RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server

2003-12-01 Thread David N. Precht
Living dangerously, eh? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server

1960? Are you sure? That's 5.5 w/o any service pack.


-Original Message-
From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 3:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server


Sorry, 5.5 Build 1960.5.

-Original Message-
From: Kevinm v1.3. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 28 November 2003 17:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server

You in 5.5 ??

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Dixon
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 4:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Phantom email address in Exchange Server

I'm trying to add the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
Administrator tells me that the address is already in use in the
organisation.

If I send a test email to the address, I get a System Admin message
informing me that the address does not exist.

Does anybody know what I can do to remove the phantom reference?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

2003-11-22 Thread David N. Precht
But...
A preliminary investigation by Microsoft indicated that the issue occurs
only with Kerberos authentication disabled, which the vendor said is
uncommon. "We recommend that our customers ensure that Kerberos
authentication is enabled, which is the default configuration,"
Microsoft said in a statement Friday. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?


This has taken a new turn...
http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/11/21/HNmsflaw_1.html 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff,
Michael
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

Not that I am aware of.  My boss just passed it on to me.  I'm not a
participate in that list.  I just thought it was odd since that would be
a huge flaw and Microsoft or anyone for that matter has said nothing.   

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

All seriousness aside, I know nothing about this issue.  

I'm inferring from the other responses to this thread that if two MVPs
have no knowledge of the issue it probably doesn't exist.  

Mike W: Were there any follow-up posts on NTBUGTRAQ about this?  

> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> 
> 
> I saw a posting about it on NTBUGTRAQ.COM.  Some guy had to shut off
> OWA indefinitely because of the issue.
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > 
> > 
> > So you have seen this?
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
> > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 8:12 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > 
> > That's because "Microsoft knows of the issue but does not have a fix
> > yet".
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I have not heard of it...
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Ben Winzenz
> > > Network Engineer
> > > Gardner & White
> > > (317) 581-1580 ext 418
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
> > > Friday, November 21, 2003 10:57 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
> > > Conversation: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > > Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Is this BS or has anyone else heard of this "flaw"?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Windows NTBugtraq Mailing List
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > Matthew Johnson
> > > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:24 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA major security flaw
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > We have upgraded our servers to Microsoft Exchange 2003 and
> > noticed a
> > > severe security issue with OWA. When you log in with your own
> > > credentials you may be logged into another user's mailbox at 
> > > random and has full access to this user's mailbox. Microsoft knows

> > > of the issue but does not have a fix yet. I was wondering how many

> > > others have seen this issue and have received the same answer from

> > > Microsoft.
> > > 
> > > This seems to be a major security flaw and we have had to
> > shut off OWA
> > > indefinitely because of the issue.
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Matthew Johnson CCNA
> > > 
> > > Network Administrator
> > > 
> > > Investment Scorecard, Inc.
> > > 
> > > 615.301.7611
> > > 
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > www.investmentscorecard.com 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > -
> > Marcus Ranum's new book "The Myth of Homeland Security" is
> now out and
> > is available from http://www.amazon.com/ranum In this hard-hitting
> > review of the homeland security business, Ranum shows us how the 
> > problem is vastly harder than it's being made to sound, and how 
> > special interests, butt covering, and bureaucracy are threatening to

> > derail any chance of making progress.
> > -
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface: 
> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&
> lang=english
> To unsubscribe

RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls

2003-11-12 Thread David N. Precht
More details please:)


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls


Hear of this one? Outsider seizes PC via Internet and places long
distance calls i.e. to Africa.

Can't find anything on it.

Regards, 
orin rehorst


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Monitoring Internet email traffic per user/mailbox

2003-11-11 Thread David N. Precht
http://www.softwareshelf.com/products/promodag.asp

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Monitoring Internet email traffic per user/mailbox


Hi,
just wondering if anyone knows of a way to monitor MSX5.5 Internet email
traffic based on each mailbox. Something tabular or graph based would be
ideal, just so we can see what sort of MB each user is sending/revieving
over a time frame. Only concerned with Internet traffic (since
internally its free).

Cheers :)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: webmail

2003-11-06 Thread David N. Precht
Biggie size, please

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bowles, John
(OIG/OMP)
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: webmail


Would you like to Super size this order sir?

_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: webmail


when i access my webmail i recieve only the parent directory 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: .Pst on OWA?

2003-06-20 Thread David N. Precht
a newbie, you think?
- Original Message - 
From: "Fyodorov, Andrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 08:54
Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA?


> this is disturbing
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 4:30 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: .Pst on OWA?
>
>
>
> Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst?
>
> Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space.
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
>
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: OWA Spellchecker

2003-06-11 Thread David N. Precht
http://www.owaspellchecker.com
- Original Message - 
From: "Steve Iadarola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 15:25
Subject: OWA Spellchecker


Checked the FAQs and did not see anything.  Anyone using a Spellcheck add-on
for E2K OWA?  Are there any that the list recommends?  Outside of waiting
for
Exchange 2003.

TIA,

Steve Iadarola

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith

2003-06-09 Thread David N. Precht
a couple of p2p servers;)
- Original Message - 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 08:08
Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith


what is the right end of a 256MB pipe?
:)

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2003 12:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith


Technically, I guess they use more, but I'm not 100% sure. Keep in mind that
PST's store mail in 2 formats (so 1 message stored twice), but I think that
conversion is done on the client side.

I have a number of users using Outlook in offline mode on the wrong end of a
256MB pipe that gets shared with lots of other traffic. Outlook, especially
the newer versions, are fairly stingy with network traffic.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:34 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith
>
>
> Recent conversations have caused me to re-think the entire
> Exchange strategy that is in place here.  The biggest bulk of
> that strategy includes Backups.  The new idea is to go with
> Item Retention, this highlights the issue that most of the
> people round here have Personal Folders containing there
> email, which in turn means that there is no way they are
> getting backed up.
>
> The problem im faced with is that a lot of our sites have
> only a 64k ISDN link which may be linking 10 people or more!
> Okay you can scrutinise me for having such a small link for
> such an amount of users, but hey im not going to pay out of
> my wages for a larger link ;p
>
> Anyway, this problem means that working directly from the
> Mail Box is out of the question, the next best thing I guess
> is Offline-Folders. Offline-Folders appear to be the perfect
> the solution, running a small test over a dial up connection
> you would think they were the ideal candidate for this
> situation.  However, a colleague informs me that it
> completely kills the network when you have a few people
> synchronising folders over an 64k link.
>
> Do synchronise folders use more bandwidth than your average
> Personal Folder?  Are there any other issues to consider when
> using offline folders as apposed to personal folders?  Im
> also informed that when you make a new folder in your mail
> box it is not automatically synchronised with the server?
>
>
>
> Please can you give me all your experience and all your info
> on working with synchronise folders within a working
> enterprise.  No matter how irrelevant you think it may seem,
> I would like to know exactly what im in for if I move to this
> solution.
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith

2003-06-09 Thread David N. Precht
how can a 256meg pipe be bad?
- Original Message - 
From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 07:47
Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith


> Technically, I guess they use more, but I'm not 100% sure. Keep in mind
that
> PST's store mail in 2 formats (so 1 message stored twice), but I think
that
> conversion is done on the client side.
>
> I have a number of users using Outlook in offline mode on the wrong end of
a
> 256MB pipe that gets shared with lots of other traffic. Outlook,
especially
> the newer versions, are fairly stingy with network traffic.
>
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis Inc.
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:34 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith
> >
> >
> > Recent conversations have caused me to re-think the entire
> > Exchange strategy that is in place here.  The biggest bulk of
> > that strategy includes Backups.  The new idea is to go with
> > Item Retention, this highlights the issue that most of the
> > people round here have Personal Folders containing there
> > email, which in turn means that there is no way they are
> > getting backed up.
> >
> > The problem im faced with is that a lot of our sites have
> > only a 64k ISDN link which may be linking 10 people or more!
> > Okay you can scrutinise me for having such a small link for
> > such an amount of users, but hey im not going to pay out of
> > my wages for a larger link ;p
> >
> > Anyway, this problem means that working directly from the
> > Mail Box is out of the question, the next best thing I guess
> > is Offline-Folders. Offline-Folders appear to be the perfect
> > the solution, running a small test over a dial up connection
> > you would think they were the ideal candidate for this
> > situation.  However, a colleague informs me that it
> > completely kills the network when you have a few people
> > synchronising folders over an 64k link.
> >
> > Do synchronise folders use more bandwidth than your average
> > Personal Folder?  Are there any other issues to consider when
> > using offline folders as apposed to personal folders?  Im
> > also informed that when you make a new folder in your mail
> > box it is not automatically synchronised with the server?
> >
> >
> >
> > Please can you give me all your experience and all your info
> > on working with synchronise folders within a working
> > enterprise.  No matter how irrelevant you think it may seem,
> > I would like to know exactly what im in for if I move to this
> > solution.
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface:
> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Outlook XP Licensing

2003-06-05 Thread David N. Precht
Contact MS Licensing.  They are the true source.
- Original Message - 
From: "Neil Doody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:50
Subject: Outlook XP Licensing


When you purchase sufficient Exchange 2000 licensing, you're entitled to
install Outlook 2000 on each of the licensed clients, or so im lead to
believe? :o

Anyway, can you install Outlook XP on these clients without the need for
any kind of Office XP license?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: TechEd

2003-06-04 Thread David N. Precht
not me:(
- Original Message - 
From: "Mynhier, Stephen - contractor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 16:10
Subject: TechEd


> Who else is here?
>
> stemy
> .+x )r뺷  yi  )ퟘí¶¥+rrʸW{jr ZZvh˧+-i٢2̞G(


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting...

2003-06-03 Thread David N. Precht
http://eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=7031&source=
- Original Message - 
From: "Ray Beckwith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 14:11
Subject: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting...


I have a question to run by the list that I have been unsuccessful in
finding any definitive answers to anywhere else. About a month ago, we
started having problems with our Exchange 2000 server. It is Ex2K SP3
running on Win2K SP3. At intervals between a couple days and a week, we
notice that a number of System Services shut down unexpectedly. Upon looking
at the event logs we see the following sequence of events.

Event Id: 7031 The IIS Admin Service service terminated unexpectedly...
Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange IMAP4 service terminated
unexpectedly...
Event Id: 7031 The Network News Transport (NNTP) service terminated
unexpectedly...
Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange POP3 terminated unexpectedly...
Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange Routing Engine service terminated
unexpectedly...
Event Id: 7031 The Simple Mail Transport Protocol (SMTP) service terminated
unexpectedly...
Event Id: 7031 The World Wide Web Publishing service terminated
unexpectedly...

On 2 occasions, this sequence was followed by the server rebooting on its
own and generating an event ID 6008 "the previous shutdown...was
unexpected."

I searched the MSKB and the only thing I could find that seemed to relate
was a reference to lingering issues from the CodeRed virus. I used Trend
Micro's system cleanup application and confirmed that there were no
indications of infection on the server.

I am hoping there are others out there that may have seen something like
this that can offer some suggestions short of reinstalling the entire
system. Please help.



Thanks in advance...

Ray Beckwith
Network Administrator
California Credit Union League
Information Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ccul.org


Thought for the day:
An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a
very narrow field.
--Niels Bohr

An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made
in his subject, and how to avoid them.
--Werner Karl Heisenberg





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: DHCP won't renew lease

2003-01-30 Thread David N. Precht
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1011&source=



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sanjeev Sharma
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 18:43
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Cc: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: DHCP won't renew lease
Importance: High


I am currently having an issue with one of the subnets on our DHCP servers
and I could use your help. On one of the subnets DHCP won't renew the
leasing of IP address to any of the clients.  The clients who already have
IP address lease to them are working normally but whichever one got rebooted
could not get the new or same IP address.  In the event viewer I see an
event ID 1011 with the following warning "The DHCP Server issued a NACK to
the client (client's hardware address) for the address (IP address) request.
Has anyone seen this before?  This server is running NT 4.0 Server SP 6a.
Thanks much in advance for any help.



