Re: Exmerge in Batch mode
I guess what i really need to know is how to construct the DN for the mailboxes. The readme seems to be a little vague. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exmerge in Batch mode
I am trying to set up Exmerge to export specific mailboxes from an Exchange 2000 server in batch mode. I have most of everything set up except the mailbox.txt file. I am having trouble with the format of it. Everytime i run it get "Error Creating EntryID CN=...". Can some one help with the correct format. Thanks in advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Authentication Problem
that is only an option if you are setup to use a internet mail account (pop3). We are setup to connect directly to the exchange server _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP Authentication Problem
There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator. > I continue to recieve this message when i try to send an email to a peticular domain. The strange thing is that it works on at least one user here, but there are several others that cant send mail there. We are running W2K and E2K both with latest service packs. All the users are using Outlook XP. Thanks in advance. The recipient is able to recieve mail from others. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using OST's on the road
I have an exchange 2000 server and am using outlook 2000 clients and was wondering if it is possible to configure outlook to use an OST when in the office and still be able to send and recieve mail remotely. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using OST's on the road
I have an Exchange 2000 server using outlook 2000 clients and want to know if it is possible to configure outlook to use .ost in the office and still be able to send and recieve there mail remotely? THanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using OST's on the road
I was wondering is it was possiable to set up Outlook to use an OST file and still be able to send and recieve mail when out of the office. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook to Outlook Sync
Im looking for a tool that will allow me to synchronize Outlook folders: Outlook to Outlook. Seems simple, but I havent found anything. The catch is each Outlook client is configured for a different Exchange server/organization. Im specifically trying to keep the contacts and calendar in sync. I would welcome a server (Exchange 2000) or client (Outlook 2002) based solution. I checked out all the sync tools at Slipstick; seem that none of them can do the job. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks..Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exch 5.5 ADC question
Hello, Scenario: we are planning to upgrade our existing NT domain w/ Exch 5.5 to a Win2000 domain. We have no plans to upgrade to Exch2000 at this time. The plan is to upgrade the NT domain to 2000, then to use the ADC to connect the 5.5 directory w/ Active Directory. The MS white paper about upgrading from 5.5 to 2000 http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/InPlace_Up.asp states: --- Ensure That At Least One Domain in the Forest Is in Native Mode At least one of your Active Directory domains must be in native mode. This requirement allows Exchange 5.5 distribution lists to be mapped to universal distribution groups and universal security groups in Active Directory. You will configure the Active Directory Connector (ADC) to replicate distribution list objects into this native mode domain. The ADC is hard-coded to create universal distribution groups, but the Exchange Store.exe process can and will convert these to universal security groups on an as-needed basis. Universal security groups can only exist in native mode domains. If these objects exist in a mixed mode domain, the conversion will fail, an error will be logged, and your public folder permissions will fail. Now, this paper is actually talking about later upgrading to Exchange 2000, which I'm not doing. So my question is, if I'm using the ADC with 5.5, and my only Win2000 domain is in MIXED mode, will I still break, and if so, how badly? If it's only the PF permissions using DL's that are the problem, I'm not too worried, because it's a small company and there aren't too many PF's. I should be able to fix the permissions manually by re-assigning them using global groups, right? Or does 5.5 through the ADC use ONLY universal groups for PF permissions? Thanks for any help, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig
That KB quote is classic. My favorite is from CA's Support Site: http://support.cai.com/helpfiles/asnt65/ASMGRError_8020.html Error 8020 8020 Failed to inventory slot(s) (EC=error string)[Device:device number][library vendor description]. Module: Library Explanation: Check error string. Cause/Solution: Solution varies. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig You didn't read my post about backing off and taking a deep breath, did you... Ah, well... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! "If you think you are experiencing a memory leak, please be aware that memory leaks may not be what they appear to be. You may discover that a memory leak is really not a memory leak but a performance enhancement" - MS KB article 268343 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig I can see that this discussion list needs new members. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Maybe, but he's OUR smart-ass. Besides, you ain't seen me when I get rollin'. ;) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder
Ok, I gave that a shot. The message appears to be sent "From" the PF. As in the PF name appears in the From field in Outlook. The only reason I clarify is that I don't do much sending on behalf of, so I'm not sure how that normally looks. But as far as I can see, I'm successfully sending AS the PF. Even when I send to a hotmail address, the PF name appears in the From field. But when you view the SMTP header (earlier in the thread), you see my address in the Return-path field. Maybe someone with a minute or two on their hands could test this, sending as a PF on their server and viewing the header, see if you get the same behavior? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Send a message to yourself from the public folder. See if the message appears to be sent from or sent on behalf of the public folder. If it's the on behalf of thing, then your permissions aren't right. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder H...I have this discussion list going to a PF, and the perms are Default = Contributor, Anonymous = Contributor. If you are the owner of this PF, then you should be in this perms list as well, with = Owner. Not sure if this would make a difference, but do you have this set up as a moderated folder? If so, do all the posts that are sent to this folder automatically get sent to you for approval, before they get posted back to the folder? -Original Message- From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Default = Author, Anonymous = None. There are no other perms specified. My guess is it's not a permissions problem - there are no errors or anything of that nature. Maybe this is just the way it works - but it seems kind of pointless to send as a PF if your address is going to show up in the mail header. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder On the Properties of the PF, what are the permission levels set to, for the Default and Anonymous entries? -Original Message- From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder I'm the Owner. I also have service account privileges. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Don't know if it would make any difference in the return-path or not, but are you the owner of the PF, or just a user? -Original Message- From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Sounds like a good idea, although I've never had to do that before. It didn't work though... my address still shows up in the return-path. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Go to the "Options..." portion of your message and set the "Have replies sent to:" box to the mail address of the PF. Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Are you populating the 'From' box with the name of the PF? >>>-Original Message- >>>From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:46 AM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder >>> >>> >>>Greetings all, >>> >>>I'm attempting to subscribe to the Bugtraq mailing list. As I've >>>done for other lists (including this one), I've created a public >>>folder to receive the list messages. I've given myself rights to >>
RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder
Owner is specified for my user. I meant that there are no other perms besides those three. The folder is not moderated. Anyone should be able to send an email to the SMTP address assigned to the PF - I've verified this by sending from an outside email address. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder H...I have this discussion list going to a PF, and the perms are Default = Contributor, Anonymous = Contributor. If you are the owner of this PF, then you should be in this perms list as well, with = Owner. Not sure if this would make a difference, but do you have this set up as a moderated folder? If so, do all the posts that are sent to this folder automatically get sent to you for approval, before they get posted back to the folder? -Original Message- From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Default = Author, Anonymous = None. There are no other perms specified. My guess is it's not a permissions problem - there are no errors or anything of that nature. Maybe this is just the way it works - but it seems kind of pointless to send as a PF if your address is going to show up in the mail header. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder On the Properties of the PF, what are the permission levels set to, for the Default and Anonymous entries? -Original Message----- From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder I'm the Owner. I also have service account privileges. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Don't know if it would make any difference in the return-path or not, but are you the owner of the PF, or just a user? -Original Message- From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Sounds like a good idea, although I've never had to do that before. It didn't work though... my address still shows up in the return-path. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Go to the "Options..." portion of your message and set the "Have replies sent to:" box to the mail address of the PF. Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Are you populating the 'From' box with the name of the PF? >>>-Original Message- >>>From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:46 AM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder >>> >>> >>>Greetings all, >>> >>>I'm attempting to subscribe to the Bugtraq mailing list. As I've >>>done for other lists (including this one), I've created a public >>>folder to receive the list messages. I've given myself rights to >>>send as the public folder, unhidden it from the GAL, and sent a >>>subscription message to Bugtraq as the public folder. >>> >>>Bugtraq replies with a confirmation message, only it comes, not to >>>the PF, but to my inbox. Below is the header of the subscription >>>message they >>>received: >>> >>> >>>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Received: (qmail 6395 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 >>>- >>>Received: from mail.securityfocus.com (HELO >>>securityfocus.com) (66.38.151.9) >>> by lists.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - >>>Received: (qmail 14298 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - >>>Received: (qmail 14292 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2001 >>>16:07:45 - >>>Received: from fw-gw.stcservices.c
RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder
Default = Author, Anonymous = None. There are no other perms specified. My guess is it's not a permissions problem - there are no errors or anything of that nature. Maybe this is just the way it works - but it seems kind of pointless to send as a PF if your address is going to show up in the mail header. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder On the Properties of the PF, what are the permission levels set to, for the Default and Anonymous entries? -Original Message- From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder I'm the Owner. I also have service account privileges. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Don't know if it would make any difference in the return-path or not, but are you the owner of the PF, or just a user? -Original Message- From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Sounds like a good idea, although I've never had to do that before. It didn't work though... my address still shows up in the return-path. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Go to the "Options..." portion of your message and set the "Have replies sent to:" box to the mail address of the PF. Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Are you populating the 'From' box with the name of the PF? >>>-Original Message- >>>From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:46 AM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder >>> >>> >>>Greetings all, >>> >>>I'm attempting to subscribe to the Bugtraq mailing list. As I've >>>done for other lists (including this one), I've created a public >>>folder to receive the list messages. I've given myself rights to >>>send as the public folder, unhidden it from the GAL, and sent a >>>subscription message to Bugtraq as the public folder. >>> >>>Bugtraq replies with a confirmation message, only it comes, not to >>>the PF, but to my inbox. Below is the header of the subscription >>>message they >>>received: >>> >>> >>>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Received: (qmail 6395 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 >>>- >>>Received: from mail.securityfocus.com (HELO >>>securityfocus.com) (66.38.151.9) >>> by lists.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - >>>Received: (qmail 14298 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - >>>Received: (qmail 14292 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2001 >>>16:07:45 - >>>Received: from fw-gw.stcservices.com (HELO >>>altair.mail.stcservices.com) >>>(205.147.247.78) >>> by mail.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - >>>Received: by altair.mail.stcservices.com with Internet Mail Service >>>(5.5.2650.21) >>> id ; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:11:08 -0500 >>>Message-ID: >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>From: BugtraQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Subject: >>>Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:11:05 -0500 >>>MIME-Version: 1.0 >>>X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) >>>Content-Type: text/plain; >>> charset="iso-8859-1" >>>-- >>> >>>As you can see, although the "From" field shows the public folder's >>>email address, the "Return-Path" field shows MY email address. Thus >>>the confirmation comes to me, and asks me if I want to subscribe to >&
RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder
I'm the Owner. I also have service account privileges. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Don't know if it would make any difference in the return-path or not, but are you the owner of the PF, or just a user? -Original Message----- From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Sounds like a good idea, although I've never had to do that before. It didn't work though... my address still shows up in the return-path. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Go to the "Options..." portion of your message and set the "Have replies sent to:" box to the mail address of the PF. Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Are you populating the 'From' box with the name of the PF? >>>-Original Message- >>>From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:46 AM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder >>> >>> >>>Greetings all, >>> >>>I'm attempting to subscribe to the Bugtraq mailing list. As I've >>>done for other lists (including this one), I've created a public >>>folder to receive the list messages. I've given myself rights to >>>send as the public folder, unhidden it from the GAL, and sent a >>>subscription message to Bugtraq as the public folder. >>> >>>Bugtraq replies with a confirmation message, only it comes, not to >>>the PF, but to my inbox. Below is the header of the subscription >>>message they >>>received: >>> >>> >>>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Received: (qmail 6395 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 >>>- >>>Received: from mail.securityfocus.com (HELO >>>securityfocus.com) (66.38.151.9) >>> by lists.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - >>>Received: (qmail 14298 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - >>>Received: (qmail 14292 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2001 >>>16:07:45 - >>>Received: from fw-gw.stcservices.com (HELO >>>altair.mail.stcservices.com) >>>(205.147.247.78) >>> by mail.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - >>>Received: by altair.mail.stcservices.com with Internet Mail Service >>>(5.5.2650.21) >>> id ; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:11:08 -0500 >>>Message-ID: >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>From: BugtraQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Subject: >>>Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:11:05 -0500 >>>MIME-Version: 1.0 >>>X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) >>>Content-Type: text/plain; >>> charset="iso-8859-1" >>>-- >>> >>>As you can see, although the "From" field shows the public folder's >>>email address, the "Return-Path" field shows MY email address. Thus >>>the confirmation comes to me, and asks me if I want to subscribe to >>>Bugtraq. Only I don't WANT to subscribe MikeS, I want to subscribe >>>the PF. >>> >>>I'm pretty sure I subscribed to Bugtraq in this exact same way in the >>>past at my last company. Why does my address show up in the >>>return-path? Is this the default behavior, and I just never noticed? >>>How can I get the PF's address to show up as the return-path? >>> >>>Thanks for your time, >>>MikeS >>> >>> >>>_ >>>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >>>Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>&g
RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder
Sounds like a good idea, although I've never had to do that before. It didn't work though... my address still shows up in the return-path. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Go to the "Options..." portion of your message and set the "Have replies sent to:" box to the mail address of the PF. Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Are you populating the 'From' box with the name of the PF? >>>-Original Message- >>>From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:46 AM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder >>> >>> >>>Greetings all, >>> >>>I'm attempting to subscribe to the Bugtraq mailing list. As >>>I've done for other lists (including this one), I've created >>>a public folder to receive the list messages. I've given >>>myself rights to send as the public folder, unhidden it from >>>the GAL, and sent a subscription message to Bugtraq as the >>>public folder. >>> >>>Bugtraq replies with a confirmation message, only it comes, >>>not to the PF, but to my inbox. Below is the header of the >>>subscription message they >>>received: >>> >>> >>>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Received: (qmail 6395 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2001 >>>16:07:45 - >>>Received: from mail.securityfocus.com (HELO >>>securityfocus.com) (66.38.151.9) >>> by lists.