RE: Kill spammers DEAD!
Spamkillers seem to be spammers. I invite you to google them and look at the results Dale L. Orr Information Systems Security Specialist State Department http://infoassurance.irm.state.gov (202)203-5066 This e-mail is unclassified based on the definitions provided in E.O. 12958 Subject: RE: Kill spammers DEAD! From: Friese, Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 10:03:38 -0500 X-Message-Number: 8 It looks like people are using it... I just sent a message there to see what happens and here's the ndr that I got The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 1/2/2003 10:01 AM The message could not be delivered because the recipient's mailbox is full. mxsmta02.inithost.com #4.2.2 -Original Message- From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Hostmaster Subject: Kill spammers DEAD! Hi list, Does anybody know if these people are serious : http://www.spamkillers.net/ Thanks Freddie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Subject: RE: Kill spammers DEAD! From: Drewery, Anthony [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 15:05:31 - X-Message-Number: 9 I'd be a little wary. By submitting your spam to them you could just be giving them live email addresses to sell on. Ant. -Original Message- From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 January 2003 14:52 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Hostmaster Subject: Kill spammers DEAD! Hi list, Does anybody know if these people are serious : http://www.spamkillers.net/ Thanks Freddie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This communication represents the originator's personal views and opinions, which do not necessarily reflect those of CP Ships. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the CP Ships Helpdesk at +44 (0) 1293 582 800. Further, we make every effort to keep our network free from viruses. However, you do need to check this email and any attachments to it for viruses as we can take no responsibility for any computer virus which might be transferred by way of this email. -- Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 09:07:29 -0800 X-Message-Number: 10 If memory serves, you have to import a bunch of stuff into your Active Directory: new objects and things to support the HP unit. It may have even gone as far as modifying your schema (can't be sure on that). When we realized what was involved, we backed off in a hurry. That's mostly due to lack of confidence (our AD setup was quite new at the time), and a lack of any defined business need. All agreed that it would be nice to have, but then agreed that affecting the entire organization to benefit one department was a risk we didn't need to take. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:08 AM Subject: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection Has anyone used an HP 9100C Digital Sender connected to Active Directory before? I cannot get the darn thing to work. I have all all the parameters correct, but get No matching entries found when I do a search. I have the correct port (389), the correct IP of the GC server, and the search root is set to (DC=domain,DC=com). If anyone has any insight on this, I would gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Subject: RE: Kill spammers DEAD! From: Drew Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:11:26 -0600 X-Message-Number: 11
RE: Norton Anti-Virus For Exchange
I've never seen it do that. I would upgrade to Ex5.5sp4, then upgrade NAVMSE to version 2.17 build 75. You'll be thrilled at all the upgrades since v1.5.2. Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Norton Anti-Virus For Exchange We currently run Exchange 5.5 SP3. We have installed NAV for Excahnge Version 1.5.2 The server has 1 gig of RAM. Recently we have been experiencing and issue in task manager. The memory allocated for NAVeAP.exe is very hightotaling almost all of the memory for the server. It usually is in the 900 meg range then the server begins to run VERY slow. Also when you look in Task Manager it is listed twice (NAVeAP.exe)The second one totaling about half the memory allocated of the first. I only have about 250 users with email accounts and by all accounts the server is not hit very hard. When rebooting the server everything seems ok for a day or so but then the memory allocated shoots up very high when a virus is detected and the server does a scan, when finished the server never reclaims the memory used and within a week I am more than likely forced to again reboot the server to reclaim the memory. Thanks in Advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
What actually happens to the zeroes and ones? Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Easier to administer and less impact on the server: Create a distribution list with no members and assign the defunct addresses to it. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Akerlund, Scott Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees The best method I have seen for this is to create a dummy mailbox. Assign it all the SMTP addresses for the former employees. Open this mailbox and set up an inbox rule wizard to permanently delete the messages as they come in. For all practical purposes they become vaporized. Not exactly RCW and such compliant, but it works. Scott -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Is there some brilliant way to delete all of the junk e-mail that ex-employees get? I.E. I have it (Exchange 2000) set to send me any e-mail message that does not resolve to one of our employees. When we kill their old e-mail box, they have inevitably set them selves to receive every piece of junk e-mail known to man so I get tons of them. I realize I could just create a rule in my e-mail box to kill it as it comes to me, but is there some kid of way to return an e-mail to the sender that acts like the domain is no longer available (I.E. it would act like it bounced and we no longer exist). For example, when our server went down during the conversion, all of the e-mails I get for this list service got bounced back and my account get set to on-hold. What ever it looks like when my e-mail gets bounced is what I would like to do for specific addresses. Does this make sense or am I barking up the wrong tree? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wal-Mart
Any ExAdmin that's also a motorcyclist would be more than happy to commute on Arkansas twisties. Arkansas two-lanes may be the best-kept secret in cycledom. Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart Doesn't decent pay in Arkansas equate to being enough to afford the Learjet to commute home to a real state every night? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart They were hiring for that same job 2 1/2 years ago. The pay was decent...but it's still in Arkansas. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 7:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Wal-Mart I have a opportunity to work there. Just curious if anyone else worked there and what they thought about the working environment. They are switching from 5.5 to 2000. - Original Message - From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:43 AM Subject: RE: Wal-Mart Hmm, yes. Anyone, please spill all the details about their infrastructure. Juuust curious. :-) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 June 2002 09:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Wal-Mart Anyone here working or has worked for Wal-Mart in Bentonville on their email system? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wal-Mart
Say it with me: Ozark mountains. Sounds pretty cool, eh? Rides pretty hot. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart I thought Arkansas was flat and straight. Did they make the twisty roads to cheer themselves up? -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart Any ExAdmin that's also a motorcyclist would be more than happy to commute on Arkansas twisties. Arkansas two-lanes may be the best-kept secret in cycledom. Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart Doesn't decent pay in Arkansas equate to being enough to afford the Learjet to commute home to a real state every night? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart They were hiring for that same job 2 1/2 years ago. The pay was decent...but it's still in Arkansas. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 7:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Wal-Mart I have a opportunity to work there. Just curious if anyone else worked there and what they thought about the working environment. They are switching from 5.5 to 2000. - Original Message - From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:43 AM Subject: RE: Wal-Mart Hmm, yes. Anyone, please spill all the details about their infrastructure. Juuust curious. :-) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 June 2002 09:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Wal-Mart Anyone here working or has worked for Wal-Mart in Bentonville on their email system? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Adding some HTML to all outbound messages?
