Re: XCH 2k3 public folders in mixed site
you only see the TLF. You cannot expand to see any underneath. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:46 PM Subject: RE: XCH 2k3 public folders in mixed site Please explan what you mean by cannot see. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: XCH 2k3 public folders in mixed site I have all my PF's homed on an Exchange 5.5 server in the same site as my first Exchange 2003 server. I have added the ADC for PF and replicated all PF's to the Exchange 2003 server as well. However, any mailbox moved to the Exchange 2003 server cannot see the Public Folders. I have modified the root PF permissions for Default -- Review and then we can see the root and then nothing else. Question is: if I modify all the permissions on the replicas on the XCH2003 server will the ADC then push them back to replicas on the XCH 5.5 server(s) and screw them up? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
XCH 2k3 public folders in mixed site
I have all my PF's homed on an Exchange 5.5 server in the same site as my first Exchange 2003 server. I have added the ADC for PF and replicated all PF's to the Exchange 2003 server as well. However, any mailbox moved to the Exchange 2003 server cannot see the Public Folders. I have modified the root PF permissions for Default -- Review and then we can see the root and then nothing else. Question is: if I modify all the permissions on the replicas on the XCH2003 server will the ADC then push them back to replicas on the XCH 5.5 server(s) and screw them up? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exchange 2003 ma!lbox move fa!lure
first xch 2003 server in xch 5.5 site. everything has gone by the book so far and first mailbox move went great from local 5.5 sp4 server to xch 2003 server. every move after that has failed with: item adsPath=LDAP://kaobrands.net/cn=Basrai\, Huzaifah,ou=Users,ou=SAP,dc=kbc,dc=kaobrands,dc=net class=user progress code=0 milliseconds=14625Preparing mailbox to be moved./progress - summary isWarning=false errorCode=0xc1041724 An internal processing error has occurred. Try restarting the Exchange System Manager or the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service, or both. I found two articles: one on having anti virus (none on server) and one on rebuilding the RUS. I have done that twice now and even let it sit over the weekend to no avail. Any others seen this or have suggestions? I have tried to move mailboxes using: ESM on mail server ESM on GC server DSA.MSC on mail server and GC server TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2003 OWA Operation
I felt really comfortable with 5.5 OWA and now am testing 2003 OWA I dont see much nuts and bolts docs so if anyone knows where some are I am grateful . . . If I go to: http://kbc-mail1/exchange/mailbox-alias I am prompted for authentication. When entered I get a PAGE NOT FOUND error If I then back out to: http://kbc-mail1/exchange it dumps me into the mailbox I was previously trying to authenticate to without asking again. Any ideas? Default WWW/SMTP/NNTP/ASP .NET; no extra compoenets/config that werent done by a default Windows 2003 install . . . Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2003 OWA Operation
that would be the Page Not Found. I understand why the browser is caching the logon info. - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:19 PM Subject: RE: 2003 OWA Operation What part of this is bothering you? The fact that you got Page not found error? Or the fact that you don't get prompted again when you are returning to the previously authenticated session? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 2003 OWA Operation I felt really comfortable with 5.5 OWA and now am testing 2003 OWA I dont see much nuts and bolts docs so if anyone knows where some are I am grateful . . . If I go to: http://kbc-mail1/exchange/mailbox-alias I am prompted for authentication. When entered I get a PAGE NOT FOUND error If I then back out to: http://kbc-mail1/exchange it dumps me into the mailbox I was previously trying to authenticate to without asking again. Any ideas? Default WWW/SMTP/NNTP/ASP .NET; no extra compoenets/config that werent done by a default Windows 2003 install . . . Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2003 OWA Operation
address generation is FLast. I also tried first.last as that is another SMTP address we manually create. No luck I get the best reults by just going /exchange no luck at all with /exchange/alias Chris - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:52 PM Subject: RE: 2003 OWA Operation And you are supplying the correct mailbox alias after the / ? Is your SMTP address generation format different from the mailbox alias? For example, do you have something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] for you SMTP addresses while your mailbox aliases are following the flast format? Try using the portion of SMTP address before the @ sign instead of the mailbox alias. For example if you SMTP address is [EMAIL PROTECTED], then use http://kbc-mail1/exchange/first.last Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 2003 OWA Operation that would be the Page Not Found. I understand why the browser is caching the logon info. - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:19 PM Subject: RE: 2003 OWA Operation What part of this is bothering you? The fact that you got Page not found error? Or the fact that you don't get prompted again when you are returning to the previously authenticated session? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 2003 OWA Operation I felt really comfortable with 5.5 OWA and now am testing 2003 OWA I dont see much nuts and bolts docs so if anyone knows where some are I am grateful . . . If I go to: http://kbc-mail1/exchange/mailbox-alias I am prompted for authentication. When entered I get a PAGE NOT FOUND error If I then back out to: http://kbc-mail1/exchange it dumps me into the mailbox I was previously trying to authenticate to without asking again. Any ideas? Default WWW/SMTP/NNTP/ASP .NET; no extra compoenets/config that werent done by a default Windows 2003 install . . . Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Error I had not seen before
Have fun!!! I get these a lot and they seem to be related to DNS name resolution . . . Same setup. 5.5 on WIndows 2000 Occasionally, mail *will* queue up in the MTA and then I have to go to the two servers that wont talk to each other and do an IPCONFIG /FLUSHDNS and then restart the MTA service for mail to flow again . . . - Original Message - From: Rosales, Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 10:31 AM Subject: Error I had not seen before Has anyone seen this error before: An Interface error has occurred. An MTABINDBACK over RPC has failed. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 92, NT/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error 1722. Bind error 0, Remote Server Name Servername, protocol String ncacn_ip_tcp:servername.lexgen.com[2069] [Base IL INCOMING RPC 36 507] (14) This is a weird error that I had not seen. Does anyone know where to start troubleshooting this? Message floww seems to be running properly. Any help would be appreciate it. Thanks, Mario *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2003 Disk Management vs 5.5
in 5.5 we always had 3 sets of disks (2 mirrors and a raid 5) for OS -- Logfiles -- Stores. in setting up my first 2003 server it doesnt seem to follow this paradigm . . . not that I see . . . or anything like a PerfWizard, etc. Does anyone know best practice for Exchange 2003 disk architecture? tia! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2003 Install Problems
the delegate authorty did it. thanks! - Original Message - From: Peter Orlowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 6:03 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Install Problems Who are you installing Exchange as? Try installing it as the user you specified as the Exchange Admin during the Forestprep/domainprep steps. You will probably need to delegate control to your user account as that superuser to be able to install Exchange 2003. This is what I had to do to install it into my 5.5 environment. - Peter -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2003 Install Problems I am installing the first 2003 server in a 5.5 site. I have done all the forest and domain prep work as well as the rest using the excellent guide they now have when installing Exchange 2003. BUT . . . when installing the server itself I get this error when trying to select the Messaging and Collaboration components for install: The component Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Servicfes cannot be assigned the action install because: - You either do not have permissions to complete this operation or Active Directory has not replicated all the necessary permissions for the deleted items container. Please check that you have the necessary permissions to modify Exchange components and that replication is complete before running setup. The account I am logged in with has domain admin rights in the parent domain and child domain (exchange getting installed in the child domain), enterprise domain and schema rights in the parent domain and Org and Site rights in the 5.5 Exchange site. I found KB article kb817378 which talks about having not run /domainprep in the parent domain, which I hadnt. Just /forestprep. So I went back and ran /domainprep as well. It then said I also had to configure RUS in the parent domain OR have a GC in the child domain. I have 1 GC in the parent domain and 2 GC's in the child domain. I tried to install RUS in the parent domain but on the second step of the wizard where you select the computer Exchange is running on is greyed out and I can do nothing but cancel. I am assuming this is as I dont have Exchange installed anywhere? Why would this be the fix then for not being able to complete an Exchange install? any ideas? tia chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder Permissions
I have an AD domain with a 2 way trust to an NT4 domain. The exchange 5.5 site has its service account in the nt4 domain and all mail servers are members of the nt4 domain. users in the ad domain have their accounts as primary's on their mailboxes. they also have reviewer permission on all public folders. however, whenever they try to open a public folder they get prompted for authentication. they are already authenticated to their mailbox and their mailbox has permission for the PF so I am not sure why they are getting prompted . . .? any ideas on how to correct? I cannot seem to nail this one . . . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2003 Install Problems
I am installing the first 2003 server in a 5.5 site. I have done all the forest and domain prep work as well as the rest using the excellent guide they now have when installing Exchange 2003. BUT . . . when installing the server itself I get this error when trying to select the Messaging and Collaboration components for install: The component Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Servicfes cannot be assigned the action install because: - You either do not have permissions to complete this operation or Active Directory has not replicated all the necessary permissions for the deleted items container. Please check that you have the necessary permissions to modify Exchange components and that replication is complete before running setup. The account I am logged in with has domain admin rights in the parent domain and child domain (exchange getting installed in the child domain), enterprise domain and schema rights in the parent domain and Org and Site rights in the 5.5 Exchange site. I found KB article kb817378 which talks about having not run /domainprep in the parent domain, which I hadnt. Just /forestprep. So I went back and ran /domainprep as well. It then said I also had to configure RUS in the parent domain OR have a GC in the child domain. I have 1 GC in the parent domain and 2 GC's in the child domain. I tried to install RUS in the parent domain but on the second step of the wizard where you select the computer Exchange is running on is greyed out and I can do nothing but cancel. I am assuming this is as I dont have Exchange installed anywhere? Why would this be the fix then for not being able to complete an Exchange install? any ideas? tia chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
5.5 IMC and Relay from IMAP session
I have an IMAP user on another network connecting to an Exchange 5.5 server. I want them to be able to use the same server to send mail as well. I have configured the IMC (5.5/sp4) with the accept connections (authenticate) and only from users homed on this server. their mailboxes are on this server. they can recieve fine but all outgoing mail gets the 550 relaying denied. I did the disable ESMTP registry hack hoping this would help with the KB article reference to the Cisco PIX firewall and not being able to handle the EAUTH command from ESMTP. No dice however. I have no way of contacting the owner of the network to see if a Cisco PIX even exists . . . any other suggestions? I dont want to just let the SMTP open in this day and age . . . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Logic Validation
Can someone double-check me? If I have another server in my ORG but in a different SITE, I should only have to create a SITE connector between it and ONE server in my site (a bridgehead) and NOT every server in my site for users to exchange mail . . .correct? TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