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - >>>Received: (qmail 14298 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - >>>Received: (qmail 14292 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2001 >>>16:07:45 - >>>Received: from fw-gw.stcservices.com (HELO >>>altair.mail.stcservices.com) >>>(205.147.247.78) >>> by mail.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - >>>Received: by altair.mail.stcservices.com with Internet Mail Service >>>(5.5.2650.21) >>> id ; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:11:08 -0500 >>>Message-ID: >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>From: BugtraQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Subject: >>>Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:11:05 -0500 >>>MIME-Version: 1.0 >>>X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) >>>Content-Type: text/plain; >>> charset="iso-8859-1" >>>-- >>> >>>As you can see, although the "From" field shows the public >>>folder's email address, the "Return-Path" field shows MY >>>email address. Thus the confirmation comes to me, and asks >>>me if I want to subscribe to Bugtraq. Only I don't WANT to >>>subscribe MikeS, I want to subscribe the PF. >>> >>>I'm pretty sure I subscribed to Bugtraq in this exact same >>>way in the past at my last company. Why does my address >>>show up in the return-path? Is this the default behavior, >>>and I just never noticed? How can I get the PF's address to >>>show up as the return-path? >>> >>>Thanks for your time, >>>MikeS >>> >>> >>>_ >>>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >>>Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder
Naturally :) It resolves and is underlined. The SMTP reply to address for the PF is also correct. -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder Are you populating the 'From' box with the name of the PF? >>>-Original Message- >>>From: ExchangeList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:46 AM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder >>> >>> >>>Greetings all, >>> >>>I'm attempting to subscribe to the Bugtraq mailing list. As >>>I've done for other lists (including this one), I've created >>>a public folder to receive the list messages. I've given >>>myself rights to send as the public folder, unhidden it from >>>the GAL, and sent a subscription message to Bugtraq as the >>>public folder. >>> >>>Bugtraq replies with a confirmation message, only it comes, >>>not to the PF, but to my inbox. Below is the header of the >>>subscription message they >>>received: >>> >>> >>>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Received: (qmail 6395 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2001 >>>16:07:45 - >>>Received: from mail.securityfocus.com (HELO >>>securityfocus.com) (66.38.151.9) >>> by lists.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - >>>Received: (qmail 14298 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - >>>Received: (qmail 14292 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2001 >>>16:07:45 - >>>Received: from fw-gw.stcservices.com (HELO >>>altair.mail.stcservices.com) >>>(205.147.247.78) >>> by mail.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - >>>Received: by altair.mail.stcservices.com with Internet Mail Service >>>(5.5.2650.21) >>> id ; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:11:08 -0500 >>>Message-ID: >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>From: BugtraQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Subject: >>>Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:11:05 -0500 >>>MIME-Version: 1.0 >>>X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) >>>Content-Type: text/plain; >>> charset="iso-8859-1" >>>-- >>> >>>As you can see, although the "From" field shows the public >>>folder's email address, the "Return-Path" field shows MY >>>email address. Thus the confirmation comes to me, and asks >>>me if I want to subscribe to Bugtraq. Only I don't WANT to >>>subscribe MikeS, I want to subscribe the PF. >>> >>>I'm pretty sure I subscribed to Bugtraq in this exact same >>>way in the past at my last company. Why does my address >>>show up in the return-path? Is this the default behavior, >>>and I just never noticed? How can I get the PF's address to >>>show up as the return-path? >>> >>>Thanks for your time, >>>MikeS >>> >>> >>>_ >>>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >>>Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder
Greetings all, I'm attempting to subscribe to the Bugtraq mailing list. As I've done for other lists (including this one), I've created a public folder to receive the list messages. I've given myself rights to send as the public folder, unhidden it from the GAL, and sent a subscription message to Bugtraq as the public folder. Bugtraq replies with a confirmation message, only it comes, not to the PF, but to my inbox. Below is the header of the subscription message they received: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: (qmail 6395 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - Received: from mail.securityfocus.com (HELO securityfocus.com) (66.38.151.9) by lists.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - Received: (qmail 14298 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - Received: (qmail 14292 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - Received: from fw-gw.stcservices.com (HELO altair.mail.stcservices.com) (205.147.247.78) by mail.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2001 16:07:45 - Received: by altair.mail.stcservices.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:11:08 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: BugtraQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:11:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" -- As you can see, although the "From" field shows the public folder's email address, the "Return-Path" field shows MY email address. Thus the confirmation comes to me, and asks me if I want to subscribe to Bugtraq. Only I don't WANT to subscribe MikeS, I want to subscribe the PF. I'm pretty sure I subscribed to Bugtraq in this exact same way in the past at my last company. Why does my address show up in the return-path? Is this the default behavior, and I just never noticed? How can I get the PF's address to show up as the return-path? Thanks for your time, MikeS _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar deleting
In Exchange Admin. Highlight the mailbox, goto Tools\Clean Mailbox. Check ONLY the calendar box. Mike -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar deleting Is there a way to delete a users Calendar and start with a fresh copy? Exchange 5.5 SP4, Outlook 98. Thanks. *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power & Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
