RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server
Living dangerously, eh? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server 1960? Are you sure? That's 5.5 w/o any service pack. -Original Message- From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 3:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server Sorry, 5.5 Build 1960.5. -Original Message- From: Kevinm v1.3. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 November 2003 17:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server You in 5.5 ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Dixon Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Phantom email address in Exchange Server I'm trying to add the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange Administrator tells me that the address is already in use in the organisation. If I send a test email to the address, I get a System Admin message informing me that the address does not exist. Does anybody know what I can do to remove the phantom reference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
But... A preliminary investigation by Microsoft indicated that the issue occurs only with Kerberos authentication disabled, which the vendor said is uncommon. We recommend that our customers ensure that Kerberos authentication is enabled, which is the default configuration, Microsoft said in a statement Friday. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw? This has taken a new turn... http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/11/21/HNmsflaw_1.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw? Not that I am aware of. My boss just passed it on to me. I'm not a participate in that list. I just thought it was odd since that would be a huge flaw and Microsoft or anyone for that matter has said nothing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw? All seriousness aside, I know nothing about this issue. I'm inferring from the other responses to this thread that if two MVPs have no knowledge of the issue it probably doesn't exist. Mike W: Were there any follow-up posts on NTBUGTRAQ about this? -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw? I saw a posting about it on NTBUGTRAQ.COM. Some guy had to shut off OWA indefinitely because of the issue. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw? So you have seen this? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw? That's because Microsoft knows of the issue but does not have a fix yet. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw? I have not heard of it... Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, November 21, 2003 10:57 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw? Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw? Is this BS or has anyone else heard of this flaw? -Original Message- From: Windows NTBugtraq Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Johnson Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA major security flaw We have upgraded our servers to Microsoft Exchange 2003 and noticed a severe security issue with OWA. When you log in with your own credentials you may be logged into another user's mailbox at random and has full access to this user's mailbox. Microsoft knows of the issue but does not have a fix yet. I was wondering how many others have seen this issue and have received the same answer from Microsoft. This seems to be a major security flaw and we have had to shut off OWA indefinitely because of the issue. Matthew Johnson CCNA Network Administrator Investment Scorecard, Inc. 615.301.7611 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.investmentscorecard.com http://www.investmentscorecard.com/ - Marcus Ranum's new book The Myth of Homeland Security is now out and is available from http://www.amazon.com/ranum In this hard-hitting review of the homeland security business, Ranum shows us how the problem is vastly harder than it's being made to sound, and how special interests, butt covering, and bureaucracy are threatening to derail any chance of making progress. - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =
RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls
More details please:) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls Hear of this one? Outsider seizes PC via Internet and places long distance calls i.e. to Africa. Can't find anything on it. Regards, orin rehorst _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitoring Internet email traffic per user/mailbox
http://www.softwareshelf.com/products/promodag.asp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitoring Internet email traffic per user/mailbox Hi, just wondering if anyone knows of a way to monitor MSX5.5 Internet email traffic based on each mailbox. Something tabular or graph based would be ideal, just so we can see what sort of MB each user is sending/revieving over a time frame. Only concerned with Internet traffic (since internally its free). Cheers :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: webmail
Biggie size, please -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: webmail Would you like to Super size this order sir? _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: webmail when i access my webmail i recieve only the parent directory _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: .Pst on OWA?
a newbie, you think? - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 08:54 Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? this is disturbing -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 4:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: .Pst on OWA? Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA Spellchecker
http://www.owaspellchecker.com - Original Message - From: Steve Iadarola [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 15:25 Subject: OWA Spellchecker Checked the FAQs and did not see anything. Anyone using a Spellcheck add-on for E2K OWA? Are there any that the list recommends? Outside of waiting for Exchange 2003. TIA, Steve Iadarola _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith
how can a 256meg pipe be bad? - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 07:47 Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith Technically, I guess they use more, but I'm not 100% sure. Keep in mind that PST's store mail in 2 formats (so 1 message stored twice), but I think that conversion is done on the client side. I have a number of users using Outlook in offline mode on the wrong end of a 256MB pipe that gets shared with lots of other traffic. Outlook, especially the newer versions, are fairly stingy with network traffic. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith Recent conversations have caused me to re-think the entire Exchange strategy that is in place here. The biggest bulk of that strategy includes Backups. The new idea is to go with Item Retention, this highlights the issue that most of the people round here have Personal Folders containing there email, which in turn means that there is no way they are getting backed up. The problem im faced with is that a lot of our sites have only a 64k ISDN link which may be linking 10 people or more! Okay you can scrutinise me for having such a small link for such an amount of users, but hey im not going to pay out of my wages for a larger link ;p Anyway, this problem means that working directly from the Mail Box is out of the question, the next best thing I guess is Offline-Folders. Offline-Folders appear to be the perfect the solution, running a small test over a dial up connection you would think they were the ideal candidate for this situation. However, a colleague informs me that it completely kills the network when you have a few people synchronising folders over an 64k link. Do synchronise folders use more bandwidth than your average Personal Folder? Are there any other issues to consider when using offline folders as apposed to personal folders? Im also informed that when you make a new folder in your mail box it is not automatically synchronised with the server? Please can you give me all your experience and all your info on working with synchronise folders within a working enterprise. No matter how irrelevant you think it may seem, I would like to know exactly what im in for if I move to this solution. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith
a couple of p2p servers;) - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 08:08 Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith what is the right end of a 256MB pipe? :) -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2003 12:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith Technically, I guess they use more, but I'm not 100% sure. Keep in mind that PST's store mail in 2 formats (so 1 message stored twice), but I think that conversion is done on the client side. I have a number of users using Outlook in offline mode on the wrong end of a 256MB pipe that gets shared with lots of other traffic. Outlook, especially the newer versions, are fairly stingy with network traffic. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith Recent conversations have caused me to re-think the entire Exchange strategy that is in place here. The biggest bulk of that strategy includes Backups. The new idea is to go with Item Retention, this highlights the issue that most of the people round here have Personal Folders containing there email, which in turn means that there is no way they are getting backed up. The problem im faced with is that a lot of our sites have only a 64k ISDN link which may be linking 10 people or more! Okay you can scrutinise me for having such a small link for such an amount of users, but hey im not going to pay out of my wages for a larger link ;p Anyway, this problem means that working directly from the Mail Box is out of the question, the next best thing I guess is Offline-Folders. Offline-Folders appear to be the perfect the solution, running a small test over a dial up connection you would think they were the ideal candidate for this situation. However, a colleague informs me that it completely kills the network when you have a few people synchronising folders over an 64k link. Do synchronise folders use more bandwidth than your average Personal Folder? Are there any other issues to consider when using offline folders as apposed to personal folders? Im also informed that when you make a new folder in your mail box it is not automatically synchronised with the server? Please can you give me all your experience and all your info on working with synchronise folders within a working enterprise. No matter how irrelevant you think it may seem, I would like to know exactly what im in for if I move to this solution. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook XP Licensing
Contact MS Licensing. They are the true source. - Original Message - From: Neil Doody [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:50 Subject: Outlook XP Licensing When you purchase sufficient Exchange 2000 licensing, you're entitled to install Outlook 2000 on each of the licensed clients, or so im lead to believe? :o Anyway, can you install Outlook XP on these clients without the need for any kind of Office XP license? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
not me:(
- Original Message -
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 16:10
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+x )r yi )�+rrW{jr ZZvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting...