Oh, yeah, and html makes it easier to insert Bad Things into messages -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Adding some HTML to all outbound messages? Not to mention that some of the net nazi black hole lists will add your domain because they hate HTML so much. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Adding some HTML to all outbound messages? Phil, I would urge your CEO to think twice about this. There are a few reasons. A) Many folks don't want HTML email. B) A 10K graphic just eats up space, makes downloading of email slow, and generally is useless to anyone but the sender. It's a cute trick, but that's it. It adds NOTHING of value. Personally if a company started sending us emails with that in everyone, we could quickly ask them to stop or block them from sending us email. -Original Message- From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 7:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Adding some HTML to all outbound messages? Exchange 5.5 SP4 Out CEO wants us to add some HTML to the top of all outbound messages. It is a graphic with a hotlink to our website. 10K total size. Can I configure this from the server? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv
What a very cool hint! Thank you! Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv There is a way to get this via exchange admin. Goto mailbox resources on the server and highlight all mailboxes, click on File and save windows contents into a csv file. Open the CSV file in excel and sum the Total K. This does it accurately. Kulwinder Chris, by any chance do you havbe an example of the script... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv Isn't exportable via admin.exe. Can be exported using script. -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Total K attribute for Header.csv Trying to export a list of my mailbox's for my mangers that have both the total k and home server attribute listed. I'm do this now by doing 2 different export's one that list the home server via the dir export and the other via the save window contents then merging them via access. Tried searching microsoft site for the attribute list of the field Total K but can't find it. Tried the words Total K in the header.csv but said it was illegal. Does anyone know what the proper name for this attribute is _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv
What a very cool hint! Thank you! Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv There is a way to get this via exchange admin. Goto mailbox resources on the server and highlight all mailboxes, click on File and save windows contents into a csv file. Open the CSV file in excel and sum the Total K. This does it accurately. Kulwinder Chris, by any chance do you havbe an example of the script... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv Isn't exportable via admin.exe. Can be exported using script. -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Total K attribute for Header.csv Trying to export a list of my mailbox's for my mangers that have both the total k and home server attribute listed. I'm do this now by doing 2 different export's one that list the home server via the dir export and the other via the save window contents then merging them via access. Tried searching microsoft site for the attribute list of the field Total K but can't find it. Tried the words Total K in the header.csv but said it was illegal. Does anyone know what the proper name for this attribute is _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv
What a very cool hint! Thank you! Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv There is a way to get this via exchange admin. Goto mailbox resources on the server and highlight all mailboxes, click on File and save windows contents into a csv file. Open the CSV file in excel and sum the Total K. This does it accurately. Kulwinder Chris, by any chance do you havbe an example of the script... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv Isn't exportable via admin.exe. Can be exported using script. -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Total K attribute for Header.csv Trying to export a list of my mailbox's for my mangers that have both the total k and home server attribute listed. I'm do this now by doing 2 different export's one that list the home server via the dir export and the other via the save window contents then merging them via access. Tried searching microsoft site for the attribute list of the field Total K but can't find it. Tried the words Total K in the header.csv but said it was illegal. Does anyone know what the proper name for this attribute is _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv
What a very cool hint! Thank you! Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv There is a way to get this via exchange admin. Goto mailbox resources on the server and highlight all mailboxes, click on File and save windows contents into a csv file. Open the CSV file in excel and sum the Total K. This does it accurately. Kulwinder Chris, by any chance do you havbe an example of the script... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv Isn't exportable via admin.exe. Can be exported using script. -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Total K attribute for Header.csv Trying to export a list of my mailbox's for my mangers that have both the total k and home server attribute listed. I'm do this now by doing 2 different export's one that list the home server via the dir export and the other via the save window contents then merging them via access. Tried searching microsoft site for the attribute list of the field Total K but can't find it. Tried the words Total K in the header.csv but said it was illegal. Does anyone know what the proper name for this attribute is _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv
What a very cool hint! Thank you! Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv There is a way to get this via exchange admin. Goto mailbox resources on the server and highlight all mailboxes, click on File and save windows contents into a csv file. Open the CSV file in excel and sum the Total K. This does it accurately. Kulwinder Chris, by any chance do you havbe an example of the script... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv Isn't exportable via admin.exe. Can be exported using script. -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Total K attribute for Header.csv Trying to export a list of my mailbox's for my mangers that have both the total k and home server attribute listed. I'm do this now by doing 2 different export's one that list the home server via the dir export and the other via the save window contents then merging them via access. Tried searching microsoft site for the attribute list of the field Total K but can't find it. Tried the words Total K in the header.csv but said it was illegal. Does anyone know what the proper name for this attribute is _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv
What a very cool hint! Thank you! Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv There is a way to get this via exchange admin. Goto mailbox resources on the server and highlight all mailboxes, click on File and save windows contents into a csv file. Open the CSV file in excel and sum the Total K. This does it accurately. Kulwinder Chris, by any chance do you havbe an example of the script... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv Isn't exportable via admin.exe. Can be exported using script. -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Total K attribute for Header.csv Trying to export a list of my mailbox's for my mangers that have both the total k and home server attribute listed. I'm do this now by doing 2 different export's one that list the home server via the dir export and the other via the save window contents then merging them via access. Tried searching microsoft site for the attribute list of the field Total K but can't find it. Tried the words Total K in the header.csv but said it was illegal. Does anyone know what the proper name for this attribute is _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Group Mail
Andy wasn't fast enough to the Send button, and he'd conditioned me to the response so well I had to send it myself. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Group Mail Andy? -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Group Mail ! fsck. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Group Mail It is a candy bar. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Group Mail Pardon me Chris, but what does fsck mean? I am new to this list and Exchange. I checked the resource kit and it is not mentioned there. TIA --Felicity What the fsck is a Group Mail Pro? Is it too much to ask for a properly phrased technical question once in a while? Christ on cracker you people... -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Group Mail How exactly does Group Mail Pro send without and SMTP server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
