RE: SSL and OWA
I see they offer wildcard certs as well. Has anyone used wildcard certs successfully with IIS 5.0? I attempted to use one when Win2k first came out (no SPs) and could not get it to work. At the time there was a knowledge-base article indicating that although Microsoft did no agree with wildcard certs, they would provide support in SP1. SP1 came and went with no mention of wildcard cert support. I did some more searching recently and still could not find anything official about MS supporting them. If anyone has done this successfully, I'd be interested to hear about it. Thanks ___ Dan Ferneyhough Information Systems Vancouver Island Health Authority, South Island -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA That's what I did. That's a dirt cheap price. -Original Message- From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA That's what I was going to do but a cert from quality ssl is trusted by 99% of all browsers for $25.00 a year. I figured why not. -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: SSL and OWA Don't buy a SSL Cert. Just windows 2000 cert services to create your own. The only difference is that the user's browser will nag them about the cert, but they just have to answer yes and it works fine. -Kevin -Original Message- From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, December 30, 2002 11:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: SSL and OWA Subject: SSL and OWA Hello, I'm in the process of buying a certificate to secure an Outlook web access page and part of the process is entering a site name. This site has no dns site name, it's accessed via a link on our company web page that's hosted by our ISP. Should I assign a dns name for this server or should I put in the netbios name of the server? I'm just looking for some suggestions as this is the first server I'm securing with SSL. Thanks again, Mike. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kerberos KDC with Exchange 5.5, Win2K and Veritas BackupExec
I am currently migrating some Exchange 5.5 users to some new hardware. The new system is running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Win2k Adv Server SP2. The server is a member server in an NT 4 domain (they are not quite ready for AD here yet). I was hoping someone could clarify some confusing information in the KB articles regarding the Kerberos KDC. Initially the Kerberos KDC was giving the following errors at startup: Service Control Manager - Event 7023 The Kerberos Key Distribution Center service terminated with the following error: The security account manager (SAM) or local security authority (LSA) server was in the wrong state to perform the security operation. Q295381 states that the Kerberos KDC should not be enabled on member servers so I disabled it. Since disabling the service, we have been getting a number of the following events: MrxSmb - Event 3034 The redirector was unable to initialize security context or query context attributes. According to Q316710, having the Kerberos KDC service disabled will cause this error and can prevent E2K services from starting up. There is no mention in Q316710 of only enabling the service if E2k is on a Win2K DC and no mention of any potential problems with Exchange 5.5. As far as I know, it is not possible to run Kerberos KDC in an NT4 Domain so Q295381 should hold true in this case and I have left the service disabled. We have been experiencing some performance problems on this server where the server will periodically stop responding for about 5 - 10 seconds and then continue functioning normally. Thanks to eventid.net, we have now determined that these slowdowns correspond with the MrxSmb events and that these events correspond directly with when backup operations are initiated against the server. The server is being backed up using Veritas Backup Exec 8.5 and a corresponding DCOM error occurs on the backup server (http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/238513.htm). We have been in touch with Veritas on this issue and so far have had little success in getting a resolution. There is one article in their knowledge base describing something very similar (MrxSmb 3034 errors) but it is apprantly only caused by a System State backup whereas we are seeing it with all backup operations (online Exchange backups included). The workaround proposed by Veritas is to install Certificate Services on the remote server (the Exchange server in this case) as the backup job is apparantly making a call to the Certificate Service to see if it should back up the database. According to the article, this only occurs with the System State backup and we are seeing it much more often than that. IMO, installing Certificate server on every Win2K member server in our NT4 domain is not a very reasonable workaround to this issue and I have my doubts that it will even resolve the issue since it is occurring with all backup jobs. At this point the whole issue appears to be directly related to the Veritas BackupExec software but I was wondering if anyone else had experienced anything similar and if they had any other potential solutions. I have not yet had a chance to verify my suspicions that NTBackup will not produce the same errors but that will be next on my list if Veritas does not provide anything useful. Any other suggestions would be greatly appreciated. ___ Dan Ferneyhough Information Systems Vancouver Island Health Authority, South Island Tel: 370-8012 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: could not open one or more attachments in Outlook 2000
Have there by any chance been new policies applied recently to stop Temporary Internet Files from roaming with the roaming profile? Dan Ferneyhough -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 13:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: could not open one or more attachments in Outlook 2000 Exchange 5.5 SP4 Clients are mostly Outlook 2K with a few Outlook98 This problems appears to have just cropped up in the last several hours. When opening an e-mail with an embedded graphic the above error is displayed and the message opens without the graphic. Everyone around here swears they haven't touched Exchange, but I've only heard that about a thousand times in the past. Any ideas on what to look for? Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cox.net Putting the Hurt on me