Thanks to everyone who helped! I finally found out the culprit. Something very stupid to boot. Almost 200 out of 500 mailboxes had their primary NT account changed to another person's NT account. It appears to be totally random as well. The first person I had to troubleshoot on had the correct NT account as a primary as he was already logged in to Outlook when the script ran. So I didnt pick up on that immedaitely. Then when he logged off and could not get back in . . . we were clued in. I suspect a rouge WSH script as the developers have been working on one to auto create mailboxes via a web interface. So you know my next question . . . anyone think of a way to track this down? I see the 200 Informational messages from the DS in the event logs about account properties being changed, but not by who or what. Any other suggestions? Obviously someone is hot to know how this happened . . . Thanks! Chris PS I know about doing that work on a Dev Domain/Exchange server . . . I warned them about that but was vetoed! :) - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:17 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes There has to be something logging when attempting to login to the mailbox. Did you look hard at the logs? From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:56:04 -0400 So nothing was changed on the servers? Was anything changed on those workstations? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:38 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes cannot find inbox for same users via OWA - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:34 AM Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes This may seem too simple but can they resolve the email servers name. Also try accessing via OWA is that ok. Everytime this comes up it is either a network problem or DNS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions that is the puzzling part . . . auth to different dc's mail on different mail servers different segments/switches on the network - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log on. NT 4 domain Windows 2000 sp 3 Exchange 5.5 sp4 all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs this started this morning have tried: new profile rebooting all dc's turning off nt auth in mail profile mapping the ipc$ to a mail server (says it doesnt exist but it is there) I dont see a named pipes binding as some articles suggest any other ideas Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
I like it! Chris - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:31 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Hold each developer by his ankles as you suspend him from the outside top floor window. That usally gets their attention. Or threaten them with an IMS interview. Or shoot the person who heads up them and have him explain why they are testing scripts on a live system. From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:23:00 -0400 Thanks to everyone who helped! I finally found out the culprit. Something very stupid to boot. Almost 200 out of 500 mailboxes had their primary NT account changed to another person's NT account. It appears to be totally random as well. The first person I had to troubleshoot on had the correct NT account as a primary as he was already logged in to Outlook when the script ran. So I didnt pick up on that immedaitely. Then when he logged off and could not get back in . . . we were clued in. I suspect a rouge WSH script as the developers have been working on one to auto create mailboxes via a web interface. So you know my next question . . . anyone think of a way to track this down? I see the 200 Informational messages from the DS in the event logs about account properties being changed, but not by who or what. Any other suggestions? Obviously someone is hot to know how this happened . . . Thanks! Chris PS I know about doing that work on a Dev Domain/Exchange server . . . I warned them about that but was vetoed! :) - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:17 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes There has to be something logging when attempting to login to the mailbox. Did you look hard at the logs? From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:56:04 -0400 So nothing was changed on the servers? Was anything changed on those workstations? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:38 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes cannot find inbox for same users via OWA - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:34 AM Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes This may seem too simple but can they resolve the email servers name. Also try accessing via OWA is that ok. Everytime this comes up it is either a network problem or DNS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions that is the puzzling part . . . auth to different dc's mail on different mail servers different segments/switches on the network - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log on. NT 4 domain Windows 2000 sp 3 Exchange 5.5 sp4 all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs this started this morning have tried: new profile rebooting all dc's turning off nt auth in mail profile mapping the ipc$ to a mail server (says it doesnt exist but it is there) I dont see a named pipes binding as some articles suggest any other ideas Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log on. NT 4 domain Windows 2000 sp 3 Exchange 5.5 sp4 all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs this started this morning have tried: new profile rebooting all dc's turning off nt auth in mail profile mapping the ipc$ to a mail server (says it doesnt exist but it is there) I dont see a named pipes binding as some articles suggest any other ideas Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
that is the puzzling part . . . auth to different dc's mail on different mail servers different segments/switches on the network - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log on. NT 4 domain Windows 2000 sp 3 Exchange 5.5 sp4 all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs this started this morning have tried: new profile rebooting all dc's turning off nt auth in mail profile mapping the ipc$ to a mail server (says it doesnt exist but it is there) I dont see a named pipes binding as some articles suggest any other ideas Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
yep. they can ping mail server . . . I will try the OWA - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:34 AM Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes This may seem too simple but can they resolve the email servers name. Also try accessing via OWA is that ok. Everytime this comes up it is either a network problem or DNS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions that is the puzzling part . . . auth to different dc's mail on different mail servers different segments/switches on the network - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log on. NT 4 domain Windows 2000 sp 3 Exchange 5.5 sp4 all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs this started this morning have tried: new profile rebooting all dc's turning off nt auth in mail profile mapping the ipc$ to a mail server (says it doesnt exist but it is there) I dont see a named pipes binding as some articles suggest any other ideas Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
everyone has the same dns settings due to dhcp would licensing give this error? I see nothing for either in the event logs on the dc or exchange server - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:34 AM Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes This may seem too simple but can they resolve the email servers name. Also try accessing via OWA is that ok. Everytime this comes up it is either a network problem or DNS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions that is the puzzling part . . . auth to different dc's mail on different mail servers different segments/switches on the network - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log on. NT 4 domain Windows 2000 sp 3 Exchange 5.5 sp4 all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs this started this morning have tried: new profile rebooting all dc's turning off nt auth in mail profile mapping the ipc$ to a mail server (says it doesnt exist but it is there) I dont see a named pipes binding as some articles suggest any other ideas Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
cannot find inbox for same users via OWA - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:34 AM Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes This may seem too simple but can they resolve the email servers name. Also try accessing via OWA is that ok. Everytime this comes up it is either a network problem or DNS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions that is the puzzling part . . . auth to different dc's mail on different mail servers different segments/switches on the network - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log on. NT 4 domain Windows 2000 sp 3 Exchange 5.5 sp4 all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs this started this morning have tried: new profile rebooting all dc's turning off nt auth in mail profile mapping the ipc$ to a mail server (says it doesnt exist but it is there) I dont see a named pipes binding as some articles suggest any other ideas Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
when we delete and then recreate the profile it resolves the mailbox with no problems. - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:37 AM Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes If ping works still try and put the IP address in the profile for the server name. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions yep. they can ping mail server . . . I will try the OWA - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:34 AM Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes This may seem too simple but can they resolve the email servers name. Also try accessing via OWA is that ok. Everytime this comes up it is either a network problem or DNS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions that is the puzzling part . . . auth to different dc's mail on different mail servers different segments/switches on the network - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log on. NT 4 domain Windows 2000 sp 3 Exchange 5.5 sp4 all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs this started this morning have tried: new profile rebooting all dc's turning off nt auth in mail profile mapping the ipc$ to a mail server (says it doesnt exist but it is there) I dont see a named pipes binding as some articles suggest any other ideas Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
we do have a trust but all these users are in the same domain as the exchange servers and primary accounts are theirs [the users] from this domain as well. The other is just a resource domain . . . - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:38 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes My only other guess is multiple domains running on trusts that are fouled up From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:37:06 -0400 everyone has the same dns settings due to dhcp would licensing give this error? I see nothing for either in the event logs on the dc or exchange server - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:34 AM Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes This may seem too simple but can they resolve the email servers name. Also try accessing via OWA is that ok. Everytime this comes up it is either a network problem or DNS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions that is the puzzling part . . . auth to different dc's mail on different mail servers different segments/switches on the network - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log on. NT 4 domain Windows 2000 sp 3 Exchange 5.5 sp4 all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs this started this morning have tried: new profile rebooting all dc's turning off nt auth in mail profile mapping the ipc$ to a mail server (says it doesnt exist but it is there) I dont see a named pipes binding as some articles suggest any other ideas Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Express yourself with MSN Messenger 6.0 -- download now! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_general _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
all are per seat let me try that - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:38 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes If you are running the Licensing Service, disable it. - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:37 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes everyone has the same dns settings due to dhcp would licensing give this error? I see nothing for either in the event logs on the dc or exchange server - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:34 AM Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes This may seem too simple but can they resolve the email servers name. Also try accessing via OWA is that ok. Everytime this comes up it is either a network problem or DNS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions that is the puzzling part . . . auth to different dc's mail on different mail servers different segments/switches on the network - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log on. NT 4 domain Windows 2000 sp 3 Exchange 5.5 sp4 all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs this started this morning have tried: new profile rebooting all dc's turning off nt auth in mail profile mapping the ipc$ to a mail server (says it doesnt exist but it is there) I dont see a named pipes binding as some articles suggest any other ideas Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