**DEANed** -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists? You know you don't have to read every mail -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 8:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists? This is precisely what I'm talking about. I don't have a problem having fun, but I do have a problem when 70% of list traffic is people being silly. I apologize that my needs do not fit into your sandbox; I'll look for another list. Thanks for being candid with me. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists? The carebear list shut down. Too many people were getting the flu from all the hugging. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists? Your solution can be found at the bottom of your email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] There is more knowledge on this list than you can imagine. We just prefer to have a bit of fun during the day too. It helps make up for the What is ScanMail and what is it used for? Questions. If you don't like it, request a refund and go try the CareBears list. It's down the road and to the left. Tom. -Original Message- From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Other Exchange mailing lists? Can someone please recommend an Exchange mailing list with more skilled professionals and less comedians? All this useless chatter is driving me up the wall ... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
The Great Cthulhu used to delete entire topic sets of messages at a time, a process he referred to as deaning, after one of his more evil minions. Note that I have no inside knowledge of this or any other cabal. See http://www.deaned.com/default.html Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists? What? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Orr, Dale Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists? **DEANed** -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists? You know you don't have to read every mail -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 8:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists? This is precisely what I'm talking about. I don't have a problem having fun, but I do have a problem when 70% of list traffic is people being silly. I apologize that my needs do not fit into your sandbox; I'll look for another list. Thanks for being candid with me. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists? The carebear list shut down. Too many people were getting the flu from all the hugging. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists? Your solution can be found at the bottom of your email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] There is more knowledge on this list than you can imagine. We just prefer to have a bit of fun during the day too. It helps make up for the What is ScanMail and what is it used for? Questions. If you don't like it, request a refund and go try the CareBears list. It's down the road and to the left. Tom. -Original Message- From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Other Exchange mailing lists? Can someone please recommend an Exchange mailing list with more skilled professionals and less comedians? All this useless chatter is driving me up the wall ... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: Group Mail
fsck has nothing to do with Exchange. Ask your *nix admin about it. Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Group Mail Pardon me Chris, but what does fsck mean? I am new to this list and Exchange. I checked the resource kit and it is not mentioned there. TIA --Felicity What the fsck is a Group Mail Pro? Is it too much to ask for a properly phrased technical question once in a while? Christ on cracker you people... -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Group Mail How exactly does Group Mail Pro send without and SMTP server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Group Mail
! fsck. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Group Mail It is a candy bar. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Group Mail Pardon me Chris, but what does fsck mean? I am new to this list and Exchange. I checked the resource kit and it is not mentioned there. TIA --Felicity What the fsck is a Group Mail Pro? Is it too much to ask for a properly phrased technical question once in a while? Christ on cracker you people... -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Group Mail How exactly does Group Mail Pro send without and SMTP server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
This has NEVER been the Be Kind to the Clueless List. ALL members are expected to do some research before asking a question, and are expected to actually CONTRIBUTE to the list when their area of expertise is crossed. If you have no area of expertise, you need to find the Care Bear List. Once upon a time, this list had several self-appointed enforcers that kept it that way. As it happened, they were also amongst the most eloquent, best-informed contributors. Now that they've gone on to greener pastures, we read more and more questions like What happens if I pull the plug out of the back of the server? Is that bad? Perhaps we should put a fund together and pay CJ to come back every few days Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Lanee Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? You are so kind to people. I hope they are just as kind to you in return! Lanee Hicks, MCSE, CNE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Clue 1: Exchange Admin program. HELP menu, Help topic, Index option, type tracking and look at all the pretty little entries that come on up. Clue 2: Go on a course Clue 3: Hire someone competent to administer your Exchange system. Clue 4: Read the fscking FAQ. I'm thinking Appendix D. -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I'm new working with exchange. How I can track the message? I enabled the track message flag on exchange. Thanks, Jorge Cardenas. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a good time to get some A/V software and keep it up to date. Jeff -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Can you change it to a haiku passphrase? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? True.. How do you change the service account password again? -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Actually, since this list is free, and anyone can come here and ask a question, I don't think anyone has a right to say, Don't talk to me that way. Don't get me wrong, I don't like it much either when Mr. Ely gets his panties in a wad and goes hog out on me, but then I also don't like it when someone signs onto the list and asks, How can I change the admin account password?, which has been asked at least 500 times and the answer is out there to be found. I have a very good friend whom I was managing and he had this really bad habit of always asking me How big can a DIM field be? (Extra credit if you know a. What language we are talking about, b. What the answer is) I used to just spout the answer off without thinking about it, then I decided one day to make him look it up. He got quite upset with me, and said, You know, why don't you just tell me? To which I replied, Give a man a fish, he eats for a day, teach a man to fish, he eats for a lifetime. While I do my best to be nice, that doesn't mean I expect others to. As a matter of fact, saying that they should is really placing my standards of conduct upon them, something I don't have the right to do, and neither do you. While if we all lived in a perfect world, people would never get upset and say cross things, this isn't the perfect world, and some people, and yes even those that have the greatest knowledge of all, sometimes just say mean things, my heartfelt suggestion is either learn to deal with it, or unsubscribe from the list. Just my opinion, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Being nice has nothing to do with it. Being big assholes (not specifically anybody) has everything to do with it. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. Hell, I remember my first question on this list, I was told succinctly by Ed Crowley to read the FAQ, check the knowledgebase, and if I still had questions, then ask them, BUT UNDER NO MEANS SHOULD I EVER ASK SUCH A STUPID QUESTION AGAIN WITHOUT FIRST TRYING TO FIND THE ANSWER. The long and the short of it is this, (Paraphrashing ED), if you want to be treated nice, call PSS. If you want the answers, first try and find out the information on your own, read the FAQ, search the archives, look into technet, then and only then, ask your question here. I guess what I'm saying, is life is hard, and sometimes ppl get a bit tired of answering questions that are quite easily answered if you only do the research first. Just my opinion, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? This has NEVER been the Be Kind to the Clueless List. ALL members are expected to do some research before asking a question, and are expected to actually CONTRIBUTE to the list when their area of expertise is crossed. If you have no area of expertise, you need to find the Care Bear List. Once upon a time, this list had several self-appointed enforcers that kept it that way. As it happened, they were also amongst the most eloquent, best-informed contributors. Now that they've gone on to greener pastures, we read more and more questions like What happens if I pull the plug out of the back of the server? Is that bad? Perhaps we should put a fund together and pay CJ to come back every few days Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Lanee Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? You are so kind to people. I hope they are just as kind to you in return! Lanee Hicks, MCSE, CNE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus
RE: Virus Attack ??