If you're referring to the razler.com domain, it's most liklely a reverse name lookup issue. The IP of your primary mail exchanger does not have a valid reverse lookup. Cox.net is probably checking for a valid reverse lookup. Dan Ferneyhough -Original Message- From: Bob Razler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cox.net Putting the Hurt on me -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I will try that. Thanks Robert J. Razler, Esq. Approvals Manager Heritage Building Group, Inc. Suite A-100 3326 Old York Road Furlong, PA 18925 215.794.0550, ext. 117 www.heritagebuildinggroup.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public Keys available at: http://www.razler.com/PGPKey.htm - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cox.net Putting the Hurt on me Clear the DNS cache (I think it's IPCONFIG /FLUSHDNS) on the IMS server first and see if the problem goes away. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bob Razler Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cox.net Putting the Hurt on me *** PGP Signature Status: bad *** Signer: Robert J. Razler, Esq. [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Signed: 2/25/2002 2:55:27 PM *** Verified: 2/25/2002 3:12:18 PM *** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** Hello: Yes, they can receive mail from me from various other accounts (hotmail, etc.) but not from my home domain. Robert J. Razler, Esq. Approvals Manager Heritage Building Group, Inc. Suite A-100 3326 Old York Road Furlong, PA 18925 215.794.0550, ext. 117 www.heritagebuildinggroup.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public Keys available at: http://www.razler.com/PGPKey.htm - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cox.net Putting the Hurt on me Yes. Call cox.net. Honestly, can you telnet to their mail servers? Can you successfully send this person an email from another mail system? - -Original Message- From: Bob Razler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 8:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cox.net Putting the Hurt on me *** PGP Signature Status: bad *** Signer: Robert J. Razler, Esq. [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Signed: 2/23/2002 11:10:30 AM *** Verified: 2/25/2002 2:53:01 PM *** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** Hello: Since @home shifted to cox.net in Texas, I have a recipient that can't get email from my domain. Mail goes out just fine to everyone else. The recipient receives mail from everyone else. However, any outgoing messages to the recipient sit in the outgoing queue with a note that cox.net is unreachable and in about 2 days I get the notice about it being undeliverable. Any ideas? Bob *** END PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** END PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBPHqasmwjiy2yaukAEQKM2ACgorrppkajk3zmnLKAkpkAwaV35DcAnRum YpP8cugHYbhNi0KpOC1rRERQ =HYiu -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
InterOrg Synchronization Clustering
Can anyone tell me if the InterOrg Synchronization Tool works in conjunction with an Exchange 5.5/NT 4.0 Cluster? I am currently doing some planning testing toward synchronizing with another Exchange organization who are running a cluster. I don't have any cluster-capable hardware abailable for testing and I have been unable to find any documentation stating whether this does or does not support clustering. Any info would be appreciated. Dan Ferneyhough Vancouver Island Health Authority Information Systems Phone: (250) 370-8012 Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Could not open one or more attatchments.
Was it just the History folder or a combination of History and Temporary Internet Files? We have been planning to stop these folders from roaming with the profile but if we can expect these same problems, then we may need to re-evaluate that strategy. Thanks Dan Ferneyhough Capital Health Region Information Systems Phone: (250) 370-8012 Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Could not open one or more attatchments. I had this issue when I prevented the Internet History folder from roaming with the profile. Couldn't tell you why this folder is needed for the opening of attachments other than a temporary storage area I suppose but re-enabled it and all was well. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Jake Wallendal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 January 2002 16:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Could not open one or more attatchments. We are getting this alot now. If you click OK the e-mail opens without the attatchments. If you close the e-mail and re-open it, everything is there. Any ideas of what I need to do to stop this. This is happening on mailboxes and .pst's. Jake. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com
Try excluding global.inc from from your virus scanning. I've seen this cause intermittent problems like this in the past. Dan Ferneyhough -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Actually I downloaded it and followed the instructions and when I access it, it will appear once then return: HTTP Error 500-12 Application Restarting PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Works great for what it does and if you need it to do more, you can always hire the developer of the script to customize it for you. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com I would like to hear what you think about it and if you have had any issues with it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com
My mistake - it's global.asa that should be excluded, not global.inc. More info in Q248013. -Original Message- From: Ferneyhough, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Try excluding global.inc from from your virus scanning. I've seen this cause intermittent problems like this in the past. Dan Ferneyhough -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Actually I downloaded it and followed the instructions and when I access it, it will appear once then return: HTTP Error 500-12 Application Restarting PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Works great for what it does and if you need it to do more, you can always hire the developer of the script to customize it for you. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com I would like to hear what you think about it and if you have had any issues with it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com
I haven't played with changing the colors myself but the color scheme is set in Global.inc. Dan Ferneyhough -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Perfect works great now I appreciate the help Another question then. Do you know where the code is to change the way this thing looks? As much as I like Yellow it kind of clashes with, well everything. PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ferneyhough, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com My mistake - it's global.asa that should be excluded, not global.inc. More info in Q248013. -Original Message- From: Ferneyhough, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Try excluding global.inc from from your virus scanning. I've seen this cause intermittent problems like this in the past. Dan Ferneyhough -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Actually I downloaded it and followed the instructions and when I access it, it will appear once then return: HTTP Error 500-12 Application Restarting PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Works great for what it does and if you need it to do more, you can always hire the developer of the script to customize it for you. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com I would like to hear what you think about it and if you have had any issues with it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ESE98 ?