http://eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=7031source= - Original Message - From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 14:11 Subject: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... I have a question to run by the list that I have been unsuccessful in finding any definitive answers to anywhere else. About a month ago, we started having problems with our Exchange 2000 server. It is Ex2K SP3 running on Win2K SP3. At intervals between a couple days and a week, we notice that a number of System Services shut down unexpectedly. Upon looking at the event logs we see the following sequence of events. Event Id: 7031 The IIS Admin Service service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange IMAP4 service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Network News Transport (NNTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange POP3 terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange Routing Engine service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Simple Mail Transport Protocol (SMTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The World Wide Web Publishing service terminated unexpectedly... On 2 occasions, this sequence was followed by the server rebooting on its own and generating an event ID 6008 the previous shutdown...was unexpected. I searched the MSKB and the only thing I could find that seemed to relate was a reference to lingering issues from the CodeRed virus. I used Trend Micro's system cleanup application and confirmed that there were no indications of infection on the server. I am hoping there are others out there that may have seen something like this that can offer some suggestions short of reinstalling the entire system. Please help. Thanks in advance... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DHCP won't renew lease
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1011source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sanjeev Sharma Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 18:43 To: NT 2000 Discussions Cc: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: DHCP won't renew lease Importance: High I am currently having an issue with one of the subnets on our DHCP servers and I could use your help. On one of the subnets DHCP won't renew the leasing of IP address to any of the clients. The clients who already have IP address lease to them are working normally but whichever one got rebooted could not get the new or same IP address. In the event viewer I see an event ID 1011 with the following warning The DHCP Server issued a NACK to the client (client's hardware address) for the address (IP address) request. Has anyone seen this before? This server is running NT 4.0 Server SP 6a. Thanks much in advance for any help. -- You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DHCP won't renew lease
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1011source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sanjeev Sharma Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 18:43 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: DHCP won't renew lease Importance: High I am currently having an issue with one of the subnets on our DHCP servers and I could use your help. On one of the subnets DHCP won't renew the leasing of IP address to any of the clients. The clients who already have IP address lease to them are working normally but whichever one got rebooted could not get the new or same IP address. In the event viewer I see an event ID 1011 with the following warning The DHCP Server issued a NACK to the client (client's hardware address) for the address (IP address) request. Has anyone seen this before? This server is running NT 4.0 Server SP 6a. Thanks much in advance for any help. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recall: X.400 connector problem
Sorry, too late... Already read it -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hanumanthappa, Santhosh Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 02:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recall: X.400 connector problem Hanumanthappa, Santhosh would like to recall the message, X.400 connector problem. ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event 9175 and 9200
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9175source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc Mearns Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 07:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event 9175 and 9200 Importance: High User Group 1. Exchange 2000 SP2 NT2000 SP2 2. The event error that we are getting are below: Event 9175 The MAPI call 'MAPILogonEx' failed with the following error: The MAPI call failed. MAPI or an unspecified service provider. ID no: 80004005-- followed by: Event 9200 Failed to perform MAPI logon. 3. I have looked on Technet and the first event seems to point to moving users. The problem seems to occur every night on our bridgehead or connector servers around 22:00. 4. I am wondering what process would could cause this to happen every night and has been happening for at least a month. Any positive input would be very much appreciated. Regards Marc Mearns Mobile - 07775-630508 Office - 020 7695 0286 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA hosted exchange problem
What a night owl ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 01:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA hosted exchange problem At 10pm on a Friday? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Natkin Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 10:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Ed what are you still doing up? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 12:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA hosted exchange problem Define group in The last group I set up. If this group has a different e-mail domain, is there an entry that corresponds to this group's e-mail domain in the default recipient policy? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Natkin Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 9:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA hosted exchange problem Hello Group I have 4 storage groups setup each with 4 mailbox stores and 4 global address list. The last group I set up can log into exchange via outlook but not OWA. I checked my filters on the address list for this group and they all come up when I do the preview. Default global address list is deleted. Win2k advance sp3 exchange enterp. Sp3 Any Ideas I.ve searched the knowledge base but most answers are for non hosted exchange problems. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forwarding mailbox contents
Take ownership of the mailbox. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Boynton, Todd Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 11:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forwarding mailbox contents Is there a way for an administrator to forward the entire contents of a mailbox to an external address without having to login to the mailbox. The mailbox contains old messages that contain sensitive information. Thanks Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message Delay
Many, many times. Some where there was a problem delivering. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 08:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message Delay All, Has anyone seen this message be sent back to them? What is it? And should I be worried? This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. The list of email addresses are below. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Twas the night before Christmas
Unless you want to get away from the family. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Etie Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 22:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Twas the night before Christmas Oh sure it's funny until you have to go in on Christmas. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 12:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Twas the night before Christmas Twas the night before Christmas, and all 'cross the WAN Email traffic was humming as only it can. Best wishes and greetings and tacky ecards And SPAM of the kind that ought to be barred. Helpdesks and Admins at home with their kin Grumbling o'er what a tough year it has been. Yet grateful for clients and bosses and such Pondering if they should tell them as much. With IIS fully patched and BSD in the front, So my Exchange server need not take the brunt, I can celebrate with my family full of Christmas cheer Knowing my servers are good til New Years. The wail of the pager then gave me the creeps! Even with batteries removed to prevent any beeps. Don my robe and to the home PC I head VPN to the office, but the connection seems dead. Driving to work, the big question I muster: Why did I go with Active/Active cluster?? Nothing coulda prepared me, no matter the time, On the serverroom floor, all the Elves of MIME! Now HELO, now MAIL FROM Now RCPT TO, now DATA On IP, On Hostname On Header and ta-da! To the virtual server Out the NIC to the 'net Bring on the next one! We'll get through this yet! The information store it seems had a bit of a fall And emails have spilled on the floor and the walls. Notes, tasks, contacts. Calendars, too. All over the place. What else could we do? You? You encode them?, I asked, simply aghast. Then I remembered, but just one year past. Santa had worked on my server that night. Since then it had seemed to be running alright. Now his helpers are here, data on the floor still Like the wrong switch run on e-s-e util. I watched in awe as the elves did assemble little packets back into the mail they resembled. Their eyes were so bright, their arms how they spun. They worked very hard, yet had so much fun! With green and red hats, they stood a foot tall. Dozens of them working and having a ball! Their cheeks were all rosy, their faces asmile. Their jackets and pants: the epitomy of style. Adorned with white sneakers with the words Got Stick? And teamwork to make any manager sick. Some segments they tossed; I asked what was that? Oh do not worry, just winmail dot DATs. They cleaned up a mess I couldn't explain, Almost done, my server was running again. Who would believe me? How could I tell? They'd institutionalize me; say I'm not well. The elves were all done; their work for today. And berated me for my open relay. Look at it this way, they spoke with a sigh, At least you're not running Oracle 9i. Then together they yelled then disappeared from sight, Happy Messaging to all, and to all a good night! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT :: Spam and Content Filtering
SurfControl DynaComm i:filterR http://www.stbernard.com/products/iprism -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT :: Spam and Content Filtering I work at a K-12 Educational Facility and we are required to filter web and e-mail content. I was wandering what you guys recommend as a filtering product. I am running: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 SP3 TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Network Engineer South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind Phone: (864) 577-7548 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 books
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/index=booksfield-keywor ds=exchange%202000search-type=ssbq=1/102-4923324-4546501 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michel Fayad Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 01:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 books Hi all, I am looking for a good book for Exchange 2000. Anybody with a good sugestion? Thanks, Michel Fayad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
I found some KBs on support.microsoft.com for Event 9318 MSExchangeMTA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Yes, I've done that procedure. But they still show up in the E2K (white Icon) in the site. Also, I'm getting warning RPC messages that is shown below on all my E2K servers. It seems they're still trying to send directory updates to these servers. Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Interface Event ID: 9318 Date: 12/9/2002 Time: 11:56:43 AM User: N/A Computer: E2K Server Description: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 55, Windows 2000/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error 1722, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name 5.5 Exch Server [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers By 'ghosted out' do you mean just a white icon? If so, that's how they normally look. The process for removing them that I perform is to use the 5.5 admin program on the E2k server, connecting to the server running SRS. You then delete the 5.5 server from the site as you'd normally do. Is that what you did? Neil -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 09 December 2002 16:52 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers Subject: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers All, I have a question for everyone. I've retired 5.5 servers from our Organization by following a MS Q article that shows you how to accomplish this. Now, when I look in ESM on E2K. It still shows the Exch 5.5 servers listed in there. Granted they are ghosted out. But how do I get rid of them as well. I also have a situation like this for a site that I removed from the Organzation, where it's still listed as an Administrative Group in E2K. Anyone have any ideas how I can get rid of these servers? Thank you, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Question
Only stays in the Sent Mail folder of the sender -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 14:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL Question What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members? TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Network Engineer South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disclaimers
Ask your Legal and Compliance Dept. I would love to hear what they say. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Dewell Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 12:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disclaimers A recurring topic seems to be about adding disclaimers to outgoing messages and I have seem various recommendations about software to do this. But I would like to know how effective are disclaimers? Do they actually have any legal standing? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MTA Error after deleting server
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9318source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield - Exchange Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 11:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MTA Error after deleting server We have moved some users from a remote Exchange Server to our central server at head office, and deleted the server using Exchange Administrator However, I'm getting the following MTA errors in Event Viewer every 10 mins on the central server where the mailboxes are now located Event ID: 9318 Source: MSExchangeMTA Type: Warning Category: Interface Description: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Blah blah Can anyone suggest why it would be trying to talk to a server that I just deleted from exchange admin on that server Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP banner
5.0.2195 is Windows 2000... Either it's the OS on the Exchange box or IIS. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Marriott Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 07:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP banner Is this from Exchange or IIS SMTP? (Or something else) Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 5.0.2195.5329 ready at Fri, 29 Nov 2002 05:09:04 -0700 tia Charles _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes
http://blackberry.net/products/software/server/index.shtml Best way to go. Less hassle for the users. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:33 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Pennell, Ronald B. Subject: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes Has anyone had any experiences with using PDA's for accessing user mailboxes? Our company is starting to research use of PDA's. So far I have done some research on the BlackBerry site. Any recommendations as to server software for E2K SP2. Any hardware recommendations for the PDA's Thanks in advance Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID: 8206 MSExchangeFBPublish
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=8206source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clemens, Rick Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 17:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID: 8206 MSExchangeFBPublish Anybody else seeing this error in their Exchange 2k/Exch 5.5 mixed environments? Can't find anything in technet or eventid! The store is running and the databases are mounted and everything seems to be working finemail is flowing no problem...so why the error? Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeFBPublish Event Category: General Event ID: 8206 Date: 11/20/2002 Time: 4:06:34 PM User: N/A Computer: SRVEXBNT01 Description: Unable to prepare message table for polling thread processing on virtual machine SRVEXBNT01. The error number is 0x80004005. Make sure Microsoft Exchange Store is running. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Keyword search
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/product.cfm?id=312 Content Auditor -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Davinder Gupta Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 19:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Keyword search Is there a way to do a search for keywords on the entire mail database? May be by using a third party software Thanks Davinder _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=184source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Online Defragmentation I have just this on the Event Viewer. What should I do? Event ID: 184 Source: ESE97 Description: MSExchangeIS ((353) ) Online defragmentation of database 'D:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB' terminated prematurely after encountering unexpected error -1019. Everything is still working fine. I found some thing like this on technet, but it have the unexpected error -1018 Any info is helpful Thank Tony Nguyen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID 209 - Can I fix this?