Agreed. My autographed copy of Managing Microsoft Exchange Server is here by my left hand. I don't touch the server without it. Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday Brain-death Question
Exch5.5 Sp4, Outlook 2000 Is there a way to allow OOF to the internet for just one user? Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monday Brain-death Question
Nah, he ain't that special. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monday Brain-death Question Not really. Though, you could set up another server with a separate IMS just for him/her. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Orr, Dale Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 4:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monday Brain-death Question Exch5.5 Sp4, Outlook 2000 Is there a way to allow OOF to the internet for just one user? Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Happy Haiku Friday
I demand that this Is the Friday of Fridays: Beer and Fish Tacos! Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Friday afternoon fun
Sick Dork in charge of our network nanny program denies this pleasure -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun Ooo fun. :) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun http://www.andylau.com/fulltimekiller/game/shoot.html -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Friday afternoon fun Sorry but this is very addictive http://www.seethru.co.uk/zine/south_coast/helicopter_game.htm Yours, Julian Stone _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday Haiku
Just three more minutes And my intense searching will be over for two days -Original Message- From: Bennett, Warren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5/Win 2k/SSL I have done some intense searching for info on how this is done but no one seems to have the answer. Warren J. Bennett _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
Clueless Wall-licker? I'm jotting that one down. Does it mean anything, or just sound cool? Dale L. Orr Microsoft Certified Professional (no brain dumps other than my own) -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Certs are not a sign of competency. They just mean that the person is capable of memorizing braindumps. I interviewed MCSEs that answered the question Explain your NT domain structure in your previous job with an answer like We had ATM coming to the back of our PCs. You've got to be careful with MCSEs that come with huge resumes. There are some ways you can tell if they're good or not though. For example if the candidate writes MCSE with a larger font than his own name, you probably have a clueless wall-licker in your hands. If a person doesn't have certification, it means that he/she has not sat through the tests. That person can be the most knowledgeable guy out there. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the one you need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set. I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Don't invite that speaker again. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
Hmm. Maybe that explains why I'm such a pariah: I don't go to movies! -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question This may sound odd but there is one golden question that will tell you exactly if the candidate will fit the group or not: What are your three favorite movies? If the person likes similar movies as the general team and sounds smart, than he/she is a good buy. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question I deal with (new and different) people daily who have worked with Exchange for years but don't know their database from their check file. I wouldn't let them within 20 feet of any Exchange server that I worked on but they are the hired Exchange expert for their company. The fact is that people are people, and certified people are not inherently better than experienced people or vice versa. I think that the best bet is the person who realizes that, regardless of how much he knows, he does not know everything and is always willing and wanting to learn more than he currently knows. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:43 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Cerification question Subject: RE: Cerification question Very good points. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question You people talk like you can't have both. Sure there are some paper MCSEs out there but there are also many MCSEs that have mucho experience. Most hiring managers, all things being equal will look at experience first but... then certs. Additionally while experience is the best there are people that have worked in one environment for so long that they know NOTHING about any other capabilities of the hardware/software. They are nearly as bad as the paper MSCE because the scope of their knowledge is so very limited and because of their experience think the only way to run a network is the way they did it at their last job. At least the Paper boyz know they are limited, are willing to learn, cost half as much and don't cause half the drama the experience guy does. They piss me off so much more, that and they usually have no idea as to WHY their last network was set up that way but that it is just the best way. Experience is NOT always the best qualifier either _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Earth Calling
Spiritual bad breath. Fish Tacos of the Soul. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Earth Calling Fish Tacos? -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Earth Calling I haven't had a list message all day. Is it my breath? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HOW DELETE A VIRUS MAIL FROM ALL THE MAIL BOXES - URGENT
Unplug your Exchange server from the network NOW. Exmerge the bad stuff out of the boxen. Run the cleanup sequence that your AV vendor has for you. Plug Exchange server back in. -Original Message- From: Venugopal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HOW DELETE A VIRUS MAIL FROM ALL THE MAIL BOXES - URGENT Hai Can any body pl. tell me how to delete a virus mail (that is mail with virus attachments spreading it self) from all the mail boxes of exchange server 5.5 we have exchange 5.5 on windows NT with around 400 mail boxes. looking f/w to you all regards venu _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Earth Calling
I haven't had a list message all day. Is it my breath? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Haiku Friday
Reboot Exchange box Annually whether it Wants me to or not Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- But he said it has been up for a year and 4 months. You're saying it's been up for 35 days? Don Ely _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
I must patch my servers The government says I must There is no excuse -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Dale, listen to me Exchange can handle itself No reboot for you! Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Reboot Exchange box Annually whether it Wants me to or not Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- But he said it has been up for a year and 4 months. You're saying it's been up for 35 days? Don Ely _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
If I do not patch The Army cuts off my pipe To the internet -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Geee thanks for correcting me Chris I skipped the AND part I thought I would get away with the OR ... -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Ours is not to reason why. Ours is but to do and die. Gomer Pyle, USMC, taught me that. -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Yea Dale... thats the true military spirit... Ours is to do or DIE... not to ask WHY -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday I must patch my servers The government says I must There is no excuse -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Dale, listen to me Exchange can handle itself No reboot for you! Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Reboot Exchange box Annually whether it Wants me to or not Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- But he said it has been up for a year and 4 months. You're saying it's been up for 35 days? Don Ely _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VNC support (was: scheduling automatic rebooting of server)
Radmin Rocks. V2.1 particularly. -Original Message- From: March, Harold W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VNC support (was: scheduling automatic rebooting of server) If he's willing to part with the cash, RAdmin is an alternative if you're a pure NT/W2K shop: http://www.famatech.com/ -Original Message- From: Benjamin Scott [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VNC support (was: scheduling automatic rebooting of server) On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, at 4:38pm, Ken Cornetet wrote: I tried to talk my boss into letting me switch to VNC, but freeware still scares management around here (But who will you call for support?). http://www.tridia.com -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to create a script for shutting down services
Hike! -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to create a script for shutting down services Q281923 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:29 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: How to create a script for shutting down services Subject: RE: How to create a script for shutting down services Q246287 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 9318 and 9322 bind and bindback errors
This happens on my dual-homed servers. I've learned to live with it. -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 8:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 9318 and 9322 bind and bindback errors I've had this happen to me we had to reboot the switchs/routers on both ends. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 9318 and 9322 bind and bindback errors I've got a 5.5 organization, and the Exchange server in one of my sites is getting 9318 bind errors to all other servers in other sites. I've verified name resolution both ways, and everything seems to be in order. I'm able to net use shares both ways with no problem. I'm also able to ping by name both ways with no problem. I've added the other servers to it's hosts and lmhosts files for good measure with no luck. Any suggestions??? Will Will Zimmerman MCSE Exchange Administrator Meristar Hotels and Resorts _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch2k sp2
The ones you need. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch2k sp2 What hotfixes should I install post sp2? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: hops?