--
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: DHCP won't renew lease

2003-01-29 Thread David N. Precht
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1011&source=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sanjeev Sharma
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 18:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: DHCP won't renew lease
Importance: High


I am currently having an issue with one of the subnets on our DHCP servers
and I could use your help. On one of the subnets DHCP won't renew the
leasing of IP address to any of the clients.  The clients who already have
IP address lease to them are working normally but whichever one got rebooted
could not get the new or same IP address.  In the event viewer I see an
event ID 1011 with the following warning "The DHCP Server issued a NACK to
the client (client's hardware address) for the address (IP address) request.
Has anyone seen this before?  This server is running NT 4.0 Server SP 6a.
Thanks much in advance for any help.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Recall: X.400 connector problem

2003-01-19 Thread David N. Precht
Sorry, too late... Already read it

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hanumanthappa,
Santhosh
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 02:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recall: X.400 connector problem


Hanumanthappa, Santhosh would like to recall the message, "X.400 connector
problem".


**
This message and any attachments are intended for the 
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient,
please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this 
communication to others; also please notify the sender by 
replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. 

The Timken Company
**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Event 9175 and 9200

2003-01-06 Thread David N. Precht
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9175&source=


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc Mearns
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 07:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Event 9175 and 9200
Importance: High


User Group

1. Exchange 2000  SP2 NT2000 SP2
2. The event error that we are getting are below:

Event 9175

The MAPI call 'MAPILogonEx' failed with the following error: 
The MAPI call failed.
MAPI or an unspecified service provider.
ID no: 80004005-- 
 
followed by: 

Event 9200

Failed to perform MAPI logon. 

3. I have looked on Technet and the first event seems to point to moving
users. The problem seems to occur every night on our bridgehead or connector
servers around 22:00. 

4. I am wondering what process would could cause this to happen every night
and has been happening for at least a month.

Any positive input would be very much appreciated.




Regards

Marc Mearns

Mobile - 07775-630508
Office  - 020 7695 0286 


**

 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they   
 are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify 
 the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ).

 The format of address is:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by 
 MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

 J Sainsbury plc  (185647 England)
 Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited  (3261722 England)

 Registered Offices:
 33 Holborn
 London
 EC1N 2HT
 
**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Message Delay

2003-01-04 Thread David N. Precht
Many, many times.  Some where there was a problem delivering.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L.
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 08:54
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Message Delay


All,

Has anyone seen this message be sent back to them?  What is it?  And should
I be worried?


This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.

YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE.

The list of email addresses are below.



__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Forwarding mailbox contents

2003-01-04 Thread David N. Precht
Take ownership of the mailbox.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Boynton, Todd
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 11:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forwarding mailbox contents


Is there a way for an administrator to forward the entire contents of a
mailbox to an external address without having to login to the mailbox. The
mailbox contains old messages that contain sensitive information.

Thanks

Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED]

== Communications Specialist
== UNET Technology Services, Network Operations
== Maine School and Library Network
==University of Maine System

 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OWA hosted exchange problem

2003-01-04 Thread David N. Precht
What a night owl ;)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics
Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 01:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA hosted exchange problem


 
At 10pm on a Friday?

William 
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Natkin
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 10:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Ed what are you still doing up?

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 12:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA hosted exchange problem


Define "group" in "The last group I set up".  If this group has a different
e-mail domain, is there an entry that corresponds to this group's e-mail
domain in the default recipient policy?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Natkin
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 9:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA hosted exchange problem


Hello Group
 
I have 4 storage groups setup each with 4  mailbox  stores and 4 global
address list. The last group I set up can log into exchange via outlook but
not OWA. I checked my filters on the address list for this group and they
all come up when I do the preview.
 
Default global address list is deleted. Win2k advance sp3  exchange enterp.
Sp3
 
Any Ideas  I.ve searched the knowledge base but most answers are for non
hosted exchange problems.
 
Thanks
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Twas the night before Christmas

2002-12-25 Thread David N. Precht
Unless you want to get away from the family.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Etie
Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 22:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Twas the night before Christmas


Oh sure it's funny until you have to go in on Christmas.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics
Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 12:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Twas the night before Christmas


Twas the night before Christmas, and all 'cross the WAN
Email traffic was humming as only it can.
Best wishes and greetings and tacky ecards
And SPAM of the kind that ought to be barred.

Helpdesks and Admins at home with their kin
Grumbling o'er what a tough year it has been.
Yet grateful for clients and bosses and such
Pondering if they should tell them as much.

With IIS fully patched and BSD in the front,
So my Exchange server need not take the brunt,
I can celebrate with my family full of Christmas cheer
Knowing my servers are good til New Years.

The wail of the pager then gave me the creeps!
Even with batteries removed to prevent any beeps.
Don my robe and to the home PC I head
VPN to the office, but the connection seems dead.

Driving to work, the big question I muster:
"Why did I go with Active/Active cluster??"
Nothing coulda prepared me, no matter the time,
On the serverroom floor, all the Elves of MIME!

"Now HELO, now MAIL FROM
Now RCPT TO, now DATA
On IP, On Hostname
On Header and ta-da!
To the virtual server
Out the NIC to the 'net
Bring on the next one!
We'll get through this yet!"

"The information store it seems had a bit of a fall
And emails have spilled on the floor and the walls.
Notes, tasks, contacts.  Calendars, too.
All over the place.  What else could we do?"

"You? You encode them?", I asked, simply aghast.
Then I remembered, but just one year past.
Santa had worked on my server that night.
Since then it had seemed to be running alright.

Now his helpers are here, data on the floor still
Like the wrong switch run on e-s-e util.
I watched in awe as the elves did assemble
little packets back into the mail they resembled.

Their eyes were so bright, their arms how they spun.
They worked very hard, yet had so much fun!
With green and red hats, they stood a foot tall.
Dozens of them working and having a ball!

Their cheeks were all rosy, their faces asmile.
Their jackets and pants: the epitomy of style.
Adorned with white sneakers with the words "Got Stick?"
And teamwork to make any manager sick.

Some segments they tossed; I asked "what was that?"
"Oh do not worry, just winmail dot DATs."
They cleaned up a mess I couldn't explain,
Almost done, my server was running again.

Who would believe me?  How could I tell?
They'd institutionalize me; say I'm not well.
The elves were all done; their work for today.
And berated me for my open relay.

"Look at it this way," they spoke with a sigh,
"At least you're not running Oracle 9i."
Then together they yelled then disappeared from sight,
"Happy Messaging to all, and to all a good night!"


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Exchange 2000 books

2002-12-17 Thread David N. Precht
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/index=books&field-keywor
ds=exchange%202000&search-type=ss&bq=1/102-4923324-4546501

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michel Fayad
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 01:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 books


Hi all,

I am looking for a good book for Exchange 2000. Anybody with a good
sugestion?

Thanks,

Michel Fayad

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OT :: Spam and Content Filtering

2002-12-17 Thread David N. Precht
SurfControl
DynaComm i:filterR
http://www.stbernard.com/products/iprism

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT :: Spam and Content Filtering



I work at a K-12 Educational Facility and we are required to filter web and
e-mail content. I was wandering what you guys recommend as a filtering
product.

I am running:
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Windows 2000 SP3


TIA,
Joshua






Joshua Morgan
Network Engineer
South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind
Phone: (864) 577-7548


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers

2002-12-09 Thread David N. Precht
I found some KBs on support.microsoft.com for "Event 9318
MSExchangeMTA".  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John
L.
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:02
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers


Yes, I've done that procedure.  But they still show up in the E2K (white
Icon) in the site.  Also, I'm getting warning RPC messages that is shown
below on all my E2K servers.  It seems they're still trying to send
directory updates to these servers.

Event Type: Warning
Event Source:   MSExchangeMTA
Event Category: Interface 
Event ID:   9318
Date:   12/9/2002
Time:   11:56:43 AM
User:   N/A
Computer:   E2K Server
Description:
An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality
Table (LTAB) index: 55, Windows 2000/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error
1722, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name 5.5 Exch Server [MAIN BASE 1 500
%10] (14) 

For more information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 

__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers



By 'ghosted out' do you mean just a white icon?  If so, that's how they
normally look.

The process for removing them that I perform is to use the 5.5 admin
program on the E2k server, connecting to the server running SRS.  You
then delete the 5.5 server from the site as you'd normally do.  Is that
what you did?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 09 December 2002 16:52
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Subject: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers


All,

I have a question for everyone.  I've retired 5.5 servers from our
Organization by following a MS Q article that shows you how to
accomplish this.  Now, when I look in ESM on E2K.  It still shows the
Exch 5.5 servers listed in there.  Granted they are ghosted out.  But
how do I get rid of them as well.  I also have a situation like this for
a site that I removed from the Organzation, where it's still listed as
an Administrative Group in E2K.  Anyone have any ideas how I can get rid
of these servers?

Thank you,

__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Disclaimers

2002-12-05 Thread David N. Precht
Ask your Legal and Compliance Dept.  I would love to hear what they say.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Dewell
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 12:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disclaimers


A recurring topic seems to be about adding disclaimers to outgoing
messages and I have seem various recommendations about software to do
this. 

But I would like to know how effective are disclaimers? 
Do they actually have any legal standing?



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: DL Question

2002-12-05 Thread David N. Precht
Only stays in the Sent Mail folder of the sender

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 14:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DL Question


What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no
members?


TIA,
Joshua





Joshua Morgan
Network Engineer
South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MTA Error after deleting server

2002-12-02 Thread David N. Precht
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9318&source=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield
- Exchange
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 11:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MTA Error after deleting server


We have moved some users from a remote Exchange Server to our central
server at head office, and deleted the server using Exchange
Administrator

However, I'm getting the following MTA errors in Event Viewer every 10
mins on the central server where the mailboxes are now located

Event ID: 9318
Source: MSExchangeMTA
Type: Warning
Category: Interface

Description:

An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC.

Blah blah

Can anyone suggest why it would be trying to talk to a server that I
just deleted from exchange admin on that server

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: SMTP banner

2002-11-29 Thread David N. Precht
5.0.2195 is Windows 2000... Either it's the OS on the Exchange box or
IIS.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles
Marriott
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 07:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP banner


Is this from Exchange or IIS SMTP? (Or something else)

"Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 5.0.2195.5329 ready at  Fri, 29
Nov 2002 05:09:04 -0700"

tia
Charles


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Error in Application Log

2002-11-21 Thread David N. Precht
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q165947

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Saul
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 19:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Error in Application Log


I am running Exchange 2000 SP3, W2K sp2, and have noticed these errors
in the application log stating the follow;

mt_open returned error 0x15 on database First Storage Group\Mailbox
Store

Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox
Category: MTA Connections
Event ID: 2007
Type: Error

I am getting these errors every minute for each of our mailbox stores.
We can still connect, see public folders, and send and receive emails
but I am concerned that something may be happening.  I can't seem to
find anything on Microsoft's KB, nor google.  Has anybody seen this?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Event ID 209 - Can I fix this?

2002-11-21 Thread David N. Precht
This problem seems to be caused by a server being rebuilt in the
exchange organization without it being removed first from the
organization using Exchange Administrator in RAW mode.  

http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=209&source=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yanek Korff
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 14:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Event ID 209 - Can I fix this?