This problem seems to be caused by a server being rebuilt in the exchange organization without it being removed first from the organization using Exchange Administrator in RAW mode. http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=209source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yanek Korff Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 14:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID 209 - Can I fix this? Here's the message I'm getting: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: X.400 Service Event ID: 209 Date: 11/13/2002 Time: 14:16:46 User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE Description: Global domain identifier (Country, ADMD, PRMD) in first Trace Information of message C=us;A= ;P=rst;L=EXCHANGE0211131916WS5VB3DM does not match MTSID value. [MTA XFER-IN 11 40] (12) According to EventID.NET: This problem seems to be caused by a server being rebuilt in the exchange organization without it being removed first from the organization using Exchange Administrator in RAW mode. Now, I'm not entirely sure if this applies. I'm working on a 5.5 Migration to 2000, bringing in new hardware and changing NT4 to w2k domains. 5.5 server is NT4 in domain RST, E2k is in the new domain but has been added to the original ORG. Can anyone offer insight? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error in Application Log
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q165947 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Saul Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 19:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error in Application Log I am running Exchange 2000 SP3, W2K sp2, and have noticed these errors in the application log stating the follow; mt_open returned error 0x15 on database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Category: MTA Connections Event ID: 2007 Type: Error I am getting these errors every minute for each of our mailbox stores. We can still connect, see public folders, and send and receive emails but I am concerned that something may be happening. I can't seem to find anything on Microsoft's KB, nor google. Has anybody seen this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Issue installing Exch2k SP2
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=8213source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 18:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Issue installing Exch2k SP2 Correction on first email.. it wasn't the SA, it was the MTA. Reinstalled the server again and this time I tried SP1 first and everything worked fine. Installed SP2 and MTA and IS would not come up. Same event errors except now I see a an event 8213. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeFBPublish Event Category: General Event ID: 8213 Date: 11/19/2002 Time: 6:01:05 PM User: N/A Computer: SB1-ITS-EXC-001 Description: System Attendant Service failed to create session for virtual machine SB1-ITS-EXC-001. The error number is 0x80005000. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Issue installing Exch2k SP2 We are adding an exchange 2000 server to an existing site. Currently we have two remote servers running exchange 2k sp2 already and the new server will be in a remote office. After installing exchange 2000, the server reboots fine and comes up properly. But once I install SP2 on it, the IS and SA service will not start. I get event 5000 and 1121. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 1121 Date: 11/18/2002 Time: 8:11:09 PM User: N/A Computer: SB1-ITS-EXC-001 Description: Error 0x8004010f connecting to the Microsoft Active Directory. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 5000 Date: 11/18/2002 Time: 8:11:09 PM User: N/A Computer: SB1-ITS-EXC-001 Description: Unable to initialize the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service. Error 0x8004010f. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. I've already checked KB 305392, and kb 329599 and they are not the cause. Anyone have any information that could help? Thanks in advance. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Issue installing Exch2k SP2
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=5000source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 17:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Issue installing Exch2k SP2 We are adding an exchange 2000 server to an existing site. Currently we have two remote servers running exchange 2k sp2 already and the new server will be in a remote office. After installing exchange 2000, the server reboots fine and comes up properly. But once I install SP2 on it, the IS and SA service will not start. I get event 5000 and 1121. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 1121 Date: 11/18/2002 Time: 8:11:09 PM User: N/A Computer: SB1-ITS-EXC-001 Description: Error 0x8004010f connecting to the Microsoft Active Directory. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 5000 Date: 11/18/2002 Time: 8:11:09 PM User: N/A Computer: SB1-ITS-EXC-001 Description: Unable to initialize the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service. Error 0x8004010f. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. I've already checked KB 305392, and kb 329599 and they are not the cause. Anyone have any information that could help? Thanks in advance. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID 9302, 9551
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9551source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 15:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID 9302, 9551 Dear All, I get these errors on my exchange server ( exchange 2000 enterprise sp3, windows 2000 sp2, Native mode-both ). Rebooted the Global catalog Server as per one of the MS KB Q articles, did not do any good...Any one has come across this warning? Any suggestions? Any ideas? Thanks *** Event 9302 (about 4 instances every minute) The transport configuration type 4 for the directory entry CN=MICROSOFT MTA,CN=DEXCH2000,CN=SERVERS,CN=DANCONA,CN=ADMINISTRATIVE GROUPS,CN=DANCONA AND PFLAUM,CN=MICROSOFT EXCHANGE,CN=SERVICES,CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=DANCONA,DC=COM is not one of the supported values. Reconfigure the transport configuration type in the identified directory entry. [BASE IL OPERATOR 24 217] (8) For more information, click .. *** event 9551 (about 4 instances every hour) An error occurred while upgrading the ACL on folder [MBX:Flores, Eloisa]/Contacts/Attorneys located on database First Storage Group\Mailbox Store (DEXCH2000). The Information Store was unable to convert the security for /O=D'ANCONA PFLAUM/OU=DANCONA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BKING into a Windows 2000 Security Identifier. It is possible that this is caused by latency in the Active Directory Service, if so, wait until the user record is replicated to the Active Directory and attempt to access the folder (it will be upgraded in place). If the specified object does NOT get replicated to the Active Directory, use the Microsoft Exchange System Manager or the Exchange Client to update the ACL on the folder manually. The access rights in the ACE for this DN were 0x47b. For more information, click ... The user-'BKing' does not exist in Active Directory---Raj Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ESE97
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=184source= http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q271987 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 10:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ESE97 Has anyone encounter this error before and what are the step I need to take to fix this. I have read Q314917 and there a lots of information about -1018. Are they the same. Event ID: 184 Source: ESE97 Description: MSExchangeIS ((353) ) Online defragmentation of database 'D:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB' terminated prematurely after encountering unexpected error -1019. Tony N. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
Did he mention 5.5 in there? I don't think he did. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 17:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory Why SP3 anyhow? SP4 is where you need to be. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov;innerhost.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory I think it will stop after 3GB. -Original Message- From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern;baldhead.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory Hi everyone. I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe process is slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an excessive amount of threads and its still not under control. Is there anything else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server but I assume it will only eat that too! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Security Log errors
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=565source=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Hooks, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Security Log errors
I have security event log errors on my domain controllers ever since
bringing Exchange 2000 into our enterprise. A little background - single
domain, single site, win2k SP3, native mode. Exchange 2k SP2 - moved
mailboxes from an Exchange 5.5 box and followed the steps to remove the
first exchange server. Exchange 5.5 was uninstalled from the old server,
but the box itself remains as a DC on the network.
The errors occur every minute for 15 minutes, every 4 hours, exactly
when one of the RUS runs. When the RUS was Always Run so were the
errors. There are 2 RUS entries, one updates all the time and works fine
(Recipient Update Service (Athena)). The other runs every four hours and
produces 15 errors per pop (Recipient Update Service (Enterprise
Configuration)). Do I really need two of these? Is there anyway to see
what exactly is in the individual RUS?
Thanks for your help.