I, for one, am deeply disappointed that this thread is not about beer. I was about to jump on this like a donkey on a waffle(1) (1) Hi, CJ! Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 7:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: hops? I do believe that's TCP returning the error; Exchange is only reporting it. In proper OSI modeling an application knows nothing about what is happening on the lower levels and hops is a TCP concept. - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 5:57 PM Subject: hops? Hi I'm running down a event id 142, and I do think its ISP related with a border gateway protocol issue. The problem is generating a undeliverable that indicates the emails cant go over 17 hops to their target. Now I'm no networking wiz but it looks like a loop issue outside our system, so I thought I would try to up the number of hops and see if that helped. Is there a place in IMS or Exchange where I can set that? I couldn't find one. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Web Access Error
And numbers and exclamation points and icons, oh, my! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access Error Square, a few columns - with some text. Kinda cute actually. -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access Error What do the Application Event Logs look like? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access Error I can't speak for Exchange 2000 but I ran into the same issue with OWA and Exchange 5.5 and it turned out to be the ability to logon local to the machine right that was needed. I had mine outside the firewall and connecting through VPN and needed to give Domain Users the Logon Local right. Like I said, I can not speak for E2K but that was EXACTLY my problem. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Shane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 12:56 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: Outlook Web Access Error When attempting to login to OWA in Exchange 2000, all of my users get this error after entering username and password: Error. Access is Denied. Administrators can log on just fine but normal users cannot. The Exchange server is Win2K with Exchange 2K and all the latest service packs installed. OWA resides on the Exchange server through the default install. The primary domain controller and global catalog is a separate Win2K server. OWA used to work until recently. Nothing has been modified on the Exchange Server, but recently there were some unintentional security changes on the domain controller and we don't know what they were. The only thing I can find about login denial in OWA says to make sure that users have log on locally rights and access this computer from the network rights. They have these but still can't login to OWA. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Web Access Error
What do the Application Event Logs look like? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access Error I can't speak for Exchange 2000 but I ran into the same issue with OWA and Exchange 5.5 and it turned out to be the ability to logon local to the machine right that was needed. I had mine outside the firewall and connecting through VPN and needed to give Domain Users the Logon Local right. Like I said, I can not speak for E2K but that was EXACTLY my problem. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Shane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 12:56 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: Outlook Web Access Error When attempting to login to OWA in Exchange 2000, all of my users get this error after entering username and password: Error. Access is Denied. Administrators can log on just fine but normal users cannot. The Exchange server is Win2K with Exchange 2K and all the latest service packs installed. OWA resides on the Exchange server through the default install. The primary domain controller and global catalog is a separate Win2K server. OWA used to work until recently. Nothing has been modified on the Exchange Server, but recently there were some unintentional security changes on the domain controller and we don't know what they were. The only thing I can find about login denial in OWA says to make sure that users have log on locally rights and access this computer from the network rights. They have these but still can't login to OWA. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: securing smtp
Human engineering problem. Disable/uninstall Outlook Express if you can't get the horsepower to forbid users to use it. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: securing smtp Oh. Well, that's an RFC question. You're asking for how to let everybody in the universe EXCEPT your own people send inbound mail? That's just kinda weird. No way to stop it; they're just telnetting into your port25 like everyone else in the world. Unless you know what IP address they're hitting you from, and refuse those. -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, March 07, 2002 7:16 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: securing smtp Subject: RE: securing smtp Thanks Tom, We are using e2k sp2 and w2k sp2. As well there is correction in my statement. Some of my users using Outlook Express. I want users not to send mail outside or within LAN without authentication. I have controlled this for mails going to other domains but users still can send mails without authentication within LAN using Outlook Express. How can I secure that, any suggestion is request. Regards, Malik Irfan -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 6:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: securing smtp It's in the FAQ for 5.5, and it's in the FAQ for 2000. I would have gotten more specific, if you had said what version of Exchange you were using. That's important info. But look it up in the FAQ will get you there. In 5.5 it's in the properties of the IMC, to require auth. In 2000 it's in the properties of the SMTP Virtual Server or connector, whichever applies in your case. -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:52 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: securing smtp Subject: securing smtp Dear all, Some of my users using Outlook Express. I want users not to send mail outside or within LAN with authentication. I have controlled this for mails going to other domains but users still can send mails with authentication within LAN. How can I secure that, any suggestion is request. Thanks and Regards. Malik Irfan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Alert:Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-012
This one is giving me a headache -- I have Exch 5.5 running on a Win2k server. I'm looking for the fine print that tells me which patch to apply first, or at all, if any, or both. Your mileage may vary. Sigh. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 9:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Alert:Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-012 -Original Message- From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 6:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Alert:Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-012 http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS02-012.asp Malformed Data Transfer Request can Cause Windows SMTP Service to Fail Originally posted: February 27, 2002 Summary Who should read this bulletin: Customers using Microsoft(r) Windows(r) 2000 Server and Professional, Windows XP Professional and Exchange Server 2000 Impact of vulnerability:Denial of Service Maximum Severity Rating:Low Recommendation:Customers who need the Windows 2000 SMTP services should apply the patch; all others should disable the SMTP service. Affected Software: - Microsoft Windows 2000 - Microsoft Windows XP Professional - Microsoft Exchange 2000 Technical description: An SMTP service installs by default as part of Windows 2000 server products. Exchange 2000, which can only be installed on Windows 2000, uses the native Windows 2000 SMTP service rather than