Here's the message I'm getting:

Event Type: Warning
Event Source:   MSExchangeMTA
Event Category: X.400 Service 
Event ID:   209
Date:   11/13/2002
Time:   14:16:46
User:   N/A
Computer:   EXCHANGE
Description:
Global domain identifier (Country, ADMD, PRMD) in first Trace
Information of message C=us;A= ;P=rst;L=EXCHANGE0211131916WS5VB3DM does
not match MTSID value. [MTA XFER-IN 11 40] (12) 

According to EventID.NET:
This problem seems to be caused by a server being rebuilt in the
exchange organization without it being removed first from the
organization using Exchange Administrator in RAW mode.  

Now, I'm not entirely sure if this applies.  I'm working on a 5.5
Migration to 2000, bringing in new hardware and changing NT4 to w2k
domains.  5.5 server is NT4 in domain RST, E2k is in the new domain but
has been added to the original ORG.

Can anyone offer insight?

-Yanek.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Online Defragmentation

2002-11-21 Thread David N. Precht
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=184&source=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Online Defragmentation


I have just this on the Event Viewer. What should I do?

Event ID: 184
Source:  ESE97

Description:
MSExchangeIS ((353) ) Online defragmentation  of database
'D:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB' terminated prematurely after encountering
unexpected error -1019.

Everything is still working fine. I found some thing like this on
technet, but it have the unexpected error -1018

Any info is helpful Thank

Tony Nguyen

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Keyword search

2002-11-21 Thread David N. Precht
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/product.cfm?id=312
Content Auditor

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Davinder Gupta
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 19:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Keyword search


Is there a way to do a search for keywords on the entire mail database?
May be by using a third party software

Thanks
Davinder



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Event ID: 8206 MSExchangeFBPublish

2002-11-21 Thread David N. Precht
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=8206&source=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clemens, Rick
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 17:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Event ID: 8206 MSExchangeFBPublish


Anybody else seeing this error in their Exchange 2k/Exch 5.5 mixed
environments?  Can't find anything in technet or eventid!  The store is
running and the databases are mounted and everything seems to be working
finemail is flowing no problem...so why the error?

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   MSExchangeFBPublish
Event Category: General 
Event ID:   8206
Date:   11/20/2002
Time:   4:06:34 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   SRVEXBNT01
Description:
Unable to prepare message table for polling thread processing on virtual
machine SRVEXBNT01. The error number is 0x80004005. Make sure Microsoft
Exchange Store is running. 

For more information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes

2002-11-21 Thread David N. Precht
http://blackberry.net/products/software/server/index.shtml
Best way to go.  Less hassle for the users.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pennell,
Ronald B.
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Pennell, Ronald B.
Subject: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes


Has anyone had any experiences with using PDA's for
accessing user mailboxes?  Our company is starting to
research use of PDA's.  So far I have done some research
on the BlackBerry site.  

Any recommendations as to server software for E2K SP2.
Any hardware recommendations for the PDA's

Thanks in advance

Ron Pennell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Event ID 9302, 9551

2002-11-20 Thread David N. Precht
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9551&source=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 15:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Event ID 9302, 9551




Dear All,
 
I get these errors on my exchange server ( exchange 2000 enterprise sp3,
windows 2000 sp2, Native mode-both ). Rebooted the Global catalog Server
as per one of the MS KB Q articles, did not do any good...Any one has
come across this warning? Any suggestions?
 
Any ideas?  Thanks
 

***
 
Event 9302 (about 4 instances every minute)
 
The transport configuration type 4 for the directory entry CN=MICROSOFT
MTA,CN=DEXCH2000,CN=SERVERS,CN=DANCONA,CN=ADMINISTRATIVE
GROUPS,CN=DANCONA AND PFLAUM,CN=MICROSOFT
EXCHANGE,CN=SERVICES,CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=DANCONA,DC=COM is not one of
the supported values. Reconfigure the transport configuration type in
the identified directory entry. [BASE IL OPERATOR 24 217] (8) 
 
For more information, click ..


*** 
event 9551 (about 4 instances every hour)

An error occurred while upgrading the ACL on folder [MBX:Flores,
Eloisa]/Contacts/Attorneys located on database "First Storage
Group\Mailbox Store (DEXCH2000)".  The Information Store was unable to
convert the security for /O=D'ANCONA &
PFLAUM/OU=DANCONA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BKING into a Windows 2000 Security
Identifier.  It is possible that this is caused by latency in the Active
Directory Service, if so, wait until the user record is replicated to
the Active Directory and attempt to access the folder (it will be
upgraded in
place).   If the specified object does NOT get replicated to the Active
Directory, use the Microsoft Exchange System Manager  or the Exchange
Client to update the ACL on the folder manually.  The access rights in
the ACE for this DN were 0x47b. 
 
For more information, click ...
 



<>
Thanks
 
Raj


**
This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information
that is 
confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other
applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information.  This
message is 
intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please
immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in
error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure,
dissemination, distribution, reproduction 
of this message or the information contained in this message or the
taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. 
Thank you for your cooperation.

**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Issue installing Exch2k SP2

2002-11-20 Thread David N. Precht
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=5000&source=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese,
Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 17:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Issue installing Exch2k SP2


We are adding an exchange 2000 server to an existing site.  Currently we
have two remote servers running exchange 2k sp2 already and the new
server will be in a remote office.  

After installing exchange 2000, the server reboots fine and comes up
properly.  But once I install SP2 on it, the IS and SA service will not
start.   I get event 5000 and 1121.

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   MSExchangeIS
Event Category: General 
Event ID:   1121
Date:   11/18/2002
Time:   8:11:09 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   SB1-ITS-EXC-001
Description:
Error 0x8004010f connecting to the Microsoft Active Directory. 

For more information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp.

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   MSExchangeIS
Event Category: General 
Event ID:   5000
Date:   11/18/2002
Time:   8:11:09 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   SB1-ITS-EXC-001
Description:
Unable to initialize the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service.
Error 0x8004010f. 

For more information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp.


I've already checked KB 305392, and kb 329599 and they are not the
cause.  Anyone have any information that could help?

Thanks in advance.

Wilson 










_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Issue installing Exch2k SP2

2002-11-20 Thread David N. Precht
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=8213&source=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese,
Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 18:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Issue installing Exch2k SP2


Correction on first email.. it wasn't the SA, it was the MTA.  

Reinstalled the server again and this time I tried SP1 first and
everything worked fine.  Installed SP2 and MTA and IS would not come up.
Same event errors except now I see a an event 8213.

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   MSExchangeFBPublish
Event Category: General 
Event ID:   8213
Date:   11/19/2002
Time:   6:01:05 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   SB1-ITS-EXC-001
Description:
System Attendant Service failed to create session for virtual machine
SB1-ITS-EXC-001. The error number is 0x80005000. 


-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson 
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Issue installing Exch2k SP2

We are adding an exchange 2000 server to an existing site.  Currently we
have two remote servers running exchange 2k sp2 already and the new
server will be in a remote office. 

After installing exchange 2000, the server reboots fine and comes up
properly.  But once I install SP2 on it, the IS and SA service will not
start.   I get event 5000 and 1121.

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   MSExchangeIS
Event Category: General
Event ID:   1121
Date:   11/18/2002
Time:   8:11:09 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   SB1-ITS-EXC-001
Description:
Error 0x8004010f connecting to the Microsoft Active Directory.

For more information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp.

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   MSExchangeIS
Event Category: General
Event ID:   5000
Date:   11/18/2002
Time:   8:11:09 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   SB1-ITS-EXC-001
Description:
Unable to initialize the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service.
Error 0x8004010f.

For more information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp.


I've already checked KB 305392, and kb 329599 and they are not the
cause.  Anyone have any information that could help?

Thanks in advance.

Wilson










_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ESE97

2002-11-18 Thread David N. Precht
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=184&source=
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q271987

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 10:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ESE97


Has anyone encounter this error before and what are the step I need to
take to fix this. I have read Q314917 and there a lots of information
about -1018. Are they the same.


Event ID: 184
Source:  ESE97

Description:
MSExchangeIS ((353) ) Online defragmentation  of database
'D:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB' terminated prematurely after encountering
unexpected error -1019.

Tony N.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: STORE.EXE loves memory

2002-11-14 Thread David N. Precht
Did he mention 5.5 in there? I don't think he did.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 17:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory


Why SP3 anyhow? SP4 is where you need to be.

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory


I think it will stop after 3GB.

-Original Message-
From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern@;baldhead.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory


Hi everyone.

I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe process is
slowly eating all memory.  I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I
tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an excessive
amount of threads and its still not under control.  Is there anything
else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server but I assume
it will only eat that too!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Security Log errors

2002-11-12 Thread David N. Precht
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=565&source=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Hooks, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Security Log errors


I have security event log errors on my domain controllers ever since
bringing Exchange 2000 into our enterprise. A little background - single
domain, single site, win2k SP3, native mode. Exchange 2k SP2 - moved
mailboxes from an Exchange 5.5 box and followed the steps to remove the
first exchange server. Exchange 5.5 was uninstalled from the old server,
but the box itself remains as a DC on the network.

The errors occur every minute for 15 minutes, every 4 hours, exactly
when one of the RUS runs. When the RUS was "Always Run" so were the
errors. There are 2 RUS entries, one updates all the time and works fine
(Recipient Update Service (Athena)). The other runs every four hours and
produces 15 errors per pop (Recipient Update Service (Enterprise
Configuration)). Do I really need two of these? Is there anyway to see
what exactly is in the individual RUS?

Thanks for your help.

Tim Hooks, MCSE
Columbus, OH

Here is the error message:

Event Type: Failure Audit
Event Source:   Security
Event Category: Directory Service Access 
Event ID:   565
Date:   11/12/2002
Time:   7:05:21 AM
User:   ATHENA\ARIES$
Computer:   HERMES
Description:
Object Open:
Object Server:  DS
Object Type:configuration
Object Name:CN=Configuration,DC=inside,DC=kbhr,DC=com
New Handle ID:  -
Operation ID:   {0,1638256139}
Process ID: 296
Primary User Name:  HERMES$
Primary Domain: ATHENA
Primary Logon ID:   (0x0,0x3E7)
Client User Name:   ARIES$
Client Domain:  ATHENA
Client Logon ID:(0x0,0x61A5CDFF)
AccessesControl Access 

Privileges  -

 Properties:
READ_CONTROL 
Create Child 
Delete Child 
List Contents 
Write Self 
Delete Tree 
Manage Replication Topology

 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Mail rejected

2002-11-08 Thread David N. Precht
I don't think so.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 20:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail rejected


Andy David Precht?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 5:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail rejected


lol
In that case, I can see why it was rejected!


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice@;pacbell.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 8:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail rejected


Probably too close to "David"!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail rejected


To close to "BVDS" perhaps?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: somewhat OT

2002-11-08 Thread David N. Precht
You forgot the **shameless plug**

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: somewhat OT


iNNERHOST - http://www.innerhost.com

-Original Message-
From: Henley, John K (Johnny), METRO [mailto:jkhenley@;att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: somewhat OT


Who all is left in the Hosted E2K (asp-model) game? 

USA.NET?
MI8? 
Critical Path?

others? 

j
Regards, 


John Henley


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Virus heads up

2002-11-08 Thread David N. Precht
I didn't think it was a virus.  I thought it was only social
engineering

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Couch, Nate
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus heads up


Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the
Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago.  From what I have learned Trend
is the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B.  

The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain at the
firewall

http://www.Friend-Greetings.com

Hope this helps.

Cheers.

