steps on a test environment, apart from steps #19 and #20, instead of which powered off the old server. The clients are unable to connect to their mailboxes using Outlook 2000. Any help.?? - Raji Arulambalam Systems Administrator Bay of Plenty REGIONAL Council P O Box 364 Whakatane. NEW ZEALAND -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 11 April 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Replace Exchange 2k Server Why does it have to have the same name? If you can use a different name, http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_appxa.htm -Original Message- From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 7:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Replace Exchange 2k Server We have a W2k native domain with Exchange 2k, SQL 2k and IIS all on one server. We are planning to upgrade that server to a better one. This new server _will_ have the same name as the old one. I want to use the Swing method of moving the Exchange Users between servers. Steps: Old server X 1. Introduce new server Y, join domain, make it a DC. 2. Install E2k on server Y. Move mailboxes etc. Rehome PF F/B etc 3. Remove the 1st Exchange server from server X. = Help here. article on how.?? 4. Transfer all 5 roles etc to Server Yswitch off server X; (demote server X first ??) 5. Build new server X, join domain, make a DC, change roles to here 6. Install E2k on server X, move every thing back to it. Wait a day. 7. Do step 4. All software that was on old server X is also installed on server Y and then back onto new server X. (E2k, IIS5, SQL2k,) Anybody do this before. ? Do you have any comments on this. ? Are there any documentation available on the correct procedures. ? TIA Raji Arulambalam Systems Administrator Bay of Plenty REGIONAL Council P O Box 364 Whakatane. NEW ZEALAND http://envbop.govt.nz ** This e-mail has been checked for viruses and no viruses were detected. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message has been swept for content and viruses. No viruses were detected. Contact the Helpdesk on extension 9CIS (9247) for assistance, if required. ** This e-mail has been checked for viruses and no viruses were detected. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Help
are you using netsecure to access the owa? Rachel -- From: Steve Iadarola[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 17 January 2002 15:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Help No. However, I am home now and I can log on through the OWA with the same machine that I kept getting asked for my credentials while on the LAN at work. It did take a few tried to log in. First try the OWA frames never loadedIt said that the pages could not be displayed (IIS Default page not found), I hit refresh and the NAV bar loaded. Hit refresh a third time and my inbox showed up. Any other thoughts? Oh, did I mention that it has always worked from a MAC. Even when no other client (Windows based) could connect to the OWA. Steve -Original Message- From: Stidley, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Help Do you have a proxy server or firewall between you and the OWA box? If so what? Joel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 sp3 on NT 4 SP6A IS Stops
Inoculan. I had the same problem, and by a process of elimination found that the only thing that would stop it re-occurring was to not use inoculan. It also just started happening out of the blue for me, and caused lots of problems because the store would not always restart after this error, and I had to restore. HTH cheers Rachel -- From: AJ Bruno[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 19 November 2001 20:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 sp3 on NT 4 SP6A IS Stops I have had this happen twice now and am trying to figure out what is causing the problem. The IS stops suddenly and I get the following message in the event log. Event Id 125 MSExchange IS 397 unable to create log file the Drive may be read only, out of space, misconfigured or corrupted, error-1032. I checked the permissions and the drive/directories are not read-only. There is 3.25 gb of free space. The server has been running for over 5 years without any major issues. During that time is has been running innoculan av software with the exchange agent and it hasn't caused a problem. What could be causing this? Thanks, Anthony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: It's not Microsoft's fault because....
what car did she have? I think I want one too! Good to hear she's okay. cheers Rachel -- From: Martin Tuip[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 14 November 2001 09:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: It's not Microsoft's fault because We're talking about safe cars here?? My fiancee survived a crash last week where she got hit in the back by an 18 wheeler .. Hit the tunnel wall and flipped over and walked away with a few bruises. Now .. I've done some researches on crashtests last week and apparently the Chrysler Voyager, the current model which costs twice the amount then my fiancees car was is nearly always fatal for the driver in a head-on collision so an expensive car doesn't mean it is safe also ;) Martin Tuip Exchange 2000 Listowner www.exchange-mail.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: It's not Microsoft's fault because What limit should they have put? $2,100? $20,000? So easy for you to make this call with 20-20 hindsight. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: It's not Microsoft's fault because Yeah, but is a 28MPH impact hard enough? Ford's Lee Iacocca's $2000 limit for the Pinto caused at least 500 people to burn to death needlessly. See http://www.mojones.com/mother_jones/SO77/dowie.html for more information. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: It's not Microsoft's fault because Everyone I've known who owned a Ford Pinto liked their car. Remember, the Pinto was a two-thousand-dollar car. Every car, even a Mercedes, will blow up if you plow into it hard enough. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: x400 addressing
As I understand it, Exchange uses the X400 addresses for internal addressing, and even if you'd never installed a X400 connector, they would still have X400 addresses. I think this is what Ed was saying. HTH cheers Rachel -- From: Engels PHAT[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 03 September 2001 10:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 addressing -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 8:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: x400 addressing Just remove them in Site Addressing. However, if you do so, people will stop getting their mail. All Exchange 5.5 recipients that you want to receive mail must have X.400 addresses defined. If you get rid of them, things stop working. This is regardless of the connector you are using to connect sites. I've removed the X400 connectors. In my opinion I should be able to remove the X400 addresses now. In case I never installed an X400 connector things will be working without a problem. How can I reach this Greetings Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Engels PHAT Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 10:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: x400 addressing Previously I've connected our Exchange Sites via the X400 connector. Due to some problems I want to get rid of the X400 addresses and therefor I've switched to the IMS. Exchange is still using the X400 addressing to send mail to recipients. See below. How get I prevent Exchange is using . In the logging on our virus scan machine, put behind the Exchange server I can prove if Exchange is still using these addresses. How can I get rid of them? Fri Aug 31 10:01:21 2001 MAIL RECEIVED: Received from IP address: 134.188.105.100 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MessageID: 999244881176 Size: 8244 bytes Fri Aug 31 10:01:22 2001 MAIL SENT: Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MessageID: 999244881176 Size: 8244 bytes Piet Engels Océ Technologies B.V. Postbus 101 5900 MA Venlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