providing its own. In addition, Windows 2000 and Windows XP workstation products provide an SMTP service that is not installed by default. All of these implementations contain a flaw that could enable denial of service attacks to be mounted against the service. The flaw involves how the service handles a particular type of SMTP command used to transfer the data that constitutes an incoming mail. By sending a malformed version of this command, an attacker could cause the SMTP service to fail. This would have the effect of disrupting mail services on the affected system, but would not cause the operating system itself to fail. Mitigating factors: - Windows XP Home Edition does not provide an SMTP service, and is not affected by the vulnerability. - Windows 2000 Professional and Windows XP Professional do provide an SMTP service, but it is not installed by default. - Windows 2000 server products do install the SMTP service by default. However, best practices recommend disabling any unneeded services, and systems on which the SMTP service had been disabled would not be at risk. - Exchange 5.5, even if installed on a Windows 2000 server, is not affected by the vulnerability. - The result of an attack would be limited to disrupting the SMTP service and, depending on the system configuration, potentially IIS and other internet services as well. However, it would not disrupt any other system functions. - The vulnerability would not enable an attacker to gain any privileges on the affected system or to access users' email or data. Vulnerability identifier: CAN-2002-0055 This email is sent to NTBugtraq automatically as a service to my subscribers. Since its programmatically created, and since its been a long time since anyone paid actual money for my programming skills, it may or may not look that good...;-] I can only hope that the information it does contain can be read well enough to serve its purpose. Cheers, Russ - Surgeon General of TruSecure Corporation/NTBugtraq Editor Delivery co-sponsored by Qualys - Make Your Network Secure Go Beyond PARTIAL Security: FREE White Paper Stop hassling with half-baked ENTERPRISE SECURITY. FREE White Paper shows you how to ensure TOTAL security for your Internet perimeter with the most current and most complete PROACTIVE Vulnerability Assessment solution. Get your FREE White Paper now. Click here! https://www.qualys.com/forms/techwhite_86.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Alert:Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-012
bowing to superior intellect My gosh, Siefried! You must be AWAKE ALREADY!!! /bowing and scraping -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Alert:Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-012 quote Does the vulnerability affect the SMTP service in Exchange Server 5.5? No. Exchange 5.5, even if installed on Windows 2000, uses its own SMTP service, which is not affected by the vulnerability /quote Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Alert:Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-012 This one is giving me a headache -- I have Exch 5.5 running on a Win2k server. I'm looking for the fine print that tells me which patch to apply first, or at all, if any, or both. Your mileage may vary. Sigh. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 9:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Alert:Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-012 -Original Message- From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 6:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Alert:Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-012 http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS02-012.asp Malformed Data Transfer Request can Cause Windows SMTP Service to Fail Originally posted: February 27, 2002 Summary Who should read this bulletin: Customers using Microsoft(r) Windows(r) 2000 Server and Professional, Windows XP Professional and Exchange Server 2000 Impact of vulnerability:Denial of Service Maximum Severity Rating:Low Recommendation:Customers who need the Windows 2000 SMTP services should apply the patch; all others should disable the SMTP service. Affected Software: - Microsoft Windows 2000 - Microsoft Windows XP Professional - Microsoft Exchange 2000 Technical description: An SMTP service installs by default as part of Windows 2000 server products. Exchange 2000, which can only be installed on Windows 2000, uses the native Windows 2000 SMTP service rather than providing its own. In addition, Windows 2000 and Windows XP workstation products provide an SMTP service that is not installed by default. All of these implementations contain a flaw that could enable denial of service attacks to be mounted against the service. The flaw involves how the service handles a particular type of SMTP command used to transfer the data that constitutes an incoming mail. By sending a malformed version of this command, an attacker could cause the SMTP service to fail. This would have the effect of disrupting mail services on the affected system, but would not cause the operating system itself to fail. Mitigating factors: - Windows XP Home Edition does not provide an SMTP service, and is not affected by the vulnerability. - Windows 2000 Professional and Windows XP Professional do provide an SMTP service, but it is not installed by default. - Windows 2000 server products do install the SMTP service by default. However, best practices recommend disabling any unneeded services, and systems on which the SMTP service had been disabled would not be at risk. - Exchange 5.5, even if installed on a Windows 2000 server, is not affected by the vulnerability. - The result of an attack would be limited to disrupting the SMTP service and, depending on the system configuration, potentially IIS and other internet services as well. However, it would not disrupt any other system functions. - The vulnerability would not enable an attacker to gain any privileges on the affected system or to access users' email or data. Vulnerability identifier: CAN-2002-0055 This email is sent to NTBugtraq automatically as a service to my subscribers. Since its programmatically created, and since its been a long time since anyone paid actual money for my programming skills, it may or may not look that good...;-] I can only hope that the information it does contain can be read well enough to serve its purpose. Cheers, Russ - Surgeon General of TruSecure Corporation/NTBugtraq Editor oo oo Delivery co-sponsored by Qualys - Make Your Network Secure oo oo Go Beyond PARTIAL Security: FREE White Paper Stop hassling with half-baked ENTERPRISE SECURITY. FREE White Paper shows you how to ensure TOTAL security for your Internet perimeter with the most current and most complete PROACTIVE Vulnerability Assessment solution. Get your FREE White Paper now. Click here! https://www.qualys.com/forms/techwhite_86.html oo oo
RE: Alert:Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-012