no dice - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:38 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes If you are running the Licensing Service, disable it. - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:37 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes everyone has the same dns settings due to dhcp would licensing give this error? I see nothing for either in the event logs on the dc or exchange server - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:34 AM Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes This may seem too simple but can they resolve the email servers name. Also try accessing via OWA is that ok. Everytime this comes up it is either a network problem or DNS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions that is the puzzling part . . . auth to different dc's mail on different mail servers different segments/switches on the network - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log on. NT 4 domain Windows 2000 sp 3 Exchange 5.5 sp4 all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs this started this morning have tried: new profile rebooting all dc's turning off nt auth in mail profile mapping the ipc$ to a mail server (says it doesnt exist but it is there) I dont see a named pipes binding as some articles suggest any other ideas Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
same result - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:41 AM Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes What if you run OWA on a different PC and try to log in as the user whose mailbox cannot be found? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes cannot find inbox for same users via OWA - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:34 AM Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes This may seem too simple but can they resolve the email servers name. Also try accessing via OWA is that ok. Everytime this comes up it is either a network problem or DNS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions that is the puzzling part . . . auth to different dc's mail on different mail servers different segments/switches on the network - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log on. NT 4 domain Windows 2000 sp 3 Exchange 5.5 sp4 all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs this started this morning have tried: new profile rebooting all dc's turning off nt auth in mail profile mapping the ipc$ to a mail server (says it doesnt exist but it is there) I dont see a named pipes binding as some articles suggest any other ideas Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
outbound m@!l F@ilure
any ideas on where to look? we forward to our ISP's outgoing smtp . . . we get incoming ok since yesterday afternoon no outgoing emails make it to their destination I can ping smtp forwarder from my IMC server nothing in any IMC queues nothing in any MTA queues on ANY server in our site Checking the site addressing table shows the right server as the 1 cost for smtp Our ISP says there is no problem there but doesnt see our mail go into their queues Using OE I can send email to my corp account and out through their smtp server. any ideas how to track or where this email may be going? No one has gotten an NDR or a delayed delivery message yet either . . . tia Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: outbound m@!l F@ilure
Update: I rebooted my IMC server and it now has 5000 emails sitting there in the MTA queue to the Internet Mail Server (same server) . . . they seem to be going down slowly since the reboot . . . All services were running prior . . . Has anyone seen this before? Chris - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 6:52 AM Subject: outbound [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] any ideas on where to look? we forward to our ISP's outgoing smtp . . . we get incoming ok since yesterday afternoon no outgoing emails make it to their destination I can ping smtp forwarder from my IMC server nothing in any IMC queues nothing in any MTA queues on ANY server in our site Checking the site addressing table shows the right server as the 1 cost for smtp Our ISP says there is no problem there but doesnt see our mail go into their queues Using OE I can send email to my corp account and out through their smtp server. any ideas how to track or where this email may be going? No one has gotten an NDR or a delayed delivery message yet either . . . tia Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: outbound m@!l F@ilure
I can do that. - Original Message - From: Jim Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 6:56 AM Subject: RE: outbound [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chris, Can you get to port 25 on the external smtp box from your IMC server? I am wondering if a firewall rule has been changed perhaps. Jim -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 August 2003 14:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: outbound [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] any ideas on where to look? we forward to our ISP's outgoing smtp . . . we get incoming ok since yesterday afternoon no outgoing emails make it to their destination I can ping smtp forwarder from my IMC server nothing in any IMC queues nothing in any MTA queues on ANY server in our site Checking the site addressing table shows the right server as the 1 cost for smtp Our ISP says there is no problem there but doesnt see our mail go into their queues Using OE I can send email to my corp account and out through their smtp server. any ideas how to track or where this email may be going? No one has gotten an NDR or a delayed delivery message yet either . . . tia Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XCH 5.5 DB Maintenance
But can the DB re-use that space for new storage without an offline defrag? - Original Message - From: Bendall, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:44 AM Subject: RE: XCH 5.5 DB Maintenance If you want to see how much space you have left in the database then have a look in the application event log for 1221. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 July 2003 16:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: XCH 5.5 DB Maintenance Yes, that is the way it's supposed to work. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: XCH 5.5 DB Maintenance Can someone confirm my thinking on this? I understood the db to convert deleted items/mailboxes, etc. to white space. when it does the IS maintence each night. From there, is the white space re-used as needed? This was my understanding . . . or will it not reclaim that white space for future use until a defrag is done. I have about 600 mb left on my priv.edb volume. I have moved about half of the mailboxes off of this server on to another to stave off any further growth. However, if the above is not true, this wont help me . . . having a 40gb priv.edb I am not looking forward to doing a defrag . . . :( at that point I would rather add on more disk . . . thoughts? tia!! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XCH 5.5 DB Maintenance
in other words, if the event 1221 from this morning says the private store has 6277 mb free and I have 600 mb free on disk then I have roughly 7 gb free space to work with? Chris - Original Message - From: Bendall, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:44 AM Subject: RE: XCH 5.5 DB Maintenance If you want to see how much space you have left in the database then have a look in the application event log for 1221. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 July 2003 16:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: XCH 5.5 DB Maintenance Yes, that is the way it's supposed to work. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: XCH 5.5 DB Maintenance Can someone confirm my thinking on this? I understood the db to convert deleted items/mailboxes, etc. to white space. when it does the IS maintence each night. From there, is the white space re-used as needed? This was my understanding . . . or will it not reclaim that white space for future use until a defrag is done. I have about 600 mb left on my priv.edb volume. I have moved about half of the mailboxes off of this server on to another to stave off any further growth. However, if the above is not true, this wont help me . . . having a 40gb priv.edb I am not looking forward to doing a defrag . . . :( at that point I would rather add on more disk . . . thoughts? tia!! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Removing Site
yes, but, this is the one and only server in the site, and once it is gone the site is. I didnt find anything that specifically addresses the *last* (but also the first! hee hee) server in the site, leaving the site up w/no servers, etc . . . - Original Message - From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:29 PM Subject: RE: Removing Site Have you read these Q articles? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;184535 XADM: Removing a Site from an Organization - You will be unable to delete a Site container using the Microsoft Exchange Server Administrator program. If you highlight the object and click the Edit menu, the Delete command is dimmed (unavailable). http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;152959 XADM: How to Remove the First Exchange Server in a Site - This article outlines the steps necessary to remove the first Microsoft Exchange Server computer installed in an Exchange Server site. In addition to any mailboxes and public folders, by default the first server in a site contains and is responsible... http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;235396 XADM: How to Determine the First Exchange Server Computer in the Site - This article describes how to determine the first Exchange Server computer in a site by running the Exchange Server Administrator program in Raw mode to assist you in troubleshooting many different System folder issues. You can perform this procedure... http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;152960 XADM: Reassigning Site Roles after Removing the First Server in an Exchange Site - The first server installed into an Exchange site by default is assigned several site-wide roles. These roles include: Routing calculation server Site folder server Default site folder replica server Offline Address Book generation server As a best... http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;189286 XADM: How to Delete a Server from a Site - When you use Microsoft Exchange Server, you may have to delete a server from the site. This article documents the procedure as well as the issues to be aware of when performing this task. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Removing Site I am killing the last server in SITE A in a 2 site ORG. If I kill the server and delete the site in Exchange then I have to re-create all the items that were in the GAL that were on that server, correct? I am not worried about the mailboxes but there were about 100 custom recipients. So best bet is to dir export the custom recipients from Site A and then import them into another container on Site B? Then I can delete Site A? Public folders are not a worry. Neither are any mailboxes that were in Site A. Only that the custom recipients that were in Site A are available to Site B after the fact. Sound right? TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Public Folders Disappear in Outlook
this what I have: server a (home server for pub folder its) server b (another instance for pub folder its) server d,e and f can see it (f being remote) server g cannot see it now, could yesterday and is remote servers d-g do not have instances of the pub folder on them on their priv is tab their pub folder server are all server a on the folder replication status tab under properties for pub folder its it says replication status column: in sync for server a local modified x/x/x for server b all other columns on this tab are blank except for that - Original Message - From: Couch, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 9:42 AM Subject: RE: Public Folders Disappear in Outlook Check the replica status of the PF's which have disappeared. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders Disappear in Outlook All the users that have mailboxes on a server at a remote physical location (but in the same Exchange site) in Exchange 5.5 SP4 all of a sudden this morning cannot see about 50% of the Public Folders via Outlook. I am pouring through KB articles but nothing so far. Any ideas? According to all no changes have been made .. . . Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GAL Question
absolutely - Original Message - From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:04 AM Subject: GAL Question Hello All. If you hide a mailbox from the Address book in the Exchange Administrator, can messages still be sent to it if you know the address? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folders Disappear in Outlook
All the users that have mailboxes on a server at a remote physical location (but in the same Exchange site) in Exchange 5.5 SP4 all of a sudden this morning cannot see about 50% of the Public Folders via Outlook. I am pouring through KB articles but nothing so far. Any ideas? According to all no changes have been made .. . . Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
ipconfig /flushdns - Original Message - From: Warren Cundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:06 PM Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem