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread David N. Precht
I do.  They don't know they can save them up on their home folder.
They know I don't back up the workstations, but most think that you only
can save PSTs on local drives ;)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 07:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'


Why the hard line approach? I never said I made the backup of the PST,
that's why one has a facilities department...I also didn't say that I
found that mail particularly important, the user wants to keep it, so
why not let him/her? They know not to come to me regarding items in PST
files.

Give the user a bit of slack here David.

Sander 

-----Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions@;entrysecurity.com] 
Sent: 06 November 2002 01:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

No, just inform them of the 'No PST Backup' policy.

I don't back up PSTs. Period.  Either its in their mailbox or it is not
that important.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 05:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'


I have a couple of users who do the same thing. They don't want to
delete old mail (for whatever reason) and I can't keep extending their
mailbox sizes. So they "move" to PST. Be aware of the risks here! Make a
periodic backup of that PST as hard drives are prone to failure.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist@;partition.co.uk] 
Sent: 06 November 2002 12:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Using a PST for 'overflow'

I was having a discussion with someone the other day and he mentioned
this phrase in passing, that they used PST files when user mailboxes
became full

I didn't dwell on this as we were talking about something else, but can
anyone suggest what he may have meant? We are now enforcing stricter
limits on mailbox size and would be interested in something like this.

For ongoing maintenance, is Outlooks Autoarchiving a viable solution?
i.e. does this move mail out of the server information store and into a
PST in the users local profile?

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread David N. Precht
No, just inform them of the 'No PST Backup' policy.

I don't back up PSTs. Period.  Either its in their mailbox or it is not
that important.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 05:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'


I have a couple of users who do the same thing. They don't want to
delete old mail (for whatever reason) and I can't keep extending their
mailbox sizes. So they "move" to PST. Be aware of the risks here! Make a
periodic backup of that PST as hard drives are prone to failure.

Sander

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist@;partition.co.uk] 
Sent: 06 November 2002 12:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Using a PST for 'overflow'

I was having a discussion with someone the other day and he mentioned
this phrase in passing, that they used PST files when user mailboxes
became full

I didn't dwell on this as we were talking about something else, but can
anyone suggest what he may have meant? We are now enforcing stricter
limits on mailbox size and would be interested in something like this.

For ongoing maintenance, is Outlooks Autoarchiving a viable solution?
i.e. does this move mail out of the server information store and into a
PST in the users local profile?

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: scan Ex2000 for phrases or certain words in emails

2002-11-05 Thread David N. Precht
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/product.cfm?id=312

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Kleciak, Clint
D N21
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:02
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: scan Ex2000 for phrases or certain words in emails



Any such functionality or third product tool?  

thanks
Clint 



--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown.
This e-mail transmission may contain confidential information.  This
information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity
to whom it is intended even if addressed incorrectly.  Please delete it
from your files if you are not the intended recipient.  Thank you for
your compliance. Copyright (c) 2002 CIGNA




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: RBL's

2002-11-05 Thread David N. Precht
Sam Adams?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of King, John
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 15:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


Never listen to sales schmucks anyways...
RBL = Real Boston Lager...

-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs@;LEAWOOD.ORG]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


OH!  So we are talking about what's stuck in Chris' beard!  Now I
understand :)



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:dely@;TripathImaging.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


Reddish Brown Lint???

-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs@;LEAWOOD.ORG] 
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


What is RBL? :P



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


Oh wait. Never mind Mr. Hummert. I finally understand what is going on. 

You took my general statements regarding the number of mail
administrators who couldn't spell RBL or who didn't fully understand its
implications as some kind of a personal attack. I can assure you that I
had neither you, nor anyone else on the list in mind particularly when I
created those statistics.

There are plenty of things on this list which the vast majority of
members don't completely understand. Heck, I've got an ever growing list
of things I don't understand completely. Not understanding something
isn't a sin; jumping willy nilly onto the latest and greatest technology
without understanding the pros and cons of it might be. My posts were
simply meant to provide a warning to those who might be interested that
all that glitters is not gold.

Sorry Christopher, this song isn't about you.

> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> 
> I asked for clarification from Mr. Walsh that I might learn to curb my

> apparently misplaced anger. How, Mr. Hummert was that rude?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net]
> > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 12:52 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> >
> > Hu you being rude to someone elseimagine that?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris
> > Scharff
> > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 10:24 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: RBL's
> >
> >
> > >Ok what makes you such a wizard?
> >
> > The cool pointy hat and eye of newt in my toolkit.
> >
> >
> > Who exacty was I rude to? The two people in the thread who I
> > directly replied to?[1] Or did I offend those mail administrators to

> > whom my coments applied for revealing that in this instance they
> > wore no clothes?
> >
> >
> > [1] Close personal friends who wouldn't take offense at my comments
> > even if they had been directed at them.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Walsh, Ric
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Sent: 10/31/2002 9:31 AM
> > Subject: RE: RBL's
> >
> > Ok what makes you such a wizard? Also add the word rude to that.
> > Have you though of taking an anger management class?
> >
> > Ric Walsh
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:22 PM
> > > To:   Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject:  RE: RBL's
> > >
> > > I'd guess 68% or more of mail admins are unable to even spell RBL.

> > > The
> >
> > > majority of the remainder is unable to comprehend the implications

> > > of
> > the
> > > functionality on their environment, whether they understand how it

> > > actually works or not.
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william@;techsanctuary.org]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:16 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: RBL's
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > That's a little harsh. (I love it when you're harsh...)
> > > >
> > > > Do you mean they are not aware of it, or they are unable to
> > > > comprehend its functionality?
> > > >
> > > > William
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris
> > > > Scharff
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: RBL's
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL
> > > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to re

RE: RBL's

2002-11-05 Thread David N. Precht
The delete key works here

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Baker,
Jennifer
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 16:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


Cripes.  How many people do I have to blacklist before this ends
already!

Chris is usually most likely almost always right.  Get over it.

-Original Message-
From: Walsh, Ric [mailto:Walshr@;national-citymortgage.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


Ok your "spelling" remark was rude to all of us.

You following remark despite it's poor grammar seems to say that the
rest of us are dumber that you. I'd have to say that it was ALL rude.

Ric Walsh




> -Original Message-
> From: Walsh, Ric 
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:32 AM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  RE: RBL's
> 
> Ok what makes you such a wizard? Also add the word rude to that. Have
> you though of taking an anger management class?
> 
> Ric Walsh
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From:   Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent:   Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:22 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject:RE: RBL's
> > 
> > I'd guess 68% or more of mail admins are unable to even spell RBL.
> > The majority of the remainder is unable to comprehend the 
> > implications of
> the
> > functionality on their environment, whether they understand how it
> > actually works or not.
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william@;techsanctuary.org]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:16 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: RBL's
> > > 
> > > 
> > > That's a little harsh. (I love it when you're harsh...)
> > > 
> > > Do you mean they are not aware of it, or they are unable to 
> > > comprehend its functionality?
> > > 
> > > William
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris 
> > > Scharff
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: RBL's
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL 
> > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd 
> > > parties to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have 
> > > to join you in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is 
> > > costing their company business.
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
> > > EMS Sales Engineer
> > > MessageOne
> > > 512.652.4500 x-244
> > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: RBL's
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Still 3rd party.  I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night and
> > > > the current stance on that is that they're "thinking about 
> > > > possibly" including RBL support in a future release.
> > > > 
> > > > Darcy
> > > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RBL's
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party?
> > > 
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
E

RE: X.400 issues

2002-11-02 Thread David N. Precht
www.eventid.net

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Bennett,
Joshua
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 11:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: X.400 issues


Event ID 57:  Source: MSExchangeMTA  Type: Warning  Category: X.400
Service
The limit on the number of associations allowed to and from
entity
(X.400 address) has been reached.   The limit is 9. [MTA XFER-IN 19
34](12)

Event ID 289:  Source: MSExchangeMTA  Type: Warning  Category: X.400
Service
A connection to (X.400 address) could not be opened [MTA XFER-IN
19
26](12)

Event ID 1290:  Source: MSExchagneMTA  Type: Warning  Category: X.400
Service
A locally initiated association to (X.400 address) was refused.
The failure reason provider was 0
and the reason was 0. Control block index 6. Type 1. [PLATFORM
KERNEL 25 130](12)

Event ID 9202: Source: MSExchangeMTA  Type: Warning  Category: Operating
System
A sockets error 10061 on an accept[] call was detected. The MTA
will
attempt to recover the sockets  connection. Control block index: /.
[BASE IL TCP/IP DRVR 8 256](12)


These are the Event ID's that continually pop up on the one remote
server with the same symptoms, the other server just produces the 289
event id only.

Thanks,

Josh

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: X.400 issues


Admission: I'm entirely too lazy to go look up the random odd event ID
or guestimate what "too long"[1] means. It there any chance you (the
collective
you) could include the Event ID source and description in addition to
the number? And that you could provide an example of sent/ received
times which constitute a "too long" delivery time.

[1] When I worked at $vbc we initially had an MS Mail PO config which
routinely resulted in >8 hour delivery times of mail from the US to
Indonesia. If a user called and said it'd been six hours and the mail
wasn't delivered, we didn't troubleshoot it.


> -Original Message-
> From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:jbennett@;cotelligent.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 8:55 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> I have an incredibly annoying situation going on that I can't seem to
> get a grip on. I am not sure of the magnitude of the errors I am 
> seeing due to the
> fact that mail is still flowing.
> 
> Here is my setup:
> 
> I am running WNT4.0 SP6 / EX 5.5 EE SP4 all hotfixes on all
> these servers. I have a hub and spoke configuration within my EX org. 
> All my remote servers connect (through X.400 connectors) to a central 
> EX server that serves as my IMS to the internet. All the spoke servers

> are BDC's in NT domains. The hub server is a member server in a 
> central domain that all other domains have 2-way trusts to. All the 
> remote servers (scattered across
> the US) are connected to the hub server by full T1 lines.
> 
> My issue is this:
> 
> The MTA on the hub server backs up and an Event ID: 289 is
> written to the App log then the queue flushes clear and all mail is 
> delivered without incident. This seems to occur about every 10 minutes

> or so during the day. There does not appear to be, at least on the 
> surface, any connectivity issues. Should I just ignore these errors, 
> as the mail is being delivered? Or is this just the beginning of a 
> major issue about to explode in my lap?
> 
> Please help, I have dug around MS site and Google and come up with
> little to no help.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Josh Bennett
> Exchange Admin\Systems Engineer
> Cotelligent, Inc.
> 401 Parkway Drive
> Broomall, PA. 19008
> 610-359-5929
> www.cotelligent.com
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[E

RE: Comp Time Question

2002-10-28 Thread David N. Precht
Same here.   They made a large portion of the company hourly and then
less than a year later, they are restrict the OT.  They wanted to pull
the comp time with us, but the Commonwealth said, "No, no, no, that OT
is OT"

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes
(IT)
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 16:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Comp Time Question


Large corp.  Hourly - restricted overtime.  No more than 1 hour per week
per employee (no joke).  Salary, no comp time, no overtime.

However, if I am here til 2am, I don't actually get in "trouble" for
showing up at 10 the next day.  But that's up to my boss.  Weekends?
Sucks to be me.

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:Tom.Meunier@;courts.state.tx.us] 
Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:33 PM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: Comp Time Question
Subject: RE: Comp Time Question


Here at the state gummint, that's what I get.

In private business, I'd work an 80 hour week and get, "Too bad, so sad,
you're salaried."

-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs@;LEAWOOD.ORG] 
Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:10 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Comp Time Question
Subject: RE: Comp Time Question


Here at the City and being "Salary", my boss allows me to take a 1 to 1
ratio for time I work over 40 hours :)



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian@;summit-technical.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Comp Time Question


Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time?

I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate
their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their
normal workweek.

Example:  If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus
package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or
what?