But it's only THURSDAY! -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Alert:Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-012 You're kidding, eh? It is 2:24 p.m. here and I am working since 5 a.m. this morn. Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Alert:Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-012 bowing to superior intellect My gosh, Siefried! You must be AWAKE ALREADY!!! /bowing and scraping -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Alert:Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-012 quote Does the vulnerability affect the SMTP service in Exchange Server 5.5? No. Exchange 5.5, even if installed on Windows 2000, uses its own SMTP service, which is not affected by the vulnerability /quote Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Alert:Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-012 This one is giving me a headache -- I have Exch 5.5 running on a Win2k server. I'm looking for the fine print that tells me which patch to apply first, or at all, if any, or both. Your mileage may vary. Sigh. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 9:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Alert:Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-012 -Original Message- From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 6:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Alert:Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-012 http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS02-012.asp Malformed Data Transfer Request can Cause Windows SMTP Service to Fail Originally posted: February 27, 2002 Summary Who should read this bulletin: Customers using Microsoft(r) Windows(r) 2000 Server and Professional, Windows XP Professional and Exchange Server 2000 Impact of vulnerability:Denial of Service Maximum Severity Rating:Low Recommendation:Customers who need the Windows 2000 SMTP services should apply the patch; all others should disable the SMTP service. Affected Software: - Microsoft Windows 2000 - Microsoft Windows XP Professional - Microsoft Exchange 2000 Technical description: An SMTP service installs by default as part of Windows 2000 server products. Exchange 2000, which can only be installed on Windows 2000, uses the native Windows 2000 SMTP service rather than providing its own. In addition, Windows 2000 and Windows XP workstation products provide an SMTP service that is not installed by default. All of these implementations contain a flaw that could enable denial of service attacks to be mounted against the service. The flaw involves how the service handles a particular type of SMTP command used to transfer the data that constitutes an incoming mail. By sending a malformed version of this command, an attacker could cause the SMTP service to fail. This would have the effect of disrupting mail services on the affected system, but would not cause the operating system itself to fail. Mitigating factors: - Windows XP Home Edition does not provide an SMTP service, and is not affected by the vulnerability. - Windows 2000 Professional and Windows XP Professional do provide an SMTP service, but it is not installed by default. - Windows 2000 server products do install the SMTP service by default. However, best practices recommend disabling any unneeded services, and systems on which the SMTP service had been disabled would not be at risk. - Exchange 5.5, even if installed on a Windows 2000 server, is not affected by the vulnerability. - The result of an attack would be limited to disrupting the SMTP service and, depending on the system configuration, potentially IIS and other internet services as well. However, it would not disrupt any other system functions. - The vulnerability would not enable an attacker to gain any privileges on the affected system or to access users' email or data. Vulnerability identifier: CAN-2002-0055 This email is sent to NTBugtraq automatically as a service to my subscribers. Since its programmatically created, and since its been a long time since anyone paid actual money for my programming skills, it may or may not look that good...;-] I can only hope that the information it does contain can be read well enough to serve its purpose. Cheers, Russ - Surgeon General of TruSecure Corporation/NTBugtraq Editor
RE: att.net down?
Trashed all my home e-mail yesterday, but no problems today. Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: att.net down? Must be that MLife Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: att.net down? Same here. Messages to att.net have been backup up since this morning. Tom -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: att.net down? Anyone having troubles with att.net? I'm not getting a response from a telnet into any of their gateways... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cabal Haiku
There is no cabal No conspiracy exists Forget this note -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Posts some times but not others. The Cabal. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Posts some times but not others. I didn't say that. Damn it, Who has been using my email?? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Posts some times but not others. How do you know that there's no cabal? You must know something about the cabal to deny its existence. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Posts some times but not others. Yes it did. That's cause the cabal was involved. [1] there is no cabal -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Posts some times but not others. Now when I did a reply to this message it came back fine. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Posts some times but not others. Post ONLY plain text. -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Posts some times but not others. When I try to post to this list it is sometimes rejected and some times it says confirmed but then comes back rejected. I get an error message about the header was in the body. TIA, Brett _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ _ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ___ _ The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is
RE: Test
Yet another test Alas, I did not study I have failed again Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Maybe this is his test center. Most people would use hotmail/Yahoo this guy likes swynk.com -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test It's generally held as bad form to send test messages to a public list. Set up a hotmail/yahoo account and send your test messages there. -Original Message- From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 20:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test I guess I fail the test then. Why would you post a test message to public mailing list? -Original Message- From: Graham Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test please ignore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automatically printing eMAILs
I think the Personal Assistant of State might object to this characterization. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Automatically printing eMAILs Ed, I think the term secretaries went out a few years ago, they're called personal assistants or executive assistants these days. Glenn - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 7:29 AM Subject: RE: Automatically printing eMAILs Naw, CEOs have secretaries that can print their e-mail for them. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automatically printing eMAILs This REAKS of a CEO req. -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automatically printing eMAILs He just wants to be able to see better in the woods by reducing the number of trees.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:30 PM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: Automatically printing eMAILs E! Check http://www.slipstick.com. They might have just what you need. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Automatically printing eMAILs Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4 Does anyone automatically print out eMAILS from a mailbox? If so please share with me. Thanks. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: test
And here I always thought it was so they could advertise their presence on the list without doing anything so useful as contribute. Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Ewins, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: test It's so the first mail they receive from the list has just the one word, and then the details of the FAQ and the archives right below, so they won't miss it and can go and read up Right Now. Or maybe not.. JDE -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: test Thanks i needed that ... Can I ask you WHY do you need a test email ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sabi Kassim-Momodu Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 05:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: test test _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Terrible disasters and an expression of sympathetic grief.