do you also publish the exchange server through an ISA server for external RPC access? - Original Message - From: Warren Cundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 4:15 PM Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Thanks for this Roger. However the ping still doesn't work at 1400. Technet says not to set this below 1400, what else can I do? Thanks -Warren -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Nope. Not DNS. MTU size. Do a technet search on MTU (or check with your VPN client vendor if you're not using the built in client) and find out how to set the MTU to 1500 (we use 1400). Outlook has a nasty habit of setting the Do Not Fragment bit on communications, and sends it at the existing MTU size. The VPN client then encapulates the packet and adds to the packet size, exceeding the network's MTU. The first hop router then generates an ICMP reply basically saying the packet needs to be fragmented by DF flag is set (Don't Fragment Flag). You can test it with the following command while connected via VPN. ping -l 1536 -f ipaddress 1536 is the standard Ethernet MTU. Try dropping that to 1400 and seeing if it works. I'd bet that's your culprit. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem Hi guys, A few users are having an intermittent connectivity problem to Exchange server over a VPN connection. Here's what we're using: Exchange 2000 Sp3, Outlook 2002 Sp2 on the clients. When these users connect to our VPN, they can see/ping everything, including Exchange, but always have problems opening outlook. First they have to set their profile to manually control the connection and force an online connection. Even then they have to hit retry a few times, but it finally connects, although very slowly. I know DNS DNS DNS, but they can ping the Exchange server by name, and I even gave them entries in the HOSTS file for the local (internal VPN) address of the Exchange server... any thoughts here? Its driving me crazy. -W _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Anti Virus Feedback
Does anyone have any experience with Panda Anti Virus on the server (exchange or file) or desktop they would be willing to share? We are considering them as a product to use and I am looking for good/bad experiences. tia chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open Relay Suggestions
I am using Interscan Virus wall as my incoming smtp server on port 25; which then forwards my mail to the Exchange IMC on port 6000. I have been testing against open relay testers and I always fail the one or two tests where they spam my domain name. I am assuming this is because Interscan cannot look up usernames to see if the mailbox is valid? For that matter I dont think Exchange 5.5's IMC does either? Anyway to close this last hole? Suggestions? I worked hard to get off all the RBL's the last mail admin had gotten us on . . . tia chris RSET 250 web3: Reset State MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sender Ok RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Recipient Ok _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 5.5 Licensing
that is what I was told as well by my rep. It is now a CAL per device that connects. So if a person at one computer opens 5 mailboxes in Outlook it is only 1 CAL. - Original Message - From: Chinnery, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:31 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Licensing Some time ago (I believe it was last year), I listened to a webcast put on by Microsoft. During the Q A, one person asked the Microsoft rep what the licensing requirement would be for the following scenario: 5 Mailboxes all being accessed from 1 computer His answer: 1 license because only 1 machine was used. Which just goes to show, as had been said mb people much more experienced with Exchange than me, that it all depends on who you talk to and that you should always direct licensing questions to your Microsoft representative. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Licensing You need to have as many CALs (client access licenses) as you do users who will connect. As far as I know each user must have their own CAL. Terminal Services works the way you're suggesting, but not this. You might not be able to buy a 5.5 CAL anymore... You may have to buy Exchange 2000 CALs (isn't there a Exchange 2003 coming out? In that case buy THOSE CALs), since a CAL is backwardly compatible. Matt -Original Message- From: Stew Leonard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Licensing Can anyone explain how Exchange 5.5 licensing works. If we need to have 250 users mailboxes do we need 250 licenses? Is is based on concurrent users--for example if a company has 1000 mailboxes but at any point only 50 people are connected to the exchange server do you only need 50 licenses? Its a bit confusing, I am sure many of you will agree. We definitely want to make sure we do this the right way. Many thanks. Stew __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Monitor Email content
not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook 11 Reply to All
nope. Just my corporate exchange account . . . - Original Message - From: Diane Poremsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:32 PM Subject: RE: Outlook 11 Reply to All Do you have more than one account in your profile? If so, it's because outlook has a problem knowing who you are - it's a problem in older versions too. -Original Message- I have notice lately that when I do a reply to all I am now included in the reply to all . . . . Anyone noticed this? I know it is beta, but thought perhaps someone else had seen this? Reviewing GFI Mail Essentials v8 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook 11 Reply to All
although after some more observation it only seems to happen when I do a REPLY TO ALL from an external email address . . . - Original Message - From: Diane Poremsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:32 PM Subject: RE: Outlook 11 Reply to All Do you have more than one account in your profile? If so, it's because outlook has a problem knowing who you are - it's a problem in older versions too. -Original Message- I have notice lately that when I do a reply to all I am now included in the reply to all . . . . Anyone noticed this? I know it is beta, but thought perhaps someone else had seen this? Reviewing GFI Mail Essentials v8 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
XCH 5.5: Moving Mailboxes
If I move mailboxes from Server A to Server B do I destroy SIS for those mailboxes? I am running out of disk space for priv.edb on Server A but have buttloads (technical term) of room on Server B's disks. I know the db wont shrink without a offline defrag but this should potentially hedge against it getting bigger if all those moved mailboxes' storage space gets converted to white space in the db for the others to use? Make sense? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers
I asked my wife about this, since she is an attorney strapping on flame-retardent underwear and her opinion was that it is used for its insurance value. If you sent the formula for Coke to the wrong person by accident it is accepted by the courts that it is common sense that this person does not have the right to freely distribute this and that they should know they recieved it by accident. Adding the legal disclaimer at the bottom just gives the attorneys extra ammunition in case it goes to trial. Hey, not only should common sense tell you that you cannot redistrbute this but WE did too. - Original Message - From: Steve Molkentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 7:57 PM Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers Ben, I agree... Sadly, due to all the legal eagles rubbing their hands in glee over more work, and the fact that unless you tell someone not to, independent of the law, they can get away with it somehow, it's been stated that you have to tell them that they do not have permission to forward. sigh... I am looking forward to seeing any prosecutions out of it too... I guess it is designed to protect people like that whole thing in the UK with that lawyer talking about the taste of her boyfriend's... Umm... I don't think I need to complete that sentence. You know what I mean. Most legislation re: IT in Australia is knee-jerk at best. For example, they are currently discussing the legality of making spam illegal - but whose problem is it (ISP, sender, etc, etc, etc). But I think that all this is a whole other thread. themolk. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 19 June 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers Seems like that disclaimer (I do not give permission to forward) would be unnecessary. If the law requires express permission then the absence of any disclaimer wouldn't constitute permission and thus unless the message specifically said I *DO* give permission to forward it would be illegal to forward it. I'll be curious to know how many people they actually get prosecuted under this law. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 13:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers Scott, and others, I totally get your point, and to some degree agree. An interesting addition... The Australian federal govt recently (last year) passed legislation to say that it is illegal to forward and e-mail without the authors express permission. Thus, a whole NEW addition to the disclaimer in Australia is popping up, saying that the author DOES NOT give permission for the e-mail to be forwarded. I think, whether we like it or not, the disclaimer is here to stay... It is how we as Admins manage it. My additional $0.02 (inc GST). themolk. -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 19 June 2003 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers Well I am not a legal speagle by any means, but the disclaimer issue it bad joke. The true responsibility of who the message went to is in the hands of the sender. If the message was addressed correctly then the need for disclaimers would be a non-issue. Sorry I watched this thread long enough that I had to put my two cents in there. I find it hard that anyone should accept the burden of responsibility for receiving an electronic message that was sent to them by mistake. And those disclaimers that try to shift the burden of responiblity from the shoulders of the sender to the reciever are a sad attempt at just that. -Original Message- From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers What about Klingon and Elvish? Google is available in both, so people must speak it. Should we not then make disclaimers available in these languages too? themolk. -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 19 June 2003 12:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers About a billion people on this planet speak Chinese ... going to included that as well ? I like the fact you are going to add Dutch to the disclaimer, but
User Feedback on Quest Spotlight on Exchange
we are strongly considering purchasing Quest's Spotlight on Exchange for our 5.5 org. Any feedback from existing customers? The latest Beta seems a great blend of many tools . . . we wanted to go with MOM but it seems monitoring Exchange 5.5 is not an option . . . thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sharepoint 2001
Has any admins here worked with having Sharepoint 2001 crawl their public folders? I am trying to set this up and have all the Exchange Server info set but cannot find where to add the content source. Is there anyone that can help? Chris This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sharepoint 2001
Of course, five minutes after sending this I figured it out. Thanks to anyone who replied. Chris! This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:57 AM Subject: Sharepoint 2001 Has any admins here worked with having Sharepoint 2001 crawl their public folders? I am trying to set this up and have all the Exchange Server info set but cannot find where to add the content source. Is there anyone that can help? Chris This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd
if you know the answer to #4 let me know as all my exchange buddies want one . . . Chris - Original Message - From: Mark Rotman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 9:24 AM Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd 5. Did you see those great new Messageware OWA products 4. Where can I get one of those kewl MEC'Ed VIP shirts ;-) -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd 6. Just how many Exchange Administrators does it take to fill Room D171/175 ? Or, lets see what happens when we schedule our most popular Exchange sessions in the smallest rooms? This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com - Original Message - From: Anthony Sollars [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:28 PM Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd 7. Is that a Blackberry in your pocket, or are you just happy to be here? Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions 8. Wanna see my new Pocket PC ? - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:42 PM Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd 9. What the hell died in there? -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions 10 Is an 8-node Active Exchange 2003 cluster supported under VMWare on Windows XP ? - one attendee joking ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Searching User Mailboxes
Thanks for the suggestions. I will check them out. One person suggested OnTrack's product which looks really intriguing as well as its ability to do bricked restore from non-bricked backups. Licensing blows though. You have to license ALL mailboxes. Resource mailboxes too. And we easily have about 200 conference rooms and pieces of equipment with mailboxes. Thanks! My first drag to boot too! Thanks for a great party. Beer and cookies. Umm ;) Chris (The other white meat) - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:14 AM Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which potential litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make more sense than trying to restore x hundred tapes for compliance, I think KVS is probably a better long term solution. Sherpa is probably better for companies with shorter retention policies (generally) IMO. OT: Congrats on the fastest drag time. :) -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:25 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Searching User Mailboxes Subject: Searching User Mailboxes Does anyone know of a product that will crawl and index mailboxes on Exchange 5.5? I know Sharepoint and Index Server will do Public Folders, but I haven't heard of anything that will do mailboxes. Mainly, I am thinking, as there is no account that has permissions on all mailboxes by default . . . We are being subpoena for all emails from X years past dealing with X subject . . . Anyone know of one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd
6. Just how many Exchange Administrators does it take to fill Room D171/175 ? Or, lets see what happens when we schedule our most popular Exchange sessions in the smallest rooms? This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com - Original Message - From: Anthony Sollars [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:28 PM Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd 7. Is that a Blackberry in your pocket, or are you just happy to be here? Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions 8. Wanna see my new Pocket PC ? - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:42 PM Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd 9. What the hell died in there? -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions 10 Is an 8-node Active Exchange 2003 cluster supported under VMWare on Windows XP ? - one attendee joking ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Another MS move
totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . . Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server or MS AV for Exchange? :) This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: MS Purchase
totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . . Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server or MS AV for Exchange? :) This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MS Purchase
Sorry for the dupe, but I got an error on delivery the first time . . . guess you cannot trust those dang things! :) This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:51 PM Subject: OT: MS Purchase totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . . Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server or MS AV for Exchange? :) This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Searching User Mailboxes
Does anyone know of a product that will crawl and index mailboxes on Exchange 5.5? I know Sharepoint and Index Server will do Public Folders, but I haven't heard of anything that will do mailboxes. Mainly, I am thinking, as there is no account that has permissions on all mailboxes by default . . . We are being subpoena for all emails from X years past dealing with X subject . . . Anyone know of one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Searching User Mailboxes
Thanks Michael! That gets me close but two things wont work: One of the keywords we want to search on is less than 5 characters and this only seems to search the subject line, not the text of the message . . . Chris - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 9:23 AM Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes ISSCAN -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Does anyone know of a product that will crawl and index mailboxes on Exchange 5.5? I know Sharepoint and Index Server will do Public Folders, but I haven't heard of anything that will do mailboxes. Mainly, I am thinking, as there is no account that has permissions on all mailboxes by default . . . We are being subpoena for all emails from X years past dealing with X subject . . . Anyone know of one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: OneNote Help
Sorry for the off-topic . . . anyone that went to Tech Ed . . . they gave out Office 2003 beta kits in the ask the experts area. Tall orange/yellow kits that also has the OneNote beta. I lost the cd key for the OneNote beta which is different from the Office 2003 beta key Anyone have the kit that could shoot me the key? much thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Friday Haiku
Here! Here! I had a wonderful time as well! many thanks Chris . . . Chris - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 9:31 PM Subject: RE: Friday Haiku I'm never going to wash my MessageOne shirt ( not that I wash any of them). Thanks to MessageOne and Chris for a great party and a memorable night. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday Haiku Actually, there are 2 shirts The one that Chris is talking about is from the MessageOne party at SpeedZone on Sunday night. It has the TechEd 2003 logo with a nice red X over TechEd and a handwritten MEC above it. Very nice. The one I was referring to was from the Aelita booth. It just has Exchange Guru written on it in nice big letters. Also very nice, but unfortunately, handed out willy-nilly, and therefore, not as cool. I think that some of the people that I saw wearing them could barely spell IT -Original Message- From: Mark Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:03 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Friday Haiku Subject: RE: Friday Haiku Got a pix of that shirt you can share with us? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Friday Haiku I have to tell you all I have never had a shirt generate so much interaction for me!! I am curious if anyone else had similar experiences . . . 1. exactly 6 people offered to buy the shirt off of me. 2. exactly 9 different people at the party last night had pictures taken with my shirt. And I mean my shirt. I had to turn around so they could be photographed standing next to the back of it. 3. At the expo yesterday someone from MS approached me and asked me why I found it necessary to cross out Tech Ed on my shirt. He seemed to think I made this shirt up just for myself and not that it was a group shirt and was quite dismayed. As if this was my personal political statement. I told him it was given to me at a party for a group of Exchange admins; not a personal vendetta, etc. Of course, I said, as long as you are here I am disappointed you canceled MEC and don't disagree with the back of the shirt. And went on with my grievances . . . :) In the end he thanked me! :) Chris - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:02 AM Subject: Friday Haiku What have I learned here? I need a wireless toy No, not one like that I want to check mail While sitting in a session I want better toys Drunk geeks aren't pretty Not enough girls for them all They need cold showers Walking around here All these Exchange Guru shirts Most cannot spell it Some sessions were good Other sessions were long naps I still hate clusters. stemy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935
Re: Friday Haiku
I have to tell you all I have never had a shirt generate so much interaction for me!! I am curious if anyone else had similar experiences . . . 1. exactly 6 people offered to buy the shirt off of me. 2. exactly 9 different people at the party last night had pictures taken with my shirt. And I mean my shirt. I had to turn around so they could be photographed standing next to the back of it. 3. At the expo yesterday someone from MS approached me and asked me why I found it necessary to cross out Tech Ed on my shirt. He seemed to think I made this shirt up just for myself and not that it was a group shirt and was quite dismayed. As if this was my personal political statement. I told him it was given to me at a party for a group of Exchange admins; not a personal vendetta, etc. Of course, I said, as long as you are here I am disappointed you canceled MEC and don't disagree with the back of the shirt. And went on with my grievances . . . :) In the end he thanked me! :) Chris - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:02 AM Subject: Friday Haiku What have I learned here? I need a wireless toy No, not one like that I want to check mail While sitting in a session I want better toys Drunk geeks aren't pretty Not enough girls for them all They need cold showers Walking around here All these Exchange Guru shirts Most cannot spell it Some sessions were good Other sessions were long naps I still hate clusters. stemy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed?
all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no
changes on either box. One here and one in the UK.
both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail.
both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue
articles I can find dont apply.
All are in DNS
Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i
have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone.
any ideas?
VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :(
TIA
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains
with properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet
caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can
TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever
implemented the network here to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday,
June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
At: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
. ryi rrr ZZvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
right now I am in the exchange transport lecture in the ultra-crowded
D171-175 which has been packed to the gills for every exchange session :(
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: TechEd
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;257679 ?
Where are you by the way?
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: TechEd
Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed?
all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no
changes on either box. One here and one in the UK.
both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail.
both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue
articles I can find dont apply.
All are in DNS
Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i
have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone.
any ideas?
VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :(
TIA
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance
gains
with properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet
caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can
TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever
implemented the network here to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
Wednesday,
June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
At: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
. ryi rrr ZZvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
unfortunately this is an all 5.5 site . . . no Exchange 2000 yet . . .
I have found 3 or 4 Q articles with the exact event id messages, but the
resoution doesnt apply.
They either say Exchange 2000 or one said DNS is in error, which it is not,
etc.
Where are you?
Chris
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: TechEd
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;257679 ?
Where are you by the way?
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: TechEd
Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed?
all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no
changes on either box. One here and one in the UK.
both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail.
both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue
articles I can find dont apply.
All are in DNS
Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i
have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone.
any ideas?
VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :(
TIA
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance
gains
with properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet
caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can
TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever
implemented the network here to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
Wednesday,
June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
At: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
. ryi rrr ZZvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
If I can do a successful rpc ping and normal ping; which I can; I would think routing would be okay; but obviously something is amiss . . . - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:44 PM Subject: RE: TechEd But IF the HOSTS file has been modified, then ping could work and 5.5 routing could fail. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:37 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd These are in the same site. They can ping each other (was that by FQDN?) and have RPC communication confirmed. - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:40 PM Subject: RE: TechEd I just left that room... Slam packed and my feet were falling asleep. Had to get up and move around I'll be coming back down in a min for the next session... I'll be the one wearing the grey PSS Superior Kung Fu shirt... Yeah, DNS is first suspect. If its 5.5 then I'd put a HOSTS file in place on each one (to be certain to eliminate DNS, which is not 5.5's first method of name resolution). What are the exact error codes within the events? stemy -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed? all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no changes on either box. One here and one in the UK. both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail. both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue articles I can find dont apply. All are in DNS Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone. any ideas? VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :( TIA Chris - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM Subject: RE: TechEd No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains with properly implemented MS technologies... Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet café. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever implemented the network here to please CJ -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: RE: TechEd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
you can have mine but I am at my hotel now. If youre near the Wyndham Market
Center feel free to grab it.
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:42 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
Anyone got a spare pass for the IT Pro party tonight...
Got the Developer party pass and forgot to pick up the IT pro party
pass...