Thanks - Brian


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11
Fax:401-738-9813
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:   http://www.summit-technical.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000

2002-10-28 Thread David N. Precht
He posted this questions to multiple lists.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 16:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000


What?

> -Original Message-
> From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions@;entrysecurity.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:16 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000
> 
> 
> Try not to cross post
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Frédéric 
> Médery
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 09:02
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000
> 
> 
> Hello Everybody,
> 
> TOPOLOGY :
> 1 Exchange 2000 SP3 + AD
> 1 Serveur AD (First DC), upgraded from NT4
> 
> PROBLEM :
> We upgraded from NT4 to Windows 2000 Active directory several months 
> ago. Since then we installed a second DC with Exchange 2k. All servers

> are Ghz servers with Go of RAM. Exchange DB and Logs are on a SANS. 
> From the begin, all the AD processes are very very slow and
> Exchange is also
> very slow.
> 
> I checked my servers and we have the error describe in the KB
> (Computer
> Name Does Not Match the Windows 2000 Domain Name After Upgrade) :
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q262376
> 
> Do you know the impact on Exch2k ?  could it be the source of
> my problem
> 
> Thanks,
> F
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000

2002-10-28 Thread David N. Precht
Try not to cross post

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Frédéric
Médery
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 09:02
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000


Hello Everybody,

TOPOLOGY :
1 Exchange 2000 SP3 + AD
1 Serveur AD (First DC), upgraded from NT4

PROBLEM :
We upgraded from NT4 to Windows 2000 Active directory several months
ago. Since then we installed a second DC with Exchange 2k. All servers
are Ghz servers with Go of RAM. Exchange DB and Logs are on a SANS. From
the begin, all the AD processes are very very slow and Exchange is also
very slow.

I checked my servers and we have the error describe in the KB (Computer
Name Does Not Match the Windows 2000 Domain Name After Upgrade) :
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q262376

Do you know the impact on Exch2k ?  could it be the source of my problem

Thanks,
F


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: nice one for a Friday

2002-10-25 Thread David N. Precht
Not really Exchange-related, though.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: nice one for a Friday



Hi, 
I have a very awkward question. 

I have a very old PC here, running windows 3.1 (!), and there is a
terminal file that runs on here, which is limited to 1024 b.  I need the
data that is generated in that file in a file that can be X times
bigger, so that the data can be used afterwards to be analysed. 
1st question:  how does a terminal file from 3.1 work?
2nd question: how can I automatically get that in word or stg?

Don't shoot me for this one?

Kim

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Delivery failure to exlist@forcefields.com

2002-10-25 Thread David N. Precht
Yes... Several times over the last week or so.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: Delivery failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Has anyone ever seen this error message before.  The strange thing is,
my orignal message showed up in the Exchange Discussion Group?

Geoff...



-Original Message-
From: TZO Mailer [mailto:mailer@;tzo.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Dale Geoffrey Edwards
Subject: Delivery failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Delivery was attempted, but failed because:
550 This system is configured to reject mail from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (Host
blacklisted - see http://maps.vix.com/rbl/)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Original Message:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

TZForward: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 216.91.57.132 by saf.tzo.com
id 2002102509570968785 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:57:09 GMT
This is where the Message-ID line would go, but I got an error message
saying to remove it for delivery purposes.
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Setting up two profiles
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:44:54 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
Content-Type: text/plain
List-Unsubscribe: 
List-Subscribe: 
X-URL: 
X-List-Host: swynk.com discussion lists 
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Message-Id:
<37F3E678919F3A45A17EB82CB66A9F7C36AC18@.americantower.com>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Right-click on the Outlook Mail icon on the Desktop.  Choose properties,
the go to profiles.  Make the new profile, making sure the name resolves
against the Exchange Server and then click the box down below the
profiles that says "Prompt for a profile."  In this matter, he will be
able to choose which one he wants.  Or show him how open the other
mailbox inside his own.

Geoff...



-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:eve_12uk@;yahoo.co.uk] 
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 8:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Setting up two profiles


I run exchange server 5.5 with outlook 2000 as client.
However one of our new bosses wants to be able to view
his mistrel mail Account in outlook 2000. This mails
has to go to a different location from his default
mailbox. That he wants two profiles one for mistrel
mails account which is private and his usual mailbox
in the organisation.

I thought of configuring outlook express but he wants
to be able to view the mails from his machine in the
office and also on a networked laptop in his flat in
the same building. Using outlook and not the browser.
With exchange this is no problem but I am not sure how
to make this possible for mistrel account.

Any suggestions on how to configure outlook 2000 to
support two profiles. The usual default account for
the organisation and one for mistrel. 


Thanks

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs

2002-10-25 Thread David N. Precht
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/product.cfm?id=311
MELIA

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Marc Mearns
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 09:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Message Tracking logs


Group

Can any one tell me of a utility or script that I can use to import the
message tracking logs and do minimum sorting of the data (preferably
freeware/shareware).

We can't use Excel because the files are in the region of 80mb and will
be larger soon. Excel can not handle the amount of records that I am
dealing with. I tried a freeware utility called CSVDB but was no good
for sorting. I basically want to be able to manipulate the data.
Especially look at the number of large messages being sent each day. 

Any constructive comments would be appreciated.

Exchange 2000 SP2
Windows 2000 SP2

Regards

Marc Mearns


**

 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they   
 are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify 
 the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ).

 The format of address is:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by 
 MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

 J Sainsbury plc  (185647 England)
 Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited  (3261722 England)

 Registered Offices:
 33 Holborn
 London
 EC1N 2HT
 
**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs

2002-10-24 Thread David N. Precht
Dead link.

Try http://www.sunbelt-software.com/product.cfm?id=311

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Peter Orlowski
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs


Try Microdata's Melia.  www.microdata.com/melia Free eval copy for 30
days I believe.

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES@;bordersgroupinc.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs


No, Promodag charges for the eval also.  >{

I would say look for reporting software rather than trying to use a db.
The reporting software will save you a lot of headaches and look
prettier when you give it to mgmt types.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse@;hotmail.com] 
Posted At: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:36 AM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Subject: Re: Exchange Message Tracking logs


Then as Ali said use Access. Enjoy! Or if this is a one time shot.
Promodag does have an eval. that works for 15 days?

- Original Message -
From: "Marc Mearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:29 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs


Tony

Thanks For your response. I did have a look at the product a few years
back for Exchange 5.5. It was ok and if I recall was not cheap. I can't
really justify the cost as my requirement is very short term.

Thanks

Regards


 -Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse@;hotmail.com]
Sent: 24 October 2002 14:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange Message Tracking logs

Instead of jumping through all those hoops. Why not by a 3rd party app
to do that. this one comes to mind but there are many if you look.
www.promodag.com

- Original Message -
From: "Marc Mearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:03 AM
Subject: Exchange Message Tracking logs


Group

Can any one tell me of a utility or script that I can use to import the
message tracking logs and do minimum sorting of the data (preferably
freeware/shareware).

We can't use Excel because the files are in the region of 80mb and will
be larger soon. Excel can not handle the amount of records that I am
dealing with. I tried a freeware utility called CSVDB but was no good
for sorting. I basically want to be able to manipulate the data.
Especially look at the number of large messages being sent each day.

Any constructive comments would be appreciated.

Exchange 2000 SP2
Windows 2000 SP2

Regards

Marc Mearns


**

 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ).

 The format of address is:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

 J Sainsbury plc  (185647 England)
 Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited  (3261722 England)

 Registered Offices:
 33 Holborn
 London
 EC1N 2HT

**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

 This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by
MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

**


**

 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ).

 The format of address is:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

 J Sainsbury plc  (185647 England)
 Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited  (3261722 England)

 Registered Offices:
 33 Holborn
 London
 EC1N 2HT

***

RE: RBL's

2002-10-24 Thread David N. Precht
That's just plain wrong ***must burn eyes now***

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher
Hummert
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 02:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


The prophet of http://www.goatse.cx/hello.jpg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


Hummert, you incompetent little piece of pond scum, did it occur to you
to actually run a "real" google search, such as "rbl email definition"?
Comes up on the first page you arrogant little pillow muncher.  See? You
want to throw shit around on the list?  There's plenty of folk that can
come on out and party, you lobotomised little wanker.

For the record - I _know_ what Scharff's contribution to life the
universe and everything is.  You?  Other than being one of the current
poster children of prophylactia (along with Precht), exactly what is
your function in the messaging universe?

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 17:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


Yea I really didn't think we were talking about:
RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE
RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on a
web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers of
romance. ... 
Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links.
Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance
www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages 

I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS ASS

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


www.google.com?

> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: RBL's
> 
> 
> Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: RBL's
> 
> 
> Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a

> spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place 
> last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to 
> and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a 
> critical sales order or customer service request based on their say 
> so?
> 
> An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more

> than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to 
> have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who 
> knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't 
> completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive 
> effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: RBL's
> > 
> > 
> > Ok please explain.
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of
> Chris Scharff
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: RBL's
> > 
> > 
> > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL 
> > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on
> 3rd parties
> > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to
> join you
> > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their 
> > company business.
> > 
> > --
> > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
> > EMS Sales Engineer
> > MessageOne
> > 512.652.4500 x-244
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: RBL's
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Still 3rd party.  I was at a meeting at MS on Monday
> night and the
> > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" 
> > > including RBL support in a future release.
> > > 
> > > Darcy
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RBL's
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party?
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch

RE: SP3

2002-10-24 Thread David N. Precht
http://microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/SP3Deply.doc
You do not need to upgrade a server running Exchange 2000 to SP1 or SP2
before upgrading to SP3. You can also install Exchange 2000 SP3 on
servers running post Exchange 2000, Exchange 2000 SP1, and Exchange 2000
SP2 hotfixes.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 05:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SP3


Does SP 3 for E2K replace 1 and 2 or do I have to install them first?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Viruses via email

2002-10-24 Thread David N. Precht
NAV on the Exchange Server
McAfee/NAV on the clients

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Greg Heywood
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 06:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Viruses via email


Just wondering if there are many companies out there that do NOT use a
virus protection product that links into exchange? Instead relying on
desktop av?

Cheers

Greg Heywood
Technology Project Manager
International Power PLC
Phone +44 20 7320 8672
Fax +44 20 7320 8725
www.ipplc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





***
Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts
any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail
or its attachments.  It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that
your systems have adequate protection against virus infection.

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of
the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error
and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or
associated attachments is strictly prohibited. 

If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by
return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then
delete it immediately from your system.

***

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: RBL's

2002-10-23 Thread David N. Precht
Let's keep it clean, shall we?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher
Hummert
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 17:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


Yea I really didn't think we were talking about:
RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE
RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on a
web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers of
romance. ... 
Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links.
Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance
www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages 

I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS ASS

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's


www.google.com?

> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: RBL's
> 
> 
> Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: RBL's
> 
> 
> Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a

> spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place 
> last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to 
> and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a 
> critical sales order or customer service request based on their say 
> so?
> 
> An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more

> than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to 
> have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who 
> knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't 
> completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive 
> effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: RBL's
> > 
> > 
> > Ok please explain.
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of
> Chris Scharff
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: RBL's
> > 
> > 
> > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL 
> > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on
> 3rd parties
> > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to
> join you
> > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their 
> > company business.
> > 
> > --
> > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
> > EMS Sales Engineer
> > MessageOne
> > 512.652.4500 x-244
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: RBL's
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Still 3rd party.  I was at a meeting at MS on Monday
> night and the
> > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" 
> > > including RBL support in a future release.
> > > 
> > > Darcy
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RBL's
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party?
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:

RE: Exch 5.5 ost synch

2002-10-22 Thread David N. Precht
Post the errors.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Craig A. Mills
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exch 5.5 ost synch


I have two Exch 5.5 sites where every user receives synch errors,
usually to the inbox and sent folders. Its not at the client. Any
suggestions?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Slow connection Solution

2002-10-19 Thread David N. Precht
Sync, offline read, sync.