Tim Hooks, MCSE
Columbus, OH
Here is the error message:
Event Type: Failure Audit
Event Source: Security
Event Category: Directory Service Access
Event ID: 565
Date: 11/12/2002
Time: 7:05:21 AM
User: ATHENA\ARIES$
Computer: HERMES
Description:
Object Open:
Object Server: DS
Object Type:configuration
Object Name:CN=Configuration,DC=inside,DC=kbhr,DC=com
New Handle ID: -
Operation ID: {0,1638256139}
Process ID: 296
Primary User Name: HERMES$
Primary Domain: ATHENA
Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x3E7)
Client User Name: ARIES$
Client Domain: ATHENA
Client Logon ID:(0x0,0x61A5CDFF)
AccessesControl Access
Privileges -
Properties:
READ_CONTROL
Create Child
Delete Child
List Contents
Write Self
Delete Tree
Manage Replication Topology
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
I didn't think it was a virus. I thought it was only social engineering -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Couch, Nate Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus heads up Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago. From what I have learned Trend is the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B. The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain at the firewall http://www.Friend-Greetings.com Hope this helps. Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: somewhat OT
You forgot the **shameless plug** -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: somewhat OT iNNERHOST - http://www.innerhost.com -Original Message- From: Henley, John K (Johnny), METRO [mailto:jkhenley;att.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: somewhat OT Who all is left in the Hosted E2K (asp-model) game? USA.NET? MI8? Critical Path? others? j Regards, John Henley _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mail rejected
I don't think so. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 20:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail rejected Andy David Precht? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 5:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail rejected lol In that case, I can see why it was rejected! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 8:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail rejected Probably too close to David! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail rejected To close to BVDS perhaps? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
No, just inform them of the 'No PST Backup' policy. I don't back up PSTs. Period. Either its in their mailbox or it is not that important. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 05:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' I have a couple of users who do the same thing. They don't want to delete old mail (for whatever reason) and I can't keep extending their mailbox sizes. So they move to PST. Be aware of the risks here! Make a periodic backup of that PST as hard drives are prone to failure. Sander -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] Sent: 06 November 2002 12:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using a PST for 'overflow' I was having a discussion with someone the other day and he mentioned this phrase in passing, that they used PST files when user mailboxes became full I didn't dwell on this as we were talking about something else, but can anyone suggest what he may have meant? We are now enforcing stricter limits on mailbox size and would be interested in something like this. For ongoing maintenance, is Outlooks Autoarchiving a viable solution? i.e. does this move mail out of the server information store and into a PST in the users local profile? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
I do. They don't know they can save them up on their home folder. They know I don't back up the workstations, but most think that you only can save PSTs on local drives ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 07:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' Why the hard line approach? I never said I made the backup of the PST, that's why one has a facilities department...I also didn't say that I found that mail particularly important, the user wants to keep it, so why not let him/her? They know not to come to me regarding items in PST files. Give the user a bit of slack here David. Sander -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] Sent: 06 November 2002 01:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' No, just inform them of the 'No PST Backup' policy. I don't back up PSTs. Period. Either its in their mailbox or it is not that important. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 05:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' I have a couple of users who do the same thing. They don't want to delete old mail (for whatever reason) and I can't keep extending their mailbox sizes. So they move to PST. Be aware of the risks here! Make a periodic backup of that PST as hard drives are prone to failure. Sander -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] Sent: 06 November 2002 12:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using a PST for 'overflow' I was having a discussion with someone the other day and he mentioned this phrase in passing, that they used PST files when user mailboxes became full I didn't dwell on this as we were talking about something else, but can anyone suggest what he may have meant? We are now enforcing stricter limits on mailbox size and would be interested in something like this. For ongoing maintenance, is Outlooks Autoarchiving a viable solution? i.e. does this move mail out of the server information store and into a PST in the users local profile? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
The delete key works here -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Baker, Jennifer Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 16:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Cripes. How many people do I have to blacklist before this ends already! Chris is usually most likely almost always right. Get over it. -Original Message- From: Walsh, Ric [mailto:Walshr;national-citymortgage.com] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Ok your spelling remark was rude to all of us. You following remark despite it's poor grammar seems to say that the rest of us are dumber that you. I'd have to say that it was ALL rude. Ric Walsh -Original Message- From: Walsh, Ric Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Ok what makes you such a wizard? Also add the word rude to that. Have you though of taking an anger management class? Ric Walsh -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: RBL's I'd guess 68% or more of mail admins are unable to even spell RBL. The majority of the remainder is unable to comprehend the implications of the functionality on their environment, whether they understand how it actually works or not. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's That's a little harsh. (I love it when you're harsh...) Do you mean they are not aware of it, or they are unable to comprehend its functionality? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd parties to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to join you in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their company business. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night and the current stance on that is that they're thinking about possibly including RBL support in a future release. Darcy -Original Message- From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin;natco-inc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RBL's Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
RE: RBL's
Sam Adams? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of King, John Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 15:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Never listen to sales schmucks anyways... RBL = Real Boston Lager... -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs;LEAWOOD.ORG] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's OH! So we are talking about what's stuck in Chris' beard! Now I understand :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:dely;TripathImaging.com] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Reddish Brown Lint??? -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs;LEAWOOD.ORG] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's What is RBL? :P Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Oh wait. Never mind Mr. Hummert. I finally understand what is going on. You took my general statements regarding the number of mail administrators who couldn't spell RBL or who didn't fully understand its implications as some kind of a personal attack. I can assure you that I had neither you, nor anyone else on the list in mind particularly when I created those statistics. There are plenty of things on this list which the vast majority of members don't completely understand. Heck, I've got an ever growing list of things I don't understand completely. Not understanding something isn't a sin; jumping willy nilly onto the latest and greatest technology without understanding the pros and cons of it might be. My posts were simply meant to provide a warning to those who might be interested that all that glitters is not gold. Sorry Christopher, this song isn't about you. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions I asked for clarification from Mr. Walsh that I might learn to curb my apparently misplaced anger. How, Mr. Hummert was that rude? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hu you being rude to someone elseimagine that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Ok what makes you such a wizard? The cool pointy hat and eye of newt in my toolkit. Who exacty was I rude to? The two people in the thread who I directly replied to?[1] Or did I offend those mail administrators to whom my coments applied for revealing that in this instance they wore no clothes? [1] Close personal friends who wouldn't take offense at my comments even if they had been directed at them. -Original Message- From: Walsh, Ric To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/31/2002 9:31 AM Subject: RE: RBL's Ok what makes you such a wizard? Also add the word rude to that. Have you though of taking an anger management class? Ric Walsh -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's I'd guess 68% or more of mail admins are unable to even spell RBL. The majority of the remainder is unable to comprehend the implications of the functionality on their environment, whether they understand how it actually works or not. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's That's a little harsh. (I love it when you're harsh...) Do you mean they are not aware of it, or they are unable to comprehend its functionality? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd parties to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to join you in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their company business. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer
RE: scan Ex2000 for phrases or certain words in emails
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/product.cfm?id=312 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Kleciak, Clint D N21 Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: scan Ex2000 for phrases or certain words in emails Any such functionality or third product tool? thanks Clint -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown. This e-mail transmission may contain confidential information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is intended even if addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files if you are not the intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance. Copyright (c) 2002 CIGNA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: X.400 issues
www.eventid.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Bennett, Joshua Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 11:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: X.400 issues Event ID 57: Source: MSExchangeMTA Type: Warning Category: X.400 Service The limit on the number of associations allowed to and from entity (X.400 address) has been reached. The limit is 9. [MTA XFER-IN 19 34](12) Event ID 289: Source: MSExchangeMTA Type: Warning Category: X.400 Service A connection to (X.400 address) could not be opened [MTA XFER-IN 19 26](12) Event ID 1290: Source: MSExchagneMTA Type: Warning Category: X.400 Service A locally initiated association to (X.400 address) was refused. The failure reason provider was 0 and the reason was 0. Control block index 6. Type 1. [PLATFORM KERNEL 25 130](12) Event ID 9202: Source: MSExchangeMTA Type: Warning Category: Operating System A sockets error 10061 on an accept[] call was detected. The MTA will attempt to recover the sockets connection. Control block index: /. [BASE IL TCP/IP DRVR 8 256](12) These are the Event ID's that continually pop up on the one remote server with the same symptoms, the other server just produces the 289 event id only. Thanks, Josh -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: X.400 issues Admission: I'm entirely too lazy to go look up the random odd event ID or guestimate what too long[1] means. It there any chance you (the collective you) could include the Event ID source and description in addition to the number? And that you could provide an example of sent/ received times which constitute a too long delivery time. [1] When I worked at $vbc we initially had an MS Mail PO config which routinely resulted in 8 hour delivery times of mail from the US to Indonesia. If a user called and said it'd been six hours and the mail wasn't delivered, we didn't troubleshoot it. -Original Message- From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:jbennett;cotelligent.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello all, I have an incredibly annoying situation going on that I can't seem to get a grip on. I am not sure of the magnitude of the errors I am seeing due to the fact that mail is still flowing. Here is my setup: I am running WNT4.0 SP6 / EX 5.5 EE SP4 all hotfixes on all these servers. I have a hub and spoke configuration within my EX org. All my remote servers connect (through X.400 connectors) to a central EX server that serves as my IMS to the internet. All the spoke servers are BDC's in NT domains. The hub server is a member server in a central domain that all other domains have 2-way trusts to. All the remote servers (scattered across the US) are connected to the hub server by full T1 lines. My issue is this: The MTA on the hub server backs up and an Event ID: 289 is written to the App log then the queue flushes clear and all mail is delivered without incident. This seems to occur about every 10 minutes or so during the day. There does not appear to be, at least on the surface, any connectivity issues. Should I just ignore these errors, as the mail is being delivered? Or is this just the beginning of a major issue about to explode in my lap? Please help, I have dug around MS site and Google and come up with little to no help. Thanks, Josh Bennett Exchange Admin\Systems Engineer Cotelligent, Inc. 401 Parkway Drive Broomall, PA. 19008 610-359-5929 www.cotelligent.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000