Those SQL people are a bit too weird for me :(
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
I just left that room... Slam packed and my feet were falling asleep. Had
to get up and move around
I'll be coming back down in a min for the next session... I'll be the one
wearing the grey PSS Superior Kung Fu shirt...
Yeah, DNS is first suspect. If its 5.5 then I'd put a HOSTS file in place
on each one (to be certain to eliminate DNS, which is not 5.5's first method
of name resolution). What are the exact error codes within the events?
stemy
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04,
2003 4:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: Re: TechEd
Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed?
all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no
changes on either box. One here and one in the UK.
both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail.
both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue
articles I can find dont apply.
All are in DNS
Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i
have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone.
any ideas?
VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :(
TIA
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance
gains
with properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet
caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can
TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever
implemented the network here to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
Wednesday,
June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
At: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
. ryi rrr Z Zvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+--xm ,)r( \y'i)l+-rrW{jxVmyzrvi
. ryi rrr ZZvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Two Unusual Outlook 2002 Problems
in server 2003 a lot of IE is disabled by default. Could that have something to do with it? I know IE and Outlook share a lot of components. - Original Message - From: Martin, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:59 PM Subject: Two Unusual Outlook 2002 Problems Recently I reconfigured my production workstation from scratch to include: - Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition; and - Office XP with sp2 This replaces a Windows 2000 Advanced Server with Office 2000 SR-1. Now I am getting two weird problems (so far) with Outlook 2002. 1. My ability to modify Outlook folder permissions now consists of modifying the Default permissions, and adding users to the list of those who have permissions. I cannot modify any permissions (except Default) and I cannot delete users from the list of those who have permissions. This is true of my individual mailbox folders, and also Public Folders. Essentially, almost everything is grayed out. 2. Every time I go to modify the current view of a folder (like add a field) using the View - Current View - Customize Current View etc. routine I get a Microsoft Outlook has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience. message, after which Outlook restarts. I can modify things by using the Field Chooser tool, or by dragging fields off the board. This is a pretty vanilla install; it has only been in production for two days. If I go back to an Outlook 2000 install I have on another Windows 2000 box everything works normally. Any ideas? Thanks . . . Jon Martin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trend Micro Interscan SMTP settings
I have two Trend Micro Interscan SMTP servers as my incoming gateways for mail. When I run them through http://www.rbl.jp/svcheck.php I pass all tests but the second and third from the last where they try passing an address of [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mydomain.com. I am trying to configure Interscan so that I pass all tests. Has anyone had experience with these 2 exploits and will they even work? If you want to see an example to see what I mean my smtp servers are: mail.jergens.com and mail4.jergens.com. TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Trend Micro Interscan SMTP settings
what version are you running? I am using 3.53 build 1493 thanks! - Original Message - From: Stevens, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:14 AM Subject: RE: Trend Micro Interscan SMTP settings I too run interscan, but pass all the tests...not sure exactly why you don't, but wanted to let you know that it is possible for all tests to pass. not much help I know. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend Micro Interscan SMTP settings I have two Trend Micro Interscan SMTP servers as my incoming gateways for mail. When I run them through http://www.rbl.jp/svcheck.php I pass all tests but the second and third from the last where they try passing an address of [EMAIL PROTECTED]mydomain.com. I am trying to configure Interscan so that I pass all tests. Has anyone had experience with these 2 exploits and will they even work? If you want to see an example to see what I mean my smtp servers are: mail.jergens.com and mail4.jergens.com. TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PF Advice
just got done with PSS and they were preyy much able to nail it. we have about 7 gb in our public folders so when I added another replication server en-masse with pfadmin it was still performing all the replication. Since the users on mailserverA already had a replica there was nothing to update. Users on mailserver2 never had a replica and were pointing to themselves to resolve public folders. so I was faced with letting the replication run its course or pointing them to mailserverA to get public folder info. I did the latter and am just waiting for it to be past 5PM EST so I can stop/start the info store to make the change take place. next time I shall add replicas/rehome in chunks! This is the other reason this didnt show up in my tests. My test were on small little chunks of folders, not the whole Hierarchy :( Live and learn Chris - Original Message - From: John Matteson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:44 PM Subject: RE: PF Advice If you are running Exchange 2K SP 3 you will need the Post SP3 rollup package as well. There is a problem that I just got through working with PSS that had to do with PF's from server one and three being seen, but PF's homed on Server 2 never showed up on Server 1 and server 3. Public Folder Hierarchy and Data messages were being sent, just they got vaporized between the Categorizer and the Advance Queue Engine inside InetMail. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PF Advice If users on mail server A can see public folders homed on that server and replicated to mail server B all on the same subnet (all about 10 feet away from each other). Users on mail Server C (same subnet and server room) can only see about half of them. Is this a Directory Services refresh I need to do? Something else? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PF Advice
I always forget to mention . . . . XCH 5.5 SP4 all servers in same site. :) - Original Message - From: John Matteson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:44 PM Subject: RE: PF Advice If you are running Exchange 2K SP 3 you will need the Post SP3 rollup package as well. There is a problem that I just got through working with PSS that had to do with PF's from server one and three being seen, but PF's homed on Server 2 never showed up on Server 1 and server 3. Public Folder Hierarchy and Data messages were being sent, just they got vaporized between the Categorizer and the Advance Queue Engine inside InetMail. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PF Advice If users on mail server A can see public folders homed on that server and replicated to mail server B all on the same subnet (all about 10 feet away from each other). Users on mail Server C (same subnet and server room) can only see about half of them. Is this a Directory Services refresh I need to do? Something else? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder Orphans
I was removing replicas of my public folders from one server. all public folders were replicated to ajc-mail3 and ajc-mail1 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all delete ajc-mail3 yes then added a new server as we are removing ajc-mail3 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all add kbc-mailpf yes once finished, I realized there were four lone folders that were replicated ONLY on ajc-mail3 Now they appear to be orphaned. I can see them but cannot access them. is there a way to get them back without a restore from backups? I cannot find an article that says yes, only how to set permissions on orphaned public folders. any ideas? hindsight being what it is I realize I should have done those two operations in reverse order. Doh! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder Orphans
I was removing replicas of my public folders from one server. all public folders were replicated to ajc-mail3 and ajc-mail1 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all delete ajc-mail3 yes then added a new server as we are removing ajc-mail3 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all add kbc-mailpf yes once finished, I realized there were four lone folders that were replicated ONLY on ajc-mail3 Now they appear to be orphaned. I can see them but cannot access them. is there a way to get them back without a restore from backups? I cannot find an article that says yes, only how to set permissions on orphaned public folders. any ideas? hindsight being what it is I realize I should have done those two operations in reverse order. Doh! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Public Folder Orphans
How can I remove the Orphaned PF? I thought I saw that article somewhere but now I cannot find it . . . :( - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:04 AM Subject: Re: Public Folder Orphans They need to be restored from backup. On 3/6/03 7:43, Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was removing replicas of my public folders from one server. all public folders were replicated to ajc-mail3 and ajc-mail1 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all delete ajc-mail3 yes then added a new server as we are removing ajc-mail3 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all add kbc-mailpf yes once finished, I realized there were four lone folders that were replicated ONLY on ajc-mail3 Now they appear to be orphaned. I can see them but cannot access them. is there a way to get them back without a restore from backups? I cannot find an article that says yes, only how to set permissions on orphaned public folders. any ideas? hindsight being what it is I realize I should have done those two operations in reverse order. Doh! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Public Folder Orphans
thanks! I have it now. Didnt show up on my technet cd and when I did support.ms.com I was using orphaned. Once I used Orphan I got it. Support.ms.com can be cagey that way sometimes! Appreciated. Chris - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:33 AM Subject: Re: Public Folder Orphans http://support.microsoft.com search = orphan public folder On 3/6/03 8:19, Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I remove the Orphaned PF? I thought I saw that article somewhere but now I cannot find it . . . :( - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:04 AM Subject: Re: Public Folder Orphans They need to be restored from backup. On 3/6/03 7:43, Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was removing replicas of my public folders from one server. all public folders were replicated to ajc-mail3 and ajc-mail1 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all delete ajc-mail3 yes then added a new server as we are removing ajc-mail3 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all add kbc-mailpf yes once finished, I realized there were four lone folders that were replicated ONLY on ajc-mail3 Now they appear to be orphaned. I can see them but cannot access them. is there a way to get them back without a restore from backups? I cannot find an article that says yes, only how to set permissions on orphaned public folders. any ideas? hindsight being what it is I realize I should have done those two operations in reverse order. Doh! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PF Advice
If users on mail server A can see public folders homed on that server and replicated to mail server B all on the same subnet (all about 10 feet away from each other). Users on mail Server C (same subnet and server room) can only see about half of them. Is this a Directory Services refresh I need to do? Something else? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PF Advice
Sorry, yes all same site. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:12 PM Subject: RE: PF Advice The public folder hierarchy (as opposed to content) is replicated through the directory replication mechanism. Therefore, if you have an inconsistent directory, you could have a replication problem. You didn't say whether these servers are in the same site or not; if they are in different sites, you should check directory replication between sites and how public folder affinity is set. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PF Advice If users on mail server A can see public folders homed on that server and replicated to mail server B all on the same subnet (all about 10 feet away from each other). Users on mail Server C (same subnet and server room) can only see about half of them. Is this a Directory Services refresh I need to do? Something else? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PF Advice
Also, they can see the folders just not the complete (or sometimes none) of the content. All are folder owners. All users with mailboxes on the other mailservers in the same site can see all the content. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:12 PM Subject: RE: PF Advice The public folder hierarchy (as opposed to content) is replicated through the directory replication mechanism. Therefore, if you have an inconsistent directory, you could have a replication problem. You didn't say whether these servers are in the same site or not; if they are in different sites, you should check directory replication between sites and how public folder affinity is set. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PF Advice If users on mail server A can see public folders homed on that server and replicated to mail server B all on the same subnet (all about 10 feet away from each other). Users on mail Server C (same subnet and server room) can only see about half of them. Is this a Directory Services refresh I need to do? Something else? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bulk Public Folder Replication?