Repeat as needed ;)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 12:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow connection Solution


Okay, then teach them how to use MAPI and work offline.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of John Q Jr.
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slow connection Solution


What is another solution to dialup users who are used to pop connections
and want calendar functions in Exchange. They like how mail was quickly
downloaded with pop, but now hate OWA. The waiting part. Looked into
Cirtix, but the attachment problem is limiting users functionality, new
remote users are a daily occurnce. So trining users is an issue. They
complain E2K OWA is too slow.

Just wondering.

- John Q Jr.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Slow connection Solution

2002-10-19 Thread David N. Precht
Then show them broadband.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of John Q Jr.
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 18:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slow connection Solution


What is another solution to dialup users who are used to pop connections
and want calendar functions in Exchange. They like how mail was quickly
downloaded with pop, but now hate OWA. The waiting part. Looked into
Cirtix, but the attachment problem is limiting users functionality, new
remote users are a daily occurnce. So trining users is an issue. They
complain E2K OWA is too slow.

Just wondering.

- John Q Jr.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Sace document in Outlook Express with Microsoft Word

2002-10-17 Thread David N. Precht
Sounds like a non-Exchange problem to me.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Bravo, Liliana
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 08:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sace document in Outlook Express with Microsoft Word
Importance: High


Hi Friends,

Do you know if it is possible to save a message in Microsoft Outlook in
Microsoft Word Format? When you select Save as on the message it only
have txt, html,eml format . It is possible add Microsoft word format on
that?

Let me know if you have any idea or any article where it explain that it
isn't possible for to confirm it.

Thank in Advance.

Liliana :) 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Exchange 2000 internet eMail archiving

2002-10-16 Thread David N. Precht

Why the repost?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois
Bourdeau
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 14:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 internet eMail archiving


Hi

My customer havee very special journaling needs.

They need eMail going outside the organisation and coming from people
outside the organisation to be archived for auditing purpose.

The Ex2K journaling is not usefull because different Manager need to
monitor different employee eMail.  I mean Manager A must be able to
monitor eMail from user 1-2-3-4 and Manager B user 5-6-7-8  but each
manager must not be able to monitor incoming and outoing email for other
group

I think that a gateway product archiving that in a database would be the
best.  With the databse we will be able to tell who has access to what
eMail (From : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) etc

Does someone know a good gateway archiving software ?

JF


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Eventid.net $$$

2002-10-16 Thread David N. Precht

Yes, William.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 01:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Eventid.net $$$


What?  Being a pain in the but (sic)?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N.
Precht
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Eventid.net $$$


Been doing it for months

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Eventid.net $$$


I just noticed that www.eventid.net now has a fee for there services.
Not to complain it is inexpensive, but just another pain in the but.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MEC 2002 comments?

2002-10-16 Thread David N. Precht

What did you like best about it?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 00:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments?


I think I liked Boston the best.  It's nice to have a MEC in a *real*
city.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Ault
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 6:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments?


You're comparing _ANY_ MEC to Boston..??? Chriminey, I could've hosted
MEC in my garage and it'd been better than Boston. Dallas was the second
worst venue, imo. Search the archives for a rehash of reasons; I've
instigated enough already. 


Tim.
x3683


-Original Message-
From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC 2002 comments?


Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above
subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so
unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison.

I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like
Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take
my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better
than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest
Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying "Have you seen Missy?". I
tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry.

I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston
in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely.
Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all.

For the record:
- the party was better than Dallas
- the party food was better than Dallas
- the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open
- the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned
zucchini.
- the venue was a lot better than Boston

BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?)
who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another
30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room
for TechEd 2003!



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: viewer of PST

2002-10-15 Thread David N. Precht

That is wrong.
http://www.wickett.net/   (yes, Mark, you already posted this but I
wanted all to have the correct facts)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 13:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: viewer of PST
Sensitivity: Private


Also, if it is burned to a CD, you will have read only access to the
.pst file.  You will need to copy it to your hard drive or wherever, in
order to do anything more than read.

Geoff...

-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: viewer of PST
Sensitivity: Private


If you want to view a static .pst you can use Outlook to do this and
configure the services to view Personal Folders (only). If you want
something that synchronises you're probably looking at .ost's, but I've
always preferred OWA myself.

> -Original Message-
> From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 15 October 2002 15:25
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: viewer of PST
> Sensitivity: Private
> 
> 
> Hi exchangers,
> 
> Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst

> off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old 
> messages.  If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to 
> perform this function?
> 
> TIA
> -- KN
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Eventid.net $$$

2002-10-15 Thread David N. Precht

Been doing it for months

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Eventid.net $$$


I just noticed that www.eventid.net now has a fee for there services.
Not to complain it is inexpensive, but just another pain in the but.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Services Failing to Start at Boot

2002-10-15 Thread David N. Precht

http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=7001&source=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Julian Brunt
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 09:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Services Failing to Start at Boot


OK I have found this event message at another site now.
 It seems that this problem appears after Exchange SP2
has been applied to the server and then restarted.  The
message below is an actual event (except for the
computer name) from the server in question.

This only happe4ns when the server is restarted.  The
services start when they are manually started after
logon.  

Is there a way I can make these services wait until the
SA starts before they attempt to, or is there a known
fix for this that I so far have not been able to locate?

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   Service Control Manager
Event Category: None
Event ID:   7001
Date:   13/10/2002
Time:   19:52:07
User:   N/A
Computer:   
Description:
The Microsoft Exchange MTA Stacks service depends on
the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service which
failed to start because of the following error: 
%%0

For more information, see Help and Support Center at
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.


Thanks for your help

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: viewer of PST

2002-10-15 Thread David N. Precht

File -> open ?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Khoi Nguyen
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: viewer of PST
Sensitivity: Private


Hi exchangers,

Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst
off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old
messages.  If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to
perform this function?

TIA
-- KN

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Event ID 8213

2002-10-15 Thread David N. Precht

Oops.. Didn't mean to send that...
You found the same article I did.  My bad

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 09:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Event ID 8213


I've been getting a repeating error message in my Eventlog on my
Exchange 2000 SP3 server that us running the RUS.  The following error
message comes up once very 25 minutes:

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   MSExchangeFBPublish
Event Category: General 
Event ID:   8213
Date:   10/15/2002
Time:   8:31:31 AM
User:   N/A
Computer:   MSA
Description:
System Attendant Service failed to create session for virtual machine
MSA. The error number is 0x80044501. 

For more information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 

I found Q296151 and tried doing the fix in the article however, it has
not taken care of the error.  I find steps 9-11 a bit confusing though,
and maybe I'm not setting the security correctly.  Does anyone have any
insight to this error or maybe help me interpret the fix from PSS?

-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
(920) 465-5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Event ID 8213

2002-10-15 Thread David N. Precht

http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=8213&source=

Q296151

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 09:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Event ID 8213


I've been getting a repeating error message in my Eventlog on my
Exchange 2000 SP3 server that us running the RUS.  The following error
message comes up once very 25 minutes:

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   MSExchangeFBPublish
Event Category: General 
Event ID:   8213
Date:   10/15/2002
Time:   8:31:31 AM
User:   N/A
Computer:   MSA
Description:
System Attendant Service failed to create session for virtual machine
MSA. The error number is 0x80044501. 

For more information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 

I found Q296151 and tried doing the fix in the article however, it has
not taken care of the error.  I find steps 9-11 a bit confusing though,
and maybe I'm not setting the security correctly.  Does anyone have any
insight to this error or maybe help me interpret the fix from PSS?

-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
(920) 465-5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: automated replies

2002-10-13 Thread David N. Precht

That'll teach'em.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu
Jones
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 11:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: automated replies


I just gather up all their email addresses and sell them in bulk to
spammers.

(:=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David N. Precht
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 9:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: automated replies


Set up their subscriptions to a public folder
OR
Set up to another, non-generating OOO email address
OR
Set their status to NOMAIL.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 03:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: automated replies


So what do you tell them then?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N.
Precht
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 10:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: automated replies


Just every one you get Reply back with something like this ...

"Can you stop OOOs and autoreplies from hitting the discussion list ?

Thanks."

Half the time I get a response and most of the time, the people are
like, "how do I do that?"

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher
Hummert
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 16:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: automated replies


What do you think you're the only one or something? Hey everyone get off
the freeway cause B. van Ouwerkerk is coming and he demands special
treatment.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of B. van
Ouwerkerk
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: automated replies


Hi,

Could you fine ppl please prevent your mailclient from sending out of
the office replies when the message comes from a list

The original subject of this messages was out of the office replies..
but that got rejected..

TIA,



B.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: automated replies

2002-10-13 Thread David N. Precht

Set up their subscriptions to a public folder
OR
Set up to another, non-generating OOO email address
OR 
Set their status to NOMAIL.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 03:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: automated replies


So what do you tell them then?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N.
Precht
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 10:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: automated replies


Just every one you get Reply back with something like this ...

"Can you stop OOOs and autoreplies from hitting the discussion list ?

Thanks."

Half the time I get a response and most of the time, the people are
like, "how do I do that?"

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher
Hummert
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 16:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: automated replies


What do you think you're the only one or something? Hey everyone get off
the freeway cause 
B. van Ouwerkerk is coming and he demands special treatment. 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of B. van
Ouwerkerk
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: automated replies


Hi,

Could you fine ppl please prevent your mailclient from sending out of
the office replies when the message comes from a list

The original subject of this messages was out of the office replies..
but 
that got rejected..

TIA,



B.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: automated replies

2002-10-12 Thread David N. Precht
Don't look at me.  I didn't send them.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of B. van
Ouwerkerk
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 16:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: automated replies


Hi,

Could you fine ppl please prevent your mailclient from sending out of
the office replies when the message comes from a list

The original subject of this messages was out of the office replies..
but 
that got rejected..

TIA,



B.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OT - Web Mail hosting

2002-10-12 Thread David N. Precht

Whats the pricing like?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Julian Stone
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 08:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT - Web Mail hosting


Another shameless plug :)

http://www.netstore.net

Yours,

Julian Stone
Exchange 2000 Consultant and Webmaster

This message sent from Exchange 2000 SP3 build 6249.4

Netstore - Europe's Leading Application Service Provider

Tel: +44 (0) 1344 444349
Mobile: +44 (0) 7710 122 312
Fax: +44 (0) 207 681 1238
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

LOCATION: <>
HomePage: <> 



-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT - Web Mail hosting




For your company users or to resell? If the former, OWA
- no, not company users - already have OWA thanks so would be
'reselling'

How many users do you want to have on the system, and what it is the
purpose of said system. well, I've been asked to think about 10,000
users/ subscribers but whether we get that amount is another matter!
It's basically to offer our customers on the retail side of the business
an alternative to hotmail etc - so they can have a 'lifestyle' email
address. The retail side of our business has mail/internet order and
also 15 shops nationwide and we sell skateboards/ inline blades/ bmx's
and clothing/ accessories. Thanks to the other suggestions - I'll look
into them. Rob -Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 9:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT - Web Mail hosting


Hi all, 
i'm looking into the feasiblity of setting up a hotmail style web based
email hosting service - does anyone know of any good companies that
offer this service? 
Preferably UK based.  I have searched and I know there are plenty about
but a personal recommendation would be nice thanks Rob

Support Analyst
T.K.C. Sales Ltd.
5 Ashmead Industrial Estate
Keynsham
Bristol
BS31 1TZ
UK
Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302



This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual(s) to whom it is addressed.  It should not be deemed to
constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s)
unless a purchase order number is quoted.  Any views or opinions
presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of TKC Group Ltd.  If you are not the intended
recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return
it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email.

intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)



This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual(s) to whom it is addressed.  It should not be deemed to
constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s)
unless a purchase order number is quoted.  Any views or opinions
presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of TKC Group Ltd.  If you are not the intended
recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return
it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email.

intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Unable to relay error message

2002-10-11 Thread David N. Precht
Have you checked to see if you are blacklisted?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unable to relay error message


Well I didn't take away much but here it is:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  test
  Sent: 10/10/2002 10:07 AM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/10/2002 10:07 AM
You do not have permission to send to this recipient.  For
assistance, contact your system administrator.