Try not to cross post -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Frédéric Médery Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 09:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 Hello Everybody, TOPOLOGY : 1 Exchange 2000 SP3 + AD 1 Serveur AD (First DC), upgraded from NT4 PROBLEM : We upgraded from NT4 to Windows 2000 Active directory several months ago. Since then we installed a second DC with Exchange 2k. All servers are Ghz servers with Go of RAM. Exchange DB and Logs are on a SANS. From the begin, all the AD processes are very very slow and Exchange is also very slow. I checked my servers and we have the error describe in the KB (Computer Name Does Not Match the Windows 2000 Domain Name After Upgrade) : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q262376 Do you know the impact on Exch2k ? could it be the source of my problem Thanks, F _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000
He posted this questions to multiple lists. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 16:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 What? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 Try not to cross post -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Frédéric Médery Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 09:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 Hello Everybody, TOPOLOGY : 1 Exchange 2000 SP3 + AD 1 Serveur AD (First DC), upgraded from NT4 PROBLEM : We upgraded from NT4 to Windows 2000 Active directory several months ago. Since then we installed a second DC with Exchange 2k. All servers are Ghz servers with Go of RAM. Exchange DB and Logs are on a SANS. From the begin, all the AD processes are very very slow and Exchange is also very slow. I checked my servers and we have the error describe in the KB (Computer Name Does Not Match the Windows 2000 Domain Name After Upgrade) : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q262376 Do you know the impact on Exch2k ? could it be the source of my problem Thanks, F _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
Same here. They made a large portion of the company hourly and then less than a year later, they are restrict the OT. They wanted to pull the comp time with us, but the Commonwealth said, No, no, no, that OT is OT -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT) Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 16:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Large corp. Hourly - restricted overtime. No more than 1 hour per week per employee (no joke). Salary, no comp time, no overtime. However, if I am here til 2am, I don't actually get in trouble for showing up at 10 the next day. But that's up to my boss. Weekends? Sucks to be me. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:Tom.Meunier;courts.state.tx.us] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:33 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the state gummint, that's what I get. In private business, I'd work an 80 hour week and get, Too bad, so sad, you're salaried. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs;LEAWOOD.ORG] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:10 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the City and being Salary, my boss allows me to take a 1 to 1 ratio for time I work over 40 hours :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/product.cfm?id=311 MELIA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Marc Mearns Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 09:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Message Tracking logs Group Can any one tell me of a utility or script that I can use to import the message tracking logs and do minimum sorting of the data (preferably freeware/shareware). We can't use Excel because the files are in the region of 80mb and will be larger soon. Excel can not handle the amount of records that I am dealing with. I tried a freeware utility called CSVDB but was no good for sorting. I basically want to be able to manipulate the data. Especially look at the number of large messages being sent each day. Any constructive comments would be appreciated. Exchange 2000 SP2 Windows 2000 SP2 Regards Marc Mearns ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: nice one for a Friday
Not really Exchange-related, though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: nice one for a Friday Hi, I have a very awkward question. I have a very old PC here, running windows 3.1 (!), and there is a terminal file that runs on here, which is limited to 1024 b. I need the data that is generated in that file in a file that can be X times bigger, so that the data can be used afterwards to be analysed. 1st question: how does a terminal file from 3.1 work? 2nd question: how can I automatically get that in word or stg? Don't shoot me for this one? Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Delivery failure to exlist@forcefields.com
Yes... Several times over the last week or so. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Delivery failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Has anyone ever seen this error message before. The strange thing is, my orignal message showed up in the Exchange Discussion Group? Geoff... -Original Message- From: TZO Mailer [mailto:mailer;tzo.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:59 AM To: Dale Geoffrey Edwards Subject: Delivery failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery was attempted, but failed because: 550 This system is configured to reject mail from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (Host blacklisted - see http://maps.vix.com/rbl/) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Original Message: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- TZForward: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 216.91.57.132 by saf.tzo.com id 2002102509570968785 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:57:09 GMT This is where the Message-ID line would go, but I got an error message saying to remove it for delivery purposes. From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Setting up two profiles Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:44:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain List-Unsubscribe: mailto:%%email.unsub%% List-Subscribe: mailto:subscribe-exchange;ls.swynk.com X-URL: http://www.swynk.com/sysapps/ X-List-Host: swynk.com discussion lists http://www.swynk.com Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Message-Id: 37F3E678919F3A45A17EB82CB66A9F7C36AC18@servername.americantower.com Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Right-click on the Outlook Mail icon on the Desktop. Choose properties, the go to profiles. Make the new profile, making sure the name resolves against the Exchange Server and then click the box down below the profiles that says Prompt for a profile. In this matter, he will be able to choose which one he wants. Or show him how open the other mailbox inside his own. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Eve Jimah [mailto:eve_12uk;yahoo.co.uk] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 8:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Setting up two profiles I run exchange server 5.5 with outlook 2000 as client. However one of our new bosses wants to be able to view his mistrel mail Account in outlook 2000. This mails has to go to a different location from his default mailbox. That he wants two profiles one for mistrel mails account which is private and his usual mailbox in the organisation. I thought of configuring outlook express but he wants to be able to view the mails from his machine in the office and also on a networked laptop in his flat in the same building. Using outlook and not the browser. With exchange this is no problem but I am not sure how to make this possible for mistrel account. Any suggestions on how to configure outlook 2000 to support two profiles. The usual default account for the organisation and one for mistrel. Thanks __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Viruses via email
NAV on the Exchange Server McAfee/NAV on the clients -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Greg Heywood Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 06:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Viruses via email Just wondering if there are many companies out there that do NOT use a virus protection product that links into exchange? Instead relying on desktop av? Cheers Greg Heywood Technology Project Manager International Power PLC Phone +44 20 7320 8672 Fax +44 20 7320 8725 www.ipplc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Let's keep it clean, shall we? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 17:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on a web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers of romance. ... Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. Category: Arts Literature Genres Romance www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS ASS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's www.google.com? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a critical sales order or customer service request based on their say so? An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Ok please explain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd parties to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to join you in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their company business. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night and the current stance on that is that they're thinking about possibly including RBL support in a future release. Darcy -Original Message- From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin;natco-inc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RBL's Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Exch 5.5 ost synch
Post the errors. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Craig A. Mills Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch 5.5 ost synch I have two Exch 5.5 sites where every user receives synch errors, usually to the inbox and sent folders. Its not at the client. Any suggestions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow connection Solution
Then show them broadband. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 18:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow connection Solution What is another solution to dialup users who are used to pop connections and want calendar functions in Exchange. They like how mail was quickly downloaded with pop, but now hate OWA. The waiting part. Looked into Cirtix, but the attachment problem is limiting users functionality, new remote users are a daily occurnce. So trining users is an issue. They complain E2K OWA is too slow. Just wondering. - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow connection Solution
Sync, offline read, sync. Repeat as needed ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 12:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow connection Solution Okay, then teach them how to use MAPI and work offline. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow connection Solution What is another solution to dialup users who are used to pop connections and want calendar functions in Exchange. They like how mail was quickly downloaded with pop, but now hate OWA. The waiting part. Looked into Cirtix, but the attachment problem is limiting users functionality, new remote users are a daily occurnce. So trining users is an issue. They complain E2K OWA is too slow. Just wondering. - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sace document in Outlook Express with Microsoft Word
Sounds like a non-Exchange problem to me. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Bravo, Liliana Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 08:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sace document in Outlook Express with Microsoft Word Importance: High Hi Friends, Do you know if it is possible to save a message in Microsoft Outlook in Microsoft Word Format? When you select Save as on the message it only have txt, html,eml format . It is possible add Microsoft word format on that? Let me know if you have any idea or any article where it explain that it isn't possible for to confirm it. Thank in Advance. Liliana :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC 2002 comments?