PFADMIN [Switches] Profile SETREPLICAS Folder Option Server(s) [Option Server(s)]... [YES|NO] pfadmin tool Chris - Original Message - From: Uso [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 8:00 AM Subject: Bulk Public Folder Replication? Hi, is there an easy way to replicate a large number of public folders to another server or do I have to click each single one and configure a replica? appreciate your help. regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stripping MIME Header
If a firewall smtp filter (say, WatchGuard) was stripping the MIME Headers off of all outgoing emails, would this effectively strip off the attachments? Ever since our partner company installed this firewall we can get no attachments from them. The logs show: [10.54.200.13:1508 216.141.241.27:25] removing unknown or denied header Received 837348 02/07/03 16:42:53 smtp-proxy[12849] [10.54.200.13:1508 216.141.241.27:25] removing unknown or denied header X-MS-TNEF-Correlator 837358 02/07/03 16:42:53 smtp-proxy[12849] [10.54.200.13:1508 216.141.241.27:25] removing unknown or denied header X-Mailer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adding Graphics to the GAL
Does anyone know of a way or a product that allows you to add a JPG, GIF or BMP to a custom tab on a users entry in the Address Book? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection
in an Exchange 5.5 no AD environment we just point ours at an Exchange server that has LDAP enabled on the default port. Have you tried that or does an Exchange 2000 server not keep its own copy of a directory since it is AD-enabled? I am not sure there . . . Chris - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:07 PM Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection If memory serves, you have to import a bunch of stuff into your Active Directory: new objects and things to support the HP unit. It may have even gone as far as modifying your schema (can't be sure on that). When we realized what was involved, we backed off in a hurry. That's mostly due to lack of confidence (our AD setup was quite new at the time), and a lack of any defined business need. All agreed that it would be nice to have, but then agreed that affecting the entire organization to benefit one department was a risk we didn't need to take. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:08 AM Subject: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection Has anyone used an HP 9100C Digital Sender connected to Active Directory before? I cannot get the darn thing to work. I have all all the parameters correct, but get No matching entries found when I do a search. I have the correct port (389), the correct IP of the GC server, and the search root is set to (DC=domain,DC=com). If anyone has any insight on this, I would gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DHCP Server on Exchange Server
Has anyone ever experienced any problems with running a DHCP server on an Exchange server? Windows 2000, SP3; Xch 5.5, Sp4 One small local scope with 70 ip leases. I dont see anything wrong on the surface. Any bad experiences or knowledge? Much Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOTALLY OT: Mac RDP Client??
I know OT but you all know a lot and I am at my wits end trying to find a RDP client that works on a Mac OS before OS X. Anyone heard of one? Much Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Absolute file protection
stand-alone windows 2000 or .net server in a workgroup with all local accounts. add specific user rights only to each folder leave off admin account uncheck inherit permissions uncheck take ownership - Original Message - From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:30 AM Subject: OT: Absolute file protection Am I missing any options? Objective: set up server folder / storage area for access by specified users only (no admin access allowed) in the NT / WIN2K server environment. Options, from worst to best: * Set up a folder with access allowed for specified users only. This will not work in our environment because the admins for the domain can take ownership of any folder. * Set up a separate server and domain with the specified users the only admins. The specified users would have to maintain the domain (and server). Also, with physical access to the server, knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could access the separate server and domain. * Use the password options of Word, Excel and other applications. There are software packages that can crack into these files. * Share a folder on the PC of one of the specified users. Anyone on the LAN with enough knowledge, time, and effort could hack into a shared folder. * Use available software packages to make files in a folder encrypted. Knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could compromise such files. * Store the files on an offsite third party system. It could be made difficult for anyone beyond the specified users to know that this type of storage arrangement had even been set up. Admins of the third party may be able to access the information. Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mass Create Public Folders
Is there a way to mass create a public folder structure in Exchange 5.5 SP 4? PFAdmin? I didnt see anything in the /help or through searches of the MS KB or Google . . . Anyone done this? TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Suppressing the envelope
At least in Outlook XP Tools Options Preferences EMail Options Advanced EMail Options Show an Envelope Icon in the System Tray - Original Message - From: Darcy Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 5:32 PM Subject: Suppressing the envelope I've looked for this off and on an never had any luck finding it. Now we have an application server that is being shared, and folks are complaining that the envelop icon is appearing multiple times when they use Outlook via this server. Here's the question: Is there some way to suppress the envelope icon that shows up in the task bar when new mail comes in? Many thanks! Darcy Adams Sr. Exchange Administrator Getty Images 601 N. 34th Street Seattle, WA 98103 Tel 206-925-6617 Cell 206-255-0169 http://www.gettyimages.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VPN breaks Outlook
That happens to me too now. Dont depress me further . . . - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 8:41 AM Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook I think its still the same in W2k as well - an h-node WINS client will check hosts and a DNS server last even if you have enabled DNS for Windows Name Resolution to resolve *netbios* names. Specific apps like Outlook, etc. of course use hosts and DNS first. Heck, I could be wrong, I havent looked it up. The only thing I am sure about anymore is that college-aged girls are starting to call me Sir. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook I believe that was changed with Win2k - the behavior you describe is 100% correct NT4 and before. I can't remember if that's been a strictly observational thing or if I read it somewhere, but I believe I read it somewhere. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 7:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook If however, you are using Netbios over TCP/IP and WINS for name resolution, HOSTS and DNS are the *last* things attempted. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Nope - first match wins. In the case of Win2k, however, HOSTS comes before LMHOSTS, so it seems to win. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov;innerhost.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook usually HOSTS overrides them all. [1] maybe because LanManager smells a little of IBM ? :) -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook No. LMHosts is for LanManager[1] name resolution. More properly called NetBIOS name resolution[2], i.e. when WINS isn't available and broadcast won't cut it. Hosts is for host resolution, more commonly served by DNS servers. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA [1] I got in trouble last time I said ththat word in front of an MS employee. [2] You call it maize, we call it a pain in the arse. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: VPN breaks Outlook LMHOSTS files are for your connected on a public network (internet) and HOSTS for when connected on a private. - Original Message - From: RBHATIA [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:17 AM Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Is it the LMHOSTS file or the HOSTS file ? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook yes you should use the lmhost file on the client pc to map to your exchange server thats what we use here at my office and it works good. If you need more help dont hesitate to email me. rich -Original Message- From: JPC [mailto:jpciocon;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN breaks Outlook Hi, folks: Mixed mode, currently migrating users from 5.5 to E2k. Remote users have Outlook 2002 on W2k Professional laptops and Alcatel PERMIT/Client. These users connect via dial-up, they can access their mailboxes and send/receive no problem. When they use LinkSys router and DSL, they can access our network, the internet and other network resources EXCEPT for their mailboxes on the E2k server. Synchronization failure messages are related to network problems preventing access to the Exchange server or the RPC message box retrieving data from Exchange server.
Re: MEC 2002 comments?
I had breakfast in there a couple of mornings. If you saw a tall bald guy with two screaming kids, that was me! :) - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:50 AM Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? That's why we all had breakfast at the Marriot in the AM. Ham Scrambles. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:ntpro;woh.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC 2002 comments? I have been to several Tech Eds and the last MEC. Content-wise I thought this one was great, especially with more 2000 experience under everyone's belt and more to talk about and report on. It seemed they skimped on all the extra's that us geeks (or just me perhaps) like so much such as: -- Something HOT for breakfast (I kinda liked the different mexican spin you could put on breakfast each day in Dallas) -- A conference shirt I didnt have to jump through hoops for (and then they ran out of them on Friday. This I paid $2K for). And what happened to Attendee Party shirts?? But I did get a stuffed Monkey after five shots at that damned basketball hoop!! :) -- Classes (lectures?) that REPEAT as there were overlaps of good content in EVERY time slot. Repeat at off hours if you like for those of us interested. -- Food still sucks but I realize it is hard to cook well for 6000 people. -- Attendee party blew compared to the last couple at Universal Studios were you had access to the whole park and food from the park; not catered crap. I loved only getting to ride 4 different adult rides all night. Had I paid $99 for my wife to go I would have been LIT! -- Wireless access still needs A LOT of work. You think they would make it more pervasive and add more AP's. If youre going to do it and Cisco is going to be a sponsor, DO IT RIGHT. At the Cisco conferences the wireless is rock solid and never fails. My 2 cents and of course I will be at Tech Ed next year for my 2 days of abbreviated infrastructure content! - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:20 AM Subject: MEC 2002 comments? Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying Have you seen Missy?. I tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry. I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all. For the record: - the party was better than Dallas - the party food was better than Dallas - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned zucchini. - the venue was a lot better than Boston BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd 2003! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MEC 2002 comments?