Thanks


-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unable to relay error message

How about posting the actual error message, rather than a "sanitized"
one? You've removed all the interesting information that might actually
lead to a solution.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez@;handleman.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 9:32 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Unable to relay error message
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I get this for one domain.
> 
> You do not have permission to send to this recipient.  For assistance,

> contact your system administrator.
> <"Server".com #5.7.1 smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for 
> "Domain">
> 
> I checked the KB and the only thing that it told me to do is add the 
> domain in the recipient policy.  I did that and I still get it.  I am 
> able to send to other domains at that site though.  Also I checked DNS

> and that is set up properly as well.  I am running E2K SP3.
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: load in MSX5.5

2002-10-09 Thread David N. Precht

64 meg of RAM, is that right?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Microsoft
Exchange List Server
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 16:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: load in MSX5.5


MSX5.5+SP4 1CPU pentiumIII/500MHZ , 64MB RAM

Greetings,

Do you know when (because of load) can I say that the server will stop
serving users requests? how many concurrent users? how many concurrent
owa sessions?

rgds,
-er

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: My IMS is having issues!

2002-10-09 Thread David N. Precht

http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=4102&source=
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=4116&source=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stevens, Dave
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 09:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: My IMS is having issues!


We have had some intermittent issues with our internet mail server; the
service is stopping itself.  Below are some of the id's...technet
suggests that the max threads could be too low (id 4094).  I have
checked the registry key and it is set to 06xe.  Is that setting too low
and could be causing this problem? Exchange 5.5 w/SP4 running on W2K.
Has anyone come across this problem? Thank you, Dave

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   MSExchangeIMC
Event Category: Internal Processing 
Event ID:   4094
Date:   10/9/2002
Time:   8:13:33 AM
User:   N/A
Computer:   ORO-MAIL
Description:
The error 0x8004011d occurred while trying to refresh network
connections to the Information Store. The Internet Mail Service is being
shut down. 

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   MSExchangeIMC
Event Category: Internal Processing 
Event ID:   4116
Date:   10/9/2002
Time:   8:13:33 AM
User:   N/A
Computer:   ORO-MAIL
Description:
An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail
Service uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server. It is
possible that the piece of mail being processed at the time will be
returned to the sender as a failed delivery instead of being delivered.
The message will be moved to the "BAD" folder, if possible, and the
error is not a temporary error. Otherwise it will be retried when the
service is restarted. Use the appropriate utilities found in the SUPPORT
directory of your Exchange CD to view and manipulate messages that have
been moved to the "BAD" folder. 

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   MSExchangeIMC
Event Category: Internal Processing 
Event ID:   4102
Date:   10/9/2002
Time:   8:13:25 AM
User:   N/A
Computer:   ORO-MAIL
Description:
A serious error has occurred while trying to send mail into the Exchange
Information Store. The Internet Mail Service is being shut down. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IS 70GB and growing....

2002-10-08 Thread David N. Precht

And you are praying for the day when it blows up?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrea Coppini
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 04:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing


About 60% of our users have mailboxes over 200Mb.

1 beats the rest downright...  His mailbox size is 2.6Gb.

-Original Message-
From: Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 08 October 2002 7:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing


140MB is big, but it's not uncommon to see mailboxes greater than 1GB in
size.

-Original Message-
From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 October 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing


Do you think 140MB mailbox is big?!?!
The exchange server is 3 years old

- Original Message -
From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:08 PM
Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing


> I'd be more tempted to look at things like storage limits.  500 users
> and 70gig, seriously who needs to save that much email?  Your email 
> shouldn't
be
> a file server.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 3:12 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing
>
> Would be tempted to look at things like restore time SLA, backup
> window time etc.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: 04 October 2002 09:36
> Posted To: Exchange List
> Conversation: IS 70GB and growing
> Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing
>
>
> I am reading all this thread, and still can't find which part made you

> so angry.
>
> How should the question be asked, so you would be so nice, to provide
> some information..
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:25 AM
> Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing
>
>
> > Heaven help him.
> >
> > Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
> > Technical Consultant
> > hp Services
> > "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral
> problems."
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Hanji
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:00 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing
> >
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > It may be some one you know.
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:39 PM
> > Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing
> >
> >
> > > Heaven help the consultant Hanji hires.
> > >
> > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> > > Tech Consultant
> > > hp Services
> > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great
> Cthulhu
> >
> > > Jones
> > > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:01 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing
> > >
> > >
> > > I vote Hanji hires a consultant to fix the problem. He's not
> > > showing much improvement...
> > >
> > > (:=
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Couch,
> > > Nate
> > > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:55 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing
> > >
> > >
> > > I vote for two servers.
> > >
> > > Nate Couch
> > > EDS Messaging
> > >
> > > > --
> > > > From: Great Cthulhu Jones
> > > > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 20:20
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing
> > > >
> > > > Who cares about it, though? If you need two servers, you need
> > > > two servers. If not, buy more hard drives.
> > > >
> > > > (:=
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sakti
> > > > Chakravarty (Senteq)
> > > > Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 6:44 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If I recall correctly, using the Move Mailbox utility retains
> > > > SIS.
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Monday, 30 September 2002 6:29 AM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: IS 70GB and growing
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi guys.
> > > >
> > > > I have an exchange 5.5 on a strong machine. The IS is over 73GB
> > > > (total
> > >
> > > > of 500 users). I am thinking whether it is the right move to
> > > > split this box into two servers. The main problem is that

RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox

2002-10-07 Thread David N. Precht

But
http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm

Yes?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 01:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox


BLB = Brick Level Backup, or backup of individual mailboxes. SMR = I am
guessing that this is Single Mailbox Restore.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fioon
Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 9:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox


Hei,

Recently have interested in Veritas, but quite new. May i know what is
BLB & SMR guys referring to ? Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 1:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox


Thank you very much.

Fortunately, I'm not using BLB.  I'll proceed with my SMR.  If I can't
get it back through agents tab, I'll try the decoder and/or mdbvue .
I'll let you know how I made out.

Thanks again,
Louise

-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 5:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox

It's been quite a while when I was playing with this stuff and I
remember that it is not trivial.

Let's see what I can remember... The Exchange 5.5 Scripting agent script
itself is stored as a hidden item in the folder it is applied to (in
your case: the particular mailbox on Server A). Another second config
item, also hidden, is created on the server the script is supposed to be
executed (in your case Server B) in the system folder Event_Config (or
similar - can't remember the correct name unfortunately).

So, if you just want to get the script code back then try to restore the
whole mailbox store on a recovery server [1] and use either a debugging
tool [2] or try to connect with Outlook and see if you can get it via
the Agents tab.

[1] Note that if you use BLB [3] you might not be able to restore
Scripting Agents. Only if you use an Exchange backup aware product to do
a full IS backup/restore you have a chance. [2] Either MicroEye
ScriptDorector
(http://www.microeye.com/scriptdirector) or the Microsoft Agent Editor
(used to be in the Exchange 5.5 SDK or BackOffice Resource Kit 4.5) or
plain mdbvu32.exe (comes with Exchange on the setup CD). But the latter
needs to be used CAREFULLY. [3] BLB => Brick Level Backup like it is
offered with ArcServe, Veritas and other backup software.



> -Original Message-
> From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:16 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm hoping you can assist me in just how to recover an event script
that
> is
> associated with a particular mailbox.  It seems the script just
> disappeared and the developer did not have a copy.
> 
> The mailbox sits on server A and the script was added to it through
the
> Agents tab.  The script executes on Server B.  Presently, I'm making
an
> assumption that restoring the mailbox from server A, I should also get
the
> script.
> 
> Is this correct?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Louise
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_

RE: Large Mailing List

2002-10-05 Thread David N. Precht

Net-Admin-Rant?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 18:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large Mailing List


Send him to groups.yahoo.com?

> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Goforth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:30 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Large Mailing List
> 
> 
> OK, this is going to sound really stupid.  Don't shoot the IT
> Puppet.  I have a supervisor that literally wants A LOT of 
> email.  He likes to read through emails on almost any 
> subject.  He's one of those people that thinks that the best 
> way to get knowledge is to read other peoples thoughts on the 
> subject (whatever that may be).  Can someone recommend a 
> Distro List that I can set him up on that would make him give 
> up on this idea?  He had me setup public folders so that the 
> rest of the office can share in his "JOY".  Whatever.  Thanks.
> 
> 
> Eric J. Goforth

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2

2002-10-05 Thread David N. Precht

Or Symantec...

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 00:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2


or GFI?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 8:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2


How about Sybari or Trend? 


-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2


HA!

I know, I get grief from people all the time over it, but its my only
choice right now until I can get NAV implemented.

> --
> From: Andy David
> Reply To: Exchange Discussions
> Sent: Friday, October 4, 2002 10:32 PM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2
> 
> Ah!
> Groupshield!
> I'm melting...
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 9:31 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: McAfee GroupShield 5.2
> 
> 
> Anyone ever have problems with McAfee GSE 5.2 and it not being able to
open
> the private information store?
> 
> I get the following error in Event Viewer:
> 
> McAfee GroupShield Exchange failed to open private message store.
> 
> Then I also get this error:
> 
> Alert Manager Event Log Alert:
> 
> An internal error occurred in Groupshield - please check the log for 
> details.(from  Serial# 3) IP  user SYSTEM
running
> GroupShield 5.20.664.0 odcmd)
> 
> I have defragged the private store and I have uninstalled/reinstalled
GSE
> but
> I cannot figure out why this is happening.
> 
> Any help is appreciated.
> 
> ~!M
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---
> ---
> The information contained in this email message is privileged and 
> confidential information intended only for the use of the individual
or
> entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
> distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have
> received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler

> Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
> 
>

===
> ===
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: 

RE: Missing INBOXES

2002-10-04 Thread David N. Precht

Any rules setup?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 13:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Missing INBOXES


We are using Exchange 5.5./sp/4. For some reason some users mailbox came
up with no mail, once they are in Outlook 2000. I have did the Database
clean up utilities for Exchange. Is there something else i can look at.
Again nothing was deleted, for some reason they don't have thier mail in
the inbox.

Thank You

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5

2002-10-04 Thread David N. Precht

Names have been changed to protect the innocent.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 07:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5


Ever wonder why CA keeps changing the names of their products?


-Original Message-
From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 12:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5



I've download the BE trial copy , but it can't run. Funny, hang on Self
Extract. Download again, same thing happened again. 

Any opinion on new ArcServe2000 BrightStore for the Disaster Recovery on
Exchange 5.5 Issue ? 

Fin
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Backing up Exchange 5.5


Yes, as a google search would have shown.