Before taking any potentially long and laborious steps (like installing a new server and moving users over), see if running NTBackup against the Exchange server produces the same errors. In the past, I have seen BackupExec (not NetBackup - haven't used that product) produce this error erroneously. NTBackup worked just fine. After demonstrating to Veritas that this was not a store corruption issue, they walked us through some more detailed troubleshooting steps and eventually determined that a DLL was out of date and caused the error. Dan Ferneyhough -Original Message- From: Koslosky, Missy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ESE98 ? I wouldn't run eseutil unless it was my only choice. IIf you're running the Enterprise version of Exchange, it's simplest to create a new private store and move the mailboxes to the new store; the database will then hold fresh copies of all of the data. If you're running the Standard version of Exchange 2000, you'd need to add another server to the site for the mailboxes to move to. One thing that I think would be interesting is if you check the SIS ratio before and after the mailbox moves; there's some question to how SIS is retained in such moves these days. Good luck, Missy Koslosky Tech Consultant Compaq Federal, LLC -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ESE98 ? Hi All, Whilst troubleshooting my NetBackup for Exchange, I revealed database issues on my server. Any suggestions as to how to deal with this w/o the backup it suggests? Currently I only have 8 users on this box and all use it daily with success. The Veritas tech suggested that I run the eseutil's and export all the mailboxes to a new Information Store. Thanks in Advance and I hope you holiday's are happy :) Fred Event Type: Error Event Source: ESE98 Event Category: Logging/Recovery Event ID: 478 Date: 12/28/2001 Time: 11:34:50 AM User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE Description: Information Store (3128) The streaming page read from the file G:\Exchange\Alameda\AlamedaUsers.stm at offset 10498048 (0x00a03000) for 3243 (0x0cab) bytes failed verification due to a page checksum mismatch. The expected checksum was 3166565542 (0xbcbdf4a6) and the actual checksum was 2563803299 (0x98d088a3). The read operation will fail with error -613 (0xfd9b). If this condition persists then please restore the database from a previous backup. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.virtualpurchasecard.com - Guaranteed B2B Purchases _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free/Busy Performance
We are considering implementing implementing a policy to globally increase the amount of Calendar free/busy data published by Outlook. The problem is that we require our resources (meeting rooms etc) and those who directly book them to have this setting at 12 months so our only option for a global setting would be 12 months as well. I have read articles in the past indicating that boosting the Publish Free/Busy Info setting too high may have perforance impacts but I am not sure how real this potential is. Has anyone else globally increased this number to 10 or 12 months and seen a real performance hit or are the warnings in the articles purely based on a theoretical performance impact? Thanks Dan Ferneyhough Capital Health Region Information Systems Phone: (250) 370-8012 Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EX5.5 Server just froze up - would post SP4 patches help?
If there's no indication of problems with the disk, try checking the transaction logs to see if a large number of logs were generated in a short period of time corresponding to the hang. I've seen instances where 5.5 SP4 servers become unresponsive to clients as a result of someone attempting to send a *huge* attachment (500Mb+) and it bogged down the server. If this does prove to be the case then consider implementing internal message size limits. Dan Ferneyhough -Original Message- From: Andrew Duey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5 Server just froze up - would post SP4 patches help? Dollars to donuts your HD went belly-up[1]. At least that would be the first thing to check on a perfectly running Exchange server that nobody's been monkeying with. Check your event/RAID logs (whichever is appropriate). --Andrew Duey, MCSE [1] always wanted to use that phrase[2] [2] and go nutz with footnotes. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EX5.5 Server just froze up - would post SP4 patches help? Our exchange 5.5 server with sp4 installed just froze up. It was not responding to outlook clients and the cursor was not responsive. I had to resort to the reset button to restart it. Is is possible that a malformed mail message could have caused this? Is there a post SP4 patch that might help? This server has never locked up like this in the last 2 years, and nothing has changed recently. Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