What did you like best about it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 00:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? I think I liked Boston the best. It's nice to have a MEC in a *real* city. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 6:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? You're comparing _ANY_ MEC to Boston..??? Chriminey, I could've hosted MEC in my garage and it'd been better than Boston. Dallas was the second worst venue, imo. Search the archives for a rehash of reasons; I've instigated enough already. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC 2002 comments? Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison. I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying Have you seen Missy?. I tell ya, I coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry. I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not see Ed Crowley, darn it all. For the record: - the party was better than Dallas - the party food was better than Dallas - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned zucchini. - the venue was a lot better than Boston BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000 square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd 2003! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Eventid.net $$$
Yes, William. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 01:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Eventid.net $$$ What? Being a pain in the but (sic)? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Eventid.net $$$ Been doing it for months -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Eventid.net $$$ I just noticed that www.eventid.net now has a fee for there services. Not to complain it is inexpensive, but just another pain in the but. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 internet eMail archiving
Why the repost? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois Bourdeau Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 14:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 internet eMail archiving Hi My customer havee very special journaling needs. They need eMail going outside the organisation and coming from people outside the organisation to be archived for auditing purpose. The Ex2K journaling is not usefull because different Manager need to monitor different employee eMail. I mean Manager A must be able to monitor eMail from user 1-2-3-4 and Manager B user 5-6-7-8 but each manager must not be able to monitor incoming and outoing email for other group I think that a gateway product archiving that in a database would be the best. With the databse we will be able to tell who has access to what eMail (From : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) etc Does someone know a good gateway archiving software ? JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID 8213
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=8213source= Q296151 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 09:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID 8213 I've been getting a repeating error message in my Eventlog on my Exchange 2000 SP3 server that us running the RUS. The following error message comes up once very 25 minutes: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeFBPublish Event Category: General Event ID: 8213 Date: 10/15/2002 Time: 8:31:31 AM User: N/A Computer: MSA Description: System Attendant Service failed to create session for virtual machine MSA. The error number is 0x80044501. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. I found Q296151 and tried doing the fix in the article however, it has not taken care of the error. I find steps 9-11 a bit confusing though, and maybe I'm not setting the security correctly. Does anyone have any insight to this error or maybe help me interpret the fix from PSS? - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID 8213
Oops.. Didn't mean to send that... You found the same article I did. My bad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 09:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID 8213 I've been getting a repeating error message in my Eventlog on my Exchange 2000 SP3 server that us running the RUS. The following error message comes up once very 25 minutes: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeFBPublish Event Category: General Event ID: 8213 Date: 10/15/2002 Time: 8:31:31 AM User: N/A Computer: MSA Description: System Attendant Service failed to create session for virtual machine MSA. The error number is 0x80044501. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. I found Q296151 and tried doing the fix in the article however, it has not taken care of the error. I find steps 9-11 a bit confusing though, and maybe I'm not setting the security correctly. Does anyone have any insight to this error or maybe help me interpret the fix from PSS? - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewer of PST
File - open ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Khoi Nguyen Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? TIA -- KN _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Services Failing to Start at Boot
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=7001source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Julian Brunt Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 09:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Services Failing to Start at Boot OK I have found this event message at another site now. It seems that this problem appears after Exchange SP2 has been applied to the server and then restarted. The message below is an actual event (except for the computer name) from the server in question. This only happe4ns when the server is restarted. The services start when they are manually started after logon. Is there a way I can make these services wait until the SA starts before they attempt to, or is there a known fix for this that I so far have not been able to locate? Event Type: Error Event Source: Service Control Manager Event Category: None Event ID: 7001 Date: 13/10/2002 Time: 19:52:07 User: N/A Computer: SERVER Description: The Microsoft Exchange MTA Stacks service depends on the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service which failed to start because of the following error: %%0 For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Thanks for your help _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Eventid.net $$$
Been doing it for months -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Eventid.net $$$ I just noticed that www.eventid.net now has a fee for there services. Not to complain it is inexpensive, but just another pain in the but. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: viewer of PST
That is wrong. http://www.wickett.net/ (yes, Mark, you already posted this but I wanted all to have the correct facts) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 13:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Also, if it is burned to a CD, you will have read only access to the .pst file. You will need to copy it to your hard drive or wherever, in order to do anything more than read. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private If you want to view a static .pst you can use Outlook to do this and configure the services to view Personal Folders (only). If you want something that synchronises you're probably looking at .ost's, but I've always preferred OWA myself. -Original Message- From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? TIA -- KN _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: automated replies
Set up their subscriptions to a public folder OR Set up to another, non-generating OOO email address OR Set their status to NOMAIL. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 03:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: automated replies So what do you tell them then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 10:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: automated replies Just every one you get Reply back with something like this ... Can you stop OOOs and autoreplies from hitting the discussion list ? Thanks. Half the time I get a response and most of the time, the people are like, how do I do that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 16:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: automated replies What do you think you're the only one or something? Hey everyone get off the freeway cause B. van Ouwerkerk is coming and he demands special treatment. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of B. van Ouwerkerk Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: automated replies Hi, Could you fine ppl please prevent your mailclient from sending out of the office replies when the message comes from a list The original subject of this messages was out of the office replies.. but that got rejected.. TIA, B. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: automated replies
That'll teach'em. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 11:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: automated replies I just gather up all their email addresses and sell them in bulk to spammers. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: automated replies Set up their subscriptions to a public folder OR Set up to another, non-generating OOO email address OR Set their status to NOMAIL. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 03:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: automated replies So what do you tell them then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 10:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: automated replies Just every one you get Reply back with something like this ... Can you stop OOOs and autoreplies from hitting the discussion list ? Thanks. Half the time I get a response and most of the time, the people are like, how do I do that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 16:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: automated replies What do you think you're the only one or something? Hey everyone get off the freeway cause B. van Ouwerkerk is coming and he demands special treatment. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of B. van Ouwerkerk Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: automated replies Hi, Could you fine ppl please prevent your mailclient from sending out of the office replies when the message comes from a list The original subject of this messages was out of the office replies.. but that got rejected.. TIA, B. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Web Mail hosting
Whats the pricing like? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Julian Stone Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 08:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Web Mail hosting Another shameless plug :) http://www.netstore.net Yours, Julian Stone Exchange 2000 Consultant and Webmaster This message sent from Exchange 2000 SP3 build 6249.4 Netstore - Europe's Leading Application Service Provider Tel: +44 (0) 1344 444349 Mobile: +44 (0) 7710 122 312 Fax: +44 (0) 207 681 1238 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LOCATION: http://www.netstore.net/contact/location.htm HomePage: http://www.netstore.net/ -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Web Mail hosting For your company users or to resell? If the former, OWA - no, not company users - already have OWA thanks so would be 'reselling' How many users do you want to have on the system, and what it is the purpose of said system. well, I've been asked to think about 10,000 users/ subscribers but whether we get that amount is another matter! It's basically to offer our customers on the retail side of the business an alternative to hotmail etc - so they can have a 'lifestyle' email address. The retail side of our business has mail/internet order and also 15 shops nationwide and we sell skateboards/ inline blades/ bmx's and clothing/ accessories. Thanks to the other suggestions - I'll look into them. Rob -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Web Mail hosting Hi all, i'm looking into the feasiblity of setting up a hotmail style web based email hosting service - does anyone know of any good companies that offer this service? Preferably UK based. I have searched and I know there are plenty about but a personal recommendation would be nice thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: automated replies
Don't look at me. I didn't send them. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of B. van Ouwerkerk Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 16:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: automated replies Hi, Could you fine ppl please prevent your mailclient from sending out of the office replies when the message comes from a list The original subject of this messages was out of the office replies.. but that got rejected.. TIA, B. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unable to relay error message
Have you checked to see if you are blacklisted? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to relay error message Well I didn't take away much but here it is: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 10/10/2002 10:07 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/10/2002 10:07 AM You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. TROY-SMTP2.handleman.com #5.7.1 smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to relay error message How about posting the actual error message, rather than a sanitized one? You've removed all the interesting information that might actually lead to a solution. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez;handleman.com] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unable to relay error message I get this for one domain. You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. Server.com #5.7.1 smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for Domain I checked the KB and the only thing that it told me to do is add the domain in the recipient policy. I did that and I still get it. I am able to send to other domains at that site though. Also I checked DNS and that is set up properly as well. I am running E2K SP3. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: My IMS is having issues!
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=4102source= http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=4116source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stevens, Dave Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 09:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: My IMS is having issues! We have had some intermittent issues with our internet mail server; the service is stopping itself. Below are some of the id's...technet suggests that the max threads could be too low (id 4094). I have checked the registry key and it is set to 06xe. Is that setting too low and could be causing this problem? Exchange 5.5 w/SP4 running on W2K. Has anyone come across this problem? Thank you, Dave Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 4094 Date: 10/9/2002 Time: 8:13:33 AM User: N/A Computer: ORO-MAIL Description: The error 0x8004011d occurred while trying to refresh network connections to the Information Store. The Internet Mail Service is being shut down. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 4116 Date: 10/9/2002 Time: 8:13:33 AM User: N/A Computer: ORO-MAIL Description: An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail Service uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server. It is possible that the piece of mail being processed at the time will be returned to the sender as a failed delivery instead of being delivered. The message will be moved to the BAD folder, if possible, and the error is not a temporary error. Otherwise it will be retried when the service is restarted. Use the appropriate utilities found in the SUPPORT directory of your Exchange CD to view and manipulate messages that have been moved to the BAD folder. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIMC Event Category: Internal Processing Event ID: 4102 Date: 10/9/2002 Time: 8:13:25 AM User: N/A Computer: ORO-MAIL Description: A serious error has occurred while trying to send mail into the Exchange Information Store. The Internet Mail Service is being shut down. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: load in MSX5.5
64 meg of RAM, is that right? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: load in MSX5.5 MSX5.5+SP4 1CPU pentiumIII/500MHZ , 64MB RAM Greetings, Do you know when (because of load) can I say that the server will stop serving users requests? how many concurrent users? how many concurrent owa sessions? rgds, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IS 70GB and growing....