Very thoughtful of you, Dean. We have all lost someone today: the person we woke up as. And I doubt if we'll ever see them again. Our thoughts and prayers are with the victims. Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Terrible disasters and an expression of sympathetic grief. Let me step out from behind the curtain to say I feel deep shock and grief for those of you who are affected by the disasters happening today. Some of you are only in shock; others have lost dear ones. Some of the people on this list may have been injured or killed, even. The enormity of this day overwhelms us all. The images, reports, and losses touch every human deeply. Let me offer myself as someone you can correspond with, should you have any need. Many of you placed yourselves at my disposal during my time of loss: I am here for you, should you need in your time of loss. It is peacemaking and sharing of grief that keeps us human. You can reach me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dean Webb _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup?
I've decided that much of the movement in the IT field is caused by bad management decisions. The only reason I have a resume out is because we're about to be absorbed into a gummint agency that seems to place high reverence on really bad IT decisions. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? I'd say report him to the Department of Mental Health, because he's flipped. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 4:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? OK, so perhaps I should add a little more information here. Believe me, I KNOW .pst files are bad. And, in light of what follows, I have already started looking for another job. We are currently merging two companies. My IT director wants ALL remote Exchange servers removed from ALL offices across Europe and for ALL users to connect Outlook directly to central servers in the UK over VPN. Some of this work has been done and naturally, users are complaining about speed issues and performance. Especially those on a 256K link! :) So, rather than backing down, he wants ALL remote users to have RPC connectivity to the central servers and use .pst files for their mail. (ouch!) But...he doesn't want the whole .pst file backing up every time because...some users have 1Gb .pst files!!! Now you understand why I am looking for another job. My arms are not nearly long enough to keep this at sufficient arms length! Instead, he wants an incremental backup on the file. Then, for it to be backed up on a networked server. So, until I find another job, any suggestions? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 September 2001 21:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? Oh manI can feel the heat of the flame throwers already. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recommendations for .pst file backup? Hi, A *little* off target I know, but can anyone recommend a product that does incremental backups of .pst files? I only want to backup what has changed in the file rather than the whole thing. Mark Hurst NT Analyst[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 (0) 1925 287805 Fax: +44 (0) 1925 287900 Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 617679 Top Jobs on the Net http://www.topjobs.net/ The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender by replying and delete this email so that it is not recoverable. If you are not the intended recipient(s), any retention, review, disclosure, distribution, copying, printing, dissemination, or other use of, or the taking of any action in reliance upon, this information is strictly prohibited and without liability on our part. _ This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by Top Jobs on the Net for your protection and assurance using Star Internet services delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ This inbound message has been checked for all known viruses by Top Jobs on The Net for your protection and assurance using Star Internet services delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp _ This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by Top Jobs on the Net for your protection and assurance using Star Internet services delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
But then what about my 401K? Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this list, just request a refund of your subscription fee. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1: You can never tell which way the train went by looking at the track. - -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
point being, if I leave the list, don't I lose my investment in it, yuk yuk. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] o__, | /\ Talk to the hand! that's between you your accountant! -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Life's golden age is when the kids are too old to need baby-sitters and too young to borrow the family car. - -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List But then what about my 401K? Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this list, just request a refund of your subscription fee. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1: You can never tell which way the train went by looking at the track. - -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Undelete command
Robominions. Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Undelete command Not that minions and/or PFY aren't a good thing to have around, but 90% or more of the task Michèle describes below could be automated via scripting. * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071 * -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Undelete command For some reason I suspected that! Serdar I hope I had minions too Soysal -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Undelete command naw, I have minions do it. (and besides, it doesn't take that long, anyway) -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Duct tape is like the force; it has a light side a dark side, and it holds the universe together. -Carl Zwanzig - -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Undelete command My goodness Michele! I hope you're getting paid hourly! :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Undelete command here's what we do: Change the primary NT account used by the mailbox to the supervisor's account. Go to the supervisor's station and from Tools, Services, highlight Microsoft Exchange Server and click Properties. On the Advanced tab, add the mailbox to the Open these additional mailboxes selections. (If the supervisor uses the Outlook Bar, add a shortcut to the mailbox there.) Hide the mailbox from the GAL. Make a notation in the Exchange Admin GAL entry in the Administrative Notes section stating that this mailbox will be deleted on a date 90 days from the date of termination. Make Administrator an Alternate Recipient for the mailbox and DO NOT check the deliver to both box Give Exchange Admins Send As permissions to the mailbox Remove the terminated employee's mailbox from all DLs. Disable their NT account. Archive their G: C: drives to CD. Give the CD to the supervisor. Give the supervisor any mail archive CDs (.pst). After 30 days, remove the mailbox from the supervisor's Additional Mailboxes listing. Ask the supervisor if the CDs are no longer needed. If they are not, ask if MIS should store them or if the supervisor would like to keep them. Delete the user's Home Directory. After 90 days, delete the mailbox the NT account. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - I have yet to hear a man ask for advice on how to combine marriage and a career. -Gloria Steinem - -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Undelete command Next time, hide the mailbox, set the max allowable incoming mail size to 0K and then get permission to delete it in writing, after having permission export the mailbox to PST and burn it to a CD.That's how I do it...YMMV For your immediate problem, get busy building that recovery server. Matthew -Original Message- From: jojo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 5:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Undelete command HELP! Recently I deleted the mailbox of one of the resigned employee, after 3 days her replacement comes in and asking about the old mails of her successor, she says that there are some important mails she needs to retrieve on the said mailbox. This user is one of the VP's here. How can I retrieve the deleted mailbox? Is there an Undelete mailbox like command in Exchange? I have Exchange 5.5 with SP4, and have no recovery server ready here. Thanks in advance... Jojo _ List posting FAQ:
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
Is it time yet for Ed to chime in with There are no technological solutions to behavioral problems? :-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Doesn't ZoneAlarm Pro have password protection for settings? Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Or you could compile a little VB app called IE.exe that pops up a GIANT dialog box saying Dad said NO Internet and drop it on your PC. Rename IE's executable so only you know where to find it. Steve -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) What OS? How savvy is your kid? You could just hard-code wrong DNS servers, wrong gateway, remove the IP stack, whatever. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 07:07 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: blocking internet access (OT) Subject: blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