I have been to several Tech Eds and the last MEC. Content-wise I thought this one was great, especially with more 2000 experience under everyone's belt and more to talk about and report on. It seemed they skimped on all the extra's that us geeks (or just me perhaps) like so much such as: -- Something HOT for breakfast (I kinda liked the different mexican spin you could put on breakfast each day in Dallas) -- A conference shirt I didnt have to jump through hoops for (and then they ran out of them on Friday. This I paid $2K for). And what happened to Attendee Party shirts?? But I did get a stuffed Monkey after five shots at that damned basketball hoop!! :) -- Classes (lectures?) that REPEAT as there were overlaps of good content in EVERY time slot. Repeat at off hours if you like for those of us interested. -- Food still sucks but I realize it is hard to cook well for 6000 people. -- Attendee party blew compared to the last couple at Universal Studios were you had access to the whole park and food from the park; not catered crap. I loved only getting to ride 4 different adult rides all night. Had I paid $99 for my wife to go I would have been LIT! -- Wireless access still needs A LOT of work. You think they would make it more pervasive and add more AP's. If youre going to do it and Cisco is going to be a sponsor, DO IT RIGHT. At the Cisco conferences the wireless is rock solid and never fails. My 2 cents and of course I will be at Tech Ed next year for my 2 days of abbreviated infrastructure content! - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:20 AM Subject: MEC 2002 comments? Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying Have you seen Missy?. I tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry. I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all. For the record: - the party was better than Dallas - the party food was better than Dallas - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned zucchini. - the venue was a lot better than Boston BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd 2003! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shutting Down 5.5
I have seen arguments both ways and am interested in the list's perspective. My predecessor here has it drilled into everyone that you have to use his batch script to stop Exchange services in a certain order. I know the info store stopping cleanly is the biggest one you want. Has anyone seen or use something like this to shut down the services in a certain order vs. letting NT take them down in the dependency order upon shutdown? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Survivors at MEC
I am! If you hear anything shoot the list a message! - Original Message - From: Ali Wilkes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 8:55 AM Subject: Survivors at MEC I put a folder in the public folders, however: Anyone staying over tonight? I heard a rumor last night about a survivors party. Info, Ideas? Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
XCH 5.5 Routing Objects
Does anyone have experience with using the routing objects for workflow in XCH 5.5? I have been able to find little on MS other than a KB on installing the Routing Wizard. Anyone have links, pointers and/or experience? TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XCH 5.5 Routing Objects
Nebermind! Forgot the nefarious Google search! :) Chris - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:50 AM Subject: XCH 5.5 Routing Objects Does anyone have experience with using the routing objects for workflow in XCH 5.5? I have been able to find little on MS other than a KB on installing the Routing Wizard. Anyone have links, pointers and/or experience? TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SPAM Utilities
We are using Surf Control's Email Filter product after using Trend. I found Trend's EContent Manager to be a pain. We use them for everything else though with great results mostly. Surf can either send no messages, or any combination of messages/content you configure. We send a simple message to a public folder where the subject line is the to: ($R) variable, from: ($S) variable and subject ($B) variable. Then if a user thinks they are not getting mail that the SMAM filter is catching they can quickly scan through the folder and check for it. They then call the helpdesk and release it if it is business-related. Chris - Original Message - From: James Casstevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 12:42 PM Subject: SPAM Utilities Lately, our School District has been getting more and more SMAM e-mails. We are currently using Scan Mail for Exchange 5.5 and the e-manager part to filter out SMAM which leaves a lot to be desired because when a user gets a SMAM e-mail, it is deleted (about 50%) of the time, however the user, in addition, gets a message that states The original message content contained a virus or was blocked due to blocking rules and has been removed. We have discussed the problem with Trend, and they seem to have no way to prevent the user from receiving this additional message. So what is the difference in a user getting SPAM or a user getting a message saying that your SPAM has been deleted? Isn't the whole idea to limit the number of e-mail messages to those that which have some meaning to the user. My question to the group is: is there anyone using a product out there that they are pleased with and that is preventing SPAM from getting to the end user, that does not send additional mails to the user telling them that their SPAM has been deleted? Any advise and or guidance on this topic would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. James J. Casstevens Network Administrator Napa Valley Unified School District Napa, CA 94558 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
I have not done any clustering nor have much XCH 2000 experience but if it is worth anything I am at MEC right now and so far 3 speakers over 3 days on HA have said to stick with active/passive and avoid active/active. Chris - Original Message - From: Imran Iqbal [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 2:35 AM Subject: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering We are currently an Exchange 5.5 site, as part of our move to Exchange 2000 I am considering setting up Exchange on a 2 node Active Active cluster and would be interested in hearing anyone views or real world experiences with similar setups. Each server would have about 800 active users and would probably be connected to a SAN for the shared storage. I have heard that there were memory issues with this setup pre SP3. I would like to know if there are any other problems and if it is worth doing Thanks in advance Imran _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMTP to aol.com
This is my personal address. I guess I should have made clear I am the postmaster for jergens.com. I receive the list at my work address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but cannot send from it as we attach a text file disclaimer a la Trend Micro so the list wont accept emails from that account. We are about to switch to Surf Control for SPAM and they can do an inline footer so I may not have to worry about it much after that. Thanks though! Chris - Original Message - From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 12:17 PM Subject: RE: SMTP to aol.com I hate to be the bearer of bad news Bubba, but according to this query at SamSpade.org, you're still being blacklisted by the Fiveten list: http://www.samspade.org/t/rbl?a=WOH.RR.COM -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: SMTP to aol.com I feel your pain. I have been working for close to 6 months now to try to solve that problem. We have reverse DNS. You dont get a NDR; nothing, it just never gets there. If I telnet into their smtp server all goes okay but again the mail never shows up in the recipient's inbox and I have tried quite a few. I finally found a website that had us listed as a blackhole and got removed from it. I even talked to AOL (703-265-4670 - postmaster line) and they ran a check on my subnet against their database and it came up clean. So we are still looking for an answer. Believe me I would rather NOT send to AOL but we sell to the consumer and our customer service dept. gets emails everyday from a domain containing 12 million users -- aol.com. :( - Original Message - From: Daniel L. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:38 PM Subject: SMTP to aol.com What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMTP to aol.com
I feel your pain. I have been working for close to 6 months now to try to solve that problem. We have reverse DNS. You dont get a NDR; nothing, it just never gets there. If I telnet into their smtp server all goes okay but again the mail never shows up in the recipient's inbox and I have tried quite a few. I finally found a website that had us listed as a blackhole and got removed from it. I even talked to AOL (703-265-4670 - postmaster line) and they ran a check on my subnet against their database and it came up clean. So we are still looking for an answer. Believe me I would rather NOT send to AOL but we sell to the consumer and our customer service dept. gets emails everyday from a domain containing 12 million users -- aol.com. :( - Original Message - From: Daniel L. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:38 PM Subject: SMTP to aol.com What would cause my messages to AOL addresses to be rejected by AOL? I can send reliably to any other domain. Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stripping email addresses
I am far from a programmer so if this is obvious a thousand humble pardons!! Is there a way to programmatically strip email addresses from a bunch of emails posted to a Public Folder? We have a SPAM Submissions Folder where users can send emails that make it past our SPAM guard to be added to the database. Right now I manually open each one and copy the email address to a text file. Can anyone think of a way to automate this? TIA! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stripping email addresses
I certainly see your point. I was hoping there was the ability to create a piece of VBScript or something I could execute from my machine against a public folder. As for the second point I dont really understand . . . almost anything would be preferable to the manual process . . . - Original Message - From: Dupler, Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:41 PM Subject: RE: Stripping email addresses Are you sure that you want to do this? As with any tool that is automagic, it can be used maliciously. Consider to what other ends it might be put. In effect, you would be converting every person with access to that folder with censorship powers. A bigger problem might be that you would get exactly what you have asked for . . . -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stripping email addresses I am far from a programmer so if this is obvious a thousand humble pardons!! Is there a way to programmatically strip email addresses from a bunch of emails posted to a Public Folder? We have a SPAM Submissions Folder where users can send emails that make it past our SPAM guard to be added to the database. Right now I manually open each one and copy the email address to a text file. Can anyone think of a way to automate this? TIA! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lyris Experience?
I am running a mailing with Lyris Listserver and I have a mail oddity going on. Mails dont get delivered to anyone on my list with an @aol.com domain. If I open up Outlook Express on the same server and deliver the mail by sending to my ISP's SMTP server the mail gets to the AOL user. If I deliver using Lyris whether direct DNS delivery or sending on to same SMTP server for forwarding the mail never gets to the AOL account. The server has a DNS registration as well as a PTR record (list.jergens.com). When I had the domain name (jergens.com) entered under the computer name - advanced tab, the Outlook Express send would fail as well. Once I removed that, the Outlook Express send works now but the Lyris send is still failing. Anyone have any ideas? TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MEC
I am in! Also, if anyone is interested my boss signed up but now cannot go (shucky darn!) but since he cannot refund he is selling his pass for $700. This also includes the early bird day too I believe. He also has a reservation at the Hotel connected to the convention center the lucky person could assume as well. If there are any takers, let me know. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 Features
Does anyone know if in Exchange 2000 you can turn on/off OOO replies/autoresponders to the internet on a per mailbox basis? I have been looking through the marketing fluff but have not seen it mentioned. TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