And you are praying for the day when it blows up? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrea Coppini Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 04:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing About 60% of our users have mailboxes over 200Mb. 1 beats the rest downright... His mailbox size is 2.6Gb. -Original Message- From: Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 October 2002 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing 140MB is big, but it's not uncommon to see mailboxes greater than 1GB in size. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 October 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing Do you think 140MB mailbox is big?!?! The exchange server is 3 years old - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:08 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I'd be more tempted to look at things like storage limits. 500 users and 70gig, seriously who needs to save that much email? Your email shouldn't be a file server. -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 3:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Would be tempted to look at things like restore time SLA, backup window time etc. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 04 October 2002 09:36 Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: IS 70GB and growing Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing I am reading all this thread, and still can't find which part made you so angry. How should the question be asked, so you would be so nice, to provide some information.. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:25 AM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Heaven help him. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Hanji Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing Hi. It may be some one you know. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:39 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Heaven help the consultant Hanji hires. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I vote Hanji hires a consultant to fix the problem. He's not showing much improvement... (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Couch, Nate Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I vote for two servers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Great Cthulhu Jones Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 20:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Who cares about it, though? If you need two servers, you need two servers. If not, buy more hard drives. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 6:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing If I recall correctly, using the Move Mailbox utility retains SIS. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 30 September 2002 6:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IS 70GB and growing Hi guys. I have an exchange 5.5 on a strong machine. The IS is over 73GB (total of 500 users). I am thinking whether it is the right move to split this box into two servers. The main problem is that I will loose SIS... On the other hand, I will have two smaller databases. I am sure some of you had this scenario in the past. I would like to hear your opinions. In case it is important, the IS is going to be moved to EMC box in 3 months (part of storage project). I am mostly intersted hearing from happy users with such big IS (are
RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox
But http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm Yes? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 01:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox BLB = Brick Level Backup, or backup of individual mailboxes. SMR = I am guessing that this is Single Mailbox Restore. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fioon Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 9:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Hei, Recently have interested in Veritas, but quite new. May i know what is BLB SMR guys referring to ? Thanks -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 1:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Thank you very much. Fortunately, I'm not using BLB. I'll proceed with my SMR. If I can't get it back through agents tab, I'll try the decoder and/or mdbvue . I'll let you know how I made out. Thanks again, Louise -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox It's been quite a while when I was playing with this stuff and I remember that it is not trivial. Let's see what I can remember... The Exchange 5.5 Scripting agent script itself is stored as a hidden item in the folder it is applied to (in your case: the particular mailbox on Server A). Another second config item, also hidden, is created on the server the script is supposed to be executed (in your case Server B) in the system folder Event_Config (or similar - can't remember the correct name unfortunately). So, if you just want to get the script code back then try to restore the whole mailbox store on a recovery server [1] and use either a debugging tool [2] or try to connect with Outlook and see if you can get it via the Agents tab. [1] Note that if you use BLB [3] you might not be able to restore Scripting Agents. Only if you use an Exchange backup aware product to do a full IS backup/restore you have a chance. [2] Either MicroEye ScriptDorector (http://www.microeye.com/scriptdirector) or the Microsoft Agent Editor (used to be in the Exchange 5.5 SDK or BackOffice Resource Kit 4.5) or plain mdbvu32.exe (comes with Exchange on the setup CD). But the latter needs to be used CAREFULLY. [3] BLB = Brick Level Backup like it is offered with ArcServe, Veritas and other backup software. Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Hi all, I'm hoping you can assist me in just how to recover an event script that is associated with a particular mailbox. It seems the script just disappeared and the developer did not have a copy. The mailbox sits on server A and the script was added to it through the Agents tab. The script executes on Server B. Presently, I'm making an assumption that restoring the mailbox from server A, I should also get the script. Is this correct? Thanks in advance, Louise _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _
RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2
Or Symantec... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 00:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 or GFI? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 8:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 How about Sybari or Trend? -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 HA! I know, I get grief from people all the time over it, but its my only choice right now until I can get NAV implemented. -- From: Andy David Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, October 4, 2002 10:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Ah! Groupshield! I'm melting... -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Anyone ever have problems with McAfee GSE 5.2 and it not being able to open the private information store? I get the following error in Event Viewer: McAfee GroupShield Exchange failed to open private message store. Then I also get this error: Alert Manager Event Log Alert: An internal error occurred in Groupshield - please check the log for details.(from ServerName Serial# 3) IP IPAddress user SYSTEM running GroupShield 5.20.664.0 odcmd) I have defragged the private store and I have uninstalled/reinstalled GSE but I cannot figure out why this is happening. Any help is appreciated. ~!M _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. === === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: Large Mailing List
Net-Admin-Rant? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 18:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Large Mailing List Send him to groups.yahoo.com? -Original Message- From: Eric Goforth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Large Mailing List OK, this is going to sound really stupid. Don't shoot the IT Puppet. I have a supervisor that literally wants A LOT of email. He likes to read through emails on almost any subject. He's one of those people that thinks that the best way to get knowledge is to read other peoples thoughts on the subject (whatever that may be). Can someone recommend a Distro List that I can set him up on that would make him give up on this idea? He had me setup public folders so that the rest of the office can share in his JOY. Whatever. Thanks. Eric J. Goforth _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange Server
TMI -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrea Coppini Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 05:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server If you were referring to me, I'll show you my willy... Regards _MR._ Andrea Coppini -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 7:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Maybe you should look into getting a better RAID controller. Her theory is right. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Andrea, Please let me disagree. All I have to do is boot without the crashed page drive. Windows will create a temp page file on the C: drive and start (just confirmed this with my hardware guys). Then when time allows, the replacement drive can be added and the page file moved to it, with all the necessary reboots. I also disagree about the 0% downtime according to your scenario #2. Based on my experience, as soon as RAID failed on the page file volume, the server did a blue screen of death. So much for 0% downtime. *In theory* the server *should* have kept running. But it did not. So screw it. If it is going to crash anyway I am not going to spend extra money on it. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Picture this: Your single (let's say IDE) pagefile drive fails, so your system crashes. You run down to your store or computer shop to buy a new drive (system still down) You install the disk in another machine (since Exchange might not start up without page drive) (system still down) You partition/format the drive (system still down) You install the new IDE disk in your exchange server (system still down) You start up Exchange. If you can afford all that downtime, go ahead and use a single drive. But now let's look at RAID1 swap: One of your swap disks fail.. Raid1 is broken so machine keeps running on one disk You take the bad disk Offline and pull it out You stroll and whistle your way down to your store or computer shop to get a new disk, maybe even have a couple of doughnuts on the way... You insert the new disk in your exchange server. run the RAID tools, rebuild the RAID. Pat yourself on the back for 0% downtime. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server If it happened once it will probably happen again. I see no big benefit of putting page file on RAID. If I had a limited number of drive bays, I would rather have a separate RAID1 for transaction logs and a separate RAID5 for informations store database files; and if no more drive array bays are available for the page file volume - I would stick an IDE or SCSI drive in the CD-ROM bay or some other available space and connect it to the onboard controller and achieve better performance instead of perceived reliability. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server So because you once had a problem with RAID that caused it to stop working must mean that it's always unreliable for everyone else every time? Robert Moir IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Do you need me to explain it all in small details? I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume. RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. Having the page file on RAID1 did not necessarily make it more reliable. Might as well have had the page file on a single drive. Why did I write this? Because I was answering someone else's remark Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. Ok now? Can I go? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What does that have to do with Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Well once I had a broken RAID1 on the page file volume. RAID did not save me. The server blue-screened. The RAID1 was physical.
RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
Names have been changed to protect the innocent. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 07:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Ever wonder why CA keeps changing the names of their products? -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 12:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 I've download the BE trial copy , but it can't run. Funny, hang on Self Extract. Download again, same thing happened again. Any opinion on new ArcServe2000 BrightStore for the Disaster Recovery on Exchange 5.5 Issue ? Fin -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Yes, as a google search would have shown. - Original Message - From: Fioon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:09 AM Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Hi, May i know which third party are you guys talking about on this Backup Exec ? It's Veritas ?? Thanks -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backing up Exchange 5.5 I know this has come up before but how is everyone else backing up their Exchange servers. We're using Backup Exec and only backing up the mailboxes not the pub.edb or priv.edb. Is it wise to stop those services periodically to back those up? And how often? We're not using the Open File Agent. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Missing INBOXES
Any rules setup? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 13:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Missing INBOXES We are using Exchange 5.5./sp/4. For some reason some users mailbox came up with no mail, once they are in Outlook 2000. I have did the Database clean up utilities for Exchange. Is there something else i can look at. Again nothing was deleted, for some reason they don't have thier mail in the inbox. Thank You _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID 1171 help?
Search on support.microsoft.com Plenty of hits -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID 1171 help? Scenario: NT 4.0 SP6a SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 I'm in the processing of replacing two servers with a more powerful one. I setup the new server and joined the site. I've moved all of the mailboxes from the first server onto the new one and didn't appear to be having any issues. However, starting on the 25th (which coincides with when I rebooted my bridgehead for the other problem I posted to the group about) I started receiving the below error about every 6-8 hours. SYMPTOMS The Exchange Server 5.5 directory may log the following event in the application event log: Event ID: 1171 Source: MSExchangeDS Description: Exception e0010002 has occurred with parameters 9 and 6 (internal ID 3190022). Contact Microsoft Technical Support for assistance. Based on my reading through newsgroups, etc. I thought it may have been a resolution error. However, I do have an entry in the DNS and was successful with RPC Ping to the bridgehead. I also tried rebooting all the servers just to make sure it wasn't something to do with the bridgehead reboot. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Employee gone, what to do with the maill box
Sounds like you have the answer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 17:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Employee gone, what to do with the maill box I haveThere is a manager, nit mine, but of a guy he just let go, and he needs some information for this past Employees mailbox. What is the best way to allow this user to access this box. Just give him permissionas and have him add it to his profile? E2K, user is using Outlook 2K. - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: list really slow today?
Nope... Just the backbone of UUNET -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT) Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 16:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: list really slow today? any one else noticing the msgs are taking a long time to show up on the list today? (or is this just my personal hell again) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: synchronizing
Check the log? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Derek Soppitt Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 08:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: synchronizing I would appreciate any troubleshooting tips on synchronizing within MS Outlook. Thx. Del NOTICE DISCLAIMER * This document and any attachments thereto may contain information which is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights and are intended for the sole use of the recipient(s) named above. Any use of the information contained herein (including, but not limited to, total or partial reproduction, communication or distribution in any form) or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents by persons other than the designated recipient(s), is strictly prohibited. If you have received this document in error, please notify the sender either by telephone, fax or by e-mail and delete the material from any computer. TQ3 Travel Solutions thanks you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conversion
Good luck to ya! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Callan, Chris Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 15:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion New Hardware and New exchange Going from Two Exch5.5 Machine to A Clustered E2k Machine. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disappearing appointments
AutoArchive enabled? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 09:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disappearing appointments Has anyone ever heard of Calendar appointments just disappearing? My users are complaining that they had a calendar appointment but it some how was deleted. Also one is saying that someone just received an invitation to a meeting from December of last year. Any one heard of this behavior? Thank you, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IS 70GB and growing....
Any mailbox quotas? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Hanji Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 16:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IS 70GB and growing Hi guys. I have an exchange 5.5 on a strong machine. The IS is over 73GB (total of 500 users). I am thinking whether it is the right move to split this box into two servers. The main problem is that I will loose SIS... On the other hand, I will have two smaller databases. I am sure some of you had this scenario in the past. I would like to hear your opinions. In case it is important, the IS is going to be moved to EMC box in 3 months (part of storage project). I am mostly intersted hearing from happy users with such big IS (are there?!) Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brightmail
CloudMark is also a client app. Runs ok most of them. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 18:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brightmail I'm running a copy of IHateSpam from Sunbelt (www.sunbelt-software.com). Seems to work well. This is not a server-based solution, but does most of the other things you want. You could add it to a standard image. David -Original Message- From: ITS.Teams.TNT.Mailing-Lists.MailingList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Brightmail We're currently investigating anti-spam products and are particularly interested in any products that allow the end user the ability to have some control over what is considered spam and what is not. Ideally, we'd like a product that places suspected spam into a separate folder within the clients' mailboxes where they can then deal with it themselves. In addition, we'd like for this to be a completely server-based solution. I know some products allow you to append a phrase to the subject of suspected spam messages so that users can then set up rules in Outlook to move those messages to a folder, but we'd prefer to have this happen automatically (without user intervention). The only product I've seen so far that can do this is Brightmail. Is anyone using Brightmail for Exchange? Are there any other products out there that would accomplish our goals? We're running Exchange 2000 SP2 and have about 2000 users. Thanks, Abby _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Intrasite Replication Issue?
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9318source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 15:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Intrasite Replication Issue? Jim: I don't have any errors on the bridgehead, but after you asked I went back and checked one of the OTHER servers. Got a bunch of the following warnings on several of the servers I checked. I can assume this is happening on all of them: EventID:9318 Source: MSExchangeMTA Type: Warning An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 149, NT/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error 1722, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name 29PALMS003E [MAIN BASE 1 500 (null)] (14) Greek to me. Thanks for the reply! -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Intrasite Replication Issue? Are you getting any error messages in your server logs? If so, what are they? -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Intrasite Replication Issue? Scenario: NT 4.0 SP6a SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 My bridgehead server is receiving GAL changes from other sites, but is not replicating this info to the other servers in my site. However, if I make a change on one of the other servers, the bridgehead does get the change. Any ideas on what to look for or what to try? Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
Thanks. There goes my lunch. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 20:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC If anyone is interested, Andy is staying at Motel 6. He'll leave the light and thong on for you. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC www.sleepinyourcar.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 5:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC www.lodging.com -Original Message- From: Bubba G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Good luck finding a hotel at this stage... I just got one this morning but that was only because I know this guy that works for the company. -Original Message- From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I finally got my boss to sign off on it. I will, hopefully, see you all there. Josh -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC OK, the time draws near. Who is going? Martin Blackstone Director, Information Technologies Superior Access Insurance Services 949.470.2111 x279 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his head out when you're coming home his face might burn up. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: malformed address
I'm sorry? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Natkin Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 17:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: malformed address tesr -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: malformed address The email address is SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: malformed address We received the following NDR, noting an error 553, malformed address...I checked google, but most of the links pertained to non-ascii characters, which this is not the case. Can anyone shed some light on this problem? The email address is correct (as listed in exchange administrator)... exchange 5.5/sp4. dave From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failure Sent RCPT TO:SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Received 553 malformed address: SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Could not deliver mail to this user. * End of message *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server.
Test received. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server. Test message Please respond to confirm I am successfully sending messages Thanks -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server. I've heard nothing good about black ice. Most people I know run zone alarm. What changes when you turn black ice off? -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server. Exchange 5.5 SP4 We just installed a new Exchange 5.5 server under Windows 2000 and are moving mailboxes onto the new system. I've had a few users who are running blackice on the desktop that are now stating that their accounts are receiving a UDP probe from the new mail system and they are wondering why that is occurring. I thought maybe it's something to do with new mail notification, but I don't understand why it would not have occurred on the old systems. I should state that the old server is running NT 4.0 versus 2000 for the new box. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Loud and clear. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 15:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Test - is this getting through yet Rob Weatherly Handleman Company (248) 362-4400 x122 -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Test TEST - Did you just forget about the FAQs today? - Original Message - From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 7:15 AM Subject: Test Test - is the list just quiet today Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: test
Received again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: test Test Please reply if this anyone sees this _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Yet again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 14:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Test- is this getting through -Original Message- From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Yup! -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test Test - is the list just quiet today Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Post a question, don't send just a test.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Dugas Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 10:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test Test - is the list just quiet today Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange - Notes dirsync issue
Test?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Natkin
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 15:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange - Notes dirsync issue
test
-Original Message-
From: Olivier de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange - Notes dirsync issue
Dear All,
We have an MS Connector for Lotus Notes installed
connecting an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server to a Lotus Notes 4.6
server. Currently we are experiencing problems with the
directory synchronization.
Every night during the Dirsync process the following
messages are logged:
Severity: 1
Date/Time: /mm/dd hh:mm:ss
Process Name: LME-NOTES-DXA
Module Name:Isnabapi
Line number:3098
Track ID:
Message number: 41106
Message:
Error converting *? Err Param 2 ?#8221; to a notes Time/Date
Severity: 1
Date/Time: /mm/dd hh:mm:ss
Process Name: LME-NOTES-DXA
Module Name:dxanotes
Line number:1864
Track ID:
Message number: 64138
Message:
Error {Not available} detected when looking for changes in
NAMES.NSF on SERVERNAME
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Many thanks in advance,
Olivier
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