- Original Message - 
From: "Fioon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:09 AM
Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5


> Hi,
> 
> May i know which third party are you guys talking about on this 
> "Backup Exec" ? It's Veritas ??
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:20 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Backing up Exchange 5.5
> 
> 
> I know this has come up before but how is everyone else backing up 
> their Exchange servers.  We're using Backup Exec and only backing up 
> the mailboxes not the pub.edb or priv.edb.  Is it wise to stop those 
> services periodically to back those up?  And how often?  We're not 
> using the Open File Agent.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: New Exchange Server

2002-10-04 Thread David N. Precht

TMI

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrea Coppini
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 05:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange Server


If you were referring to me, I'll show you my willy...

Regards
_MR._ Andrea Coppini

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 October 2002 7:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange Server


Maybe you should look into getting a better RAID controller.  Her theory
is right.

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange Server


Andrea,

Please let me disagree.

All I have to do is boot without the crashed page drive. Windows will
create a temp page file on the C: drive and start (just confirmed this
with my hardware guys). Then when time allows, the replacement drive can
be added and the page file moved to it, with all the necessary reboots.

I also disagree about the 0% downtime according to your scenario #2.
Based on my experience, as soon as RAID failed on the page file volume,
the server did a blue screen of death. So much for 0% downtime. *In
theory* the server *should* have kept running. But it did not. So screw
it. If it is going to crash anyway I am not going to spend extra money
on it.

-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange Server


Picture this:

Your single (let's say IDE) pagefile drive fails, so your system
crashes. You run down to your store or computer shop to buy a new drive
(system still down) You install the disk in another machine (since
Exchange might not start up without page drive) (system still down) You
partition/format the drive (system still down) You install the new IDE
disk in your exchange server (system still down) You start up Exchange.

If you can afford all that downtime, go ahead and use a single drive.
But now let's look at RAID1 swap:

One of your swap disks fail.. Raid1 is broken so machine keeps running
on one disk You take the bad disk Offline and pull it out 
You stroll and whistle your way down to your store or computer shop to
get a new disk, maybe even have a couple of doughnuts on the way... You
insert the new disk in your exchange server. run the RAID tools, rebuild
the RAID. Pat yourself on the back for 0% downtime.


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 October 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange Server


If it happened once it will probably happen again. I see no big benefit
of putting page file on RAID. If I had a limited number of drive bays, I
would rather have a separate RAID1 for transaction logs and a separate
RAID5 for informations store database files; and if no more drive array
bays are available for the page file volume - I would stick an IDE or
SCSI drive in the CD-ROM bay or some other available space and connect
it to the onboard controller and achieve better performance instead of
perceived reliability.

-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange Server


So because you once had a problem with RAID that caused it to stop
working must mean that it's always unreliable for everyone else every
time?

Robert Moir
IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
>SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue > 0
0 rows returned 

> -Original Message-
> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 03 October 2002 13:53
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: New Exchange Server
> 
> 
> Do you need me to explain it all in small details?
> 
> I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume.
> RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. Having the page file 
> on RAID1 did not necessarily make it more reliable. Might as well have

> had the page file on a single drive. Why did I write this? Because I
> was answering someone else's remark "Placing the pagefile on a 
> separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance."
> 
> Ok now? Can I go?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:52 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: New Exchange Server
> 
> 
> What does that have to do with Exchange?
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
> Technical Consultant
> hp Services
> "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral
> problems."
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
> Fyodorov
> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:04 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: New Exchange Server
> 
> 
> Well once I had a broken RAID1 on the page file volume. RAID did not
> save me. T

RE: list really slow today?

2002-10-03 Thread David N. Precht

Nope... Just the backbone of UUNET

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes
(IT)
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 16:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: list really slow today?


any one else noticing the msgs are taking a long time to show up on the
list today?

(or is this just my personal hell again)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Employee gone, what to do with the maill box

2002-10-03 Thread David N. Precht

Sounds like you have the answer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Jr.
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 17:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Employee gone, what to do with the maill box


I haveThere is a manager, nit mine, but of a guy he just let go, and he
needs some information for this past Employees mailbox. What is the best
way to allow this user to access this box. Just give him permissionas
and have him add it to his profile? E2K, user is using Outlook 2K.

- John Q

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Event ID 1171 help?

2002-10-03 Thread David N. Precht

Search on support.microsoft.com

Plenty of hits

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11
Ben T
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Event ID 1171 help?


Scenario:

NT 4.0 SP6a SRP
Exchange 5.5 SP4

I'm in the processing of replacing two servers with a more powerful one.

I setup the new server and joined the site.  I've moved all of the
mailboxes from the first server onto the new one and didn't appear to be
having any issues.

However, starting on the 25th (which coincides with when I rebooted my
bridgehead for the other problem I posted to the group about) I started
receiving the below error about every 6-8 hours.

SYMPTOMS
The Exchange Server 5.5 directory may log the following event in the
application event log: 
Event ID: 1171
Source: MSExchangeDS
Description: Exception e0010002 has occurred with parameters 9 and 6
(internal ID 3190022). Contact Microsoft Technical Support for
assistance. 

Based on my reading through newsgroups, etc. I thought it may have been
a resolution error.  However, I do have an entry in the DNS and was
successful with RPC Ping to the bridgehead.  I also tried rebooting all
the servers just to make sure it wasn't something to do with the
bridgehead reboot.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.


Ben Parrnelli
Network Administrator
Comm & Data Directorate
MAGTF Training Command
29 Palms, CA 92278

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: synchronizing

2002-09-30 Thread David N. Precht

Check the log?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Derek Soppitt
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 08:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: synchronizing


I would appreciate any troubleshooting tips on synchronizing within MS
Outlook.

Thx.

Del 


  NOTICE & DISCLAIMER * This
document and any attachments thereto may contain information which is
confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights and are
intended for the sole use of the recipient(s) named above.  Any use of
the information contained herein (including, but not limited to, total
or partial reproduction, communication or distribution in any form) or
the taking of any action in reliance on the contents by persons other
than the designated recipient(s), is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this document in error, please notify the sender
either by telephone, fax or by e-mail and delete the material from any
computer.

TQ3 Travel Solutions thanks you for your cooperation.

**



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IS 70GB and growing....

2002-09-29 Thread David N. Precht

Any mailbox quotas?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Hanji
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 16:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IS 70GB and growing


Hi guys.

I have an exchange 5.5 on a strong machine. The IS is over 73GB (total
of 500 users). I am thinking whether it is the right move to split this
box into two servers. The main problem is that I will loose SIS...
On the other hand, I will have two smaller databases.

I am sure some of you had this scenario in the past. I would like to
hear your opinions. In case it is important, the IS is going to be moved
to EMC box in 3 months (part of storage project).

I am mostly intersted hearing from happy users with such big IS (are
there?!)

Thanks!


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Disappearing appointments

2002-09-29 Thread David N. Precht

AutoArchive enabled?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 09:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disappearing appointments


Has anyone ever heard of Calendar appointments just disappearing?  My
users are complaining that they had a calendar appointment but it some
how was deleted.  Also one is saying that someone just received an
invitation to a meeting from December of last year.  Any one heard of
this behavior?

Thank you,
 
Alex 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Conversion

2002-09-29 Thread David N. Precht

Good luck to ya!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Callan, Chris
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 15:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conversion


New Hardware and New exchange

Going from Two Exch5.5 Machine to A Clustered E2k Machine.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: malformed address

2002-09-24 Thread David N. Precht

I'm sorry?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Natkin
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 17:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: malformed address


tesr

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: malformed address


The email address is SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?

> -Original Message-
> From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 12:24 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: malformed address
> 
> 
> We received the following NDR, noting an error 553, "malformed 
> address"...I checked google, but most of the links pertained to 
> non-ascii characters, which this is not the case.  Can anyone shed 
> some light on this problem? The email address is correct (as listed in

> exchange administrator)... exchange 5.5/sp4. dave
> 
> 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Mail delivery failure
> 
> Sent >>> RCPT TO:
> Received <<< 553 malformed address: 
> 
> Could not deliver mail to this user.
> * End of message ***
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MEC

2002-09-24 Thread David N. Precht

Thanks.  There goes my lunch.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 20:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


If anyone is interested, Andy is staying at Motel 6. He'll leave the
light and thong on for you.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


www.sleepinyourcar.com




-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 5:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


www.lodging.com

-Original Message-
From: Bubba G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


Good luck finding a hotel at this stage... I just got one this morning
but that was only because "I know this guy that works for the company".

-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 1:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC


I finally got my boss to sign off on it. I will, hopefully, see you all
there.

Josh

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC


OK, the time draws near.
Who is going?



Martin Blackstone
Director, Information Technologies
Superior Access Insurance Services
949.470.2111 x279

-Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his
head out when you're coming home his face might burn up.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.



==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Intrasite Replication Issue?

2002-09-24 Thread David N. Precht

http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9318&source=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11
Ben T
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 15:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Intrasite Replication Issue?


Jim:

I don't have any errors on the bridgehead, but after you asked I went
back and checked one of the OTHER servers.

Got a bunch of the following warnings on several of the servers I
checked. I can assume this is happening on all of them:

EventID:9318
Source: MSExchangeMTA
Type:   Warning

An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality
Table (LTAB) index: 149, NT/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error   1722,
Bind
error   0,  Remote Server Name 29PALMS003E [MAIN BASE 1 500 (null)]
(14)

Greek to me.

Thanks for the reply!


-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Intrasite Replication Issue?


Are you getting any error messages in your server logs?  If so, what are
they?

-Original Message-
From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Intrasite Replication Issue?


Scenario:

NT 4.0 SP6a SRP
Exchange 5.5 SP4

My bridgehead server is receiving GAL changes from other sites, but is
not replicating this info to the other servers in my site.  However, if
I make a change on one of the other servers, the bridgehead does get the
change.

Any ideas on what to look for or what to try?

Thanks.


Ben Parrnelli
Network Administrator
Comm & Data Directorate
MAGTF Training Command
29 Palms, CA 92278

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Brightmail

2002-09-24 Thread David N. Precht

CloudMark is also a client app.  Runs ok most of them.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 18:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Brightmail


I'm running a copy of IHateSpam from Sunbelt (www.sunbelt-software.com).
Seems to work well.  This is not a server-based solution, but does most
of the other things you want.  You could add it to a standard image.

David

-Original Message-
From: ITS.Teams.TNT.Mailing-Lists.MailingList
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Brightmail


We're currently investigating anti-spam products and are particularly
interested in any products that allow the end user the ability to have
some control over what is considered spam and what is not.  Ideally,
we'd like a product that places suspected spam into a separate folder
within the clients' mailboxes where they can then deal with it
themselves.  In addition, we'd like for this to be a completely
server-based solution.  I know some products allow you to append a
phrase to the subject of suspected spam messages so that users can then
set up rules in Outlook to move those messages to a folder, but we'd
prefer to have this happen automatically (without user intervention).
The only product I've seen so far that can do this is Brightmail.  Is
anyone using Brightmail for Exchange?  Are there any other products out
there that would accomplish our goals?  We're running Exchange 2000 SP2
and have about 2000 users.

Thanks,

Abby


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Test

2002-09-23 Thread David N. Precht

Yet again.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 14:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test


Test- is this getting through


-Original Message-
From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test

Yup!

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Test


Test - is the list just quiet today


Brian

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person
responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be
advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use,
dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is
strictly prohibited. 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: test

2002-09-23 Thread David N. Precht

Received again.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: test


Test
Please reply if this anyone sees this

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Test

2002-09-23 Thread David N. Precht

Loud and clear.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 15:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test


Test - is this getting through yet



Rob Weatherly
Handleman Company
(248) 362-4400 x122


-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Test

TEST - Did you just forget about the FAQs today?

- Original Message - 
From: "Brian Dugas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 7:15 AM
Subject: Test


> Test - is the list just quiet today
> 
> 
> Brian
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   3   >